RE: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box

2011-04-15 Thread Brian Desmond
If there isn't a problem they're causing I wouldn't go messing with it. Much of 
this stuff is core to the OS and they aren't likely to have done any testing 
with it turned off...

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c   - 312.731.3132

From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 5:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box

2008 R2 seems to have a vast array of pre-configured scheduled tasks. I can see 
the benefit from stuff like the Time Sync, IP address conflict, and Disk 
Defragmenter, but are all the others strictly required? I'm trying to 
streamline Terminal Services boxes and I'm thinking about disabling some of 
these tasks, are there any gotchas I should be aware of?

TIA,



JRR

--
On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the 
machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly 
to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.

IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) 
named above and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or 
unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of 
humour or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, 
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not authorised 
(either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social faux pas.

Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context somewhere 
other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or no grammatical use 
and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, 
although the kelpie next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell you. 
Those of you with an overwhelming fear of the unknown will be gratified to 
learn that there is no hidden message revealed by reading this warning 
backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice from Microsoft.

However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your computer 
you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you have received 
this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites, whisk and place in 
a warm oven for 40 minutes.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box

2011-04-15 Thread Harry Singh
rant on

While I really like 2008/2008R2 I'm a bit at a loss trying to understand why
there would be Tasks which would be considered core to the OS even visible.
I'm not a software developer, but why make important scheduled tasks
,strictly designed for the OS, clearly visible to the server admin..

rant off



On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.comwrote:

 *If there isn’t a problem they’re causing I wouldn’t go messing with it.
 Much of this stuff is core to the OS and they aren’t likely to have done any
 testing with it turned off…*

 * *

 *Thanks,*

 *Brian Desmond*

 *br...@briandesmond.com*

 * *

 *w – 312.625.1438 | c   – 312.731.3132*

 * *

 *From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, April 12, 2011 5:25 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box



 2008 R2 seems to have a vast array of pre-configured scheduled tasks. I can
 see the benefit from stuff like the Time Sync, IP address conflict, and Disk
 Defragmenter, but are all the others strictly required? I'm trying to
 streamline Terminal Services boxes and I'm thinking about disabling some of
 these tasks, are there any gotchas I should be aware of?

 TIA,



 JRR

 --
 On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into
 the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able
 rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such
 a question.

 *IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual
 addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential,
 privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem,
 no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the
 intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email
 is not authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an
 irritating social faux pas.

 Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context
 somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or no
 grammatical use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the
 transmission of this email, although the kelpie next door is living on
 borrowed time, let me tell you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of
 the unknown will be gratified to learn that there is no hidden message
 revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice
 from Microsoft.

 However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your
 computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you have
 received this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites, whisk
 and place in a warm oven for 40 minutes.*

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box

2011-04-15 Thread Michael B. Smith
It’s part of the very modular redesign of 2008+. I think it’s great. It gives 
you control when you NEED IT.

And secondly, in order to see many of the tasks, you have to enable “view 
hidden tasks”.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box

rant on

While I really like 2008/2008R2 I'm a bit at a loss trying to understand why 
there would be Tasks which would be considered core to the OS even visible. I'm 
not a software developer, but why make important scheduled tasks ,strictly 
designed for the OS, clearly visible to the server admin..

rant off


On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Brian Desmond 
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com wrote:
If there isn’t a problem they’re causing I wouldn’t go messing with it. Much of 
this stuff is core to the OS and they aren’t likely to have done any testing 
with it turned off…

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w – 312.625.1438tel:312.625.1438 | c   – 312.731.3132tel:312.731.3132

From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 5:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box

2008 R2 seems to have a vast array of pre-configured scheduled tasks. I can see 
the benefit from stuff like the Time Sync, IP address conflict, and Disk 
Defragmenter, but are all the others strictly required? I'm trying to 
streamline Terminal Services boxes and I'm thinking about disabling some of 
these tasks, are there any gotchas I should be aware of?

TIA,



JRR

--
On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the 
machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly 
to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.

IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) 
named above and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or 
unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of 
humour or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, 
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not authorised 
(either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social faux pas.

Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context somewhere 
other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or no grammatical use 
and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, 
although the kelpie next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell you. 
Those of you with an overwhelming fear of the unknown will be gratified to 
learn that there is no hidden message revealed by reading this warning 
backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice from Microsoft.

However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your computer 
you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you have received 
this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites, whisk and place in 
a warm oven for 40 minutes.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


Re: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box

2011-04-15 Thread Andrew S. Baker
I'd recommend leaving them.  :)

The OS handles them just fine without any performance issue that I'm aware
of.

Plus what Brian said...



*ASB *(Professional Bio http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker/bio)
 *Technology Services that Maximize Business Results...

 *



On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 6:25 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:

 2008 R2 seems to have a vast array of pre-configured scheduled tasks. I can
 see the benefit from stuff like the Time Sync, IP address conflict, and Disk
 Defragmenter, but are all the others strictly required? I'm trying to
 streamline Terminal Services boxes and I'm thinking about disabling some of
 these tasks, are there any gotchas I should be aware of?

 TIA,



 JRR



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box

2011-04-15 Thread Andrew S. Baker
AND, if you're not using admin credentials, you won't see any but the ones
you have rights to.



*ASB *(Professional Bio http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker/bio)
 *Technology Services that Maximize Business Results...

 *



On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote:

  It’s part of the very modular redesign of 2008+. I think it’s great. It
 gives you control when you NEED IT.



 And secondly, in order to see many of the tasks, you have to enable “view
 hidden tasks”.



 Regards,



 Michael B. Smith

 Consultant and Exchange MVP

 http://TheEssentialExchange.com



 *From:* Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Friday, April 15, 2011 12:31 PM

 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Re: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box



 rant on



 While I really like 2008/2008R2 I'm a bit at a loss trying to understand
 why there would be Tasks which would be considered core to the OS even
 visible. I'm not a software developer, but why make important scheduled
 tasks ,strictly designed for the OS, clearly visible to the server admin..



 rant off





 On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com
 wrote:

 *If there isn’t a problem they’re causing I wouldn’t go messing with it.
 Much of this stuff is core to the OS and they aren’t likely to have done any
 testing with it turned off…*

 * *

 *Thanks,*

 *Brian Desmond*

 *br...@briandesmond.com*

 * *

 *w – 312.625.1438 | c   – 312.731.3132*

 * *

 *From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, April 12, 2011 5:25 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box



 2008 R2 seems to have a vast array of pre-configured scheduled tasks. I can
 see the benefit from stuff like the Time Sync, IP address conflict, and Disk
 Defragmenter, but are all the others strictly required? I'm trying to
 streamline Terminal Services boxes and I'm thinking about disabling some of
 these tasks, are there any gotchas I should be aware of?

 TIA,



 JRR



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box

2011-04-15 Thread Steven Peck
I think it's great too.  Lots of built in examples of what is going on with
your system and what times it happens.  We have one system that does it's
most intensive work at night, so we were able to move the 'ScheduledDefrag'
from 1am to 1pm when the system is sleeping.
Steven Peck
http://www.blkmtn.org



On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote:

  It’s part of the very modular redesign of 2008+. I think it’s great. It
 gives you control when you NEED IT.



 And secondly, in order to see many of the tasks, you have to enable “view
 hidden tasks”.



 Regards,



 Michael B. Smith

 Consultant and Exchange MVP

 http://TheEssentialExchange.com



 *From:* Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Friday, April 15, 2011 12:31 PM

 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Re: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box



 rant on



 While I really like 2008/2008R2 I'm a bit at a loss trying to understand
 why there would be Tasks which would be considered core to the OS even
 visible. I'm not a software developer, but why make important scheduled
 tasks ,strictly designed for the OS, clearly visible to the server admin..



 rant off





 On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com
 wrote:

 *If there isn’t a problem they’re causing I wouldn’t go messing with it.
 Much of this stuff is core to the OS and they aren’t likely to have done any
 testing with it turned off…*

 * *

 *Thanks,*

 *Brian Desmond*

 *br...@briandesmond.com*

 * *

 *w – 312.625.1438 | c   – 312.731.3132*

 * *

 *From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, April 12, 2011 5:25 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box



 2008 R2 seems to have a vast array of pre-configured scheduled tasks. I can
 see the benefit from stuff like the Time Sync, IP address conflict, and Disk
 Defragmenter, but are all the others strictly required? I'm trying to
 streamline Terminal Services boxes and I'm thinking about disabling some of
 these tasks, are there any gotchas I should be aware of?

 TIA,



 JRR

 --
 On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into
 the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able
 rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such
 a question.

 *IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual
 addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential,
 privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem,
 no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the
 intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email
 is not authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an
 irritating social faux pas.

 Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context
 somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or no
 grammatical use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the
 transmission of this email, although the kelpie next door is living on
 borrowed time, let me tell you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of
 the unknown will be gratified to learn that there is no hidden message
 revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice
 from Microsoft.

 However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your
 computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you have
 received this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites, whisk
 and place in a warm oven for 40 minutes.*

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog

RE: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

2009-08-13 Thread David Lum
All these ways to get around what EE is trying to accomplish ist *anything* 
like piracy righ� ? To each his own, but here���s what I did: Answered 
enough Q's so that it's free...I think it takes 5000 points or something, but I 
did that years ago and have never paid for it since. Answering Q's on there is 
a great challenge for your skills - it's not completely different than the Q's 
posted here, except you get points that earn your way towards free membership, 
and you get an even broader scope of challenges than this list (if y�re 
into such things).

Challenge yourself, sign up and see if you can answer the questions before some 
of the pros on there.

Yes, I have also paid for an EventID.NET subscription,�m weird���

David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764




-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 5:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

Like I said- in a Google search in IE you can look at the cached results.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
 Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud

- Original Message -
From: Angus Scott-Fleming angu...@geoapps.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Mon Aug 10 20:00:48 2009
Subject: Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

On 10 Aug 2009 at 14:22, Micheal Espinola Jr  wrote:

 Contrary to popular belief, you do NOT have to sign up for
 ExpertSexchange in order to see solutions. All the replies and
 solutions are at the bottom of the page - past the adverts, etc...

That may be true if you have scripting disabled.  I believe it hides the
answers if you have scripting enabled.

--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

2009-08-11 Thread Maglinger, Paul
I doesn't show the recommended solution though... 

-Original Message-
From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:angu...@geoapps.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 7:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

On 10 Aug 2009 at 14:22, Micheal Espinola Jr  wrote:

 Contrary to popular belief, you do NOT have to sign up for 
 ExpertSexchange in order to see solutions. All the replies and 
 solutions are at the bottom of the page - past the adverts, etc...

That may be true if you have scripting disabled.  I believe it hides the

answers if you have scripting enabled.

--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



RE: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

2009-08-11 Thread John Cook
Nice tip, thanks!

John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4


-Original Message-
From: Mike Gill [mailto:lis...@canbyfoursquare.com]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 8:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

Almost. Once you're looking at the cached page, the answers are still 
obfuscated 9 times out of 10. In the top right, click plain text version and 
behold.

--
Mike Gill

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 5:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

Like I said- in a Google search in IE you can look at the cached results.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
 Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud

- Original Message -
From: Angus Scott-Fleming angu...@geoapps.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Mon Aug 10 20:00:48 2009
Subject: Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

On 10 Aug 2009 at 14:22, Micheal Espinola Jr  wrote:

 Contrary to popular belief, you do NOT have to sign up for
 ExpertSexchange in order to see solutions. All the replies and
 solutions are at the bottom of the page - past the adverts, etc...

That may be true if you have scripting disabled.  I believe it hides the
answers if you have scripting enabled.

--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

2009-08-11 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
That's wild.  I've never had an issue scrolling down to see the answers.
IE, FF, blocking JS, or not.

I just did 5 random searches with vanilla IE7 and had no issues.  What kind
of blocking are people seeing?

--
ME2


On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:30 AM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote:

 Nice tip, thanks!

 John W. Cook
 Systems Administrator
 Partnership For Strong Families
 315 SE 2nd Ave
 Gainesville, Fl 32601
 Office (352) 393-2741 x320
 Cell (352) 215-6944
 Fax (352) 393-2746
 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4


 -Original Message-
 From: Mike Gill [mailto:lis...@canbyfoursquare.com]
 Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 8:27 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

 Almost. Once you're looking at the cached page, the answers are still
 obfuscated 9 times out of 10. In the top right, click plain text version
 and behold.

 --
 Mike Gill

 -Original Message-
 From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
 Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 5:09 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

 Like I said- in a Google search in IE you can look at the cached results.
 John W. Cook
 Systems Administrator
 Partnership For Strong Families
  Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud

 - Original Message -
 From: Angus Scott-Fleming angu...@geoapps.com
 To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 Sent: Mon Aug 10 20:00:48 2009
 Subject: Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

 On 10 Aug 2009 at 14:22, Micheal Espinola Jr  wrote:

  Contrary to popular belief, you do NOT have to sign up for
  ExpertSexchange in order to see solutions. All the replies and
  solutions are at the bottom of the page - past the adverts, etc...

 That may be true if you have scripting disabled.  I believe it hides the
 answers if you have scripting enabled.

 --
 Angus Scott-Fleming
 GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
 1-520-290-5038
 +---+




 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
 attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
 which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
 confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
 dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
 information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
 the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
 may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
 of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
 unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
 and/or criminal penalties.
  Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
 need to.

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
 attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
 which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
 confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
 dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
 information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
 the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
 may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
 of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
 unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
 and/or criminal penalties.
  Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
 need to.

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

2009-08-10 Thread Michael . Leone
Angus Scott-Fleming angu...@geoapps.com wrote on 08/08/2009 10:20:08 
PM:

 On 7 Aug 2009 at 13:21, Christopher  wrote:
 
  luck. I also googled a bit, but could only find an Expert's Exchange 
  question (that sounded exactly like my problem) but of course I'm not 
  signing up andpaying any cash for it.
 
 Often if you can set your browser's User Agent to GoogleBot you'll
 be granted 
 full access to the page.  Only a few sites are 'smart' enough to match 
the 
 GoogleBot agent against a list of known googlebot IPs ;-)
 
 The Agent String I use is Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.googlebot.
 com/bot.html) 

What works for me: if an Expert's Exchange link comes up in a Google 
search, I click on the cached link of that entry. Then, I click on the 
text only view when the cached version comes up. That usually lets you 
see the thread, without having to sign up. Or it used to, anyway.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

2009-08-10 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Contrary to popular belief, you do NOT have to sign up for ExpertSexchange
in order to see solutions.  All the replies and solutions are at the bottom
of the page - past the adverts, etc...


--
ME2


On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:37 AM, michael.le...@pha.phila.gov wrote:


 Angus Scott-Fleming angu...@geoapps.com wrote on 08/08/2009 10:20:08
 PM:

  On 7 Aug 2009 at 13:21, Christopher  wrote:
 
   luck. I also googled a bit, but could only find an Expert's Exchange
   question (that sounded exactly like my problem) but of course I'm not
   signing up andpaying any cash for it.
 
  Often if you can set your browser's User Agent to GoogleBot you'll
  be granted
  full access to the page.  Only a few sites are 'smart' enough to match
 the
  GoogleBot agent against a list of known googlebot IPs ;-)
 
  The Agent String I use is Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.googlebot.
  com/bot.html)


 What works for me: if an Expert's Exchange link comes up in a Google
 search, I click on the cached link of that entry. Then, I click on the
 text only view when the cached version comes up. That usually lets you see
 the thread, without having to sign up. Or it used to, anyway.







~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

2009-08-10 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 10 Aug 2009 at 14:22, Micheal Espinola Jr  wrote:

 Contrary to popular belief, you do NOT have to sign up for 
 ExpertSexchange in order to see solutions. All the replies and 
 solutions are at the bottom of the page - past the adverts, etc...

That may be true if you have scripting disabled.  I believe it hides the 
answers if you have scripting enabled.

--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

2009-08-10 Thread John Cook
Like I said- in a Google search in IE you can look at the cached results.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
 Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud

- Original Message -
From: Angus Scott-Fleming angu...@geoapps.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Mon Aug 10 20:00:48 2009
Subject: Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

On 10 Aug 2009 at 14:22, Micheal Espinola Jr  wrote:

 Contrary to popular belief, you do NOT have to sign up for
 ExpertSexchange in order to see solutions. All the replies and
 solutions are at the bottom of the page - past the adverts, etc...

That may be true if you have scripting disabled.  I believe it hides the
answers if you have scripting enabled.

--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

2009-08-10 Thread Mike Gill
Almost. Once you're looking at the cached page, the answers are still 
obfuscated 9 times out of 10. In the top right, click plain text version and 
behold.

-- 
Mike Gill

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] 
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 5:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

Like I said- in a Google search in IE you can look at the cached results.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
 Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud

- Original Message -
From: Angus Scott-Fleming angu...@geoapps.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Mon Aug 10 20:00:48 2009
Subject: Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

On 10 Aug 2009 at 14:22, Micheal Espinola Jr  wrote:

 Contrary to popular belief, you do NOT have to sign up for
 ExpertSexchange in order to see solutions. All the replies and
 solutions are at the bottom of the page - past the adverts, etc...

That may be true if you have scripting disabled.  I believe it hides the
answers if you have scripting enabled.

--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

2009-08-09 Thread Andrew S. Baker
If the jobs only need local access, run them as the SYSTEM account (no
password), which will avoid all the logon-logoff issues, and also avoid any
password changing complexities as well.


-ASB
---
 http://Home.ASBzone.com/ASB/
 http://www.linkedin.com/in/AndrewBaker
---



On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Christopher c.bo...@gmail.com wrote:

 OK - here's the scenario. Windows XP, SP2 workstaions joined to a domain..
 User has several scheduled tasks that run every 5 minutes.  The tasks
 basically just run a batch file that looks for a specific file in a
 direcory. If it finds it, it runs another batch file that performs a few
 other misc. checks and then actually calls an executable to process these
 large data sets.

 This is all basically to allow the user to have these data processing runs
 happen automatically, no matter who has the workstation locked, etc.. all he
 has to do is drop data in a specific folder and create one file over the
 network and within the next 5 minutes, it starts up.

 After working out a few GPO issues that were kicking the users out of the
 Log on as batch job user right, the jobs run fine.  The problem now, is
 that if the owner of the job (whoever's credentials it's running under) is
 logged in when the job kicks off, the processes that were started by the
 scheduled task are killed.  This doesn't happen if the owner of the job is
 not logged on, or any other user is logged on, of course.  My assumption is
 that only the initial batch file called by the scheduled task is run under
 the batch login type, so if the scheduled task was directly calling the
 executable then it would stay running, but since this the job is runnig a
 batch file that is calling another batch file, which in turn is actually
 calling the executable, the exe doesn't run under the batch type login and
 is killed just like every other user proccess when he logs off.

 I looked at a few shell commands to see if there was any specific way to
 call the 2nd batch file, or executable, that would run it under the same
 logon that the original batch file was run under but didn't hae any luck.  I
 also googled a bit, but could only find an Expert's Exchange question (that
 sounded exactly like my problem) but of course I'm not signing up and paying
 any cash for it.

 Any thoughts, suggestions, flames?  Also, if there is a better way to
 accomplish this, I wouldn't mind hearing it.   Thanks in advance..

 -cb








~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

2009-08-08 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 7 Aug 2009 at 13:21, Christopher  wrote:

 luck. I also googled a bit, but could only find an Expert's Exchange 
 question (that sounded exactly like my problem) but of course I'm not 
 signing up andpaying any cash for it.

Often if you can set your browser's User Agent to GoogleBot you'll be granted 
full access to the page.  Only a few sites are 'smart' enough to match the 
GoogleBot agent against a list of known googlebot IPs ;-)

The Agent String I use is Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.googlebot.com/bot.html) 
...


--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

2009-08-08 Thread John Cook
You can also open the cached version from a Google search, you have to scroll 
down a ways but a lot of the comments are there. HTH

John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4

-Original Message-
From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:angu...@geoapps.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 10:20 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

On 7 Aug 2009 at 13:21, Christopher  wrote:

 luck. I also googled a bit, but could only find an Expert's Exchange
 question (that sounded exactly like my problem) but of course I'm not
 signing up andpaying any cash for it.

Often if you can set your browser's User Agent to GoogleBot you'll be granted
full access to the page.  Only a few sites are 'smart' enough to match the
GoogleBot agent against a list of known googlebot IPs ;-)

The Agent String I use is Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.googlebot.com/bot.html)
...


--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

2009-08-07 Thread Christopher
Oops, I take that back... the specific workstation in question is SP3, but I
honestly think that won't matter in the end.. :)

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

2009-08-07 Thread Joe Tinney
Christopher,

If you scroll beneath all the advertisements on the
Experts Exchange page you can see the responses, typically. If that
doesn't work then send me the link and I'll send you the responses to
see if they help.

 

Have you used Process Explorer to verify the credentials and rights the
process has when it is running? You should be able to see that.
http://live.sysinternals.com/procexp.exe 

 

Good luck,

Joe 

 

From: Christopher [mailto:c.bo...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 2:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

 

OK - here's the scenario. Windows XP, SP2 workstaions joined to a
domain..  User has several scheduled tasks that run every 5 minutes.
The tasks basically just run a batch file that looks for a specific file
in a direcory. If it finds it, it runs another batch file that performs
a few other misc. checks and then actually calls an executable to
process these large data sets.

 

This is all basically to allow the user to have these data processing
runs happen automatically, no matter who has the workstation locked,
etc.. all he has to do is drop data in a specific folder and create one
file over the network and within the next 5 minutes, it starts up.

 

After working out a few GPO issues that were kicking the users out of
the Log on as batch job user right, the jobs run fine.  The problem
now, is that if the owner of the job (whoever's credentials it's running
under) is logged in when the job kicks off, the processes that were
started by the scheduled task are killed.  This doesn't happen if the
owner of the job is not logged on, or any other user is logged on, of
course.  My assumption is that only the initial batch file called by the
scheduled task is run under the batch login type, so if the scheduled
task was directly calling the executable then it would stay running, but
since this the job is runnig a batch file that is calling another batch
file, which in turn is actually calling the executable, the exe doesn't
run under the batch type login and is killed just like every other user
proccess when he logs off.

 

I looked at a few shell commands to see if there was any specific way to
call the 2nd batch file, or executable, that would run it under the same
logon that the original batch file was run under but didn't hae any
luck.  I also googled a bit, but could only find an Expert's Exchange
question (that sounded exactly like my problem) but of course I'm not
signing up and paying any cash for it.

 

Any thoughts, suggestions, flames?  Also, if there is a better way to
accomplish this, I wouldn't mind hearing it.   Thanks in advance..

 

-cb

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

2009-08-07 Thread Christopher Bodnar
My suggestion is to create a service account that will never log on
interactively to the workstation. Have that account's credentials execute
the batch file. 

 

 

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003

  _  

From: c.bo...@gmail.com [mailto:c.bo...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 2:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

 

OK - here's the scenario. Windows XP, SP2 workstaions joined to a domain..
User has several scheduled tasks that run every 5 minutes.  The tasks
basically just run a batch file that looks for a specific file in a
direcory. If it finds it, it runs another batch file that performs a few
other misc. checks and then actually calls an executable to process these
large data sets.

 

This is all basically to allow the user to have these data processing runs
happen automatically, no matter who has the workstation locked, etc.. all
he has to do is drop data in a specific folder and create one file over
the network and within the next 5 minutes, it starts up.

 

After working out a few GPO issues that were kicking the users out of the
Log on as batch job user right, the jobs run fine.  The problem now, is
that if the owner of the job (whoever's credentials it's running under) is
logged in when the job kicks off, the processes that were started by the
scheduled task are killed.  This doesn't happen if the owner of the job is
not logged on, or any other user is logged on, of course.  My assumption
is that only the initial batch file called by the scheduled task is run
under the batch login type, so if the scheduled task was directly calling
the executable then it would stay running, but since this the job is
runnig a batch file that is calling another batch file, which in turn is
actually calling the executable, the exe doesn't run under the batch type
login and is killed just like every other user proccess when he logs off.

 

I looked at a few shell commands to see if there was any specific way to
call the 2nd batch file, or executable, that would run it under the same
logon that the original batch file was run under but didn't hae any luck.
I also googled a bit, but could only find an Expert's Exchange question
(that sounded exactly like my problem) but of course I'm not signing up
and paying any cash for it.

 

Any thoughts, suggestions, flames?  Also, if there is a better way to
accomplish this, I wouldn't mind hearing it.   Thanks in advance..

 

-cb

 

 

 



-
This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the
message and any attachments.  Thank you.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Scheduled Tasks/Batch logons, etc

2009-08-07 Thread Christopher
Wow, Thanks Joe.. I feel like an idiot now.  I could've sworn I'd scrolled
all the way down looking for the solution when visiting the site from a
google search (which has happened several times) but I guess not.



And Thanks Christopher,

Creating a dedicated account for it would work, I'll just have to work out
permissions issues..



A side-bar to this, is there any way  to set it up so that a user can alter
the priority of another users processes (without Admin privileges, of
course)?

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: scheduled tasks

2008-01-09 Thread James Rankin
The at or soon commands run via a logon or startup script should be able to
do this methinks, although there is doubtless an easier way...

On 09/01/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 We want to setup a scheduled task on client PCs that run cleanmgr and
 defrag.  What is the best way of handling this?  All clients have the same
 local administrator password so we could setup scheduled tasks that run
 under the local admin id.  How best to deploy?

 
 Jon Bjerke
 Systems Administrator
 Communications Data Group
 102 S Duncan Road
 Champaign, IL  61822-2818
 217-355-8400 x322

 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]








-- 
James Rankin
Tel: +44 7902 193912

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: scheduled tasks

2008-01-09 Thread Michael B. Smith
Personally, I would go for this way: schtasks /create /?

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 9:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: scheduled tasks

 



We want to setup a scheduled task on client PCs that run cleanmgr and
defrag.  What is the best way of handling this?  All clients have the same
local administrator password so we could setup scheduled tasks that run
under the local admin id.  How best to deploy?   


Jon Bjerke
Systems Administrator
Communications Data Group
102 S Duncan Road
Champaign, IL  61822-2818
217-355-8400 x322

 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]








 


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

Re: scheduled tasks

2008-01-09 Thread James Rankin
The schtasks syntax even tells you it replaces at.exe - shows you how long
it is since I did something like that  :-

On 09/01/2008, Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  Personally, I would go for this way: schtasks /create /?



 Regards,



 Michael B. Smith

 MCSE/Exchange MVP

 http://TheEssentialExchange.com



 *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *Sent:* Wednesday, January 09, 2008 9:35 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* scheduled tasks





 We want to setup a scheduled task on client PCs that run cleanmgr and
 defrag.  What is the best way of handling this?  All clients have the same
 local administrator password so we could setup scheduled tasks that run
 under the local admin id.  How best to deploy?

 
 Jon Bjerke
 Systems Administrator
 Communications Data Group
 102 S Duncan Road
 Champaign, IL  61822-2818
 217-355-8400 x322

 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

















-- 
James Rankin
Tel: +44 7902 193912

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Scheduled Tasks

2001-08-17 Thread Dowling, Glenn

Stephen:

In the properties of the specific task, set the Run As section to run as
the particular user (e.g. yourself or a service account) and type in that
login's password.

Glenn M. Dowling
NT System Administrator
IBM Global Services @ Lucent Technologies


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:57
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Scheduled Tasks


THis may have been covered before, but I think I missed it.  Anyway, anyone
know how to make a scheduled task win windows 2000 server run an item
without being logged into a user at the physical machine?  I figured out
that that was what was happening with my tasks, I was getting the 0X1 error
because I was running from terminal services, but no one had physically
logged onto the computer.

Stephen


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




RE: Scheduled Tasks

2001-08-17 Thread Stephen Chiang

I am running it with a domain administrator account.

-Original Message-
From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


Stephen:

In the properties of the specific task, set the Run As section to run as
the particular user (e.g. yourself or a service account) and type in that
login's password.

Glenn M. Dowling
NT System Administrator
IBM Global Services @ Lucent Technologies


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:57
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Scheduled Tasks


THis may have been covered before, but I think I missed it.  Anyway, anyone
know how to make a scheduled task win windows 2000 server run an item
without being logged into a user at the physical machine?  I figured out
that that was what was happening with my tasks, I was getting the 0X1 error
because I was running from terminal services, but no one had physically
logged onto the computer.

Stephen


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




RE: Scheduled Tasks

2001-08-17 Thread Stephen Chiang

Yes, if I log on physically or via remote control software and run the task,
it completes fine, if I do it via terminal services while that I'm still
logged in via the remote control software, it also runs fine, if I am logged
out, and I try it via terminal services, it fails.  I have the accounted on
the particular task itself- the Task Scheduler service will only run off the
local system.

Stephen


-Original Message-
From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


Can you run the task from the server logged in as that particular account?
Where do you have the account listed -- in the Task Scheduler service or the
particular task itself?

 Glenn M. Dowling
 IBM Global Services @ Lucent Technologies
 Work: 732.949.6456
 Fax: 732.834.6413
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 13:27
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


I am running it with a domain administrator account.

-Original Message-
From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


Stephen:

In the properties of the specific task, set the Run As section to run as
the particular user (e.g. yourself or a service account) and type in that
login's password.

Glenn M. Dowling
NT System Administrator
IBM Global Services @ Lucent Technologies


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:57
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Scheduled Tasks


THis may have been covered before, but I think I missed it.  Anyway, anyone
know how to make a scheduled task win windows 2000 server run an item
without being logged into a user at the physical machine?  I figured out
that that was what was happening with my tasks, I was getting the 0X1 error
because I was running from terminal services, but no one had physically
logged onto the computer.

Stephen


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




RE: Scheduled Tasks

2001-08-17 Thread Dowling, Glenn

What does the Task Scheduler log say?


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 14:33
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


Yes, if I log on physically or via remote control software and run the task,
it completes fine, if I do it via terminal services while that I'm still
logged in via the remote control software, it also runs fine, if I am logged
out, and I try it via terminal services, it fails.  I have the accounted on
the particular task itself- the Task Scheduler service will only run off the
local system.

Stephen


-Original Message-
From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


Can you run the task from the server logged in as that particular account?
Where do you have the account listed -- in the Task Scheduler service or the
particular task itself?

 Glenn M. Dowling
 IBM Global Services @ Lucent Technologies
 Work: 732.949.6456
 Fax: 732.834.6413
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 13:27
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


I am running it with a domain administrator account.

-Original Message-
From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


Stephen:

In the properties of the specific task, set the Run As section to run as
the particular user (e.g. yourself or a service account) and type in that
login's password.

Glenn M. Dowling
NT System Administrator
IBM Global Services @ Lucent Technologies


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:57
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Scheduled Tasks


THis may have been covered before, but I think I missed it.  Anyway, anyone
know how to make a scheduled task win windows 2000 server run an item
without being logged into a user at the physical machine?  I figured out
that that was what was happening with my tasks, I was getting the 0X1 error
because I was running from terminal services, but no one had physically
logged onto the computer.

Stephen


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




RE: Scheduled Tasks

2001-08-17 Thread Stephen Chiang

Started 8/17/2001 12:07:00 AM
w1rename.job (w1rename.bat)
Finished 8/17/2001 12:07:00 AM
Result: The task completed with an exit code of (1).

exit code of 1 means it didnt complete the job.



-Original Message-
From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


What does the Task Scheduler log say?


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 14:33
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


Yes, if I log on physically or via remote control software and run the task,
it completes fine, if I do it via terminal services while that I'm still
logged in via the remote control software, it also runs fine, if I am logged
out, and I try it via terminal services, it fails.  I have the accounted on
the particular task itself- the Task Scheduler service will only run off the
local system.

Stephen


-Original Message-
From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


Can you run the task from the server logged in as that particular account?
Where do you have the account listed -- in the Task Scheduler service or the
particular task itself?

 Glenn M. Dowling
 IBM Global Services @ Lucent Technologies
 Work: 732.949.6456
 Fax: 732.834.6413
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 13:27
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


I am running it with a domain administrator account.

-Original Message-
From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


Stephen:

In the properties of the specific task, set the Run As section to run as
the particular user (e.g. yourself or a service account) and type in that
login's password.

Glenn M. Dowling
NT System Administrator
IBM Global Services @ Lucent Technologies


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:57
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Scheduled Tasks


THis may have been covered before, but I think I missed it.  Anyway, anyone
know how to make a scheduled task win windows 2000 server run an item
without being logged into a user at the physical machine?  I figured out
that that was what was happening with my tasks, I was getting the 0X1 error
because I was running from terminal services, but no one had physically
logged onto the computer.

Stephen


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




RE: Scheduled Tasks

2001-08-17 Thread Bunting, Jeff

Your batch file needs to open a command shell in order to execute its
commands:

cmd /c C:\Program Files\wirename.bat

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Spencer Kent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


.. rename the job to .CMD and try it.

Kent

--- Dowling, Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Do you have the full path to the batch job listed in
 the task (e.g.
 C:\Program Files\wirename.bat) or just the batch job
 name?  The computer
 might not know where the file is located.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 14:51
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks
 
 
   Started 8/17/2001 12:07:00 AM
 w1rename.job (w1rename.bat)
   Finished 8/17/2001 12:07:00 AM
   Result: The task completed with an exit code of
 (1).
 
 exit code of 1 means it didnt complete the job.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:36 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks
 
 
 What does the Task Scheduler log say?
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 14:33
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks
 
 
 Yes, if I log on physically or via remote control
 software and run the task,
 it completes fine, if I do it via terminal services
 while that I'm still
 logged in via the remote control software, it also
 runs fine, if I am logged
 out, and I try it via terminal services, it fails. 
 I have the accounted on
 the particular task itself- the Task Scheduler
 service will only run off the
 local system.
 
 Stephen
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:49 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks
 
 
 Can you run the task from the server logged in as
 that particular account?
 Where do you have the account listed -- in the Task
 Scheduler service or the
 particular task itself?
 
  Glenn M. Dowling
  IBM Global Services @ Lucent Technologies
  Work: 732.949.6456
  Fax: 732.834.6413
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 13:27
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks
 
 
 I am running it with a domain administrator account.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:20 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks
 
 
 Stephen:
 
 In the properties of the specific task, set the Run
 As section to run as
 the particular user (e.g. yourself or a service
 account) and type in that
 login's password.
 
 Glenn M. Dowling
 NT System Administrator
 IBM Global Services @ Lucent Technologies
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:57
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Scheduled Tasks
 
 
 THis may have been covered before, but I think I
 missed it.  Anyway, anyone
 know how to make a scheduled task win windows 2000
 server run an item
 without being logged into a user at the physical
 machine?  I figured out
 that that was what was happening with my tasks, I
 was getting the 0X1 error
 because I was running from terminal services, but no
 one had physically
 logged onto the computer.
 
 Stephen
 
 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
 
 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
 
 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
 
 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




RE: Scheduled Tasks

2001-08-17 Thread Stephen Chiang

that doesn't work...

Remember, the batch file works fine as long as I am logged into the computer
at the workstation or remotely from Timbuktu... it just doesn't work in
Terminal services if a user is not logged in.

Stephen



-Original Message-
From: Spencer Kent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


.. rename the job to .CMD and try it.

Kent

--- Dowling, Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Do you have the full path to the batch job listed in
 the task (e.g.
 C:\Program Files\wirename.bat) or just the batch job
 name?  The computer
 might not know where the file is located.


 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 14:51
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


   Started 8/17/2001 12:07:00 AM
 w1rename.job (w1rename.bat)
   Finished 8/17/2001 12:07:00 AM
   Result: The task completed with an exit code of
 (1).

 exit code of 1 means it didnt complete the job.



 -Original Message-
 From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:36 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


 What does the Task Scheduler log say?


 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 14:33
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


 Yes, if I log on physically or via remote control
 software and run the task,
 it completes fine, if I do it via terminal services
 while that I'm still
 logged in via the remote control software, it also
 runs fine, if I am logged
 out, and I try it via terminal services, it fails.
 I have the accounted on
 the particular task itself- the Task Scheduler
 service will only run off the
 local system.

 Stephen


 -Original Message-
 From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:49 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


 Can you run the task from the server logged in as
 that particular account?
 Where do you have the account listed -- in the Task
 Scheduler service or the
 particular task itself?

  Glenn M. Dowling
  IBM Global Services @ Lucent Technologies
  Work: 732.949.6456
  Fax: 732.834.6413
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 13:27
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


 I am running it with a domain administrator account.

 -Original Message-
 From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:20 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


 Stephen:

 In the properties of the specific task, set the Run
 As section to run as
 the particular user (e.g. yourself or a service
 account) and type in that
 login's password.

 Glenn M. Dowling
 NT System Administrator
 IBM Global Services @ Lucent Technologies


 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:57
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Scheduled Tasks


 THis may have been covered before, but I think I
 missed it.  Anyway, anyone
 know how to make a scheduled task win windows 2000
 server run an item
 without being logged into a user at the physical
 machine?  I figured out
 that that was what was happening with my tasks, I
 was getting the 0X1 error
 because I was running from terminal services, but no
 one had physically
 logged onto the computer.

 Stephen



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




RE: Scheduled Tasks

2001-08-17 Thread Don Ely

If I remember correctly, you need to use the /interactive to run command
files in an unattended fashion.

-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:19 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


that doesn't work...

Remember, the batch file works fine as long as I am logged into the
computer at the workstation or remotely from Timbuktu... it just doesn't
work in Terminal services if a user is not logged in.

Stephen



-Original Message-
From: Spencer Kent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


.. rename the job to .CMD and try it.

Kent

--- Dowling, Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Do you have the full path to the batch job listed in
 the task (e.g.
 C:\Program Files\wirename.bat) or just the batch job
 name?  The computer
 might not know where the file is located.


 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 14:51
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


   Started 8/17/2001 12:07:00 AM
 w1rename.job (w1rename.bat)
   Finished 8/17/2001 12:07:00 AM
   Result: The task completed with an exit code of
 (1).

 exit code of 1 means it didnt complete the job.



 -Original Message-
 From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:36 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


 What does the Task Scheduler log say?


 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 14:33
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


 Yes, if I log on physically or via remote control
 software and run the task,
 it completes fine, if I do it via terminal services
 while that I'm still
 logged in via the remote control software, it also
 runs fine, if I am logged
 out, and I try it via terminal services, it fails.
 I have the accounted on
 the particular task itself- the Task Scheduler
 service will only run off the
 local system.

 Stephen


 -Original Message-
 From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:49 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


 Can you run the task from the server logged in as
 that particular account?
 Where do you have the account listed -- in the Task
 Scheduler service or the
 particular task itself?

  Glenn M. Dowling
  IBM Global Services @ Lucent Technologies
  Work: 732.949.6456
  Fax: 732.834.6413
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 13:27
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


 I am running it with a domain administrator account.

 -Original Message-
 From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:20 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


 Stephen:

 In the properties of the specific task, set the Run
 As section to run as
 the particular user (e.g. yourself or a service
 account) and type in that
 login's password.

 Glenn M. Dowling
 NT System Administrator
 IBM Global Services @ Lucent Technologies


 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:57
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Scheduled Tasks


 THis may have been covered before, but I think I
 missed it.  Anyway, anyone
 know how to make a scheduled task win windows 2000
 server run an item
 without being logged into a user at the physical
 machine?  I figured out
 that that was what was happening with my tasks, I
 was getting the 0X1 error
 because I was running from terminal services, but no
 one had physically
 logged onto the computer.

 Stephen



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




RE: Scheduled Tasks

2001-08-17 Thread Don Ely

The /interactive switch means you can run a scheduled task without being
logged on to the system.

-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


It doesn't work.  Meaning, if I run it, I get the status code 0x1 and
the files that I am renaming and copying onto a mapped networked drive
are not moved.  If, however, I am logged in then the files are copied
off fine.

What's the /interactive switch?

Thanks.

Stephen



-Original Message-
From: Webb, Brian (Telecom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


What do you mean by doesn't work in Terminal services?  What is it
this batch file is trying to do?  The scheduled job will run the job on
the server in the context of the user specified.  If you use the
/interactive switch it will be just like the specified user was sitting
at the console running the command.  It won't open a terminal server
session and do something in that session.

Disclaimer: This is the current user's personal opinion and is not made
on behalf of my employer.


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:19 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


that doesn't work...

Remember, the batch file works fine as long as I am logged into the
computer at the workstation or remotely from Timbuktu... it just doesn't
work in Terminal services if a user is not logged in.

Stephen



-Original Message-
From: Spencer Kent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


.. rename the job to .CMD and try it.

Kent

--- Dowling, Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Do you have the full path to the batch job listed in
 the task (e.g.
 C:\Program Files\wirename.bat) or just the batch job
 name?  The computer
 might not know where the file is located.


 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 14:51
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


   Started 8/17/2001 12:07:00 AM
 w1rename.job (w1rename.bat)
   Finished 8/17/2001 12:07:00 AM
   Result: The task completed with an exit code of
 (1).

 exit code of 1 means it didnt complete the job.



 -Original Message-
 From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:36 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


 What does the Task Scheduler log say?


 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 14:33
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


 Yes, if I log on physically or via remote control
 software and run the task,
 it completes fine, if I do it via terminal services
 while that I'm still
 logged in via the remote control software, it also
 runs fine, if I am logged
 out, and I try it via terminal services, it fails.
 I have the accounted on
 the particular task itself- the Task Scheduler
 service will only run off the
 local system.

 Stephen


 -Original Message-
 From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:49 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


 Can you run the task from the server logged in as
 that particular account?
 Where do you have the account listed -- in the Task
 Scheduler service or the
 particular task itself?

  Glenn M. Dowling
  IBM Global Services @ Lucent Technologies
  Work: 732.949.6456
  Fax: 732.834.6413
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 13:27
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


 I am running it with a domain administrator account.

 -Original Message-
 From: Dowling, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:20 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Scheduled Tasks


 Stephen:

 In the properties of the specific task, set the Run
 As section to run as
 the particular user (e.g. yourself or a service
 account) and type in that
 login's password.

 Glenn M. Dowling
 NT System Administrator
 IBM Global Services @ Lucent Technologies


 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:57
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Scheduled Tasks


 THis may have been covered before, but I think I
 missed it.  Anyway, anyone
 know how to make a scheduled task win windows 2000
 server run an item
 without being logged into a user at the physical
 machine?  I figured out
 that that was what was happening with my tasks, I
 was getting the 0X1 error
 because I was running from terminal services, but no
 one had physically
 logged onto