SELECT statement

2004-01-23 Thread Gary Broughton
I'm attempting to collate a webpage showing results by various football
teams in various cup competitions, and am trying to minimise the number of
selects as best I can.

What I'm trying to get out in one statement is the number of home matches
played by Burnley, how many they've won, drawn and lost, and the totals
goals scored by them and against them.  In an ideal world it would be
something like the following, but I know this will not work:

SELECT COUNT(*) AS matchesplayed, COUNT(result='H') AS homewins,
COUNT(result='D') AS drawngames, COUNT(result='A') AS awaywins,
SUM(homescore) AS homegoalsscored, SUM(awayscore) AS awaygoalsscored
FROM matchstats
WHERE (homeTeam = 'Burnley') AND (competition = 'F.A.Cup')

Effectively it's like a grouping, but the goals columns are calculations of
the entire number of matches.  I can achieve it with two statements, but
wondered if there was a way of combining the two?

Many thanks
Gary



-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



FW: mysqld-nt claims all available CPU

2003-09-04 Thread Gary Broughton
MySQLd-nt (v4.0.14) is eating up all the available CPU resources on a
Windows 2000 server (dual 933 Pentium, 1GB RAM), with a maximum of 40
users so far.  I have tried each combination of the default
configuration files, and each variety of the executable (nt, max-nt
etc.), and it's always the same.  The webpage to access the database is
written is ASP, and all connections are closed when finished with before
the page is finished.  Has anyone any ideas why it shoots up to the top
like this?

Many thanks

Gary



mysqld-nt claims all available CPU

2003-09-04 Thread Gary Broughton
MySQLd-nt (v4.0.14) is eating up all the available CPU resources on a
Windows 2000 server (dual 933 Pentium, 1GB RAM), with a maximum of 40
users so far.  I have tried each combination of the default
configuration files, and each variety of the executable (nt, max-nt
etc.), and it's always the same.  The webpage to access the database is
written is ASP, and all connections are closed when finished with before
the page is finished.  Has anyone any ideas why it shoots up to the top
like this?

Many thanks

Gary



RE: Mysql processlist sleep time

2003-08-14 Thread Gary Broughton
The PHP one is indeed used less, probably by about 10% of the users
while it's being tested.  I was simply wondering if the idle timeouts
were possibly responsible for the CPU usage problems, and I thought
(rightly or wrongly?), that setting the 'xxx_timeout' options would
close those persistent connections after the set number of seconds.

It's just so bizarre that the mysqld program eats up all the available
CPU most of the time, inevitably almost grinding things to a halt.  I've
searched high and low for a solution, asking advice in lots of places,
tweaking loads of things here and there, and nothing seems to make any
difference whatsoever.  I appreciate that Windows, MySQL and PHP is not
really the combination of choice though! :-)

Many thanks for your reply.
Gary

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 07 August 2003 22:55
To: Gary Broughton
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mysql processlist sleep time


On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 07:54:24PM +0100, Gary Broughton wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I continue to have problems with the CPU usage with MySQL and PHP 
> under IIS 5 (Win2000).  I recently rewrote our messageboards in PHP 
> (from ASP).  I now have both online separately, and if I look at the 
> processlist, the times on the ASP version rarely hit double figures, 
> but those on the PHP version often reach several hundred (wait and 
> inactivity timeouts are set to 300 - I thought this would stop it?!).

I'm not sure what the problem is.  From your description, it sounds as
if the PHP one is either used less or is more efficient about using
connections, since they're idle more often.

> I am at a real loss as to why the processes are not being cleared. I 
> am using a persistent connection at the top of the webpage, and every 
> MySQL query is ended with a 'mysql_free_result()' statement, including

> before any redirects using the 'header' command.

Hang on.  You're using *persistent* connections, so why would you expect
them not to persist?

