OpenSSL 3.x binaries naming convention (on Windows)

[Olivier Mascia via openssl-users]

[This is a partial repost from another topic]

I have a question, regarding Windows binaries.

(We build our own for x86/amd64 using the documented procedure, the compilers 
installed are Visual Studio 2019, with latest updates).

I take it (might be wrong, because the build scripts are complex to me) that 
the naming convention of binaries for OpenSSL 3 on Windows platform is like 
this:

libcrypto-3.dll (and libssl-3.dll)  for the 32 bits 
(release) builds
libcrypto-3-x64.dll (and libssl-3-x64.dll)  for the 64 bits 
(release) builds

Is this naming convention intended to be stable over the 3.x life?  Or would it 
change for things like libcrypto-3.1.dll (or the like) with releases like 3.1.x?

__
Best Regards, Meilleures salutations, Met vriendelijke groeten, Mit 
freundlichen Grüßen,
Olivier Mascia

Re: [openssl-users] Windows 1.1.1 binaries and web server

[Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd]

> This is very useful!  Can you post an udate to the wiki?  
> https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Binaries

Wiki has been updated with details of the binaries and download
locations. 

Angus

-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Re: [openssl-users] Windows 1.1.1 binaries and web server

[Salz, Rich via openssl-users]

This is very useful!  Can you post an udate to the wiki?  
https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Binaries


On 2/21/18, 8:57 AM, "Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd" 
 wrote:

Windows developers may be interested in our Win32 build of OpenSSL
1.1.1-pre1 (alpha), the binaries are digitally code signed 'Open Source
Developer, François PIETTE', the lead developer for the Delphi Internet
Component Suite project.  About half way down the page at:

http://wiki.overbyte.eu/wiki/index.php/ICS_Download

The latest 1.0.2 and 1.1.0 are also available, digitally code signed. 

I have also built my Windows ICS web application server to use
1.1.1-pre1 (alpha) so it can be used for testing TLSv1.3, the
information page shows the protocol you connect with, the ciphers
available and the OpenSSL and draft version being used. 

Currently most browsers still connect with TLSv1.2.  

https://www2.telecom-tariffs.co.uk/serverinfo.htm

Angus

-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users


-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[openssl-users] Windows 1.1.1 binaries and web server

[Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd]

Windows developers may be interested in our Win32 build of OpenSSL
1.1.1-pre1 (alpha), the binaries are digitally code signed 'Open Source
Developer, François PIETTE', the lead developer for the Delphi Internet
Component Suite project.  About half way down the page at:

http://wiki.overbyte.eu/wiki/index.php/ICS_Download

The latest 1.0.2 and 1.1.0 are also available, digitally code signed. 

I have also built my Windows ICS web application server to use
1.1.1-pre1 (alpha) so it can be used for testing TLSv1.3, the
information page shows the protocol you connect with, the ciphers
available and the OpenSSL and draft version being used. 

Currently most browsers still connect with TLSv1.2.  

https://www2.telecom-tariffs.co.uk/serverinfo.htm

Angus

-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[openssl-users] Windows OpenSSL's FIPS Binaries

[Dr. Pala]

Hi all,

does anybody know if there are downloadable binaries of openssl-fips 
and/or openssl-fips-ecp (2.0.16 or earlier) for Windows ?


Cheers,
Max

--
Best Regards,
Massimiliano Pala, Ph.D.
OpenCA Labs Director
OpenCA Logo


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Re: [openssl-users] Binaries exit with signature bytes

[Satya Das]

Forgot to mention that I am on fips module 2.0.11 fipsld building openssl 
1.0.1e with distribution patches when I get the "libcrypto.so.10 is not 
cross-compiler aware" error. The symbols that incore is looking for are indeed 
not present (startX etc) in the shared object built. How can I fix this error ? 

-Original Message-
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of 
Satya Das
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 5:48 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Binaries exit with signature bytes


>What platform are you building? Is it a native or cross compile?

>You'd get that behaviour if fipsld isn't linking the binaries properly.

Thanks Steve. I am on centos 6, native compile. I saw " /libcrypto.so is not 
cross-compiler aware." with fipsld linking until introducing -exe option to 
incore invocation. It builds fine with the modified fipsld but then I now have 
this run time error to deal with.

TIA.


-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Re: [openssl-users] Binaries exit with signature bytes

[Satya Das]

>What platform are you building? Is it a native or cross compile?

>You'd get that behaviour if fipsld isn't linking the binaries properly.

Thanks Steve. I am on centos 6, native compile. I saw " /libcrypto.so is not 
cross-compiler aware." with fipsld linking until introducing -exe option to 
incore invocation. It builds fine with the modified fipsld but then I now have 
this run time error to deal with.

TIA.


-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Re: [openssl-users] Binaries exit with signature bytes

[Dr. Stephen Henson]

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016, Satya Das wrote:

> 
> I am building a fips capable openssl package and running into a condition 
> where all binaries exit with a signature in the stdout. As far as I can tell 
> it is the incore hash. It seems FINGERPRINT_premain() is finding a ? in the 
> FINGERPRINT_ascii_value and branching to exit(0).
> 

What platform are you building? Is it a native or cross compile?

You'd get that behaviour if fipsld isn't linking the binaries properly.

Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org
-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[openssl-users] Binaries exit with signature bytes

[Satya Das]

Hello,

I am building a fips capable openssl package and running into a condition where 
all binaries exit with a signature in the stdout. As far as I can tell it is 
the incore hash. It seems FINGERPRINT_premain() is finding a ? in the 
FINGERPRINT_ascii_value and branching to exit(0).

What am I missing ?

Thanks
-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Re: [openssl-users] Is there a public OpenSSL github with prebuilt binaries?

[Viktor Dukhovni]

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 09:05:52PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:

> Is there an official OpenSSL github account with prebuilt binaries for
> platforms like iOS and Android?
> 
> If so, where is it?

Prebuilt binaries of security toolkits should in my view come only
from the platform vendor (whom you can't avoid trusting).  I don't
think the OpenSSL team should either directly or indirectly endorse
anyone's pre-built binaries.

-- 
Viktor.
___
openssl-users mailing list
openssl-users@openssl.org
https://mta.opensslfoundation.net/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Re: [openssl-users] Is there a public OpenSSL github with prebuilt binaries?

[Salz, Rich]

> Is there an official OpenSSL github account with prebuilt binaries for
> platforms like iOS and Android?
> 
> If so, where is it?

There's this: https://www.openssl.org/about/binaries.html 
 
> If not, should there be?

If someone wants to step forward we can add them to that page.

___
openssl-users mailing list
openssl-users@openssl.org
https://mta.opensslfoundation.net/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[openssl-users] Is there a public OpenSSL github with prebuilt binaries?

[Jeffrey Walton]

Is there an official OpenSSL github account with prebuilt binaries for
platforms like iOS and Android?

If so, where is it?

If not, should there be?
___
openssl-users mailing list
openssl-users@openssl.org
https://mta.opensslfoundation.net/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Re: Fwd: Download binaries - 404 not found

[Ken Goldman]

On 12/3/2014 9:41 AM, T K wrote:

Is there any other way to download binaries for Win32/64?


http://slproweb.com/products/Win32OpenSSL.html


__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   majord...@openssl.org

RE: Download binaries - 404 not found

[Salz, Rich]

> http://www.openssl.org/related/binaries.html gives an "404 not found" error. 
> Is there any other way to download binaries for Win32/64?

They moved to the ‘about’ area.  The FAQ is auto-generated and I forgot to 
update that.  Fixed, thanks.
:��I"Ϯ��r�m
(Z+�K�+1���x��h[�z�(Z+���f�y���f���h��)z{,���

Download binaries - 404 not found

[T K]

Hi,

maybe I missed the information but
http://www.openssl.org/related/binaries.html gives an "404 not found"
error. Is there any other way to download binaries for Win32/64?

Thanks,
Thorsten

Fwd: Download binaries - 404 not found

[T K]

Hi,

maybe I missed the information that the files are not available any more...
http://www.openssl.org/related/binaries.html gives an "404 not found"
error. Is there any other way to download binaries for Win32/64?

Thanks,
Thorsten

Re: Cannot create keystore using Purify instrumented binaries.

[Sanjith Chungath]

Thanks to all for information.
Special thanks to Geoff for mentioning the assembly code. As he mentioned
the assembly code was making thousands of UMRs and the code dump in Purify
instrumented code. I was able to complete my test cases and found few
memory leaks in our code.

Thanks again for the help.
-Sanjith.

On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Tim Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Sanjith Chungath wrote:
>
>> I am getting thousands of UMRs and finally one segmentation error and a
>> core dump while trying to create a keystore. Am using 0.9.8g. Everything
>> works fine without purify. I also tried rebuilding openssl with PURIFY"
>> compiler option. But that also didnt help me.
>>
>
> Compile with debug enabled - i.e. "-g" compiler option and rerun the test
> so that the line numbers in each source file are also listed - that helps
> when looking at the context.
>
> With a -DPURIFY build you should not in general be getting any UMRs.
>
> You can also look at
> http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1642&user=guest&pass=guestwhich 
> is a patch I posted to the list back in Feb when looking through
> purify issues.
>
> I'm working on a linux-x86 setup (not solaris-sparc) but most of the issues
> are platform independent.
>
> Tim.
>

Re: Cannot create keystore using Purify instrumented binaries.

[Tim Hudson]

Sanjith Chungath wrote:
I am getting thousands of UMRs and finally one segmentation error and a 
core dump while trying to create a keystore. Am using 0.9.8g. Everything 
works fine without purify. I also tried rebuilding openssl with PURIFY" 
compiler option. But that also didnt help me. 


Compile with debug enabled - i.e. "-g" compiler option and rerun the test so 
that the line numbers in each source file are also listed - that helps when 
looking at the context.


With a -DPURIFY build you should not in general be getting any UMRs.

You can also look at 
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1642&user=guest&pass=guest which is 
a patch I posted to the list back in Feb when looking through purify issues.


I'm working on a linux-x86 setup (not solaris-sparc) but most of the issues are 
platform independent.


Tim.


PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature

Re: Cannot create keystore using Purify instrumented binaries.

[Geoff Thorpe]

On Thursday 02 October 2008 06:40:53 Sanjith Chungath wrote:
> I am getting thousands of UMRs and finally one segmentation error and
> a core dump while trying to create a keystore. Am using 0.9.8g.
> Everything works fine without purify. I also tried rebuilding openssl
> with PURIFY" compiler option. But that also didnt help me.

Out of curiosity, did you configure openssl with "no-asm" before building 
it? I don't know if purify's instrumentation conflicts with assumptions 
in the assembly-optimised code, but disabling assembly optimisations 
would be one way of finding out.

Cheers,
Geoff

-- 
Un terrien, c'est un singe avec des clefs de char...
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[Parind Shah]

Thanks Chris, I appreciate you taking time to respond & help.

Parind. 


 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 8:35 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

On 5/12/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That works Chris.
>
> Obviously I'm missing a step, can you please tell me what did you do 
> to build the static version of 64 bit binaries? I want to be able to 
> build them and not keep bothering you.
>
> Thanks again,
> Parind.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 1:16 AM
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
>
> On 5/12/06, hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/11/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Chris,
> > >
> > > I was able to use binaries you provided & also create my own set 
> > > this time. Here's the output of the test.bat. Looks like it passed
> all tests.
> > > I ran in on 64 bit Win 2003 Server R2.
> > >
> > > One thing I'm still struggling with is that I can't build the 
> > > static
>
> > > libs for the 64 bit, can you?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Parind.
> > >
> >
> > I will give it a try...
> >
> > Chris.
> >
> Give these a try...
>
> Openssl-0.9.8b-static-libs-Win64-ia64.zip
> Openssl-0.9.8b-static-libs-Win64-x64.zip
>
> Chris.
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Parind,

You do everything the same ... according to the instructions. But when
you run ma\ntdll.mak you make dynamic DLL's. If you do ms\nt.mak instead
you will get static libs.

It doesn't say this in the 64 bit instructions but I know this from
building the 32 bit code. It works with the 64 bit compile as well.

I hope this helps... let me know how you make out.

Chris.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[hunter]

On 5/12/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

That works Chris.

Obviously I'm missing a step, can you please tell me what did you do to
build the static version of 64 bit binaries? I want to be able to build
them and not keep bothering you.

Thanks again,
Parind.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 1:16 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

On 5/12/06, hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/11/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Chris,
> >
> > I was able to use binaries you provided & also create my own set
> > this time. Here's the output of the test.bat. Looks like it passed
all tests.
> > I ran in on 64 bit Win 2003 Server R2.
> >
> > One thing I'm still struggling with is that I can't build the static

> > libs for the 64 bit, can you?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Parind.
> >
>
> I will give it a try...
>
> Chris.
>
Give these a try...

Openssl-0.9.8b-static-libs-Win64-ia64.zip
Openssl-0.9.8b-static-libs-Win64-x64.zip

Chris.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Parind,

You do everything the same ... according to the instructions. But when
you run ma\ntdll.mak you make dynamic DLL's. If you do ms\nt.mak
instead you will get static libs.

It doesn't say this in the 64 bit instructions but I know this from
building the 32 bit code. It works with the 64 bit compile as well.

I hope this helps... let me know how you make out.

Chris.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[Parind Shah]

That works Chris.

Obviously I'm missing a step, can you please tell me what did you do to
build the static version of 64 bit binaries? I want to be able to build
them and not keep bothering you.

Thanks again,
Parind.
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 1:16 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

On 5/12/06, hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/11/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Chris,
> >
> > I was able to use binaries you provided & also create my own set 
> > this time. Here's the output of the test.bat. Looks like it passed
all tests.
> > I ran in on 64 bit Win 2003 Server R2.
> >
> > One thing I'm still struggling with is that I can't build the static

> > libs for the 64 bit, can you?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Parind.
> >
>
> I will give it a try...
>
> Chris.
>
Give these a try...

Openssl-0.9.8b-static-libs-Win64-ia64.zip
Openssl-0.9.8b-static-libs-Win64-x64.zip

Chris.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[hunter]

On 5/12/06, hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 5/11/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I was able to use binaries you provided & also create my own set this
> time. Here's the output of the test.bat. Looks like it passed all tests.
> I ran in on 64 bit Win 2003 Server R2.
>
> One thing I'm still struggling with is that I can't build the static
> libs for the 64 bit, can you?
>
> Thanks,
> Parind.
>

I will give it a try...

Chris.


Give these a try...

Openssl-0.9.8b-static-libs-Win64-ia64.zip
Openssl-0.9.8b-static-libs-Win64-x64.zip

Chris.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[hunter]

On 5/11/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Chris,

I was able to use binaries you provided & also create my own set this
time. Here's the output of the test.bat. Looks like it passed all tests.
I ran in on 64 bit Win 2003 Server R2.

One thing I'm still struggling with is that I can't build the static
libs for the 64 bit, can you?

Thanks,
Parind.



I will give it a try...

Chris.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[Parind Shah]

Chris,

I was able to use binaries you provided & also create my own set this
time. Here's the output of the test.bat. Looks like it passed all tests.
I ran in on 64 bit Win 2003 Server R2.

One thing I'm still struggling with is that I can't build the static
libs for the 64 bit, can you?

Thanks,
Parind.

Output from the test.bat >>>

Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790]
(C) Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corp.


Z:\OpenSSL 0.9.8b Binaries\x64\out32dll>..\ms\test
rsa_test
PKCS #1 v1.5 encryption/decryption ok
OAEP encryption/decryption ok
PKCS #1 v1.5 encryption/decryption ok
OAEP encryption/decryption ok
PKCS #1 v1.5 encryption/decryption ok
OAEP encryption/decryption ok
PKCS #1 v1.5 encryption/decryption ok
OAEP encryption/decryption ok
PKCS #1 v1.5 encryption/decryption ok
OAEP encryption/decryption ok
PKCS #1 v1.5 encryption/decryption ok
OAEP encryption/decryption ok
destest
Doing cbcm
Doing ecb
Doing ede ecb
Doing cbc
Doing desx cbc
Doing ede cbc
Doing pcbc
Doing cfb8 cfb16 cfb32 cfb48 cfb64 cfb64() ede_cfb64() done
Doing ofb
Doing ofb64
Doing ede_ofb64
Doing cbc_cksum
Doing quad_cksum
input word alignment test 0 1 2 3
output word alignment test 0 1 2 3
fast crypt test
ideatest
ecb idea ok
cbc idea ok
cfb64 idea ok
bftest
testing blowfish in raw ecb mode
testing blowfish in ecb mode
testing blowfish set_key
testing blowfish in cbc mode
testing blowfish in cfb64 mode
testing blowfish in ofb64
shatest
test 1 ok
test 2 ok
test 3 ok
sha1test
test 1 ok
test 2 ok
test 3 ok
md5test
test 1 ok
test 2 ok
test 3 ok
test 4 ok
test 5 ok
test 6 ok
test 7 ok
md2test
test 1 ok
test 2 ok
test 3 ok
test 4 ok
test 5 ok
test 6 ok
test 7 ok
rc2test
ecb RC2 ok
rc4test
test 0 ok
test 1 ok
test 2 ok
test 3 ok
test 4 ok
test 5 ok
test end processing done
test multi-call done
bulk test ok
randtest
test 1 done
test 2 done
test 3 done
test 4 done
dhtest
.+.+..+.++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++
*++*++*+
+*++*++*++*++*++*

p=9C0CD96905812E67
g=5
pri 1=4325B4A7BEEADBAD
pub 1=1AB4A86B70BDF115
pri 2=447B89F0A1F5E670
pub 2=339B2213012E763D
key1 =26B3B5F404DB35AE
key2 =26B3B5F404DB35AE
exptest




 done
dsatest
test generation of DSA parameters
.++*
...++..+...++.+..+..



+++*
seed
D5014E4B 60EF2BA8 B6211B40 62BA3224 E0427DD3
counter=105 h=2
P:
00:8d:f2:a4:94:49:22:76:aa:3d:25:75:9b:b0:68:
69:cb:ea:c0:d8:3a:fb:8d:0c:f7:cb:b8:32:4f:0d:
78:82:e5:d0:76:2f:c5:b7:21:0e:af:c2:e9:ad:ac:
32:ab:7a:ac:49:69:3d:fb:f8:37:24:c2:ec:07:36:
ee:31:c8:02:91
Q:
00:c7:73:21:8c:73:7e:c8:ee:99:3b:4f:2d:ed:30:
f4:8e:da:ce:91:5f
G:
62:6d:02:78:39:ea:0a:13:41:31:63:a5:5b:4c:b5:
00:29:9d:55:22:95:6c:ef:cb:3b:ff:10:f3:99:ce:
2c:2e:71:cb:9d:e5:fa:24:ba:bf:58:e5:b7:95:21:
92:5c:9c:c4:2e:9f:6f:46:4b:08:8c:c5:72:af:53:
e6:d7:88:02
ectest
Curve defined by Weierstrass equation
 y^2 = x^3 + a*x + b  (mod 0x17)
 a = 0x1
 b = 0x1
A cyclic subgroup:
 point at infinity
 x = 0xD, y = 0x7
 x = 0x5, y = 0x4
 x = 0x11, y = 0x3
 x = 0x11, y = 0x14
 x = 0x5, y = 0x13
 x = 0xD, y = 0x10
Generator as octect string, compressed form:
 030D
Generator as octect string, uncompressed form:
 040D07
Generator as octect string, hybrid form:
 070D07
A representation of the inverse of that generator in
Jacobian projective coordinates:
 X = 0xC, Y = 0xF, Z = 0xA

SEC2 curve secp160r1 -- Generator:
 x = 0x4A96B5688EF573284664698968C38BB913CBFC82
 y = 0x23A628553168947D59DCC912042351377AC5FB32
verify degree ... ok
verify group order  ok

NIST curve P-192 -- Generator:
 x = 0x188DA80EB03090F67CBF20EB43A18800F4FF0AFD82FF1012
 y = 0x7192B95FFC8DA78631011ED6B24CDD573F977A11E794811
verify degree ... ok
verify group order  ok

NIST curve P-224 -- Generator:
 x = 0xB70E0CBD6BB4BF7F321390B94A03C1D356C21122343280D6115C1D21
 y = 0xBD376388B5F723FB4C22DFE6CD4375A05A07476444D5819985007E34
verify degree ... ok
verify group order  ok

NIST curve P-256 -- Generator:
 x =
0x6B17D1F2E12C4247F8BCE6E563A440F277037D812DEB33A0F4A13945D898C296
 y =
0x4FE342E2FE1A7F9B8EE7EB4A7C0F9E162BCE33576B315ECECBB6406837BF51F5
verify degree ... ok
verify group order  ok

NIST curve P-384 -- Generator:
 x =
0xAA87CA22BE8B05378EB1C71EF320AD746E1D3B628BA79B9859F741E082542A385502F
25DBF55296C3A545E3872760AB7
 y =
0x3617DE4A96262C6F5D9E98BF9292DC29F8F41DBD289A147CE9DA3113B5F0B8C00A60B
1CE1D7E819D7A431D7C90EA0E5F
verify degree ... ok
verify group order  ok

NIST c

RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[Parind Shah]

 
Chris,

I really appreciate you taking time to build 64 bit binaries. I'll try
to use it and get back to you.

Many thanks in advance,
Parind. 

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:45 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

On 5/8/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it possible to include 64 bit binaries as well?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wai Wu
> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 11:12 AM
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries
>
> Yes. Please hunter. Please include the header files in the download.
> Also, a small request, can you provide a build for static linking?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
> Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:56 PM
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
>
> On 5/7/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this
> morning.
> > My apologies to all.
> >
> > >> Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,
> >
> > I was going to comment that this site does not offer the 0.9.8b 
> > binaries, but what I'm after now is some information on any tricks 
> > to compiling the DLL's with only the features needed for my 
> > application to reduce their size. I'd rather not try to blindly rip 
> > appart the source without some guidance as I am not a C++ coder, my 
> > former coding
>
> > skills were limited to masm.
> >
> > Regards,  Mike
> >
> >
______
> > OpenSSL Project
http://www.openssl.org
> > User Support Mailing List
openssl-users@openssl.org
> > Automated List Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> Mike,
>
> I provide the binaries for hunter.campbus.com. The files are actually 
> stored at brandleadershipmarketing.com/apache. You can take the 
> Archive and MD5 link from hunter.campbus.com.
>
> I have been busy and have not had time to build Openssl-0.9.8b. I will

> be getting to the Apache builds in the next few days but I thought I 
> would try to address your issue - smaller binaries. I assume you also 
> need headers and libs for building your application. I will be waiting

> for an update to mod_ssl for Apache 1.3.x.
>
> I noticed an option for the build to not statically link the engines.
> This results in binaries that are a little smaller. I built the code 
> with 'no-static-engine' and used the 'install' option. Then I zipped 
> up the directory structure created by the makefile in c:\openssl. The 
> engine dll's can be found in the c:\openssl\lib\engines directory.
>
> Openssl-0.9.8b-no-static-engine-Win32.zip
>
> Try this build and let me know if it suits your needs. If it does I 
> will continue the build the updates in this form in addition to the 
> regular package, which is created to support Apache 1.3.x. Apache 
> 2.x.x are packaged with OpenSSL included.
>
> If you prefer you can build your own using these options, but let me 
> know so that I know if should continue to provide this form of
package.
>
> Chris Lewis
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Parind,

I built 64 bit binaries.

Openssl-0.9.8b-Win64-ia64.zip
Openssl-0.9.8b-Win64-x64.zip

at http://brandleadershipmarketing.com/apache

I zipped up the entire build directory because I cannot test these. If
they are ok I will figure out what parts to package.

Your feed back would be appreciated.

Chris.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.open

RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[Wai Wu]

Excellent. Many Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:45 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

On 5/8/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it possible to include 64 bit binaries as well?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wai Wu
> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 11:12 AM
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries
>
> Yes. Please hunter. Please include the header files in the download.
> Also, a small request, can you provide a build for static linking?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
> Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:56 PM
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
>
> On 5/7/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this
> morning.
> > My apologies to all.
> >
> > >> Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,
> >
> > I was going to comment that this site does not offer the 0.9.8b 
> > binaries, but what I'm after now is some information on any tricks 
> > to compiling the DLL's with only the features needed for my 
> > application to reduce their size. I'd rather not try to blindly rip 
> > appart the source without some guidance as I am not a C++ coder, my 
> > former coding
>
> > skills were limited to masm.
> >
> > Regards,  Mike
> >
> >
__
> > OpenSSL Project
http://www.openssl.org
> > User Support Mailing List
openssl-users@openssl.org
> > Automated List Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> Mike,
>
> I provide the binaries for hunter.campbus.com. The files are actually 
> stored at brandleadershipmarketing.com/apache. You can take the 
> Archive and MD5 link from hunter.campbus.com.
>
> I have been busy and have not had time to build Openssl-0.9.8b. I will

> be getting to the Apache builds in the next few days but I thought I 
> would try to address your issue - smaller binaries. I assume you also 
> need headers and libs for building your application. I will be waiting

> for an update to mod_ssl for Apache 1.3.x.
>
> I noticed an option for the build to not statically link the engines.
> This results in binaries that are a little smaller. I built the code 
> with 'no-static-engine' and used the 'install' option. Then I zipped 
> up the directory structure created by the makefile in c:\openssl. The 
> engine dll's can be found in the c:\openssl\lib\engines directory.
>
> Openssl-0.9.8b-no-static-engine-Win32.zip
>
> Try this build and let me know if it suits your needs. If it does I 
> will continue the build the updates in this form in addition to the 
> regular package, which is created to support Apache 1.3.x. Apache 
> 2.x.x are packaged with OpenSSL included.
>
> If you prefer you can build your own using these options, but let me 
> know so that I know if should continue to provide this form of
package.
>
> Chris Lewis
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Parind,

I built 64 bit binaries.

Openssl-0.9.8b-Win64-ia64.zip
Openssl-0.9.8b-Win64-x64.zip

at http://brandleadershipmarketing.com/apache

I zipped up the entire build directory because I cannot test these. If
they are ok I will figure out what parts to package.

Your feed back would be appreciated.

Chris.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[hunter]

On 5/8/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Is it possible to include 64 bit binaries as well?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wai Wu
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 11:12 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries

Yes. Please hunter. Please include the header files in the download.
Also, a small request, can you provide a build for static linking?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:56 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

On 5/7/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this
morning.
> My apologies to all.
>
> >> Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,
>
> I was going to comment that this site does not offer the 0.9.8b
> binaries, but what I'm after now is some information on any tricks to
> compiling the DLL's with only the features needed for my application
> to reduce their size. I'd rather not try to blindly rip appart the
> source without some guidance as I am not a C++ coder, my former coding

> skills were limited to masm.
>
> Regards,  Mike
>
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mike,

I provide the binaries for hunter.campbus.com. The files are actually
stored at brandleadershipmarketing.com/apache. You can take the Archive
and MD5 link from hunter.campbus.com.

I have been busy and have not had time to build Openssl-0.9.8b. I will
be getting to the Apache builds in the next few days but I thought I
would try to address your issue - smaller binaries. I assume you also
need headers and libs for building your application. I will be waiting
for an update to mod_ssl for Apache 1.3.x.

I noticed an option for the build to not statically link the engines.
This results in binaries that are a little smaller. I built the code
with 'no-static-engine' and used the 'install' option. Then I zipped up
the directory structure created by the makefile in c:\openssl. The
engine dll's can be found in the c:\openssl\lib\engines directory.

Openssl-0.9.8b-no-static-engine-Win32.zip

Try this build and let me know if it suits your needs. If it does I will
continue the build the updates in this form in addition to the regular
package, which is created to support Apache 1.3.x. Apache 2.x.x are
packaged with OpenSSL included.

If you prefer you can build your own using these options, but let me
know so that I know if should continue to provide this form of package.

Chris Lewis
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Parind,

I built 64 bit binaries.

Openssl-0.9.8b-Win64-ia64.zip
Openssl-0.9.8b-Win64-x64.zip

at http://brandleadershipmarketing.com/apache

I zipped up the entire build directory because I cannot test these. If
they are ok I will figure out what parts to package.

Your feed back would be appreciated.

Chris.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[hunter]

On 5/9/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

hunter wrote:
> On 5/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Typically one links to the static library then, which of course will only
>> link in .obj files that are consumed.  One bit of OpenSSL magic are the
>> seperate objects which create a (relatively) quite small binary.  That is,
>> if you use explicit methods, e.g. use TLSV1_server_init if you will only
>> respond with TLS, instead of SSLV23_server_init where you draw in much
>> more conditional code.
>
> Are you saying that if I build and provide a package with static libs
> and headers that an application could use this to compile smaller
> binaries?

Yes.

> I will look for instructions on how to do this...

You should find ms/ntdll.mak as well as ms/nt.mak, one spits out dynamic libs
into out32dll/, the other static libs into out32/.

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bill,

Thanks.

I found nt.mak and created a package with it.

Chris
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

hunter wrote:

On 5/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Typically one links to the static library then, which of course will only
link in .obj files that are consumed.  One bit of OpenSSL magic are the
seperate objects which create a (relatively) quite small binary.  That is,
if you use explicit methods, e.g. use TLSV1_server_init if you will only
respond with TLS, instead of SSLV23_server_init where you draw in much
more conditional code.


Are you saying that if I build and provide a package with static libs
and headers that an application could use this to compile smaller
binaries?


Yes.


I will look for instructions on how to do this...


You should find ms/ntdll.mak as well as ms/nt.mak, one spits out dynamic libs
into out32dll/, the other static libs into out32/.

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[hunter]

On 5/8/06, Wai Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Yes. Please hunter. Please include the header files in the download.
Also, a small request, can you provide a build for static linking?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:56 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

On 5/7/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this
morning.
> My apologies to all.
>
> >> Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,
>
> I was going to comment that this site does not offer the 0.9.8b
> binaries, but what I'm after now is some information on any tricks to
> compiling the DLL's with only the features needed for my application
> to reduce their size. I'd rather not try to blindly rip appart the
> source without some guidance as I am not a C++ coder, my former coding

> skills were limited to masm.
>
> Regards,  Mike
>
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mike,

I provide the binaries for hunter.campbus.com. The files are actually
stored at brandleadershipmarketing.com/apache. You can take the Archive
and MD5 link from hunter.campbus.com.

I have been busy and have not had time to build Openssl-0.9.8b. I will
be getting to the Apache builds in the next few days but I thought I
would try to address your issue - smaller binaries. I assume you also
need headers and libs for building your application. I will be waiting
for an update to mod_ssl for Apache 1.3.x.

I noticed an option for the build to not statically link the engines.
This results in binaries that are a little smaller. I built the code
with 'no-static-engine' and used the 'install' option. Then I zipped up
the directory structure created by the makefile in c:\openssl. The
engine dll's can be found in the c:\openssl\lib\engines directory.

Openssl-0.9.8b-no-static-engine-Win32.zip

Try this build and let me know if it suits your needs. If it does I will
continue the build the updates in this form in addition to the regular
package, which is created to support Apache 1.3.x. Apache 2.x.x are
packaged with OpenSSL included.

If you prefer you can build your own using these options, but let me
know so that I know if should continue to provide this form of package.

Chris Lewis
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Wai and Mike,

I have built OpenSSL 0.9.8b with static libs.

Openssl-0.9.8b-static-libs-Win32.zip

At brandleadershipmarketing.com/apache or select Archive and MD5s from
hunter.campbus.com.

I have no way to test these. Please let me know if you are able to use
them and if you want me to continue to provide them. I made the
package similar to the Openssl-0.9.8b-no-static-engine-Win32.zip with
headers and libs.

Mike, I hope this helps you as well.

Chris Lewis
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[hunter]

On 5/8/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Is it possible to include 64 bit binaries as well?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wai Wu
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 11:12 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries

Yes. Please hunter. Please include the header files in the download.
Also, a small request, can you provide a build for static linking?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:56 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

On 5/7/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this
morning.
> My apologies to all.
>
> >> Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,
>
> I was going to comment that this site does not offer the 0.9.8b
> binaries, but what I'm after now is some information on any tricks to
> compiling the DLL's with only the features needed for my application
> to reduce their size. I'd rather not try to blindly rip appart the
> source without some guidance as I am not a C++ coder, my former coding

> skills were limited to masm.
>
> Regards,  Mike
>
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mike,

I provide the binaries for hunter.campbus.com. The files are actually
stored at brandleadershipmarketing.com/apache. You can take the Archive
and MD5 link from hunter.campbus.com.

I have been busy and have not had time to build Openssl-0.9.8b. I will
be getting to the Apache builds in the next few days but I thought I
would try to address your issue - smaller binaries. I assume you also
need headers and libs for building your application. I will be waiting
for an update to mod_ssl for Apache 1.3.x.

I noticed an option for the build to not statically link the engines.
This results in binaries that are a little smaller. I built the code
with 'no-static-engine' and used the 'install' option. Then I zipped up
the directory structure created by the makefile in c:\openssl. The
engine dll's can be found in the c:\openssl\lib\engines directory.

Openssl-0.9.8b-no-static-engine-Win32.zip

Try this build and let me know if it suits your needs. If it does I will
continue the build the updates in this form in addition to the regular
package, which is created to support Apache 1.3.x. Apache 2.x.x are
packaged with OpenSSL included.

If you prefer you can build your own using these options, but let me
know so that I know if should continue to provide this form of package.

Chris Lewis
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Parind,

I have never tried to build 64 bit and I don't have anything to try it
on. I will look and see how complicated it is...

Chris Lewis
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[hunter]

On 5/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Mike Ehlert wrote:
>
> but what I'm after now is some information on any tricks to compiling
> the DLL's with only the features needed for my application to reduce
> their size.

Typically one links to the static library then, which of course will only
link in .obj files that are consumed.  One bit of OpenSSL magic are the
seperate objects which create a (relatively) quite small binary.  That is,
if you use explicit methods, e.g. use TLSV1_server_init if you will only
respond with TLS, instead of SSLV23_server_init where you draw in much
more conditional code.

Bill
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bill,

Are you saying that if I build and provide a package with static libs
and headers that an application could use this to compile smaller
binaries?

I will look for instructions on how to do this...

Chris Lewis
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[Parind Shah]

 
Is it possible to include 64 bit binaries as well? 

 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wai Wu
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 11:12 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries

Yes. Please hunter. Please include the header files in the download.
Also, a small request, can you provide a build for static linking? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:56 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

On 5/7/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this
morning.
> My apologies to all.
>
> >> Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,
>
> I was going to comment that this site does not offer the 0.9.8b 
> binaries, but what I'm after now is some information on any tricks to 
> compiling the DLL's with only the features needed for my application 
> to reduce their size. I'd rather not try to blindly rip appart the 
> source without some guidance as I am not a C++ coder, my former coding

> skills were limited to masm.
>
> Regards,  Mike
>
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mike,

I provide the binaries for hunter.campbus.com. The files are actually
stored at brandleadershipmarketing.com/apache. You can take the Archive
and MD5 link from hunter.campbus.com.

I have been busy and have not had time to build Openssl-0.9.8b. I will
be getting to the Apache builds in the next few days but I thought I
would try to address your issue - smaller binaries. I assume you also
need headers and libs for building your application. I will be waiting
for an update to mod_ssl for Apache 1.3.x.

I noticed an option for the build to not statically link the engines.
This results in binaries that are a little smaller. I built the code
with 'no-static-engine' and used the 'install' option. Then I zipped up
the directory structure created by the makefile in c:\openssl. The
engine dll's can be found in the c:\openssl\lib\engines directory.

Openssl-0.9.8b-no-static-engine-Win32.zip

Try this build and let me know if it suits your needs. If it does I will
continue the build the updates in this form in addition to the regular
package, which is created to support Apache 1.3.x. Apache 2.x.x are
packaged with OpenSSL included.

If you prefer you can build your own using these options, but let me
know so that I know if should continue to provide this form of package.

Chris Lewis
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[Wai Wu]

Yes. Please hunter. Please include the header files in the download.
Also, a small request, can you provide a build for static linking? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:56 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

On 5/7/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this
morning.
> My apologies to all.
>
> >> Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,
>
> I was going to comment that this site does not offer the 0.9.8b 
> binaries, but what I'm after now is some information on any tricks to 
> compiling the DLL's with only the features needed for my application 
> to reduce their size. I'd rather not try to blindly rip appart the 
> source without some guidance as I am not a C++ coder, my former coding

> skills were limited to masm.
>
> Regards,  Mike
>
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mike,

I provide the binaries for hunter.campbus.com. The files are actually
stored at brandleadershipmarketing.com/apache. You can take the Archive
and MD5 link from hunter.campbus.com.

I have been busy and have not had time to build Openssl-0.9.8b. I will
be getting to the Apache builds in the next few days but I thought I
would try to address your issue - smaller binaries. I assume you also
need headers and libs for building your application. I will be waiting
for an update to mod_ssl for Apache 1.3.x.

I noticed an option for the build to not statically link the engines.
This results in binaries that are a little smaller. I built the code
with 'no-static-engine' and used the 'install' option. Then I zipped up
the directory structure created by the makefile in c:\openssl. The
engine dll's can be found in the c:\openssl\lib\engines directory.

Openssl-0.9.8b-no-static-engine-Win32.zip

Try this build and let me know if it suits your needs. If it does I will
continue the build the updates in this form in addition to the regular
package, which is created to support Apache 1.3.x. Apache 2.x.x are
packaged with OpenSSL included.

If you prefer you can build your own using these options, but let me
know so that I know if should continue to provide this form of package.

Chris Lewis
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Mike Ehlert wrote:


but what I'm after now is some information on any tricks to compiling
the DLL's with only the features needed for my application to reduce
their size.


Typically one links to the static library then, which of course will only
link in .obj files that are consumed.  One bit of OpenSSL magic are the
seperate objects which create a (relatively) quite small binary.  That is,
if you use explicit methods, e.g. use TLSV1_server_init if you will only
respond with TLS, instead of SSLV23_server_init where you draw in much
more conditional code.

Bill
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[hunter]

On 5/7/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this morning.
My apologies to all.

>> Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,

I was going to comment that this site does not offer the 0.9.8b binaries,
but what I'm after now is some information on any tricks to compiling
the DLL's with only the features needed for my application to reduce
their size. I'd rather not try to blindly rip appart the source without some
guidance as I am not a C++ coder, my former coding skills were limited
to masm.

Regards,  Mike

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Mike,

I provide the binaries for hunter.campbus.com. The files are actually
stored at brandleadershipmarketing.com/apache. You can take the
Archive and MD5 link from hunter.campbus.com.

I have been busy and have not had time to build Openssl-0.9.8b. I will
be getting to the Apache builds in the next few days but I thought I
would try to address your issue - smaller binaries. I assume you also
need headers and libs for building your application. I will be waiting
for an update to mod_ssl for Apache 1.3.x.

I noticed an option for the build to not statically link the engines.
This results in binaries that are a little smaller. I built the code
with 'no-static-engine' and used the 'install' option. Then I zipped
up the directory structure created by the makefile in c:\openssl. The
engine dll's can be found in the c:\openssl\lib\engines directory.

Openssl-0.9.8b-no-static-engine-Win32.zip

Try this build and let me know if it suits your needs. If it does I
will continue the build the updates in this form in addition to the
regular package, which is created to support Apache 1.3.x. Apache
2.x.x are packaged with OpenSSL included.

If you prefer you can build your own using these options, but let me
know so that I know if should continue to provide this form of
package.

Chris Lewis
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[Mike Ehlert]

Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this morning.
My apologies to all.


Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,


I was going to comment that this site does not offer the 0.9.8b binaries,
but what I'm after now is some information on any tricks to compiling
the DLL's with only the features needed for my application to reduce
their size. I'd rather not try to blindly rip appart the source without some
guidance as I am not a C++ coder, my former coding skills were limited
to masm.

Regards,  Mike 


__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[Mike Ehlert]

- Original Message - 
From: "Wai Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 2:36 PM
Subject: RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries


Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/, and I am 
using Visual Studio 2005 C++, and everything works fine. Ofcourse, I have 
the issue of getting a good random number generator.





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kyle Hamilton
Sent: Sat 5/6/2006 12:31 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries



First off, those aren't official.  They seem to be compiled by VC++ 6,
which seems to be binary-incompatible with VC++ .Net 2002+.  (I use
VC++2005 Express Edition, at the moment, and I can't get anything to
run when linked against those.)

Any inquiries about the Shining Light Productions binaries need to be
directed there.

He might be modifying his build process to include a FIPS-compliant
version of 0.9.7j -- I just don't know.

-Kyle H

On 5/5/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Can anyone tell me how long it usually takes after a release before the
official Windows binaries are updated (at Shining Light Productions)?


Regards,  Mike

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]





__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[Wai Wu]

Thnx. I will give it a try. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Hamilton
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 5:50 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

A fairly good random number generator can be found via CryptoAPI, if you
want to go through the hassle of using it.

-Kyle H

On 5/6/06, Wai Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/, and I
am using Visual Studio 2005 C++, and everything works fine. Ofcourse, I
have the issue of getting a good random number generator.
>
>
> 
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kyle Hamilton
> Sent: Sat 5/6/2006 12:31 AM
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
>
>
>
> First off, those aren't official.  They seem to be compiled by VC++ 6,

> which seems to be binary-incompatible with VC++ .Net 2002+.  (I use
> VC++2005 Express Edition, at the moment, and I can't get anything to
> run when linked against those.)
>
> Any inquiries about the Shining Light Productions binaries need to be 
> directed there.
>
> He might be modifying his build process to include a FIPS-compliant 
> version of 0.9.7j -- I just don't know.
>
> -Kyle H
>
> On 5/5/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me how long it usually takes after a release before 
> > the official Windows binaries are updated (at Shining Light
Productions)?
> >
> >
> > Regards,  Mike
> >
> >
__
> > OpenSSL Project
http://www.openssl.org
> > User Support Mailing List
openssl-users@openssl.org
> > Automated List Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[Kyle Hamilton]

A fairly good random number generator can be found via CryptoAPI, if
you want to go through the hassle of using it.

-Kyle H

On 5/6/06, Wai Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/, and I am using 
Visual Studio 2005 C++, and everything works fine. Ofcourse, I have the issue 
of getting a good random number generator.




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kyle Hamilton
Sent: Sat 5/6/2006 12:31 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries



First off, those aren't official.  They seem to be compiled by VC++ 6,
which seems to be binary-incompatible with VC++ .Net 2002+.  (I use
VC++2005 Express Edition, at the moment, and I can't get anything to
run when linked against those.)

Any inquiries about the Shining Light Productions binaries need to be
directed there.

He might be modifying his build process to include a FIPS-compliant
version of 0.9.7j -- I just don't know.

-Kyle H

On 5/5/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how long it usually takes after a release before the
> official Windows binaries are updated (at Shining Light Productions)?
>
>
> Regards,  Mike
>
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]





__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[Wai Wu]

Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/, and I am using 
Visual Studio 2005 C++, and everything works fine. Ofcourse, I have the issue 
of getting a good random number generator.

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kyle Hamilton
Sent: Sat 5/6/2006 12:31 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries



First off, those aren't official.  They seem to be compiled by VC++ 6,
which seems to be binary-incompatible with VC++ .Net 2002+.  (I use
VC++2005 Express Edition, at the moment, and I can't get anything to
run when linked against those.)

Any inquiries about the Shining Light Productions binaries need to be
directed there.

He might be modifying his build process to include a FIPS-compliant
version of 0.9.7j -- I just don't know.

-Kyle H

On 5/5/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how long it usually takes after a release before the
> official Windows binaries are updated (at Shining Light Productions)?
>
>
> Regards,  Mike
>
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


<>

Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[Mike Ehlert]

First off, those aren't official.  
Any inquiries about the Shining Light Productions binaries need to be

directed there.


Thanks Kyle. I sent him an email 2 days ago but haven't hear back yet.

I went ahead and compiled 0.9.8b on my own today, and I noticed that
libeay32.dll is 1,089,536 bytes in size. The install.w32 document
mentions the "no-static-engine" to decrease the size of the libeay32.dll,
but I was wondering if anyone knows of any similar options or howto's
to decrease the size of libeay32.dll.  


Regards,  Mike
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

[Kyle Hamilton]

First off, those aren't official.  They seem to be compiled by VC++ 6,
which seems to be binary-incompatible with VC++ .Net 2002+.  (I use
VC++2005 Express Edition, at the moment, and I can't get anything to
run when linked against those.)

Any inquiries about the Shining Light Productions binaries need to be
directed there.

He might be modifying his build process to include a FIPS-compliant
version of 0.9.7j -- I just don't know.

-Kyle H

On 5/5/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Can anyone tell me how long it usually takes after a release before the
official Windows binaries are updated (at Shining Light Productions)?


Regards,  Mike

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

0.9.8b windows binaries

[Mike Ehlert]

Can anyone tell me how long it usually takes after a release before the 
official Windows binaries are updated (at Shining Light Productions)?



Regards,  Mike 


__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: “OpenSSL binaries” on the (shared) server

[ssl_virgin (sent by Nabble.com)]

Thanks Kyle, much appreciated! 
--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/OpenSSL-binaries-on-the-%28shared%29-server-t1079747.html#a2818694
Sent from the OpenSSL - User forum at Nabble.com.

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: “OpenSSL binaries” on the (shared) server

[Kyle Hamilton]

Chances are, your host already has it installed.  Log into a shell and
type 'openssl' to see.

If he doesn't, you can download the source from openssl.org, put it on
your account, and compile it to generate an openssl binary, which
should go in a ~/bin directory of some kind.

-Kyle H

On 2/7/06, ssl_virgin (sent by Nabble.com) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  Hello again – another (possibly dumb) question I'm afraid:
>
> With your help I have successfully created a Private Key and Public
> Certificate using OpenSSL.  These were created on my PC and will be uploaded
> to the server (and the Public Cert will also be uploaded to PayPal).
> Apparently, in order to generate PayPal buttons "on the fly", I also need to
> upload "OpenSSL binaries" to the server.  What I need to know is:
>
> 1) what files exactly do I need to upload? (Server is running Linux).
>
> 2) Is this normally something that my host provider needs to be involved in
> (I have a shared server account), or can I just upload them to my server
> space (and obviously reference them accordingly in my scripts)?
>
> Thanks for any advice you can give!
> 
>  View this message in context: "OpenSSL binaries" on the (shared) server
>  Sent from the OpenSSL - User forum at Nabble.com.

“OpenSSL binaries” on the (shared) server

[ssl_virgin (sent by Nabble.com)]

Hello again – another (possibly dumb) question I'm afraid:

With your help I have successfully created a Private Key and Public Certificate using OpenSSL.  These were created on my PC and will be uploaded to the server (and the Public Cert will also be uploaded to PayPal).  Apparently, in order to generate PayPal buttons “on the fly”, I also need to upload “OpenSSL binaries” to the server.  What I need to know is:

1) what files exactly do I need to upload? (Server is running Linux).

2) Is this normally something that my host provider needs to be involved in (I have a shared server account), or can I just upload them to my server space (and obviously reference them accordingly in my scripts)?

Thanks for any advice you can give!

View this message in context: “OpenSSL binaries” on the (shared) server
Sent from the OpenSSL - User forum at Nabble.com.

Building Universial Binaries on a PPC MacOSX

[Jean-Pierre Szikora]

Hi,

As the new MacIntel are there, I want to build Universal Binaries of 
OpenSSL on a PowerPC MacOSX. How can I do that?


There are 2 URL on Apple's developer site describing that process:

http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Porting/Conceptual/PortingUnix/compiling/chapter_4_section_3.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40002850-BAJCFEBA
http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2005/tn2137.html

I've added  "-g -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk -arch i386 
-arch ppc" in the darwin-ppc-cc line of Configure. (0.9.7i)

and then:
./config shared -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H
make

The problem is that ar cannot work with libraries containing code for 
more than one architecture after ranlib has added a table of contents to 
them.


Is there a way to solve this issue?

Cheers,

Jean-Pierre

--
Dr Jean-Pierre Szikora   e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   tel: 32-2-764.75.00
74, av. Hippocrate - UCL 7459   fax: 32-2-764.65.65
1200 Brussels - Belgium PGP key: 0x6FCD7405

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IBM's OpenSSL binaries

[Stewart Dean]

This is free, although:
1) you have to register
2) the latest copy is 9.7d
Note that:
1) it is in RPM format
2) OPen SSH is available from the same page, though in installp format 
(use smitty)
3) both may have their libraries in funny places (typically IBM, they 
know better), so if you compile other stuff that is looking for 
libraries, etc., you 'll have to figure out where to point them.  for 
ssh, look in the .toc after you download the installables and run:

inutoc .
for ssl, use the rpm I forget the command that tells you where the stuff is.

https://www6.software.ibm.com/dl/aixtbx/aixtbx-i?S_PKG=dlaixww&S_TACT=&S_CMP=

Tom Spence wrote:

Good idea and where can I find?  BULL GROUP Website?

*/Stewart Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:

why not take the binary IBM supplies and supports?

Tom Spence wrote:
 > Hello,
 >
 > I have very small problem but it won't running... Please help me...
 > Here is what I got:
 >
 > # ./Configure aix-gcc
 >  (no problem)
 > # make
 > 
 > gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_THREAD_SAFE
 > -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -O -DB_ENDIAN -c -o aix_ppc32.o
aix_ppc32.s
 > (It stops right there for forever)
 >
 > Any idea??? I appreciate your help. Thanks.
 >
 >
 > (__[TomCigar]___~~~

-- 


Stewart Dean, Unix System Admin, Henderson Computer Resources
Center of Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York 12504
[EMAIL PROTECTED] voice: 845-758-7475, fax: 845-758-7035

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]



(__[TomCigar]___~~~


--

Stewart Dean, Unix System Admin, Henderson Computer Resources
Center of Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York  12504
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  voice: 845-758-7475, fax: 845-758-7035

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: binaries built with openssl 0.9.7b running on openssl 0.9.6b or 0.9.6g

[Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker]

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:57:55 -0700, Joseph Bruni 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

brunij> If you build your application on OS X or Darwin, you'll run into the 
brunij> really nasty problem where the LinkEditor will bind your app to shared 
brunij> libraries even if you specify static libraries.
brunij> 
brunij> (I found this out the hard way.)

Yup, that's a bug in the LinkEditor (ld for the Unixly impaired :-)).
I've complained about it to Apple more than a year ago (and they
confirmed the problem, but seem not to want to fix it), and I
encourage others to do the same.  The problem is described in great
detail in the file PROBLEMS (first item), along with possible
solutions (adapted for OpenSSL itself, but with a bit of thought, you
can apply the same knowledge to any other software).

-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  \ S-168 36  BROMMA  \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
\  SWEDEN   \
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See  for more info.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: binaries built with openssl 0.9.7b running on openssl 0.9.6b or 0.9.6g

[Joseph Bruni]

If you build your application on OS X or Darwin, you'll run into the 
really nasty problem where the LinkEditor will bind your app to shared 
libraries even if you specify static libraries.

(I found this out the hard way.)

Not fun.

On Mar 19, 2004, at 9:52 AM, Mark Rowe wrote:

Hi,

Question

If I build applications using a later version of
openssl and run the compiled binaries on an
operating system with earlier versions of openssl
will there be any problems?
Example: I build applications using openssl 0.9.7b on
linux redhat version 7.2 with kernel 2.4.7 and gnu gcc 2.96
and then run these binaries on linux redhat version 7.2 with
kernel 2.4.17 gnu gcc 2.96 that has openssl version 0.9.6g. 
Will there be any problems?

Thanks

-Mark-

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: binaries built with openssl 0.9.7b running on openssl 0.9.6b or 0.9.6g

[Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker]

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:52:21 -0600, Mark Rowe <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> said:

rowe> If I build applications using a later version of
rowe> openssl and run the compiled binaries on an
rowe> operating system with earlier versions of openssl
rowe> will there be any problems?
rowe> 
rowe> Example: I build applications using openssl 0.9.7b on
rowe> linux redhat version 7.2 with kernel 2.4.7 and gnu gcc 2.96
rowe> and then run these binaries on linux redhat version 7.2 with
rowe> kernel 2.4.17 gnu gcc 2.96 that has openssl version 0.9.6g.   

If you link with the static libraries, you will have no problems as
far as OpenSSL goes.  If you link with the shared libraries, the
likelyhood is high that you will run into problems.

-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  \ S-168 36  BROMMA  \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
\  SWEDEN   \
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: binaries built with openssl 0.9.7b running on openssl 0.9.6b or 0.9.6g

[Amar Desai]

Question

If I build applications using a later version of
openssl and run the compiled binaries on an
operating system with earlier versions of openssl
will there be any problems?
Example: I build applications using openssl 0.9.7b on
linux redhat version 7.2 with kernel 2.4.7 and gnu gcc 2.96
and then run these binaries on linux redhat version 7.2 with
kernel 2.4.17 gnu gcc 2.96 that has openssl version 0.9.6g.


It depends on how you are building your application. If you link your 
application against static libraries then I think it shouldn't matter. 
But if you link your application against shared libraries then it may 
have problems...

Amar



__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

binaries built with openssl 0.9.7b running on openssl 0.9.6b or 0.9.6g

[Mark Rowe]

Hi,

Question

If I build applications using a later version of
openssl and run the compiled binaries on an
operating system with earlier versions of openssl
will there be any problems?
Example: I build applications using openssl 0.9.7b on
linux redhat version 7.2 with kernel 2.4.7 and gnu gcc 2.96
and then run these binaries on linux redhat version 7.2 with
kernel 2.4.17 gnu gcc 2.96 that has openssl version 0.9.6g. 
Will there be any problems?

Thanks

-Mark-

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: I just want the binaries for W2K

[Peter 'Luna' Runestig]

Rabellino Sergio wrote:

Hi peter, which tool are you using to create .msi packages ??
It's a freeware one ?


It's my own code that creates the package, read this:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-dev&m=103210259026139&w=2
also
http://www.runestig.com/msiutil.html

Cheers,
- Peter
--
Peter 'Luna' Runestig (fd. Altberg), Sweden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP Key ID: 0xD07BBE13
Fingerprint: 7B5C 1F48 2997 C061 DE4B  42EA CB99 A35C D07B BE13
AOL Instant Messenger Screen name: PRunestig

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: I just want the binaries for W2K

[Rabellino Sergio]

Peter 'Luna' Runestig wrote:

Marcel Elsner wrote:


Hi,
 
i am sick of compiling everything again and again using 3 or more 
different compilers. I really tried it but now just want
running code. Is anybody out there who allready has the binarys for 
windows 2000? if, then please send it or give me
a link where i can download.


Here's one suggestion:
ftp://ftp.runestig.com/pub/openssl-win32/openssl-0.9.6h.msi
ftp://ftp.runestig.com/pub/openssl-win32/openssl-0.9.6h.msi.sig
or
http://www.runestig.com/pub/openssl-win32/openssl-0.9.6h.msi
http://www.runestig.com/pub/openssl-win32/openssl-0.9.6h.msi.sig

More info about these packages:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-dev&m=103210259026139&w=2

Cheers,
- Peter


Hi peter, which tool are you using to create .msi packages ??
It's a freeware one ?


Thanks.
--
Dott. Sergio Rabellino

 Technical Staff
 Department of Computer Science
 University of Torino (Italy)
 Member of the Internet Society

http://www.di.unito.it/~rabser
Tel. +39-0116706701
Fax. +39-011751603

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: I just want the binaries for W2K

[Peter 'Luna' Runestig]

Marcel Elsner wrote:

Hi,
 
i am sick of compiling everything again and again using 3 or more 
different compilers. I really tried it but now just want
running code. Is anybody out there who allready has the binarys for 
windows 2000? if, then please send it or give me
a link where i can download.

Here's one suggestion:
ftp://ftp.runestig.com/pub/openssl-win32/openssl-0.9.6h.msi
ftp://ftp.runestig.com/pub/openssl-win32/openssl-0.9.6h.msi.sig
or
http://www.runestig.com/pub/openssl-win32/openssl-0.9.6h.msi
http://www.runestig.com/pub/openssl-win32/openssl-0.9.6h.msi.sig

More info about these packages:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-dev&m=103210259026139&w=2

Cheers,
- Peter
--
Peter 'Luna' Runestig (fd. Altberg), Sweden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP Key ID: 0xD07BBE13
Fingerprint: 7B5C 1F48 2997 C061 DE4B  42EA CB99 A35C D07B BE13
AOL Instant Messenger Screen name: PRunestig

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I just want the binaries for W2K

[Marcel Elsner]

Hi,
 
i am sick of compiling everything again and again 
using 3 or more different compilers. I really tried it but now just want 

running code. Is anybody out there who allready has the binarys for windows 2000? if, then please 
send it or give me 
a link where i can download.
 
 
thx & happy 3rd 
advent
 
Marcel

[Crypt::SSLeay] Looking for modern version of Perl binaries for Win32

[Clinton Pierce]

Looking for a bit of help here.  I need to do some LWP work over https, and
the proxy method for the LWP::UserAgent module doesn't do http-CONNECT style
proxying (it simply re-isses the GET).

According to the manpage, Crypt::SSLeay (0.45) does thorugh the
$ENV{HTTPS_PROXY} interface but the version made available by Activestate
(0.17) doesn't seem to.

Does anyone have a modern Win32/Activestate compatable version of
Crypt::SSLeay compiled and wouldn't mind giving me the binaries?

Thank you!
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Need recipe for finding binaries with static libssl

[Mike Green]

In light of the recent vulnerabilities announced in openssl, I am attempting 
to recompile packages against openssl-0.9.6e.  Finding binaries/libraries 
compiled against shared libraries has been straightforward.  However, I 
have no clue how to approach finding binaries/libraries that have 
statically compiled openssl code in them.

Does anyone have a recipe for doing this?  I would appreciate an idea of 
what tools to use (nm?) and symbols to look for.  The environment I am 
attempting to do this in is linux on packages compiled for i686.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: binaries

[Paul E. Prak]

Hi Andrew,

I like to have a certificate for my http-server and to create certicate for
members of my team.
The platform i am currently running on is win98se (dutch version)

Talking about a fee? Maybe at a later stage for now i don't know.

Regards,
Paul

- Original Message -
From: "Andrew T. Finnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:23 PM
Subject: RE: binaries


> What kind of platforms are we looking to have this on?
> I have somewhat access to a large set of machines including the
> following:
>
> Compilers:
> --
>
> Visual C++ 6.0
> Visual C++ .NET
> SunCC 5.2
> gcc (of course.. )
>
> Platforms:
> --
>
> Windows NT 4.0
> Windows 2000
> Windows 2000 Advanced Server
> Windows XP Professional
> Sparc Solaris 7
> Sparc Solaris 8
> Any version of linux, because ofcourse the distro's are free.
>
>
> What kind of support would everyone expect from this? I would like to
> know what all would
> Be involved or better yet, what the people from this group would
> _expect_. Would anyone be
> Oposed to a small fee for these? Maybe a subscription type fee that
> would be very minimal in the range of
> $5/month , or something like that just so the machine's hosting this can
> be paid for and the time doing this
> Is paid for. As everyone knows bandwidth is not free nowadays and
> depending on the traffic received it can cost
> A pretty penny. I would like some ideas as to what could be done with
> this and what people would/wouldn't do for
> These binaries. This could become a great way to alleviate the build
> pain some people experience.
>
>
> -
> Andrew T. Finnell
> Active Solutions L.L.C
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: binaries

[Andrew T. Finnell]

What kind of platforms are we looking to have this on?
I have somewhat access to a large set of machines including the
following:

Compilers:
--

Visual C++ 6.0 
Visual C++ .NET
SunCC 5.2
gcc (of course.. )

Platforms:
--

Windows NT 4.0
Windows 2000
Windows 2000 Advanced Server
Windows XP Professional
Sparc Solaris 7
Sparc Solaris 8
Any version of linux, because ofcourse the distro's are free.


What kind of support would everyone expect from this? I would like to
know what all would 
Be involved or better yet, what the people from this group would
_expect_. Would anyone be
Oposed to a small fee for these? Maybe a subscription type fee that
would be very minimal in the range of 
$5/month , or something like that just so the machine's hosting this can
be paid for and the time doing this
Is paid for. As everyone knows bandwidth is not free nowadays and
depending on the traffic received it can cost
A pretty penny. I would like some ideas as to what could be done with
this and what people would/wouldn't do for
These binaries. This could become a great way to alleviate the build
pain some people experience.


- 
Andrew T. Finnell
Active Solutions L.L.C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Richard 
> Levitte - VMS Whacker
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 6:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: binaries
> 
> 
> A note on this: if someone wants to produce OpenSSL binaries 
> in a consistent way and put them out somewhere, I'd be happy 
> to link to them or the directory they're in.
> 
> Note that consistently means that there should be some kind 
> of note saying exactly how the binaries were produced and 
> what is required to install them.  It also means that the 
> production of binaries shouldn't just be on a one-time basis, 
> I don't think that several links to various versions of the 
> otherwise same binary is very useful. Basically, I'm looking 
> for people to commit themselves for some time, and to handle 
> it nicely when they need to do something else (basically, 
> hand it off to someone else that can commit in the same manner).
> 
> Another note: neither me nor the rest of the OpenSSL team will take
> *any* responsability for the quality of the binaries.  All 
> we'll do is to set up the links.  If there are viruses coming 
> with the binaries, blame the one who produced them, not us, 
> or blame yourself for not having an updated virus scanner.  I 
> know this sounds harsh, I just don't want the middle man to 
> be attacked.
> 
> -- 
> Richard Levitte   \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Redakteur@Stacken  \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
> \  SWEDEN   \ or +46-708-26 53 44
> Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
> 
> Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of 
> $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/> ~levitte/mail/> for more 
> info. 
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: binaries

[Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker]

A note on this: if someone wants to produce OpenSSL binaries in a
consistent way and put them out somewhere, I'd be happy to link to
them or the directory they're in.

Note that consistently means that there should be some kind of note
saying exactly how the binaries were produced and what is required to
install them.  It also means that the production of binaries shouldn't
just be on a one-time basis, I don't think that several links to
various versions of the otherwise same binary is very useful.
Basically, I'm looking for people to commit themselves for some time,
and to handle it nicely when they need to do something else
(basically, hand it off to someone else that can commit in the same
manner).

Another note: neither me nor the rest of the OpenSSL team will take
*any* responsability for the quality of the binaries.  All we'll do is
to set up the links.  If there are viruses coming with the binaries,
blame the one who produced them, not us, or blame yourself for not
having an updated virus scanner.  I know this sounds harsh, I just
don't want the middle man to be attacked.

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken  \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\  SWEDEN   \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: binaries

[Andrew Finnell]

Title: Message



Paul,
 
    Well someone can't just give you binaries because you would need a build 
specific to your compiler and the settings you want for your application. You 
should probably ought to list your problem including platform , compiler and 
settings.
 
 
-Andrew T. 
FinnellSoftware EngineereSecurity Inc(321) 394-2485

  
  -Original Message-From: Paul E. Prak 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:43 
  PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: 
  binaries
  Hi Andrew,
   
  Nope I didn't. It is not a problem with the 
  source.
  My problem is in C++ it acts a bit weird and I do 
  not know the real problem.
   
  Regards,
  Paul.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Andrew Finnell 
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' 

Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 11:11 
PM
Subject: RE: binaries

Paul,
    
    Did you post what the problem was during your 
compile?
 
-Andrew T. 
FinnellSoftware EngineereSecurity Inc(321) 
394-2485

  
  -Original Message-From: Paul E. Prak 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 5:10 
  PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
  binaries
  Hi all,
   
  Can I download the binaries for 
  win32 somewhere?
   
  I tried almost everything to compile but 
  could not fix it.
   
  Please help!!!
   
  Regards,
  Paul

Re: binaries

[Paul E. Prak]

Title: Message



Hi Andrew,
 
Nope I didn't. It is not a problem with the 
source.
My problem is in C++ it acts a bit weird and I do 
not know the real problem.
 
Regards,
Paul.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Andrew Finnell 
  To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' 
  
  Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 11:11 
  PM
  Subject: RE: binaries
  
  Paul,
      
      Did you post what the problem was during your 
  compile?
   
  -Andrew T. 
  FinnellSoftware EngineereSecurity Inc(321) 
  394-2485
  

-Original Message-From: Paul E. Prak 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 5:10 
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
binaries
Hi all,
 
Can I download the binaries for 
win32 somewhere?
 
I tried almost everything to compile but could 
not fix it.
 
Please help!!!
 
Regards,
Paul

RE: binaries

[Andrew Finnell]

Title: Message



Paul,
    
    Did you post what the problem was during your 
compile?
 
-Andrew T. 
FinnellSoftware EngineereSecurity Inc(321) 
394-2485

  
  -Original Message-From: Paul E. Prak 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 5:10 
  PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
  binaries
  Hi all,
   
  Can I download the binaries for 
  win32 somewhere?
   
  I tried almost everything to compile but could 
  not fix it.
   
  Please help!!!
   
  Regards,
  Paul

binaries

[Paul E. Prak]

Hi all,
 
Can I download the binaries for 
win32 somewhere?
 
I tried almost everything to compile but could not 
fix it.
 
Please help!!!
 
Regards,
Paul

RE: WIN32 binaries anyone??

[John . Airey]

Have you checked out http://curl.haxx.se/download.html?

-
John Airey
Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute for the
Blind,
Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU,
Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>-Original Message-
>From: Radi Shourbaji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 13 September 2001 08:50
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: WIN32 binaries anyone??
>Importance: High


>I am in search of pre-built binaries for WIN32 to use in conjunction with
curl in a w2k environment.  Any help would be appreciated!  
 
>Thanks!
 
>Radi
 

- 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 
system.

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: WIN32 binaries anyone??

[Hannu Krosing]

I use the ones from m2crypto (python bindings) site

http://www.pobox.org.sg/home/ngps/m2/


the libs themself are at:

http://www.pobox.org.sg/home/ngps/m2/openssl-0.9.6-win32.zip

---
Hannu
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

WIN32 binaries anyone??

[Radi Shourbaji]

I am in
search of pre-built binaries for WIN32 to use in conjunction with curl in a w2k
environment.  Any help would be
appreciated!  

 

Thanks!

 

Radi

 

[Announce] M2Crypto 0.05p1 and Win32 binaries]

[Ng Pheng Siong]

Hello,

M2Crypto 0.05p1 is now available, in source and Win32 binary
packages.

M2Crypto is a Python interface to OpenSSL's ciphers, message 
digests and SSL and S/MIME functionality.

Get it here:

http://www.post1.com/home/ngps/m2


As usual, feedback is welcome.
-- 
Ng Pheng Siong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * http://www.post1.com/home/ngps
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Announcement: OpenSSL 0.9.6 binaries for HP-UX 10.20

[Lutz Jaenicke]

On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 11:23:36PM +0100, Reiner Buehl wrote:
> I could provide a swinstall version if people are interrested, but I
> do not have a ftp site to make it available.

Binaries are not provided at the OpenSSL download site, so the problem for
people is finding them.
I don't remember having seen a discussion about, but I do see a problem with
the integrity of the contents. There is no guarantee that there is no
trojan horse inside a contributed package.
(This remark is not meant as an offense, just as a general point to think
about!)

I could offer my own ftp site, but I would rather use your script to build
the package and rebuild it before making it available, for the very reason
stated above. If I offer it at my site, I am kind of responsible for the
contents...

Having this said, I don't know whether the policy at hpux.connect.org.uk
has changed. They did not offer cryptographic software for the old export
resctriction rules. This archive would be a good place for HP-UX binaries.

Best regards,
Lutz
-- 
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTU Cottbus   http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
Lehrstuhl Allgemeine Elektrotechnik  Tel. +49 355 69-4129
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus  Fax. +49 355 69-4153
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Announcement: OpenSSL 0.9.6 binaries for HP-UX 10.20

[George Staikos]

On Friday 17 November 2000 17:23, Reiner Buehl wrote:
> I could provide a swinstall version if people are interrested, but I
> do not have a ftp site to make it available.

  That would be great!  You could probably submit to the HP Packaging Project 
too

-- 

George Staikos 

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Announcement: OpenSSL 0.9.6 binaries for HP-UX 10.20

[Reiner Buehl]

I could provide a swinstall version if people are interrested, but I
do not have a ftp site to make it available.

Best Regards,
Reiner.

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lutz Jaenicke
> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 11:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Announcement: OpenSSL 0.9.6 binaries for HP-UX 10.20
> 
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Due to the questions arising on this list during the last days I have
> decided to provide binaries of OpenSSL 0.9.6 for HP-UX 10.20.
> In fact, I just tar'ed together my own installation and wrote a README :-)
> 
> You can download it at:
>   ftp://ftp.aet.tu-cottbus.de/pub/postfix_tls/related/openssl-bin/
> Please make sure to read the README file, which is appended to this email.
> 
> Best regards,
>   Lutz
> -- 
> Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> BTU Cottbus   http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
> Lehrstuhl Allgemeine Elektrotechnik  Tel. +49 355 69-4129
> Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus  Fax. +49 355 69-4153
> -snip--snip--snip--snip--snip--snip--snip--snip--snip--snip--snip--snip--snip-
> Contents:
> =
> 
> This is a binary of OpenSSL-0.9.6 for HP-UX 10.20, compiled for portabilty.
> It should run on all HP platforms with HP-UX 10.20, probably also on HP-UX 11.
> 
> It contains the openssl binary as well as both shared and archive libraries
> and header files to be used for compilations, as created by "make install"
> >from the OpenSSL source. The installation was performed with the script
> shlib/hpux10-cc.sh, the only change is that I have changed the shared
> library names to "...0.9.6" in shlib/Makefile.hpux10-cc to allow easier
> upgrading.
> 
> Installation: * IMPORTANT *
> =
> Due to the compiled in paths to the shared libraries, this package MUST
> be installed in /usr/local/ssl. If you install it in any other location,
> you must set a soft link, so that the shared libraries can be referenced
> vi /usr/local/ssl! Otherwise the package will not work.
> 
> To install, perform
>   cd /usr/local ; gtar zxvf /path/to/openssl-0.9.6-hpux-10.20-runtime.tar.gz
> (Use gunzip and tar if you don't have gnu-tar installed.)
> 
> Disclaimer:
> ===
> This package is a copy of my own installation I am running without problems
> on several hosts since the release of OpenSSL 0.9.6. I won't take any
> responsibility whatsoever :-)
> 
> Copying:
> 
> The contents of the archive is covered by the OpenSSL license. Besides this,
> you can copy and redistribute this binary distribution as it pleases you.
> 
> Cottbus, 17 November 2000, Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Announcement: OpenSSL 0.9.6 binaries for HP-UX 10.20

[Lutz Jaenicke]

Hi!

Due to the questions arising on this list during the last days I have
decided to provide binaries of OpenSSL 0.9.6 for HP-UX 10.20.
In fact, I just tar'ed together my own installation and wrote a README :-)

You can download it at:
  ftp://ftp.aet.tu-cottbus.de/pub/postfix_tls/related/openssl-bin/
Please make sure to read the README file, which is appended to this email.

Best regards,
Lutz
-- 
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTU Cottbus   http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
Lehrstuhl Allgemeine Elektrotechnik  Tel. +49 355 69-4129
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus  Fax. +49 355 69-4153
-snip--snip--snip--snip--snip--snip--snip--snip--snip--snip--snip--snip--snip-
Contents:
=

This is a binary of OpenSSL-0.9.6 for HP-UX 10.20, compiled for portabilty.
It should run on all HP platforms with HP-UX 10.20, probably also on HP-UX 11.

It contains the openssl binary as well as both shared and archive libraries
and header files to be used for compilations, as created by "make install"
from the OpenSSL source. The installation was performed with the script
shlib/hpux10-cc.sh, the only change is that I have changed the shared
library names to "...0.9.6" in shlib/Makefile.hpux10-cc to allow easier
upgrading.

Installation: * IMPORTANT *
=
Due to the compiled in paths to the shared libraries, this package MUST
be installed in /usr/local/ssl. If you install it in any other location,
you must set a soft link, so that the shared libraries can be referenced
vi /usr/local/ssl! Otherwise the package will not work.

To install, perform
  cd /usr/local ; gtar zxvf /path/to/openssl-0.9.6-hpux-10.20-runtime.tar.gz
(Use gunzip and tar if you don't have gnu-tar installed.)

Disclaimer:
===
This package is a copy of my own installation I am running without problems
on several hosts since the release of OpenSSL 0.9.6. I won't take any
responsibility whatsoever :-)

Copying:

The contents of the archive is covered by the OpenSSL license. Besides this,
you can copy and redistribute this binary distribution as it pleases you.

Cottbus, 17 November 2000, Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Win32 binaries needed.

[David Maurus]

Craig Manley wrote:

> Hi all,
> I've got the free Borland C++ 5.5 compiler but I can't compile the
> source on Win98. Has anybody got already compiled Win32 binaries (or a
> complete setup) that I could download?

You can grab them here (temporary):
http://www.mailbag.de/Out32dll.zip

The zip contains the complete content of the out32dll directory. I've
compiled openssl-0.9.6 with masm 6.15 and VC6Sp4.

- David



__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Win32 binaries needed.

[Craig Manley]

Hi all,
I've got the free Borland C++ 5.5 compiler but I can't compile the
source on Win98. Has anybody got already compiled Win32 binaries (or a
complete setup) that I could download?
P.S. I'm not a C programmer so I have no hope in figuring out how to
compile it myself.
-Craig Manley.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Solaris SUN Binaries

[Holger Reif]

You don't need special privilegues to compile openssl. Just go
into your home directory, download the tar.gz archive, unpack
and compile it. The only thing yopu can'T do as usual is the 
installing.

Neal Scoones schrieb:
> 
> Hello -
> 
> I'm trying to build a small proxy on my web server that can act as a https
> client.  I've got libwww running fine, but can't seem to get openssl to
> complile successfully.  Multiple things seem to be holding me back:
> 
> 1 - I don't have root access
> 2 - I can't write to the main perl lib dirctory, and instead have to do a
> "use lib" to a directory I can write to.
> 3 - Other things I don't know about
> 
> My question is whether anyone knows of a source for precompiled binaries
> for openssl, or of another way to get PERL to speak https as a client that
> doesn't require extensive compiling.  In the absence of enough UNIX
> knowlege to fix the code to get something to complile, I'm really stuck.
> 
> My ISP is running SunOS on a Solaris server.
> 
> Thanks so much,
> Neal
> 
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Holger Reif  Tel.: +49 361 74707-0
SmartRing GmbH   Fax.: +49 361 7470720
Europaplatz 5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D-99091 ErfurtWWW.SmartRing.de
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Making exportable binaries?

[John Fisher]

Hello,

I'm writing an application that utilizes OpenSSL for
encryption/authentication. Certainly, I can make the application
binaries as strong as I want in the US, cryptographically-speaking. But,
if I wanted to generated some binaries that I knew were export-safe
outside the US, how would I do it? It seems that I can give flags to the
Configure script when building OpenSSL, in order to scale down the
strength of encryption, but what flags specifically? What exactly would
I end up with, in terms of encryption and authentication?

Thanks,
John
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]