RE: Utterly convincing spam
There are sadly, some very stupid people out there :( Add in the thought of getting some money for basically typing a few characters into an email and you up the motivational factor for these stupid people. From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 22 March 2012 10:54 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT: Utterly convincing spam I just received an email from the World Fund For Unclaimed Lottery Prizes, signed in the glorious name of Doctor Peter McWealth. I am thoroughly convinced of its authenticity, having read that name. The fact that the World Fund For Unclaimed Lottery Prizes' esteemed Doctor of Riches uses a Yahoo.com email address as well only makes me more determined to give them my bank details. The sad thing is, for this approach to have made it out there, means it must have worked at some point? Surely not? -- http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER I certainly don't have time to monitor the content of e-mail sent and received via this account for the purposes of ensuring compliance with anyone's policies and procedures. I am pretty sure that somewhere in UK legislation there is some politically-correct drivel that stipulates I must never send or store e-mails or attachments that are obscene, indecent, sexist, racist, defamatory, abusive, in breach of copyright, encrypted, amusing, overly long, slightly opinionated, anonymous, likely to harm animals or hurt the feelings of an as-yet-unspecified or as-yet-nonexistent minority (such as extraterrestrial eggplants). Emails of this nature sent in or out of this account may be intercepted and stopped by the system, but it's a long shot. This being the UK, even if I was prosecuted for breach of said email guidelines, I'd probably walk with a suspended sentence anyway, but if I'd forgotten to pay my car insurance, I'd most certainly be hung, drawn and quartered. I am not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has been sent, in more or less the same way that cyclozine manufacturers aren't responsible for drug addicts mixing it with methadone and overdosing, so I'm glad I cleared the confusion up there nice and early. Where opinions are expressed, they are not necessarily mine. However, I don't make a habit of expressing other people's opinions for them, so you shouldn't take that statement as an indication that I am in the business of providing an opinion-expressing service. In the event that I did, this discourse would provide no guarantee that I would do it anyway, but I don't, so I won't. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to them, aside from the fact that you've clearly got some level of unauthorised access to their account or are at least engaged in some sort of fraud, I'm obliged to tell you that may not copy, forward disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any way. To do so may be unlawful, and as you're already breaking the law, I am sure that bombshell makes you quake in your boots and turn yourself over to law enforcement immediately. If you receive this e-mail by mistake, please advise the sender immediately. That would be me, and as I am clearly prone to sending emails to completely the wrong person, I should instantly be stripped of my status as a technical consultant and sent to do something more becoming of my stupidity, such as appearing on Big Brother, the X Factor or insert country name here's Got Talent. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: list delays
And I am off for curry and beer (UK) :) I shall look forward to tomorrow morning when I log back on to see how things have progressed! From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: 15 March 2012 17:04 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: list delays HEY I JUST ATE! Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.comhttp://www.carlwebster.com/ From: Steven M. Caesare [scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 10:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: list delays I'm sorry to hear of your woes. Before long you'll be very cynical looking... like this guy: [Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CD02A1.3DDA7690] -sc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmininline: image001.jpg
RE: Carolina BBQ Sauce (was Re: Proxy server and ISA)
Snap, me too - for the taste of Newcastle Brown Ale, not the football aspect. Whereas Old Speckled Hen is quite a nice pint. From: Rankin, James R [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 13 March 2012 17:36 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Carolina BBQ Sauce (was Re: Proxy server and ISA) I actually despise Newcastle Brown Ale as it is brewed in the city that hosts the rivals of my own football team. I therefore would hate their ale even if it tasted like ambrosia. Luckily, I think it actually is rank. I don't mind Speckled Hen, tho! Nice caramel-ly aftertaste to it ---Blackberried From: Gary Whitten li...@undiscoveredworlds.com Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:54:57 -0400 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Carolina BBQ Sauce (was Re: Proxy server and ISA) Per James’ comment in a previous email, I’ve been told a number of beers that are popular/well-received in the US have low opinions in the UK or elsewhere in Europe. Newcastle and Old Speckled Hen are two examples. Definitely agree with Kurt. ….Stone. Young’s Double Chocolate. ☺ Add in Southern Tier in NY and Mendocino Brewing in CA as two more of my US faves. Also love almost everything Samuel Smith. From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:52 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Carolina BBQ Sauce (was Re: Proxy server and ISA) Most American major brands (Bud, Coors, Miller, etc.) are swill, not lager. OTOH, there are a *lot* of smaller brands with good stouts, porters, IPAs and others. I'm particularly fond of some of the Stone offerings, and Young's Chocolate Stout, among others. Heck, I also like Shiner Bock. Kurt On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 06:53, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: American beer is lager This topic will now soon be banned from here too, along with BBQ sauce On 13 March 2012 13:23, Webster webs...@carlwebster.commailto:webs...@carlwebster.com wrote: It is an international mailing list and you can imagine the american beer is water type arguments. The burgers wars were just incredible. Who knew burgers, the types of meat, the style of cooking, comparing various chains, cooking methods, etc etc etc. It was such a horrible thread, I being the list owner had to step in and ban the topic from further discussion. It has been 10 years since all three thread topics were banned. When we tuba players gather at conferences, the list members still talk about the vile language and name calling that went on in those discussions. They would have made Gary Slinger look like a saint! :) Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.comhttp://www.carlwebster.com/ From: Jonathan Link [jonathan.l...@gmail.commailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 7:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Carolina BBQ Sauce (was Re: Proxy server and ISA) Is it the well done/not well done burger debate? I can't imagine what situation arose that needed to ban beer from the discussion. It must have been truly heinous. On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Webster webs...@carlwebster.commailto:webs...@carlwebster.com wrote: I run a mailing list for tuba and euphonium players since mid 90s. There are three banned topics: Drum Bugle Corp Burgers Beer Who would have thought that tuba players would be banned from discussing beer and hamburgers!!! But in that world, those are world war starting topics. Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.comhttp://www.carlwebster.com/ From: John Leto [jo...@colonialsavings.commailto:jo...@colonialsavings.com] Subject: RE: Carolina BBQ Sauce (was Re: Proxy server and ISA) I agree. It's been my experience that the topics that start the most fights around here are indeed politics, religion, and BBQ. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. * IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER * This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message it was obviously addressed to you and therefore you can read it, even it we didn't mean to send it to you. However, if the contents of
RE: New to virtualization
Best hope your NetApp is connected via some means to the internet (or whatever black magic the NetApp uses to talk back to the mothership so they can send you an email). From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com] Sent: 13 March 2012 18:08 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: New to virtualization NetApp makes good SANs, and their support is great! (A drive starts to go bad, and you get an email from support asking where to ship it to, etc. Sometimes that is the first and perhaps only indication something is going wrong.) That is GREAT to hear, thx From: Richard McClary [mailto:richard.mccl...@aspca.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:54 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: New to virtualization I'm really just getting started here myself, but... VM NICs connect to real ESX NICs, and you will need some ESX NICs for redundancy, for management, for a possible DMZ in the future, etc. Oh yeah - the ESX hosts need NICs for the iSCSI connection to the datastore. Figure on getting some dedicated network switches as well and work out some subnetting (so the management, kernel, and other connections are not a part of your main LAN). NetApp makes good SANs, and their support is great! (A drive starts to go bad, and you get an email from support asking where to ship it to, etc. Sometimes that is the first and perhaps only indication something is going wrong.) From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:04 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: New to virtualization Hi all, I am starting to investigate moving our aging network infrastructure into the virtual world. ~ 10 servers, 6-7 years old Windows 2003 domain Exchange 2003 Citrix 4.0 farm ~190 users After some initial discussions w/ a reseller, here's what they are recommending: (3) DL 380 G7 servers (to host the VMs) ~$18,000 (1) Net App FAS2240 (this is the SAN that would host 12 600GB drives of storage for the VMs) ~$20,000 VMWare essentials plus kit (VMware software) ~$5200 (3) MS Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise (this would allow the 3 HP servers to run 4 Windows 2008 VMs each) I guess the way it would work is that the VMs would reside on the SAN, and the 3 hosts would call up the SAN to load each VM utilizing the host's CPU, RAM, NIC, etc.)... right? I have meetings scheduled w/ 2 other vendors, but verbally both have started the conversation along the same path as above. Being very new to VM, does the above scenario seem to make sense? It is hard for me to imagine all that traffic going between the SAN and the host servers w/o creating a huge bottleneck (over gig Ethernet) Do people recommend virtualizing every server? Domain controllers? Exchange? Citrix farm (4 server)? Shouldn't something be left physical? Is 7 TB of storage enough (probably only 3 usable after array config)? Is the net app a decent appliance? $20k sounds cheap to me... I have done a little more reading, and from what I understand w/ 3 Windows Enterprise licenses, I would be limiting myself to 12 VMs. However, if I went w/ 3 Windows Datacenter licenses, for a small increase in price - I would get unlimited VMs? Which would allow for actually having a testing environment, and better patch deployment? Thx . ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals(r) (ASPCA(r)) and is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by reply email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin . ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to
RE: Office 2000 SR-1 Select CD
Hi, Did you get this sorted? I may well have the ISO at home. Just checked in the office, but we dumped everything pre-2003 a few years ago. Cheers, Matt From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com] Sent: 13 January 2012 16:00 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT: Office 2000 SR-1 Select CD If anyone can help me out offline, I'd appreciate it: Looking for this CD, preferably in ISO format. Office 2000 SR-1 Select CD I know it is no longer publically available. I've got a server that has Office 2000 installed at SR-1( Yes, it's really 2000). And it needs a patch, the patch requires SP3, SP3 is asking me for data1acc.msi, which as far as I can tell is only on the Office 2000 SR-1 Select CD (see link below). http://support.microsoft.com/kb/266323 This is an ancient application that nobody wants to touch, and requires Office 2000. So I can't really update it to a newer office version, but we have identified a security vulnerability which MS has a patch for, so I need to get that done if possible. Thanks Chris Bodnar, MCSE, MCITP Technical Support III Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services Guardian Life Insurance Company of America Email: christopher_bod...@glic.commailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com Phone: 610-807-6459 Fax: 610-807-6003 - This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Recursive File Copy?
How about a quick cut and paste jobbie in Excel for want of a better idea? Dir c:\file.jpg /s /b c:\mylist.txt Open mylist.txt up in Excel and then add in the necessary copy / overwrite commands and job is a goodun. From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sca...@gmail.com] Sent: 20 December 2011 17:00 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Recursive File Copy? Need to replace file.jpg with a new version of file.jpg across about 100 directories. Googling, but coming up short and found some scripts that don't quite work... feel like I'm wasting time when it should be easy, and thought the brains here probably have done this before with ease... Sam ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: VDI
PCoIP is still rubbish when used over an ASDL type service via VPN back to the mothership. I have to use it twice a week remotely and it is extra laggy. Maybe it is the company trying to tell me they don't want me working from home! From: Rankin, James R [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 14 December 2011 18:40 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: VDI I wasn't keen on View for remote users. YMMV, but I found PCoIP rubbish remotely. Things may have improved. Sent from my SR-71 Blackbird From: pdw1...@hotmail.com Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:42:39 -0500 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: VDI I agree, Harry. I'd like to justify using View. We haven't got a quote on it yet so a lot depends on how close it is to the Symantec solution. Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:19:54 -0500 Subject: Re: VDI From: hbo...@gmail.commailto:hbo...@gmail.com To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com I don't know a thing about CWS and I know you mentioned Citrix but have you looked at their VDI-in-a-Box solution? http://www.citrix.com/English/ps2/products/product.asp?contentID=2316437 I would try my best to somehow justify the price difference to get either VM and Citrix as those two players seem to very active in the VDI space. Which ultimately means easier integration and better support, community or otherwise, for you. Harry. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:09 PM, pdw1...@hotmail.commailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com wrote: Due to computerized physician order entry (part of meaningful use), we looking at implementing a virtual desktop solution. I have identified three: Citrix, VM View and Symantec's Corporate Workspace product (used to be Nuvision until it was bought out by Symantec). I am familiar with Citrix and spent a day at a conference on VM, but I have no knowledge (other than what the salesperson showed us) of CWS. Has anybody done any work with the Symantec product? The price is good compared to the other two but we have never purchased an product based on price alone. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Tool to simulate a poor network connection?
Harsh. Windows ME would be a better (or worse) candidate :) Oh and stick the VMs on an external hard drive (via a USB1 port) for an extra performance hit! From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: 10 November 2011 14:13 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Tool to simulate a poor network connection? Windows 98 SE From: Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan [mailto:jderrenbac...@kshgs.com] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 4:56 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Tool to simulate a poor network connection? I see there are a few tools out there, but curious if anyone know which ones work the best. I'm trying to simulate low bandwidth, dropped packets, and latency between a VM on my laptop and a server. Any recos? Thanks, Jon ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Tool to simulate a poor network connection?