Jeremy
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

MySQL 4.0.13: up 6 days, processed 212,516,276 queries (399/sec. avg)

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



A final Windows MySQL PHP plea

2003-08-14 Thread Gary Broughton
Hi all

Is there anybody out there who has managed to successfully configure
Win2000, IIS5, MySQL 4.0.14 and PHP 4.3.2 (ISAPI) to work with a couple
of hundred users at any one time?  I have chucked absolutely everything
I can think of at this, but the MySQL (it seems) simply eats all the
available CPU within a short space of time (regardless of users) and
brings the site to a halt.  My last throw of the dice today was to
install all on a new Dual 1.8Ghz Pentium, with three hard disks in a
RAID array, and 2GB memory, but it's achieved pretty much nothing.  I am
now desperate, and if anyone has any flash of inspiration for me, I'm
all ears.  The previous ASP version of the site runs like a dream, but
there's something I'm either doing wrong, or this new combination of
software simply doesn't like.

Many thanks

Stressed Gary



FW: A final Windows MySQL PHP plea

2003-08-14 Thread Gary Broughton
Thanks to everybody for all your help and advice.  It seems Linux is
(Bgoing to HAVE to be the next step, but while I know sod all about it, I
(Bhave enlisted the help of a colleague to assist with that side of
(Bthings.  So I shall crack on with that, and subsequently let you know
(Bwhat the outcome is. :-)
(BThanks again
(BGary
(B
(B-Original Message-
(BFrom: Nils Valentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BSent: 14 August 2003 02:35
(BTo: Andrew Rothwell
(BCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BSubject: Re: A final Windows MySQL PHP plea
(B
(B
(BHi Andrew,
(B
(BI guess your reply was meant for Gary (the original poster of this
(Be-mail).
(B
(BI will foward your request to the mailing  list.
(B
(BBest regards
(B
(BNils Valentin
(BTokyo/Japan
(B
(B
(B
(B
(B> WOW!!!
(B> That kind of System Power and you are wasting it on Windows and IIS
(B> E!
(B>
(B> Sorry - but Dual Proc Support, with 2gigs of RAM would Love Redhat 9.0
(B
(B> like a kid loves chocolate.
(B>
(B> I don$B!G(Bt know about the more than 100 concurrent users, but bear in
(B> mind (as I understand it) that means that you can have up to 100
(B> queries at 1 time, as soon as the query is over, the next user is
(B> available for his query.
(B>
(B> Linux itself can support 1000's of users at one time -
(B> You might be surprised.
(B>
(B> Andrew
(B>
(B> -Original Message-
(B> From: Nils Valentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:04 PM
(B> To: Gary Broughton; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B> Subject: Re: A final Windows MySQL PHP plea
(B>
(B>
(B> Hi Gary,
(B>
(B> I understood that the packages provided by MySQL are set to 100
(B> concurrent users by default, so what you ae asking is actually if
(B> somebody successfully
(B> compiled a version for more than 100 concurrent users and was able to
(B> use it
(B> in a production environment ?
(B>
(B> Do I understand that correct ?
(B>
(B> My guess would be that you are more likely to find Linux users having
(B> done such a setup. Unfortunately I haven'Tt had such an experience
(B> yet, but as you
(B> probably now Dell has made a study (which is also announced on
(Bwww.mysq.
(B> com)
(B> which describes their experience, perhaps it contains the one or the
(B> other
(B> useful tip.
(B>
(B> http://www.dell.com/us/en/biz/topics/power_ps2q03-jaffe.htm
(B>
(B> Best regards
(B>
(B> Nils Valentin
(B> Tokyo/Japan
(B>
(B> 2003$BG/(B 8$B7n(B 13$BF|(B $B?eMKF|(B 01:21$B!"(BGary Broughton 
(B> $B$5$s$O=q$-$^$7$?(B:
(B> > Hi all
(B> >
(B> > Is there anybody out there who has managed to successfully configure
(B
(B> > Win2000, IIS5, MySQL 4.0.14 and PHP 4.3.2 (ISAPI) to work with a
(B> > couple of hundred users at any one time?  I have chucked absolutely
(B> > everything I can think of at this, but the MySQL (it seems) simply
(B> > eats all the available CPU within a short space of time (regardless
(B> > of
(B> >
(B> > users) and brings the site to a halt.  My last throw of the dice
(B> > today
(B> >
(B> > was to install all on a new Dual 1.8Ghz Pentium, with three hard
(B> > disks
(B> >
(B> > in a RAID array, and 2GB memory, but it's achieved pretty much
(B> > nothing.  I am now desperate, and if anyone has any flash of
(B> > inspiration for me, I'm all ears.  The previous ASP version of the
(B> > site runs like a dream, but there's something I'm either doing
(B> > wrong, or this new combination of software simply doesn't like.
(B> >
(B> > Many thanks
(B> >
(B> > Stressed Gary
(B>
(B> --
(B> ---
(B> Valentin Nils
(B> Internet Technology
(B>
(B>  E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B>  URL: http://www.knowd.co.jp
(B>  Personal URL: http://www.knowd.co.jp/staff/nils
(B
(B--
(B---
(BValentin Nils
(BInternet Technology
(B
(B E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B URL: http://www.knowd.co.jp
(B Personal URL: http://www.knowd.co.jp/staff/nils
(B
(B
(B--
(BMySQL General Mailing List
(BFor list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
(BTo unsubscribe:
(Bhttp://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B
(B-- 
(BMySQL General Mailing List
(BFor list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
(BTo unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MySQL, IIS and PHP

