[nycwireless] REMOVE ME PLEASE!!!

2006-03-20 Thread vic

How many requests do I have to make to remove me from this e-mail list?
Please tell me:

- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 6:47 AM
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] NYCwireless mailing list etiquette



-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 09:16:30PM -0500, Dustin Goodwin wrote:

There have been several heated exchanges on the list recently. As far as
I am concerned, the rules of polite debate have been wildly violated. I
am working on a list etiquette document that I will send out shortly. I
hope we can raise the level of civil dialogue on the list.

- Dustin -

Hi Dustin,
you are entitled to revise the rules as you see fit but the frequency of
these 'wild violations' is something that does not represent a pattern of
the vast majority of posters. And the recent heated exchanges have been
very informative and I suspect will die down of their own accord.
So, at least from my point of view, no rule change is in order.
Cheers,
Kev
- -- 
|  .''`.  == Debian GNU/Linux == |   my web site:   |

| : :' :  The  Universal | debian.home.pipeline.com |
| `. `'  Operating System| go to counter.li.org and |
|   `-http://www.debian.org/ |be counted! #238656   |
| my keysever: pgp.mit.edu   | my NPO: cfsg.org |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEHpZtv8UcC1qRZVMRAqVjAJ4gtPI3A1J/eHK2TJmXuU+AuR+AdQCaAwFO
2hRpJDW7Cti8e0hM/OtZzMI=
=bFL4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/ 


--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


Re: [nycwireless] New Yorker Article [was:Multichannel News -AnalystsQuestionBellInvestments]

2006-03-16 Thread vic
I seem to remember having asked to be taken off this list. Is nycwireless 
that inept?

I wonder.


- Original Message - 
From: Ruben Safir [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Jim Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jim Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net

Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] New Yorker Article [was:Multichannel 
News -AnalystsQuestionBellInvestments]




On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:50 -0800, Jim Henry wrote:

Ruben,
   I do not work for Time Warner.



Yeah - right.



--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/ 


--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


Re: [nycwireless] Governement run telecom and broadband

2006-01-12 Thread vic

I am tired of this conservative bashing. I am leaving this list!!
g b all


- Original Message - 
From: Dana Spiegel [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 12:12 AM
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] Governement run telecom and broadband



Jim,

This is my last response to you, because you seem to be doing what  
many right-wing politicians are quite good at: changing the subject.


This shouldn't be a discussion about whether the municipal networks  
are going to work or not. I dare-say that common sense tells us that  
some number will be successful, and some number will not. How you  
evaluate their outcomes relies almost entirely on your point of view.


The real, fundamental problem is that America has slow, expensive,  
and only partially available broadband when compared to just about  
every other industrialized nation. This is especially embarrassing  
considering that we invented the damn technology, and nurtured it for  
its first two decades.


This is a _fact_. No amount of hewing and hawing, or dancing around  
the subject will change this.


Another fact: our sorry state of broadband has occurred over the past  
5 years. A period of time when Conservative Republicans have been  
running this country and calling (almost) all of the shots.


So, there arise really two questions (which you seem to be entirely  
unable to answer and which is why, I suspect, you'd rather change the  
subject):


1) Why is the state of broadband in America so awful?
and
2) What are you going to do about it?

This is less a question for you directly, but rather a question for  
those in charge of this Country.


And the answer _isn't_ more competition in the future and a more open  
marketplace with fewer regulations. THAT is an end result of good  
policy-making. I want to know what we're doing that's failing, and  
what we should be doing instead. If we put in place good policy, more  
competition in a healthy marketplace will happen by itself.


And I'm not pro-muniwireless or anti-muniwireless, or left-wing or  
right-wing, or even Republican or Democrat. I'm an independent.


