Re: Installation of OJB
Okay Armin,
will deal now with src-dist
but, why am i not able to use binary?
only for "enable" p6spy ?
or in generall better to use SRC?
for Struts e.g. i allways use the binary-version
greetings,
--- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi,
>
> Ralf Bode wrote:
>
> > Hi Armin,
> >
> > i used the bin-version.
> > how am i now able to enable p6spy?
> > in OJB.properties i found no key for it!
> >
>
> you have to use the source version.
>
> > greetings,
> >
> > is it possible, that this is a bug?
> > (not setting the foreign-key?)
>
> hmm, I don't think so. There was a bug when equals
> and hashcode method
> of the persistence capable objects are overridden
> (fixed in CVS). But
> this doesn't bother your test. Nevertheless you can
> try the CVS head.
>
> regards,
> Armin
>
> >
> > --- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >
> Hi
> > Ralf,
> >
> >>hmm, your test is now similar to the tests in OJB
> >>test-suite. These
> >>tests pass without problems (against hsql, sapDB,
> >>mySQL,...).
> >>
> >>How does the generated sql look like? You can use
> >>p6spy to log all
> >>generated SQL. If you run your test within
> OJB-suite
> >>you only need to
> >>enable p6spy in build.properties file.
> >>
> >>regards,
> >>Armin
> >>
> >>Ralf Bode wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>hallo armin,
> >>>it is the same behavor!
> >>>field "autoid" in table "kunde"
> >>>is also "null" ...
> >>>
> >>>mmm (1.0rc5 - downloaded yesterday morning)
> >>>libs in classpath:
> >>>commons-collecton
> >>>commons-dbcp
> >>>commons-lang
> >>>commons-pool
> >>>db-ojb10rc5
> >>>
> >>>(and mysql...) :-)
> >>>
> >>>i did:
> >>>
> >>>Auto auto = new Auto();
> >>>auto.setFarbe("blau");
> >>>
> >>>Kunde kunde = new Kunde();
> >>>kunde.setNachname("Bode");
> >>>kunde.setVorname("Ralle");
> >>>kunde.setAuto(auto);
> >>>
> >>>//OJB aktivieren!
> >>>broker.beginTransaction();
> >>>broker.store(kunde);
> >>>broker.commitTransaction();
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--- Ralf Bode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi
> >>>Armin, Brain and the rest :-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>hier is my code (a simple test-example)
> >>>>CAR:
> >>>>package de.ralle;
> >>>>
> >>>>import java.io.Serializable;
> >>>>
> >>>>//the CAR
> >>>>public class Auto implements Serializable{
> >>>>
> >>>> private String farbe;
> >>>> public Auto() {
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> public String getFarbe() {
> >>>> return farbe;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> public void setFarbe(String string) {
> >>>> farbe = string;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>>}
> >>>>
> >>>>CUSTOMER:
> >>>>package de.ralle;
> >>>>
> >>>>import java.io.Serializable;
> >>>>
> >>>>//my customer!
> >>>>public class Kunde implements Serializable{
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> private String vorname;
> >>>> private String nachname;
> >>>>
> >>>> private Auto auto;
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> public Kunde(){
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> public Auto getAuto() {
> >>>> return auto;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> public String getNachname() {
> >>>> return nachname;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> public String getVorname() {
> >>>> return vorname;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> public void setAuto(Auto auto) {
> >>>> this.auto = auto;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> public void setNachname(String string) {
> >>>> nachname = string;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> public void setVorname(String string) {
> >>>> vorname = string;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>>}
> >>>>
> >>>>and XML:
> >>>> >>>> class="de.ralle.Kunde"
> >>>> table="Kunde" >
> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> id="1"
> >>>> name="id"
> >>>> column="id"
> >>>> jdbc-type="INTEGER"
> >>>> primarykey="true"
> >>>> access="anonymous"/>
> >>>> >>>> id="2"
> >>>> name="vorname"
> >>>> column="vorname"
> >>>> jdbc-type="VARCHAR"/>
> >>>> >>>> id="3"
> >>>> name="nachname"
> >>>> column="nachname"
> >>>> jdbc-type="VARCHAR"/>
> >>>> >>>> id="4"
> >>>> name="autoId"
> >>>> column="autoid"
> >>>> jdbc-type="INTEGER"
> >>>> access="anonymous"/>
> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> name="auto"
> >>>> class-ref="de.ralle.Auto"
> >>>> auto-retrieve="true"
> >>>> auto-update="true"
> >>>> auto-delete="true">
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> class="de.ralle.Auto"
> >>>> table="auto">
> >>>> >>>> id="1"
> >>>> name="id"
> >>>> column="id"
> >>>> jdbc-type="INTEGER"
> >>>> primarykey="true"
>
=== message truncated ===
__
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de
Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: http://suche.yahoo.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Installation of OJB
Hi Armin,
i used the bin-version.
how am i now able to enable p6spy?
in OJB.properties i found no key for it!
greetings,
is it possible, that this is a bug?
(not setting the foreign-key?)
--- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi
Ralf,
>
> hmm, your test is now similar to the tests in OJB
> test-suite. These
> tests pass without problems (against hsql, sapDB,
> mySQL,...).
>
> How does the generated sql look like? You can use
> p6spy to log all
> generated SQL. If you run your test within OJB-suite
> you only need to
> enable p6spy in build.properties file.
>
> regards,
> Armin
>
> Ralf Bode wrote:
>
> > hallo armin,
> > it is the same behavor!
> > field "autoid" in table "kunde"
> > is also "null" ...
> >
> > mmm (1.0rc5 - downloaded yesterday morning)
> > libs in classpath:
> > commons-collecton
> > commons-dbcp
> > commons-lang
> > commons-pool
> > db-ojb10rc5
> >
> > (and mysql...) :-)
> >
> > i did:
> >
> > Auto auto = new Auto();
> > auto.setFarbe("blau");
> >
> > Kunde kunde = new Kunde();
> > kunde.setNachname("Bode");
> > kunde.setVorname("Ralle");
> > kunde.setAuto(auto);
> >
> > //OJB aktivieren!