That will also add in user frustration for every time it is launched the pigging thing decides to update itself (and promptly break in the process) From: Rod Trent [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com] Sent: 10 November 2011 15:53 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Tool to simulate a poor network connection? iTunes? From: Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan [mailto:jderrenbac...@kshgs.com] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:26 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Tool to simulate a poor network connection? Just finished getting WANem running. Super easy, works perfect. Just dialed in 50ms of delay between my VM and one of my servers. For anyone who wants to try it, they have a vm image of it. Set it to NAT inside of vmware, boot it up, give it a static ip in the range your vmware gives out, set your VM client going through WANem to use WANem's ip as its default GW, hit the default GWs web interface http://WANemIP/WANem And set whatever you want. Pretty cool.. Looks like you can add delay, jitter, loss, packet deplication, packet corruption, reordering, etc. Jon From: Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:10 AM To: 'NT System Admin Issues' Subject: RE: Tool to simulate a poor network connection? Good ideas on Windows98/ME, lol. I'm trying wanem now. It has settings for packet drop, latency, etc. Look like it should do the job... Thanks Martin. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: web filtering
*snap* I know that when WebMarshall decides it can't talk to a DC it blocks internet access. Otherwise I rarely see it blocking anything for me (but I don't search for bad things at work!). We have ours blocking .exe's and the like, it also allows for different max sizes of download during the day (I guess to prevent us developers from downloading ISOs all day long and breaking the WAN). From: Ray [mailto:rz...@qwest.net] Sent: 08 November 2011 16:56 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: web filtering We use Webmarshall. No idea about price or effectiveness. From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 9:47 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: web filtering I have a BarelyCuda and it works well for me... On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:39 AM, pdw1...@hotmail.commailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com wrote: I've finally gotten a budget to put in place a web filtering platform. I've looked at three so far: Websense, iPrism and Barracuda. Of those, I like Websense but it was too costly and no one liked Barracuda. iPrism is looking good so far but I'd like to demo a few more. I'm not opposed to a cloud-based service either. If you are using a web-filtering product, can you tell me what it is and whether you feel it is worth the price you pay? I've been reading some reviews on different products, but a review is secondary to what actual users experience. Thanks! ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Anti-virus boot-up disks?
These are hardware switches on the USB device, iirc, and thus anything on the USB stick should be readable/executable but if there was a virus on the say the PC it should not be able to copy itself onto the USB stick (or do anything bad(tm) to the contents of it). Even a virus on the USB stick should not be able to cause any addition infections to the files on the USB device. # From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 13 September 2011 16:31 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Anti-virus boot-up disks? Well, I guess if it's read-only, a virus would have a hell of a job copying itself to it. But if the virus is already present when you set the switch to read-only, then it will still execute, I should think. On 13 September 2011 16:28, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.commailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com wrote: I have never used a flash drive with a write-protect switch. Does anyone on the list have any experience with those and know whether or not a virus would be able to bypass that? Just curious how effective it would be in keeping viruses at bay. That being said, if you're booting off it, I don't really see a huge issue as you're not going to be running anything off the hard drive, so at least in theory, you shouldn't need to worry about viruses that may be on the hard drive. From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.commailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 11:25 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Anti-virus boot-up disks? Quick check of Amazon.com seems to show: 2GB drive for $10 http://www.amazon.com/Flash-Drive-write-protect-switch/dp/B005KL31E6 8GB drive for $20.99 http://www.amazon.com/RiDATA-Flash-Drive-Slider-Drives/dp/B000RGDA5E/ref=pd_ cp_e_4http://www.amazon.com/RiDATA-Flash-Drive-Slider-Drives/dp/B000RGDA5E/ref=pd_%0Acp_e_4 32GB drive for $57.99 http://www.amazon.com/Ritek-Ridata-Twister-Protection-RDEZ32G-TW-LIG0/dp/B00 2G9TWUMhttp://www.amazon.com/Ritek-Ridata-Twister-Protection-RDEZ32G-TW-LIG0/dp/B00%0A2G9TWUM Sure, you can get a DVD for less than a dollar, but for the prices above, I'd just get the flash drive and the ease of use that comes with that. Cheers Ken From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 13 September 2011 9:57 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Anti-virus boot-up disks? They are lots more expensive than CD/DVDs, however. Not that this is automatically a non-starter, but it speaks to Mr. Cook's earlier point. I'd sooner get a USB DVD drive, even though they are slightly less portable. ASB http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market... On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:12 AM, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.commailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com wrote: There are USB sticks with a switch that is supposed to make them read-only until you flip the switch again. I don't know how that works or how well, but I know that there are flash drives with a write-protect switch on 'em. You can find 'em on NewEgg and probably elsewhere. I just checked on NewEgg to make sure I wasn't misremembering. From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.orgmailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 8:59 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Anti-virus boot-up disks? Did not and here's why - I have yet to hear about any guaranteed way to make a USB drive unwriteable on any machine you plug it into short of having a manufacturer burn the data to one and ship it to you in which case you're paying 25x more for the same effect a non rewritable CD/DVD gives you. If anyone knows of a way to do it (and I'm not talking about a reg hack on a machine or a program that disables the functionality on a computer) please share. John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 5950 NW 1st Place Gainesville, Fl 32607 Office (352) 244-1610tel:%28352%29%20244-1610 Cell (352) 215-6944tel:%28352%29%20215-6944 MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.orgmailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 8:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Anti-virus boot-up disks? Thanks, anyone tried this on a USB stick? Z Edward E. Ziots CISSP, Network +, Security + Security Engineer Lifespan Organization Email:ezi...@lifespan.orgmailto:email%3aezi...@lifespan.org Cell:401-639-3505tel:401-639-3505 From: G.Waleed Kavalec [mailto:kava...@gmail.commailto:kava...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 3:18 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Anti-virus boot-up disks? Excellent! Thank you. On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:31 PM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.orgmailto:john.c...@pfsf.org wrote: The Microsoft system sweeper standalone seemed to work well when I tested it. http://connect.microsoft.com/systemsweeper John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 5950 NW 1st Place Gainesville, Fl 32607 Office (352)
RE: External subdomains considered dangerous?
Maybe those companies only use external hosted pop3/imap accounts (granted that is unlikely). I assume from the article is more about a company emailing another company. I own a .org.uk domain in the UK, and I quite often get emails (which is meant for the .org). I have even had invoices, emails from their accounts department, etc landing in my personal email. More recently I had a batch of CVs for people apply for job applications as a secretary - either they misread the advert or just automatically typed in the .uk without thinking about it - as the .org is a UK based company). From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 September 2011 15:31 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: External subdomains considered dangerous? Why are internal email addresses being typed in manually? ASB http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market... On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.commailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: 20gb of email in six months, and it includes full router configs with passwords, too. http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/doppelganger-domains/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: External subdomains considered dangerous?
Shhh, best not tell my employer (who primarily does work for the UK MoD) :) From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 09 September 2011 16:07 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: External subdomains considered dangerous? Aha, you are therefore a Chinese agent :-) On 9 September 2011 15:47, Matthew B Ames matthew.a...@qinetiq.commailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com wrote: Maybe those companies only use external hosted pop3/imap accounts (granted that is unlikely). I assume from the article is more about a company emailing another company. I own a .org.ukhttp://org.uk domain in the UK, and I quite often get emails (which is meant for the .org). I have even had invoices, emails from their accounts department, etc landing in my personal email. More recently I had a batch of CVs for people apply for job applications as a secretary - either they misread the advert or just automatically typed in the .uk without thinking about it - as the .org is a UK based company). From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 September 2011 15:31 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: External subdomains considered dangerous? Why are internal email addresses being typed in manually? ASB http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market... On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.commailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: 20gb of email in six months, and it includes full router configs with passwords, too. http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/doppelganger-domains/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. http://www.qinetiq.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. * IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER * This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message it was obviously addressed to you and therefore you can read it, even it we didn't mean to send it to you. However, if the contents of this email make no sense whatsoever then you probably were not the intended recipient, or, alternatively, you are a mindless cretin; either way, you should immediately kill yourself and destroy your computer (not necessarily in that order). Once you have taken this action, please contact us.. no, sorry, you can't use your computer, because you just destroyed it, and possibly also committed suicide afterwards, but I am starting to digress.. The originator of this email is not liable for the transmission of the information contained in this communication. Or are they? Either way it's a pretty dull legal query and frankly one I'm not going to dwell on. But should you have nothing better to do, please feel free to ruminate on it, and please pass on any concrete conclusions should you find them. However, if you pass them on via email, be sure to include a disclaimer regarding liability for transmission. In the event that the originator did not send this email to you, then please return it to us and attach a scanned-in picture of your mother's brother's wife wearing nothing but a kangaroo suit, and we will immediately refund you exactly half of what you paid for the can of Whiskas you bought when you went to Pets At Home yesterday. We take no responsibility for non-receipt of this email because we are running Exchange 5.5 and everyone knows how glitchy that can be. In the event that you do get this message then please note
RE: Email Problem
That word has made it onto UK TV (adverts) recently. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxYyGT4hnNg From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 September 2011 21:39 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Email Problem Shazam! -- Espi On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Joseph Heaton jhea...@dfg.ca.govmailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov wrote: wow... That line is from GI Joe, not Captain Planet. Are we really that old, or are you that young? John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.commailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com 9/6/2011 8:46 AM Who do you think you are??? Captain Planet? :D -Original Message- From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.commailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Email Problem and knowing is half the battle. John Aldrich wrote: Well, I think it may have been an HTML issue... :D I should know better than to use HTML email anyway. :D -Original Message- From: Matthew B Ames [mailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.commailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 11:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Email Problem I have seen that feature in Outlook 2003 before, when the emails where HTML formatted. Normally when that happened my calendar entries would appear on the calendar but be blank. Opening the email to read and it appeared blank, but hit forward or reply and the contents would appear (or at least some of the content appeared, long emails would still get truncated). In our environment it was when some patches has been rolled out via Radia. Either a reboot, or re-registering Word/Outlook fixed it, iirc. -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.commailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: 06 September 2011 16:11 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Email Problem I think I may have resolved the strangeness...I just sent a test reply and was able to see the body. Thanks! -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.commailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 11:08 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Email Problem Nothin' but a little alcohol. :D I'm using a linux-based email client at home and Outlook 2007 at work. I'm pretty sure there were some recent updates to my email client at home and I suspect that might have affected the way Outlook is seeing the messages. From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.commailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 11:00 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Email Problem Did you take any medication over the weekend? On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:54 AM, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.commailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com wrote: I replied from home this weekend, but when I got here, and looked at the messages I sent out, the bodies were blank. Does anyone else see that, or am I hallucinating? From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.commailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 12:26 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Email Problem You do realize, of course, that this error doesn't necessarily indicate a problem with your outbound mail server...right? Now then...from what I can garner from your typically sparse data...If you one-off these messages it works OK, it's only when he bulk mails...so do the end recipients ever get the message after waiting 72 hours, or have you never been able to wait that long? Do they ever get duplicates after 72 hours? How many recipients are we talking about anyway? 100, 1000, ONE MILLION USERS? Inquiring minds want to know. As to your salient question, where to start looking: How internet email works: http://email.about.com/cs/standards/a/smtp.htm Understanding SMTP Error Messages: http://email.about.com/cs/standards/a/smtp_error_code.htm - WJR 2011/9/3 John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.commailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com On Fri September 2 2011, you wrote: Research the specific SMTP status code and message you are receiving back. Delayed can mean different things. You/he received a specific error message. Be specific with us, or look it up. All I have is the following: quote Warning: message 1QyPNV-xd-UY delayed 72 hours This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent has not yet been delivered to one or more of its recipients after more than 72 hours on the queue on SMTPSERVER The message identifier is: 1QyPNV-xd-UY The subject of the message is: National Account-Paychex The date of the message is:Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:33:24 -0400 The addresses to which the message has not yet been delivered are: [snip list of email addresses] No action is required on your part. Delivery attempts will continue for some time
RE: Email Problem
I am pretty sure the bloke who does the voiceover on that advert is the boss from Reynholm Industries, Douglas Reynholm (played by Chris Morris). In case that name does not ring a bell, think of the UK IT based comedy called the IT Crowd http://www.reynholm.co.uk/it.php and http://www.reynholm.co.uk/profile.php it might be a cheap advert, but it has made me think about the product (and mention it on here - shame on me!) -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: 07 September 2011 13:53 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Email Problem On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Matthew B Ames matthew.a...@qinetiq.com wrote: That word has made it onto UK TV (adverts) recently. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxYyGT4hnNg I see that TV advertising in the UK is just as bad as it is in the US. :) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Email Problem
I can see the body of the messages you sent from home. I assume you use Outlook 2007 at work, and KMail at home. I am reading your messages at work using Outlook 2010. -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: 06 September 2011 15:54 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Email Problem I replied from home this weekend, but when I got here, and looked at the messages I sent out, the bodies were blank. Does anyone else see that, or am I hallucinating? From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 12:26 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Email Problem You do realize, of course, that this error doesn't necessarily indicate a problem with your outbound mail server...right? Now then...from what I can garner from your typically sparse data...If you one-off these messages it works OK, it's only when he bulk mails...so do the end recipients ever get the message after waiting 72 hours, or have you never been able to wait that long? Do they ever get duplicates after 72 hours? How many recipients are we talking about anyway? 100, 1000, ONE MILLION USERS? Inquiring minds want to know. As to your salient question, where to start looking: How internet email works: http://email.about.com/cs/standards/a/smtp.htm Understanding SMTP Error Messages: http://email.about.com/cs/standards/a/smtp_error_code.htm - WJR 2011/9/3 John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com On Fri September 2 2011, you wrote: Research the specific SMTP status code and message you are receiving back. Delayed can mean different things. You/he received a specific error message. Be specific with us, or look it up. All I have is the following: quote Warning: message 1QyPNV-xd-UY delayed 72 hours This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent has not yet been delivered to one or more of its recipients after more than 72 hours on the queue on SMTPSERVER The message identifier is: 1QyPNV-xd-UY The subject of the message is: National Account-Paychex The date of the message is: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:33:24 -0400 The addresses to which the message has not yet been delivered are: [snip list of email addresses] No action is required on your part. Delivery attempts will continue for some time, and this warning may be repeated at intervals if the message remains undelivered. Eventually the mail delivery software will give up, and when that happens, the message will be returned to you. /quote Note that I created an Outlook Distribution list that contains all the email addresses in that list of recipients who had not yet received the message and sent them a message. Within 24 hours, all of them had confirmed that they had received the message from me. -- Thanks, John Aldrich Blueridge Industries IT Manager ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Email Problem
I have seen that feature in Outlook 2003 before, when the emails where HTML formatted. Normally when that happened my calendar entries would appear on the calendar but be blank. Opening the email to read and it appeared blank, but hit forward or reply and the contents would appear (or at least some of the content appeared, long emails would still get truncated). In our environment it was when some patches has been rolled out via Radia. Either a reboot, or re-registering Word/Outlook fixed it, iirc. -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: 06 September 2011 16:11 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Email Problem I think I may have resolved the strangeness...I just sent a test reply and was able to see the body. Thanks! -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 11:08 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Email Problem Nothin' but a little alcohol. :D I'm using a linux-based email client at home and Outlook 2007 at work. I'm pretty sure there were some recent updates to my email client at home and I suspect that might have affected the way Outlook is seeing the messages. From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 11:00 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Email Problem Did you take any medication over the weekend? On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:54 AM, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com wrote: I replied from home this weekend, but when I got here, and looked at the messages I sent out, the bodies were blank. Does anyone else see that, or am I hallucinating? From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 12:26 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Email Problem You do realize, of course, that this error doesn't necessarily indicate a problem with your outbound mail server...right? Now then...from what I can garner from your typically sparse data...If you one-off these messages it works OK, it's only when he bulk mails...so do the end recipients ever get the message after waiting 72 hours, or have you never been able to wait that long? Do they ever get duplicates after 72 hours? How many recipients are we talking about anyway? 100, 1000, ONE MILLION USERS? Inquiring minds want to know. As to your salient question, where to start looking: How internet email works: http://email.about.com/cs/standards/a/smtp.htm Understanding SMTP Error Messages: http://email.about.com/cs/standards/a/smtp_error_code.htm - WJR 2011/9/3 John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com On Fri September 2 2011, you wrote: Research the specific SMTP status code and message you are receiving back. Delayed can mean different things. You/he received a specific error message. Be specific with us, or look it up. All I have is the following: quote Warning: message 1QyPNV-xd-UY delayed 72 hours This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent has not yet been delivered to one or more of its recipients after more than 72 hours on the queue on SMTPSERVER The message identifier is: 1QyPNV-xd-UY The subject of the message is: National Account-Paychex The date of the message is: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:33:24 -0400 The addresses to which the message has not yet been delivered are: [snip list of email addresses] No action is required on your part. Delivery attempts will continue for some time, and this warning may be repeated at intervals if the message remains undelivered. Eventually the mail delivery software will give up, and when that happens, the message will be returned to you. /quote Note that I created an Outlook Distribution list that contains all the email addresses in that list of recipients who had not yet received the message and sent them a message. Within 24 hours, all of them had confirmed that they had received the message from me. -- Thanks, John Aldrich Blueridge Industries IT Manager ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: The U in UPS stands for...?
I have 2 UPS at home one for the PCs in the office, and a second one in the loft powering my routers, switch and NAS (and soon CCTV, so I might need to upgrade that unit). From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: 01 September 2011 19:00 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: The U in UPS stands for...? John, trust me, have your PC or at least one PC with all your management tools and comfort zone on a UPS. It results in a lot less running around like a headless chicken in the event of a power failure. From: John Aldrich [jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: 01 September 2011 6:28 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: The U in UPS stands for...? That's just WRONG! :) [John-Aldrich][Thread-Count] From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 1:19 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The U in UPS stands for...? I have a 1500AVR under my desk at %work%, and I just obtain two 1500VA (model CP1500PFCLCD) units at home. ASB http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market... On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.commailto:mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com wrote: So far, I'm liking CyberPower devices. What model(s)? -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmininline: image001.jpginline: image002.jpg
RE: share data with remote office
How much data? Would the remote uses being storing files on the HQ server for backup purposes only, or would they be working on live documents? If working on documents remotely what sort of file sizes? Would they get annoyed by a slowdown in opening/saving files? What routers are currently in place at both locations? If you only have a cheapo home/domestic router, then replace then with something like Draytek Vigor 2820 and let that handle a site to site VPN for you. This assumes your remote worker always works from the same location, connectivity would then be transparent to the remote user. Otherwise as Charlie says what is the matter with Win 2k8 VPN? -Original Message- From: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:charl...@golden-eagle.org] Sent: 02 September 2011 16:19 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: share data with remote office What costs for a VPN? The Win native VPN, while not perfect, is adequate and free... *** Charlie Kaiser charl...@golden-eagle.org Kingman, AZ *** -Original Message- From: Laurence [mailto:laurence.chi...@jalapeno-bs.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: share data with remote office Hi All scenario: small organisation with Windows Server 2008 foundation and 3 x Windows 7 Pro PCs at head office. Active Directory. shared folders mapped to drive letters on client PCs. broadband Internet connectivity. data on server backed up to Internet backup service nightly they have one Windows XP Pro SP3 PC in a remote office connected to Internet via broadband link we would like the ability to share data between head office and remote staff and have this data stored on the head office server so it can be backed up i thought of using DropBox but it does not like network folders so I'm a little stumped at the moment anybody tried anything similar and would like to share their solution? VPN is out due to costs thanks Laurence ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: What may cause that ? Ready NAS NV+
I have just upped my NV+ to 4.1.7 so I shall see how it pans out, it is currently connected to a netgear (non-managed) switch, but I do have a spare Procurve (model number escapes me) knocking about which I could swap over. Have you checked out the readynas forums to see if anyone else is seeing similar problems on there? From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: 05 August 2011 05:53 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: R: What may cause that ? Ready NAS NV+ Yes it is 4.1.7. The switch is an HP Procurve 1820 and the issue is only with Netgear.Very strange I may only add that the router is a WAN router with IP helper set for getting DHCP from a Server in the WAN but I had no other issues besides, sometimes connection lost for ISP problems Guido Elia HELPPC Da: Matthew B Ames [mailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com] Inviato: giovedì 4 agosto 2011 19.48 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: What may cause that ? Ready NAS NV+ Latest firmware now applying to my NV+, and it appears my Linksys failure isn't related to Netgear, a quick Google suggest the good old bulging cap issue: http://homecommunity.cisco.com/t5/Switches/Almost-100-failure-rate-of-the-SR2024c-switches-anyone-know-why/td-p/223467 From: Matthew B Ames [mailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com] Sent: 04 August 2011 18:39 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: What may cause that ? Ready NAS NV+ Oh, I lied, 4.1.7 is the latest. From: Matthew B Ames [mailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com] Sent: 04 August 2011 17:46 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: What may cause that ? Ready NAS NV+ What firmware is on the NV+ ? I believe the latest is: RAIDiator 4.1.6 [1.00a043] or at least that is what I have installed on mine. I can't say I have seen that happen, but I did have a cheapo Linksys/Cisco giga switch show similar behaviour - maybe I'll power it back up and see how it behaves. From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: 04 August 2011 16:39 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: What may cause that ? Ready NAS NV+ Second time in a month a local lan becomes irresponsive Pinging any address returns no availability. Even pinging the local machine or the router . Removing the cable of a NAS netgear from the HP switch (static IP) everything is back to normal. And even if I reconnect the NAS after few seconds the situation remains OK until... ? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. http://www.qinetiq.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. http://www.qinetiq.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient
RE: What may cause that ? Ready NAS NV+
What firmware is on the NV+ ? I believe the latest is: RAIDiator 4.1.6 [1.00a043] or at least that is what I have installed on mine. I can't say I have seen that happen, but I did have a cheapo Linksys/Cisco giga switch show similar behaviour - maybe I'll power it back up and see how it behaves. From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: 04 August 2011 16:39 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: What may cause that ? Ready NAS NV+ Second time in a month a local lan becomes irresponsive Pinging any address returns no availability. Even pinging the local machine or the router . Removing the cable of a NAS netgear from the HP switch (static IP) everything is back to normal. And even if I reconnect the NAS after few seconds the situation remains OK until... ? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: What may cause that ? Ready NAS NV+
Oh, I lied, 4.1.7 is the latest. From: Matthew B Ames [mailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com] Sent: 04 August 2011 17:46 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: What may cause that ? Ready NAS NV+ What firmware is on the NV+ ? I believe the latest is: RAIDiator 4.1.6 [1.00a043] or at least that is what I have installed on mine. I can't say I have seen that happen, but I did have a cheapo Linksys/Cisco giga switch show similar behaviour - maybe I'll power it back up and see how it behaves. From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: 04 August 2011 16:39 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: What may cause that ? Ready NAS NV+ Second time in a month a local lan becomes irresponsive Pinging any address returns no availability. Even pinging the local machine or the router . Removing the cable of a NAS netgear from the HP switch (static IP) everything is back to normal. And even if I reconnect the NAS after few seconds the situation remains OK until... ? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. http://www.qinetiq.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: What may cause that ? Ready NAS NV+
Latest firmware now applying to my NV+, and it appears my Linksys failure isn't related to Netgear, a quick Google suggest the good old bulging cap issue: http://homecommunity.cisco.com/t5/Switches/Almost-100-failure-rate-of-the-SR2024c-switches-anyone-know-why/td-p/223467 From: Matthew B Ames [mailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com] Sent: 04 August 2011 18:39 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: What may cause that ? Ready NAS NV+ Oh, I lied, 4.1.7 is the latest. From: Matthew B Ames [mailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com] Sent: 04 August 2011 17:46 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: What may cause that ? Ready NAS NV+ What firmware is on the NV+ ? I believe the latest is: RAIDiator 4.1.6 [1.00a043] or at least that is what I have installed on mine. I can't say I have seen that happen, but I did have a cheapo Linksys/Cisco giga switch show similar behaviour - maybe I'll power it back up and see how it behaves. From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: 04 August 2011 16:39 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: What may cause that ? Ready NAS NV+ Second time in a month a local lan becomes irresponsive Pinging any address returns no availability. Even pinging the local machine or the router . Removing the cable of a NAS netgear from the HP switch (static IP) everything is back to normal. And even if I reconnect the NAS after few seconds the situation remains OK until... ? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. http://www.qinetiq.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. http://www.qinetiq.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: old cars (was RE: Vipre console hangs server on reboot)
Cambelt = timing belt VAG TDI service interval was revised from 90k miles down to 60k miles a few years ago, so I get to change the belt every 2 years or so. The oil pickup is in the bottom of the sump and has a habit of getting blocked, especially for engines running on variable servicing (uses expensive oil, but means I don't have to change the oil every 10k). If the pickup gets blocked, then I am sure you can guess the end results can be less than pleasant. This is more of an issue on the VAG 1.8T (petrol) unit, which can mean the end of the turbo :( From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com] Sent: 03 August 2011 14:52 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: old cars (was RE: Vipre console hangs server on reboot) 3rd Cam belt? (would that be a timing belt?)...if you have gone through 3 in 186k I'd be getting rid of that thing in a hurry! What's variable? Oil pickup change? Being Canadian, I think there must be some terminoloy differences! :) On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Matthew B Ames matthew.a...@qinetiq.commailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com wrote: 1.9TDi 110 Octy mk1 for me with 186k on the clock, with a run between Farnborough and Weymouth I can get 61mpg if I drive nicely (well I did when I drove back on Monday) - about 50% motorway. I think the car must be a due a service soon, as I run on variable, and tend to get my full 30k. Guess I had better pencil in some work on the car time, as it is due its 3rd cambelt and an oil pickup change too. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: old cars (was RE: Vipre console hangs server on reboot)
I want a 110 for some fun. In the meantime my 2001 1.9TDi Octavia with 185k on the clock keeps on chugging along. Just a shame the insurance seems so silly and high ☹ From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:mark.kel...@confused.com] Sent: 29 July 2011 10:30 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: old cars (was RE: Vipre console hangs server on reboot) I am happy with my 1990 Land Rover Defender 110. It goes anywhere. ☺ Not so happy with my 1996 Vauxhall Corsa 1.4 liter. Runs well but looks a mess. Mark From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] Sent: 29 July 2011 04:14 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: old cars (was RE: Vipre console hangs server on reboot) Would love to see pics of the 47 Ford someone posted about earlier. The GTR is a monster. Congrats. On Thursday, July 28, 2011, Eric Wittersheim eric.wittersh...@gmail.commailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.com wrote: I meant to say that I pull. On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Eric Wittersheim eric.wittersh...@gmail.commailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.com wrote: Ha. I pulled a 300 MP Raptor 5er. Mine is a 35 foot. Just got it this year, love it. On Jul 28, 2011 8:37 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.commailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote: I have the same exact rig. Use it to pull a 38ft Keystone Raptor 5th wheel. - Sean On Jul 28, 2011, at 12:20 PM, Eric Wittersheim eric.wittersh...@gmail.commailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.com wrote: 2008 GMC Sierra 3500 Duramax Dually On Jul 28, 2011 3:17 PM, Gary Slinger gary.slin...@gmail.commailto:gary.slin...@gmail.com wrote: Neither am I now. B*stard. :) On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:13 PM, kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: I have just invested in a nissan GTR which means my wife is not talking to me :-( Sent from my POS BlackBerry wireless device, which may wipe itself at any moment -- *From: * Evan Brastow ebras...@automatedemblem.commailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com *Date: *Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:12:52 + *To: *NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com *ReplyTo: * NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com *Subject: *RE: old cars (was RE: Vipre console hangs server on reboot) Nice! 2010 Infiniti G37x here. ** ** (I didn't want to share in the bashing previously as I've asked my share of dumb questions on this list.) ** ** Evan ** ** ** ** *From:* Gary Slinger [mailto:gary.slin...@gmail.commailto:gary.slin...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:30 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: old cars (was RE: Vipre console hangs server on reboot) ** ** 2011 Infiniti G37S, currently with no speeding tickets :) On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote: 18 year old Mazda 626, 10 year old Subaru Forester, and a 6 year old Dodge Dakota. -Paul -Original Message- From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.orgmailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 9:51 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: old cars (was RE: Vipre console hangs server on reboot) I have a 40yr old 400hp Datsun, also paid for :-). Our newest of 3 cars we own car is uh...14. Dave -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.commailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin _ This message has been checked for all known viruses by bluesource. For further information visit www.blue-source.comhttp://www.blue-source.com powered by Messagelabs ** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com Limited ** Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registration no. 310635. Inspop.com Limited [also trading as Confused.com] is registered in England and Wales at 2nd Floor, Friary House, Greyfriars Road, Cardiff, CF10 3AE [Reg. No. 03857130]. Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies [which may contain alterations] subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person
RE: old cars (was RE: Vipre console hangs server on reboot)
