Re: [Oorexx-devel] Upload doc builds to http://build.oorexx.org/builds/docs/
I would rather that you find another server. Mine is rather stressed at the moment with some testing for the Fedora project. David Ashley On 06/01/2015 09:33 AM, Erich Steinböck wrote: Sorry, but I do not have FTP available at my server. David, what other options do we have regarding uploading to build.oorexx.org <http://build.oorexx.org>? Or would you rather not want us to keep using your oorexx.org <http://oorexx.org> server? Erich On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:10 PM, David Ashley <mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote: Sorry, but I do not have FTP available at my server. David Ashley On 05/30/2015 03:46 PM, Erich Steinböck wrote: Until we get back our nighty builds, can I (or someone else) manually upload preliminary doc builds to http://build.oorexx.org/builds/docs/ ? How would that work? FTP? Any special authorization needed? -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Upload doc builds to http://build.oorexx.org/builds/docs/
Sorry, but I do not have FTP available at my server. David Ashley On 05/30/2015 03:46 PM, Erich Steinböck wrote: Until we get back our nighty builds, can I (or someone else) manually upload preliminary doc builds to http://build.oorexx.org/builds/docs/ ? How would that work? FTP? Any special authorization needed? -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] doc ooRexx brand : directory 'publish' in SVN, needed ?
That directory is indeed a generated directory. David Ashley On 05/25/2015 05:13 PM, Jean-Louis Faucher wrote: Publican ooRexx brand : I made a change in en-US/Notices.xml, committed to svn The same change has been propagated to the the file publish/oorexx/en-US/Notices.xml by make. This file has now the svn status 'modified'. Do we need the directory 'publish' in svn ? Seems to be a generated directory. Jean-Louis -- One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Saying good bye
That is correct. I have shut down my build machine. David Ashley On 04/11/2015 12:25 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > Rick and David. > > First many thanks for taking the time and effort needed to get ooRexx to > the state it is in now; the Rexx community is grateful, and we wish you > both the best of luck in whatever directions y'all decide to go. > > David, does this mean that you no longer need the two guests here for > building ooRexx on z/Linux? > > Have a good one, too. > > DJ > > On 04/10/2015 09:23 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: >> Since its inception, the oorexx project has struggled to attract new >> developers and over the years, those we were able to attract as >> committers have drifted away from the project. This has resulted in the >> project having a very small "bus factor" >> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_factor) with just 3 really active >> developers. Mark Miesfeld's illness and passing last year created a >> massive hole in the project that David Ashley and I have struggled to >> fill. All of our attempts at getting additional people involved have >> failed. As a result, both of us have decided it is time for us to leave >> as well. The amount of work needed to continue exceeds what we are will >> or able to provide. >> >> Jon Wolfers is picking up the administration of the project for now and >> is attempting to see if a new developer community can be created. I >> will continue to monitor the mailing lists and will answer questions >> about any aspects of the code, processes, etc. that I can, but I will >> not be contributing any new code or directly involved with the debugging >> of problems. >> >> It has been and interesting and at times tiring 10 years of working on >> this project, but the time has come to make an end. >> >> Rick >> >> >> -- >> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT >> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard >> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises >> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ >> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF >> >> >> >> ___ >> Oorexx-devel mailing list >> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >> -- BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 Build for Windows
The Windows VM went south for the winter back in January and I have not had the time to rebuild it until recently (Linux VMs are so much easier to build/maintain). I am in the process of rebuilding it now and I hope to have it up soon. Hopefully in a week or so. David Ashley On 03/16/2015 03:55 PM, Erich Steinböck wrote: http://build.oorexx.org/builds/interpreter-main/ has a bunch of ooRexx 5.0 Linux-flavor builds, but I can't find any Windows build. Could you please also let a build run for Windows? Thanks, Erich -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Class Exists Query
So why doesn't Jon's method throw an error? Are you not invoking a
method on a class that does not exist (the isa method)? Why does that
not throw an error?
David Ashley
On 03/11/2015 10:12 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Jon's method doesn't throw an error either.
Rick
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:03 AM, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
But I wanted something that queries for the existence of the
class. I do not want an error thrown if the class does not exist.
I just want to know whether or not the class actually exists. Your
.context method does that.
David Ashley
On 03/11/2015 09:58 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:55 AM, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
That works for builtin classes, but not for user defined
classes. I want something that can query both.
That method works just fine for any class that is visible in the
environment. It is not just restricted to the builtin classes.
Rick
David Ashley
On 03/11/2015 09:52 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers wrote:
Would this do?
say .string~isa(.class)
1
... rexxtry.rex on
WindowsNT
say .strung~isa(.class)
0
... rexxtry.rex on
WindowsNT
Jon
On 11 March 2015 at 14:48, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Rick -
Is there a way to query ooRexx to discover if a class
exists? I think
this would be a good addition if that functionality does
not exist.
David Ashley
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go
Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot
Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly
thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub
for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership
blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel
Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is
your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look
and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for
all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs
to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Para
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Class Exists Query
I thought I tried it and found that it threw an error. I guess not. My bad.
David Ashley
On 03/11/2015 10:12 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Jon's method doesn't throw an error either.
Rick
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:03 AM, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
But I wanted something that queries for the existence of the
class. I do not want an error thrown if the class does not exist.
I just want to know whether or not the class actually exists. Your
.context method does that.
David Ashley
On 03/11/2015 09:58 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:55 AM, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
That works for builtin classes, but not for user defined
classes. I want something that can query both.
That method works just fine for any class that is visible in the
environment. It is not just restricted to the builtin classes.
Rick
David Ashley
On 03/11/2015 09:52 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers wrote:
Would this do?
say .string~isa(.class)
1
... rexxtry.rex on
WindowsNT
say .strung~isa(.class)
0
... rexxtry.rex on
WindowsNT
Jon
On 11 March 2015 at 14:48, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Rick -
Is there a way to query ooRexx to discover if a class
exists? I think
this would be a good addition if that functionality does
not exist.
David Ashley
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go
Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot
Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly
thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub
for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership
blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel
Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is
your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look
and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for
all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs
to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel
Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in part
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Class Exists Query
I can't. Too busy with real work.
David Ashley
On 03/11/2015 10:06 AM, René Jansen wrote:
Hi Rick, David,
is any of you interested in presenting a talk at the symposium in Vienna?
best regards,
René Jansen.
On 11 mrt. 2015, at 10:59, David Ashley <mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Just what I was looking for. Just could not find the correct place to
look.
David Ashley
On 03/11/2015 09:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:48 AM, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Rick -
Is there a way to query ooRexx to discover if a class exists? I
think
this would be a good addition if that functionality does not exist.
"Existence" is difficult to define, but you can determine if the
class is visible from a given package context.
.context~package~findClass('SomeClass")
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Class Exists Query
But I wanted something that queries for the existence of the class. I do
not want an error thrown if the class does not exist. I just want to
know whether or not the class actually exists. Your .context method does
that.
David Ashley
On 03/11/2015 09:58 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:55 AM, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
That works for builtin classes, but not for user defined classes.
I want something that can query both.
That method works just fine for any class that is visible in the
environment. It is not just restricted to the builtin classes.
Rick
David Ashley
On 03/11/2015 09:52 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers wrote:
Would this do?
say .string~isa(.class)
1
... rexxtry.rex on WindowsNT
say .strung~isa(.class)
0
... rexxtry.rex on WindowsNT
Jon
On 11 March 2015 at 14:48, David Ashley mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Rick -
Is there a way to query ooRexx to discover if a class exists?
I think
this would be a good addition if that functionality does not
exist.
David Ashley
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel
Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is
your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look
and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for
all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs
to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel
Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and
join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Class Exists Query
That works for builtin classes, but not for user defined classes. I want
something that can query both.
David Ashley
On 03/11/2015 09:52 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers wrote:
Would this do?
say .string~isa(.class)
1
... rexxtry.rex on WindowsNT
say .strung~isa(.class)
0
... rexxtry.rex on WindowsNT
Jon
On 11 March 2015 at 14:48, David Ashley <mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Rick -
Is there a way to query ooRexx to discover if a class exists? I think
this would be a good addition if that functionality does not exist.
David Ashley
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel
Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and
join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Class Exists Query
Just what I was looking for. Just could not find the correct place to look.
David Ashley
On 03/11/2015 09:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:48 AM, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Rick -
Is there a way to query ooRexx to discover if a class exists? I think
this would be a good addition if that functionality does not exist.
"Existence" is difficult to define, but you can determine if the class
is visible from a given package context.
.context~package~findClass('SomeClass")
Rick
David Ashley
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel
Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and
join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Class Exists Query
Rick - Is there a way to query ooRexx to discover if a class exists? I think this would be a good addition if that functionality does not exist. David Ashley -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Cmake problem
You are probably right about CMake not discovering missing requisites header files. I would open a bug on the CMake.org web site. In any case, it does crap out when it compiles. It is just that the message is not very informative. David Ashley On 03/02/2015 11:08 AM, CVBruce wrote: I did get ooRexx V5 (from the svn repository) to compile. The only problem I ran into was that although I had curses installed, I didn't have the curses-devl package, so my system didn't have the required curses.h. Shouldn't cmake discover this and report it during makefile creation? Bruce On Feb 21, 2015, at 11:23 AM, David Ashley wrote: Upgrading CMake should fix the problem. The newer GCC should also fix the linker problem. David Ashley On 02/21/2015 09:39 AM, CVBruce wrote: Thanks Rick. So the cmake I'm using is the newest one in my Linux distro. I assume that I can manually install a newer version from CMake. Are there any other packages that would need to be upgraded? I'm aware of the gcc issues, and I have gcc 4.7 installed. Thanks again. Bruce On Feb 21, 2015, at 2:59 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: I suspect this is a cmake version problem. I'm not sure what release the TIMESTAMP subcommand was implemented, but it is not in the 2.8.8 documdentation, but works on the 2.8.12.2 version I'm running. Rick On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:23 AM, CVBruce <mailto:cvbr...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, I tried to compile ooRexx V5 on Raspbian (Debian Wheezy). Cmake didn't complete. Here's what I got. cmake version 2.8.9 CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:70 (string): string does not recognize sub-command TIMESTAMP -- Building for a 32-bit architecture -- SVN Revision Number is 10884 CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:470 (target_include_directories): Unknown CMake command "target_include_directories". -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! Is my version of cmake, just not new enough? Thanks, Bruce -- Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case stu
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Cmake problem
Upgrading CMake should fix the problem. The newer GCC should also fix the linker problem. David Ashley On 02/21/2015 09:39 AM, CVBruce wrote: Thanks Rick. So the cmake I'm using is the newest one in my Linux distro. I assume that I can manually install a newer version from CMake. Are there any other packages that would need to be upgraded? I'm aware of the gcc issues, and I have gcc 4.7 installed. Thanks again. Bruce On Feb 21, 2015, at 2:59 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: I suspect this is a cmake version problem. I'm not sure what release the TIMESTAMP subcommand was implemented, but it is not in the 2.8.8 documdentation, but works on the 2.8.12.2 version I'm running. Rick On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:23 AM, CVBruce <mailto:cvbr...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, I tried to compile ooRexx V5 on Raspbian (Debian Wheezy). Cmake didn't complete. Here's what I got. cmake version 2.8.9 CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:70 (string): string does not recognize sub-command TIMESTAMP -- Building for a 32-bit architecture -- SVN Revision Number is 10884 CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:470 (target_include_directories): Unknown CMake command "target_include_directories". -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! Is my version of cmake, just not new enough? Thanks, Bruce -- Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] odd behaviour
The development version ooRexx 5.0 will not link on RHEL 6 or CentOS 6 (or anything earlier) due to a linker bug in those releases. This also includes some Ubuntu releases. That is why they are not being built by the nightly build process. David Ashley On 02/10/2015 09:11 AM, Enrico Sorichetti wrote: > I just pulled svn Rev: 10882 > > it builds and works on APPLE Yosemite using > — Apple LLVM version 6.0 (clang-600.0.56) (based on LLVM 3.5svn) > > it builds and seems to work on CENTOS 7 using > — c++ (GCC) 4.8.2 20140120 (Red Hat 4.8.2-16) > > it fails on CENTOS 6 using > — c++ (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11) > > with : > Linking CXX executable bin/rexx > bin/librexx.so.5.0.0: undefined reference to `RexxString::ch_PLUS' > bin/librexx.so.5.0.0: undefined reference to > `MemorySegmentSet::LargeSegmentDeadSpace' > bin/librexx.so.5.0.0: undefined reference to `RexxString::ch_MINUS' > bin/librexx.so.5.0.0: undefined reference to > `MemorySegmentSet::SegmentDeadSpace' > bin/librexx.so.5.0.0: undefined reference to `Numerics::FORM_ENGINEERING' > bin/librexx.so.5.0.0: undefined reference to `Numerics::FORM_SCIENTIFIC' > > but … > it builds and seems to work using > clang version 3.4.2 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot2-final) > > the linux tests were quick and dirty … > > rexx -e "parse version v;say v;parse source s;say s" > REXX-ooRexx_5.0.0(MT)_64-bit 6.05 10 Feb 2015 > Linux COMMAND INSTORE > > rexxcps.rex > > any suggestions on how to proceed ? > > cheers > enrico > > PS. > the process was the same for all the environments > svn checkout … to ooRexx.svn > mkdir ooRexx.build > cd ooRexx.build > cmake ../ooRexx.svn > > cmake version used 3.1.0 > > > > > -- > Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, > sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your > hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought > leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a > look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Bogus dependency error for Build 10881 x86_64 and OpenSuSE 13.1
The new CMake build environment does a much better job of analyzing the code that is being placed in RPM files. One of the helper scripts that we have supplied from the very beginning is one designed to start the Rexx interpreter via a C-shell script. CMake sees that script and creates a dependency in the RPM for the csh.rpm file. We are still debating on what to do about this. In the meantime you will need to install the csh.rpm file prior to installing ooRexx 5.0 builds. David Ashley On 01/30/2015 01:47 PM, J. Leslie Turriff wrote: > I just tried to install the newest build on my OpenSuSE system, and > got this > error, even though csh is installed: > > 13:43:41,root@pinto > ~ > #rpm -Uf > ~leslie/Downloads/Packages/ooRexx-related/ooRexx/V5.0/ooRexx-5.0.0-10881.x86_64.opensuse131.rpm > error: Failed dependencies: > csh is needed by ooRexx-5.0.0-1.x86_64 > 13:43:51,root@pinto > ~ > #whereis csh > csh: /usr/bin/csh /bin/csh /etc/csh.login /etc/csh.cshrc > /usr/share/man/man1/csh.1.gz > > Leslie -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Online HTML docs look backlevel
It has not been updated in a long time. One more thing to add to my list. David Ashley On 01/27/2015 07:55 PM, Michael Lueck wrote: > Greetings RexxLA'ers, > > I found this version of the docs online: > > http://www.oorexx.org/docs/rexxref/book1.htm > Open Object Rexx > Reference > Version 4.0.0 Edition > August 14, 2009 > > > Has this missed getting refreshed, or is it not updated any longer? > > I am thankful, > -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] OOREXX on z/OS
I guess my head went south for the Winter over the holidays. Ubuntu does
not appear to support the S390 architecture. My bad.
David Ashley
On 01/09/2015 03:43 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
That's David. Does Ubuntu come in a s390x flavor?
DJ
On 1/9/2015 3:39 PM, David Ashley wrote:
Sorry, I meant Ubuntu (a Debian-based release). Debian will not link
the latest 5.0 code base. It uses an older linker. So we can only
support Ubuntu.
David Ashley
On 01/09/2015 03:36 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
David, the latest release of Debian for s390x that I can locate is
7.7, dated
2014-10-18. What have I missed here?
DJ
On 1/9/2015 2:51 PM, David Ashley wrote:
14.10 if you have it. If not, 14.04 will do.
Be sure to install the compiler (C++), rpmbuild, ncurses-devel and
CMake.
On 01/09/2015 02:48 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
OK, sounds good, then. What release of Debian would you like to
have here?
DJ
On 1/9/2015 1:53 PM, David Ashley wrote:
If you have the resources, I can make use of it.
David Ashley
On 01/09/2015 11:32 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
Hello, David.
Would you like access to Debian on z/VM?
Have a good weekend, too.
DJ
On 1/8/2015 12:53 PM, David Ashley wrote:
Currently we have two Zseries builds performed every night for
the trunk 5.0 version. Both are RPM-based, SLES 12 and RHEL
7.0. We currently do not have access to an Debian-based Zseries
platform.
David Ashley
On 01/08/2015 12:40 PM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
Good point. 5.0.0 it is. I'll try it with CMake.
Next step is finding a z/OS platform to work.
Thanks.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Rick McGuire
mailto:object.r...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Neither one should be an easier port target than the
other, although I'm not particularly happy about having to
support a new release of 4.2.0 when the rest of the
platforms will be moving the 5.0.0 code base.
Rick
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Hobart Spitz
mailto:orexx...@gmail.com>> wrote:
That did the trick.
A bit more advice if you don't mind. This was just a
dry run to get me familiar with the build process in
preparation for attempting a port to z/OS. So, my
question is whether USS is an easier port target for
4.2.0 or 5.0? I realize that this would depend on
whether the various items on which the OORexx versions
are dependant are available in USS; I couldn't
possibly attempt a guess at that.
Thanks for the help.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:22 PM, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
The message below means the the autoconf package
has not been installed on your system. You need to
install it and then restart the process (with
./configure).
FYI - version 5.0 of ooRexx is under development
in the Subversion trunk. It uses the CMake package
to control the build and is a dream to use (really
easy). If you are trying for a release version of
ooRexx on your platform then you are using the
correct method to build ooRexx. If you are looking
for something the play with then the Subversion
trunk will provide a better learning experience in
the long run.
David Ashley
On 01/08/2015 09:35 AM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
Here's a rough recap what what I did:
* Downloaded and extracted ooRexx.4.2.0.tar.gz.
* Per my reading of unix-like-build.txt, I
issued ./configure and then ./make. There
were some messages that got away from me
because of volume. (Terminal is now set to
save all output.)
* I tried remaking, with no noticeable change.
* I tried make -B to get the missed messages
and go some messages that I found to be obscure:
CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . &&
/bin/bash
/home/tzvi/ORxBld/ooRexx-4.2.0/missing
aclocal-1.13
/home/tzvi/ORxBld/ooRexx-4.2.0/missing:
line 81: aclocal-1.13: command not found
WARNING: 'aclocal-1.13' is missing on
your system.
You should only need it if you
modified 'acinclude.m4' or
'configure.ac <http://configure.ac>'
or m4 files included by 'configure.ac
<http://configure.ac>'.
The 'aclocal' program is part of the
GNU Automake package:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/automake>
It also requires GNU Autoconf, GNU
Re: [Oorexx-devel] OOREXX on z/OS
Sorry, I meant Ubuntu (a Debian-based release). Debian will not link the
latest 5.0 code base. It uses an older linker. So we can only support
Ubuntu.
David Ashley
On 01/09/2015 03:36 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
David, the latest release of Debian for s390x that I can locate is
7.7, dated
2014-10-18. What have I missed here?
DJ
On 1/9/2015 2:51 PM, David Ashley wrote:
14.10 if you have it. If not, 14.04 will do.
Be sure to install the compiler (C++), rpmbuild, ncurses-devel and CMake.
On 01/09/2015 02:48 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
OK, sounds good, then. What release of Debian would you like to have
here?
DJ
On 1/9/2015 1:53 PM, David Ashley wrote:
If you have the resources, I can make use of it.
David Ashley
On 01/09/2015 11:32 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
Hello, David.
Would you like access to Debian on z/VM?
Have a good weekend, too.
DJ
On 1/8/2015 12:53 PM, David Ashley wrote:
Currently we have two Zseries builds performed every night for
the trunk 5.0 version. Both are RPM-based, SLES 12 and RHEL 7.0.
We currently do not have access to an Debian-based Zseries platform.
David Ashley
On 01/08/2015 12:40 PM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
Good point. 5.0.0 it is. I'll try it with CMake.
Next step is finding a z/OS platform to work.
Thanks.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Rick McGuire
mailto:object.r...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Neither one should be an easier port target than the other,
although I'm not particularly happy about having to support
a new release of 4.2.0 when the rest of the platforms will
be moving the 5.0.0 code base.
Rick
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Hobart Spitz
mailto:orexx...@gmail.com>> wrote:
That did the trick.
A bit more advice if you don't mind. This was just a
dry run to get me familiar with the build process in
preparation for attempting a port to z/OS. So, my
question is whether USS is an easier port target for
4.2.0 or 5.0? I realize that this would depend on
whether the various items on which the OORexx versions
are dependant are available in USS; I couldn't possibly
attempt a guess at that.
Thanks for the help.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:22 PM, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
The message below means the the autoconf package has
not been installed on your system. You need to
install it and then restart the process (with
./configure).
FYI - version 5.0 of ooRexx is under development in
the Subversion trunk. It uses the CMake package to
control the build and is a dream to use (really
easy). If you are trying for a release version of
ooRexx on your platform then you are using the
correct method to build ooRexx. If you are looking
for something the play with then the Subversion
trunk will provide a better learning experience in
the long run.
David Ashley
On 01/08/2015 09:35 AM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
Here's a rough recap what what I did:
* Downloaded and extracted ooRexx.4.2.0.tar.gz.
* Per my reading of unix-like-build.txt, I issued
./configure and then ./make. There were some
messages that got away from me because of
volume. (Terminal is now set to save all output.)
* I tried remaking, with no noticeable change.
* I tried make -B to get the missed messages and
go some messages that I found to be obscure:
CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . &&
/bin/bash
/home/tzvi/ORxBld/ooRexx-4.2.0/missing
aclocal-1.13
/home/tzvi/ORxBld/ooRexx-4.2.0/missing:
line 81: aclocal-1.13: command not found
WARNING: 'aclocal-1.13' is missing on your
system.
You should only need it if you modified
'acinclude.m4' or
'configure.ac <http://configure.ac>' or
m4 files included by 'configure.ac
<http://configure.ac>'.
The 'aclocal' program is part of the GNU
Automake package:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/automake>
It also requires GNU Autoconf, GNU m4
and Perl in order to run:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf>
<http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/>
<http://www.perl.org/>
make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 127
Re: [Oorexx-devel] OOREXX on z/OS
14.10 if you have it. If not, 14.04 will do.
Be sure to install the compiler (C++), rpmbuild, ncurses-devel and CMake.
On 01/09/2015 02:48 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
OK, sounds good, then. What release of Debian would you like to have here?
DJ
On 1/9/2015 1:53 PM, David Ashley wrote:
If you have the resources, I can make use of it.
David Ashley
On 01/09/2015 11:32 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
Hello, David.
Would you like access to Debian on z/VM?
Have a good weekend, too.
DJ
On 1/8/2015 12:53 PM, David Ashley wrote:
Currently we have two Zseries builds performed every night for the
trunk 5.0 version. Both are RPM-based, SLES 12 and RHEL 7.0. We
currently do not have access to an Debian-based Zseries platform.
David Ashley
On 01/08/2015 12:40 PM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
Good point. 5.0.0 it is. I'll try it with CMake.
Next step is finding a z/OS platform to work.
Thanks.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Rick McGuire
mailto:object.r...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Neither one should be an easier port target than the other,
although I'm not particularly happy about having to support a
new release of 4.2.0 when the rest of the platforms will be
moving the 5.0.0 code base.
Rick
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Hobart Spitz
mailto:orexx...@gmail.com>> wrote:
That did the trick.
A bit more advice if you don't mind. This was just a dry
run to get me familiar with the build process in
preparation for attempting a port to z/OS. So, my
question is whether USS is an easier port target for 4.2.0
or 5.0? I realize that this would depend on whether the
various items on which the OORexx versions are dependant
are available in USS; I couldn't possibly attempt a guess
at that.
Thanks for the help.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:22 PM, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
The message below means the the autoconf package has
not been installed on your system. You need to install
it and then restart the process (with ./configure).
FYI - version 5.0 of ooRexx is under development in
the Subversion trunk. It uses the CMake package to
control the build and is a dream to use (really easy).
If you are trying for a release version of ooRexx on
your platform then you are using the correct method to
build ooRexx. If you are looking for something the
play with then the Subversion trunk will provide a
better learning experience in the long run.
David Ashley
On 01/08/2015 09:35 AM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
Here's a rough recap what what I did:
* Downloaded and extracted ooRexx.4.2.0.tar.gz.
* Per my reading of unix-like-build.txt, I issued
./configure and then ./make. There were some
messages that got away from me because of volume.
(Terminal is now set to save all output.)
* I tried remaking, with no noticeable change.
* I tried make -B to get the missed messages and go
some messages that I found to be obscure:
CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . &&
/bin/bash
/home/tzvi/ORxBld/ooRexx-4.2.0/missing
aclocal-1.13
/home/tzvi/ORxBld/ooRexx-4.2.0/missing: line
81: aclocal-1.13: command not found
WARNING: 'aclocal-1.13' is missing on your
system.
You should only need it if you modified
'acinclude.m4' or
'configure.ac <http://configure.ac>' or m4
files included by 'configure.ac
<http://configure.ac>'.
The 'aclocal' program is part of the GNU
Automake package:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/automake>
It also requires GNU Autoconf, GNU m4 and
Perl in order to run:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf>
<http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/>
<http://www.perl.org/>
make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 127
Clearly, I can start from scratch to reproduce the
missed messages. I probably should have done so
before writing.
In any event, thanks for the help. Now that I'm
between contracts, I should be able to give this
focused attention.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:52 AM, David Ashley
mailto:w.da
Re: [Oorexx-devel] OOREXX on z/OS
If you have the resources, I can make use of it.
David Ashley
On 01/09/2015 11:32 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
Hello, David.
Would you like access to Debian on z/VM?
Have a good weekend, too.
DJ
On 1/8/2015 12:53 PM, David Ashley wrote:
Currently we have two Zseries builds performed every night for the
trunk 5.0 version. Both are RPM-based, SLES 12 and RHEL 7.0. We
currently do not have access to an Debian-based Zseries platform.
David Ashley
On 01/08/2015 12:40 PM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
Good point. 5.0.0 it is. I'll try it with CMake.
Next step is finding a z/OS platform to work.
Thanks.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Rick McGuire <mailto:object.r...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Neither one should be an easier port target than the other,
although I'm not particularly happy about having to support a
new release of 4.2.0 when the rest of the platforms will be
moving the 5.0.0 code base.
Rick
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Hobart Spitz mailto:orexx...@gmail.com>> wrote:
That did the trick.
A bit more advice if you don't mind. This was just a dry run
to get me familiar with the build process in preparation for
attempting a port to z/OS. So, my question is whether USS
is an easier port target for 4.2.0 or 5.0? I realize that
this would depend on whether the various items on which the
OORexx versions are dependant are available in USS; I
couldn't possibly attempt a guess at that.
Thanks for the help.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:22 PM, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
The message below means the the autoconf package has not
been installed on your system. You need to install it
and then restart the process (with ./configure).
FYI - version 5.0 of ooRexx is under development in the
Subversion trunk. It uses the CMake package to control
the build and is a dream to use (really easy). If you
are trying for a release version of ooRexx on your
platform then you are using the correct method to build
ooRexx. If you are looking for something the play with
then the Subversion trunk will provide a better learning
experience in the long run.
David Ashley
On 01/08/2015 09:35 AM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
Here's a rough recap what what I did:
* Downloaded and extracted ooRexx.4.2.0.tar.gz.
* Per my reading of unix-like-build.txt, I issued
./configure and then ./make. There were some
messages that got away from me because of volume.
(Terminal is now set to save all output.)
* I tried remaking, with no noticeable change.
* I tried make -B to get the missed messages and go
some messages that I found to be obscure:
CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/bash
/home/tzvi/ORxBld/ooRexx-4.2.0/missing
aclocal-1.13
/home/tzvi/ORxBld/ooRexx-4.2.0/missing: line
81: aclocal-1.13: command not found
WARNING: 'aclocal-1.13' is missing on your system.
You should only need it if you modified
'acinclude.m4' or
'configure.ac <http://configure.ac>' or m4
files included by 'configure.ac
<http://configure.ac>'.
The 'aclocal' program is part of the GNU
Automake package:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/automake>
It also requires GNU Autoconf, GNU m4 and Perl
in order to run:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf>
<http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/>
<http://www.perl.org/>
make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 127
Clearly, I can start from scratch to reproduce the
missed messages. I probably should have done so before
writing.
In any event, thanks for the help. Now that I'm
between contracts, I should be able to give this
focused attention.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:52 AM, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I guess first we need to establish just what you
overall build convention and environment is. Are
you using the latest trunk (with CMake)? Are you
performing an out-of-source build? If you are
trying to compile an older versi
Re: [Oorexx-devel] OOREXX on z/OS
Will anyone else on your team need commit access? We might as well do this all in one batch. David Ashley On 01/09/2015 11:03 AM, René Jansen wrote: > Hi David, > > have an account - it is rvjansen. Of course I would be extremely cautious > with the repository and will do nothing without conferring with you first. > > best regards, > > René. > >> On 9 jan. 2015, at 17:45, David Ashley wrote: >> >> Rene - >> >> In order to get commit rights you first need an account on SourceForge. Then >> Rick and I can evaluate your commit privileges. We need to do that because >> the commit privilege is all or nothing with the repository. Rick and I need >> to make sure everyone understands how the repository is organized and when >> and where commits are allowed. We usually have an unknown developer submit a >> few patches before we grant commit privileges but we may be able to bypass >> that for you. >> >> >> On 01/09/2015 10:34 AM, René Jansen wrote: >>> David, >>> >>> At this point it would be really helpful to have commit rights to at least >>> a part of the repository, for Hobart, Terry and me. I have arranged machine >>> capacity and also have really big iron at my disposal at a client site. I >>> would be great if we could collaborate using svn over the coming period. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> René >>> >>> >> -- >> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, >> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your >> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought >> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a >> look and join the conversation now. >> http://goparallel.sourceforge.net___ >> Oorexx-devel mailing list >> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > -- > Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, > sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your > hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought > leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a > look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] OOREXX on z/OS
Rene - In order to get commit rights you first need an account on SourceForge. Then Rick and I can evaluate your commit privileges. We need to do that because the commit privilege is all or nothing with the repository. Rick and I need to make sure everyone understands how the repository is organized and when and where commits are allowed. We usually have an unknown developer submit a few patches before we grant commit privileges but we may be able to bypass that for you. On 01/09/2015 10:34 AM, René Jansen wrote: David, At this point it would be really helpful to have commit rights to at least a part of the repository, for Hobart, Terry and me. I have arranged machine capacity and also have really big iron at my disposal at a client site. I would be great if we could collaborate using svn over the coming period. Best regards, René -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] OOREXX on z/OS
At this point I think we need help in the install/uninstall and test
areas for Zseries. Anything you can do in these areas would be helpful.
When you find problems just open up bug reports. Don't worry too much
about if it really is a bug or not, Rick and I are more that happy to
filter the reports.
David Ashley
On 01/09/2015 10:17 AM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
Not only did CMake work as advertised (like a dream) but the make
process itself was much faster. I don't miss those 20 minute builds
(old machine with 2.6G virt, 4 real). No doubt much of the speed-up
is due to the rearchitecture in 5.0.0.
I haven't done a test install. Is it unnecessary?
I didn't fully understand the comments about the zSeries builds;
perhaps I missed some emails.
So, the question is, how can I best help in the z/OS porting effort at
this point?
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:53 PM, David Ashley <mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Currently we have two Zseries builds performed every night for the
trunk 5.0 version. Both are RPM-based, SLES 12 and RHEL 7.0. We
currently do not have access to an Debian-based Zseries platform.
David Ashley
On 01/08/2015 12:40 PM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
Good point. 5.0.0 it is. I'll try it with CMake.
Next step is finding a z/OS platform to work.
Thanks.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Rick McGuire
mailto:object.r...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Neither one should be an easier port target than the other,
although I'm not particularly happy about having to support a
new release of 4.2.0 when the rest of the platforms will be
moving the 5.0.0 code base.
Rick
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Hobart Spitz
mailto:orexx...@gmail.com>> wrote:
That did the trick.
A bit more advice if you don't mind. This was just a dry
run to get me familiar with the build process in
preparation for attempting a port to z/OS. So, my
question is whether USS is an easier port target for
4.2.0 or 5.0? I realize that this would depend on
whether the various items on which the OORexx versions
are dependant are available in USS; I couldn't possibly
attempt a guess at that.
Thanks for the help.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:22 PM, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
The message below means the the autoconf package has
not been installed on your system. You need to
install it and then restart the process (with
./configure).
FYI - version 5.0 of ooRexx is under development in
the Subversion trunk. It uses the CMake package to
control the build and is a dream to use (really
easy). If you are trying for a release version of
ooRexx on your platform then you are using the
correct method to build ooRexx. If you are looking
for something the play with then the Subversion trunk
will provide a better learning experience in the long
run.
David Ashley
On 01/08/2015 09:35 AM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
Here's a rough recap what what I did:
* Downloaded and extracted ooRexx.4.2.0.tar.gz.
* Per my reading of unix-like-build.txt, I issued
./configure and then ./make. There were some
messages that got away from me because of
volume. (Terminal is now set to save all output.)
* I tried remaking, with no noticeable change.
* I tried make -B to get the missed messages and
go some messages that I found to be obscure:
CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . &&
/bin/bash
/home/tzvi/ORxBld/ooRexx-4.2.0/missing
aclocal-1.13
/home/tzvi/ORxBld/ooRexx-4.2.0/missing: line
81: aclocal-1.13: command not found
WARNING: 'aclocal-1.13' is missing on your
system.
You should only need it if you modified
'acinclude.m4' or
'configure.ac <http://configure.ac>' or
m4 files included by 'configure.ac
<http://configure.ac>'.
The 'aclocal' program is part of the GNU
Automake package:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/automake>
Re: [Oorexx-devel] OOREXX on z/OS
Currently we have two Zseries builds performed every night for the trunk
5.0 version. Both are RPM-based, SLES 12 and RHEL 7.0. We currently do
not have access to an Debian-based Zseries platform.
David Ashley
On 01/08/2015 12:40 PM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
Good point. 5.0.0 it is. I'll try it with CMake.
Next step is finding a z/OS platform to work.
Thanks.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Rick McGuire <mailto:object.r...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Neither one should be an easier port target than the other,
although I'm not particularly happy about having to support a new
release of 4.2.0 when the rest of the platforms will be moving the
5.0.0 code base.
Rick
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Hobart Spitz mailto:orexx...@gmail.com>> wrote:
That did the trick.
A bit more advice if you don't mind. This was just a dry run
to get me familiar with the build process in preparation for
attempting a port to z/OS. So, my question is whether USS is
an easier port target for 4.2.0 or 5.0? I realize that this
would depend on whether the various items on which the OORexx
versions are dependant are available in USS; I couldn't
possibly attempt a guess at that.
Thanks for the help.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:22 PM, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
The message below means the the autoconf package has not
been installed on your system. You need to install it and
then restart the process (with ./configure).
FYI - version 5.0 of ooRexx is under development in the
Subversion trunk. It uses the CMake package to control the
build and is a dream to use (really easy). If you are
trying for a release version of ooRexx on your platform
then you are using the correct method to build ooRexx. If
you are looking for something the play with then the
Subversion trunk will provide a better learning experience
in the long run.
David Ashley
On 01/08/2015 09:35 AM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
Here's a rough recap what what I did:
* Downloaded and extracted ooRexx.4.2.0.tar.gz.
* Per my reading of unix-like-build.txt, I issued
./configure and then ./make. There were some
messages that got away from me because of volume.
(Terminal is now set to save all output.)
* I tried remaking, with no noticeable change.
* I tried make -B to get the missed messages and go
some messages that I found to be obscure:
CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/bash
/home/tzvi/ORxBld/ooRexx-4.2.0/missing aclocal-1.13
/home/tzvi/ORxBld/ooRexx-4.2.0/missing: line 81:
aclocal-1.13: command not found
WARNING: 'aclocal-1.13' is missing on your system.
You should only need it if you modified
'acinclude.m4' or
'configure.ac <http://configure.ac>' or m4
files included by 'configure.ac
<http://configure.ac>'.
The 'aclocal' program is part of the GNU
Automake package:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/automake>
It also requires GNU Autoconf, GNU m4 and
Perl in order to run:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf>
<http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/>
<http://www.perl.org/>
make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 127
Clearly, I can start from scratch to reproduce the missed
messages. I probably should have done so before writing.
In any event, thanks for the help. Now that I'm between
contracts, I should be able to give this focused attention.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:52 AM, David Ashley
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I guess first we need to establish just what you
overall build convention and environment is. Are you
using the latest trunk (with CMake)? Are you
performing an out-of-source build? If you are trying
to compile an older version of ooRexx there are other
questions that need to be asked.
David Ashley
On 01/07/2015 07:20 PM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
After dusting off my C/C++ (which was a process more
Re: [Oorexx-devel] OOREXX on z/OS
The message below means the the autoconf package has not been installed
on your system. You need to install it and then restart the process
(with ./configure).
FYI - version 5.0 of ooRexx is under development in the Subversion
trunk. It uses the CMake package to control the build and is a dream to
use (really easy). If you are trying for a release version of ooRexx on
your platform then you are using the correct method to build ooRexx. If
you are looking for something the play with then the Subversion trunk
will provide a better learning experience in the long run.
David Ashley
On 01/08/2015 09:35 AM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
Here's a rough recap what what I did:
* Downloaded and extracted ooRexx.4.2.0.tar.gz.
* Per my reading of unix-like-build.txt, I issued ./configure and
then ./make. There were some messages that got away from me
because of volume. (Terminal is now set to save all output.)
* I tried remaking, with no noticeable change.
* I tried make -B to get the missed messages and go some messages
that I found to be obscure:
CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/bash
/home/tzvi/ORxBld/ooRexx-4.2.0/missing aclocal-1.13
/home/tzvi/ORxBld/ooRexx-4.2.0/missing: line 81: aclocal-1.13:
command not found
WARNING: 'aclocal-1.13' is missing on your system.
You should only need it if you modified 'acinclude.m4' or
'configure.ac <http://configure.ac>' or m4 files
included by 'configure.ac <http://configure.ac>'.
The 'aclocal' program is part of the GNU Automake
package:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/automake>
It also requires GNU Autoconf, GNU m4 and Perl in
order to run:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf>
<http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/>
<http://www.perl.org/>
make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 127
Clearly, I can start from scratch to reproduce the missed messages. I
probably should have done so before writing.
In any event, thanks for the help. Now that I'm between contracts, I
should be able to give this focused attention.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:52 AM, David Ashley <mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I guess first we need to establish just what you overall build
convention and environment is. Are you using the latest trunk
(with CMake)? Are you performing an out-of-source build? If you
are trying to compile an older version of ooRexx there are other
questions that need to be asked.
David Ashley
On 01/07/2015 07:20 PM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
After dusting off my C/C++ (which was a process more like a major
archaeological dig), rebuilding the lost virtual machine, and
some other, hopefully forgivable, delays, I have gotten configure
and make to the point where I get this message:
*ar: librexx_la-ArrayClass.o: No such file or directory*
*make: *** [librexx.la <http://librexx.la>] Error 1*
A search for la-ArrayClass found one file: librexx_la-ArrayClass.lo
Does anyone want to coach this novice builder (without giving the
whole thing away) enough so I don't feel like I'm stumbling
around in the dark?
I'm building on a 32 bit Ubuntu 14.04 LTS virtual machine.
Thanks.
--
OREXXMan
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot
Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and
more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
OREXXMan
Re: [Oorexx-devel] OOREXX on z/OS
I guess first we need to establish just what you overall build convention and environment is. Are you using the latest trunk (with CMake)? Are you performing an out-of-source build? If you are trying to compile an older version of ooRexx there are other questions that need to be asked. David Ashley On 01/07/2015 07:20 PM, Hobart Spitz wrote: After dusting off my C/C++ (which was a process more like a major archaeological dig), rebuilding the lost virtual machine, and some other, hopefully forgivable, delays, I have gotten configure and make to the point where I get this message: *ar: librexx_la-ArrayClass.o: No such file or directory* *make: *** [librexx.la <http://librexx.la>] Error 1* A search for la-ArrayClass found one file: librexx_la-ArrayClass.lo Does anyone want to coach this novice builder (without giving the whole thing away) enough so I don't feel like I'm stumbling around in the dark? I'm building on a 32 bit Ubuntu 14.04 LTS virtual machine. Thanks. -- OREXXMan -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Mac OSX build and rxsock6 library
Killed two birds with one stone (or several svn updates). The rxsock6 library now compiles cleanly on all platforms (including Mac OSX and Windows). It is not yet debugged but I will get to that next week. I have ooRexx compiling on the MAC OSX 10.10.1 (Yosemite) without errors. I still have to create the install file in CMake yet, but that should not be too difficult. David Ashley -- Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Compiled on Mac 10.10.1
I got my used Mac Mini last Friday. It was pretty easy to set up. I updated it to OSX 10.10.1 and then install the Xcode application tools. I got ooRexx checked out via svn and then installed CMake. No problems so far. Then I tried to compile ooRexx just to see what would happen. I had made no changes to the CMakeListing.txt file. I got a few warnings and then hit an error. I think this is a size mismatch between int and a pointer. I put the errors.txt file on the build server in the status subdirectory. I will start to address the necessary changes to the CMakeListing.txt file a little later. David Ashley -- Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Mac Users/Developers
I may be able to obtain an older Mac Mini (the one just older than the just introduced version). Would someone who has experience building ooRexx on a Mac be willing to help me set up my new machine so that I can build ooRexx on it? I have absolutely no experience on a mac and do not even know the first thing about one, starting from scratch. Thanks, David Ashley -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Windows Problem
All - Is there a way to uninstall a Windows application (ooRexx) silently from the command line? David Ashley -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] First Automated Test Suite Results
All - The first automated ooRexx test suite results are available. A Fedora20-x86_64 VM was used to generate the results. This VM will be used nightly to create new results. The results are placed in the same folder as the RPM install file on which the test is based (usually the same as the nightly build). I will work on getting automated test suite results for Win7-x86_64 next. Rick -- There are lots of errors in this first run. Please take a look at them. David Ashley -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Test Suite Results on the Build Machine
All - I am working on getting the Test Suite executed on a nightly basis on the Build Machine. Currently there is a problem with rexxutil that prevents this from happening. Hopefully we will get that worked out soon and the results will begin to show up on a daily basis. Currently I am planning on just executing the tests in two environments: Win7-x86_64 Fedora20-x86_64 The test results will show up in the same folder as the exe/rpm. For example interpreter-main/win7-x86_64/testresults.txt. Hopefully this will ease the test burden on all of us. David Ashley -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Windows CMake Error
That fixed it. David Ashley On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 18:31 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > Not able to reproduce the problem locally, but I'm pretty sure I've > fixed it. > > > Rick > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:09 PM, David Ashley > wrote: > Rick - > > I am now getting the following Windows build error: > > CMake Error at cmake_install.cmake:394 (file): > file INSTALL cannot find > "C"/Users/dashley/buildorx/cmake/bin/rexxexit.pdb". > > David Ashley > > > > -- > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > -- > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Windows CMake Error
Rick - I am now getting the following Windows build error: CMake Error at cmake_install.cmake:394 (file): file INSTALL cannot find "C"/Users/dashley/buildorx/cmake/bin/rexxexit.pdb". David Ashley -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Windows Builds Not Available
All - The Build Machine froze up last night and when I rebooted it the Win7 virtual machine somehow lost the MS C Compiler. It just disappeared off the virtual disk. So I have to reinstall the compiler in order to get it back up. This might take a day or two since I will take this chance to install a newer version of the compiler. Be patient. David Ashley -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Nightly Build Failed
Rick - All the nightly builds failed withe the following error: -- Looking for usersec.h -- Looking for usersec.h - not found -- Looking for ncurses.h -- Looking for ncurses.h - found CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:1531 (add_subdirectory): The source directory /home/dashley/buildorx/testbinaries does not contain a CMakeLists.txt file. -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! David Ashley -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Rethinking the test binaries
I agree. Trying to reproduce all the options in place for the main build in a test build environment will be error prone. And the upkeep for multiple build environments will be worse than a single build environment. David Ashley On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 11:24 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > I've been rethinking how the API test binaries are generated and built > as part of some restructure work on the test framework. My first > thought was to convert the build to use CMake. In the course of > creating the CMake script, there were a number of issues that needed > to be resolved, such as where the libraries and include files were > located, where to generate the CMake output, issues with having to > constantly switch between 32- and 64- bit builds, what platforms are > supported, etc. > > > I'm starting to think that the easiest solution to this would be to > move the test sources into the main development tree, then generate > the test binaries as part of the build. This eliminates a lot of the > build issues, and also ensures that the tests will be picking up > binaries that match the interpreter version being tested. > > > This is really pretty trivial to do. The binaries will be built into > the normal output directory, but will not be included as part of the > install. I'm really thinking there are some big wins here. Does > anybody see any downsides with doing this? > > > Rick > -- > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] What needs installing to get ncurses to build?