> > broker.beginTransaction();
> > broker.store(kunde);
> > broker.commitTransaction();
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Ralf Bode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi
> > Armin, Brain and the rest :-)
> >
> >>hier is my code (a simple test-example)
> >>CAR:
> >>package de.ralle;
> >>
> >>import java.io.Serializable;
> >>
> >>//the CAR
> >>public class Auto implements Serializable{
> >>
> >>private String farbe;
> >>public Auto() {
> >>}
> >>
> >>public String getFarbe() {
> >>return farbe;
> >>}
> >>
> >>public void setFarbe(String string) {
> >>farbe = string;
> >>}
> >>
> >>}
> >>
> >>CUSTOMER:
> >>package de.ralle;
> >>
> >>import java.io.Serializable;
> >>
> >>//my customer!
> >>public class Kunde implements Serializable{
> >>
> >>
> >>private String vorname;
> >>private String nachname;
> >>
> >>private Auto auto;
> >>
> >>
> >>public Kunde(){
> >>}
> >>
> >>public Auto getAuto() {
> >>return auto;
> >>}
> >>
> >>public String getNachname() {
> >>return nachname;
> >>}
> >>
> >>public String getVorname() {
> >>return vorname;
> >>}
> >>
> >>public void setAuto(Auto auto) {
> >>this.auto = auto;
> >>}
> >>
> >>public void setNachname(String string) {
> >>nachname = string;
> >>}
> >>
> >>public void setVorname(String string) {
> >>vorname = string;
> >>}
> >>
> >>}
> >>
> >>and XML:
> >> >>class="de.ralle.Kunde"
> >>table="Kunde" >
> >>
> >> >>id="1"
> >>name="id"
> >>column="id"
> >>jdbc-type="INTEGER"
> >>primarykey="true"
> >>access="anonymous"/>
> >> >>id="2"
> >>name="vorname"
> >>column="vorname"
> >>jdbc-type="VARCHAR"/>
> >> >> id="3"
> >>name="nachname"
> >>column="nachname"
> >>jdbc-type="VARCHAR"/>
> >> >>id="4"
> >>name="autoId"
> >>column="autoid"
> >>jdbc-type="INTEGER"
> >>access="anonymous"/>
> >>
> >> >>name="auto"
> >>class-ref="de.ralle.Auto"
> >>auto-retrieve="true"
> >>auto-update="true"
> >>auto-delete="true">
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >>class="de.ralle.Auto"
> >>table="auto">
> >> >>id="1"
> >>name="id"
> >>column="id"
> >>jdbc-type="INTEGER"
> >>primarykey="true"
> >>access="anonymous"/>
> >> >>id="2"
> >>name="farbe"
> >>column="farbe"
> >>jdbc-type="VARCHAR" />
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>THANKS!
> >>
> >> --- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >
> Hi
> >>Ralf,
> >>
> >>>it does deal with anonymous fields, but only in
> >>>conjunction with 1:1
> >>>references. Please post class-descriptor and
> >>
> >>source
> >>
> >>>for Customer, Car.
> >>>
> >>>regards,
> >>>Armin
> >>>
> >>>Ralf Bode wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hi Armin.
> >>>>
> >>>>okay i didn´t know about 1.0rc5 isn´t
> >>>>dealing with anonymous-keys.
>
=== message truncated ===
__
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de
Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: http://suche.yahoo.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Installation of OJB
hallo armin,
it is the same behavor!
field "autoid" in table "kunde"
is also "null" ...
mmm (1.0rc5 - downloaded yesterday morning)
libs in classpath:
commons-collecton
commons-dbcp
commons-lang
commons-pool
db-ojb10rc5
(and mysql...) :-)
i did:
Auto auto = new Auto();
auto.setFarbe("blau");
Kunde kunde = new Kunde();
kunde.setNachname("Bode");
kunde.setVorname("Ralle");
kunde.setAuto(auto);
//OJB aktivieren!
broker.beginTransaction();
broker.store(kunde);
broker.commitTransaction();
--- Ralf Bode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi
Armin, Brain and the rest :-)
>
> hier is my code (a simple test-example)
> CAR:
> package de.ralle;
>
> import java.io.Serializable;
>
> //the CAR
> public class Auto implements Serializable{
>
> private String farbe;
> public Auto() {
> }
>
> public String getFarbe() {
> return farbe;
> }
>
> public void setFarbe(String string) {
> farbe = string;
> }
>
> }
>
> CUSTOMER:
> package de.ralle;
>
> import java.io.Serializable;
>
> //my customer!
> public class Kunde implements Serializable{
>
>
> private String vorname;
> private String nachname;
>
> private Auto auto;
>
>
> public Kunde(){
> }
>
> public Auto getAuto() {
> return auto;
> }
>
> public String getNachname() {
> return nachname;
> }
>
> public String getVorname() {
> return vorname;
> }
>
> public void setAuto(Auto auto) {
> this.auto = auto;
> }
>
> public void setNachname(String string) {
> nachname = string;
> }
>
> public void setVorname(String string) {
> vorname = string;
> }
>
> }
>
> and XML:
>class="de.ralle.Kunde"
> table="Kunde" >
>
> id="1"
> name="id"
> column="id"
> jdbc-type="INTEGER"
> primarykey="true"
> access="anonymous"/>
> id="2"
> name="vorname"
> column="vorname"
> jdbc-type="VARCHAR"/>
> id="3"
> name="nachname"
> column="nachname"
> jdbc-type="VARCHAR"/>
> id="4"
> name="autoId"
> column="autoid"
> jdbc-type="INTEGER"
> access="anonymous"/>
>
> name="auto"
> class-ref="de.ralle.Auto"
> auto-retrieve="true"
> auto-update="true"
> auto-delete="true">
>
>
>
>class="de.ralle.Auto"
> table="auto">
> id="1"
> name="id"
> column="id"
> jdbc-type="INTEGER"
> primarykey="true"
> access="anonymous"/>
> id="2"
> name="farbe"
> column="farbe"
> jdbc-type="VARCHAR" />
>
>
>
>
> THANKS!
>
> --- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi
> Ralf,
> >
> > it does deal with anonymous fields, but only in
> > conjunction with 1:1
> > references. Please post class-descriptor and
> source
> > for Customer, Car.
> >
> > regards,
> > Armin
> >
> > Ralf Bode wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Armin.
> > >
> > > okay i didn´t know about 1.0rc5 isn´t
> > > dealing with anonymous-keys.
> > >
> > > so i do like suggested in 1:1-mapping.
> > >
> > > but then in my Beans i have
> > > int carId
> > > Car car;
> > >
> > > i do now:
> > > setCar(Car c){
> > > car = c;
> > > carId = c.getId();
> > > }
> > >
> > > but i think this is redundant, isn´t ?
> > > now i am very confused on dealing with OJB...
> > >
> > > a short, and last question,
> > > wh
Re: Installation of OJB
Hi Armin, Brain and the rest :-)
hier is my code (a simple test-example)
CAR:
package de.ralle;
import java.io.Serializable;
//the CAR
public class Auto implements Serializable{
private String farbe;
public Auto() {
}
public String getFarbe() {
return farbe;
}
public void setFarbe(String string) {
farbe = string;
}
}
CUSTOMER:
package de.ralle;
import java.io.Serializable;
//my customer!
public class Kunde implements Serializable{
private String vorname;
private String nachname;
private Auto auto;
public Kunde(){
}
public Auto getAuto() {
return auto;
}
public String getNachname() {
return nachname;
}
public String getVorname() {
return vorname;
}
public void setAuto(Auto auto) {
this.auto = auto;
}
public void setNachname(String string) {
nachname = string;
}
public void setVorname(String string) {
vorname = string;
}
}
and XML:
THANKS!
--- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi
Ralf,
>
> it does deal with anonymous fields, but only in
> conjunction with 1:1
> references. Please post class-descriptor and source
> for Customer, Car.
>
> regards,
> Armin
>
> Ralf Bode wrote:
>
> > Hi Armin.
> >
> > okay i didn´t know about 1.0rc5 isn´t
> > dealing with anonymous-keys.
> >
> > so i do like suggested in 1:1-mapping.
> >
> > but then in my Beans i have
> > int carId
> > Car car;
> >
> > i do now:
> > setCar(Car c){
> > car = c;
> > carId = c.getId();
> > }
> >
> > but i think this is redundant, isn´t ?
> > now i am very confused on dealing with OJB...
> >
> > a short, and last question,
> > why doesn´t OJB1.0.rc5 not deal with
> anonymous-keys
> > i thought its a nice feature!
> >
> > greetings ralf
> >
> >
> > --- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >
> Hi,
> >
> >>Ralf Bode wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi Armin,
> >>>thanks for your patience, first!
> >>>but the things with declaring PK_Fields
> >>>i read at:
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
http://db.apache.org/ojb/howto-use-anonymous-keys.html
> >
> >>>i did everything like told me :-)
> >>>the document is written nice and understandful,
> >>
> >>doh! Assume the current implementation doesn't
> >>achieve this. All
> >>anonymous keys are held in an internal map using
> the
> >>object itself as
> >>key. Reading will be successful, but when the
> object
> >>e.g. will be
> >>serialized and then returned to OJB the anonymous
> PK
> >>field will never be
> >>found (object does not match a key), its only
> >>possible to extract the FK
> >>from the associated reference object.
> >>Thus I think anonymous keys will only work in
> >>conjunction with 1:1
> >>references.
> >>I don't write the 'anonymous-key' stuff, so maybe
> I
> >>overlooked an
> >>important argument.
> >>
> >>regards,
> >>Armin
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>but only the little thing
> >>>froeign-key is null in my case...
> >>>
> >>>did you know if this sample is available?
> >>>i didn´t found it in src-distribution.
> >>>
> >>>thanks alot!
> >>>
> >>> --- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >
> >>
> >>Hi
> >>
> >>>Ralf,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>but in my case the own id´s
> >>>>>of a class where anonymous too,
> >>>>>is that the matter?
> >>>>
> >>>>AFAIK we don't have a test case that mix this
> >>
> >>stuff.
> >>
> >>>>Think it is not allowed to declare a PK field
> >>>>anonymous.
> >>>>Recommend you to setup a test case similar to
> the
> >>>>examples in test suite
> >>>>or docu
> >>>>(http://db.apache.org/ojb/tutorial3.html#Mapping
> >>
> >>1:1
> >>
> >>>>associations). As recently as your test pass
> sta
Re: Installation of OJB
hi brain, an example would be nice, i know, that i can not access an anonymous-key in java :-) the reason why i find this useful is, because of having clean JavaBeans for database. not blown up with eg carId (when i am also reffering to a car) but armin told, that anonymous-keys not available in 1.0.rc5..? now i am really confused :-) greetings ralf --- Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > I declare PK's anonymous quite frequently. I will > post an example when > I get in to work =) Basically it works just like > normal, you still > refer to it by the name attribute (though I tend to > use THIS_STYLE for > names for anon keys to make sure it is clear you > cannot de-reference > them in the Java. > > -Brian > > On Feb 3, 2004, at 6:10 AM, Armin Waibel wrote: > > > Hi Ralf, > > > > > but in my case the own id´s > > > of a class where anonymous too, > > > is that the matter? > > > > AFAIK we don't have a test case that mix this > stuff. > > Think it is not allowed to declare a PK field > anonymous. > > Recommend you to setup a test case similar to the > examples in test > > suite or docu > (http://db.apache.org/ojb/tutorial3.html#Mapping 1:1 > > > associations). As recently as your test pass start > to tweak ;-) > > > > regards, > > Armin > > > > > > Ralf Bode wrote: > >> Hi Armin, again... > >> ...sorry... > >> i looked in samples you told me! > >> (thanks for tipps!) > >> but i have all so like > >> 1:1-relationship > >> org.apache.ojb.broker.ObjectRepository$Group > >> org.apache.ojb.broker.ObjectRepository$Componente > >> (access="anonymous" for reffered ids) > >> but in my case the own id´s > >> of a class where anonymous too, > >> is that the matter? > >> but i don´t think so, because > >> for car and customer a id is "generated". > >> But only!!! the reffered id (in customer for car > is "null") > >> ...strangely... isn´t it ? > >> perhaps i can send it to list / to you? > >> (i asked, because i will not blow up list > >> with my (i think) foolishness) > >> thanks for your patience! > >> ralf > >> --- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > Hi > >> Ralf, > >>> Ralf Bode wrote: > >>> > >>>> hi ... again :-( > >>>> > >>>> it is really frustratingly... > >>>> i turned OTM->true > >>>> made: > >>>> customer.setCar(car) > >>>> broker.store(customer); > >>>> > >>> > >>> I don't know what's wrong with your test, but > this > >>> will definitely work with the PB-api. > >>> You can find many examples in test suite, e.g. > >>> ...broker.AnonymousFieldsTest. > >>> > >>> regards, > >>> Armin > >>> > >>> > >>>> but same... > >>>> customer is in DB, car not! > >>>> :-( > >>>> > >>>> i have read in aritcle in german-javamag > >>>> on OJB there was said "all is nice" > >>>> > >>>> or am i to stuid? > >>>> > >>>> i though it would be possible > >>>> to store "customer" and his car... > >>>> has anyone a "runnig"-case for an idot, like > me? > >>>> > >>>> thanks! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> --- Brian McCallister > >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > >>> > >>> Objects > >>> > >>>> are not automatically stored by reachability > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> -- the car isn't inserted because it is > attached to Customer. This > >>>>> *can* actually be done in the OTM if Car is a > truly dependent > >>>>> object > >>>>> (otm-dependent attribute), but in the PB an > object must be made > >>>>> explicitly persistent. > >>>>> > >>>>> broker.store(ca); > >>>>> broker.store(cu); > >>>>> > >>>>> -Brian > >>>>> > >>>>> On Feb 2, 2004, at 3:13 PM, Ralf Bode wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > &
Re: Installation of OJB
Hi Armin.
