Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

[Zhipeng Huang]

Feel free to add your name to the wiki :)

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Alex Xu  wrote:

> ++, I also want to join this party :)
>
> 2018-01-09 8:40 GMT+08:00 Zhipeng Huang :
>
>> Agree 100% to avoid regular meeting and it is better to have bi-weekly
>> email report. Meeting should be arranged event based, and I think given the
>> status of OpenStack community's work on resource provider, mostly what we
>> need to do is attend k8s meetings (sig-scheduler, wg-resource-management,
>> etc.)
>>
>> BTW for the RM SIG proposed here, let's not limit the scope to k8s only
>> since we might have broader collaborative efforts happening in the future.
>> k8s is our first primary target community to sync up with.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:12 AM, Jay Pipes  wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/08/2018 12:26 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote:
>>>
 Hi all,

 With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in
 OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community
 increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a
 Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community to
 communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other related
 SIGs.

 The formation of the SIG is to provide a gathering of similar
 interested parties and establish an official channel. Currently we have
 already OpenStack developers actively participating in kubernetes
 discussion (e.g. [1]), we would hope the ResMgmt SIG could further help
 such activities and better align the resource mgmt mechanism, especially
 the data modeling between the two communities (or even more communities
 with similar desire).

 I have floated the idea with Jay Pipes and Chris Dent and received
 positive feedback. The SIG will have a co-lead structure so that people
 could spearheading in the area they are most interested in. For example for
 me as Cyborg dev, I will mostly lead in the area of acceleration[2].

 If you are also interested please reply to this thread, and let's find
 a efficient way to form this SIG. Efficient means no extra unnecessary
 meetings and other undue burdens.

>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> From the Nova perspective, the scheduler meeting (which is Mondays at
>>> 1400 UTC) is the primary meeting where resource tracking and accounting
>>> issues are typically discussed.
>>>
>>> Chris Dent has done a fabulous job recording progress on the resource
>>> providers and placement work over the last couple releases by issuing
>>> status emails to the openstack-dev@ mailing list each Friday.
>>>
>>> I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if
>>> we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events in
>>> the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular meetings for
>>> a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have targeted
>>> topical meetings over regular meetings.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> -jay
>>>
>>> 
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.op
>>> enstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Zhipeng (Howard) Huang
>>
>> Standard Engineer
>> IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line
>> Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
>> Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
>> Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen
>>
>> (Previous)
>> Research Assistant
>> Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
>> University of California, Irvine
>> Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
>> Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402
>>
>> OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado
>>
>> 
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University of California, Irvine
Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

[Alex Xu]

++, I also want to join this party :)

2018-01-09 8:40 GMT+08:00 Zhipeng Huang :

> Agree 100% to avoid regular meeting and it is better to have bi-weekly
> email report. Meeting should be arranged event based, and I think given the
> status of OpenStack community's work on resource provider, mostly what we
> need to do is attend k8s meetings (sig-scheduler, wg-resource-management,
> etc.)
>
> BTW for the RM SIG proposed here, let's not limit the scope to k8s only
> since we might have broader collaborative efforts happening in the future.
> k8s is our first primary target community to sync up with.
>
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:12 AM, Jay Pipes  wrote:
>
>> On 01/08/2018 12:26 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in
>>> OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community
>>> increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a
>>> Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community to
>>> communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other related
>>> SIGs.
>>>
>>> The formation of the SIG is to provide a gathering of similar interested
>>> parties and establish an official channel. Currently we have already
>>> OpenStack developers actively participating in kubernetes discussion (e.g.
>>> [1]), we would hope the ResMgmt SIG could further help such activities and
>>> better align the resource mgmt mechanism, especially the data modeling
>>> between the two communities (or even more communities with similar desire).
>>>
>>> I have floated the idea with Jay Pipes and Chris Dent and received
>>> positive feedback. The SIG will have a co-lead structure so that people
>>> could spearheading in the area they are most interested in. For example for
>>> me as Cyborg dev, I will mostly lead in the area of acceleration[2].
>>>
>>> If you are also interested please reply to this thread, and let's find a
>>> efficient way to form this SIG. Efficient means no extra unnecessary
>>> meetings and other undue burdens.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> From the Nova perspective, the scheduler meeting (which is Mondays at
>> 1400 UTC) is the primary meeting where resource tracking and accounting
>> issues are typically discussed.
>>
>> Chris Dent has done a fabulous job recording progress on the resource
>> providers and placement work over the last couple releases by issuing
>> status emails to the openstack-dev@ mailing list each Friday.
>>
>> I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if
>> we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events in
>> the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular meetings for
>> a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have targeted
>> topical meetings over regular meetings.
>>
>> Best,
>> -jay
>>
>> 
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Zhipeng (Howard) Huang
>
> Standard Engineer
> IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line
> Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
> Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
> Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen
>
> (Previous)
> Research Assistant
> Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
> University of California, Irvine
> Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
> Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402
>
> OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

