Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> As far as I have been able to determine, no one in the project seems >> to have the ability to do anything in our Bugzilla instance beyond the >> basic operations that any member of the public is able to do. We >> need to get a handful of people to have some elevated permissions to >> edit bugs, edit components, etc., so we can manage the quality process >> for the upcoming 3.4 release. >> >> I'll enter a JIRA issue asking that myself, and whichever other >> committers want to be included, be added to a group that will have the >> following additional Bugzilla permissions: >> > > I've gone ahead and enter the JIRA issue for this with Infra@: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4350 > Wow, that was fast! Thanks to Tony, we now have a small group of BZ admins for the project. is there anything urgent we need to look at right now? If not, maybe a new thread on what we want to do. Maybe simplification and reduction in number of components? Clarification/adjustment of the workflow? What we have now is very confusing to users. -Rob > Note that I did also request that all other accounts, other then the > named admins, be reset back to their basic permissions. The new > admins can then quickly re-enable permissions for project members as > appropriate. As David mentioned earlier in this thread, we'll want > to get into the practice of enabling a set of privileges for all > committers. > > >> - editbugs >> - editcomponents >> - canconfirm >> - editkeywords >> >> Having these additional permissions will especially be critical for >> those engaging in QA, I think. >> >> I'm not sure if Infra will do it (security concerns, etc.), but it >> would also be good to have one or two admin-level committers, with the >> editusers permission, so they can enable the above permissions for >> other users without going through Infra. >> >> So if you want to be on the initial batch, please respond to this note >> and let me know what your Bugzilla ID is. This is not necessarily the >> same as your Apache ID. And if you don't yet have a Bugzilla account >> for the project, you can request one here: >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ >> >> Thanks! >> >> -Rob
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > As far as I have been able to determine, no one in the project seems > to have the ability to do anything in our Bugzilla instance beyond the > basic operations that any member of the public is able to do. We > need to get a handful of people to have some elevated permissions to > edit bugs, edit components, etc., so we can manage the quality process > for the upcoming 3.4 release. > > I'll enter a JIRA issue asking that myself, and whichever other > committers want to be included, be added to a group that will have the > following additional Bugzilla permissions: > I've gone ahead and enter the JIRA issue for this with Infra@: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4350 Note that I did also request that all other accounts, other then the named admins, be reset back to their basic permissions. The new admins can then quickly re-enable permissions for project members as appropriate. As David mentioned earlier in this thread, we'll want to get into the practice of enabling a set of privileges for all committers. > - editbugs > - editcomponents > - canconfirm > - editkeywords > > Having these additional permissions will especially be critical for > those engaging in QA, I think. > > I'm not sure if Infra will do it (security concerns, etc.), but it > would also be good to have one or two admin-level committers, with the > editusers permission, so they can enable the above permissions for > other users without going through Infra. > > So if you want to be on the initial batch, please respond to this note > and let me know what your Bugzilla ID is. This is not necessarily the > same as your Apache ID. And if you don't yet have a Bugzilla account > for the project, you can request one here: > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ > > Thanks! > > -Rob
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Wolf Halton > wrote: > > I volunteer. > > > > I'll need your BZ login ID, which is not necessarily the same as your > Apache ID. > > > http://sourcefreedom.com > > On Jan 12, 2012 2:16 PM, "Rob Weir" wrote: > > > >> As far as I have been able to determine, no one in the project seems > >> to have the ability to do anything in our Bugzilla instance beyond the > >> basic operations that any member of the public is able to do. We > >> need to get a handful of people to have some elevated permissions to > >> edit bugs, edit components, etc., so we can manage the quality process > >> for the upcoming 3.4 release. > >> > >> I'll enter a JIRA issue asking that myself, and whichever other > >> committers want to be included, be added to a group that will have the > >> following additional Bugzilla permissions: > >> > >> - editbugs > >> - editcomponents > >> - canconfirm > >> - editkeywords > >> > >> Having these additional permissions will especially be critical for > >> those engaging in QA, I think. > >> > >> I'm not sure if Infra will do it (security concerns, etc.), but it > >> would also be good to have one or two admin-level committers, with the > >> editusers permission, so they can enable the above permissions for > >> other users without going through Infra. > >> > >> So if you want to be on the initial batch, please respond to this note > >> and let me know what your Bugzilla ID is. This is not necessarily the > >> same as your Apache ID. And if you don't yet have a Bugzilla account > >> for the project, you can request one here: > >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> -Rob > >> > My bugzilla login is wolf.hal...@gmail.com -- This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com Advancing Libraries Together - http://LYRASIS.org
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Wolf Halton wrote: > I volunteer. > I'll need your BZ login ID, which is not necessarily the same as your Apache ID. > http://sourcefreedom.com > On Jan 12, 2012 2:16 PM, "Rob Weir" wrote: > >> As far as I have been able to determine, no one in the project seems >> to have the ability to do anything in our Bugzilla instance beyond the >> basic operations that any member of the public is able to do. We >> need to get a handful of people to have some elevated permissions to >> edit bugs, edit components, etc., so we can manage the quality process >> for the upcoming 3.4 release. >> >> I'll enter a JIRA issue asking that myself, and whichever other >> committers want to be included, be added to a group that will have the >> following additional Bugzilla permissions: >> >> - editbugs >> - editcomponents >> - canconfirm >> - editkeywords >> >> Having these additional permissions will especially be critical for >> those engaging in QA, I think. >> >> I'm not sure if Infra will do it (security concerns, etc.), but it >> would also be good to have one or two admin-level committers, with the >> editusers permission, so they can enable the above permissions for >> other users without going through Infra. >> >> So if you want to be on the initial batch, please respond to this note >> and let me know what your Bugzilla ID is. This is not necessarily the >> same as your Apache ID. And if you don't yet have a Bugzilla account >> for the project, you can request one here: >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ >> >> Thanks! >> >> -Rob >>
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
I volunteer. http://sourcefreedom.com On Jan 12, 2012 2:16 PM, "Rob Weir" wrote: > As far as I have been able to determine, no one in the project seems > to have the ability to do anything in our Bugzilla instance beyond the > basic operations that any member of the public is able to do. We > need to get a handful of people to have some elevated permissions to > edit bugs, edit components, etc., so we can manage the quality process > for the upcoming 3.4 release. > > I'll enter a JIRA issue asking that myself, and whichever other > committers want to be included, be added to a group that will have the > following additional Bugzilla permissions: > > - editbugs > - editcomponents > - canconfirm > - editkeywords > > Having these additional permissions will especially be critical for > those engaging in QA, I think. > > I'm not sure if Infra will do it (security concerns, etc.), but it > would also be good to have one or two admin-level committers, with the > editusers permission, so they can enable the above permissions for > other users without going through Infra. > > So if you want to be on the initial batch, please respond to this note > and let me know what your Bugzilla ID is. This is not necessarily the > same as your Apache ID. And if you don't yet have a Bugzilla account > for the project, you can request one here: > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ > > Thanks! > > -Rob >
RE: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
+1 on our own BZ Admin list. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 14:39 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers [ ... ] > I would like to discuss what the policy should become. IMO - Open up normal, > non-admin permissions to all of the project's committers. Also, open normal > permissions up to the community as a whole. If someone abuses their > privileges then remove them. The BZ admin will need to deal with Spammers. > +1 But is there any way we can have our own BZ Admin distribution list? It is extremely weird that I get BZ Admin emails for all projects, including AOO, though I appear to have admin privileges for none of them > Regards, > Dave [ ... ]
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 15, 2012, at 1:49 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> Rob Weir wrote: > Did you read anyone say that current privileges are going to be > dropped? I certainly did not say that. No, but that was a doubt I had: in the process of granting new privileges, it might be that someone notices that a lot of people already have high privileges, and that this group includes people currently unaffiliated with the project. I was just making sure that current privileges are not dropped now: this will still be an issue, but it can be dealt with separately. >>> >>> We need to have a common set of privileges for ALL committers. We should >>> not have to request it, it should be done. >>> >> >> That is a curious statement, considering that: > > For the BZ to be useful to the community it must be possible for any > contributor to have sufficient privileges to engage in the process. > > In the project's that I work on like Apache POI everyone has BZ rights to > create issues and change status. AFAIK it is very open and very helpful and > actually leads to valuable conversations with users. Even if some are similar > to a no its not a bug yes it is. No matter. > > You are allowed basic rights to open, comment, update and close JIRA issues > at Apache. Admin rights are special. > > BTW - an open BZ provides another path for contributors to get attention and > possibly become committers. > >> >> - committers are not automatically subscribed to ooo-private. > > So far, every committer is given the opportunity to do so. And it is > exceedingly easy. > >> - committers are not automatically list moderators. They need to request it. >> >> - committers are not automatically blog editors. They need to request it. >> >> - committers are not automatically wiki editors or admins. They need >> to request it. > > How much use has the project made of OOODEV cwiki vs. OOOUSERS cwiki? One is > by request and the other is open to anyone. > > IMO we should ask Infrastructure to drop OOODEV. > >> >> - committers are not automatically forum editors or admins. They need >> to request it. >> >> So far as I can tell, the only thing that happens automatically for >> committers is SVN access. And even that is not really automatic. > > I watch the Infrastructure ML. It is part of the workflow when the PPMC > requests the committer's id. An incubator committer is a more difficult setup > than a TLP committer, there is an extra step for Apache CMS permission. > >> >> Given the above, I had no expectations that Bugzilla access for >> committers would happen without request. Do you have a reason to be >> optimistic in this case? > > We have our own, separate BZ that is NOT part of the normal Apache BZ. > Perhaps it was missed back in July, but we are responsible. That's the cost > for keeping the old issue ids. > > >> >> And are you suggesting we wait for this to happen? > > Given that we are accountable for this BZ we as the PPMC are responsible for > its state. > >> Or would it make >> more sense to get a few volunteers, per my original note, and go >> forward with that for now? > > Yes, I agree that we need to get some volunteers. We should define what we > want our BZ admins to do. > OK.That is clearer. When you previously said, "We should not have to request it, it should be done" I took that as it should be technologically done, and done automatically without request. I see now that you mean it should be done as a matter of our ordinary process and workflow, although it may require a manual step. +1 on that. > I would like to know the current mysterious closed policy and workflow in > this custom BZ. It really bothers me that we have no clue who has authority > and who doesn't. We are responsible. > > I would like to discuss what the policy should become. IMO - Open up normal, > non-admin permissions to all of the project's committers. Also, open normal > permissions up to the community as a whole. If someone abuses their > privileges then remove them. The BZ admin will need to deal with Spammers. > +1 But is there any way we can have our own BZ Admin distribution list? It is extremely weird that I get BZ Admin emails for all projects, including AOO, though I appear to have admin privileges for none of them > Regards, > Dave > >> >> -Rob >> >> >>> The PPMC should decide what the normal set of privileges should be for the >>> general community as well. >>> >>> Maybe as another thread this will noticed. >>> >>> I am really glad I rejected using BZ to discuss the website a few months >>> ago since no privileges with the AOO BZ have been assigned to anyone who >>> wasn't with the former project yet former members who have not continued >>> with this project still have privileges. >>> >>> Th
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
On Jan 16, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> On Jan 15, 2012, at 1:49 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >>> Rob Weir wrote: Did you read anyone say that current privileges are going to be dropped? I certainly did not say that. >>> >>> No, but that was a doubt I had: in the process of granting new privileges, >>> it might be that someone notices that a lot of people already have high >>> privileges, and that this group includes people currently unaffiliated with >>> the project. I was just making sure that current privileges are not dropped >>> now: this will still be an issue, but it can be dealt with separately. >> >> We need to have a common set of privileges for ALL committers. We should not >> have to request it, it should be done. >> > > That is a curious statement, considering that: For the BZ to be useful to the community it must be possible for any contributor to have sufficient privileges to engage in the process. In the project's that I work on like Apache POI everyone has BZ rights to create issues and change status. AFAIK it is very open and very helpful and actually leads to valuable conversations with users. Even if some are similar to a no its not a bug yes it is. No matter. You are allowed basic rights to open, comment, update and close JIRA issues at Apache. Admin rights are special. BTW - an open BZ provides another path for contributors to get attention and possibly become committers. > > - committers are not automatically subscribed to ooo-private. So far, every committer is given the opportunity to do so. And it is exceedingly easy. > - committers are not automatically list moderators. They need to request it. > > - committers are not automatically blog editors. They need to request it. > > - committers are not automatically wiki editors or admins. They need > to request it. How much use has the project made of OOODEV cwiki vs. OOOUSERS cwiki? One is by request and the other is open to anyone. IMO we should ask Infrastructure to drop OOODEV. > > - committers are not automatically forum editors or admins. They need > to request it. > > So far as I can tell, the only thing that happens automatically for > committers is SVN access. And even that is not really automatic. I watch the Infrastructure ML. It is part of the workflow when the PPMC requests the committer's id. An incubator committer is a more difficult setup than a TLP committer, there is an extra step for Apache CMS permission. > > Given the above, I had no expectations that Bugzilla access for > committers would happen without request. Do you have a reason to be > optimistic in this case? We have our own, separate BZ that is NOT part of the normal Apache BZ. Perhaps it was missed back in July, but we are responsible. That's the cost for keeping the old issue ids. > > And are you suggesting we wait for this to happen? Given that we are accountable for this BZ we as the PPMC are responsible for its state. > Or would it make > more sense to get a few volunteers, per my original note, and go > forward with that for now? Yes, I agree that we need to get some volunteers. We should define what we want our BZ admins to do. I would like to know the current mysterious closed policy and workflow in this custom BZ. It really bothers me that we have no clue who has authority and who doesn't. We are responsible. I would like to discuss what the policy should become. IMO - Open up normal, non-admin permissions to all of the project's committers. Also, open normal permissions up to the community as a whole. If someone abuses their privileges then remove them. The BZ admin will need to deal with Spammers. Regards, Dave > > -Rob > > >> The PPMC should decide what the normal set of privileges should be for the >> general community as well. >> >> Maybe as another thread this will noticed. >> >> I am really glad I rejected using BZ to discuss the website a few months ago >> since no privileges with the AOO BZ have been assigned to anyone who wasn't >> with the former project yet former members who have not continued with this >> project still have privileges. >> >> This is a huge issue and ought to be addressed this week. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Andrea. >>
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: >> >> Did you read anyone say that current privileges are going to be >> dropped? I certainly did not say that. > > > No, but that was a doubt I had: in the process of granting new privileges, > it might be that someone notices that a lot of people already have high > privileges, and that this group includes people currently unaffiliated with > the project. I was just making sure that current privileges are not dropped > now: this will still be an issue, but it can be dealt with separately. > That is something we need to deal with, eventually. Having escalated privileges associated with people no longer involved with the project is bad for security. (Wasn't the vector of the last hack of the Apache website via a XSS attack of bug tracking admin accounts?) Remember, we can always add permissions back for someone if they did not see and respond to this note. Another option is to generate a report of all ID's with elevated privileges and have that sent to ooo-private where we can decide next steps. -Rob > Regards, > Andrea.
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jan 15, 2012, at 1:49 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> Rob Weir wrote: >>> Did you read anyone say that current privileges are going to be >>> dropped? I certainly did not say that. >> >> No, but that was a doubt I had: in the process of granting new privileges, >> it might be that someone notices that a lot of people already have high >> privileges, and that this group includes people currently unaffiliated with >> the project. I was just making sure that current privileges are not dropped >> now: this will still be an issue, but it can be dealt with separately. > > We need to have a common set of privileges for ALL committers. We should not > have to request it, it should be done. > That is a curious statement, considering that: - committers are not automatically subscribed to ooo-private. - committers are not automatically list moderators. They need to request it. - committers are not automatically blog editors. They need to request it. - committers are not automatically wiki editors or admins. They need to request it. - committers are not automatically forum editors or admins. They need to request it. So far as I can tell, the only thing that happens automatically for committers is SVN access. And even that is not really automatic. Given the above, I had no expectations that Bugzilla access for committers would happen without request. Do you have a reason to be optimistic in this case? And are you suggesting we wait for this to happen? Or would it make more sense to get a few volunteers, per my original note, and go forward with that for now? -Rob > The PPMC should decide what the normal set of privileges should be for the > general community as well. > > Maybe as another thread this will noticed. > > I am really glad I rejected using BZ to discuss the website a few months ago > since no privileges with the AOO BZ have been assigned to anyone who wasn't > with the former project yet former members who have not continued with this > project still have privileges. > > This is a huge issue and ought to be addressed this week. > > Regards, > Dave > >> >> Regards, >> Andrea. >
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
On Jan 15, 2012, at 1:49 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: >> Did you read anyone say that current privileges are going to be >> dropped? I certainly did not say that. > > No, but that was a doubt I had: in the process of granting new privileges, it > might be that someone notices that a lot of people already have high > privileges, and that this group includes people currently unaffiliated with > the project. I was just making sure that current privileges are not dropped > now: this will still be an issue, but it can be dealt with separately. We need to have a common set of privileges for ALL committers. We should not have to request it, it should be done. The PPMC should decide what the normal set of privileges should be for the general community as well. Maybe as another thread this will noticed. I am really glad I rejected using BZ to discuss the website a few months ago since no privileges with the AOO BZ have been assigned to anyone who wasn't with the former project yet former members who have not continued with this project still have privileges. This is a huge issue and ought to be addressed this week. Regards, Dave > > Regards, > Andrea.
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
Rob Weir wrote: Did you read anyone say that current privileges are going to be dropped? I certainly did not say that. No, but that was a doubt I had: in the process of granting new privileges, it might be that someone notices that a lot of people already have high privileges, and that this group includes people currently unaffiliated with the project. I was just making sure that current privileges are not dropped now: this will still be an issue, but it can be dealt with separately. Regards, Andrea.
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > Hi *, > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:52:03PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> On 12/01/2012 Rob Weir wrote: >> >I'll enter a JIRA issue asking that myself, and whichever other >> >committers want to be included, be added to a group that will have the >> >following additional Bugzilla permissions: >> >- editbugs >> >- editcomponents >> >- canconfirm >> >- editkeywords >> >> I still have extended permissions (on bugs, not on users) that were >> preserved with the Bugzilla migration. They come handy from time to >> time, so please do not drop them (or just re-add me to the list). >> User pescetti AT apache.org > > are current privileges going to dropped? > I didn't understand it this way (though I confess I do not read *all* > mail coming from this list - otherwise I wouldn't have time to spend on > doing what I like ;) ). > Did you read anyone say that current privileges are going to be dropped? I certainly did not say that. -Rob > Just in case they're going to be dropped, please keep my current status > (canconfirm et. al.): arielch AT apache.org > > > Regards > -- > Ariel Constenla-Haile > La Plata, Argentina
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
On Jan 14, 2012, at 4:28 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > Hi *, > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:52:03PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> On 12/01/2012 Rob Weir wrote: >>> I'll enter a JIRA issue asking that myself, and whichever other >>> committers want to be included, be added to a group that will have the >>> following additional Bugzilla permissions: >>> - editbugs >>> - editcomponents >>> - canconfirm >>> - editkeywords >> >> I still have extended permissions (on bugs, not on users) that were >> preserved with the Bugzilla migration. They come handy from time to >> time, so please do not drop them (or just re-add me to the list). >> User pescetti AT apache.org > > are current privileges going to dropped? > I didn't understand it this way (though I confess I do not read *all* > mail coming from this list - otherwise I wouldn't have time to spend on > doing what I like ;) ). > > Just in case they're going to be dropped, please keep my current status > (canconfirm et. al.): arielch AT apache.org IMO the default permissions in the OOO Bugzilla to be VERY constrained. I fixed an issue a few weeks ago with the website and could not do anything! Does anyone have a reference about the workflow in this bugzilla? It is definitely not what I'm used to in the normal Apache bugzilla. Let's consider making our special BZ much more open! Regards, Dave
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
Hi *, On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:52:03PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 12/01/2012 Rob Weir wrote: > >I'll enter a JIRA issue asking that myself, and whichever other > >committers want to be included, be added to a group that will have the > >following additional Bugzilla permissions: > >- editbugs > >- editcomponents > >- canconfirm > >- editkeywords > > I still have extended permissions (on bugs, not on users) that were > preserved with the Bugzilla migration. They come handy from time to > time, so please do not drop them (or just re-add me to the list). > User pescetti AT apache.org are current privileges going to dropped? I didn't understand it this way (though I confess I do not read *all* mail coming from this list - otherwise I wouldn't have time to spend on doing what I like ;) ). Just in case they're going to be dropped, please keep my current status (canconfirm et. al.): arielch AT apache.org Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina pgpYTargf9a6x.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
On 12/01/2012 Rob Weir wrote: I'll enter a JIRA issue asking that myself, and whichever other committers want to be included, be added to a group that will have the following additional Bugzilla permissions: - editbugs - editcomponents - canconfirm - editkeywords I still have extended permissions (on bugs, not on users) that were preserved with the Bugzilla migration. They come handy from time to time, so please do not drop them (or just re-add me to the list). User pescetti AT apache.org Thanks, Andrea.
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
On 13/01/12 23:07, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Great!! One thing to do: Go into your bugzilla account and change your e-mail address! The openoffice.org one will stop working eventually. Also, when you make the change, your history and any issues that have your name on them in any way will be preserved under the new ID. - Dennis -Original Message- From: David McKay [mailto:dmc...@btconnect.com] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 14:11 To: dennis.hamil...@acm.org Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; thegur...@apache.org Subject: Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers On 13/01/12 20:02, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: For David McKay, see if thegur...@apache.org is registered. On the other hand, I would not elevate his privileges or ask that he be set up as administrator without having his confirmation that he's still interested and available. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 04:35 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:48 AM, tj wrote: On 1/12/2012 14:16, Rob Weir wrote: [snip] So if you want to be on the initial batch, please respond to this note and let me know what your Bugzilla ID is. This is not necessarily the same as your Apache ID. And if you don't yet have a Bugzilla account for the project, you can request one here: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ Thanks! -Rob Count me in (t...@apache.org) for both permissions and admin. I already have some elevated permissions for Documentation project bugs. I will try to make contact with David McKay, to see if he's still interested. It would be nice to have an admin who actually knows what to do. I'd consider him as already volunteered per his previous statements. Do you know his Bugzilla ID? -Rob -- /tj/ I'm still interested and available, real-world job permitting. I'm in the UK time-zone if that has any bearing on anything. Dave. Done.