Dana Spiegel
Executive Director
NYCwireless
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.NYCwireless.net
+1 917 402 0422

Read the Wireless Community blog: http://www.wirelesscommunity.info


On Jan 12, 2006, at 8:24 PM, Jim Henry wrote:


Dana,
   I've read the article you reference, and, like the one I  
provided a link
to, it is interesting.  They make some good points. However, like  
the PFF

paper, it's an advocacy document. I found no mention of municipalities
failing, or at least not doing as well, as commercial enterprises in
delivering critical services. There are certainly examples, such as
Philadelphia's PGW or NYC's water utility (nowhere near as bad as  
PGW I'm

sure, but failing to meter water is still pretty bad). No mention of a
possible negative outcome from a municipal offering.
   I am not too familiar with freepress.net but from checking their  
web
site, even though they claim to be non-partisan  the stories they  
offer seem

to be coming from a leftist point of view.

Jim


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dana Spiegel
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] Governement run telecom and broadband


Jim,

Perhaps you should do a bit more research.

The PFF is well known to rely on half-truths and misrepresentations
of fact to support their anti-municipal agenda.

Free Press has released a white paper that provides the whole story,
and if you look at government broadband initiatives, they are
overwhelmingly cost saving and beneficial to local communities.

http://www.freepress.net/docs/mb_white_paper.pdf

Also, PFF's supporters include (and are primarily) every incumbent
telecom and cable company: http://www.pff.org/about/supporters.html

While this isn't a problem in and of itself, it should make you
wonder where their views and motivations are coming from.


Dana Spiegel
Executive Director
NYCwireless
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.NYCwireless.net
+1 917 402 0422

Read the Wireless Community blog: http://www.wirelesscommunity.info


On Jan 9, 2006, at 10:04 PM, Jim Henry wrote:


Here's an interesting study on government going into the telecom
business.

http://www.pff.org/issues-pubs/pops/pop11.3govtownership.pdf

Jim

--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/
nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe:
http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.14.14/222 - Release
Date: 1/5/2006






--

Re: [nycwireless] Governement run telecom and broadband

2006-01-12 Thread vic

Why not this is as good as spam!
- Original Message - 
From: Michael Stearne [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: vic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Dana Spiegel [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net

Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 12:45 AM
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] Governement run telecom and broadband


On 1/13/06, vic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I am tired of this conservative bashing. I am leaving this list!!
g b all



Don't cut and run.



- Original Message -
From: Dana Spiegel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 12:12 AM
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] Governement run telecom and broadband


 Jim,

 This is my last response to you, because you seem to be doing what
 many right-wing politicians are quite good at: changing the subject.

 This shouldn't be a discussion about whether the municipal networks
 are going to work or not. I dare-say that common sense tells us that
 some number will be successful, and some number will not. How you
 evaluate their outcomes relies almost entirely on your point of view.

 The real, fundamental problem is that America has slow, expensive,
 and only partially available broadband when compared to just about
 every other industrialized nation. This is especially embarrassing
 considering that we invented the damn technology, and nurtured it for
 its first two decades.

 This is a _fact_. No amount of hewing and hawing, or dancing around
 the subject will change this.

 Another fact: our sorry state of broadband has occurred over the past
 5 years. A period of time when Conservative Republicans have been
 running this country and calling (almost) all of the shots.

 So, there arise really two questions (which you seem to be entirely
 unable to answer and which is why, I suspect, you'd rather change the
 subject):

 1) Why is the state of broadband in America so awful?
 and
 2) What are you going to do about it?

 This is less a question for you directly, but rather a question for
 those in charge of this Country.

 And the answer _isn't_ more competition in the future and a more open
 marketplace with fewer regulations. THAT is an end result of good
 policy-making. I want to know what we're doing that's failing, and
 what we should be doing instead. If we put in place good policy, more
 competition in a healthy marketplace will happen by itself.

 And I'm not pro-muniwireless or anti-muniwireless, or left-wing or
 right-wing, or even Republican or Democrat. I'm an independent.

 Dana Spiegel
 Executive Director
 NYCwireless
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.NYCwireless.net
 +1 917 402 0422

 Read the Wireless Community blog: http://www.wirelesscommunity.info


 On Jan 12, 2006, at 8:24 PM, Jim Henry wrote:

 Dana,
I've read the article you reference, and, like the one I
 provided a link
 to, it is interesting.  They make some good points. However, like
 the PFF
 paper, it's an advocacy document. I found no mention of municipalities
 failing, or at least not doing as well, as commercial enterprises in
 delivering critical services. There are certainly examples, such as
 Philadelphia's PGW or NYC's water utility (nowhere near as bad as
 PGW I'm
 sure, but failing to meter water is still pretty bad). No mention of a
 possible negative outcome from a municipal offering.
I am not too familiar with freepress.net but from checking their
 web
 site, even though they claim to be non-partisan  the stories they
 offer seem
 to be coming from a leftist point of view.

 Jim

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
 Of Dana Spiegel
 Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 11:06 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
 Subject: Re: [nycwireless] Governement run telecom and broadband


 Jim,

 Perhaps you should do a bit more research.

 The PFF is well known to rely on half-truths and misrepresentations
 of fact to support their anti-municipal agenda.

 Free Press has released a white paper that provides the whole story,
 and if you look at government broadband initiatives, they are
 overwhelmingly cost saving and beneficial to local communities.

 http://www.freepress.net/docs/mb_white_paper.pdf

 Also, PFF's supporters include (and are primarily) every incumbent
 telecom and cable company: http://www.pff.org/about/supporters.html

 While this isn't a problem in and of itself, it should make you
 wonder where their views and motivations are coming from.


 Dana Spiegel
 Executive Director
 NYCwireless
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.NYCwireless.net
 +1 917 402 0422

 Read the Wireless Community blog: http://www.wirelesscommunity.info


 On Jan 9, 2006, at 10:04 PM, Jim Henry wrote:

 Here's an interesting study on government going into the telecom
 business.

 http://www.pff.org/issues-pubs/pops/pop11.3govtownership.pdf

 Jim

 --
 NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
 Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman

Re: [nycwireless] Municipal Broadband - Must read!

2006-01-08 Thread vic

We will never invade china. We will do it through free markets and trade.

-=vic
---
VICTOR SCELBA
- Original Message - 
From: Michael Stearne [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nycwireless nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 3:06 AM
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] Municipal Broadband - Must read!


On 1/8/06, Jim Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Billy Bob,

Let's see, GDP keeps on clicking at 3-4 % growth pretty much every year...
The same was true in 2005.  Inflation practically non-existent. 
Unemployment
about as low as it's been ever in our history, Home ownership at an all 
time
high.  State of the country is such that those who the U.S classifies as 
in
poverty often own televisions, phones, cars, and get food every day! 
Compare
that to some other countries.  We've removed one of the most evil 
dictators

in history from power and in only 3 years that country, which has never
known a democratic tradition, has easily made more progress than our own


You've convinced me.  Let get those commie bastards in China next!
Freedom is on the march! When are we invading China for their human
rights and U.N. violations?
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/ 


--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


Re: [nycwireless] govt. subsidy and broadband

2006-01-08 Thread vic
Ya know I am getting real tired of playing teacher. Perhaps I should smoke 
pot and become a college professor. LOL!


http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/06/25/sprj.irq.centrifuge/
U.S. officials emphasized this was not evidence Iraq had a nuclear 
weapon -- but it was evidence the Iraqis concealed plans to reconstitute 
their nuclear program as soon as the world was no longer looking. The parts 
and documents Obeidi gave the CIA were... 

Just one of many examples.
Mike your tuition is overdue and you will not receive your grade, albeit 
low, until you have paid your tuition. LOL!

-=vic

- Original Message - 
From: Michael Stearne [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: vic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Billy Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cienfuegos 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net

Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 3:15 AM
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] govt. subsidy and broadband


On 1/8/06, vic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

They said they had nuclear capabilities not nuke weapons. There is a


What nuclear capabilities did they find?


difference. Well lets say you go walking down the street and you see a
gun... you pick it up you look in the chamber and it is empty. A gun with
out bullets is still a weapon. All you have to do is put the bullets in. 
BTW


No, let's say you invaded a country for an empty tractor trailer and
3,000 U.S. soldiers  died because of it.  An empty laboratory is a
weapon?


I don't think the people from Alabama appreciate your comment. You are
safe because people have gone and died to keep you safe. Be a little 
more

appreciative.


I have a cousin permanently disabled from his service in Iraq and more
than one friend currently in the desert.  Don't question my
patriotism.


get with the program and stop trying to be cute.


BTW it's ciao not cio Kool-Aid drinker. 


--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


Re: [nycwireless] govt. subsidy and broadband

2006-01-08 Thread vic
Hey I got hit with the Reply-All first and there was a bunch of crap on 
it. It was my duty to respond. I think you should go after this mike guy... 
If the stuff he sent me did not have your address on it then you never would 
have received my educational reply. Thanks but it is not necessary to send 
me an include or do not include e-mail.


-=vic

- Original Message - 
From: Eric Glover [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Michael Stearne' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'vic' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
'Cienfuegos' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net

Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] govt. subsidy and broadband


This thread is getting silly, and is not relevant to the purposes of the 
group - if possible, could the thread be limited to the interested 
parties - if you want to be on this, please send an e-mail to Michael, Jim 
and Vic, and then they will involve only you - and not the whole group.


Thanks,
Eric

Jim Henry wrote:


Michael,
   If you honestly believe the war with Iraq was for the reason you list,
then you need to diversify your news sources and get informed. 
Additionally,
Vic and I have been civil and tried to discuss this intelligently. I see 
no

reason to resort to  name calling, as now both us us have been called
Kool-aid drinker. That's usually what happens when one side of an issue
can no longer support its argument with facts.
Respectfully,
Jim



-Original Message-
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 3:16 AM
To: vic
Cc: Cienfuegos; nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Subject: Re: This thread is getting silly, and is not relevant to the 
purposes of the group - if possible, could the thread be limited to the 
interested parties - if you want to be on this, please send an e-mail to 
Michael or Jim, and then they will involve only you - and not the whole 
group.




Thanks,
[nycwireless] govt. subsidy and broadband


On 1/8/06, vic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


They said they had nuclear capabilities not nuke

weapons. There is

a


What nuclear capabilities did they find?



difference. Well lets say you go walking down the street

and you see a

gun... you pick it up you look in the chamber and it is

empty. A gun
with out bullets is still a weapon. All you have to do is put the 
bullets in. BTW


No, let's say you invaded a country for an empty tractor trailer and 
3,000 U.S. soldiers  died because of it.  An empty laboratory is a 
weapon?




I don't think the people from Alabama appreciate your

comment. You
are safe because people have gone and died to keep you safe. Be a 
little more appreciative.


I have a cousin permanently disabled from his service in Iraq and more 
than one friend currently in the desert.  Don't question my patriotism.




get with the program and stop trying to be cute.


BTW it's ciao not cio Kool-Aid drinker.



--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/







--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


Re: [nycwireless] govt. subsidy and broadband

2006-01-07 Thread vic
Biggest debtor yes but not debt by proportion to GDP. Our debt is small when 
compared to our GDP.
War debts let us have comparative safety on the streets to trade and 
partially keep up the value of the USD.


-=vic
---
- Original Message - 
From: Cienfuegos [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 10:35 PM
Subject: [nycwireless] govt. subsidy and broadband



Lets try to keep our conversations down to earth please.

Those who are terrified about govt. subsidized broadband, rather than
repeating the erroneous and semi-religious mantra of the wonders of a
capitalist economy a little education on the subject would go a long
way.  The biggest debtor nation in the world is the USA, and where is
the outcry for the 40% of the gnp that goes to fund the pentagon and
other war related depts?

Lets keep it on the tech tip shall we, that is why signed on for this
mailing list.

Aias








--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/



--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


Re: [nycwireless] Municipal Broadband - Must read!

2006-01-07 Thread vic
We have a trillion dollar economy and interest rates are at record lows. 
What are you talking about. I don't think you have ever taken a business 
class or watched news other then the MTV news.

-=vic
---

- Original Message - 
From: Billy Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Dustin Goodwin' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
'nycwireless' nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net

Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 11:35 PM
Subject: RE: [nycwireless] Municipal Broadband - Must read!



No... I'm not kidding. If you really believe that, then you live in LaLa
land.

Not only does our economy suck but so does our current state of our 
country

as a whole.


-Original Message-
From: Jim Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 10:58 AM
To: 'Billy Bob'; 'Dustin Goodwin'; 'nycwireless'
Subject: RE: [nycwireless] Municipal Broadband - Must read!

You're kidding, right? ;-)


-Original Message-
From: Billy Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 11:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Dustin Goodwin'; 'nycwireless'
Subject: RE: [nycwireless] Municipal Broadband - Must read!


...we have the strongest economy in the world...

Where do you live??

Certainly not here.

Bruce

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Henry
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 8:20 PM
To: 'Dustin Goodwin'; 'nycwireless'
Subject: RE: [nycwireless] Municipal Broadband - Must read!

OK, guess I should have read the article first:-). No thanks to govt.
subsidized broadband. We already have too much of a socialist load on
our economy.  The fact that we have less socialism than most other
countries is probably the main reason that we have the strongest
economy in the world,
the envy of other nations.   Just my two cents.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dustin
 Goodwin
 Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 9:40 AM
 To: nycwireless
 Subject: [nycwireless] Municipal Broadband - Must read!


 If you think you have a well developed theory on the why or
why not of
 the municipal broadband debate you must read this article.
 Some of the conclusions:
 The US is desperately behind in broaband compared to the rest the
 world. As for existing US broadband.We are paying way too
much for way
 too little compared to the rest of the world.
 US monopolies are have bloated the price of broadband and slowed
 investment. Lack of Federal and State policy/programs/tax
 breaks/incentives are mostly to blame.
 As we learned during the electrification of the rural US free
 enterprise is not the best system for bringing real low
cost broadband
 to everyone. If your municipality really wants to be on the
broadband
 grid and your expecting help from private telcos... your screwed.
 Municipal broadband or the threat of municipal broadband has been
 shown to encourage private sector investment.
 Most places including NYC should be shopping around for a municipal
 broadband solution if they expect their businesses to compete on a
 global level.
 The US communication infrastructure is stagnating and the
fixes will
 come from a combination public policy *AND* private enterprise.

 *Let There Be Wi-Fi*
 Broadband is the electricity of the 21st century-and much of America
 is being left in the dark.
 http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0601.podesta.html
 --
 NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
 Un/Subscribe:
 http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
 Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/



 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.14.14/222 - Release
 Date: 1/5/2006



--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe:
http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.14.14/222 - Release
Date: 1/5/2006




--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/ 


--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


Re: [nycwireless] govt. subsidy and broadband

2006-01-07 Thread vic
We already found WMD. We found a mobile weapons laboratory almost right 
away. There were no chems in it but is was there. We know he had WMD because 
WE the US GAVE WMD to Iraq to fight Iran.

Please I thirst for intelligent convo..
Prior to invasion Iraq's military FIRED on our US planes almost 50 TIMES. 
Last time I checked when one nation's army fires on another nation's Air 
Force that in itself is an act of war. Get the facts man

Cio baby,
-=vic
---
VICTOR SCELBA
- Original Message - 
From: Billy Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'vic' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Cienfuegos' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net

Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 11:36 PM
Subject: RE: [nycwireless] govt. subsidy and broadband



I'll bet you're still looking for WMD's to justify war debts



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of vic
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 10:32 PM
To: Cienfuegos; nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] govt. subsidy and broadband

Biggest debtor yes but not debt by proportion to GDP. Our debt is small 
when

compared to our GDP.
War debts let us have comparative safety on the streets to trade and
partially keep up the value of the USD.

-=vic
---
- Original Message -
From: Cienfuegos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 10:35 PM
Subject: [nycwireless] govt. subsidy and broadband



Lets try to keep our conversations down to earth please.

Those who are terrified about govt. subsidized broadband, rather than
repeating the erroneous and semi-religious mantra of the wonders of a
capitalist economy a little education on the subject would go a long
way.  The biggest debtor nation in the world is the USA, and where is
the outcry for the 40% of the gnp that goes to fund the pentagon and
other war related depts?

Lets keep it on the tech tip shall we, that is why signed on for this
mailing list.

Aias









--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/



--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/



--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/