Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-10 Thread ken mays
Nibal,

There are a bunch of documents that review this subject from the light to the 
extensive.

For those of us that have done these 'migrations', we'd like to tell you that 
this is not an easy undertaking - but can be done.

As mentioned before, read up on some migration docs concerning the matter and 
invite experienced consultants to discuss with you the concerns your company 
may have on migration issues.

As a freebie, don't go with a 'fly-by-night' distro that might not be around in 
a year or more. Might be cool today, but won't be cool when
things go wrong on an important business presentation.

Hope that helps,
~ Ken Mays


--- On Fri, 12/11/09, Moises Castellanos m2o...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Moises Castellanos m2o...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux
 To: Nibal nalgh...@gmail.com
 Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
 Date: Friday, December 11, 2009, 6:47 AM
 
 
 On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:32 AM,
 Nibal nalgh...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 Hi All,
 
 I need your advice :
 
 
 
 I’m planning to migrate from windows clients OS to any
 Linux version, in our organization :
 
 
 
 Current  Environment  :
 
 
 
 Solaris 10 server OS which have Oracle Ebs 10 web – this
 will not change
 
 Clients :
 
 Windows  XP . 200 , vista , can access oracle application
 internet browser with java j-initiator  , outlook mail
 client, office applications this most important things I
 need to be on new system if this possible
 
 All our clients’ hardware are Intel base
 
 
 
 My question which Linux version we can select, this is
 mostly  because of  license issue , and what about
 openSolaris?
 
 
 
  Your mayor problem will be the j-initiator this browser
 plugin only runs in windows y don't know if runs with
 wine.
 My recomendation is install a test machine with
 Linux(Ubuntu/Fedora/openSUSE) or OpenSolaris or better
 install both 
 
 and install all the applications your clients needs in your
 organization.
 
  Regards
 
  
 
 Thanks
 
 Nibal
 
 --
 
 This message posted from opensolaris.org
 
 ___
 
 opensolaris-discuss
 mailing list
 
 opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
 
 
 -Inline Attachment Follows-
 
 ___
 opensolaris-discuss mailing list
 opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


  
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-07 Thread Nibal Al-Ghoul
Is Nexenta  free?
No need to get license  




Thanks  Best Regards 
Nibal 

-Original Message-
From: Erast [mailto:er...@gnusolaris.org] 
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 5:50 AM
To: Nibal
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

Why not use Nexenta as a Linux client - it is Debian, yet with 
OpenSolaris features!

Nibal wrote:
 Hi All,
 I need your advice :
 
 I'm planning to migrate from windows clients OS to any Linux version, in
our organization :
 
 Current  Environment  :
 
 Solaris 10 server OS which have Oracle Ebs 10 web - this will not change 
 Clients :
 Windows  XP . 200 , vista , can access oracle application internet browser
with java j-initiator  , outlook mail client, office applications this most
important things I need to be on new system if this possible 
 All our clients' hardware are Intel base
 
 My question which Linux version we can select, this is mostly  because of
license issue , and what about openSolaris?
  
 Thanks 
 Nibal

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-07 Thread Neil Houston
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Ron Halstead rdhalst...@gmail.com wrote:
 How does this relate to opensolaris at all?

 If Outlook/Entourage or office applications are a
 requirement for your organization, then your only
 choices are Windows and Mac OSX.  No linux or
 solaris.  Although you can use some products that try
 to duplicate the functionality of Outlook / Office,
 they're not the same, and you will encounter some
 differences which may be called problems in some
 cases.

 I disagree with the above. With the availability of OpenOffice, Firefox and 
 Thunderbird, there is no need for Windows, and its a lot less expensive. 
 True, there might be a learning curve, and the old fogies might gripe about 
 the change (I'm 63 and didn't gripe a bit) but the apps work great and fill 
 the bill. Personally, I would stay with Solaris or OpenSolaris but the advice 
 about a consultant should be closely considered.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but OpenOffice is simply nowhere near
Microsoft Office. To you, perhaps, but try selling it to your Admin
staff who sit in Excel all day. It doesn't even come close.

Linux isn't actually much cheaper than MS for desktop users in an
Enterprise until quite some time after the deployment. Your initial
savings on CALs will be overshadowed by the amount you're paying to
retrain your staff, your users, and to get the vendor on-site to fix
the problems you are invariably and definitely going to meet.

You then have the problems about the random, legacy, bespoke
applications that you may not even know are running on your network
that X number of users can't live without, wine doesn't cut it here.

After that, you have problems as you no longer have SCCM or Group
Policy, next that your users can't interact *PROPERLY* (a mozilla
plugin doesn't cut it here, either) with the shiny expensive new
exchange servers that were put in, and chances are your intranet was
written for IE (not cheap to fix) ... the dungeon starts to collapse.

To Surmise, anyone considering installing OpenSolaris for their users,
in a real enterprise environment that isn't a software house, lab, or
so on, should really consider a new line of work.

If you're *forced* to do such a transition, do it with a linux and get
the vendor on board early on to work out your migration plan and pilot
the thing to death. Even then, it's going to take you a very long time
to get it running properly, and you're going to get fired long before
that time...

Not even Linux is ready for this kind of use, let alone Solaris.


 --ron

--houst0n

 --
 This message posted from opensolaris.org
 ___
 opensolaris-discuss mailing list
 opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-07 Thread Erik Trimble

You're being overly dramatic.

Certainly, Linux/Solaris isn't a drop-in replacement. That said, there 
are a great number of places where it _is_ a viable solution. It all 
depends on a very thorough examination of exactly what the organization 
is doing, how it is doing it, and what it really is trying to 
accomplish.  Transitions need to be well-research, and the costs (both 
up-front, reoccurring, and in-place) cataloged ahead of time.


-Erik


Neil Houston wrote:

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Ron Halstead rdhalst...@gmail.com wrote:
  

How does this relate to opensolaris at all?

If Outlook/Entourage or office applications are a
requirement for your organization, then your only
choices are Windows and Mac OSX.  No linux or
solaris.  Although you can use some products that try
to duplicate the functionality of Outlook / Office,
they're not the same, and you will encounter some
differences which may be called problems in some
cases.
  

I disagree with the above. With the availability of OpenOffice, Firefox and 
Thunderbird, there is no need for Windows, and its a lot less expensive. True, 
there might be a learning curve, and the old fogies might gripe about the 
change (I'm 63 and didn't gripe a bit) but the apps work great and fill the 
bill. Personally, I would stay with Solaris or OpenSolaris but the advice about 
a consultant should be closely considered.



Sorry to burst your bubble, but OpenOffice is simply nowhere near
Microsoft Office. To you, perhaps, but try selling it to your Admin
staff who sit in Excel all day. It doesn't even come close.

Linux isn't actually much cheaper than MS for desktop users in an
Enterprise until quite some time after the deployment. Your initial
savings on CALs will be overshadowed by the amount you're paying to
retrain your staff, your users, and to get the vendor on-site to fix
the problems you are invariably and definitely going to meet.

You then have the problems about the random, legacy, bespoke
applications that you may not even know are running on your network
that X number of users can't live without, wine doesn't cut it here.

After that, you have problems as you no longer have SCCM or Group
Policy, next that your users can't interact *PROPERLY* (a mozilla
plugin doesn't cut it here, either) with the shiny expensive new
exchange servers that were put in, and chances are your intranet was
written for IE (not cheap to fix) ... the dungeon starts to collapse.

To Surmise, anyone considering installing OpenSolaris for their users,
in a real enterprise environment that isn't a software house, lab, or
so on, should really consider a new line of work.

If you're *forced* to do such a transition, do it with a linux and get
the vendor on board early on to work out your migration plan and pilot
the thing to death. Even then, it's going to take you a very long time
to get it running properly, and you're going to get fired long before
that time...

Not even Linux is ready for this kind of use, let alone Solaris.


  

--ron



--houst0n

  

--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org



___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
  



--
Erik Trimble
Java System Support
Mailstop:  usca22-123
Phone:  x17195
Santa Clara, CA
Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-07 Thread Paul Gress

Neil Houston wrote:

Sorry to burst your bubble, but OpenOffice is simply nowhere near
Microsoft Office. To you, perhaps, but try selling it to your Admin
staff who sit in Excel all day. It doesn't even come close.
  
I disagree.  I have enormous spreadsheets created using Openoffice, and 
I have used almost every advanced feature.  I have yet to find anything 
MS Excel does that Openoffice Calc cannot.  I would be happy if you can 
find a specific example so I can research it.


Paul
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-07 Thread Paul Gress

Nibal Al-Ghoul wrote:

Is Nexenta  free?
No need to get license  
  

Yes, Free.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-06 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
 I’m planning to migrate from windows clients OS to any Linux version,
 in our organization :
 
 Current  Environment  :
 
 Solaris 10 server OS which have Oracle Ebs 10 web – this will not
 change
 Clients :
 Windows  XP . 200 , vista , can access oracle application internet
 browser with java j-initiator  , outlook mail client, office
 applications this most important things I need to be on new system if
 this possible

How does this relate to opensolaris at all?

If Outlook/Entourage or office applications are a requirement for your 
organization, then your only choices are Windows and Mac OSX.  No linux or 
solaris.  Although you can use some products that try to duplicate the 
functionality of Outlook / Office, they're not the same, and you will encounter 
some differences which may be called problems in some cases.

If you want a linux to use as your user interface, I would suggest ubuntu.  Be 
sure to install compiz-config-manager as soon as the installation is completed. 
 It's not available by default, and I wouldn't use any linux system without it.

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-06 Thread Ron Halstead
 How does this relate to opensolaris at all?
 
 If Outlook/Entourage or office applications are a
 requirement for your organization, then your only
 choices are Windows and Mac OSX.  No linux or
 solaris.  Although you can use some products that try
 to duplicate the functionality of Outlook / Office,
 they're not the same, and you will encounter some
 differences which may be called problems in some
 cases.

I disagree with the above. With the availability of OpenOffice, Firefox and 
Thunderbird, there is no need for Windows, and its a lot less expensive. True, 
there might be a learning curve, and the old fogies might gripe about the 
change (I'm 63 and didn't gripe a bit) but the apps work great and fill the 
bill. Personally, I would stay with Solaris or OpenSolaris but the advice about 
a consultant should be closely considered.

--ron
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-05 Thread Nibal
Is Nexenta  free?
No need to get license
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-05 Thread Erast

absolutely free and open: http://www.nexenta.org

Nibal wrote:

Is Nexenta  free?
No need to get license

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-05 Thread Nibal
what about this 
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/
NexentaStor 2.2 
trial for 45 days only ?!
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-05 Thread Erik Trimble

Erast wrote:

absolutely free and open: http://www.nexenta.org

Nibal wrote:

Is Nexenta  free?
No need to get license

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
All the Linux(es) and OpenSolaris are Free (in the sense that you don't 
have to pay per-seat or per-server licenses); Nexenta is an OpenSolaris 
derivative and is likewise free.  You can download, install, and update 
them all for free.


For all the commercial versions of Linux (Ubuntu, RedHat, SUSE, etc) 
plus OpenSolaris you can get paid support contracts, which will cover 
priority telephone support, plus access to certain custom patches and 
much more attention to potential problems than from Microsoft.  The 
exact level of support you will receive depends on the vendor.


The best thing (in my opinion) about the Linux/OpenSolaris model of 
paying only for support is that you really get something for your money, 
and you generally pay considerably less.  Most vendors will only have 
you pay for support for those machines which you consider critical (i.e. 
the ones you really want covered) - in many cases, I see companies pay 
for support for their central server infrastructure, and then don't 
bother for their development and desktop environments;  this is all 
perfectly legal.


--
Erik Trimble
Java System Support
Mailstop:  usca22-123
Phone:  x17195
Santa Clara, CA
Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-05 Thread Nibal
What is your advice Erik , which version shall we have go with ?
As per your practical experience  
You can note my first posted message 

Thanks,
Nibal Al-Ghoul
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-05 Thread Nibal
What is your advice Erik , which version shall we have to go with ?
As per your practical experience
You can note my first posted message

Thanks,
Nibal Al-Ghoul
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-05 Thread Erik Trimble

Nibal wrote:

What is your advice Erik , which version shall we have to go with ?
As per your practical experience
You can note my first posted message

Thanks,
Nibal Al-Ghoul
  
It's very hard to recommend which one, because I know nothing about your 
environment.


If no one in your organization knows any of the Linux or OpenSolaris 
products, you really are going to have to hire an outside consultant to 
do the evaluation for you, and map out a migration path.  It's not 
something that we can resolve over an email exchange.


If you are interested in learning more, I recommend you go down to your 
local bookstore or library, and pick out one of the very excellent 
O'Reilly-published books on Linux.  They're an excellent primer on what 
is available and possible on various Linux/OpenSolaris platforms.


Personally (and, note, I do have a vested interest here), I like 
OpenSolaris or even Solaris for use on the servers - it's more flexible 
than many linuxes, and it's limitations are much less relevant on the 
server side than on the client side.  And, I like Sun Support more than 
RedHat Support. :-)


As for clients, I'm in favor of Ubuntu, generally. The 'apt-get' 
technology for upgrades is superior to 'rpm', and Ubuntu is more 
responsive than Debian (and, you can easily get commercial support from 
Canonical, the Ubuntu publisher), and Linux in general will run on 
virtually any hardware you have.


But, you really do have to have someone knowledgeable look at your 
environment, to determine which applications you need, what is 
available, and what your hardware requirements are, not to mention what 
kind of a budget you have.


--
Erik Trimble
Java System Support
Mailstop:  usca22-123
Phone:  x17195
Santa Clara, CA
Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


[osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-04 Thread Nibal
Hi All,
I need your advice :

I’m planning to migrate from windows clients OS to any Linux version, in our 
organization :

Current  Environment  :

Solaris 10 server OS which have Oracle Ebs 10 web – this will not change 
Clients :
Windows  XP . 200 , vista , can access oracle application internet browser with 
java j-initiator  , outlook mail client, office applications this most 
important things I need to be on new system if this possible 
All our clients’ hardware are Intel base

My question which Linux version we can select, this is mostly  because of  
license issue , and what about openSolaris?
 
Thanks 
Nibal
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux

2009-12-04 Thread Erast
Why not use Nexenta as a Linux client - it is Debian, yet with 
OpenSolaris features!


Nibal wrote:

Hi All,
I need your advice :

I’m planning to migrate from windows clients OS to any Linux version, in our 
organization :

Current  Environment  :

Solaris 10 server OS which have Oracle Ebs 10 web – this will not change 
Clients :
Windows  XP . 200 , vista , can access oracle application internet browser with java j-initiator  , outlook mail client, office applications this most important things I need to be on new system if this possible 
All our clients’ hardware are Intel base


My question which Linux version we can select, this is mostly  because of  
license issue , and what about openSolaris?
 
Thanks 
Nibal

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org