Re: Setting up notifications for Dell Server failures
I still use Dell IT Assistant to email me the alerts from OpenManage. Seems to work pretty well 2008/9/29 Jim Majorowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] I use OpenManage Server Administrator (5.4.0 installed) all the time. I don't think I've ever gotten it to email me notifications though. I can get it to manually send one, but it seems to not do them automatically. -Original Message- From: Terry Dickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 11:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Setting up notifications for Dell Server failures Do you have the Openmanage software installed? I am pretty sure it can automatically do this for you if you configure it correctly? -Original Message- From: Jim Majorowicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 1:04 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Setting up notifications for Dell Server failures We have a customer with a Dell PowerEdge 1800 tower that has had a bad habit of failing a particular SCSI drive. This server has managed to kill 4 drives in slot 0:1 and one drive each in 0:2 and 0:4. Dell has been great with the warranty replacements, even went as far as to replace the entire subsystem, but it didn't solve the problem. I got Dell to agree to sell me an additional drive at cost to add to the array as a spare. (One of the failures included two drives over the weekend, prompting a real emergency when the server went offline.) What I need help with is after I install and configure the array spare how to notify myself or my office that a drive has failed? Always before, we've relied on the customer to notify us when buzzer alarm noise sounds. It is my understanding that after the spare is installed, the buzzer won't sound until a second drive fails and there is no spare to take up the slack. I need to be able to know when a drive fails so I can start the warranty process with Dell hopefully before a second drive fails. Regards, Jim Majorowicz, MCP Sr. Network Engineer SBPI_US_rgb Whitsell Computer Services (503) 297-8440x12 www.whitsell.com We can support you no matter where you are. Ask me for details. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
CV is travelling on business 9/29-10/2
I will be out of the office starting 09/29/2008 and will not return until 10/03/2008. I will be out of the office . Please contact Tracy Tarpey for Mgmt issue and Jason Moras for any technical issues. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Sunbelt and CBL issues
I wondered why Exchange was not allowing the list to reach me. I wish the people running these services took the time to do some checking BEFORE listing an IP. Jon On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quality always shows... Heh. On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The list got recognition on CBL again J http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=64.128.133.151 Wondered why I wasn't getting any mail! ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: External RAID HDD Enclosure Recomendations
Yeah and this OF wishes he knew as much as some of you kids! Jon On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Steven M. Caesare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe the list shorthand for that was OF, and one Jon Harris was nominated Resident OF. -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Changing computer names scripomatically
hi there, I have a need to rename approx 100 machines from companya-pc01 etc to companybpc01 Is there a way to do this via script, either at user logon, or from server going out and doing it remotely. Any help would be appreciated Thanks Graeme -- Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Is the list down
Is the list down? I havent seen a email from the list in a day... Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA Phone: 401-639-3505 -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Powershell scheduled job You can redirect from within the script itself using out-file or echo (ghetto but I use it sometimes). Gci c:\badexample | sort-object name |out-file c:\filename.txt -troy -Original Message- From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 3:29 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Powershell scheduled job I have a job I schedule as follows: powershell.exe -PSConsoleFile C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\Bin\ExShell.psc1 -Command . 'C:\Scripts\job.ps1' How can I redirect the output of this job to a text file? Thanks! jlc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Changing computer names scripomatically
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=enq=Rename+Windows+Computer+script returns a bunch of promising results Cheers Ken From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2008 8:15 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Changing computer names scripomatically hi there, I have a need to rename approx 100 machines from companya-pc01 etc to companybpc01 Is there a way to do this via script, either at user logon, or from server going out and doing it remotely. Any help would be appreciated Thanks Graeme ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Is the list down
Our IP address has also just made it onto these lists, at the same time. Is there something going around out there? Will this e-mail make it through? I haven't been on one of these lists in a couple of years. Via mxtoolbox we are listed on three: CBL, Lashback, and PSBL. Reason given for all three is Return codes were 127.0.0.2. When I test our e-mail server, also via mxtoolbox, it says we are not an open relay. All checks OK. Any clue on what a poor one man shop, jack of all trades, master of none derelict can do? From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 7:41 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Is the list down Apparently the list made it onto some spam blacklists... 2008/9/30 Ziots, Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is the list down? I havent seen a email from the list in a day... Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA Phone: 401-639-3505 -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Powershell scheduled job You can redirect from within the script itself using out-file or echo (ghetto but I use it sometimes). Gci c:\badexample | sort-object name |out-file c:\filename.txt -troy -Original Message- From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 3:29 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Powershell scheduled job I have a job I schedule as follows: powershell.exe -PSConsoleFile C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\Bin\ExShell.psc1 -Command . 'C:\Scripts\job.ps1' How can I redirect the output of this job to a text file? Thanks! jlc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Hello?? Anybody there?
Haven't seen a list post in over 24 hours. I realize I can be anti-social at times, but this is a bit much. :-) Is it me? -- Michael Leone Network Administrator, ISM Philadelphia Housing Authority 2500 Jackson St Philadelphia, PA 19145 Tel: 215-684-4180 Cell: 215-252-0143 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Hello?? Anybody there?
I have been getting tidbits from others. It seems someone has us on a spam list. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 9:52 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Hello?? Anybody there? This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Hello?? Anybody there?
David McSpadden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/30/2008 09:52:55 AM: I have been getting tidbits from others. It seems someone has us on a spam list. Thanks. I can't seem to find the web interface for the list, either. http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/all_forums/ doesn't have this list as one of the options. I figured I would check the list archives; see if the whole list was down, or if it was just me. But I can't find the web interface, and it's not added as a footer to all list posts (which would be a help, BTW, if anyone from list administration is listening ... :-)) ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Hello?? Anybody there?
When this is finally resolved, I will be posting to the list about how to find out if the list is alive without posting to the list! (Hint: there are other ways to read and post besides using E-mail.) Carl From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 9:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Hello?? Anybody there? I have been getting tidbits from others. It seems someone has us on a spam list. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 9:52 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Hello?? Anybody there? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
List dead...
Just checking. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Hello?? Anybody there?
Here! Have been receiving messages the last few days, but not as many as I'm used to seeing. Don Guyer Systems Engineer Information Services Department Prudential Fox Roach/ Trident 431 W. Lancaster Avenue Devon, PA 19333 Ph: (610) 993-3299 Fax: (610) 650-5306 www.prufoxroach.com blocked::blocked::http://www.prufoxroach.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 9:52 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Hello?? Anybody there? Haven't seen a list post in over 24 hours. I realize I can be anti-social at times, but this is a bit much. :-) Is it me? -- Michael Leone Network Administrator, ISM Philadelphia Housing Authority 2500 Jackson St Philadelphia, PA 19145 Tel: 215-684-4180 Cell: 215-252-0143 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] /pre table width=100%trtd class=body This email and any files transmitted with it are confidentialbr and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity tobr whom they are addressed. It may contain information protected by br state and federal privacy and intellectual property laws.br If you have received this email in error pleasebr notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail frombr your system. If you are not the named addressee you shouldbr not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail, and you arebr notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking anybr action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.br /td/tr/table ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
AD authentication drops
Anyone else have this problem? W2k3 server environment, XP Pro desktops all part of single domain AD setup. Logon script maps access to shared folders for all employees. One mapped drive for shared workspace, one for private. Frequently something happens and the mapped drives dissapear. If you try to attach by start;run and use the unc to the folder it will typically show one or none of the 12 or so folders that are there. logging off and back on almost always fixes it back. We have about 120 desktops in 4 different offices. This problem crops up almost daily and shows up in every location. We also run Exchange, so they are maintaining a connection there as well, and we have seen outlook drop authentication too, so that they are asked for a username/password midstream, which almost always results in a support call, because it needs the domain\ info before the username when it does that. The outlook authentication happens way less frequently than the problem with mapped drives. any ideas? Been fighting this for a while. Replaced storage vault with new hardward and had hoped that this problem would go away with that, but it had no affect. Thanks for any help. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: AD authentication drops
Do you have any errors on the DCs or (particularly) on the member servers where you are seeing your connections dropping, or even on the workstations themselves? I'd be looking for anything red or yellow in there that looks interesting...maybe domain authentication failures, NetLogon errors, errors from Workstation or Server services, etc. 2008/9/30 Jeff Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone else have this problem? W2k3 server environment, XP Pro desktops all part of single domain AD setup. Logon script maps access to shared folders for all employees. One mapped drive for shared workspace, one for private. Frequently something happens and the mapped drives dissapear. If you try to attach by start;run and use the unc to the folder it will typically show one or none of the 12 or so folders that are there. logging off and back on almost always fixes it back. We have about 120 desktops in 4 different offices. This problem crops up almost daily and shows up in every location. We also run Exchange, so they are maintaining a connection there as well, and we have seen outlook drop authentication too, so that they are asked for a username/password midstream, which almost always results in a support call, because it needs the domain\ info before the username when it does that. The outlook authentication happens way less frequently than the problem with mapped drives. any ideas? Been fighting this for a while. Replaced storage vault with new hardward and had hoped that this problem would go away with that, but it had no affect. Thanks for any help. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
blacklisted
PSBL says they have received spamtrap mail from our IP address. How do I check all my PCs to see which ones are responsible? I have anti-virus on all workstations and servers, anti-spam on the e-mail server, and anti-spyware on the workstations. All is updated regularly. What else do I need to do? Any places anyone can point me? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
test...please reply
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: blacklisted
Monitor the traffic as it is leaving your firewall. If you see smtp traffic that doesn't belong to you then track down the originating ip from the log and see what is up that way? From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 10:52 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: blacklisted PSBL says they have received spamtrap mail from our IP address. How do I check all my PCs to see which ones are responsible? I have anti-virus on all workstations and servers, anti-spam on the e-mail server, and anti-spyware on the workstations. All is updated regularly. What else do I need to do? Any places anyone can point me? __ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: blacklisted
Block all outbound port 25 on your firewall, except for your mail server. From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 10:52 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: blacklisted PSBL says they have received spamtrap mail from our IP address. How do I check all my PCs to see which ones are responsible? I have anti-virus on all workstations and servers, anti-spam on the e-mail server, and anti-spyware on the workstations. All is updated regularly. What else do I need to do? Any places anyone can point me? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: blacklisted
First check to see if your server is setup to open relay http://www.checkor.com/ If your email server is not setup to open relay then check your firewall or router logs to see what internal IP address is sending out on port 25. Your firewall should be locked down to ONLY allow outbound port 25 traffic from your email server or SMTP gateway. Additionally setup your firewall (if it has the function) to send you an email alert any time an internal computer attempts to send out email on port 25. That way you know the moment a computer is compromised. Matt On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Holstrom, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PSBL says they have received spamtrap mail from our IP address. How do I check all my PCs to see which ones are responsible? I have anti-virus on all workstations and servers, anti-spam on the e-mail server, and anti-spyware on the workstations. All is updated regularly. What else do I need to do? Any places anyone can point me? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: test...please reply
test From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 10:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: test...please reply __ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: *****SPAM***** blacklisted
Yeah the past couple days our Spamassassin has been tagging all of the NTSysadmin mails due to Spamcop. I really dont know why we even bother using them anymore. We're using a 3rd party hosted spam solution and dont even need spamassassin anymore. i.e.: On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Holstrom, Don wrote: Content analysis details: (5.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -- -- 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.] 10 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?64.128.133.151 ] ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: test...please reply
reply from a gmail account On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Chyka, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: *****SPAM***** blacklisted
ironport is blocking here. From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 11:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: *SPAM* blacklisted Yeah the past couple days our Spamassassin has been tagging all of the NTSysadmin mails due to Spamcop. I really dont know why we even bother using them anymore. We're using a 3rd party hosted spam solution and dont even need spamassassin anymore. i.e.: On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Holstrom, Don wrote: Content analysis details: (5.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -- -- 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.] 10 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?64.128.133.151] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: blacklisted
I always white list any mailing lists I sign up for. These temporary transient blocks are pretty common for mailing lists so best just to avoid the issue up front. From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 11:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: *SPAM* blacklisted ironport is blocking here. From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 11:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: *SPAM* blacklisted Yeah the past couple days our Spamassassin has been tagging all of the NTSysadmin mails due to Spamcop. I really dont know why we even bother using them anymore. We're using a 3rd party hosted spam solution and dont even need spamassassin anymore. i.e.: On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Holstrom, Don wrote: Content analysis details: (5.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -- -- 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.] 10 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?64.128.133.151] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: test...please reply
It showed up. From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 9:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: test...please reply ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: test...please reply
Hello from another Gmail. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Matt Plahtinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: reply from a gmail account On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Chyka, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: -- Devin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: AD authentication drops
+2 This is almost certainly backend infrastructure that is having issues. Along with what James said, check for DNS or time issues. What do your DCs look like when you run replmon or dcdiag? -troy -Original Message- From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 7:32 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: AD authentication drops Do you have any errors on the DCs or (particularly) on the member servers where you are seeing your connections dropping, or even on the workstations themselves? I'd be looking for anything red or yellow in there that looks interesting...maybe domain authentication failures, NetLogon errors, errors from Workstation or Server services, etc. 2008/9/30 Jeff Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone else have this problem? W2k3 server environment, XP Pro desktops all part of single domain AD setup. Logon script maps access to shared folders for all employees. One mapped drive for shared workspace, one for private. Frequently something happens and the mapped drives dissapear. If you try to attach by start;run and use the unc to the folder it will typically show one or none of the 12 or so folders that are there. logging off and back on almost always fixes it back. We have about 120 desktops in 4 different offices. This problem crops up almost daily and shows up in every location. We also run Exchange, so they are maintaining a connection there as well, and we have seen outlook drop authentication too, so that they are asked for a username/password midstream, which almost always results in a support call, because it needs the domain\ info before the username when it does that. The outlook authentication happens way less frequently than the problem with mapped drives. any ideas? Been fighting this for a while. Replaced storage vault with new hardward and had hoped that this problem would go away with that, but it had no affect. Thanks for any help. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: AD authentication drops
Sounds like offline files issue across the board. We are actually working on a similar problem for some of our laptop users right now, and symptoms are almost identical-- 1) Implement a GPO that disables offline file caching for all domain machines that do NOT absolutely need it. For us, this covers our typical wired desktop machines. \Computer Configuration\Administrative Templates\Network\Offline Files, set the Allow or Disallow use of the Offline Files feature to disabled. 2) For machines that must have offline files enabled (like laptops), read through http://support.microsoft.com/kb/811660/en-us. Some of this can be set via GPO, but if you have a large number of computers, you will probably need to be enter some on each machine via regedit (eg, set the primary user). 3) Short-term fix on each machine can be achieved by following http://support.microsoft.com/kb/230738/en-us to re-initialize the offline files cache database, losing all offline files (make sure you are as sync-ed as possible first). But, unless you implement some measure from step 1/2, the problem WILL reappear when different users log onto the computers. -Bonnie From: Jeff Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 7:25 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: AD authentication drops Anyone else have this problem? W2k3 server environment, XP Pro desktops all part of single domain AD setup. Logon script maps access to shared folders for all employees. One mapped drive for shared workspace, one for private. Frequently something happens and the mapped drives dissapear. If you try to attach by start;run and use the unc to the folder it will typically show one or none of the 12 or so folders that are there. logging off and back on almost always fixes it back. We have about 120 desktops in 4 different offices. This problem crops up almost daily and shows up in every location. We also run Exchange, so they are maintaining a connection there as well, and we have seen outlook drop authentication too, so that they are asked for a username/password midstream, which almost always results in a support call, because it needs the domain\ info before the username when it does that. The outlook authentication happens way less frequently than the problem with mapped drives. any ideas? Been fighting this for a while. Replaced storage vault with new hardward and had hoped that this problem would go away with that, but it had no affect. Thanks for any help. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: AD authentication drops
Have issue on frsevent(failed) and systemlog test also. everything else check good. No obviously related issues in server log files. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Miller Bonnie L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sounds like offline files issue across the board. We are actually working on a similar problem for some of our laptop users right now, and symptoms are almost identical-- 1) Implement a GPO that disables offline file caching for all domain machines that do NOT absolutely need it. For us, this covers our typical wired desktop machines. \Computer Configuration\Administrative Templates\Network\Offline Files, set the Allow or Disallow use of the Offline Files feature to disabled. 2) For machines that must have offline files enabled (like laptops), read through http://support.microsoft.com/kb/811660/en-us. Some of this can be set via GPO, but if you have a large number of computers, you will probably need to be enter some on each machine via regedit (eg, set the primary user). 3) Short-term fix on each machine can be achieved by following http://support.microsoft.com/kb/230738/en-us to re-initialize the offline files cache database, losing all offline files (make sure you are as sync-ed as possible first). But, unless you implement some measure from step 1/2, the problem WILL reappear when different users log onto the computers. -Bonnie *From:* Jeff Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 30, 2008 7:25 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* AD authentication drops Anyone else have this problem? W2k3 server environment, XP Pro desktops all part of single domain AD setup. Logon script maps access to shared folders for all employees. One mapped drive for shared workspace, one for private. Frequently something happens and the mapped drives dissapear. If you try to attach by start;run and use the unc to the folder it will typically show one or none of the 12 or so folders that are there. logging off and back on almost always fixes it back. We have about 120 desktops in 4 different offices. This problem crops up almost daily and shows up in every location. We also run Exchange, so they are maintaining a connection there as well, and we have seen outlook drop authentication too, so that they are asked for a username/password midstream, which almost always results in a support call, because it needs the domain\ info before the username when it does that. The outlook authentication happens way less frequently than the problem with mapped drives. any ideas? Been fighting this for a while. Replaced storage vault with new hardward and had hoped that this problem would go away with that, but it had no affect. Thanks for any help. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: *****SPAM***** blacklisted
IronPort owns Spamcop. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:00 AM, David McSpadden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ironport is blocking here. From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 11:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: *SPAM* blacklisted Yeah the past couple days our Spamassassin has been tagging all of the NTSysadmin mails due to Spamcop. I really dont know why we even bother using them anymore. We're using a 3rd party hosted spam solution and dont even need spamassassin anymore. i.e.: On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Holstrom, Don wrote: Content analysis details: (5.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -- -- 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.] 10 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?64.128.133.151] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: test...please reply
Hello from Gmail as well. My normal work account has not gotten any emails from Lyris. Anyone know what's going on? Chris 2008/9/30 Devin Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello from another Gmail. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Matt Plahtinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: reply from a gmail account On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Chyka, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Devin -- Chris Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, karaoke mic in one hand, beer in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally warn out, and screaming 'WOO HOO! What a ride!': ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
temp sensors
i need to get a couple of small temp only sensors to be able to send snmp/email/page messages. Google comes up with Enviromux-Mini. Anyone have any good/bad experience with these? any others out there that only do temp? dave ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: list test
Same. On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Ralph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Me too. Haven't received any of the messages from a few different lists. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- Chris Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, karaoke mic in one hand, beer in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally warn out, and screaming 'WOO HOO! What a ride!': ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: temp sensors
I have and use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] product. Inexpensive and works well. www.temperaturealert.com Roger Wright Network Administrator Evatone, Inc. 727.572.7076 x388 _ From: Dave Eldridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: temp sensors i need to get a couple of small temp only sensors to be able to send snmp/email/page messages. Google comes up with Enviromux-Mini. Anyone have any good/bad experience with these? any others out there that only do temp? dave ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: test...please reply
Since the sender is not receiving list mails (because of a DNSBL issue), it is likely they are not receiving anyones responses that are only being sent tot the list. -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Setting up notifications for Dell Server failures
I was beginning to think that was what I was going to have to do. Ugh. At least this will remind me, again, why I switched majors in college. (I am not the best programmer in the world. I'm too left handed. :P) Always look on the bright side. It's a good exercise in scripting skill. -Original Message- From: Durf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 4:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Setting up notifications for Dell Server failures There is no automatic email option in OpenManage - I don't know why, but there isn't. However, there is a run a program option, and it is dead easy to configure a canned VBscript to send you an email. -- Durf On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Jim Majorowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess I'm missing where I configure this to send the message when an Alert occurs. -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 12:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Setting up notifications for Dell Server failures OpenManage like Terry said, or a DRAC card if it has it installed. -Original Message- From: Terry Dickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 1:15 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Setting up notifications for Dell Server failures Do you have the Openmanage software installed? I am pretty sure it can automatically do this for you if you configure it correctly? -Original Message- From: Jim Majorowicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 1:04 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Setting up notifications for Dell Server failures We have a customer with a Dell PowerEdge 1800 tower that has had a bad habit of failing a particular SCSI drive. This server has managed to kill 4 drives in slot 0:1 and one drive each in 0:2 and 0:4. Dell has been great with the warranty replacements, even went as far as to replace the entire subsystem, but it didn't solve the problem. I got Dell to agree to sell me an additional drive at cost to add to the array as a spare. (One of the failures included two drives over the weekend, prompting a real emergency when the server went offline.) What I need help with is after I install and configure the array spare how to notify myself or my office that a drive has failed? Always before, we've relied on the customer to notify us when buzzer alarm noise sounds. It is my understanding that after the spare is installed, the buzzer won't sound until a second drive fails and there is no spare to take up the slack. I need to be able to know when a drive fails so I can start the warranty process with Dell hopefully before a second drive fails. Regards, Jim Majorowicz, MCP Sr. Network Engineer SBPI_US_rgb Whitsell Computer Services (503) 297-8440x12 www.whitsell.com We can support you no matter where you are. Ask me for details. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- -- Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks! ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: temp sensors
