Re: [newbie] Is having LILO/GRUB on the MBR harmful to XP?

2004-02-07 Thread Bruce Brown
On Tuesday 03 February 2004 04:01 pm, Alan Ianson wrote:
 On Tue Feb 3 2004 12:47 pm, David Reid wrote:
  I'm preparing to install Mandrake 9.2 to dual boot with Windows XP on my
  laptop. It's my first install and I've reduced the NTFS partition using
  Partition Magic 8.0 to make 9Gb of the 20Gb disk available. Ideally, I'd
  like to install LILO/GRUB on the MBR but I've read reports of non-windows
  boot loaders being considered a virus (by XP or the BIOS or Virus
  software I'm not sure which) and advice to retain the XP boot loader and
  to place LILO/GRUB on the boot partition. Does anyone know if this is
  still a consideration? I'd really appreciate it If someone could also
  tell me whether it's easier/better to create the Linux partitions with
  Partition Magic before starting the install or to leave the install
  process to create them for me.

 I've been using Windows/XP, FreeDOS and various distro's of linux with lilo
 as the boot loader for quite a while. I haven't had any ill affects from
 having lilo in the MBR.
I will second that.. I wonder why you used partition magic. Mandrake 9.2 
worked flawlessly to repartition and grab the free area from my Windows XP 
NTFS partition. There was only one thing I had to do which was defrag the 
drive to get the space open.
Anyway I have been running about 2 months now without problems..
Bruce


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Is having LILO/GRUB on the MBR harmful to XP?

2004-02-06 Thread Johan
Hi,
Since you want to give it a try..here is a copy of my grub menu..
*

timeout 10
color black/cyan yellow/cyan
i18n (hd0,8)/boot/grub/messages
keytable (hd0,8)/boot/us.klt
altconfigfile (hd0,8)/boot/grub/menu.once
default 0
#
title Windows XP Home hdg1
root (hd1,0)
map (0x81) (0x80)
map (0x80) (0x81)
makeactive
chainloader +1
#***
title Mandrake 260-1 enterprise  hde-9-10
kernel (hd0,8)/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.0-1mdkenterprise devfs=mount splash=silent 
hdd=ide-scsi hdb=ide-scsi acpi=ht resume=/dev/hde11 vga=788 root=/dev/hde9
initrd (hd0,8)/boot/initrd-2.6.0-1mdkenterprise.img

#
title Mandrake 2422-26 Enterprise  hde-9-10
kernel (hd0,8)/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-26mdkenterprise devfs=mount splash=silent 
hdd=ide-scsi hdb=ide-scsi acpi=ht resume=/dev/hde11 vga=788 root=/dev/hde9
initrd (hd0,8)/boot/initrd-2.4.22-26mdkenterprise.img

#
title Mandrake 2422-26  hde-9-10
kernel (hd0,8)/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-26mdk devfs=mount splash=silent hdd=ide-scsi 
hdb=ide-scsi acpi=ht resume=/dev/hde11 vga=788 root=/dev/hde9
initrd (hd0,8)/boot/initrd-2.4.22-26mdk.img

#
title Mandrake 2422-21 hde-9-10
kernel (hd0,8)/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-21mdk root=/dev/hde9 devfs=mount splash=silent  
hdd=ide-scsi hdb=ide-scsi acpi=ht resume=/dev/hde11 splash=silent vga=788
initrd (hd0,8)/boot/initrd-2.4.22-21mdk.img

#

title Windows 98 hde1
root (hd0,0)
chainloader +1
#***
title Mandrake linux-nonfb hde9-10
kernel (hd0,8)/boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/hde9 devfs=mount splash=silent hdd=ide-scsi 
hdb=ide-scsi acpi=ht resume=/dev/hde11
initrd (hd0,8)/boot/initrd.img
#**
title floppy
root (fd0)
chainloader +1
#

title Suse 9.0 kernel-121-K_delft  hde5/6
kernel (hd0,4)/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.21-121-default root=/dev/hde5 vga=0x314 
splash=silent desktop hdd=ide-scsi hdb=ide-scsi hddlun=0 showopts
initrd (hd0,4)/boot/initrd-2.4.21-121-default