2003-08-14 Thread Gary Broughton
Hi Dan

Thanks for your reply.  No, the process list was showing say 20 or 30
users with just milliseconds of activity, the only one on for any great
length of time was myself as root.  Stopping the service does return the
machine to normality, but then it shoots right back up to 100% within
seconds of restarting.  I've used the mysqld-nt, mysql-max-nt and
mysqld-opt executables, but the result is just the same.

I can't understand why this problem has occurred though - in it's
current environment of one IIS site using the ASP board (95% of users -
live) and one IIS site using the new PHP (5% - test) it runs like a
dream, but when I enable PHP on the live site and direct all to that, it
just collapses.  I'm pretty sure all the settings for the two sites are
identical, and the my.ini and php.ini obviously are not changed!

Regards
Gary

-Original Message-
From: Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 04 August 2003 21:59
To: Gary Broughton; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MySQL, IIS and PHP


Gary Broughton wrote:

>Hi all
>
>I've just recoded a website in PHP from ASP, running off IIS 5.  It has

>been tested by a dozen users over the weekend, but now I have put it 
>live the CPU utilisation is up at 100%, mainly swallowed up by 
>mysql-nt.exe.  I wondered if anyone could offer any advice as to why 
>this could be (the MySQL settings have not changed, and are as they 
>were when it was accessed via the ASP code).
>
>Regards
>
>Gary
>
>
>  
>
What does 'mysqladmin processlist -p PASSWORD' give? Are there any 
processes that have been running for ages?
What about if you shut down MySQL and restart it?


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Mysql processlist sleep time

2003-08-14 Thread Gary Broughton
Hi all

 

I continue to have problems with the CPU usage with MySQL and PHP under
IIS 5 (Win2000).  I recently rewrote our messageboards in PHP (from
ASP).  I now have both online separately, and if I look at the
processlist, the times on the ASP version rarely hit double figures, but
those on the PHP version often reach several hundred (wait and
inactivity timeouts are set to 300 - I thought this would stop it?!).

 

I am at a real loss as to why the processes are not being cleared.  I am
using a persistent connection at the top of the webpage, and every MySQL
query is ended with a 'mysql_free_result()' statement, including before
any redirects using the 'header' command.

 

Has anybody any ideas on why this can be?  I cannot find out how to tell
what is causing the long sleep period.

 

Many thanks

Gary



RE: Mysql processlist sleep time

2003-08-14 Thread Gary Broughton
I don't believe Windows services can be started with any priority types.
MySQL is on it's own box with the ASP version, which works like a dream.
It's simply that whenever the PHP version is used (either as a solitary
website on another box or as another website on the same box), that's
when mysqld goes mad.  The odd thing is that the software is effectively
identical between the two languages, and has simply had functions
changed as and where appropriate.  I have also used the programming
methods as used in the book "PHP and MySQL Web Development" too, as well
as reading advice from "MySQL Second Edition" by Paul Dubois.  I just
wonder if this is a problem that is unable to be solved?!

-Original Message-
From: Adam Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 08 August 2003 17:16
To: 'Gary Broughton'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Mysql processlist sleep time


I think I see the problem.  Mysql really needs to be on it's own box.
It's designed to just use as much power as it can find.  This is a good
thing for those with dedicated machines.  I don't know if there's a
configuration setup that tell mysql that it's not the head honcho.  Does
Windows have a way to start a process (mysql) in low priority?

> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Broughton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 4:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Mysql processlist sleep time
> 
> 
> The PHP one is indeed used less, probably by about 10% of the users 
> while it's being tested.  I was simply wondering if the idle timeouts 
> were possibly responsible for the CPU usage problems, and I thought 
> (rightly or wrongly?), that setting the 'xxx_timeout' options would 
> close those persistent connections after the set number of seconds.
> 
> It's just so bizarre that the mysqld program eats up all the available

> CPU most of the time, inevitably almost grinding things to a halt.  
> I've searched high and low for a solution, asking advice in lots of 
> places, tweaking loads of things here and there, and nothing seems to 
> make any difference whatsoever.  I appreciate that Windows, MySQL and
> PHP is not
> really the combination of choice though! :-)
> 
> Many thanks for your reply.
> Gary
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 August 2003 22:55
> To: Gary Broughton
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Mysql processlist sleep time
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 07:54:24PM +0100, Gary Broughton wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I continue to have problems with the CPU usage with MySQL and PHP
> > under IIS 5 (Win2000).  I recently rewrote our messageboards in PHP 
> > (from ASP).  I now have both online separately, and if I 
> look at the
> > processlist, the times on the ASP version rarely hit double
> figures,
> > but those on the PHP version often reach several hundred (wait and
> > inactivity timeouts are set to 300 - I thought this would 
> stop it?!).
> 
> I'm not sure what the problem is.  From your description, it sounds as

> if the PHP one is either used less or is more efficient about using 
> connections, since they're idle more often.
> 
> > I am at a real loss as to why the processes are not being
> cleared. I
> > am using a persistent connection at the top of the webpage,
> and every
> > MySQL query is ended with a 'mysql_free_result()'
> statement, including
> 
> > before any redirects using the 'header' command.
> 
> Hang on.  You're using *persistent* connections, so why would
> you expect
> them not to persist?
> 
> Jeremy
> -- 
> Jeremy D. Zawodny |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/
> 
> MySQL 4.0.13: up 6 days, processed 212,516,276 queries (399/sec. avg)
> 
> --
> MySQL General Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> To unsubscribe:
> http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



MySQL, IIS and PHP

2003-08-04 Thread Gary Broughton
Hi all

I've just recoded a website in PHP from ASP, running off IIS 5.  It has
been tested by a dozen users over the weekend, but now I have put it
live the CPU utilisation is up at 100%, mainly swallowed up by
mysql-nt.exe.  I wondered if anyone could offer any advice as to why
this could be (the MySQL settings have not changed, and are as they were
when it was accessed via the ASP code).

Regards

Gary



UNION or not?

2003-08-01 Thread Gary Broughton
Hi all

 

I want to provide a list of up to 20 online users on our network of
football forums, but would like to list those live on the current team
first, before "filling" any remainder with those online using a
different team.  I couldn't see any way of getting it all into one
select (which in English 'speak' would be like "order by team 380, then
get the rest" I suppose?), and saw only the UNION function as the
possible solution.

 

All I'm after, if possible, is to know if I'm using the most efficient
method of retrieving the data, and also whether putting the extra "LIMIT
20" outside the UNION would indeed pick up the first 20 records only,
even though there's a potential for 40.

 

(SELECT user_id, username, last_login FROM users

 WHERE unix_timestamp(last_access) > unix_timestamp()-1440

 AND user_id <> '9' AND last_team = '380' ORDER BY last_login LIMIT 20)

UNION

(SELECT user_id, username, last_login FROM users

 WHERE unix_timestamp(last_access) > unix_timestamp()-1440

 AND last_team <> '380' ORDER BY last_login LIMIT 20) 

LIMIT 20

 

Incidentally, the "user_id <> '25'" is only there to prevent display of
the name of the current online user in the list.

 

Many thanks as always

Gary



WHERE x IN (SELECT x ...

2003-07-31 Thread Gary Broughton
I believe the multiple 'SELECT' statements will not be included until
version 4.1 is released?

If this is the case, is there a crude workaround method of attempting to
perform the following until such a time as it is?

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM messages WHERE forum_id IN (SELECT forum_id FROM
forums WHERE team_no = 400)

Many thanks

Gary



More COUNT GROUP ORDER woes

2003-07-30 Thread Gary Broughton
I'm having a problem similar to one I mentioned last week.  I'm trying
to retrieve the number of posts a selected user has made on a selected
forum, plus details of the record of his/her latest post (date and
subject).

SELECT COUNT(*) AS postcount, m.user_id, m.subject, m.posting_date,
u.username, u.registered
FROM messages m, users u
WHERE m.forum_id = '297' AND m.user_id = '4910' AND m.user_id =
u.user_id
GROUP BY m.user_id ORDER BY m.posting_date DESC

Basically this statement ignores anything to do with the ordering, and
brings out a post (seemingly at random) which is not the latest (i.e.
I'm hoping and expecting for 30th July, but get a record from 19th May).
If I use "MAX(m.posting_date)" I can retrieve the latest date, but any
other data from the 'message' fields (i.e. the subject) relates to this
record from 19th May.

Is there a way of getting the count and this latest record in the one
statement.

Any help, as always, would be much appreciated.

Gary


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Repair table

2003-07-24 Thread Gary Broughton
It may or may not help, but if you connect to the database using
MySQLCC, you can highlight all the tables and repair, optimise or check
in one go (in the Windows version at least!).

Gary

-Original Message-
From: Jeff McKeon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 24 July 2003 16:15
To: MySQL LIST
Subject: Repair table

Is there a way to issue a "REPAIR TABLE table_name" command to all
tables at once?  Something like "REPAIR TABLE *"

Thanks,

Jeff McKeon

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: GROUP BY ORDER BY

2003-07-24 Thread Gary Broughton
Hi

Many thanks to one and all for your time and assistance with my
question. I used the 'AS cnt' method and it works brilliantly.  Simple
isn't it? :-)

Cheers
Gary

-Original Message-
From: Victoria Reznichenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 24 July 2003 14:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GROUP BY ORDER BY

"Gary Broughton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> I wonder if someone could help with what I assume is a simple query
> using GROUP and/or ORDER statements (something I struggle to get to
> grips with).  I am trying to get a list of users who have posted to a
> forum by number of posts descending, but am unable to find the right
> statement to do it.
> 
> 
> 
> At the moment I have: "select count(*), user_id FROM messages WHERE
> forum_id = 294 GROUP BY user_id" . which gets me what I want, but in a
> random user order.
> 
> 
> 
> I have looked through the MySQL documentation, but have been unable to
> hit on the combination of functions needed to get what I need (which
is
> effectively 'ORDER BY count(*) DESC').


SELECT COUNT(*) AS cnt, user_id FROM messages WHERE forum_id = 294 GROUP
BY user_id ORDER BY cnt DESC


-- 
For technical support contracts, goto
https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.net http://www.ensita.net/
   __  ___ ___   __
  /  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Victoria Reznichenko
 / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/   MySQL AB / Ensita.net
   <___/   www.mysql.com





-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



GROUP BY ORDER BY

2003-07-24 Thread Gary Broughton
Hi

 

I wonder if someone could help with what I assume is a simple query
using GROUP and/or ORDER statements (something I struggle to get to
grips with).  I am trying to get a list of users who have posted to a
forum by number of posts descending, but am unable to find the right
statement to do it.

 

At the moment I have: "select count(*), user_id FROM messages WHERE
forum_id = 294 GROUP BY user_id" . which gets me what I want, but in a
random user order.

 

I have looked through the MySQL documentation, but have been unable to
hit on the combination of functions needed to get what I need (which is
effectively 'ORDER BY count(*) DESC').

Can anybody help?

 

Many thanks

Gary



SQL statement dilemna

2003-06-25 Thread Gary Broughton
I'm attempting to write one SQL statement to retrieve data in a
particular way, and don't seem to be able to do it despite dozens of
attempts (indeed maybe it cannot be done), but wondered if anyone could
suggest anything, such as a function I may have missed that can do it,
or that it simply isn't possible!

 

I have to list player's histories in a football team throughout his
career, and only have the fixture table and appearance table to go off:

Fixtures

Fixid, Fixdate, Hometeam, Awayteam

1, 10 May 2003, Lancashire, Sussex

2, 12 May 2003, Sussex, Northants

3, 15 May 2003, Essex, Durham

4, 16 May 2003, Durham, Leicestershire

5, 20 May 2003, Sussex, Derbyshire

Appearances

Playerid, Fixid, Teamid, Substitute?

Anderson, 1, Sussex, 0

Anderson, 2, Sussex, 1

Anderson, 3, Durham, 0

Anderson, 4, Durham, 0

Anderson, 5, Sussex, 1

 

What I am trying to do is retrieve a count of how many games a player
has started, or been substitute for, per team, per chronological spell
at the team (i.e. in this instance he's played for Sussex in two
separate spells, so I need that information grouped in two different
returned records), such as:

Playerid, Teamid, count(not a substitute), count(substitute),
first_game_for_team

Anderson, Sussex, 1, 1, 10 May 2003

Anderson, Durham, 2, 0, 15 May 2003

Anderson, Sussex, 0, 1, 20 May 2003

 

My latest SQL statement is:

 SELECT COUNT(*), a.playerid, a.substitute, a.teamid, f.fixdate, t.name
FROM fixture f, apps a, team t

 WHERE a.player_id = 'Anderson' AND a.fixid = f.fixid AND a.teamid =
t.teamid

 GROUP BY a.teamid, a.substitute ORDER BY f.fixdate DESC

. but this simply creates two records per team, one for substitute
appearances, one for starting appearances.

 

Any pointers would be greatly appreciated, and if I'm asking an
inappropriate question for the group please accept my apologies in
advance.

 

Many thanks

Gary Broughton

 

 



MySQL 4 maintenance tasks on Windows

2003-06-10 Thread Gary Broughton
Hi all

I've recently moved a database to MySQL from MSSQL, and am running it on
a Windows 2000 Server.

Can anybody advise me on the best method for running regular maintenance
tasks (i.e. optimize and analyze)?  I assumed I would be best creating a
batch file containing and running 'myisamchk ...' line-by-line, via
Windows scheduled tasks, but I don't appear to be having much luck.

Any assistance or pointers in the right direction would be very much
appreciated.

Regards
Gary Broughton


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Auto decrement

2003-05-27 Thread Gary Broughton
Does anyone know if there is a way of setting an auto numbered field
that starts at say 2,000,000 and decreases by one on each insert?


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]