[newbie] login problem

2005-02-13 Thread Mr Steve Harris
Hello, 
My son recently installed Mandrake 10.1 over 9.2 on my
machine.  While most things seem to be going smoothly,
sometimes it takes a long time to log in.  

The machine has a p3 and 256MB RAM.  

It gets to the GUI login screen.  I log in, but it
then sits there and does nothing for sometimes over 10
minutes.  It does it for other users as well, using
both KDE and Gnome.  It doesn't do it all the time,
nor can I see a pattern.  

Can anyone help?

Steve.

Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
http://au.movies.yahoo.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] lost drive?

2002-01-04 Thread steve harris

The kernel will recognize all drives at boot.

Do a:

dmesg | more

You can look thru it and see which drives and partitions it sees.

or redirect it into a file:

dmesg 2 test.txt

- Original Message -
From: Eric Budinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:59 AM
Subject: RE: [newbie] lost drive?


 I tried the mount command listed at the bottom cause the other hard
 drive should be hdc but it didn't come up. It said mnt/ohd does not
 exist

 How do I see if linux even see's the other harddrive?

 Eric


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dave Sherman
 Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:02 AM
 To: Mandrake-newbie
 Subject: Re: [newbie] lost drive?

 On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 08:47, Eric Budinger wrote:
  Hi,
 
   I just re-installed Linux on my 4 gig hard drive. I have a 4 gig, My
  Cdrom and a 1.2 gig. On my 1.2gig is my OLD linux system with my old
  HOME directory. Well I don't see my old drive. My 4 gig is my Pri
  Master, My CDrom is my Pri Slave and my 1.2 gig is my Sec Master.
 Help?
 
  Eric

 Linux is not like DOS -- you can't just access a drive by its letter or
 anything like that. Instead, each drive must be mounted on your root
 filesystem.

 You can probably access the drive by mounting /dev/hdc (or maybe
 /dev/hdb, depending upon how the cdrom was detected). The hard drive
 devices are named 'hdx' (for hard drive x, where 'x' is a, b, c... in
 order of primacy on the IDE channel). cdrom's sometimes appear as a hard
 drive if they are ordinary ide drives, or will appear as scsi devices if
 they are cd burners.

 So, assuming your second hard drive is /dev/hdb, you can mount it on
 your root filesystem as a directory, maybe call it /ohd (for 'old hard
 drive'). Once it is mounted as a directory, you can access it and do
 whatever copying or transferring of data you need to do. Then, just
 unmount it and you are ready to go.

 The mount command might be something like this (must be done as root):
 mount -t ext2 /dev/hdc /ohd

 There are lots of other options to the mount command, 'man mount' for
 more info on it.

 Dave
 --
 Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy, and good
 with ketchup.




 _
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com









 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] lots of crashes???

2000-04-15 Thread steve harris

Since it's the weekend,
:o)

rant on

Linux is very stable and beats windows all over the place.

But,

until the Linux community gets this web browser "crap" resolved, to me, 
Linux ain't worth the CD it is shipped on.

90% of my usage is surfing the internet.
IE 4 has problems, and 5 is worse, but Netscape dying at random is 
unacceptable.

M14 sucks and Netscape 6, well, ain't much better.

rant off

And we thank you for your support..


Original Message Follows
From: Ribbo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] lots of crashes???
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 20:50:30 +0700

On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Mohamed Saad wrote:

  well... here are the crashes!
  KDE: I was opening 2 windows of Netscape. And
  suddenly, the whole system freezed! I just could move
  the mouse! but i can't do anything! I had to press
  ctrl+alt+backspace to log out! and it worked!

well that means your linux still worked and not crash.
just one application crashed, it was X problem.

  KDE: I pressed Log Out, the screen turned black, and i
  couldn't Do any thing! i had to press "Reset"
  Xfce3: It was my first time to even see it! i just
  used it for 15 seconds!! :) i pressed the button with
  the penguin, and the whole system freezed!! I had to
  press "reset"

next time try to log from another console and kill the X.

  Gnome: I was just moving around... It suddenly made a
  GPF, and told me that this may be due to a bug, and
  they gave some email to report at! (this is not really
  serious, as it didn't really crash the system!)

try to reconfigure your X server.
run Xconfigurator or XF86setup.
make sure you choose properly

  The point is... Why do people say that linux is "ROCK
  SOLID"?? it is NOT "rock solid"! It is just," more
  solid than Windows!"
  I was just wondering!! :)
 

sure linux is ROCK solid.
my school server runs with linux and it have 2 year uptime now.



--
Rib

During the voyage of life, remember to keep an eye out for a fair wind; 
batten
down during a storm; hail all passing ships; and fly your colors proudly.


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com




Re: [newbie] Can't shutdown

2000-04-14 Thread steve harris

yes it is.

what i do is exit from xwindows as the user
then at the user prompt "su", then "shutdown" normally. this saves you from 
logging out and back in as root to shutdown.

Original Message Follows
From: "Glen M. Chambers" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Can't "shutdown"
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 16:15:08 +0100

Hi all,

This seems a strange problem but whenever I'm logged into LINUX as a user I
can't shutdown, i..e go into a terminal - says no command. But if I log in 
as
root, I can.

Is this right? :(

Glen


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com




Re: [newbie] amd chip

2000-04-10 Thread steve harris

MDP,
I use RH 6.0 and Win98 dual boot on a Packard Bell 955 K6-2 333 system. On 
board audio and video. 96meg ram.
Runs all day, I use it for a gateway/firewall and client.

steve

Original Message Follows
From: "Pittman, Merle" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] amd chip
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 16:21:33 -0230

This may be a little off topic, but I thought I'd ask anyway.

I have been given an AMD K62 333MHz and MB by a friend.  Has anyone had any
problems with these CPU's.

I have heard rumors about them overheating and having problems  (especially
with win98).  can anyone confirm this, or do you have comments of your own?

Thanks.

MDP


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com




Re: [newbie] URGENT HELP NEEDED

2000-04-03 Thread steve harris

John,

I know it isnt much help, but what I did was load 6.0 back on my machine and 
get a refund.
:o)

No, really, there are some problems for some people (like me) on the new 7.0 
MacMillan Mandrake. My install was 2:40 using the new or old install 
methods.

I didnt have time to waste, so MacMillan quickly and promptly refunded my 
purchase price.



Original Message Follows
From: John N [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] URGENT HELP NEEDED
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 21:10:58 -0700

I installed, from scratch, Mandrake 7.

It took 2.75 HOURS - usually takes 35 minutes.

The system is now glacially s-l-o-w  with far too much hard drive activity.

It is also reporting a 2.2GB hard drive as about 5GB  !!

Have I activated any compression system, like the DOS DoubleDisk, by 
mistake?

I have to have sendmail configured and running by morning so please H-E-L-P 
!!!


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com




Re: [newbie] upgrading RedHat 6.1 to Mandrake 7.0

2000-03-30 Thread steve harris

frank,
RedHat 6.2 will be out April 10.
MacMillan Mandrake 7 died on my system, and I was trying to upgrade 
MacMillan Mandrake 6.0 to 7.0

You should only upgrade if you need added hardware support or something else 
new you NEED.
There are current security updates for your RH 6.1

My comment would be "don't upgrade just to upgrade.

If you upgrade any system be prepared to tweak a few things.
(no real good answer for you I know, just experience)

fwiw

steve


Original Message Follows
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] upgrading RedHat 6.1 to Mandrake 7.0
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 14:36:19 +0200 (MEST)

On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, larry wrote:

  i just installed mandrake.  i didn't see the word "redhat" anywhere 
in
  the installation.  unless you know a hell of lot more than i do, i'd just 
do
  a new mandrake install.

no, I asked if it is possible to upgrade RedHat 6.1 to Mandrake 7.0
(the homepage states that Mandrake is RedHat-compatible, so I assume that
I can upgrade my RedHat 6.1 installation to Mandrake 7.0 without
jeopardizing my whole configuration and setup...

and I don't want to 'just' install mandrake over my existing system,
because it'll take me additional two weeks to recreate my whole
enviorment...

  larry

bye
Frank


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com




Re: [newbie] HP deskjet 710c

2000-03-28 Thread steve harris

Sven, it will work but you have some work to do.
I have a 712HP, it is a "ppa" printer.
I call it a "winprinter", kinda like a "winmodem".

This site will take you thru the steps to make it work.

http://www.httptech.com/ppa/

They also have a mailing list too.

steve

Original Message Follows
From: "Sven Vermeulen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] HP deskjet 710c
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:23:19 +0200

hello,

I'm trying to get my HP deskjet 710c running under linux mandrake 7.0 with 
aspfilter but whitout succes. Is there anyone who has his 710c running or 
can anybody tell me with which HP printer the 710c is compatible?

bye,
Sven.

__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com




Re: [newbie] browser

2000-03-28 Thread steve harris

The i386 files run fine on a kernel that is  i586,
it is backwards compatible usually.

Get the common and communicator two files if you want email and newsgroups.
Get the common and navigator two files if you want a browser only.

Get the 4.72 files, not 4.7

Install the common first, which will uninstall the original also.
The install teh corresponding second one you need.

I run the Kpackage to do my work in Mandrake. Not the update facility.

netscape-common-4.72-6.i386.rpm (must have)

netscape-communicator-4.72-6.i386.rpm (email and browser and news)

netscape-navigator-4.72-6.i386.rpm (browser only)

I use these files on a MacMillan 6.0 system which is i586.

steve




Original Message Follows
From: KompuKit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] browser
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 20:06:42 -0500

which file(s) do I download for the 4.72 update...
will it work on Mandrake...seeing as most drake files...
are of the i586.rpm  format...

steve harris wrote:
 
  Someone asked earlier about browsers.
 
  Not really anything other than Netscape. Mozilla is getting better 
though,
  M14 is the latest I think.
 
  This 4.72 Netscape is better on my old machine than the 4.61 and 4.70
  "stable" versions.
 
  Download the 4.72 stable versions from this ftp site.
 
  ftp://ftp.rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/updates/6.0/i386/
 
  The single file versions from the Netscape site itself always seemed to 
be
  unstable.
 
  fwiw
 
  steve
 
  __
  Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

--
===KompuKit===
Kit Goins  ICQ# 7110071
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Lowell, Mass.
Web Designer  http://kitdesigns.bizhosting.com
WebServer:http://kompukit.dyndns.org
(Server Runs between M-F 6pm-12am,S+S 12pm-12am EST)
===KompuKit===


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com




Re: [newbie] simple network

2000-03-28 Thread steve harris

Dan,

I run the Linksys home kit, $59? at Best Buy.
Get this book, contains everything to run a gateway with ipchains, smb, link 
NT and 98 machines to linux, etc.
A good book. I transfer files between the windows and linux machines.
The book has an excellent troubleshooting section if what it suggest you to 
do doesnt work. For example both of my Linux machines would not recognize 
the Linksys cards. It suggested cat /proc/pci then modify your conf.modules.

http://www.idgbooks.com/cgi/fill_out_template.pl?idgbook:0-7645-3335-5:book-idg::uidg34061

I'm in no way affiliated with the book.

steve



Original Message Follows
From: "Dan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] simple network
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 21:47:23 -0500

 I am attempting just to set up a simple 2 computer home network using 
Mandrake 7.0 and Linksys "network in a box" It works under Win98. Anyone 
know of any "simple" network documentation for this? All I've read so far 
seems a tad out of my league...for now.

 Thank you in advance,
 Dan

__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com




Re: [newbie] Red Hat 6.2

2000-03-27 Thread steve harris

Phil,
is this what you are after?

ftp://ftp.rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/

Wish I had dsl
:o(

steve


Original Message Follows
From: "Phil Lamey" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Red Hat 6.2
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 12:27:51 -0600

Anybody where I can download the ISO for Red Hat 6.2

Thanks,

Phil Lamey
PS:  The direct FTP from Redhat.com does not have the new ISO yet.


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com




Re: [newbie] Laptops

2000-03-27 Thread steve harris

For laptops, this site is very helpful

http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kharker/linux-laptop/

My toshiba 115cs was on the list,
I was also able to download the XF86Config file!
(toshiba is a little weird about 800x600, actually 800x594 I think)



__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com




RE: [newbie] Linux is so slow... Please help

2000-03-26 Thread steve harris


vern,

you can contact MacMillan and they said they would refund my money.
I shipped the package back, I am still waiting.




Original Message Follows
From: vern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Linux is so slow... Please help
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 14:39:54 -0500

I've had similar experiences with MacMillan Mandrake 7.0
plus half of my hardware failed to function (video, floppy,
CDROM  etc.) I'm back with 6.1 or 6.5 as MacMillan calls
it, and happy as a clam.  I do regret the $50+ I wasted to
learn this lesson, maybe something on those other 5 CD's
is useful!
Vern


On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, you wrote:
  On 26/03/00 7:53, steve harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] is reported to
  have said:
 
  I bought MacMillan Mandrake 7.0 recently and I experienced the same 
problems
  Charles did on it being very slow.
  Also 6.0 takes about 30 minutes to install, and this new 7.0 took 2:40.
  Ridiculous.
 
  Same here.  The install was very long, and my machine is much slower than
  with 6.
 
  Kirk
 
   vice | versa
  Translations from French to English, English to French
  Traductions francais-anglais, anglais-francais
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.mcelhearn.com
  Kirk McElhearn | Chemin de la Lauze | 05600 Guillestre | France


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com




RE: [newbie] Linux is so slow... Please help

2000-03-26 Thread steve harris

Herman,
I have a K6-2, I have ran 5.2 and 6.0
I had 6.0 running pretty good.
Best Buy put 7.0 on sale for $20.

2:40 for the install!

6.0 full install is 20-30 minutes tops.

Then the system ran very slow as Charles discribed, something eating up 
resources horribly.

So I did a clean install, destroying my exising installation.
No difference.

I lost confidence when 5.2 and 6.0 is flawless and 7.0 dies on the same 
machine.

The 3 hour install should have been my first clue as to what was 
coming..

There must be a hardware problem somewhere as you and others report it runs 
fine.

And no, I wasnt running the win4 install. I even tried creating the boot 
floppy and running the old text install, no luck.
It just sits there forever copying the packages.

fwiw

steve


Original Message Follows
From: "Herman R.willett" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Linux is so slow... Please help
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 16:50:01 -0600

Hi:  I am curious.

I just installed Mandrake 7.0 on six of my machines.  All but one went
without a flaw.  One did not allow the X-Window to come upon install,
so I fuddeled around and got it to allow a text install.  As it is in a 
closet
and does not require a perminate monitor, this is fine.  What were you
problems again.

Herman

On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, you wrote:
  vern,
 
  you can contact MacMillan and they said they would refund my money.
  I shipped the package back, I am still waiting.
 
 
 
 
  Original Message Follows
  From: vern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: [newbie] Linux is so slow... Please help
  Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 14:39:54 -0500
 
  I've had similar experiences with MacMillan Mandrake 7.0
  plus half of my hardware failed to function (video, floppy,
  CDROM  etc.) I'm back with 6.1 or 6.5 as MacMillan calls
  it, and happy as a clam.  I do regret the $50+ I wasted to
  learn this lesson, maybe something on those other 5 CD's
  is useful!
  Vern
 
 
  On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, you wrote:
On 26/03/00 7:53, steve harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] is reported to
have said:
   
I bought MacMillan Mandrake 7.0 recently and I experienced the same
  problems
Charles did on it being very slow.
Also 6.0 takes about 30 minutes to install, and this new 7.0 took 
2:40.
Ridiculous.
   
Same here.  The install was very long, and my machine is much slower 
than
with 6.
   
Kirk
   
 vice | versa
Translations from French to English, English to French
Traductions francais-anglais, anglais-francais
   
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.mcelhearn.com
Kirk McElhearn | Chemin de la Lauze | 05600 Guillestre | France
 
 
  __
  Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com




Re: [newbie] Lucent Winmodem

2000-03-26 Thread steve harris


curtis, go ahead and try it.
The instructions come with the lucent download and the program told me what 
I was doing wrong. (I had to get a new kernel)
It figures out what port the lucent is on and creates the /dev/modem link to 
match it.

Try it! Shouldnt hurt anything. (famous last words)

Original Message Follows
From: "curtis patrick" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Lucent Winmodem
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 17:30:24 -0800

do you think my winmodem will work it is a lucent chipset.
- Original Message -----
From: steve harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2000 7:05 PM
Subject: [newbie] Lucent Winmodem


  For those needing some confidence to try the Lucent winmodem drivers, 
even
  *I* was successful. I am using the Winmodem now.
 
  I am using RH6.0, I had previously updated it to a 2.2.9-27mdk kernel.
 
  I downloaded the Lucent Zip file.
  It contains a readme to follow.
  Running ./ltinst it came back and said this module was compiled for 
kernel
  2.2.12-20
 
  I went to rpmfind.net and downloaded the kernel 2.2.12-20.i386.rpm and
  installed it. Changed my lilo.conf and ran lilo.
 
  Rebooted then tried ./ltinst again. Worked!
 
  Fired up Kppp and changed the device to /dev/modem and it worked.
  (I was using /dev/ttyS1 on an external courier modem)
 
  Cool!
 
  Kernel in rpm format in which you don't have to compile it.
  http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/redhat/6.1/i386/kernel-2.2.12-20.i386.html
 
  Lucent driver:
  http://www.linmodems.org/#linmodems
  Get the linux568.zip file.
 
  fwiw
  steve
 
  __
  Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
 
 


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com




Re: [newbie] browser

2000-03-26 Thread steve harris

Someone asked earlier about browsers.

Not really anything other than Netscape. Mozilla is getting better though, 
M14 is the latest I think.

This 4.72 Netscape is better on my old machine than the 4.61 and 4.70 
"stable" versions.

Download the 4.72 stable versions from this ftp site.

ftp://ftp.rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/updates/6.0/i386/

The single file versions from the Netscape site itself always seemed to be 
unstable.

fwiw

steve



__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com




RE: [newbie] Linux is so slow... Please help

2000-03-25 Thread steve harris

Anthony, my RAM in my K6-2 machine is 96meg.
With two netscape windows open and KDE I am using 29meg.
Mine don't use all the RAM at start. But 96 Meg is a lot.

I have run MacMillan Mandrake 5.2 and 6.0 with no problems.

I bought MacMillan Mandrake 7.0 recently and I experienced the same problems 
Charles did on it being very slow.
Also 6.0 takes about 30 minutes to install, and this new 7.0 took 2:40. 
Ridiculous.

I grabbed the Mandrake 6.0 and threw it back on the machine.

I sent 7.0 back, and I am still waiting on a refund from MacMillan.

fwiw
steve

Original Message Follows
From: Anthony Huereca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Linux is so slow... Please help
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 00:31:56 -0500

I'm not sure why your system is so slow, but I can explain the RAM 
utilization.
I've found out (as I once complained about the same thing that you are) that
Linux uses RAM differently than Windows. It'll take up all "x" (in your case 
256
MB) RAM soon after bootup. However, it shouldn't affect the performance at
all when you open program or anything. Instead of taking the Ram
in chunks like Windows, Linux just takes the whole thing at once. So don't
worry about seeing 100% ram utilization. Not sure why
Linux is slow though for you.


  my processor is a PIII 450 overclocked to 540( not the problem I've 
already
  declocked it and the same thing happens ), I have 256 megs of 
SDRAM@100mhz,
  I have two ATA-66 drives one at 18 gigs and another at 27.3 gigs, and a
  diamond viper v770.
 
  It is really wierd... I boot up and look at the system resource manager(I
  forget the name) and I can see my RAM usage go up by about 6 to 12 megs a
  second until it is all used up.  It doesn't use any of the swap file 
either.
  I don't understand.
 
  Thanks,
  Charles Ulwelling
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
  Behalf Of Vic
  Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2000 7:57 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux is so slow... Please help
 
 
  What is your processor speed, and how fast is
  your harddrive, like is it an older ide or newer udma33,
  or scsi?
 
 
 
 
  On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Charles Ulwelling mewed:
   I'm having a serious problem with linux mandrake 7.0.  I boot up and 
with
   in a matter of seconds my ram utilization goes to max.  I have 256 megs 
of
   RAM so I don't understand how this could be.  It makes linux completely
   unuseable.  I'm booting into KDE.
  
   Thanks,
   Charles Ulwelling
  --
  My new linux web server with Apache
 
  http://kittypuss.dnydns.org
 
  Sign up for ClickDough and get paid to surf the web.
 
  
http://secure.clickdough.com/servlets/cr/CRSignup.po?referral_id=kittypuss
--
Anthony Huereca
http://m3000.1wh.com
Press any key to continue and any other key to quit


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com




Re: [[newbie] First...apologies]

2000-03-14 Thread steve harris

Did you run "lilo" after modifying lilo.conf?
The changes do not take effect until you run lilo.
Just a thought.

Original Message Follows
From: Wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [[newbie] First...apologies]
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 10:44:09 +1000

When I start Linux with linux mem=128M it boots and reports 128M of ram.  
When
I boot from the lilo.conf file (which has the mem=128M in the append 
section),
it only boots with 65M.  Any reasons why this would be so, and is there a 
way
aroudn this/

Wayne

PS:  it worked first time last time!



  On Sun, 20 Apr 2036, you wrote:
  Wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   All,
   after a bad crash this morning after trying to install my new HD I had 
to
   reinstall Mdk 7.  I have forgotten the command you add to append 
section of
   your lilo.conf file to get it to recognise more than 65 MB of RAM.  ANy
  help?
  
   Wayne
  ==
  If it's necessary, add
  append="mem=128M"
 
  You might want to try booting first with
  linux mem=128
  to be certain that it will work with that number.
  HTH, Mike
 
  "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."
   -Benjamin Frankilin
 
  
  Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com.
--
***
***
Wayne Petherick
Criminology Department
Humanities and Social Sciences
Bond University
Gold Coast, Australia
***
***

__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



Re: [newbie] KiKbd error

2000-03-11 Thread steve harris

Got it fixed.

As root:

Go to KDE Control Center
Input Devices
International Keyboard

I clicked on default, whatever that may have changed.

Exited and restarted X



Original Message Follows
From: "steve harris" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] KiKbd error
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 16:30:55 PST


Good evening,

searched the archives and the internet.

Running KDE as root and then exit is one error.

KiKbd:X11 error: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)

It only happens as root and not as another user.

Looking at the process manager, KiKbd is running in root,
but is not running as another user.

I share the same XF86Config, but haven't discovered where X is starting
KiKbd as root but not another user.

Eliminating KiKbd on root X start may not fix the error, but I hope so.

Can anyone tell me which file it's in?

Thanks!


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



Re: [newbie] mandrake 6.0 with pentium II, Apache Server, Oracle 8i

2000-03-03 Thread steve harris

FlipZ
I got the same problem.
Passwd didnt help either.
Let me know if you get an answer that works.

MacMillan said to ship it back for a refund, but I'd like to fix it instead 
of sending it back.

steve


Original Message Follows
From: "FlipZ" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] mandrake 6.0 with pentium II, Apache Server, Oracle 8i
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 09:57:25 -0600

i got 2 problems:


1.  I can't login as root, but i can login as my user and su to root.

2.,   Startx works with root but not the other users


Any help would be greta.

FlipZ


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



Re: [newbie] /usr/bin/expect and network monitoring

2000-03-01 Thread steve harris

I use Ethereal, works good.
Search on Freshmeat for the program and homepage.
steve


Original Message Follows
From: dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] /usr/bin/expect and network monitoring
Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 16:30:18 -0800


   I'm trying to install the Multi Router Traffic Grapher (mrtg-2.8.9-2mdk 
RPM for
   i586). I don't have this file and haven't a clue what it is or where to 
get it.

  You'll find it at http://www.tuxfinder.com

flupke,

Duhoh, I did look for the file. I never thought to look for the rpm, which I
already had (on the Mandrake disk ?) :( . Oh well. Now Expect wants to 
install
tk and tcl as well, round and round I go...MRTG is not a simple program and 
I
hope there are some answers to your related post

  Can anyone tell me where I can find BASIC informations about snmp and
  networkmonitoring please?

cause MRTG is heavy on SNMP

Thanks to the URL's posted by you and Sam I've hopefully got a couple of 
other
alternatives more suitable for a newbie: ksniffer, pload, xnetload.
..
..well pload and xnetload are simple in/out graphs for a single interface of
your choice, not sure which I like better, neither is very impressive. The
ksniffer rpm requires an older version of a file I have, I may look at 
makeing
that one.



__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



[newbie] Slow Mandrake 7?

2000-02-29 Thread steve harris

I upgraded my Mandrake 6.0 with 7.0

The system appears to run 10-20x slower. Even the mouse jerks across the 
screen slower.

I have compared the processes running to another existing 6.0 system, but I 
can't see anything obvious to slow the 7.0 down.

I deleted a lot of tasks which are started in the */init.d directory, but no 
help.

I am running a K6-2-333 with 96meg ram. It shows all of the ram on boot.


After upgrading ran slow, I went ahead and done a clean install with 7.0 
Result: still horribly slow.

Anyone seen this?

I'll keep working on it. HAS to be something simple.

TIA

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com