Re: Cannot select a different icon set
Rob Weir wrote: You should enter a defect in BZ for this. It would be better to do that first, and then post a note to the list linking to the issue. It's at https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119208 as I posted; but since I open issues as CONFIRMED, I typically ask for a quick confirmation before opening them if they are P2. This might be part of the old workflow, anyway, which would involve the needsconfirm assignees and so on. Regards, Andrea.
Re: [Propose RC Build Blockers] Bug 119189 (Writer is crashing via Print Dialog) and Bug 119161 (import regression)
Torokhov, I don't think the two bugs should be taken as release blocker. But for second regression issue, it should be fixed in next release. Lily 2012/4/8 Torokhov Sergey torokhov_...@mail.ru The first one Bug 119189 - Print Selection crash Writer when is chosen again https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119189 cause the Writer crashing but itsn't regression as also observed in OpenOffice-3.0.0. The second Bug 119161 - Regression: Writer set table border's line style like none during import from .docx https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119161 is an import regression in comparison with OpenOffice.org 3.3.0
Re: Linux builds
On 4/10/12 4:33 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi Lily, On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:20:50AM +0800, xia zhao wrote: Ariel, Do you means user have to remove the old packages manually? I don't mean anything, I'm just describing the situation: that's the way I has been working since OOo 3.0.0 It isn't reasonable for end users. Yes. Quite strange nobody seemed to complained about it (I haven't found previous bug reports about it). Though keeping the old package is default behavior, I couldn't understand the reason. Me neither. May be this was the design behind the 3 layer OOo, I've no idea. If just want to keeping the previous configuration etc, is it possible to split and erase other packages? No matter which reason, back to the upgrade problem, we need find one way to resolve the couldn't launch or crash problem. Looking at the backtrace, the might have been introduced by changes on the extension handling, but I'm just guessing (I don't have a build with debugging symbols right now). I agree that the issue is not nice and also happended in earlier versions, at least the desktop integration part. The extension problem can be related to the changes we made in the extension manager... I assume it will take some time to find a good solution. I am no expert in this area but would it be possible to define a meta package that do some clean unintall of older basis packages and desktop integrations? For the future we should rework the 3 layer office asap and should ensure that we can do a smooth and always working upgrade installation. For now we have at least a workaround of a manually uninstall if the meta package wouldn't work. Just an idea Juergen
Re: Who can help modify the licese page?
2012/4/6 Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net On Apr 6, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Rob Weir wrote: On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: On Apr 6, 2012, at 5:24 AM, Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote: Hi Lily; --- Gio 5/4/12, xia zhao lilyzh...@gmail.com ha scritto: ... Data: Giovedì 5 Aprile 2012, 22:03 Hi all, On the lincese page, http://www.openoffice.org/license.html. It still saying developers could use the Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/). SUN/Oracle only accepted work under this license that was non-editable and for which there was no editable version that could be contributed to the project.. If you notice carefully, the phrase is in past tense and applies only to legacy releases. Who can help modify this page? I think a review to the whole page is desirable for the new release. Any committer can change it using the Apache CMS bookmarklet or SVN. The big question is what to write in there. Is there a reason why the page should mix together copyright statements on the website as well as license statements on the releases? Especially since this link appears on every page, it is confusing. Yes, we are still distributing the legacy code. That is not a very good reason, IMHO. I think we should put the legacy license prominent on the legacy download page. But I don't see why it should be in the footer of *every* openoffice.org web page. If it were up to me I'd have the site copyright statement only here, and put the release license link on the download pages only. The download page links to the license page. Maybe we need two license pages. At least three, I think: 1) legacy LPGL for where we offer downloads of the legacy release 2) ALv2 for where we offer downloads of the new Apache releases 3) A site copyright/license page on all pages, explaining the copyright on the website contents itself. But I think it makes zero sense to have page that are not dealing with releases at all have a link that talks confusingly about the license on releases. Remember, through the magic of Google, a user could end up entering any random page on the website, to find the answer to their questions. +1. Make links in the appropriate places. (1) is linked from downloads. (2) is linked from where? (3) is linked from template/footer.html - The site license should have the current /license.html url. - Split the current page in two new pages - legacy_license.html and package_license.html - Edit license.html into the site license file. Yes, this is one good and easy way to resolve these kinds of license problems on pages. Go ahead and make it so. Regards, Dave -Rob Regards, Dave -Rob Cheers, Pedro.
Re: Linux builds
Juergen, Is this anyplace we can record this important known issues and let end user aware it? Like release notes or somethings else like technical note etc? Best regards, Lily 2012/4/10 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 4/10/12 4:33 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi Lily, On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:20:50AM +0800, xia zhao wrote: Ariel, Do you means user have to remove the old packages manually? I don't mean anything, I'm just describing the situation: that's the way I has been working since OOo 3.0.0 It isn't reasonable for end users. Yes. Quite strange nobody seemed to complained about it (I haven't found previous bug reports about it). Though keeping the old package is default behavior, I couldn't understand the reason. Me neither. May be this was the design behind the 3 layer OOo, I've no idea. If just want to keeping the previous configuration etc, is it possible to split and erase other packages? No matter which reason, back to the upgrade problem, we need find one way to resolve the couldn't launch or crash problem. Looking at the backtrace, the might have been introduced by changes on the extension handling, but I'm just guessing (I don't have a build with debugging symbols right now). I agree that the issue is not nice and also happended in earlier versions, at least the desktop integration part. The extension problem can be related to the changes we made in the extension manager... I assume it will take some time to find a good solution. I am no expert in this area but would it be possible to define a meta package that do some clean unintall of older basis packages and desktop integrations? For the future we should rework the 3 layer office asap and should ensure that we can do a smooth and always working upgrade installation. For now we have at least a workaround of a manually uninstall if the meta package wouldn't work. Just an idea Juergen
Re: WaE: desktop/source/app/app.cxx
On 09.04.2012 20:06, Pavel Janík wrote: Hi, this is the culprit of the unused warning. Can you please fix it? Done. -Andre Index: desktop/source/app/app.cxx 1308357 af const sal_uInt32 nT1 (aFileStat.getModifyTime().Seconds); 1308357 af const sal_uInt32 nT2 (aMarkerModifyTime.Seconds);
Re: Linux builds
El día 10 de abril de 2012 09:12, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com escribió: I am no expert in this area but would it be possible to define a meta package that do some clean unintall of older basis packages and desktop integrations? Some time ago, openSUSE replaced their go-oo build with LibO (without a warning to the users...). The update cleaned previous installs so some kind of scripting magic associated with the new packages should be possible. Regards Ricardo
Read Me file need do spell check Mac platform
I download Mac package for recently rc build candidate:r1309668http://people.apache.org/~jsc/developer-snapshots/macos/r1309668/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmgAnd checked the read me file, seems the spell check is needed. For example marktig mailig should be marketing mail etc. I report https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119212 for it. Lily
Bundled extensions
Moin, I've tested r1309668 en_US to verify the fix for issue 119114 [1]. The good news: - No crash when checking for updates. The bad news: - The error http://download.translate.org.za/spellchecker/dict-en_ZA-latest.update.xml does not exist. is still present - looks not very professional. - Clicking on 'Show all Updates' shows English (South Africa) spell checker as update available. The description field shows 'An error occurred: Not found!' - looks not very professional. - The presenter screen extension is not installed. Groetjes, Olaf [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119114
Re: Bundled extensions
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:43 AM, O.Felka olaf-openoff...@gmx.de wrote: Moin, I've tested r1309668 en_US to verify the fix for issue 119114 [1]. The good news: - No crash when checking for updates. The bad news: - The error http://download.translate.org.za/spellchecker/dict-en_ZA-latest.update.xml does not exist. is still present - looks not very professional. That URL is an external one, not one that we control. Do you know what the behavior is in OOo 3.3 when checking for an update of that extension? -Rob - Clicking on 'Show all Updates' shows English (South Africa) spell checker as update available. The description field shows 'An error occurred: Not found!' - looks not very professional. - The presenter screen extension is not installed. Groetjes, Olaf [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119114
Re: Bundled extensions
Am 10.04.2012 15:28, schrieb Rob Weir: On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:43 AM, O.Felkaolaf-openoff...@gmx.de wrote: The bad news: - The error http://download.translate.org.za/spellchecker/dict-en_ZA-latest.update.xml does not exist. is still present - looks not very professional. That URL is an external one, not one that we control. Do you know what the behavior is in OOo 3.3 when checking for an update of that extension? No, I have no idea what OOo 3.3 will do. But I think it would behave the same. But I'm sure we wouldn't have bundled it. Regards, Olaf
Re: Fake OOo download website that loads malware
