RE: Cisco ASA question

2013-01-08 Thread Ziots, Edward
Remember even with the Egress filtering you are looking to do outbound, it 
could be an internal compromised host or account that is using your legitimate 
email servers to send the email out, but I would drop and log all other traffic 
from trust to untrust on port 25 and eliminate the hosts.  

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +

Security Engineer

Lifespan Organization

ezi...@lifespan.org

 

From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@sfgtrust.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 10:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cisco ASA question

 

Hi Folks,

 

At a new job here.  I have a few Cisco ASA.  One of them, an ASA 5510, seems to 
be not very strict on outbound rules.  I'm new to ASA (came from the Fortinet 
world), so any advice on setting up outbound rules?  In particular we've been 
on spamhaus and I think there is an internal machine sending out smtp messages. 
 Short term solution would be to restrict out smtp to our mail servers only. 

 

On the ASA | Configuration | Access Rules, I created an inside à outside rule.  
Traffic from mail server out, smtp, permit.  Other rule has traffic as deny.  
This does not seem correct, even me being new to ASA.

 

Suggestions appreciated,

Tom

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Cisco ASA question

2013-01-08 Thread Tom Miller
Great thanks.  I did that at my last gig.  I'm amazed at the config but am 
working to tighten things.  New to ASA so it's a little slow going.   Apologies 
for my ignorance here.

Under access rules, I see Outside, and those rules are limited and seem correct.

Then I see Inside (incoming) with a few rules, and another Inside (outgoing) 
with a few rules.  What's the difference?

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 11:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA question

Short term solution would be to restrict out smtp to our mail servers only.

I think all networks should do that all the time. We do as do most others folks 
that I know.

Basically you should see in order:

Inside to outside allow smpt from your mail server.
Inside to outside deny smtp from any

Cisco reads them in order and stops on the first matching rule.  So in the 
above your email server would get an allow. A desktop would not qualify on that 
first rule so it would move to the second rule and get denied. So if I am 
reading your description right I think your rules are ok.

Send us the rules in order if you want. Feel free to mask the ip addresses if 
you want.

From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@sfgtrust.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 10:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cisco ASA question

Hi Folks,

At a new job here.  I have a few Cisco ASA.  One of them, an ASA 5510, seems to 
be not very strict on outbound rules.  I'm new to ASA (came from the Fortinet 
world), so any advice on setting up outbound rules?  In particular we've been 
on spamhaus and I think there is an internal machine sending out smtp messages. 
 Short term solution would be to restrict out smtp to our mail servers only.

On the ASA | Configuration | Access Rules, I created an inside -- outside 
rule.  Traffic from mail server out, smtp, permit.  Other rule has traffic as 
deny.  This does not seem correct, even me being new to ASA.

Suggestions appreciated,
Tom

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Cisco ASA question

2013-01-08 Thread Patrick Salmon
Looks right to me, both in sequence and content [1].

- You're allowing SMTP from specific host(s). Correct. Not so much a 'best
practice' ptooey as a must-do.
- Next, you're denying SMTP from anything else. Also correct.
- Implied, but must exist, is the Deny Any Any at the end. You'd be
surprised how many people forget that.

An aside: this is a great forum with an abundance of expertise in many
areas. That said, a google search on Cisco Forums / Cisco Community / Cisco
support forum will give you a much more focused target audience. Not that
you won't get great answers here, as you will.

Pat

[1]. CCNP. Also, full disclosure and disclaimer: I am an employee of Cisco
Systems. Opinions expressed, however, are mine alone and not that of Cisco.

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Tom Miller tmil...@sfgtrust.com wrote:

  Hi Folks,

 ** **

 At a new job here.  I have a few Cisco ASA.  One of them, an ASA 5510,
 seems to be not very strict on outbound rules.  I’m new to ASA (came from
 the Fortinet world), so any advice on setting up outbound rules?  In
 particular we’ve been on spamhaus and I think there is an internal machine
 sending out smtp messages.  Short term solution would be to restrict out
 smtp to our mail servers only. 

 ** **

 On the ASA | Configuration | Access Rules, I created an inside à outside
 rule.  Traffic from mail server out, smtp, permit.  Other rule has traffic
 as deny.  This does not seem correct, even me being new to ASA.

 ** **

 Suggestions appreciated,

 Tom

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Cisco ASA question

2013-01-08 Thread Erik Goldoff
*and* I'd recommend checking SMTP relay on internal mail server.  Is
it allowing internal systems to relay smtp traffic instead of smtp
direct ?   Just another loophole that might need to be tightened.

in most cases, *if* internal smtp relay is required, usually limited
to a specific group of 'authorized' systems and not open to entire
internal subnets.

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org wrote:
 Remember even with the Egress filtering you are looking to do outbound, it
 could be an internal compromised host or account that is using your
 legitimate email servers to send the email out, but I would drop and log all
 other traffic from trust to untrust on port 25 and eliminate the hosts.



 Z



 Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +

 Security Engineer

 Lifespan Organization

 ezi...@lifespan.org



 From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@sfgtrust.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 10:54 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Cisco ASA question



 Hi Folks,



 At a new job here.  I have a few Cisco ASA.  One of them, an ASA 5510, seems
 to be not very strict on outbound rules.  I’m new to ASA (came from the
 Fortinet world), so any advice on setting up outbound rules?  In particular
 we’ve been on spamhaus and I think there is an internal machine sending out
 smtp messages.  Short term solution would be to restrict out smtp to our
 mail servers only.



 On the ASA | Configuration | Access Rules, I created an inside à outside
 rule.  Traffic from mail server out, smtp, permit.  Other rule has traffic
 as deny.  This does not seem correct, even me being new to ASA.



 Suggestions appreciated,

 Tom

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



RE: Cisco ASA question

2013-01-08 Thread Tom Miller
I had the direction incorrect!  Thanks for the help folks,

Relay only by exemption on the mail servers, though.

From: Patrick Salmon [mailto:psal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 11:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cisco ASA question

Looks right to me, both in sequence and content [1].

- You're allowing SMTP from specific host(s). Correct. Not so much a 'best 
practice' ptooey as a must-do.
- Next, you're denying SMTP from anything else. Also correct.
- Implied, but must exist, is the Deny Any Any at the end. You'd be surprised 
how many people forget that.

An aside: this is a great forum with an abundance of expertise in many areas. 
That said, a google search on Cisco Forums / Cisco Community / Cisco support 
forum will give you a much more focused target audience. Not that you won't get 
great answers here, as you will.

Pat

[1]. CCNP. Also, full disclosure and disclaimer: I am an employee of Cisco 
Systems. Opinions expressed, however, are mine alone and not that of Cisco.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Tom Miller 
tmil...@sfgtrust.commailto:tmil...@sfgtrust.com wrote:
Hi Folks,

At a new job here.  I have a few Cisco ASA.  One of them, an ASA 5510, seems to 
be not very strict on outbound rules.  I'm new to ASA (came from the Fortinet 
world), so any advice on setting up outbound rules?  In particular we've been 
on spamhaus and I think there is an internal machine sending out smtp messages. 
 Short term solution would be to restrict out smtp to our mail servers only.

On the ASA | Configuration | Access Rules, I created an inside -- outside 
rule.  Traffic from mail server out, smtp, permit.  Other rule has traffic as 
deny.  This does not seem correct, even me being new to ASA.

Suggestions appreciated,
Tom

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Cisco ASA question

2012-11-13 Thread Tom Miller
Folks,

 

I have a new job and they use Cisco ASA firewalls here.  I'm new to Cisco 
firewalls so I'm still learning.

 

Under Remote Access VPN -- AAA/Local User --- AAA Server groups, I have a few 
Windows 2000 servers that are DCs listed here.  Those are going to be retired 
and I need to point this to 2008 R2 servers.  

 

Can anyone tell me which roles/features on a Windows 2008 R2 server I need to 
install/configure to be used by the ASA?

 

Thanks,

Tom


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


RE: Cisco ASA question

2012-11-13 Thread Damien Solodow
Check the Windows 2000 DCs listed; they are likely running IAS. On 2008+ that’s 
Network Policy Server.


DAMIEN SOLODOW
Systems Engineer
317.447.6033 (office)
317.447.6014 (fax)
HARRISON COLLEGE

From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@sfgtrust.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cisco ASA question

Folks,

I have a new job and they use Cisco ASA firewalls here.  I'm new to Cisco 
firewalls so I'm still learning.

Under Remote Access VPN -- AAA/Local User --- AAA Server groups, I have a few 
Windows 2000 servers that are DCs listed here.  Those are going to be retired 
and I need to point this to 2008 R2 servers.

Can anyone tell me which roles/features on a Windows 2008 R2 server I need to 
install/configure to be used by the ASA?

Thanks,
Tom

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


RE: Cisco ASA question

2012-11-13 Thread N Parr
Nothing that I know of, just change the IP's to point to your new DC's.  That's 
all I had to do.


From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@sfgtrust.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 9:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cisco ASA question

Folks,

I have a new job and they use Cisco ASA firewalls here.  I'm new to Cisco 
firewalls so I'm still learning.

Under Remote Access VPN -- AAA/Local User --- AAA Server groups, I have a few 
Windows 2000 servers that are DCs listed here.  Those are going to be retired 
and I need to point this to 2008 R2 servers.

Can anyone tell me which roles/features on a Windows 2008 R2 server I need to 
install/configure to be used by the ASA?

Thanks,
Tom

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Cisco ASA question

2012-11-13 Thread Tom Miller
Are you using Radius or NT Domain?

 

From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 11:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA question

 

Nothing that I know of, just change the IP's to point to your new DC's.
That's all I had to do.  

 



From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@sfgtrust.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 9:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cisco ASA question

Folks,

 

I have a new job and they use Cisco ASA firewalls here.  I'm new to
Cisco firewalls so I'm still learning.

 

Under Remote Access VPN -- AAA/Local User --- AAA Server groups, I
have a few Windows 2000 servers that are DCs listed here.  Those are
going to be retired and I need to point this to 2008 R2 servers.  

 

Can anyone tell me which roles/features on a Windows 2008 R2 server I
need to install/configure to be used by the ASA?

 

Thanks,

Tom

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Cisco ASA question

2012-11-13 Thread Rick Berry
If you’re just using it so their AD credentials are being referenced for 
AnyConnect/etc, it’s just a matter of changing the IPs in ASDM … highlight the 
AAA server group on the top that contains those old DCs and then add the new 
ones down below in the ‘servers in the selected group’ section (presuming 
you’re using NT Domain protocol).

They’ve got a bloody convenient ‘test’ button out to the right side of that 
section, to make sure it flies.



