[newbie] Mandrake Corporate 2.1

2003-04-05 Thread Darin
Does anyone know where Mandrake Corporate Server 2.1 can be downloaded
from?  I don't see it in any of the lists on the Mandrake site.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Apache stops responding?

2001-05-14 Thread Darin Lang

on 5/14/01 6:12 PM, RDWest at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 last question
 what does telnet do...
 what is it used for
Telnet is a virtual terminal that allows you to log into a remote computer
via a network of some sort, and presents you with a command prompt with
which to run commands and programs on the remote computer.

About the Set up below, you have 3 different domain names pointing to the
same IP. Apache chokes because it can't decide which page to deliver /gsp,
/tcoclan, or /shs
Darin
-- 
WIN A TRILLION: $1,000,000,000,000.00 at MoonBughead.com
http://MoonBughead.com/contest/


 -
 
 NameVirtualHost 24.9.19.5
 
 
 VirtualHost 24.9.19.5
 ServerName gsp.ath.cx
 DocumentRoot /vhost/gsp/html
 
 VirtualHost 24.9.19.5
 ServerName tcoclan.ath.cx
 DocumentRoot /vhost/tcoclan/html
 
 VirtualHost 24.9.19.5
 ServerName shs.tcoclan.ath.cx
 DocumentRoot /vhost/shs/html





Re: [newbie] Which distribution to use as server?

2001-05-12 Thread Darin Lang

I'd install the servers right off the  bat. Linux Mandrake 8 is the best one
to use, IMHO,  because it installs Apache with PHP, MySQL, and Perl right
off the bat. Other distro's may not. Usually you have to install those
separately which takes between hours and days depending on your knowledge of
GNU-Linux. Mandrake 8 automatically configures and sets up the base
directory and loopback as well, meaning that immediately after installation
of Mandrake, open a browser and type  http://localhost/  and it serves up
a web page on your server from /var/www/html/
To test PHP put a file in that same directory called info.php containing
only the line:
? phpinfo(); ?

Call that up in a browser as  http://localhost/info.php , it  will tell
you all sorts of information you may or may not be interested in.

Darin

on 5/13/01 10:32 AM, Ted Shaw at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 G'day -
 
 I'm just beginning the steep trek to using Linux so please forgive the naive
 questions. I'd like to use Linux both as a workstation and as a server for
 my home system. I'm especially keen to learn to use Apache/php/MySQL for web
 page development. As an old windoze user I've got a lot to learn - I've
 ordered several books but before ordering any software I thought I'd ask:
 
 1. Is Mandrake-Linux the best distribution for use as a server?
 2. Would it be best to start off installing Mandrake-Linux as a workstation
 and then later install the applications necessary to turn it into a server
 or would it be better to install everything at the beginning?
 
 Having just recently subscribed to the list, I'm impressed with the quality
 of the assistance and the manner in which its given. The discussion
 regarding LM 7.2 vs LM 8.0 has been especially useful.
 
 Any advice greatly appreciated.
 
 Ted
 
 
 
 
 





Re: [newbie] partitions

2001-05-11 Thread Darin Lang

I like to have a partition for my web tree, and other Documents. so I make a
/usr partition
/ partition 
and a swap partition.
There are lots of ways to do it, and everyone has their own opinion, but the
basic gist is that you can reinstall on the root partition without affecting
your /usr partition. When you put in the new upgrade on / all your documents
will be right there where you left them in /usr
you might also want to include a /home partition for user documents and
sites. Or a /var to preserve apache and mysql, etc. files

Darin
-- 
WIN A TRILLION: $1,000,000,000,000.00 at MoonBughead.com
http://MoonBughead.com/contest/


on 5/11/01 5:12 PM, Bill W. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi All,
 I recently purchased a 30 gig hard drive and installed LM 8 on it. The
 system is a dual boot with win98.
 I have absolutely no experience with partitions so I just went with
 recommended and it seems like I have one huge partition in addition to a
 small swap. I am moving to linux but I want to know if I should be creating
 smaller partitions for /var, /home etc..also, with a hd of this size
 would anyone recommend going to the reiserfs?
 
 Thanks,
 Bill W.
 





Re: [newbie] Help on getting 2cd set of LM 8.0

2001-05-10 Thread Darin Lang

http://cart.cheapbytes.com/cgi-bin/cart

$3.49

Darin

-- 
WIN A TRILLION: $1,000,000,000,000.00 at MoonBughead.com
http://MoonBughead.com/contest/



on 5/10/01 12:51 PM, Bob Barnes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 I've been reading the mail in here for a couple weeks. I've tried
 getting both disks via modem but my 28.8 connect isn't getting the job done.
 I've signed up on the Mandrake page to receive the 2-CD set when available.
 I run Win2K Pro and have been interested in Linux for awhile now. I live
 beyond the limit for any high speed internet connect and was wondering if
 any one of you would send me a copy of the two CDs that you have downloaded.
 
 Of course I'll pay shipping and handling and what you think is fair for your
 time and media.
 
 Send any details you need to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  I'd sure appreciate it!
 ThankYou
 
 Bob Barnes
 RR2  Box 44
 Bardwell, Kentucky
 42023
 
 





Re: [newbie] software and upgrade questions

2001-05-10 Thread Darin Lang

on 5/9/01 10:27 AM, Jennifer Williams at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 first of all, thanks to everyone who had an answers for me.  after all was
 done, i think the install may have knocked windows out, i am not that bothered
 since my important things that i am working are stored elsewhere anyway.  i
 have new questions: i had asked about dual booting- should i go ahead and get
 the 8.0 (and is the avail by box or download) versus using the 7.2?  also,
 does anyone have any recommendations for web design programs and the like for
 linux.  with windows i was using frontpage (which i didn't really like to
 begin with), there were a couple of things bundled with it- but i was looking
 for something a bit more full bodied.
 
 and one last question, on the 7.2 there is a graphic art program called
 cameleo that for the life of me i cannot get to install.  i get to the little
 install icon and won't do anything.  :0
 
 jenny
 
 
8.0 installs Sketch and Killustrator. They are good by linux standards,
ancient by desktop publishing standards. The most advanced wed design
program I have found for linux is Quanta, which installs from Mandrake 8.0.
It is a far cry from Front Page, and is more remniscent of Allaire's Home
site. It is a great text editor, not a wysiwyg editor. If you are looking
for something better than front page try dreamweaver. But it is not for
Linux, not yet. 

Darin
-- 
WIN A TRILLION: $1,000,000,000,000.00 at MoonBughead.com
http://MoonBughead.com/contest/






Re: [newbie] Apache lies

2001-05-10 Thread Darin Lang

on 5/9/01 9:22 PM, Chubby Vic at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 http://kittypuss.org/cgi-bin/UltraBoard/UltraBoard.pl
 
 This file exists.
 
 Apache says:
 
 404 Not FoundNot Found The requested URL /cgi-bin/UltraBoard/UltraBoard.pl
 was not found on this server.
 
 Apache-AdvancedExtranetServer/1.3.19 Server at kittypuss.org Port 80
 

Open up Netconf in KDE click on Server Tasks then Apache Web server

click Defaults, and check your script alias entry and ensure that it points
to the right directory. e.g.

Script Alias: /cgi-bin/ /var/www/cgi-bin/

or however you have it configured. By the way I have found that editing the
httpd.conf file directly in a text editor, does not always work with the
New Apache extranet server, it seems it has to be done through the NetConf
interface. 

Darin
-- 
WIN A TRILLION: $1,000,000,000,000.00 at MoonBughead.com
http://MoonBughead.com/contest/






Re: [newbie] Redhat vs Mandrake

2001-05-10 Thread Darin Lang

on 5/9/01 4:43 PM, Jeffrey M. Reed at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Wednesday 09 May 2001 15:27, Mark Johnson wrote:
 My wife's company has asked me about installing a linux
 server to relay mail within their local LAN and also out
 to their ISP.  They'd like to run apache and mySQL.  They
 wanted to know whether they should install RedHat or
 Mandrake.
 
 I'm not sure how to answer them why would one be
 better than the other?
 
 there is no better my friend. they are, in essence, the
 same. the commands, the programs, the security, everything.
 essentially the same. the only baddie i keep seeing in
 RedHat is they mess up the compiler a lot. so, unless
 you're developing a lot, that won't matter.
 
 linux is linux is linux...no matter if it's slack, redhat,
 mandrake, whatever. i'd go with either. linuxbusca runs on
 mandrake and debian...and while it's nothing pretty to look
 at yet, mandrake does the email, web server, and DSL
 gateway. pretty awesome.
 
 just my two cents.

Apache and Mysql won't deliver the mail. Mandrake installs Postfix by
default, which is easier than Sendmail to configure, although neither of
them are actually easy to configure. Mandrake and Redhat are based on the
same installer program, that is all that varies from brand to brand is how
it is installed, and the tools each installs for configuring it.
Darin
-- 
WIN A TRILLION: $1,000,000,000,000.00 at MoonBughead.com
http://MoonBughead.com/contest/






Re: [newbie] Mandrake 8

2001-05-10 Thread Darin Lang

I ran sndconfig like you say, but I got an error. It correctly located my
CS4237B:CTRL Sound card, but it couldn't get it working although there was a
pop. I got the error:

modprobe error: Can't locate module sound-slot-0

Does anyone have a sound-slot-0? Or is there some other problem?
I also tried folling the CS4232 how-to which says to:
modprobe sound
insmod ad1848
insmod uart401
insmod cs4232 io=0x534 irq=5 dma=1 dma2=0

it said it didn't like the irq. i gave it the argument again with irq 7 and
it didn't complain. but still no sound.

Thanks fro the sndcnofig tip. I had no idea about that and for the first
time it did make a pop noise which is something.
Darin 

on 5/10/01 11:44 PM, Kit at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Do this
 
 logout...of X...then select:
 Restart (but in commandline mode or linux prompt mode)
 
 when there, put this command in:
 
 /usr/sbin/sndconfig
 
 or 
 
 /usr/bin/sndconfig
 
 (forget which,try both)
 then just do what it says...afterwhich, log back into X
 you should then have sound.
 
 I bought the same CD's from the same place...
 I had know trouble at all...everything worked fine.
 
 Darin Lang wrote:
 
 
 Anyone else have installation problems?
 
 
 FWIW, I had no problems installing Mandrake 8.0 from the CD set I bought
 from CheapBytes.com. My mouse works: all three buttons and the scroll wheel,
 Logitech with a ps/2 type connector, I don't know if that is a ps/2 mouse
 techincally though. My screen resolution is perfect and stable, something it
 never was before when I had Slackware Linux, the image flickered and was
 distorted and it took me weeks to get it that good. I do not have sound,
 because I have an obscure sound card (cs4237b) on an ISA bus. But everything
 else installed without a hitch, automatically upon install including my
 printer. I did have to reinstall twice before I was happy with the intalled
 software configuration. But it ran well everytime and did a nice dual boot
 install without any hitches.
 
 I did have a hard time getting Apple Talk running, since it is not
 included (Samba is) for some stupid reason/oversight. And Postfix was a bit
 difficult to configure, but much easier than sendmail which I never did get
 to work when I was running slackware linux, but Red Hat has a nice how-to.
 
 Up till this week I have been running Slackware Linux with no printer,
 no mail server, no sound, a jittery display that was so difficult to look at
 for any length of time that I gave up using it and just telnetted from the
 computer sitting next to it. 2 mouse buttons worked and it took me 2 days to
 get the keyboard layout switched to Dvorak on boot. Mandrake took care of
 everything almost automatically and it is running nicely except for the
 sound, though it did install my TV tuner card.
 
 Darin
 
 --
 WIN A TRILLION: $1,000,000,000,000.00 at MoonBughead.com
 http://MoonBughead.com/contest/





Re: [newbie] What's a good program to...

2001-04-24 Thread Darin

Dont know specifically any apps, but I recommend you check out Freshmeat.
I'm willing to bet that a search there would turn up something..

http://freshmeat.net

Darin -
- Original Message -
From: Derek Rayne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Linux Newbie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 11:20 AM
Subject: [newbie] What's a good program to...


 Hi there,

 I am looking for my Linux system (Pentium 133) the following types of
 programs:

 1) PrintMaster type (that does it all)

 2) HTML Editor (NOT CoffeeCup)

 Thanks!


 =
 
 Richard Wegner - Linux Newbie - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 NOTE: Derek Rayne is a FICTIONAL CHARACTER this is just an
 e-mail address I chose!
 

 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
 http://auctions.yahoo.com/







[newbie] Mandrake 7.2 on Dell CPi-A laptop

2001-02-19 Thread Darin

Hi,
   I'm trying to set up Mandrake 7.2 on a Dell Latitude CPi-A laptop.. The
installation went flawlessly, and Mandrake boots up fine..  I can even get a
really nice display when starting X, but only from the LCD display..  I
notice that when starting X, there is a message that mentions Internal LCD
display only.  When I try to use the function keys to switch to the external
display, it does the switch, but the external display is messed up.  Is
there a way to get either the External display, or both internal and
external to work at the same time?

The video chip is a NeoMagic 2200.  Everything else seems to be working just
fine. I can even use the PCMCIA modem to dial out and connect to the net..

Any help would be appreciated..

Thanks

Darin -





RE: [newbie] Mandrake 7.2 on Dell CPi-A laptop

2001-02-19 Thread Darin

Yeah.. I tried several different resolutions.. Even generic 640x480x16 color
VGA.. None of them gave a display.. Some would show the screen 4 times,
others were more difficult to read.. At any rate, I found the cure... There
is a line you can add to the options in XF86Config or XF86Config-4.  I
pasted a snippet from the XF86Config below.

The intern_disp and extern_disp options allow you to tell the chipset which
display you want to use.. This doesnt give you the flexibility of switching
on the fly like Windoze, but it does work very well.. This also lets you use
the external display with the docking station/port replicator.

FWIW, everything else is working fine.. I did have to set the serial port
speeds with setserial.. It was forcing the modems to connect at 33k..  Those
have been the only two hitches I've had with the entire laptop so far..

Darin -


===
# **
# Graphics device section
# **

# Any number of graphics device sections may be present
# Device configured by Xconfigurator:

Section "Device"
Identifier  "My Video Card"
VendorName  "Unknown"
BoardName   "Unknown"
#VideoRam4096
#Chipset"NM2160"
#Option "intern_disp"
 Option "extern_disp"
EndSection















-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Franki
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 1:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Mandrake 7.2 on Dell CPi-A laptop


It must be something specific with how laptops send the signal out to the
external monitor

TFT and other notebook screens generally have low refresh rates compared to
Crt displays,, thats why I always try using generic laptop screen settings
when I need to get an old monitor working... (recently I had an old 14 inch
SVGA CRT that wouldn't handle anything but "generic 800x600 notebook" got no
idea why, but no other settings worked, and since that did, I didn't bother
trying to setup x by hand...)

I don't know if xfree suports multiple displays,, I had never though to try
it.

you don't mention what you mean by "messed up" a monitor trying to display a
refresh it can't handle has a specific look...

as does a monitor trying to display a res it can't handle...

try setting your notebook res lower, say 800x600 or lower, and then see if
the monitor can handle it..

then try using a lower refresh and try the same thing, keep going down till
it works, and then work your way back up till you find a res and refresh
that works on your ext monitor,, then you will just have to use drakeconf to
change monitors whenever you want to use your external monitor,, corse I
could be wrong, their could be a much easier answer...

rgds

Frank

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darin
Sent: Tuesday, 20 February 2001 2:26 AM
To: Newbie
Subject: [newbie] Mandrake 7.2 on Dell CPi-A laptop


Hi,
   I'm trying to set up Mandrake 7.2 on a Dell Latitude CPi-A laptop.. The
installation went flawlessly, and Mandrake boots up fine..  I can even get a
really nice display when starting X, but only from the LCD display..  I
notice that when starting X, there is a message that mentions Internal LCD
display only.  When I try to use the function keys to switch to the external
display, it does the switch, but the external display is messed up.  Is
there a way to get either the External display, or both internal and
external to work at the same time?

The video chip is a NeoMagic 2200.  Everything else seems to be working just
fine. I can even use the PCMCIA modem to dial out and connect to the net..

Any help would be appreciated..

Thanks

Darin -








RE: [newbie] laptop install

2001-02-19 Thread Darin

Robert,

I just finished installing Mandrake 7.2 on a Dell CPi A366XT laptop.. Its a
couple of years old, but the install went pretty well. I had minor X
configuration problems because I wanted to use the external display.. But,
PCMCIA works well. It found my Xircom modem/ethernet card with no problems
and the sound works well too..

I found a site that really gave me a lot of good info.. Its called Linux on
Laptops.. The URL is: http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kharker/linux-laptop/
I highly recommend it to anyone that wants to use Linux on their Laptop..

Darin -



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Robert F. Trettel
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 8:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] laptop install





Hi All,

I just put in a order for a Dell Inspiron 3800 laptop. Has anybody tried
Mandrake7.2 on this
laptop,if so any thing I should know.
Also it is setup with WinMe,will try a dual boot.

Have a great day
and thanks
Robert F. Trettel






RE: [newbie] the downloaded targz file via windowME can not be read by linux(...

2001-02-17 Thread Darin



CD-RW 
disks and Direct CD dont write to a Cd in a standard ISO9660 format.. They use 
UFS, which is the same filesystem that DVDs use.. I dont know if a 2.2.x kernel 
can read UFS or not.. I think UFS support was added into 2.4.. 

That 
is probably why you cant read the file.. You might try burning the file to a 
standard CD-R using Adaptec Easy CD or Nero..

Darin 
-

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On 
  Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 
  11:11 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [newbie] the downloaded targz 
  file via windowME can not be read by linux(...some one post in news group 
  alt.os.linux.mandrake told how to access ext2 file from cdrw(my is toshiba 
  dvd, cdr, cdrw combo), I follow cd /dev  rw cdrom 
   ln -s scd0 cdrom it make me 
  can access linux file , but when I insert my cdrw disk which have a copy 
  of tar.gz driver file I download from windowME aol using Adaptech's Direct 
  CD, I can not see anything when I try to l ls /mnt/cdrom need 
  help Sincere Eric 


Re: [newbie] Quake

1999-11-21 Thread Darin Martin

Me too.. Epic is doing the same thing.. Making the Linux client available
for download instaed of including it on the CD.. I guess we cant expect
miracles overnight.. At least companies are starting to recognize that Linux
users want to play games.
- Original Message -
From: Seth Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 1999 1:17 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Quake


 On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, you wrote:
  update. ( you can see it for yourself by going to the console or xterm
  window and typing 'finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | more')
 Oh yah. . .totally. . .ive worked in the software industry hehe. . ."when
its
 done" is quite a mantra there. . .yah i been following plans and stuff. .
.was
 pretty disappointed to see no simultaneous ship date):

 --

 Seth Gibson
 www.mp3.com/PSM0x2710
 members.tripod.com/cybernetic_thunder (Under Construction)
 The Functional Design of the UNIX Operating System is probably one of the
 few truly beautiful things left in the world.





Re: [newbie] Quake

1999-11-20 Thread Darin Martin



 On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, you wrote:
  I'm still waiting (myself) to find out where/when I can buy the Linux
  version of Q3 Arena. :-) I called Id software on Friday and they said
  they don't have a release date yet. :-(
 Yah rumor was nov 24, then dec 7. . .according to folks at all the comp
shops i
 been to.  What i understand from reading the plans of id staff, it seems
that
 the Elite (tin box) edition won't have linux binaries, additionally, the
Linux
 version WILL NOT ship simultaneously with the Win/Mac versions as
originally
 planned.  Linux binaries will not be able for dload until post xmas,
mainly for
 the purpose of collecting stats.

If a software dealer gives you a hard date for the release of any Id game,
they are making it up.. Anyone that has followed John Carmack and co. over
the last few years knows that they never give hard release dates.  They
always release the game "When Its Done".

Todd Hollenshead, the CEO for Id software had this to say in a recent finger
update. ( you can see it for yourself by going to the console or xterm
window and typing 'finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | more')

Here is Todds update:

11-14-1999

Demo Test notes:

As Graeme indicated, this is a preliminary release. We are
retaining the prohibition on physical media distribution until we
release the final or "gold" demo. That means that magazines will
NOT be allowed to distribute this version of the demo on coverdisks.
This is marked all over the test, however I would appreciate it if
all of the Quake 3 and game site webmasters that are mirroring or
covering the release would lend me a hand and make sure our friendly
neighborhood game and computer magazines understand this.

Rest assured, we will allow physical media distribution of the final
demo, once it is released, but not yet.

Second, although the 1-800-idgames number is on the screen, we (id) aren't
accepting orders yet. Also, please remember that number is not for
technical support for Quake III Arena, the demo test, or any other id
game. Feedback, bugs, etc., in the demo test should still be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Finally, before the crazy speculation starts, we aren't done with the
game yet. We will be finished "when it's done!" Again, anyone besides
id claiming to have the official release date is just pulling your chain.








Re: [newbie] GAIM

1999-11-08 Thread Darin Martin

I'm using GAIM 0.9.10 on my work machine..  It works fine for me.
I had problems with previous versions locking up while trying to connect,
but thats because my work machine was behind a firewall and versions of GAIM
prior to 0.9.9 did not work well with a proxy or firewall.

Are you running one of the more current versions or an older version?


- Original Message -
From: Karen M. Heiby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 2:09 AM
Subject: [newbie] GAIM


 Is anyone else noticing GAIM (AOL Instant Messenger) is freezing upon
 connecting?  I wonder if AOL might have anyone not using their version
 of AOL IM for Windows blocked from their system?  Like they're doing to
 MSN Messenger?

 My other concern is that I had a friend here trying to get my modem to
 work.  Is there a remote chance something he did could be causing
 GAIM to not connect?  I didn't think so, because my ICQ-clone programs
 are still working fine.

 I have been deleting and reinstalling GAIM and this is the first time
 ever that it's freezing up on me, after using it for a month.  When
 I use Windows 98, my AOL IM in that is working fine.

 Karen





Re: [newbie] Choose Pentium? OR 586?

1999-11-08 Thread Darin Martin

You are correct... The P-II/P-III/Celeron/Xeon are all based on the Pentium
Pro.  There have been changes like MMX and Katmai as well as the process
shrinking from .35 micron for the P-Pro to .25 for the P-II/P-II/Celeron and
then .18 micron for the new Coppermine P-III processors.
There have also been cache changes.. The P-Pro had cache on the die that ran
at the speed of the CPU and came in 256k, 512k, and 1 meg varieties.
The P-II and early P-III had 512k of 1/2 speed cache on the slot card.  The
first celerons had no L2 cache at all.. The second gen Celerons have 128k of
full speed cache on the chip die.  The Coppermine chips have 256k of full
speed cache on the chip also..
I believe some of the instruction pipelining for the FPU has been improved
over the last 5 years as well..
However, the main instruction set for the CPU remains unchanged since the
P-Pro came out in late 1995.

Intel's 7th generation processor is supposed to be released 4th quarter
2000.  It has been code named Merced for the last 4 years or so.. The actual
product name "Itanium" was recently announced.  It will be a true 64 bit
processor and completely incompatible with all x86 code, unless someone
decides to create an emulator for it.

- Original Message -
From: Matt Stegman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 6:31 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Choose Pentium? OR 586?


 On  5 Nov, John Aldrich wrote:
  On Fri, 05 Nov 1999, you wrote:
  Hi,
 
  In menuconfig, (I have a feeling this is a dumb question) I
  automatically have 386 with an "X" next to it.  I have a Pentium 233
  mHz.  Is that technically a 586?  I'm not sure whether to tell it that
  or Pentium.  My Linux book says to check 586 but I'm not sure why.
 
  Yes! A Pentium is a 586-class processor. I think Technically a
  Pentium is a 586, a Pentium Pro is a 686, a PII would be a 786, and a
  PIII would be an 886

 Not quite.  P-II and P-III are both 686 processors.  The first (or so I
 hear) truly 7th generation x86 processor on the market is AMD's Athlon
 processor.  The P-III is just a hyped up P-II, which is just a P-Pro
 with MMX.  Of course, I'm over-simplfying, but I believe I'm mostly
 correct.  I do know for sure that neither the P-II nor P-III qualify as
 anything more than a "686" processor.

 --
  -Matt Stegman
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: [newbie] Choose Pentium? OR 586?

1999-11-08 Thread Darin Martin


- Original Message -
From: Matt Stegman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Choose Pentium? OR 586?


 On  8 Nov, Darin Martin wrote:
  There have also been cache changes.. The P-Pro had cache on the die that
ran
  at the speed of the CPU and came in 256k, 512k, and 1 meg varieties.

 We're talking about L2 cache here, right?  I didn't know that P-Pros
 had full speed cache.  I always thought that was only on Celerons.  Was
 this on all P-Pros?


Yes.. This is all dealing with L2 cache.. All P-Pro versions had full speed
cache on the chip.  Thats the primary reason the P-Pro was so expensive when
it was released.  Today, even the 1 meg P-Pro chips are still pretty
expensive.. Around $350 each.  One other advantage the P-Pro had was its
scalability.  The chipsets for the P-Pro could easily support 4 way SMP.
And 6 and 8 way SMP were attainable with minor modifications as well. The
P-II couldnt scale beyond 2 way until the Xeon came out, and even then could
only scale to 4 way until just very recently.
The on-chip L2 cache gave the P-Pro a serious advantage over early P-II
chips too..  Before I added the second CPU to my P-Pro system, I could
easily get higher framerates in Quake, Unreal, etc.. than my friends that
had P-II 233 systems.


  Intel's 7th generation processor is supposed to be released 4th quarter
  2000.  It has been code named Merced for the last 4 years or so.. The
actual
  product name "Itanium" was recently announced.  It will be a true 64 bit
  processor and completely incompatible with all x86 code, unless someone
  decides to create an emulator for it.

 I've heard about Merced (sorry, I mean Itanium- couldn't they come up
 with a better name?), but haven't been following it as much as the
 Athlon.  I suppose I'm more of an AMD guy than an Intel fellow.  Plus,
 buying an Athlon will let me reap the benefits of a mature x86 chip
 while waiting for Merced (whoops again, but "Itanium" doesn't roll off
 the tongue as easily as "Merced") to bloom.

 Also, what is Intel supposed to do with Merced that Digital (um...
 Compaq...  I'm not good with names this morning) hasn't put into the
 Alpha processor?  I suppose it's always good to have competition, but
 does Intel really expect to dent this market?

 I suppose if Microsoft puts NT on Merced, that will help a lot.
 Especially since they no longer support Alpha.  Is this their plan all
 along?

MS is reportedly working on Win2k for the Merced/Itanium.  From what I've
heard, they will not have anything ready for at least a year or two *after*
the Itanium is released.  However, Linux will probably be available for
Itanium shortly after its release.. I've read a few articles about compiler
development for the Itanium.. This is a tremendous chance for Linux to get a
giant leap ahead of MS in the server and high end workstation market.

Personally, I'll be building a K7 system as soon as a better chipset
solution is available from VIA or ALI.  I think that the K7 has far more
potential than the Coppermine and even the Itanium.  The big problem for
Itanium is that there will be no backwards compatibility with x86
technology.  That means little hardware or software support on initial
release unless people start development now.  The K7 and the K8 (code name
Sledgehammer) are going to keep Intel in a #2 spot for a long time to come..






Re: [newbie] Choose Pentium? OR 586?

1999-11-08 Thread Darin Martin


- Original Message -
From: Damien Mc Kenna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Choose Pentium? OR 586?


 It has been code named Merced for the last 4 years or so..

 BING!  Wrong.  Merced is a different technology (IA-64) that HP is
 designing for Intel using some of the HP-PA wizardry.  The first chip
 in that series seems like it won't be much faster than the 786 chips
 due next year...
 ... which are called Williamette.  They'll be Intel's first official
 786 chips and will probably have a number of similar tricks to AMD's
 Athlon to speed things up yet again.


Umm.. Sorry, but you are in fact, incorrect...
Go to this site...
http://developer.intel.com/design/IA64/index.htm?iid=search+IA642;

And, if you go to this page, you will see the IA-32 is targeted at mainstram
desktop, mobile, and low end server/workstations while the IA-64 (Merced) is
targeted at high-end servers.
http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/speeches/MPF1097A.HTM

The Merced (aka Itanium) uses the IA-64 architecture which is backward
compatible with IA-32.. But the Willamete design is IA-32 only.. Not IA-64.







Re: [newbie] Netscape Tinytype

1999-10-14 Thread Darin

On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, you wrote:
 John,
 
 I have this same problem with Linux Netscape.  Very s-m-a-l-l print.  What
 do you mean about 'swap the order of the "75dpi" and "100dpi" fonts?  How
 does this give 100 dpi fonts?
 
 Richard

Read the instructions at www.mandrakeuser.org
They tell how to use the 100 dpi fonts.
-- 
Cthulhu for President in 2000 - Why settle for the lesser evil



Re: [newbie] How do I turn in a hacker?

1999-10-08 Thread Darin

On Fri, 08 Oct 1999, you wrote:
 Don't worry about contacting his ISP. Contact the FBI.
 
Ummm.. The .pt is for Portugal.. I really doubt the FBI can do a whole lot
there..  If thats where the person in question is actually located.. Who knows?
The college student's system may have been hacked already and was just a point
where they could anonymously try thier exploits from..

   nslookup 193.137.8.223
  Name:oboe.dsi.uminho.pt
  Address:  193.137.8.223

-- 
Cthulhu for President in 2000 - Why settle for the lesser evil



Re: [newbie] 3c59x problems

1999-09-24 Thread Darin

On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, you wrote:
 
  I recently installed Mandrake 6.0 alongside win98 on my Dell XPS-T PIII 450.  
my ethernet card is the 3com 3C905C-TX.  When booting up, Linux fails to recognize my 
ethernet card, and responds with "failed" when trying to bring up interface eth0.  I 
am using the 3c95x driver, although the 3c509 driver has the same problem.  My 
question is, do I need to specify the irq and base I/O address?  win98 seems to think 
my irq is 11, but I don't know how to go about finding the I/O address.  Any input 
would be greatly appreciated.
 
 -gabriel weinstock
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
Please do 2 things:

1:  Turn off HTML in your messages
2:  Set your wordwrap to 80 characters..

Thanks 

Content-Type: text/html; name="unnamed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: 


-- 
Cthulhu for President in 2000 - Why settle for the lesser evil



Re: [newbie] Wierdness

1999-09-24 Thread Darin

On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, you wrote:
 I'm not sure if I should just chalk this up to "flaky hardware" or
 whether it's something to do with Mandrake or what. Here's the
 situation: I have a dual-ppro 200 (only one processor running right
 now... SMP locks the machine up tight on boot-up!) with 192 megs of
 ram. Mandrake detects the ram just fine. I also have an Advansys
 ABP-940UA Ultra SCSI card hooked into a 8.5 GB SCSI drive, but I boot
 off an 850 mb IDE.
 I normally have to boot twice before I can get a reasonable Bogomips
 count. Typically I get about 1% of the "normal" bogomips at first
 boot and full bogomips after I reboot. For example, right now I think
 it's running at 192 Bogomips. I realize this isn't a REAL measure of
 performance, but it's close enough for me, as at 2 bogomips as I had
 at first boot, the system was CRAWLING!
 
 Any ideas???

Does your motherboard support the MP 1.4 specification?  I believe the SMP
kernel requires that your motherboard follow the Intel MP 1.4 specification.
I have an option in my BIOS to switch from 1.1 to 1.4
I run a dual P-Pro with 2 UW SCSI drives.  This system runs for weeks on end. 
Since going with Mandrake, I have never had a single hard lockup. I've had
applications with memory leaks use up all the memory.  All I had to do was kill
X off and everything was back to normal.

Darin -
-- 
Cthulhu for President in 2000 - Why settle for the lesser evil



Re: [newbie] iso

1999-09-20 Thread Darin

On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, you wrote:
 On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Dan Brown wrote:
 
 
 Doesn't have to be that fast, i used to download the isos with my X2.
 120megs every 8 hours, it does take awhile mind you, and it really sucks
 when it goes wrong, but when it works it'll make you beam :) 

Thats what I did.. Took just about 36 hours to get completed.  But, it burned
perfectly fine.

-- 
Cthulhu for President in 2000 - Why settle for the lesser evil



Re: [newbie] 6.1 Download/Install

1999-09-18 Thread Darin

I wish!
Unfortunately, even some major cities in the States still don't have high speed
access.  I downloaded my copy with my 56k modem.  While that isnt quite as slow
as your connection, its pretty close.. I averaged about 4.8 KB/sec for my
download of Helios.

Darin -
--
Cthulhu for President in 2000 - Why settle for the lesser evil



Re: [newbie] this is a subject.

1999-09-15 Thread Darin

On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, you wrote:
 como...
 i just bought a supraMax i56 modem to replace my LT Win-modem... but i cant 
 get the thing to work in linux... it worked for a day in windows... but now 
 it does the same thing in windows as it does in linux...
 
 the modem is on com2 under windows
 i used modemtool to set the linux port ...
 
 when i use kppp it says... 'modem ready...'
 then sits there with the message 'initalizing modem'
 if i open the log in kppp it says 'expecting OK'
 
 any help is welcomed and thanks,
 reb0rn

If the model number of your modem is 2580, 2380, 2390,2560, 2300, 2260, or 2370
it is a software driven modem.  In other words, you went from one Winmodem to
another.  Very few PCI modems are real modems.  

--
Cthulhu for President in 2000 - Why settle for the lesser evil



Re: [newbie] SCSI Scanner

1999-09-12 Thread Darin

The SANE drivers support most popular SCSI scanners.  The latest drivers are
in the Cooker and will be in 6.1 distributions.

-Original Message-
From: Doug Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sunday, September 12, 1999 3:48 PM
Subject: [newbie] SCSI Scanner


 I would like to use my scsi scanner with linux. Do any of the image
processing programs available support scanners?  Are there appropriate
drivers
around?

Doug Reid




RE: [newbie] setup my PCI modem !

1999-08-09 Thread Martin, Darin W.

Unfortunately, the Olitec PCI modems are software driven.  They will only
work with the drivers that were written for Windows 95/98.  There is no way
to make the modem work under Mandrake or any other Linux distribution.

 -Original Message-
 From: jeff d'Izarny [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Sunday, August 08, 1999 9:48 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  [newbie] setup my PCI modem !
 
 Is it possible to set up a Olitec PCI modem for linux Mandrake 6.0
 ?? i try but The message is : "modem not response" ??
 please help me !
 
 



RE: [newbie] Networking Linux-Win95

1999-08-09 Thread Martin, Darin W.

Check out Samba.  Samba allows you to access Windows shares and also allows
you to share disk space and printers to other Windows users.  

 -Original Message-
 From: Neilesh Patel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, August 09, 1999 9:44 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  [newbie] Networking Linux-Win95
 
 I have a Linux Server (well it's not really a server, but I'd like to call
 it one) that has a deskjet 720C printer (HP) connected to it. is there
 anyway for the windows machines to print to the printer, while I'm running
 Linux on the server? If so how?
 let me know
 
 thanks
 neil



RE: [newbie] How do I install my scanner Umax S-6E?

1999-08-09 Thread Martin, Darin W.

Joao, 
  Before spending the money on a new SCSI card, go to the SANE page and try
their drivers.  They list your scanner and the controller it comes with as
supported.. Their site is at http://www.mostang.com/sane/


 -Original Message-
 From: Joao C Agostini [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, August 09, 1999 10:19 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: [newbie] How do I install my scanner Umax S-6E?
 
 Hello  
   
   Thank you very much for the information and for the attention. It is
 a
 sad news, but I will take your advice because, I find, this will be the
 only form of doing my scanner to work. But, even so, I would like
 something to know on which module for a generic board scsi, do you know?
 Thank you again.
 
 Steve Philp ha scritto:
  
  Joao C Agostini wrote:
  
   Hello
  
   Does by chance anybody have a scanner of the mark Umax S-6E? I
 saw in
   the sane that there is the drive for him, but when I made the
   installation of Mandrake it didn't consist a scsi board for him. I
 wrote
   for to Umax so that they informed me which the type of the scsi board
   that they used for S-6E, but until today I didn't obtain answer. Did I
   Read in the documents of the sane that the kernel should include a
   module (?) of generic scsi, what module is this? How do I do so that
 it
   is carried by the kernel or so that it is included in him? What should
   read to enable my scanner? At once thank you very much.
  
  The SCSI board that ships with the S-6E is a completely worthless piece
  of crap and should be tossed into the nearest trash can.  Pick up a
  cheap Adaptec and install the kernel drivers for it and you'll be fine
  with that scanner.  I used to run the same here with an AHA-1524 card
  (at least, I think that was the number of the card, it's been awhile).
  
  --
  Steve Philp
  Network Administrator
  Advance Packaging Corp.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 -- 
 João Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Brasil - SP ICQ - 33.965.439
 usuário Linux # 106644



Re: [newbie] MS releases new Windows and NT Keyboard (humor)

1999-01-03 Thread Darin Martin

- Original Message -
From: Sam Gentile [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 1:37 PM
Subject: RE: [newbie] MS releases new Windows and NT Keyboard (humor)


Oh, everyone who doesn't agree with your viewpoint is a "Microsoft plant?"
No, I am just an Engineer who has used both since 1993. You're spreading
crap and it's UN-professional as well as false. Have you used Windows NT?
Have you used Windows 2000 for 6 months as I have? No? THEN DON'T MAKE
STATEMENTS OUT OF YOUR BEHIND. I have told you the truth - I have been
running for 6 months and instead you choose to believe myths instead of
direct experience.



You must admit that this is probably not the best place to push MS and its
agenda.
However, from my perspective, MS and its products just do not perform the
way they could/should.
And, before you say I know nothing about MS... I have been a beta tester for
MS products since Win 95 was called Chicago.  I have been to MS offices in
Dallas and Seattle.. I have instructor certification from MS.  Not just MCSE
or MCP, but Instructor certification.  I have run most every MS product in
existance since 1990.

I am a Unix engineer by trade also.. My employer was using NT 4 and IIS as
the company web server for all of our web-based products up until very
recently..  We switched to Solaris and Netscape Enterprise Server.. The
reason for the change?  The IIS servers would crash on a regular basis and,
when they were up the 3 systems they were running on (Dual P-II 450 Compaq
servers) couldnt keep up with the workload.  Since switching to NES just
over a month ago, we have reached 10,000,000 (Yes, Ten Million) hits per
day. with two dual cpu Sun servers.  NES has had exactly two problems in the
last month and both of those were caused by router failures.

You can't blame this on "poorly written software" because we were using
Microsoft's own web server.  We have MCSE certified engineers on site to
handle the configuration of the servers and even MS themselves looked at our
configuration and could find no problems with it.  The problem is that NT
and yes, Win 2k still needs time to mature.  It is not ready to be an
enterprise level OS.  It might be OK for file and print serving, but forget
mission-critical applications where a companys future depends on solid,
robust, stable performance.

I too have run Win2k since the early betas have come out.  While I am
impressed with the improvements they have made, it still has a way to go
before it will be on a level with Solaris or Linux.

And, do I run MS operating systems at home? Yes..   I like to watch movies
and play games.. Those are 2 things that Linux does not do well at this
point.. In time, that will change.

And, if you're not completely convinced by my statements, then I ask you why
Microsoft themselves could not get their Hotmail service to run on NT and
IIS reliably?  When they purchased Hotmail, it was running on Solaris and
Apache.  They tried to cut over, but again IIS and NT could not handle the
workload and would not stay up.  So, to this day Hotmail still runs on
Solaris and Apache.

Now, I'm not going to blindly say that Unix/Linux/Solaris never crashes..
They do crash some times.. But their reliability far exceeds that of
NT/95/98/Win2k.  I'm not "making statements out of my behind either".  I
have the experience.. I've been there.. I've got the t-shirt.

Darin -

Sr. Systems Engineer
LEXIS-NEXIS
My opinions are my own.. Not my emplyers..  So there..