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:33 PM, floris v floris...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, in the old oooforum.org forum this topic was posted: http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?p=485494#485494 It appears that if you download and install OOo from http://www.office-suite-download.com/ you also get the funmoods toolbar and a lot of trouble. Can you take action against it? Thank you. I found more information from the user on this one. He found it when searching Bing for Open Office. If you try that you will see several fake sites, as paid advertisements. One site even claims to be the official Open Office download (http://www.open-office-download.net/) though their premium installer (showing a large OpenOffice.org logo) installs a bunch of other apps that inject themselves into your browser, etc. The business model is simple. They are paid per install to bundle these other apps, and they advertize their adulterated version of OpenOffice via email spam, social network spam, domain squatting and search engine advertisements. In general taking down the actual sites is difficult. Some of these, for example, are off-shore. So our best bet is to go after the weakest link, namely Bing. The search engines like Bing and Google generally have a policy against using 3rd party trademarks in ad text. Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc., have similar policies that could be used. So instead of trying to shut down the site, you simply prevent the sites from using the major search engines and social network sites to confuse users. However, to raise a complaint against these ads via Bing would require that we actually have the registered trademark in Apache's name, something we do not have now. But if we did we could take care of all of these sites in an afternoon. -Rob Peter aka floris v
Re: Fake OOo download website that loads malware
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:33 PM, floris v floris...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, in the old oooforum.org forum this topic was posted: http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?p=485494#485494 It appears that if you download and install OOo from http://www.office-suite-download.com/ you also get the funmoods toolbar and a lot of trouble. Can you take action against it? Thank you. I found more information from the user on this one. He found it when searching Bing for Open Office. If you try that you will see several fake sites, as paid advertisements. One site even claims to be the official Open Office download (http://www.open-office-download.net/) though their premium installer (showing a large OpenOffice.org logo) installs a bunch of other apps that inject themselves into your browser, etc. The business model is simple. They are paid per install to bundle these other apps, and they advertize their adulterated version of OpenOffice via email spam, social network spam, domain squatting and search engine advertisements. In general taking down the actual sites is difficult. Some of these, for example, are off-shore. So our best bet is to go after the weakest link, namely Bing. The search engines like Bing and Google generally have a policy against using 3rd party trademarks in ad text. Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc., have similar policies that could be used. So instead of trying to shut down the site, you simply prevent the sites from using the major search engines and social network sites to confuse users. However, to raise a complaint against these ads via Bing would require that we actually have the registered trademark in Apache's name, something we do not have now. But if we did we could take care of all of these sites in an afternoon. Shane, what is your advice on this? Is it now time to move and register the trademarks to the PPMC can take action here? -Rob Peter aka floris v
Re: Read Me file need do spell check Mac platform
Am 10.04.12 12:07, schrieb xia zhao: I download Mac package for recently rc build candidate:r1309668http://people.apache.org/~jsc/developer-snapshots/macos/r1309668/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmgAnd checked the read me file, seems the spell check is needed. For example marktig mailig should be marketing mail etc. I report https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119212 for it. You know, that OOo use the native Mac OS X Spellchecker by default and not the one from OOo? So this is probabily not a OOo Problem. Greetings Raphael -- My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
Re: Linux builds
On 04/10/2012 03:05 AM, RGB ES wrote: El d�a 10 de abril de 2012 09:12, J�rgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com escribi�: I am no expert in this area but would it be possible to define a meta package that do some clean unintall of older basis packages and desktop integrations? Some time ago, openSUSE replaced their go-oo build with LibO (without a warning to the users...). The update cleaned previous installs so some kind of scripting magic associated with the new packages should be possible. I haven't tried to install AOO in update mode by folloiwng these instructions: (issue 119162 -- https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119162) * upgrade to 3.4 by command: rpm -Uvh o*.rpm (I installed it in a separate directory as a new install a while back.) I will do this today, but... if there IS a problem with installing over 3.3, is there some reason we can't tell Linux users to de-install 3.3 first before installing 3.4 as part of the release notes? Scripting this de-installation might be a bit tricky depending on distro, but all Linux users should know how to de-install on their own. and re openSuSE and maybe others -- the symlink from the original OOo main, soffice, noramlly /usr/bin/soffice, will still need to be investigated -- maybe also include in release notes. Regards Ricardo -- MzK Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea. -- Robert Heinlein
Question about OOo, AOO