RE: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
Great!! One thing to do: Go into your bugzilla account and change your e-mail address! The openoffice.org one will stop working eventually. Also, when you make the change, your history and any issues that have your name on them in any way will be preserved under the new ID. - Dennis -Original Message- From: David McKay [mailto:dmc...@btconnect.com] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 14:11 To: dennis.hamil...@acm.org Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; thegur...@apache.org Subject: Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers On 13/01/12 20:02, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > For David McKay, see if thegur...@apache.org is registered. > > On the other hand, I would not elevate his privileges or ask that he be set > up as administrator without having his confirmation that he's still > interested and available. > > - Dennis > > -Original Message- > From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 04:35 > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:48 AM, tj wrote: >> On 1/12/2012 14:16, Rob Weir wrote: >> [snip] >> >>> So if you want to be on the initial batch, please respond to this note >>> and let me know what your Bugzilla ID is. This is not necessarily the >>> same as your Apache ID. And if you don't yet have a Bugzilla account >>> for the project, you can request one here: >>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> -Rob >>> >>> >> Count me in (t...@apache.org) for both permissions and admin. I already have >> some elevated permissions for Documentation project bugs. >> >> I will try to make contact with David McKay, to see if he's still >> interested. It would be nice to have an admin who actually knows what to do. >> > I'd consider him as already volunteered per his previous statements. > Do you know his Bugzilla ID? > > -Rob > >> -- >> /tj/ >> I'm still interested and available, real-world job permitting. I'm in the UK time-zone if that has any bearing on anything. Dave. > > >
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
On 13/01/12 20:02, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: For David McKay, see if thegur...@apache.org is registered. On the other hand, I would not elevate his privileges or ask that he be set up as administrator without having his confirmation that he's still interested and available. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 04:35 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:48 AM, tj wrote: On 1/12/2012 14:16, Rob Weir wrote: [snip] So if you want to be on the initial batch, please respond to this note and let me know what your Bugzilla ID is. This is not necessarily the same as your Apache ID. And if you don't yet have a Bugzilla account for the project, you can request one here: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ Thanks! -Rob Count me in (t...@apache.org) for both permissions and admin. I already have some elevated permissions for Documentation project bugs. I will try to make contact with David McKay, to see if he's still interested. It would be nice to have an admin who actually knows what to do. I'd consider him as already volunteered per his previous statements. Do you know his Bugzilla ID? -Rob -- /tj/ I'm still interested and available, real-world job permitting. I'm in the UK time-zone if that has any bearing on anything. Dave.
RE: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
For David McKay, see if thegur...@apache.org is registered. On the other hand, I would not elevate his privileges or ask that he be set up as administrator without having his confirmation that he's still interested and available. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 04:35 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:48 AM, tj wrote: > On 1/12/2012 14:16, Rob Weir wrote: > [snip] > >> >> So if you want to be on the initial batch, please respond to this note >> and let me know what your Bugzilla ID is. This is not necessarily the >> same as your Apache ID. And if you don't yet have a Bugzilla account >> for the project, you can request one here: >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ >> >> Thanks! >> >> -Rob >> >> > Count me in (t...@apache.org) for both permissions and admin. I already have > some elevated permissions for Documentation project bugs. > > I will try to make contact with David McKay, to see if he's still > interested. It would be nice to have an admin who actually knows what to do. > I'd consider him as already volunteered per his previous statements. Do you know his Bugzilla ID? -Rob > -- > /tj/ >
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:48 AM, tj wrote: > On 1/12/2012 14:16, Rob Weir wrote: > [snip] > >> >> So if you want to be on the initial batch, please respond to this note >> and let me know what your Bugzilla ID is. This is not necessarily the >> same as your Apache ID. And if you don't yet have a Bugzilla account >> for the project, you can request one here: >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ >> >> Thanks! >> >> -Rob >> >> > Count me in (t...@apache.org) for both permissions and admin. I already have > some elevated permissions for Documentation project bugs. > > I will try to make contact with David McKay, to see if he's still > interested. It would be nice to have an admin who actually knows what to do. > I'd consider him as already volunteered per his previous statements. Do you know his Bugzilla ID? -Rob > -- > /tj/ >
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
On 1/12/2012 14:16, Rob Weir wrote: [snip] So if you want to be on the initial batch, please respond to this note and let me know what your Bugzilla ID is. This is not necessarily the same as your Apache ID. And if you don't yet have a Bugzilla account for the project, you can request one here: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ Thanks! -Rob Count me in (t...@apache.org) for both permissions and admin. I already have some elevated permissions for Documentation project bugs. I will try to make contact with David McKay, to see if he's still interested. It would be nice to have an admin who actually knows what to do. -- /tj/
Re: Seeking Bugzilla Admin Volunteers
Hi Rob, So if you want to be on the initial batch, please respond to this note and let me know what your Bugzilla ID is. Count me in. My bugzilla id is "h...@apache.org". Herbert