Re: [Oorexx-devel] Windows Installers

[P.O. Jonsson]

The Windows 8 builds listed are from 20 hrs ago (the ones that I deleted 
manually), with time these messages will be pushed down and eventually go away. 
I do not know of a way to erase these messages on Sourceforge. Since there are 
no additional Win builds uploaded anymore this will heal itself with time. Just 
make a few commits and the problem goes away ;-)

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se



> Am 17.04.2022 um 14:36 schrieb Gilbert Barmwater :
> 
> There is a new Debian build listed on the Summary page but there are still 
> two Windows8 builds listed.  I can confirm that the error message appears and 
> the files are NOT listed on the Files page.
> On 4/17/2022 6:50 AM, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
>> Hello Gil,
>> 
>> This is a bit weird, I think it is just a glitch. On the „Summary“ page of 
>> ooRexx/Sourceforge there are links for Windows 7, 8 etc but it you try to 
>> click on them you get this error message:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> If you go to the files section and browse to oorexx/5.0.0beta you will see 
>> that there are no additional installers there.
>> 
>> What I think happened was that I deleted the additional installers manually 
>> (using FTP) just AFTER a build was triggered and uploaded, so the 
>> information on the summary page became obsolete.
>> 
>> In just about an hour there is another upload scheduled so please have a 
>> look then if the problem goes away, it should really, I have scraped all the 
>> weird places that Jenkins scan for „Artifacts“ to confirm that there are no 
>> additional copies to be uploaded lurking on the controller node (previously 
>> called the Jenkins Master).
>> 
>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
>> P.O. Jonsson
>> oor...@jonases.se 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 16.04.2022 um 20:00 schrieb Gilbert Barmwater >> >:
>>> 
>>> I just noticed a new series of builds have been uploaded and they still 
>>> seem to contain the redundant installers for Windows.  Did the disable not 
>>> work?
>>> 
>>> Gil
>>> On 4/12/2022 11:03 AM, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
 I will disable the uploads of the redundant installers, 8 -> 2 but I do 
 not dare touching the Windows installer, I leave that to you or Erich. As 
 you say it seems to be a hard task.
 
 Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
 P.O. Jonsson
 oor...@jonases.se 
 
 
 
 
> Am 12.04.2022 um 16:39 schrieb Rick McGuire  >:
> 
> Go ahead and take a crack at it, but I seriously doubt it will work. 
> Mike's solution works because he only has to worry about a single 
> executable. In the ooRexx case, we would need to insert this logic into 
> both rexx.exe and rexxhide.exe, and have the logic to handle every single 
> one of the binary artifacts of a release, including multiple dlls and the 
> rexx.img binary image. Not really practical. 
> 
> Rick
> 
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:26 AM P.O. Jonsson  > wrote:
> On the RexxLa  list it was noted that we 
> have 8 different installers for Windows, which is a bit confusing. Since 
> it appears that windows.x86_32.exe and windows.x86_64.exe work on all 
> Windows 7/8/10 platforms I suggest to stop uploading the additional 
> installers built on W7/W8.1/W10 Virtual Machines.
> 
> I still  think we should continue building & testing on those platforms.
> 
> Mike Cowlishaw offered a solution for a single installer for 32/64 bit 
> Windows in that thread
> 
> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
> P.O. Jonsson
> oor...@jonases.se 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
> 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
> 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
> 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Oorexx-devel mailing list
 Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
 
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
 
>>> ___
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>>> 
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
>>> 

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Windows Installers

[P.O. Jonsson]

These are old builds that were still in the upload dir I guess, I forgot to 
delete them. Will fix it tomorrow first thing. Sorry.

FYI We will continue to build on W7/8.1/10, it is just the upload that has been 
disabled. Should you ever need to use a dedicated copy they are available on 
Jenkins for download.

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se




> Am 16.04.2022 um 20:00 schrieb Gilbert Barmwater :
> 
> I just noticed a new series of builds have been uploaded and they still seem 
> to contain the redundant installers for Windows.  Did the disable not work?
> 
> Gil
> 
> On 4/12/2022 11:03 AM, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
>> I will disable the uploads of the redundant installers, 8 -> 2 but I do not 
>> dare touching the Windows installer, I leave that to you or Erich. As you 
>> say it seems to be a hard task.
>> 
>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
>> P.O. Jonsson
>> oor...@jonases.se 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 12.04.2022 um 16:39 schrieb Rick McGuire >> >:
>>> 
>>> Go ahead and take a crack at it, but I seriously doubt it will work. Mike's 
>>> solution works because he only has to worry about a single executable. In 
>>> the ooRexx case, we would need to insert this logic into both rexx.exe and 
>>> rexxhide.exe, and have the logic to handle every single one of the binary 
>>> artifacts of a release, including multiple dlls and the rexx.img binary 
>>> image. Not really practical. 
>>> 
>>> Rick
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:26 AM P.O. Jonsson >> > wrote:
>>> On the RexxLa  list it was noted that we 
>>> have 8 different installers for Windows, which is a bit confusing. Since it 
>>> appears that windows.x86_32.exe and windows.x86_64.exe work on all Windows 
>>> 7/8/10 platforms I suggest to stop uploading the additional installers 
>>> built on W7/W8.1/W10 Virtual Machines.
>>> 
>>> I still  think we should continue building & testing on those platforms.
>>> 
>>> Mike Cowlishaw offered a solution for a single installer for 32/64 bit 
>>> Windows in that thread
>>> 
>>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
>>> P.O. Jonsson
>>> oor...@jonases.se 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>>> 
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>>> 
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> 
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
>> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Windows Installers

[Gilbert Barmwater]

I just noticed a new series of builds have been uploaded and they still 
seem to contain the redundant installers for Windows.  Did the disable 
not work?


Gil

On 4/12/2022 11:03 AM, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
I will disable the uploads of the redundant installers, 8 -> 2 but I 
do not dare touching the Windows installer, I leave that to you or 
Erich. As you say it seems to be a hard task.


Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se





Am 12.04.2022 um 16:39 schrieb Rick McGuire :

Go ahead and take a crack at it, but I seriously doubt it will work. 
Mike's solution works because he only has to worry about a single 
executable. In the ooRexx case, we would need to insert this logic 
into both rexx.exe and rexxhide.exe, and have the logic to handle 
every single one of the binary artifacts of a release, including 
multiple dlls and the rexx.img binary image. Not really practical.


Rick

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:26 AM P.O. Jonsson  wrote:

On the RexxLa  list it was noted
that we have 8 different installers for Windows, which is a bit
confusing. Since it appears that windows.x86_32.exe and
windows.x86_64.exe work on all Windows 7/8/10 platforms I suggest
to stop uploading the additional installers built on W7/W8.1/W10
Virtual Machines.

I still  think we should continue building & testing on those
platforms.

Mike Cowlishaw offered a solution for a single installer for
32/64 bit Windows in that thread

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se




___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel




___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Windows Installers

[Mike Cowlishaw]

Guess I don't follow.  If the installer is currently one of two .exe files
my suggestion should work fine ... the stub would write one or other of
those to disk and then invoke it.  Nothing in those .exes needs to change?
 
Mike


  _  

From: P.O. Jonsson [mailto:oor...@jonases.se] 
Sent: 12 April 2022 16:04
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Windows Installers


I will disable the uploads of the redundant installers, 8 -> 2 but I do not
dare touching the Windows installer, I leave that to you or Erich. As you
say it seems to be a hard task.

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se





Am 12.04.2022 um 16:39 schrieb Rick McGuire :

Go ahead and take a crack at it, but I seriously doubt it will work. Mike's
solution works because he only has to worry about a single executable. In
the ooRexx case, we would need to insert this logic into both rexx.exe and
rexxhide.exe, and have the logic to handle every single one of the binary
artifacts of a release, including multiple dlls and the rexx.img binary
image. Not really practical.  

Rick

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:26 AM P.O. Jonsson  wrote:


On the RexxLa <mailto:rexxla-memb...@groups.io>  list it was noted that we
have 8 different installers for Windows, which is a bit confusing. Since it
appears that windows.x86_32.exe and windows.x86_64.exe work on all Windows
7/8/10 platforms I suggest to stop uploading the additional installers built
on W7/W8.1/W10 Virtual Machines. 

I still  think we should continue building & testing on those platforms.

Mike Cowlishaw offered a solution for a single installer for 32/64 bit
Windows in that thread

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se




___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel


___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel



___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Windows Installers

[P.O. Jonsson]

I will disable the uploads of the redundant installers, 8 -> 2 but I do not 
dare touching the Windows installer, I leave that to you or Erich. As you say 
it seems to be a hard task.

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se




> Am 12.04.2022 um 16:39 schrieb Rick McGuire :
> 
> Go ahead and take a crack at it, but I seriously doubt it will work. Mike's 
> solution works because he only has to worry about a single executable. In the 
> ooRexx case, we would need to insert this logic into both rexx.exe and 
> rexxhide.exe, and have the logic to handle every single one of the binary 
> artifacts of a release, including multiple dlls and the rexx.img binary 
> image. Not really practical. 
> 
> Rick
> 
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:26 AM P.O. Jonsson  > wrote:
> On the RexxLa  list it was noted that we 
> have 8 different installers for Windows, which is a bit confusing. Since it 
> appears that windows.x86_32.exe and windows.x86_64.exe work on all Windows 
> 7/8/10 platforms I suggest to stop uploading the additional installers built 
> on W7/W8.1/W10 Virtual Machines.
> 
> I still  think we should continue building & testing on those platforms.
> 
> Mike Cowlishaw offered a solution for a single installer for 32/64 bit 
> Windows in that thread
> 
> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
> P.O. Jonsson
> oor...@jonases.se 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel