Re: [Oorexx-devel] Kedit utility - where to put it
Hi Mark, That looks good - thank you for creating the bug report. As you will no doubt have seen, I have created a small folder in the incubator. I think that there are many rexx-ers who use Kedit, it is operationally close enough to Xedit to feel familiar to them and allows them to work the way they are used to on the mainframe without the console bound awkwardness of 'The'. Those two utilities make things a lot easier. I was going to make a point of how much cheaper than Slickedit Kedit is, but I see that the price of Kedit has gone up and the price of Slickedit has come down to the point where Slickedit is only just over twice as expensive as Kedit now. I think it was about ten times as much last time I looked. Kedit is being sunsetted, so I don't imagine it will attract many new users, and I expect most people who want these macros will have had them for a long time, but the rexindex was in desperate need of a bit of maintenance to cope with the evolution of ooRexx which has come such a long way in the last 10 years. Jon On 20 January 2014 18:25, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers < > sahana...@windhorse.biz> wrote: > >> >> If I get time, I will write a rexx sample script to download all files >> from a directory from sourceforge into a subfolder in your download folder. >> Not sure how, I could use rexcurl, but perhaps one wouldn't want one of >> Mark's utilities as a dependency for an ooRexx sample (although that might >> be a good thing). I could do it with ole & IE, but I'm not sure whether >> that would work on Linux. Do you have thoughts? >> >> > Jon, > > I have 2 thoughts > > 1.) I can't believe that SourceForge intends for the snapshot feature to > work that way. So, if we open a bug I think they will fix it. It would be > a very cool feature if it did work. > > https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/site-support/6552/ > > 2.) If we were to decide to allow / accept user contributions and > actually want ooRexx users to be able to get those contributions, it would > be more user friendly to have a section on the Files download page for them. > > Currently the download page has: > > Name Modified > Totals: 10 Items > oorexx < 14 hours ago > ooDialog2014-01-18 > oorexx-docs 2013-12-09 > ooSQLite2013-08-27 > oorexxunit 2012-07-25 > oorexx-buildutils 2010-08-18 > RexxGTK 2009-11-01 > OldFiles2009-07-17 > windows-build-tools 2009-02-12 > orxutils2006-09-15 > > I would suggest adding 1 more section: > > user-contributions 2014-04-11 > > And under that section have sections for individual contributions. I see > several things in the incubator that would be easier for ooRexx users to > access if they could be downloaded from the Files download pages. They > could go under user-contributions: > > decimalFormat > keditMacros > mod_oorexx > ooRexxShell > ZabrodskyAAT > > -- > Mark Miesfeld > > > > -- > CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. > Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For > Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. > Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Merging with svn
I know a number of people are using my earlier tutorial on how to do merges with svn, so I thought I'd highlight something I just learned. More recent versions of svn have a number of enhancements that make doing merges a lot easier. In particular, it gets rid of the need to do the r(m-1) r(m) specification on the merge command. Here's a nice tutorial on doing merges: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.branchmerge.basicmerging.html Rick -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] rxapi stops working
Since I installed 4.2.0 RC this morning I've had a couple of 'rxapi has stopped working' popups. After the second time I thought I had found a way to reproduce it (a command that caused 2 more occurrences of the popup) but the third try worked without error, as did several more tries. So it is going to be difficult to reproduce ... Ring any bells with anyone? This is on Win7, 32-bit. Mike -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] rxapi stops working
No, we've not had any reports of issues like that. rxapi has not even had much (if any) update activity for this release, so it's hard to even guess what might be going wrong. Rick On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Mike Cowlishaw wrote: > Since I installed 4.2.0 RC this morning I've had a couple of 'rxapi has > stopped working' popups. After the second time I thought I had found a way > to reproduce it (a command that caused 2 more occurrences of the popup) but > the third try worked without error, as did several more tries. So it is > going to be difficult to reproduce ... > > Ring any bells with anyone? This is on Win7, 32-bit. > > Mike > > > -- > CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. > Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For > Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. > Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] rxapi stops working
Also, some information about what you suspected was causing the problem might give a nugget of information that could be useful in tracking down the cause. Rick On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Mike Cowlishaw wrote: > Since I installed 4.2.0 RC this morning I've had a couple of 'rxapi has > stopped working' popups. After the second time I thought I had found a way > to reproduce it (a command that caused 2 more occurrences of the popup) but > the third try worked without error, as did several more tries. So it is > going to be difficult to reproduce ... > > Ring any bells with anyone? This is on Win7, 32-bit. > > Mike > > > -- > CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. > Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For > Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. > Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] rxapi stops working
Also, some information about what you suspected was causing the problem might give a nugget of information that could be useful in tracking down the cause. I didn't get as far as having a suspicion :-). What I was doing (on the 3 occasions that seemed to be reproducible) was: In a command window, running ELAP (the old VM shell I wrote but now run on Windows): Typed in the command: c \tex\mi (this is 'change to directory best matching '\tex' then to directory in that that best matches 'mi'). The command causes ELAP to cals another Rexx program to 'expand' the argument to a fully qualifed directory path (in this case "\text" because there was no match to 'mi'). That is then effected by a call to the directory BIF to change ELAP's context to the new directory and an actual CD command is issued to Windows so it knows about the change too. All of the above seemed to work as usual, with ELAP reporting that 'mi' was not found and then displaying the Ready message and prompt, e.g.,: Ready; 2:29pm (09:29 EDT) m:\text} As that is displayed, Windows puts up the 'rxapi has stopped working' box -- on cancelling that, everything seems to run normally. So it's a bit mysterious -- something along the way broke, but ELAP itself seemed to keep running just fine. [All of this after a reboot, fresh install, and another reboot.] Mike -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] oorexx 4.2.0 for 32 bit Windows - Unsafe, says Norton!!!