Depending on your Linux distribution, you will need to install ncurses-devel (RPMs) or libncurses5-dev (DEB). David Ashley On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 18:05 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > Just did my first Linux build in a while, and I'm getting a compile > error because it can't find ncurses.h. What do I need to install to > get this to build? > > > Rick > -- > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Maybe an Odd Question
Rick - If I am writing a C++ method for ooRexx and I want to perform an arithmetic operation on an ooRexx object (add one to it or maybe multiply it by a number), is there a way to do that without dropping out of the C++ method? I looked, but it does not appear that there are exposed methods to perform arithmetic operations on ooRexx objects. Thanks as always, David Ashley -- Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] PDcurses and orxncurses on Windows
Rick, I guess this is mostly for you. I need advice. PDCurses is a public domain version of the curses library (and I do mean Public Domain). The source code is without any license and freely available on SourceForge and other repositories. It is portable to Windows and should compile easily on that platform. I want to include the PDCurses source into the orxncurses library for Windows. This will give the Windows environment the same functionality as the *nix environment without the need for the Windows user to install any other support libraries. I think this is the same situation as the ooSQLite library, but I would like to be sure. The ooSQLite library provides a readme that explains the mixed qualities of the source. I will do the same for PDCurses. Let me know if you think this will work. If it will, I have some followup questions about how to organize the code for you. David Ashley -- Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0.0 Support For Older Operating Systems
These are not automation issues. These are pure build issues. First, there is a problem with CMake. You can not just ask your distribution to install CMake and be ready to go. The version of CMake that gets installed may be too old. That means that now you have to remove the version of CMake you just installed and download/build CMake from the current source. Most of our users/developers will be VERY reluctant to perform that operation. So we have a fundamental problem with most older Linux distributions. Second, it is not the the older linkers will not link the ooRexx code, it is that there is a known bug in those older versions. And again, the user is stuck with correcting the problem with a procedure they will be VERY uncomfortable with and that is not portable between RPM and DEB distributions (and it could be worse than that in some cases). We always want the user to have the option of building ooRexx from source. But if the build procedure is too hard then the user will just not choose ooRexx at all. That is one thing we really do not want. David Ashley On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 16:45 +0200, René Jansen wrote: > David, > > I appreciate the heads up, but I am wondering if this change does not come > too soon. I know it is sometimes good to make a clean break, and a > programming language is not a museum of older tools and architectures. Still, > I am wondering if the subgoals - wanting to use modern building tools and > modern compiler features, wanting an automated build procedure, are not > counterproductive to the goal of wanting to reach the widest possible user > segment - because it is the best possible programming language. > > My suggestion would be to put off the new features until the majority of > platforms support them, or work actively to support alternative > buiidling/compiling procedures. Cmake seems simple: don't use the modern > features when older features do the job, or generate and tweak a makefile to > perform this role. > > I have bigger worries over compiler/linkage editor bugs. Features that > trigger linkage editor bugs in widely used tools are clearly too new. I would > postpone using those until most linkage editors are fixed. I think > fragmenting the user base would be detrimental to language uptake. Other > interpreters seem not to have this problem. If this is hard to fix, I would > suggest to postpone the release until more infrastructure supports it. In my > opinion, that would hurt ooRexx less than releasing for a smaller OS base. > > best regards, > > René Jansen. > > On 10 okt. 2014, at 18:15, David Ashley wrote: > > > All - > > > > Please read all of this note as this could impact you. > > > > For the last few days I have been trying to get the 5.0.0 version of > > ooRexx to build on my older VMs on the Build Machine. I keep running > > into one of the following problems. > > > > 1. We use a lot of the newer features in CMake and these older operating > > systems only have an older version of CMake available. > > > > 2. The GCC compiler/linker will not link the compiler output due to a > > bug in the linker. > > > > Before I talk about these problem I want explain our philosophy on > > building ooRexx. We supply many install packages for ooRexx for two > > reasons: to verify that ooRexx will build on an OS release and to ensure > > that ooRexx will install on an OS. We therefore try to impose as few > > problems on the developer who wants to build ooRexx on their own. > > > > Starting with version 5.0.0 we have added a new wrinkle into building > > ooRexx with the CMake product. While CMake is not usually installed by > > default it is easily added using the OS specific installer or for > > Windows, downloading it off the web. > > > > So now lets get back to our two problems. > > > > Problem 1 is not easy to solve for a developer. It usually means that > > they will need to download the latest CMake source and build it for > > themselves, which is not an easy task. That also means that I will have > > to perform that task for each of our older operating systems (VMs). > > There are over 25 of these so this task will take a LOT of time. > > > > Problem 2 is even worse. There is really no good solution for this. The > > problem is caused by our choice to use newer C++ features to increase > > the performance and ease of developing the interpreter. The only > > solution would be to try and integrate a newer version of GCC into an OS > > that may not be able to support it (no fun at all). > > > > For these reasons we will not be supporting ooRexx 5.0.0 on any of the > > OSs that have problems 1 or
Re: [Oorexx-devel] DISCUSS: #158 Add iteration over a supplier to DO/LOOP
I like this suggestion. David Ashley On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 20:39 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > Yeah, I considered something like that too, but it somehow feels wrong > to me. All of the other loop options are prepositions like TO, BY, > FOR, OVER, WHILE, and UNTIL. Using a noun like supplier just doesn't > fit well with the other options. Maybe we can do something like was > done with USE ARG. This was done this way so that the USE instruction > could be reused for some other type of operation that made sense. How > about combining a preposition with a keyword that identified what we > are iterating over. There's a handy list of prepositions here: > > > https://www.englishclub.com/grammar/prepositions-list.htm > > > FROM is one that is available, so something like > > > do index, item from supplier expr > > > would work, with the supplier indicating what sort of source we're > looking at. This can then be extended to other types of source if we > wish, such as > > > do index, item from array expr > > > or > > > do index, item from map expr > > > We don't need to add anything additional now, but it's would be nice > to go with something that can be expanded on in the future. > > > Rick > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:42 PM, David Ashley > wrote: > How about > Do index, item supplier .someclass~methods > > with "supplier" being a subkeyword. That makes it very clear > what is > happening. > > David Ashley > > On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 17:39 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > > Having just coded about 3 supplier loops today where I ended > up in an > > infinite loop because I forgot to code the next method call > at the end > > of the loop, I'd really like to reopen this for discussion > for > > possible inclusion in 5.0.0. Suppliers as they currently > exists are > > really quite error prone. I really wish they had never been > included. > > Methods like allIndexes and allItems do the job fairly well, > but > > suppliers are there, and we have things in the language that > return > > supplier objects, such as the methods method of Class, so we > have to > > deal with them. > > > > > > The mechanism for implementing this is fairly clearcut, the > big > > problem is the syntax. Unlike the other control-variable > forms (do i > > = t to and do i over ...), each iteration of the loop > would need > > to set two variables, one for the index and one for the > item. > > > > > > One possibility is to use commas for the two variables: > > > > > > do index, item over .someclass~methods > > > > > > Two variables would indicate we wish to iterate over a > supplier, so > > the over expression must either evaluate to a supplier > object or to an > > object that supports a supplier method. > > > > > > we could use a different keyword potentially, but I'm having > trouble > > even proposing anything that makes sense to specify two > variables. A > > completely new instruction might work but that seems > unnecessary. > > Anybody else have any other ideas? > > > > > > Rick > > > > > -- > > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog > Analyzer > > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI > DSS Reports > > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download > White paper > > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog > Analyzer > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho > > ___ > > Oorexx-devel mailing list > > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance
Re: [Oorexx-devel] DISCUSS: #158 Add iteration over a supplier to DO/LOOP
How about Do index, item supplier .someclass~methods with "supplier" being a subkeyword. That makes it very clear what is happening. David Ashley On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 17:39 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > Having just coded about 3 supplier loops today where I ended up in an > infinite loop because I forgot to code the next method call at the end > of the loop, I'd really like to reopen this for discussion for > possible inclusion in 5.0.0. Suppliers as they currently exists are > really quite error prone. I really wish they had never been included. > Methods like allIndexes and allItems do the job fairly well, but > suppliers are there, and we have things in the language that return > supplier objects, such as the methods method of Class, so we have to > deal with them. > > > The mechanism for implementing this is fairly clearcut, the big > problem is the syntax. Unlike the other control-variable forms (do i > = t to and do i over ...), each iteration of the loop would need > to set two variables, one for the index and one for the item. > > > One possibility is to use commas for the two variables: > > > do index, item over .someclass~methods > > > Two variables would indicate we wish to iterate over a supplier, so > the over expression must either evaluate to a supplier object or to an > object that supports a supplier method. > > > we could use a different keyword potentially, but I'm having trouble > even proposing anything that makes sense to specify two variables. A > completely new instruction might work but that seems unnecessary. > Anybody else have any other ideas? > > > Rick > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0.0 Support For Older Operating Systems
All - Please read all of this note as this could impact you. For the last few days I have been trying to get the 5.0.0 version of ooRexx to build on my older VMs on the Build Machine. I keep running into one of the following problems. 1. We use a lot of the newer features in CMake and these older operating systems only have an older version of CMake available. 2. The GCC compiler/linker will not link the compiler output due to a bug in the linker. Before I talk about these problem I want explain our philosophy on building ooRexx. We supply many install packages for ooRexx for two reasons: to verify that ooRexx will build on an OS release and to ensure that ooRexx will install on an OS. We therefore try to impose as few problems on the developer who wants to build ooRexx on their own. Starting with version 5.0.0 we have added a new wrinkle into building ooRexx with the CMake product. While CMake is not usually installed by default it is easily added using the OS specific installer or for Windows, downloading it off the web. So now lets get back to our two problems. Problem 1 is not easy to solve for a developer. It usually means that they will need to download the latest CMake source and build it for themselves, which is not an easy task. That also means that I will have to perform that task for each of our older operating systems (VMs). There are over 25 of these so this task will take a LOT of time. Problem 2 is even worse. There is really no good solution for this. The problem is caused by our choice to use newer C++ features to increase the performance and ease of developing the interpreter. The only solution would be to try and integrate a newer version of GCC into an OS that may not be able to support it (no fun at all). For these reasons we will not be supporting ooRexx 5.0.0 on any of the OSs that have problems 1 or 2. I know this is disappointing but please try to be reassured that as time progresses this will become less of a problem. Those using the older OSs will still be able to fall back on ooRexx 4.2.0 (which is a really good version of ooRexx). Currently we are going to only support the OS versions that are showing up on the nightly builds (plus some others that may be added later). If you have questions about this topic please feel free to post a reply to this post. David Ashley -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Install packages
There was no Mint 17 install package produced for ooRexx 4.2.0. The release of Mint 17 preceded the release of ooRexx 4.2. We do not have the resources to go back and add this release for Mint 17. Sorry, you are on your own. David Ashley On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 18:43 +0100, r...@ntlworld.com wrote: > Sorry if this is the wrong list but I couldn't find the names of the other > lists. > > I've just installed Mint 17 on my netbook and as there is no package for 17 I > downloaded the file for Mint 16 > I get the following when trying to install : > > $ sudo dpkg -i ooRexx-4.2.0-1.mint16.i386.deb > Selecting previously unselected package oorexx. > (Reading database ... 160979 files and directories currently installed.) > Preparing to unpack ooRexx-4.2.0-1.mint16.i386.deb ... > Unpacking oorexx (4.2.0-9940) ... > dpkg-deb (subprocess): decompressing archive member: internal gzip read > error: ': too many length or distance symbols' > dpkg-deb: error: subprocess returned error exit status 2 > dpkg: error processing archive ooRexx-4.2.0-1.mint16.i386.deb (--install): > cannot copy extracted data for './usr/lib/librxsock.a' to > '/usr/lib/librxsock.a.dpkg-new': unexpected end of file or stream > Errors were encountered while processing: > ooRexx-4.2.0-1.mint16.i386.deb > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] SVN snapshot question
You are downloading the whole repository with the snapshot. It is much easier to just check out the part of the tree you want. David Ashley On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 18:04 -0500, J. Leslie Turriff wrote: > Hi, > I recently discovered that the orxcurses package resides in the ooRexx > SVN > repository. I went to the SourceForge site and found the package there. > There seem to be two ways to download it: the "Download Snapshot" link at > the top of the list, and the SVN checkout command. > I tried using the "Download Snapshot," and after quite a long time > SourceForge generated a 278MB oorexx-code-0-10663.zip file, which will take > about three hours to download. > That's a big file for just an ncurses package. Am I perchance > downloading > the whole repository? > > Leslie -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Windows Builds on the Build Machine
All - The Windows builds of ooRexx have now been completely revised for CMake and automated on the Build Machine. The use of Cygwin on the Windows VM has been eliminated and I am now using a single VM to produce the 32 and 64 bit builds. If anyone has problems with these builds please let me know. David Ashley -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Testers wanted...
That is correct. You must compile from source to get binaries you can use. Then you can adjust your PATH to point to them. If you can not compile the binaries then you are stuck installing an RPM/DEB. David Ashley On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 10:26 -0500, J. Leslie Turriff wrote: > On Tuesday 07 October 2014 08:57:00 David Ashley wrote: > > If rxapid is still compatible then you should be able to switch by > > adjusting your PATH. Have not tried this, but it should work. > > > > David Ashley > > Okay, but then it looks like the only way to get 5.0.0 into my system > is to > compile from source, since the RPM is built non-relocatable (see below); is > this correct? > > Leslie > > > > On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 09:03 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > > > David, > > > > > > > > > The 5.0.0 interpreter is still compatible with the 4.2.0 daemon > > > because none of the structures used to pass data back and forth have > > > changed. I'm switching back and forth between 5.0.0 and 4.2.0 > > > constantly without needing to kill the rxapi process. Given that you > > > needn't worry about rxapid, does that make it feasible? > > > > > > > > > Rick > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:56 AM, David Ashley > > > wrote: > > > There is definitely no way to have multiple versions of ooRexx > > > installed > > > on Linux. All the methods will eventually cause problems with > > > the rxapid > > > daemon. > > > > > > David Ashley > > > > > > On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 22:29 -0500, J. Leslie Turriff wrote: > > > > On Sunday 05 October 2014 10:54:05 Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers > > > > > > > > Well, I would like to install V5.0.0 on my Linux > > > > > > machine, so I downloaded > > > > > > > ooRexx-5.0.0-10622.x86_64.opensuse131.rpm from the build > > > > > > system. I'd rather > > > > > > > not overlay my current V4.2, so I tried this: > > > > > $rpm -iv --relocate /usr/bin=/usr/local/bin \ > > > > > --relocate /usr/include=/usr/local/include \ > > > > > --relocate /usr/lib64=/usr/local/lib64 \ > > > > > --relocate /usr/share=/usr/local/share \ > > > > > --test -f > > > > > > Downloads/Packages/ooRexx-related/\ > > > > > > > > ooRexx/V5.0/\ > > > > > > ooRexx-5.0.0-10622.x86_64.opensuse131.rpm > > > > > > > and got this output: > > > > > Preparing packages... > > > > > path /usr/bin in package ooRexx-5.0.0-1.x86_64 is > > > > > > not relocatable > > > > > > > > path /usr/include in package ooRexx-5.0.0-1.x86_64 > > > > > > is not > > > > > > > relocatable > > > > > > > > > path /usr/lib64 in package ooRexx-5.0.0-1.x86_64 > > > > > > is not relocatable > > > > > > > > path /usr/share in package ooRexx-5.0.0-1.x86_64 > > > > > > is not relocatable > > > > > > > so I'm guessing there is no way to have two versions of > > > > > > ooRexx installed on a > > > > > > > Linux system at the same time? > > > > > > > > Leslie > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] General Test Question
I was looking at my ooRexx ncurses implementation and I am wondering about how to supply mt tests for the package. Including them in the ooRexx test environment really does not work because the tests do things like mover the cursor around the screen, draw lines, and other weird stuff that is screen oriented. There is no way to know whether or not a test is successful unless you observer what is happening to the screen. So obviously putting such test in our test environment does not really work. So do I supply a test package or not? And if so, how? Any suggestions are welcome. David Ashley -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] V5
Well, not exactly true. I was planning on getting the ncurses support into the rpm and deb installs. The GTK support will come as a standalone package but it will be in the form of an rpm or deb package. David Ashley On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 10:17 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > Not currently planned for the release. > > > Rick > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:15 AM, wrote: > Will the new version include GTK and/or ncurses? > > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog > Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI > DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White > paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog > Analyzer > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Testers wanted...
