Re: [newbie] KMail configuration

2005-03-10 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 10 Mar 2005 02:59, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
 On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:47 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
  No - that wouldn't make sense.  I'm using the same View for all the
  messages, and some show the iconised attachment while others show it in
  full, so it must be something in the composer setup, I guess.
 
  Anne

 Which message that has the signature as attachment? Maybe it's displayed
 different in my kmail 1.7.1

Take a look at the difference between your messages and Mikkel's.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302 (http://counter.li.org/)
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?  Mandrake at all levels


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] KMail configuration

2005-03-10 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:18 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
 Take a look at the difference between your messages and Mikkel's.

 Anne

I'm sorry, but I don't see any difference between his email and mine? In the 
footer? No, it's the same. Strange.

-- 
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | http://linux2.arinet.org
21:49:17 up 45 min, Mandrakelinux release 10.1 (Official) for i586 
public key: https://www.arinet.org/fajar-pub.key


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] KMail configuration

2005-03-10 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 10 Mar 2005 14:50, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
 On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:18 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
  Take a look at the difference between your messages and Mikkel's.
 
  Anne

 I'm sorry, but I don't see any difference between his email and mine? In
 the footer? No, it's the same. Strange.

How strange.  It isn't here - see attached.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302 (http://counter.li.org/)
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?  Mandrake at all levels
attachment: footer3.jpg
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] KMail configuration

2005-03-10 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Thursday 10 March 2005 11:49 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
 On Thursday 10 Mar 2005 14:50, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
  On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:18 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
   Take a look at the difference between your messages and Mikkel's.
  
   Anne
 
  I'm sorry, but I don't see any difference between his email and mine? In
  the footer? No, it's the same. Strange.

 How strange.  It isn't here - see attached.

 Anne

Oh wow.. yes. Your Kmail surely has something different in it. Here's what 
Mikkel footer in my Kmail. Exactly the same as mine that shows in your kmail. 
Yours is 1.7.1 too?

-- 
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | http://linux2.arinet.org
04:34:59 up 7:31, Mandrakelinux release 10.1 (Official) for i586 
public key: https://www.arinet.org/fajar-pub.key
attachment: mikkel-footer.jpg
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



[newbie] KMail configuration

2005-03-09 Thread Anne Wilson
I never noticed it with the older version of kmail, but now I'm seeing that 
some kmail users are displaying Mandrake's footer message in full and others 
have it as an attachment.  I presume there's a setting somewhere for this?  
I'd really rather keep that paper-clip display for things that have a real 
attachment, and I see that I am one of those mis-using it - if you can call 
it a mis-use.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302 (http://counter.li.org/)
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?  Mandrake at all levels


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] KMail configuration

2005-03-09 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 02:01 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
 I never noticed it with the older version of kmail, but now I'm seeing that
 some kmail users are displaying Mandrake's footer message in full and
 others have it as an attachment.  I presume there's a setting somewhere for
 this? I'd really rather keep that paper-clip display for things that have a
 real attachment, and I see that I am one of those mis-using it - if you can
 call it a mis-use.

 Anne

Not sure Anne, but under View can't you check how this shows up?

-- 

/\
DarkLord
\/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] KMail configuration

2005-03-09 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 09 Mar 2005 20:28, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 On Wednesday 09 March 2005 02:01 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
  I never noticed it with the older version of kmail, but now I'm seeing
  that some kmail users are displaying Mandrake's footer message in full
  and others have it as an attachment.  I presume there's a setting
  somewhere for this? I'd really rather keep that paper-clip display for
  things that have a real attachment, and I see that I am one of those
  mis-using it - if you can call it a mis-use.
 
  Anne

 Not sure Anne, but under View can't you check how this shows up?

No - that wouldn't make sense.  I'm using the same View for all the 
messages, and some show the iconised attachment while others show it in full, 
so it must be something in the composer setup, I guess.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302 (http://counter.li.org/)
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?  Mandrake at all levels


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] KMail configuration

2005-03-09 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:47 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
 No - that wouldn't make sense.  I'm using the same View for all the
 messages, and some show the iconised attachment while others show it in
 full, so it must be something in the composer setup, I guess.

 Anne

Which message that has the signature as attachment? Maybe it's displayed 
different in my kmail 1.7.1
-- 
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | http://linux2.arinet.org
09:57:54 up 1:09, Mandrakelinux release 10.1 (Official) for i586 
public key: https://www.arinet.org/fajar-pub.key


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] kmail configuration

2001-10-01 Thread etharp

when I put in the info, as a general rule, i do not use the words Password 
or login since caps make a difference. I usally use the expect as 
assword and ogin and then put the user name, Earthlink changed the way 
you need to sigh in a few weeks ago from a format with ELN/username to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Friday 28 September 2001 13:01, you had thoughts to the concept of:
 Dave Sherman wrote:
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  On Friday 28 September 2001 11:10 am, Charles A. Punch wrote:
   Sorry I can't help, but I do have another problem Kmail. It will not
   recognize my passsword or username. These same settings work fine in
   Mozilla. I got it to work once a long time ago, and I don't think I am
   doing anything different. I have tried just about every variation on
   the settings that semed anywhere near logical and nothing changes.
 
  Any specific error messages? Failed authentication? Something else?

 Could not login to earthlink.net
 I said PASS your password
 Then the server said;
 -ERR bad password or username

 Thanx for any help you can give me.

 ShalomOut
Chal

 Elder PCUSA
 Registered Linux user #217118

  Dave
  - --
  Nihil tam munitum quod non expugnari pecunia possit. (No
  fortification is such that it cannot be subdued with money.)
  - - Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 B.C.
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
  Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
  Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
 
  iD8DBQE7tLG1A68l26XsZUYRAuoWAJ9aiM3MUHH22eJywiFwBGivWAnrswCg3diY
  8qor2b4q7u+Zdl070XG8FCw=
  =fog0
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
   
  
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
  Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name=message.footer
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Description: 




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] kmail-configuration of multiple mail accounts

2001-07-21 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

Not too sure on this one. I would say to try different combinations of 
settings (within reason, of course) until KDE 2.2 is released (August 6). 
Then upgrade to 2.2 and try again.

Does anyone on the list have a better idea?

On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 20:32, srinivas sastry wrote:
 there are two types of mail accounts available. 1) local mail 2) pop3. i
 choose pop3 and eventhough i could send mails using kmail, i couldn't use
 it for receiving them. the exact error message is:

  couldn't connect to 202.54.30.2 // * this is my isp's ip address.
  i said PASS  password
  server says ERR  password supplied for sastryks@hd2 is not correct.

 i could use the same password and receive mails both in outlook and
 netscape messenger. i'm at a loss as to how to correct it .

  thanks

  srinivas sastry
 -Original Message-
 From: Sridhar Dhanapalan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 2:17 PM
 To: srinivas sastry
 Subject: Re: [newbie] kmail-configuration of multiple mail accounts


 What settings did you use? Did you select the right account type? Most
 e-mail accounts use POP3.

 On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 03:04, srinivas sastry wrote:
  hi sridhar
  thank you very much for your  reply. i could be able to
  configure 3 to 4 of my mail accounts. but there comes a problem with my
  principle mail account. all it says when i click checkmail is : the
  server says the password is wrong.  but when i use the same in netscape
  messenger i could be able to receive my mails . but i couldn't configure
  multiple mail accounts in netscape messenger. i tried but invain. any
  help is appreciated.
 
  thanks
 
  sastry
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sridhar Dhanapalan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 2:30 PM
  To: srinivas sastry; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [newbie] kmail-configuration of multiple mail accounts
 
 
  Click Settings - Configure KMail. In the resulting window, click Network
  and open the Sending Mail tab (it should be open already). You can add
  accounts in the Incoming Mail section -- just click Add.
 
  If you need more info, there's always the Help button.
 
  On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:27, srinivas sastry wrote:
   hi all
   i'm a newbie and i'm using mandrake 7.2. can anyone tell me how
   to configure multiple e-mail accounts in kmail.
  
   thanks
   sastry

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan.
There are two major products that come from Berkeley:
LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence.
-- Jeremy S. Anderson




Re: [newbie] kmail-configuration of multiple mail accounts

2001-07-20 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

Click Settings - Configure KMail. In the resulting window, click Network and 
open the Sending Mail tab (it should be open already). You can add accounts 
in the Incoming Mail section -- just click Add.

If you need more info, there's always the Help button.


On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:27, srinivas sastry wrote:
 hi all
 i'm a newbie and i'm using mandrake 7.2. can anyone tell me how to
 configure multiple e-mail accounts in kmail.

 thanks
 sastry

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan.
There are two major products that come from Berkeley:
LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence.
-- Jeremy S. Anderson




RE: [newbie] kmail-configuration of multiple mail accounts

2001-07-20 Thread srinivas sastry

hi sridhar
thank you very much for your  reply. i could be able to configure 3 to 4 
of my mail accounts. but there comes a problem with my principle mail account. all it 
says when i click checkmail is : the server says the password is wrong.  but when i 
use the same in netscape messenger i could be able to receive my mails . but i 
couldn't configure multiple mail accounts in netscape messenger. i tried but invain. 
any help is appreciated.

thanks

sastry

-Original Message-
From: Sridhar Dhanapalan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 2:30 PM
To: srinivas sastry; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] kmail-configuration of multiple mail accounts


Click Settings - Configure KMail. In the resulting window, click Network and 
open the Sending Mail tab (it should be open already). You can add accounts 
in the Incoming Mail section -- just click Add.

If you need more info, there's always the Help button.


On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:27, srinivas sastry wrote:
 hi all
 i'm a newbie and i'm using mandrake 7.2. can anyone tell me how to
 configure multiple e-mail accounts in kmail.

 thanks
 sastry

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan.
There are two major products that come from Berkeley:
LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence.
-- Jeremy S. Anderson





[newbie] kmail configuration

2001-05-27 Thread Chase Brady

Kmail appends the characters smpt:// to the beginning of my outgoing
mail server.  My ISP doesn't like that.  Any way to stop it?

Thanks,

--Chase






[newbie] kmail configuration or list?

2001-05-24 Thread bascule

i have just noticed that when i choose 'reply...' from the right click menu 
to a message the recipient is not the list but the original sender - every 
time ! 

is the list malfunctioning by not inserting the 'reply to' header in the 
posts back to list subscribers? or do i have my kmail configured wrong,i have 
looked for some relevant setting but nothing seems to apply, it does seem 
that the headers in these list posts should have 
'Reply-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in them but they do not,

of course this explains why none of my recent posts have made it on the list 
and why some folk have had direct mails, my fault for not reading the 
recipient headers on my posts! but i would like to know if it's just me or if 
this is a list problem (it applies to 'expert' too but other lists are fine)

bascule




RE: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?

2001-05-24 Thread Clarkson, Nick

No, it's not just you. Same happens here. I have to cut  paste the newbie
address into the To... box every time.

Nick

-Original Message-
From: bascule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 May 2001 12:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?


i have just noticed that when i choose 'reply...' from the right click menu 
to a message the recipient is not the list but the original sender - every 
time ! 

is the list malfunctioning by not inserting the 'reply to' header in the 
posts back to list subscribers? or do i have my kmail configured wrong,i
have 
looked for some relevant setting but nothing seems to apply, it does seem 
that the headers in these list posts should have 
'Reply-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in them but they do not,

of course this explains why none of my recent posts have made it on the list

and why some folk have had direct mails, my fault for not reading the 
recipient headers on my posts! but i would like to know if it's just me or
if 
this is a list problem (it applies to 'expert' too but other lists are fine)

bascule




Re: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?

2001-05-24 Thread John Morine

If you choose Reply All it will address it to the original sender 
and to the list.

On Thursday 24 May 2001 08:46, bascule wrote:
 i have just noticed that when i choose 'reply...' from the right
 click menu to a message the recipient is not the list but the
 original sender - every time !

 is the list malfunctioning by not inserting the 'reply to' header
 in the posts back to list subscribers? or do i have my kmail
 configured wrong,i have looked for some relevant setting but
 nothing seems to apply, it does seem that the headers in these list
 posts should have
 'Reply-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in them but they do not,

 of course this explains why none of my recent posts have made it on
 the list and why some folk have had direct mails, my fault for not
 reading the recipient headers on my posts! but i would like to know
 if it's just me or if this is a list problem (it applies to
 'expert' too but other lists are fine)

 bascule




Re: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?

2001-05-24 Thread Dave Sherman

I experience the same problem. My workaround: use reply-all, which will 
then show both the list and the personal email addresses, then remove the 
personal address and leave only the list address.

Dave

On Thursday 24 May 2001 06:46, thus spake bascule:
 i have just noticed that when i choose 'reply...' from the right click
 menu to a message the recipient is not the list but the original sender
 - every time !

 is the list malfunctioning by not inserting the 'reply to' header in the
 posts back to list subscribers? or do i have my kmail configured wrong,i
 have looked for some relevant setting but nothing seems to apply, it
 does seem that the headers in these list posts should have
 'Reply-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in them but they do not,

 of course this explains why none of my recent posts have made it on the
 list and why some folk have had direct mails, my fault for not reading
 the recipient headers on my posts! but i would like to know if it's just
 me or if this is a list problem (it applies to 'expert' too but other
 lists are fine)

 bascule

-- 
Nihil tam munitum quod non expugnari pecuna possit.
- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 B.C.




Re: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?

2001-05-24 Thread skip


bascule i have just noticed that when i choose 'reply...' from the
bascule right click menu to a message the recipient is not the list but
bascule the original sender - every time !

The list is working *as it should*.  If kmail doesn't allow you to reply to
all as well as reply to sender, it's what is broken, not the mailing
list.  A short mail header tutorial follows.

There are several headers that typically contain email addresses: 'to:',
'from:', 'cc:', 'bcc:', and 'reply-to:'.  'bcc:' should get stripped by the
sender's mail transport agent, so it doesn't figure in anything below.  If
you do the equivalent of reply to sender, the mail user agent should
compose a message with a 'to:' field that consists of the email address in
the original 'reply-to:' field.  If the original contained no 'reply-to:'
field, it should use the email address found in the 'from:' field (which
must exist - your mail transport agent will add one if you don't).  If you
do the equivalent of reply to all, the mail user agent will compose a
message with the 'to:' field set as in the reply to sender case and a
'cc:' field that contains the remaining email addresses ('cc:' and 'from:'
if it differs from 'reply-to:' and wasn't used to format the 'to:' field).

Example 1.  If I send a message to you with these headers:

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: bascule [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Skip Montanaro)

and you execute reply to sender, you should generate a response containing

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Skip Montanaro)

If you execute reply to all, you should generate a response containing

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Skip Montanaro)
Cc: bascule [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

(unless your mail user agent has some not me to setting enabled).

Example 2: If I send a message to you with these headers:

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: bascule [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

and you execute reply to sender, you should generate a response to Harry
Potter's email address at Hogwarts School of Wizards.  He, of course, won't
know who the hell you are, but that's between you and him.

Many mailing list managers support reply-to munging.  If they are set to
force replies to go to the list, they replace any 'reply-to:' headers in the
message with a 'reply-to:' that points back to the list.  Many people
naively think that is a good thing.  Usually, these people are any or all of

* relatively new to the net

* unacquainted with their mail user agent and don't know how to invoke
  the reply to all command or use a broken mail user agent that
  doesn't have such a command

* have never accidentally sent a steamy or flame-ridden reply to a large
  mailing list full of people they don't know *very well* that was
  intended to go to just the sender

Reply-to munging is almost always the wrong setting for a mailing list.
The correct way to do things -- certainly in this case -- is the way this
list works.  Leave 'reply-to:' alone and trust people to figure out how to
use the tools they have at their disposal.  If you have a very small list of
people who are very tight with one another (perhaps the main characters in
The Big Chill), then maybe it's okay to munge 'reply-to:', but only if
everyone agrees.

-- 
Skip Montanaro ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(847)971-7098




Re: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?

2001-05-24 Thread Renaud OLGIATI

On Thursday 24 May 2001 09:03, I was honoured by a missive from Clarkson, 
Nick that said :

 No, it's not just you. Same happens here. I have to cut  paste the newbie
 address into the To... box every time.

Workaround: Reply to All, which puts both adresses, sender and list, in the 
To: box.

Cheers,

Ron the Frog, on the banks of the Paraguay River.
-- 
   Avoid the Gates of Hell !
   Run Linux.
  ---  http://personales.conexion.com.py/~rolgiati  ---




Re: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?

2001-05-24 Thread irv

On Thu, 24 May 2001 09:21:48 John Morine wrote:
 If you choose Reply All it will address it to the original sender 
 and to the list.

Which explains why I get two copies of many messages. 
Please don't do this!

The mail server should be re-configured to put the listserver address in 
the 
from field - see, for example, the Topica lists.

Regards,
Irv

 On Thursday 24 May 2001 08:46, bascule wrote:
  i have just noticed that when i choose 'reply...' from the right
  click menu to a message the recipient is not the list but the
  original sender - every time !
 
  is the list malfunctioning by not inserting the 'reply to' header
  in the posts back to list subscribers? or do i have my kmail
  configured wrong,i have looked for some relevant setting but
  nothing seems to apply, it does seem that the headers in these list
  posts should have
  'Reply-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in them but they do not,
 
  of course this explains why none of my recent posts have made it on
  the list and why some folk have had direct mails, my fault for not
  reading the recipient headers on my posts! but i would like to know
  if it's just me or if this is a list problem (it applies to
  'expert' too but other lists are fine)
 
  bascule







Re: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?

2001-05-24 Thread poogle

On Thursday 24 May 2001 11:28, you wrote:
 bascule i have just noticed that when i choose 'reply...' from the
 bascule right click menu to a message the recipient is not the list
 but bascule the original sender - every time !




You can always use filter rules to make sure you always reply (only) to the 
list, so that if To or Cc contains [EMAIL PROTECTED], set reply to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 

Poogle




Re: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?

2001-05-24 Thread TezcatlipocA

I had to do the same thing but worse. I always had to type it. HAD, because 
thanks to bascule and his complaint about this I decided to do something. I 
added the newbie address to the Addressbook in KMail. Now when I reply to 
someone the Original sender appears on the line then I hit the botton with 
the periods ... next to the To space and click on the newbie address. 
That's it. No need to type or cut and paste. :)

TezcatlipocA

On Thursday 24 May 2001 06:03, you wrote:
 No, it's not just you. Same happens here. I have to cut  paste the newbie
 address into the To... box every time.

 Nick

 -Original Message-
 From: bascule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 24 May 2001 12:46
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?


 i have just noticed that when i choose 'reply...' from the right click menu
 to a message the recipient is not the list but the original sender - every
 time !

 is the list malfunctioning by not inserting the 'reply to' header in the
 posts back to list subscribers? or do i have my kmail configured wrong,i
 have
 looked for some relevant setting but nothing seems to apply, it does seem
 that the headers in these list posts should have
 'Reply-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in them but they do not,

 of course this explains why none of my recent posts have made it on the
 list

 and why some folk have had direct mails, my fault for not reading the
 recipient headers on my posts! but i would like to know if it's just me or
 if
 this is a list problem (it applies to 'expert' too but other lists are
 fine)

 bascule





Re: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?

2001-05-24 Thread skip


irvm The mail server should be re-configured to put the listserver
irvm address in the from field - see, for example, the Topica lists.

No it shouldn't.  See my previous message.

-- 
Skip Montanaro ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(847)971-7098




Re: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?

2001-05-24 Thread s

On Thursday 24 May 2001 04:55 pm, you wrote:
 irvm The mail server should be re-configured to put the listserver
 irvm address in the from field - see, for example, the Topica lists.

 No it shouldn't.  See my previous message.

It used to be that way, click on an old message from December..., see.  Don't 
know why it isn't now.  But if you make a rule to set the reply to the list, 
then it will appear there when you click the reply button.

-s





Re: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?

2001-05-24 Thread s

I made a rule that states if the To or CC says newbie or the subject contains 
newbie, to set the reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and transfer to 
mdknubylist (my folder for the list).  You have to put the set reply to 
first.  Don't know why, but if it's second, it'll get transferred but not set 
the reply.  However if set reply to is first it will set it and transfer it 
too.  Now just click the button to reply.
-s


On Thursday 24 May 2001 04:51 pm, you wrote:
 I had to do the same thing but worse. I always had to type it. HAD, because
 thanks to bascule and his complaint about this I decided to do something. I
 added the newbie address to the Addressbook in KMail. Now when I reply to
 someone the Original sender appears on the line then I hit the botton with
 the periods ... next to the To space and click on the newbie address.
 That's it. No need to type or cut and paste. :)

 TezcatlipocA

 On Thursday 24 May 2001 06:03, you wrote:
  No, it's not just you. Same happens here. I have to cut  paste the
  newbie address into the To... box every time.
 
  Nick
 
  -Original Message-
  From: bascule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 24 May 2001 12:46
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?
 
 
  i have just noticed that when i choose 'reply...' from the right click
  menu to a message the recipient is not the list but the original sender -
  every time !
 
  is the list malfunctioning by not inserting the 'reply to' header in the
  posts back to list subscribers? or do i have my kmail configured wrong,i
  have
  looked for some relevant setting but nothing seems to apply, it does seem
  that the headers in these list posts should have
  'Reply-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in them but they do not,
 
  of course this explains why none of my recent posts have made it on the
  list
 
  and why some folk have had direct mails, my fault for not reading the
  recipient headers on my posts! but i would like to know if it's just me
  or if
  this is a list problem (it applies to 'expert' too but other lists are
  fine)
 
  bascule





[newbie] Kmail configuration

2000-10-13 Thread Jeff Malka

Is there a way to configure kmail in such a way that the "To" listing shows
in addition to From, Subject, and date?

Thanks

Jeff Malka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux user  183185