#

title Fedora Core 1  2422-1.2115.nptl hde7/8
root (hd0,6)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-1.2115.nptl ro root=LABEL=/ hdd=ide-scsi hdb=ide-scsi 
rhgb
initrd /boot/initrd-2.4.22-1.2115.nptl.img

#
title Memory Test
kernel (hd0,4)/boot/memtest.bin
#
*
Johan

On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 23:01:07 -0500
Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 19:56:24 +0200
 Johan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hi,
  I suggest grub..
  On my drive one there is win 98 - mdk 9.2 - fedora - suse 9.0.
  On my drive two there is win xp home.
  Grub handles this effortlessly.
  
  I even experimented with to two win systems (up to 3 win systems can
  be handled) on same drive - that worked fine with the hide/unhide
  option. This is all in the grub howto.. etc.
  
  grub need some close study and I feel sure it can be done.
 
 Thanks, I'm going to give it a try!
 
  
  Johan
  ***
sni

-- 
Johan
Registered Linux User #330034 .. still learning
May this be a good day for learning

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Is having LILO/GRUB on the MBR harmful to XP?

2004-02-05 Thread Johan
Hi,
I suggest grub..
On my drive one there is win 98 - mdk 9.2 - fedora - suse 9.0.
On my drive two there is win xp home.
Grub handles this effortlessly.

I even experimented with to two win systems (up to 3 win systems can be handled) on 
same drive - that worked fine with the hide/unhide option. This is all in the grub 
howto.. etc.

grub need some close study and I feel sure it can be done.

Johan
***
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:17:49 +
Robert Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Wednesday 04 Feb 2004 4:59 am, Guy Rouillier wrote:
 
 
  Robert, mind if I piggyback on this question?  I have a new AMD64
  laptop, and it came with XP Home (of course!)  I want to put XP-64
  as well as Mandrake 32-bit and 64-bit.  Can lilo or grub handle
  copying files before starting to boot Windows versions?  Here's the
  rub: all versions of Windows derived from NT have two critical
  startup files: ntldr and ntdetect.com.  These are incompatible
  between the 32-bit and 64-bit versions, so I need the boot
  mechanism to copy in the right versions from backup directories
  before kicking off the boot process. System Commander does this,
  and I just learned the hard way that BootMagic (comes with
  Partition Magic) does *not* gr. Seeing as I have to
  start all over, I thought I'd try doing it with grub.  Thanks.
 
 Greg,
 
 If I read your question right you want to quad boot your machine? That 
 is an interesting idea :-) Might be difficult to manage booting into 
 the 2 Windows partitions though. (Not sure really). I think you might 
 have to move this question to the expert mailing list if you get 
 stuck :-) It would be difficult for Lilo/Grub to see the windows 
 files you refer to as the Windows partitions wouldn't be mounted by 
 Linux at that point.
 
 Robert
 
 
 


-- 
Johan
Registered Linux User #330034 .. still learning
May this be a good day for learning

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Is having LILO/GRUB on the MBR harmful to XP?

2004-02-05 Thread Guy Rouillier
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 19:56:24 +0200
Johan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 I suggest grub..
 On my drive one there is win 98 - mdk 9.2 - fedora - suse 9.0.
 On my drive two there is win xp home.
 Grub handles this effortlessly.
 
 I even experimented with to two win systems (up to 3 win systems can
 be handled) on same drive - that worked fine with the hide/unhide
 option. This is all in the grub howto.. etc.
 
 grub need some close study and I feel sure it can be done.

Thanks, I'm going to give it a try!

 
 Johan
 ***
 On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:17:49 +
 Robert Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Wednesday 04 Feb 2004 4:59 am, Guy Rouillier wrote:
  
  
   Robert, mind if I piggyback on this question?  I have a new AMD64
   laptop, and it came with XP Home (of course!)  I want to put XP-64
   as well as Mandrake 32-bit and 64-bit.  Can lilo or grub handle
   copying files before starting to boot Windows versions?  Here's
   the rub: all versions of Windows derived from NT have two critical
   startup files: ntldr and ntdetect.com.  These are incompatible
   between the 32-bit and 64-bit versions, so I need the boot
   mechanism to copy in the right versions from backup directories
   before kicking off the boot process. System Commander does this,
   and I just learned the hard way that BootMagic (comes with
   Partition Magic) does *not* gr. Seeing as I have to
   start all over, I thought I'd try doing it with grub.  Thanks.
  
  Greg,
  
  If I read your question right you want to quad boot your machine?
  That is an interesting idea :-) Might be difficult to manage booting
  into the 2 Windows partitions though. (Not sure really). I think you
  might have to move this question to the expert mailing list if you
  get stuck :-) It would be difficult for Lilo/Grub to see the windows
  
  files you refer to as the Windows partitions wouldn't be mounted by 
  Linux at that point.
  
  Robert
  
  
  
 
 
 -- 
 Johan
 Registered Linux User #330034 .. still learning
 May this be a good day for learning
 
 


-- 
Guy Rouillier


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Is having LILO/GRUB on the MBR harmful to XP?

2004-02-04 Thread John Richard Smith
Guy Rouillier wrote:

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 00:13:59 -0500
Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

Here's what I need.  On the first primary partition (C: to Windows),WinNT/2K/XP 
will always put ntldr and ntdetect.com in the root.  The waySystem Commander handles 
this is to create backup directories for each version, e.g., c:\sc\win2k and 
c:\sc\winxp.   It copies the startup files into these backup directories, and then 
when you ask to boot a particular version, it copies the set of files in that 
directory into
c:\, then tells the operating system to boot.
Appreciate any options you can think of.  I still have System Commander,
 

I have never used system commander.
I have used windows to boot mandrake.
I cannot remember how it was done,
basically you have to create a new entry
for booting Mandrake in windblows
equivelant of /etc/lilo.conf, but it's
not worth he hastle.
Easiest way is to remove system commander,
slap your Windblows Install CD of whichever
windblows OS you want to use to load for
all the win OS( in your case either NT,or W2K,
or XP) run it to fix MBR
Then proceed to install Mandrake and let it put
lilo in the mbr(it does no harm whatsoever)
and use Lilo to boot mandrake, and chain load
onto Windblows for the 3 Win OS's.
that way you don't have to mess about much.
Any time you want to change an OS it's easy.
My MSI motherboard doesn't think mandrake is a virus. But you
say, MSI motherboard. This MB has a virus checker in the BIOS
what makes this happen ? That is the question ?
My MSI mobo has both a bios and a boot sector virus checker
and neither interfere with lilo and my mandrake boots.
It's odd that you are having this problem, is there a genuine
virus in there ?
John

--
John Richard Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Is having LILO/GRUB on the MBR harmful to XP?

2004-02-04 Thread Robert Walker
On Wednesday 04 Feb 2004 4:59 am, Guy Rouillier wrote:


 Robert, mind if I piggyback on this question?  I have a new AMD64
 laptop, and it came with XP Home (of course!)  I want to put XP-64
 as well as Mandrake 32-bit and 64-bit.  Can lilo or grub handle
 copying files before starting to boot Windows versions?  Here's the
 rub: all versions of Windows derived from NT have two critical
 startup files: ntldr and ntdetect.com.  These are incompatible
 between the 32-bit and 64-bit versions, so I need the boot
 mechanism to copy in the right versions from backup directories
 before kicking off the boot process. System Commander does this,
 and I just learned the hard way that BootMagic (comes with
 Partition Magic) does *not* gr. Seeing as I have to
 start all over, I thought I'd try doing it with grub.  Thanks.

Greg,

If I read your question right you want to quad boot your machine? That 
is an interesting idea :-) Might be difficult to manage booting into 
the 2 Windows partitions though. (Not sure really). I think you might 
have to move this question to the expert mailing list if you get 
stuck :-) It would be difficult for Lilo/Grub to see the windows 
files you refer to as the Windows partitions wouldn't be mounted by 
Linux at that point.

Robert


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] Is having LILO/GRUB on the MBR harmful to XP?

2004-02-03 Thread David Reid
I'm preparing to install Mandrake 9.2 to dual boot with Windows XP on my
laptop. It's my first install and I've reduced the NTFS partition using
Partition Magic 8.0 to make 9Gb of the 20Gb disk available. Ideally, I'd
like to install LILO/GRUB on the MBR but I've read reports of non-windows
boot loaders being considered a virus (by XP or the BIOS or Virus software
I'm not sure which) and advice to retain the XP boot loader and to place
LILO/GRUB on the boot partition. Does anyone know if this is still a
consideration? I'd really appreciate it If someone could also tell me
whether it's easier/better to create the Linux partitions with Partition
Magic before starting the install or to leave the install process to create
them for me.

Thanks,

David.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Is having LILO/GRUB on the MBR harmful to XP?

2004-02-03 Thread Greg Meyer
On Tuesday 03 February 2004 03:47 pm, David Reid wrote:
 I'm preparing to install Mandrake 9.2 to dual boot with Windows XP on my
 laptop. It's my first install and I've reduced the NTFS partition using
 Partition Magic 8.0 to make 9Gb of the 20Gb disk available. Ideally, I'd
 like to install LILO/GRUB on the MBR but I've read reports of non-windows
 boot loaders being considered a virus (by XP or the BIOS or Virus software
 I'm not sure which) and advice to retain the XP boot loader and to place
 LILO/GRUB on the boot partition. Does anyone know if this is still a
 consideration? I'd really appreciate it If someone could also tell me
 whether it's easier/better to create the Linux partitions with Partition
 Magic before starting the install or to leave the install process to create
 them for me.

It's not XP that considers it a virus, but some BIOS virus checking routines.  
IMO, it is preferable to install to mbr.  I have never experienced a problem 
with this in terms of hurting my windows isntalls.
-- 
/g


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Is having LILO/GRUB on the MBR harmful to XP?

2004-02-03 Thread Alan Ianson
On Tue Feb 3 2004 12:47 pm, David Reid wrote:
 I'm preparing to install Mandrake 9.2 to dual boot with Windows XP on my
 laptop. It's my first install and I've reduced the NTFS partition using
 Partition Magic 8.0 to make 9Gb of the 20Gb disk available. Ideally, I'd
 like to install LILO/GRUB on the MBR but I've read reports of non-windows
 boot loaders being considered a virus (by XP or the BIOS or Virus software
 I'm not sure which) and advice to retain the XP boot loader and to place
 LILO/GRUB on the boot partition. Does anyone know if this is still a
 consideration? I'd really appreciate it If someone could also tell me
 whether it's easier/better to create the Linux partitions with Partition
 Magic before starting the install or to leave the install process to create
 them for me.

I've been using Windows/XP, FreeDOS and various distro's of linux with lilo as 
the boot loader for quite a while. I haven't had any ill affects from having 
lilo in the MBR.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Is having LILO/GRUB on the MBR harmful to XP?

2004-02-03 Thread Robert Walker
On Tuesday 03 Feb 2004 8:47 pm, David Reid wrote:
 I'm preparing to install Mandrake 9.2 to dual boot with Windows XP
 on my laptop. It's my first install and I've reduced the NTFS
 partition using Partition Magic 8.0 to make 9Gb of the 20Gb disk
 available. Ideally, I'd like to install LILO/GRUB on the MBR but
 I've read reports of non-windows boot loaders being considered a
 virus (by XP or the BIOS or Virus software I'm not sure which) and
 advice to retain the XP boot loader and to place LILO/GRUB on the
 boot partition. Does anyone know if this is still a consideration?
 I'd really appreciate it If someone could also tell me whether it's
 easier/better to create the Linux partitions with Partition Magic
 before starting the install or to leave the install process to
 create them for me.

 Thanks,

 David.

Hi David,

I have a dual boot Windows XP Pro and MDK 9.2 on my P4-M laptop. I had 
Windows XP Pro installed as a single NTFS partition (about 36gig). I 
just resized the Windows partition using the Mandrake partitioning 
tool (why use Partition Magic?? :-) and made a second partition 
(native Linux ext-3). I didn't even bother defraging the Windows 
partition!! I didn't bother with a shared FAT partition as Linux 
support for reading from NTFS is excellent or a swap partition (the 
laptop has 1 gig of RAM). I just installed MDK with a Lilo bootloader 
and it works great.

I also have MDK Linux installed on a PC I use as a router/gateway with 
a cheapo MSI motherboard. This MB has a virus checker in the BIOS 
which checks the MBR for nasty viri. Unfortunately it thinks Linux is 
a virus so I just turned it off (its probably only needed by M$ 
Winblows users anyway :-). So don't worry about using the MBR... 
budge over Winblows and make room for a real OS :-)

Robert


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Is having LILO/GRUB on the MBR harmful to XP?

2004-02-03 Thread Greg Meyer
On Tuesday 03 February 2004 05:23 pm, Robert Walker wrote:
 a cheapo MSI motherboard. This MB has a virus checker in the BIOS
 which checks the MBR for nasty viri. Unfortunately it thinks Linux is
 a virus so I just turned it off (its probably only needed by M$
 Winblows users anyway :-). So don't worry about using the MBR..

If you want to use the BIOS virus check, leave it off until you install the 
bootloader and then turn it back on.  It merely prevents anything from 
writing to the mbr and lets you know if it changes.  If you turn it on after 
you write the mbr, it shouldn't give you trouble.
-- 
/g

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Is having LILO/GRUB on the MBR harmful to XP?

2004-02-03 Thread Guy Rouillier
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 22:23:11 +
Robert Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Hi David,
  
 I have a dual boot Windows XP Pro and MDK 9.2 on my P4-M laptop. I had
 Windows XP Pro installed as a single NTFS partition (about 36gig). I 
 just resized the Windows partition using the Mandrake partitioning 
 tool (why use Partition Magic?? :-) and made a second partition 
 (native Linux ext-3). I didn't even bother defraging the Windows 
 partition!! I didn't bother with a shared FAT partition as Linux 
 support for reading from NTFS is excellent or a swap partition (the 
 laptop has 1 gig of RAM). I just installed MDK with a Lilo bootloader 
 and it works great.
 
 I also have MDK Linux installed on a PC I use as a router/gateway with
 
 a cheapo MSI motherboard. This MB has a virus checker in the BIOS 
 which checks the MBR for nasty viri. Unfortunately it thinks Linux is 
 a virus so I just turned it off (its probably only needed by M$ 
 Winblows users anyway :-). So don't worry about using the MBR... 
 budge over Winblows and make room for a real OS :-)
 
 Robert
 
 
 

Robert, mind if I piggyback on this question?  I have a new AMD64
laptop, and it came with XP Home (of course!)  I want to put XP-64 as
well as Mandrake 32-bit and 64-bit.  Can lilo or grub handle copying
files before starting to boot Windows versions?  Here's the rub: all
versions of Windows derived from NT have two critical startup files:
ntldr and ntdetect.com.  These are incompatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit versions, so I need the boot mechanism to copy in the right
versions from backup directories before kicking off the boot process. 
System Commander does this, and I just learned the hard way that
BootMagic (comes with Partition Magic) does *not* gr. 
Seeing as I have to start all over, I thought I'd try doing it with
grub.  Thanks.




-- 
Guy Rouillier


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com