Re: OT: SolarWinds Standard Tools Free for .EDU and .GOV

[Phil Brutsche]

Be warned that this is not a permanent offer - they are giving away a
limited # of licenses.

Vicky Spelshaus wrote:
> http://www.solarwinds.com/campaigns/sled_toolset.aspx?Program=426

-- 

Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Wan optimizer

[Greg Olson]

I'll add to this as well, if anyone has any experience using Riverbed vs Cisco 
Waas, I'd appreciate hearing your experiences as well.


From: Liu, David (G2DD) [mailto:da...@g2.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 7:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Wan optimizer

Anyone care to comment on how riverbed handles afp ? I wasn't able to find much 
documentation on their site that talks about optimization for non-smb/http 
protocols & wonder if anyone has used it for filesharing between two remote 
offices, OsX server/clients.

From: Jason Morris [mailto:jmor...@mjmc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Wan optimizer

I used Riverbed in a test environment and was impressed with their performance. 
However, the application we were looking to optimize had very little benefit 
from the "Caching" that Riverbed uses. That wasn't a failure on their part, it 
was the old technology of the application.
For most other data sets, it worked perfect and "as advertised".
YMMV, Jason

From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Wan optimizer

I've seen occasional talk about bandwidth management/compression.  I'm looking 
for an appliance that can do this between my HQ site and second largest site.  
Anyone have any experience/recommendations.  The two I am familiar with are 
Citrix's WANOptimizer and Packeteer (now Blue Coat).

Thanks,




Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the 
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.









--

The pages accompanying this email transmission contain information from MJMC, 
Inc., which

is confidential and/or privileged. The information is to be for the use of the 
individual

or entity named on this cover sheet. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are

hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this

communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in 
error, please

immediately notify us by telephone so that we can arrange for the retrieval of 
the original

document.





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Wan optimizer

[Liu, David (G2DD)]

Anyone care to comment on how riverbed handles afp ? I wasn't able to
find much documentation on their site that talks about optimization for
non-smb/http protocols & wonder if anyone has used it for filesharing
between two remote offices, OsX server/clients. 

 

From: Jason Morris [mailto:jmor...@mjmc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Wan optimizer

 

I used Riverbed in a test environment and was impressed with their
performance. However, the application we were looking to optimize had
very little benefit from the "Caching" that Riverbed uses. That wasn't a
failure on their part, it was the old technology of the application.

For most other data sets, it worked perfect and "as advertised".

YMMV, Jason

 

From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Wan optimizer

 

I've seen occasional talk about bandwidth management/compression.  I'm
looking for an appliance that can do this between my HQ site and second
largest site.  Anyone have any experience/recommendations.  The two I am
familiar with are Citrix's WANOptimizer and Packeteer (now Blue Coat).

 

Thanks,

 

 

 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message. 

 

 

 

 

--
The pages accompanying this email transmission contain information from
MJMC, Inc., which
is confidential and/or privileged. The information is to be for the use
of the individual
or entity named on this cover sheet. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are
hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission
in error, please
immediately notify us by telephone so that we can arrange for the
retrieval of the original
document.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT-RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Webster]

> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
> Subject: OT-RE: Account Unknown profiles
> 
> Still doing the sales engineer thing with Peak 10 but I've recently
> added some Sr. mgmt responsibilities with staff and its working out
> well.  I really like it and its going to open tons of doors for me down
> the road.  

All the doors will say North Carolina Dept. of Prisons on them.

> Con tact

You will need tact as a con if you ever get out! :)


Webster


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

OT: SolarWinds Standard Tools Free for .EDU and .GOV

[Vicky Spelshaus]

http://www.solarwinds.com/campaigns/sled_toolset.aspx?Program=426

-- 
Organization and good planning are just crutches for people that can't
handle stress and caffeine. - unknown

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Vista and Server 08 SP2

[Phil Brutsche]

I have it on my home desktop and a work laptop I carry with me
everywhere I go.

It runs more smoothly than the Vista SP1 desktop I have at work.

I haven't tried it on any 2008 machines yet (the only one I have is a
test box).

Glen Johnson wrote:
> Speaking of patches, anyone tested this yet.
> 
> So far, we have it on one vista 32 system and no issues.
> 
> Nice to have one patch for both server and workstations.
> 
> Gonna test on a couple of virtual 08 server later this week.

-- 

Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Tim Vander Kooi]

Well yeah. There is that. ;-)


-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:20 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Too bad the Gators spoiled their fun last year!

John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP


-Original Message-
From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Except when the Sooners beat the tar and stuffing out of the Longhorns every 
year in the Cotton Bowl. :-)
Sorry Sherry, couldn't resist.
TVK

-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

The credit goes to our little NT list queen of Texas.  I called Sherry with a 
Nortel VPN question and she got on my case pretty hard for dropping off-list.  
So here I is...b\c I'm scared to death of Sherry, as you don't mess with Texas!

Shook


-Original Message-
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shook was lost, and now has been found... Ok who looked under the rock
and found his hiding place again ( Grin Shookie)

Z

Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
ezi...@lifespan.org
Phone:401-639-3505
-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Thanks big guy, it's good to be back.  Of course, it won't feel like
home until Webster\ME2\MBS\TVK\Blackstone et al, chime in with some wise
crack at my expense... :)

Shook
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shookie!!

Welcome back, man... missed ya around here.


Well, I ended up taking ownership of the profile folders, deleting the
old, non-existent account from the Security tab, and putting me there
with full control, and the delete buttons under the Profile list
appeared for me.  These two profiles have been deleted.

Thanks for the help, everyone!

Joe
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Webb, Brian (Corp)]

Install the User Profile Hive Cleanup Service.  It will remove all those
pesky locks and allow you to clean up nicely.
 
http://www.microsoft.com/downloadS/details.aspx?FamilyID=1b286e6d-8912-4
e18-b570-42470e2f3582&displaylang=en
 
-Brian

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Account Unknown profiles



Server 2k3

 

I've got a couple profiles on my server that are listed as Account
Unknown.  The delete button is greyed out for them.  I'd like to delete
them, but can't figure out how.  When I look under C:\Documents and
Settings, I see two folders there for personnel that have not been with
the organization for a couple of years now.  I'm assuming that these
profile folders are the ones showing up as Account Unknown, since they
are not listed otherwise under the Profile list.  I tried to manually
delete the folders themselves, but get an error saying the NTUSER.DAT is
being used by another user or program.