I've been using the tempager and room alert to monitor my server room, remote switch cabinet and telco room. Easy to setup, good customer service. No problems so far (had these in place for about six months now). http://www.avtech.com/ Damon From: Dave Eldridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: temp sensors i need to get a couple of small temp only sensors to be able to send snmp/email/page messages. Google comes up with Enviromux-Mini. Anyone have any good/bad experience with these? any others out there that only do temp? dave ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: External RAID HDD Enclosure Recomendations
What, no get off the lawn jokes? :P From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: External RAID HDD Enclosure Recomendations Yeah and this OF wishes he knew as much as some of you kids! Jon On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Steven M. Caesare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe the list shorthand for that was OF, and one Jon Harris was nominated Resident OF. -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: External RAID HDD Enclosure Recomendations
Not from me too tired and too old. Jon On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Jim Majorowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: What, no get off the lawn jokes? :P *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:28 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: External RAID HDD Enclosure Recomendations Yeah and this OF wishes he knew as much as some of you kids! Jon On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Steven M. Caesare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe the list shorthand for that was OF, and one Jon Harris was nominated Resident OF. -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: temp sensors
We also have a couple Avtech systems with multiple monitors. It's extremely configurable but takes some time to get up and running. Roger Wright Network Administrator Evatone, Inc. 727.572.7076 x388 _ From: Lee, Damon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:19 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: temp sensors I've been using the tempager and room alert to monitor my server room, remote switch cabinet and telco room. Easy to setup, good customer service. No problems so far (had these in place for about six months now). http://www.avtech.com/ Damon From: Dave Eldridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: temp sensors i need to get a couple of small temp only sensors to be able to send snmp/email/page messages. Google comes up with Enviromux-Mini. Anyone have any good/bad experience with these? any others out there that only do temp? dave ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: temp sensors
Use a few AKCP Sensor Probes. You can get them from. http://www.rackittechnology.com/shopping/solution.php?cID=371 From: Dave Eldridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 11:09 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: temp sensors i need to get a couple of small temp only sensors to be able to send snmp/email/page messages. Google comes up with Enviromux-Mini. Anyone have any good/bad experience with these? any others out there that only do temp? dave ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: temp sensors
www.itwatchdogs.com Affordable and work like a champ. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Dave Eldridge [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: i need to get a couple of small temp only sensors to be able to send snmp/email/page messages. Google comes up with Enviromux-Mini. Anyone have any good/bad experience with these? any others out there that only do temp? dave ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Print server upgrade to 2008
I'm surprised I haven't gotten an answer to this? Does nobody know the answer? Is this just a really stupid idea? -Original Message- From: Jim Dandy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 9:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Print server upgrade to 2008 I'd like to upgrade my print server from 2003 to 2008 so I can load 64-bit drivers. Will the following procedure cause any problems? 1) Build a 2008 server and recreate all the print queues on my present print server including using the same queue and share names. 2) Take the old print server down and rename the 2008 print server to have the same name as the old print server. It's my understanding that, if the drivers aren't the exact same version on the clients as are on the print server they will be updated to the same drivers as on the server. Is that true? My users would not be logging on with Admin privileges. Thanks for your help. Curt Finley ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Print server upgrade to 2008
That should work, and your clients should update the driver as long as the names are exact. But if that is the only reason to upgrade, you can load 64bit drivers on a 32bit 2K3 server. Right-click printer - sharing tab - additional drivers. Select x64 and it should prompt for location. -Troy -Original Message- From: Jim Dandy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 9:50 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Print server upgrade to 2008 I'm surprised I haven't gotten an answer to this? Does nobody know the answer? Is this just a really stupid idea? -Original Message- From: Jim Dandy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 9:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Print server upgrade to 2008 I'd like to upgrade my print server from 2003 to 2008 so I can load 64-bit drivers. Will the following procedure cause any problems? 1) Build a 2008 server and recreate all the print queues on my present print server including using the same queue and share names. 2) Take the old print server down and rename the 2008 print server to have the same name as the old print server. It's my understanding that, if the drivers aren't the exact same version on the clients as are on the print server they will be updated to the same drivers as on the server. Is that true? My users would not be logging on with Admin privileges. Thanks for your help. Curt Finley ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Print server upgrade to 2008
Thanks. I guess I should have checked into 64 bit drivers a bit more before making big plans for upgrades. I thought I had heard that 2003 couldn't handle 64-bit Vista drivers. I hadn't bother to try adding one. Curt -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 10:00 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Print server upgrade to 2008 That should work, and your clients should update the driver as long as the names are exact. But if that is the only reason to upgrade, you can load 64bit drivers on a 32bit 2K3 server. Right-click printer - sharing tab - additional drivers. Select x64 and it should prompt for location. -Troy -Original Message- From: Jim Dandy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 9:50 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Print server upgrade to 2008 I'm surprised I haven't gotten an answer to this? Does nobody know the answer? Is this just a really stupid idea? -Original Message- From: Jim Dandy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 9:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Print server upgrade to 2008 I'd like to upgrade my print server from 2003 to 2008 so I can load 64-bit drivers. Will the following procedure cause any problems? 1) Build a 2008 server and recreate all the print queues on my present print server including using the same queue and share names. 2) Take the old print server down and rename the 2008 print server to have the same name as the old print server. It's my understanding that, if the drivers aren't the exact same version on the clients as are on the print server they will be updated to the same drivers as on the server. Is that true? My users would not be logging on with Admin privileges. Thanks for your help. Curt Finley ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: temp sensors
I have one of those. It does the job, but you have to rely on a server to do all the work. I prefer the AvTech products, but if cost is an issue, this thing will do the job. From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 9:13 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: temp sensors I have and use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] product. Inexpensive and works well. www.temperaturealert.com Roger Wright Network Administrator Evatone, Inc. 727.572.7076 x388 _ From: Dave Eldridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: temp sensors i need to get a couple of small temp only sensors to be able to send snmp/email/page messages. Google comes up with Enviromux-Mini. Anyone have any good/bad experience with these? any others out there that only do temp? dave ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Open iMac
Has anyone recently tried opening up the new iMac? How? -Z.V. This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original message (including attachments). ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Open iMac
Hammer? Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Vue, Za [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Open iMac Has anyone recently tried opening up the new iMac? How? -Z.V. This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original message (including attachments). ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Open iMac
Hammer +2 Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA Phone: 401-639-3505 From: Vue, Za [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Open iMac Has anyone recently tried opening up the new iMac? How? -Z.V. This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original message (including attachments). ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Open iMac
Something so crude, when you've invested all that money in the Dremel? -- Richard McClary, Systems Administrator ASPCA Knowledge Management 1717 S Philo Rd, Ste 36, Urbana, IL 61802 217-337-9761 http://www.aspca.org Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/30/2008 01:21:09 PM: Hammer? Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Vue, Za [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Open iMac Has anyone recently tried opening up the new iMac? How? -Z.V. This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original message (including attachments). ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Open iMac
If that does not work...bigger hammer! On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hammer? Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] *From:* Vue, Za [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:47 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Open iMac Has anyone recently tried opening up the new iMac? How? -Z.V. -- This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original message (including attachments). ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Open iMac
Or drop it on Concrete from Very large heights! Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA Phone: 401-639-3505 From: Robert Cato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Open iMac ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Terminal Server printing question