okay i didn´t know about 1.0rc5 isn´t
dealing with anonymous-keys.
so i do like suggested in 1:1-mapping.
but then in my Beans i have
int carId
Car car;
i do now:
setCar(Car c){
car = c;
carId = c.getId();
}
but i think this is redundant, isn´t ?
now i am very confused on dealing with OJB...
a short, and last question,
why doesn´t OJB1.0.rc5 not deal with anonymous-keys
i thought its a nice feature!
greetings ralf
--- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi,
>
> Ralf Bode wrote:
> > Hi Armin,
> > thanks for your patience, first!
> > but the things with declaring PK_Fields
> > i read at:
> >
>
http://db.apache.org/ojb/howto-use-anonymous-keys.html
> > i did everything like told me :-)
> > the document is written nice and understandful,
>
> doh! Assume the current implementation doesn't
> achieve this. All
> anonymous keys are held in an internal map using the
> object itself as
> key. Reading will be successful, but when the object
> e.g. will be
> serialized and then returned to OJB the anonymous PK
> field will never be
> found (object does not match a key), its only
> possible to extract the FK
> from the associated reference object.
> Thus I think anonymous keys will only work in
> conjunction with 1:1
> references.
> I don't write the 'anonymous-key' stuff, so maybe I
> overlooked an
> important argument.
>
> regards,
> Armin
>
>
> > but only the little thing
> > froeign-key is null in my case...
> >
> > did you know if this sample is available?
> > i didn´t found it in src-distribution.
> >
> > thanks alot!
> >
> > --- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >
> Hi
> > Ralf,
> >
> >> > but in my case the own id´s
> >> > of a class where anonymous too,
> >> > is that the matter?
> >>
> >>AFAIK we don't have a test case that mix this
> stuff.
> >>Think it is not allowed to declare a PK field
> >>anonymous.
> >>Recommend you to setup a test case similar to the
> >>examples in test suite
> >>or docu
> >>(http://db.apache.org/ojb/tutorial3.html#Mapping
> 1:1
> >>
> >>associations). As recently as your test pass start
> >>to tweak ;-)
> >>
> >>regards,
> >>Armin
> >>
> >>
> >>Ralf Bode wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi Armin, again...
> >>>...sorry...
> >>>
> >>>i looked in samples you told me!
> >>>(thanks for tipps!)
> >>>but i have all so like
> >>>1:1-relationship
> >>>org.apache.ojb.broker.ObjectRepository$Group
> >>>org.apache.ojb.broker.ObjectRepository$Componente
> >>>(access="anonymous" for reffered ids)
> >>>but in my case the own id´s
> >>>of a class where anonymous too,
> >>>is that the matter?
> >>>but i don´t think so, because
> >>>for car and customer a id is "generated".
> >>>
> >>>But only!!! the reffered id
> >>>(in customer for car is "null")
> >>>
> >>>...strangely... isn´t it ?
> >>>
> >>>perhaps i can send it to list / to you?
> >>>(i asked, because i will not blow up list
> >>> with my (i think) foolishness)
> >>>
> >>>thanks for your patience!
> >>>ralf
> >>> --- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >
> >>
> >>Hi
> >>
> >>>Ralf,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Ralf Bode wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>hi ... again :-(
> >>>>>
> >>>>>it is really frustratingly...
> >>>>>i turned OTM->true
> >>>>>made:
> >>>>>customer.setCar(car)
> >>>>>broker.store(customer);
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>I don't know what's wrong with your test, but
> this
> >>>>will definitely work
> >>>>with the PB-api.
> >>>>You can find many examples in test suite, e.g.
> >>>>...broker.AnonymousFieldsTest.
> >>>>
> >>>>regards,
> >>>>Armin
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>but same...
> >>>>>customer is in DB, car not!