[Zhipeng Huang]

application filed at

https://review.openstack.org/534342 and wiki created at
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Res_Mgmt_SIG .

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Zhipeng Huang 
wrote:

> i think I could do it, but I gotta rely on you guys to attend the Resource
> Management WG meeting since its time is really bad for us in APAC timezone
> :P
>
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Chris Dent  wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Jay Pipes wrote:
>>
>> I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if
>>> we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events in
>>> the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular meetings for
>>> a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have targeted
>>> topical meetings over regular meetings.
>>>
>>
>> I agree, would much prefer to see more email and less meetings. It
>> would be fantastic if we can get some cross pollination disucssion
>> happening.
>>
>> A status email, especially one that was cross-ecosystem, would be
>> great. Unfortunately I can't commit to doing that myself (the
>> existing 2 a week I do is plenty) but hope someone will take it up.
>>
>> --
>> Chris Dent  (⊙＿⊙') https://anticdent.org/
>> freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent
>> 
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Zhipeng (Howard) Huang
>
> Standard Engineer
> IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line
> Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
> Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
> Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen
>
> (Previous)
> Research Assistant
> Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
> University of California, Irvine
> Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
> Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402
>
> OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado
>



-- 
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University of California, Irvine
Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

[Zhipeng Huang]

i think I could do it, but I gotta rely on you guys to attend the Resource
Management WG meeting since its time is really bad for us in APAC timezone
:P

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Chris Dent  wrote:

> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if we're
>> talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events in the
>> resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular meetings for a
>> resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have targeted topical
>> meetings over regular meetings.
>>
>
> I agree, would much prefer to see more email and less meetings. It
> would be fantastic if we can get some cross pollination disucssion
> happening.
>
> A status email, especially one that was cross-ecosystem, would be
> great. Unfortunately I can't commit to doing that myself (the
> existing 2 a week I do is plenty) but hope someone will take it up.
>
> --
> Chris Dent  (⊙＿⊙') https://anticdent.org/
> freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University of California, Irvine
Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

[Chris Dent]

On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Jay Pipes wrote:

I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if we're 
talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events in the 
resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular meetings for a 
resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have targeted topical 
meetings over regular meetings.


I agree, would much prefer to see more email and less meetings. It
would be fantastic if we can get some cross pollination disucssion
happening.

A status email, especially one that was cross-ecosystem, would be
great. Unfortunately I can't commit to doing that myself (the
existing 2 a week I do is plenty) but hope someone will take it up.

--
Chris Dent  (⊙＿⊙') https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

[Thierry Carrez]

Zhipeng Huang wrote:
> [...]
> With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in
> OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community
> increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a
> Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community to
> communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other related
> SIGs.
> [...]

When ready, please propose a change to the governance-sigs repository,
adding the proposed SIG to the sigs.yaml file:

https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance-sigs/tree/sigs.yaml

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

[Zhipeng Huang]

Hi Eric,

Glad to count you in :)

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:57 AM, Eric Fried  wrote:

> > I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if
> > we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events
> > in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular
> > meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have
> > targeted topical meetings over regular meetings.
>
> Agree with this.  That said, please include me (efried) in whatever
> shakes out.
>
> On 01/08/2018 02:12 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> > On 01/08/2018 12:26 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in
> >> OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community
> >> increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form
> >> a Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community
> >> to communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other
> >> related SIGs.
> >>
> >> The formation of the SIG is to provide a gathering of similar
> >> interested parties and establish an official channel. Currently we
> >> have already OpenStack developers actively participating in kubernetes
> >> discussion (e.g. [1]), we would hope the ResMgmt SIG could further
> >> help such activities and better align the resource mgmt mechanism,
> >> especially the data modeling between the two communities (or even more
> >> communities with similar desire).
> >>
> >> I have floated the idea with Jay Pipes and Chris Dent and received
> >> positive feedback. The SIG will have a co-lead structure so that
> >> people could spearheading in the area they are most interested in. For
> >> example for me as Cyborg dev, I will mostly lead in the area of
> >> acceleration[2].
> >>
> >> If you are also interested please reply to this thread, and let's find
> >> a efficient way to form this SIG. Efficient means no extra unnecessary
> >> meetings and other undue burdens.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > From the Nova perspective, the scheduler meeting (which is Mondays at
> > 1400 UTC) is the primary meeting where resource tracking and accounting
> > issues are typically discussed.
> >
> > Chris Dent has done a fabulous job recording progress on the resource
> > providers and placement work over the last couple releases by issuing
> > status emails to the openstack-dev@ mailing list each Friday.
> >
> > I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if
> > we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events
> > in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular
> > meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have
> > targeted topical meetings over regular meetings.
> >
> > Best,
> > -jay
> >
> > 
> __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:
> unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University of California, Irvine
Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

[Zhipeng Huang]

Agree 100% to avoid regular meeting and it is better to have bi-weekly
email report. Meeting should be arranged event based, and I think given the
status of OpenStack community's work on resource provider, mostly what we
need to do is attend k8s meetings (sig-scheduler, wg-resource-management,
etc.)

BTW for the RM SIG proposed here, let's not limit the scope to k8s only
since we might have broader collaborative efforts happening in the future.
k8s is our first primary target community to sync up with.

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:12 AM, Jay Pipes  wrote:

> On 01/08/2018 12:26 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in
>> OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community
>> increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a
>> Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community to
>> communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other related
>> SIGs.
>>
>> The formation of the SIG is to provide a gathering of similar interested
>> parties and establish an official channel. Currently we have already
>> OpenStack developers actively participating in kubernetes discussion (e.g.
>> [1]), we would hope the ResMgmt SIG could further help such activities and
>> better align the resource mgmt mechanism, especially the data modeling
>> between the two communities (or even more communities with similar desire).
>>
>> I have floated the idea with Jay Pipes and Chris Dent and received
>> positive feedback. The SIG will have a co-lead structure so that people
>> could spearheading in the area they are most interested in. For example for
>> me as Cyborg dev, I will mostly lead in the area of acceleration[2].
>>
>> If you are also interested please reply to this thread, and let's find a
>> efficient way to form this SIG. Efficient means no extra unnecessary
>> meetings and other undue burdens.
>>
>
> +1
>
> From the Nova perspective, the scheduler meeting (which is Mondays at 1400
> UTC) is the primary meeting where resource tracking and accounting issues
> are typically discussed.
>
> Chris Dent has done a fabulous job recording progress on the resource
> providers and placement work over the last couple releases by issuing
> status emails to the openstack-dev@ mailing list each Friday.
>
> I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if we're
> talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events in the
> resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular meetings for a
> resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have targeted topical
> meetings over regular meetings.
>
> Best,
> -jay
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University of California, Irvine
Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

[Eric Fried]

> I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if
> we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events
> in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular
> meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have
> targeted topical meetings over regular meetings.

Agree with this.  That said, please include me (efried) in whatever
shakes out.

