Re: [onap-discuss] Deprecate modeling/etsicatalog repo

[denghui (L) via lists.onap.org]

Dear Amy

Since no comment received during 5 days, so I have opened a ticket here: 
deprecate etsicatalog repo in modeling project(IT-26097)
Do we need open another ticket for remove components from Jenkins build?

Thanks a lot for your advice
Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: ZWARICO, AMY 
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2023 9:10 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; denghui (L) 
Cc: Paweł Pawlak 
Subject: RE: Deprecate modeling/etsicatalog repo

That sounds like a great idea. Please remove the components in the etsicatalog 
from the jenkins build.

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of 
denghui (L) via lists.onap.org
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2023 10:07 AM
To: onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; 
onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>
Subject: [onap-discuss] Deprecate modeling/etsicatalog repo

Dear Community, The Modeling project is composed of multiple repositories, 
among them, the etsicatalog repo was not active since last November, and the 
contributors don't plan to do any feature updates. After discussing with the 
main

Dear Community,

The Modeling project is composed of multiple repositories, among them, the 
etsicatalog repo was not active since last November, and the contributors don't 
plan to do any feature updates. After discussing with the main contributors, we 
suggest to archive the repo, and mark it read-only/unmaintained.
We would like to trigger a final call for this decision, please check if you 
would like to keep the repo active and help contribute or maintain the code.
If I do not hear an objection within 5 business days, then I will open a ticket 
with the Help Desk to move forward with the archive process.

Thanks.

DENG Hui



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#24563): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/24563
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/101919890/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-tsc] Deprecate modeling/etsicatalog repo

[denghui (L) via lists.onap.org]

Dear Community,

The Modeling project is composed of multiple repositories, among them, the 
etsicatalog repo was not active since last November, and the contributors don't 
plan to do any feature updates. After discussing with the main contributors, we 
suggest to archive the repo, and mark it read-only/unmaintained.
We would like to trigger a final call for this decision, please check if you 
would like to keep the repo active and help contribute or maintain the code.
If I do not hear an objection within 5 business days, then I will open a ticket 
with the Help Desk to move forward with the archive process.

Thanks.

DENG Hui


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#9456): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/9456
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/101919892/21656
Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: 
https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/21656/1412191262/xyzzy 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] SDC PTL election results

[denghui (L) via lists.onap.org]

Congratulations to Christophe for new leadership
Thanks Ofir for your work.

DENG Hui

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Ofir Sonsino
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 5:07 PM
To: onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Closset, Christophe 

Subject: [onap-discuss] SDC PTL election results

All SDC committers have voted: 
https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_fd54171122362463

Congratulations to Christophe Closset !

Result is now reflected at 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Voting+Results+History


Br,
Ofir

From: onap-...@lists.onap.org 
mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of Closset, 
Christophe
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 10:23 AM
To: onap-...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-sdc] Nominations for SDC PTL are open

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Dear all,

I'd like to nominate myself for the PTL role of SDC.



Short Summary
I've been part of the ONAP community since its inception in 2017 and I've been 
involved in many aspects of it :
I'm a committer on CLAMP, integration and have been contributing changes to 
CLAMP, SO, SDC, portal, AAF, Doc, integration and a few on OOM.
I've been working in SDN for a long time (at least for the last 5years+), 
supporting AT&T teams in the open sourcing of ECOMP and I've been recently 
engaged in SDC and would be honored to push the work further.



Objective

As PTL, I want to work with the SDC team and make SDC a success for the whole 
ONAP community.


Regards
Christophe

From: onap-...@lists.onap.org 
mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of Sonsino, 
Ofir
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 10:23 AM
To: onap-...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-sdc] Nominations for SDC PTL are open

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Dear SDC committers,

Nominations for the PTL position for SDC project are open, according to the 
process described at:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Annual+Community+Elections+-+Process#AnnualCommunityElectionsProcess-PTLElections

Individuals interested in running for the PTL position should reply-all 
indicating their intention to run.
Nominations are due by 12PM UTC, July 23th.

Br,

Ofir Sonsino
Project Technical Lead, SDC
AT&T Network Application Development * NetCom
Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago
***
Office: +972 (3) 5451417
Mobile: +972 (52) 4377782
E-mail: ofir.sons...@intl.att.com



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#21775): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/21775
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/75840436/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Community Coordinators - CALL FOR SELF NOMINATIONS - Ends May 9, 5 PM Pacific

[denghui (L)]

Dear TSC,

I would like to humbly self-nominate myself for the "Network Management" 
Community Coordinator position.

Candidate Name:
*@Hui Deng, denghu...@huawei.com

Company:
*Huawei

Head-shot picture:
[image003.jpg]
Position:
*"Network Management" Community Coordinator

Biography:
*Hui DENG obtained his Doctor degree from Dept. Computer Science and 
Technology at Tsinghua University in 2002. He worked as Principal staff between 
2007 and 2016 in China Mobile. He joined Huawei and is the director of 5G 
Core/MEC/NFV related standard and opensource. He acted as the co-chair of IETF 
MIF working group. And he was the board of director of WBA(Wireless Broadband 
Alliance) between 2012-2014, acted as the board of director of OPNFV between 
2014-2016 and 1st board of chairman of OPEN-O project in Linux Foundation. He 
was the SDO coordinator, co-chair of modeling subcommittee in ONAP between 
2017-2019..

Candidate's Statement:

As the ex-SDO coordinator, we have organized 4 times Multi-SDO ONAP workshop 
before:

External SDOs session in Developer event in 
September

External SDO session in ONAP Forum Dec. 12th, 
2017

Jan 2019 ONAP DDF OPNFV Plugfest 
SDO

Apr. 2019 ONAP M-SDOs 
workshop
Based on my past experience of network management , I am willing to continue to 
help on those topics, and bring the connections between ONAP with those 
SDOs/Opensources...

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of 
Kenny Paul via Lists.Onap.Org
Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 4:57 PM
To: onap-...@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] Community Coordinators - CALL FOR SELF NOMINATIONS - 
Ends May 9, 5 PM Pacific

(bcc'd to onap-discuss)

There are currently six Community Coordinator positions open. These positions 
are open to anyone.

  *   
Infrastructure
  *   
AI(ML/DL)
  *   
5G
  *   Cloud 
Native
  *   Edge 
Computing
  *   Network 
Management

Who is eligible to Run: Any Community Member

Who is eligible to Vote: TSC Members

Process:

Self-Nomination Phase
Individuals interested in running for a particular Community Coordinator 
position must reply-all to this email with the specific coordinator position 
you are running for.  Candidates are strongly recommended to include a 
hea

[onap-discuss] Zero commit removal Request and Seperate the committer for parsers repo of Modeling project

[denghui (L)]

Dear TSC and the communities,

In order to avoid the future risk, we will separate java based parser, python 
based parser, and microservice based parser into 3 different repos.
Modeling project current have below 4 repos:

modeling/

modeling/modelspec

modeling/javatoscachecker

modeling/toscaparsers

modeling/genericparser



In this case, we will

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Zero+commit+removal+Request+and+Seperate+the+committer+for+parsers+repo



1) move the committers of javatoscachecker to its new repo javatoscachecker:

rjana


Rittwik


Jana


rj...@att.com


serbanjora


Serban


Jora


sj2...@att.com


2) python based parser committers will be kept and

Zhaoxing


Zhaoxing


Meng


meng.zhaoxi...@zte.com.cn


maopengzhang


maopeng


zhang


zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn


remove all other committers of toscaparsers repo

AmirLevy


Amir


Levy


a...@cloudify.co


rjana


Rittwik


Jana


rj...@att.com


serbanjora


Serban


Jora


sj2...@att.com


3) remove zero committer from modeling/ based on request from Linux Foundation, 
below are info provided by Linux Foundation

Repo


Name


email


# com


onap-gerrit-modeling-committers


Alexander Vul


alex@intel.com


0


onap-gerrit-modeling-committers


dong hu


don...@raisecom.com


0


onap-gerrit-modeling-committers


Amir Levy


a...@cloudify.co


0


onap-gerrit-modeling-committers


Andrei Kojukhov


andr...@amdocs.com


0


onap-gerrit-modeling-committers


Sandeep Shah


sandeep.sh...@techmahindra.com


0


onap-gerrit-modeling-committers


shitao li


lishi...@huawei.com


0


onap-gerrit-modeling-committers


Rittwik Jana


rj...@att.com


0


Thanks a lot for your checking
Best regards,

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#15623): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15623
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29915452/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Poll on attendance of modeling subcommitee in ONS

[denghui (L)]

Hello modelers,

Linus foundation is kindly help to prepare the modeling subcommittee event 
before and during ONS, we create a poll here:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Poll+on+modeling+subcommitee+on+ONS+attendance
Please kindly help to fill in

1)  Whether you plan to attend Apr. 1st/2nd only

2)  Whether you plan to attend Apr 1st/2nd and ONS

3)  Whether you plan to attend Apr 1st/2nd and unconference Modleing 
subcommittee meeting between 3rd-5th. April.

Thanks a lot for your help

Andy and DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#15409): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15409
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29694751/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Collecting related issues for M-SDOs workshop in ONS 2019

[denghui (L)]

Dear community members/PTL/committees/task forces

Based on last week F2F discussion, in order to host an efficient ONAP/M-SDO 
workshop in ONS 2019, we are collecting the input issues from the community 
(projects/committee/task force) before end of January.
After collecting those issues, we will send dedicated topic to related SDO, let 
them help ONAP to resolve those issue during the workshop specifically.

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Collect+issues+in+ONAP+related+to+M-SDOs

Deadline is Jan. 31st eastern time.

thanks a lot for your help
Best regards,

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#15193): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15193
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29570748/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Call for SDOs related issues before ONS M-SDOs workshop

[denghui (L)]

Dear community members/PTL/committees/task forces

Based on last week F2F discussion, in order to host an efficient ONAP/M-SDO 
workshop in ONS 2019, we are collecting the input issues from the community 
(projects/committee/task force) before end of January.
After collecting those issues, we will send dedicated topic to related SDO, let 
them help ONAP to resolve those issue during the workshop specifically.

Please fill in below wiki page before Jan. 31st eastern time.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Collect+issues+in+ONAP+related+to+M-SDOs

thanks a lot for your help
Best regards,

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#14989): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/14989
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29145654/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] ONAP/OSM topic to TSC

[denghui (L)]

Hi Catherine,

Speaking for SDO coordinator, from today M-SDO slot, we have one presentation 
about ONAP/OSM Harmonization made from Amdocs.
There were comments from audience that it should be discussed in TSC level, so 
I am forwarding this request to TSC here for you to consider including this 
into future TSC meeting.

The link of presentation is here:
https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/48533526/ONAP_OSM_Harmonization_Status.pptx?api=v2

Thanks a lot for your consideration
Best regards,

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#14898): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/14898
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28985836/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] SDO‘s Report this afternoon

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

We are going to have M-SDO report to ONAP as below agenda this afternoon 4:30pm 
in plenary room: 
Ritchie:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Jan+2019+ONAP+DDF+OPNFV+Plugfest+SDO

Please each presenter to upload your slide in advance, thanks


Agenda:

1) TMF/MEF, Andy

2) ETSI NFV, Thinh

3) ONAP/OSM, Andrei

4) 20190402 Multi-SDO/ZSM/ONAP/OSM workshop call for topics

Feel free to attend , thanks a lot

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#14888): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/14888
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28984590/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Modeling subcommittee call today

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

We have two slots of modeling subcommittee this afternoon in Paris, the agenda 
is here:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+2019-01-08

the F2F meeting place is plenary room: Richie 
(200)

Please be aware of that we are going to use webex other than zoom, the bridge 
is here:
Tuesday January 8, 2019 14:45 - 15:30
https://nokiameetings.webex.com
meeting #: 958 487 154 Meeting password: cKqR4Y42

Best regards,

Andy and DENG Hui


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#14848): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/14848
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28972562/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Call every night this week

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

I suddenly find out that we still have TSC call tonight, for people who from 
china, we have the call every night from Monday to Thursday this week, from 
9pm-12am.
Maybe this time is fine for European people an Eastern Coast, but it is really 
not good for Chinese who have the family.

I am suggesting to not do this again.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#14472): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/14472
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28742735/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] SDC Update

[denghui (L)]

Same here, definitely will miss u.

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Chaker Al Hakim
Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 2:04 AM
To: onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Merkado, Tomer ; 
Nachmias, Lior ; Sonsino, Ofir 
; Gitelman, Tal ; 
Shlosberg, Yuli ; Amit, Idan 
; EMPOROPULO, VITALIY ; 
Avi Gaffa ; oren...@amdocs.com; WEISS KEIDAR, EINAV 
; halfon@amdocs.com; Lefevre, Catherine 
; micla...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] SDC Update

Hi Michael,

I wish you all the best in your new endeavor . You will be missed.

All the best,
Chaker


From: onap-...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Michael Lando
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 6:53 PM
To: onap-...@lists.onap.org
Cc: 'onap-...@lists.onap.org' 
mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Merkado, Tomer 
mailto:tomer.merk...@intl.att.com>>; Nachmias, Lior 
mailto:lior.nachm...@intl.att.com>>; Sonsino, Ofir 
mailto:ofir.sons...@intl.att.com>>; Gitelman, Tal 
mailto:tal.gitel...@intl.att.com>>; Shlosberg, Yuli 
mailto:yuli.shlosb...@intl.att.com>>; Amit, Idan 
mailto:idan.a...@intl.att.com>>; EMPOROPULO, VITALIY 
mailto:vitaliy.emporop...@amdocs.com>>; Avi 
Gaffa mailto:avraham.ga...@amdocs.com>>; 
oren...@amdocs.com; WEISS KEIDAR, EINAV 
mailto:einav.we...@amdocs.com>>; 
halfon@amdocs.com; Lefevre, Catherine 
mailto:catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com>>; 
micla...@gmail.com
Subject: [onap-sdc] SDC Update

Hello,

I Would like to submit my resignation from the PTL position in SDC,
As I am leaving my compony I will no Longer be able to participate in the 
Project.

The committers for SDC are already aware of this change.

With this notification I would also like to open the nominations to replace me 
as the SDC PTL.









BR,

[Michael Lando]

AT&T Network Application Development * NetCom
Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago
***
Office: +972 (3) 5451487
Mobile: +972 (54) 7833603
e-mail: michael.la...@intl.att.com



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#14220): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/14220
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28504716/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-modelingsub] [onap-discuss] Agreements on Montreal offline discussion of Resource IM and Service IM

[denghui (L)]

Hi Kenny and Andy,

All those breakout offline discussion will be discussed in general session 
formally this afternoon, Chesla and Kevin, please join the discussion this 
afternoon from 4:30,

Thanks a lot for your help
Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: MAYER, ANDREW J [mailto:am8...@att.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 1:14 PM
To: onap-modeling...@lists.onap.org; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; SCAGGS, KEVIN 
; WECHSLER, CHESLA C ; denghui (L) 

Cc: HALLAHAN, RYAN 
Subject: Re: [onap-modelingsub] [onap-discuss] Agreements on Montreal offline 
discussion of Resource IM and Service IM

Thanks for clearing this up Kenny.
Best Regards,
Andy



From: "Kenny Paul" mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 10:08:32 AM
To: "onap-modeling...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-modeling...@lists.onap.org>" 
mailto:onap-modeling...@lists.onap.org>>, 
"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, "SCAGGS, 
KEVIN" mailto:ks0...@att.com>>, "WECHSLER, CHESLA C" 
mailto:cw1...@att.com>>, "'denghui (L)'" 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>
Cc: "HALLAHAN, RYAN" mailto:rh1...@att.com>>
Subject: Re: [onap-modelingsub] [onap-discuss] Agreements on Montreal offline 
discussion of Resource IM and Service IM
Actually that is completely non-negotiable; anything discussed in a breakout 
discussion MUST be taken back to a general, and fully public subcommittee call 
before any decision can be made.

...same song I've been singing for a couple of weeks now. ;-)

Best Regards,
-kenny

Kenny Paul, Technical Program Manager, The Linux Foundation
kp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>, 510.766.5945
San Francisco Bay Area, Pacific Time Zone


From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of 
WECHSLER, CHESLA C
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 8:43 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Agreements on Montreal offline discussion of 
Resource IM and Service IM

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.

Because of the lack of good audio in the breakout sessions (and really, in 
general), I think we can only come out of Montreal with proposals to bring back 
to the normal call for discussion and approval.  Not all key people were able 
to travel to Montreal unfortunately.  Deng, Andy, what do you think?

Chesla



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13415): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13415
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27796546/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] ONAP Support for Secure Communication

[denghui (L)]

Modeling: No

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of gaoweitao
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 11:50 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; amy.zwar...@att.com
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] ONAP Support for Secure Communication

Hi Amy,

  VNFSDK：No

BR
Victor
发件人：Amy Zwarico
收件人：onap-discuss@lists.onap.org,
时间：2018-10-16 22:18:36
主 题：[onap-discuss] ONAP Support for Secure Communication






PTLs: The security subcommittee is tracking ONAP support of secure 
communication on all ONAP interfaces (typically HTTPS), which is one of the S3P 
requirements. Please respond to this email with a the status of your project’s 
support of secure communication. ("Yes" or "No")

Amy Zwarico, LMTS

Chief Security Office / Enterprise Security Support / Cloud Security Services

AT&T Services

(205) 613-1667






-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13125): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13125
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27369768/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Joint modeling and architecture meeting during Motreal F2F architecture meeting

[denghui (L)]

Hi, architecture and modeling subcommittee

This is the proposal to have a joint meeting between architecture and modeling 
subcommittee. Based on recent discussion, modeling subcommittee has difficulty 
to move forward on some topics due to lack of the guidance of ONAP architecture.
Since there are many modelers will be in this meeting. In this case we are 
proposing to have a joint meeting right after the architecture meeting on 
Wednesday morning (31st, Oct) for only half day in order to have a better 
alignment of future work.

Please kindly help to stay half  day there if you are interested in this 
follow-up work discussion and we will check whether there is the possibility to 
prepare the remote access bridge.
We will not make any decision in this half day meeting, and will bring 
everything output from this meeting back to our regular modeling subcommittee 
call to confirm again.

Thanks a lot for your attention
Best regards,

DENG Hui


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12677): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12677
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26267161/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for agenda 9/18/2018 modeling meeting

[denghui (L)]

Dear Modelers,

Andy and I would like to reformulate our session application based on the wiki. 
Here is the tentative agenda items for this week,
Duration

Agenda Item

Requested by

Notes / Links

START RECORDING

 5

New cochair welcome


Hui Deng  & Andy 
Mayer

 5

 Resource IM report

 Xu Yang



 5

 Service IM report

 Lingli Deng



 5

 DM report

 Anatoly Katzman



 5

 M4 discussion


 Hui Deng & Andy 
Mayer





 ?

 Mehmet Toy





Feel free to add any other items you may have at : 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+2018-09-18

Thanks

Co-chairs


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12444): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12444
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/25720653/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [modeling]Cancel the modeling subcommitee/Service IM/Data Model call this week

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Due to New Year in Israel, modeling subcommittee would like to cancel below 
calls this week:

1)  modeling subcommittee call , 9am eastern time Tuesday.

2)  Service IM call, 12pm eastern time, Wednesday

3)  Data modeling call, 10am eastern time, Monday

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12323): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12323
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/25499496/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling Modeling Subcommittee Elections Call for Self-Nominations

[denghui (L)]

Dear Modeling subcommittee

I would like sincerely nominate myself as a candidate of chair of modeling 
subcommittee.

The goal of next year of modeling subcommittee needs to achieve the following 
goals
1) The internal data model design based on consensus.
2) Resource information model design, especially align with Data model.
3) Service model design with help from Architecture committee and impacted 
projects.
4) Infrastructure modeling design together with Multicloud in order to support 
Azure, K8S, .. et al.
5) Support other model spec from other committees like close loop policy, data 
collection VES .. et al.
6) Clarify more detail of the high level requirement together with use case 
committee and impacted projects.

If I were elected,  I would do my best to lead the group in taking the 
following opportunities for modeling subcommittee
1) Since the market of NFV has already taken off, most of them are based on 
SDOs, I would bring theirs experience into ONAP which could help ONAP become 
more success.
2) There are many standard delegate's involvement at the moment, I would revise 
some current process to better transfer SDO delegate's involvement into 
productive deliverables for ONAP community.
3) I would like to establish more mutual communication and setup activities 
with other SDOs like: ETSI NFV, TMF, MEF, ONF, IETF .. et al.

Below are my short Bio.
Hui DENG obtained his Doctor degree from Dept. Computer Science and Technology 
at Tsinghua University in 2002. He worked as chief researcher in Hitachi 
(China) R&D Cooperation from 2002 to 2007, and worked as Principal staff 
between 2007 and 2016 in China Mobile. He joined Huawei and working on NFV 
related topic since 2016. He acted as the co-chair of IETF MIF working group. 
And he was the board of director of WBA(Wireless Broadband Alliance) between 
2012-2014, acted as the board of director of OPNFV between 2014-2016 and 1st 
board of chairman of OPEN-O project in Linux Foundation. He is the current 
chair of modeling subcommittee in ONAP.

2017 - 2018 Chair of modeling subcommittee, ONAP
2016 - 2016 1st Board of Chairman, OPEN-O
2014 - 2016 Board of Director (officer), OPNFV
2012 - 2014 Board of Director, WBA(Wireless Broadband Alliance)
2009 - 2016 Co-chair, MIF(Multiple Interfaces) WG, IETF
2016 – now ETSI NFV ISG coordinator of Huawei

Professional experience
2016 – Now Chief NFV Strategy Officer, Huawei
2007 – 2016 Principal Staff, China Mobile
2002 – 2007 Chief Researcher, Hitachi

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui


From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Kenny Paul
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 4:41 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling Modeling Subcommittee Elections 
Call for Self-Nominations

As per Subcommittee Chair 
Elections
 I am officially opening the self-nomination period for the Modeling 
Subcommittee Chair elections.
The nomination period will end on Friday, Aug 24 @ 2:00 Pm Pacific

The members eligible to be a voting member is set to V118 of the Modeling 
Subcommittee Membership Page
I have updated that page, adding a column for Company and a column that says 
"Voting Member", and removing 3 individuals I know are no longer involved with 
ONAP.  One of them never even set up a wiki account.

The "Voting Member" column usage is simple. If you are the person from your 
company that will be casting the vote, then put "Yes" in that column. If not, 
leave it blank.


Who is eligible to Run: Subcommittee members of record (as per v118 of the wiki 
page)

Who is eligible to Vote: Subcommittee members of record (as per v118 of the 
wiki page) AND as controlled within the context of Section 
4.4.1.4
 of the Community Document

Process:

Self-Nomination Phase
When appropriate a call for nominations will be sent by the LF to the 
appropriate distribution list, using the subcommittee's specific email tag.  
Individuals interested in running for the Subcommittee Chair position must 
reply-all to that email with your intention to run.  It is recommended that 
candidates include a biography and statement of intent on why you would be a 
good person to hold this position.
·
·

 *   The nomination phase begins with the receipt of the announcement ( as 
verified by checking the appropriate list in groups.io 
)
 *   The nomination phase ends four (4) full business days after the 
announcement in the same time zone the poll was initiated from

Election Phase
A Condorcet election will be held using the CIVS voting 
system.  All 
subcommittee members (as indicated above) will receive an invitation to vote.
·
·

 *   The election

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] [0815 Service IM Minutes]

[denghui (L)]

Hi Menglin

For Item 6:, I would suggest to revise it as below:
6: For R4+, the relationship between Service template and Network Service 
Template would bette be guided jointly by Architecture and Modeling 
subcommittee, for NSD in R3, please Maopeng’s help to propose to SDC and check 
whether it could be acceptable in SDC for such new node type.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui


From: LinMeng [mailto:menglin...@chinamobile.com]

Subject: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] [0815 Service IM Minutes]

Hi all,
This is the minutes of Service IM Call on Wednesday. Please check and make sure 
that we have consensus on it.

1. Yan presents VFC requirements for 
NSD<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Network+Service+Descriptor+Proposal>. VFC 
project implement ETSI NFVO, which needs to consume the NSD. VFC also needs 
standard NSD. VFC would like to receive the NSD from SDC. In the long run, VFC 
also needs to receive NSD from OSS and BSS.
2. YangXu presents NSD updates from the resource IM calls ?Proposed Network 
Service Descriptor 
Model<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Proposed+Network+Service+Descriptor+Model>?.
 From his understanding of previous calls of reousrce IM CALL, NS is a 
composition of VNFs, VLs and topology of how to construct a service, which are 
all in the domain of resource. NS is different from the service we want ONAP to 
handle.
3. From Lingli and Andy's discussion: For IM, we agreed to move NSD to resource 
domain for Casablanca. But for Dublin+, there are considerations on having also 
service domain reflection on resources (including network service).
4. MaoPeng presents NSD 
proposal<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Network+Service+Descriptor+Proposal>: 
NSD requires to do some limitation in NFV resoures composition, not all the SDC 
resources and substitution mappings to NS TOSCA node.
5. Currently we are working on enabling interworking commercial NFVO deployment 
with ONAP community version
6. Agreed to continue with a special service type for network service design 
and distribution to be supported by SDC/SO/VFC for Casablanca.

Best Regards,
Lin
---
孟琳
人工智能和智慧运营研发中心
中国移动通信有限公司研究院
中国北京市西城区宣武门西大街32号（100053）

Meng Lin
Center of AI and Intelligent Operation R&D
China Mobile Research Institute
No.32 Xuanwumen west street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China

Mobile: +86 13810012241
Email: menglin...@chinamobile.com<mailto:menglin...@chinamobile.com>
-



发件人: mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> 代表 
LinMeng mailto:menglin...@chinamobile.com>>
答复: mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, 
mailto:menglin...@chinamobile.com>>
日期: 2018年8月15日 星期三 14:44
收件人: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, Yan Yang 
mailto:yangya...@chinamobile.com>>, "yangxu (H)" 
mailto:yang...@huawei.com>>, maopeng 
mailto:zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn>>, "Katzman, 
Anatoly" mailto:ak4...@intl.att.com>>
抄送: 邓灵莉 mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>>, 
"denghui (L)" mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>
主题: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] [Service IM Agenda]

Hi all,
For today’s service IM call, we will continue the remaining agenda of 
yesterday’s modeling subcommittee call,  will mainly focus on NSD/SD Discussion:

1.  VFC requirements for NSD (Yan Yang<https://wiki.onap.org/display/~yangyan>)

2.  Resource/Service IM decision on NSD  (Xu 
Yang<https://wiki.onap.org/display/~yxpoke>)

3. NSD Proposal (Maopeng Zhang<https://wiki.onap.org/display/~maopengzhang>)

4. Service DM proposal (Anatoly 
Katzman<https://wiki.onap.org/display/~anatoly.katzman>)

5. NSD/SD next step



Thanks!



Best regards,

Lin

---
孟琳
人工智能和智慧运营研发中心
中国移动通信有限公司研究院
中国北京市西城区宣武门西大街32号（100053）

Meng Lin
Center of AI and Intelligent Operation R&D
China Mobile Research Institute
No.32 Xuanwumen west street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China

Mobile: +86 13810012241
Email: menglin...@chinamobile.com<mailto:menglin...@chinamobile.com>
-





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11943): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11943
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24576204/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] Next week call will be chaired by Andy

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Due to my schedule next week, I won't be available for next week call. And Andy 
has agreed to kindly help to chair the call of modeling subcommittee next week.
Please feel free to contact with him about your proposal of next week agenda.

Many thanks for Andy's help
Best regards,

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11925): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11925
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24612980/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] DM IG 2018-08-13 call is cancelled #modeling

[denghui (L)]

Hi Anatoly

Last week, during Service IM call, there were suggestion that this needs to be 
further discussed,

1)  Current NSD IM belongs to resource IM other than service IM according 
to the consensus of Service/Resource IM discussion.

2)  VFC needs NS information for their use case.

Let's discuss it today during modeling subcommittee call, I will arrange every 
related statekholder to discuss it, maybe :

1)  VFC requirements for NS (YANG Yan)

2)  Resource/Service IM decision on NSD (Yang Xu)

3)  NSD Proposal (Maopeng)

4)  Service DM proposal (Anatoly)

5)  Next step (all)

If needed, we could discuss it again on Wednesday service IM call

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

From: Katzman, Anatoly [mailto:ak4...@intl.att.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 9:00 PM
To: 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' 
Cc: denghui (L) ; LinMeng ; 
MAYER, ANDREW J ; Lando,Michael ; 
Alexander Vul ; Anatoly Katzman ; 
Andrei Kojukhov ; GUPTA, ARUN ; BAXTER, 
ANDREW ; Bill Coan ; HU, BIN 
; Chenchuanyu ; Chuyi Guo 
; BULLARD, GIL ; Eshet, Itamar 
; Jacqueline Beaulac ; 
Janusz Pieczerak ; Jessie S Jewitt 
; SCAGGS, KEVIN ; Lianhao Lu 
; Lingli Deng ; Maopeng Zhang 
; Marek Kukulski ; 
NUTAKKI, MADHU ; Priya TG ; Lishitao 
; Thinh Nguyenphu ; Gaoweitao 
(Victor, MANO) ; WECHSLER, CHESLA C ; 
Xiaodong Shang ; yangxu (H) ; 
Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network) ; Zhong Heliu 
; Zhuoyao HUANG <10112...@zte.com.cn>
Subject: [modeling] DM IG 2018-08-13 call is cancelled #modeling

Dear all,

the today meeting of the Data Modeling Interest 
Group<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+Interest+Group+2018-08-13+Meeting+Minutes>
 is cancelled.

The plans for this call were to finalize the model of an ONAP service so that 
it would support the following cases:
- ONAP end-to-end service
- ETSI NS
- nested services
We are very close to these goals. The impression after the previous call was 
that the proposed TOSCA 
definitions<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/R3+onap.nodes.Service> and 
modeling conventions<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Complex+Service+Example> 
would be able to provide an adequate coverage for all these cases.

Based on this impression, I would like to use this unplanned break time for the 
following activities:
1. improvement of the examples and other explanatory 
materials<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Complex+Service+Example> provided 
with the model. All those who is interested in a better explanation on any 
aspect of the service model, please visit the meeting agenda 
page<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+Interest+Group+2018-08-13+Meeting+Minutes>
 and submit your questions in the Q&A section
2. preparing the ground for the upcoming discussion of Allotted Resource (am 
ONAP model for a share of an external service)

Sorry for the short notice,

Anatoly Katzman


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11869): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11869
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24502641/21656
Mute #modeling: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=modeling&subid=2740164
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] [modeling] Call for nominations: modeling subcommitee Chair and Vice Chair

[denghui (L)]

Hello Modelers

I would like nominate myself as a candidate of chair and vice chair of modeling 
subcommittee.

The goal of next year of modeling subcommittee needs to achieve the following 
goals
1) The internal data model design based on consensus.
2) Resource information model design, especially align with Data model.
3) Service model design with help from Architecture committee and impacted 
projects.
4) Infrastructure modeling design together with Multicloud in order to support 
Azure, K8S, .. et al.
5) Support other model spec from other committees like close loop policy, data 
collection VES .. et al.
6) Clarify more detail of the high level requirement together with use case 
committee and impacted projects.

If I were elected,  I would do my best to lead the group in taking the 
following opportunities for modeling subcommittee
1) Since the market of NFV has already taken off, most of them are based on 
SDOs, I would bring theirs experience into ONAP which could help ONAP become 
more success.
2) There are many standard delegate's involvement at the moment, I would revise 
some current process to better transfer SDO delegate's involvement into 
productive deliverables for ONAP community.
3) I would like to establish more mutual communication and setup activities 
with other SDOs like: ETSI NFV, TMF, MEF, ONF, IETF .. et al.

Below are my short Bio.
Hui DENG obtained his Doctor degree from Dept. Computer Science and Technology 
at Tsinghua University in 2002. He worked as chief researcher in Hitachi 
(China) R&D Cooperation from 2002 to 2007, and worked as Principal staff 
between 2007 and 2016 in China Mobile. He joined Huawei and working on NFV 
related topic since 2016. He acted as the co-chair of IETF MIF working group. 
And he was the board of director of WBA(Wireless Broadband Alliance) between 
2012-2014, acted as the board of director of OPNFV between 2014-2016 and 1st 
board of chairman of OPEN-O project in Linux Foundation. He is the current 
chair of modeling subcommittee in ONAP.

2017 - 2018 Chair of modeling subcommittee, ONAP
2016 - 2016 1st Board of Chairman, OPEN-O
2014 - 2016 Board of Director (officer), OPNFV
2012 - 2014 Board of Director, WBA(Wireless Broadband Alliance)
2009 - 2016 Co-chair, MIF(Multiple Interfaces) WG, IETF
2016 - ETSI NFV ISG coordinator of Huawei

Professional experience
2016 - Now Chief NFV Strategy Officer, Huawei
2007 - 2016 Principal Staff, China Mobile
2002 - 2007 Chief Researcher, Hitachi


From: onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2018 11:13 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; 
onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>
Subject: [onap-tsc] [modeling] Call for nominations: modeling subcommitee Chair 
and Vice Chair

Hello all

Based on today modeling subcommittee call, we have decided the following 
consensus for the election of modeling subcommittee
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+Subcommittee+Election<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Modeling-2BSubcommittee-2BElection&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=3UIWLh7P2rAFm1qdZ7jMYQ&m=fYPrSce5nFNyqgTvCYIi3JeW0zAkWPjkxxLU1URlVek&s=Jsvl4N827SR8fidxWGa-JJpiB196vc3qyhs1d9wKnB4&e=>

This is the self-nomination phase and will end in 2 business weeks: Thursday 
Aug 14th 2018
Please identify clearly whether you are interested in Chair, VC or both of them.

Please aware of members of modeling subcommittee is locked,
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Members<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Members&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=3UIWLh7P2rAFm1qdZ7jMYQ&m=fYPrSce5nFNyqgTvCYIi3JeW0zAkWPjkxxLU1URlVek&s=NFYW-ld4JkJStHostl_YsfYze9kpn6r2UirRBN4pYqI&e=>
We don't allow anybody add his name after today modeling subcommittee call 
20180731 10am eastern time

Thanks a lot for your help

Best regards,

Deng Hui



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11854): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11854
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24501885/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Poll on ONS EU modeling meetup

[denghui (L)]

Hello all



Based on last modeling subcommittee call, we will poll how many people will 
attend this event:

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/201809+ONS+EU+Modeling+meetup+poll



We will check how many people and who will attend this event then decide what 
we could decide,

please fill in your name at the link if you plan to attend,



Thanks a lot



DENG Hui


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11793): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11793
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24239521/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for nominations: modeling subcommitee Chair and Vice Chair

[denghui (L)]

Hi Chesla

I have just updated the wiki page based on your recommendation by including 
below link,
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Technical+Community+Document#ONAPTechnicalCommunityDocument-4.4.1.3SubcommitteeChair/ViceChairElections

thanks a lot for your help
Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of C. Wechsler
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2018 11:51 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for nominations: modeling 
subcommitee Chair and Vice Chair


[Sorry for starting new 
topic
 with Confluence access request  - should have replied here]
Hi, Kenny, Deng,

I'm having the same access problem  getting to the link on the page Deng 
created about the subcommittee voting rules.

Both this page:

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+Subcommittee+Election



and this page referenced from the previous one:

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Subcommittee+Election+Process



give me that "You do not have permission to view this page. Request access 
below, you will receive an email when you've been granted access" message which 
I think Kenny has attributed to a locked page that was deprecated in favor of 
the new rules.



Would you please make sure the links are correct on this page at your earliest 
possible opportunity and send an update to the group?  I think the right place 
to go is 
here
 but I'm not sure and don't want to steer people wrong.



Thanks,

Chesla


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11567): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11567
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23904335/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for nominations: modeling subcommitee Chair and Vice Chair

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Based on today modeling subcommittee call, we have decided the following 
consensus for the election of modeling subcommittee
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+Subcommittee+Election

This is the self-nomination phase and will end in 2 business weeks: Thursday 
Aug 14th 2018
Please identify clearly whether you are interested in Chair, VC or both of them.

Please aware of members of modeling subcommittee is locked,
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Members
We don't allow anybody add his name after today modeling subcommittee call 
20180731 10am eastern time

Thanks a lot for your help

Best regards,

Deng Hui


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11556): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11556
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23904335/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss][onap-tsc] PTL Election announcement for ONAP Multi VIM/Cloud project

[denghui (L)]

+1 for both of you

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Xinhui Li
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 7:00 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss][onap-tsc] PTL Election announcement for ONAP Multi 
VIM/Cloud project

Dear TSC and ONAP community,

It is my pleasure to announce the result of Multi VIM/Cloud PTL election for 
R3.  Bin Yang ran as the only candidate and has been confirmed by the voting 
results of committers at: 
https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_949d2520dce241dd.

Congratulations Bin Yang!

Taking this opportunity, I would like to thank the TSC and the ONAP community 
for your support to Multi VIM/Cloud project.  Bin Yang has been participating 
in the Multi VIM/Cloud project from the very beginning and he is a strong 
community leader. I am confident our project will continue its success under 
Bin Yang’s leadership.  Your continuous support to him and this team will be 
greatly appreciated.

To ensure the success of the project and a smooth transition, I will remain to 
be a committer of Multi VIM/Cloud to help as much as possible.

Best wishes and thanks!
Xinhui Li


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11439): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11439
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23743082/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] PTL Election for modeling project - Result

[denghui (L)]

Thank you Chesla.

TSC recommend that the election of the committee should happen after TSC 
election, that is after Aug.15, but have to finish before Aug. 30.
According to this rule, self-nomination should be after 8.15.

Current modeling subcommittee follow Subcommittee Officer Elections which are 
governed under ONAP TSC Charter - 
Pre-LFN#5.4.1Membership
I will try to send confirm email to all current members and clean the inactive 
member asap.

Thanks a lot for your remind
Best regards,

DENG Hui


From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of C. Wechsler
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 5:51 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] PTL Election for modeling project - 
Result


Congratulations, Deng.
I'd like to get a good understanding of how the Model Subcommittee Chair gets 
elected and when.  I believe you had mentioned August at one point, but is 
there a particular date?  Is there a timeframe for self nominations?  Is there 
a clear understanding of who can nominate and who can vote?  Apologies if this 
is all documented somewhere and I just don't know where.
Thanks!
Chesla


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11437): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11437
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23814153/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [modeling] PTL Election for modeling project - Result

[denghui (L)]

Dear ONAP TSC,

Based on the process of annual community elections for PTL described on 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Annual+Community+Elections, here’s the voting 
result for modeling project:
1. DENG Hui  (Condorcet方法优胜者: 胜出所有其他投票选项)

2. Abstain  负于 DENG Hui，差距为 8�C0


I have updated the Voting Results History page: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Voting+Results+History . Thank you for your 
support!

Regards,

DENG Hui


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11425): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11425
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23814153/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [modeling] SDC review documentation of high level requirement

[denghui (L)]

Hello modelers

This is the bridge info for Wednesday 10am eastern time meeting.

Thanks for your join

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11395): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11395
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23804005/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 15.0 MIMEDIR//EN
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:REQUEST
X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:China Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ATTENDEE;CN="denghui (L)";RSVP=TRUE:mailto:denghu...@huawei.com
ATTENDEE;CN='anatoly.katz...@att.com';RSVP=TRUE:mailto:anatoly.katzman@att.
	com
ATTENDEE;CN="LANDO, MICHAEL";RSVP=TRUE:mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com
CLASS:PUBLIC
CREATED:20180724T153100Z
DESCRIPTION:Join from PC\, Mac\, Linux\, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/
	137904496 <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fzoom.us%2Fj%2F137904
	496&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNHWLm-MNCNZh9JQ8TByZ7QBGA_nzQ> \nOr iPhone one-tap
	 (US Toll): +14086380968\,137904496# or +16465588656\,137904496#\nOr Telep
	hone:\nDial: +1 408 638 0968 (US Toll) or +1 646 558 8656 (US Toll)\nMeeti
	ng ID: 137 904 496\nInternational numbers available: https://zoom.us/zoomc
	onference?m=mi-ad1sMLWlXByAKLio5vDnd9JYqUR_a <https://www.google.com/url?q
	=https%3A%2F%2Fzoom.us%2Fzoomconference%3Fm%3Dmi-ad1sMLWlXByAKLio5vDnd9JYq
	UR_a&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGUpQlMWM7Hx42afMT3U-kpQiPOMA> \n\n
DTEND;TZID="China Standard Time":20180725T23
DTSTAMP:20180724T152441Z
DTSTART;TZID="China Standard Time":20180725T220000
LAST-MODIFIED:20180724T153100Z
LOCATION:https://zoom.us/j/137904496
ORGANIZER;CN="denghui (L)":mailto:denghu...@huawei.com
PRIORITY:5
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-cn:SDC review documentation of high level requirement
TRANSP:OPAQUE
UID:04008200E00074C5B7101A82E0089048457FA523D401000
	01000B540D30B76592E4080200A19A899E195
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nJoin from PC\, Mac\, L
	inux\, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/137904496\n\nOr iPhone one-tap (US Toll): +14086380968\,137904496# or 
	+16465588656\,137904496#\n\nOr Telephone:\nDial: +
	1 408 638 0968 (US Toll) or +1 646 558 8656 (US Toll)\nMeeting ID: 137 904 496\nInternation
	al numbers available: 
	https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=mi-ad1sMLWlXByAKLio5v
	Dnd9JYqUR_a\n\n\n\n\n
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:BUSY
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-MICROSOFT-DISALLOW-COUNTER:FALSE
X-MS-OLK-APPTLASTSEQUENCE:1
X-MS-OLK-APPTSEQTIME:20180724T152441Z
X-MS-OLK-AUTOFILLLOCATION:FALSE
X-MS-OLK-CONFTYPE:0
BEGIN:VALARM
TRIGGER:-PT15M
ACTION:DISPLAY
DESCRIPTION:Reminder
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

Re: [onap-discuss] #modeling Mapping between Modeling and Casablanca R3 requirements

[denghui (L)]

Hi Gildas

I had added a column here and fill in the PTL's feedback on the limited 
requirements.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+R3+Modeling+High+Level+Requirements

thanks for your help

DENG Hui

From: Gildas Lanilis
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 11:45 PM
To: denghui (L) 
Cc: onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; GILBERT, MAZIN E 
(MAZIN E) 
Subject: #modeling Mapping between Modeling and Casablanca R3 requirements

Hi Deng,

This is to follow up on the need to understand "what else" is required from a 
Modelling perspective for Casablanca Release.
Could you help into performing the mapping between the list in "ONAP R3 
Modeling Level 
Requirements<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+R3+Modeling+High+Level+Requirements>"
 and the "Casablanca Release 
Requirements<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Casablanca+Release+Requirements>"?
So far what has been approved for the Scope of Casablanca is documented 
here<https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/34375712/ONAP%20Casablanca%20M1%20Status%20Summary%20Version5.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1532014370813&api=v2>.

I would recommend to add a column in the "ONAP R3 Modeling Level 
Requirements<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+R3+Modeling+High+Level+Requirements>"
 indicating which Casablanca Release Requirement it refers to.
The plan is to review and discuss this with PTLs during Monday PTL meeting at 6 
am PDT.

Let me know if I can help.

Thanks,
Gildas

[HuaweiLogowithName]
Gildas Lanilis
ONAP Release Manager
Santa Clara CA, USA
gildas.lani...@huawei.com<mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>
Mobile: 1 415 238 6287


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11346): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11346
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23745409/21656
Mute #modeling: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=modeling&subid=2740164
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] Minutes of SDC review of high level requirement

[denghui (L)]

Information model has been presented and approved by modeling subcommittee, but 
Data Model hasn’t,
please work with SDC to improve the DM design and come back to modeling 
subcommittee when you are ready.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

From: Lando,Michael [mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2018 12:57 AM
To: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn; yangxu (H)
Cc: denghui (L); onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] Minutes of SDC review of 
high level requirement

The issue is reusability you need to review all the definitions you are trying 
to create and I identify the component that are already available.

Based on my review I see duplications in the node type so my answer is this 
need to be reviewed again.

In addition I am still not clear if this was presented to the modeling 
subcommittee and did it get approved by them?








BR,

[Michael Lando]

AT&T Network Application Development · NetCom
Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago
···
Office: +972 (3) 5451487
Mobile: +972 (54) 7833603
e-mail: michael.la...@intl.att.com<mailto:michael.la...@intl.att.com>

From: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn 
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 03:55
To: yang...@huawei.com; Lando,Michael 
Cc: denghu...@huawei.com; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org
Subject: 答复: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] Minutes of SDC review of 
high level requirement




Hello all,



 Thanks Yang XU for clarifying about the state of Wan Connection.

 To Michael, if we leverage the relationship types and capability 
types which are already existed and remove the new ones which might be 
duplicate and just leave the node types and data type introduced in wiki page 
(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design-Time+Data+Model%3A+WAN+Service),<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Design-2DTime-2BData-2BModel-253A-2BWAN-2BService-29-2C&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=FYvXSElfSmWIXOeZxWIxQysejuz9-TXmaL6uftBh8MY&m=K8FkF7f3Qm2IxaQ2WlIm2W9BPRXvKKKUUoYEmw0CUsg&s=pfIvFnD4SjoGtFtOulHN3UYSsOfLYbqrAlOC2zp7Qwc&e=>
  is it good enough for SDC to support Wan Connection in release 3?



Best Regards!













黄卓垚huangzhuoyao



职位position
承载网管开发部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部Strategy & IT-IT Dept.


[cid:image002.gif@01D422A0.B7055A00]

[cid:image003.gif@01D422A0.B7055A00]
深圳市南山区科技南路55号中兴通讯研发大楼33楼
33/F, R&D Building, ZTE Corporation Hi-tech Road South,
Hi-tech Industrial Park Nanshan District, Shenzhen, P..R.China, 518057
T: +86 755    F: +86 755 
M: +86 xxx
E: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn<mailto:huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn>
www.zte.com.cn<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.zte.com.cn_&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=FYvXSElfSmWIXOeZxWIxQysejuz9-TXmaL6uftBh8MY&m=K8FkF7f3Qm2IxaQ2WlIm2W9BPRXvKKKUUoYEmw0CUsg&s=CGEZTdwpHrL1NPbO3ElGqjzQXJokLKZALRIayTto50k&e=>


原始邮件
发件人：yangxu(H) mailto:yang...@huawei.com>>
收件人：denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>
 mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
日 期 ：2018年07月18日 23:52
主 题 ：Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] Minutes of SDC review of high 
level requirement
Hi Hui and all,

Regarding the last bullet, AFAIK, the WAN connection has been agreed in release 
2 and moved from service IM clean page to resource IM clean page according to 
participants' suggestion that the WAN connection should be considered as 
resource.

Best regards,
Xu
发件人：denghui (L)
收件人：onap-discuss@lists.onap.org,onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org,onap-...@lists.onap.org>,
时间：2018-07-18 22:33:37
主 题：[onap-discuss] [modeling] Minutes of SDC review of high level requirement

Hello all

Please find the recorded meeting session here:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2018+2H+Modeling+sub-committee+meeting+agenda+and+minutes<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_2018-2B2H-2BModeling-2Bsub-2Dcommittee-2Bmeeting-2Bagenda-2Band-2Bminutes&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=FYvXSElfSmWIXOeZxWIxQysejuz9-TXmaL6uftBh8MY&m=K8FkF7f3Qm2IxaQ2WlIm2W9BPRXvKKKUUoYEmw0CUsg&s=NmSzgEv4tx5x2Ja1cjw3Bccr2pMVgnTOMcP5D_IUKBo&e=>


the meeting minutes are list below:

1) 20180719 9am, the last review from SDC before TSC meeting, will try to 
invite PTLs from SDC/SO/A&AI, the meeting bridge will be sent out tomorrow.

2) Service descriptor/resource composite/PNF/PNF instance/network 
Service/SD-WAN/Element group/Multicloud need to be reviewed tomorrow

3)  the committee will ask the approval for Implementation and documentation 
par

[onap-discuss] Withdraw modeling report to TSC this week

[denghui (L)]

Hello TSC and modelers.

Because concern raised in the list about our this week consensus report.
I plan to withdraw this week report and had another round discussion in next 
week modeling subcommittee call.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11279): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11279
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23744650/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Today SDC/SO/A&AI high level requirement review call bridge

[denghui (L)]

Hello, owners,

Thanks Michael for yesterday review, today, let's have another round of review 
before TSC call at 9am Eastern time

Hi Seshu and Jimmy

Could you also kindly help to join this call since there are some requirements 
need your help to review

Thanks a lot for your help
Best regards,

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11261): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11261
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23742761/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

--- Begin Message ---
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:China Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN=denghui (L):MAILTO:denghu...@huawei.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=denghui (L
 ):MAILTO:denghu...@huawei.com
DESCRIPTION;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:Join from PC\, Mac\, Linux\, iOS or Android: htt
 ps://zoom.us/j/137904496 <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fzoom.
 us%2Fj%2F137904496&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNHWLm-MNCNZh9JQ8TByZ7QBGA_nzQ> \nOr
  iPhone one-tap (US Toll): +14086380968\,137904496# or +16465588656\,13790
 4496#\nOr Telephone:\nDial: +1 408 638 0968 (US Toll) or +1 646 558 8656 (
 US Toll)\nMeeting ID: 137 904 496\nInternational numbers available: https:
 //zoom.us/zoomconference?m=mi-ad1sMLWlXByAKLio5vDnd9JYqUR_a <https://www.g
 oogle.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fzoom.us%2Fzoomconference%3Fm%3Dmi-ad1sMLWlXB
 yAKLio5vDnd9JYqUR_a&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGUpQlMWM7Hx42afMT3U-kpQiPOMA> \n\
 n
SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:SDC/SO/AAI review high level requirement
DTSTART;TZID=China Standard Time:20180719T21
DTEND;TZID=China Standard Time:20180719T22
UID:04008200E00074C5B7101A82E008C0F08421C81ED401000
 01000903D1000362106448E0590B747256406
CLASS:PUBLIC
PRIORITY:5
DTSTAMP:20180719T075849Z
TRANSP:OPAQUE
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SEQUENCE:0
LOCATION;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:https://zoom.us/j/137904496
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-APPT-SEQUENCE:0
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-OWNERAPPTID:-1949075486
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:TENTATIVE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INTENDEDSTATUS:BUSY
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INSTTYPE:0
X-MICROSOFT-DISALLOW-COUNTER:FALSE
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:DISPLAY
DESCRIPTION:REMINDER
TRIGGER;RELATED=START:-PT15M
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
--- End Message ---

[onap-discuss] [modeling] new proposal to change TSC report consensus slide wording

[denghui (L)]

Hello Modelers,

I have received comments from Andy and Andrei after the meeting about our 
consensuses slide, as below, according to their proposal, 3 changes are listed 
below:
1) Clarify On-Boarding and the Internal ONAP models are distinct
2) remove "align with R3 IM"
3) removing the statement "(backward compatible with onboarding model)

According to our recorded session
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2018+2H+Modeling+sub-committee+meeting+agenda+and+minutes

I re-listen to the recorded session 20180717, I did ask any objection to the 
final consensus in the end.
only Michela raised the  comments to remove 3rd bullet.  I did explain the 
reason, and didn't hear any objection from Michela any more.

In this case, my judge would be from our session
3) is not yet a 100% consensuses assuming Michela not reponse in time,  but 1) 
and 2) are 2 new proposals to change the existing consensus

So I am asking the modeling subcommittee here whether you agree to add 1) and 
remove 2)
If there is no any objection before TSC call, I will revise them as this 
proposal.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui




From: Andrei Kojukhov [mailto:andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 4:10 AM
To: MAYER, ANDREW J mailto:am8...@att.com>>; denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>; Lingli Deng 
mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>>
Cc: 'eric.deb...@orange.com' 
mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>>; Mark Gibson 
mailto:mar...@amdocs.com>>; 'Mehmet Toy' 
mailto:mehmet@verizon.com>>; 'Alex Vul' 
mailto:alex@intel.com>>; 'Davis, Nigel' 
mailto:nda...@ciena.com>>; 'Ranganathan, Raghu' 
mailto:rra...@ciena.com>>; 'Priya TG' 
mailto:priy...@netcracker.com>>; WECHSLER, CHESLA C 
mailto:cw1...@att.com>>; KATZMAN, ANATOLY 
mailto:ak4...@intl.att.com>>; LANDO, MICHAEL 
mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; HALLAHAN, RYAN 
mailto:rh1...@att.com>>; Lingli Deng 
mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>>
Subject: RE: Minutes from Today's Meeting

Andy, Denghui, Lingli

I tend to agree with Andy. What I captured from a meeting screen is quickly 
adding sentences to a reporting slide by a chair because of lack of time.
There is obviously a room for making mistakes and inaccurate wording.

BR

Andrei

From: MAYER, ANDREW J mailto:am8...@att.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 10:30 PM
To: denghui (L) mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>; Lingli 
Deng mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>>
Cc: 'eric.deb...@orange.com' 
mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>>; Andrei Kojukhov 
mailto:andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com>>; Mark Gibson 
mailto:mar...@amdocs.com>>; 'Mehmet Toy' 
mailto:mehmet@verizon.com>>; 'Alex Vul' 
mailto:alex@intel.com>>; 'Davis, Nigel' 
mailto:nda...@ciena.com>>; 'Ranganathan, Raghu' 
mailto:rra...@ciena.com>>; 'Priya TG' 
mailto:priy...@netcracker.com>>; WECHSLER, CHESLA C 
mailto:cw1...@att.com>>; KATZMAN, ANATOLY 
mailto:ak4...@intl.att.com>>; LANDO, MICHAEL 
mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; HALLAHAN, RYAN 
mailto:rh1...@att.com>>; Lingli Deng 
mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>>
Subject: RE: Minutes from Today's Meeting

Denghui,

We appreciate that you captured some of the major points that were agreed to 
during the Modeling Sub-committee call.

We do have a few questions that need clarification on the TSC readout:

  *   How was the agreement captured that the VNF Descriptor model for 
On-Boarding and the Internal ONAP models are distinct? We reached consensus on 
this point multiple times during the Modeling Sub-committee call, but it is not 
listed. Please reflect this important point.
  *   During the call there did not seem to be clear consensus with the 
statement "align with R3 IM". Based on the recording we all agreed that we need 
keep the Information Modeling and Data Modeling aligned during the 
collaborative work on the internal data model for R4 and beyond. However, since 
it was not a clear agreement, please remove "align with R3 IM"
  *   Please consider removing the statement "(backward compatible with 
onboarding model)".  Based on the recording, it wasn't clear during the call 
that we had community consensus on this particular statement.

Best Regards,
Andy

Andy Mayer, Ph.D. | PMTS, D2.0 Integration | AT&T Labs | Phone: +1 (732) 
420-9945 | am8...@att.com<mailto:am8...@att.com>



From: denghui (L)
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 11:16 AM
To: 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' ; 
'onap-...@lists.onap.org' 
Subject: [modeling] Meeting minutes, slides and video recorded available for 
modeling subcommittee call yesterday

Hello all

Please kindly help to review yesterday meeting minutes, slides, and video 
recorded as below link:
https:/

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Minutes of SDC review of high level requirement

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Please find the recorded meeting session here:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2018+2H+Modeling+sub-committee+meeting+agenda+and+minutes


the meeting minutes are list below:

1) 20180719 9am, the last review from SDC before TSC meeting, will try to 
invite PTLs from SDC/SO/A&AI, the meeting bridge will be sent out tomorrow.

2) Service descriptor/resource composite/PNF/PNF instance/network 
Service/SD-WAN/Element group/Multicloud need to be reviewed tomorrow

3)  the committee will ask the approval for Implementation and documentation 
part, not for low priority and experiemental

4) WAN connection need modeling subcommittee review and approval

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11223): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11223
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23671445/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [modeling] SDC review high level requirement on Wednesday

[denghui (L)]

BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:China Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN=denghui (L):MAILTO:denghu...@huawei.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=onap-discu
 s...@lists.onap.org:MAILTO:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=ONAP-TSC@l
 ists.onap.org:MAILTO:onap-...@lists.onap.org
DESCRIPTION;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:Hello owners\nDue to time limitation\, we can’
 t go through all high level requirements\, we plan to ask the help of SDC 
 PTL to review it again today.\nPlease help to join it\nThanks a lot\nDENG 
 Hui\n\nJoin from PC\, Mac\, Linux\, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/1379
 04496<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fzoom.us%2Fj%2F137904496&s
 a=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNHWLm-MNCNZh9JQ8TByZ7QBGA_nzQ>\nOr iPhone one-tap (US T
 oll): +14086380968\,137904496# or +16465588656\,137904496#\nOr Telephone:\
 nDial: +1 408 638 0968 (US Toll) or +1 646 558 8656 (US Toll)\nMeeting ID:
  137 904 496\nInternational numbers available: https://zoom.us/zoomconfere
 nce?m=mi-ad1sMLWlXByAKLio5vDnd9JYqUR_a<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%
 3A%2F%2Fzoom.us%2Fzoomconference%3Fm%3Dmi-ad1sMLWlXByAKLio5vDnd9JYqUR_a&sa
 =D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGUpQlMWM7Hx42afMT3U-kpQiPOMA>\n\n\n
SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:[modeling] SDC review high level requirement on Wedn
 esday
DTSTART;TZID=China Standard Time:20180718T21
DTEND;TZID=China Standard Time:20180718T22
UID:04008200E00074C5B7101A82E008F0C28514C81ED401000
 01000903D1000362106448E0590B747256406
CLASS:PUBLIC
PRIORITY:5
DTSTAMP:20180718T105925Z
TRANSP:OPAQUE
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SEQUENCE:0
LOCATION;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:https://zoom.us/j/137904496
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-APPT-SEQUENCE:0
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-OWNERAPPTID:-294488094
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:TENTATIVE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INTENDEDSTATUS:BUSY
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INSTTYPE:0
X-MICROSOFT-DISALLOW-COUNTER:FALSE
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:DISPLAY
DESCRIPTION:REMINDER
TRIGGER;RELATED=START:-PT15M
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Meeting minutes, slides and video recorded available for modeling subcommittee call yesterday

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Please kindly help to review yesterday meeting minutes, slides, and video 
recorded as below link:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2018+2H+Modeling+sub-committee+meeting+agenda+and+minutes

thanks a lot for your checking
Best regards

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11196): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11196
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23627003/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] High level requirement reviewed by PTLs and SDC

[denghui (L)]

Hello owners of requirements,

Thanks PTL meeting time and theirs kind comments, we have moved 3+5 out of high 
level requirement into other table.
For the left of those requirements, please help to join the dedicated 
discussion today with SDC after modeling subcommittee call

>From yesterday, PTL and TSC has strong concern about modeling requirement 
>bring additional work besides of M1 requirement.
Please each owner identify with impacted PTL, whether your requirement in the 
scope of M1 of that impact projects,
if not, that requirement will also have to be moved into lower priority for 
future release other than R3.

As SDC suggested in the list, each of owner, please help to prepare and explain 
your requirement

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui


From: denghui (L)
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 4:46 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org
Cc: 'Lando,Michael' ; 'anatoly.katz...@att.com' 

Subject: [modeling] High level requirement reviewed by PTLs and SDC

Hello, owners of requirements

I have sent you a private email last week about today PTL's meeting that you 
will kindly help to explain your proposed high requirement to PTLs,
whether impacted PTLs agree it and allocate the implementation resource to 
support it
If impacted PTLs agree, this requirement will stay in R3 high level 
requirement, otherwise, it will move to lower priority category.

Since there are so many high level requirements related to SDC, if today PTL 
session time is not enough,
SDC PTLs could help to discuss it on Tuesday again right after modeling 
subcommittee call, we can use the same bridge of modeling subcommittee on 
Tuesday.

Thanks a lot for your attendance
Best regards,

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11170): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11170
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23530211/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [modeling] High level requirement reviewed by PTLs and SDC

[denghui (L)]

Hello, owners of requirements

I have sent you a private email last week about today PTL's meeting that you 
will kindly help to explain your proposed high requirement to PTLs,
whether impacted PTLs agree it and allocate the implementation resource to 
support it
If impacted PTLs agree, this requirement will stay in R3 high level 
requirement, otherwise, it will move to lower priority category.

Since there are so many high level requirements related to SDC, if today PTL 
session time is not enough,
SDC PTLs could help to discuss it on Tuesday again right after modeling 
subcommittee call, we can use the same bridge of modeling subcommittee on 
Tuesday.

Thanks a lot for your attendance
Best regards,

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11137): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11137
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23530211/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus working branch for modeling

[denghui (L)]

Chris

In order to build a validation job for papyrus, we need many days/Human 
resource to do this job in order to let papyrus file could follow LF official 
procedure, we also need do maven for it later as well.

I will try to manually merge this commit without the validation.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

From: Christopher Donley (Chris)
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 10:28 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com; denghui (L) 

Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus working branch for modeling

Hui,

I don't think that repo has a validation job. It will either need to be 
manually validated by a Committer or you'll need to set up a jjb job. Since 
Papyrus generates xml files and not java/python code, I don't think there is a 
jjb job for it, so you may need to do it manually.

Chris

From: denghui (L)
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; 
jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com<mailto:jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com>;
Cc: Christopher Donley (Chris);
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus working branch for modeling
Time: 2018-07-12 18:15:26

Hi Jessie,

Thanks a lot for your help.

Maybe this is your 1st time to submit to ONAP gerrit,  in order to get 
successfully merged, your commit needs to pass jbuilder check,
Could you kindly help to study from this wiki page about jbuilder : 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Using+Standard+Jenkins+Job+%28JJB%29+Templates
The recommit it again, then after jbuilder+2, then I could quickly merge this 
commit into the working branch.

Thanks a lot for your help

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Jessie Jewitt
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 5:03 AM
To: onap-discuss 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus working branch for modeling

Deng Hui-
   I uploaded all the Papyrus files to the working branch. There is an 
outstanding issue open in Gerrit for you to approve to commit these files to 
the branch. Could you possibly do this so we can start downloading the model 
for people to work on starting tomorrow?
Thank you,
Jessie

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:05 AM, denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hello modelers

I have created a working branch (R3workingbranch) which will help papyrus 
contributors could submit papyrus files to Gerrit, folder name will be 
/modelspec/papyrus

Please kindly remember to submit the correct place by : git checkout 
R3workingbranch

Thanks a lot for your help

DENG Hui



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#7): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/7
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23209084/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus working branch for modeling

[denghui (L)]

Hi Jessie,

Thanks a lot for your help.

Maybe this is your 1st time to submit to ONAP gerrit,  in order to get 
successfully merged, your commit needs to pass jbuilder check,
Could you kindly help to study from this wiki page about jbuilder : 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Using+Standard+Jenkins+Job+%28JJB%29+Templates
The recommit it again, then after jbuilder+2, then I could quickly merge this 
commit into the working branch.

Thanks a lot for your help

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Jessie Jewitt
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 5:03 AM
To: onap-discuss ; denghui (L) 

Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus working branch for modeling

Deng Hui-
   I uploaded all the Papyrus files to the working branch. There is an 
outstanding issue open in Gerrit for you to approve to commit these files to 
the branch. Could you possibly do this so we can start downloading the model 
for people to work on starting tomorrow?
Thank you,
Jessie

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:05 AM, denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hello modelers

I have created a working branch (R3workingbranch) which will help papyrus 
contributors could submit papyrus files to Gerrit, folder name will be 
/modelspec/papyrus

Please kindly remember to submit the correct place by : git checkout 
R3workingbranch

Thanks a lot for your help

DENG Hui



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#0): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/0
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23209084/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] Att: PTL - Languages supported in ONAP

[denghui (L)]

Modeling has two different languages (java and Python) which support 2 
different parsers, they work independently, I think that you have already 
include both of them.

Thanks

DENG Hui

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Arul Nambi
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2018 10:07 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: onap-sec...@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] Att: PTL - Languages supported in ONAP

Hi PTL's/Community,
In the security committee we are looking for the list of languages that needs 
to be supported when we come up with new tools for code coverage and static 
analysis.
Currently we know of

  1.  Java(ofcourse)
  2.  Javascript
We think that we will need PHP and Phyton, but need confirmation from the 
projects(preferably PTLs) about the language support that is needed and the 
name of the project.
There is a query in gerrit which can be used to find projects with certain file 
extensions, but it hard think of all the languauges.
Once we have a complete list I can update the wiki page so that in future we 
will know the languages that we support.
Regards
Arul

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11058): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11058
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23245565/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Progress report about Modeling R3 VNFD DM 2 options discussion

[denghui (L)]

Dear TSC,

Last week, modeling subcommittee report two options to TSC, and the 
recommendations from TSC received are make further clarification of 2options, 
especially:
*Impact on functional requirement/non functional requirements
*Impact on influenced projects
*Impact on Integrations/existing use cases
The report 0705 slides are here: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/TSC+2018-07-05+Meeting+Agenda

Modeling subcommittee had several round internal and different level discussion 
and yesterday modeling subcommittee call made below recommendations:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2018+2H+Modeling+sub-committee+meeting+agenda+and+minutes
*Because option 1 is not yet full specified, it needs more time to 
design, implement and be verified
*Option 1 will provide stable data model (based on vCPE) by M2 model 
freeze and having this new DM in R3
*Option 2 : R2 resource DM as the baseline  (ONAP R2+ Design-Time 
Resource DM clean 
version
 ) by M2 model freeze.
VNFD should be at least modeled based on SOL001 and reference the latest ETSI 
NFV SOL001 GS v2.5.1
*By M2, modeling subcommittee will compare 2 options and bring them 
back to TSC
*Option 1 and 2 will work together to try to converge as well.
*We will not make comparison before this time.

Those recommendations may change before TSC meeting during committee list 
discussion this week.
We will upload tentative slide to the TSC 0712 agenda asap

Thanks a lot for your review
Best regards,

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11012): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11012
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23242494/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for agreement on obsoleting some attributes/datatypes of the resource IM

[denghui (L)]

Hello IM modelers,

According to yesterday call, resource IM team would like to call for agreement 
on obsoleting some attributes/datatypes of the resource IM.
The reason for obsoleting those artifacts is that their functionalities are 
covered by HPA related attributes and thus redundant in the model.
Detailed information of the proposal can be found at 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Obsolete+Legacy+Attributes.

Agreement that needs to be reached across the modeling subcommittee is:

*   Agree on marking the proposed attributes/datatypes as "obsolete" in the 
clean version of the resource IM

*   The format of such marking will follow the same way as the conclusion 
of lifecycle stereotype proposal

Deadline for this call is July 17th, PST 00:00. Please comment on the mailing 
list if you have any concerns.

Please note that it's also suggested to submit the same proposal to ETSI after 
agreement reached in the subcommittee, this will be discussed offline.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11010): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11010
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23242213/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for owner of R3 Modeling high level requirement

[denghui (L)]

Hello modelers,

According to yesterday call, we would like to call for owner for each high 
level requirement.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2018+2H+Modeling+sub-committee+meeting+agenda+and+minutes

The responsibility of owner are shown as below:

1)  Coordinate both IM and DM model spec commitment.

2)  Coordinate code implement those requirements

3)  Coordinate the impacted project about those requirement.

4)  Report to modeling subcommittee about the progress regularly.

If you would like kindly help to volunteer to contribute, please fill in your 
name in the column of owner of each high level requirement.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+R3+Modeling+High+Level+Requirements

if there is no owner for the requirements, we will downgrade the priority and 
each drop those requirements.
Based on the input, we will report to TSC on the result this week.

Thanks a lot for your kind help
Best regards

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11009): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11009
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23242168/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Modeling Project Casablanca M1 Scope

[denghui (L)]

Hi Brian

Hope previous email could answer your questions, thanks a lot for your kind 
review

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: Brian Hedstrom [mailto:brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com]
Sent: Friday, July 6, 2018 5:57 AM
To: onap-discuss 
Cc: denghui (L) ; Gildas Lanilis 

Subject: [modeling] Modeling Project Casablanca M1 Scope

Modeling Subcommittee:

I was reviewing the Casablanca Release 
Deck<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/TSC+2018-07-05+Meeting+Agenda?preview=%2F33067338%2F36963870%2FONAP+Casablanca+M1+Status+Summary+Version4.pdf>
 which Gildas presented today on the TSC call and the TSC approved.

