Re: [osol-discuss] local standalone install..
Hi Sriram, I am not sure of the Opensolaris sparc DVD image roadmap. I am adding the osol-discuss alias so that you get a better response. Regards, Krishnan On 07/22/09 09:17, Sriram Sitaraman wrote: is there a plan to create a DVD image. seems like a lot of work to set up a single node. Sriram -Original Message- From: krishnan.parthasara...@sun.com [mailto:krishnan.parthasara...@sun.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 2:24 AM To: Sriram Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] local standalone install.. Hi Sriram, There is no Install DVD/CD for installing OpenSolaris on sparc as yet. The only way you can install it is by using Automated Installer. See http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/dev/AIinstall/initial.html for more information. Hope this helps, Krishnan On 07/21/09 01:12, Sriram wrote: hi I have a sparc box - which I would like to install openSolaris. This is a sun blade 1000. I don't want to do a network install / jumpstart etc.. I tried reading on where/how to get a local Install DVD for OpenSolaris 11 for Sparc - but no luck. any help is appriciated. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Bacula build
Hi, Check if you have in addition SUNWmysql installed, configure will use /usr/sfw/bin/mysql_config from this package to figure out where are include and lib files, then try with: ./configure --with-mysql=/usr/sfw/ Regards, -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Applications menu doesn't update
Rino Mardo wrote: normal behaviour? um, i've used gnome before with other nixes, most notably linux, and it doesn't behave like that. adding menu items shouldn't require to kill the gnome-panel process. it should just appear right away. could this be a bug then? Rino, Definitely a bug, gnome-panel should not require restarting for menu items to appear in it's menus. Can you log another bug in d.o.o. giving exact instructions of what you did, version of OpenSolaris you were at etc. cheers Matt ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] HAL fails to start after upgrade to 118
Hi, After enabling core dumps as you suggested and running /usr/lib/hal/hald --daemon=no --verbose=yes I got a core dump from hald. I have attached the output of the above command in hal-log.txt. I have also attached the output of pflags and pstack on the core file. Does that help? Thanks, Matt -- This message posted from opensolaris.org08:23:19.608 [I] hald.c:472: hal 0.5.8 08:23:19.609 [I] hald.c:537: Will not daemonize 08:23:19.611 [I] hald_dbus.c:4333: local server is listening at unix:path=/var/run/hald/dbus-pvJnfBGqHq,guid=62af6cd9e586e2d74ce410764a66be67 Runner started - allowed paths are '/usr/lib/hal:/usr/lib/hal:/usr/bin' 08:23:19.621 [I] hald_runner.c:220: Runner has pid 2515 (process:2514): GLib-WARNING **: giounix.c:405Error while getting flags for FD: Error 0 (0) 08:23:19.632 [I] devinfo.c:69: add_subtree: i86pc 08:23:19.633 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/local 08:23:19.634 [I] devinfo.c:69: add_subtree: scsi_vhci 08:23:19.634 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/scsi_vhci_0 08:23:19.634 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0_0 08:23:19.634 [I] devinfo.c:69: add_subtree: pci1043,815a 08:23:19.634 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/pci1043_815a__1 08:23:19.634 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/isa_1_1 08:23:19.634 [I] devinfo.c:69: add_subtree: asy 08:23:19.634 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/isa_1/asy_1_3f8_1 08:23:19.634 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/isa_1/lp_1_378_1 08:23:19.634 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/isa_1/i8042_1_60_1 08:23:19.634 [I] devinfo.c:69: add_subtree: mouse 08:23:19.635 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/isa_1/i8042_1_60/mouse_1_1_logicaldev_input 08:23:19.635 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/isa_1/none__1 08:23:19.635 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/isa_1/joyst__1 08:23:19.635 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/isa_1/motherboard__1 08:23:19.635 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/isa_1/pit_beep_1 08:23:19.635 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/pci1043_815a__1 08:23:19.635 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/pci1043_815a_2_0 08:23:19.635 [I] devinfo.c:69: add_subtree: printer 08:23:19.636 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/pci1043_815a_2/printer_1_printer_1 08:23:19.658 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/pci1043_815a_2/device_2_2 08:23:19.658 [I] devinfo.c:69: add_subtree: keyboard 08:23:19.661 [D] devinfo_usb.c:565: devlink /dev/usb/hid0, minor_name keyboard 08:23:19.662 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/pci1043_815a_2/device_2/keyboard_0_if0_2_logicaldev_input 08:23:19.665 [D] devinfo_usb.c:565: devlink /dev/usb/hid3, minor_name hid_1_128 08:23:19.665 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/pci1043_815a_2/device_2/input_1_if1_3 08:23:19.665 [I] devinfo.c:170: add_node: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_0_0/pci1043_815a_2_1_0 08:23:19.665 [I] devinfo.c:69: add_subtree: storage core 'hald-2496' of 2496: /usr/lib/hal/hald --daemon=no --verbose=yes data model = _ILP32 flags = MSACCT|MSFORK /1:flags = 0 sigmask = 0xbefc,0x cursig = SIGSEGV /2:flags = DETACH|STOPPED door(0x0,0x0,0x0,0xfeb4ee00,0xf5f00,0xa) why = PR_SUSPENDED /3:flags = STOPPED lwp_park(0x0,0x0,0x0) why = PR_SUSPENDED core 'hald-2496' of 2496: /usr/lib/hal/hald --daemon=no --verbose=yes - lwp# 1 / thread# 1 fee9ec34 strstr (0, 8080424, 81c3b20, feee44a2) + 2c 08072dce get_dev_link_path (81926e8, 80984cc, 0, 804752c, 8047524, 8047528) + 10e 08073366 devinfo_usb_scsa2usb_add (81b81c0, 81926e8, 6, 807264f) + 4a 080727e3 devinfo_usb_add (81b8140, 81926e8, 81c2748, 0) + 61b 0806d965 devinfo_add_node (81b8140, 81926e8, 45, 8076934) + 5d 0806d717 devinfo_add_subtree (81b8140, 81926e8, 0, 8076934) + 47 0806d73c devinfo_add_subtree (81b7d00, 818cca0, 0, 8076934) + 6c 0806d73c devinfo_add_subtree (81b7c60, 818c000, 0, 8076934) + 6c 0806d73c devinfo_add_subtree (0, 818b058, 1, 66766564) + 6c 0806d68c devinfo_add (0, 8098518, 8047ad8, 8073a5c) + 8c 08073a8a osspec_probe (fefa001f, fef90a30, 80563cf, 0, 7273752f, 6962732f) + 12 0806168e main (3, 8047d48, 8047d58, 8047d3c) + 502 0805b9ad _start (3, 8047e00, 8047e12, 8047e1e, 0, 8047e2c) + 7d - lwp# 2 / thread# 2 feef20c1 __door_return (0, 0, 0, 0) + 21 feed8e17 door_create_func (0, fef7f000, feb4efec, feeece1e) + 2f feeece56 _thrp_setup (feca0a00) + 7e feeed0e0 _lwp_start (feca0a00, 0, 0,
Re: [osol-discuss] firefox 3.5 for OpenSolaris, where can i get them?
leon.sha leon@sun.com wrote: Did you LD_LIBRARY_PATH by yourself? Try to unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH and start /usr/bin/firefox again. If I use the firefox from sunfreeware, I do not need to unset the variable and I never needed to do this. If I unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH, /usr/bin/firefox starts, shows a feew non-white information and then segfaults. So it is obviously a bug in the reliminary version of firefox that already has been fixed in 3.5-final. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] some issues with opensolaris as server platform
Hey folks, I try to establish opensolaris as standard OS for my 40+ thumper/thors and experience a couple of weirdnesses, maybe someone can enlighten me in some of the issues :) (?) I use an opensolaris install server and try to manage the post-install issues through a custom pkg lying on a different install source which in general works fine, but as I mentioned there are some issues: After the first reboot the 'new' host comes up with hostname 'opensolaris' this is of cause no good option in a automatic installation environment. It would be nice to have the machine with it's hostname from dhcp after the first reboot. I tried some things, lik stopping nwam and starting 'physical:default' deleting '/etc/nodename' most of the times the host does not come back after reboot at all no login on console either :( So what are the steps to get a hostname via dhcp after reboot ? Also ennoying: booting the latest opensolaris kernel in single-user mode leads me to a root-bash-prompt which does not work, all I get is 'bash: /usr/bin/hostname: no such file or directory' there. Any tricks/hints someone ? This leads straight to the next problem, if there is a small logical 'cluster' for server installation like 'SUNWrecommended' how it is called ? I tried 'entire' and 'storage-server' but also the second has all the gnome/X packets which I don't need (at least not for testing). Also the storage-server cluster has some issues during installation at least with the nfs client pkg. (?) cheers thanks for any hints christoph -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] firefox 3.5 for OpenSolaris, where can i get them?
why are there so many problems with FF 3.5 here? and what is svn117? are we having the same release 2009/06? my installation was all default out of the box. and i didn't uninstall the previous firefox, just changed the symlink. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Applications menu doesn't update
sure. i logged bug number 10194 in d.o.o. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Applications menu doesn't update
Rino Mardo wrote: sure. i logged bug number 10194 in d.o.o. Thanks, I've taken a look and managed to recreate the issue. and I will investigate further. cheers Matt ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] 64 Bit Vista under VirtualBox
Hi, did someone succeed to install a 64 Bit Vista under VB? I did try to do this with 3.0.2 and I get a message that there was a hardware problem. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Is Oracle getting ready to kill OpenSolaris?
OReilly Media just did this parody article making fun of SJV Nichols's Computer World article: Is Oracle getting ready to kill Unbreakable Linux? http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/07/is-oracle-getting-ready-to-kil.html My guess is neither article is really right. Unbreakable Linux can't be killed because it's not an operating system. It's a cheaper (and reportedly better) support contract system for RHEL. OpenSolaris can't be killed because it's basically Solaris Nevada with CDE and the installer and a bunch of other goodies (flash archive, etc.) taken out and a Debian style package management system put in. Red Hat is trapped in a classic pincer attack- like Hannibal defeating the Romans at the battle of Cannae: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cannae with Unbreakable Linux outflanking them on the left and OpenSolaris outflanking them on the right. Should be interesting to see how this turns out. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] local standalone install..
Hi Sriram, There are plans to support this in the future using the text installer. AI is definitely too much work for a single node. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/caiman/TextInstallerProject/ - Keith krishnan parthasarathi - Sun Microsystems - Bangalore India wrote: Hi Sriram, I am not sure of the Opensolaris sparc DVD image roadmap. I am adding the osol-discuss alias so that you get a better response. Regards, Krishnan On 07/22/09 09:17, Sriram Sitaraman wrote: is there a plan to create a DVD image. seems like a lot of work to set up a single node. Sriram -Original Message- From: krishnan.parthasara...@sun.com [mailto:krishnan.parthasara...@sun.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 2:24 AM To: Sriram Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] local standalone install.. Hi Sriram, There is no Install DVD/CD for installing OpenSolaris on sparc as yet. The only way you can install it is by using Automated Installer. See http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/dev/AIinstall/initial.html for more information. Hope this helps, Krishnan On 07/21/09 01:12, Sriram wrote: hi I have a sparc box - which I would like to install openSolaris. This is a sun blade 1000. I don't want to do a network install / jumpstart etc.. I tried reading on where/how to get a local Install DVD for OpenSolaris 11 for Sparc - but no luck. any help is appriciated. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Killer new feature- Midoris in Jaris!!!
OK, the last new killer game-changing application in OpenSolaris was time slider, which made it's debut in 2008.11, well now Jaris (the Japanese Solaris distro) seems to have this new Wine-like tool already set up that makes it VERY easy for clueless new users with no previous UNIX experience to use all of their already purchased, pre-existing Microsoft Windows software inside OpenSolaris. I've added a link below, which I'm hoping points to an English translation of the Japanese documentation done by Google: http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=ensl=jau=http://jaris.jp/support-howto2.htmlei=JQ9nSuOfF4_YsgPLxfXnDgsa=Xoi=translate Is there any chance we can get this Midoris feature included by default in one of the upcoming releases of Sun's official OpenSolaris Indiana distribution (so we all aren't forced to switch from Indiana to Jaris to get this feature pre-installed by default), or is there a licensing issue that prohibits this? Compiling Wine from source and then trying to get everything patched together back in my 2008.05 days was a real pain. I say we take Thunderbird or some other app that's eating space off from the upcoming 2010.02 release and put Midoris on the live CD-ROM so that I can make a live CD demo of TimeSlider + Midoris + CIFS that will impress the heck out of my customers. OpenSolaris as it is right now is just a mere curiosity for a lot of IT people that involves words they don't understand like dtrace and smf. The very first question people in small business IT shops ask when I show them OpenSolaris is will Photoshop or Microsoft Outlook or Quickbooks or ACT! or Crystal Reports or Epicore or Microsoft Word or [insert name of Windows app here] run on OpenSolaris? And when I tell them it probably won't without hours of pain and suffering trying to port some unstable Linux Wine environment over from Linux to Solaris, that usually ends their interest in OpenSolaris and the end result is thousands of dollars in potential Solaris support contracts lost forever to Redmond. Now if I could walk in to Microsoft IT shops and just give them the live CD and tell them to boot it up and tell them that all their Windows apps will work seamlessly without them having to install or compile anything, AND show them what ZFS does, AND get the live OpenSolaris CD to join the Windows work group and share files over CIFS at the click of the button. If we can do all that, then I guarantee you that there will be a massive tectonic shift to OpenSolaris almost overnight (I'm talking exponential growth and exponential increase in revenues for Sun via support contracts). Millions of people are looking for something to switch to instead of Windows Vista, and OpenSolaris could be it! Please don't let this opportunity pass us by! The key to make OpenSolaris successful in small businesses environments is to make it inter-operate with CISCO and Microsoft products better than Linux does. Make OpenSolaris inter-operate with the already established Microsoft IT base of millions of desktop computers hooked up into an Active Directory powered by CISCO routers and switches that exists in many businesses today and there is no way that Red Hat Linux will be able to complete. OpenSolaris will dominate and become the enterprise OS of choice. Computer hardware manufacturers will all embrace OpenSolaris because ZFS performs better with more RAM (and the hard ware manufacturers are looking for an excuse to up sell the customer to a more powerful computer) and Sun and all the people who worked so hard on OpenSolaris will benefit immensely from this new found success. What do you guys think? Midoris in the next version of OpenSolaris? Yes or No? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] 100% CPU usage on an idle system
Please see the attached output from the top command. It reports 100% CPU, even though the listed processes add up to nowhere near that. Although the user and kernel values do change, they always add up to 100%. What could be causing this, or is it lying? Thanks, Matt -- This message posted from opensolaris.orgload averages: 5.46, 4.71, 4.16; up 0+00:32:5418:05:50 117 processes: 108 sleeping, 8 running, 1 on cpu CPU states: 0.0% idle, 59.4% user, 40.6% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap Kernel: 3380 ctxsw, 14257 trap, 992 intr, 26267 syscall, 14 fork, 11571 flt Memory: 2048M phys mem, 123M free mem, 1023M total swap, 1023M free swap PID USERNAME NLWP PRI NICE SIZE RES STATETIMECPU COMMAND 1497 root1 590 131M 94M sleep1:54 5.47% Xorg 1808 matt2 300 70M 9472K run 0:58 3.19% gnome-session 1830 matt1 590 3952K 2528K sleep0:42 2.42% dbus-daemon 2386 matt 11 590 310M 128M sleep4:00 2.25% firefox-bin 10178 matt2 590 90M 20M sleep0:03 1.99% gnome-terminal 1844 matt1 590 13M 6596K sleep0:38 1.92% gconfd-2 1897 matt1 590 98M 31M sleep0:12 1.53% gnome-panel 2025 matt1 12 19 75M 17M run 0:05 1.11% tracker-indexer 19954 matt4 12 19 84M 21M run 0:00 0.96% tracker-extract 1926 matt1 590 85M 19M sleep0:14 0.80% isapython2.4 1879 matt2 590 80M 17M sleep0:12 0.62% gnome-settings- 19431 root1 300 5472K 4104K run 0:00 0.49% isapython2.4 1948 matt1 12 19 101M 43M run 0:21 0.47% trackerd 1925 matt1 590 77M 15M sleep0:06 0.32% gnome-power-man 1934 matt1 590 73M 11M sleep0:03 0.24% tracker-applet 1956 matt2 590 86M 15M sleep0:03 0.21% nwam-manager 2154 matt1 590 12M 5012K sleep0:04 0.21% xscreensaver 2195 matt1 590 88M 20M sleep0:04 0.21% notification-da 10204 matt1 590 4004K 2360K cpu 0:04 0.21% top 20122 root1 400 1752K 464K run 0:00 0.20% zfs 1899 matt1 590 9816K 3052K sleep0:02 0.17% gvfsd 20123 matt1 400 9444K 2660K run 0:00 0.15% vino-server 1894 matt1 590 77M 16M sleep0:04 0.14% metacity 359 daemon 4 590 9260K 2728K sleep0:00 0.13% idmapd 2043 matt2 590 87M 18M sleep0:03 0.11% gnome-netstatus 144 root 38 590 14M 4592K sleep0:01 0.09% nscd 1918 matt2 590 105M 37M sleep0:01 0.07% nautilus 2172 root1 590 2368K 1328K sleep0:01 0.07% gnome-netstatus 1314 root 33 590 54M 47M run 0:06 0.05% java 273 mysql 9 590 54M 20M sleep0:00 0.04% mysqld ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 100% CPU usage on an idle system
Please see the attached output from the top command. It reports 100% CPU, even though the listed processes add up to nowhere near that. Although the user and kernel values do change, they always add up to 100%. What could be causing this, or is it lying? Don't use top. That is for linux kids. Use the correct tool. Run this as root : prstat -c -R -n 20 10 12 Dennis ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 64 Bit Vista under VirtualBox
Hi, did someone succeed to install a 64 Bit Vista under VB? I did try to do this with 3.0.2 and I get a message that there was a hardware problem. My result also. I think we need very very new AMD Opterons to do this. Dennis ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 64 Bit Vista under VirtualBox
Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org wrote: did someone succeed to install a 64 Bit Vista under VB? I did try to do this with 3.0.2 and I get a message that there was a hardware problem. My result also. I think we need very very new AMD Opterons to do this. I did this test on a VT aware Intel Core 2 quad (the two chip version). Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 100% CPU usage on an idle system
prstat reports very similar numbers, although it doesn't tell you the total CPU usage anywhere that I can tell, just per-process. The thing that brought this to my attention in the first place was the gnome system monitor. I should have said first time round that I'm running OpenSolaris snv_117 -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 64 Bit Vista under VirtualBox
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 16:53 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: did someone succeed to install a 64 Bit Vista under VB? I did try to do this with 3.0.2 and I get a message that there was a hardware problem. Not 3.0.2, but VB 2.2.4 is running Vista64 just fine at the moment on b117. This is on an Intel E5405 (Dell Precision 7400). I DID run into some problems getting it installed and occasionally booting will abort (VB's term) for no apparent reason. Trying again usually works. (Pure feel-o-meter observation: it seems to abort more often if I happen to be dragging the window around while Vista is booting...) ACPI, IO APIC, VT-x, and 3D acceleration are enabled. Nested paging and PAE are disabled. I'm using a virtual Intel PRO/1000 ethernet and AC97 audio. Only thing odd about my setup is that I installed onto a vmdk built from a zvol. I was thinking about upgrading to VBox 3, but your comments have me a bit nervous. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] turning off graphical desktop boot screen
Hi, I've got 2009.06 installed and will be using it as an NFS server in a remote data center so I don't need any GUIs or graphics. I'd like to disable the graphical desktop and graphical boot screen (the blue background with the orange progress bar), as well as any other graphical stuff that I don't need. svcadm disable gdm did the trick for shutting off the gnome desktop and X in general, but after reboots I still have a graphical boot screen up and running that only goes away after I push the Esc key. I was looking at GRUB menu.lst and wondering if console= is the right place to change that behavior, but I'm not sure what options I can pass to it or what I should change it to. Here's the line I'm referring to: kernel$ /platform/i86pc/kernel/$ISADIR/unix -B $ZFS-BOOTFS,console=graphics Any ideas or pointers are greatly appreciated. Tom ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 64 Bit Vista under VirtualBox
did someone succeed to install a 64 Bit Vista under VB? I did try to do this with 3.0.2 and I get a message that there was a hardware problem. I'm not sure if this is the same problem, but with 64bit Windows 7 RC I have to make sure the IO APIC is enabled for the virtual guest hardware, otherwise the CD installer crashes with an unexpected error 0xc225. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] turning off graphical desktop boot screen
Tom Georgoulias wrote: Hi, I've got 2009.06 installed and will be using it as an NFS server in a remote data center so I don't need any GUIs or graphics. I'd like to disable the graphical desktop and graphical boot screen (the blue background with the orange progress bar), as well as any other graphical stuff that I don't need. svcadm disable gdm did the trick for shutting off the gnome desktop and X in general, but after reboots I still have a graphical boot screen up and running that only goes away after I push the Esc key. I was looking at GRUB menu.lst and wondering if console= is the right place to change that behavior, but I'm not sure what options I can pass to it or what I should change it to. Here's the line I'm referring to: kernel$ /platform/i86pc/kernel/$ISADIR/unix -B $ZFS-BOOTFS,console=graphics Just remove the console=graphics I believe. Cheers, -- Shawn Walker ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Is `bacula' available in a pkg repository somewhere
Robert Hartzell b...@rwhartzell.net writes: Harry Putnam wrote: Sean s...@ttys0.net writes: We just compile it ourselves. It builds without any issues. It fails here when ./configure is run like this: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/src/test --with-mysql \ --includedir=/usr/mysql/5.1/include/mysql/ [...] checking for MySQL support... no configure: error: Unable to find mysql.h in standard locations The file `mysql.h' is where I told configure to look: ls -l /usr/mysql/5.1/include/mysql/mysql.h -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 33654 ... /usr/mysql/5.1/include/mysql/mysql.h I have never used the --includedir option but LDFLAGS has worked well for me, LDFLAGS=-L/usr/postgres/8.3/lib -R/usr/postgres/8.3/lib export LDFLAGS; ./configure ... just adjust the path for mysql. Setting that like you suggest: LDFLAGS=-L/usr/mysql/5.1/lib -R/usr/mysql/5.1/lib;export LDFLAGS ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/src/test --with-mysql [...] * Seems to make no difference at all... Still ends with the same error: checking for MySQL support... no configure: error: Unable to find mysql.h in standard locations ps- I also tried with includedir set after setting LDFLAGS as above. Same result... same error. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Is `bacula' available in a pkg repository somewhere
Harry Putnam wrote: Robert Hartzell b...@rwhartzell.net writes: Harry Putnam wrote: Sean s...@ttys0.net writes: We just compile it ourselves. It builds without any issues. It fails here when ./configure is run like this: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/src/test --with-mysql \ --includedir=/usr/mysql/5.1/include/mysql/ [...] checking for MySQL support... no configure: error: Unable to find mysql.h in standard locations The file `mysql.h' is where I told configure to look: ls -l /usr/mysql/5.1/include/mysql/mysql.h -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 33654 ... /usr/mysql/5.1/include/mysql/mysql.h I have never used the --includedir option but LDFLAGS has worked well for me, LDFLAGS=-L/usr/postgres/8.3/lib -R/usr/postgres/8.3/lib export LDFLAGS; ./configure ... just adjust the path for mysql. Setting that like you suggest: LDFLAGS=-L/usr/mysql/5.1/lib -R/usr/mysql/5.1/lib;export LDFLAGS ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/src/test --with-mysql [...] * Seems to make no difference at all... Still ends with the same error: checking for MySQL support... no configure: error: Unable to find mysql.h in standard locations ps- I also tried with includedir set after setting LDFLAGS as above. Same result... same error. You may want to try variations on the --includedir...sometimes there's an implicit #include mysql/mysql.h in there... Try walking up the tree to just the /usr/mysql/5.1/ dir? ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] HAL fails to start after upgrade to 118
After enabling core dumps as you suggested and running /usr/lib/hal/hald --daemon=no --verbose=yes I got a core dump from hald. I have attached the output of the above command in hal-log.txt. I have also attached the output of pflags and pstack on the core file. ... fee9ec34 strstr (0, 8080424, 81c3b20, feee44a2) + 2c 08072dce get_dev_link_path (81926e8, 80984cc, 0, 804752c, 8047524, 8047528) + 10e 08073366 devinfo_usb_scsa2usb_add (81b81c0, 81926e8, 6, 807264f) + 4a 080727e3 devinfo_usb_add (81b8140, 81926e8, 81c2748, 0) + 61b Looks like a null pointer dereference segv, apparently when hald is looking at some usb storage device. Do you have any usb storage devices connected? Does hald start without crashing when you unplug those usb storage devices? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Bacula build
evaldas evaldas.aur...@edqm.eu writes: Hi, Check if you have in addition SUNWmysql installed, configure will use /usr/sfw/bin/mysql_config from this package to figure out where are include and lib files, then try with: ./configure --with-mysql=/usr/sfw/ Thanks... but I'm a bit confused here... when I search for that pkg pkg search mysql|grep 'sfw.*SUNWmysql@' It appears there is no version 5.1 only 4.0.24 Am I supposed to have 2 versions installed in different places to get a build of bacula to work? That sounds strange... and likely to cause problems no? Here is what I have installed: SUNWmysql-base (dev) 0.5.11-0.111installed SUNWmysql51 (dev) 5.1.30-0.111installed SUNWmysql51lib (dev) 5.1.30-0.111installed SUNWmysql51test (dev) 5.1.30-0.111installed SUNWphp52-mysql (dev) 5.2.9-0.111 installed ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Killer new feature- Midoris in Jaris!!!
Hmm... hey dude, you might want to check out the downloads section on Wine's project website (http://winehq.org/) and, lo' and behold, is a link to the OpenSolaris package download. I didn't see a development release package, but at least there is something to try. Matt -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 100% CPU usage on an idle system
Please see the attached output from the top command. It reports 100% CPU, even though the listed processes add up to nowhere near that. Although the user and kernel values do change, they always add up to 100%. Load is high; and there are quite a few context switches, system calls and faults. Maybe gnome-session is trying to start some gui process is a loop, but the process is crashing? There also is significant use of system cpu time. Who's consuming the system time? What is reported by a kernel profile? # lockstat -kIW -D 20 sleep 20 -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Bacula build
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes: Check if you have in addition SUNWmysql installed, configure will use /usr/sfw/bin/mysql_config from this package to figure out where are include and lib files, then try with: ./configure --with-mysql=/usr/sfw/ Thanks... but I'm a bit confused here... when I search for that pkg pkg search mysql|grep 'sfw.*SUNWmysql@' It appears there is no version 5.1 only 4.0.24 Am I supposed to have 2 versions installed in different places to get a build of bacula to work? That sounds strange... and likely to cause problems no? I went ahead and installed this package: sunwmy...@4.0.24-0.111 in addition to those already installed: SUNWmysql-base (dev) 0.5.11-0.111installed SUNWmysql51 (dev) 5.1.30-0.111installed SUNWmysql51lib (dev) 5.1.30-0.111installed SUNWmysql51test (dev) 5.1.30-0.111installed SUNWphp52-mysql (dev) 5.2.9-0.111 installed Then running your suggested cmdline (with my own PREFIX) ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/src/test --with-mysql=/usr/sfw/ [...] Still fails looking for mysql.h configure: error: Invalid MySQL directory /usr/sfw/ - unable to find mysql.h under /usr/sfw/ Far as I know mysql.h is not a library.. but an include file. And at any rate is not included in the package you mention: pkg contents SUNWmysql|grep mysql.h$ no hits ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Is `bacula' available in a pkg repository somewhere
Harry Putnam wrote: Robert Hartzell b...@rwhartzell.net writes: Harry Putnam wrote: Sean s...@ttys0.net writes: We just compile it ourselves. It builds without any issues. It fails here when ./configure is run like this: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/src/test --with-mysql \ --includedir=/usr/mysql/5.1/include/mysql/ [...] checking for MySQL support... no configure: error: Unable to find mysql.h in standard locations The file `mysql.h' is where I told configure to look: ls -l /usr/mysql/5.1/include/mysql/mysql.h -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 33654 ... /usr/mysql/5.1/include/mysql/mysql.h I have never used the --includedir option but LDFLAGS has worked well for me, LDFLAGS=-L/usr/postgres/8.3/lib -R/usr/postgres/8.3/lib export LDFLAGS; ./configure ... just adjust the path for mysql. Setting that like you suggest: LDFLAGS=-L/usr/mysql/5.1/lib -R/usr/mysql/5.1/lib;export LDFLAGS ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/src/test --with-mysql change --with-mysql to --with-mysql=/usr/mysql/5.1 should work fine... i just tested on opensolaris build 118 -- Robert W Hartzell bear at rwhartzell.net RwHartzell.Net ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Bacula build
Harry Putnam wrote: Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes: Check if you have in addition SUNWmysql installed, configure will use /usr/sfw/bin/mysql_config from this package to figure out where are include and lib files, then try with: ./configure --with-mysql=/usr/sfw/ Thanks... but I'm a bit confused here... when I search for that pkg pkg search mysql|grep 'sfw.*SUNWmysql@' It appears there is no version 5.1 only 4.0.24 Am I supposed to have 2 versions installed in different places to get a build of bacula to work? That sounds strange... and likely to cause problems no? I went ahead and installed this package: sunwmy...@4.0.24-0.111 in addition to those already installed: The sql statements in bacula 3.0 are not compatible with mysql 4.0.1 so I don't know how far you will get 4.0.24, may work fine but i would use a newer version use --with-mysql=/usr/mysql/5.1 or change the 5.1 to the version of mysql you want to use thats installed on your system -- Robert W Hartzell bear at rwhartzell.net RwHartzell.Net ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Bacula build
evaldas evaldas.aur...@edqm.eu writes: Hi, Check if you have in addition SUNWmysql installed, configure will use /usr/sfw/bin/mysql_config from this package to figure out where are include and lib files, then try with: ./configure --with-mysql=/usr/sfw/ Regards, After tinkering around some more I see what the trouble was. I didn't need the package you suggested... and uninstalled it. What I needed was to tell ./configure in general where to look for mysql stuff: --with-mysql=/usr/mysql/5.1 I'd been using the suggestion in the README that says to `--with-mysql' But that is expecting a linux environment. Once I set the top level to look for mysql... all started working. ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/src/test --with-mysql=/usr/mysql/5.1 Seems to have worked. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Is Oracle getting ready to kill Unbreakable Linux?
I don't think that's a parody article. As far as I can tell, the article is straight, and it makes sense to me. Since Oracle hasn't had much success grabbing market share from Red Hat, why should it put much effort into Unbreakable Linux? That's especially the case now that it owns Solaris: other vendors can adopt improvements Oracle makes to Unbreakable Linux, but not those it makes to Solaris. According to [url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10173701-16.html]this[/url], Unbreakable Linux isn't much of a threat to Red Hat. Not that I'm much of a fan of Red Hat. I switched from Fedora to openSUSE on my laptop at about the same time I switched to OpenSolaris on my main computer. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Is `bacula' available in a pkg repository somewhere
Mark Martin storycraf...@gmail.com writes: ps- I also tried with includedir set after setting LDFLAGS as above. Same result... same error. You may want to try variations on the --includedir...sometimes there's an implicit #include mysql/mysql.h in there... Try walking up the tree to just the /usr/mysql/5.1/ dir? You hit it... but it was more general than includedir. It appears to have wanted the general address of mysql --with-mysql=/usr/mysql/5.1 Seems to have worked. Thanks ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 64 Bit Vista under VirtualBox
Jürgen Keil jrgn.k...@googlemail.com wrote: did someone succeed to install a 64 Bit Vista under VB? I did try to do this with 3.0.2 and I get a message that there was a hardware problem. I'm not sure if this is the same problem, but with 64bit Windows 7 RC I have to make sure the IO APIC is enabled for the virtual guest hardware, otherwise the CD installer crashes with an unexpected error 0xc225. I am no longer at work, but I remember that the error code ended with 25, let me try again tomorrow - thanks. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Is `bacula' available in a pkg repository somewhere
Harry Putnam wrote: Mark Martin storycraf...@gmail.com writes: ps- I also tried with includedir set after setting LDFLAGS as above. Same result... same error. You may want to try variations on the --includedir...sometimes there's an implicit #include mysql/mysql.h in there... Try walking up the tree to just the /usr/mysql/5.1/ dir? You hit it... but it was more general than includedir. It appears to have wanted the general address of mysql --with-mysql=/usr/mysql/5.1 Seems to have worked. Glad to hear it! Would you consider submitting a .spec file for this and getting it in to the /contrib repository for others to benefit from your hard work? http://jucr.opensolaris.org/home/ ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] turning off graphical desktop boot screen
Shawn Walker wrote: Tom Georgoulias wrote: I was looking at GRUB menu.lst and wondering if console= is the right place to change that behavior, but I'm not sure what options I can pass to it or what I should change it to. Here's the line I'm referring to: kernel$ /platform/i86pc/kernel/$ISADIR/unix -B $ZFS-BOOTFS,console=graphics Just remove the console=graphics I believe. Not sure that was the right thing to do, I was left with a blue screen that I couldn't get rid of when accessing through the ilom remote console. :) Tom ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Is `bacula' available in a pkg repository somewhere
Robert Hartzell b...@rwhartzell.net writes: just adjust the path for mysql. Setting that like you suggest: LDFLAGS=-L/usr/mysql/5.1/lib -R/usr/mysql/5.1/lib;export LDFLAGS ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/src/test --with-mysql change --with-mysql to --with-mysql=/usr/mysql/5.1 should work fine... i just tested on opensolaris build 118 For the record and the benefit of anyone else who searches this group about mysql. Yup it does... change --with-mysql to --with-mysql=/usr/mysql/5.1 I got there just ahead of your suggestion but thanks for the help. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] turning off graphical desktop boot screen
Tom Georgoulias wrote: Shawn Walker wrote: Tom Georgoulias wrote: I was looking at GRUB menu.lst and wondering if console= is the right place to change that behavior, but I'm not sure what options I can pass to it or what I should change it to. Here's the line I'm referring to: kernel$ /platform/i86pc/kernel/$ISADIR/unix -B $ZFS-BOOTFS,console=graphics Just remove the console=graphics I believe. Not sure that was the right thing to do, I was left with a blue screen that I couldn't get rid of when accessing through the ilom remote console. :) Sorry, you also have to remove these: splashimage /boot/solaris.xpm foreground d25f00 background 115d93 I've done that on my local box, and it worked fine. Cheers, -- Shawn Walker ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] turning off graphical desktop boot screen
There are probably three lines above that you should also remove: splashimage /boot/solaris.xpm foreground d25f00 background 115d93 -- Alan Tom Georgoulias wrote: Shawn Walker wrote: Tom Georgoulias wrote: I was looking at GRUB menu.lst and wondering if console= is the right place to change that behavior, but I'm not sure what options I can pass to it or what I should change it to. Here's the line I'm referring to: kernel$ /platform/i86pc/kernel/$ISADIR/unix -B $ZFS-BOOTFS,console=graphics Just remove the console=graphics I believe. Not sure that was the right thing to do, I was left with a blue screen that I couldn't get rid of when accessing through the ilom remote console. :) Tom ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Bacula build
Robert Hartzell b...@rwhartzell.net writes: Harry Putnam wrote: Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes: Check if you have in addition SUNWmysql installed, configure will use /usr/sfw/bin/mysql_config from this package to figure out where are include and lib files, then try with: ./configure --with-mysql=/usr/sfw/ Thanks... but I'm a bit confused here... when I search for that pkg pkg search mysql|grep 'sfw.*SUNWmysql@' It appears there is no version 5.1 only 4.0.24 Am I supposed to have 2 versions installed in different places to get a build of bacula to work? That sounds strange... and likely to cause problems no? I went ahead and installed this package: sunwmy...@4.0.24-0.111 in addition to those already installed: The sql statements in bacula 3.0 are not compatible with mysql 4.0.1 so I don't know how far you will get 4.0.24, may work fine but i would use a newer version use --with-mysql=/usr/mysql/5.1 or change the 5.1 to the version of mysql you want to use thats installed on your system Ha.. thanks again for the help and being persistent ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] turning off graphical desktop boot screen
Shawn Walker wrote: Tom Georgoulias wrote: Shawn Walker wrote: Tom Georgoulias wrote: I was looking at GRUB menu.lst and wondering if console= is the right place to change that behavior, but I'm not sure what options I can pass to it or what I should change it to. Here's the line I'm referring to: kernel$ /platform/i86pc/kernel/$ISADIR/unix -B $ZFS-BOOTFS,console=graphics Just remove the console=graphics I believe. Not sure that was the right thing to do, I was left with a blue screen that I couldn't get rid of when accessing through the ilom remote console. :) Sorry, you also have to remove these: splashimage /boot/solaris.xpm foreground d25f00 background 115d93 I've done that on my local box, and it worked fine. That did the trick, thanks. Tom ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Business view.... kill OpenSolaris?
I think you have all got the discussion to technical.This is a straight business case the questions to ansawer at oracle are as follows... Can it make cash? How much? When? Can oracle do it or should someone else do it? If Oracle has not got the ansawers..like Nortels assets someone else needs the chance.The question you should all ask yourself is what would be the zenith? Work towards it..its not ownership but opportunity..technically opensolaris has potential.if the right BUSINESS skills are on board.Yes change is frighting but also exciting!!! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Business view.... kill OpenSolaris?
I think you have all got the discussion too technical.This is a straight business case the questions to ansawer at oracle are as follows... Can it make cash? How much? When? Can oracle do it or should someone else do it? If Oracle has not got the ansawers..like Nortels assets someone else needs the chance.The question you should all ask yourself is what would be the zenith? Work towards it..its not ownership but opportunity..technically opensolaris has potential.if the right BUSINESS skills are on board.Yes change is frighting but also exciting!!! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 100% CPU usage on an idle system
Jürgen Keil wrote: Load is high; and there are quite a few context switches, system calls and faults. Maybe gnome-session is trying to start some gui process is a loop, but the process is crashing? To investigate this possibility, run the following as root (or pfexec etc): dtrace -s /use/demo/dtrace/whoexec.d wait 10 or 20 seconds and Ctrl-C, and you get a summary of who exec'd what during the interval the script ran. Look for suspiciously high numbers; and idle system will have 0 to a few execs in that sort of interval (maybe a cron job but not too much else). Gavin ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 100% CPU usage on an idle system
Gavin Maltby wrote: dtrace -s /use/demo/dtrace/whoexec.d This may work better :) dtrace -s /usr/demo/dtrace/whoexec.d Cheers, Jim -- Jim Walker, http://blogs.sun.com/jwalker Sun Microsystems, Broomfield, Colorado ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] HAL fails to start after upgrade to 118
It's a known issue. You could check CR6850995 for more details. How about first remove your usb storage device, then start up hald daemon, finally reconnect the usb storage device? Thanks, Lin ? 2009?07?22? 20:30, Matthew Stevenson wrote: Hi, After enabling core dumps as you suggested and running /usr/lib/hal/hald --daemon=no --verbose=yes I got a core dump from hald. I have attached the output of the above command in hal-log.txt. I have also attached the output of pflags and pstack on the core file. Does that help? Thanks, Matt ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Cannot create an rpool mirror - shouldn't be this hard! [resolved]
This is an old issue of mine but I figured I'd post the resolution. This is a bug in the Areca Firmware. They have yet to publish a new version on their site (as of 7-22-2009), but support may be able to get it to you. Mine has the version of 1.47. I had to send the drives it wasn't working with to Taiwan but they figured it out. -Nick -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Killer new feature- Midoris in Jaris!!!
Matthew Nawrocki wrote: Hmm... hey dude, you might want to check out the downloads section on Wine's project website (http://winehq.org/) and, lo' and behold, is a link to the OpenSolaris package download. I didn't see a development release package, but at least there is something to try. Matt Unfortunately, the winehq has the link broken, it should be: http://www.sunfreepacks.com/listing/?limit=10offset=20 I can confirm that wine version works for me. Paul ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Printing process variable
Hi All, Just want to know is there any way I can print variables used inside a function using dtrace ? Thanks Akhil -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] svc:/system/cryptosvc:default
i use opensoalris #svcs #mantenance Jul_21 svc:/system/cryptosvc:default #svcs -xv svc:/system/cryptosvc:default cat the log find [ Jul 20 07:54:56 Enabled. ] [ Jul 20 07:54:57 Executing start method (/sbin/cryptoadm start). ] cryptoadm: failed to open /dev/cryptoadm: No such file or directory [ Jul 20 07:54:57 Method start exited with status 1. ] and then #svcadm clear svc:/system/cryptosvc:default the server is online but reboot soalris have same problem why... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Killer new feature- Midoris in Jaris!!!
I see wine package in contrib rep: http://pkg.opensolaris.org/contrib/info/0/wine%401.0.1%2C5.11-0.101%3A20081209T223210Z But I have 2 questions: 1) Why is it so big (111 Mb against ~ 10 Mb of Ubuntu deb package) 2) Why does it depend on ent...@0.5.11-0.101? Does it mean that I can't use it on /dev branch of OpenSolaris? Unfortunately, the winehq has the link broken, it should be: http://www.sunfreepacks.com/listing/?limit=10offset=2 0 I can confirm that wine version works for me. Paul ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
