[NSP] Re: Has there ever been an NSP with _all_ keys (no open holes)?

2011-03-22 Thread Ian Lawther
The American uilleann pipe maker Patsy Brown made uilleann pipes with 
keys on all the holes. The only picture I can find on line is rather 
small but is at


http://www.lemccullough.com/LEMcCullough/Music-Biography_files/PatsyBrown-filtered.jpg

A larger copy of this appears in Patrick Sky's uilleann pipe tutor and 
the keys can be seen to hinged  from above the hole using a pillar and 
rod system. This other picture from the uilleann obsession website shows 
that the upper keys were hinged from the side (see top most chanter). 


http://www.uilleannobsession.com/photos/boston_pipers/16.jpg

What the benefits, if any, of this were I do not know.

Ian




inky-adrian wrote:

Hello all,
yes, it's in the Bowes museum. A bagpipe, part Northumberland-all 
keyed and part Union.

Adrian


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html






[NSP] Re: Has there ever been an NSP with _all_ keys (no open holes)?

2011-03-22 Thread GibbonsSoinne
   Adrian,

   I stand corrected

   Only the one known example, I take it?

   How do you mean part-Union?

   Do you mean a wholly keyed NSP chanter,

   cylindrical bored and closed ended, but with UP drones and regulators?



   I must go and look at it - even if they (it?) never caught on,

   and even if it never deserved to



   John

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: Has there ever been an NSP with _all_ keys (no open holes)?

2011-03-22 Thread inky-adrian

Hello all,
yes, it's in the Bowes museum. A bagpipe, part Northumberland-all keyed and 
part Union.
Adrian 




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] wholly keyed chanter??

2011-03-22 Thread GibbonsSoinne
   One obvious response is that playing finger holes on NSP is faster and
   more 'positive' than playing keyed notes. Half of this may be down to
   the poor dexterity of the little finger, but I can't play
   even thumb-keyed notes as crisply as open-holed ones. There's something
   in Tom Clough's writings about most players being less fluent on keyed
   notes, so it isn't just me.



   Now the 20 open-holed keyless chanter played by two telepathic people
   with small hands might be worth a go





   John



   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: Has there ever been an NSP with _all_ keys (no open holes)?

2011-03-22 Thread John Dally
A saxophone is a woodwind without any open holes covered by fingers.
Some holes are always open to make notes, but all of them are closed
by a key pad, as opposed to fingers like the other woodwinds you
mention, Colin.

I suspect if you covered all the holes with keys and pads you would
lose a lot of color if not artistic nuance.  Although I'm not a pipe
maker, I would guess it would be very difficult to add keys like the
Boehm system on an F or G chanter.

At least with flat fingered styles of piping you would lose a lot of
nuance with keys.  Compare Irish wooden keyless flute playing with
Irish players of silver Boehm system flutes.  They can play faster on
the silver keyed flute, and they can be jazzy, but personally I don't
see those as advantages.  YMMV

A fully keyed NSP chanter would make choyting exceedingly easy.  ;-)
I'm with Richard.



On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Richard York
 wrote:
>  Interesting... would it actually be easier, with all keys and therefore
> "all fingers [] available
>  to hit keys "?
> As it is I'm still teaching my fingers when to move to make all the notes
> faster, and still letting my thumb & little finger learn which position is
> which, but most of the fingers are limited to their unique notes.
> If several fingers were available to hit the same key, I feel instinctively
> that it would be more confusing, even though I happily do exactly that on
> concertinas and other keyboard instruments.
> Somehow the woodwind holding position says different things to my hands, and
> I expect a particular finger always to produce a particular note.
>
> What would you hold it by, given that touching any key would produce a note?
> - you'd need some blank bits to keep your fingers on, and then have to lift
> them up and move them to the notes.
>  More confusion.
>
> I think I'll stick to having holes!
>
> Richard.
>
>
>
> On 22/03/2011 21:28, Colin wrote:
>>
>> Interesting thought but which woodwind instruments don't have at least 6
>> or 7 open (unkeyed) holes?
>> All mine have the standard unkeyed holes along with the other keyed ones.
>> Maybe the large amount of metalwork hides the fact the holes are there but
>> certainly flutes, clarinets, saxophones, bassoons and oboes have open holes.
>> Flutes, of course, go a step further in having keys with holes in them .
>> As far as I know, there is no member of the woodwind class made without
>> open holes (discounting some bass instruments which would be impossible for
>> the fingers to reach maybe).
>>
>> Colin Hill
>> - Original Message - From: "Matthew Boris"
>> 
>> To: 
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 9:06 PM
>> Subject: [NSP] Has there ever been an NSP with _all_ keys (no open holes)?
>>
>>
>>>
>>>  I was pondering recently, both on the stacatto effect of the keys, the
>>>  difficulties in only having two fingers free to hit keys, and also
>>>  thinking about whether a person missing a hand could play bagpipes in
>>>  general.
>>>
>>>  A thought occurred to me:  have any NSP been made which had every hole
>>>  covered by a key?  With such a settup, all fingers would be available
>>>  to hit keys.  I think that's how a lot of modern woodwinds are made; is
>>>  there any reason besides tradition that this is not regularly done on
>>>  NSP?
>>>
>>>  -Matthew
>>>  Arlington, Virginia, USA
>>>  --
>>>
>>>
>>> To get on or off this list see list information at
>>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Text inserted by Panda IS 2011:
>>
>> This message has NOT been classified as spam. If it is unsolicited mail
>> (spam), click on the following link to reclassify it:
>> http://localhost:6083/Panda?ID=pav_2380&SPAM=true&path=C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Richard\Local%20Settings\Application%20Data\Panda%20Security\Panda%20Internet%20Security%202011\AntiSpam
>>
>> ---
>>
>>
>
>
>
>




[NSP] Re: Has there ever been an NSP with _all_ keys (no open holes)?

2011-03-22 Thread Richard York
 Interesting... would it actually be easier, with all keys and 
therefore "all fingers [] available

  to hit keys "?
As it is I'm still teaching my fingers when to move to make all the 
notes faster, and still letting my thumb & little finger learn which 
position is which, but most of the fingers are limited to their unique 
notes.
If several fingers were available to hit the same key, I feel 
instinctively that it would be more confusing, even though I happily do 
exactly that on concertinas and other keyboard instruments.
Somehow the woodwind holding position says different things to my hands, 
and I expect a particular finger always to produce a particular note.


What would you hold it by, given that touching any key would produce a 
note? - you'd need some blank bits to keep your fingers on, and then 
have to lift them up and move them to the notes.

 More confusion.

I think I'll stick to having holes!

Richard.



On 22/03/2011 21:28, Colin wrote:
Interesting thought but which woodwind instruments don't have at least 
6 or 7 open (unkeyed) holes?

All mine have the standard unkeyed holes along with the other keyed ones.
Maybe the large amount of metalwork hides the fact the holes are there 
but certainly flutes, clarinets, saxophones, bassoons and oboes have 
open holes. Flutes, of course, go a step further in having keys with 
holes in them .
As far as I know, there is no member of the woodwind class made 
without open holes (discounting some bass instruments which would be 
impossible for the fingers to reach maybe).


Colin Hill
- Original Message - From: "Matthew Boris" 


To: 
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 9:06 PM
Subject: [NSP] Has there ever been an NSP with _all_ keys (no open 
holes)?





  I was pondering recently, both on the stacatto effect of the keys, the
  difficulties in only having two fingers free to hit keys, and also
  thinking about whether a person missing a hand could play bagpipes in
  general.

  A thought occurred to me:  have any NSP been made which had every hole
  covered by a key?  With such a settup, all fingers would be available
  to hit keys.  I think that's how a lot of modern woodwinds are 
made; is

  there any reason besides tradition that this is not regularly done on
  NSP?

  -Matthew
  Arlington, Virginia, USA
  --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html








--- 


Text inserted by Panda IS 2011:

This message has NOT been classified as spam. If it is unsolicited 
mail (spam), click on the following link to reclassify it: 
http://localhost:6083/Panda?ID=pav_2380&SPAM=true&path=C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Richard\Local%20Settings\Application%20Data\Panda%20Security\Panda%20Internet%20Security%202011\AntiSpam
--- 










[NSP] Re: Has there ever been an NSP with _all_ keys (no open holes)?

2011-03-22 Thread Colin
Interesting thought but which woodwind instruments don't have at least 6 or 
7 open (unkeyed) holes?

All mine have the standard unkeyed holes along with the other keyed ones.
Maybe the large amount of metalwork hides the fact the holes are there but 
certainly flutes, clarinets, saxophones, bassoons and oboes have open holes. 
Flutes, of course, go a step further in having keys with holes in them .
As far as I know, there is no member of the woodwind class made without open 
holes (discounting some bass instruments which would be impossible for the 
fingers to reach maybe).


Colin Hill
- Original Message - 
From: "Matthew Boris" 

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 9:06 PM
Subject: [NSP] Has there ever been an NSP with _all_ keys (no open holes)?




  I was pondering recently, both on the stacatto effect of the keys, the
  difficulties in only having two fingers free to hit keys, and also
  thinking about whether a person missing a hand could play bagpipes in
  general.

  A thought occurred to me:  have any NSP been made which had every hole
  covered by a key?  With such a settup, all fingers would be available
  to hit keys.  I think that's how a lot of modern woodwinds are made; is
  there any reason besides tradition that this is not regularly done on
  NSP?

  -Matthew
  Arlington, Virginia, USA
  --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html









[NSP] Has there ever been an NSP with _all_ keys (no open holes)?

2011-03-22 Thread Matthew Boris
   I was pondering recently, both on the stacatto effect of the keys, the
   difficulties in only having two fingers free to hit keys, and also
   thinking about whether a person missing a hand could play bagpipes in
   general.

   A thought occurred to me:  have any NSP been made which had every hole
   covered by a key?  With such a settup, all fingers would be available
   to hit keys.  I think that's how a lot of modern woodwinds are made; is
   there any reason besides tradition that this is not regularly done on
   NSP?

   -Matthew
   Arlington, Virginia, USA
   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: Spring NPS newsletter

2011-03-22 Thread Julia Say
On 18 Mar 2011, Julia Say wrote: 

> The newsletter has been posted  (18 March).

Judging by early reports, it's on a very slow train this time (like 4 days to 
get 7 
miles!)

Don't know what the mail is up to, but hopefully it will reach most Uk members 
by 
the end of the week.

If you want to report receipt (or non-receipt!) please do so _off-list_  to me, 
as 
the annoyance value of multiple "I've got it" type messages is rather high.

Thanks
Julia



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html