Hello! I hope I haven't t bothered with my questions. But I don't have anyone to ask for advice, so I rely on your wisdom, the Jedi of this mailing list So, Why AOO all documents open in a single process? Has anyone tried to make AOO open documents in different processes? Regards, Nikolay
Re: Question about OOo, AOO
Hi Nikolay, Ochirov Nikolay schrieb: Hello! I hope I haven't t bothered with my questions. But I don't have anyone to ask for advice, so I rely on your wisdom, the Jedi of this mailing list So, Why AOO all documents open in a single process? Has anyone tried to make AOO open documents in different processes? Why do you want to do it? This things are possible: Generate a folder for a second user. Call AOO with the -env parameter. You get one process, but two different users. For example one user can use a German UI and the other user can use an English UI. Install the AOO in administrative mode with setting a different user path on bootstrap.ini. Then you can run two processes soffice.exe. If a user starts soffice.exe he gets a .lock file in his user directory, which prevents, that soffice.exe is started a second time for the same user. Kind regards Regina
Re: Question about OOo, AOO
Thank you very much, Regina! I just noticed that the AOO open all documents in one process, it became interesting. But I would like to write code that would do so would AOO every single document open in a single process))) I began to look as it does AOO, found the function OfficeIPCThread :: EnableOfficeIPCThread (), changed code a bit. But it didn't work - first document is opened, while others will not open. AOO gives a messgebox The application cannot be started. [context = user] caught unexpected exception! (user - my account in system, system - Ubuntu) I have no much experience in this question in particular and programming in general. If anyone will be willing to help with this - I will be very happy! Regards, Nikolay 10 апреля 2012 г. 21:09 пользователь Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de написал: Hi Nikolay, Ochirov Nikolay schrieb: Hello! I hope I haven't t bothered with my questions. But I don't have anyone to ask for advice, so I rely on your wisdom, the Jedi of this mailing list So, Why AOO all documents open in a single process? Has anyone tried to make AOO open documents in different processes? Why do you want to do it? This things are possible: Generate a folder for a second user. Call AOO with the -env parameter. You get one process, but two different users. For example one user can use a German UI and the other user can use an English UI. Install the AOO in administrative mode with setting a different user path on bootstrap.ini. Then you can run two processes soffice.exe. If a user starts soffice.exe he gets a .lock file in his user directory, which prevents, that soffice.exe is started a second time for the same user. Kind regards Regina
Re: Linux builds
2012/4/9 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 4/9/12 1:31 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 07:54:35AM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: I'm missing the linux builds revision 1309668. May be I had overseen something. yes you have, Ariel had to built on revision 1310206 because of issue https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=119168https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119168 Check http://people.apache.org/~**arielch/packages/r1310206/.http://people.apache.org/%7Earielch/packages/r1310206/. .. Juergen Please be patient, and wait until I announce it here (other wise you may download an incomplete package). It will take a while, it's 11 GB of packages! All packages are now uploaded, signed, and with its MD5/SHA-1/SHA512 checksums. SDK: 2 archs * 2 pkg formats * 1 lang = 4 packages Full install sets: 2 archs * 2 pkg formats * 16 langs = 64 packages Language Packs: 2 archs * 2 pkg formats * 16 langs = 64 packages TOTAL 132 packages11 Gb (10485780)44:39:46 Thanks Ariel Does anybody have tested an upgrade installation with these new Linux packages and can verify the reported problem, see https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=119162https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119162 I think we haven't noticed this problem before and I would be interested if others can confirm this problem. Juergen et * -- I just confirmed this problem with upgrading from 3.3 to 3.4 and updated the issue. I don't feel it's a release blocker but does merit attention in release notes and/or README for this release. Even in the best of circumstances, stuff happens. And, with the intersection of LO and OO on my system, well, who knows...you do indeed NEED to deinstall 3.3 first to get 3.4 to work in the default installation area. I will be offline for ~1 day because of traveling and I will make the call for VOTE depending on the feedback from you. Juergen -- MzK Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea. -- Robert Heinlein
Re: [INFRA] download.services.openoffice.org in danger
Am 04/10/2012 01:33 AM, schrieb Peter Pöml:
Hi Dave,
Am 13.03.2012 um 19:42 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Hi Peter,
Sorry for the delaying in responding directly to your generous offer.
sorry for the delay on my side as well.
On Mar 6, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Peter Pöml wrote:
Am 04.03.2012 um 23:43 schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 03/04/2012 08:02 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
With the Oracle infrastructure going away we are in danger of losing the legacy
downloads and the root of the MirrorBrain network.
I haven't realised that this counts also for the download webserver. I thought
for mail services only.
Is it definite that {download,updateext}.service.openoffice.org is going to be
switched off - and when is it?
Also it turns out that the Extensions site uses the url
updateexte.services.openoffice.org for updates and that url points to
download.services.openoffice.org
I don't know the reason for the linking. But maybe it's because a few
extensions are outsourced from the main repository due to their high load. See:
http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/extended/extensions/
/ExtensionUpdateService/check.Update is one of the most popular files - with
around 5-10 requests per second.
SourceForge has asked to take control of updateexte.services.openoffice.org
which makes sense.
Great.
What do we want to do about download.services.openoffice.org?
It can be switched to the alternative host which is hosted by MirrorBrain
itself, so that this is used for serving downloads instead of the Oracle hosted
service.
Please note however that my fallback of download.services.openoffice.org does
not have all features. It has the mirror redirection (the essential), but does
not serve cryptographic hashes for verification, no automatically generated
torrents, no metalinks.
If you compare the following two URLs, you can note the differences:
http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/stable/3.3.0/OOo_3.3.0_Solaris_Sparc_install-wJRE_en-US.tar.gz.mirrorlist
http://openoffice.mirrorbrain.org/stable/3.3.0/OOo_3.3.0_Solaris_Sparc_install-wJRE_en-US.tar.gz.mirrorlist
Also, what's not visible, is that the fallback host doesn't count downloads.
Mirror selection and redirection are the same. But as you might know, large
downloads benefit from means for download verification, which is why crypto
hashes and metalinks/torrents are useful, especially affecting downloaders with
not less-than-ideal connectivity.
To set up a full fallback, I am lacking the disk space, unfortunately. I don't
have space for the file tree. (I would appreciate donations for running costs
of disk space, or access to server, very much.)
But, no problem, there is the option of continuing by switching to my host as
it is.
Given there is hardware, I could set up a successor for
download.services.openoffice.org, respectively move it to a new home, if there
is interest...
Well I hope there is! I know I am biased, because I'm the one who built
download.services.openoffice.org, and spent some years with it. But I'd bet
some money that nobody wants to go back to pre-MirrorBrain times, where the
really close mirrors were always ignored when you downloaded OpenOffice.org...
See the file http://www.openoffice.org/download/globalvars.js;. Just exchange the content for the
MIRROR_MIRRORBRAIN_URL and MIRROR_MIRRORBRAIN2_URL variables.
Marcus
By the way, here's a disclaimer: I'm also the head behind LibreOffice's
download system. Yes, if you might wonder: I am maintaining the download servers of both
projects and have no problem with that :-)
Neither do I. The purpose is to preserve the legacy for those who still require
access. Apache OO will use Apache Infrastructure and Mirrors (many the same)
and having someone take responsibility for this legacy would be wonderful.
If you have successor hardware ready then the simple way to proceed is to change the dns
for download.services.openoffice.org dns to point to your server. This server is then the
root of the mirrorbrain network and you will be responsible for dealing with
mirrors.
Well, not really, since the mirror network is headless, I'm only redirecting
an old state of the tree, without being the root of the network. I'd be the root of the
network if mirrors would sync from me. But the mirrors have traditionally synced from
another place. (For historical reasons, too lengthy to explain,
download.services.openoffice.org hasn't been the root of the mirror network either.)
Wondering: download.services.openoffice.org was changed to point to my server I
thought, but it's pointing to the Oracle server again now. Was it changed back?
Peter
IMHO the plan was to shutdown the download.services.openoffice.org as
it is hosted by Oracle. Therefore the default downloads were stopped to
go to this server but changed to your server.
However, it seems that the Oracle server is still working. Strange.