From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@sfgtrust.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cisco ASA question

Folks,

I have a new job and they use Cisco ASA firewalls here.  I'm new to Cisco 
firewalls so I'm still learning.

Under Remote Access VPN -- AAA/Local User --- AAA Server groups, I have a few 
Windows 2000 servers that are DCs listed here.  Those are going to be retired 
and I need to point this to 2008 R2 servers.

Can anyone tell me which roles/features on a Windows 2008 R2 server I need to 
install/configure to be used by the ASA?

Thanks,
Tom

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


RE: Cisco ASA question

2012-11-13 Thread Jon Harris

Last time I set one of these up it was NPS and another part under that.  There 
was some arcane coding I had to do but that was more than 3 years ago so maybe 
Cisco fixed it by now.  Sorry I changed jobs and no longer have ready access to 
the rules I had setup.  I could look thru my old backups and see if I can find 
it but Damien is on the right track. Jon
 From: damien.solo...@harrison.edu
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA question
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:14:14 +









Check the Windows 2000 DCs listed; they are likely running IAS. On 2008+ that’s 
Network Policy Server.
 
 

DAMIEN SOLODOW
Systems Engineer
317.447.6033 (office)
317.447.6014 (fax)
HARRISON COLLEGE

 


From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@sfgtrust.com]


Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:59 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: Cisco ASA question


 
Folks,
 
I have a new job and they use Cisco ASA firewalls here.  I'm new to Cisco 
firewalls so I'm still learning.
 
Under Remote Access VPN -- AAA/Local User --- AAA Server groups, I have a few 
Windows 2000 servers that are DCs listed here.  Those are going to be retired
 and I need to point this to 2008 R2 servers.  
 
Can anyone tell me which roles/features on a Windows 2008 R2 server I need to 
install/configure to be used by the ASA?
 
Thanks,
Tom
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~

~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



---

To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/

or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com

with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~

~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



---

To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/

or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com

with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin   
  
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-16 Thread Ken Schaefer
You can use a certificate with SAN (Subject Alternate Name) field set. IIS has 
supported both wildcard certs (*.domain.tld in the CN field) and SAN certs 
(CN=host.domain.tld and SAN set to host.otherdomain.tld) since II6
You need to use the same cert for all sites sharing the IP address, hence all 
DNS names need to be in the same domain (wildcard) or you need to define all 
hosts in the SAN field.

Cheers
Ken

From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 June 2010 1:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

+1 on SSL needs
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Richard Stovall 
rich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.com wrote:
The only caveat I can think of is if you ever need to do SSL on more than one 
of the sites.  You'll need different IPs in this case since the host header is 
encrypted.  You can solve the translation problem by adding a second internal 
IP to the server.

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Kennedy, Jim 
kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote:
Yep, it will work exactly like your internal host header set up.



From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:bch...@medaille.edumailto:bch...@medaille.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:41 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

Hi Jim,

So I would just need 1 nat translation on the asa with port 80 open and 2 
entries with our public dns server with 2 different hostnames pointing to the 
same public ip and then the headers will function fine?



From: Kennedy, Jim 
[mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

That would work. However I would just use the same IP for both publically and 
let the host header take care of it.



From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:can...@gmail.commailto:can...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

I *think* you would need a second public IP address. then you would do a one to 
one with the second public server and the internal website.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Chyka, Robert 
bch...@medaille.edumailto:bch...@medaille.edu wrote:
Ok here my scenario:

I have 2 websites on a Windows Server 2008 box with IIS7.  We are using one IP 
address for both sites using host headers.  On our internal AD DNS we have an 
entry in for both hostnames pointing to the same IP address (A records).  For 
our first site we have a one-to-one NAT translation on our ASA with port 80 
open on the ACL.

My question is:  How do I do another one to one NAT translation with a 
different public IP address so I can register both sites with our public DNS 
provider?  We want to be able to have 2 different public ips translated out 
from the 2 websites.

Thanks for the help and input.

BOb
































~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-16 Thread Richard Stovall
Would a SAN cert serve up different content in the same way you can have
multiple sites on the same port and IP using host header names?

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:

 You can use a certificate with SAN (Subject Alternate Name) field set. IIS
 has supported both wildcard certs (*.domain.tld in the CN field) and SAN
 certs (CN=host.domain.tld and SAN set to host.otherdomain.tld) since II6

 You need to use the same cert for all sites sharing the IP address, hence
 all DNS names need to be in the same domain (wildcard) or you need to define
 all hosts in the SAN field.



 Cheers

 Ken



 *From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 June 2010 1:13 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question



 +1 on SSL needs

 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 The only caveat I can think of is if you ever need to do SSL on more than
 one of the sites.  You'll need different IPs in this case since the host
 header is encrypted.  You can solve the translation problem by adding a
 second internal IP to the server.



 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Kennedy, Jim 
 kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote:

 Yep, it will work exactly like your internal host header set up.







 *From:* Chyka, Robert [mailto:bch...@medaille.edu]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:41 AM


 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question



 Hi Jim,



 So I would just need 1 nat translation on the asa with port 80 open and 2
 entries with our public dns server with 2 different hostnames pointing to
 the same public ip and then the headers will function fine?







 *From:* Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:38 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question



 That would work. However I would just use the same IP for both publically
 and let the host header take care of it.







 *From:* Candee Vaglica [mailto:can...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:35 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question



 I *think* you would need a second public IP address. then you would do a
 one to one with the second public server and the internal website.

 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Chyka, Robert bch...@medaille.edu
 wrote:

 Ok here my scenario:



 I have 2 websites on a Windows Server 2008 box with IIS7.  We are using one
 IP address for both sites using host headers.  On our internal AD DNS we
 have an entry in for both hostnames pointing to the same IP address (A
 records).  For our first site we have a one-to-one NAT translation on our
 ASA with port 80 open on the ACL.



 My question is:  How do I do another one to one NAT translation with a
 different public IP address so I can register both sites with our public DNS
 provider?  We want to be able to have 2 different public ips translated out
 from the 2 websites.



 Thanks for the help and input.



 BOb









































~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-16 Thread Phil Brutsche
Your 2 options: are:

a) SAN certs
b) Separate IP numbers and SSL certificates

IIS does not yet support TLS SNI
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication) and won't until
Windows Server 8 (or whatever the next major version will be called) at
the earliest.

Downside to SAN certs: each time you add to the list of web sites
covered by the certificate you need to buy a new certificate.

On 6/16/2010 8:47 AM, Chyka, Robert wrote:
 So I want to add a SSL cert to both sites.  I would look at SAN certs? 

-- 

Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-16 Thread Richard Stovall
This has been a very informative thread.

The following may be useful when setting things up if you're running IIS 7.
 There is a link for IIS 6 and Apache as well.

http://www.sslshopper.com/article-ssl-host-headers-in-iis-7.html


On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Chyka, Robert bch...@medaille.edu wrote:

 Who do you recommend for SAN certs?  I think that is the way I am going
 to go.

 Thanks!

 -Original Message-
 From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 11:03 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

 Your 2 options: are:

 a) SAN certs
 b) Separate IP numbers and SSL certificates

 IIS does not yet support TLS SNI
 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication) and won't until
 Windows Server 8 (or whatever the next major version will be called) at
 the earliest.

 Downside to SAN certs: each time you add to the list of web sites
 covered by the certificate you need to buy a new certificate.

 On 6/16/2010 8:47 AM, Chyka, Robert wrote:
  So I want to add a SSL cert to both sites.  I would look at SAN certs?


 --

 Phil Brutsche
 p...@optimumdata.com

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-16 Thread Ken Schaefer
Yes.

The caveat is that all sites on that IP address/port combination need to use 
the same cert. that way, IIS doesn't need access to the host header first - it 
just uses the one certificate. After decryption, it can then get access to the 
HOST header value, and route the request to the appropriate website.

Cheers
Ken

From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 June 2010 9:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

Would a SAN cert serve up different content in the same way you can have 
multiple sites on the same port and IP using host header names?
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Ken Schaefer 
k...@adopenstatic.commailto:k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
You can use a certificate with SAN (Subject Alternate Name) field set. IIS has 
supported both wildcard certs (*.domain.tld in the CN field) and SAN certs 
(CN=host.domain.tld and SAN set to host.otherdomain.tld) since II6
You need to use the same cert for all sites sharing the IP address, hence all 
DNS names need to be in the same domain (wildcard) or you need to define all 
hosts in the SAN field.

Cheers
Ken

From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.commailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 June 2010 1:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

+1 on SSL needs
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Richard Stovall 
rich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.com wrote:
The only caveat I can think of is if you ever need to do SSL on more than one 
of the sites.  You'll need different IPs in this case since the host header is 
encrypted.  You can solve the translation problem by adding a second internal 
IP to the server.

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Kennedy, Jim 
kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote:
Yep, it will work exactly like your internal host header set up.



From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:bch...@medaille.edumailto:bch...@medaille.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:41 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

Hi Jim,

So I would just need 1 nat translation on the asa with port 80 open and 2 
entries with our public dns server with 2 different hostnames pointing to the 
same public ip and then the headers will function fine?



From: Kennedy, Jim 
[mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

That would work. However I would just use the same IP for both publically and 
let the host header take care of it.



From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:can...@gmail.commailto:can...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

I *think* you would need a second public IP address. then you would do a one to 
one with the second public server and the internal website.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Chyka, Robert 
bch...@medaille.edumailto:bch...@medaille.edu wrote:
Ok here my scenario:

I have 2 websites on a Windows Server 2008 box with IIS7.  We are using one IP 
address for both sites using host headers.  On our internal AD DNS we have an 
entry in for both hostnames pointing to the same IP address (A records).  For 
our first site we have a one-to-one NAT translation on our ASA with port 80 
open on the ACL.

My question is:  How do I do another one to one NAT translation with a 
different public IP address so I can register both sites with our public DNS 
provider?  We want to be able to have 2 different public ips translated out 
from the 2 websites.

Thanks for the help and input.

BOb









































~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-16 Thread Ken Schaefer
I've personally used Digicert, and they seem to be fine. I think a few other 
people have used certificatesforexchange.com

Cheers
Ken

-Original Message-
From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:bch...@medaille.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, 16 June 2010 11:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

Who do you recommend for SAN certs?  I think that is the way I am going to go.

Thanks!

-Original Message-
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 11:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

Your 2 options: are:

a) SAN certs
b) Separate IP numbers and SSL certificates

IIS does not yet support TLS SNI
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication) and won't until Windows 
Server 8 (or whatever the next major version will be called) at the earliest.

Downside to SAN certs: each time you add to the list of web sites covered by 
the certificate you need to buy a new certificate.

