Re: Multiple monitor control

2010-11-08 Thread James Rankin
Ultramon is awesome, I've also used SplitView with good results

On 7 November 2010 13:44, Tony Patton apco...@gmail.com wrote:

 That's the way I have mine configured.

 I also use Ultramon, its very handy for multi monitor setups.

 T

 typed slowly on HTC Desire
 On 6 Nov 2010 13:13, Jeff Steward jstew...@gmail.com wrote:
  Look for the setting called Dual-View, not Span.
 
  -Jeff Steward
 
  On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Jim McAtee j...@zolx.com wrote:
 
  (I'd normally post this to the XP list, but it's pretty dead...)
 
  I'm running XP Pro and have two native 1280x1024 monitors, and an NVIDIA
  GeForce 6600 GT video card. When I enable two monitors the NVIDIA driver
  stretches the desktop across both monitors, which means that the taskbar
  stretches from one end to the other and the system tray ends up at the
 far
  right of the right-hand monitor.
 
  What I'd prefer is to have the left/primary monitor behave as it always
  has:
 
  - the taskbar should only appear on the left-hand monitor, with the
 system
  tray at the right hand side of this monitor
 
  - anything that appears in the -center- of the screen, such as dialogue
  boxes, should appear in the center of the left-hand monitor
 
  - the right-hand monitor should only be used for windows dragged into
 this
  space
 
  - and (would be nice) if a window is maximized, it maximizes on the
 monitor
  in which it resides, not across the entire desktop
 
  Does anyone know how I can accomplish this? I have a feeling that the
  NVIDIA driver may be purposely trying to do things that I don't want,
 but
  isn't as configurable as I'd like.
 
 
  ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
  ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
 
  ---
  To manage subscriptions click here:
  http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
  or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
  with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
 
 
  ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
  ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
 
  ---
  To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
  or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
  with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin




-- 
On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into
the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able
rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such
a question.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: PC Memory

2010-11-08 Thread Webster
I have a couple of customers who use these types of devices:

 

http://www.memorytesters.com/

 

 

Webster

 

From: Bob Hartung [mailto:bhart...@wiscoind.com] 
Subject: PC Memory

 

The subject of Dell vs Kingston memory reminded me of something that's
always frustrated me about computer memory and that's figuring out how to
identify what a memory chip is and what it would work in.

Some memory suppliers are good about putting ID stickers on the memory so
you have some idea of what you have but more often than not, they don't. I'd
like to be able to take a memory module and have some way of identifying the
amount of RAM, speed, compatibility.

Is there a reference or website that has information like that?


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

non-APC batteries?

2010-11-08 Thread Adam Greene
Needing to replace battery on a 3-yr-old APC SmartUPS 1000xl ... any 
reason not to go with a less expensive non-APC alternative (like 
http://www.thenerds.net/AMERICAN_BATTERY.ABC_Replacement_Battery_Cartrige7.RBC7.html)?


Thanks,
Adam

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


RE: non-APC batteries?

2010-11-08 Thread Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
APC batteries aren't even manufactured by APC...many times there is an APC 
label over top of the case where the original manufacturer's logo is actually 
printed directly on the case.

I go with what is available at Batteries Plus; as long as the connector sizes 
are the same, the Ah ratings are the same, and the case is physically the same 
(this is important! Many times the cases need to be the EXACT size of the 
original) you're good to go.

Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians  Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.com

-Original Message-
From: Adam Greene [mailto:maill...@webjogger.net]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 10:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: non-APC batteries?

Needing to replace battery on a 3-yr-old APC SmartUPS 1000xl ... any
reason not to go with a less expensive non-APC alternative (like
http://www.thenerds.net/AMERICAN_BATTERY.ABC_Replacement_Battery_Cartrige7.RBC7.html)?

Thanks,
Adam

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL 
and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, 
disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may 
contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is 
intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as 
recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this 
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from 
your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not 
disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it 
contains.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



Re: non-APC batteries?

2010-11-08 Thread Kramer, Jack
I got my last replacement battery from RefurbUPS.com and it's performed
great so far. Saved a ton of money compared to the pricing direct from
APC, too.


Jack Kramer
Computer Systems Specialist
University Relations, Michigan State University
w: 517-884-1231 / c: 248-635-4955




On 11/8/10 10:17 AM, Adam Greene maill...@webjogger.net wrote:

Needing to replace battery on a 3-yr-old APC SmartUPS 1000xl ... any
reason not to go with a less expensive non-APC alternative (like
http://www.thenerds.net/AMERICAN_BATTERY.ABC_Replacement_Battery_Cartrige7
.RBC7.html)?

Thanks,
Adam

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



KMS activation issue

2010-11-08 Thread Stefan Jafs
Ok, so ordered Windows Data Center 2008 do I can use many servers on my
Virtual Infrastructure, I now added an 2008R2 server using the MAK key, and
getting an error code:
0xC004F038, after Googeling it i get that I need minimum 25 servers on that
key! What's up with that? What am I doing wrong?

-- 
Stefan Jafs

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: non-APC batteries?

2010-11-08 Thread Adam Greene

Thanks, Jack and Jonathan. Exactly the feedback I needed. Much appreciated.

Adam

On 11/8/2010 10:35 AM, Kramer, Jack wrote:

I got my last replacement battery from RefurbUPS.com and it's performed
great so far. Saved a ton of money compared to the pricing direct from
APC, too.


Jack Kramer
Computer Systems Specialist
University Relations, Michigan State University
w: 517-884-1231 / c: 248-635-4955




On 11/8/10 10:17 AM, Adam Greenemaill...@webjogger.net  wrote:


Needing to replace battery on a 3-yr-old APC SmartUPS 1000xl ... any
reason not to go with a less expensive non-APC alternative (like
http://www.thenerds.net/AMERICAN_BATTERY.ABC_Replacement_Battery_Cartrige7
.RBC7.html)?

Thanks,
Adam

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


Home Folder Permissions reset

2010-11-08 Thread Matthew W. Ross
Hey list,

I'm sure this is something that has been touched on before, but my quick search 
through the list archives didn't get anything concrete...

I'm looking to lock down permissions on user home folders. I'm unsure on how, 
but one user was able to access the contents of another and that will have to 
be stopped ASAP. I'd like some help on what are the correct permissions, as I 
have a few questions.

Let me explain what things are like currently. Right now, home folder 
permissions are as follows:

There is a \\SERVER\Homes share. The _sharing_ permissions on this folder is 
set to Everyone has Change, Domain Admins has Full control.

Each user has a home folder under this share (i.e.: \\SERVER\Homes\Username) 
with the following permissions:

DOMAN\Username has Modify
SERVER\Administrators has Full Control
SERVER\Users has Read and Execute[1]
SYSTEM has full control
CREATOR OWNER has no permissions

And now, several questions:

A) What are the correct sharing permissions? Should Everyone be changed to 
Domain Users? Should Domain Admins not be in that list?

B) What is the SYSTEM permissions for? Is it needed?

C) SERVER\Administrators vs DOMAIN\Domain Admins... Which is more appropriate?

I'm working on a script to reset these permissions, probably with xcacls. I 
need to find my old cacls script first, or write it from scratch. If somebody 
has a working script for this handy, I'd love a copy.

[1] The SERVER\Users group appears to be part of my problem, as I didn't intend 
for other users to be able to read and/or execute files on another user's home 
folder, but this was an inherited permission I missed.


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



RE: Home Folder Permissions reset

2010-11-08 Thread Don Guyer
Authenticated Users should have Read access to \\SERVER\Homes, each
individual user should have Full Control to \\SERVER\Homes\username.

Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox  Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com


-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] 
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Home Folder Permissions reset

Hey list,

I'm sure this is something that has been touched on before, but my quick
search through the list archives didn't get anything concrete...

I'm looking to lock down permissions on user home folders. I'm unsure on
how, but one user was able to access the contents of another and that
will have to be stopped ASAP. I'd like some help on what are the correct
permissions, as I have a few questions.


Let me explain what things are like currently. Right now, home folder
permissions are as follows:

There is a \\SERVER\Homes share. The _sharing_ permissions on this
folder is set to Everyone has Change, Domain Admins has Full
control.

Each user has a home folder under this share (i.e.:
\\SERVER\Homes\Username) with the following permissions:

DOMAN\Username has Modify
SERVER\Administrators has Full Control
SERVER\Users has Read and Execute[1]
SYSTEM has full control
CREATOR OWNER has no permissions

And now, several questions:

A) What are the correct sharing permissions? Should Everyone be
changed to Domain Users? Should Domain Admins not be in that list?

B) What is the SYSTEM permissions for? Is it needed?

C) SERVER\Administrators vs DOMAIN\Domain Admins... Which is more
appropriate?

I'm working on a script to reset these permissions, probably with
xcacls. I need to find my old cacls script first, or write it from
scratch. If somebody has a working script for this handy, I'd love a
copy.

[1] The SERVER\Users group appears to be part of my problem, as I didn't
intend for other users to be able to read and/or execute files on
another user's home folder, but this was an inherited permission I
missed.


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



RE: Home Folder Permissions reset

2010-11-08 Thread Matthew W. Ross
Read access to the Share allows users to write to their home folders?

Also, doesn't full control allow a user to change his permissions?


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District


- Original Message -
From: Don Guyer
[mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Mon, 08 Nov 2010
08:56:43 -0800
Subject: RE: Home Folder Permissions reset


 Authenticated Users should have Read access to \\SERVER\Homes, each
 individual user should have Full Control to \\SERVER\Homes\username.
 
 Don Guyer
 Systems Engineer - Information Services
 Prudential, Fox  Roach/Trident Group
 431 W. Lancaster Avenue
 Devon, PA 19333
 Direct: (610) 993-3299
 Fax: (610) 650-5306
 don.gu...@prufoxroach.com
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] 
 Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:48 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Home Folder Permissions reset
 
 Hey list,
 
 I'm sure this is something that has been touched on before, but my quick
 search through the list archives didn't get anything concrete...
 
 I'm looking to lock down permissions on user home folders. I'm unsure on
 how, but one user was able to access the contents of another and that
 will have to be stopped ASAP. I'd like some help on what are the correct
 permissions, as I have a few questions.
 
 
 Let me explain what things are like currently. Right now, home folder
 permissions are as follows:
 
 There is a \\SERVER\Homes share. The _sharing_ permissions on this
 folder is set to Everyone has Change, Domain Admins has Full
 control.
 
 Each user has a home folder under this share (i.e.:
 \\SERVER\Homes\Username) with the following permissions:
 
 DOMAN\Username has Modify
 SERVER\Administrators has Full Control
 SERVER\Users has Read and Execute[1]
 SYSTEM has full control
 CREATOR OWNER has no permissions
 
 And now, several questions:
 
 A) What are the correct sharing permissions? Should Everyone be
 changed to Domain Users? Should Domain Admins not be in that list?
 
 B) What is the SYSTEM permissions for? Is it needed?
 
 C) SERVER\Administrators vs DOMAIN\Domain Admins... Which is more
 appropriate?
 
 I'm working on a script to reset these permissions, probably with
 xcacls. I need to find my old cacls script first, or write it from
 scratch. If somebody has a working script for this handy, I'd love a
 copy.
 
 [1] The SERVER\Users group appears to be part of my problem, as I didn't
 intend for other users to be able to read and/or execute files on
 another user's home folder, but this was an inherited permission I
 missed.
 
 
 --Matt Ross
 Ephrata School District
 
 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
 
 
 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
 
 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


RE: Home Folder Permissions reset

2010-11-08 Thread Derek Johnson
Authenticated Users should have LIST access to \\SERVER\Homes, each individual 
user should have Modify to \\SERVER\Homes\username.



Derek A Johnson

Sr. Systems Administrator



National Association of Realtors

430 N. Michigan Ave.

Chicago, IL 60611



Email: djohn...@realtors.org



Cell: 262.496.9201

Desk: 312.329.8618



-Original Message-
From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 10:57 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Home Folder Permissions reset



Authenticated Users should have Read access to 
\\SERVER\Homesfile:///\\SERVER\Homes, each individual user should have Full 
Control to \\SERVER\Homes\usernamefile:///\\SERVER\Homes\username.



Don Guyer

Systems Engineer - Information Services

Prudential, Fox  Roach/Trident Group

431 W. Lancaster Avenue

Devon, PA 19333

Direct: (610) 993-3299

Fax: (610) 650-5306

don.gu...@prufoxroach.commailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com





-Original Message-

From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]

Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:48 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: Home Folder Permissions reset



Hey list,



I'm sure this is something that has been touched on before, but my quick search 
through the list archives didn't get anything concrete...



I'm looking to lock down permissions on user home folders. I'm unsure on how, 
but one user was able to access the contents of another and that will have to 
be stopped ASAP. I'd like some help on what are the correct permissions, as I 
have a few questions.





Let me explain what things are like currently. Right now, home folder 
permissions are as follows:



There is a \\SERVER\Homesfile:///\\SERVER\Homes share. The _sharing_ 
permissions on this folder is set to Everyone has Change, Domain Admins has 
Full control.



Each user has a home folder under this share (i.e.:

\\SERVER\Homes\Usernamefile:///\\SERVER\Homes\Username) with the following 
permissions:



DOMAN\Username has Modify

SERVER\Administrators has Full Control

SERVER\Users has Read and Execute[1]

SYSTEM has full control

CREATOR OWNER has no permissions



And now, several questions:



A) What are the correct sharing permissions? Should Everyone be changed to 
Domain Users? Should Domain Admins not be in that list?



B) What is the SYSTEM permissions for? Is it needed?



C) SERVER\Administrators vs DOMAIN\Domain Admins... Which is more appropriate?



I'm working on a script to reset these permissions, probably with xcacls. I 
need to find my old cacls script first, or write it from scratch. If somebody 
has a working script for this handy, I'd love a copy.



[1] The SERVER\Users group appears to be part of my problem, as I didn't intend 
for other users to be able to read and/or execute files on another user's home 
folder, but this was an inherited permission I missed.





--Matt Ross

Ephrata School District



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



---

To manage subscriptions click here:

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/

or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com

with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



---

To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/

or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com

with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: KMS activation issue

2010-11-08 Thread Stefan Jafs
Ok, so I had to add Volume Activation Managment tools add the MAK key and
then do the Activation, it's all good took a little while to figure out.



On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Stefan Jafs stefan.j...@gmail.com wrote:

  Ok, so ordered Windows Data Center 2008 do I can use many servers on my
 Virtual Infrastructure, I now added an 2008R2 server using the MAK key, and
 getting an error code:
 0xC004F038, after Googeling it i get that I need minimum 25 servers on that
 key! What's up with that? What am I doing wrong?

 --
 Stefan Jafs

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin




-- 
Stefan Jafs

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Home Folder Permissions reset

2010-11-08 Thread James Winzenz
I think Don was referring to the NTFS permissions, not the Share 
permissions.  Each admin has to decide whether they want their users to have 
full control to their individual user folders (business may also dictate). 
Yes, full control would allow them to change the permissions on his/her 
folder, including removing the local admin group.  From my experience, I 
usually do the following for the NTFS permissions:


-For the top-level Homes folder (we call it Users), we usually just do 
domain users - read/list folder contents plus administrators - full control
-for the individual user folders, I do administrators - full control and the 
individual user - modify.  I also remove any inherited permissions when the 
folder is originally created, including Creator/Owner.


Regarding share permissions, everyone has a different opinion on this.  Some 
go the route of just leaving the share permissions at Everyone - Full 
Control and restricting permissions using the NTFS permissions.  Some go a 
step further and restrict both Share and NTFS permissions.  The thing to 
keep in mind is that when combining Share and NTFS permissions, the most 
restrictive always wins.  So if Share permissions are set to Everyone - Full 
Control, and NTFS permissions for a certain group are set to read only, 
members of that group (assuming they don't have explicit permissions or are 
not members of another group that has more permissions) would have read only 
access.


As for SYSTEM, I did some researching on this a while back, and found that 
for a volume containing only files/folders, it does not appear to be 
necessary.  We have removed it from our data volumes without noticing any 
issues at all.


HTH,

James
-Original Message- 
From: Matthew W. Ross

Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 10:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Home Folder Permissions reset

Read access to the Share allows users to write to their home folders?

Also, doesn't full control allow a user to change his permissions?


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District


- Original Message -
From: Don Guyer
[mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Mon, 08 Nov 2010
08:56:43 -0800
Subject: RE: Home Folder Permissions reset



Authenticated Users should have Read access to \\SERVER\Homes, each
individual user should have Full Control to \\SERVER\Homes\username.

Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox  Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com


-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Home Folder Permissions reset

Hey list,

I'm sure this is something that has been touched on before, but my quick
search through the list archives didn't get anything concrete...

I'm looking to lock down permissions on user home folders. I'm unsure on
how, but one user was able to access the contents of another and that
will have to be stopped ASAP. I'd like some help on what are the correct
permissions, as I have a few questions.


Let me explain what things are like currently. Right now, home folder
permissions are as follows:

There is a \\SERVER\Homes share. The _sharing_ permissions on this
folder is set to Everyone has Change, Domain Admins has Full
control.

Each user has a home folder under this share (i.e.:
\\SERVER\Homes\Username) with the following permissions:

DOMAN\Username has Modify
SERVER\Administrators has Full Control
SERVER\Users has Read and Execute[1]
SYSTEM has full control
CREATOR OWNER has no permissions

And now, several questions:

A) What are the correct sharing permissions? Should Everyone be
changed to Domain Users? Should Domain Admins not be in that list?

B) What is the SYSTEM permissions for? Is it needed?

C) SERVER\Administrators vs DOMAIN\Domain Admins... Which is more
appropriate?

I'm working on a script to reset these permissions, probably with
xcacls. I need to find my old cacls script first, or write it from
scratch. If somebody has a working script for this handy, I'd love a
copy.

[1] The SERVER\Users group appears to be part of my problem, as I didn't
intend for other users to be able to read and/or execute files on
another user's home folder, but this was an inherited permission I
missed.


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:

Re: Home Folder Permissions reset

2010-11-08 Thread Andrew S. Baker
Matt,

The SYSTEM permissions will allow the local computer to do things like
DEFRAG those folders.

Here are some scripts that might help:


   - * 
http://kb.ultratech-llc.com/Scripts/?File=Perms.BAThttp://kb.ultratech-llc.com/Scripts/?File=HomePerms.BAT*
   - *http://KB.UltraTech-llc.com/Scripts/?File=Perms.BAT
http://kb.ultratech-llc.com/Scripts/?File=Perms.BAT*


*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker

*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *



On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Matthew W. Ross
mr...@ephrataschools.orgwrote:

 Hey list,

 I'm sure this is something that has been touched on before, but my quick
 search through the list archives didn't get anything concrete...

 I'm looking to lock down permissions on user home folders. I'm unsure on
 how, but one user was able to access the contents of another and that will
 have to be stopped ASAP. I'd like some help on what are the correct
 permissions, as I have a few questions.

 Let me explain what things are like currently. Right now, home folder
 permissions are as follows:

 There is a \\SERVER\Homes share. The _sharing_ permissions on this folder
 is set to Everyone has Change, Domain Admins has Full control.

 Each user has a home folder under this share (i.e.:
 \\SERVER\Homes\Username) with the following permissions:

 DOMAN\Username has Modify
 SERVER\Administrators has Full Control
 SERVER\Users has Read and Execute[1]
 SYSTEM has full control
 CREATOR OWNER has no permissions

 And now, several questions:

 A) What are the correct sharing permissions? Should Everyone be changed
 to Domain Users? Should Domain Admins not be in that list?

 B) What is the SYSTEM permissions for? Is it needed?

 C) SERVER\Administrators vs DOMAIN\Domain Admins... Which is more
 appropriate?

 I'm working on a script to reset these permissions, probably with xcacls. I
 need to find my old cacls script first, or write it from scratch. If
 somebody has a working script for this handy, I'd love a copy.

 [1] The SERVER\Users group appears to be part of my problem, as I didn't
 intend for other users to be able to read and/or execute files on another
 user's home folder, but this was an inherited permission I missed.


 --Matt Ross
 Ephrata School District



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Excel Issue

2010-11-08 Thread Joseph L. Casale
One of our more proficient users has been saving excel data as .shs somehow.
They have been doing this since 2006? Now that we are on Office 2010 it 
doesn't:)

I don't have any old version of excel installed anywhere, is there any way for 
me to recover this in 2010?

Thanks!
jlc

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Excel Issue

2010-11-08 Thread Steve Kelsay
Google excell .shs convert  gives lots of free converters.

 

From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 12:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Excel Issue

 

One of our more proficient users has been saving excel data as .shs
somehow.

They have been doing this since 2006? Now that we are on Office 2010 it
doesn'tJ

 

I don't have any old version of excel installed anywhere, is there any
way for me to recover this in 2010?

 

Thanks!
jlc

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: KMS activation issue

2010-11-08 Thread Kennedy, Jim
You need five servers hitting KMS to get it started. 25 is for desktops.

However you say you used a MAK key on the 2008R2 server?  That is the 
problem...if you want that server to be your KMS sever you need to put the KMS 
license in it. Remove the MAK key and add the KMS key with slmgr.vbs.

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:stefan.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: KMS activation issue

Ok, so ordered Windows Data Center 2008 do I can use many servers on my Virtual 
Infrastructure, I now added an 2008R2 server using the MAK key, and getting an 
error code:
0xC004F038, after Googeling it i get that I need minimum 25 servers on that 
key! What's up with that? What am I doing wrong?

--
Stefan Jafs

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Home Folder Permissions reset

2010-11-08 Thread Joseph L. Casale
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2008/06/30/automatic-creation-of-user-folders-for-home-roaming-profile-and-redirected-folders.aspx

Give that a read...
I have used setacl and a script to interpret folder name into account name to 
tidy this up.
jlc

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



Re: KMS activation issue

2010-11-08 Thread Stefan Jafs
Thank I just realized that my Data server Licence is an KMS key not MAK! So
do I need to run the utility on 5 of my server to change from MAK to KMS to
get it to work?

SJ

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Kennedy, Jim
kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgwrote:

  You need five servers hitting KMS to get it started. 25 is for desktops.



 However you say you used a MAK key on the 2008R2 server?  That is the
 problem…if you want that server to be your KMS sever you need to put the KMS
 license in it. Remove the MAK key and add the KMS key with slmgr.vbs.



 *From:* Stefan Jafs [mailto:stefan.j...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Monday, November 08, 2010 11:41 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* KMS activation issue



 Ok, so ordered Windows Data Center 2008 do I can use many servers on my
 Virtual Infrastructure, I now added an 2008R2 server using the MAK key, and
 getting an error code:

 0xC004F038, after Googeling it i get that I need minimum 25 servers on that
 key! What's up with that? What am I doing wrong?

 --
 Stefan Jafs

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin




-- 
Stefan Jafs

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: KMS activation issue

2010-11-08 Thread Kennedy, Jim
Ok, you only install the KMS key on the one server you want to be your KMS 
server. You install no key on any of the other servers, so remove the MAK and 
add in nothing on the other servers with slmgr.vbs. Check your DNS to make sure 
the KMS server registered itself as the kms server for your domain.

If your KMS server is 2008 and you need to service R2 or windows 7 clients you 
need this update:   http://support.microsoft.com/kb/968912


From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:stefan.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 1:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: KMS activation issue

Thank I just realized that my Data server Licence is an KMS key not MAK! So do 
I need to run the utility on 5 of my server to change from MAK to KMS to get it 
to work?

SJ
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Kennedy, Jim 
kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote:
You need five servers hitting KMS to get it started. 25 is for desktops.

However you say you used a MAK key on the 2008R2 server?  That is the 
problem...if you want that server to be your KMS sever you need to put the KMS 
license in it. Remove the MAK key and add the KMS key with slmgr.vbs.

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:stefan.j...@gmail.commailto:stefan.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: KMS activation issue

Ok, so ordered Windows Data Center 2008 do I can use many servers on my Virtual 
Infrastructure, I now added an 2008R2 server using the MAK key, and getting an 
error code:
0xC004F038, after Googeling it i get that I need minimum 25 servers on that 
key! What's up with that? What am I doing wrong?

--
Stefan Jafs

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



--
Stefan Jafs

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Home Folder Permissions reset

2010-11-08 Thread Don Guyer
Yes, I was talking NTFS perms.

For new users here, we map their home drives using AD, which
automagically gives them Full Perms to this folder. We've never ran into
any issues doing it this way and don't see a need to change it up, for
fear of the user messing with their folder.

Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox  Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com


-Original Message-
From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winz...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 12:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Home Folder Permissions reset

I think Don was referring to the NTFS permissions, not the Share 
permissions.  Each admin has to decide whether they want their users to
have 
full control to their individual user folders (business may also
dictate). 
Yes, full control would allow them to change the permissions on his/her 
folder, including removing the local admin group.  From my experience, I

usually do the following for the NTFS permissions:

-For the top-level Homes folder (we call it Users), we usually just
do 
domain users - read/list folder contents plus administrators - full
control
-for the individual user folders, I do administrators - full control and
the 
individual user - modify.  I also remove any inherited permissions when
the 
folder is originally created, including Creator/Owner.

Regarding share permissions, everyone has a different opinion on this.
Some 
go the route of just leaving the share permissions at Everyone - Full 
Control and restricting permissions using the NTFS permissions.  Some go
a 
step further and restrict both Share and NTFS permissions.  The thing to

keep in mind is that when combining Share and NTFS permissions, the most

restrictive always wins.  So if Share permissions are set to Everyone -
Full 
Control, and NTFS permissions for a certain group are set to read only, 
members of that group (assuming they don't have explicit permissions or
are 
not members of another group that has more permissions) would have read
only 
access.

As for SYSTEM, I did some researching on this a while back, and found
that 
for a volume containing only files/folders, it does not appear to be 
necessary.  We have removed it from our data volumes without noticing
any 
issues at all.

HTH,

James
-Original Message- 
From: Matthew W. Ross
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 10:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Home Folder Permissions reset

Read access to the Share allows users to write to their home folders?

Also, doesn't full control allow a user to change his permissions?


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District


- Original Message -
From: Don Guyer
[mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Mon, 08 Nov 2010
08:56:43 -0800
Subject: RE: Home Folder Permissions reset


 Authenticated Users should have Read access to \\SERVER\Homes, each
 individual user should have Full Control to \\SERVER\Homes\username.

 Don Guyer
 Systems Engineer - Information Services
 Prudential, Fox  Roach/Trident Group
 431 W. Lancaster Avenue
 Devon, PA 19333
 Direct: (610) 993-3299
 Fax: (610) 650-5306
 don.gu...@prufoxroach.com


 -Original Message-
 From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
 Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:48 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Home Folder Permissions reset

 Hey list,

 I'm sure this is something that has been touched on before, but my
quick
 search through the list archives didn't get anything concrete...

 I'm looking to lock down permissions on user home folders. I'm unsure
on
 how, but one user was able to access the contents of another and that
 will have to be stopped ASAP. I'd like some help on what are the
correct
 permissions, as I have a few questions.


 Let me explain what things are like currently. Right now, home folder
 permissions are as follows:

 There is a \\SERVER\Homes share. The _sharing_ permissions on this
 folder is set to Everyone has Change, Domain Admins has Full
 control.

 Each user has a home folder under this share (i.e.:
 \\SERVER\Homes\Username) with the following permissions:

 DOMAN\Username has Modify
 SERVER\Administrators has Full Control
 SERVER\Users has Read and Execute[1]
 SYSTEM has full control
 CREATOR OWNER has no permissions

 And now, several questions:

 A) What are the correct sharing permissions? Should Everyone be
 changed to Domain Users? Should Domain Admins not be in that list?

 B) What is the SYSTEM permissions for? Is it needed?

 C) SERVER\Administrators vs DOMAIN\Domain Admins... Which is more
 appropriate?

 I'm working on a script to reset these permissions, probably with
 xcacls. I need to find my old cacls script first, or write it from
 scratch. If somebody has a working script for this handy, I'd love a
 copy.

 [1] The SERVER\Users group appears to be 

PSEXEC and %homedrive%

2010-11-08 Thread Christopher Bodnar
Wondering if anyone else has run into this before.

I've got a VBS script that we use pretty frequently, and I was trying to 
run it remotely using PSEXEC against a bunch of systems. Finally narrowed 
the problem down to the fact that for some reason, the %HOMEDRIVE% 
variable and PSEXEC didn't mix well on some systems. Not all. And if run 
locally, it worked perfectly. I also enumerated the variable through 
PSEXEC remotely without any issues, which surprised me.  I was able to 
change the variable to %SYSTEMROOT%. which solved the issue, but was 
wondering what the underlying problem was. 

Very odd.


Thanks


Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003

-
This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the
message and any attachments.  Thank you.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

2010-11-08 Thread Andrew S. Baker
If you are using PSEXEC remotely, then it is running on the remote system in
a local system context, unless you specified the credentials it was to use.

That can be a problem if you're not limiting your actions on the remote end
to generic system activities.


*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *



On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Christopher Bodnar 
christopher_bod...@glic.com wrote:

 Wondering if anyone else has run into this before.

 I've got a VBS script that we use pretty frequently, and I was trying to
 run it remotely using PSEXEC against a bunch of systems. Finally narrowed
 the problem down to the fact that for some reason, the %HOMEDRIVE% variable
 and PSEXEC didn't mix well on some systems. Not all. And if run locally, it
 worked perfectly. I also enumerated the variable through PSEXEC remotely
 without any issues, which surprised me.  I was able to change the variable
 to %SYSTEMROOT%. which solved the issue, but was wondering what the
 underlying problem was.

 Very odd.


 Thanks


 Chris Bodnar, MCSE
 Systems Engineer


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Deploy 2008 R2 Domain Controllers

2010-11-08 Thread Sean Martin
Good morning all,

We recently acquired new servers to replace our existing Domain Controllers
as part of our hardware refresh strategy. Obviously we want to get the
hardware into production as soon as possible, but we're not quite ready to
take on the project of upgrading the forest to 2008.

Would their be any issues with replacing all of our existing Windows 2003
DCs with Windows 2008 R2, but leaving the Forest/Domain functional levels at
2003 until we have validated all of the applications in our environment? Are
there any major changes to DNS, WINs or DHCP that would need to be
considered?

- Sean

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Deploy 2008 R2 Domain Controllers

2010-11-08 Thread Sean Martin
Forgot to mention we're running Exhcange 2003 SP2. From what I've read that
should be supported.

- Sean

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:

 Good morning all,

 We recently acquired new servers to replace our existing Domain Controllers
 as part of our hardware refresh strategy. Obviously we want to get the
 hardware into production as soon as possible, but we're not quite ready to
 take on the project of upgrading the forest to 2008.

 Would their be any issues with replacing all of our existing Windows 2003
 DCs with Windows 2008 R2, but leaving the Forest/Domain functional levels at
 2003 until we have validated all of the applications in our environment? Are
 there any major changes to DNS, WINs or DHCP that would need to be
 considered?

 - Sean


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Deploy 2008 R2 Domain Controllers

2010-11-08 Thread Michael B. Smith
I don't see any issues. You will have to bump the schema, but as long as you 
don't change the DFL or FFL, you'll continue to operate as you always have.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 2:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Deploy 2008 R2 Domain Controllers

Forgot to mention we're running Exhcange 2003 SP2. From what I've read that 
should be supported.

- Sean
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Sean Martin 
seanmarti...@gmail.commailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
Good morning all,

We recently acquired new servers to replace our existing Domain Controllers as 
part of our hardware refresh strategy. Obviously we want to get the hardware 
into production as soon as possible, but we're not quite ready to take on the 
project of upgrading the forest to 2008.

Would their be any issues with replacing all of our existing Windows 2003 DCs 
with Windows 2008 R2, but leaving the Forest/Domain functional levels at 2003 
until we have validated all of the applications in our environment? Are there 
any major changes to DNS, WINs or DHCP that would need to be considered?

- Sean


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Deploy 2008 R2 Domain Controllers

2010-11-08 Thread Brian Desmond
Sean-

You'll be fine leaving the functional level as-is, however any app compat issue 
you're going to have is about 99% likely to be a result of the OS upgrade not 
the DFL/FFL bump.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c   - 312.731.3132

From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Deploy 2008 R2 Domain Controllers

Forgot to mention we're running Exhcange 2003 SP2. From what I've read that 
should be supported.

- Sean
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Sean Martin 
seanmarti...@gmail.commailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
Good morning all,

We recently acquired new servers to replace our existing Domain Controllers as 
part of our hardware refresh strategy. Obviously we want to get the hardware 
into production as soon as possible, but we're not quite ready to take on the 
project of upgrading the forest to 2008.

Would their be any issues with replacing all of our existing Windows 2003 DCs 
with Windows 2008 R2, but leaving the Forest/Domain functional levels at 2003 
until we have validated all of the applications in our environment? Are there 
any major changes to DNS, WINs or DHCP that would need to be considered?

- Sean


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Deploy 2008 R2 Domain Controllers

2010-11-08 Thread Andrew S. Baker
There's no problem doing that.  In fact, you can't move the forest to a
higher functional level until you've gotten rid of all the 2003 DCs.  :)

WINS and DHCP are about the same, but DNS is a little bit cooler.  In
particular, conditional forwarders are more visible and managed centrally.


*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *



On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:

 Good morning all,

 We recently acquired new servers to replace our existing Domain Controllers
 as part of our hardware refresh strategy. Obviously we want to get the
 hardware into production as soon as possible, but we're not quite ready to
 take on the project of upgrading the forest to 2008.

 Would their be any issues with replacing all of our existing Windows 2003
 DCs with Windows 2008 R2, but leaving the Forest/Domain functional levels at
 2003 until we have validated all of the applications in our environment? Are
 there any major changes to DNS, WINs or DHCP that would need to be
 considered?

 - Sean




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Need Volume License Reseller

2010-11-08 Thread Mike Gill
My current reseller isn't working out. I deal mainly with small shops under
50 as well as several churches so they need to be familiar with discounted
non-profit licensing. Tech Soup is out as they don't service religious
institutions. I would like someone who deals with more than just MS, like
Adobe and Autodesk as well. That's not a requirement I just like to deal
with one person if I can. Any recommendations based on excellent service?

 

-- 
Mike Gill

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Need Volume License Reseller

2010-11-08 Thread Damien Solodow
CDW? 

PCMall is an option as well.

 

DAMIEN SOLODOW

Systems Engineer

317.447.6033 (office)

317.217.6851 (fax)

HARRISON COLLEGE

 

From: Mike Gill [mailto:lis...@canbyfoursquare.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 3:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Need Volume License Reseller

 

My current reseller isn't working out. I deal mainly with small shops
under 50 as well as several churches so they need to be familiar with
discounted non-profit licensing. Tech Soup is out as they don't service
religious institutions. I would like someone who deals with more than
just MS, like Adobe and Autodesk as well. That's not a requirement I
just like to deal with one person if I can. Any recommendations based on
excellent service?

 

-- 
Mike Gill

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Need Volume License Reseller

2010-11-08 Thread John Cook
Consistent Computer Bargains

 John W. Cook
System Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4

From: Mike Gill [mailto:lis...@canbyfoursquare.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 3:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Need Volume License Reseller

My current reseller isn't working out. I deal mainly with small shops under 50 
as well as several churches so they need to be familiar with discounted 
non-profit licensing. Tech Soup is out as they don't service religious 
institutions. I would like someone who deals with more than just MS, like Adobe 
and Autodesk as well. That's not a requirement I just like to deal with one 
person if I can. Any recommendations based on excellent service?

--
Mike Gill


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need 
to.

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. 
Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are 
present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or 
damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Need Volume License Reseller

2010-11-08 Thread Kennedy, Jim
CDW has worked out very well for us. Been very good with MS licensing and our 
site licenses with Adobe...Symantec licensing. The account rep can fire up a 
conference call with a licensing specialist in a heartbeat on the particular 
product you need. That worked out for us very well as there were some major 
changes to the school agreements in Ohio with MS and we were very confused.

From: Mike Gill [mailto:lis...@canbyfoursquare.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 3:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Need Volume License Reseller

My current reseller isn't working out. I deal mainly with small shops under 50 
as well as several churches so they need to be familiar with discounted 
non-profit licensing. Tech Soup is out as they don't service religious 
institutions. I would like someone who deals with more than just MS, like Adobe 
and Autodesk as well. That's not a requirement I just like to deal with one 
person if I can. Any recommendations based on excellent service?

--
Mike Gill


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Need Volume License Reseller

2010-11-08 Thread Derek Johnson
CDW ask for Dave Chase Or Josh Luff

daveandj...@cdw.commailto:daveandj...@cdw.com

866.429.8834

Derek A Johnson
Sr. Systems Administrator

National Association of Realtors
430 N. Michigan Ave.
Chicago, IL 60611

Email: djohn...@realtors.orgmailto:djohn...@realtors.org

Cell: 262.496.9201
Desk: 312.329.8618

From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 2:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Need Volume License Reseller

Consistent Computer Bargains

 John W. Cook
System Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4

From: Mike Gill [mailto:lis...@canbyfoursquare.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 3:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Need Volume License Reseller

My current reseller isn't working out. I deal mainly with small shops under 50 
as well as several churches so they need to be familiar with discounted 
non-profit licensing. Tech Soup is out as they don't service religious 
institutions. I would like someone who deals with more than just MS, like Adobe 
and Autodesk as well. That's not a requirement I just like to deal with one 
person if I can. Any recommendations based on excellent service?

--
Mike Gill


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need 
to.


This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. 
Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are 
present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or 
damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Need Volume License Reseller

2010-11-08 Thread Roger Wright
I've had good success with CDW (Drew Klos) and TLIC (Matt Biben).


Roger Wright
___

Life isn't like a box of chocolates. It's more like a jar of jalapenos: what
you do today might burn your butt tomorrow.




On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Mike Gill lis...@canbyfoursquare.comwrote:

 My current reseller isn’t working out. I deal mainly with small shops under
 50 as well as several churches so they need to be familiar with discounted
 non-profit licensing. Tech Soup is out as they don’t service religious
 institutions. I would like someone who deals with more than just MS, like
 Adobe and Autodesk as well. That’s not a requirement I just like to deal
 with one person if I can. Any recommendations based on excellent service?



 --
 Mike Gill



 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Need Volume License Reseller

2010-11-08 Thread Bob Fronk
+1 CDW

NEGATIVE 1 million - PC Mall.



From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 4:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Need Volume License Reseller

I've had good success with CDW (Drew Klos) and TLIC (Matt Biben).


Roger Wright
___
Life isn't like a box of chocolates. It's more like a jar of jalapenos: what 
you do today might burn your butt tomorrow.



On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Mike Gill 
lis...@canbyfoursquare.commailto:lis...@canbyfoursquare.com wrote:
My current reseller isn't working out. I deal mainly with small shops under 50 
as well as several churches so they need to be familiar with discounted 
non-profit licensing. Tech Soup is out as they don't service religious 
institutions. I would like someone who deals with more than just MS, like Adobe 
and Autodesk as well. That's not a requirement I just like to deal with one 
person if I can. Any recommendations based on excellent service?

--
Mike Gill


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

2010-11-08 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Christopher Bodnar
christopher_bod...@glic.com wrote:
 I've got a VBS script that we use pretty frequently, and I was trying to run
 it remotely using PSEXEC against a bunch of systems. Finally narrowed the
 problem down to the fact that for some reason, the %HOMEDRIVE% variable and
 PSEXEC didn't mix well on some systems.

  %HOMEDRIVE% is set as part of the user logon process, which, in my
experience, generally doesn't happen for anything except a typical GUI
logon.

  (%HOMEDRIVE% and %HOMEPATH% both come from the setting on the
Profile tab of an account's properties.)

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


RE: Need Volume License Reseller

2010-11-08 Thread Webster
NEGATIVE 1 million - PC Mall. 

 

As a laid off former PCMall employee, u, I _must_ (legally) keep my
mouth shut until February 9, 2011!  But you can probably infer what I want
to say. J

 

 

Webster

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com] 
Subject: RE: Need Volume License Reseller

 

+1 CDW

 

NEGATIVE 1 million - PC Mall.  


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Excel Issue

2010-11-08 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
 One of our more proficient “users” has been saving excel data as .shs
 somehow.

  FYI: That's a scrap object.  The only time I've ever seen one
created is someone selecting data and dragging it onto the desktop by
mistake.  It's only MS Office which does it.  Other than your user,
the only use I've ever heard of this feature is by attackers as part
of a security exploit.  Not one of Microsoft's better ideas, IMO.

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



Re: Need Volume License Reseller

2010-11-08 Thread Jonathan Link
When I want to buy something they don't give me the time of day.
When I don't want to buy something I get weekly calls from my account rep,
who has also changed since my last account rep tried to talk to me.

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com wrote:

  “NEGATIVE 1 million – PC Mall. ”



 As a laid off former PCMall employee, u, I _*must*_ (legally) keep my
 mouth shut until February 9, 2011!  But you can probably infer what I want
 to say. J





 Webster



 *From:* Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com]
 *Subject:* RE: Need Volume License Reseller



 +1 CDW



 NEGATIVE 1 million – PC Mall.

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~

 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Need Volume License Reseller

2010-11-08 Thread Jonathan Link
I'll put it out there.  If you have a relationship with Dell already, talk
to your rep.  Account reps have a licensing specialist on their team.

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:

 When I want to buy something they don't give me the time of day.
 When I don't want to buy something I get weekly calls from my account rep,
 who has also changed since my last account rep tried to talk to me.

   On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com wrote:

  “NEGATIVE 1 million – PC Mall. ”



 As a laid off former PCMall employee, u, I _*must*_ (legally) keep my
 mouth shut until February 9, 2011!  But you can probably infer what I want
 to say. J





 Webster



 *From:* Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com]
 *Subject:* RE: Need Volume License Reseller



 +1 CDW



 NEGATIVE 1 million – PC Mall.

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~

 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Need Volume License Reseller

2010-11-08 Thread Jeff Brown
+1 Consistent Computer Bargains.  They know non-profit software for sure,
and they don't bother me.

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:

 When I want to buy something they don't give me the time of day.
 When I don't want to buy something I get weekly calls from my account rep,
 who has also changed since my last account rep tried to talk to me.

 On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com wrote:

  “NEGATIVE 1 million – PC Mall. ”



 As a laid off former PCMall employee, u, I _*must*_ (legally) keep my
 mouth shut until February 9, 2011!  But you can probably infer what I want
 to say. J





 Webster



 *From:* Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com]
 *Subject:* RE: Need Volume License Reseller



 +1 CDW



 NEGATIVE 1 million – PC Mall.

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~

 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Home Folder Permissions reset

2010-11-08 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Matthew W. Ross
mr...@ephrataschools.org wrote:
 There is a \\SERVER\Homes share. The _sharing_ permissions on this folder is 
 set to Everyone has Change, Domain Admins has Full control.

  I tend to lean towards Users=Full, and doing everything in NTFS
permissions.  Sometimes I'll get slightly fancier, and so something
like Administrators=Full, Users=Modify.

  I never get fine grained in share permissions.  Share permissions
are a vestige from back when Microsoft still thought FAT was a good
idea and many computers thus didn't *have* the capability of doing
permissions at the filesystem level.

 SERVER\Administrators vs DOMAIN\Domain Admins... Which is more appropriate?

  That's entirely up to you and your organization and your needs.
Perhaps not all server admins are domain admins, or perhaps  not all
domain admins are server admins.

 I'm working on a script to reset these permissions, probably with xcacls. I
 need to find my old cacls script first, or write it from scratch. If somebody
 has a working script for this handy, I'd love a copy.

  I find FILEACL (free third-party tool) is the least-bad for working
with DACLs (permissions) on files and folders.All of Microsoft's
tools suck.  CACLS, XCACLS.EXE, and XCACLS.VBS suck *a lot*.  In
particular, IIRC, none of them are aware of NTFS inheritance, which
can cause them to actively break things.  ICACLS at least does
inheritance right, but is very limited in what it can do.  SUBINACL
can do a lot but has rather cumbersome syntax.  SETACL (another
third-party tool) can do everything but its syntax makes SUBINACL look
good.  FILEACL seems to suck the least.

  I find the following FILEACL idioms to be highly useful.

  Report all directly applied ACEs, one object per line:

FILEACL.EXE d:\foo /SUB /FILES /LINE /NOINHERITED

  Clear all direct ACEs and propigate inheritable ACEs from parent:

FILEACL d:\foo /REPLACE /INHERIT /SUB /FILES

  An ACE is an Access Control Entry, i.e., a given
subject+permissions+flags combination in an ACL.  A direct ACE is an
ACE set on an object, rather than inherited from a parent.  In my
book, ideally, most ACEs should be inherited; direct ACEs should be
the exceptions.  For example, you would want direct ACEs on your
username folders, and everything within those folders inherited.

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


RE: Need Volume License Reseller

2010-11-08 Thread Paul Everett
+1 CCB

 

Off list me and I'll give you my reps contact info.

 

Paul

 

From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 4:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Need Volume License Reseller

 

+1 Consistent Computer Bargains.  They know non-profit software for
sure, and they don't bother me.

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com
wrote:

When I want to buy something they don't give me the time of day.

When I don't want to buy something I get weekly calls from my account
rep, who has also changed since my last account rep tried to talk to me.

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com wrote:

NEGATIVE 1 million - PC Mall. 

 

As a laid off former PCMall employee, u, I _must_ (legally) keep my
mouth shut until February 9, 2011!  But you can probably infer what I
want to say. J

 

 

Webster

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com] 

Subject: RE: Need Volume License Reseller

 

+1 CDW

 

NEGATIVE 1 million - PC Mall.  

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ 


~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

2010-11-08 Thread Christopher Bodnar
I would agree with this, except that when I enumerate that using PSEXEC, I 
get the correct value,  so it does seem to be setting it:

***
H:\Utilitiespsexec \\SERVERNAME cmd.exe /c echo %homedrive%

PsExec v1.94 - Execute processes remotely
Copyright (C) 2001-2008 Mark Russinovich
Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com


C:
cmd.exe exited on gbtinvsql2x with error code 0.
***


Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003



From:   Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date:   11/08/2010 04:15 PM
Subject:Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%



On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Christopher Bodnar
christopher_bod...@glic.com wrote:
 I've got a VBS script that we use pretty frequently, and I was trying to 
run
 it remotely using PSEXEC against a bunch of systems. Finally narrowed 
the
 problem down to the fact that for some reason, the %HOMEDRIVE% variable 
and
 PSEXEC didn't mix well on some systems.

  %HOMEDRIVE% is set as part of the user logon process, which, in my
experience, generally doesn't happen for anything except a typical GUI
logon.

  (%HOMEDRIVE% and %HOMEPATH% both come from the setting on the
Profile tab of an account's properties.)

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



-
This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the
message and any attachments.  Thank you.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Home Folder Permissions reset

2010-11-08 Thread Matthew W. Ross
Thanks Ben, I'll see if I can't find FILEACL and make use of it.

In the mean time, I have fixed my problem... for now. I was able to use the 
existing commands available from MS, but with a few problems. My biggest 
problem was that icacls.exe seems to be able to set permissions on folders, but 
not files when I pass the recursive command. (Anybody know how to make icacls 
do this?) So I had to resort to using the old cacls.exe for the actual 
permissions.

Here's the little script I had to use to make it work, which I ran from the 
root of the home share:

@echo off
REM --- Make  a list of folders.
dir /A:D /B /-C /D  CurrentFolders.txt
REM --- Make the Administrator's group Owner, so we can redo permissions.
for /f %%i in (CurrentFolders.txt) do takeown /f %%i /R /A
REM --- Remove the inheritance for each folder.
for /f %%i in (CurrentFolders.txt) do icacls %%i /inheritance:R /T /C /L /Q
REM --- Apply the permissions I want on each folder.
for /f %%i in (CurrentFolders.txt) do cacls %%i /t /e /c /g DOMAIN\%%i:C
for /f %%i in (CurrentFolders.txt) do cacls %%i /t /e /c /g ADMINISTRATORS:C
for /f %%i in (CurrentFolders.txt) do cacls %%i /t /e /c /g DOMAIN\Domain 
Admins:F

Now, off to find and try FILEACL.


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District


- Original Message -
From: Ben Scott
[mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Mon, 08 Nov 2010
13:40:37 -0800
Subject: Re: Home Folder Permissions reset


 On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Matthew W. Ross
 mr...@ephrataschools.org wrote:
  There is a \\SERVER\Homes share. The _sharing_ permissions on this folder
 is set to Everyone has Change, Domain Admins has Full control.
 
   I tend to lean towards Users=Full, and doing everything in NTFS
 permissions.  Sometimes I'll get slightly fancier, and so something
 like Administrators=Full, Users=Modify.
 
   I never get fine grained in share permissions.  Share permissions
 are a vestige from back when Microsoft still thought FAT was a good
 idea and many computers thus didn't *have* the capability of doing
 permissions at the filesystem level.
 
  SERVER\Administrators vs DOMAIN\Domain Admins... Which is more
 appropriate?
 
   That's entirely up to you and your organization and your needs.
 Perhaps not all server admins are domain admins, or perhaps  not all
 domain admins are server admins.
 
  I'm working on a script to reset these permissions, probably with xcacls.
 I
  need to find my old cacls script first, or write it from scratch. If
 somebody
  has a working script for this handy, I'd love a copy.
 
   I find FILEACL (free third-party tool) is the least-bad for working
 with DACLs (permissions) on files and folders.All of Microsoft's
 tools suck.  CACLS, XCACLS.EXE, and XCACLS.VBS suck *a lot*.  In
 particular, IIRC, none of them are aware of NTFS inheritance, which
 can cause them to actively break things.  ICACLS at least does
 inheritance right, but is very limited in what it can do.  SUBINACL
 can do a lot but has rather cumbersome syntax.  SETACL (another
 third-party tool) can do everything but its syntax makes SUBINACL look
 good.  FILEACL seems to suck the least.
 
   I find the following FILEACL idioms to be highly useful.
 
   Report all directly applied ACEs, one object per line:
 
   FILEACL.EXE d:\foo /SUB /FILES /LINE /NOINHERITED
 
   Clear all direct ACEs and propigate inheritable ACEs from parent:
 
   FILEACL d:\foo /REPLACE /INHERIT /SUB /FILES
 
   An ACE is an Access Control Entry, i.e., a given
 subject+permissions+flags combination in an ACL.  A direct ACE is an
 ACE set on an object, rather than inherited from a parent.  In my
 book, ideally, most ACEs should be inherited; direct ACEs should be
 the exceptions.  For example, you would want direct ACEs on your
 username folders, and everything within those folders inherited.
 
 -- Ben
 
 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



Re: Deploy 2008 R2 Domain Controllers

2010-11-08 Thread Sean Martin
Thanks for the feedback guys.

Brian, that little caveat you mentioned makes me think investigating all of
our applications prior to moving forward would be warranted. Are there any
specific issues that may be documented, or that you've experienced
personally? I'm thinking I should probably look into some of our main apps
that have reliance on AD.

Symantec Enterprise Vault 8.0 SP5
Cisco Unity 7.x
Sharepoint 2010 - Still in development
CRM 4.0

- Sean

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:

 There's no problem doing that.  In fact, you can't move the forest to a
 higher functional level until you've gotten rid of all the 2003 DCs.  :)

 WINS and DHCP are about the same, but DNS is a little bit cooler.  In
 particular, conditional forwarders are more visible and managed centrally.


  *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker
 *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
 * *



 On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.comwrote:

 Good morning all,

 We recently acquired new servers to replace our existing Domain
 Controllers as part of our hardware refresh strategy. Obviously we want to
 get the hardware into production as soon as possible, but we're not quite
 ready to take on the project of upgrading the forest to 2008.

 Would their be any issues with replacing all of our existing Windows 2003
 DCs with Windows 2008 R2, but leaving the Forest/Domain functional levels at
 2003 until we have validated all of the applications in our environment? Are
 there any major changes to DNS, WINs or DHCP that would need to be
 considered?

 - Sean


   ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

2010-11-08 Thread Carl Houseman
Do this

 

psexec \\SERVERNAME file:///\\SERVERNAME  cmd /c set

 

So what's the difference.  Look again at this very carefully...

 

psexec \\SERVERNAME cmd.exe /c echo %homedrive%

 

Hint:  On what computer is %homedrive% expanded ?

 

Carl

 

From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 5:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

 

I would agree with this, except that when I enumerate that using PSEXEC, I
get the correct value,  so it does seem to be setting it: 

*
** 
H:\Utilitiespsexec \\SERVERNAME cmd.exe /c echo %homedrive% 

PsExec v1.94 - Execute processes remotely 
Copyright (C) 2001-2008 Mark Russinovich 
Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com 


C: 
cmd.exe exited on gbtinvsql2x with error code 0. 
*
** 


Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003 



From:Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com 
To:NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
Date:11/08/2010 04:15 PM 
Subject:Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive% 

  _  




On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Christopher Bodnar
christopher_bod...@glic.com wrote:
 I've got a VBS script that we use pretty frequently, and I was trying to
run
 it remotely using PSEXEC against a bunch of systems. Finally narrowed the
 problem down to the fact that for some reason, the %HOMEDRIVE% variable and
 PSEXEC didn't mix well on some systems.

 %HOMEDRIVE% is set as part of the user logon process, which, in my
experience, generally doesn't happen for anything except a typical GUI
logon.

 (%HOMEDRIVE% and %HOMEPATH% both come from the setting on the
Profile tab of an account's properties.)

-- Ben

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Deploy 2008 R2 Domain Controllers

2010-11-08 Thread Don Ely
Unity and SP are fine.  Not sure on the other 2...

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks for the feedback guys.

 Brian, that little caveat you mentioned makes me think investigating all of
 our applications prior to moving forward would be warranted. Are there any
 specific issues that may be documented, or that you've experienced
 personally? I'm thinking I should probably look into some of our main apps
 that have reliance on AD.

 Symantec Enterprise Vault 8.0 SP5
 Cisco Unity 7.x
 Sharepoint 2010 - Still in development
 CRM 4.0

 - Sean

   On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.comwrote:

 There's no problem doing that.  In fact, you can't move the forest to a
 higher functional level until you've gotten rid of all the 2003 DCs.  :)

 WINS and DHCP are about the same, but DNS is a little bit cooler.  In
 particular, conditional forwarders are more visible and managed centrally.


  *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker
 *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
 * *



 On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.comwrote:

 Good morning all,

 We recently acquired new servers to replace our existing Domain
 Controllers as part of our hardware refresh strategy. Obviously we want to
 get the hardware into production as soon as possible, but we're not quite
 ready to take on the project of upgrading the forest to 2008.

 Would their be any issues with replacing all of our existing Windows 2003
 DCs with Windows 2008 R2, but leaving the Forest/Domain functional levels at
 2003 until we have validated all of the applications in our environment? Are
 there any major changes to DNS, WINs or DHCP that would need to be
 considered?

 - Sean


   ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Deploy 2008 R2 Domain Controllers

2010-11-08 Thread Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
Any considerations for schema modifications? (will existing mods port to AD2k8 
automatically, or will you have to manually mod the 2k8 domain?)


Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians  Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/


From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 6:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Deploy 2008 R2 Domain Controllers

Thanks for the feedback guys.

Brian, that little caveat you mentioned makes me think investigating all of our 
applications prior to moving forward would be warranted. Are there any specific 
issues that may be documented, or that you've experienced personally? I'm 
thinking I should probably look into some of our main apps that have reliance 
on AD.

Symantec Enterprise Vault 8.0 SP5
Cisco Unity 7.x
Sharepoint 2010 - Still in development
CRM 4.0

- Sean
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Andrew S. Baker 
asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no problem doing that.  In fact, you can't move the forest to a higher 
functional level until you've gotten rid of all the 2003 DCs.  :)

WINS and DHCP are about the same, but DNS is a little bit cooler.  In 
particular, conditional forwarders are more visible and managed centrally.



ASB (My XeeSM Profile)http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker
Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...



On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Sean Martin 
seanmarti...@gmail.commailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
Good morning all,

We recently acquired new servers to replace our existing Domain Controllers as 
part of our hardware refresh strategy. Obviously we want to get the hardware 
into production as soon as possible, but we're not quite ready to take on the 
project of upgrading the forest to 2008.

Would their be any issues with replacing all of our existing Windows 2003 DCs 
with Windows 2008 R2, but leaving the Forest/Domain functional levels at 2003 
until we have validated all of the applications in our environment? Are there 
any major changes to DNS, WINs or DHCP that would need to be considered?

- Sean



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL 
and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, 
disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may 
contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is 
intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as 
recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this 
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from 
your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not 
disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it 
contains.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

2010-11-08 Thread Christopher Bodnar
Thanks Carl,

I see what you are saying now. I just don't understand the behavior. I 
would think anything after the SERVERNAME would be evaluated on the 
remote machine, but that doesn't' seem to be the case when specifying a 
variable. 

thanks


Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003



From:   Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date:   11/08/2010 06:10 PM
Subject:RE: PSEXEC and %homedrive%



Do this
 
psexec \\SERVERNAME cmd /c set
 
So what's the difference.  Look again at this very carefully...
 
psexec \\SERVERNAME cmd.exe /c echo %homedrive%
 
Hint:  On what computer is %homedrive% expanded ?
 
Carl
 
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 5:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%
 
I would agree with this, except that when I enumerate that using PSEXEC, I 
get the correct value,  so it does seem to be setting it: 

***
 

H:\Utilitiespsexec \\SERVERNAME cmd.exe /c echo %homedrive% 

PsExec v1.94 - Execute processes remotely 
Copyright (C) 2001-2008 Mark Russinovich 
Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com 


C: 
cmd.exe exited on gbtinvsql2x with error code 0. 
***
 



Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003 



From:Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com 
To:NT System Admin Issues 
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
Date:11/08/2010 04:15 PM 
Subject:Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive% 




On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Christopher Bodnar
christopher_bod...@glic.com wrote:
 I've got a VBS script that we use pretty frequently, and I was trying to 
run
 it remotely using PSEXEC against a bunch of systems. Finally narrowed 
the
 problem down to the fact that for some reason, the %HOMEDRIVE% variable 
and
 PSEXEC didn't mix well on some systems.

 %HOMEDRIVE% is set as part of the user logon process, which, in my
experience, generally doesn't happen for anything except a typical GUI
logon.

 (%HOMEDRIVE% and %HOMEPATH% both come from the setting on the
Profile tab of an account's properties.)

-- Ben
 
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


-
This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the
message and any attachments.  Thank you.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Excel Issue

2010-11-08 Thread Joseph L. Casale
  FYI: That's a scrap object.  The only time I've ever seen one created is 
 someone selecting data and dragging it onto the desktop by mistake.  It's 
 only MS Office which does it.  Other than your user, the only use I've ever 
 heard of this feature is by attackers as part of a security exploit.  Not 
 one of Microsoft's better ideas, IMO.

Yeah, I know what it is, and if you met this user, it would surprise you in the 
least, sigh...

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



RE: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

2010-11-08 Thread Crawford, Scott
Your entire command line gets parsed on your computer first and then it 
performs the operation.

Assume you're running from a PC named Workstation against a server named Server.

Psexec \\serverfile:///\\server cmd /c echo %computername%

Gets parsed to

Psexec \\serverfile:///\\server cmd /c echo Workstation

Which is exactly what the server does.

What you want is

Psexec \\serverfile:///\\server cmd /c echo ^%computername^%

The carets escape the percents to pass the command echo %computername% to the 
server.

From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 5:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

Thanks Carl,

I see what you are saying now. I just don't understand the behavior. I would 
think anything after the SERVERNAME would be evaluated on the remote machine, 
but that doesn't' seem to be the case when specifying a variable.

thanks


Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003



From:Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com
To:NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date:11/08/2010 06:10 PM
Subject:RE: PSEXEC and %homedrive%




Do this

psexec \\SERVERNAMEfile:///\\SERVERNAME\ cmd /c set

So what's the difference.  Look again at this very carefully...

psexec \\SERVERNAME cmd.exe /c echo %homedrive%

Hint:  On what computer is %homedrive% expanded ?

Carl

From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 5:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

I would agree with this, except that when I enumerate that using PSEXEC, I get 
the correct value,  so it does seem to be setting it:

***
H:\Utilitiespsexec \\SERVERNAME cmd.exe /c echo %homedrive%

PsExec v1.94 - Execute processes remotely
Copyright (C) 2001-2008 Mark Russinovich
Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com


C:
cmd.exe exited on gbtinvsql2x with error code 0.
***


Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003



From:Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com
To:NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date:11/08/2010 04:15 PM
Subject:Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%






On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Christopher Bodnar
christopher_bod...@glic.com wrote:
 I've got a VBS script that we use pretty frequently, and I was trying to run
 it remotely using PSEXEC against a bunch of systems. Finally narrowed the
 problem down to the fact that for some reason, the %HOMEDRIVE% variable and
 PSEXEC didn't mix well on some systems.

%HOMEDRIVE% is set as part of the user logon process, which, in my
experience, generally doesn't happen for anything except a typical GUI
logon.

(%HOMEDRIVE% and %HOMEPATH% both come from the setting on the
Profile tab of an account's properties.)

-- Ben



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

2010-11-08 Thread Crawford, Scott
...and by %computername%, I of course mean whatever variable you'd like to 
expand.

From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 5:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

Your entire command line gets parsed on your computer first and then it 
performs the operation.

Assume you're running from a PC named Workstation against a server named Server.

Psexec \\serverfile:///\\server cmd /c echo %computername%

Gets parsed to

Psexec \\serverfile:///\\server cmd /c echo Workstation

Which is exactly what the server does.

What you want is

Psexec \\serverfile:///\\server cmd /c echo ^%computername^%

The carets escape the percents to pass the command echo %computername% to the 
server.

From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 5:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

Thanks Carl,

I see what you are saying now. I just don't understand the behavior. I would 
think anything after the SERVERNAME would be evaluated on the remote machine, 
but that doesn't' seem to be the case when specifying a variable.

thanks


Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003



From:Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com
To:NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date:11/08/2010 06:10 PM
Subject:RE: PSEXEC and %homedrive%




Do this

psexec \\SERVERNAMEfile:///\\SERVERNAME\ cmd /c set

So what's the difference.  Look again at this very carefully...

psexec \\SERVERNAME cmd.exe /c echo %homedrive%

Hint:  On what computer is %homedrive% expanded ?

Carl

From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 5:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

I would agree with this, except that when I enumerate that using PSEXEC, I get 
the correct value,  so it does seem to be setting it:

***
H:\Utilitiespsexec \\SERVERNAME cmd.exe /c echo %homedrive%

PsExec v1.94 - Execute processes remotely
Copyright (C) 2001-2008 Mark Russinovich
Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com


C:
cmd.exe exited on gbtinvsql2x with error code 0.
***


Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003



From:Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com
To:NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date:11/08/2010 04:15 PM
Subject:Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%






On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Christopher Bodnar
christopher_bod...@glic.com wrote:
 I've got a VBS script that we use pretty frequently, and I was trying to run
 it remotely using PSEXEC against a bunch of systems. Finally narrowed the
 problem down to the fact that for some reason, the %HOMEDRIVE% variable and
 PSEXEC didn't mix well on some systems.

%HOMEDRIVE% is set as part of the user logon process, which, in my
experience, generally doesn't happen for anything except a typical GUI
logon.

(%HOMEDRIVE% and %HOMEPATH% both come from the setting on the
Profile tab of an account's properties.)

-- Ben



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with 

RE: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

2010-11-08 Thread Carl Houseman
Just to underline Scott's point, the entire line is evaluated for the
existence of environment variables which are expanded locally, then the
result is passed to the remote system for execution.

 

How to do what you were attempting to do - specify the variable so it isn't
expanded locally but on the remote system instead.

 

psexec \\SERVERNAME cmd /v:on /c echo !computername!

 

Carl

 

From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 6:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

 

Thanks Carl, 

I see what you are saying now. I just don't understand the behavior. I would
think anything after the SERVERNAME would be evaluated on the remote
machine, but that doesn't' seem to be the case when specifying a variable. 

thanks 


Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003 



From:Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com 
To:NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
Date:11/08/2010 06:10 PM 
Subject:RE: PSEXEC and %homedrive% 

  _  




Do this 
  
psexec  file:///\\SERVERNAME\ \\SERVERNAME cmd /c set 
  
So what's the difference.  Look again at this very carefully... 
  
psexec \\SERVERNAME cmd.exe /c echo %homedrive% 
  
Hint:  On what computer is %homedrive% expanded ? 
  
Carl 
  
From: Christopher Bodnar [ mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com
mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 5:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive% 
  
I would agree with this, except that when I enumerate that using PSEXEC, I
get the correct value,  so it does seem to be setting it: 

*
** 
H:\Utilitiespsexec \\SERVERNAME cmd.exe /c echo %homedrive% 

PsExec v1.94 - Execute processes remotely 
Copyright (C) 2001-2008 Mark Russinovich 
Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com 


C: 
cmd.exe exited on gbtinvsql2x with error code 0. 
*
** 


Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003 



From:Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com 
To:NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
Date:11/08/2010 04:15 PM 
Subject:Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive% 

 

  _  





On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Christopher Bodnar
christopher_bod...@glic.com wrote:
 I've got a VBS script that we use pretty frequently, and I was trying to
run
 it remotely using PSEXEC against a bunch of systems. Finally narrowed the
 problem down to the fact that for some reason, the %HOMEDRIVE% variable and
 PSEXEC didn't mix well on some systems.

%HOMEDRIVE% is set as part of the user logon process, which, in my
experience, generally doesn't happen for anything except a typical GUI
logon.

(%HOMEDRIVE% and %HOMEPATH% both come from the setting on the
Profile tab of an account's properties.)

-- Ben 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Deploy 2008 R2 Domain Controllers

2010-11-08 Thread Brian Desmond
The schema is stored in the directory itself so it's going to be fine.

I haven't heard anything negative about any of the apps listed below so I 
wouldn't worry about them. Usually issues come up around legacy stuff or things 
running on *nix.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c   - 312.731.3132

From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 3:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Deploy 2008 R2 Domain Controllers

Any considerations for schema modifications? (will existing mods port to AD2k8 
automatically, or will you have to manually mod the 2k8 domain?)


Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians  Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/


From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 6:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Deploy 2008 R2 Domain Controllers

Thanks for the feedback guys.

Brian, that little caveat you mentioned makes me think investigating all of our 
applications prior to moving forward would be warranted. Are there any specific 
issues that may be documented, or that you've experienced personally? I'm 
thinking I should probably look into some of our main apps that have reliance 
on AD.

Symantec Enterprise Vault 8.0 SP5
Cisco Unity 7.x
Sharepoint 2010 - Still in development
CRM 4.0

- Sean
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Andrew S. Baker 
asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no problem doing that.  In fact, you can't move the forest to a higher 
functional level until you've gotten rid of all the 2003 DCs.  :)

WINS and DHCP are about the same, but DNS is a little bit cooler.  In 
particular, conditional forwarders are more visible and managed centrally.



ASB (My XeeSM Profile)http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker
Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...


On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Sean Martin 
seanmarti...@gmail.commailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
Good morning all,

We recently acquired new servers to replace our existing Domain Controllers as 
part of our hardware refresh strategy. Obviously we want to get the hardware 
into production as soon as possible, but we're not quite ready to take on the 
project of upgrading the forest to 2008.

Would their be any issues with replacing all of our existing Windows 2003 DCs 
with Windows 2008 R2, but leaving the Forest/Domain functional levels at 2003 
until we have validated all of the applications in our environment? Are there 
any major changes to DNS, WINs or DHCP that would need to be considered?

- Sean



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL 
and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, 
disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may 
contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is 
intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as 
recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this 
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from 
your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not 
disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it 
contains.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: non-APC batteries?

2010-11-08 Thread Rick Schmahl
Hello Adam, hope it's not too late to reply...

At my dayjob we use the services of Costal Business Machines. They ship
an empty box for the UPS with a return label. We ship it and in a week
or so it's returned with a new battery. Additionally they test the
rest of the components and replace whatever else is necessary. It's
then under warranty for a year. The cost is fractional compared to a
new device and it's nice to know the entire UPS is under warranty, not
just the battery.

The rep I go through is Bowman Hood 800-944-9320 x111 bh...@cbmi.com

-- 
-Rick


AG Needing to replace battery on a 3-yr-old APC SmartUPS 1000xl ... any 
AG reason not to go with a less expensive non-APC alternative (like 
AG 
http://www.thenerds.net/AMERICAN_BATTERY.ABC_Replacement_Battery_Cartrige7.RBC7.html)?

AG Thanks,
AG Adam

AG ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
AG ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

AG ---
AG To manage subscriptions click here:
AG http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
AG or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
AG with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin






~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

2010-11-08 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com wrote:
 psexec \\SERVERNAME cmd /v:on /c echo !computername!

  FYI, if delayed expansion is enabled on the local host,
I think you'll still get the unwanted behavior, i.e., expands locally,
not remotely.  I think Scott Crawford's method, using the caret to
escape the percent, is slightly better.

  (CMD's quoting and escaping is incredibly idiosyncratic, so I'm not
really sure.)

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


RE: Home Folder Permissions reset

2010-11-08 Thread greg.sweers
Backups are also key.  Built in tools use that account to do a whole list of 
things.  System should have full access pretty much everywhere.

Greg Sweers
CEO
ACTS360.comhttp://www.acts360.com/
P.O. Box 1193
Brandon, FL  33509
813-657-0849 Office
813-758-6850 Cell
813-341-1270 Fax

From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 12:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Home Folder Permissions reset

Matt,

The SYSTEM permissions will allow the local computer to do things like DEFRAG 
those folders.

Here are some scripts that might help:


* http://kb.ultratech-llc.com/Scripts/?File=HomePerms.BAT





* 
http://KB.UltraTech-llc.com/Scripts/?File=Perms.BAThttp://kb.ultratech-llc.com/Scripts/?File=Perms.BAT







ASB (My XeeSM Profile)http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker

Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...



On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Matthew W. Ross 
mr...@ephrataschools.orgmailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org wrote:
Hey list,

I'm sure this is something that has been touched on before, but my quick search 
through the list archives didn't get anything concrete...

I'm looking to lock down permissions on user home folders. I'm unsure on how, 
but one user was able to access the contents of another and that will have to 
be stopped ASAP. I'd like some help on what are the correct permissions, as I 
have a few questions.

Let me explain what things are like currently. Right now, home folder 
permissions are as follows:

There is a \\SERVER\Homes share. The _sharing_ permissions on this folder is 
set to Everyone has Change, Domain Admins has Full control.

Each user has a home folder under this share (i.e.: \\SERVER\Homes\Username) 
with the following permissions:

DOMAN\Username has Modify
SERVER\Administrators has Full Control
SERVER\Users has Read and Execute[1]
SYSTEM has full control
CREATOR OWNER has no permissions

And now, several questions:

A) What are the correct sharing permissions? Should Everyone be changed to 
Domain Users? Should Domain Admins not be in that list?

B) What is the SYSTEM permissions for? Is it needed?

C) SERVER\Administrators vs DOMAIN\Domain Admins... Which is more appropriate?

I'm working on a script to reset these permissions, probably with xcacls. I 
need to find my old cacls script first, or write it from scratch. If somebody 
has a working script for this handy, I'd love a copy.

[1] The SERVER\Users group appears to be part of my problem, as I didn't intend 
for other users to be able to read and/or execute files on another user's home 
folder, but this was an inherited permission I missed.


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

2010-11-08 Thread Michael B. Smith
Anecdote: believe it or not, MSFT really wanted to clean it up and make a 
modern shell (the standard PowerShell host is still based on cmd.exe, in case 
you hadn't noticed) - but doing so broke too many things.

Sodeal with the behavior that's 25 years old, install a ported UNIX shell, 
or use PowerShell where quoting and escaping is very well defined in 99.5% of 
the cases.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 9:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com wrote:
 psexec \\SERVERNAME cmd /v:on /c echo !computername!

  FYI, if delayed expansion is enabled on the local host, I think you'll 
still get the unwanted behavior, i.e., expands locally, not remotely.  I think 
Scott Crawford's method, using the caret to escape the percent, is slightly 
better.

  (CMD's quoting and escaping is incredibly idiosyncratic, so I'm not really 
sure.)

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

2010-11-08 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
+1.  Using carets to escape the characters works.

--
ME2





On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.eduwrote:

  Your entire command line gets parsed on your computer first and then it
 performs the operation.



 Assume you’re running from a PC named Workstation against a server named
 Server.



 Psexec \\server cmd /c echo %computername%



 Gets parsed to



 Psexec \\server cmd /c echo Workstation



 Which is exactly what the server does.



 What you want is



 Psexec \\server cmd /c echo ^%computername^%



 The carets escape the percents to pass the command echo %computername% to
 the server.



 *From:* Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
 *Sent:* Monday, November 08, 2010 5:26 PM

 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: PSEXEC and %homedrive%



 Thanks Carl,

 I see what you are saying now. I just don't understand the behavior. I
 would think anything after the SERVERNAME would be evaluated on the remote
 machine, but that doesn't' seem to be the case when specifying a variable.

 thanks


 Chris Bodnar, MCSE
 Systems Engineer
 Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
 Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
 Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
 Phone: 610-807-6459
 Fax: 610-807-6003



 From:Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com
 To:NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 
 Date:11/08/2010 06:10 PM
 Subject:RE: PSEXEC and %homedrive%
  --




 Do this

 psexec \\SERVERNAME cmd /c set

 So what's the difference.  Look again at this very carefully...

 psexec \\SERVERNAME cmd.exe /c echo %homedrive%

 Hint:  On what computer is %homedrive% expanded ?

 Carl

 *From:* Christopher Bodnar 
 [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.comchristopher_bod...@glic.com]
 *
 Sent:* Monday, November 08, 2010 5:16 PM*
 To:* NT System Admin Issues*
 Subject:* Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

 I would agree with this, except that when I enumerate that using PSEXEC, I
 get the correct value,  so it does seem to be setting it:


 ***
 H:\Utilitiespsexec \\SERVERNAME cmd.exe /c echo %homedrive%

 PsExec v1.94 - Execute processes remotely
 Copyright (C) 2001-2008 Mark Russinovich
 Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com


 C:
 cmd.exe exited on gbtinvsql2x with error code 0.

 ***


 Chris Bodnar, MCSE
 Systems Engineer
 Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
 Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
 Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
 Phone: 610-807-6459
 Fax: 610-807-6003



 From:Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com
 To:NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 
 Date:11/08/2010 04:15 PM
 Subject:Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%


  --





 On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Christopher Bodnar
 christopher_bod...@glic.com wrote:
  I've got a VBS script that we use pretty frequently, and I was trying to
 run
  it remotely using PSEXEC against a bunch of systems. Finally narrowed the
  problem down to the fact that for some reason, the %HOMEDRIVE% variable
 and
  PSEXEC didn't mix well on some systems.

 %HOMEDRIVE% is set as part of the user logon process, which, in my
 experience, generally doesn't happen for anything except a typical GUI
 logon.

 (%HOMEDRIVE% and %HOMEPATH% both come from the setting on the
 Profile tab of an account's properties.)

 -- Ben



 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

2010-11-08 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Nov 8, 20d10 at 9:36 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
 Anecdote: believe it or not, MSFT really wanted to clean it up and make a
 modern shell ... but doing so broke too many things.

  I'd buy that if Rex Conn hadn't already done it 20+ years ago in 4DOS.

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


Re: Home Folder Permissions reset

2010-11-08 Thread Andrew S. Baker
iCACLS will work on files, but you need to use *.* rather than just list the
folder names.


FILEACL is also recommended, and I use it in a number of scripts.


*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *



On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.orgwrote:

 Thanks Ben, I'll see if I can't find FILEACL and make use of it.

 In the mean time, I have fixed my problem... for now. I was able to use the
 existing commands available from MS, but with a few problems. My biggest
 problem was that icacls.exe seems to be able to set permissions on folders,
 but not files when I pass the recursive command. (Anybody know how to make
 icacls do this?) So I had to resort to using the old cacls.exe for the
 actual permissions.

 Here's the little script I had to use to make it work, which I ran from the
 root of the home share:

 @echo off
 REM --- Make  a list of folders.
 dir /A:D /B /-C /D  CurrentFolders.txt
 REM --- Make the Administrator's group Owner, so we can redo permissions.
 for /f %%i in (CurrentFolders.txt) do takeown /f %%i /R /A
 REM --- Remove the inheritance for each folder.
 for /f %%i in (CurrentFolders.txt) do icacls %%i /inheritance:R /T /C /L /Q
 REM --- Apply the permissions I want on each folder.
 for /f %%i in (CurrentFolders.txt) do cacls %%i /t /e /c /g DOMAIN\%%i:C
 for /f %%i in (CurrentFolders.txt) do cacls %%i /t /e /c /g
 ADMINISTRATORS:C
 for /f %%i in (CurrentFolders.txt) do cacls %%i /t /e /c /g DOMAIN\Domain
 Admins:F

 Now, off to find and try FILEACL.


 --Matt Ross
 Ephrata School District


 - Original Message -
 From: Ben Scott
 [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 [mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
 Sent: Mon, 08 Nov 2010
 13:40:37 -0800
 Subject: Re: Home Folder Permissions reset


  On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Matthew W. Ross
  mr...@ephrataschools.org wrote:
   There is a \\SERVER\Homes share. The _sharing_ permissions on this
 folder
  is set to Everyone has Change, Domain Admins has Full control.
 
I tend to lean towards Users=Full, and doing everything in NTFS
  permissions.  Sometimes I'll get slightly fancier, and so something
  like Administrators=Full, Users=Modify.
 
I never get fine grained in share permissions.  Share permissions
  are a vestige from back when Microsoft still thought FAT was a good
  idea and many computers thus didn't *have* the capability of doing
  permissions at the filesystem level.
 
   SERVER\Administrators vs DOMAIN\Domain Admins... Which is more
  appropriate?
 
That's entirely up to you and your organization and your needs.
  Perhaps not all server admins are domain admins, or perhaps  not all
  domain admins are server admins.
 
   I'm working on a script to reset these permissions, probably with
 xcacls.
  I
   need to find my old cacls script first, or write it from scratch. If
  somebody
   has a working script for this handy, I'd love a copy.
 
I find FILEACL (free third-party tool) is the least-bad for working
  with DACLs (permissions) on files and folders.All of Microsoft's
  tools suck.  CACLS, XCACLS.EXE, and XCACLS.VBS suck *a lot*.  In
  particular, IIRC, none of them are aware of NTFS inheritance, which
  can cause them to actively break things.  ICACLS at least does
  inheritance right, but is very limited in what it can do.  SUBINACL
  can do a lot but has rather cumbersome syntax.  SETACL (another
  third-party tool) can do everything but its syntax makes SUBINACL look
  good.  FILEACL seems to suck the least.
 
I find the following FILEACL idioms to be highly useful.
 
Report all directly applied ACEs, one object per line:
 
FILEACL.EXE d:\foo /SUB /FILES /LINE /NOINHERITED
 
Clear all direct ACEs and propigate inheritable ACEs from parent:
 
FILEACL d:\foo /REPLACE /INHERIT /SUB /FILES
 
An ACE is an Access Control Entry, i.e., a given
  subject+permissions+flags combination in an ACL.  A direct ACE is an
  ACE set on an object, rather than inherited from a parent.  In my
  book, ideally, most ACEs should be inherited; direct ACEs should be
  the exceptions.  For example, you would want direct ACEs on your
  username folders, and everything within those folders inherited.
 
  -- Ben


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: PSEXEC and %homedrive%

2010-11-08 Thread Andrew S. Baker
*(CMD's quoting and escaping is incredibly idiosyncratic, so I'm
not really sure.)*

Man, you're not joking.   Just try to pass quotation marks to SCHTASKS.EXE

Scott does have it right, though...   That's the method I use.


*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *



On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  psexec \\SERVERNAME cmd /v:on /c echo !computername!

   FYI, if delayed expansion is enabled on the local host,
 I think you'll still get the unwanted behavior, i.e., expands locally,
 not remotely.  I think Scott Crawford's method, using the caret to
 escape the percent, is slightly better.

  (CMD's quoting and escaping is incredibly idiosyncratic, so I'm not
 really sure.)

 -- Ben




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Home Folder Permissions reset

2010-11-08 Thread Matthew W. Ross
I don't know why icacls wasn't working for the files, but it was setting 
permissions on the folders. I did try the *.* wildcard, but it didn't seem to 
work either. It was frustrating, and my users were without their home folders 
for a little bit today. Not exactly how I wanted things to go, but it worked 
out.


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District


- Original Message -
From: Andrew S. Baker
[mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Mon, 08 Nov 2010
19:26:30 -0800
Subject: Re: Home Folder Permissions reset


 iCACLS will work on files, but you need to use *.* rather than just list the
 folder names.
 
 
 FILEACL is also recommended, and I use it in a number of scripts.
 
 
 *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
 *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
 * *
 
 
 
 On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Matthew W. Ross
 mr...@ephrataschools.orgwrote:
 
  Thanks Ben, I'll see if I can't find FILEACL and make use of it.
 
  In the mean time, I have fixed my problem... for now. I was able to use
 the
  existing commands available from MS, but with a few problems. My biggest
  problem was that icacls.exe seems to be able to set permissions on
 folders,
  but not files when I pass the recursive command. (Anybody know how to make
  icacls do this?) So I had to resort to using the old cacls.exe for the
  actual permissions.
 
  Here's the little script I had to use to make it work, which I ran from
 the
  root of the home share:
 
  @echo off
  REM --- Make  a list of folders.
  dir /A:D /B /-C /D  CurrentFolders.txt
  REM --- Make the Administrator's group Owner, so we can redo permissions.
  for /f %%i in (CurrentFolders.txt) do takeown /f %%i /R /A
  REM --- Remove the inheritance for each folder.
  for /f %%i in (CurrentFolders.txt) do icacls %%i /inheritance:R /T /C /L
 /Q
  REM --- Apply the permissions I want on each folder.
  for /f %%i in (CurrentFolders.txt) do cacls %%i /t /e /c /g DOMAIN\%%i:C
  for /f %%i in (CurrentFolders.txt) do cacls %%i /t /e /c /g
  ADMINISTRATORS:C
  for /f %%i in (CurrentFolders.txt) do cacls %%i /t /e /c /g DOMAIN\Domain
  Admins:F
 
  Now, off to find and try FILEACL.
 
 
  --Matt Ross
  Ephrata School District
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Ben Scott
  [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  [mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
  Sent: Mon, 08 Nov 2010
  13:40:37 -0800
  Subject: Re: Home Folder Permissions reset
 
 
   On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Matthew W. Ross
   mr...@ephrataschools.org wrote:
There is a \\SERVER\Homes share. The _sharing_ permissions on this
  folder
   is set to Everyone has Change, Domain Admins has Full control.
  
 I tend to lean towards Users=Full, and doing everything in NTFS
   permissions.  Sometimes I'll get slightly fancier, and so something
   like Administrators=Full, Users=Modify.
  
 I never get fine grained in share permissions.  Share permissions
   are a vestige from back when Microsoft still thought FAT was a good
   idea and many computers thus didn't *have* the capability of doing
   permissions at the filesystem level.
  
SERVER\Administrators vs DOMAIN\Domain Admins... Which is more
   appropriate?
  
 That's entirely up to you and your organization and your needs.
   Perhaps not all server admins are domain admins, or perhaps  not all
   domain admins are server admins.
  
I'm working on a script to reset these permissions, probably with
  xcacls.
   I
need to find my old cacls script first, or write it from scratch. If
   somebody
has a working script for this handy, I'd love a copy.
  
 I find FILEACL (free third-party tool) is the least-bad for working
   with DACLs (permissions) on files and folders.All of Microsoft's
   tools suck.  CACLS, XCACLS.EXE, and XCACLS.VBS suck *a lot*.  In
   particular, IIRC, none of them are aware of NTFS inheritance, which
   can cause them to actively break things.  ICACLS at least does
   inheritance right, but is very limited in what it can do.  SUBINACL
   can do a lot but has rather cumbersome syntax.  SETACL (another
   third-party tool) can do everything but its syntax makes SUBINACL look
   good.  FILEACL seems to suck the least.
  
 I find the following FILEACL idioms to be highly useful.
  
 Report all directly applied ACEs, one object per line:
  
 FILEACL.EXE d:\foo /SUB /FILES /LINE /NOINHERITED
  
 Clear all direct ACEs and propigate inheritable ACEs from parent:
  
 FILEACL d:\foo /REPLACE /INHERIT /SUB /FILES
  
 An ACE is an Access Control Entry, i.e., a given
   subject+permissions+flags combination in an ACL.  A direct ACE is an
   ACE set on an object, rather than inherited from a parent.  In my
   book, ideally, most ACEs should be inherited; direct ACEs should be
   the exceptions.  For example, you would want direct ACEs on your
   username folders, and