Marcus
Re: Read Me file need do spell check Mac platform
On 4/10/12 12:07 PM, xia zhao wrote: I download Mac package for recently rc build candidate:r1309668http://people.apache.org/~jsc/developer-snapshots/macos/r1309668/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmgAnd checked the read me file, seems the spell check is needed. For example marktig mailig should be marketing mail etc. I report https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119212 for it. Thanks Lily, the readme should be reworked completely. It is generated and depending on the platform, different pieces get merged together. We should review the whole readme file for each platform and should update (including spell checking) the content accordingly. Juergen
Re: Question about OOo, AOO
Hi Nikolay, On 11.04.2012 02:02, Ochirov Nikolay wrote: Thank you very much, Regina! I just noticed that the AOO open all documents in one process, it became interesting. But I would like to write code that would do so would AOO every single document open in a single process))) I began to look as it does AOO, found the function OfficeIPCThread :: EnableOfficeIPCThread (), changed code a bit. Hm, you are talking about running AOO in different processes not threads, right? Both approaches pose different difficulties. Using multiple threads (which we do to some small extend) would require our base libraries do be thread safe. Which they are not as far as I know. Using different processes might lead to all dlls loaded several times (from the top of my head I don´t know if they can be shared over process boundaries) and thereby multiplying our memory consumption. Regards, Andre But it didn't work - first document is opened, while others will not open. AOO gives a messgebox The application cannot be started. [context = user] caught unexpected exception! (user - my account in system, system - Ubuntu) I have no much experience in this question in particular and programming in general. If anyone will be willing to help with this - I will be very happy! Regards, Nikolay 10 апреля 2012 г. 21:09 пользователь Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de написал: Hi Nikolay, Ochirov Nikolay schrieb: Hello! I hope I haven't t bothered with my questions. But I don't have anyone to ask for advice, so I rely on your wisdom, the Jedi of this mailing list So, Why AOO all documents open in a single process? Has anyone tried to make AOO open documents in different processes? Why do you want to do it? This things are possible: Generate a folder for a second user. Call AOO with the -env parameter. You get one process, but two different users. For example one user can use a German UI and the other user can use an English UI. Install the AOO in administrative mode with setting a different user path on bootstrap.ini. Then you can run two processes soffice.exe. If a user starts soffice.exe he gets a .lock file in his user directory, which prevents, that soffice.exe is started a second time for the same user. Kind regards Regina
Re: Bundled extensions
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 03:28 +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 4/10/12 3:45 PM, O.Felka wrote: Am 10.04.2012 15:28, schrieb Rob Weir: On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:43 AM, O.Felkaolaf-openoff...@gmx.de wrote: The bad news: - The error http://download.translate.org.za/spellchecker/dict-en_ZA-latest.update.xml does not exist. is still present - looks not very professional. That URL is an external one, not one that we control. Do you know what the behavior is in OOo 3.3 when checking for an update of that extension? No, I have no idea what OOo 3.3 will do. But I think it would behave the same. But I'm sure we wouldn't have bundled it. yes it should it be the same problem in OOo3.3. I would propose that we don't bundle extensions that will include an external update Url or something like that. We should bundle extension only that will be supported and completely handled by our extension repo. ah - ok, that sounds reasonable at it's face. Now if an extension is published at the AOO ext. repository and it's implemented in a scripted language (basic, js, python, etc) the oxt (extension body) is the source code, so that makes easy sense. What if the extension is in java or c++ or some other language where an external source repository is used, however the extension runtime and support vector are both through the AOO ext. repository - I would assume given a suitable license on the source that it would be, eligible, for consideration. Anyway - I'm putting forth a question that doesn't need to be answered today, just thinking out loud I suppose. //drew If no update Url is given in the extension and the extension is distributed via the ext repo the update info Was (and hopefully is, will be) generated on demand. Juergen
Re: Linux builds
On 10.04.2012 07:12, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Does anybody have tested an upgrade installation with these new Linux packages and can verify the reported problem, see https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119162 I think we haven't noticed this problem before and I would be interested if others can confirm this problem. I will be offline for ~1 day because of traveling and I will make the call for VOTE depending on the feedback from you. Old basis package set remaining is the default behaviour, at least tested with OOo 3.0.0. On Fedora 16: - install OOo 3.0.0 (OOO300_m9 9358) - install OOo 3.1.1 (OOO310_m19 9420) 1) there is an issue with the desktop integration, same for AOO 2) the old basis3.0 remains: /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0 /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1 All ooobasis3.0 packages are kept. Strange. Here is what I would expect would happen on an update: - There is one top-level or meta package that has dependencies on all the other packages (directly or indirectly) - This meta package of OOo3.? is replaced by AOO3.4 - The packages of OOo3.? are not referenced anymore and get removed automatically. The new packages are installed. Everything is find. So one of the following things goes wrong: - The old meta package is not removed because the new one has no relationship to it (maybe because of a different application name) - The old meta package is removed but some other package keeps a reference to one of OOo3.? base packages. - Something else that I did not think of yet (I am currently on a business trip and am still adapting to the new time zone) Regards, Andre [...]
Re: [EXTENSIONS]Alternative for Report Builder?
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 17:22 -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: On 04/07/12 01:43, drew wrote: ... Ok For the MySQL connector and pdf filter however, use of a separate repository, a project at SF or GC, is not required or less so, is that correct? It is not required but I would recommend it, depending on what the maintainer wants to do. Ideally it would be best to maintain it under version control. The core sources are under AL2 but the dependencies are copyleft and both will have to be together in one way or another. Both sf or google code have some nice resources to handle patches and some space to do binary releases so it would be a good complement to the extensions site. Hi Pedro, Thanks. OK, one more maybe stupid question. Is it correct that the API described for the report designer extension at: http://www.openoffice.org/api/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/report/module-ix.html is not supported in the coming AOO 3.4 release binary? Thanks //drew
--with-system-graphite fails on FreeBSD.
Hi hdu, Just for your info. with svn 1308242 and with --with-system-graphite, build fails on FreeBSD at vcl project with following build error. pfg and I tested several patches to fix, but still in vain. [maho@ligeti8amd64 /work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/vcl]$ gmake -sr[ build DEP ] LNK:Library/libvcl.so [ build CXX ] vcl/source/glyphs/glyphcache In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.2/memory:53, from /work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/stl/preextstl.h:48, from /work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/vcl/inc/graphite_features.hxx:28, from /work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/vcl/source/glyphs/glyphcache.cxx:40: /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:321: error: 'ostreambuf_iterator' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:321: error: template argument 2 is invalid /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:321: error: expected unqualified-id before '' token /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:326: error: 'ostreambuf_iterator' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:326: error: template argument 2 is invalid /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:326: error: expected unqualified-id before '' token /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: template declaration of 'typename __gnu_cxx::__enable_ifstd::__is_char_Tp::__value, _CharT*::__type std::__copy_aux' /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: 'istreambuf_iterator' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected primary-expression before '' token /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected primary-expression before ',' token /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: 'istreambuf_iterator' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected primary-expression before '' token /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected primary-expression before ',' token /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:332: error: expected primary-expression before '*' token /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:332: error: expected primary-expression before ')' token /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:407: error: 'ostreambuf_iterator' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:407: error: template argument 2 is invalid /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:407: error: expected unqualified-id before '' token gmake: *** [/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/workdir/CxxObject/vcl/source/glyphs/glyphcache.o] エラー 1 Best regards, Nakata Maho
Re: --with-system-graphite fails on FreeBSD.
Sorry... I should report without --with-system-graphite... I'll post again, soon. Thanks Nakata Maho From: Maho NAKATA m...@apache.org Subject: --with-system-graphite fails on FreeBSD. Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:36:36 +0900 (JST) Hi hdu, Just for your info. with svn 1308242 and with --with-system-graphite, build fails on FreeBSD at vcl project with following build error. pfg and I tested several patches to fix, but still in vain. [maho@ligeti8amd64 /work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/vcl]$ gmake -sr[ build DEP ] LNK:Library/libvcl.so [ build CXX ] vcl/source/glyphs/glyphcache In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.2/memory:53, from /work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/stl/preextstl.h:48, from /work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/vcl/inc/graphite_features.hxx:28, from /work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/vcl/source/glyphs/glyphcache.cxx:40: /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:321: error: 'ostreambuf_iterator' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:321: error: template argument 2 is invalid /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:321: error: expected unqualified-id before '' token /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:326: error: 'ostreambuf_iterator' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:326: error: template argument 2 is invalid /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:326: error: expected unqualified-id before '' token /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: template declaration of 'typename __gnu_cxx::__enable_ifstd::__is_char_Tp::__value, _CharT*::__type std::__copy_aux' /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: 'istreambuf_iterator' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected primary-expression before '' token /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected primary-expression before ',' token /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: 'istreambuf_iterator' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected primary-expression before '' token /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected primary-expression before ',' token /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:332: error: expected primary-expression before '*' token /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:332: error: expected primary-expression before ')' token /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:407: error: 'ostreambuf_iterator' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:407: error: template argument 2 is invalid /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:407: error: expected unqualified-id before '' token gmake: *** [/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/workdir/CxxObject/vcl/source/glyphs/glyphcache.o] エラー 1 Best regards, Nakata Maho
Re: Read Me file need do spell check Mac platform
Yes Juergen, I suppose these kinds of works will be done before RC build is voted and the modified files be reviewed before we publish official AOO 3.4. Lily 2012/4/11 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 4/10/12 12:07 PM, xia zhao wrote: I download Mac package for recently rc build candidate:r1309668http://**people.apache.org/~jsc/** developer-snapshots/macos/**r1309668/Apache_OpenOffice_** incubating_3.4.0_MacOS_x86_**install_en-US.dmghttp://people.apache.org/%7Ejsc/developer-snapshots/macos/r1309668/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg And checked the read me file, seems the spell check is needed. For example marktig mailig should be marketing mail etc. I report https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=119212https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119212for it. Thanks Lily, the readme should be reworked completely. It is generated and depending on the platform, different pieces get merged together. We should review the whole readme file for each platform and should update (including spell checking) the content accordingly. Juergen
Re: [EXTENSIONS]Alternative for Report Builder?
Hi Drew; Not sure if I am the right person to answer this but I will try. --- Mar 10/4/12, drew d...@baseanswers.com ha scritto: ... Hi Pedro, Thanks. OK, one more maybe stupid question. Is it correct that the API described for the report designer extension at: http://www.openoffice.org/api/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/report/module-ix.html is not supported in the coming AOO 3.4 release binary? It depends on what you call support ;). We havent changed it and in theory it should still be possible to build it if you have the dependencies in place and play with the build system. This said, I do consider them unsupported since the code will be cleaned out of the tree in a relatively short time after 3.4 Release. Pedro. ps. SVN doesnt really delete stuff and the 3.4 tarballs will be around if needed.
with internal graphite build fails on FreeBSD.
Hi hdu, In svn 1308242, build fails on FreeBSD at graphite project (by enabling using graphite) with following build error. build -- version: 275224 = Building module graphite = Entering /work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/graphite mkdir ./unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/silgraphite-2.3.1/engine mkdir: ./unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/silgraphite-2.3.1/engine: File exists cd ./unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/silgraphite-2.3.1/engine gmake -j1 touch /work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/graphite/./unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/so_built_so_graphite Making all in src gmake[1]: Entering directory `/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/graphite/unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/silgraphite-2.3.1/engine/src' /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile c++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\silgraphite\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\silgraphite\ -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\2.3.1\ -DPACKAGE_STRING=\silgraphite\ 2.3.1\ -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\silgraphite-de...@lists.sourceforge.net\ -DPACKAGE=\silgraphite\ -DVERSION=\2.3.1\ -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -DLT_OBJDIR=\.libs/\ -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DSIZEOF_WCHAR_T=4 -DHAVE_FABSF=1 -I. -I../include/graphite -I../src/generic -I../src/font -I../src/segment -I. -I./unxfbsdx.pro/inc/so_graphite -I../inc -I./inc/pch -I./inc -I./unx/inc -I./unxfbsdx.pro/inc -I. -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/stl -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/external -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/inc -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solenv/unxfbsdx/inc -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solenv/inc -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/res -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/stl -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solenv/inc/Xp31 -I/usr/local/openjdk6/include -I/usr/local/openjdk6/include/freebsd -I/usr/local/openjdk6/include/bsd -I/usr/local/openjdk6/include/linux -I/usr/local/openjdk6/include/native_threads/include -I/usr/local/include -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/offuh -I. -I./res -I. -pipe -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -g -Wall -Wextra -Wendif-labels -Wshadow -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -DFREEBSD -DUNX -DVCL -DGCC -DC341 -DX86_64 -DX86_64 -D_PTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DNEW_SOLAR -D_USE_NAMESPACE=1 -DSTLPORT_VERSION=450 -DHAVE_GCC_VISIBILITY_FEATURE -D__DMAKE -DUNIX -DCPPU_ENV=gcc3 -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/c++/4.2 -DSUPD=340 -DPRODUCT -DNDEBUG -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -DOPTIMIZE -DCUI -DSOLAR_JAVA -I. -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/stl -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/external -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/inc -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solenv/unxfbsdx/inc -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solenv/inc -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/res -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/stl -I/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solenv/inc/Xp31 -I/usr/local/openjdk6/include -I/usr/local/openjdk6/include/freebsd -I/usr/local/openjdk6/include/bsd -I/usr/local/openjdk6/include/linux -I/usr/local/openjdk6/include/native_threads/include -I/usr/local/include -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=no -fPIC -DNDEBUG -DTRACING -O3 -DNDEBUG -MT Font.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/Font.Tpo -c -o Font.lo `test -f '../src/font/Font.cpp' || echo './'`../src/font/Font.cpp libtool: compile: c++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\silgraphite\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\silgraphite\