On 6/16/2010 8:47 AM, Chyka, Robert wrote:
 So I want to add a SSL cert to both sites.  I would look at SAN certs?


-- 

Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-16 Thread Chyka, Robert
Thanks for your insight Ken..

Bob

-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 10:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

I've personally used Digicert, and they seem to be fine. I think a few other 
people have used certificatesforexchange.com

Cheers
Ken

-Original Message-
From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:bch...@medaille.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, 16 June 2010 11:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

Who do you recommend for SAN certs?  I think that is the way I am going to go.

Thanks!

-Original Message-
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 11:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

Your 2 options: are:

a) SAN certs
b) Separate IP numbers and SSL certificates

IIS does not yet support TLS SNI
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication) and won't until Windows 
Server 8 (or whatever the next major version will be called) at the earliest.

Downside to SAN certs: each time you add to the list of web sites covered by 
the certificate you need to buy a new certificate.

On 6/16/2010 8:47 AM, Chyka, Robert wrote:
 So I want to add a SSL cert to both sites.  I would look at SAN certs?


-- 

Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-16 Thread Brian Desmond
I'd also go with DigiCert. They have good pricing, a really easy to use website 
and fantastic customer service.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com

c   - 312.731.3132


-Original Message-
From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:bch...@medaille.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 9:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

Thanks for your insight Ken..

Bob

-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 10:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

I've personally used Digicert, and they seem to be fine. I think a few other 
people have used certificatesforexchange.com

Cheers
Ken

-Original Message-
From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:bch...@medaille.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 June 2010 11:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

Who do you recommend for SAN certs?  I think that is the way I am going to go.

Thanks!

-Original Message-
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 11:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

Your 2 options: are:

a) SAN certs
b) Separate IP numbers and SSL certificates

IIS does not yet support TLS SNI
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication) and won't until Windows 
Server 8 (or whatever the next major version will be called) at the earliest.

Downside to SAN certs: each time you add to the list of web sites covered by 
the certificate you need to buy a new certificate.

On 6/16/2010 8:47 AM, Chyka, Robert wrote:
 So I want to add a SSL cert to both sites.  I would look at SAN certs?


-- 

Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-15 Thread Chyka, Robert
Ok here my scenario:

 

I have 2 websites on a Windows Server 2008 box with IIS7.  We are using
one IP address for both sites using host headers.  On our internal AD
DNS we have an entry in for both hostnames pointing to the same IP
address (A records).  For our first site we have a one-to-one NAT
translation on our ASA with port 80 open on the ACL.

 

My question is:  How do I do another one to one NAT translation with a
different public IP address so I can register both sites with our public
DNS provider?  We want to be able to have 2 different public ips
translated out from the 2 websites.

 

Thanks for the help and input.

 

BOb  


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-15 Thread Candee Vaglica
I *think* you would need a second public IP address. then you would do a one
to one with the second public server and the internal website.

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Chyka, Robert bch...@medaille.edu wrote:

  Ok here my scenario:



 I have 2 websites on a Windows Server 2008 box with IIS7.  We are using one
 IP address for both sites using host headers.  On our internal AD DNS we
 have an entry in for both hostnames pointing to the same IP address (A
 records).  For our first site we have a one-to-one NAT translation on our
 ASA with port 80 open on the ACL.



 My question is:  How do I do another one to one NAT translation with a
 different public IP address so I can register both sites with our public DNS
 provider?  We want to be able to have 2 different public ips translated out
 from the 2 websites.



 Thanks for the help and input.



 BOb







~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-15 Thread Kennedy, Jim
That would work. However I would just use the same IP for both publically and 
let the host header take care of it.



From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:can...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

I *think* you would need a second public IP address. then you would do a one to 
one with the second public server and the internal website.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Chyka, Robert 
bch...@medaille.edumailto:bch...@medaille.edu wrote:
Ok here my scenario:

I have 2 websites on a Windows Server 2008 box with IIS7.  We are using one IP 
address for both sites using host headers.  On our internal AD DNS we have an 
entry in for both hostnames pointing to the same IP address (A records).  For 
our first site we have a one-to-one NAT translation on our ASA with port 80 
open on the ACL.

My question is:  How do I do another one to one NAT translation with a 
different public IP address so I can register both sites with our public DNS 
provider?  We want to be able to have 2 different public ips translated out 
from the 2 websites.

Thanks for the help and input.

BOb










~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-15 Thread Chyka, Robert
Hi Jim,

 

So I would just need 1 nat translation on the asa with port 80 open and
2 entries with our public dns server with 2 different hostnames pointing
to the same public ip and then the headers will function fine?

 

 

 

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

 

That would work. However I would just use the same IP for both
publically and let the host header take care of it.

 

 

 

From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:can...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

 

I *think* you would need a second public IP address. then you would do a
one to one with the second public server and the internal website.

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Chyka, Robert bch...@medaille.edu
wrote:

Ok here my scenario:

 

I have 2 websites on a Windows Server 2008 box with IIS7.  We are using
one IP address for both sites using host headers.  On our internal AD
DNS we have an entry in for both hostnames pointing to the same IP
address (A records).  For our first site we have a one-to-one NAT
translation on our ASA with port 80 open on the ACL.

 

My question is:  How do I do another one to one NAT translation with a
different public IP address so I can register both sites with our public
DNS provider?  We want to be able to have 2 different public ips
translated out from the 2 websites.

 

Thanks for the help and input.