 

Any ideas on how I can get rid of these?

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[John Cook]

Too bad the Gators spoiled their fun last year!

John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP


-Original Message-
From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Except when the Sooners beat the tar and stuffing out of the Longhorns every 
year in the Cotton Bowl. :-)
Sorry Sherry, couldn't resist.
TVK

-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

The credit goes to our little NT list queen of Texas.  I called Sherry with a 
Nortel VPN question and she got on my case pretty hard for dropping off-list.  
So here I is...b\c I'm scared to death of Sherry, as you don't mess with Texas!

Shook


-Original Message-
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shook was lost, and now has been found... Ok who looked under the rock
and found his hiding place again ( Grin Shookie)

Z

Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
ezi...@lifespan.org
Phone:401-639-3505
-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Thanks big guy, it's good to be back.  Of course, it won't feel like
home until Webster\ME2\MBS\TVK\Blackstone et al, chime in with some wise
crack at my expense... :)

Shook
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shookie!!

Welcome back, man... missed ya around here.


Well, I ended up taking ownership of the profile folders, deleting the
old, non-existent account from the Security tab, and putting me there
with full control, and the delete buttons under the Profile list
appeared for me.  These two profiles have been deleted.

Thanks for the help, everyone!

Joe
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Eldridge, Dave]

Sherry here's hoping you're not a basketball fan.

Except when the Nuggets beat the you know what out of the whinny
Cubanites (a.k.a) the Mavericks.
:)

-Original Message-
From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Except when the Sooners beat the tar and stuffing out of the Longhorns
every year in the Cotton Bowl. :-)
Sorry Sherry, couldn't resist.
TVK

-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

The credit goes to our little NT list queen of Texas.  I called Sherry
with a Nortel VPN question and she got on my case pretty hard for
dropping off-list.  So here I is...b\c I'm scared to death of Sherry, as
you don't mess with Texas!

Shook


-Original Message-
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shook was lost, and now has been found... Ok who looked under the rock
and found his hiding place again ( Grin Shookie) 

Z

Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
ezi...@lifespan.org
Phone:401-639-3505
-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Thanks big guy, it's good to be back.  Of course, it won't feel like
home until Webster\ME2\MBS\TVK\Blackstone et al, chime in with some wise
crack at my expense... :) 

Shook
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shookie!!

Welcome back, man... missed ya around here.


Well, I ended up taking ownership of the profile folders, deleting the
old, non-existent account from the Security tab, and putting me there
with full control, and the delete buttons under the Profile list
appeared for me.  These two profiles have been deleted.

Thanks for the help, everyone!

Joe
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately via e-mail 
if you have received this e-mail by mistake; then, delete this e-mail from your 
system.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Tim Vander Kooi]

Except when the Sooners beat the tar and stuffing out of the Longhorns every 
year in the Cotton Bowl. :-)
Sorry Sherry, couldn't resist.
TVK

-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

The credit goes to our little NT list queen of Texas.  I called Sherry with a 
Nortel VPN question and she got on my case pretty hard for dropping off-list.  
So here I is...b\c I'm scared to death of Sherry, as you don't mess with Texas!

Shook


-Original Message-
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shook was lost, and now has been found... Ok who looked under the rock
and found his hiding place again ( Grin Shookie) 

Z

Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
ezi...@lifespan.org
Phone:401-639-3505
-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Thanks big guy, it's good to be back.  Of course, it won't feel like
home until Webster\ME2\MBS\TVK\Blackstone et al, chime in with some wise
crack at my expense... :) 

Shook
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shookie!!

Welcome back, man... missed ya around here.


Well, I ended up taking ownership of the profile folders, deleting the
old, non-existent account from the Security tab, and putting me there
with full control, and the delete buttons under the Profile list
appeared for me.  These two profiles have been deleted.

Thanks for the help, everyone!

Joe
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT-RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Tim Vander Kooi]

Unfortunately all the doors being opened say Women on the outside.
TVK

-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT-RE: Account Unknown profiles

Still doing the sales engineer thing with Peak 10 but I've recently added some 
Sr. mgmt responsibilities with staff and its working out well.  I really like 
it and its going to open tons of doors for me down the road.  Con tact off list 
if you need an updated vCard...

Shook


-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

So are you done with the Sales thing?
So do settle back in. It's been a little stale lately.

:)

-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Thanks big guy, it's good to be back.  Of course, it won't feel like home until 
Webster\ME2\MBS\TVK\Blackstone et al, chime in with some wise crack at my 
expense... :) 

Shook
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shookie!!

Welcome back, man... missed ya around here.


Well, I ended up taking ownership of the profile folders, deleting the old, 
non-existent account from the Security tab, and putting me there with full 
control, and the delete buttons under the Profile list appeared for me.  These 
two profiles have been deleted.

Thanks for the help, everyone!

Joe
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately via e-mail 
if you have received this e-mail by mistake; then, delete this e-mail from your 
system.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Andy Shook]

The credit goes to our little NT list queen of Texas.  I called Sherry with a 
Nortel VPN question and she got on my case pretty hard for dropping off-list.  
So here I is...b\c I'm scared to death of Sherry, as you don't mess with Texas!

Shook


-Original Message-
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shook was lost, and now has been found... Ok who looked under the rock
and found his hiding place again ( Grin Shookie) 

Z

Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
ezi...@lifespan.org
Phone:401-639-3505
-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Thanks big guy, it's good to be back.  Of course, it won't feel like
home until Webster\ME2\MBS\TVK\Blackstone et al, chime in with some wise
crack at my expense... :) 

Shook
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shookie!!

Welcome back, man... missed ya around here.


Well, I ended up taking ownership of the profile folders, deleting the
old, non-existent account from the Security tab, and putting me there
with full control, and the delete buttons under the Profile list
appeared for me.  These two profiles have been deleted.

Thanks for the help, everyone!

Joe
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

OT-RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Andy Shook]

Still doing the sales engineer thing with Peak 10 but I've recently added some 
Sr. mgmt responsibilities with staff and its working out well.  I really like 
it and its going to open tons of doors for me down the road.  Con tact off list 
if you need an updated vCard...

Shook


-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

So are you done with the Sales thing?
So do settle back in. It's been a little stale lately.

:)

-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Thanks big guy, it's good to be back.  Of course, it won't feel like home until 
Webster\ME2\MBS\TVK\Blackstone et al, chime in with some wise crack at my 
expense... :) 

Shook
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shookie!!

Welcome back, man... missed ya around here.


Well, I ended up taking ownership of the profile folders, deleting the old, 
non-existent account from the Security tab, and putting me there with full 
control, and the delete buttons under the Profile list appeared for me.  These 
two profiles have been deleted.

Thanks for the help, everyone!

Joe
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately via e-mail 
if you have received this e-mail by mistake; then, delete this e-mail from your 
system.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Ziots, Edward]

Shook was lost, and now has been found... Ok who looked under the rock
and found his hiding place again ( Grin Shookie) 

Z

Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
ezi...@lifespan.org
Phone:401-639-3505
-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Thanks big guy, it's good to be back.  Of course, it won't feel like
home until Webster\ME2\MBS\TVK\Blackstone et al, chime in with some wise
crack at my expense... :) 

Shook
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shookie!!

Welcome back, man... missed ya around here.


Well, I ended up taking ownership of the profile folders, deleting the
old, non-existent account from the Security tab, and putting me there
with full control, and the delete buttons under the Profile list
appeared for me.  These two profiles have been deleted.

Thanks for the help, everyone!

Joe
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Tim Vander Kooi]

I was actually just thinking of you this weekend Shookie. My dog went out in 
the rain and rolled in the mud and something oddly resembling goose feces. When 
she came back inside, the combination of sight and smell made me think of you 
buddy. ;-)
TVK

-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Thanks big guy, it's good to be back.  Of course, it won't feel like home until 
Webster\ME2\MBS\TVK\Blackstone et al, chime in with some wise crack at my 
expense... :) 

Shook
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shookie!!

Welcome back, man... missed ya around here.


Well, I ended up taking ownership of the profile folders, deleting the old, 
non-existent account from the Security tab, and putting me there with full 
control, and the delete buttons under the Profile list appeared for me.  These 
two profiles have been deleted.

Thanks for the help, everyone!

Joe
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Eldridge, Dave]

So are you done with the Sales thing?
So do settle back in. It's been a little stale lately.

:)

-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Thanks big guy, it's good to be back.  Of course, it won't feel like home until 
Webster\ME2\MBS\TVK\Blackstone et al, chime in with some wise crack at my 
expense... :) 

Shook
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shookie!!

Welcome back, man... missed ya around here.


Well, I ended up taking ownership of the profile folders, deleting the old, 
non-existent account from the Security tab, and putting me there with full 
control, and the delete buttons under the Profile list appeared for me.  These 
two profiles have been deleted.

Thanks for the help, everyone!

Joe
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately via e-mail 
if you have received this e-mail by mistake; then, delete this e-mail from your 
system.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Account Unknown profiles

[Orland, Kathleen]

They won't. They're all Shook up.

- Original Message - 
From: "Andy Shook" 
To: "NT System Admin Issues" 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:00 PM
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles


> Thanks big guy, it's good to be back.  Of course, it won't feel like home
until Webster\ME2\MBS\TVK\Blackstone et al, chime in with some wise crack at
my expense... :)
>
> Shook
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:54 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles
>
> Shookie!!
>
> Welcome back, man... missed ya around here.
>
>
> Well, I ended up taking ownership of the profile folders, deleting the
old, non-existent account from the Security tab, and putting me there with
full control, and the delete buttons under the Profile list appeared for me.
These two profiles have been deleted.
>
> Thanks for the help, everyone!
>
> Joe
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[John Cook]

Check the archives.Welcome back!

John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP


-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Thanks big guy, it's good to be back.  Of course, it won't feel like home until 
Webster\ME2\MBS\TVK\Blackstone et al, chime in with some wise crack at my 
expense... :)

Shook
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shookie!!

Welcome back, man... missed ya around here.


Well, I ended up taking ownership of the profile folders, deleting the old, 
non-existent account from the Security tab, and putting me there with full 
control, and the delete buttons under the Profile list appeared for me.  These 
two profiles have been deleted.

Thanks for the help, everyone!

Joe
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Andy Shook]

Thanks big guy, it's good to be back.  Of course, it won't feel like home until 
Webster\ME2\MBS\TVK\Blackstone et al, chime in with some wise crack at my 
expense... :) 

Shook
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Shookie!!

Welcome back, man... missed ya around here.


Well, I ended up taking ownership of the profile folders, deleting the old, 
non-existent account from the Security tab, and putting me there with full 
control, and the delete buttons under the Profile list appeared for me.  These 
two profiles have been deleted.

Thanks for the help, everyone!

Joe
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Joe Heaton]

Shookie!!

Welcome back, man... missed ya around here.


Well, I ended up taking ownership of the profile folders, deleting the old, 
non-existent account from the Security tab, and putting me there with full 
control, and the delete buttons under the Profile list appeared for me.  These 
two profiles have been deleted.

Thanks for the help, everyone!

Joe
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Wan optimizer

[Erik Goldoff]

what type of traffic are you trying to accelerate ?  Most WAN Optimizers
cache the data stream and remove most of the windowing/handshaking to reduce
the latency ... so your data streams to the destination without two way
delays of 'got that segment, what's the next segment , got that next
segment, what's next now' type of protocols
 

Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

  _  

From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Wan optimizer


I've seen occasional talk about bandwidth management/compression.  I'm
looking for an appliance that can do this between my HQ site and second
largest site.  Anyone have any experience/recommendations.  The two I am
familiar with are Citrix's WANOptimizer and Packeteer (now Blue Coat).
 
Thanks,
 
 


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message. 

 


 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Wan optimizer

[Carol Fee]

Yes, and it does a lot more than that.
 
CFee
 



From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Wan optimizer


Was that compression and traffic prioritization?  

>>> "Carol Fee"  5/26/2009 2:06 PM >>>

+1 for Riverbed.
 
CFee
 



From: Jason Morris [mailto:jmor...@mjmc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Wan optimizer



I used Riverbed in a test environment and was impressed with their
performance. However, the application we were looking to optimize had
very little benefit from the "Caching" that Riverbed uses. That wasn't a
failure on their part, it was the old technology of the application.

For most other data sets, it worked perfect and "as advertised".

YMMV, Jason

 

From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Wan optimizer

 

I've seen occasional talk about bandwidth management/compression.  I'm
looking for an appliance that can do this between my HQ site and second
largest site.  Anyone have any experience/recommendations.  The two I am
familiar with are Citrix's WANOptimizer and Packeteer (now Blue Coat).

 

Thanks,

 

 

 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message. 

 

 

 

 


--
The pages accompanying this email transmission contain information from
MJMC, Inc., which
is confidential and/or privileged. The information is to be for the use
of the individual
or entity named on this cover sheet. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are
hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission
in error, please
immediately notify us by telephone so that we can arrange for the
retrieval of the original
document.

 

 


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message. 

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Vista and Server 08 SP2

[Glen Johnson]

Speaking of patches, anyone tested this yet.

So far, we have it on one vista 32 system and no issues.

Nice to have one patch for both server and workstations.

Gonna test on a couple of virtual 08 server later this week.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Exporting permissions

[Kurt Buff]

fileacl.exe will not only export the permissions, it will optionally
do so in the form of a batch file that that you can use to re-apply
them after editing or whatever. It's a very nice tool indeed.

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 07:54, helpdesk UK  wrote:
> I have come across a domain I need to migrate from Win2k ==> Win2k3 but
> before we do that we have come across a big problem with the current file
> server.
> It has not been maintained properly and the permissions are
> randomly assigned all over the place. & not documented either.
> Some places groups have been used some places users...etc...also within
> shares permissions have been shared out to random users and map drives
> manually to some shares...The customer is also not at all happy with the
> file structure and the Directors have been complaining about it since 1
> year.
> So the File server has turned out to be a big problem for now & both parties
> feel this is the right time to invest in a few man days and get it
> sorted
> The domain is in such a mess that both parties have agreed it is not worth
> migrating and they are starting from scratch on the new domain i.e. Win2k3.
> The plan is to simply export the users and send them to HR for approval and
> once done we will import them to the new domain i.e. this will result in
> ensuring only valid users are created. They have 12 Administrator accounts
> currently out of which 5 users don't even work for them any more and the
> accounts are still enabled !!!
> But for File server what has been agreed is we need to export all
> the permissions [ Share + NTFS ] dump it to an excel file for each folder [
> i.e. even if they are not shared ] within the file structure. Once this
> audit is complete we need to than present this information to the IT manager
> and restructure the data in correct shares with new set of drive letters and
> get this problem sorted using groups as opposed to individual users.
> So what I am looking for a script / tool of some kind which will dump this
> data to a excel file with information as follows
> user name / group name   *** folder / file location *** permission assigned
> ***
> Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
> Thank you all all in advance for taking th
>
> Stu
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Adobe "Patch day"

[David Lum]

I was out last week, was this discussed?
http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=3442&tag=nl.e019
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Exporting permissions

[Ziots, Edward]

Icacls on Windows 2003 R2 SP2 also will export the permissions too: 

 

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753525(WS.10).aspx

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505



From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com] 
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 11:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exporting permissions

 

Oops.  I didn't notice that you need the filesystem permissions as well.
Dumpsec will do this, but it might be a bit tedious getting the
information for a lot of directories and sorting through it.  Srvcheck
will only do the shares.

 

From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com] 
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exporting permissions

 

There was a thread here quite recently that addressed this.  Two tools
to do what you're looking for are:

1)  Srvcheck.exe from the appropriate Windows resource kit

2)  Dumpsec from http://www.somarsoft.com/ 

 

Dumpsec gives the option to export the report to csv which you can open
directly in Excel.

 

Good luck,

 

RS

 

From: helpdesk UK [mailto:uk.helpd...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 10:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exporting permissions

 

I have come across a domain I need to migrate from Win2k ==> Win2k3 but
before we do that we have come across a big problem with the current
file server.

 

It has not been maintained properly and the permissions are randomly
assigned all over the place. & not documented either.

Some places groups have been used some places users...etc...also within
shares permissions have been shared out to random users and map drives
manually to some shares...The customer is also not at all happy with the
file structure and the Directors have been complaining about it since 1
year.

 

So the File server has turned out to be a big problem for now & both
parties feel this is the right time to invest in a few man days and get
it sorted

 

The domain is in such a mess that both parties have agreed it is not
worth migrating and they are starting from scratch on the new domain
i.e. Win2k3.

 

The plan is to simply export the users and send them to HR for approval
and once done we will import them to the new domain i.e. this will
result in ensuring only valid users are created. They have 12
Administrator accounts currently out of which 5 users don't even work
for them any more and the accounts are still enabled !!! 

 

But for File server what has been agreed is we need to export all the
permissions [ Share + NTFS ] dump it to an excel file for each folder [
i.e. even if they are not shared ] within the file structure. Once this
audit is complete we need to than present this information to the IT
manager and restructure the data in correct shares with new set of drive
letters and get this problem sorted using groups as opposed to
individual users.

 

So what I am looking for a script / tool of some kind which will dump
this data to a excel file with information as follows

 

user name / group name   *** folder / file location *** permission
assigned ***

 

Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.

 

Thank you all all in advance for taking th

 

Stu

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Joe Tinney]

+1. I've seen this on folders used by MS updates to store their
decompressed files in during the install. Taking ownership of them
allowed me to delete them. The error message was that they were 'in
use'.

 

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

 

Joe,

Check your permissions on those files "in use" .  When I've seen this in
the past, it was due to the account I was logged in with didn't have
full control of the file(s) in question.  In that case, I would take
ownership of said files, modify permissions as needed, then kill it.
IME, those files were never in use via some process.

 

My $.02,

 

Shook

 

(BTW, its good to be back...had to take three months off due to a killer
1st quarter)

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Account Unknown profiles

 

Server 2k3

 

I've got a couple profiles on my server that are listed as Account
Unknown.  The delete button is greyed out for them.  I'd like to delete
them, but can't figure out how.  When I look under C:\Documents and
Settings, I see two folders there for personnel that have not been with
the organization for a couple of years now.  I'm assuming that these
profile folders are the ones showing up as Account Unknown, since they
are not listed otherwise under the Profile list.  I tried to manually
delete the folders themselves, but get an error saying the NTUSER.DAT is
being used by another user or program.

 

Any ideas on how I can get rid of these?

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Wan optimizer

[Tom Miller]

Was that compression and traffic prioritization?  

>>> "Carol Fee"  5/26/2009 2:06 PM >>>
+1 for Riverbed.
 
CFee
 

From: Jason Morris [mailto:jmor...@mjmc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Wan optimizer


I used Riverbed in a test environment and was impressed with their
performance. However, the application we were looking to optimize had
very little benefit from the “Caching” that Riverbed uses. That wasn’t a
failure on their part, it was the old technology of the application.
For most other data sets, it worked perfect and “as advertised”.
YMMV, Jason
 

From:Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Wan optimizer

 

I've seen occasional talk about bandwidth management/compression.  I'm
looking for an appliance that can do this between my HQ site and second
largest site.  Anyone have any experience/recommendations.  The two I am
familiar with are Citrix's WANOptimizer and Packeteer (now Blue Coat).

 

Thanks,

 

 

 
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.
  

 
 
--
The pages accompanying this email transmission contain information from
MJMC, Inc., which is confidential and/or privileged. The information is
to be for the use of the individual or entity named on this cover sheet.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission
in error, please immediately notify us by telephone so that we can
arrange for the retrieval of the original document.
 
 

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Wan optimizer

[Carol Fee]

+1 for Riverbed.
 
CFee
 



From: Jason Morris [mailto:jmor...@mjmc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Wan optimizer



I used Riverbed in a test environment and was impressed with their
performance. However, the application we were looking to optimize had
very little benefit from the "Caching" that Riverbed uses. That wasn't a
failure on their part, it was the old technology of the application.

For most other data sets, it worked perfect and "as advertised".

YMMV, Jason

 

From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Wan optimizer

 

I've seen occasional talk about bandwidth management/compression.  I'm
looking for an appliance that can do this between my HQ site and second
largest site.  Anyone have any experience/recommendations.  The two I am
familiar with are Citrix's WANOptimizer and Packeteer (now Blue Coat).

 

Thanks,

 

 

 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message. 

 

 

 

 


--
The pages accompanying this email transmission contain information from
MJMC, Inc., which
is confidential and/or privileged. The information is to be for the use
of the individual
or entity named on this cover sheet. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are
hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission
in error, please
immediately notify us by telephone so that we can arrange for the
retrieval of the original
document.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Roger Wright]

Try from your machine using the manage option My Computer, and manage accounts. 
 Also, try the C$ share remotely and see if you can rename the old users' 
folders.

   

Roger Wright
Network Administrator
Evatone, Inc.
727.572.7076  x388
_  


-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Same results when I RDP to the box using the local admin credentials.  The 
profile delete button is grayed out, and neither of the profile folders can be 
deleted.  I'm going to try to reboot at lunch time, and see what happens.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Andy Shook]

Joe,
Check your permissions on those files "in use" .  When I've seen this in the 
past, it was due to the account I was logged in with didn't have full control 
of the file(s) in question.  In that case, I would take ownership of said 
files, modify permissions as needed, then kill it.  IME, those files were never 
in use via some process.

My $.02,

Shook

(BTW, its good to be back...had to take three months off due to a killer 1st 
quarter)

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Account Unknown profiles

Server 2k3

I've got a couple profiles on my server that are listed as Account Unknown.  
The delete button is greyed out for them.  I'd like to delete them, but can't 
figure out how.  When I look under C:\Documents and Settings, I see two folders 
there for personnel that have not been with the organization for a couple of 
years now.  I'm assuming that these profile folders are the ones showing up as 
Account Unknown, since they are not listed otherwise under the Profile list.  I 
tried to manually delete the folders themselves, but get an error saying the 
NTUSER.DAT is being used by another user or program.

Any ideas on how I can get rid of these?

Thanks,

Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
jhea...@etp.ca.gov






~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Account Unknown profiles

[Joe Heaton]

Can't figure out why anything would be grabbing these two ntuser.dat files.  
These users have been gone for a long time, before I got here.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Account Unknown profiles

[James Rankin]

You could try using Process Explorer to find the ntuser.dat file via the
Find function which will show which process or handle has the file(s) open,
then close the handle using the same tool

I take no responsibility if the server BSODs or hangs though :-)

2009/5/26 Joe Heaton 

>  Server 2k3
>
>
>
> I’ve got a couple profiles on my server that are listed as Account
> Unknown.  The delete button is greyed out for them.  I’d like to delete
> them, but can’t figure out how.  When I look under C:\Documents and
> Settings, I see two folders there for personnel that have not been with the
> organization for a couple of years now.  I’m assuming that these profile
> folders are the ones showing up as Account Unknown, since they are not
> listed otherwise under the Profile list.  I tried to manually delete the
> folders themselves, but get an error saying the NTUSER.DAT is being used by
> another user or program.
>
>
>
> Any ideas on how I can get rid of these?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Joe Heaton
>
> AISA
>
> Employment Training Panel
>
> 1100 J Street, 4th Floor
>
> Sacramento, CA  95814
>
> (916) 327-5276
>
> jhea...@etp.ca.gov
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Windows 7 to ship all versions on one medium

[Mike Gill]

I just downloaded the Vista SP2 DVD from eOpen. The file is named:


SW_DVD5_Windows_Vista_Business_32BIT_English_Full_Int_SP2_MLF_X15-39889.ISO

Upon running setup.exe, the title window for the license agreement reads:

WINDOWS VISTA BUSINESS SERVICE PACK 2

So at least for me, there is only one version on the disc.

-- 
Mike Gill

-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 5:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Windows 7 to ship all versions on one medium

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Mike Gill 
wrote:
> Is this just for retail media? All the OEM and volume media I have ever
seen
> says the specific version of Vista on the disc and install screens.

  The Volume License Media disc images I have downloaded from eOpen
(or whatever Microsoft's calling it now) offer the option to install
any edition of Vista.  You just provide a matching Volume License Key.

  Come to think of it... I don't think I've ever actually booted one
of the Dell OEM Vista discs.  :)  That's one drawback to managed IT,
you loose touch with stuff that isn't your custom environment...

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Joe Heaton]

Same results when I RDP to the box using the local admin credentials.  The 
profile delete button is grayed out, and neither of the profile folders can be 
deleted.  I'm going to try to reboot at lunch time, and see what happens.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Steven Calvanese]

You may also want to check the Admin accounts on the box to make sure
they are set as administrators, they may have changed to debugger users.




-Original Message-
From: Roger Wright [mailto:rwri...@evatone.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

Can you manage the box remotely and remove the accounts?

   

Roger Wright
Network Administrator
Evatone, Inc.
727.572.7076  x388
_  

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

I'll give that a try.  Now to find time to reboot the main file server,
lol.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Roger Wright]

Can you manage the box remotely and remove the accounts?

   

Roger Wright
Network Administrator
Evatone, Inc.
727.572.7076  x388
_  

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account Unknown profiles

I'll give that a try.  Now to find time to reboot the main file server, lol.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Joe Heaton]

I'll give that a try.  Now to find time to reboot the main file server, lol.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Please disregard

[Klint Price - ArizonaITPro]

Gee, I guess it is working... lol

Klint


From: David Lum [david@nwea.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Please disregard

Yeah I picked ‘em up on sale – it was buy one get one, limit ten so I stocked 
up! “Sarcasm…get yer sarcasm here!”

Dave

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 6:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Please disregard

That’s that new thing called sarcasm isn’t it?

Shook

From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Please disregard

What do you mean? I totally disregarded Klint's e-mail, it's yours I am 
replying to :-). Nobody on this list ever replies to anything except strict NT 
administrator business!
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764










~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: mass email

[Silvio L. Nisgoski]

Oh, we´ve done somethings like that. It is just that it bothers me that 
people have all the trouble signing, writing ( even in the paper forms ) , 
don´t pay attention to what they are signing, and later complain that the 
one email they receive with marketing info is too much... oh well, users.



- Original Message - 
From: "Andy Ognenoff" 

To: "NT System Admin Issues" 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:29 AM
Subject: RE: mass email


We combat that problem by using double opt-in (confirmed consent) and then
we store the source of the sign up (web form, sweepstakes entry, etc) along
with the date and include that in every email we send.

So it'll say something like "Andy Ognenoff, you subscribed on 5/26/09 as
andyognenoff[at]gmail.com through our win a cruise sweepstakes."  And then
of course you provide a one-click unsubscribe as well.

- Andy O.

From: Silvio L. Nisgoski [mailto:nisgo...@gmx.de]
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 10:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: mass email

Big problem is with people that consent to receive the email, sign up for
the newsletter, put their address in the fields ( hand-written or digital )
then later complain that we are sending them marketing emails .,


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~ 



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Wan optimizer

[Jason Morris]

I used Riverbed in a test environment and was impressed with their
performance. However, the application we were looking to optimize had
very little benefit from the "Caching" that Riverbed uses. That wasn't a
failure on their part, it was the old technology of the application.

For most other data sets, it worked perfect and "as advertised".

YMMV, Jason

 

From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Wan optimizer

 

I've seen occasional talk about bandwidth management/compression.  I'm
looking for an appliance that can do this between my HQ site and second
largest site.  Anyone have any experience/recommendations.  The two I am
familiar with are Citrix's WANOptimizer and Packeteer (now Blue Coat).

 

Thanks,

 

 

 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message. 

 

 

--
The pages accompanying this email transmission contain information from MJMC, 
Inc., which
is confidential and/or privileged. The information is to be for the use of the 
individual
or entity named on this cover sheet. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are
hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in 
error, please
immediately notify us by telephone so that we can arrange for the retrieval of 
the original
document.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Wan optimizer

[Tom Miller]

I've seen occasional talk about bandwidth management/compression.  I'm looking 
for an appliance that can do this between my HQ site and second largest site.  
Anyone have any experience/recommendations.  The two I am familiar with are 
Citrix's WANOptimizer and Packeteer (now Blue Coat).
 
Thanks,
 
 

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the 
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[David Lum]

Reboot, log on as local admin account and see if they are no longer greyed out.

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Account Unknown profiles

Server 2k3

I've got a couple profiles on my server that are listed as Account Unknown.  
The delete button is greyed out for them.  I'd like to delete them, but can't 
figure out how.  When I look under C:\Documents and Settings, I see two folders 
there for personnel that have not been with the organization for a couple of 
years now.  I'm assuming that these profile folders are the ones showing up as 
Account Unknown, since they are not listed otherwise under the Profile list.  I 
tried to manually delete the folders themselves, but get an error saying the 
NTUSER.DAT is being used by another user or program.

Any ideas on how I can get rid of these?

Thanks,

Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
jhea...@etp.ca.gov






~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Account Unknown profiles

[Fergal O'Connell]

Log in as local admin or domain admin and delete them?

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent: 26 May 2009 17:36
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Account Unknown profiles

Server 2k3

I've got a couple profiles on my server that are listed as Account Unknown.  
The delete button is greyed out for them.  I'd like to delete them, but can't 
figure out how.  When I look under C:\Documents and Settings, I see two folders 
there for personnel that have not been with the organization for a couple of 
years now.  I'm assuming that these profile folders are the ones showing up as 
Account Unknown, since they are not listed otherwise under the Profile list.  I 
tried to manually delete the folders themselves, but get an error saying the 
NTUSER.DAT is being used by another user or program.

Any ideas on how I can get rid of these?

Thanks,

Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
jhea...@etp.ca.gov







The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Account Unknown profiles

[Joe Heaton]

Server 2k3

 

I've got a couple profiles on my server that are listed as Account
Unknown.  The delete button is greyed out for them.  I'd like to delete
them, but can't figure out how.  When I look under C:\Documents and
Settings, I see two folders there for personnel that have not been with
the organization for a couple of years now.  I'm assuming that these
profile folders are the ones showing up as Account Unknown, since they
are not listed otherwise under the Profile list.  I tried to manually
delete the folders themselves, but get an error saying the NTUSER.DAT is
being used by another user or program.

 

Any ideas on how I can get rid of these?

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Please disregard

[David Lum]

Yeah I picked 'em up on sale - it was buy one get one, limit ten so I stocked 
up! "Sarcasm...get yer sarcasm here!"

Dave

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 6:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Please disregard

That's that new thing called sarcasm isn't it?

Shook

From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Please disregard

What do you mean? I totally disregarded Klint's e-mail, it's yours I am 
replying to :-). Nobody on this list ever replies to anything except strict NT 
administrator business!
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764






~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Please disregard

[Sherry Abercrombie]

Shookie, you're back!!!   It's about time ;)

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Andy Shook  wrote:

>  That’s that new thing called sarcasm isn’t it?
>
>
>
> Shook
>
>
>
> *From:* David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:42 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Please disregard
>
>
>
> What do you mean? I totally disregarded Klint's e-mail, it's yours I am
> replying to :-). Nobody on this list ever replies to anything except strict
> NT administrator business!
>
> *David Lum** **// *SYSTEMS ENGINEER
> NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
> (Desk) 971.222.1025 *// *(Cell) 503.267.9764
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke
Sent from Haslet, TX, United States

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: mass email

[Andy Ognenoff]

We combat that problem by using double opt-in (confirmed consent) and then
we store the source of the sign up (web form, sweepstakes entry, etc) along
with the date and include that in every email we send.

So it'll say something like "Andy Ognenoff, you subscribed on 5/26/09 as
andyognenoff[at]gmail.com through our win a cruise sweepstakes."  And then
of course you provide a one-click unsubscribe as well.

 - Andy O. 

From: Silvio L. Nisgoski [mailto:nisgo...@gmx.de] 
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 10:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: mass email

Big problem is with people that consent to receive the email, sign up for
the newsletter, put their address in the fields ( hand-written or digital )
then later complain that we are sending them marketing emails .,


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Performance problem on VMwareServer2 - gah

[Devin Meade]

I played around with VMWare server 2.0 and found the ajax web server sucked
all the life out of the host.  That was the only thing on a fairly quick
machine.  Version 1 kills Version 2 performance wise.  Throw in AJAX with
the rest of your google search terms and read on.

-Devin

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Ken Schaefer  wrote:

> FFS - the OP is running a grand total of 5 OSes - 4 VMs and the host, with
> nothing running in any of the VMs across 3 disks on a new server
>
> I can do better than that my laptop (I am writing this email whilst running
> 4 MOSS servers, 1 SQL Server and a DC) on my Dell E6400 with 3 spindles.
>
> Seeing 15 minute lags in the VMs at a time means that something else is up.
> It's not the number of disks. It be the RAID controller, or some other
> driver issue.
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
> 
> From: Charlie Kaiser [charl...@golden-eagle.org]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 May 2009 5:09 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Performance problem on VMwareServer2 - gah
>
> You've got an inadequate disk subsystem for what you're trying to do.
> Choices...
> 1. Launch fewer VMs at one time.
> 2. Add JBOD storage and run one VM per spindle.
> 3. Add USB drives and run the VMs off of that. Not ideal, but workable.
>
> A Raid5 array, as Joseph pointed out, with its parity overhead, is going to
> be unworkable long term. BTDT. My best solution in the past has been a
> bunch
> of disks, ideally mirror sets for reliability if you can swing it, with one
> VM per array.
>
> ***
> Charlie Kaiser
> charl...@golden-eagle.org
> Kingman, AZ
> ***
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: jesse-r...@wi.rr.com [mailto:jesse-r...@wi.rr.com]
> > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:24 AM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Performance problem on VMwareServer2 - gah
> >
> > Single Array, RAID5, made up of 3 physical disks (thats all we have).
> >
> > Original Message:
> > -
> > From: Charlie Kaiser charl...@golden-eagle.org
> > Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:08:22 -0700
> > To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
> > Subject: RE: Performance problem on VMwareServer2 - gah
> >
> >
> > How are the physical drives configured? We usually put no
> > more than one VM on a spindle. The conflicts between two VMs
> > on one spindle produce unacceptable bottlenecks in my experience.
> >
> > ***
> > Charlie Kaiser
> > charl...@golden-eagle.org
> > Kingman, AZ
> > ***
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: jesse-r...@wi.rr.com [mailto:jesse-r...@wi.rr.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 10:49 AM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: Performance problem on VMwareServer2 - gah
> > >
> > > Thought I'd ask our resident gurus...
> > >
> > > I have a brand new HP DL360 server. 8GB memory, 2 quads, 3
> > SAS drives
> > > with a P400i/512 controller w/BBWC.
> > >
> > > I am running Windows 2003 R2 Enterpise on the host machine. I also
> > > created
> > > (4) VMs (each 75GB in size, preallocated) each with a
> > Single vCPU, and
> > > 2GB of memory, running Windows 2003 R2 Enterprise.
> > > NOTE -- These VMs have NOTHING on them except the O/S. No
> > > applications, no nothing.
> > >
> > > I have serious performance problems as it relates to the
> > VMs becoming
> > > unusable for a periond of 15 minutes or so every now and
> > then I am
> > > noticing, on the HOST, that the logical disk - % write time
> > > performance counter just shoots up 100% for as much as
> > 10-15 minutes
> > > (see attachment
> > > diskusage1.jpg) and then slowly comes down back to near zero (see
> > > attachment diskusage2.jpg). The graphs show a total time
> > duration of
> > > 16 minutes - FYI...
> > >
> > > During this high spike of Disk Write % on the host, the VMs
> > themselves
> > > are doing NOTHING. Again, they are PLAIN OS installed with nothing
> > > installed.
> > > Performance monitoring on those VMs shows barely ANY
> > activiate at all,
> > > while the host shows 100% disk write %. So it's definitely
> > the host,
> > > it seems, causing the poor performance. Also, notice in Attachment
> > > diskusage2.jpg the slow decline of Disk Write %... This
> > ALWAYS happens
> > > after a period of 100% disk write % usage it trails off slowly
> > > like that over a 10-15 minute period before it come down to zero
> > > again.
> > >
> > > Any idea what is causing this? I'm thinking about giving up
> > and going
> > > to ESXi. ??
> > >
> > > picture1 -
> > > http://communities.vmware.com/servlet/JiveServlet/download/126
> > > 0005-23055/dis
> > > kusage1.jpg?tstart=0
> > >
> > > picture2-
> > > http://communities.vmware.com/servlet/JiveServlet/download/126
> > > 0005-23054/dis
> > > kusage2.jpg?tstart=0
> > >
> > > Thanks all!
> > >
> > > Remember the true meaning of Memorial Day!
> > > JR
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > > m

Re: Two Factor Authentication

[Dennis Depp]

Robert,

We are using RSA for authentication with OWA (Exchange 2007), Cisco
VPN and access to our intranet from outside.  OWA and intranet access
is through a Whale Box which is now Microsoft IAG.  The solution works
very well for us.

Denny

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Two Factor Authentication

[Robert Cato]

Thought of another question

Does you implementation have special requirements (Cisco hardware or ISA
server for example)?



On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Robert Cato  wrote:

> Good morning,
>
> Anybody using two-factor authentication that would care to share opinions
> and an overview of how you are using?
>
> We are looking to protect E2K7 OWA, MOSS07, and Terminal Services.
>
> Here are a couple I have found that look promising.
> http://www.multifa.com/
>
> http://enterprise.comodo.com/security-solutions/authentication-identity-assurance/two-factor/
> http://www.entrust.com/two-factor-authentication/
> http://www.rsa.com/node.aspx?id=1156
>
> Thanks,
> Robert
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Please disregard

[Andy Shook]

That's that new thing called sarcasm isn't it?

Shook

From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Please disregard

What do you mean? I totally disregarded Klint's e-mail, it's yours I am 
replying to :-). Nobody on this list ever replies to anything except strict NT 
administrator business!
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Please disregard

[David Lum]

What do you mean? I totally disregarded Klint's e-mail, it's yours I am 
replying to :-). Nobody on this list ever replies to anything except strict NT 
administrator business!

David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764

-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:can...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:40 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Please disregard

Oh, sure.
None of us will pay any attention; especially on *this* list.
hehehe.
Good job!

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Klint Price - ArizonaITPro
 wrote:
> Just upgraded my MTA to E2K7, and making sure everything is routing
> correctly.
>
> Klint
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Two Factor Authentication

[Cameron Cooper]

We have been using the RSA SecurID Tokens and haven't had any issues
with it running ES03 on WS03.  Currently, we are only using it for OWA
and for three people to use with a Cisco VPN.  The Cisco VPN was a
little challenge to setup and we did have an issue with RSA and
multi-homed servers.

 

_

Cameron Cooper

IT Director - CompTIA A+ Certified

Aurico Reports, Inc

Phone: 847-890-4021Fax: 847-255-1896

ccoo...@aurico.com  

 

From: Steven Calvanese [mailto:scalvan...@membersolutions.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two Factor Authentication

 

We use RSA and have had zero issues with it.  Initial pin setup for
users is a little confusing, I had to walk through 90% of the people
using it(even with directions).

 

 



From: Robert Cato [mailto:cato.rob...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Two Factor Authentication

Good morning,

 

Anybody using two-factor authentication that would care to share
opinions and an overview of how you are using?

 

We are looking to protect E2K7 OWA, MOSS07, and Terminal Services. 


Here are a couple I have found that look promising.

http://www.multifa.com/

http://enterprise.comodo.com/security-solutions/authentication-identity-
assurance/two-factor/

http://www.entrust.com/two-factor-authentication/

http://www.rsa.com/node.aspx?id=1156 

 

Thanks,
Robert

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Two Factor Authentication

[Steven Calvanese]

We use RSA and have had zero issues with it.  Initial pin setup for
users is a little confusing, I had to walk through 90% of the people
using it(even with directions).
 



From: Robert Cato [mailto:cato.rob...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Two Factor Authentication


Good morning,
 
Anybody using two-factor authentication that would care to share
opinions and an overview of how you are using?
 
We are looking to protect E2K7 OWA, MOSS07, and Terminal Services. 

Here are a couple I have found that look promising.
http://www.multifa.com/
http://enterprise.comodo.com/security-solutions/authentication-identity-
assurance/two-factor/
http://www.entrust.com/two-factor-authentication/
http://www.rsa.com/node.aspx?id=1156 
 
Thanks,
Robert
 

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Two Factor Authentication

[Robert Cato]

Good morning,

Anybody using two-factor authentication that would care to share opinions
and an overview of how you are using?

We are looking to protect E2K7 OWA, MOSS07, and Terminal Services.

Here are a couple I have found that look promising.
http://www.multifa.com/
http://enterprise.comodo.com/security-solutions/authentication-identity-assurance/two-factor/
http://www.entrust.com/two-factor-authentication/
http://www.rsa.com/node.aspx?id=1156

Thanks,
Robert

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Please disregard

[Candee Vaglica]

Oh, sure.
None of us will pay any attention; especially on *this* list.
hehehe.
Good job!

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Klint Price - ArizonaITPro
 wrote:
> Just upgraded my MTA to E2K7, and making sure everything is routing
> correctly.
>
> Klint
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~