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Oliver Sims < oliver.s...@simsassociates.co.uk> wrote: > Just downloaded oorexx-4.2.0.windows.x86_32.exe to my XP machine. At end > of download, Norton anti-virus popped up and said it was "unsafe" and > removed the downloaded file!!! > This is a false positive by Norton. As you can see Norton is using a heuristic to detect the virus. Heuristic checks are notorious for producing false positives. I submitted the problem to Norton and they admitted it was a false positive and said it would be corrected. But, if they did anything, it seems if is related to the file name only. You can turn Norton off and download the file, The go to: https://submit.symantec.com/false_positive/ and submit the download as a false positive. I believe Norton will come back and agree it is a false positive. Other than that I don't know what to do about it. I believe it is actually coming from NSIS. The other thing you can do is turn Norton off, run the installation, then turn Norton back on and have it scan the installation directory. I believe it will report the files are okay. -- Mark Miesfeld -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Fwd: [No Reply] False Positive Submission [3393192]
This is the reply I got from Norton when I submitted the first beta file to them. As you can see they affirm it is a false positive and say they corrected it. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Forwarded message -- From: Symantec FP Incident Response Date: Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 10:50 PM Subject: [No Reply] False Positive Submission [3393192] To: miesf...@gmail.com In relation to submission [3393192]. Upon further analysis and investigation we have verified your submission and as such this detection will be removed from our products. The updated detection will be distributed in the next set of virus definitions, available via LiveUpdate or from our website at http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/defs.download.html Decisions made by Symantec are subject to change if alterations to the Software are made over time or as classification criteria and/or the policy employed by Symantec changes over time to address the evolving landscape. If you are a software vendor, why not take part in our whitelisting program? To participate in this program, please complete the following form: https://submit.symantec.com/whitelist Sincerely, Symantec Security Response http://securityresponse.symantec.com This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank you. -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Fwd: [No Reply] False Positive submission (3393192)
Here is the submission report for 3393192. I couldn't find it at first or I would have forwarded if first. As you can see here, the file I submitted had a different file name. Which is why I think their "correction" may have been file name based. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:10 PM Subject: [No Reply] False Positive submission (3393192) To: miesf...@gmail.com Thank you for contacting Symantec. Your submission has been received and will be reviewed. We endeavor to respond to all submissions within 2 working days. The tracking number for your submission is: 3393192, please reference this tracking number in any further correspondence on this issue. Your submission: - When did the detection you are reporting occur? = DOWNLOAD Which product were you using when you saw this? = NIS Which of the following types of detection are you reporting? = AUTO-PROTECT Name (person to contact) = Mark Miesfeld Email address = miesf...@gmail.com Are you the creator or distributor of the software in question? = yes File being uploaded = oorexx420_9716-x86_32.exe Download (or blocking) URL = Name of the software being detected = oorexx420_9716-x86_32.exe Name of detection given by Symantec product = Suspicious.Cloud.9.A File hash or clipboard paste from product = This information has disappeared. Your instructions did no good. I can not locate the event in history. Additional notes or steps to reproduce the detection = The file uploaded is a Windows installation file for ooRexx an open source project. The project is hosted on SourceForge: https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/I am a developer and committer on the project. I built the ooRexx interpreter and the installation package from scratch. I had Norton AntiVirus scan the package. It reports no threats: Scan Statistics: Scan Start: Local: 12/15/2013 2:55 PM UTC: 12/15/2013 10:55 PM Scan Time: 9 seconds Scan Targets: C:\work.ooRexx\wc\main.4.2.0\ooRexx420_9716-x86_32.exe Counts: Total items scanned: 1 - Files & Directories: 1 - Registry Entries: 0 - Processes & Start-up Items: 0 - Network & Browser Items: 0 - Other: 0 - Trusted Files: 0 - Skipped Files: 0 Total security risks detected: 0 Total items resolved: 0 Total items that require attention: 0 Resolved Threats: No risks have been resolved Unresolved Threats: No unresolved risks When I go to upload the file to SoureceForge as soon as the file open dialog appears and I navigate to the correct folder Norton AntiVirus puts up a red alert box saying it is processing a threat. Then it automatically deletes it. It did the same thing when I used the Choose File button on this page. I then used the exclude button on the threat processing page to exclude the file so I could upload it here. Now the event from history has disappeared. And even though I set all exclusions to none and none are listed when I go to upload the file to SourceForge it no longer produces an alert. Ive been fooling with this for 2 days. Yesterday afternoon when I first got the alert. I did a complete computer scan and besides tracking cookies no threats were found. I did a second complete scan overnight again no threats. It then did a complete clean of the build and built the package immediately scanned it and then immediately tried to upload it. Got the threat notice. I know there is no virus in the code base and I dont see how the executable could have got infected in such a short time. I dont understand how using Norton AntiVirus to to scan the file can produce a no threat report and then trying to upload the file produces a threat warning. I dont see how two complete computer scans by Norton AntiVirus can say all threats resolved then doing a clean build of the executable can end up with an executable that Norton says is infected. It seems to me this has to be a false positive. Thanks for your time. - Sincerely, Symantec Security Response http://securityresponse.symantec.com This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank you. -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a
[Oorexx-devel] Fwd: [No Reply] False Positive submission (3415563)
I just submitted the release canidate build to Symantec. Here is their submission received report. Usually they reply sooner than 2 days. I'll forward their reply as soon as I get it. The process of submitting it is relatively easy and straight forward. I encourage any one who has qualms about the file to submit it on their own. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:50 AM Subject: [No Reply] False Positive submission (3415563) To: miesf...@gmail.com Thank you for contacting Symantec. Your submission has been received and will be reviewed. We endeavor to respond to all submissions within 2 working days. The tracking number for your submission is: 3415563, please reference this tracking number in any further correspondence on this issue. Your submission: - When did the detection you are reporting occur? = DOWNLOAD Which product were you using when you saw this? = NIS Which of the following types of detection are you reporting? = INSIGHT Name (person to contact) = Mark Miesfeld Email address = miesf...@gmail.com Are you the creator or distributor of the software in question? = yes File being uploaded = ooRexx-4.2.0.windows.x86_32.exe Download (or blocking) URL = http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.2.0%20%28release%20candidate%29/ooRexx-4.2.0.windows.x86_32.exe/download Name of the software being detected = oorexx-4.2.0.windows.x86_32.exe Name of detection given by Symantec product = Suspicious.Cloud.7.EP File hash or clipboard paste from product = I dont have this. Additional notes or steps to reproduce the detection = In addition to uploading the file I also included the URL to publicly download the file. The detection from Norton happens when I download the file. - Sincerely, Symantec Security Response http://securityresponse.symantec.com This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank you. -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] oorexx 4.2.0 for 32 bit Windows - Unsafe, says Norton!!!
Here is a link to NSIS's page on false positives. http://nsis.sourceforge.net/NSIS_False_Positives There are some links to online virus scanners. You can try scanning the file with one or more of them. Here is a link to the report of doing a scan from one of them. If you look at the report, it reports 2 out of 23 scanners report malware. However the names of the malware are different, and different from what Norton reported. http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/scanresult/92c7a03d4c30e1c2f398d4f90a30968d2bb935ef Basically, I just think the anti-virus software is not very reliable. -- Mark Miesfeld On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Oliver Sims < > oliver.s...@simsassociates.co.uk> wrote: > >> Just downloaded oorexx-4.2.0.windows.x86_32.exe to my XP machine. At >> end of download, Norton anti-virus popped up and said it was "unsafe" and >> removed the downloaded file!!! >> > > > This is a false positive by Norton. As you can see Norton is using a > heuristic to detect the virus. Heuristic checks are notorious for > producing false positives. > > I submitted the problem to Norton and they admitted it was a false > positive and said it would be corrected. But, if they did anything, it > seems if is related to the file name only. > > You can turn Norton off and download the file, The go to: > > https://submit.symantec.com/false_positive/ > > and submit the download as a false positive. I believe Norton will come > back and agree it is a false positive. > > Other than that I don't know what to do about it. > > I believe it is actually coming from NSIS. The other thing you can do is > turn Norton off, run the installation, then turn Norton back on and have it > scan the installation directory. I believe it will report the files are > okay. > > -- > Mark Miesfeld > > -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Fwd: [No Reply] False Positive submission (3393192)
Have just tried re-download. It worked fine. Semantic must have OK'd the file name as you suggested. Many thanks. (Why didn't I try contacting Symantec myself? Doh!) -- Oliver Sims _ From: Mark Miesfeld [mailto:miesf...@gmail.com] Sent: 21 January 2014 17:58 To: ooRexx Dev List Subject: [Oorexx-devel] Fwd: [No Reply] False Positive submission (3393192) Here is the submission report for 3393192. I couldn't find it at first or I would have forwarded if first. As you can see here, the file I submitted had a different file name. Which is why I think their "correction" may have been file name based. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:10 PM Subject: [No Reply] False Positive submission (3393192) To: miesf...@gmail.com Thank you for contacting Symantec. Your submission has been received and will be reviewed. We endeavor to respond to all submissions within 2 working days. The tracking number for your submission is: 3393192, please reference this tracking number in any further correspondence on this issue. Your submission: - When did the detection you are reporting occur? = DOWNLOAD Which product were you using when you saw this? = NIS Which of the following types of detection are you reporting? = AUTO-PROTECT Name (person to contact) = Mark Miesfeld Email address = miesf...@gmail.com Are you the creator or distributor of the software in question? = yes File being uploaded = oorexx420_9716-x86_32.exe Download (or blocking) URL = Name of the software being detected = oorexx420_9716-x86_32.exe Name of detection given by Symantec product = Suspicious.Cloud.9.A File hash or clipboard paste from product = This information has disappeared. Your instructions did no good. I can not locate the event in history. Additional notes or steps to reproduce the detection = The file uploaded is a Windows installation file for ooRexx an open source project. The project is hosted on SourceForge: https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/ I am a developer and committer on the project. I built the ooRexx interpreter and the installation package from scratch. I had Norton AntiVirus scan the package. It reports no threats: Scan Statistics: Scan Start: Local: 12/15/2013 2:55 PM UTC: 12/15/2013 10:55 PM Scan Time: 9 seconds Scan Targets: C:\work.ooRexx\wc\main.4.2.0\ooRexx420_9716-x86_32.exe Counts: Total items scanned: 1 - Files & Directories: 1 - Registry Entries: 0 - Processes & Start-up Items: 0 - Network & Browser Items: 0 - Other: 0 - Trusted Files: 0 - Skipped Files: 0 Total security risks detected: 0 Total items resolved: 0 Total items that require attention: 0 Resolved Threats: No risks have been resolved Unresolved Threats: No unresolved risks When I go to upload the file to SoureceForge as soon as the file open dialog appears and I navigate to the correct folder Norton AntiVirus puts up a red alert box saying it is processing a threat. Then it automatically deletes it. It did the same thing when I used the Choose File button on this page. I then used the exclude button on the threat processing page to exclude the file so I could upload it here. Now the event from history has disappeared. And even though I set all exclusions to none and none are listed when I go to upload the file to SourceForge it no longer produces an alert. Ive been fooling with this for 2 days. Yesterday afternoon when I first got the alert. I did a complete computer scan and besides tracking cookies no threats were found. I did a second complete scan overnight again no threats. It then did a complete clean of the build and built the package immediately scanned it and then immediately tried to upload it. Got the threat notice. I know there is no virus in the code base and I dont see how the executable could have got infected in such a short time. I dont understand how using Norton AntiVirus to to scan the file can produce a no threat report and then trying to upload the file produces a threat warning. I dont see how two complete computer scans by Norton AntiVirus can say all threats resolved then doing a clean build of the executable can end up with an executable that Norton says is infected. It seems to me this has to be a false positive. Thanks for your time. - Sincerely, Symantec Security Response http://securityresponse.symantec.com This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a fac
[Oorexx-devel] Fwd: [No Reply] False Positive Submission [3415563]
Here is Symantec's reply to the submission of ooRexx-4.2.0.windows.x86_32.exe, saying yes it was a false positive. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Forwarded message -- From: Symantec FP Incident Response Date: Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:01 PM Subject: [No Reply] False Positive Submission [3415563] To: miesf...@gmail.com In relation to submission [3415563]. Upon further analysis and investigation we have verified your submission and as such this detection will be removed from our products. The updated detection will be distributed in the next set of virus definitions, available via LiveUpdate or from our website at http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/defs.download.html Decisions made by Symantec are subject to change if alterations to the Software are made over time or as classification criteria and/or the policy employed by Symantec changes over time to address the evolving landscape. If you are a software vendor, why not take part in our whitelisting program? To participate in this program, please complete the following form: https://submit.symantec.com/whitelist Sincerely, Symantec Security Response http://securityresponse.symantec.com This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank you. -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