Good afternoon, I'm trying to track down an odd printing issue involving Terminal Server on a Windows 2003 server. I am the administrator on the domain, and we're using an older scheduling program called Xytech. If I login to TS, and login to Xytech with a user account, it prints instantly. If I login to TS as a user, and then login to Xytech as a user, it takes 60-120 seconds to print. To rule out permissions, I added the user account to all the same groups I am in. Any idea what could cause this, or how I can remedy the situation? Thanks, Eric Brown IT Manager Forest Post Productions [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 855-4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Open iMac
by-4 On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Ziots, Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hammer +2 Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA Phone: 401-639-3505 From: Vue, Za [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Open iMac Has anyone recently tried opening up the new iMac? How? -Z.V. This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original message (including attachments). -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Terminal Server printing question
Problem with users being able to load print drivers. I believe by default the User rights on Win2k3 don't allow anyone but administrators to load printer drivers. Also You can use filemon/regmon and procmon from Sysinternals, to take a look at what is going on application wise in that particular function as compared to when you are logged on as admin, to determine the root cause of the slow down. Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA Phone: 401-639-3505 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:42 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Terminal Server printing question Good afternoon, I'm trying to track down an odd printing issue involving Terminal Server on a Windows 2003 server. I am the administrator on the domain, and we're using an older scheduling program called Xytech. If I login to TS, and login to Xytech with a user account, it prints instantly. If I login to TS as a user, and then login to Xytech as a user, it takes 60-120 seconds to print. To rule out permissions, I added the user account to all the same groups I am in. Any idea what could cause this, or how I can remedy the situation? Thanks, Eric Brown IT Manager Forest Post Productions [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 855-4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Video Conferencing
Just been asked to look into a video conferencing/meeting solution for the company...anyone have recommendations? I'm looking at the Tandberg site, but that is mostly site to site video. I'd like to host meetings, with multiple people attending with an interface such as webex/live meeting. Or have the ability to show video from remote sites as well. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Video Conferencing
We had good success with Yugma. I don't think we're still using it, but when we did the service and presentation tools were more than adequate and the service is certainly affordable. https://www.yugma.com/forbusiness/business.php Roger Wright Network Administrator Evatone, Inc. 727.572.7076 x388 _ From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Video Conferencing Just been asked to look into a video conferencing/meeting solution for the company...anyone have recommendations? I'm looking at the Tandberg site, but that is mostly site to site video. I'd like to host meetings, with multiple people attending with an interface such as webex/live meeting. Or have the ability to show video from remote sites as well. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Open iMac
Yes, need a clearer definition on open. There's properly (which apparently you need to be an Apple Genius for), or there's just open it, which involves the previously mentioned methods. Hammer +3 On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Sherry Abercrombie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Define open On 9/30/08, Ziots, Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or drop it on Concrete from Very large heights! Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA Phone: 401-639-3505 From: Robert Cato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Open iMac -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Chris Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, karaoke mic in one hand, beer in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally warn out, and screaming 'WOO HOO! What a ride!': ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Video Conferencing
+1 Unless you have a newer firewall that understands H.232 traffic, it will not play nice with the newer Polycom stuff. -Original Message- From: Mike French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Video Conferencing How about www.polycom.com Used them at a client site, had good results. Just make sure your firewall will play nice with whatever you choose... From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Video Conferencing   ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
OT: shared calendars
I apologize if this is the wrong list for this question, but does anyone know if Outlook 2007 has a limitation of viewing shared calendars? We have Exchange 2003 as the host. Thanks, Thomas Gonzalez Technology Manager Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas 210.349.2404 phone 210.403.1586 DID 210.349.2666 fax www.girlscouts-swtx.org http://www.girlscouts-swtx.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Video Conferencing
+2. You can also get software from Polycom that your mobile users can use to connect to the video conference. Thanks, Krishna Reddy IT Manager Nucomm, Inc. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:22 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Video Conferencing +1 Unless you have a newer firewall that understands H.232 traffic, it will not play nice with the newer Polycom stuff. -Original Message- From: Mike French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Video Conferencing How about www.polycom.com Used them at a client site, had good results. Just make sure your firewall will play nice with whatever you choose... From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Video Conferencing ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Video Conferencing
+1 for Yugma. On 9/30/08, Krishna Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +2. You can also get software from Polycom that your mobile users can use to connect to the video conference. Thanks, Krishna Reddy IT Manager Nucomm, Inc. -- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:22 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Video Conferencing +1 Unless you have a newer firewall that understands H.232 traffic, it will not play nice with the newer Polycom stuff. -Original Message- From: Mike French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Video Conferencing How about www.polycom.com Used them at a client site, had good results. Just make sure your firewall will play nice with whatever you choose... From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Video Conferencing ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Video Conferencing
That would be H.323, I believe, and yes, you are correct. If it were me doing this (and it is, I just haven't gotten to it yet), I'd put the Polycom unit in a DMZ with it's own public IP address, and just open it up. Turn it off when not int use, and pay for the encryption license on both ends. Kurt On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Unless you have a newer firewall that understands H.232 traffic, it will not play nice with the newer Polycom stuff. -Original Message- From: Mike French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Video Conferencing How about www.polycom.com Used them at a client site, had good results. Just make sure your firewall will play nice with whatever you choose... From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Video Conferencing ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Video Conferencing
Whoops. Yep, H.323. Fingers working faster than the brain... Yes, this setup would greatly simplify things! -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Video Conferencing That would be H.323, I believe, and yes, you are correct. If it were me doing this (and it is, I just haven't gotten to it yet), I'd put the Polycom unit in a DMZ with it's own public IP address, and just open it up. Turn it off when not int use, and pay for the encryption license on both ends. Kurt On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Unless you have a newer firewall that understands H.232 traffic, it will not play nice with the newer Polycom stuff. -Original Message- From: Mike French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Video Conferencing How about www.polycom.com Used them at a client site, had good results. Just make sure your firewall will play nice with whatever you choose... From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Video Conferencing ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Open iMac
Shh. Don't tell anyone where you found this: http://home.earthlink.net/~strahm_s/manuals.html ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Open iMac
Define open On 9/30/08, Ziots, Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or drop it on Concrete from Very large heights! Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA Phone: 401-639-3505 -- *From:* Robert Cato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:23 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Open iMac -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Video Conferencing
How about www.polycom.com Used them at a client site, had good results. Just make sure your firewall will play nice with whatever you choose... From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Video Conferencing   ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Open iMac
About those Apple Geniuses... http://gizmodo.com/5055539/apple-store-geniuses-might-actually-be-dunces -- Durf On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Christopher Bosak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, need a clearer definition on open. There's properly (which apparently you need to be an Apple Genius for), or there's just open it, which involves the previously mentioned methods. Hammer +3 On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Sherry Abercrombie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Define open On 9/30/08, Ziots, Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or drop it on Concrete from Very large heights! Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA Phone: 401-639-3505 From: Robert Cato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Open iMac -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Chris Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, karaoke mic in one hand, beer in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally warn out, and screaming 'WOO HOO! What a ride!': ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- -- Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks! ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: External RAID HDD Enclosure Recomendations
I joined the List the first time back in '96 or '97 I think. So far back I don't remember clearly. And even then ME2 and Michael Smith were here. As well as several others that I came to rely on for accurate information as I was in my first few years of IT work. I was an OF when I first came to IT back in '95. I have learned much from the folks here and hope I have shed a little light on a few things for others also. Been busy enough lately now that I am self-employed(1) that I don't make it to the list every day; sometimes only once a week. I too, do not delete anything. I keep it all in a Google mailbox so that I can search on things. The ones I use the most I star and then i have a couple of tags get applied on the message entry to the mailbox to make the searching faster.(2) I have very much enjoyed my time here as well as learned many things. And had some humor sent my way. Thanks to all for a great community. Len Hammond (1) my corporate position was dropped almost 2 years ago and in southeast Michigan the IT departments in corporations are no longer growing. Couldn't find a job so I started a company and decided to go it alone. grin Kinda scary! but fun and emotionally rewarding even if the money hasn't started rolling in yet. (2) At some point I would like to migrate all of my NT List messages to a new GMail box so I can have the name on this mailbox to use for my general business mailbox. I may have to ask for advice on that change. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not from me too tired and too old. Jon On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Jim Majorowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: What, no get off the lawn jokes? :P *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:28 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: External RAID HDD Enclosure Recomendations Yeah and this OF wishes he knew as much as some of you kids! Jon On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Steven M. Caesare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe the list shorthand for that was OF, and one Jon Harris was nominated Resident OF. -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Open iMac
Hahahaha... figures. They all seem like such weenises to me. Or is that weenii? On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Durf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: About those Apple Geniuses... http://gizmodo.com/5055539/apple-store-geniuses-might-actually-be-dunces -- Durf On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Christopher Bosak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, need a clearer definition on open. There's properly (which apparently you need to be an Apple Genius for), or there's just open it, which involves the previously mentioned methods. Hammer +3 On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Sherry Abercrombie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Define open On 9/30/08, Ziots, Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or drop it on Concrete from Very large heights! Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA Phone: 401-639-3505 From: Robert Cato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Open iMac -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Chris Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, karaoke mic in one hand, beer in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally warn out, and screaming 'WOO HOO! What a ride!': ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- -- Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks! ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Video Conferencing
Or install a video gateway and connect a PRI. Then users can place IP, or ISDN calls, and connect via webcams with Cisco Video advantage. Up to 16 concurrent conferences, each with I believe 16 participants. Device does the rate matching among the different participants. But I don't believe this is truly what the OP is looking for. Steve you mentioned LiveMeeting - you know LiveMeeting supports video right? On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whoops. Yep, H.323. Fingers working faster than the brain... Yes, this setup would greatly simplify things! -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Video Conferencing That would be H.323, I believe, and yes, you are correct. If it were me doing this (and it is, I just haven't gotten to it yet), I'd put the Polycom unit in a DMZ with it's own public IP address, and just open it up. Turn it off when not int use, and pay for the encryption license on both ends. Kurt On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Unless you have a newer firewall that understands H.232 traffic, it will not play nice with the newer Polycom stuff. -Original Message- From: Mike French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Video Conferencing How about www.polycom.com Used them at a client site, had good results. Just make sure your firewall will play nice with whatever you choose... From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Video Conferencing ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Open iMac
iHammer. From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:21 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Open iMac Hammer? Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Vue, Za [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Open iMac Has anyone recently tried opening up the new iMac? How? -Z.V. _ This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original message (including attachments). ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Open iMac
Yes, Apple;s and Wii's do seem to have the same shade of white on them. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 15:08 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Open iMac Hahahaha... figures. They all seem like such weenises to me. Or is that weenii? On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Durf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: About those Apple Geniuses... http://gizmodo.com/5055539/apple-store-geniuses-might-actually-be-dunces -- Durf On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Christopher Bosak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, need a clearer definition on open. There's properly (which apparently you need to be an Apple Genius for), or there's just open it, which involves the previously mentioned methods. Hammer +3 On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Sherry Abercrombie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Define open On 9/30/08, Ziots, Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or drop it on Concrete from Very large heights! Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA Phone: 401-639-3505 From: Robert Cato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Open iMac -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Chris Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, karaoke mic in one hand, beer in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally warn out, and screaming 'WOO HOO! What a ride!': ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- -- Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks! ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Video Conferencing
Yes I know you can run video with livemeeting or webex...but can you get return video? ie with webcams? I also took at look at that Microsoft roundtable device online, anybody tried that out? On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Kevin Lundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or install a video gateway and connect a PRI. Then users can place IP, or ISDN calls, and connect via webcams with Cisco Video advantage. Up to 16 concurrent conferences, each with I believe 16 participants. Device does the rate matching among the different participants. But I don't believe this is truly what the OP is looking for. Steve you mentioned LiveMeeting - you know LiveMeeting supports video right? On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whoops. Yep, H.323. Fingers working faster than the brain... Yes, this setup would greatly simplify things! -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Video Conferencing That would be H.323, I believe, and yes, you are correct. If it were me doing this (and it is, I just haven't gotten to it yet), I'd put the Polycom unit in a DMZ with it's own public IP address, and just open it up. Turn it off when not int use, and pay for the encryption license on both ends. Kurt On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Unless you have a newer firewall that understands H.232 traffic, it will not play nice with the newer Polycom stuff. -Original Message- From: Mike French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Video Conferencing How about www.polycom.com Used them at a client site, had good results. Just make sure your firewall will play nice with whatever you choose... From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Video Conferencing ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Windirstat
Any WinDirStat users out there? (http://windirstat.sourcefourge.net) Great little utility for analyzing disk utilization. Has anyone figured out how to export the results to a text or csv file? I'd really like to export so I can then sort and compare various file share. The only thing I have found is a screen capture. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Open iMac
AOL OMG An email from the list!!! My first since Friday /AOL Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:18 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Open iMac iHammer. From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:21 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Open iMac Hammer? Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Vue, Za [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Open iMac Has anyone recently tried opening up the new iMac? How? -Z.V. _ This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original message (including attachments). ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Video Conferencing
Yes, you can use webcams with Livemeeting. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Steve Ens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes I know you can run video with livemeeting or webex...but can you get return video? ie with webcams? I also took at look at that Microsoft roundtable device online, anybody tried that out? On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Kevin Lundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or install a video gateway and connect a PRI. Then users can place IP, or ISDN calls, and connect via webcams with Cisco Video advantage. Up to 16 concurrent conferences, each with I believe 16 participants. Device does the rate matching among the different participants. But I don't believe this is truly what the OP is looking for. Steve you mentioned LiveMeeting - you know LiveMeeting supports video right? On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whoops. Yep, H.323. Fingers working faster than the brain... Yes, this setup would greatly simplify things! -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Video Conferencing That would be H.323, I believe, and yes, you are correct. If it were me doing this (and it is, I just haven't gotten to it yet), I'd put the Polycom unit in a DMZ with it's own public IP address, and just open it up. Turn it off when not int use, and pay for the encryption license on both ends. Kurt On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Unless you have a newer firewall that understands H.232 traffic, it will not play nice with the newer Polycom stuff. -Original Message- From: Mike French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Video Conferencing How about www.polycom.com Used them at a client site, had good results. Just make sure your firewall will play nice with whatever you choose... From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Video Conferencing ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Open iMac
Is that like hose A and hose B? -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Open iMac Hahahaha... figures. They all seem like such weenises to me. Or is that weenii? On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Durf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: About those Apple Geniuses... http://gizmodo.com/5055539/apple-store-geniuses-might-actually-be-dunces -- Durf On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Christopher Bosak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, need a clearer definition on open. There's properly (which apparently you need to be an Apple Genius for), or there's just open it, which involves the previously mentioned methods. Hammer +3 On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Sherry Abercrombie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Define open On 9/30/08, Ziots, Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or drop it on Concrete from Very large heights! Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA Phone: 401-639-3505 From: Robert Cato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Open iMac -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Chris Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, karaoke mic in one hand, beer in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally warn out, and screaming 'WOO HOO! What a ride!': ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- -- Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks! ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
New threat Clickjacking
http://redmondmag.com/news/article.asp?editorialsid=10247 Todd Lemmiksoo Network Administrator All-Mode Communications, Inc. 1725 Dryden Road Freeville, New York 13068 (607) 347-4164 x440 1-877-ALLMODE (toll free) http://www.all-mode.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
SortaOT: Mailbox Sizes and AutoArchive
So when, in your opinions, is a good time to start archiving? I haven't really noticed a performance degrade with my system, but I wanted to see if anyone here enforces a size or message count limit. My current inbox count: Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~image001.png
RE: Open iMac
Is that like LRN2INTERNET? Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 15:25 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Open iMac AOL OMG An email from the list!!! My first since Friday /AOL Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:18 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Open iMac iHammer. From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:21 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Open iMac Hammer? Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Vue, Za [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Open iMac Has anyone recently tried opening up the new iMac? How? -Z.V. _ This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original message (including attachments). ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: SortaOT: Mailbox Sizes and AutoArchive
Exchange 2007? Eh, don't worry too much about it as long as you have enough memory on your Exchange Server. Exchange 2003 or before? I wouldn't let mine get over 5,000 if you paid me. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:32 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: SortaOT: Mailbox Sizes and AutoArchive So when, in your opinions, is a good time to start archiving? I haven't really noticed a performance degrade with my system, but I wanted to see if anyone here enforces a size or message count limit. My current inbox count: Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~image001.png
RE: External RAID HDD Enclosure Recomendations
warm fuzzy Well said Len. I joined the list back in 98 and have credited most of my education to the members here. I have actually quoted member posts when writing proposals for new gear. I'm not really active as far as posting but read most posts and learn new stuff daily. Thanks all! /warm fuzzy Rick From: Len Hammond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:55 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: External RAID HDD Enclosure Recomendations I joined the List the first time back in '96 or '97 I think. So far back I don't remember clearly. And even then ME2 and Michael Smith were here. As well as several others that I came to rely on for accurate information as I was in my first few years of IT work. I was an OF when I first came to IT back in '95. I have learned much from the folks here and hope I have shed a little light on a few things for others also. Been busy enough lately now that I am self-employed(1) that I don't make it to the list every day; sometimes only once a week. I too, do not delete anything. I keep it all in a Google mailbox so that I can search on things. The ones I use the most I star and then i have a couple of tags get applied on the message entry to the mailbox to make the searching faster.(2) I have very much enjoyed my time here as well as learned many things. And had some humor sent my way. Thanks to all for a great community. Len Hammond (1) my corporate position was dropped almost 2 years ago and in southeast Michigan the IT departments in corporations are no longer growing. Couldn't find a job so I started a company and decided to go it alone. grin Kinda scary! but fun and emotionally rewarding even if the money hasn't started rolling in yet. (2) At some point I would like to migrate all of my NT List messages to a new GMail box so I can have the name on this mailbox to use for my general business mailbox. I may have to ask for advice on that change. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not from me too tired and too old. Jon On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Jim Majorowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What, no get off the lawn jokes? :P From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: External RAID HDD Enclosure Recomendations Yeah and this OF wishes he knew as much as some of you kids! Jon On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Steven M. Caesare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe the list shorthand for that was OF, and one Jon Harris was nominated Resident OF. -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: SortaOT: Mailbox Sizes and AutoArchive
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905803 We recommend that you maintain a range of 3,500 to 5,000 items in a folder depending on the capacity of the Exchange Server environment. Additionally, you can create more top-level folders or create sub-folders underneath the Inbox and Sent Items folders. When you do this, the costs that are associated with index creation will be greatly reduced if the number of items in any one folder does not exceed 5,000. From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:32 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: SortaOT: Mailbox Sizes and AutoArchive So when, in your opinions, is a good time to start archiving? I haven't really noticed a performance degrade with my system, but I wanted to see if anyone here enforces a size or message count limit. My current inbox count: Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~image001.png
RE: SortaOT: Mailbox Sizes and AutoArchive
Heh. oops. Time for some housekeeping. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 15:41 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SortaOT: Mailbox Sizes and AutoArchive http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905803 We recommend that you maintain a range of 3,500 to 5,000 items in a folder depending on the capacity of the Exchange Server environment. Additionally, you can create more top-level folders or create sub-folders underneath the Inbox and Sent Items folders. When you do this, the costs that are associated with index creation will be greatly reduced if the number of items in any one folder does not exceed 5,000. _ From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:32 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: SortaOT: Mailbox Sizes and AutoArchive So when, in your opinions, is a good time to start archiving? I haven't really noticed a performance degrade with my system, but I wanted to see if anyone here enforces a size or message count limit. My current inbox count: Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~image001.png
RE: SortaOT: Mailbox Sizes and AutoArchive
I'd say... LOL Most organizations do not allow archiving in the traditional sense... to a PST (either stored on the user's PC, or a network share). Many are moving forward with enterprise archiving products that will archive for you. For the rest of us, the norm seems to be mailbox limits (for example 500MB) and force the users to do their own cleaning when they hit these limits. You should definitely have mailbox limits in place though, as storage is not infinite. HTH From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:50 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SortaOT: Mailbox Sizes and AutoArchive Heh... oops. Time for some housekeeping. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 15:41 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SortaOT: Mailbox Sizes and AutoArchive http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905803 We recommend that you maintain a range of 3,500 to 5,000 items in a folder depending on the capacity of the Exchange Server environment. Additionally, you can create more top-level folders or create sub-folders underneath the Inbox and Sent Items folders. When you do this, the costs that are associated with index creation will be greatly reduced if the number of items in any one folder does not exceed 5,000. From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:32 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: SortaOT: Mailbox Sizes and AutoArchive So when, in your opinions, is a good time to start archiving? I haven't really noticed a performance degrade with my system, but I wanted to see if anyone here enforces a size or message count limit. My current inbox count: Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~image001.png
Re: New threat Clickjacking
Experts say that NoScript, a security add-on to Firefox that blocks JavaScript execution, is designed to defend against most attack scenarios. You betcha. I run this on every site unless I absolutely need js functionality on a particular site in order to retrieve information. Its a shame IE doesn't have an equivalent. NoScript is exceptional for what it does. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Todd Lemmiksoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://redmondmag.com/news/article.asp?editorialsid=10247 Todd Lemmiksoo Network Administrator All-Mode Communications, Inc. 1725 Dryden Road Freeville, New York 13068 (607) 347-4164 x440 1-877-ALLMODE (toll free) http://www.all-mode.com -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: FTP though an F5 BigIP
Michael, Just wanted to let you know that I was able to resolve this issue, it was caused by FTP flipping from active to passive, I setup a VS and connected it to the pool and still the issue persisted, after doing some research on F5 website, and changing the script to passive, it worked perfectly. Thanks again for your responses, Bob Smith - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:50 PM Subject: RE: FTP though an F5 BigIP Well, that's what you want to change. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange From: Bob Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:39 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: FTP though an F5 BigIP Hi Michael, No persistence and no stickiness. Thanks for the reply, Bob Smith - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:12 PM Subject: RE: FTP though an F5 BigIP Do you have connections to the F5 set to sticky? (That is, IP persistence.) Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange From: Bob Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: FTP though an F5 BigIP Hello All, We implement an active/passive F5 BigIP last weekend for 2 webservers, since then a daily FTP Job on the webserver to offload the log files has failed, nothing else has changed in the environment, same firewall, same servers, these were previously connected to Kemp LB's (through the kemps it worked fine) and we replaced the Kemp with F5's, has anyone run into this. Thank you in advance, Bob Smith ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: New threat Clickjacking
I found that 99% of the sites I visited just don't work with NoScript, so I spend my whole day whitelisting crap. Guess how long that lasted? Good AV, AS, Firewall, OpenDNS, and something like SpywareBlaster (Which blacklists bad sites), and a functional internet makes me happy. Sam -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: New threat Clickjacking Experts say that NoScript, a security add-on to Firefox that blocks JavaScript execution, is designed to defend against most attack scenarios. You betcha. I run this on every site unless I absolutely need js functionality on a particular site in order to retrieve information. Its a shame IE doesn't have an equivalent. NoScript is exceptional for what it does. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Todd Lemmiksoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://redmondmag.com/news/article.asp?editorialsid=10247 Todd Lemmiksoo Network Administrator All-Mode Communications, Inc. 1725 Dryden Road Freeville, New York 13068 (607) 347-4164 x440 1-877-ALLMODE (toll free) http://www.all-mode.com -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: FTP though an F5 BigIP
Glad to have helped and glad you resolved it. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange From: Bob Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: FTP though an F5 BigIP Michael, Just wanted to let you know that I was able to resolve this issue, it was caused by FTP flipping from active to passive, I setup a VS and connected it to the pool and still the issue persisted, after doing some research on F5 website, and changing the script to passive, it worked perfectly. Thanks again for your responses, Bob Smith - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NT System Admin Issues mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:50 PM Subject: RE: FTP though an F5 BigIP Well, that's what you want to change. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange From: Bob Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:39 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: FTP though an F5 BigIP Hi Michael, No persistence and no stickiness. Thanks for the reply, Bob Smith - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NT System Admin Issues mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:12 PM Subject: RE: FTP though an F5 BigIP Do you have connections to the F5 set to sticky? (That is, IP persistence.) Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange From: Bob Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: FTP though an F5 BigIP Hello All, We implement an active/passive F5 BigIP last weekend for 2 webservers, since then a daily FTP Job on the webserver to offload the log files has failed, nothing else has changed in the environment, same firewall, same servers, these were previously connected to Kemp LB's (through the kemps it worked fine) and we replaced the Kemp with F5's, has anyone run into this. Thank you in advance, Bob Smith ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windirstat
Sorry, no, I haven't found that either. I've found diruse.exe to be helpful for this, though. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Kevin Lundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any WinDirStat users out there? (http://windirstat.sourcefourge.net) Great little utility for analyzing disk utilization. Has anyone figured out how to export the results to a text or csv file? I'd really like to export so I can then sort and compare various file share. The only thing I have found is a screen capture. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: New threat Clickjacking
Sure, I've whitelisted some trusted stuff too, but I cant say I've experienced anything that sounds that bad. In fact, my browsing experience has been better since it can be used to also block advertising. I think you should still use it to at least catch unwanted Flash, Silverlight, XSS, JAR, and IFRAMES - even if you aren't otherwise blocking the other stuff. It definitely takes some tweaking to get running mostly transparently, which is unfortunate. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Sam Cayze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found that 99% of the sites I visited just don't work with NoScript, so I spend my whole day whitelisting crap. Guess how long that lasted? Good AV, AS, Firewall, OpenDNS, and something like SpywareBlaster (Which blacklists bad sites), and a functional internet makes me happy. Sam -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: New threat Clickjacking Experts say that NoScript, a security add-on to Firefox that blocks JavaScript execution, is designed to defend against most attack scenarios. You betcha. I run this on every site unless I absolutely need js functionality on a particular site in order to retrieve information. Its a shame IE doesn't have an equivalent. NoScript is exceptional for what it does. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Todd Lemmiksoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://redmondmag.com/news/article.asp?editorialsid=10247 Todd Lemmiksoo Network Administrator All-Mode Communications, Inc. 1725 Dryden Road Freeville, New York 13068 (607) 347-4164 x440 1-877-ALLMODE (toll free) http://www.all-mode.com -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: New threat Clickjacking
+1 for NoScript. I also add in Ad Block Plus. After those two, I only have an issue with the crappiest of web sites, and I'll turn to IE for those. Kurt On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sure, I've whitelisted some trusted stuff too, but I cant say I've experienced anything that sounds that bad. In fact, my browsing experience has been better since it can be used to also block advertising. I think you should still use it to at least catch unwanted Flash, Silverlight, XSS, JAR, and IFRAMES - even if you aren't otherwise blocking the other stuff. It definitely takes some tweaking to get running mostly transparently, which is unfortunate. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Sam Cayze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found that 99% of the sites I visited just don't work with NoScript, so I spend my whole day whitelisting crap. Guess how long that lasted? Good AV, AS, Firewall, OpenDNS, and something like SpywareBlaster (Which blacklists bad sites), and a functional internet makes me happy. Sam -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: New threat Clickjacking Experts say that NoScript, a security add-on to Firefox that blocks JavaScript execution, is designed to defend against most attack scenarios. You betcha. I run this on every site unless I absolutely need js functionality on a particular site in order to retrieve information. Its a shame IE doesn't have an equivalent. NoScript is exceptional for what it does. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Todd Lemmiksoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://redmondmag.com/news/article.asp?editorialsid=10247 Todd Lemmiksoo Network Administrator All-Mode Communications, Inc. 1725 Dryden Road Freeville, New York 13068 (607) 347-4164 x440 1-877-ALLMODE (toll free) http://www.all-mode.com -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windirstat
Try JDiskReport*: http://www.jgoodies.com * Requires Java, but its an elegant tool. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Kevin Lundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any WinDirStat users out there? (http://windirstat.sourcefourge.net) Great little utility for analyzing disk utilization. Has anyone figured out how to export the results to a text or csv file? I'd really like to export so I can then sort and compare various file share. The only thing I have found is a screen capture. -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windirstat
The lack of reporting is probably my biggest complaint with WinDirStat, although you get what you pay for, right? There should be an option to e-mail a report, but it's just a crude print out of each folder in the tree highlighted and it's corresponding size. - Sean On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Kevin Lundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any WinDirStat users out there? (http://windirstat.sourcefourge.net) Great little utility for analyzing disk utilization. Has anyone figured out how to export the results to a text or csv file? I'd really like to export so I can then sort and compare various file share. The only thing I have found is a screen capture. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: shared calendars
Instead of apologizing, why not subscribe to the Exchange list on this same listserv and ask the question there? When you get there, you might try writing a better question, in particular, what kind of limitation you're experiencing or asking about. I don't know that OL 2007 has any limitations that are more restrictive than any earlier version of OL. Carl From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:21 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT: shared calendars I apologize if this is the wrong list for this question, but does anyone know if Outlook 2007 has a limitation of viewing shared calendars? We have Exchange 2003 as the host. Thanks, Thomas Gonzalez Technology Manager Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas 210.349.2404 phone 210.403.1586 DID 210.349.2666 fax www.girlscouts-swtx.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: External RAID HDD Enclosure Recomendations
I wouldn't trust Google or anything 'in the cloud' to maintain my valuable database of saved list messages. Just MHO. Stuff happens. If you don't have a local copy and a backup of your local copy it could all be toast. Carl From: Len Hammond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:55 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: External RAID HDD Enclosure Recomendations I joined the List the first time back in '96 or '97 I think. So far back I don't remember clearly. And even then ME2 and Michael Smith were here. As well as several others that I came to rely on for accurate information as I was in my first few years of IT work. I was an OF when I first came to IT back in '95. I have learned much from the folks here and hope I have shed a little light on a few things for others also. Been busy enough lately now that I am self-employed(1) that I don't make it to the list every day; sometimes only once a week. I too, do not delete anything. I keep it all in a Google mailbox so that I can search on things. The ones I use the most I star and then i have a couple of tags get applied on the message entry to the mailbox to make the searching faster.(2) I have very much enjoyed my time here as well as learned many things. And had some humor sent my way. Thanks to all for a great community. Len Hammond (1) my corporate position was dropped almost 2 years ago and in southeast Michigan the IT departments in corporations are no longer growing. Couldn't find a job so I started a company and decided to go it alone. grin Kinda scary! but fun and emotionally rewarding even if the money hasn't started rolling in yet. (2) At some point I would like to migrate all of my NT List messages to a new GMail box so I can have the name on this mailbox to use for my general business mailbox. I may have to ask for advice on that change. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not from me too tired and too old. Jon On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Jim Majorowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What, no get off the lawn jokes? :P From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: External RAID HDD Enclosure Recomendations Yeah and this OF wishes he knew as much as some of you kids! Jon On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Steven M. Caesare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe the list shorthand for that was OF, and one Jon Harris was nominated Resident OF. -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Actionpack Licensing question
Wondering if someone can answer this question for me. We have a license for 64bit Windows Server 2003, do we have downgrade rights to 32bit using the same key? Thanks, Neil ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