In looking at the Modeling Project Casablanca M1 
checklist<https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=35524278> (R3 
Scope), I noticed that most all of the Epics and Stories are for developing 
service and resource Information Models and Data Models and their mappings.

These items are not part of the Modeling Project 
scope<https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3247202>, but are part 
of the Modeling Subcommittee activities.

This has created a lot of confusion as to what the Modeling Project scope and 
responsibility is versus the Modeling Subcommittee. Can we get clarification?

In addition, I (again) recommend we change the name of the modeling project to 
eliminate confusion.  For example, Model Parsers project.

Thanks
--
Brian Hedstrom
Founder/CEO
OAM Technology Consulting LLC
oam.technology<http://oam.technology>
brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com<mailto:brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com>
720-470-7091

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#10923): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/10923
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23168988/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] PTL Election announcement for ONAP modeling project

[denghui (L)]

Hi Mazin

I guess that you know that PTL couldn't remove the committer, I sent email to 
every committer after Release 1,
two of them email's are not reachable, one agree to step down, so that's the 
reason we removed 3 of them after the vote of all committers.
Others replied and said that they would like to continue.

Current committers are not only for tosca parser , but also for modelspec.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

From: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) [mailto:ma...@research.att.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 9:20 PM
To: denghui (L) 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] PTL Election announcement for ONAP 
modeling project

Thanks. I am assuming the project is based on the repo that is supporting the 
Tosca Parsers,
and you are tracking active committers.

Are you holding an election at the same time for the Chair subcommittee?

Mazin


On Jul 5, 2018, at 8:21 AM, denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote:

Mazin

Yes it is modeling project PTL election other than modeling subcommittee.

You may have missed below email which does have the link to repositories
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resources+and+Repositories#ResourcesandRepositories-Modeling<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Resources-2Band-2BRepositories-23ResourcesandRepositories-2DModeling&d=DwQFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=h336thy4AQC9X1JMXCsyYKGnG9RZQiRvWQY-u54zaMI&s=ffAQ4YaMD5X0xX09fOLdQR9a4020jv33Vw3hzajOwBA&e=>
the committers in modeling project are:
Hui Deng
Shitao Li
Rittwik Jana
Bruce Thompson
Maopeng Zhang
Zhaoxing Meng
Amir Levy
Arthur Berezin
Sandeep Shah
Ling Li
Liuhe Zhong
Yannan Han
Hu Dong
Serban Jora
Lingli Deng

I did send email to helpdesk to remove 3 of them from the list before based on 
the confirmation of project:
Bruce Thompson
Arthur Berezin
Ling Li

It seems that they are still here, I will send again to helpdesk
So the final qualified committers are:
Hui Deng
Shitao Li
Rittwik Jana
Maopeng Zhang
Zhaoxing Meng
Amir Levy
Sandeep Shah
Liuhe Zhong
Yannan Han
Hu Dong
Serban Jora
Lingli Deng

Thanks for your checking
Best regards,

DENG Hui


From: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) [mailto:ma...@research.att.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 7:35 PM
To: denghui (L) mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; 
onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] PTL Election announcement for ONAP 
modeling project

Deng,

I appreciate you holding an election for the PTL.

For the modeling project PTL election, we need each Chair to ensure they have 
vetted all
active committers before any election is taking place. Can you share the list of
active committers.

As outlined in the website the issue is different for the subcommittee modeling 
Chair.

It seems that you are initiating a PTL election and not a subcommittee modeling 
Chair election.
Please confirm, and share the list of active Committers who will be voting for 
the new PTL.

thanks
mazin








On Jul 4, 2018, at 2:14 AM, denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote:

Dear ONAP Community and ONAP TSC,

As mandated by ONAP process, PTL elections must be held at least once a year.
You can read more details here: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Annual+Community+Elections<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Annual-2BCommunity-2BElections&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Oej6QUk5p2KdqNEWySpOHA&m=aqtE2C1ZdfxIEpvFpsi-ywKvepAjMEEvXvpyXwKvr7o&s=1VOSZREkf7OvEcmx6COn9S0Mz80ACCfrmsVXjmhZwZs&e=>

if you are interested in this position, I invite you to submit your 
self-nomination for ONAP modeling project.

Important dates:
---
You have 2 days to submit your self-nomination from receipt of this email. (End 
by July 6th 2018 10:00 IST)

Election duration: July 6th 2018 12:00 IST -  July 11th 2018 12:00 IST
(from CVIS system, private email will be sent to all committers email id 
mentioned 
athttps://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resources+and+Repositories<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Resources-2Band-2BRepositories&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=XBYNhzlk2jx6nSVGWpJjJUhpTLxHynkr7bh6Vp5VOXU&s=odKqVMZCdJUsygPKUpW7Gk3KS-ALAv3Pe3CO5I_82Ls&e=>
 )

Election result: July 11th 2018 (will be announced in onap-discuss and onap-tsc 
mailing lists)




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#10874): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/10874
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23036778/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] PTL Election announcement for ONAP modeling project

[denghui (L)]

Mazin

Yes it is modeling project PTL election other than modeling subcommittee.

You may have missed below email which does have the link to repositories
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resources+and+Repositories#ResourcesandRepositories-Modeling
the committers in modeling project are:
Hui Deng
Shitao Li
Rittwik Jana
Bruce Thompson
Maopeng Zhang
Zhaoxing Meng
Amir Levy
Arthur Berezin
Sandeep Shah
Ling Li
Liuhe Zhong
Yannan Han
Hu Dong
Serban Jora
Lingli Deng

I did send email to helpdesk to remove 3 of them from the list before based on 
the confirmation of project:
Bruce Thompson
Arthur Berezin
Ling Li

It seems that they are still here, I will send again to helpdesk
So the final qualified committers are:
Hui Deng
Shitao Li
Rittwik Jana
Maopeng Zhang
Zhaoxing Meng
Amir Levy
Sandeep Shah
Liuhe Zhong
Yannan Han
Hu Dong
Serban Jora
Lingli Deng

Thanks for your checking
Best regards,

DENG Hui


From: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) [mailto:ma...@research.att.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 7:35 PM
To: denghui (L) 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] PTL Election announcement for ONAP 
modeling project

Deng,

I appreciate you holding an election for the PTL.

For the modeling project PTL election, we need each Chair to ensure they have 
vetted all
active committers before any election is taking place. Can you share the list of
active committers.

As outlined in the website the issue is different for the subcommittee modeling 
Chair.

It seems that you are initiating a PTL election and not a subcommittee modeling 
Chair election.
Please confirm, and share the list of active Committers who will be voting for 
the new PTL.

thanks
mazin







On Jul 4, 2018, at 2:14 AM, denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote:

Dear ONAP Community and ONAP TSC,

As mandated by ONAP process, PTL elections must be held at least once a year.
You can read more details here: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Annual+Community+Elections<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Annual-2BCommunity-2BElections&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Oej6QUk5p2KdqNEWySpOHA&m=aqtE2C1ZdfxIEpvFpsi-ywKvepAjMEEvXvpyXwKvr7o&s=1VOSZREkf7OvEcmx6COn9S0Mz80ACCfrmsVXjmhZwZs&e=>

if you are interested in this position, I invite you to submit your 
self-nomination for ONAP modeling project.

Important dates:
---
You have 2 days to submit your self-nomination from receipt of this email. (End 
by July 6th 2018 10:00 IST)

Election duration: July 6th 2018 12:00 IST -  July 11th 2018 12:00 IST
(from CVIS system, private email will be sent to all committers email id 
mentioned 
athttps://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resources+and+Repositories<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Resources-2Band-2BRepositories&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=XBYNhzlk2jx6nSVGWpJjJUhpTLxHynkr7bh6Vp5VOXU&s=odKqVMZCdJUsygPKUpW7Gk3KS-ALAv3Pe3CO5I_82Ls&e=>
 )

Election result: July 11th 2018 (will be announced in onap-discuss and onap-tsc 
mailing lists)



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#10853): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/10853
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23036778/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R3 Modeling high level requirements

[denghui (L)]

Hello Jessie

Answer inline == >

From: jessie jewitt [mailto:jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 3:46 AM
To: denghui (L) 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R3 Modeling high level requirements

Hello DENG Hui,
  I think it has been beneficial to collect and review the modeling 
requirements for R3. Thank you for doing this. I have a few questions for you, 
if you would be so kind as to answer:

1. The requirements were supposed to be completed, according to the Casablanca 
Release Calendar, on 5/25. I haven't seen a poll, or anything, for the approval 
of these requirements. When do you anticipate they will be officially approved? 
I didn't see anything in the meeting minutes from today's meeting.
==> yesterday it was on the agenda, but due to other topics, we can’t have this 
part of discussion. In this case, we have to have discussion next Tuesday and 
start to poll right after if necessarily. I read through the comments on the 
wiki page, there is only 1 pending comment from your question about the 
consensus of service interest group, I am curious why don＇t you discuss them in 
that interest group, but challenge it in the modeling subcommittee, this way 
really slow down our progress

2. Again, according to the release calendar, we were to have established a 
"modeling plan" by 6/28. Does such a plan exist? If so, could you point me to 
where I can find it?
==> modeling plan is quite align with high level requirement, it will automate 
reflect the plan, we could use same contents for plan.

3. You indicated in the modeling subcommittee meeting this morning that our 
"model freeze" is in 3 weeks. With the requirements not yet agreed, and given 
the number of requirements currently specified, what is your expectation of 
what can actually be accomplished in 3 week's time?
== >  My suggestion is to postpone to M3 other than M2 for modeling freeze, I 
will bring this up to committee for discussion.

== > This is our 1st trial of procedure , we will revise it after this release 
accordingly.
Opensource normally follow 3 steps : plan , freeze and RC (API is not good 
reference for us)
Modeling subcommittee may need to align with them in next release.

Thank you

DENG Hui


Thank you,
Jessie

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 3:15 AM, denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hello Kevin and all

I have created a high level requirements wiki page based on the input of 
Beijing event:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+R3+Modeling+High+Level+Requirements
Please help to contribute to the spreadsheet as soon as possible,
I also moved Kevin’s draft proposal under this wiki page for your reference:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Casablanca+High+Level+Modeling+Requirements+-+Draft

We are going to go through this wiki page this Tuesday, as the basis for our 
release planning.

I will create a separate wiki page for release planning of those requirements 
accordingly.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#10832): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/10832
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/22674361/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] PTL Election announcement for ONAP modeling project

[denghui (L)]

Dear ONAP Community and ONAP TSC,

As mandated by ONAP process, PTL elections must be held at least once a year.
You can read more details here: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Annual+Community+Elections

if you are interested in this position, I invite you to submit your 
self-nomination for ONAP modeling project.

Important dates:
---
You have 2 days to submit your self-nomination from receipt of this email. (End 
by July 6th 2018 10:00 IST)

Election duration: July 6th 2018 12:00 IST -  July 11th 2018 12:00 IST
(from CVIS system, private email will be sent to all committers email id 
mentioned at https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resources+and+Repositories )

Election result: July 11th 2018 (will be announced in onap-discuss and onap-tsc 
mailing lists)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#10829): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/10829
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23036778/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R3 Modeling high level requirements

[denghui (L)]

Hello Kevin and all

I have created a high level requirements wiki page based on the input of 
Beijing event:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+R3+Modeling+High+Level+Requirements
Please help to contribute to the spreadsheet as soon as possible,
I also moved Kevin's draft proposal under this wiki page for your reference:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Casablanca+High+Level+Modeling+Requirements+-+Draft

We are going to go through this wiki page this Tuesday, as the basis for our 
release planning.

I will create a separate wiki page for release planning of those requirements 
accordingly.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#10527): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/10527
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/22674361/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling

[denghui (L)]

Sure, we will try

DENG Hui

From: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) [mailto:ma...@research.att.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 12:20 PM
To: denghui (L) 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
Subject: Re: Modeling

Thanks you. Also please share with the TSC what requirements your subcommittee 
generated so the TSC can assess the different views.

Mazin
On Jun 20, 2018, at 12:08 PM, denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi Mazin

We will try to summarize the major disagreements and bring it to TSC in next 2 
weeks.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui



From: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) [mailto:ma...@research.att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 11:33 AM
To: denghui (L) mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc 
mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Modeling

Deng Hui,

Thanks for your presentation today, and I really appreciate the modeling 
committee working together. Lots has been accomplished since R1.

I just wanted to articulate the conversation main points.

1. Modeling approaches for ONAP releases should be approved by the TSC. This 
should be documented and approved no later than M2.

2. If the modeling committee is unable to interlock on a common approach for 
offline, documentation or runtime, then different options should be brought to 
the TSC for review and making a decision.

Modeling directly impacts deployability. Disagreements impacting R3 should be 
documented and brought to the TSC over the next 2 weeks.

Thanks!
Mazin

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#10507): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/10507
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/22460897/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling

[denghui (L)]

Hi Mazin

We will try to summarize the major disagreements and bring it to TSC in next 2 
weeks.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui



From: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) [mailto:ma...@research.att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 11:33 AM
To: denghui (L) 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
Subject: Modeling

Deng Hui,

Thanks for your presentation today, and I really appreciate the modeling 
committee working together. Lots has been accomplished since R1.

I just wanted to articulate the conversation main points.

1. Modeling approaches for ONAP releases should be approved by the TSC. This 
should be documented and approved no later than M2.

2. If the modeling committee is unable to interlock on a common approach for 
offline, documentation or runtime, then different options should be brought to 
the TSC for review and making a decision.

Modeling directly impacts deployability. Disagreements impacting R3 should be 
documented and brought to the TSC over the next 2 weeks.

Thanks!
Mazin
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

[denghui (L)]

Hello all,

This is 1 week’s call for approval on the “obsolete legacy 
attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM.
The intention is to mark several attributes/datatypes of the current model as 
“obsoleted” as their functionalities are covered by some other attributes.
Detailed information of the proposal can be found at: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Obsolete+Legacy+Attributes , the proposed 
changes are marked in red.

Thanks a lot for your review
Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #56955] RE: Beijing Release: Last Mile

[denghui (L)]

Dear Jessica,

Sorry for late,

https://jenkins.onap.org/view/modeling/job/modeling-toscaparsers-javatoscachecker-master-javatoscachecker-release-version-java-daily/209/
https://jenkins.onap.org/view/modeling/job/modeling-toscaparsers-nfvparser-master-nfvparser-release-version-java-daily/127/

thanks

DENG Hui


-Original Message-
From: Jessica Wagantall via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 1:00 PM
To: denghui (L) 
Cc: Gildas Lanilis ; j...@research.att.com; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-rele...@lists.onap.org; 
rittwik.j...@gmail.com; shang.xiaod...@zte.com.cn; yangya...@chinamobile.com
Subject: [ONAP Helpdesk #56955] RE: [onap-discuss] Beijing Release: Last Mile

Dear Deng, 

Thanks, but I need you to give me the links to the Jenkins jobs that generated 
these please. 

I cannot perform a release without them.

Thanks!
Jess
 
On Tue Jun 05 22:48:45 2018, denghu...@huawei.com wrote:
> Hi Jess,
> 
> This is for modeling part, thanks a lot:
> 
> Javatoscachecker:  /org/onap/modeling/toscaparsers/Checker/1.2.0-
> SNAPSHOT/Checker-1.2.0-20180605.124309-
> 60.jar<https://nexus.onap.org/service/local/repositories/snapshots/con
> tent/org/onap/modeling/toscaparsers/Checker/1.2.0-
> SNAPSHOT/Checker-1.2.0-20180605.124309-60.jar>
> NFVParser:  /org/onap/modeling/toscaparsers/nfvparser/modeling-
> toscaparsers-nfvparser/1.1.0-SNAPSHOT/modeling-toscaparsers-nfvparser-
> 1.1.0-20180329.050338-
> 7.zip<https://nexus.onap.org/service/local/repositories/snapshots/cont
> ent/org/onap/modeling/toscaparsers/nfvparser/modeling-
> toscaparsers-nfvparser/1.1.0-SNAPSHOT/modeling-toscaparsers-nfvparser-
> 1.1.0-20180329.050338-7.zip>
> 
> Deng Hui
> 
> From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss- 
> boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Jessica Wagantall
> Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 6:16 AM
> To: Gildas Lanilis 
> Cc: onap-rele...@lists.onap.org; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Beijing Release: Last Mile
> 
> No request received yet also from the modeling team.
> 
> Thanks!
> Jess
> 
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Jessica Wagantall 
> mailto:jwagant...@linuxfoundation.org>
> >
> wrote:
> Dear Gildas,
> 
> Here is an update on the pending items:
> 
> *** MUSIC *** New release version 2.5.5 needed ***
> 
> - Working with Tom on this now. We should be releasing soon.
> Reference: #56927: Music Jar Release 2.5.5
> 
> *** VID *** New clarification from the team ***
> 
> - The request was placed to make a docker release but I noticed
>   their maven artifacts haven't been released for the specific version 
> used
>   to build their docker images. Do we approve a release of those too?
> Reference: #56922: VID docker release
> 
> *** AAF *** Pending Ram's Approval ***
> 
> - Docker release for  onap/aaf/sms and onap/aaf/smsquorumclient 2.0.0
> - Java artifacts 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT/sms-client-2.0.0-20180530.111014-
> 8.jar<https://nexus.onap.org/index.html#view-
> repositories;snapshots~browsestorage~/org/onap/aaf/sms/sms-
> client/2.0.0-SNAPSHOT/sms-client-2.0.0-20180530.111014-8.jar>
> Reference: #56662: Artifacts for Release
> 
> No release request yet from multicloud or usecase-ui teams!
> 
> Thanks!
> Jess
> 
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Jessica Wagantall 
> mailto:jwagant...@linuxfoundation.org>
> >
> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for this Gildas,
> 
> Due to the importance of these releases, I will help posting here the 
> blockers we encounter in the RT tickets.
> 
> Here are some blockers:
> 
> *** AAF *** Pending Ram's Approval ***
> 
> - Docker release for  onap/aaf/sms and onap/aaf/smsquorumclient 2.0.0
> - Java artifacts 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT/sms-client-2.0.0-20180530.111014-
> 8.jar<https://nexus.onap.org/index.html#view-
> repositories;snapshots~browsestorage~/org/onap/aaf/sms/sms-
> client/2.0.0-SNAPSHOT/sms-client-2.0.0-20180530.111014-8.jar>
> Reference: #56662: Artifacts for Release
> 
> *** DMAAP *** Pending Ram's Approval ***
> 
> - Docker release for onap/dmaap/dmaap-mr:1.1.4
> Reference: #56857: Move docker image to release repository
> 
> *** VFC *** Yan to clarify ***
> 
> - Email sent for 8 maven artifacts to be released, but email mentions 
> also docker images needed and no link to docker images jobs
> - Do we just need to release the maven artifacts? if docker images 
> need release, please update request with corresponding docker links 
> from Jenkins
> Reference: #56821: Please help to release VF-C R2 artifacts to 
> releases repo
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> Jess
> 
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Gildas Lanilis 
> mailto:gildas.lani...@huawe

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Need a Quick Summary of MEF & ONS Activity

[denghui (L)]

Both ONF and MEF has been involved in ONAP service modeling discussion, no 
conclusion has been made yet.

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Kenny Paul
Sent: Monday, June 4, 2018 10:54 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Need a Quick Summary of MEF & ONS Activity


Sorry about reaching out to the entire list, but I have a time critical bit of 
info I need for a Board presentation.
I need a quick one-sentence summary of current participation for both ONA and 
MEF.  Looking for a high-level summary, not low level details.
Thanks!

Best Regards,
-kenny

Kenny Paul, Technical Program Manager, The Linux Foundation
kp...@linuxfoundation.org, 510.766.5945
San Francisco Bay Area, Pacific Time Zone


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure]

[denghui (L)]

Hello modelers,

We are hoping that  people could raise the discussion point before next Tuesday 
modeling call in this list or wiki page, we will limit one point discussion 
time during our next call.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of GUPTA, ARUN
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 11:20 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure]



The Wiki pages for Cloud Infrastructure Modeling in general:
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33065694
and for Cloud Aggregation Classes:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Cloud+Infrastructure+Aggregate+Representation+Classes

The presentation used in today's (Tuesday May 22) Modeling Committee call is on 
the second page.


-Arun


Arun Gupta
Lead Member of Technical Staff
Domain 2 Architecture and Planning
200 S Laurel Ave - Bldg B, B5-3Z09
Middletown, NJ 07748
P: 732 420 6597
arungu...@att.com




___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] 20180522 meeting minutes of modeling subcommittee

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

This week has many follow-ups, so we post the meeting minutes again in the 
list, thanks
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2018+1HModeling+sub-committee+meeting+agenda+and+minutes
please help to cast your vote on the new meeting time of Resource IM and DM 
respectively asap

thanks a lot

DENG Hui


1) R2 DM progress   Victor   5m

Victor is working with Dejan on this verification, finished today, will wait 
for SDC verification later this week.

2) Service IM   Lingli Deng 5m

M: Wednesday meeting



3) Resource IM  YANG Xu 5m

M:

3.1 ONAP feedback to ETSI last week, some further discussion will be needed in 
ONAP

3.2 please cast your vote on meeting time asap

Meeting Day/Time 
Poll



4) VES 6.0 update   Alok Gupta 10m

slide

M:

4.1 Some concern about the process of thsi spec, never discussed in modeling 
subcommittee, no IM, whehter papryus will be used



5) R3 DM Meeting  Day/Time Poll Anatoly 5m

R3 Data Model Meeting Day/Time 
Poll

M: 5.1 Please help to cast your vote asap



6) Multicloud infomation model  Ramki  25m

The Wiki pages for Cloud Infrastructure Modeling in general:

https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33065694

and for Cloud Aggregation Classes:

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Cloud+Infrastructure+Aggregate+Representation+Classes

The presentation used in today's (Tuesday May 22) Modeling Committee call is on 
the second page.

M:

6.1 there was some concern to expose physical location,

6.2 Next week modeling will do it again

6.3 Please feedback in the mailling list on this topic before next week 
modeling call



7) Draft R3 Modeling Requirements Kevin 5m

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Help on ONAP R2 Data Modeling verification

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

We have more than 10-20 companies regularly to talk about ONAP modeling , but 
unfortunately we have only 2 coders contributing ONAP R2 modeling code 
contribution.
Victor has worked on this more than 1 week, and felt that he can’t do such huge 
work just by himself, so he has create below jira to invite more contributors

I create JIRA tickets to track the status for R2 DM 
Verification：

1.  
https://jira.onap.org/browse/SDC-1291

2.  
https://jira.onap.org/browse/SDC-1290

3.  
https://jira.onap.org/browse/SDC-1289

4.  
https://jira.onap.org/browse/SDC-1288
  Owner: Dejan from ericsson

5.  
https://jira.onap.org/browse/SDC-1287
  Owner: Dejan from ericsson

6.  
https://jira.onap.org/browse/SDC-1286
  Owner: Victor Gao

If you could help, please come and help on first 3 bullets.
Many thanks for your help

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Next week modeling call is cancel due to chinese holiday

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Next Monday and Tuesday are Chinese holiday, so we cancelled Tuesday call, 
service/resource call will continue on Wednesday and Friday.
Fortunately we have two companies are contributing the code for our release 2 
modeling DM.

I will send the request to LF to cancel it.

Thanks

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Request for last call for comment on WAN service proposal

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Per service call discussion yesterday, this is 2 weeks call for comment on WAN 
service proposal
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/WanService

the discussion minutes and slides for related discussions and calls are 
documented here
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=28381459

Thanks,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] this week modeling call will be cancelled

[denghui (L)]

Hello modelers

Lots of people reach me that due to China SDN/NFV conference, we would like to 
cancel this week regular weekly modeling call

1)  For service call, #1 will be started this Friday

2)  For resource IM, please help to comment on the link: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Class+vs+Datatype+Categorization

3)  For resource DM, please help to comment on the link : 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Why+does+R3+need+multiple+DMs

Thanks a lot for your help
Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Invite feedback on R3 DM proposal

[denghui (L)]

Hello Modelers,

In order to get sufficient discussion in the beginning other than before the 
deadline, we would like to invite each company to feedback to Anatoly on your 
view.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Why+does+R3+need+multiple+DMs
Please either send your view in this wiki page or send to the list.

Especially those related company in R2 
Ericsson/Nokia/Netcracker/ZTE/Huawei/Intel/ARM/Amdocs/Operators.
Then we could discuss it again in the coming weekly call,

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource Information Model - Class vs Datatype Categorization call for comments

[denghui (L)]

Dear All,

Here's a call for comment on the class vs datatype categorization issue of the 
resource IM.

Current resource information model 
(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design+Time+Model+Clean+Version) has all 
objects categorized as "class".
There are comments stating that some of them should be "Datatype" instead of 
"Class".

During the resource IM call, the participants have agreed to use the 
categorization in ETSI IFA015 v2.4.1 as a basis for discussion.
More information can be found on the following wiki page:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Class+vs+Datatype+Categorization

We would like to have one week's time to collect feedback from the community. 
Please comment on the wiki page above if you have any concern with the current 
proposal.
Objects with no comment will be categorized accordingly, and those with 
comments will be discussed in the following calls.

BR,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Friday morning modeling workshop venue

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Venue: Intercontinental Los Angeles Downtown, sponsored by Linux Foundation 
Network
Echo Park Meeting Room 5th floor
Date: March 30th
Time: 8am-1pm

Lingli will post agenda later today,

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Last call for ONAP NS IM

[denghui (L)]

Hello modelers,

According to last Sunday discussions, it seems that NS IM become more stable, 
here is one week call for ONAP NS IM.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/NetworkService

After this call, this version will move into the clean version.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling]modeling call this week is cancelled

[denghui (L)]

Hello modelers,

This week call is cancelled , thanks

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling spec timeline changed

[denghui (L)]

Hello modelers

We had twice presentations from Kevin in Model/Arc about proposing modeling 
spec coming out early as below link:
https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16003450/ONAP%20Process%20Proposed%20Updates%202018-03-21.pdf?api=v2
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Proposed+ONAP+Release+Process+Updates+for+Information+and+Data+Modeling

Based on this new proposal, modeling spec will become freeze in M2 deadline, 
that will be about 2 months earlier than our R2 progress especially for DM
In R3 it is about August,

Secondly there are some requirement about code contribution mandate for model 
spec proposal
M2 Note:  Development Commitments for Infomodel Requirements?

Please feel free to let us know if you have comments here.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Sunday afternoon modeling session in ONS 2018 @ Sun Mar 25, 2018 1pm - 7pm (PDT) (denghu...@huawei.com)

[denghui (L)]

This is the bridge for remote presenter on Sunday.

Thanks

DENG Hui
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 15.0 MIMEDIR//EN
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:REQUEST
X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Romance Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16011028T03
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010325T02
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ATTACH;ENCODING=BASE64;VALUE=BINARY;X-FILENAME=invite.ics:QkVHSU46VkNBTEVOR
	EFSDQpQUk9ESUQ6LS8vR29vZ2xlIEluYy8vR29vZ2xlIENhbGVuZGFyIDcwLjkwNTQvL0VODQp
	WRVJTSU9OOjIuMA0KQ0FMU0NBTEU6R1JFR09SSUFODQpNRVRIT0Q6UkVRVUVTVA0KQkVHSU46V
	kVWRU5UDQpEVFNUQVJUOjIwMTgwMzI1VDIwMDAwMFoNCkRURU5EOjIwMTgwMzI2VDAyMDAwMFo
	NCkRUU1RBTVA6MjAxODAzMjNUMDAwMzExWg0KT1JHQU5JWkVSO0NOPU9OQVAgTWVldGluZ3MgY
	W5kIEV2ZW50czptYWlsdG86bGludXhmb3VuZGF0aW9uLm9yZ18xcm10YjV0cHIzDQogdWM4Zjc
	2Zm1mbHBsb2k4OEBncm91cC5jYWxlbmRhci5nb29nbGUuY29tDQpVSUQ6MTgzZmZmZTZkYjF0d
	GJ1dThtaW5mdWFlYzRAZ29vZ2xlLmNvbQ0KQVRURU5ERUU7Q1VUWVBFPUlORElWSURVQUw7Uk9
	MRT1SRVEtUEFSVElDSVBBTlQ7UEFSVFNUQVQ9TkVFRFMtQUNUSU9OO1JTVlA9DQogVFJVRTtDT
	j1kZW5naHVpMTJAaHVhd2VpLmNvbTtYLU5VTS1HVUVTVFM9MDptYWlsdG86ZGVuZ2h1aTEyQGh
	1YXdlaS5jb20NCkNSRUFURUQ6MjAxODAzMjNUMDAwMjI0Wg0KREVTQ1JJUFRJT046SGkgdGhlc
	mVcLCBcblxuT05BUCBNZWV0aW5nIDUgaXMgaW52aXRpbmcgeW91IHRvIGEgc2NoZWR1bGVkIFp
	vDQogb20gbWVldGluZy4gXG5cbkpvaW4gZnJvbSBQQ1wsIE1hY1wsIExpbnV4XCwgaU9TIG9yI
	EFuZHJvaWQ6IGh0dHBzOi8vem9vbS51DQogcy9qLzg4MjQ0MjYxOFxuXG5PciBpUGhvbmUgb25
	lLXRhcCA6XG4gICAgVVM6ICsxNjQ2NTU4ODY1NlwsXCw4ODI0NDI2MTgjICBvDQogciArMTY2O
	TkwMDY4MzNcLFwsODgyNDQyNjE4IyBcbk9yIFRlbGVwaG9uZTpcbiAgICBEaWFsKGZvciBoaWd
	oZXIgcXVhbGl0eVwsDQogIGRpYWwgYSBudW1iZXIgYmFzZWQgb24geW91ciBjdXJyZW50IGxvY
	2F0aW9uKTogXG4gICAgICAgIFVTOiArMSA2NDYgNTU4IDg2DQogNTYgIG9yICsxIDY2OSA5MDA
	gNjgzMyAgb3IgKzEgODU1IDg4MCAxMjQ2IChUb2xsIEZyZWUpIG9yICsxIDg3NyAzNjkgMDkyN
	iAoDQogVG9sbCBGcmVlKVxuICAgIE1lZXRpbmcgSUQ6IDg4MiA0NDIgNjE4XG4gICAgSW50ZXJ
	uYXRpb25hbCBudW1iZXJzIGF2YWlsYWJsDQogZTogaHR0cHM6Ly96b29tLnVzL3pvb21jb25mZ
	XJlbmNlP209Q0RZX2Vub2k5RHY0NGp5YzM3V04zRUtCUFpfMjIwbUJcblxuXG5cDQogbi06On4
	6fjo6fjp+On46fjp+On46fjp+On46fjp+On46fjp+On46fjp+On46fjp+On46fjp+On46fjp+O
	n46fjp+On46fjp+On46DQogfjp+On46On46fjo6LVxuUGxlYXNlIGRvIG5vdCBlZGl0IHRoaXM
	gc2VjdGlvbiBvZiB0aGUgZGVzY3JpcHRpb24uXG5cblZpZXcgDQogeW91ciBldmVudCBhdCBod
	HRwczovL3d3dy5nb29nbGUuY29tL2NhbGVuZGFyL2V2ZW50P2FjdGlvbj1WSUVXJmVpZD1NVGd
	6Wm1aDQogbVpUWmtZakYwZEdKMWRUaHRhVzVtZFdGbFl6UWdaR1Z1WjJoMWFURXlRR2gxWVhkb
	GFTNWpiMjAmdG9rPU56SWpiR2x1ZFhobWIzDQogVnVaR0YwYVc5dUxtOXlaMTh4Y20xMFlqVjB
	jSEl6ZFdNNFpqYzJabTFtYkhCc2IyazRPRUJuY205MWNDNWpZV3hsYm1SaGNpNW5iDQogMjluY
	kdVdVkyOXROamxpTnpJMVptUTNZamcwWTJOak1UQXhPR1F6WXpCbVpHUXdZMlppTUdRelpHVTF
	NV1l3TWcmY3R6PUFtZXJpDQogY2ElMkZMb3NfQW5nZWxlcyZobD1lbiZlcz0xLlxuLTo6fjp+O
	jp+On46fjp+On46fjp+On46fjp+On46fjp+On46fjp+On46fjp+DQogOn46fjp+On46fjp+On4
	6fjp+On46fjp+On46fjp+On46fjo6fjp+OjotDQpMQVNULU1PRElGSUVEOjIwMTgwMzIzVDAwM
	DMxMVoNCkxPQ0FUSU9OOmh0dHBzOi8vem9vbS51cy9qLzg4MjQ0MjYxOA0KU0VRVUVOQ0U6MA0
	KU1RBVFVTOkNPTkZJUk1FRA0KU1VNTUFSWTpPTkFQIFN1bmRheSBhZnRlcm5vb24gbW9kZWxpb
	mcgc2Vzc2lvbiBpbiBPTlMgMjAxOA0KVFJBTlNQOk9QQVFVRQ0KRU5EOlZFVkVOVA0KRU5EOlZ
	DQUxFTkRBUg0K
ATTENDEE;CN="denghui (L)";RSVP=TRUE:mailto:denghu...@huawei.com
CLASS:PUBLIC
CREATED:20180323T072236Z
DESCRIPTION:more details » <https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=V
	IEW&eid=MTgzZmZmZTZkYjF0dGJ1dThtaW5mdWFlYzQgZGVuZ2h1aTEyQGh1YXdlaS5jb20&to
	k=NzIjbGludXhmb3VuZGF0aW9uLm9yZ18xcm10YjV0cHIzdWM4Zjc2Zm1mbHBsb2k4OEBncm91
	cC5jYWxlbmRhci5nb29nbGUuY29tNjliNzI1ZmQ3Yjg0Y2NjMTAxOGQzYzBmZGQwY2ZiMGQzZG
	U1MWYwMg&ctz=America%2FLos_Angeles&hl=en&es=0> \n\nONAP Sunday afternoon m
	odeling session in ONS 2018\nWhen	Sun Mar 25\, 2018 1pm – 7pm Pacific Ti
	me	\nWhere	https://zoom.us/j/882442618 (map <https://www.google.com/url?q=
	https%3A%2F%2Fzoom.us%2Fj%2F882442618&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGcNpykg7m1otfbP
	j317UctpeEy2w> )	\nCalendar	denghu...@huawei.com	\nWho	•	kpaul@linuxfoun
	dation.org - creator	\n•	denghu...@huawei.com	\n	\nHi there\, \nONAP Mee
	ting 5 is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. \nJoin from PC\, Mac\,
	 Linux\, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/882442618 <https://www.google.c
	om/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fzoom.us%2Fj%2F882442618&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGcNpyk
	g7m1otfbPj317UctpeEy2w> \nOr iPhone one-tap :\nUS: +16465588656\,\,8824426
	18# or +16699006833\,\,882442618# \nOr Telephone:\nDial(for higher quality
	\, dial a number based on your current location): \nUS: +1 646 558 8656 or
	 +1 669 900 6833 or +1 855 880 1246 (Toll Free) or +1 877 369 0926 (Toll F
	ree)\nMeeting ID: 882 442 618\nInternational numbers available: https://zo
	om.us/zoomconference?m=CDY_enoi9Dv44jyc37WN3EKBPZ_220mB <https://www.googl
	e.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fzoom.us%2Fzoomconference%3Fm%3DCDY_enoi9Dv44jyc3
	7WN3EKBPZ_220mB&

[onap-discuss] [modeling]Modeling call tomorrow

[denghui (L)]

Reminder, the US entered Daylight Savings Time yesterday.  For those outside 
the US, tomorrow’s modeling call will start one hour earlier.  2100 Beijing time

DENG Hui

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Venue of ONAP modeling Sunday afternoon workshop has been finalized

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

As you have already know that, we will have Sunday afternoon and Friday morning 
two days workshop
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Sunday+afternoon+modeling+session+in+ONS+2018
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Friday+morning+modeling+session+in+ONS+2018
Please everybody help to register for those events asap

and the venue of Sunday afternoon will be :
Sheraton Gateway LAX
6101 W Century Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90045
http://www.sheratonlax.com
Meeting Room: Gateway Ballroom (Lobby Level)

Please know that only coffee and beverages will be served (no lunch).