Can you get us all a good deal too ;-) From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:mark.kel...@confused.com] Sent: 29 July 2011 12:24 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: old cars (was RE: Vipre console hangs server on reboot) Oh yes. ☺ From: Tony Patton [mailto:apco...@gmail.com] Sent: 29 July 2011 12:09 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: old cars (was RE: Vipre console hangs server on reboot) At least you know where to get a good insurance deal :-) T Typed slowly on HTC Desire On Jul 29, 2011 10:36 AM, Mark Kelsay mark.kel...@confused.commailto:mark.kel...@confused.com wrote: I am happy with my 1990 Land Rover Defender 110. It goes anywhere. ☺ Not so happy with my 1996 Vauxhall Corsa 1.4 liter. Runs well but looks a mess. Mark From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.commailto:hbo...@gmail.com] Sent: 29 July 2011 04:14 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: old cars (was RE: Vipre console hangs server on reboot) Would love to see pics of the 47 Ford someone posted about earlier. The GTR is a monster. Congrats. On Thursday, July 28, 2011, Eric Wittersheim eric.wittersh...@gmail.commailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.commailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.commailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.com wrote: I meant to say that I pull. On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Eric Wittersheim eric.wittersh...@gmail.commailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.commailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.commailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.com wrote: Ha. I pulled a 300 MP Raptor 5er. Mine is a 35 foot. Just got it this year, love it. On Jul 28, 2011 8:37 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.commailto:seanmarti...@gmail.commailto:seanmarti...@gmail.commailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote: I have the same exact rig. Use it to pull a 38ft Keystone Raptor 5th wheel. - Sean On Jul 28, 2011, at 12:20 PM, Eric Wittersheim eric.wittersh...@gmail.commailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.commailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.commailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.com wrote: 2008 GMC Sierra 3500 Duramax Dually On Jul 28, 2011 3:17 PM, Gary Slinger gary.slin...@gmail.commailto:gary.slin...@gmail.commailto:gary.slin...@gmail.commailto:gary.slin...@gmail.com wrote: Neither am I now. B*stard. :) On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:13 PM, kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: I have just invested in a nissan GTR which means my wife is not talking to me :-( Sent from my POS BlackBerry wireless device, which may wipe itself at any moment -- *From: * Evan Brastow ebras...@automatedemblem.commailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.commailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.commailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com *Date: *Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:12:52 + *To: *NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com *ReplyTo: * NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com *Subject: *RE: old cars (was RE: Vipre console hangs server on reboot) Nice! 2010 Infiniti G37x here. ** ** (I didn't want to share in the bashing previously as I've asked my share of dumb questions on this list.) ** ** Evan ** ** ** ** *From:* Gary Slinger [mailto:gary.slin...@gmail.commailto:gary.slin...@gmail.commailto:gary.slin...@gmail.commailto:gary.slin...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:30 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: old cars (was RE: Vipre console hangs server on reboot) ** ** 2011 Infiniti G37S, currently with no speeding tickets :) On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote: 18 year old Mazda 626, 10 year old Subaru Forester, and a 6 year old Dodge Dakota. -Paul -Original Message- From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.orgmailto:david@nwea.orgmailto:david@nwea.orgmailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 9:51 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: old cars (was RE: Vipre console hangs server on reboot) I have a 40yr old 400hp Datsun, also paid for :-). Our newest of 3 cars we own car is uh...14. Dave -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.commailto:kurt.b...@gmail.commailto:kurt.b...@gmail.commailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to
RE: Sys Admin Day
Not read that before Nice one :) As for me, I get to work late trying to figure out how to import about half a million assets which have planned maintenance on them into SAP when none of them seem to have with any standard formatting/structure. From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 29 July 2011 16:41 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Sys Admin Day I know I posted my blog from 2009 for SysAdmin Day here when I originally wrote it, but as I completely forgot about today being SysAdmin Day and haven't got time to knock anything together, I'm going to apologetically post another link for anyone who wasn't around then http://raythestray.blogspot.com/2009/07/today-is-systems-administrator-day.html On 29 July 2011 16:35, William Robbins dangerw...@gmail.commailto:dangerw...@gmail.com wrote: I get to work late tonight. :P - WJR On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:28, Matthew B Ames matthew.a...@qinetiq.commailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com wrote: Happy Sys Admin day hope you all get some cakes, or something nice! http://www.sysadminday.com/ -- Matthew Ames Senior Software Engineer, IT Services MoD Boscombe Down Tel: 01980 662791, Mobile: 07799 828279tel:07799%20828279 Fax: 01980 664012 Email: matthew.a...@qinetiq.commailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com (work) matt...@ames.orgmailto:matt...@ames.org (home) QinetiQ - The Global Defence and Security Experts. Delivering customer focused solutions. Many hands make a tall horse. 11 was a race horse, 22 was 12. race, 22112. To err is human - to moo, bovine. Macmillan Cancer Support Charity bike ride - donate nowhttp://www.justgiving.com/mba-mac-2011 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. http://www.qinetiq.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. * IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER * This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message it was obviously addressed to you and therefore you can read it, even it we didn't mean to send it to you. However, if the contents of this email make no sense whatsoever then you probably were not the intended recipient, or, alternatively, you are a mindless cretin; either way, you should immediately kill yourself and destroy your computer (not necessarily in that order). Once you have taken this action, please contact us.. no, sorry, you can't use your computer, because you just destroyed it, and possibly also committed suicide afterwards, but I am starting to digress.. The originator of this email is not liable for the transmission of the information contained in this communication. Or are they? Either way it's a pretty dull legal query and frankly one I'm not going to dwell on. But should you have nothing better to do, please feel free to ruminate on it, and please pass on any concrete conclusions should you find them. However, if you pass them on via email, be sure to include a disclaimer regarding liability for transmission. In the event that the originator did not send this email to you, then please return it to us and attach a scanned-in picture of your mother's brother's wife wearing nothing but a kangaroo suit, and we will immediately refund you exactly half of what you paid for the can of Whiskas you bought when you went to Pets At Home yesterday. We take no responsibility for non-receipt of this email because we are running Exchange 5.5 and everyone knows how glitchy
RE: non-local admin revisited
and if that fails, then simply remove the users hands :) From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 20 July 2011 17:02 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: non-local admin revisited It is if they have to type some credentials in. If they have admin accounts and will type their password in after clicking on anything, then they clearly need to have their admin accounts removed. On 20 July 2011 16:59, Jim Dandy jda...@asmail.ucdavis.edumailto:jda...@asmail.ucdavis.edu wrote: My users aren't smart enough to use UAC properly. They'll click on anything if they think that is what they need to do to get to whatever they want to do. No matter how much you warn them, a dimmed UAC screen isn't going to inhibit their impulses. -Original Message- From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 6:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: non-local admin revisited Hmmm, I like this. With UAC on there is validity to running as an admin all the time, IF you only have admin on your own machine. Less hassle for them with minimal risk. Very cool twist Andrew. From: Andrew S. Baker [asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 8:11 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: non-local admin revisited IT members have Win7 and have local admin access of their own machines, but with UAC enabled at the default level. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt- software.com/read/my_forums/http://software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. * IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER * This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message it was obviously addressed to you and therefore you can read it, even it we didn't mean to send it to you. However, if the contents of this email make no sense whatsoever then you probably were not the intended recipient, or, alternatively, you are a mindless cretin; either way, you should immediately kill yourself and destroy your computer (not necessarily in that order). Once you have taken this action, please contact us.. no, sorry, you can't use your computer, because you just destroyed it, and possibly also committed suicide afterwards, but I am starting to digress.. The originator of this email is not liable for the transmission of the information contained in this communication. Or are they? Either way it's a pretty dull legal query and frankly one I'm not going to dwell on. But should you have nothing better to do, please feel free to ruminate on it, and please pass on any concrete conclusions should you find them. However, if you pass them on via email, be sure to include a disclaimer regarding liability for transmission. In the event that the originator did not send this email to you, then please return it to us and attach a scanned-in picture of your mother's brother's wife wearing nothing but a kangaroo suit, and we will immediately refund you exactly half of what you paid for the can of Whiskas you bought when you went to Pets At Home yesterday. We take no responsibility for non-receipt of this email because we are running Exchange 5.5 and everyone knows how glitchy that can be. In the event that you do get this message then please note that we take no responsibility for that either. Nor will we accept any liability, tacit or implied, for any damage you may or may not incur as a result of receiving, or not, as the case may be, from time to time, notwithstanding all liabilities implied or otherwise, ummm, hell, where was I...umm, no matter what happens, it is NOT, and NEVER WILL BE, OUR FAULT! The comments and opinions expressed herein are my own and NOT those of my employer, who, if he knew I was sending emails and surfing the seamier side of the Internet, would cut off my manhood and feed it to me for afternoon tea. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
RE: NIC manufacturers
iPhones, etc. maybe? Do you run a wireless network? Any rogue APs, etc? Managed or non-managed switches? -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: 12 July 2011 11:44 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NIC manufacturers I was looking at my DHCP clients and noticed that I have a few machines that are NOT identified. Looking up the MAC address online I see that it's registered to private. Any idea what the heck is up with that? Any suggestions on how to find it, assuming it's NOT a PC? (I know I have several devices who's MAC address is registered to Apple, and we have no Macs here, so...) -- Thanks, John Aldrich Blueridge Industries IT Manager ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: NIC manufacturers
Don't your APs have static IPs? I was suggesting it was more likely to be a wireless device, rather than the AP itself. Try a telnet on various port numbers and see if you can get response from the IP address to determine what the device(s) are Otherwise ping it and start unplugging things till you find it (best do that out of hours, unless you want your boss to smack you around the head, assuming the unit is powered up out of normal office hours). Or blacklist the mac address in your DHCP and assign it an address not in your range and see who phones up and says my iPhone / laptop from home / etc isn't working anymore. -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: 12 July 2011 16:08 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NIC manufacturers Non-managed switches, unfortunately. We do have a few wireless access points, but the MAC address doesn't match up with them AFAICT. -Original Message- From: Matthew B Ames [mailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 7:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NIC manufacturers iPhones, etc. maybe? Do you run a wireless network? Any rogue APs, etc? Managed or non-managed switches? -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: 12 July 2011 11:44 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NIC manufacturers I was looking at my DHCP clients and noticed that I have a few machines that are NOT identified. Looking up the MAC address online I see that it's registered to private. Any idea what the heck is up with that? Any suggestions on how to find it, assuming it's NOT a PC? (I know I have several devices who's MAC address is registered to Apple, and we have no Macs here, so...) -- Thanks, John Aldrich Blueridge Industries IT Manager ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: NIC manufacturers
Does your AP have a static address? I would expect it to be static (or at least a reservation). Is the AP running its own DHCP server, or does your normal DHCP server handle addresses for wireless devices too? -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: 12 July 2011 17:30 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NIC manufacturers I only have one WAP to which I have access and it's sitting in my office. I'm looking at the bottom of the router/access point and comparing the MAC address there to the one on the DHCP server. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 12:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NIC manufacturers And how are you determining this? Are you able to examine the MAC address table on the WAP somehow? On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 08:08, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com wrote: Non-managed switches, unfortunately. We do have a few wireless access points, but the MAC address doesn't match up with them AFAICT. -Original Message- From: Matthew B Ames [mailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 7:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NIC manufacturers iPhones, etc. maybe? Do you run a wireless network? Any rogue APs, etc? Managed or non-managed switches? -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: 12 July 2011 11:44 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NIC manufacturers I was looking at my DHCP clients and noticed that I have a few machines that are NOT identified. Looking up the MAC address online I see that it's registered to private. Any idea what the heck is up with that? Any suggestions on how to find it, assuming it's NOT a PC? (I know I have several devices who's MAC address is registered to Apple, and we have no Macs here, so...) -- Thanks, John Aldrich Blueridge Industries IT Manager ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http
RE: Social engineering - new vector
You signature block gets better and better. :thumbsup: From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 28 June 2011 12:07 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Social engineering - new vector http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/27/mission_impossible_mouse_attack/ -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. * IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER * This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message it was obviously addressed to you and therefore you can read it, even it we didn't mean to send it to you. However, if the contents of this email make no sense whatsoever then you probably were not the intended recipient, or, alternatively, you are a mindless cretin; either way, you should immediately kill yourself and destroy your computer (not necessarily in that order). Once you have taken this action, please contact us.. no, sorry, you can't use your computer, because you just destroyed it, and possibly also committed suicide afterwards, but I am starting to digress.. The originator of this email is not liable for the transmission of the information contained in this communication. Or are they? Either way it's a pretty dull legal query and frankly one I'm not going to dwell on. But should you have nothing better to do, please feel free to ruminate on it, and please pass on any concrete conclusions should you find them. However, if you pass them on via email, be sure to include a disclaimer regarding liability for transmission. In the event that the originator did not send this email to you, then please return it to us and attach a scanned-in picture of your mother's brother's wife wearing nothing but a kangaroo suit, and we will immediately refund you exactly half of what you paid for the can of Whiskas you bought when you went to Pets At Home yesterday. We take no responsibility for non-receipt of this email because we are running Exchange 5.5 and everyone knows how glitchy that can be. In the event that you do get this message then please note that we take no responsibility for that either. Nor will we accept any liability, tacit or implied, for any damage you may or may not incur as a result of receiving, or not, as the case may be, from time to time, notwithstanding all liabilities implied or otherwise, ummm, hell, where was I...umm, no matter what happens, it is NOT, and NEVER WILL BE, OUR FAULT! The comments and opinions expressed herein are my own and NOT those of my employer, who, if he knew I was sending emails and surfing the seamier side of the Internet, would cut off my manhood and feed it to me for afternoon tea. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: MS Outlook error when opening without Admin rights
Might be worth checking to see what plugins (if any) are running Outlook too, and which version is it? From: Ben Schorr [mailto:b...@rolandschorr.com] Sent: 28 June 2011 14:28 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: MS Outlook error when opening without Admin rights Does this happen even if you start Outlook in Safe Mode? (hold down CTRL while you click the icon) See if this helps: http://www.officeforlawyers.com/outlook/tsol.htm#safe Ben M. Schorr Chief Executive Officer __ Roland Schorr Tower www.rolandschorr.comhttp://www.rolandschorr.com b...@rolandschorr.commailto:b...@rolandschorr.com From: IT Technical [mailto:icttec...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 23:02 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: MS Outlook error when opening without Admin rights Hi All, We are experiencing a strange problem with Ms Outlook. Unless a user is made a local admin, Outlook gives the following error and will not open, Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. Making a user a member of the local admin works, but we want to remove these priviledges. Thanks, Tech Support. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Social engineering - new vector
They get scared and kill themselves. Had any new job offers recently?! From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 28 June 2011 16:03 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Social engineering - new vector I'm wondering what recruitment agents make of it when I send them my CV :-) On 28 June 2011 15:59, Matthew B Ames matthew.a...@qinetiq.commailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com wrote: You signature block gets better and better. :thumbsup: From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 28 June 2011 12:07 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Social engineering - new vector http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/27/mission_impossible_mouse_attack/ -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. * IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER * This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message it was obviously addressed to you and therefore you can read it, even it we didn't mean to send it to you. However, if the contents of this email make no sense whatsoever then you probably were not the intended recipient, or, alternatively, you are a mindless cretin; either way, you should immediately kill yourself and destroy your computer (not necessarily in that order). Once you have taken this action, please contact us.. no, sorry, you can't use your computer, because you just destroyed it, and possibly also committed suicide afterwards, but I am starting to digress.. The originator of this email is not liable for the transmission of the information contained in this communication. Or are they? Either way it's a pretty dull legal query and frankly one I'm not going to dwell on. But should you have nothing better to do, please feel free to ruminate on it, and please pass on any concrete conclusions should you find them. However, if you pass them on via email, be sure to include a disclaimer regarding liability for transmission. In the event that the originator did not send this email to you, then please return it to us and attach a scanned-in picture of your mother's brother's wife wearing nothing but a kangaroo suit, and we will immediately refund you exactly half of what you paid for the can of Whiskas you bought when you went to Pets At Home yesterday. We take no responsibility for non-receipt of this email because we are running Exchange 5.5 and everyone knows how glitchy that can be. In the event that you do get this message then please note that we take no responsibility for that either. Nor will we accept any liability, tacit or implied, for any damage you may or may not incur as a result of receiving, or not, as the case may be, from time to time, notwithstanding all liabilities implied or otherwise, ummm, hell, where was I...umm, no matter what happens, it is NOT, and NEVER WILL BE, OUR FAULT! The comments and opinions expressed herein are my own and NOT those of my employer, who, if he knew I was sending emails and surfing the seamier side of the Internet, would cut off my manhood and feed it to me for afternoon tea. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. http://www.qinetiq.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. * IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER
[ot] RE: FontZilla
What the North Americans need is a trip to the UK, well Swindon in particular to visit our special roundabout, known as the Magic Roundabout. It is constructed from five small roundabouts to generate one large one. I guess it is ever Learner drivers nightmare :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Roundabout_(Swindon) Roundabout work fine, when people know what to do on then - and blocking the roundabout when your exit is not clear is never going to win you any friends. Infact, anyone caught doing such a thing should go for a long walk off a short pier wearing some concrete walking boots :) From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 June 2011 16:18 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: FontZilla North Americans on the whole have problems knowing what to do with roundabouts. We've just started implementing them in Winnipeg and they've gotten quote a lot of complaints. lack of educamation. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Matthew B Ames matthew.a...@qinetiq.commailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com wrote: Haha, nice one. Good job it was not my local council doing that. Instead we are having all our roundabouts removed and replaced with crossroads and traffic lights installed - all to help with traffic flow for the sailing events for the Olympics (2012)... apparently. Rather than using a 14pt font, I would recommend the council buy everyone larger monitors instead :) From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 22 June 2011 15:34 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: FontZilla Not in the slightest. I am long-sighted, and I can read the guy across the room's emails just fine from my desk. However - to put this in perspective, here is another thing this council have done recently... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-13873091 On 22 June 2011 15:30, Sean Rector sean.rec...@vaopera.orgmailto:sean.rec...@vaopera.org wrote: I'm laughing my a$$ off at this. 14-point? You have got to be kidding me! Sean Rector, MCSE From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 9:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT: FontZilla Wow. The local government here in the UK that I work for, despite being in the middle of the deepest cuts for two decades, have decided to use our precious IT resources to.enforce 14-point Arial as the Outlook font for all users, just so that partially-sighted people can be sure they can read our emails. Amazing. I'm pretty sure eye tests and glasses have been available to all since 1946...yet here we go. It gets better, though. They have also decided to change every single publication and communication that comes out of the council to 14-point Arial, even to the stage where council tax bills will no longer be able to display the address correctly in the envelope window. Which means they will have to shell out for special envelopes right across the board with bigger windows. Great money-saving sense! Rant off.we all love execs as much as we love users :-) -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. * IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER * This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message it was obviously addressed to you and therefore you can read it, even it we didn't mean to send it to you. However, if the contents of this email make no sense whatsoever then you probably were not the intended recipient, or, alternatively, you are a mindless cretin; either way, you should immediately kill yourself and destroy your computer (not necessarily in that order). Once you have taken this action, please contact us.. no, sorry, you can't use your computer, because you just destroyed it, and possibly also committed suicide afterwards, but I am starting to digress.. The originator of this email is not liable for the transmission of the information contained in this communication. Or are they? Either way it's a pretty dull legal query and frankly one I'm not going to dwell on. But should you have nothing better to do, please feel free to ruminate on it, and please pass on any concrete conclusions should you find them. However, if you pass them on via email, be sure to include a disclaimer regarding liability for transmission. In the event that the originator did not send this email to you, then please return it to us and attach a scanned-in picture of your mother's brother's wife wearing nothing but a kangaroo suit, and we will immediately refund you exactly half of what you paid for the can of Whiskas you bought when you went to Pets At Home yesterday. We take no responsibility for non-receipt of this email because we are running Exchange
RE: FontZilla
Haha, nice one. Good job it was not my local council doing that. Instead we are having all our roundabouts removed and replaced with crossroads and traffic lights installed - all to help with traffic flow for the sailing events for the Olympics (2012)... apparently. Rather than using a 14pt font, I would recommend the council buy everyone larger monitors instead :) From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 22 June 2011 15:34 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: FontZilla Not in the slightest. I am long-sighted, and I can read the guy across the room's emails just fine from my desk. However - to put this in perspective, here is another thing this council have done recently... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-13873091 On 22 June 2011 15:30, Sean Rector sean.rec...@vaopera.orgmailto:sean.rec...@vaopera.org wrote: I'm laughing my a$$ off at this. 14-point? You have got to be kidding me! Sean Rector, MCSE From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 9:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT: FontZilla Wow. The local government here in the UK that I work for, despite being in the middle of the deepest cuts for two decades, have decided to use our precious IT resources to.enforce 14-point Arial as the Outlook font for all users, just so that partially-sighted people can be sure they can read our emails. Amazing. I'm pretty sure eye tests and glasses have been available to all since 1946...yet here we go. It gets better, though. They have also decided to change every single publication and communication that comes out of the council to 14-point Arial, even to the stage where council tax bills will no longer be able to display the address correctly in the envelope window. Which means they will have to shell out for special envelopes right across the board with bigger windows. Great money-saving sense! Rant off.we all love execs as much as we love users :-) -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. * IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER * This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message it was obviously addressed to you and therefore you can read it, even it we didn't mean to send it to you. However, if the contents of this email make no sense whatsoever then you probably were not the intended recipient, or, alternatively, you are a mindless cretin; either way, you should immediately kill yourself and destroy your computer (not necessarily in that order). Once you have taken this action, please contact us.. no, sorry, you can't use your computer, because you just destroyed it, and possibly also committed suicide afterwards, but I am starting to digress.. The originator of this email is not liable for the transmission of the information contained in this communication. Or are they? Either way it's a pretty dull legal query and frankly one I'm not going to dwell on. But should you have nothing better to do, please feel free to ruminate on it, and please pass on any concrete conclusions should you find them. However, if you pass them on via email, be sure to include a disclaimer regarding liability for transmission. In the event that the originator did not send this email to you, then please return it to us and attach a scanned-in picture of your mother's brother's wife wearing nothing but a kangaroo suit, and we will immediately refund you exactly half of what you paid for the can of Whiskas you bought when you went to Pets At Home yesterday. We take no responsibility for non-receipt of this email because we are running Exchange 5.5 and everyone knows how glitchy that can be. In the event that you do get this message then please note that we take no responsibility for that either. Nor will we accept any liability, tacit or implied, for any damage you may or may not incur as a result of receiving, or not, as the case may be, from time to time, notwithstanding all liabilities implied or otherwise, ummm, hell, where was I...umm, no matter what happens, it is NOT, and NEVER WILL BE, OUR FAULT! The comments and opinions expressed herein are my own and NOT those of my employer, who, if he knew I was sending emails and surfing the seamier side of the Internet, would cut off my manhood and feed it to me for afternoon tea. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
PCoIP via a DirectAccess connection
The company I work for has started rolling out W7 machines, and we are using DA for our remote connectivity, which as a general rule seems to be doing exactly what it says on the tin (and it does it pretty well). However I also use PCoIP to connect to a VDI environment for a network of a more classified nature, and performance for this - even for screen updates (typing into Notepad, etc) is pretty terrible. Rather than getting too into the depths of this (as I am just a user, so I can't comment on any network specific settings), I am just wondering if other people have implemented this and how it fairs for users at home (ADSL connections, in my case I am syncing around 15meg down, .6 up). I have tried switching my connectivity between PCoIP and RDP and I have found virtually no difference. As a sanity check, I have tried using my old laptop connecting back into the same network via X-Kryptor and performance is far superior when I launch a remote desktop session (I have tried remote desktop connections via the PCoIP connection). Therefore I am basically ruling out my connectivity at home from being part of the problem. I am a pilot on this system, so it is unlikely that internet connectivity at the company end is saturated. Thanks, Matt -- Matthew Ames Senior Software Engineer, IT Services MoD Boscombe Down Tel: 01980 662791, Mobile: 07799 828279 Fax: 01980 664012 Email: matthew.a...@qinetiq.commailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com (work) matt...@ames.orgmailto:matt...@ames.org (home) QinetiQ - The Global Defence and Security Experts. Delivering customer focused solutions. Many hands make a tall horse. 11 was a race horse, 22 was 12. race, 22112. To err is human - to moo, bovine. Macmillan Cancer Support Charity bike ride - donate nowhttp://www.justgiving.com/mba-mac-2011 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: PCoIP via a DirectAccess connection
I wish we could have ICA :) I suspect that have decided that PCoIP is fine internally and forgotten that a lot of us work off site :( Cheers, Matt (who is off home to a suitably laggy connection tomorrow!) From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 20 June 2011 16:27 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: PCoIP via a DirectAccess connection Get them to implement Citrix ICA :-) PCoIP performed terribly for us remotely (although that was a couple of years ago) On 20 June 2011 16:23, Matthew B Ames matthew.a...@qinetiq.commailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com wrote: The company I work for has started rolling out W7 machines, and we are using DA for our remote connectivity, which as a general rule seems to be doing exactly what it says on the tin (and it does it pretty well). However I also use PCoIP to connect to a VDI environment for a network of a more classified nature, and performance for this - even for screen updates (typing into Notepad, etc) is pretty terrible. Rather than getting too into the depths of this (as I am just a user, so I can't comment on any network specific settings), I am just wondering if other people have implemented this and how it fairs for users at home (ADSL connections, in my case I am syncing around 15meg down, .6 up). I have tried switching my connectivity between PCoIP and RDP and I have found virtually no difference. As a sanity check, I have tried using my old laptop connecting back into the same network via X-Kryptor and performance is far superior when I launch a remote desktop session (I have tried remote desktop connections via the PCoIP connection). Therefore I am basically ruling out my connectivity at home from being part of the problem. I am a pilot on this system, so it is unlikely that internet connectivity at the company end is saturated. Thanks, Matt -- Matthew Ames Senior Software Engineer, IT Services MoD Boscombe Down Tel: 01980 662791, Mobile: 07799 828279 Fax: 01980 664012 Email: matthew.a...@qinetiq.commailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com (work) matt...@ames.orgmailto:matt...@ames.org (home) QinetiQ - The Global Defence and Security Experts. Delivering customer focused solutions. Many hands make a tall horse. 11 was a race horse, 22 was 12. race, 22112. To err is human - to moo, bovine. Macmillan Cancer Support Charity bike ride - donate nowhttp://www.justgiving.com/mba-mac-2011 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. http://www.qinetiq.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. * IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER * This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message it was obviously addressed to you and therefore you can read it, even it we didn't mean to send it to you. However, if the contents of this email make no sense whatsoever then you probably were not the intended recipient, or, alternatively, you are a mindless cretin; either way, you should immediately kill yourself and destroy your computer (not necessarily in that order). Once you have taken this action, please contact us.. no, sorry, you can't use your computer, because you just destroyed it, and possibly also committed suicide afterwards, but I am starting to digress.. The originator of this email is not liable for the transmission of the information contained in this communication. Or are they? Either way it's a pretty dull legal query and frankly one I'm not going to dwell on. But should you have nothing better to do, please feel free to ruminate on it, and please pass on any concrete conclusions should you find them. However, if you pass them on via email, be sure to include a disclaimer regarding liability for transmission. In the event that the originator did not send this email to you, then please
RE: [OT] Citibank worse at security than Sony
As a software engineer I would feel rather guilty to develop a system that was that poor. I used to have a Citi credit card. I had better check it is no long active. -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: 15 June 2011 04:36 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: [OT] Citibank worse at security than Sony So... 200,000 or so Citigroup customers have had their person info stolen. Someone logged in to one account properly, then changed the account number in the URL to someone else, and the site happily served up that account instead. I hesitate to even call the first party an attacker. Is it really an attack if the bank just leaves a pile of money sitting on the sidewalk and someone takes it? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2003393/How-Citigroup-hackers-broke-door-using-banks-website.html Some banker fat cats need to go to jail for this. This is incompetence of the highest order. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: [OT] Citibank worse at security than Sony
Quote from that article: The method is seemingly simple, but the fact that the thieves knew to focus on this particular vulnerability marks the Citigroup attack as especially ingenious, security experts said. One security expert familiar with the investigation wondered how the hackers could have known to breach security by focusing on the vulnerability in the browser. It would have been hard to prepare for this type of vulnerability, he said. The security expert insisted on anonymity because the inquiry was at an early stage. I like the use of the words *especially ingenious*. It is hardly a browser vulnerability, it a design and implementation issue. It should have been picked up at multiple levels (design, coding, testing, etc). The security expert did not want his name listed incase he sounded like a wally :-) -Original Message- From: Alan Davies [mailto:adav...@cls-services.com] Sent: 15 June 2011 10:31 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] Citibank worse at security than Sony What floors me is how sophisticated they are saying the attack is! Honestly, this article makes me so angry! http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/14/technology/14security.html?_r=3 This is basic s**t! It's not APT. It's not sophisticated. It's complete lack of good governance and due diligence. It's a high profile web app with PII data that should be having significant PT work done at a MINIMUM of quarterly. As with Sony, one has to wonder where their priorities are with data protection .. a -Original Message- From: Matthew B Ames [mailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com] Sent: 15 June 2011 07:24 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] Citibank worse at security than Sony As a software engineer I would feel rather guilty to develop a system that was that poor. I used to have a Citi credit card. I had better check it is no long active. -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: 15 June 2011 04:36 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: [OT] Citibank worse at security than Sony So... 200,000 or so Citigroup customers have had their person info stolen. Someone logged in to one account properly, then changed the account number in the URL to someone else, and the site happily served up that account instead. I hesitate to even call the first party an attacker. Is it really an attack if the bank just leaves a pile of money sitting on the sidewalk and someone takes it? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2003393/How-Citigroup-hackers-br oke-door-using-banks-website.html Some banker fat cats need to go to jail for this. This is incompetence of the highest order. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ WARNING: The information in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the named addressee, you must not use, copy or disclose this email (including any attachments) or the information in it save to the named addressee nor take any action in reliance on it. If you receive this email or any attachments in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the same and any copies. CLS Services Ltd × Registered in England No 4132704 × Registered Office: Exchange Tower × One Harbour Exchange Square × London E14 9GE ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: [OT]: I.T. idiots
Depends if he then submits a mileage claim or not :) Bike = motorbike, or pedal? If the latter then double points to be awarded for getting exercise while on company time. From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 15 June 2011 11:17 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT: I.T. idiots I work with a guy who just suddenly upped and went home without a word about half an hour ago. He has just telephoned me to let me know he has successfully verified our secure email delivery procedure, by riding all the way home on his bike, and confirming receipt of the email on his home PC. Considering the fact that he could have done this without leaving his desk by using a) a smartphone or b) our public access network, I am left wondering how he ever got to work on this team. -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. IMPORTANT: The information in this email is CONFIDENTIAL. If its contents are disclosed in any way my lawyers will swoop down from black helicopters like Seal Team Six and drag you away with a black bag over your head. They will then take you to a secret prison and make you fight to the death with other people who dared to share this email. You will be given a large bowie knife and a supply of methamphetamines while I watch the said deathmatch and wager vast sums of money on who will be the winner. If the fight becomes boring or there is a stalemate, I will release rabid dogs and my two-stone cat into the arena to liven things up a bit. If these animals become in any way docile, I will squirt them with water pistols until they become a bit more temperamental. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: [OT]: I.T. idiots
I noticed that where I work we can claim money for mile for cycling - trouble is the 120 mile round trip to get to work by bike makes for rather a long day! I have to make do with a lunchtime run when I am onsite, or a 20 mile mountain bike when working from home in my lunch break. Maybe he has a bit-on-the-side and he popped home to do her while verifying the secure mail delivery :) From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 15 June 2011 11:30 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: [OT]: I.T. idiots Pedal bike. I wouldn't mind the chance to get away for a bit of exercise during work time as well! On 15 June 2011 11:27, Matthew B Ames matthew.a...@qinetiq.commailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com wrote: Depends if he then submits a mileage claim or not :) Bike = motorbike, or pedal? If the latter then double points to be awarded for getting exercise while on company time. From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 15 June 2011 11:17 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT: I.T. idiots I work with a guy who just suddenly upped and went home without a word about half an hour ago. He has just telephoned me to let me know he has successfully verified our secure email delivery procedure, by riding all the way home on his bike, and confirming receipt of the email on his home PC. Considering the fact that he could have done this without leaving his desk by using a) a smartphone or b) our public access network, I am left wondering how he ever got to work on this team. -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. IMPORTANT: The information in this email is CONFIDENTIAL. If its contents are disclosed in any way my lawyers will swoop down from black helicopters like Seal Team Six and drag you away with a black bag over your head. They will then take you to a secret prison and make you fight to the death with other people who dared to share this email. You will be given a large bowie knife and a supply of methamphetamines while I watch the said deathmatch and wager vast sums of money on who will be the winner. If the fight becomes boring or there is a stalemate, I will release rabid dogs and my two-stone cat into the arena to liven things up a bit. If these animals become in any way docile, I will squirt them with water pistols until they become a bit more temperamental. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. http://www.qinetiq.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. IMPORTANT: The information in this email is CONFIDENTIAL. If its contents are disclosed in any way my lawyers will swoop down from black helicopters like Seal Team Six and drag you away with a black bag over your head. They will then take you to a secret prison and make you fight to the death with other people who dared to share this email. You will be given a large bowie knife and a supply of methamphetamines while I watch the said deathmatch and wager vast sums of money on who will be the winner. If the fight becomes boring or there is a stalemate, I will release rabid dogs and my two-stone cat into the arena to liven things up a bit. If these animals become in any way docile, I will squirt them with water pistols until they become a bit more
RE: [OT]: I.T. idiots
I bow to your greater experience :) From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 15 June 2011 16:16 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: [OT]: I.T. idiots Yeah. You wouldn't want to spend half an hour on a bike then just get on another one :-0 On 15 June 2011 16:16, Guyer, Don don.gu...@fiserv.commailto:don.gu...@fiserv.com wrote: If that were the case, I would rather not waste any time riding a bike home.. Don Guyer Windows Systems Engineer RIM Operations Engineering Distributed - A Team, Tier 2 Enterprise Technology Group Fiserv don.gu...@fiserv.commailto:don.gu...@fiserv.com Office: 1-800-523-7282 x 1673 Fax: 610-233-0404 www.fiserv.comhttp://www.fiserv.com/ From: Matthew B Ames [mailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.commailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 6:35 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT]: I.T. idiots I noticed that where I work we can claim money for mile for cycling - trouble is the 120 mile round trip to get to work by bike makes for rather a long day! I have to make do with a lunchtime run when I am onsite, or a 20 mile mountain bike when working from home in my lunch break. Maybe he has a bit-on-the-side and he popped home to do her while verifying the secure mail delivery :) From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 15 June 2011 11:30 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: [OT]: I.T. idiots Pedal bike. I wouldn't mind the chance to get away for a bit of exercise during work time as well! On 15 June 2011 11:27, Matthew B Ames matthew.a...@qinetiq.commailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com wrote: Depends if he then submits a mileage claim or not :) Bike = motorbike, or pedal? If the latter then double points to be awarded for getting exercise while on company time. From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 15 June 2011 11:17 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT: I.T. idiots I work with a guy who just suddenly upped and went home without a word about half an hour ago. He has just telephoned me to let me know he has successfully verified our secure email delivery procedure, by riding all the way home on his bike, and confirming receipt of the email on his home PC. Considering the fact that he could have done this without leaving his desk by using a) a smartphone or b) our public access network, I am left wondering how he ever got to work on this team. -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. IMPORTANT: The information in this email is CONFIDENTIAL. If its contents are disclosed in any way my lawyers will swoop down from black helicopters like Seal Team Six and drag you away with a black bag over your head. They will then take you to a secret prison and make you fight to the death with other people who dared to share this email. You will be given a large bowie knife and a supply of methamphetamines while I watch the said deathmatch and wager vast sums of money on who will be the winner. If the fight becomes boring or there is a stalemate, I will release rabid dogs and my two-stone cat into the arena to liven things up a bit. If these animals become in any way docile, I will squirt them with water pistols until they become a bit more temperamental. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. http://www.qinetiq.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put
RE: Is this even possible
Add another mailbox to the distribution list, and then write a simple app to monitor the new account, extract the attachment(s) print the delete the message. However there may be neater solutions out there. This is the first idea which jumps out of my head (as I have no specific knowledge of Exchange, which I guess you are running - 2003). -Original Message- From: Nigel Parker [mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk] Sent: 14 June 2011 10:56 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Is this even possible Had a request When an email hits a certain Email distribution list they would like the attachment to be printed on a printer down on the shop floor As far as I know the name of the attachment will be the same Is it possible to do this in an automated way? Nigel Parker Systems Engineer Ultraframe (UK) Ltd Tel: 01200 452329 Fax: 01200 452201 Web: www.ultraframe.com Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd. This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and unlawful. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
[slightly OT] Has anyone used Meridio (document management system)
If so, would you mind dropping me an email off list, especially if you have any experience with the SQL databases it uses behind the scenes - I need to extract some data from the system, and some of the data seems to rather well hidden. Thanks, Matt -- Matthew Ames Senior Software Engineer, IT Services MoD Boscombe Down Tel: 01980 662791, Mobile: 07799 828279 Fax: 01980 664012 Email: matthew.a...@qinetiq.commailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com (work) matt...@ames.orgmailto:matt...@ames.org (home) QinetiQ - The Global Defence and Security Experts. Delivering customer focused solutions. Many hands make a tall horse. 11 was a race horse, 22 was 12. race, 22112. To err is human - to moo, bovine. Macmillan Cancer Support Charity bike ride - donate nowhttp://www.justgiving.com/mba-mac-2011 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Access form password
We have had the cottage-industry of Access applications across the company I work for too. They are developed by normal staff who then leave/move on and then these things chug along for a bit and then start to fail and end up in my department for fixing. :( From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 10 June 2011 14:56 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Access form password Thanks everyone for all the pointers. However...I think the database is corrupted. It can't be repaired, you can't view the database properties, it throws an index error every time - and according to Google, that points to a database corrupted beyond repair. Even though the users are still managing to utilize it. Somehow. I think I may try to use this as the starting point for a larger project to get the myriad small Access databases dotted around the place consolidated into a single SQL-based system with proper maintenance and authentication etc. I am so glad it's Friday afternoon :-) On 10 June 2011 14:52, Daniel Rodriguez drod...@gmail.commailto:drod...@gmail.com wrote: It may help if you could see the contents of the .df files. There are some free viewers. DBFPlus comes to mind. You may also need to convert those .dbf files. DBFConvert probably do the trick for you. That way you dont have to go hunting for an older version of Access. Then I use a hex editor to look at those forms. Also, I would look at any vba scripting files, if any. But, that's me. Typed not so frustratingly on my Dell Streak 7. On Jun 10, 2011 9:01 AM, roberto.gri...@gmail.commailto:roberto.gri...@gmail.com wrote: ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. IMPORTANT: The information in this email is CONFIDENTIAL. If its contents are disclosed in any way my lawyers will swoop down from black helicopters like Seal Team Six and drag you away with a black bag over your head. They will then take you to a secret prison and make you fight to the death with other people who dared to share this email. You will be given a large bowie knife and a supply of methamphetamines while I watch the said deathmatch and wager vast sums of money on who will be the winner. If the fight becomes boring or there is a stalemate, I will release rabid dogs and my two-stone cat into the arena to liven things up a bit. If these animals become in any way docile, I will squirt them with water pistols until they become a bit more temperamental. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
[OT] Friday funny: Anarchy in the UK
[cid:image001.jpg@01CC2783.8AA722B0] -- Matthew Ames Senior Software Engineer, IT Services MoD Boscombe Down Tel: 01980 662791, Mobile: 07799 828279 Fax: 01980 664012 Email: matthew.a...@qinetiq.commailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com (work) matt...@ames.orgmailto:matt...@ames.org (home) QinetiQ - The Global Defence and Security Experts. Delivering customer focused solutions. Many hands make a tall horse. 11 was a race horse, 22 was 12. race, 22112. To err is human - to moo, bovine. Macmillan Cancer Support Charity bike ride - donate nowhttp://www.justgiving.com/mba-mac-2011 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmininline: image001.jpg
RE: How to find a workstation
Psshutdown could work... Run it and wait for a phone call my computer just turned itself off. :) From: richardmccl...@aspca.org [mailto:richardmccl...@aspca.org] Sent: 08 June 2011 12:57 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: How to find a workstation Thanks! Thinking of dedicating a white board to the mapping. I actually have gone registry hunting. I thought of the Description field, and if our help desk folks would remember to put that in and update it, it might be best. What I'd really like is a nice big orange button. Push it, and the machine starts beeping... -- richard Bill Humphries nt...@hedgedigger.commailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com 06/07/2011 03:08 PM Please respond to NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com To NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Press this button if the To is a fax number. Enter in the fax number like 123-456-7890. cc Subject Re: How to find a workstation 60 machines? I would just use excel or visio or some graphics app to map out workstation locations. Or add the full-time user name or location in the description field in AD. Quick and Dirty Way: If you have admin priviledges on the machines, browse machine \\machine\c$file:///\\machine\c$ and see what users have profiles and identify full-time user. You could also probably do this by opening registry remotely and taking a peak. Bill richardmccl...@aspca.orgmailto:richardmccl...@aspca.org wrote: Greetings! We have been directed to have all our workstations named with a department code, a location (State) code, and the Dell (mostly) service tag number... There is a script which will tell us, in AD, who the last person is to have logged into that machine. PROBLEM: 1. In the summer, we have like 18 student workers. They must find an unoccupied desk. If the owner of that desk comes in, they must move. They have no assigned desk. (A single user may need to move 3 times during a single shift.) 2. SO, in my phone system console, or in my VIPRE console, I see that the machine named [gibberish] has had some sort of issue with the VoIP system, or that there is a malware infection (and we may need to boot into SafeMode to do a re-scan). 3. We see a temp worker was the last person to log into that workstation... HOW or WHAT might we use so that we can figure out which of the 60 or so desks actually has the machine name in question? Those who had us change our naming convention (and they have more users than to we) are in a situation where desktop systems are not shared. We do not have this luxury. The other location is finally beginning to understand our complaints. SO, is there some sort of utility, etc that would enable us to find the machine [gibberish], where Fred Temp was the last person logged in? I'd settle for a button that would make that machine start beeping, if nothing else. Thanks! -- Richard D. McClary Jr Infrastructure Architect, Information Technology Group *ASPCA^(r) * 1717 S. Philo Rd, Ste 36 Urbana, IL 61802 richardmccl...@aspca.orgmailto:richardmccl...@aspca.org P: 217-337-9761 C: 217-417-1182 F: 217-337-9761 _www.aspca.org_ http://www.aspca.org/ The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals^(r) (ASPCA^(r) ) and is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by reply email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here:
RE: SOLVED -- RE: server locks up
I was lost with that too, and I am from Somerset, so definitely not a UK thing :) A quick google suggests American and Canadian slang for very good/excellent/etc. I guess John should now be able to disabled the job to reboot the server and see how it goes From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 31 May 2011 13:41 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: SOLVED -- RE: server locks up Copaceticthat's a new one for me. US slang in origin? On 31 May 2011 13:38, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.commailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com wrote: Ok... it looks like everything is copacetic now that I have uninstalled ICVerify. The system rebooted normally this weekend and was up and running this morning when I came in. I'm reasonably certain that it's working properly now. Thanks to all who helped. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. IMPORTANT: The information in this email is CONFIDENTIAL. If its contents are disclosed in any way my lawyers will swoop down from black helicopters like Seal Team Six and drag you away with a black bag over your head. They will then take you to a secret prison and make you fight to the death with other people who dared to share this email. You will be given a large bowie knife and a supply of methamphetamines while I watch the said deathmatch and wager vast sums of money on who will be the winner. If the fight becomes boring or there is a stalemate, I will release rabid dogs and my two-stone cat into the arena to liven things up a bit. If these animals become in any way docile, I will squirt them with water pistols until they become a bit more temperamental. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: System Restore and Scareware
I had one of these last night. When I ran regedit (having logged in normally) it opened and then promptly closed down. Booted into safe mode and checked the software\windows\currentversion\run runonce keys for anything that looked suspect (running from temp, app data, etc. Removed those keys, and the random named .exe they launched. Rebooted back into windows, cleaned up the host files, and then downloaded the latest version of MalwareBytes. 90 minutes later and the machine reported itself as clean. I need to run another scan to check and then work out what AV package is on there, as there were shortcuts for Norton, AVG and MacCr@ppy on the desktop. From: Rankin, James R [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 20 May 2011 20:51 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: System Restore and Scareware Some of these little beasties are easy to beat - I've seen ones where deleting a file did the trick. Unfortunately at the other end of the scale live some crafty process-injection nasties that are a veritable nightmare to find. Fortunately MalwareBYtes has a good track record of pulling them out for you. Typed frustratingly slowly on my BlackBerry(r) wireless device From: Bob Hartung bhart...@wiscoind.com Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:47:23 -0500 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: System Restore and Scareware I've had a couple of recent cases of scareware infecting some Windows XP Pro systems here. One reported lots of virus infestations and prevented the user from accessing the internet and, for a low price, would fix all. The other reported that the hard drive had tons of errors and the boot sector was gone, etc. And for a small fee, their utility could fix it. This system was unusable. Maybe this is pretty basic but I haven't seen mention of it but in both cases, Window's System Restore easily removed both. I've seen descriptions of fixing infected systems involving fairly complex procedures and multiple utilities. I guess I just wanted to recommend giving System Restore a try first before resorting to the heavy artillery. On the system that had the failed hard drive scareware, it was impossible to access System Restore in normal windows. I figured Safe Mode was the way to go but I discovered System Restore is not available in Safe Mode. I did learn that you can run System Restore in Safe Mode with Command Prompt. Just enter %systemroot%\system32\restore\rstrui.exe at the command prompt and you're in System Restore. Not sure why regular Safe Mode wouldn't have that command available. Hope that's of help to someone else. -- Bob Hartung Wisco Industries, Inc. 736 Janesville St. Oregon, WI 53575 Tel: (608) 835-3106 x215 Fax: (608) 835-7399 e-mail: bhartung(at)wiscoind.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: System Restore and Scareware
Cool, nice one. I'll download that for later use. As it was hopefully I have cleaned up the lodgers' girlfriends computer, however that should mean the lodger won't mind paying this weeks rent, as he has gained some additional services from me for free! Cheers, Matt From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 23 May 2011 10:07 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: System Restore and Scareware I suspect regedit will be among the list of window titles that the malware will check and terminate if it sees them run. A trick to get around this is to run the regedit window on a different desktop (not monitor - use something like http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/cc817881). Malware generally only detects windows running on the primary desktop. On 23 May 2011 07:26, Matthew B Ames matthew.a...@qinetiq.commailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com wrote: I had one of these last night. When I ran regedit (having logged in normally) it opened and then promptly closed down. Booted into safe mode and checked the software\windows\currentversion\run runonce keys for anything that looked suspect (running from temp, app data, etc. Removed those keys, and the random named .exe they launched. Rebooted back into windows, cleaned up the host files, and then downloaded the latest version of MalwareBytes. 90 minutes later and the machine reported itself as clean. I need to run another scan to check and then work out what AV package is on there, as there were shortcuts for Norton, AVG and MacCr@ppy on the desktop. From: Rankin, James R [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 20 May 2011 20:51 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: System Restore and Scareware Some of these little beasties are easy to beat - I've seen ones where deleting a file did the trick. Unfortunately at the other end of the scale live some crafty process-injection nasties that are a veritable nightmare to find. Fortunately MalwareBYtes has a good track record of pulling them out for you. Typed frustratingly slowly on my BlackBerry(r) wireless device From: Bob Hartung bhart...@wiscoind.commailto:bhart...@wiscoind.com Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:47:23 -0500 To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: System Restore and Scareware I've had a couple of recent cases of scareware infecting some Windows XP Pro systems here. One reported lots of virus infestations and prevented the user from accessing the internet and, for a low price, would fix all. The other reported that the hard drive had tons of errors and the boot sector was gone, etc. And for a small fee, their utility could fix it. This system was unusable. Maybe this is pretty basic but I haven't seen mention of it but in both cases, Window's System Restore easily removed both. I've seen descriptions of fixing infected systems involving fairly complex procedures and multiple utilities. I guess I just wanted to recommend giving System Restore a try first before resorting to the heavy artillery. On the system that had the failed hard drive scareware, it was impossible to access System Restore in normal windows. I figured Safe Mode was the way to go but I discovered System Restore is not available in Safe Mode. I did learn that you can run System Restore in Safe Mode with Command Prompt. Just enter %systemroot%\system32\restore\rstrui.exe at the command prompt and you're in System Restore. Not sure why regular Safe Mode wouldn't have that command available. Hope that's of help to someone else. -- Bob Hartung Wisco Industries, Inc. 736 Janesville St. Oregon, WI 53575 Tel: (608) 835-3106 x215 Fax: (608) 835-7399 e-mail: bhartung(at)wiscoind.comhttp://wiscoind.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
RE: server locks up
I seem to recall ICVerify being a problem for one of your (other?) servers in the past. If so, did the removal of it from that machine cure problems it was experiencing? -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: 23 May 2011 14:21 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: server locks up Not positive it *is* resolved, however I have a strong suspicion that the problem was due to a bad software package, namely ICVerify. I have removed that piece of software and this morning the server was up and running still (successful automatic reboot over the weekend.) I'll continue to monitor and if it *does* lock up again, I'll let y'all know. :D -Original Message- From: techconnect [mailto:techconn...@bellsouth.net] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 9:05 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: re: server locks up So what was the resolution on this problem? Jason I've got a Dell Poweredge 2900 that keeps locking up for no apparent reason that I can find. Nothing in the event logs...just the logs stop at a certain point. If I reboot the server on a regular basis (2 or 3 times per week) it's all good, but I hate to do that. I'd like to find out what's causing this problem. Any suggestions where to start since there appears to be nothing in the event logs? Server is Windows 2003 and is one of our DCs. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Fake AV site
I saw that site about a week ago when I was at home. I think I was using Chrome at the time however. Likewise I just closed my browser tab (and performed a full scan with ESET). From: Jeff Bunting [mailto:bunting.j...@gmail.com] Sent: 20 May 2011 01:29 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Fake AV site Ran across a fake AV site this evening, with a faux-windows explorer web page. Anyone have favorite places to report this sort of thing? I sent the URL to Google's malware reporting, didn't know if there were other well-regarded places to submit these Here's a .png screenshot of the web page I took if anyone's interested (SkyDrive). The green progress bar was animated and completed its scan before the windows security alert popped up. The page was easily closed by killing the IE tab (the domain name appears in the image) http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pHzOqf6GUpj4i-Jmq3CZd6VhkMg0yNK33pu-4PcTBzLjmkydC3bY_BUfYoKsbnH-a7DaUXp9fq8CyGwHEQAepWw/FakeAV.png?psid=1 Jeff ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: NAS drives (search tool)
Mine lives in the loft in its original box. Useless piece of junk. On a more useful note, if it runs a version of linux, I think you can ssh to it, and then use find on rather than having to access it via any shares it may be presenting. From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: 20 May 2011 14:53 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NAS drives (search tool) Just give up. Those things are truly awful speedwise. If you have a backup of the TeraStation data then I would contemplate a restoration of the backup to more responsive hardware, clean that, wipe the Terastation and restore the cleaned data. On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Tammy Stewart copper...@personainternet.commailto:copper...@personainternet.com wrote: That indeed looks nice. Thanks. Will pass it on see if he can get it to do what is needed. Drives are: Buffalo TeraStation PRO NAS drives (model # TS-RHTGL/R5) Not sure if that makes any difference or not but thought I would throw it out there anyway. Thanks, Tammy From: Guyer, Don [mailto:don.gu...@fiserv.commailto:don.gu...@fiserv.com] Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 9:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NAS drives (search tool) How about something like TreeSize? Don Guyer Windows Systems Engineer RIM Operations Engineering Distributed - A Team, Tier 2 Enterprise Technology Group Fiserv don.gu...@fiserv.commailto:don.gu...@fiserv.com Office: 1-800-523-7282 x 1673tel:1-800-523-7282%20x%201673 Fax: 610-233-0404tel:610-233-0404 www.fiserv.comhttp://www.fiserv.com/ From: Tammy Stewart [mailto:copper...@personainternet.commailto:copper...@personainternet.com] Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 9:11 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NAS drives (search tool) Hi, I am looking for some sort of tool that can search an entire NAS drive for a certain file, display it so it can be deleted. (not much unlike agent ransack, windows search, etc) A customer I am working with has 16 large drives with several TB of data on each and many many shares. (in the hundreds) They have conficker I expect to find several instances of the fake recycler bins, the worm copies the autorun.inf files in these shares. Scanning with AV takes ages because of the amount of data involved by the time the scan is done items removed - they (worm copies) already have been re-written again. Is there such a tool? Trying to get more info about the NAS model numbers setup so to make it easier to narrow down what will work what will not. Yes - autorun is killed via GPO at the site (although it is possible the GPO didn't take on every machine) Yes - it is believed that every machine is fitted with AV it is set up properly. (although it is possible that a few machines have missed the install or AV is broke) - this part is being investigated (in order to figure out why it keeps re-propagating) TIA! Tammy ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX
RE: Weird mail issue sending PDF attachments (or maybe also other files)
Does the message size of the email in the recipient's inbox suggest is the attachment is there but masked/hidden by the mail client (I am assuming Outlook), or has it actually been stripped out? What happens if you view the mailbox via webmail/owa? One of our suppliers used to email in PDF quotes and the PDFs were not quite correct (not sure on the finer details), but it caused the content checking email software (MailMarshall, iirc) to silently drop the whole message :( From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: 12 May 2011 07:17 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Weird mail issue sending PDF attachments (or maybe also other files) SBS2k3 env. The customer has a LOB app that creates invoices and reports in PDF and send them by email No problem when sending from XP an Office 2003 From Windows 7 and Office 2007/2010 the mail is sent with no errors but 40-50% of recipients don't get the attachment (visible) Tried changing to text only but no joy. Sending manually the created PDF results in the same issue. The file can be received if sent zipped GuidoElia HELPPC ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Contingency For Home Workers
If the home worker is working 100% (or a large proportion of their time) at home, then provide them with company equipment. If they only work part time at home and break their machine / ability to connect to your corporate resources then make them come into the office until they fix the machine. Initially (4 years ago), the company used to provide ADSL lines, and we used CheckPoint. This meant I could only work from the one location. CheckPoint was later replaced with X-Kryptor but then worked with a broadband/tethered 3g connection, but again this sill required a company resource (ie. laptop) to be at home. Currently we do not support use of home machines apart from for reading email on our unclass systems. I guess what I am saying is that, working at home is seem as a privilege rather than a right, so if I toasted my work laptop I would be expected to go back into the office and use a spare desktop until my laptop was rebuilt/replaced/etc. We are moving to a more VDI based infrastructure, so things may be changing again, and the use of home machines connecting into our unclass environments may be more likely. From: Robert Jackson [mailto:r...@walkermartyn.co.uk] Sent: 12 May 2011 06:56 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Contingency For Home Workers Just looking for some thoughts/feedback on what others are doing. We have a number of home workers who have remote access capability based around Oracle's Secure Global Desktop (a Tarantella WebTop derivative) and RSA SecurID token technology. The setup is ideal: we give the users a SecurID token and they use their own home broadband connection and hardware (PC/Laptop) to access the company systems. However we had a scenario over last weekend whereby one home worker decided to upgrade to Internet Explorer 9 and yes you've guessed it Oracle's Secure Global Desktop stopped working due to Java issues. I've now been asked to come up with a cost effective contingency plan should such a situation arise again. My initial thoughts would be to get the users to use Firefox or Safari instead of IE. Although I don't think you can force users to use something they may be do not want to, especially as it their own personal kit. So, it brings me to the question of how do other people/businesses deal with the whole home worker scenario, especially when faced with hardware issues or software upgrades gone bad? Regards, Rab. = Robert Jackson Phone: +44 (0) 141 332 7999 IT Manager Fax: +44 (0) 141 331 2820 Walker Martyn Ltd 1 Park Circus PlaceEmail: r...@walkermartyn.co.ukmailto:r...@walkermartyn.co.uk Glasgow G3 6AH, Scotland Web: http://www.walkermartyn.co.ukhttp://www.walkermartyn.co.uk/ = The information in this internet E-mail is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access, copying or re-use of information in it by anyone else is unauthorised. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Walker Martyn Ltd or any of its affiliates. If you are not the intended recipient please contact administra...@walkermartyn.co.ukmailto:administra...@walkermartyn.co.uk. Walker Martyn Ltd, company number SC197533. Company is registered in Scotland and has its registered office at 1 Park Circus Place, Glasgow G3 6AH, UK. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with
RE: VOIP design questions
Do you then run a headset with that, or handset that plugs into the user's computer via USB? From: Tobie Fysh [mailto:tobie.f...@freebridge.org.uk] Sent: 04 May 2011 17:58 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: VOIP design questions Lync 2010 into a Dialogic Media Gateway. Fantastic, no desk phone and a number that follows me around. Tobie From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] Sent: 02 May 2011 14:39 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: VOIP design questions Folks, We are planning to retire our current phone system and move to a Mitel VOIP system. Not having implemented VOIP before, I have some questions for those of you that have: - our vendor claims our current data network can easily handle VOIP traffic since it's a small amount of traffic (don't know exact amount yet, still awaiting vendor response). As such, they tell it is possible to use our current network to accommodate voice and data. I'm not sure if Im comfortable with this. I was thinking of a more segregated approach: different network and voice and data never intersect. - our vendor claims we can use the existing data jack for the phones, and plug the desktop PCs/laptops into the phone as a sort of switch. I'm thinking this would add another level of complexity: phone is broke and by the way you can't get on the network now. - the reason the vendor suggests the above is that the current voice drops (cat5) terminate to phone patch panels (in most cases). Those cables would need to be cut and re-terminated to switches. So I have some concerns about our vendor claims. The dollar figure they propose does not include network changes, new switches, etc. Looking at the cost proposal, I am thinking there are quite a few hardware and man-hours costs missing. What do you folks do for VOIP? Thanks, Tom Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This message has been scanned by MimeCast on behalf of Freebridge Community Housing and found to be free of viruses and not SPAM. If you have any concerns about the message contents please contact the ICT ServiceDesk. [Freebridge Community Housing Logo]http://www.freebridge.org.uk [twitter.com/Freebridge]http://twitter.com/Freebridge [Freebridge on Facebook]http://www.facebook.com/pages/Kings-Lynn-United-Kingdom/Freebridge-Community-Housing/192690183387?v=box_3 This e-mail (including any attachments), is confidential and intended only for the use of the addressee(s). It may contain information covered by legal, professional or other privilege. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Do not copy, use or disclose this e-mail. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard copy version. Freebridge Community Housing Ltd is a Charitable Industrial and Provident Society - Reg No IP29744R Registered with the Housing Corporation - No L4463. VAT Registration Number 860762121 Freebridge Community Housing, Juniper House, Austin Street, Kings Lynn, Norfolk PE30 1DZ This email message has been scanned for viruses by Mimecast. Mimecast delivers a complete managed email solution from a single web based platform. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
RE: no list traffic today ???
Last thing I saw was stamped 22:46 19/04/2011 (BST). I then had about 9 messages blocked due to offensive language, which I could not be @rsed to release :) From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: 20 April 2011 14:08 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: no list traffic today ??? Tried first to login via the web on sunbelt-software.com but the link doesn't seem to be there. I have not received any list traffic since before 7pm East Coast yesterday ( 4/19/2011 )... So yes, this is a test ... I'll try to be thick skinned for the responses if the listserv cranks back up. Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Drobo experiences
Plus Buffalo performance used to be pretty rubbish. Fortunately I was saved from the poor performance of the Terastation when it bricked itself during an upgrade, I then went down the Infrant ReadyNas route for some cheap network storage at home, and have been happy since :) From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: 04 April 2011 17:57 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Drobo experiences +1 on the buffalo comment. I have yet to try a QNap, but they do look impressive from a distance. ASB (Professional Biohttp://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker/bio) Technology Services that Maximize Business Results... On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:55 PM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.orgmailto:john.c...@pfsf.org wrote: QNAP baby, I've come to loath the Buffalo products and their apparent inability to configure NTFS share permissions. John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 5950 NW 1st Place Gainesville, Fl 32607 Office (352) 244-1610tel:%28352%29%20244-1610 Cell (352) 215-6944tel:%28352%29%20215-6944 MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.commailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 12:55 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Drobo experiences i am looking at some cheap disk archive too...looked at the drobo and the dlink but I think am going to get a Buffalo Terra pro...1U, 8TB ... On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr michealespin...@gmail.commailto:michealespin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, Directly supporting Drobo devices is new to me - but in the past two weeks I have come to the conclusion that these things are not worth the support headaches. Particularly it seems, when dealing with DroboShare attached equipment. I'm repeatedly seeing delays, timeouts, and outright connectivity drops. Does anyone have any insight into similar issues, or (hopefully) anything to the contrary? Thanks! -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: APC battery tray
Is possible the batters have started to expand and are now jammed into the tray? Check the voltage across the batteries, if it 0vdc (or pretty close) then you need not really worry about them shorting out, imho. -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: 05 April 2011 15:34 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: APC battery tray Any tips for getting the batteries out of the tray in an APC UPS? Our rackmount APC takes 4 batteries and they appear to be *glued* into the tray. The guy at Batteries Plus was shocked that he couldn't get 'em out with a screwdriver by prying on them. A friend on another list suggested soaking the bottom of the tray in Goo Gone, but I'm afraid that might short out the batteries or something even worse... Is that likely to be safe and does anyone have any clue what APC used to secure the batteries into the tray? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Social networking fun
The approach the company I work for is to say that you should not spend more than 1 hour per day on social networking/personal webmail/etc sites per day. I assume they just gather up the proxy logs and scan them though looking for offenders. Obviously leaving facebook open on a tab with some of itself-updating bits could soon get you into trouble! The idea that I am trying to get is that it might be better to try and make it self-policed by the end users. From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com] Sent: 01 April 2011 14:41 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Social networking fun I use iPrism and I am pretty sure you can report on, and categorize, such sites in a fashion that would allow access during hours X through Y, etc. You can also make user defined site categories and put sites in those categories for reports or filtering. BF From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 8:08 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Social networking fun Does anyone know of any way to effectively police the use of social networking in an environment? We have just been told that for some reason all employees are to be allowed unrestricted access to social networking sites, but obviously the management want to know whether users are taking a lend, and spending all day on FarmVille or Bejewelled or looking at pictures of their mates instead of updating our customer base as to events and launches. There are a few Web 2.0 appliances that I have heard of that claim to be able to perform in-depth filtering of social networking and microblogging sites, but I was just wondering what other people who have had this issue may have deployed to get around this. We already have WebSense here, but it's not clever enough to differentiate between business and leisure usage of certain sites, at least certainly not the version we currently use. TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social faux pas. Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or no grammatical use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, although the kelpie next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of the unknown will be gratified to learn that there is no hidden message revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice from Microsoft. However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you have received this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites, whisk and place in a warm oven for 40 minutes. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: