Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG
Feel free to add your name to the wiki :) On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > ++, I also want to join this party :) > > 2018-01-09 8:40 GMT+08:00 Zhipeng Huang : > >> Agree 100% to avoid regular meeting and it is better to have bi-weekly >> email report. Meeting should be arranged event based, and I think given the >> status of OpenStack community's work on resource provider, mostly what we >> need to do is attend k8s meetings (sig-scheduler, wg-resource-management, >> etc.) >> >> BTW for the RM SIG proposed here, let's not limit the scope to k8s only >> since we might have broader collaborative efforts happening in the future. >> k8s is our first primary target community to sync up with. >> >> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:12 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: >> >>> On 01/08/2018 12:26 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: >>> Hi all, With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community to communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other related SIGs. The formation of the SIG is to provide a gathering of similar interested parties and establish an official channel. Currently we have already OpenStack developers actively participating in kubernetes discussion (e.g. [1]), we would hope the ResMgmt SIG could further help such activities and better align the resource mgmt mechanism, especially the data modeling between the two communities (or even more communities with similar desire). I have floated the idea with Jay Pipes and Chris Dent and received positive feedback. The SIG will have a co-lead structure so that people could spearheading in the area they are most interested in. For example for me as Cyborg dev, I will mostly lead in the area of acceleration[2]. If you are also interested please reply to this thread, and let's find a efficient way to form this SIG. Efficient means no extra unnecessary meetings and other undue burdens. >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> From the Nova perspective, the scheduler meeting (which is Mondays at >>> 1400 UTC) is the primary meeting where resource tracking and accounting >>> issues are typically discussed. >>> >>> Chris Dent has done a fabulous job recording progress on the resource >>> providers and placement work over the last couple releases by issuing >>> status emails to the openstack-dev@ mailing list each Friday. >>> >>> I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if >>> we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events in >>> the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular meetings for >>> a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have targeted >>> topical meetings over regular meetings. >>> >>> Best, >>> -jay >>> >>> >>> __ >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.op >>> enstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Zhipeng (Howard) Huang >> >> Standard Engineer >> IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line >> Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd >> Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com >> Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen >> >> (Previous) >> Research Assistant >> Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 >> University of California, Irvine >> Email: zhipe...@uci.edu >> Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 >> >> OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado >> >> >> __ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib >> e >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipe...@uci.edu Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:un
Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG
++, I also want to join this party :) 2018-01-09 8:40 GMT+08:00 Zhipeng Huang : > Agree 100% to avoid regular meeting and it is better to have bi-weekly > email report. Meeting should be arranged event based, and I think given the > status of OpenStack community's work on resource provider, mostly what we > need to do is attend k8s meetings (sig-scheduler, wg-resource-management, > etc.) > > BTW for the RM SIG proposed here, let's not limit the scope to k8s only > since we might have broader collaborative efforts happening in the future. > k8s is our first primary target community to sync up with. > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:12 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > >> On 01/08/2018 12:26 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in >>> OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community >>> increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a >>> Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community to >>> communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other related >>> SIGs. >>> >>> The formation of the SIG is to provide a gathering of similar interested >>> parties and establish an official channel. Currently we have already >>> OpenStack developers actively participating in kubernetes discussion (e.g. >>> [1]), we would hope the ResMgmt SIG could further help such activities and >>> better align the resource mgmt mechanism, especially the data modeling >>> between the two communities (or even more communities with similar desire). >>> >>> I have floated the idea with Jay Pipes and Chris Dent and received >>> positive feedback. The SIG will have a co-lead structure so that people >>> could spearheading in the area they are most interested in. For example for >>> me as Cyborg dev, I will mostly lead in the area of acceleration[2]. >>> >>> If you are also interested please reply to this thread, and let's find a >>> efficient way to form this SIG. Efficient means no extra unnecessary >>> meetings and other undue burdens. >>> >> >> +1 >> >> From the Nova perspective, the scheduler meeting (which is Mondays at >> 1400 UTC) is the primary meeting where resource tracking and accounting >> issues are typically discussed. >> >> Chris Dent has done a fabulous job recording progress on the resource >> providers and placement work over the last couple releases by issuing >> status emails to the openstack-dev@ mailing list each Friday. >> >> I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if >> we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events in >> the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular meetings for >> a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have targeted >> topical meetings over regular meetings. >> >> Best, >> -jay >> >> >> __ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib >> e >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > > -- > Zhipeng (Howard) Huang > > Standard Engineer > IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line > Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd > Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com > Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen > > (Previous) > Research Assistant > Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 > University of California, Irvine > Email: zhipe...@uci.edu > Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 > > OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG
application filed at https://review.openstack.org/534342 and wiki created at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Res_Mgmt_SIG . On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > i think I could do it, but I gotta rely on you guys to attend the Resource > Management WG meeting since its time is really bad for us in APAC timezone > :P > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > >> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Jay Pipes wrote: >> >> I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if >>> we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events in >>> the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular meetings for >>> a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have targeted >>> topical meetings over regular meetings. >>> >> >> I agree, would much prefer to see more email and less meetings. It >> would be fantastic if we can get some cross pollination disucssion >> happening. >> >> A status email, especially one that was cross-ecosystem, would be >> great. Unfortunately I can't commit to doing that myself (the >> existing 2 a week I do is plenty) but hope someone will take it up. >> >> -- >> Chris Dent (⊙＿⊙') https://anticdent.org/ >> freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent >> >> __ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib >> e >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > > -- > Zhipeng (Howard) Huang > > Standard Engineer > IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line > Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd > Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com > Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen > > (Previous) > Research Assistant > Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 > University of California, Irvine > Email: zhipe...@uci.edu > Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 > > OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado > -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipe...@uci.edu Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG
i think I could do it, but I gotta rely on you guys to attend the Resource Management WG meeting since its time is really bad for us in APAC timezone :P On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Jay Pipes wrote: > > I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if we're >> talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events in the >> resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular meetings for a >> resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have targeted topical >> meetings over regular meetings. >> > > I agree, would much prefer to see more email and less meetings. It > would be fantastic if we can get some cross pollination disucssion > happening. > > A status email, especially one that was cross-ecosystem, would be > great. Unfortunately I can't commit to doing that myself (the > existing 2 a week I do is plenty) but hope someone will take it up. > > -- > Chris Dent (⊙＿⊙') https://anticdent.org/ > freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipe...@uci.edu Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG
On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Jay Pipes wrote: I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have targeted topical meetings over regular meetings. I agree, would much prefer to see more email and less meetings. It would be fantastic if we can get some cross pollination disucssion happening. A status email, especially one that was cross-ecosystem, would be great. Unfortunately I can't commit to doing that myself (the existing 2 a week I do is plenty) but hope someone will take it up. -- Chris Dent (⊙＿⊙') https://anticdent.org/ freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG
Zhipeng Huang wrote: > [...] > With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in > OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community > increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a > Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community to > communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other related > SIGs. > [...] When ready, please propose a change to the governance-sigs repository, adding the proposed SIG to the sigs.yaml file: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance-sigs/tree/sigs.yaml -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG
Hi Eric, Glad to count you in :) On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:57 AM, Eric Fried wrote: > > I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if > > we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events > > in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular > > meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have > > targeted topical meetings over regular meetings. > > Agree with this. That said, please include me (efried) in whatever > shakes out. > > On 01/08/2018 02:12 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > > On 01/08/2018 12:26 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in > >> OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community > >> increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form > >> a Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community > >> to communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other > >> related SIGs. > >> > >> The formation of the SIG is to provide a gathering of similar > >> interested parties and establish an official channel. Currently we > >> have already OpenStack developers actively participating in kubernetes > >> discussion (e.g. [1]), we would hope the ResMgmt SIG could further > >> help such activities and better align the resource mgmt mechanism, > >> especially the data modeling between the two communities (or even more > >> communities with similar desire). > >> > >> I have floated the idea with Jay Pipes and Chris Dent and received > >> positive feedback. The SIG will have a co-lead structure so that > >> people could spearheading in the area they are most interested in. For > >> example for me as Cyborg dev, I will mostly lead in the area of > >> acceleration[2]. > >> > >> If you are also interested please reply to this thread, and let's find > >> a efficient way to form this SIG. Efficient means no extra unnecessary > >> meetings and other undue burdens. > > > > +1 > > > > From the Nova perspective, the scheduler meeting (which is Mondays at > > 1400 UTC) is the primary meeting where resource tracking and accounting > > issues are typically discussed. > > > > Chris Dent has done a fabulous job recording progress on the resource > > providers and placement work over the last couple releases by issuing > > status emails to the openstack-dev@ mailing list each Friday. > > > > I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if > > we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events > > in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular > > meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have > > targeted topical meetings over regular meetings. > > > > Best, > > -jay > > > > > __ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject: > unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipe...@uci.edu Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG
Agree 100% to avoid regular meeting and it is better to have bi-weekly email report. Meeting should be arranged event based, and I think given the status of OpenStack community's work on resource provider, mostly what we need to do is attend k8s meetings (sig-scheduler, wg-resource-management, etc.) BTW for the RM SIG proposed here, let's not limit the scope to k8s only since we might have broader collaborative efforts happening in the future. k8s is our first primary target community to sync up with. On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:12 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/08/2018 12:26 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in >> OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community >> increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a >> Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community to >> communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other related >> SIGs. >> >> The formation of the SIG is to provide a gathering of similar interested >> parties and establish an official channel. Currently we have already >> OpenStack developers actively participating in kubernetes discussion (e.g. >> [1]), we would hope the ResMgmt SIG could further help such activities and >> better align the resource mgmt mechanism, especially the data modeling >> between the two communities (or even more communities with similar desire). >> >> I have floated the idea with Jay Pipes and Chris Dent and received >> positive feedback. The SIG will have a co-lead structure so that people >> could spearheading in the area they are most interested in. For example for >> me as Cyborg dev, I will mostly lead in the area of acceleration[2]. >> >> If you are also interested please reply to this thread, and let's find a >> efficient way to form this SIG. Efficient means no extra unnecessary >> meetings and other undue burdens. >> > > +1 > > From the Nova perspective, the scheduler meeting (which is Mondays at 1400 > UTC) is the primary meeting where resource tracking and accounting issues > are typically discussed. > > Chris Dent has done a fabulous job recording progress on the resource > providers and placement work over the last couple releases by issuing > status emails to the openstack-dev@ mailing list each Friday. > > I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if we're > talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events in the > resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular meetings for a > resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have targeted topical > meetings over regular meetings. > > Best, > -jay > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipe...@uci.edu Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG
> I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if > we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events > in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular > meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have > targeted topical meetings over regular meetings. Agree with this. That said, please include me (efried) in whatever shakes out. On 01/08/2018 02:12 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/08/2018 12:26 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in >> OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community >> increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form >> a Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community >> to communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other >> related SIGs. >> >> The formation of the SIG is to provide a gathering of similar >> interested parties and establish an official channel. Currently we >> have already OpenStack developers actively participating in kubernetes >> discussion (e.g. [1]), we would hope the ResMgmt SIG could further >> help such activities and better align the resource mgmt mechanism, >> especially the data modeling between the two communities (or even more >> communities with similar desire). >> >> I have floated the idea with Jay Pipes and Chris Dent and received >> positive feedback. The SIG will have a co-lead structure so that >> people could spearheading in the area they are most interested in. For >> example for me as Cyborg dev, I will mostly lead in the area of >> acceleration[2]. >> >> If you are also interested please reply to this thread, and let's find >> a efficient way to form this SIG. Efficient means no extra unnecessary >> meetings and other undue burdens. > > +1 > > From the Nova perspective, the scheduler meeting (which is Mondays at > 1400 UTC) is the primary meeting where resource tracking and accounting > issues are typically discussed. > > Chris Dent has done a fabulous job recording progress on the resource > providers and placement work over the last couple releases by issuing > status emails to the openstack-dev@ mailing list each Friday. > > I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if > we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events > in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular > meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have > targeted topical meetings over regular meetings. > > Best, > -jay > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG
On 01/08/2018 12:26 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: Hi all, With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community to communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other related SIGs. The formation of the SIG is to provide a gathering of similar interested parties and establish an official channel. Currently we have already OpenStack developers actively participating in kubernetes discussion (e.g. [1]), we would hope the ResMgmt SIG could further help such activities and better align the resource mgmt mechanism, especially the data modeling between the two communities (or even more communities with similar desire). I have floated the idea with Jay Pipes and Chris Dent and received positive feedback. The SIG will have a co-lead structure so that people could spearheading in the area they are most interested in. For example for me as Cyborg dev, I will mostly lead in the area of acceleration[2]. If you are also interested please reply to this thread, and let's find a efficient way to form this SIG. Efficient means no extra unnecessary meetings and other undue burdens. +1 From the Nova perspective, the scheduler meeting (which is Mondays at 1400 UTC) is the primary meeting where resource tracking and accounting issues are typically discussed. Chris Dent has done a fabulous job recording progress on the resource providers and placement work over the last couple releases by issuing status emails to the openstack-dev@ mailing list each Friday. I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have targeted topical meetings over regular meetings. Best, -jay __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG
Hi all, With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community to communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other related SIGs. The formation of the SIG is to provide a gathering of similar interested parties and establish an official channel. Currently we have already OpenStack developers actively participating in kubernetes discussion (e.g. [1]), we would hope the ResMgmt SIG could further help such activities and better align the resource mgmt mechanism, especially the data modeling between the two communities (or even more communities with similar desire). I have floated the idea with Jay Pipes and Chris Dent and received positive feedback. The SIG will have a co-lead structure so that people could spearheading in the area they are most interested in. For example for me as Cyborg dev, I will mostly lead in the area of acceleration[2]. If you are also interested please reply to this thread, and let's find a efficient way to form this SIG. Efficient means no extra unnecessary meetings and other undue burdens. [0] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j3vrG6BgE0hUDs2e-1ZUegKN4W4Adb1B6oJ6j-4kyPU/edit?usp=sharing [1] https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/782 [2] https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/labels/area%2Fhw-accelerators -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipe...@uci.edu Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