Many thanks to MEF for kind sponsorship
Best regards,

DENG Hui

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

[denghui (L)]

Hello Jessie,

ONAP resource DM proposals have been on table for the long time and discussed 
and polled couple of time about which direction.
I am not familiar about this new work which has never been discussed in our 
committee.

At this moment, the urgent thing is not only do DM spec, but also contribute 
the code to R2, that is the joint JIRA TASK which has been distributed among 5 
companies already.
If you could help to contribute the code, please kindly help to consider to 
contribute the left of them: No.4 and No.7

Thanks a lot for your contribution
Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: jessie jewitt [mailto:jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com]
Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 1:26 AM
To: denghui (L) 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc ; Rittwik 
Jana 
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello-
I don't remember this being an action out of the modelling committee 
meeting yesterday. How does it compare to the action item from another meeting 
that Alex, Thinh, Anatoly and myself took to work on the IM to DM model 
mapping, and the mappings that have already been proposed (and commented on) 
here:

https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=25436710

Could you please clarify.
Thank you,
Jessie

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 4:46 AM, denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hello all

As agreed in modeling subcommittee meeting, we need to update the onap types of 
the data model to reflect the agreements reached in information model.

It’s huge work to achieve the goal, in order to accelerate, 7 separate tasks 
have been created based on the current IM. We encourage interested people to 
volunteer to take the lead for particular task.

The tasks including:
1. VDU: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-67
2. HPA: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-68
3. CP: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-69
4. DeploymentFlavor: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-70
5. VL: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-71
6. VNFD: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-72
7. monitor: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-73

It’s expected that the lead would help provide tosca definitions on the 
contribution page 
(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+align+with+TOSCA+NFV+Profile) and
help implement related logic in SDC, APPC/VFC projects.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Currently, only 1,2,3,5 have been take, many thanks to Ericsson/Intel/Huawei
we still missing contributor for 4,6,7, R2 DM spec aligned with IM need to be 
finalized before next Tuesday modeling call.

Please help to volunteer

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

From: denghui (L)
Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 8:46 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; 'onap-tsc' 
Cc: Rittwik Jana ; 'Lingli Deng' 

Subject: [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello all

As agreed in modeling subcommittee meeting, we need to update the onap types of 
the data model to reflect the agreements reached in information model.

It's huge work to achieve the goal, in order to accelerate, 7 separate tasks 
have been created based on the current IM. We encourage interested people to 
volunteer to take the lead for particular task.

The tasks including:
1. VDU: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-67
2. HPA: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-68
3. CP: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-69
4. DeploymentFlavor: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-70
5. VL: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-71
6. VNFD: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-72
7. monitor: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-73

It's expected that the lead would help provide tosca definitions on the 
contribution page 
(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+align+with+TOSCA+NFV+Profile) and
help implement related logic in SDC, APPC/VFC projects.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

[denghui (L)]

Hello Andrei,

It's really hard to keep the synchronization between SDO and OSS, they have 
different paces,
ONAP is working for Release time frame restriction.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

From: Andrei Kojukhov [mailto:andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 8:59 PM
To: denghui (L) ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 

Cc: Rittwik Jana ; Lishitao ; 
MAYER, ANDREW J 
Subject: RE: [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello Deng Hui, Andy,

As the topics 1 -  6 are more or less covered (or in the process of finalizing) 
by the ETSI GS NFV-SOL001 so it would not be a big deal to re-use the TOSCA 
constructs from there.

However the topic # 7 is not covered (and not planned to be covered) by SOL001 
so to my understanding we really have an issue. I'm aware of existence of TOSCA 
based monitoring definitions done by AT&T team and I was requested to 
contribute it in ETSI SOL but this contribution may take time.

BR

Andrei

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 2:46 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc 
mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: Rittwik Jana mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>
Subject: [onap-tsc] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello all

As agreed in modeling subcommittee meeting, we need to update the onap types of 
the data model to reflect the agreements reached in information model.

It's huge work to achieve the goal, in order to accelerate, 7 separate tasks 
have been created based on the current IM. We encourage interested people to 
volunteer to take the lead for particular task.

The tasks including:
1. VDU: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-67
2. HPA: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-68
3. CP: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-69
4. DeploymentFlavor: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-70
5. VL: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-71
6. VNFD: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-72
7. monitor: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-73

It's expected that the lead would help provide tosca definitions on the 
contribution page 
(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+align+with+TOSCA+NFV+Profile) and
help implement related logic in SDC, APPC/VFC projects.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

As agreed in modeling subcommittee meeting, we need to update the onap types of 
the data model to reflect the agreements reached in information model.

It's huge work to achieve the goal, in order to accelerate, 7 separate tasks 
have been created based on the current IM. We encourage interested people to 
volunteer to take the lead for particular task.

The tasks including:
1. VDU: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-67
2. HPA: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-68
3. CP: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-69
4. DeploymentFlavor: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-70
5. VL: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-71
6. VNFD: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-72
7. monitor: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-73

It's expected that the lead would help provide tosca definitions on the 
contribution page 
(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+align+with+TOSCA+NFV+Profile) and
help implement related logic in SDC, APPC/VFC projects.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] URGENT - Modeling Subcommittee meeting minutes from March 6th meeting...

[denghui (L)]

Hi Thinh

It is output of meeting, but we did hear your disagreement, and we also 
questioned whether you and Nokia could contribute all implementation for SOL001 
into ONAP SDC/VNFSDK/VFC/SO projects or not, we haven’t heard any reply yet.

Thanks a  lot

DENG Hui

From: Nguyenphu, Thinh (Nokia - US/Irving) [mailto:thinh.nguyen...@nokia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 11:29 PM
To: Vul, Alex; denghui (L); Gadiyar, Rajesh; Addepalli, Srinivasa R; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org
Cc: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E); Katzman, Anatoly
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] URGENT - Modeling Subcommittee meeting minutes from 
March 6th meeting...

Hi Deng Hui,

This statement in meeting note is not correct either.

“2) will update onap type with TOSCA NFV profile, and”

We did not agreed to update onap types with TOSCA NFV profile 
(tosca-nfv-profile-wd05-rev03). The tosca-nfv-profile-wd05-rev03 is out of date 
and no long align with ONAP R2 IM. The correct mapping should be SOL001 v.0.6.0 
(a draft is available and  expect to be public available in 3 days from now).

SOL001 v0.6.0 includes update on all of nodes, datatypes, capabilities types 
and HPA with all of the data types. in addition, it has all of the TOSCA types 
for support single deployment too.

Would please update the meeting note and if need further discussion, my 
recommendation is to assign the topic for next week call again.

Regards,
Thinh

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Vul, Alex
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 7:04 AM
To: denghui (L) mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>; Gadiyar, 
Rajesh mailto:rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>>; Addepalli, 
Srinivasa R 
mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; 
onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>
Cc: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) 
mailto:ma...@research.att.com>>; Katzman, Anatoly 
mailto:ak4...@intl.att.com>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] URGENT - Modeling Subcommittee meeting minutes from 
March 6th meeting...

Dear Deng Hui,

The meeting minutes appear to be incorrect…


Item 4) under the 1) DM incorrectly states that…

4) will work on improve R3 modeling spec before end of Beijing release

Extra addition related to IM+(including HPA) will be added later

As I understand it, the above statement alleges that we agreed to postpone the 
HPA modeling extensions until R3. Is this correct?

I am afraid we never agreed to postpone the implementation of HPA until after 
R2. In fact, if I remember correctly, when asked if anyone had any objections 
to implementing HPA in R2, no one on the call raised any objections. Having 
talked to Anatoly, my understanding is that he never agreed to exclude the HPA 
model extensions from R2 either.

Once again, HPA is an agreed upon functional requirement to be implemented in 
ONAP R2. HPA has gone through the public review. HPA information and data model 
extensions need to be considered as part of R2

The HPA modeling extensions are based on the same industry standard information 
model as ONAP IM R2+  �C ETSI IFA011 v2.4.1. The HPA modeling extensions can 
added to either the NFV profile based data model or a ETSI SOL001 based data 
model.

If the community decision is to use the NFV Profile based data model so be it. 
We will add the HPA related data types, node types and attributes to what 
Victor uploaded on the Wiki, under the NFV Profile model and move on. The 
implementation of HPA in R2 is on-going…

In the future, I would suggest that we record the Modeling Subcommittee 
meetings. This way we can avoid any misunderstandings like this from happening…

Kind regards,

Alex Vul
Intel Corporation
20180306 Meeting agenda and Minutes

1) DM: Anatoly Katzman

●Victor’s proposal will be agreed �C TOSCA NFV profile plus R2 IM+

https://<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+align+with+TOSCA+NFV+Profile>wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+align+with+TOSCA+NFV+Profile<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+align+with+TOSCA+NFV+Profile>

Note: need to confirm whether onboarding has any issue, if fail then need to 
fall back to R1 solution.

1) will keep onap type and heat type both folders, and

2) will update onap type with TOSCA NFV profile, and

3) will best effort to let 2 use cases use it, if fail, and will fall back to 
heat type , and

4) will work on improve R3 modeling spec before end of Beijing release

Extra addition related to IM+(including HPA) will be added later

2)Resource IM:Xu Yang
3)Service IM/DM:Lingli Deng & Maopeng (Wednesday call)
4)Modeling workshop in ONS 2017

5) If time allows:

  Modeling spec Papyrus:  Jessie Jewitt

  Modeling tools:   Nigel Davis

  Parser:  Atul Purohit

  A&AI   

Re: [onap-discuss] URGENT - Modeling Subcommittee meeting minutes from March 6th meeting...

[denghui (L)]

Dear Alex

You misunderstand “later” , it doesn’t mean R3, but means later next week.
The slide is final output among us, no word changes.

DENG Hui

From: Vul, Alex [mailto:alex@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 9:04 PM
To: denghui (L); Gadiyar, Rajesh; Addepalli, Srinivasa R; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org
Cc: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E); Katzman, Anatoly; SHADMI, DAVID
Subject: URGENT - Modeling Subcommittee meeting minutes from March 6th 
meeting...

Dear Deng Hui,

The meeting minutes appear to be incorrect…


Item 4) under the 1) DM incorrectly states that…

4) will work on improve R3 modeling spec before end of Beijing release

Extra addition related to IM+(including HPA) will be added later

As I understand it, the above statement alleges that we agreed to postpone the 
HPA modeling extensions until R3. Is this correct?

I am afraid we never agreed to postpone the implementation of HPA until after 
R2. In fact, if I remember correctly, when asked if anyone had any objections 
to implementing HPA in R2, no one on the call raised any objections. Having 
talked to Anatoly, my understanding is that he never agreed to exclude the HPA 
model extensions from R2 either.

Once again, HPA is an agreed upon functional requirement to be implemented in 
ONAP R2. HPA has gone through the public review. HPA information and data model 
extensions need to be considered as part of R2

The HPA modeling extensions are based on the same industry standard information 
model as ONAP IM R2+  �C ETSI IFA011 v2.4.1. The HPA modeling extensions can 
added to either the NFV profile based data model or a ETSI SOL001 based data 
model.

If the community decision is to use the NFV Profile based data model so be it. 
We will add the HPA related data types, node types and attributes to what 
Victor uploaded on the Wiki, under the NFV Profile model and move on. The 
implementation of HPA in R2 is on-going…

In the future, I would suggest that we record the Modeling Subcommittee 
meetings. This way we can avoid any misunderstandings like this from happening…

Kind regards,

Alex Vul
Intel Corporation
20180306 Meeting agenda and Minutes

1) DM: Anatoly Katzman

●Victor’s proposal will be agreed �C TOSCA NFV profile plus R2 IM+

https://<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+align+with+TOSCA+NFV+Profile>wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+align+with+TOSCA+NFV+Profile<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+align+with+TOSCA+NFV+Profile>

Note: need to confirm whether onboarding has any issue, if fail then need to 
fall back to R1 solution.

1) will keep onap type and heat type both folders, and

2) will update onap type with TOSCA NFV profile, and

3) will best effort to let 2 use cases use it, if fail, and will fall back to 
heat type , and

4) will work on improve R3 modeling spec before end of Beijing release

Extra addition related to IM+(including HPA) will be added later

2)Resource IM:Xu Yang
3)Service IM/DM:Lingli Deng & Maopeng (Wednesday call)
4)Modeling workshop in ONS 2017

5) If time allows:

  Modeling spec Papyrus:  Jessie Jewitt

  Modeling tools:   Nigel Davis

  Parser:  Atul Purohit

  A&AIJames Forsyth

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource TOSCA Data model

[denghui (L)]

Hi Michela

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Michela Bevilacqua
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 1:09 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource TOSCA Data model

Hi,
I share some questions about Resource TOSCA data model as follow up of the 
today´s ONAP  modeling subcommittee meeting


1)  Assuming the discussion we had today during the ONAP modeling 
subcommittee about OASIS TOSCA NFV or SOL001 is limited to the VNF onboarding 
model. What is the TOSCA data model used by SDC to generate the VNF and service 
descriptors to be shared with the ONAP run time component ?
== >  this is not correct, for R2 it cover everwhere, there is a proposal 
talking about R3 model which will cover onboarding, but it needs further 
discussion


2)  Assuming the discussion we had today during the ONAP modeling 
subcommittee about OASIS TOSCA NFV or SOL001 is limited to the VNF onboarding 
model.  I expect that the VNF onboarding model needs implementation only in SDC.
  == > no


3)  Assuming OASIS TOSCA NFV profile (v004) is a subset of ETSI SOL001 
without features as HPA and monitoring parameters, if OASIS TOSCA NFV profile 
will be preferred for VNF onboarding model, will SOL001 used to introduce HPA 
and Monitoring parameters or …. ?
   == > ONAP TOSCA NFV profile will include HPA.


4)  If OASIS TOSCA NFV profile will be preferred for in R2, do we expect to 
move to SOL001 in R3 ? IN other word, are we only delaying SOL001 support of 1 
release or …?



  == > no decision yet, will be discussed during R3. Maybe ONAP and ETSI NFV 
board level relationship also related.



Thanks



DENG Hui




BR
Michela








From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Nguyenphu, Thinh 
(Nokia - US/Irving)
Sent: den 5 mars 2018 22:14
To: jessie jewitt 
mailto:jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Data model mapping using SOL001

Hi Jessie,

Your summary below shows there are a lot of inconsistency of TOSCA types naming 
convention with IFA011.  I fully acknowledge it. SOL WG is in the process of 
cleaning it up with these guidelines:

  *   SOL001 Type naming convention is UpperCamelCase.
  *   SOL001 properties naming convention is lowercase_underscored or 
snake_case.
  *   SOL001 shall not include postfixes of “d”, “D”, “Desc”, “Descr” of type 
or properties names.
  *   SOL001 shall not include prefixes of “vnf” of properties names, like 
vnfdid, vnfProvider, vnfProductName, vnfSoftwareVersion, 
vnfdVersion,vnfProductInfoName, vnfProductinfoDescription.

The inconsistence issues should be resolved with the next version of SOL001 
(v0.6.0).

Meanwhile, I have created a wiki page to show all of the ONAP R2 Resource IM 
attributes (clean version wiki page) map to SOL001 (TOSCA model) data model, 
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=25436710.  (see SOL001 
Mapping column).  The mapping table shows that all of ONAP Resource IM 
attributes are mapped into TOSCA types with detail.  Except for any of new 
attributes (“orange” highlighted text) are not yet defined.

Perhaps, I can introduce this page at Modeling sub_committee on Tuesday call.

Thinh

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of jessie jewitt
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2018 1:20 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Data model mapping using SOL001

This message is particularly directed to Anatoly, Alex, and Thinh, as we have 
an action item to map ONAP IM to DM. If one of you could respond, I'd 
appreciate it.

My understanding is that SOL001 is mapping the VNFD model to TOSCA. They 
indicate they are mapping the  ETSI NFV elements listed below into TOSCA types 
(page 12).

I'm not clear why they chose the elements they did, as they don't all 
correspond to the VNFD model which is defined in the ETSI "VnfTemplateModule" 
of the model.

Also, the actual ETSI elements named do not correspond to exactly what is 
defined in the model (they probably just got sloppy, but they should pay 
attention to detail).

Here's the list of the currently defined elements that they map
1. VNF   -   Shouldn't this be Vnfd? The Vnf is defined in the VnfModule of the 
model. Also, the element is called Vnf and not VNF.
2. VDU   -   OK, but it should be Vdu, not VDU.
3. Cpd  -Maybe ok? It is defined in the CommonTemplateModule as an abstract 
class. You don't instantiate abstract classes, so you will never have an 
instance. Do you have TOSCA types that represent abstract classes? Also, they 
don't map other abstract classes such as VirtualLinkDesc, so why map this one?
4. VduCpd  - OK. 

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP modeling session registration in ONS 2017

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

As we discussed yesterday modeling call, we create two wiki page for 2 onap 
modeling session on Sunday afternoon and Friday monning,
If you are able to attend, please fill in your info to the registration 
spreadsheet, really thanks LFN and MEF sponsor them
Sunday afternoon: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Sunday+afternoon+modeling+session+in+ONS+2018
Friday morning: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Friday+morning+modeling+session+in+ONS+2018

Thanks a lot for your help

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling]Poll on modeling workshop in ONS 2018

[denghui (L)]

Reminder

From: denghui (L)
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 9:33 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
Subject: [modeling]Poll on modeling workshop in ONS 2018

Hello all

Please cast your vote on the date of workshop for modeling workshop in ONS 2018
https://doodle.com/poll/a95qs5bg5fwmskdg

Thanks a lot

Deng Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Reminder for information model related votes (Naming Convention & Meeting Time)

[denghui (L)]

Just remind everybody, for 1st poll , there are 3 options:

Option 1: be consistent with ETSI IFA011 naming convention; give feedback to 
ETSI about the new proposals and make change to ONAP according to the result

Option 2: make changes in ONAP IM and keep a mapping (e.g., in the description 
of the class/attribute) of ETSI names with ONAP ones

Option 3: Option 2 + feedback to ETSI about the changes

Please help to cast your vote

Thanks

DENG Hui

From: yangxu (H)
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 1:22 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss][modeling] Reminder for information model related votes 
(Naming Convention & Meeting Time)

Hello all,

There're two votes ongoing related to information model design and the deadline 
is approaching.

If you haven't voted, please see the following wiki pages and provide your 
opinions.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Naming+Convention+Poll
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Meeting+Time+Poll

Best regards,
Xu
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling]Poll on modeling workshop in ONS 2018

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Please cast your vote on the date of workshop for modeling workshop in ONS 2018
https://doodle.com/poll/a95qs5bg5fwmskdg

Thanks a lot

Deng Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP modeling subcommittee call meeting minutes

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

The meeting minutes is here:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee+meetings
copy below

I am sending out poll on day of modeling workshop today

Best regards,

DENG Hui
20180227 Meeting agenda and Minutes

Deadline for modeling spec is M3: Mar. 7th

Implementation of model spec will be before M4

Modeling workshop is needed during ONS 2018, poll on Sunday or Friday

1)DM:   Anatoly Katzman (Anatoly is absent due to traveling, Deng 
Hui help to lead the discussion)

1.1) AT&T suggest to keep Heat support , agreed

1.2) two tosca proposal on the table

   a) 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+align+with+TOSCA+NFV+Profile

   b) 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+Compliance+with+ETSI

Consensus a) will be R2, b) will be a new proposal for R3+  (Intel question 
whether we need b) proposal)

   Intel: support SOL001/TOSCA NFV DM or code contributor

   ARM: support SOL001

   AT&T(Andy) support TOSCA NFV DM for onboarding,  along with Heat

   Nokia:  support SOL001, code contributor(check)

   Ericsson: support SOL 001/TOSCA NFV DM ,code(check)

   Netcracker?

   Huawei support SOL001/TOSCA NFV DM code contributor

   ZTE:  support SOL001/TOSCA NFV DM code contributor

   China Mobile support TOSCA NFV DM code contributor

Comments:

a) current ONAP IM is more than IFA 11, we need to follow ONAP spec

b) China Mobile question on SOL001 IPR issue, OASIS TOSCA is more IPR 
friendly.

2)Resource IM: Xu Yang

  community agreed to do majority vote for the not agreed attributes in the 
end.

  YANG Xu will organize the call on wednesday and thursday, then put vote 
spreedsheet on the wiki about the left issues. End of vote will be Monday

  company who disagree with some attbiutes will be recorded



3)Service IM:Lingli Deng/Maopeng Zhang

  Lingli and Maopeng will make R2 proposal asap.



4) Others (no time to discuss)

  Parser:Atul Purohit

  Modeling tools: Nigel Davis,

  Modeling spec Papyrus: Jessie Jewitt

  A&AI James Forsyth

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI NFV ISG

[denghui (L)]

Hello modelers

Below page has been created:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/20180225+Progress+summary

feel free to comment if any update are needed.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2018 8:48 AM
To: Stephen Terrill ; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
Cc: Rittwik Jana 
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG

Hi Steven

Your suggestion sounds reasonable, I will do wiki and send an informal email to 
the ETSI NFV list before next Monday

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: Stephen Terrill [mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 4:07 PM
To: denghui (L) mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc 
mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: Rittwik Jana mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG

Hi Deng,

In the previous TSC when there was a discussion about liaisons it was pointed 
out that some work was required as there is no liaison relationship 
established, I guess that hasn't happened.  When it comes to the liaisons that 
say "please take consideration of my work" they don't mean much as the real 
work has to be driven by the work items etc by the participants there.  I 
assume that the goal of the LS is to have a place to raise the issue of 
evolution of the specs.  You could acthieve that by having a status wiki in 
modelling and a friendly informal email to the etsi lists pointing to it.

BR,

Steve

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 1:23 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc 
mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: Rittwik Jana mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>
Subject: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI 
NFV ISG

Hello all

Based on email discussion, enclosed draft liaison from modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG is as the enclosed.

Thanks a lot for you review

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI NFV ISG

[denghui (L)]

Hi Steven

Your suggestion sounds reasonable, I will do wiki and send an informal email to 
the ETSI NFV list before next Monday

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: Stephen Terrill [mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 4:07 PM
To: denghui (L) ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 

Cc: Rittwik Jana 
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG

Hi Deng,

In the previous TSC when there was a discussion about liaisons it was pointed 
out that some work was required as there is no liaison relationship 
established, I guess that hasn't happened.  When it comes to the liaisons that 
say "please take consideration of my work" they don't mean much as the real 
work has to be driven by the work items etc by the participants there.  I 
assume that the goal of the LS is to have a place to raise the issue of 
evolution of the specs.  You could acthieve that by having a status wiki in 
modelling and a friendly informal email to the etsi lists pointing to it.

BR,

Steve

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 1:23 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc 
mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: Rittwik Jana mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>
Subject: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI 
NFV ISG

Hello all

Based on email discussion, enclosed draft liaison from modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG is as the enclosed.

Thanks a lot for you review

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI NFV ISG

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Based on email discussion, enclosed draft liaison from modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG is as the enclosed.

Thanks a lot for you review

Best regards,

DENG Hui
<>
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] 20180213 modeling subcommittee Meeting Minutes

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Modeling subcommittee has been questioned when will our modeling DM spec come 
out, below are our meeting minutes this week.

Hi Kenny, We are going to cancel next week modeling subcommittee call due to 
china new year, thanks a lot for your help

-
20180213 modeling subcommittee Meeting agenda and Minutes
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee+meetings

1)  Resource IM YANG Xu
there is no consensus whether we need to follow ETSI NFV naming convention or 
change into ONAP naming.
Two polls will be set to decide the naming convention and future meeting time. 
The polls close on Feb 28th.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Meeting+Time+Poll
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Naming+Convention+Poll

2)  Data modeling Anatoly Katzman
DENG Hui: modeling subcommittee have to finalize the 1st draft version by M3 
deadline, in this case, we need to allow solutions only 1 week, and make the 
decision on Feb. 28th.
DENG Hui: there are two solutions on the table now: Monolithic VDU design and 
TOSCA NFV profile, we are not make decision today, but would get basic impress 
what company would like to follow:
Vendors:
1) Ericsson  vote for  of ETSI NFV Profile
2) ZTE   vote for  ETSI SOL NFV profile
3) Huawei vote for  ETSI NFV profile
4) Nokia --no one on call
5) Netcracker (Priya TG) vote for ETSI NFV Profile
Operators:
1) AT&T: Monolithic VDU
2) China Mobile: lacking information to do an informed comparison hence no 
strong opinion to any specific proposal currently. The options on the table 
should firstly meet the requirement as a unified DM in the community with 
consistency to the IM and implementable in Beijing release cadence with vendors 
support. It would be better if we could align with SDO in the same time.
Next step:
a) check whether we have 3rd solution or not in a week
b) make decision on Feb.27th

3) Modeling tool poll(Jessie)
1) use github for papyrus revision
fine from IM's team (Kevin, Andy, Lingli, and YANG Xu)
Anyway, polling will end by the end of Feb.

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Whether How and when we should move to Github for modeling spec update process

[denghui (L)]

Hi Brian

Yes, could you kindly help to do it under modeling tools wiki page?

Thanks a lot for your help
Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: Brian Hedstrom [mailto:brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com]
Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 11:12 PM
To: denghui (L) 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org P 
; jessie jewitt 
Subject: Re: [modeling] Whether How and when we should move to Github for 
modeling spec update process

Hi Deng,
I'm in favor of using Git for model development.
Do we want to add a Poll page to the wiki to track participant voting on this 
topic?

Thanks
Brian

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:31 PM, denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hello modeling subcommittee,

Many Thanks to Jessie’s kind presentation on GitHub for Papyrus model.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee+Contributions
https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16003450/GitHub%20for%20Papyrus%20Model.pptx?api=v2

Due to time limitation, we would like to discussion in the list together with 
the communities whether, how and when we should move to Github to manage the 
modeling spec update process.

Thanks a lot for your advice
Best regards,

DENG Hui



--
Brian Hedstrom
Founder/CEO
OAM Technology Consulting LLC
oam.technology<http://oam.technology>
brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com<mailto:brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com>
720-470-7091
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling]Modeling call next week

[denghui (L)]

Hi Kenny

From latest program: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/VF2F+Feb.+5-8%2C+2017
We are starting from 9:30am eastern time , which is 10:30pm Beijing time

Thanks  a lot for your reminder

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: Kenny Paul [mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Saturday, February 3, 2018 3:29 AM
To: denghui (L) 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org P 
; Rittwik Jana ; 邓灵莉 

Subject: Re: [modeling]Modeling call next week

Hi Deng,
I'll cxl next week's call even though these requests should always be routed 
throgh the wiki page
Meeting Requests, Changes, Hosting & 
Recording<https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=8231933>

I don’t understand the sentence that follows however. Not sure if this is a 
request for a change, or what the intent is.
>> we will have our modeling subcommittee session on Wednesday 9am eastern 
>> time, 10pm Beijing time.

Thanks!

Best Regards,
-kenny

Kenny Paul,  Technical Program Manager
kp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>
510.766.5945


On Feb 2, 2018, at 4:46 AM, denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote:

Hello all

Our modeling subcommittee call will be cancelled next week due to vf2f,

Hi Kenny,

could you kindly help to cancel next week call, thanks a lot

and we will have our modeling subcommittee session on Wednesday 9am eastern 
time, 10pm Beijing time.

1)  Resource IM Xu Yang

2)  Service IM Maopeng Zhang

3)  Data modeling Anatoly

4)  Centralized Parser Atul

5)  Modeling tools Nigel

6) Projects follow up modeling spec discussion (Modeling contact from each 
Project)

Let me know if you have any other suggestions.



Thanks a lot



DENG Hui



___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling]Modeling call next week

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Our modeling subcommittee call will be cancelled next week due to vf2f,

Hi Kenny,

could you kindly help to cancel next week call, thanks a lot

and we will have our modeling subcommittee session on Wednesday 9am eastern 
time, 10pm Beijing time.

1)  Resource IM Xu Yang

2)  Service IM Maopeng Zhang

3)  Data modeling Anatoly

4)  Centralized Parser Atul

5)  Modeling tools Nigel

6) Projects follow up modeling spec discussion (Modeling contact from each 
Project)
Let me know if you have any other suggestions.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Whether How and when we should move to Github for modeling spec update process

[denghui (L)]

Hello modeling subcommittee,

Many Thanks to Jessie's kind presentation on GitHub for Papyrus model.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee+Contributions
https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16003450/GitHub%20for%20Papyrus%20Model.pptx?api=v2

Due to time limitation, we would like to discussion in the list together with 
the communities whether, how and when we should move to Github to manage the 
modeling spec update process.

Thanks a lot for your advice
Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] the training videos of Papyrus have been updated

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Many thanks to Nigel who has kindly help to update all videos, please feel free 
to study them online.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+tools

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] remove the committer whose email is invalid

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Does anybody know that I could remove the committer if that email address is 
not valid anymore?

Thanks a lot for your advice

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus trianing video

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

The video is posted here, please feel free to study it for our future IM design.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+tools
https://zoom.us/recording/play/hifhg4gm8ZqlA-LkeM9qqsNiG3JMq4qdeFilqdKXK6wcYabYufNH86MhaTlEjJHY

Thanks again for Nigel Davis's kind help on this

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus version

[denghui (L)]

Hi Nigel

Could you kindly help to advice what's final version for papyrus for modeling 
team? Thanks a lot for your kind help.

Hi Andy,

Have you recorded Nigel's training about Papyrus last Friday? Thanks a lot for 
your kind help

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP modeling tool Papyrus trianing session

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

We are very honor to invite Nigel Davis to give a tutorial about Papyrus which 
will be used for ONAP Info modeling.
Since Modeling subcommittee is full of schedule every week. We arrange this 
tutorial on this Friday VNFSDK Modeling sub-team session.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2017-12-22+Meeting+notes

Andy, could you kind help to post zoom ID and time here?

Please come and join us
Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling workshop notes

[denghui (L)]

Hello All

ONAP Modeling workshop minutes

1   Service IM: back to service(customer facing service)/service 
component(resource facing service, e.g. network service)/resource/resource 
component layering class diagram, not using composite/decorative pattern for 
Beijing, translate into papyrus format based on agreed clean version.

2   Resource IM: For design time model, agreed to work on a subset of 
IFA011 for Beijing (i.e. remove internalCP as show in the discussion page), 
agreed to add hierarchy for CP inheritance, agreed to work on the latest 
version of IFA011 (v2.3.1). For run time model, agreed to refactor some of the 
attributes (e.g., ip addresses).

3   Design time DM: Agreed on Service and Resource hierarchy, while both 
service and resource can leverage substitution mapping mechanism to realize 
self-recursion aggregation or composition relations if needed by the IM.

4   Runtime DM A&AI will update NFV related API? in order to align with 
Information model, and notify the related project accordingly

5   Agreed to work on a concrete example to show how ONAP IM maps to ONAP 
DM.

6   R2 will be based on TOSCA simple profile 1.1 other than 1.2, but may 
need to consider some special feature of 1.2 if needed by the use case

7   Each DF should be described in a single TOSCA Service template (VNFD) 
and considered as a single VNF, in Beijing release, one VNF package will only 
contain one VNFD

8   R2+ Modeling spec naming convention will use the low camel for 
attribute names, will consider to add naming convention check during M1/M4

9   WiKi will be used for Modeling spec intermediate version,  Readthedoc 
will be used for published version

10Michela volunteer to start to work on the common terminologies for ONAP 
modeling

11Modeling spec will be migrate to Papyrus asap, needs to decide version 
number and setup the timeline to proceed it

12Use Jira/backlog to track the work asap

Thanks for your checking
Best regards

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] SDO slides in ONAP Forum this week

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Please check the enclosed slide for SDOs, thanks a lot for your checking
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/External+SDO+session+in+ONAP+Forum+Dec.+12th%2C+2017

Really thanks MEF/TMF/ETSI NFV/OASIS TOSCA/IETF/ONF for kind help

Thursday workshop slide will be posted on Thursday program page.

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP modeling workshop program

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

There is a small change to let Kevin present first about IM then let SDO to 
discuss it later.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Modeling+Workshop+Program

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss