Re: [newbie] Asus Motherboards and Mandrake - will it work 100% ?

2003-12-15 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Sunday 14 December 2003 03:04 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
  I just got an Asus A7V600.  It works nicely with 9.2,
   though only three of my five speakers work with onboard
   sound.  What the hell, my sound card should be arriving on
   Wednesday, so I can have fun wrestling with that instead
   ;-)
  
  Sir Robin
  
   That's not on the TWiki page either, Sir Robin!   Consider
   your hand slapped g
 
  [rubs hand]
  OK, it's up there.

 Seen it, thanks.  We'll get that list to a really usable size
 before long.

 Anne

I'm just gonna reiterate some previous cautions I've mentioned 
about TWiki (for which I'm probly still in the doghouse). 

   First of all the intention and effort is laudable. It will only 
continue as such if it's totally constantly maintained and 
changed. It has no advice (opinions) contained that are carved in 
stone. It should prominently mention that the suggestions 
contained in various parts, are just that suggestions, opinions, 
ie, 'worked for me' and 'YMMV'. Not giving the impression of real 
world real time solutions. One of the reasons MandrakeUser became 
ineffectual and in many parts wrong and dated. 

For hardware, well idiots like me know that's a changing deal, 
month to month. Case in point, I suspect Robin might'a got an 
AV7600 due to my referrences to it on the OT_her list. With 
latest 2.4.23 kernel's the board needs 'nolapic' passed to it to 
avoid kernel panics, specially under a load like sound or video 
encoding/decoding. A board difficiency or a need for the new 
kernel to mature more? To state either would be just an opinion. 
The board is great for 9.2 an early 10.0, but will it still be 
good for 10.0 final? Can prior kernel releases function with it? 
I've all but completely eliminated panics by moderating ram 
timings, increasing Vcore and IO voltages a touch, and using 
2.4.23 kernel versions cautiously. Could be try'n to change PCI 
slots I use for the one card in the system. Point is, variables, 
and the permutations are a real problem. Then add in users.

   Before I got an AV7600 I researched it's components. I didn't 
use twiki's or hardware sites. I use Google and mailing list 
archives. Particularly the current linux-kernel ml (lkml). The 
study requires searching by components. Searching by mobo model 
number is mostly useless. For example, the integrated NIC is very 
new to market, 3c940. It has a 3com/Asus Linux driver for it, 
that doesn't work with (compile against) newer kernels. NBD for 
me, I had an old D-link card sittin around, and the onboard 3c is 
easily disasabled in bios.

   Similar deal with the integrated sound. The (separate, not part 
of the VIA south bridge chipset) is an Analog Devices Inc. 
ADI-1980, AC97 codec compliant. Fortunately, the VIA driver in 
current kernels works for this chip. For me, and my speaker 
system. It's a 6-channel sound device, that as Robin seems to 
have found, doesn't support more than 2 chl. for his use. Works 
for me, not for him. Variables.

Nothin on the board is of any other particular interest, other 
than the KT600 chipset with 400Mhz cpu support. Since this isn't 
really new to the Linux kernel, VIA chipset support is almost a 
sure thing goin in. A read of lkml would probly be more 
discouraging for any other chipset vendor, specially nForce*. 
Well there are also SATA ports, but anybody who's a bit savy 
would know to avoid SATA anyhow, any OS.  Does an opinion like 
that reflect TWiki 'documentation'?  I think not but Google or 
lkml will lead you too it.

Now these motherboard, hardware and such are particulars, and 
involve opinion. The info doesn't belong in a TWiki, and probly 
won't be valid longer than next month.  Same deal with 
applications and configuration. How to do it in the X.1 version 
is completely wrong for X.11. Google and the lkml are by nature 
not as susceptible to such degeneration. Opinons are always 
inescapable.

   So IMO, TWiki should prominenty be displayed as At the current 
time, this is a best guess from various contributors, mostly 
gathered from mailing lists. It is not supported or endorsed by 
anyone. Use at your own risk.
-- 
  Tom Brinkman Corpus Christi, Texas

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Asus Motherboards and Mandrake - will it work 100% ?

2003-12-14 Thread robin
Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas wrote:
On Saturday 06 December 2003 00:29, Janus Sandsgaard wrote:

Yep!!!

Not those but

Got a Asus A7N266 (all in one) and now a MSI 6570G (all in one!)

Both worked nicely on mdk 9.0, 9,1 and 9.2!

For graphic acceleration you need the nvidia rpm packages!

Even the sound sounds great! ;-))

I just got an Asus A7V600.  It works nicely with 9.2, though only three 
of my five speakers work with onboard sound.  What the hell, my sound 
card should be arriving on Wednesday, so I can have fun wrestling with 
that instead ;-)

Sir Robin

--
Certitude is possible for those who only own one encyclopedia.
- Robert Anton Wilson
Robin Turner
IDMYO
Bilkent Univeritesi
Ankara 06533
Turkey
www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Asus Motherboards and Mandrake - will it work 100% ?

2003-12-14 Thread Anne Wilson
On Sunday 14 Dec 2003 2:31 pm, robin wrote:
 Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas wrote:
  On Saturday 06 December 2003 00:29, Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
 
  Yep!!!
 
  Not those but
 
  Got a Asus A7N266 (all in one) and now a MSI 6570G (all in one!)
 
  Both worked nicely on mdk 9.0, 9,1 and 9.2!
 
  For graphic acceleration you need the nvidia rpm packages!
 
  Even the sound sounds great! ;-))

 I just got an Asus A7V600.  It works nicely with 9.2, though only
 three of my five speakers work with onboard sound.  What the hell,
 my sound card should be arriving on Wednesday, so I can have fun
 wrestling with that instead ;-)

 Sir Robin

That's not on the TWiki page either, Sir Robin!   Consider your hand 
slapped g

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Asus Motherboards and Mandrake - will it work 100% ?

2003-12-14 Thread robin
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 14 Dec 2003 2:31 pm, robin wrote:

Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas wrote:

On Saturday 06 December 2003 00:29, Janus Sandsgaard wrote:

Yep!!!

Not those but

Got a Asus A7N266 (all in one) and now a MSI 6570G (all in one!)

Both worked nicely on mdk 9.0, 9,1 and 9.2!

For graphic acceleration you need the nvidia rpm packages!

Even the sound sounds great! ;-))
I just got an Asus A7V600.  It works nicely with 9.2, though only
three of my five speakers work with onboard sound.  What the hell,
my sound card should be arriving on Wednesday, so I can have fun
wrestling with that instead ;-)
Sir Robin


That's not on the TWiki page either, Sir Robin!   Consider your hand 
slapped g
[rubs hand]
OK, it's up there.
Sir Robin

--
Certitude is possible for those who only own one encyclopedia.
- Robert Anton Wilson
Robin Turner
IDMYO
Bilkent Univeritesi
Ankara 06533
Turkey
www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Asus Motherboards and Mandrake - will it work 100% ?

2003-12-13 Thread Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas
On Saturday 06 December 2003 00:29, Janus Sandsgaard wrote:

Yep!!!

Not those but

Got a Asus A7N266 (all in one) and now a MSI 6570G (all in one!)

Both worked nicely on mdk 9.0, 9,1 and 9.2!

For graphic acceleration you need the nvidia rpm packages!

Even the sound sounds great! ;-))

[]s Ricardo Castanho

 I am buying a new PC and can choose between these two motherboards:

 - Asus P4BGL-MX/533 (standard)
   http://uk.asus.com/products/mb/socket478/p4bgl-mx-533/overview.htm

 - Asus P4P800-VM (with AGP)
   http://uk.asus.com/products/mb/socket478/p4p800-vm/overview.htm

 They are both all-in-one types of motherboards with integrated LAN,
 audio, graphics etc.

 Question:

 - Does anyone have experience with these motherboards running Mandrake?
 - Do they work 100% with Linux?

 Asus provides some drivers for Linux, but I gues that is not the same as
 saying everything (lan, audio etc) will work in real life? I can't find the
 motherboard in the hardware database at the Mandrake website.

 -j

-- 
==
Linux user # 102240 = [EMAIL PROTECTED] user = 100% M$ FREE 
==


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Asus Motherboards and Mandrake - will it work 100% ?

2003-12-08 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 04:31, Anne Wilson wrote:
 On Sunday 07 Dec 2003 8:59 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
  On Sunday 07 December 2003 07:00 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
Besides, SATA will soon be deprecated by PCI
Express.
  
   You wait for ages for a bus, then as always 2 come along
   together g
  
   Anne
 
  Well, IMO, I don't see any suspense to it. 
 
 Sorry, Tom.  Old British joke. ;-)
 
 Anne

I see the truth of it.

LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Lets face it if winblowz wasn't full of holes
 then it would probably look like Linux
-- Aron Smith, Mandrake OT mailing list
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Asus Motherboards and Mandrake - will it work 100% ?

2003-12-07 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Saturday 06 December 2003 05:29 pm, Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
  So, then the main difference is that the P4BGL-MX/533 has
  ATA/133 IDE ports, and the P4P800-VM has SATA, but only
  ATA/100 IDE ports.  I'd suggest avoiding SATA for now, so I
  think the P4BGL-MX/533 would be more suitable for use with
  Linux with ATA/133 drive(s).

 What is SATA?

Serial Advanced Technology Attachment  (for IDE harddrives). 
It's theroretical thruput is 150mb/s compared to ATA/133's 
133mb/s.  In reality this synthetic marginal gain doesn't often 
happen, specially with Linux. People with SATA happily report 45 
to 50mb/s from 'hdparm -t'. Big deal. My ATA/133 drives get 47+.  
Real world average performance is less than half that. Many 
problems and high cpu load are reported with SATA/Linux. 

   Currently there's only good full kernel support for VIA and 
Intel controllers. Besides, SATA will soon be deprecated by PCI 
Express. Best definitive source for research into this is the 
lkml (linux-kernel mailing list) archives. Ignore (windo$e) 
hardware site reviews. Actually 'burst' numbers like hdparm -t 
are pretty much useless too.  Just a synthetic bench that has 
very little relevance to various real world IDE operations.

   IMO, better to stick with ATA/133 for now.
-- 
  Tom Brinkman Corpus Christi, Texas

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Asus Motherboards and Mandrake - will it work 100% ?

2003-12-07 Thread Anne Wilson
 Besides, SATA will soon be deprecated by PCI
 Express. 

You wait for ages for a bus, then as always 2 come along together g

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Asus Motherboards and Mandrake - will it work 100% ?

2003-12-07 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Sunday 07 December 2003 07:00 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
  Besides, SATA will soon be deprecated by PCI
  Express.

 You wait for ages for a bus, then as always 2 come along
 together g

 Anne

Well, IMO, I don't see any suspense to it. Up till now all the 
various IDE schemes since Vesa Local, including SATA, ride on the 
old. tired, rode hard'n put up wet 33.3Mhz PCI/IDE bus. Using 
various schemes to double, triple, even quad pump the results. Of 
course this would make users believe that this 2x, 3x, even 4x 
the thruput  til reality sets in.

   Best example is AGP. Advertised as 66mhz, but it's just a 
gimmick that ups graphical performance by about 7%, while 
imposing additional loads on the cpu/cache/ram that have a 
detrimental affect to overall system performance. In truth it's 
just a 33.3mhz PCI bus subset spec.  Once that cat was out of the 
bag, they went on to advertise AGP 2x, 4x, and now 8x.  An 
they've got a lot of people thinkin it's an improvement. Billy 
Gates type marketing IMO. Serious overclockers and production 
server, mission critical types OTOH, went as far out of the way 
as they could (and still do) to resist and avoid these crowd 
pleasers.

   I don't know enough about PCI-X to comment on it accurately, 
but as you can see from the name, it still runs on the 33.3mhz 
PCI bus. Never know what just might be right around the next 
corner tho  ;)But 

Then ya still got'a wait 6 mos. to a year for it to be 
adequately supported in Linux.  As it stands, better HDD 
performance is currently achieved with high rpms and bigger 
bigger faster drive caches. Yet the PCI/IDE bus hasn't been fully 
exploited yet.  
-- 
  Tom Brinkman Corpus Christi, Texas

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Asus Motherboards and Mandrake - will it work 100% ?

2003-12-07 Thread Charlie Mahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Sunday 07 December 2003 1:59 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
snip
 Well, IMO, I don't see any suspense to it. Up till now all the
 various IDE schemes since Vesa Local, including SATA, ride on the
 old. tired, rode hard'n put up wet 33.3Mhz PCI/IDE bus. Using
 various schemes to double, triple, even quad pump the results. Of
 course this would make users believe that this 2x, 3x, even 4x
 the thruput  til reality sets in.

Best example is AGP. Advertised as 66mhz, but it's just a
 gimmick that ups graphical performance by about 7%, while
 imposing additional loads on the cpu/cache/ram that have a
 detrimental affect to overall system performance. In truth it's
 just a 33.3mhz PCI bus subset spec.  Once that cat was out of the
 bag, they went on to advertise AGP 2x, 4x, and now 8x.  An
 they've got a lot of people thinkin it's an improvement. Billy
 Gates type marketing IMO. Serious overclockers and production
 server, mission critical types OTOH, went as far out of the way
 as they could (and still do) to resist and avoid these crowd
 pleasers.

I don't know enough about PCI-X to comment on it accurately,
 but as you can see from the name, it still runs on the 33.3mhz
 PCI bus. Never know what just might be right around the next
 corner tho  ;)But 

 Then ya still got'a wait 6 mos. to a year for it to be
 adequately supported in Linux.  As it stands, better HDD
 performance is currently achieved with high rpms and bigger
 bigger faster drive caches. Yet the PCI/IDE bus hasn't been fully
 exploited yet.

This is actually fairly readable and understandable:

http://www.anandtech.com/systems/showdoc.html?i=1830

If you want the specs they're here for download:

http://www.pcisig.com/specifications

You need to register to get the specs I think.

Regards;
Charlie
- -- 
Edmonton,AB,Canada User 244963 at http://counter.li.org
Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (FiveStar) for i586 kernel 2.4.22-21mdk
16:54:55 up 3 days, 20:04, 1 user, load average: 1.65, 0.78, 0.68
PIZZA!!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/07+FZqvqlrLPr5YRAjeFAKCiKX/Px5+v4GTM6XiKkSM9ZCtGuACfbd44
AmWeoPichtDF0AmUjAovhIY=
=fMN8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Asus Motherboards and Mandrake - will it work 100% ?

2003-12-06 Thread Janus Sandsgaard
On Saturday 06 December 2003 03:46, Dan LaBine wrote:

 Janus; I'm running many Asus boards without problems. The new (?) Asus
 P4S533-MX is 110% Ok for Mandrake 9.2. If it doesn't work for you, I'll buy
 it from you. 

Thank you. That's good news! Does anybody know about how well the Asus 
P4P800-VM works with Mandrake?

 One word of caution though. Break down and buy a Video Card!
 Most boards run like Doggy-Doo-Doo using on-board video controllers, so do
 yourself a favor and beg, borrow, steal, or otherwise acquire a good video
 card.

The PC will primary be for Office-applications, but I know that the build-in 
video controller is not top of anything. This is why im am considering  the 
Asus P4P800-VM which has AGP-port.

-j

-- 
Spiren er landet!
http://spiren.janus.dk

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Asus Motherboards and Mandrake - will it work 100% ?

2003-12-06 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Saturday 06 December 2003 02:29 am, Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
 I am buying a new PC and can choose between these two
 motherboards:

 - Asus P4BGL-MX/533 (standard)
  
 http://uk.asus.com/products/mb/socket478/p4bgl-mx-533/overview
.htm

 - Asus P4P800-VM (with AGP)
  
 http://uk.asus.com/products/mb/socket478/p4p800-vm/overview.ht
m

 They are both all-in-one types of motherboards with
 integrated LAN, audio, graphics etc.

 Question:

 - Does anyone have experience with these motherboards running
 Mandrake? - Do they work 100% with Linux?

 Asus provides some drivers for Linux, but I gues that is not
 the same as saying everything (lan, audio etc) will work in
 real life? I can't find the motherboard in the hardware
 database at the Mandrake website.

 -j

 Neither would make for a multimedia machine, so the decision 
comes down to their suitability for office type apps, email and 
surfing for which they should be adequate. So AGP 
capabilities are sort'a moot. Integrated graphics should be 
adequate, but remember to pass a mem= append to the kernel, 
subtracting 8mb for video.  Usually Asus recommend ram brands to 
use, if you can't find this info, Crucial/Micron is always a safe 
bet for Asus boards.

   So, then the main difference is that the P4BGL-MX/533 has 
ATA/133 IDE ports, and the P4P800-VM has SATA, but only ATA/100 
IDE ports.  I'd suggest avoiding SATA for now, so I think the 
P4BGL-MX/533 would be more suitable for use with Linux with 
ATA/133 drive(s).  My experience with vendor drivers is that 
you'll be better off using native Linux kernel drivers to 
maintain kernel compatibility.

 Now to qualify, I don't have experience with either of these 
(or any ITX) boards, and IMO, don't think Intel 8xx chipsets are 
mature yet, but better than SiS chipset boards for Linux use. I'd 
be lookin for a VIA chipset solution.  I wouldn't be concerned 
too much with Mdk's hardware database. It's woefully behind and 
unmaintained.  My bet is the graphics, lan and sound will have 
kernel support, altho you might need to update to newer kernels, 
even if Mandrake 9.2 is used. But I doubt it, Realtek items are 
well supported, and to a little lesser extent, so is the i8xx 
video (XFree drivers).

  You should'a mentioned if you have existing parts you wanna 
re-use or if the new system will be built from scratch.  Could 
have alot to do with which board you use.
-- 
  Tom Brinkman Corpus Christi, Texas

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Asus Motherboards and Mandrake - will it work 100% ?

2003-12-06 Thread Janus Sandsgaard
On Saturday 06 December 2003 09:47, Tom Brinkman wrote:

 Neither would make for a multimedia machine, so the decision
 comes down to their suitability for office type apps, email and
 surfing for which they should be adequate. So AGP
 capabilities are sort'a moot. Integrated graphics should be
 adequate, but remember to pass a mem= append to the kernel,
 subtracting 8mb for video.

I will start with the integrated graphics, but plan to buy a decicated graphic 
card later. This is just to get started with. First of all I will just be 
foing Office work. Later I get bigger needs and wants.

 So, then the main difference is that the P4BGL-MX/533 has
 ATA/133 IDE ports, and the P4P800-VM has SATA, but only ATA/100
 IDE ports.  I'd suggest avoiding SATA for now, so I think the
 P4BGL-MX/533 would be more suitable for use with Linux with
 ATA/133 drive(s).

What is SATA?

  You should'a mentioned if you have existing parts you wanna
 re-use or if the new system will be built from scratch.  Could
 have alot to do with which board you use.

I am planning on buying this machine:

http://proconsult.dk/katalog/m_pc/s_pc-office/pc-office3/pc-office-p4-2k6.html

- Intel Pentium 4, 2.66 GHz med 512 KB cache
 - ASUS P4BGL-MX/533 motherboard med i845GL chipset
 - 512 MB PC3200 DDR RAM (400 MHz)
 - Seagate Barracuda 7200.7, 120 GB, 7200 rpm, 683 Mbit/sec, 8.5 ms
 - Intel Extreme Graphics
 - 10/100 Mbit Fast Ethernet
- Lite-On Combo DVD/CD-RW

But as said: I am not sure about the motherboard. The most important thing for 
me is that it work 100%. 

If a Motherboard without integrated graphic, sound and lan can be bough at a 
similar price, I will find a solution for LAN, graphic, sound etc. Either by 
buying cheap parts of use some of the parts I have around. Sound and LAN is 
no problem.

I have theese motherboards to choose from:

http://proconsult.dk/katalog/m_komp/s_komp-mb/

-j

-- 
Spiren er landet!
http://spiren.janus.dk

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] Asus Motherboards and Mandrake - will it work 100% ?

2003-12-05 Thread Janus Sandsgaard
I am buying a new PC and can choose between these two motherboards:

- Asus P4BGL-MX/533 (standard)
  http://uk.asus.com/products/mb/socket478/p4bgl-mx-533/overview.htm

- Asus P4P800-VM (with AGP)
  http://uk.asus.com/products/mb/socket478/p4p800-vm/overview.htm

They are both all-in-one types of motherboards with integrated LAN, audio, 
graphics etc.

Question: 

- Does anyone have experience with these motherboards running Mandrake?
- Do they work 100% with Linux?

Asus provides some drivers for Linux, but I gues that is not the same as 
saying everything (lan, audio etc) will work in real life? I can't find the 
motherboard in the hardware database at the Mandrake website.

-j

-- 
Spiren er landet!
http://spiren.janus.dk

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Asus Motherboards and Mandrake - will it work 100% ?

2003-12-05 Thread Dan LaBine
Janus; I'm running many Asus boards without problems. The new (?) Asus P4S533-MX is 
110%
Ok for Mandrake 9.2. If it doesn't work for you, I'll buy it from you. One word of 
caution though.
Break down and buy a Video Card! Most boards run like Doggy-Doo-Doo using on-board 
video
controllers, so do yourself a favor and beg, borrow, steal, or otherwise acquire a 
good video card.

There. You should be all set now! Grin!

Lanman

*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***

On 12/6/2003 at 3:29 AM Janus Sandsgaard wrote:

I am buying a new PC and can choose between these two motherboards:

- Asus P4BGL-MX/533 (standard)
  http://uk.asus.com/products/mb/socket478/p4bgl-mx-533/overview.htm

- Asus P4P800-VM (with AGP)
  http://uk.asus.com/products/mb/socket478/p4p800-vm/overview.htm

They are both all-in-one types of motherboards with integrated LAN,
audio,
graphics etc.

Question:

- Does anyone have experience with these motherboards running Mandrake?
- Do they work 100% with Linux?

Asus provides some drivers for Linux, but I gues that is not the same as
saying everything (lan, audio etc) will work in real life? I can't find
the
motherboard in the hardware database at the Mandrake website.

-j

--
Spiren er landet!
http://spiren.janus.dk


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com