If rxapid is still compatible then you should be able to switch by adjusting your PATH. Have not tried this, but it should work. David Ashley On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 09:03 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > David, > > > The 5.0.0 interpreter is still compatible with the 4.2.0 daemon > because none of the structures used to pass data back and forth have > changed. I'm switching back and forth between 5.0.0 and 4.2.0 > constantly without needing to kill the rxapi process. Given that you > needn't worry about rxapid, does that make it feasible? > > > Rick > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:56 AM, David Ashley > wrote: > There is definitely no way to have multiple versions of ooRexx > installed > on Linux. All the methods will eventually cause problems with > the rxapid > daemon. > > David Ashley > > On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 22:29 -0500, J. Leslie Turriff wrote: > > On Sunday 05 October 2014 10:54:05 Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers > wrote: > > > : > > > As I understand it a future new version 5.0.0 is available > from the build > > > machine. > > > > > > You can find it here <http://build.oorexx.org/downloads/>. > > > > > > For windows platforms you download an installer, just like > you did when you > > > last upgraded and you can just install it on your machine. > When you have > > > finished testing, you can just get the installer for your > current version > > > from sourceforge > <http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/> (or your > > > download folder) and install it back. The only exception > I am aware of is > > > if you have installed an independent version of ooDialog, > in which case you > > > will need to reinstall that after you have installed your > previous version > > > of ooRexx. For other platforms, you will no doubt know > what to do. > > > > > > I assume there is some value in your just downloading the > new version and > > > checking that what you run on the old version still runs > on the new version > > > and raising bug reports > <http://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/> where it > > > doesn't. > > > > Well, I would like to install V5.0.0 on my Linux > machine, so I downloaded > > ooRexx-5.0.0-10622.x86_64.opensuse131.rpm from the build > system. I'd rather > > not overlay my current V4.2, so I tried this: > > > > > $rpm -iv --relocate /usr/bin=/usr/local/bin \ > > > --relocate /usr/include=/usr/local/include \ > > > --relocate /usr/lib64=/usr/local/lib64 \ > > > --relocate /usr/share=/usr/local/share \ > > > --test -f > Downloads/Packages/ooRexx-related/\ > > > ooRexx/V5.0/\ > > > > ooRexx-5.0.0-10622.x86_64.opensuse131.rpm > > > > and got this output: > > > > > Preparing packages... > > > path /usr/bin in package ooRexx-5.0.0-1.x86_64 is > not relocatable > > > path /usr/include in package ooRexx-5.0.0-1.x86_64 > is not > > relocatable > > > path /usr/lib64 in package ooRexx-5.0.0-1.x86_64 > is not relocatable > > > path /usr/share in package ooRexx-5.0.0-1.x86_64 > is not relocatable > > > > so I'm guessing there is no way to have two versions of > ooRexx installed on a > > Linux system at the same time? > > > > Leslie > > > > > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog > Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI > DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White > paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog > Analyzer > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Testers wanted...
There is definitely no way to have multiple versions of ooRexx installed on Linux. All the methods will eventually cause problems with the rxapid daemon. David Ashley On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 22:29 -0500, J. Leslie Turriff wrote: > On Sunday 05 October 2014 10:54:05 Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers wrote: > > : > > As I understand it a future new version 5.0.0 is available from the build > > machine. > > > > You can find it here <http://build.oorexx.org/downloads/>. > > > > For windows platforms you download an installer, just like you did when you > > last upgraded and you can just install it on your machine. When you have > > finished testing, you can just get the installer for your current version > > from sourceforge <http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/> (or your > > download folder) and install it back. The only exception I am aware of is > > if you have installed an independent version of ooDialog, in which case you > > will need to reinstall that after you have installed your previous version > > of ooRexx. For other platforms, you will no doubt know what to do. > > > > I assume there is some value in your just downloading the new version and > > checking that what you run on the old version still runs on the new version > > and raising bug reports <http://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/> where it > > doesn't. > > Well, I would like to install V5.0.0 on my Linux machine, so I > downloaded > ooRexx-5.0.0-10622.x86_64.opensuse131.rpm from the build system. I'd rather > not overlay my current V4.2, so I tried this: > > > $rpm -iv --relocate /usr/bin=/usr/local/bin \ > > --relocate /usr/include=/usr/local/include \ > > --relocate /usr/lib64=/usr/local/lib64 \ > > --relocate /usr/share=/usr/local/share \ > > --test -f Downloads/Packages/ooRexx-related/\ > > ooRexx/V5.0/\ > > ooRexx-5.0.0-10622.x86_64.opensuse131.rpm > > and got this output: > > > Preparing packages... > > path /usr/bin in package ooRexx-5.0.0-1.x86_64 is not relocatable > > path /usr/include in package ooRexx-5.0.0-1.x86_64 is not > relocatable > > path /usr/lib64 in package ooRexx-5.0.0-1.x86_64 is not relocatable > > path /usr/share in package ooRexx-5.0.0-1.x86_64 is not relocatable > > so I'm guessing there is no way to have two versions of ooRexx installed on a > Linux system at the same time? > > Leslie -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Windows Build Error
The download I did turned out to be only documentation. Where did you get a free version of the full Visual Studio? I can not seem to find it anywhere. David Ashley On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 10:45 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > I'm using the full 2013 version right now. > > > Rick > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:42 AM, David Ashley > wrote: > Are you using the 2013 express version? > > David Ashley > > On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 09:19 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > > Rats, it appears resource compiler version you are using > doesn't > > support enum symbols in the .rc file. I there any chance you > could > > upgrade the compiler version you are are using? You're > already 4 > > release versions behind what I'm using to build and I > suspect problems > > like this will become more and more common. > > > > > > If an upgrade is not possible, I think this is fixable, but > it might > > take a bit of work. > > > > > > Rick > > > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:09 AM, David Ashley > > wrote: > > Rick - > > > > I am getting a error on compiling winmsgtb.rc this > morning. It > > seems to > > have an undefined keyword or key name, maybe on line > 57? The > > RPM and DEB > > builds are fine. > > > > David Ashley > > > > > > > > -- > > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with > EventLog > > Analyzer > > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with > Out-of-the-box PCI > > DSS Reports > > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? > Download White > > paper > > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with > EventLog > > Analyzer > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > ___ > > Oorexx-devel mailing list > > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > > > > > -- > > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog > Analyzer > > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI > DSS Reports > > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download > White paper > > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog > Analyzer > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > ___ > > Oorexx-devel mailing list > > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog > Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI > DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White > paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog > Analyzer > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Windows Build Error
Downloading the full 2013 version now. I will try to upgrade in the next day or so. David Ashley On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 10:45 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > I'm using the full 2013 version right now. > > > Rick > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:42 AM, David Ashley > wrote: > Are you using the 2013 express version? > > David Ashley > > On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 09:19 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > > Rats, it appears resource compiler version you are using > doesn't > > support enum symbols in the .rc file. I there any chance you > could > > upgrade the compiler version you are are using? You're > already 4 > > release versions behind what I'm using to build and I > suspect problems > > like this will become more and more common. > > > > > > If an upgrade is not possible, I think this is fixable, but > it might > > take a bit of work. > > > > > > Rick > > > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:09 AM, David Ashley > > wrote: > > Rick - > > > > I am getting a error on compiling winmsgtb.rc this > morning. It > > seems to > > have an undefined keyword or key name, maybe on line > 57? The > > RPM and DEB > > builds are fine. > > > > David Ashley > > > > > > > > -- > > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with > EventLog > > Analyzer > > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with > Out-of-the-box PCI > > DSS Reports > > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? > Download White > > paper > > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with > EventLog > > Analyzer > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > ___ > > Oorexx-devel mailing list > > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > > > > > -- > > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog > Analyzer > > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI > DSS Reports > > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download > White paper > > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog > Analyzer > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > ___ > > Oorexx-devel mailing list > > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog > Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI > DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White > paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog > Analyzer > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?i
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Windows Build Error
Are you using the 2013 express version? David Ashley On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 09:19 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > Rats, it appears resource compiler version you are using doesn't > support enum symbols in the .rc file. I there any chance you could > upgrade the compiler version you are are using? You're already 4 > release versions behind what I'm using to build and I suspect problems > like this will become more and more common. > > > If an upgrade is not possible, I think this is fixable, but it might > take a bit of work. > > > Rick > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:09 AM, David Ashley > wrote: > Rick - > > I am getting a error on compiling winmsgtb.rc this morning. It > seems to > have an undefined keyword or key name, maybe on line 57? The > RPM and DEB > builds are fine. > > David Ashley > > > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog > Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI > DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White > paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog > Analyzer > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Windows Build Error
Rick - I am getting a error on compiling winmsgtb.rc this morning. It seems to have an undefined keyword or key name, maybe on line 57? The RPM and DEB builds are fine. David Ashley -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Windows Build Environment Problem
Rick - This is a strange one. When I run my script(s) that perform the cmake build in the foreground I have no problems. But when I run them through an ssh session I get an error from CMake almost right away. Right after it discovers the Windows compiler it tries to CD to \cygwin\home\dashley \cmake\CMakeFiles\CMakeTmp in order to do a test compile. The CD command fails but does not give any indication why. I checked to make sure the subdir exists and it does. Any idea why this would be different? David Ashley -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need some feedback on a new feature.
I prefer the namespace:name version. It seems more hierarchical. David Ashley On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 18:52 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > One of the features I've been working on is a concept of namespaces > that can be used to disambiguate information pulled in from > different ::requires files. The basis if this is a new NAMESPACE > option on the ::requires directive where you give a simple name to a > loaded requires file. > > > ::requires 'some.file' namespace somename > > > Once a requires file has been tagged with a namespace name, it can be > used to qualify references to classes within that namespace explicitly > identify which version you want. As part of this, there is a special > reserved namespace of REXX that will allow you to always get to the > interpreter-provided version of things. > > > My thoughts on how the namespace is specified builds on what is done > with the message syntax for message sends where we have things like > > > init~self:super > > > Where the first token is the target name, the part after the colon is > the qualifier. This works for namespaces, but part of me thinks this > might be better with the qualifier first. > > > There are multiple places where this will show up. > > > 1) .variables. This will allow things like .array:rexx~new...or > should this be .rexx:array~new? > > > 2) ::class directives. > > >::class foo subclass rexx:object (or should it be object:rexx). > > > 3) Potentially on function calls and call instructions. Again, should > it be qualifier first or second? > > > The more I look at this, the more I think it should be namespace:name > rather than name:namespace, but this is the reverse of the method name > convention. These are not strictly the the same concept, but it is > different. What do others think? > > > Rick > > > > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Win7 VMs Back Online
All - I have the Win7 VMs on the Build Machine working again. They are now producing v5.0.0 development editions of ooRexx. Both the x86_32 and the x86_64 versions should be available at http://build.orexx.org/ David Ashley -- Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Win CMake Build Problem
Rick - I figured out the root cause why the "nmake nsis_template_installer" command is not running. During the CMake configuration cmake can not find the NSIS binary (makensis). I have tried everything I can think of to get cmake to recognize my NSIS installation, but no joy. Here are just some of the things I have tried: - adding NSIS to the PATH - adding a HINT to the find_program command What magic are you using? David Ashley -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Windows Compile Error
I use Visual Studio v9.0. The compiler is v15.00.30729.01. On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 20:42 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > What version of the compiler are you using? I had to add a check to > PlatformDefinitions.h to check for the MSC version. We used to have > to use map isnan to _isnan, but when I upgraded to VSC 13 it was > necessary to add a version check and disable the define. See line 133 > in interpreter\platform\windows\PlatformDefinitions.h. Check the > value of MSC_VER...I might have this test set at the wrong level. > > > Rick > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 8:34 PM, David Ashley > wrote: > Rick - > > I am a lot further now. It is actually trying to compile the > code. But > it gets an error when compiling NumberStringClass.cpp. > > C:\cygwin\home\dashley\buildorx\interpreter\classes > \NumberStringClass.cpp(3979) : error C3861: '_isnan': > identifier not > found > NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'C:\PROGRA~1\MICROS~1.0\VC\bin > \cl.exe' : > return code '0x2' > Stop. > NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual > Studio > 9.0\VC\Bin\nmake.exe"' : return code '0x2' > Stop. > NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual > Studio > 9.0\VC\Bin\nmake.exe"' : return code '0x2' > Stop. > > Any ideas what is going on? > > David Ashley > > > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog > Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI > DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White > paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog > Analyzer > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Windows Compile Error
Rick - I am a lot further now. It is actually trying to compile the code. But it gets an error when compiling NumberStringClass.cpp. C:\cygwin\home\dashley\buildorx\interpreter\classes \NumberStringClass.cpp(3979) : error C3861: '_isnan': identifier not found NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'C:\PROGRA~1\MICROS~1.0\VC\bin\cl.exe' : return code '0x2' Stop. NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\Bin\nmake.exe"' : return code '0x2' Stop. NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\Bin\nmake.exe"' : return code '0x2' Stop. Any ideas what is going on? David Ashley -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] When should we consider using C++11 features?
While I am for the use of C++11 there could be a problem with some of our older *nix platforms. Their compilers may not support those features. Also, I am not sure if the version of the Windows compiler that we use supports the use of those features (Rick would know more know more about this than I do). At this point it really looks like we will need to start with a clean slate as far as platforms we support with the ooRexx 5.0 version. David Ashley On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 09:36 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > It's probably worth having this conversation now that this standard > has been out for 3 years now and compiler support seems to be pretty > good. > > > As I've been doing the code cleanup on the trunk version, I've had a > number of times where a search on how to do something in C++ gave hits > to C++11 features. Currently, I've been steering clear of anything > dealing with C++11, but I'm starting to think it might be time to open > the doors a bit. The 5.0.0 version might be a good time to take this > step. > > > Rick > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz file on SourceForge
What files seem to be missing? Platform specific features are defined via the build itself through several different means. But the Mac, Linux and AIX builds are all sourced from that tar file. Oh, the AIX build does have some missing build files due to some not under our control, but that is the only platform that is specific in that way. David Ashley On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 12:27 -0700, CVBruce wrote: > No, it is only for linux. It does not contain the platform specific files > for AIX or OSX. > > Bruce > On Sep 22, 2014, at 12:20 PM, David Ashley wrote: > > > The tar.gz file is for all *nix platforms. > > > > David Ashley > > > > On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 11:13 -0700, CVBruce wrote: > >> And so if you want to build AIX or OSX, you have to download from the SVN. > >> Bruce > >> On Sep 22, 2014, at 11:11 AM, David Ashley wrote: > >> > >>> Yes, the contents are as intended. The tar.gz file contains the > >>> Linux/*nix files to build ooRexx. The .zip file contains the Windows > >>> source files. We do this so that you don't get files you do not need to > >>> build ooRexx on your platform. > >>> > >>> David Ashley > >>> > >>> On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 11:06 -0700, CVBruce wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I may not understand what this source file, ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz, > >>>> is supposed to contain, but I would expect it to contain all the source > >>>> required to build ooRexx on any platform. When I compare the contents > >>>> of this file with the SVN main/releases/4.2.0/trunk it is clear that the > >>>> only platform contained in the source file is linux. Missing are > >>>> windows, aix and mac. Take for example the directory > >>>> rexxapi/server/platform. SVN contains a windows and a unix > >>>> subdirectory, while the tar file contains only unix. That unix > >>>> subdirectory in the SVN contains aix, linux, and mac, while the tar file > >>>> contains only linux. > >>>> > >>>> Was this the intended source distribution? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> Bruce Skelly > >>>> -- > >>>> Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > >>>> Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > >>>> Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > >>>> Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > >>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > >>>> ___ > >>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list > >>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > >>> Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > >>> Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > >>> Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > >>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > >>> ___ > >>> Oorexx-devel mailing list > >>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > >> Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > >> Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > >> Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > >> ___ > >> Oorexx-devel mailing list > >> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > > > > > ---
Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz file on SourceForge
The tar.gz file is for all *nix platforms. David Ashley On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 11:13 -0700, CVBruce wrote: > And so if you want to build AIX or OSX, you have to download from the SVN. > Bruce > On Sep 22, 2014, at 11:11 AM, David Ashley wrote: > > > Yes, the contents are as intended. The tar.gz file contains the > > Linux/*nix files to build ooRexx. The .zip file contains the Windows > > source files. We do this so that you don't get files you do not need to > > build ooRexx on your platform. > > > > David Ashley > > > > On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 11:06 -0700, CVBruce wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I may not understand what this source file, ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz, is > >> supposed to contain, but I would expect it to contain all the source > >> required to build ooRexx on any platform. When I compare the contents of > >> this file with the SVN main/releases/4.2.0/trunk it is clear that the only > >> platform contained in the source file is linux. Missing are windows, aix > >> and mac. Take for example the directory rexxapi/server/platform. SVN > >> contains a windows and a unix subdirectory, while the tar file contains > >> only unix. That unix subdirectory in the SVN contains aix, linux, and > >> mac, while the tar file contains only linux. > >> > >> Was this the intended source distribution? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Bruce Skelly > >> -- > >> Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > >> Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > >> Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > >> Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > >> ___ > >> Oorexx-devel mailing list > >> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > > > > > -- > > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > ___ > > Oorexx-devel mailing list > > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz file on SourceForge
Yes, the contents are as intended. The tar.gz file contains the Linux/*nix files to build ooRexx. The .zip file contains the Windows source files. We do this so that you don't get files you do not need to build ooRexx on your platform. David Ashley On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 11:06 -0700, CVBruce wrote: > Hi, > > I may not understand what this source file, ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz, is > supposed to contain, but I would expect it to contain all the source required > to build ooRexx on any platform. When I compare the contents of this file > with the SVN main/releases/4.2.0/trunk it is clear that the only platform > contained in the source file is linux. Missing are windows, aix and mac. > Take for example the directory rexxapi/server/platform. SVN contains a > windows and a unix subdirectory, while the tar file contains only unix. That > unix subdirectory in the SVN contains aix, linux, and mac, while the tar file > contains only linux. > > Was this the intended source distribution? > > Thanks, > > Bruce Skelly > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Apologies
Rene - Please send a copy of the Mac version of pthreads.h so I can resolve the problems. David Ashley w dot david dot ashley at gmail dot com On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 07:29 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > I changed the mechanism used to check for these symbols. The change > worked on Linux, but I don't know if this will fix your problem or > not. > > > Rick > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 6:27 AM, René Jansen > wrote: > done that. Yes. there is a difference. > > > This is from the Cmake-generate new config.h : > > > /* Define to 1 if you have pthread_mutexattr_settype function > */ > /* #undef HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEXATTR_SETTYPE */ > > > /* Define to 1 if PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK is a valid value */ > /* #undef HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK */ > > > /* Define to 1 if PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE is a valid value */ > /* #undef HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE */ > > > /* Define to 1 if PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP is a valid value > */ > /* #undef HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP */ > > > While the 4.2.0 version had: > > > > > /* Define to 1 if you have pthread_mutexattr_settype function > */ > #define HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEXATTR_SETTYPE 1 > > > /* Define to 1 if PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK is a valid value */ > #define HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK 1 > > > /* Define to 1 if PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE is a valid value */ > #define HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE 1 > > > /* Define to 1 if PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP is a valid value > */ > /* #undef HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP */ > > > If there is a 1 or not after the define is not significant, > no? (long time since I did this). > > > However, adding these and updating to most recent svn yields: > > > [ 94%] Building CXX object > CMakeFiles/rexxc.dir/utilities/rexxc/platform/unix/RexxCompiler.cpp.o > > /Users/rvjansen/apps/oorexx/oorexx-code-0/utilities/rexxc/platform/unix/RexxCompiler.cpp:86:73: > error: > use of undeclared identifier 'CATD_ERR' > if ((catd = catopen(REXXMESSAGEFILE, SECOND_PARAMETER)) == > (nl_catd)CATD_ERR) > > ^ > > /Users/rvjansen/apps/oorexx/oorexx-code-0/utilities/rexxc/platform/unix/RexxCompiler.cpp:89:70: > error: > use of undeclared identifier 'CATD_ERR' > if ((catd = catopen(DataArea, SECOND_PARAMETER)) == > (nl_catd)CATD_ERR) > > ^ > > /Users/rvjansen/apps/oorexx/oorexx-code-0/utilities/rexxc/platform/unix/RexxCompiler.cpp:100:70: > error: > use of undeclared identifier 'CATD_ERR' > if ((catd = catopen(DataArea, SECOND_PARAMETER)) == > (nl_catd)CATD_ERR) > > ^ > > /Users/rvjansen/apps/oorexx/oorexx-code-0/utilities/rexxc/platform/unix/RexxCompiler.cpp:147:16: > warning: > format string is not a string literal (potentially > insecure) [-Wformat-security] > printf(ptr); >^~~ > 1 warning and 3 errors generated. > make[2]: *** > > [CMakeFiles/rexxc.dir/utilities/rexxc/platform/unix/RexxCompiler.cpp.o] Error > 1 > make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/rexxc.dir/all] Error 2 > > > where last night the compile was clean. > > > best regards, > > > René. > > > > On 22 sep. 2014, at 02:07, Rick McGuire > wrote: > > > > One thing David used to figure out this problem on Linux was > > to build the 4.2.0 version (which uses the old autotools > > build) and compare the generated config.h from that build to > > the one generated by cmake. The bit of code that was messed > > up was the create method in SysSemaphore.cpp., specifically > > the different PTHREAD_* defines. These should still end up > > the same as the autotools generated version from the old > > build. If they don't, then David is the expert on how that > > is generated. > > >
Re: [Oorexx-devel] More square brackets
I want to stick my thumb in the pie on this topic. I think we need to be very careful of how much syntactic sugar we add to the language. Otherwise we might end up being like Perl with eight different ways of coding everything. I like Rexx/ooRexx because the language is consistent and easy to read/debug. The more syntactic sugar you add, the harder it is to read and you end up having to look up things you do not understand or have not encountered thus slowing your productivity. And the idea of double brackets - YUK! Reminds me of Lisp which IMHO is the least user friendly language I have ever encountered. Bottom line, syntactic sugar should only be added when it clearly enhances productivity or makes the code easier to read. David Ashley On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 13:41 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > I think these do need to be bracketed, since the "," is already used > in the IF/WHEN instruction and with DO WHILE/UNTIL for the shortcut > AND conditionals. Square brackets are already used as a message type > (primarily with collection objects), but thankfully, the usage follows > the same rules as builtin functions, so they can be used in both the > message form and paren-like fashion. Doubling up might work, but it > feels somehow "not right" to me. > > > Rick > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Mike Cowlishaw > wrote: > If one didn't want to use up the 'gold' of single > brackets ... > > > first, does one need the brackets at all? I've often thought > as commas in Rexx as being a list notation, in effect, so > perhaps: > > a=1, 2, 3 > > or > > do x over 23, 34, 45 > > Or, to save single-square-brackets one could go > Wikipedia-like: > > a=[[1, 2, 3]] > > etc ... > > Mike > > > -- > Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > -- > Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Brand Code Updated
If you are making changes to the docs/trunk tree then there is a build of most of those documents every night on the Build machine (http://build.oorexx.org/). David Ashley On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 19:41 +0100, Oliver Sims wrote: > Ah, thanks. > > I haven't built any docs before. I just updated the xml files for the > ooDialog Guide (and occasionally the ooDialog Ref), used Tortoise-SVN to > commit them, and someone (Mark?) or something else magically built the docs. > > > If you like, I'll have a go at building these two docs, although I've never > used Publican before, and I'm a bit blank about what "build the docs" > actually means or implies, so I might need a bit of help. > > -- Oliver > > > > > -Original Message- > From: David Ashley [mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com] > Sent: 08 August 2014 17:16 > To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Brand Code Updated > > If you do not have Publican installed on your workstation then you need to > install that first. If you do not build the ooRexx docs then just ignore all > this. > > 1. Use Subversion to check out the docs/trunk/oorexx tree. > 2. cd to the oorexx subdir. > 3. Run the following on Linux > > make > make install > > On Windows run > > nmake > nmake install > > That will update the ooRexx Brand (common code) on your machine. > > David Ashley > > On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 16:27 +0100, Oliver Sims wrote: > > Sorry, I'm a bit lost here. > > - Ref the 'oorexx subdirectory' - do you mean the installed oorexx on my > PC? > > (I wouldn't have thought so.) > > - In any case, I don't appear to have a 'make' command on my PC (I > > thought a make command would come with e.g. a C++ compiler - which I > haven't got). > > > > If I'm hopelessly adrift on this, perhaps I could call you to better > > understand - sometimes a phone call is worth 100 emails. > > > > Many thanks, > > Oliver (a bit lost...) > > > > -- > Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and > search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck > Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code > search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > -- > Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and > search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck > Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code > search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Brand Code Updated
If you do not have Publican installed on your workstation then you need to install that first. If you do not build the ooRexx docs then just ignore all this. 1. Use Subversion to check out the docs/trunk/oorexx tree. 2. cd to the oorexx subdir. 3. Run the following on Linux make make install On Windows run nmake nmake install That will update the ooRexx Brand (common code) on your machine. David Ashley On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 16:27 +0100, Oliver Sims wrote: > Sorry, I'm a bit lost here. > - Ref the 'oorexx subdirectory' - do you mean the installed oorexx on my PC? > (I wouldn't have thought so.) > - In any case, I don't appear to have a 'make' command on my PC (I thought a > make command would come with e.g. a C++ compiler - which I haven't got). > > If I'm hopelessly adrift on this, perhaps I could call you to better > understand - sometimes a phone call is worth 100 emails. > > Many thanks, > Oliver (a bit lost...) -- Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Brand Code Updated
Just cd to the oorexx subdirectory and run make make install On *nix the "make install" will need to be run from the root account. These commands work on both Windows and *nix. David Ashley On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 20:51 +0100, Oliver Sims wrote: > Does this apply to the ooDialog Reference and the ooDialog User Guide? > If so, could you give me a little more detail on what precisely I need to do > please? For example, I'd guess that doing a "make" does not use the same > software as a C++ "make" would - or does it? > > Many thanks, > Oliver > > > > -Original Message- > From: David Ashley [mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com] > Sent: 07 August 2014 14:56 > To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List > Subject: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Brand Code Updated > > All - > > If you are producing the ooRexx docs this is an FYI that the ooRexx Brand > code has been updated. To get the latest brand code do an svn check out of > the docs/trunk/oorexx subdirectory. Next you need to "make" > the code and then install it. > > If you do not perform this update then you will be missing some new text and > images in the Notices appendix. But it will not break you docs. > > David Ashley > > > > -- > Infragistics Professional > Build stunning WinForms apps today! > Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. > Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > -- > Infragistics Professional > Build stunning WinForms apps today! > Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. > Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Brand Code Updated
All - If you are producing the ooRexx docs this is an FYI that the ooRexx Brand code has been updated. To get the latest brand code do an svn check out of the docs/trunk/oorexx subdirectory. Next you need to "make" the code and then install it. If you do not perform this update then you will be missing some new text and images in the Notices appendix. But it will not break you docs. David Ashley -- Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Syntax Diagrams in Rexxref
I built a new rexxref.pdf and this time I used the SVG version of the diagrams instead of the PNG versions. I also changed the color to gray. I must say the diagrams look much sharper and they also do not leap out at you as much. Again, only the built in functions have been converted so far. The new pdf is at http://build.oorexx.org/builds/release-candidates/ Please let me know what you think. David Ashley -- Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Rexxref Syntax Diagrams
Actually, the text scaling issue is more due to the sizing of the images in the xml. The xlm text is scaling the images to 50%. If I do not specify the scale factor it uses 100% which causes a loss of precision in the text and lines and images that run off the right side of the page in the pdf. 50% seemed like a good compromise but reducing it further might make the text and lines look better in the pdf but might cause problems in the html rendering. We might have to experiment to see what is better. David Ashley On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 15:15 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > Ok, that makes me feel better. I was getting the sense this was some > sort of black-box website. I think we need to play around with the > colors a bit, and I if docbook supports this now, I'd also like to see > the svg version. I found the text in the trial version did not scale > particularly well...perhaps the svg version might be a little better > behaved. I guess it really depends on how stuff ends up getting > stored in the .pdf. > > > Rick > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:09 PM, David Ashley > wrote: > The syntax files can be either .svg or .png (I chose .png for > the > rexxref example). This web site is used by many open source > project to > produce their syntax diagrams and is itself an open source > project. The > Jason project uses this for all their syntax diagrams. There > are a > number of others that use it as well. > > We could always bring up our own version of the web site if > needed. > > David Ashley > > On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 14:54 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > > What form are the diagrams in? I'm a little nervous about > being > > dependent upon the website vs. having a a build tool that we > can just > > use directly. If this actually spit out some form of > markup, then > > we'd still have a manual option if the website went away. > > > > > > Rick > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 2:42 PM, David Ashley > > wrote: > > The color is completely customizable. The font is > not. > > > > Basically you feed the ebnf you want into the web > site and out > > pops the > > diagram(s). I created a single file of all the BIFs > and fed it > > into the > > web site, taking all the defaults for color. You > then download > > the > > diagram(s) and use them as you please. Maintenance > should be > > pretty > > easy. > > > > David Ashley > > > > On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 13:46 -0400, Rick McGuire > wrote: > > > I can't say I'm crazy about the appearance...the > yellow > > color is a > > > little jarring and the text is a bit difficult to > read > > against that > > > background color. Can any of that be customized? > > > > > > > > > How will the source need to be maintained to use > this and > > how does it > > > get updated? Will this be something like what we > had with > > the > > > inheritance diagrams where we had to update an > image file > > any time > > > something changed, or is this kept as some sort of > markup? > > > > > > > > > Rick > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 1:38 PM, David Ashley > > > wrote: > > > I build a test copy of rexxref.pdf so you > can see > > how the new > > > railroad > > > syntax diagrams look. The builtin function > chapter > > is the only > > > one I > > > have worked on up to this point. The pdf > is > > available from > > > >
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Rexxref Syntax Diagrams
The syntax files can be either .svg or .png (I chose .png for the rexxref example). This web site is used by many open source project to produce their syntax diagrams and is itself an open source project. The Jason project uses this for all their syntax diagrams. There are a number of others that use it as well. We could always bring up our own version of the web site if needed. David Ashley On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 14:54 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > What form are the diagrams in? I'm a little nervous about being > dependent upon the website vs. having a a build tool that we can just > use directly. If this actually spit out some form of markup, then > we'd still have a manual option if the website went away. > > > Rick > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 2:42 PM, David Ashley > wrote: > The color is completely customizable. The font is not. > > Basically you feed the ebnf you want into the web site and out > pops the > diagram(s). I created a single file of all the BIFs and fed it > into the > web site, taking all the defaults for color. You then download > the > diagram(s) and use them as you please. Maintenance should be > pretty > easy. > > David Ashley > > On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 13:46 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > > I can't say I'm crazy about the appearance...the yellow > color is a > > little jarring and the text is a bit difficult to read > against that > > background color. Can any of that be customized? > > > > > > How will the source need to be maintained to use this and > how does it > > get updated? Will this be something like what we had with > the > > inheritance diagrams where we had to update an image file > any time > > something changed, or is this kept as some sort of markup? > > > > > > Rick > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 1:38 PM, David Ashley > > wrote: > > I build a test copy of rexxref.pdf so you can see > how the new > > railroad > > syntax diagrams look. The builtin function chapter > is the only > > one I > > have worked on up to this point. The pdf is > available from > > http://build.oorexx.org/builds/release-candidates/ > > > > Please let me know what you think. > > > > David Ashley > > > > > > > > -- > > Infragistics Professional > > Build stunning WinForms apps today! > > Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms > controls. > > Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > ___ > > Oorexx-devel mailing list > > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > > > > > -- > > Infragistics Professional > > Build stunning WinForms apps today! > > Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms > controls. > > Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > ___ > > Oorexx-devel mailing list > > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > > -- > Infragistics Professional > Build stunning WinForms apps today! > Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. > Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > __
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Rexxref Syntax Diagrams
The color is completely customizable. The font is not. Basically you feed the ebnf you want into the web site and out pops the diagram(s). I created a single file of all the BIFs and fed it into the web site, taking all the defaults for color. You then download the diagram(s) and use them as you please. Maintenance should be pretty easy. David Ashley On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 13:46 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > I can't say I'm crazy about the appearance...the yellow color is a > little jarring and the text is a bit difficult to read against that > background color. Can any of that be customized? > > > How will the source need to be maintained to use this and how does it > get updated? Will this be something like what we had with the > inheritance diagrams where we had to update an image file any time > something changed, or is this kept as some sort of markup? > > > Rick > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 1:38 PM, David Ashley > wrote: > I build a test copy of rexxref.pdf so you can see how the new > railroad > syntax diagrams look. The builtin function chapter is the only > one I > have worked on up to this point. The pdf is available from > http://build.oorexx.org/builds/release-candidates/ > > Please let me know what you think. > > David Ashley > > > > -- > Infragistics Professional > Build stunning WinForms apps today! > Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. > Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > -- > Infragistics Professional > Build stunning WinForms apps today! > Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. > Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Rexxref Syntax Diagrams
I build a test copy of rexxref.pdf so you can see how the new railroad syntax diagrams look. The builtin function chapter is the only one I have worked on up to this point. The pdf is available from http://build.oorexx.org/builds/release-candidates/ Please let me know what you think. David Ashley -- Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Syntax Diagrams
funcadd ::= 'rxfuncadd(' name ',' module ( ',' procedure )? ')'
rxfuncdrop ::= 'rxfuncdrop(' name ')'
rxfuncquery ::= 'rxfuncquery(' name ')'
rxqueue ::= 'rxqueue(' ( 'Create' ( ',' queuename )? |
'Delete' ',' queuename |
'Get' |
'Set' ',' newqueuename ) ')'
setlocal ::= 'setlocal()'
sign ::= 'sign(' number ')'
sourceline ::= 'sourceline(' ( number )? ')'
space ::= 'space(' string ( ',' ( n )? ( ',' pad )? )? ')'
stream ::= 'stream(' name ( ',' ( 'State' |
command ',' stream_command |
'Description' ) )? ')'
stream_command ::= ( ( 'Open' ( 'Both' write_options | 'Read' | 'Write'
write_options | ( ) ) options ) |
( 'Close' ) |
( 'Flush' ) |
( ( 'Seek' | 'Position' ) ( '=' | '<' | '+' | ';' |
() ) offset ( 'Read' | 'Write' | ) ( 'Char' | 'Line') ) |
( 'Query' ( 'Datetime' |
'Exists' |
'Handle' |
( 'Seek' | 'Position' ) ( ('Read' |
'Write' ) ( 'Char' |
'Line' |
( ) ) |
'Sys' ) ) ) |
( 'Size' ) |
( 'Streamtype' ) |
( 'Timestamp' )
) ')'
stream_write_options ::= ( () | 'Append' | 'Replace' )
stream_options ::= ( ( ) | 'Shared' | 'Shareread' | 'Sharewrite' )
( 'Nobuffer' | 'Binary' ( 'Reclength' length )? )+
strip ::= 'strip(' string ( ',' ( option ( ',' chars )? )? )? ')'
substr ::= 'substr(' string ',' n ( ',' ( ( length )? ( ',' pad )? )? )?
')'
subword ::= 'subword(' string ',' n ( ',' length )? ')'
symbol ::= 'symbol(' name ')'
time ::= 'time(' ( option ( ',' ( string )? ( ',' option2 )? )?)? ')'
trace ::= 'trace(' ( option )? ')'
translate ::= 'translate(' string ( ',' ( tableo ( ',' ( tablei ( ','
pad )? )? )? |
pos ( ',' length )? ) )? ')'
trunc ::= 'trunc(' number ( ',' n )? ')'
upper ::= 'upper(' string ( ',' ( n ( ',' length )? )? )? ')'
userid ::= 'userid()'
value ::= 'value(' name ( ',' ( newvalue )? ( ',' selector )? )? ')'
var ::= 'var(' name ')'
verify ::= 'verify{' string ',' reference ( ',' ( option )?
( ',' ( start )? ( ',' length )? )? )? ')'
word ::= 'word(' string ',' n ')'
wordindex ::= 'wordindex(' string ',' n ')'
wordlength ::= 'wordlength(' string ',' n ')'
wordpos ::= 'wordpos(' phrase ',' string ( ',' start )? ')'
words ::= 'words(' string ')'
x2b ::= 'x2b(' hexstring ')'
x2c ::= 'x2c(' hexstring ')'
x2d ::= 'x2d(' hexstring ')'
xrange ::= 'xrange(' start ( ',' end )? ')'
Please let me know what you think.
David Ashley
--
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms apps today!
Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls.
Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] New s390x VMs for Building ooRexx
All - Dave Jones of V/Soft Software has been kind enough to provide us with s390 Virtual Machines to build ooRexx under Red Hat 7.0 and SLES 11.3. The builds are done daily at night and are available on the ooRexx Build Machine (http://build.oorexx.org/). Many thanks to Dave for the work done to set up each of these VMs to our requirements. The builds are now automated and should appear on the Build Machine on a daily basis going forward. David Ashley ooRexx Project Team -- Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Numbering for the next feature release...
I was wondering when you were going to suggest that. I have no problem with it as it is a major rewrite of the code and eventually som e major new features will be worked into it. David Ashley On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 16:03 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > I've been working on a fairly major code restructuring and cleanup > over the last couple of weeks. This will make it easier to implement > some new features, and hopefully, will make it easier to maintain > release-to-release compatibility of the rexxc compiled images. > > > Because this update is going to be another compiled program > compatibility break, I'm starting to think it might be time to bump > the version number up to 5.0. > > > Rick > -- > Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and > search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck > Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code > search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] pSeries Access for ooRexx from IBM
It does not really matter. David Ashley On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 16:38 -0400, Chip Davis wrote: > I misunderstood. > > I gather you don't really need z/OS (or z/VM) as much as a RedHat > z/Linux LPAR. I don't know if they are running Linux on the bare > metal or if it's a guest under Z/VM, but I'll check. Does it matter? > > -Chip- > > On 7/9/2014 3:57 PM David Ashley said: > > Actually, to start with, we would only need an LPAR that has RHEL > > installed on it. Marist College already supplies us with an LPAR for > > SLES on zSeries. > > > > David Ashley > > > > On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 13:30 -0400, Chip Davis wrote: > >> Depending on the level of z/OS or z/VM access required (probably not > >> sysprog) I may have a possibility with an academic institution. Let > >> me know if I should pursue. > >> > >> -Chip- > >> > >> On 7/9/2014 10:31 AM David Ashley said: > >>> The group I am working with does not provide zSeries resources. I am > >>> looking into other possibilities at IBM for zSeries resources. > >>> > >>> David Ashley > >>> > >>> On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 16:23 +0200, René Jansen wrote: > >>>> Hi David, > >>>> > >>>> I think this would be a good addition to the range, and when provided > >>>> with access I would certainly use it. I hope the limited access aspect > >>>> does not add overhead to the build process. > >>>> > >>>> Would it be possible to get a similar deal for Z (z/OS, z/Linux?) access? > >>>> > >>>> best regards, > >>>> > >>>> René Jansen. > >>>> > >>>> On 9 jul. 2014, at 16:00, David Ashley wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> All - > >>>>> > >>>>> I have been in discussions with IBM about providing two Linux pSeries > >>>>> VMs for the ooRexx project through their PartnerWorld program. One VM > >>>>> would run RHEL 7.0 and the other SLES 11.3. I have not gone public with > >>>>> these discussions until now because I figured that it would probably not > >>>>> work out. But now we have come to a point where I need feedback from the > >>>>> project team because it looks like we really can get access to these > >>>>> VMs. > >>>>> > >>>>> The sticky point is that the access would be a limited time access but > >>>>> with the possibility of subsequently renewing that access multiple > >>>>> times. That means that when the access runs out we could reactivate it > >>>>> when we needed it again in the future for the same period. > >>>>> > >>>>> I think that this arrangement would be acceptable but I want > >>>>> confirmation from the team before I proceed. We can get a 30 day access > >>>>> period with no trouble at all. Longer periods, up to 180 days, will be > >>>>> more work (mostly on IBM's part) but is still doable. > >>>>> > >>>>> This access would allow us to be able to break into the pSeries market > >>>>> with no monetary outlay. We could do periodic builds and testing on > >>>>> these VMs with very little work on our part. > >>>>> > >>>>> So what does everyone think about this? > >>>>> > >>>>> David Ashley > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > >>>>> Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community > >>>>> Edition > >>>>> Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > >>>>> Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > >>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > >>>>> ___ > >>>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list > >>>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Open source business process management suite b
Re: [Oorexx-devel] pSeries Access for ooRexx from IBM
Actually, to start with, we would only need an LPAR that has RHEL installed on it. Marist College already supplies us with an LPAR for SLES on zSeries. David Ashley On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 13:30 -0400, Chip Davis wrote: > Depending on the level of z/OS or z/VM access required (probably not > sysprog) I may have a possibility with an academic institution. Let > me know if I should pursue. > > -Chip- > > On 7/9/2014 10:31 AM David Ashley said: > > The group I am working with does not provide zSeries resources. I am > > looking into other possibilities at IBM for zSeries resources. > > > > David Ashley > > > > On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 16:23 +0200, René Jansen wrote: > >> Hi David, > >> > >> I think this would be a good addition to the range, and when provided with > >> access I would certainly use it. I hope the limited access aspect does not > >> add overhead to the build process. > >> > >> Would it be possible to get a similar deal for Z (z/OS, z/Linux?) access? > >> > >> best regards, > >> > >> René Jansen. > >> > >> On 9 jul. 2014, at 16:00, David Ashley wrote: > >> > >>> All - > >>> > >>> I have been in discussions with IBM about providing two Linux pSeries > >>> VMs for the ooRexx project through their PartnerWorld program. One VM > >>> would run RHEL 7.0 and the other SLES 11.3. I have not gone public with > >>> these discussions until now because I figured that it would probably not > >>> work out. But now we have come to a point where I need feedback from the > >>> project team because it looks like we really can get access to these > >>> VMs. > >>> > >>> The sticky point is that the access would be a limited time access but > >>> with the possibility of subsequently renewing that access multiple > >>> times. That means that when the access runs out we could reactivate it > >>> when we needed it again in the future for the same period. > >>> > >>> I think that this arrangement would be acceptable but I want > >>> confirmation from the team before I proceed. We can get a 30 day access > >>> period with no trouble at all. Longer periods, up to 180 days, will be > >>> more work (mostly on IBM's part) but is still doable. > >>> > >>> This access would allow us to be able to break into the pSeries market > >>> with no monetary outlay. We could do periodic builds and testing on > >>> these VMs with very little work on our part. > >>> > >>> So what does everyone think about this? > >>> > >>> David Ashley > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > >>> Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community > >>> Edition > >>> Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > >>> Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > >>> ___ > >>> Oorexx-devel mailing list > >>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > >> Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition > >> Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > >> Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > >> ___ > >> Oorexx-devel mailing list > >> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > > > > > -- > > Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > > Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition > > Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > > Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > > ___ > > Oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] MacOSX support
We are pretty loose about repository access. But there are some rules you should know about. 1. Once a set of files has been copied to a release subdirectory please do not modify those files. 2. the trunk and branches are always available for updates. 3. Stay out of other peoples sandbox subdirectories unless you have arranged otherwise with the sandbox owner. 4. If a file is strictly for a specific platform then we like to put those in a subdirectory like platform/unix for example. I thnk most of the Mac stuff has usually been merged into the unix files but if something is specific to only the Mac then by all meas create a platform/mac (or other name) subdirectory to hold it. Right now I handle most of the *nix development. Mark handles a lot of the Windows stuff (especially ooDialog), and Rick does most of the platform independent work. But there are exceptions so ask if you are not sure about features you want to work on. Rick and Mark may have other comments on this. David Ashley On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 16:40 +0200, René Jansen wrote: > As discussed during the symposium I would like to volunteer for supporting > ooRexx on OSX - as I obviously see that as an important platform to add to > the officially supported list. > > I would like to know which the rules are that I would have to abide with and > which parts of the repository would be off limits. Of course, being familiar > with development in larger groups, we do not have to state the obvious. I > would like to know the rules for platform support - as I remember from the > beginnings of ooRexx, we would like to support capabilities and not just do > #ifdefs. I am fine with that. I would think it is important to: > > 1) Have a build for the most recent MacOSX available at all times > 2) Test upcoming releases > 3) Make sure platform specific functionality works > > I expect to be able to put some time into that (I regularly build ooRexx for > own purposes, and have provided installers for past releases). > The switch to cmake seems a good moment in time to reinvest some effort into > building the interpreter and installers, and make sure the MacOSX package is > not seen as incomplete in comparison to other platforms. > > Please let me know your opinions and let's see if we can make this work. > > best regards, > > René Jansen. > -- > Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition > Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] pSeries Access for ooRexx from IBM
The group I am working with does not provide zSeries resources. I am looking into other possibilities at IBM for zSeries resources. David Ashley On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 16:23 +0200, René Jansen wrote: > Hi David, > > I think this would be a good addition to the range, and when provided with > access I would certainly use it. I hope the limited access aspect does not > add overhead to the build process. > > Would it be possible to get a similar deal for Z (z/OS, z/Linux?) access? > > best regards, > > René Jansen. > > On 9 jul. 2014, at 16:00, David Ashley wrote: > > > All - > > > > I have been in discussions with IBM about providing two Linux pSeries > > VMs for the ooRexx project through their PartnerWorld program. One VM > > would run RHEL 7.0 and the other SLES 11.3. I have not gone public with > > these discussions until now because I figured that it would probably not > > work out. But now we have come to a point where I need feedback from the > > project team because it looks like we really can get access to these > > VMs. > > > > The sticky point is that the access would be a limited time access but > > with the possibility of subsequently renewing that access multiple > > times. That means that when the access runs out we could reactivate it > > when we needed it again in the future for the same period. > > > > I think that this arrangement would be acceptable but I want > > confirmation from the team before I proceed. We can get a 30 day access > > period with no trouble at all. Longer periods, up to 180 days, will be > > more work (mostly on IBM's part) but is still doable. > > > > This access would allow us to be able to break into the pSeries market > > with no monetary outlay. We could do periodic builds and testing on > > these VMs with very little work on our part. > > > > So what does everyone think about this? > > > > David Ashley > > > > > > -- > > Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > > Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition > > Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > > Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > > ___ > > Oorexx-devel mailing list > > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > -- > Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition > Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] pSeries Access for ooRexx from IBM
All - I have been in discussions with IBM about providing two Linux pSeries VMs for the ooRexx project through their PartnerWorld program. One VM would run RHEL 7.0 and the other SLES 11.3. I have not gone public with these discussions until now because I figured that it would probably not work out. But now we have come to a point where I need feedback from the project team because it looks like we really can get access to these VMs. The sticky point is that the access would be a limited time access but with the possibility of subsequently renewing that access multiple times. That means that when the access runs out we could reactivate it when we needed it again in the future for the same period. I think that this arrangement would be acceptable but I want confirmation from the team before I proceed. We can get a 30 day access period with no trouble at all. Longer periods, up to 180 days, will be more work (mostly on IBM's part) but is still doable. This access would allow us to be able to break into the pSeries market with no monetary outlay. We could do periodic builds and testing on these VMs with very little work on our part. So what does everyone think about this? David Ashley -- Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Weird result
Rick - I was doing some work on my laptop which is running a 4.3 build of ooRexx (built with CMake). I found a weird result and wondered if the same think is happening on Windows. Here is the problem. dashley@dhcp-9-41-90-229 ~$ rexxtry.rex REXX-ooRexx_4.3.0(MT)_64-bit 6.04 17 Jun 2014 rexxtry.rex lets you interactively try REXX statements. Each string is executed when you hit Enter. Enter 'call tell' for a description of the features. Go on - try a few...Enter 'exit' to end. say userid() unknown ... rexxtry.rex on Linux exit As you can see the BIF userid() id giving an 'unknown' value instead og the user's name. Is this happening on Windows? David Ashley -- Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Windows Menu Items
I don't currently have access to a Windows machine but I want to add some system menu entries to the RPM and DEB CMake builds for ooRexx. Would someone please list the Windows menu items that get installed for ooRexx? Thanks, David Ashley -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Discuss: Embedding data into an ooRexx program.
You might want to look in the incubator at the texttemplate entry. There is some code I wrote there to do text substitution on text files that might be of use to the ::Data effort. David Ashley -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Discuss: Embedding data into an ooRexx program.
But what if a program needs to include two ::DATA directives in a single package? In this case we would need to determine which one we wanted to work with. David Ashley On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 11:09 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > Not sure what you mean...::Data directives are paired with an end > marker, so > > > ::Data data1 > > > ::enddata > ::Data data2 > > > ::enddata > > > Is perfectly well defined syntax. The end marker does not need to be > uniquely defined for every directive and in generally, the end marker > only needs to be redefined if there is a potential for conflict. I > suspect for a very large percentage of uses, there will be no need to > redefine the end marker at all. It just needs to be possible. > > > Rick > > > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:03 AM, David Ashley > wrote: > We also need a way to determine which ::Data directive we are > working > with should there be multiple directives in the package. > > David Ashley > > > > -- > HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis > Risk Solutions > Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems > Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. > Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data > Exploration > http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > -- > HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions > Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems > Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. > Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration > http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Discuss: Embedding data into an ooRexx program.
We also need a way to determine which ::Data directive we are working with should there be multiple directives in the package. David Ashley -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Suspect executables not getting built correctly ...
Another suggestion. If we have to implement an end-of-data marker we should let the programmer define that marker as a required option on the directive statement. That way the language does not define something that will conflict with the user's data. We make it the responsibility of the programmer to make sure that the marker is unique. David Ashley -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Discuss: Embedding data into an ooRexx program.
Sorry, I was out of pocket most of the weekend so I did not see this until today. I have also wanted/requested this feature for some time. It seems only natural that in an object oriented language that data and program be held together in a single entity (an ooRexx program or class file). One suggestion I have is that when parsed, the end of the data should be either the end of the source file or another directive statement. If you don't do it this way the programmer will always be mis-coding it because all other directives work in this manner. And no other directive has a special END statement/directive. I would be happy if the data was returned as an array of strings. Rick's Other return types would also be useful but are not really necessary to me, but might be to others. There is another feature that would be useful to me for this. It would be nice if there was a substitution mechanism for the data itself i.e. special variables in the data that could be replaced with data specified by the programmer. Perl uses this concept with the "$var" and the old Net.Data product used the "$(var)" sequence. An ooRexx directory class instance could be used as the variable/replacement text. But this is something a user could code as well so maybe we should not put this in. Just thinking out loud here. David Ashley On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 09:42 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > This is something I've been thinking about for some time, and we even > have a couple of RFEs open for something like this (though in > fairness, I opened one of these). On occasion, I find I'd like to > write a program that needs some associated data. Coding the data as a > series of assignment statements is a pain, and if you off-load the > data into an external file, you run the risk of the program and the > data getting separated. It would be nice to be able to include the > data directly in the program. > > > This can be kludged up a bit, in fact one of the samples I just > created uses this technique (see the timezone example, which embeds a > timezone table directly in the file. This works, but it has its > drawbacks. For example, the data in there is still subject to Rexx > comment parsing rules, so there are limits to what you can embed with > this technique. It also fails if you compile the code with rexxc, > since it requires the use of sourceline. > > > What I'm thinking of is a new directive (Something > like ::DATA, ::ASSET, or ::RESOURCE...we can debate the spelling of > the directive name later). When encountered, it will consume all file > lines without parsing until it encounters a terminating delimiter. > This is somewhat equivalent to the CDATA directive in XML. We would > need to define the rules for what that delimiter is. As a first pass, > I'd suggest something like ::ENDDATA (or END, this depends > on what we end up naming the directive. The terminator must appear at > the beginning of a line to be recognized. It might be nice to support > adding a name for matching up and also allowing comments on the line, > so I don't think we want to say something like "the terminator must be > the only thing on the line". > > > Ideally, we should be to embed any text data inside the directive and > the terminator, including Rexx code. To facilitate that, we might > want to be able to specify the terminator name on the opening > directive. > > > For accessing this, right now I envision accessing these a methods of > the .Package class. I'm not particularly in favor of doing this > via .local or special variables. This mechanism is horribly overused > and we run into name conflicts every time we add something to it. > > > One big question is how this data is returned. I can think of at > least 3 options that I'd want: 1) an array of lines, 2) a single > string with linends inserted or 3) a single string with the data all > concatenated together. The last would be handy for storing > base64-encoded binary data. An option on the directive specifying how > this should be handled would be nice...we'd need to decide on a > default. I'd probably vote array of lines currently. > > > Since this would frequently be treated as an embedded file, I think a > class that acts as an in-memory input stream would be a nice addition > here. There are some prototypes of this in the incubator currently, > the work just needs to be completed. > > > Like I said, I've been thinking about this for some time and I'm > constantly running into situations where I want this feature, so it > might be time to start discussing this for real. > > > Rick >
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Fixing up Makefile.am for new samples.
Nope. The file manifest is actually in the rpm spec file and the deb manifest file. The magic happens there. David Ashley On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 05:36 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > Ok, my biggest concern is that two of the samples will be picked up > because they are .rex files, but will be non-functional because they > pick up files they depend upon. > > > Rick > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:07 PM, David Ashley > wrote: > Rick - > > I have to be perfectly honest here. I do not see these updates > as > necessary to the old build. As long as the code is up-to-date, > I am not > fired up to make the to builds match entirely. Especially > since the old > builds will be targeted mostly toward older distributions that > will be > going out of support in the future. > > David Ashley > > On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 18:35 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > > David, > > > > > > Could you take a look at what needs to be done in > Makefile.am for the > > changes to the samples? If I read what it's doing > correctly, it is > > just copying all of the .rex files. However, there are now > a couple > > other files in that directory (a .cls and a .txt) that would > also need > > to be copied. > > > > > > Rick > > > > > -- > > HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis > Risk Solutions > > Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems > > Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. > > Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data > Exploration > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems > > ___ > > Oorexx-devel mailing list > > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > > -- > HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis > Risk Solutions > Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems > Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. > Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data > Exploration > http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > -- > HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions > Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems > Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. > Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration > http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Fixing up Makefile.am for new samples.
Rick - I have to be perfectly honest here. I do not see these updates as necessary to the old build. As long as the code is up-to-date, I am not fired up to make the to builds match entirely. Especially since the old builds will be targeted mostly toward older distributions that will be going out of support in the future. David Ashley On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 18:35 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > David, > > > Could you take a look at what needs to be done in Makefile.am for the > changes to the samples? If I read what it's doing correctly, it is > just copying all of the .rex files. However, there are now a couple > other files in that directory (a .cls and a .txt) that would also need > to be copied. > > > Rick > -- > HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions > Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems > Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. > Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration > http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] CmakeList.txt Errors
Rick - Looks like you made some spelling errors in either the cmake file or the file names for syncronizedConcurrency.rex usetree.rex David Ashley -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Confused at where we are with CMake
I also want to say that I find the CMake system to be very flexible and, after a little education, easy to work with. And highly system independent. When I recommended CMake I had no idea it would work as well as it has for us. David Ashley On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 16:16 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > No, I basically implemented my own version of CPack, leveraging some > of the files produced by the install commands. CMake actually > generates a script that takes care of the hardest parts of the > process, so it turned out to be pretty easy to implement. > > > I'm finding this version to be incredibly flexible. Things like > having the .pdb files get included in the installer if you're building > from a Debug build is just one example. > > > Rick > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Mark Miesfeld > wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Rick McGuire > wrote: > I think it is ready to go, although it probably needs > a round or two of testing to make sure everything > works. Right now, can build either of two ways, the > non-template based version you did (although this > version is probably out of date with respect to the > samples) and the template-based build I was working > on. As far as I know, the template version is > complete. To build, first build via nmake, then issue > "nmake nsis_template_installer" to build it. > > > Okay, that's the piece I missed. I thought it was going to > work by issuing CPack after issuing nmake to build the > binaries. > > > -- > Mark Miesfeld > > > -- > HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis > Risk Solutions > Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems > Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. > Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data > Exploration > http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > -- > HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions > Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems > Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. > Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration > http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status
All - I have converted about 30% of the VMs on the Build Machine to use the new CMake build system we have been working on. Unfortunately. we will not be able to convert much more than that because a lot of the older VMs do not have an up-to-date CMake version and can not build ooRexx successfully. So we will have to maintain the old autotools build for those environments until we phase them out. But all new VMS will be set up to use the CMake build system if at all possible. Also, I have added and removed some of the VMs. RHEL 6.0 - removed, no longer supported by Red Hat RHEL 7.0 - added Mint 17 - added Mint 13 - removed David Ashley -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] A couple of questions about the NSIS script.
Not sure about #1 but for #2 I would always test for 64 bit, but that is just my preference. I don't think it really matters a whole lot. David Ashley On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 16:24 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > Spotted a couple of things about the how the NSIS script is currently > set up: > > > 1) We're setting the variable NODOTVER on the makensis command line, > but I don't see any references to this in the script. Is this still > needed? > > > 2) The makensis command line is setting the variable CPU to either > "x32" or "x64", but the script code is testing for the value > "x86_64". One of these probably has to change...which one? > > > Rick > -- > HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions > Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems > Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. > Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration > http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Future CPU Architecture Decisions
The bottom line is that any library or application that is 32 bit only would not be usable in a 64 bit operating system. Perhaps the most obvious library is the IBM DB2 Rexx libraries. These are 32 bit only (no 64 bit libraries exist) and would not work on a 64 bit OS, no matter what version of ooRexx you would use with it. A replacement library would need to be found. Maybe this is also a good point to address Windows. At this point Microsoft has not announced anything about dropping support for 32 bit libraries/apps. So I think that we can safely assume Microsoft will continue to support 32 bit apps and libraries since the number of 32 bit only apps is still very large. Indeed, IMHO Microsoft may never be able to give up 32 bit support entirely. They are between their OS rock and their user apps hard place. David Ashley On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 18:19 +0100, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers wrote: > Hi David > > > Could you just lay out for us what that would mean in terms of users > still on 32bit machines and also those reliant on extensions like rexx > \sql, rexxCurl etc. > > > thanks, > > > Jon -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