> >>>>>:-(
> >>>>>
> >>>>>i have read in ar
Re: Installation of OJB
Hi Armin, thanks for your patience, first! but the things with declaring PK_Fields i read at: http://db.apache.org/ojb/howto-use-anonymous-keys.html i did everything like told me :-) the document is written nice and understandful, but only the little thing froeign-key is null in my case... did you know if this sample is available? i didn´t found it in src-distribution. thanks alot! --- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi Ralf, > > > but in my case the own id´s > > of a class where anonymous too, > > is that the matter? > > AFAIK we don't have a test case that mix this stuff. > Think it is not allowed to declare a PK field > anonymous. > Recommend you to setup a test case similar to the > examples in test suite > or docu > (http://db.apache.org/ojb/tutorial3.html#Mapping 1:1 > > associations). As recently as your test pass start > to tweak ;-) > > regards, > Armin > > > Ralf Bode wrote: > > Hi Armin, again... > > ...sorry... > > > > i looked in samples you told me! > > (thanks for tipps!) > > but i have all so like > > 1:1-relationship > > org.apache.ojb.broker.ObjectRepository$Group > > org.apache.ojb.broker.ObjectRepository$Componente > > (access="anonymous" for reffered ids) > > but in my case the own id´s > > of a class where anonymous too, > > is that the matter? > > but i don´t think so, because > > for car and customer a id is "generated". > > > > But only!!! the reffered id > > (in customer for car is "null") > > > > ...strangely... isn´t it ? > > > > perhaps i can send it to list / to you? > > (i asked, because i will not blow up list > > with my (i think) foolishness) > > > > thanks for your patience! > > ralf > > --- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > Hi > > Ralf, > > > >>Ralf Bode wrote: > >> > >>>hi ... again :-( > >>> > >>>it is really frustratingly... > >>>i turned OTM->true > >>>made: > >>>customer.setCar(car) > >>>broker.store(customer); > >>> > >> > >>I don't know what's wrong with your test, but this > >>will definitely work > >>with the PB-api. > >>You can find many examples in test suite, e.g. > >>...broker.AnonymousFieldsTest. > >> > >>regards, > >>Armin > >> > >> > >>>but same... > >>>customer is in DB, car not! > >>>:-( > >>> > >>>i have read in aritcle in german-javamag > >>>on OJB there was said "all is nice" > >>> > >>>or am i to stuid? > >>> > >>>i though it would be possible > >>>to store "customer" and his car... > >>>has anyone a "runnig"-case for an idot, like me? > >>> > >>>thanks! > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> --- Brian McCallister > >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > >> > >>Objects > >> > >>>are not automatically stored by reachability > >>> > >>> > >>>>-- the car isn't > >>>>inserted because it is attached to Customer. > This > >>>>*can* actually be > >>>>done in the OTM if Car is a truly dependent > object > >>>>(otm-dependent > >>>>attribute), but in the PB an object must be made > >>>>explicitly persistent. > >>>> > >>>>broker.store(ca); > >>>>broker.store(cu); > >>>> > >>>>-Brian > >>>> > >>>>On Feb 2, 2004, at 3:13 PM, Ralf Bode wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Hi Brian, > >>>>>now i got an "anonym" id > >>>>>(very nice, so i now have "pure" javaBeans > >>>>>no technicals in it :-) > >>>>> > >>>>>i made > >>>>>cu = new Custiomer(); > >>>>>ca = new Car(); > >>>>>cu.setCar(ca); > >>>>>broker.store(cu); > >>>>> > >>>>>now only a customer was in DB > >>>>> > >>>>>i must add the "auto-*" in descriptor: > >>>>> >>>>> nam
Re: Installation of OJB
Hi Armin, again... ...sorry... i looked in samples you told me! (thanks for tipps!) but i have all so like 1:1-relationship org.apache.ojb.broker.ObjectRepository$Group org.apache.ojb.broker.ObjectRepository$Componente (access="anonymous" for reffered ids) but in my case the own id´s of a class where anonymous too, is that the matter? but i don´t think so, because for car and customer a id is "generated". But only!!! the reffered id (in customer for car is "null") ...strangely... isn´t it ? perhaps i can send it to list / to you? (i asked, because i will not blow up list with my (i think) foolishness) thanks for your patience! ralf --- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi Ralf, > > Ralf Bode wrote: > > hi ... again :-( > > > > it is really frustratingly... > > i turned OTM->true > > made: > > customer.setCar(car) > > broker.store(customer); > > > > I don't know what's wrong with your test, but this > will definitely work > with the PB-api. > You can find many examples in test suite, e.g. > ...broker.AnonymousFieldsTest. > > regards, > Armin > > > but same... > > customer is in DB, car not! > > :-( > > > > i have read in aritcle in german-javamag > > on OJB there was said "all is nice" > > > > or am i to stuid? > > > > i though it would be possible > > to store "customer" and his car... > > has anyone a "runnig"-case for an idot, like me? > > > > thanks! > > > > > > > > > > --- Brian McCallister > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > Objects > > are not automatically stored by reachability > > > >>-- the car isn't > >>inserted because it is attached to Customer. This > >>*can* actually be > >>done in the OTM if Car is a truly dependent object > >>(otm-dependent > >>attribute), but in the PB an object must be made > >>explicitly persistent. > >> > >>broker.store(ca); > >>broker.store(cu); > >> > >>-Brian > >> > >>On Feb 2, 2004, at 3:13 PM, Ralf Bode wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Hi Brian, > >>>now i got an "anonym" id > >>>(very nice, so i now have "pure" javaBeans > >>>no technicals in it :-) > >>> > >>>i made > >>>cu = new Custiomer(); > >>>ca = new Car(); > >>>cu.setCar(ca); > >>>broker.store(cu); > >>> > >>>now only a customer was in DB > >>> > >>>i must add the "auto-*" in descriptor: > >>> >>> name="car" > >>> class-ref="de.ralle.Car" > >>> auto-retrive="true" > >>> auto-update="true" > >>> auto-delete="true"> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>now i have a car and a customer, > >>>but custumer.carId is "null" in database... > >>>of course carId is anonym too! ... > >>> > >>>any idea? or am i to silly > >>>and i must do pure sql ... as a penalty... ? :-) > >>> > >>> > >>>in table customer is: > >>>CREATE TABLE CUSTOMER > >>>( > >>>ID INT PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT, > >>>CARID INT, > >>>FOREIGN KEY (CARID) REFERENCES CAR(ID) > >>>); > >>> > >>>thanks! > >>> > >>> --- Ralf Bode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > >> > >>Thanks > >> > >>>Brian, > >>> > >>>>but do you mean with "anonymous" keys ? > >>>> > >>>>now i have (in classes): > >>>>CUSTOMER > >>>>car: Car > >>>>carId: int > >>>> > >>>>CAR: > >>>>id: int > >>>> > >>>>(and the XML desc for it like in mail before) > >>>>am i with anon.keys able to "see" car-fk in > >>>>database-table CUSTOMER? > >>>>after: > >>>>broker.store(customer); ? > >>>> > >>>>thanks again, and thanks for your patience. > >>>>greetings! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>On the FK thing, if you do not use anonymous > >> > >>FK's > >> > >
Re: Installation of OJB
hi ... again :-( it is really frustratingly... i turned OTM->true made: customer.setCar(car) broker.store(customer); but same... customer is in DB, car not! :-( i have read in aritcle in german-javamag on OJB there was said "all is nice" or am i to stuid? i though it would be possible to store "customer" and his car... has anyone a "runnig"-case for an idot, like me? thanks! --- Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Objects are not automatically stored by reachability > -- the car isn't > inserted because it is attached to Customer. This > *can* actually be > done in the OTM if Car is a truly dependent object > (otm-dependent > attribute), but in the PB an object must be made > explicitly persistent. > > broker.store(ca); > broker.store(cu); > > -Brian > > On Feb 2, 2004, at 3:13 PM, Ralf Bode wrote: > > > Hi Brian, > > now i got an "anonym" id > > (very nice, so i now have "pure" javaBeans > > no technicals in it :-) > > > > i made > > cu = new Custiomer(); > > ca = new Car(); > > cu.setCar(ca); > > broker.store(cu); > > > > now only a customer was in DB > > > > i must add the "auto-*" in descriptor: > > > name="car" > > class-ref="de.ralle.Car" > > auto-retrive="true" > > auto-update="true" > > auto-delete="true"> > > > > > > > > now i have a car and a customer, > > but custumer.carId is "null" in database... > > of course carId is anonym too! ... > > > > any idea? or am i to silly > > and i must do pure sql ... as a penalty... ? :-) > > > > > > in table customer is: > > CREATE TABLE CUSTOMER > > ( > > ID INT PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT, > > CARID INT, > > FOREIGN KEY (CARID) REFERENCES CAR(ID) > > ); > > > > thanks! > > > > --- Ralf Bode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > Thanks > > Brian, > >> > >> but do you mean with "anonymous" keys ? > >> > >> now i have (in classes): > >> CUSTOMER > >> car: Car > >> carId: int > >> > >> CAR: > >> id: int > >> > >> (and the XML desc for it like in mail before) > >> am i with anon.keys able to "see" car-fk in > >> database-table CUSTOMER? > >> after: > >> broker.store(customer); ? > >> > >> thanks again, and thanks for your patience. > >> greetings! > >> > >> > >> > >>> On the FK thing, if you do not use anonymous > FK's > >>> the ID's need to be > >>> managed manually, as well as the references. I > >> tend > >>> to recommend using > >>> anonymous keys for FK relationships because it > is > >>> very easy to forget > >>> this. > >>> > >>> -Brian > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > - > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >> > >> > > > __ > >> > >> Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de > >> Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: > >> http://suche.yahoo.de > >> > >> > > > - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > > __ > > > > Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de > > Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: > http://suche.yahoo.de > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: http://suche.yahoo.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Installation of OJB
Hi Brian, now i got an "anonym" id (very nice, so i now have "pure" javaBeans no technicals in it :-) i made cu = new Custiomer(); ca = new Car(); cu.setCar(ca); broker.store(cu); now only a customer was in DB i must add the "auto-*" in descriptor: now i have a car and a customer, but custumer.carId is "null" in database... of course carId is anonym too! ... any idea? or am i to silly and i must do pure sql ... as a penalty... ? :-) in table customer is: CREATE TABLE CUSTOMER ( ID INT PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT, CARID INT, FOREIGN KEY (CARID) REFERENCES CAR(ID) ); thanks! --- Ralf Bode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Thanks Brian, > > but do you mean with "anonymous" keys ? > > now i have (in classes): > CUSTOMER > car: Car > carId: int > > CAR: > id: int > > (and the XML desc for it like in mail before) > am i with anon.keys able to "see" car-fk in > database-table CUSTOMER? > after: > broker.store(customer); ? > > thanks again, and thanks for your patience. > greetings! > > > > > On the FK thing, if you do not use anonymous FK's > > the ID's need to be > > managed manually, as well as the references. I > tend > > to recommend using > > anonymous keys for FK relationships because it is > > very easy to forget > > this. > > > > -Brian > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > __ > > Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de > Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: > http://suche.yahoo.de > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: http://suche.yahoo.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Installation of OJB
Thanks Brian, but do you mean with "anonymous" keys ? now i have (in classes): CUSTOMER car: Car carId: int CAR: id: int (and the XML desc for it like in mail before) am i with anon.keys able to "see" car-fk in database-table CUSTOMER? after: broker.store(customer); ? thanks again, and thanks for your patience. greetings! > On the FK thing, if you do not use anonymous FK's > the ID's need to be > managed manually, as well as the references. I tend > to recommend using > anonymous keys for FK relationships because it is > very easy to forget > this. > > -Brian > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: http://suche.yahoo.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Installation of OJB
Thanks!
now OJB 1.0.rc5 works fine
it makes me now PKs automaticly
thanks
but it doesn´t deal with
foreignkey
customer --> car
i do
cu = new Customer();
cu.setName("foo");
car = new Car();
car.setColor("blue");
cu.setCar(car);
...
broker.store(cu);
okay
in DB is a new car and a new customer.
but carId in table customer is ="0".
(car has a new PK become by db)
in xml i did this in customer-describtion:
in class Customer
i have this:
Car car;
int carId;
any idea?
i watched docu,in internet, saw tutorial3
but it is not deliverd with OJB.
so please not be angry (because of lots questions)
(i last worked with 0.94... sorry)
Thanks advice!
Ralf
--- Brian McCallister
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Your
primary key should be one of the primitive
> wrappers, ie Integer
> instead of int.
>
> If you use an int then it is initialized to 0, which
> is saved into the
> database as it is a valid int =( If you want
> autoincrement to work you
> need to use the Integer (or Long) wrapper. When the
> pk is null, it will
> autoincrement.
>
>
> public class IncorrectThing
> {
> public int pk;
> }
>
> public class CorrentThing
> {
> public Integer pk;
> }
>
> IncorrectThing it = new IncorrectThing();
> CorrectThing ct = new CorrectThing();
>
> If "it" is stored it has a valid value for it.pk -->
> 0
> If "ct" is stored it has null for ct.pk, so will
> have a value assigned.
>
> -Brian
>
> On Feb 2, 2004, at 11:47 AM, Ralf Bode wrote:
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > i am still dealing now without its internals ;-)
> > i didn´t figured it out on page!!
> > Thanks Brenden,!!!
> >
> > one short question - then i am
> > quiet! :-)
> >
> > why must i set the PK in my code?
> >
> > customer.setId(123);
> >
> > i described it in XML
> > primarykey="true"
> > autoincrement="true"
> >
> > but got Errsos, when i dont set up
> > the PK.
> >
> > thanks again for a quick ;-)
> > advice
> >
> > ralf
> >
> > --- "Larry V. Streepy, Jr."
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > I
> struggled
> > with this same problem when learning and
> >> working with OJB.
> >> My final solution was to run the build of OJB and
> >> then setup my project
> >> build to extract the generated SQL (the
> schema.ddl
> >> file) and copy it
> >> into my build area and use ant sql tasks to
> generate
> >> the tables. I know
> >> that this creates a minor dependency between the
> two
> >> projects, but
> >> that's fairly easy to manage. I have no need for
> >> setting up and
> >> utilizing torque in my project (I use Axgen to
> >> generate everything from
> >> UML), so it seemed like major complications to
> solve
> >> a simple problem.
> >>
> >> YMMV.
> >> Larry.
> >>
> >> Brian McCallister wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have considered including the torque stuff in
> >> the ojb-blank project
> >>> before, and opted against it as I thought I
> might
> >> be pushing too much
> >>> complexity on users then.
> >>>
> >>> Right now there isn't an *ideal* way to create
> the
> >> internal tables as
> >>> most of the time people don't need them (though
> >> the hi/lo sequence
> >>> table is needed enough that this may be
> incorrect,
> >> since it is the
> >>> default sequence manager).
> >>>
> >>> What are thoughts on including the torque
> >> generator stuff in
> >>> ojb-blank? The ojb-core schema is already
> included
> >> in the src/schema
> >>> directory, but the build-torque and torque
> related
> >> jars are not
> >>> included. Now that I think about it, I have done
> >> this for all of the
> >>> projects I have built around ojb-blank bits
> >> anyway, so that is a
> >>> certain argument in favor.
> >>>
> >>> In the short term, Thomas D has has a nice
> little
> >> walkthrough on
> >>> getting torque from OJB setup in the xdoclet
> docs,
> >> but that is sort of
> >>> hidden =) (note, we should probably move that
> into
> >> its own HOWTO).
> >>>
> >>> -Brian
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 2, 2004, at 3:19 AM, Ralf Bode wrote:
> >>
Re: Installation of OJB
Thanks i am still dealing now without its internals ;-) i didn´t figured it out on page!! Thanks Brenden,!!! one short question - then i am quiet! :-) why must i set the PK in my code? customer.setId(123); i described it in XML primarykey="true" autoincrement="true" but got Errsos, when i dont set up the PK. thanks again for a quick ;-) advice ralf --- "Larry V. Streepy, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > I struggled with this same problem when learning and > working with OJB. > My final solution was to run the build of OJB and > then setup my project > build to extract the generated SQL (the schema.ddl > file) and copy it > into my build area and use ant sql tasks to generate > the tables. I know > that this creates a minor dependency between the two > projects, but > that's fairly easy to manage. I have no need for > setting up and > utilizing torque in my project (I use Axgen to > generate everything from > UML), so it seemed like major complications to solve > a simple problem. > > YMMV. > Larry. > > Brian McCallister wrote: > > > I have considered including the torque stuff in > the ojb-blank project > > before, and opted against it as I thought I might > be pushing too much > > complexity on users then. > > > > Right now there isn't an *ideal* way to create the > internal tables as > > most of the time people don't need them (though > the hi/lo sequence > > table is needed enough that this may be incorrect, > since it is the > > default sequence manager). > > > > What are thoughts on including the torque > generator stuff in > > ojb-blank? The ojb-core schema is already included > in the src/schema > > directory, but the build-torque and torque related > jars are not > > included. Now that I think about it, I have done > this for all of the > > projects I have built around ojb-blank bits > anyway, so that is a > > certain argument in favor. > > > > In the short term, Thomas D has has a nice little > walkthrough on > > getting torque from OJB setup in the xdoclet docs, > but that is sort of > > hidden =) (note, we should probably move that into > its own HOWTO). > > > > -Brian > > > > On Feb 2, 2004, at 3:19 AM, Ralf Bode wrote: > > > >> Hi to all, > >> > >> just a question about to install OJB > >> i read, that i have to load the sources and > >> run some build-scripts okay. > >> > >> but is there an easy-way? > >> i only need a build-script for the binary-version > >> of OJB, that "installs" OJB-internal-tables into > >> database. > >> > >> or is there a reason for "building" all ? > >> > >> thanks for advice! > >> > >> greetings > >> ralf > >> > >> > __ > >> > >> Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de > >> Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: > http://suche.yahoo.de > >> > >> > - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: http://suche.yahoo.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installation of OJB
okay... let me ask, you do not have any of its internal-tables? in my case i need only "makePersisten" and getCollectionByQuery, and getObjectByQuery really, i wondered, that the tables are empty! (since now i use the created core-obj.sql to load it in my database... what a dirty workaround, isn´t it?:-) thank you!!! you made me happy! :-) but, why is this not told in anyway on the web-page? --- Brendan Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > I'm not using any. So far I've not used any features > that require them > but this may change... > > > -Original Message- > From: Ralf Bode [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 February 2004 10:43 > To: OJB Users List > Subject: RE: Installation of OJB > > Thanks Brendan, > > but it doesn´t work! > but this would be the way i likded ;-) > > how do you get your internal tables? > > --- Brendan Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > Looking in the source tree, the torque schema files > > are in src/schema. > > There are three files: > > ojbcore-schema.xml > > ojbtest-schema.xml > > ojbtest-data.xml > > > > There seems to be loads of targets in > > ./build-torque.xml but none of > > them seem to specifically build just the internal > > tables, they seem to > > do a wildcard *-schema.xml. > > > > Perhaps if you remove the two test files and run a > > build you'll only get > > the core tables created? > > I'd be interested to see if this works. I myself > > would like to see a > > specific core-only build target. Although it's > nice > > to see the junit > > tests run and verify that it all works, I don't > want > > to deploy all the > > test tables with my final app... > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ralf Bode [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 02 February 2004 09:55 > > To: OJB Users List > > Subject: RE: Installation of OJB > > > > Hi Brendan, > > > > yes i know, that i need its internal tables > > > > perhaps my 1. mail was not easy to understand. > > sorry for that. > > > > I installed ojb like suggested in "Getting > started" > > so i have a database called "ojb" > > which is full of tables i do not need! > > > > i am searching for "template", where > > i can define my-project-schema.xml > > > > after runing ant(on that template) i have a > database > > "my-project" > > which has only obj- and my tables. > > > > i think, that would be the most interessting > > for users, which like the brilliant way to work > with > > broker. i like it really, but i dont like the > whole > > tables (zoo,reptile, etc) :-) > > > > perhaps there is an tutorial, i didnt found it > yet! > > > > thanks for advice! > > > > greetings > > ralf > > > > > > --- Brendan Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > schrieb: > > > You only need the internal tables to use certain > > > features. > > > > > > I'm using a database sequence for my primary > keys > > > and I've not needed > > > any of the other stuff yet so all I've done is > > > included all the jars > > > from the binary dist into my classpath along > with > > a > > > copy of the > > > repository xml files rewritten for my app. > > > > > > http://db.apache.org/ojb/howto-use-db-sequences.html > > > > > > This doc more specifically covers what you need > > for > > > deployment: > > > http://db.apache.org/ojb/deployment.html > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Ralf Bode [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 02 February 2004 08:19 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Installation of OJB > > > > > > Hi to all, > > > > > > just a question about to install OJB > > > i read, that i have to load the sources and > > > run some build-scripts okay. > > > > > > but is there an easy-way? > > > i only need a build-script for the > binary-version > > > of OJB, that "installs" OJB-internal-tables into > > > database. > > > > > > or is there a reason for "building" all ? > > > > > > thanks for advice! > > > > > > greetings > > > ralf > > > > > > > > >