 

BOb  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-15 Thread Kennedy, Jim
Yep, it will work exactly like your internal host header set up.



From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:bch...@medaille.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

Hi Jim,

So I would just need 1 nat translation on the asa with port 80 open and 2 
entries with our public dns server with 2 different hostnames pointing to the 
same public ip and then the headers will function fine?



From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

That would work. However I would just use the same IP for both publically and 
let the host header take care of it.



From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:can...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

I *think* you would need a second public IP address. then you would do a one to 
one with the second public server and the internal website.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Chyka, Robert 
bch...@medaille.edumailto:bch...@medaille.edu wrote:
Ok here my scenario:

I have 2 websites on a Windows Server 2008 box with IIS7.  We are using one IP 
address for both sites using host headers.  On our internal AD DNS we have an 
entry in for both hostnames pointing to the same IP address (A records).  For 
our first site we have a one-to-one NAT translation on our ASA with port 80 
open on the ACL.

My question is:  How do I do another one to one NAT translation with a 
different public IP address so I can register both sites with our public DNS 
provider?  We want to be able to have 2 different public ips translated out 
from the 2 websites.

Thanks for the help and input.

BOb


















~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-15 Thread Chyka, Robert
Nice.  I will give that a shot.

 

Thanks..

 

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

 

Yep, it will work exactly like your internal host header set up.

 

 

 

From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:bch...@medaille.edu] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

 

Hi Jim,

 

So I would just need 1 nat translation on the asa with port 80 open and
2 entries with our public dns server with 2 different hostnames pointing
to the same public ip and then the headers will function fine?

 

 

 

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

 

That would work. However I would just use the same IP for both
publically and let the host header take care of it.

 

 

 

From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:can...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

 

I *think* you would need a second public IP address. then you would do a
one to one with the second public server and the internal website.

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Chyka, Robert bch...@medaille.edu
wrote:

Ok here my scenario:

 

I have 2 websites on a Windows Server 2008 box with IIS7.  We are using
one IP address for both sites using host headers.  On our internal AD
DNS we have an entry in for both hostnames pointing to the same IP
address (A records).  For our first site we have a one-to-one NAT
translation on our ASA with port 80 open on the ACL.

 

My question is:  How do I do another one to one NAT translation with a
different public IP address so I can register both sites with our public
DNS provider?  We want to be able to have 2 different public ips
translated out from the 2 websites.

 

Thanks for the help and input.

 

BOb  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-15 Thread Erik Goldoff
+1

use same IPs for public like you do internal, let host header mechanism sort
it out at the IIS server level.

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org
 wrote:

  Yep, it will work exactly like your internal host header set up.







 *From:* Chyka, Robert [mailto:bch...@medaille.edu]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:41 AM

 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question



 Hi Jim,



 So I would just need 1 nat translation on the asa with port 80 open and 2
 entries with our public dns server with 2 different hostnames pointing to
 the same public ip and then the headers will function fine?







 *From:* Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:38 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question



 That would work. However I would just use the same IP for both publically
 and let the host header take care of it.







 *From:* Candee Vaglica [mailto:can...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:35 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question



 I *think* you would need a second public IP address. then you would do a
 one to one with the second public server and the internal website.

 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Chyka, Robert bch...@medaille.edu
 wrote:

 Ok here my scenario:



 I have 2 websites on a Windows Server 2008 box with IIS7.  We are using one
 IP address for both sites using host headers.  On our internal AD DNS we
 have an entry in for both hostnames pointing to the same IP address (A
 records).  For our first site we have a one-to-one NAT translation on our
 ASA with port 80 open on the ACL.



 My question is:  How do I do another one to one NAT translation with a
 different public IP address so I can register both sites with our public DNS
 provider?  We want to be able to have 2 different public ips translated out
 from the 2 websites.



 Thanks for the help and input.



 BOb

























~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-15 Thread Erik Goldoff
+1 on SSL needs

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote:

 The only caveat I can think of is if you ever need to do SSL on more than
 one of the sites.  You'll need different IPs in this case since the host
 header is encrypted.  You can solve the translation problem by adding a
 second internal IP to the server.


 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Kennedy, Jim 
 kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote:

  Yep, it will work exactly like your internal host header set up.







 *From:* Chyka, Robert [mailto:bch...@medaille.edu]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:41 AM

 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question



 Hi Jim,



 So I would just need 1 nat translation on the asa with port 80 open and 2
 entries with our public dns server with 2 different hostnames pointing to
 the same public ip and then the headers will function fine?







 *From:* Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:38 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question



 That would work. However I would just use the same IP for both publically
 and let the host header take care of it.







 *From:* Candee Vaglica [mailto:can...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:35 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question



 I *think* you would need a second public IP address. then you would do a
 one to one with the second public server and the internal website.

 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Chyka, Robert bch...@medaille.edu
 wrote:

 Ok here my scenario:



 I have 2 websites on a Windows Server 2008 box with IIS7.  We are using
 one IP address for both sites using host headers.  On our internal AD DNS we
 have an entry in for both hostnames pointing to the same IP address (A
 records).  For our first site we have a one-to-one NAT translation on our
 ASA with port 80 open on the ACL.



 My question is:  How do I do another one to one NAT translation with a
 different public IP address so I can register both sites with our public DNS
 provider?  We want to be able to have 2 different public ips translated out
 from the 2 websites.



 Thanks for the help and input.



 BOb






























~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Cisco ASA Question/IIS Question

2010-06-15 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Chyka, Robert bch...@medaille.edu wrote:
 My question is:  How do I do another one to one NAT translation with a
 different public IP address so I can register both sites with our public DNS
 provider?

  Sounds like you already got the right answer (just use one IP
address on the public side), but a bit of explanation about the why
behind it:

  One-to-one static NAT means the NAT device translates an IP address
on one side to a different address on the other side.  Nothing else --
it doesn't keep state.  So you can't put two one-to-one NATs using the
same IP address on the private side, because the NAT device would have
no way of knowing which public IP address a given packet is associated
with.

  If you had to do two public IP addresses with one private IP
address, you would have to do some kind of stateful translation on the
NAT device.  Different implementations call this different things,
such as dynamic NAT or port forwarding or NAPT (network
address/port translation) or PAT, etc..  I don't know what Cisco
calls it.

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Cisco ASA Question

2009-02-27 Thread Kelsey, John
Hi all,
   Working on a Cisco ASA 5505, trying to get to a machine on the inside
interface via SSH from a machine on the outside interface.  I can SSH to
the ASA itself, but can't figure out how to get to a host behind it.  I
tried all kinds of ACL's, no joy.  Any suggestions for a ASA noob?
 
Thanks all!
 
***
John C. Kelsey
DuBois Regional Medical Center
(:  814.375.3073  
2  :   814.375.4005
*:   jckel...@drmc.org mailto:jckel...@drmc.org  
***
 
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This 
message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Cisco ASA Question

2009-02-27 Thread Christopher Bodnar
I'm not familiar with the ASA devices, but are you creating a VPN tunnel
through the device first? I would think you would need to do that to
access resources on the internal network. 

 

 

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003

  _  

From: Kelsey, John [mailto:jckel...@drmc.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 9:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cisco ASA Question

 

Hi all,

   Working on a Cisco ASA 5505, trying to get to a machine on the inside
interface via SSH from a machine on the outside interface.  I can SSH to
the ASA itself, but can't figure out how to get to a host behind it.  I
tried all kinds of ACL's, no joy.  Any suggestions for a ASA noob?

 

Thanks all!

 

***
John C. Kelsey

DuBois Regional Medical Center
*:  814.375.3073  
*  :   814.375.4005
*:mailto:jckel...@drmc.org jckel...@drmc.org 
***

 

 

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for
the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

 

 



-
This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the
message and any attachments.  Thank you.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Cisco ASA Question

2009-02-27 Thread Kelsey, John
No VPN.  I thought I could just do port forwarding, but apparently I
can't.
 
 
***
John C. Kelsey
DuBois Regional Medical Center
(:  814.375.3073  
*:   jckel...@drmc.org mailto:jckel...@drmc.org  
***

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 09:48
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question



I'm not familiar with the ASA devices, but are you creating a
VPN tunnel through the device first? I would think you would need to do
that to access resources on the internal network. 

 

 

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003





From: Kelsey, John [mailto:jckel...@drmc.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 9:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cisco ASA Question

 

Hi all,

   Working on a Cisco ASA 5505, trying to get to a machine on
the inside interface via SSH from a machine on the outside interface.  I
can SSH to the ASA itself, but can't figure out how to get to a host
behind it.  I tried all kinds of ACL's, no joy.  Any suggestions for a
ASA noob?

 

Thanks all!

 

***
John C. Kelsey

DuBois Regional Medical Center
*:  814.375.3073  
*  :   814.375.4005
*:   jckel...@drmc.org mailto:jckel...@drmc.org  
***

 

 

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager. This message contains confidential information and
is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named
addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

 

 


 


 









This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution,
copying, or communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately by return e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
Thank you. 

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This 
message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Cisco ASA Question

2009-02-27 Thread Jon Harris
You can I think do the port forwarding but I don't know how.  I have a stack
of books on the ASA that I am only just getting to read.  I have to find out
about the port 80 filtering first (the reason I spent for the books).

Jon

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Kelsey, John jckel...@drmc.org wrote:

  No VPN.  I thought I could just do port forwarding, but apparently I
 can't.


  ***
 *John C. Kelsey
 *DuBois Regional Medical Center
 (:  814.375.3073
 *:   jckel...@drmc.org
 ***

  -Original Message-
 *From:* Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
 *Sent:* Friday, February 27, 2009 09:48
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
  *Subject:* RE: Cisco ASA Question

   I’m not familiar with the ASA devices, but are you creating a VPN tunnel
 through the device first? I would think you would need to do that to access
 resources on the internal network.







 Chris Bodnar, MCSE
 Sr. Systems Engineer
 Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
 Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
 Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
 Phone: 610-807-6459
 Fax: 610-807-6003
  --

 *From:* Kelsey, John [mailto:jckel...@drmc.org]
 *Sent:* Friday, February 27, 2009 9:42 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Cisco ASA Question



 Hi all,

Working on a Cisco ASA 5505, trying to get to a machine on the inside
 interface via SSH from a machine on the outside interface.  I can SSH to the
 ASA itself, but can't figure out how to get to a host behind it.  I tried
 all kinds of ACL's, no joy.  Any suggestions for a ASA noob?



 Thanks all!



 ***
 *John C. Kelsey*

 DuBois Regional Medical Center
 (:  814.375.3073
 2  :   814.375.4005
 *:   jckel...@drmc.org
 ***





 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
 solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
 If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
 This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
 individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
 disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.










  --

 *This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is
 privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
 If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
 notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or
 communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received
 this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail
 and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. *


 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
 solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
 If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
 This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
 individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
 disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.







~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Cisco ASA Question

2009-02-27 Thread Rohyans, Aaron
1.1.1.1= Outside IP Address

192.168.1.1 = Inside Host IP Address

 

Asa(config)# static (inside,outside) tcp 1.1.1.1 22 192.168.1.1 22
netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

Asa(config)# access-list OUTSIDE_ACCESS_IN permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1
eq 22

Asa(config)# access-group OUTSIDE_ACCESS_IN in interface outside

 

Hope this helps,

 

Aaron T. Rohyans
Senior Network Engineer

CCIE #21945, CCSP, CCNA, CQS-Firewall, CQS-IDS, CQS-VPN, ISSP, CISP,
JNCIA-ER

DPSciences Corporation
7400 N. Shadeland Ave., Suite 245

Indianapolis, IN 46250
Office:  (317) 348-0099
Fax:   (317) 849-7134
arohy...@dpsciences.com mailto:dwiss...@dpsciences.com 
http://www.dpsciences.com/

 

From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 10:10 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cisco ASA Question

 

You can I think do the port forwarding but I don't know how.  I have a
stack of books on the ASA that I am only just getting to read.  I have
to find out about the port 80 filtering first (the reason I spent for
the books).

 

Jon

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Kelsey, John jckel...@drmc.org wrote:

No VPN.  I thought I could just do port forwarding, but apparently I
can't.

 

 

***
John C. Kelsey
DuBois Regional Medical Center
(:  814.375.3073  

*:   jckel...@drmc.org mailto:jckel...@drmc.org  
***

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 09:48
To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question

I'm not familiar with the ASA devices, but are you creating a
VPN tunnel through the device first? I would think you would need to do
that to access resources on the internal network. 

 

 

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003



From: Kelsey, John [mailto:jckel...@drmc.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 9:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cisco ASA Question

 

Hi all,

   Working on a Cisco ASA 5505, trying to get to a machine on
the inside interface via SSH from a machine on the outside interface.  I
can SSH to the ASA itself, but can't figure out how to get to a host
behind it.  I tried all kinds of ACL's, no joy.  Any suggestions for a
ASA noob?

 

Thanks all!

 

***
John C. Kelsey

DuBois Regional Medical Center
(:  814.375.3073  
2  :   814.375.4005
*:   jckel...@drmc.org mailto:jckel...@drmc.org  
***

 

 

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager. This message contains confidential information and
is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named
addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

 

 

 

 

 



This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution,
copying, or communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately by return e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
Thank you. 

 

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the
system manager. This message contains confidential information and is
intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named
addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Cisco ASA Question

2009-02-27 Thread John Hornbuckle
Amateur!

;-)

From: Rohyans, Aaron [mailto:arohy...@dpsciences.com]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 10:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question


1.1.1.1= Outside IP Address
192.168.1.1 = Inside Host IP Address

Asa(config)# static (inside,outside) tcp 1.1.1.1 22 192.168.1.1 22 netmask 
255.255.255.255 0 0
Asa(config)# access-list OUTSIDE_ACCESS_IN permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq 22
Asa(config)# access-group OUTSIDE_ACCESS_IN in interface outside

Hope this helps,

Aaron T. Rohyans
Senior Network Engineer
CCIE #21945, CCSP, CCNA, CQS-Firewall, CQS-IDS, CQS-VPN, ISSP, CISP, JNCIA-ER
DPSciences Corporation
7400 N. Shadeland Ave., Suite 245
Indianapolis, IN 46250
Office:  (317) 348-0099
Fax:   (317) 849-7134
arohy...@dpsciences.commailto:dwiss...@dpsciences.com
http://www.dpsciences.com/

From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 10:10 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cisco ASA Question

You can I think do the port forwarding but I don't know how.  I have a stack of 
books on the ASA that I am only just getting to read.  I have to find out about 
the port 80 filtering first (the reason I spent for the books).

Jon
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Kelsey, John 
jckel...@drmc.orgmailto:jckel...@drmc.org wrote:
No VPN.  I thought I could just do port forwarding, but apparently I can't.


***
John C. Kelsey
DuBois Regional Medical Center
*:  814.375.3073
*:   jckel...@drmc.orgmailto:jckel...@drmc.org
***
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Bodnar 
[mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.commailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 09:48
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA Question

I'm not familiar with the ASA devices, but are you creating a VPN tunnel 
through the device first? I would think you would need to do that to access 
resources on the internal network.







Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.commailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003



From: Kelsey, John [mailto:jckel...@drmc.orgmailto:jckel...@drmc.org]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 9:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cisco ASA Question



Hi all,

   Working on a Cisco ASA 5505, trying to get to a machine on the inside 
interface via SSH from a machine on the outside interface.  I can SSH to the 
ASA itself, but can't figure out how to get to a host behind it.  I tried all 
kinds of ACL's, no joy.  Any suggestions for a ASA noob?



Thanks all!



***
John C. Kelsey

DuBois Regional Medical Center
*:  814.375.3073
*  :   814.375.4005
*:   jckel...@drmc.orgmailto:jckel...@drmc.org
***





This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This 
message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.












This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is 
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If 
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that 
any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of this message 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments. Thank you.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This 
message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.















~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~