Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte

Hi,

On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:51:00:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> Well, every high school in north america would have you think that
> without a start button, a computer is completely useless and broken.

I'm pretty sure that the school I went to still has those 286 Siemens
machines with MS-DOS and Pascal. So, there's maybe some hope left (those
machines slow enough to play some gorilla.bas ;-).

This is for Germany only, but what to expect if Microsoft and Compaq
(just to name two companies) are involved in a campaign to get every
school an affordable connection to the internet?

Cheers, Rocco.



msg26473/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-30 Thread Rocco Rutte

Hi,

On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:36:41:AM + Simon White wrote:
> Computer courses should teach about computers, not some proprietary
> software guff. Doesn't have to be programming, but how about file systems,
> and troubleshooting procedures?

Troubleshooting is part of what I think makes most sence. Everybody
should learn how to help yourself, including how to gain knowledge,
searching for information and stuff like that. Just fundamental things
of how to get used to a certain environment on your own.

The Windows GUI-only knowledge doesn't help a lot if 'vi' (or edit.com)
is the only tool someone has to make the GUI working. Mice won't help a
lot if you have to edit config files to make the mouse working...

Btw, I often see that former DOS users are having much less trouble to
get used to Unix and shells than Windows users.

Cheers, Rocco.



msg26413/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-30 Thread Simon White

30-Mar-02 at 10:26, Rocco Rutte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> No! I was writing about schools. At _school_ others were told how to use
> Word and Works. Our teacher really asked us what we want to do the last
> two two years in Computer Science. So we decided _not_ to learn how to
> use MS Office.

The only courses that should teach how to use MS Office are secretarial
courses.

Anyone with an ounce of computer sense will be doing something far more
interesting than what we used to call "typesetting".

Computer courses should teach about computers, not some proprietary
software guff. Doesn't have to be programming, but how about file systems,
and troubleshooting procedures? That is where the world at large is sadly
lacking...

-- 
[Simon White. vim/mutt. [EMAIL PROTECTED] GIMPS:60.41% see www.mersenne.org]
When the bosses talk about improving productivity, they are never talking
about themselves.
[Linux user #170823 http://counter.li.org. Home cooked signature rotator.]



Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-30 Thread Rocco Rutte

Hi,

On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 10:16:13:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus:
> > In Computer Science I spent two terms on creating a website on something
> > dealing with new media (okay, surfing all the time and hacking it
> > together in 1/2 day before deadline). Others students have to write web
> > pages with Word and do some 'office' with Works. Again: what to expect?

> Computer Science? You mean, university level computer science?

You try to fool me? ;-)

> They
> teach you to use MSWord at university?

No! I was writing about schools. At _school_ others were told how to use
Word and Works. Our teacher really asked us what we want to do the last
two two years in Computer Science. So we decided _not_ to learn how to
use MS Office.

> Get your money back, you were
> cheated! Any idiot can use Word with no training. To spend money on
> learning this is nothing more than a waste.

... of time, too.

Cheers, Rocco.



msg26411/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-29 Thread Michael Maibaum

On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 10:16:13PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus:
> > In Germany there's a campaign running to connect every school to the
> > internet. IIRC, Microsoft and Compaq are involved by contributing
> > hardware and software for free/for low price. So what to expect?
> 
> Yuck. It's bad enough that MS practically owns all the schools in NA.
> 
> > In Computer Science I spent two terms on creating a website on something
> > dealing with new media (okay, surfing all the time and hacking it
> > together in 1/2 day before deadline). Others students have to write web
> > pages with Word and do some 'office' with Works. Again: what to expect?
> 
> Computer Science? You mean, university level computer science? They
> teach you to use MSWord at university? Get your money back, you were
> cheated! Any idiot can use Word with no training. To spend money on
> learning this is nothing more than a waste.

Well, while I would agree that word isn't computer science...people
could stand to learn it properlynearly everyone I know absolutely
mangles stuff with it, similarly with excel. Like most things, it is
easy to use badly. 

Michael


-- 
Dr Michael A. Maibaum - (W)+1 (415) 561 1682 - (H)+1 (415) 626 6733
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.gene-hacker.net/>



msg26410/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-29 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park


--1LKvkjL3sHcu1TtY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus:
> In Germany there's a campaign running to connect every school to the
> internet. IIRC, Microsoft and Compaq are involved by contributing
> hardware and software for free/for low price. So what to expect?

Yuck. It's bad enough that MS practically owns all the schools in NA.

> In Computer Science I spent two terms on creating a website on something
> dealing with new media (okay, surfing all the time and hacking it
> together in 1/2 day before deadline). Others students have to write web
> pages with Word and do some 'office' with Works. Again: what to expect?

Computer Science? You mean, university level computer science? They
teach you to use MSWord at university? Get your money back, you were
cheated! Any idiot can use Word with no training. To spend money on
learning this is nothing more than a waste.

--=20
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
byob, v:
Believing Your Own Bull

--1LKvkjL3sHcu1TtY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8pUodPTh2iSBKeccRAi8iAJwMLDE/0+I82FKggLLh6TqSCy5aswCfTFQm
LStKsMdSH5z7g9HCKt0i+Eo=
=A4Zv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--1LKvkjL3sHcu1TtY--



Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-29 Thread Rocco Rutte

Hi,

On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:51:00:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> Well, every high school in north america would have you think that
> without a start button, a computer is completely useless and broken.

In Germany there's a campaign running to connect every school to the
internet. IIRC, Microsoft and Compaq are involved by contributing
hardware and software for free/for low price. So what to expect?

In Computer Science I spent two terms on creating a website on something
dealing with new media (okay, surfing all the time and hacking it
together in 1/2 day before deadline). Others students have to write web
pages with Word and do some 'office' with Works. Again: what to expect?

Discussions arise every now and then trying to figure out whose fault it
actually is. No answer found so far, of course.

Cheers, Rocco.



msg26407/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-29 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park


--0vzXIDBeUiKkjNJl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus:
> This isn't my opinion, this is basic computer science.  What are they
> teaching you kids in those schools these days?

Well, every high school in north america would have you think that
without a start button, a computer is completely useless and broken.

--=20
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
It is difficult to soar with the eagles when you work with turkeys.

--0vzXIDBeUiKkjNJl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8pMWkPTh2iSBKeccRAmw3AJ9ujqjuz2Qo6LwNqLunOnEqqc0DegCbBg61
pUwpN0SNLFstE+Wf5+bE6No=
=hs/9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--0vzXIDBeUiKkjNJl--



Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-29 Thread Mike Schiraldi

> > No, not really. It's marketing.
> 
> The definition of OS isn't marketing, it's Computer Science.  It's
> been presented.  It agrees with what I said.  Get over it.

Okay, i think this argument is finished. I'll summarize:

  Some people believe that the Operating System is the kernel plus the
  stuff in /bin.

  Some people believe it's more than that.

  Some people believe it's less than that.

There's no ultimate authority on the matter, and as demonstrated, even
computer scientists have varied opinions on it.

Usually Webster's dictionary is used to settle this sort of dispute, but
they're not very helpful in this case. So we're just going to have to agree
to disagree and let the offtopic thread die.



msg26395/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-29 Thread David Champion

* On 2002.03.29, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
*   "Shawn McMahon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> begin  quoting what David Champion said on Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:58:32PM -0600:
> > No, not really. It's marketing.
> 
> The definition of OS isn't marketing, it's Computer Science.  It's
> been presented.  It agrees with what I said.  Get over it.

You're the best, Shawn! *smooch*

-- 
 -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago



Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-29 Thread Shawn McMahon

begin  quoting what David Champion said on Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:58:32PM -0600:
> No, not really. It's marketing.

The definition of OS isn't marketing, it's Computer Science.  It's
been presented.  It agrees with what I said.  Get over it.




msg26387/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-29 Thread David Champion

* On 2002.03.29, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
*   "Shawn McMahon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> SunOS 5.8 is a component of the Solaris operating environment.  Guess
> what OS stands for?  SunOS 5.8 is the KERNEL, not the operating
> environment.

That's not actually true. "SunOS" refers to the kernel and the basic
UNIX components -- including ps and sh. The "Solaris Operating
Environment" refers to SunOS plus all add-on packaged that they ship:
OpenWindows (if present), CDE, volume management software, network
management software, etc.


> This isn't my opinion, this is basic computer science.  What are they
> teaching you kids in those schools these days?

No, not really. It's marketing.

-- 
 -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago