Re: Fatal error when page render clashes with a mail/news fetch

2011-10-20 Thread Chris Young
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:04:30 +0100, Harriet Bazley wrote:

> On 20 Oct 2011 as I do recall,
>   cj  wrote:
> 
> > Has anyone else noticed that if a mail fetch initiates while NetSurf
> > is rendering a page, then NS exits with a fatal error?

> What I've observed has been fatal errors reported from Netsurf while
> Firefox is rendering a page, resulting in both apps quitting the iconbar
> (and sometimes FileCore in Use errors).

There is also a crash that occurs when the homepage fails to fetch
(not involving any other non-NetSurf software!).  Due to the
randomness I've not yet been able to get a log nor systematically
reproduce it, but it might be related.

Chris



Re: Fatal error when page render clashes with a mail/news fetch

2011-10-20 Thread cj
In article <18c32a2552.GrahameParish@grahame.parish>,
   Grahame Parish  wrote:

> Just tried loading the news.bbc.co.uk page and running a mail fetch 
> (Netfetch/Hermes) and got a Netsurf error followed by quit.

Ahhh - it's not just my system then.

> In the instances above I rarely get an error box, just a sudden
> quit from the iconbar.

It's still worth checking in Scrap where NetSurf puts its log file,
(there is an obey file in the !NS app called OpenScrap which is a
quick way to get there). Check the timestamp on the log file to see
whether it has just been written. I have found that, even when NS
goes into a black hole, and the log file is not opened in an editor,
it still often has been written.

-- 
Chris Johnson



Re: Fatal error when page render clashes with a mail/news fetch

2011-10-20 Thread Grahame Parish
In message <52251d32acch...@chris-johnson.org.uk>
  cj  wrote:

> Has anyone else noticed that if a mail fetch initiates while NetSurf
> is rendering a page, then NS exits with a fatal error?

> Before submitting a report, it would be interesting to know whether
> anyone else has experienced this.

> It has done it several times here over the past few weeks(?), but has
> taken me a while to realise the connection. I have now tried fetching
> a web page and then forcing a mail fetch - it gives the error
> sometimes - it may depend on exactly where NS has reached in the
> rendering when the mail fetch starts and whether the page to be
> rendered is already in the cache or not.

> Forcing a news/rss fetch while NS was rendering a page caused NetSurf
> to just vanish from the iconbar, with no error message. The pages
> used for the test were ROOL pages.

> I did these tests with r13071, but the errors have also occurred with
> earlier releases. Machine is an Iyonix with RISC OS 5.17. Mail/news
> software is Netfetch with Hermes and NewsHound.

I've been experiencing random quits from Netsurf in recent revisions 
since 2.8 was released.  Not been able to pin them down to anything, 
and often after restarting NS it will have no problem with the page.  
I've seen it on a variety of sites and locally rendered pages (email 
attachments).  One instance was a Dabs.com offer email where NS quit 
without warning long after the page had rendered.  As I hadn't seen 
any other mentions I haven't reported it up to now.  Will grab a log 
next time it happens.

Just tried loading the news.bbc.co.uk page and running a mail fetch 
(Netfetch/Hermes) and got a Netsurf error followed by quit.  I've got 
a 50K zip file of the log if wanted.  In the instances above I rarely 
get an error box, just a sudden quit from the iconbar.

-- 
Grahame Parish



Re: Fatal error when page render clashes with a mail/news fetch

2011-10-20 Thread cj
In article <52251f6554j...@jaharrison.me.uk>,
   John Harrison  wrote:
> Do you specifically mean rendering, as opposed to downloading?  The
> pages I tried took a few seconds, but didn't have a long rendering
> pause after getting the data.

Difficult to say - one starts off the NetSurf fetch, then forces a
mail/news fetch as soon as possible, the mail fetch status opens, and
then the error occurs. Its not obvious at what point NetSurf has got
to. The test I did just now with a mail fetch caused NetSurf to
vanish, rather than raise an error box. Even the NS log files show
different errors, e.g. segmentation fault in one, illegal instruction
in another.

I guess I should just send in the log files and let the experts
decide.

-- 
Chris Johnson



Re: Fatal error when page render clashes with a mail/news fetch

2011-10-20 Thread John Harrison

> Has anyone else noticed that if a mail fetch initiates while NetSurf
> is rendering a page, then NS exits with a fatal error?

I just did a manually initiated mail fetch while NetSurf was loading a
page, with no adverse effect. (r13065)

Do you specifically mean rendering, as opposed to downloading?  The pages I
tried took a few seconds, but didn't have a long rendering pause after
getting the data.

Regards

-- 
John Harrison
Website http://jaharrison.me.uk



Re: Fatal error when page render clashes with a mail/news fetch

2011-10-20 Thread Harriet Bazley
On 20 Oct 2011 as I do recall,
  cj  wrote:

> Has anyone else noticed that if a mail fetch initiates while NetSurf
> is rendering a page, then NS exits with a fatal error?
>
> Before submitting a report, it would be interesting to know whether
> anyone else has experienced this.
>
[snip]

Quick test here using a known slow-to-render site doesn't show up any
error - but then that could be a 'not always' case.

What I've observed has been fatal errors reported from Netsurf while
Firefox is rendering a page, resulting in both apps quitting the iconbar
(and sometimes FileCore in Use errors).   I've always assumed this was
actually an error from Firefox being misallocated by the Wimp due to the
extreme level of emulation which is going on, since it only seems to
happen to Netsurf when Firefox crashes - but it could be related to your
observations.

-- 
Harriet Bazley ==  Loyaulte me lie ==

The saddest words in the English language are 'Too' and 'late'



Fatal error when page render clashes with a mail/news fetch

2011-10-20 Thread cj
Has anyone else noticed that if a mail fetch initiates while NetSurf
is rendering a page, then NS exits with a fatal error?

Before submitting a report, it would be interesting to know whether
anyone else has experienced this.

It has done it several times here over the past few weeks(?), but has
taken me a while to realise the connection. I have now tried fetching
a web page and then forcing a mail fetch - it gives the error
sometimes - it may depend on exactly where NS has reached in the
rendering when the mail fetch starts and whether the page to be
rendered is already in the cache or not.

Forcing a news/rss fetch while NS was rendering a page caused NetSurf
to just vanish from the iconbar, with no error message. The pages
used for the test were ROOL pages.

I did these tests with r13071, but the errors have also occurred with
earlier releases. Machine is an Iyonix with RISC OS 5.17. Mail/news
software is Netfetch with Hermes and NewsHound.

-- 
Chris Johnson



List Focus [Was Re: puzzling email]

2011-10-20 Thread Daniel Silverstone
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:57:21AM +0100, Vince M Hudd wrote:
> Either way, this is now off-topic.

Indeed it is.  It was off topic about four mails in.

Please don't sprawl your RISC OS discussions on this list.  I'm sure there're
places where you don't irritate many people while doing so.  I've received
complaints, so that thread stops now, or I start forcibly unsubscribing people.

Keep the focus guys.

Thanks,

Daniel.

-- 
Daniel Silverstone   http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
PGP mail accepted and encouraged.Key Id: 3CCE BABE 206C 3B69



Re: puzzling email (getting OT)

2011-10-20 Thread Dr Peter Young
On 20 Oct 2011  Brian Bailey  wrote:

> [snip]

>> Anyway this is getting off-topic here; should it be continued on the
>> MPro list?

> Not really, Peter. Well, not yet anyway! For a start I don't use
> MessengerPro.

> I suspected I would get a response similar to yours.

> The problem is that I frequently get messages that are treated by Pluto as
> HTML attachments, plus graphics files also as attachments. Most of these
> are dross and don't concern me too much, they just don't matter, but some
> are commercially important and I should very much like to see them
> rendered correctly when loaded into NetSurf, so it is functionally a cross
> application problem, as well as a cross platform problem.

> I got into a real tangle with a business person. Neither of us could
> read/render correctly each others HTML files, sent to and from each other
> via email, cross platform, and it mattered. The situation was extremely
> frustrating and was never resolved. Tempers were starting to get a bit
> frayed.

Yes, as in the bit that is snipped, MPro seems to be able to reply to 
or forward HTML messages in a way that Windows users can read. It 
sounds as if this may be the deciding point.

Best wishes,

Peter.

-- 
Peter   \  /  zfc Lu \ Prestbury, Cheltenham,  Glos. GL52
and  \/ ____  \  England.
family   / /  \ | | |\ | /  _  \  http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
/  \__/ \_/ | \| \__/   \__ pnyo...@ormail.co.uk



Re: puzzling email (getting OT)

2011-10-20 Thread cj
In article <5225151bf7bbai...@argonet.co.uk>,
   Brian Bailey  wrote:
> I got into a real tangle with a business person. Neither of us
> could read/render correctly each others HTML files, sent to and
> from each other via email, cross platform, and it mattered.

... but this is still the province of the mail reader/sender software
and not a browser problem (unless the html contains important content
as javascript which isn't being rendered).

-- 
Chris Johnson



Re: puzzling email

2011-10-20 Thread Vince M Hudd
Brian Bailey  wrote:
> [snip]

[...]

> I see that you use [Messenger Pro]

I use Messenger Pro for Windows, which is a different beast, so I'm afraid
you'll have to ask someone else (and somewhere more appropriate) to find out
how the RISC OS version handles HTML attachments.

-- 
Soft Rock Software:   http://www.softrock.co.uk
Vince M Hudd: http://misc.vinceh.com/about-vinceh/
RISCOSitory:  http://www.riscository.com




Re: puzzling email

2011-10-20 Thread Vince M Hudd
lists  wrote:
> In article ,
>Vince M Hudd  wrote:

> > The bottom line, for users of Pluto, is that if you want to see attached
> > images displayed in the HTML, you'll need to save and manually edit.
> > (Remote images should be fine, of course).
 
> I use !Pluto
 
> I often receive attachments, usually jokes, where I see one attached file
> with an HTML file type and a number of JPEGs, sometimes GIFFs. I
> double-click on the HTML and a browser, Fresco of Netsurf, whichever has
> been seen by the filer, loads and displays the HTML file with all the
> images in the right place. No need for an intermediate save operation

Okay. I'm sure it didn't do that when I was using it, so maybe that's been
dealt with in an upgrade that came after I stopped. I'm not sure there were
many, and I thought mainly bug fixes (the way I remember it working wasn't a
bug, per se).

Or maybe I'm just remembering wrongly.

Either way, this is now off-topic.
-- 
Soft Rock Software:   http://www.softrock.co.uk
Vince M Hudd: http://misc.vinceh.com/about-vinceh/
RISCOSitory:  http://www.riscository.com



Re: puzzling email (getting OT)

2011-10-20 Thread Brian Bailey
[snip]

> Anyway this is getting off-topic here; should it be continued on the 
> MPro list?

Not really, Peter. Well, not yet anyway! For a start I don't use
MessengerPro.

I suspected I would get a response similar to yours. 

The problem is that I frequently get messages that are treated by Pluto as
HTML attachments, plus graphics files also as attachments. Most of these
are dross and don't concern me too much, they just don't matter, but some
are commercially important and I should very much like to see them
rendered correctly when loaded into NetSurf, so it is functionally a cross
application problem, as well as a cross platform problem.

I got into a real tangle with a business person. Neither of us could
read/render correctly each others HTML files, sent to and from each other
via email, cross platform, and it mattered. The situation was extremely
frustrating and was never resolved. Tempers were starting to get a bit
frayed.

Regards

Brian




Re: puzzling email

2011-10-20 Thread lists
In article ,
   Vince M Hudd  wrote:
> The bottom line, for users of Pluto, is that if you want to see attached
> images displayed in the HTML, you'll need to save and manually edit.
> (Remote images should be fine, of course).

I use !Pluto

I often receive attachments, usually jokes, where I see one attached file
with an HTML file type and a number of JPEGs, sometimes GIFFs. I
double-click on the HTML and a browser, Fresco of Netsurf, whichever has
been seen by the filer, loads and displays the HTML file with all the
images in the right place. No need for an intermediate save operation

-- 
Stuart Winsor

Only plain text for emails
http://www.asciiribbon.org






Re: puzzling email (getting OT)

2011-10-20 Thread Dr Peter Young
On 20 Oct 2011  Brian Bailey  wrote:

> [snip]

>> It's a long time since I used Pluto, but my recollection is that it
>> doesn't treat HTML attachments any differently to any other type of
>> attachment: You double click on it, a temporary copy is saved and that's
>> filer_run.

>> It doesn't parse the HTML in any way to see if any other attached files
>> are needed by it, so they aren't saved alongside it - and therefore, as
>> you say, the images references aren't rewritten.

>> The bottom line, for users of Pluto, is that if you want to see attached
>> images displayed in the HTML, you'll need to save and manually edit.
>> (Remote images should be fine, of course).

> Vince, I should be glad of further clarification. My understanding is that
> MessengerPro doesn't behave significantly differently from Pluto when it
> comes to handling HTML, but maybe I'm out of date because MessengerPro has
> been subject to further development whereas Pluto hasn't. I see that you
> use the former and should be interested to learn if that too is subject to
> the same problems the affect Pluto, please. It may well be crunch time for
> me entailing a reluctant swap to MessengerPro.

MPro show HTML e-mails as an attempt to render the HTML in the body of 
the message (usually quite a bit of a mess), with the HTML as an 
attachment. You can then click on the attachment to load it into a 
browser. It's a long time since I used Pluto, so I can't remember if 
it does that; I do remember control-G to load the HTML into the 
message window, and if MPro can do that, I haven't found out how.

One thing that MPro does, and I don't think Pluto does, is that if you 
reply to or froward an HTML message, no matter if there are graphics 
as attachments as well as the HTML, the resulting message is received 
on the Dark Side as a standard HTML message. I haven't been able to 
check this myself, but I've never had the usual Windows-users' whinge 
that they can't read the message, as one gets when one replies 
bottom-posted :-)

Anyway this is getting off-topic here; should it be continued on the 
MPro list?

With best wishes,

Peter.

-- 
Peter   \  /  zfc Lu \ Prestbury, Cheltenham,  Glos. GL52
and  \/ ____  \  England.
family   / /  \ | | |\ | /  _  \  http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
/  \__/ \_/ | \| \__/   \__ pnyo...@ormail.co.uk



Re: puzzling email

2011-10-20 Thread Brian Bailey
[snip]

> It's a long time since I used Pluto, but my recollection is that it
> doesn't treat HTML attachments any differently to any other type of
> attachment: You double click on it, a temporary copy is saved and that's
> filer_run.

> It doesn't parse the HTML in any way to see if any other attached files
> are needed by it, so they aren't saved alongside it - and therefore, as
> you say, the images references aren't rewritten.

> The bottom line, for users of Pluto, is that if you want to see attached
> images displayed in the HTML, you'll need to save and manually edit.
> (Remote images should be fine, of course).

Vince, I should be glad of further clarification. My understanding is that
MessengerPro doesn't behave significantly differently from Pluto when it
comes to handling HTML, but maybe I'm out of date because MessengerPro has
been subject to further development whereas Pluto hasn't. I see that you
use the former and should be interested to learn if that too is subject to
the same problems the affect Pluto, please. It may well be crunch time for
me entailing a reluctant swap to MessengerPro.

Brian