RE: Installation of OJB
Hi thank you, but i really do only search a "small" solution, whichs only builds my internal ojb-talbes. if was, i would load a deliverd obj-core.sql into my database. this would be enough, i am on a "lerning-trip" so tools like xdoclet seams to be "overdosed" greetings --- Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Basically there are two easy ways to getting > started, though I don't think > they are properly described in a tutorial yet. > > If you have an existing database that you want to > manipulate with OJB, > or you like to start with the database then create > the Java source code > for it, then I suggest you look at Druid > (http://sourceforge.net/projects/druid) which allows > you to import the > database/create the database, and then generates OJB > Java code for it. > > If you want to start with the Java source (and have > control over it), then > the easiest way would be to use the XDoclet module, > in which case it > bascially amounts to adding special javadoc tags to > your source code, and > then invoking an ant task in your build file that > creates the repository > descriptor (repository_user.xml) and a corresponding > torque database > schema. Details on the module and the usage of the > torque schema can be > found in the corresponding documentation > (xdoclet-module.html). I suggest > you use the CVS version or at least 1.0rc5 if you > want to work this way. > > Tom > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: http://suche.yahoo.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installation of OJB
Thanks Brendan, but it doesn´t work! but this would be the way i likded ;-) how do you get your internal tables? --- Brendan Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Looking in the source tree, the torque schema files > are in src/schema. > There are three files: > ojbcore-schema.xml > ojbtest-schema.xml > ojbtest-data.xml > > There seems to be loads of targets in > ./build-torque.xml but none of > them seem to specifically build just the internal > tables, they seem to > do a wildcard *-schema.xml. > > Perhaps if you remove the two test files and run a > build you'll only get > the core tables created? > I'd be interested to see if this works. I myself > would like to see a > specific core-only build target. Although it's nice > to see the junit > tests run and verify that it all works, I don't want > to deploy all the > test tables with my final app... > > > > -Original Message- > From: Ralf Bode [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 February 2004 09:55 > To: OJB Users List > Subject: RE: Installation of OJB > > Hi Brendan, > > yes i know, that i need its internal tables > > perhaps my 1. mail was not easy to understand. > sorry for that. > > I installed ojb like suggested in "Getting started" > so i have a database called "ojb" > which is full of tables i do not need! > > i am searching for "template", where > i can define my-project-schema.xml > > after runing ant(on that template) i have a database > "my-project" > which has only obj- and my tables. > > i think, that would be the most interessting > for users, which like the brilliant way to work with > broker. i like it really, but i dont like the whole > tables (zoo,reptile, etc) :-) > > perhaps there is an tutorial, i didnt found it yet! > > thanks for advice! > > greetings > ralf > > > --- Brendan Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > schrieb: > > You only need the internal tables to use certain > > features. > > > > I'm using a database sequence for my primary keys > > and I've not needed > > any of the other stuff yet so all I've done is > > included all the jars > > from the binary dist into my classpath along with > a > > copy of the > > repository xml files rewritten for my app. > > > http://db.apache.org/ojb/howto-use-db-sequences.html > > > > This doc more specifically covers what you need > for > > deployment: > > http://db.apache.org/ojb/deployment.html > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ralf Bode [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 02 February 2004 08:19 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Installation of OJB > > > > Hi to all, > > > > just a question about to install OJB > > i read, that i have to load the sources and > > run some build-scripts okay. > > > > but is there an easy-way? > > i only need a build-script for the binary-version > > of OJB, that "installs" OJB-internal-tables into > > database. > > > > or is there a reason for "building" all ? > > > > thanks for advice! > > > > greetings > > ralf > > > > > __ > > > > Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de > > Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: > > http://suche.yahoo.de > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > __ > > Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de > Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: > http://suche.yahoo.de > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: http://suche.yahoo.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installation of OJB
Hi Brendan, yes i know, that i need its internal tables perhaps my 1. mail was not easy to understand. sorry for that. I installed ojb like suggested in "Getting started" so i have a database called "ojb" which is full of tables i do not need! i am searching for "template", where i can define my-project-schema.xml after runing ant(on that template) i have a database "my-project" which has only obj- and my tables. i think, that would be the most interessting for users, which like the brilliant way to work with broker. i like it really, but i dont like the whole tables (zoo,reptile, etc) :-) perhaps there is an tutorial, i didnt found it yet! thanks for advice! greetings ralf --- Brendan Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > You only need the internal tables to use certain > features. > > I'm using a database sequence for my primary keys > and I've not needed > any of the other stuff yet so all I've done is > included all the jars > from the binary dist into my classpath along with a > copy of the > repository xml files rewritten for my app. > http://db.apache.org/ojb/howto-use-db-sequences.html > > This doc more specifically covers what you need for > deployment: > http://db.apache.org/ojb/deployment.html > > -Original Message- > From: Ralf Bode [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 February 2004 08:19 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Installation of OJB > > Hi to all, > > just a question about to install OJB > i read, that i have to load the sources and > run some build-scripts okay. > > but is there an easy-way? > i only need a build-script for the binary-version > of OJB, that "installs" OJB-internal-tables into > database. > > or is there a reason for "building" all ? > > thanks for advice! > > greetings > ralf > > __ > > Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de > Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: > http://suche.yahoo.de > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: http://suche.yahoo.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Installation of OJB
Hi to all, just a question about to install OJB i read, that i have to load the sources and run some build-scripts okay. but is there an easy-way? i only need a build-script for the binary-version of OJB, that "installs" OJB-internal-tables into database. or is there a reason for "building" all ? thanks for advice! greetings ralf __ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: http://suche.yahoo.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thread-safe
Hi, just a question about thread-safty. i use OJB to store business-objects in a webapp. in my struts-actions i use my own class called "OJBDelegate". Its methods are not! delcared with synchronized. now my question: is ojb threadsafe? if two or more "struts-actions" call the same method of my ojb-class, what should happend? thinking on transactions etc. greetings __ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: http://suche.yahoo.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