On 01/08/2018 02:12 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 01/08/2018 12:26 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in
>> OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community
>> increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form
>> a Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community
>> to communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other
>> related SIGs.
>>
>> The formation of the SIG is to provide a gathering of similar
>> interested parties and establish an official channel. Currently we
>> have already OpenStack developers actively participating in kubernetes
>> discussion (e.g. [1]), we would hope the ResMgmt SIG could further
>> help such activities and better align the resource mgmt mechanism,
>> especially the data modeling between the two communities (or even more
>> communities with similar desire).
>>
>> I have floated the idea with Jay Pipes and Chris Dent and received
>> positive feedback. The SIG will have a co-lead structure so that
>> people could spearheading in the area they are most interested in. For
>> example for me as Cyborg dev, I will mostly lead in the area of
>> acceleration[2].
>>
>> If you are also interested please reply to this thread, and let's find
>> a efficient way to form this SIG. Efficient means no extra unnecessary
>> meetings and other undue burdens.
> 
> +1
> 
> From the Nova perspective, the scheduler meeting (which is Mondays at
> 1400 UTC) is the primary meeting where resource tracking and accounting
> issues are typically discussed.
> 
> Chris Dent has done a fabulous job recording progress on the resource
> providers and placement work over the last couple releases by issuing
> status emails to the openstack-dev@ mailing list each Friday.
> 
> I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if
> we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events
> in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular
> meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have
> targeted topical meetings over regular meetings.
> 
> Best,
> -jay
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

[Jay Pipes]

On 01/08/2018 12:26 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote:

Hi all,

With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in 
OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community 
increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a 
Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community to 
communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other related 
SIGs.


The formation of the SIG is to provide a gathering of similar interested 
parties and establish an official channel. Currently we have already 
OpenStack developers actively participating in kubernetes discussion 
(e.g. [1]), we would hope the ResMgmt SIG could further help such 
activities and better align the resource mgmt mechanism, especially the 
data modeling between the two communities (or even more communities with 
similar desire).


I have floated the idea with Jay Pipes and Chris Dent and received 
positive feedback. The SIG will have a co-lead structure so that people 
could spearheading in the area they are most interested in. For example 
for me as Cyborg dev, I will mostly lead in the area of acceleration[2].


If you are also interested please reply to this thread, and let's find a 
efficient way to form this SIG. Efficient means no extra unnecessary 
meetings and other undue burdens.


+1

From the Nova perspective, the scheduler meeting (which is Mondays at 
1400 UTC) is the primary meeting where resource tracking and accounting 
issues are typically discussed.


Chris Dent has done a fabulous job recording progress on the resource 
providers and placement work over the last couple releases by issuing 
status emails to the openstack-dev@ mailing list each Friday.


I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if 
we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events 
in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular 
meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have 
targeted topical meetings over regular meetings.


Best,
-jay

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

[Zhipeng Huang]

Hi all,

With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in
OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community
increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a
Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community to
communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other related
SIGs.

The formation of the SIG is to provide a gathering of similar interested
parties and establish an official channel. Currently we have already
OpenStack developers actively participating in kubernetes discussion (e.g.
[1]), we would hope the ResMgmt SIG could further help such activities and
better align the resource mgmt mechanism, especially the data modeling
between the two communities (or even more communities with similar desire).

I have floated the idea with Jay Pipes and Chris Dent and received positive
feedback. The SIG will have a co-lead structure so that people could
spearheading in the area they are most interested in. For example for me as
Cyborg dev, I will mostly lead in the area of acceleration[2].

If you are also interested please reply to this thread, and let's find a
efficient way to form this SIG. Efficient means no extra unnecessary
meetings and other undue burdens.

[0]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j3vrG6BgE0hUDs2e-1ZUegKN4W4Adb1B6oJ6j-4kyPU/edit?usp=sharing
[1] https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/782
[2] https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/labels/area%2Fhw-accelerators

-- 
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University of California, Irvine
Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev