Re: [newbie] Modem difficulties

1999-08-20 Thread Rick Fry




Original Message Follows
From: Rick Fry [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  it is. So, forget all these .config files we seem to have to manually 
edit with wonderful devices such as VI. [BLEAH!!]

 You know, there _are_ more intuitive editors out there--lots of
them, in fact.  I like pico, but kedit is pretty good as well.  Of
course, there aren't that many cases any more where you _have_ to
manually edit the .conf files, as software like linuxconf and others
tend to work as well.  Also, I guess this means you've never had to hack 
the Windows registry?

Nope. Never have. In as much as I'm comfortable using regedit, I've never 
had to use it to get something to work. That's not the point. Having to 
manually edit things was one of the major downfalls of OffulStinky/2. Then, 
of course, they were plagued by bad management, marketing and just a plain 
gawd awful stupid looking system. Heck, I'm running 2000 release candidate 1 
now. Yes, the betas had their problems. But, that's why they call them 
BETA!!!

When you can make a version of this Linux, whether it be Red Hat or 
 Mandrake, that's better at plug 'n play than Windows, maybe more of us 
will start using it on a more pronounced basis.

 "So, quitcherbeleakin" yourself.  Linux is getting much better at 
PnP, though it admittedly isn't to the level of Windows yet.  Windows 
isn't anywhere near the level of the Mac, either, so why are you holding 
Windows out as the holy grail of PnP?

Because it is. Unix has been around eons before Mr. Gates' MSDOS or even 
Windows. You'd think that someone would have gotten it right by now. Gates 
took the MacIntrash environment and made it work. One of my many employment 
endeavors was collecting shareware and freeware for the PC, Mac, Amiga [now 
THERE's an underrated machine] and the Atari. I've been there, done that and 
saw the movie. My first computer was in 1979. It was a TRS-80 Model I Level 
I with 16K of memory and the only storage device was a casette recorder. 
That was back just before the Crapple ][ came out with it's TRS-80 wannabe 
style.






___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



[newbie] Modem difficulties

1999-08-19 Thread Sengir

Thus far I have figured out how to get connected to my ISP.  I have setup
Kppp with the DNS and everything dials up seemingly correct.  But, this is
where my issue is, when I attempt to use Netscape it can't look up any pages
I try to access.  Even when I put the IP address in directly so a domain
look up isn't needed.

I also have a second issue.  I have a 56k V.90 Acer Modem and it can't seem
to get it to connect any higher than 38600 in Linux but I get 49333 in
windows.  Any suggestions?

Thanks to everyone,

Brian

P.S.  Thanks to all who have helped so for with my Voodoo3 questions.



Re: [newbie] Modem difficulties

1999-08-19 Thread Gavin Grabias

On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, you wrote:
 Thus far I have figured out how to get connected to my ISP.  I have setup
 Kppp with the DNS and everything dials up seemingly correct.  But, this is
 where my issue is, when I attempt to use Netscape it can't look up any pages
 I try to access.  Even when I put the IP address in directly so a domain
 look up isn't needed.
 
 I also have a second issue.  I have a 56k V.90 Acer Modem and it can't seem
 to get it to connect any higher than 38600 in Linux but I get 49333 in
 windows.  Any suggestions?
 
 Thanks to everyone,
 
 Brian
 
 P.S.  Thanks to all who have helped so for with my Voodoo3 questions.
--

Well I will address your modem speed issue since I hear some of our users
complain about this quite a bit.  Modems initially connect at the best speed. 
however windows is not always true with it.  Sometimes it connects at a speed a
little too high.  Your modem will retrain itself to get to its maximal speed
whether it be slowing down or speeding up.  I would do a file transfer to see
if the transfer speed is the same.  If not try playing around with init
strings.  You'd be amazed at how many people connect at 49k and then we look at
there actual speed on the terminal server and its like 40k.  this used to be a
big flaw in the old x2.  I think v.90 is the worst thing since windows.  Anyone
who doesnt connect at the impossible 56,000 thinks that there isp is messed up
little do they know that their is many factors that play roles in your connect
speed.

Regards,
   Gavin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

  ENTER.NET - "The Road to the Internet Starts Here!" (tm)
  (610) 437-2221 * http://www.enter.net/ * email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [newbie] Modem difficulties

1999-08-19 Thread Doug Nordwall



Douglas Nordwall
New Mexico Highlands University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rex.nmhu.edu/~musashi

On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Sengir wrote:

 Thus far I have figured out how to get connected to my ISP.  I have setup
 Kppp with the DNS and everything dials up seemingly correct.  But, this is
 where my issue is, when I attempt to use Netscape it can't look up any pages
 I try to access.  Even when I put the IP address in directly so a domain
 look up isn't needed.

Are you behind a proxy/firewall? trying pinging an internet address. That
should tell you a lot. Also. do an ifconfig and a route to make sure that
you have the ppp interface up and that it has a route out.

 
 I also have a second issue.  I have a 56k V.90 Acer Modem and it can't seem
 to get it to connect any higher than 38600 in Linux but I get 49333 in
 windows.  Any suggestions?
 

turn off your flow control. This one got me for a while.

 Thanks to everyone,
 
 Brian
 
 P.S.  Thanks to all who have helped so for with my Voodoo3 questions.
 



Re: [[newbie] Modem difficulties]

1999-08-19 Thread Michael Scottaline

"Sengir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus far I have figured out how to get connected to my ISP.  I have setup
Kppp with the DNS and everything dials up seemingly correct.  But, this is
where my issue is, when I attempt to use Netscape it can't look up any pages
I try to access.  Even when I put the IP address in directly so a domain
look up isn't needed.
==
Try entering "nameserver DNS#" (w/o quotes) in /etc/resolv.conf
If your ISP has provided you with two numbers, you can repeat this on a second
line.
===

I also have a second issue.  I have a 56k V.90 Acer Modem and it can't seem
to get it to connect any higher than 38600 in Linux but I get 49333 in
windows.  Any suggestions?
=
Not sure on this one.  I get almost identical speeds either way [though I
haven't booted into windows in a while ;o)]



Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com.



Re: [[newbie] Modem difficulties]

1999-08-19 Thread John Aldrich


- Original Message -
From: Michael Scottaline [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: [[newbie] Modem difficulties]



 I also have a second issue.  I have a 56k V.90 Acer Modem and it can't
seem
 to get it to connect any higher than 38600 in Linux but I get 49333 in
 windows.  Any suggestions?
 =
 Not sure on this one.  I get almost identical speeds either way [though I
 haven't booted into windows in a while ;o)]

Windows has a bad habit of lying about it's true connect speed...it reports
the MAXIMUM connect speed and you modem often retrains BACK down to a more
stable speed.
John



Re: [newbie] Modem difficulties

1999-08-19 Thread Rick Fry


I'm sorry Gavin but as one that just left a position as technical support 
for a medium sized ISP after almost 2 years, I can say that most of my 
customers are smart enough to not expect that mythical 56K speed. For the 
most part, we're aware that the speed is multidependent in that it comes 
close to the restrictions on DSL connects. Things like number of pairs in 
any given cable, the ambient temperature around those pairs and the 
possibility of noise from outside influences including the number of birds 
sitting on any given cable and how many of their toes are touching the 
wires. They would, however, like to achieve at least 33.6K or at least the 
average 40K connect speeds.

Also, you *nix guys that seem to have nothing but bad things to say about 
Windows are slowly realizing what some of us are finding out about *nix in a 
more pronounced way. Obviously these vendors, such as Diamond and others, 
that refuse to write drivers for *nix must know something that we don't. 
Somebody once commented about the plug 'n play capabilities of Windows. I'm 
finding that it's even less pronounced in *nix. So, quitcherbeleakin. Some 
of us don't really care how to make a watch. We just want to know what time 
it is. So, forget all these .config files we seem to have to manually edit 
with wonderful devices such as VI. [BLEAH!!] When you can make a version of 
this Linux, whether it be Red Hat or Mandrake, that's better at plug 'n play 
than Windows, maybe more of us will start using it on a more pronounced 
basis.

It's starting to sound like the OS/2 wars we used to get into years ago. 
Then, let's not forget about CP/M even a few more years ago that I owned 3 
different copies of that were totally incompatible with each other. Forget 
the competition. [Oh yeah, I'm leaving my position as technical support 
because of an acquisition and a merger. Not because of anything I did.]

Original Message Follows
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, you wrote:
You'd be amazed at how many people connect at 49k and then we look at
there actual speed on the terminal server and its like 40k.  this used to be 
a big flaw in the old x2.  I think v.90 is the worst thing since windows.  
Anyone who doesnt connect at the impossible 56,000 thinks that there isp is 
messed up little do they know that their is many factors that play roles in 
your connect speed.

Regards,
Gavin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

   ENTER.NET - "The Road to the Internet Starts Here!" (tm)
   (610) 437-2221 * http://www.enter.net/ * email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Modem difficulties

1999-08-19 Thread Dan Brown

From: Rick Fry [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 more pronounced way. Obviously these vendors, such as Diamond and
others,
 that refuse to write drivers for *nix must know something that we
don't.

And what, do you think, would that be?  I can tell you one thing
that we all know: there are more Windows users than there are Linux
users (duh!).  So, where will Diamond's efforts most efficiently be
invested?  In Windows development, so that a given amount of effort will
have the greatest return.  They may or may not be right, but I expect
that's their motivation.  In any case, I'd be willing to bet that it has
nothing to do with the capabilities of the OS.

 it is. So, forget all these .config files we seem to have to manually
edit
 with wonderful devices such as VI. [BLEAH!!]

You know, there _are_ more intuitive editors out there--lots of
them, in fact.  I like pico, but kedit is pretty good as well.  Of
course, there aren't that many cases any more where you _have_ to
manually edit the .conf files, as software like linuxconf and others
tend to work as well.  Also, I guess this means you've never had to hack
the Windows registry?

 When you can make a version of
 this Linux, whether it be Red Hat or Mandrake, that's better at plug
'n play
 than Windows, maybe more of us will start using it on a more
pronounced
 basis.

"So, quitcherbeleakin" yourself.  Linux is getting much better at
PnP, though it admittedly isn't to the level of Windows yet.  Windows
isn't anywhere near the level of the Mac, either, so why are you holding
Windows out as the holy grail of PnP?