I don't think that's a parody article. As far as I can tell, the article is straight, and it makes sense to me. Since Oracle hasn't had much success grabbing market share from Red Hat, why should it put much effort into Unbreakable Linux? That's especially the case now that it owns Solaris: other vendors can adopt improvements Oracle makes to Unbreakable Linux, but not those it makes to Solaris.
According to [url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10173701-16.html]this[/url], Unbreakable Linux isn't much of a threat to Red Hat. Not that I'm much of a fan of Red Hat. I switched from Fedora to openSUSE on my laptop at about the same time I switched to OpenSolaris on my main computer. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
