[opnfv-tech-discuss] Testing WG Meeting - Organizing for 2019

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Eastern Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN="MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)":MAILTO:a...@research.att.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN=opnfv-tec
 h-disc...@lists.opnfv.org:MAILTO:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN=test-wg@l
 ists.opnfv.org:MAILTO:test...@lists.opnfv.org
DESCRIPTION;LANGUAGE=en-US:See https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test
 +Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting\nUsual time (this timeslot): Thursday 15:00-
 16:00 UTC\nZoom: https://zoom.us/j/5014627785\nAccess Code: 5014627785\nIR
 C channel: #opnfv-testperf @ Freenode<http://webchat.freenode.net/?channel
 s=opnfv-testperf>\nAGENDA\n•   Agenda bashing\n•   Discussion 
 of 2019 Meeting-planning poll/outcomes. Al Morton<https://wiki.opnfv.org/d
 isplay/~acm>\n•   Testing WG Priorities for the upcoming release:\no
Development of a recommendation for gate requirements\n
 for the new release process David McBride<https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/~
 dmcbride>\no   others?\n•   All other business\n•   Schedu
 le next meeting Rex Lee<https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/~rexlee8776>\n\n\n
SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=en-US:Testing WG Meeting - Organizing for 2019
DTSTART;TZID=Eastern Standard Time:20190221T10
DTEND;TZID=Eastern Standard Time:20190221T11
UID:04008200E00074C5B7101A82E008E0A4938C06C9D401000
 01000B2B160A5A4911547B7A670C8E3AD9848
CLASS:PUBLIC
PRIORITY:5
DTSTAMP:20190220T153630Z
TRANSP:OPAQUE
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SEQUENCE:0
LOCATION;LANGUAGE=en-US:https://zoom.us/j/5014627785
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-APPT-SEQUENCE:0
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-OWNERAPPTID:1133783011
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:TENTATIVE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INTENDEDSTATUS:BUSY
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INSTTYPE:0
X-MICROSOFT-DISALLOW-COUNTER:TRUE
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:DISPLAY
DESCRIPTION:REMINDER
TRIGGER;RELATED=START:-PT15M
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#22837): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22837
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/29954720/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test working group meeting?}

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Alec, please see below.

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
Alec via Lists.Opnfv.Org
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 8:19 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) ; David McBride 
; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: test...@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

Is there a recurring meeting invite still ongoing? I don’t see the meeting in 
my calendar any more (last one was Dec 27).
[acm]
No calendar invites yet this year, just mail and updates on
the Test WG wiki page.

Our meeting Thursday will determine what the new invite would look-like.
Right now, there seems to be consensus on “bi-weekly meetings”,
and it appears we no longer need the APAC-time-friendly week.

Thanks for filling out the wiki page, and hope to see you
Thursday if you can make it.

regards,
Al

  Alec



From: mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of Al 
Morton mailto:a...@research.att.com>>
Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 3:09 PM
To: David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>, 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>" 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Cc: "Foley, Emma L" mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>, 
"Yuyang (Gabriel)" 
mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>, OLLIVIER Cédric 
IMT/OLN mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>, 
Mingjiang Li mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>, Trevor 
Bramwell mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>, 
"HU, BIN" mailto:bh5...@att.com>>, test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

Hi all, as a Reminder ...

I’ll determine if we have a Quorum of Testers
on Wednesday, to give time for a meeting announcement
(or cancellation) to reach everyone before the proposed
Thursday meeting.

Let everyone know your plans here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_meetings_Test-2BWorking-2BGroup-2BWeekly-2BMeeting=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=_6cen3Hn-e_hOm0BhY7aIpA58dd19Z9qGQsr8-6zYMI=G-JXRHP7Gc_QSC6O5pFieALOPFe_uAxDCrf-_Yc84f4=wOT9K_7eksnIYQPfqt-_ClrlzrTQIdKSqvghWJY34Ck=>
(partial responses in the table are acceptable at this point).

thanks,
Al

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org> 
[mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 1:36 PM
To: David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Cc: Foley, Emma L mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>; 
Yuyang (Gabriel) mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>; Mingjiang Li 
mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>; Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; HU, BIN 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>; test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test 
working group meeting?}

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Hi David and all,
(sorry for the response-delay:
testing demands lots of time/weekends...)

I suggest to start the meeting logistics discussion by poll,
then convene a meeting on Feb 21 if there will be
a quorum of testing folks to finalize. This week would be the
APAC meeting time anyway, and that’s an additional
point to discuss.

So, let me kindly ask that folks assemble their preferences here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_meetings_Test-2BWorking-2BGroup-2BWeekly-2BMeeting=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=_6cen3Hn-e_hOm0BhY7aIpA58dd19Z9qGQsr8-6zYMI=G-JXRHP7Gc_QSC6O5pFieALOPFe_uAxDCrf-_Yc84f4=wOT9K_7eksnIYQPfqt-_ClrlzrTQIdKSqvghWJY34Ck=>

Also, on item 3 below:
Start developing a recommendation for gate requirements for the new release 
process.
Is this the current status (or is there info I didn’t find)?
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/testing/Gating+the+New+CD+Process<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_testing_Gating-2Bthe-2BNew-2BCD-2BProcess=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=_6cen3Hn-e_hOm0BhY7aIpA58dd19Z9qGQsr8-6zYMI=G-JXRHP7Gc_QSC6O5pFieALOPFe_uAxDCrf-_Yc84f4=etzoAKaiGee2TxHss3NJuy7o7EYXuPxRsLjqgsw9rYs=>

However, item 4 of
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/Code_and_Release_Quality<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__etherpad.opnfv.org_p_Code-5Fand-5FRelease-5FQuality=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=_6cen3Hn-e_hOm0BhY7aIpA58dd19Z9qGQsr8-6zYM

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] VSPERF weekly meeting - 20 Feb 2019 (ww93)

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

If you are willing, Sridhar, I suggest to add some
discussion of PROX logging capability to the agenda.
I'm interested to try this out at some time soon.

thanks,
Al

From: Rao, Sridhar [mailto:sridhar@spirent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 12:53 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) ; 'Trevor Cooper' 
; 'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)' 
; Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com) 
; Bill Michalowski (bmich...@redhat.com) 
; Alec Hothan (ahothan) ; Jose Angel 
Lausuch ; thomas.fai...@6wind.com; martin.klo...@tieto.com; 
richard.el...@tieto.com; Bob Fubel ; Govindharajan, 
Hariprasad 
Subject: [vsperf] VSPERF weekly meeting - 20 Feb 2019 (ww93)

Agenda:


  1.  Development Update
  2.  Build status
  3.  ...

Previous Meeting minutes:

  *   WW92: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2019/opnfv-vswitchperf.2019-02-13-16.06.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2019_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2019-2D02-2D13-2D16.06.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=7KX97vU7o7CgkLLQlEVmbKZmxXnNlfhsvhc3BfCX71Q=5qRdqHEq1zlH0jifQFPafvYY6DnXdHc9nF4IRTkpx1c=>
  *   WW91: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2019/opnfv-vswitchperf.2019-01-30-16.03.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2019_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2019-2D01-2D30-2D16.03.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=7KX97vU7o7CgkLLQlEVmbKZmxXnNlfhsvhc3BfCX71Q=pCiRpf5ImCAcROn4zKY6oRIaQ03fS-LN3YG5vImogic=>
  *   WW90: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2019/opnfv-vswitchperf.2019-01-23-15.59.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2019_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2019-2D01-2D23-2D15.59.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=7KX97vU7o7CgkLLQlEVmbKZmxXnNlfhsvhc3BfCX71Q=skDzXsdBBvkyZgtGj6p_B2kYId8ABG_a9LwPHvw1sHA=>


Time: Wednesday PT 8h00 UTC 16h00.

IRC: freenode 
https://freenode.net/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__freenode.net_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=7KX97vU7o7CgkLLQlEVmbKZmxXnNlfhsvhc3BfCX71Q=LyXPWK4O7IBjLdBbWyiyHs6SnhVojguuAh27Jz7BrCU=>
 channel: #opnfv-vswitchperf; 
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-vswitchperf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__webchat.freenode.net_-3Fchannels-3Dopnfv-2Dvswitchperf=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=7KX97vU7o7CgkLLQlEVmbKZmxXnNlfhsvhc3BfCX71Q=XMjeVgX9JwafWglla0WACfukDNt-HmnKrFZa3gBDqnw=>
Audio: 
https://zoom.us/j/2362828999<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_j_2362828999=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=7KX97vU7o7CgkLLQlEVmbKZmxXnNlfhsvhc3BfCX71Q=fK_WcDUJOKsW9j8VlEDiAjo5lUpY4QT08YhB7GEvxms=>
Or iPhone one-tap :
US: +16699006833,,2362828999# or +16465588656,,2362828999#
Or Telephone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 877 369 0926 (Toll Free) or +1 855 
880 1246 (Toll Free)
Meeting ID: 236 282 8999
International numbers available: 
https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=Xn-Kas4jq2GuyfbCCKYpwvi6FpHEYX8n<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_zoomconference-3Fm-3DXn-2DKas4jq2GuyfbCCKYpwvi6FpHEYX8n=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=7KX97vU7o7CgkLLQlEVmbKZmxXnNlfhsvhc3BfCX71Q=rcPbirwPl_gG1aaAdCUb20tXY1IcuAp_xUsmJGTBF_E=>



Cheers,
Sridhar

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#22833): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22833
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/29937874/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test working group meeting?}

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Thanks Mark, it will help a lot if you attend,
and we all appreciate that you are giving-up
vacation time!

Can you "unpack" your point: "discussion around Akraino" ?

Test WG Priority for the upcoming release would be a good
pre-requisite for the topic David McBride suggested:

  Start developing a recommendation for gate requirements
  for the new release process.

I see that quite a few more people have responded on the wiki
(thanks!), so I think we will have a good representation of
testers tomorrow.  I will send a one-time invite.

regards,
Al

From: Beierl, Mark [mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 6:38 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
Cc: David McBride ; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Foley, Emma L ; 
Yuyang (Gabriel) ; OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
; Mingjiang Li ; Trevor 
Bramwell ; HU, BIN ; test-wg 

Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

I am actually on vacation this week, but with the discussion around Akraino am 
interested in participating.

I would also like to get an idea from other test WG members as to what our 
priority for the upcoming release should be.
Regards,
Mark

On Feb 19, 2019, at 18:11, Al Morton 
mailto:a...@research.att.com>> wrote:

[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Hi all, as a Reminder ...

I'll determine if we have a Quorum of Testers
on Wednesday, to give time for a meeting announcement
(or cancellation) to reach everyone before the proposed
Thursday meeting.

Let everyone know your plans here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_meetings_Test-2BWorking-2BGroup-2BWeekly-2BMeeting=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=_6cen3Hn-e_hOm0BhY7aIpA58dd19Z9qGQsr8-6zYMI=G-JXRHP7Gc_QSC6O5pFieALOPFe_uAxDCrf-_Yc84f4=wOT9K_7eksnIYQPfqt-_ClrlzrTQIdKSqvghWJY34Ck=>
(partial responses in the table are acceptable at this point).

thanks,
Al

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org> 
[mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 1:36 PM
To: David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Cc: Foley, Emma L mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>; 
Yuyang (Gabriel) mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>; Mingjiang Li 
mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>; Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; HU, BIN 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>; test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test 
working group meeting?}

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Hi David and all,
(sorry for the response-delay:
testing demands lots of time/weekends...)

I suggest to start the meeting logistics discussion by poll,
then convene a meeting on Feb 21 if there will be
a quorum of testing folks to finalize. This week would be the
APAC meeting time anyway, and that's an additional
point to discuss.

So, let me kindly ask that folks assemble their preferences here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_meetings_Test-2BWorking-2BGroup-2BWeekly-2BMeeting=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=_6cen3Hn-e_hOm0BhY7aIpA58dd19Z9qGQsr8-6zYMI=G-JXRHP7Gc_QSC6O5pFieALOPFe_uAxDCrf-_Yc84f4=wOT9K_7eksnIYQPfqt-_ClrlzrTQIdKSqvghWJY34Ck=>

Also, on item 3 below:
Start developing a recommendation for gate requirements for the new release 
process.
Is this the current status (or is there info I didn't find)?
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/testing/Gating+the+New+CD+Process<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_testing_Gating-2Bthe-2BNew-2BCD-2BProcess=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=_6cen3Hn-e_hOm0BhY7aIpA58dd19Z9qGQsr8-6zYMI=G-JXRHP7Gc_QSC6O5pFieALOPFe_uAxDCrf-_Yc84f4=etzoAKaiGee2TxHss3NJuy7o7EYXuPxRsLjqgsw9rYs=>

However, item 4 of
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/Code_and_Release_Quality<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__etherpad.opnfv.org_p_Code-5Fand-5FRelease-5FQuality=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=_6cen3Hn-e_hOm0BhY7aIpA58dd19Z9qGQsr8-6zYMI=G-JXRHP7Gc_QSC6O5pFieALOPFe_uAxDCrf-_Yc84f4=GAuwTwW39Eij3NxLwrrJuHbuhuqMvUarjKQq6ZVMX3o=>
has some relevant discussion.

thanks for your time, everyone!
Al


From: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 12:14 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) mailto:a...@research.att.com>>
Cc: Foley, Emma L mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>; 
Yuyang (Gabriel) mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
mailto:cedric.olli

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test working group meeting?}

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi all, as a Reminder ...

I’ll determine if we have a Quorum of Testers
on Wednesday, to give time for a meeting announcement
(or cancellation) to reach everyone before the proposed
Thursday meeting.

Let everyone know your plans here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_meetings_Test-2BWorking-2BGroup-2BWeekly-2BMeeting=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=_6cen3Hn-e_hOm0BhY7aIpA58dd19Z9qGQsr8-6zYMI=G-JXRHP7Gc_QSC6O5pFieALOPFe_uAxDCrf-_Yc84f4=wOT9K_7eksnIYQPfqt-_ClrlzrTQIdKSqvghWJY34Ck=>
(partial responses in the table are acceptable at this point).

thanks,
Al

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 1:36 PM
To: David McBride ; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: Foley, Emma L ; Yuyang (Gabriel) 
; OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
; Mingjiang Li ; Trevor 
Bramwell ; HU, BIN ; test-wg 

Subject: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test 
working group meeting?}

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Hi David and all,
(sorry for the response-delay:
testing demands lots of time/weekends...)

I suggest to start the meeting logistics discussion by poll,
then convene a meeting on Feb 21 if there will be
a quorum of testing folks to finalize. This week would be the
APAC meeting time anyway, and that’s an additional
point to discuss.

So, let me kindly ask that folks assemble their preferences here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_meetings_Test-2BWorking-2BGroup-2BWeekly-2BMeeting=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=_6cen3Hn-e_hOm0BhY7aIpA58dd19Z9qGQsr8-6zYMI=G-JXRHP7Gc_QSC6O5pFieALOPFe_uAxDCrf-_Yc84f4=wOT9K_7eksnIYQPfqt-_ClrlzrTQIdKSqvghWJY34Ck=>

Also, on item 3 below:
Start developing a recommendation for gate requirements for the new release 
process.
Is this the current status (or is there info I didn’t find)?
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/testing/Gating+the+New+CD+Process<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_testing_Gating-2Bthe-2BNew-2BCD-2BProcess=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=_6cen3Hn-e_hOm0BhY7aIpA58dd19Z9qGQsr8-6zYMI=G-JXRHP7Gc_QSC6O5pFieALOPFe_uAxDCrf-_Yc84f4=etzoAKaiGee2TxHss3NJuy7o7EYXuPxRsLjqgsw9rYs=>

However, item 4 of
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/Code_and_Release_Quality<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__etherpad.opnfv.org_p_Code-5Fand-5FRelease-5FQuality=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=_6cen3Hn-e_hOm0BhY7aIpA58dd19Z9qGQsr8-6zYMI=G-JXRHP7Gc_QSC6O5pFieALOPFe_uAxDCrf-_Yc84f4=GAuwTwW39Eij3NxLwrrJuHbuhuqMvUarjKQq6ZVMX3o=>
has some relevant discussion.

thanks for your time, everyone!
Al


From: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 12:14 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) mailto:a...@research.att.com>>
Cc: Foley, Emma L mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>; 
Yuyang (Gabriel) mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>; Mingjiang Li 
mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>; Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; HU, BIN 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>; test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: status of test working group meeting?

Al,

Thanks for the response.  I'm not sure why the email distribution was slow.

In any case, I think that having a regularly scheduled meeting is important.  
If weekly seems unmanageable, then I'd suggest bi-weekly meetings, instead.

Here's a suggested plan.  If you don't mind Al, I'd like to designate you as 
Chair for the next meeting.  If you could, please send an invitation.  A 
suggested agenda is as follows:

  1.  Decide on meeting frequency
  2.  Decide on rotating chair schedule for the next 6 months (who & when)
  3.  Start developing a recommendation for gate requirements for the new 
release process.
Item #3 is going to take some time, so barring any other urgent issues, I 
suggest that be the topic for the meetings for the foreseeable future.  Let me 
know what you think.

David

On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:53 AM MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
mailto:a...@research.att.com>> wrote:
Hi David,

We planned two meetings in January:
the f2f meeting during the plugfest was
quite well-attended, and we planned a
follow-up on Jan 24 (when Cedric would
present his Xtesting material again).

I chaired both January sessions, but
the meeting on the 24th had to be re-scheduled:
My eye-doctor moved my appointment to a time
that conflicted with the meeting.

I sent mail to tech-discuss and test-wg
lists to find a time to re-schedule, but the messages
were long-delayed before distribution (??)
and then no one replied. I

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test working group meeting?}

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi David and all,
(sorry for the response-delay:
testing demands lots of time/weekends...)

I suggest to start the meeting logistics discussion by poll,
then convene a meeting on Feb 21 if there will be
a quorum of testing folks to finalize. This week would be the
APAC meeting time anyway, and that’s an additional
point to discuss.

So, let me kindly ask that folks assemble their preferences here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting

Also, on item 3 below:
Start developing a recommendation for gate requirements for the new release 
process.
Is this the current status (or is there info I didn’t find)?
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/testing/Gating+the+New+CD+Process

However, item 4 of
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/Code_and_Release_Quality
has some relevant discussion.

thanks for your time, everyone!
Al


From: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 12:14 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
Cc: Foley, Emma L ; Yuyang (Gabriel) 
; OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
; Mingjiang Li ; Trevor 
Bramwell ; HU, BIN ; test-wg 

Subject: Re: status of test working group meeting?

Al,

Thanks for the response.  I'm not sure why the email distribution was slow.

In any case, I think that having a regularly scheduled meeting is important.  
If weekly seems unmanageable, then I'd suggest bi-weekly meetings, instead.

Here's a suggested plan.  If you don't mind Al, I'd like to designate you as 
Chair for the next meeting.  If you could, please send an invitation.  A 
suggested agenda is as follows:

  1.  Decide on meeting frequency
  2.  Decide on rotating chair schedule for the next 6 months (who & when)
  3.  Start developing a recommendation for gate requirements for the new 
release process.
Item #3 is going to take some time, so barring any other urgent issues, I 
suggest that be the topic for the meetings for the foreseeable future.  Let me 
know what you think.

David

On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:53 AM MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
mailto:a...@research.att.com>> wrote:
Hi David,

We planned two meetings in January:
the f2f meeting during the plugfest was
quite well-attended, and we planned a
follow-up on Jan 24 (when Cedric would
present his Xtesting material again).

I chaired both January sessions, but
the meeting on the 24th had to be re-scheduled:
My eye-doctor moved my appointment to a time
that conflicted with the meeting.

I sent mail to tech-discuss and test-wg
lists to find a time to re-schedule, but the messages
were long-delayed before distribution (??)
and then no one replied. I assumed that
it must be a busy time, it certainly was for me!

For the future:
We mostly need a topic, a volunteer (rotating) chair from
among the testers, and a week when there will be
a chance for good attendance (and finally, an invite!).

Al


From: Foley, Emma L 
[mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com<mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>]
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 12:02 PM
To: David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; Yuyang 
(Gabriel) mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>; 
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) mailto:a...@research.att.com>>; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>; Mingjiang Li 
mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>
Cc: Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; HU, BIN 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>; test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: RE: status of test working group meeting?

My initial response is: “Oh, that’s what was missing from my calendar”

The calendar hit has fallen off my calendar recently.
I believe we have a rotating chair.
I *think* the chair is responsible for sending the invites.

That said, I haven’t been able to make it in the last few weeks, and it may 
have been cancelled due to the Chinese Spring festival.

Best regards,
Emma

From: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 4:35 PM
To: Foley, Emma L mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>; 
Yuyang (Gabriel) mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>; 
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) mailto:a...@research.att.com>>; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>; Mingjiang Li 
mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>
Cc: Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; Bin Hu 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>; test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: status of test working group meeting?

Team,

I tried joining the test working group meeting this morning at 7 a.m. Pacific, 
but no one was on.  I thought I might be off by an hour, so I tried again at 8 
a.m., but still no one.  Do I have the date/time/frequency confused? Does the 
meeting page need to be updated? Who's currently chairing the meeting?  Please 
clarify.  Thanks.

David

--
David McBride
Release Manager, OPNFV
Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
Email/Google Talk: 
dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>
Skype: da

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Test WG for 17 and 24 Jan 2019

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Test WG,

AFAIK, there are not topics proposed for 17 Jan.

I will chair the meeting on 24 Jan again, where 
we'll cover the action items from the face2face 
meeting, and hear from Cedric on Xtesting.

https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting

regards,
Al

> -Original Message-
> From: test...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf
> Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 7:48 AM
> To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; test...@lists.opnfv.org
> Subject: [test-wg] Test WG Face to Face WILL have remote access!
> 
> *** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***.
> Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
> 
> Hi Test WG,
> 
> Our session at the plugfest will have remote access:
> 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__zoom.us_j_160090727=DwIFAg=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=uMg7-RnxHDArT1TrjpPT7ykC-
> qHEDzkWmJX-2XaBEaw=sjD-obeFDO4Etg6q_C7o12P6xhsqpxmgVJ2CEMGDakA=
> 
> We will change from our usual time, to
> Thursday January 10, 2019 15:45 - 16:30 CET
> 
> There's a brief agenda posted, please feel free to
> join us and suggest additional items, especially those
> that came-up this week and may need additional discussion.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> your humble organizer for the day,
> Al
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> 
> View/Reply Online (#659):
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__lists.opnfv.org_g_test-2Dwg_message_659=DwIFAg=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=uMg7-RnxHDArT1TrjpPT7ykC-
> qHEDzkWmJX-2XaBEaw=ANEv7WzgWZcCnhQoZfoOYYbYZe7fhnsTezCS0GNRU9M=
> Mute This Topic: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__lists.opnfv.org_mt_28994896_1198490=DwIFAg=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=uMg7-RnxHDArT1TrjpPT7ykC-
> qHEDzkWmJX-2XaBEaw=8LGDJw7lrkxAeSI1StvMlnmPJkGIsaHIyDTkaV_G8cg=
> Group Owner: test-wg+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
> Unsubscribe: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__lists.opnfv.org_g_test-2Dwg_unsub=DwIFAg=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=uMg7-RnxHDArT1TrjpPT7ykC-
> qHEDzkWmJX-2XaBEaw=74mFMNAlAcB0bBQGuG6RmrceBgoPpoiLiJbBLbnQL_w=
> [acmor...@att.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#22715): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22715
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/29526567/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Test tools abstract for ONS and OpenStack summit #testperf #testwg #yardstick #functest #bottlenecks #vsperf #nfvbench #storperf

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Emma,

I'm willing to help-out with input on the overall
description of test tools, and what we might take-up
next to address cloud-native, edge computing (and IoT??)
I did a little editing here (on the talk for ONS 2019,
I won't be attending OpenStack):

https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/test-tool-evolution-presentation

I continue to be very interested in what other test projects
plan to do testing about edge compute scenarios - it's something
I've discussed with Mark on occasion.

regards,
Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Emma Foley
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 6:19 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Test tools abstract for ONS and OpenStack summit 
#testperf #testwg #yardstick #functest #bottlenecks #vsperf #nfvbench #storperf

Hi folks,

Once again I'm soliciting input for a test tools presentation at ONS and the 
OpenStack Summit.

I have added draft abstracts on: 
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/test-tool-evolution-presentation
All input is greatly appreciated, including feedback on previous presentations 
and discussion topics.

Deadlines are coming up fast, on the 21st (ONS) and the 23rd (OpenStack).

Best regards,
Emma



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#22716): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22716
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/29197383/21656
Mute #functest: https://lists.opnfv.org/mk?hashtag=functest=2783016
Mute #yardstick: https://lists.opnfv.org/mk?hashtag=yardstick=2783016
Mute #storperf: https://lists.opnfv.org/mk?hashtag=storperf=2783016
Mute #testperf: https://lists.opnfv.org/mk?hashtag=testperf=2783016
Mute #testwg: https://lists.opnfv.org/mk?hashtag=testwg=2783016
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Test WG for 17 and 24 Jan 2019

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi all,

An unfortunate coincidence will prevent me from chairing
the Test-wg meeting on Thursday, Jan 24 (an eye doctor 
appointment just moved to the meeting hour. This is a doctor 
with a very busy schedule, and I need to make the appointment
this week - I'm very sorry!)

We have a couple of options:

- If Cedric can re-schedule, we can move this agenda to a 
meeting at a later date.

- If Cedric prefers to go ahead on the 24th as planned,
then I hope someone else will step-up to chair the meeting.
See the meeting page for the Agenda (action items, then Cedric): 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting


Please let us all know what option you prefer.

Thanks, and sorry for the last-minute bobble on my part!
Al

> -Original Message-
> From: test...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf
> Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 9:01 PM
> To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; test...@lists.opnfv.org
> Subject: [test-wg] Test WG for 17 and 24 Jan 2019
> 
> *** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***.
> Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
> 
> Hi Test WG,
> 
> AFAIK, there are not topics proposed for 17 Jan.
> 
> I will chair the meeting on 24 Jan again, where
> we'll cover the action items from the face2face
> meeting, and hear from Cedric on Xtesting.
> 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_meetings_Test-2BWorking-2BGroup-2BWeekly-
> 2BMeeting=DwIFAg=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=XlRsT17Z5XGOBLTllK1zlzaXReyHd
> 1rq60G-2YZfbz0=Sqpvin_J9J9I4Z5lfmp6NU5CORkj69r1NfSJjM8lLsE=
> 
> regards,
> Al
> 
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: test...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf
> > Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 7:48 AM
> > To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; test...@lists.opnfv.org
> > Subject: [test-wg] Test WG Face to Face WILL have remote access!
> >
> > *** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***.
> > Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more
> information.
> >
> > Hi Test WG,
> >
> > Our session at the plugfest will have remote access:
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> > 3A__zoom.us_j_160090727=DwIFAg=LFYZ-
> > o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=uMg7-RnxHDArT1TrjpPT7ykC-
> > qHEDzkWmJX-2XaBEaw=sjD-obeFDO4Etg6q_C7o12P6xhsqpxmgVJ2CEMGDakA=
> >
> > We will change from our usual time, to
> > Thursday January 10, 2019 15:45 - 16:30 CET
> >
> > There's a brief agenda posted, please feel free to
> > join us and suggest additional items, especially those
> > that came-up this week and may need additional discussion.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > your humble organizer for the day,
> > Al
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> 
> View/Reply Online (#660):
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__lists.opnfv.org_g_test-2Dwg_message_660=DwIFAg=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=XlRsT17Z5XGOBLTllK1zlzaXReyHd
> 1rq60G-2YZfbz0=3BlS9HlNvjLGqAnApYY48yIcmQ23vIMAXI8n7zSW39c=
> Mute This Topic: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__lists.opnfv.org_mt_29168110_1198490=DwIFAg=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=XlRsT17Z5XGOBLTllK1zlzaXReyHd
> 1rq60G-2YZfbz0=4qW6OcXPufi4o9rvdJZaIE6_CfIbFMG9-H0c7wrBcao=
> Group Owner: test-wg+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
> Unsubscribe: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__lists.opnfv.org_g_test-2Dwg_unsub=DwIFAg=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=XlRsT17Z5XGOBLTllK1zlzaXReyHd
> 1rq60G-2YZfbz0=hrU_Bds_EjPdsXK4UtIZfumURZIuTg0A1bLvGR5g29Q=
> [acmor...@att.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#22706): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22706
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/29526567/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Question about Nodes 4 and 5 on Pod 12

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi VSPER'ers,

As many of you know, I've been working to sort-out
some effects of Interrupts on our benchmarking.

Most recent efforts with PROX are documented here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/vsperf/Long+Duration+Testing#LongDurationTesting-FirsttestswithPROXmonitoring

When looking through
 $ sudo less /var/log/messages

I found a big difference between the amount of log activity
on Node 4 (lots of log entries, almost every second has something)
and Node 5, which has been rather quiet at times:

Logging on Node 5 - almost NO ACTIVITY !!! this is over 30 minutes!!!
Jan 17 09:00:01 pod12-node5 systemd: Started Session 12 of user root.
Jan 17 09:01:01 pod12-node5 systemd: Started Session 13 of user root.
Jan 17 09:02:03 pod12-node5 systemd: Created slice User Slice of opnfv.
Jan 17 09:02:03 pod12-node5 systemd-logind: New session 14 of user opnfv.
Jan 17 09:02:03 pod12-node5 systemd: Started Session 14 of user opnfv.
Jan 17 09:02:08 pod12-node5 dbus[13369]: [system] Activating service 
name='org.freedesktop.problems' (using servicehelper)
Jan 17 09:02:08 pod12-node5 dbus[13369]: [system] Successfully activated 
service 'org.freedesktop.problems'
Jan 17 09:02:08 pod12-node5 systemd-logind: New session 15 of user opnfv.
Jan 17 09:02:08 pod12-node5 systemd: Started Session 15 of user opnfv.
Jan 17 09:10:01 pod12-node5 systemd: Started Session 16 of user root.
Jan 17 09:20:01 pod12-node5 systemd: Started Session 17 of user root.
Jan 17 09:30:01 pod12-node5 systemd: Started Session 18 of user root.

This is just one of the differences I noticed between Nodes 4 and 5,
and I'm keen to learn more about how we arrived at these
different states.

Any clues appreciated!

thanks and regards,
Al



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#22708): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22708
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/29526568/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Thursday Dinner OPNFV@Plugfest/Hackfest

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

URL that works:  https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/66305/

> -Original Message-
> From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 9:26 AM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
> Subject: Thursday Dinner OPNFV@Plugfest/Hackfest
> 
> Folks attending Plugfest,
> 
> If you would like to join some colleagues for
> dinner discussions on Thursday evening,
> at a Lebanese restaurant in Saclay,
> 
> Please review the following gerrit patch:
> https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/66305,edit/
> 
> +1 will add you to the reservation.
> 
> Location details in the Commit message.
> 
> We'll meet at 7:30 PM, and we will finalize
> the headcount at Noon on Thursday.
> 
> Hope you can join,
> Al

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#22636): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22636
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/28985254/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Test WG Face to Face WILL have remote access!

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Test WG,

Our session at the plugfest will have remote access:

https://zoom.us/j/160090727

We will change from our usual time, to
Thursday January 10, 2019 15:45 - 16:30 CET

There's a brief agenda posted, please feel free to
join us and suggest additional items, especially those
that came-up this week and may need additional discussion.

Thanks!

your humble organizer for the day,
Al



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#22637): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22637
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/29006269/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Thursday Dinner OPNFV@Plugfest/Hackfest

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Folks attending Plugfest,

If you would like to join some colleagues for 
dinner discussions on Thursday evening,
at a Lebanese restaurant in Saclay,

Please review the following gerrit patch:
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/66305,edit/

+1 will add you to the reservation.

Location details in the Commit message.

We'll meet at 7:30 PM, and we will finalize
the headcount at Noon on Thursday.

Hope you can join,
Al

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#22630): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22630
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/28985254/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] VSPERF weekly meeting - 21 Nov 2018 (ww85)

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Sorry, looks like I will miss the meeting today!
My family has over-ridden my schedule (during vacation,
they are right in-fact).

Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Sridhar K. N. Rao
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 10:37 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) ; 'Trevor Cooper' 
; 'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)' 
; Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com) 
; Bill Michalowski (bmich...@redhat.com) 
; Alec Hothan (ahothan) ; 
eddie.arr...@huawei.com; Jose Angel Lausuch ; Julien 
Meunier ; thomas.fai...@6wind.com; 
martin.klo...@tieto.com; richard.el...@tieto.com; Bob Fubel 
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] VSPERF weekly meeting - 21 Nov 2018 
(ww85)

Agenda

  1.  Development Update.
  2.  Hunter Release plan.
  3.  Cross-Numa performance Characterization.
  4.  Plugfest  Update.
  5.  IEEE NFVSDN.

Meeting minutes

  *   WW84: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-11-14-15.58.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D11-2D14-2D15.58.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=yWzMAmP8OvB3MaXD2MOc_D3OpnBZjLUpWCcwoQNcz0U=6JU8Ptrv2qK4ra_gGZwXMzLvfQ_ojyzGc_RjLzDCzMY=>
  *   WW83: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-10-31-15.03.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D10-2D31-2D15.03.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=yWzMAmP8OvB3MaXD2MOc_D3OpnBZjLUpWCcwoQNcz0U=LSMsD5JQ0G6wqkw6Eygi2bJEry6Cug88B4eBRui2_cI=>
  *   WW82: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-10-24-15.00.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D10-2D24-2D15.00.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=yWzMAmP8OvB3MaXD2MOc_D3OpnBZjLUpWCcwoQNcz0U=P3DfycsnN9_tA8KFVPEJDl3w5PqHyBR-ulbkL5EoIqo=>
  *   WW81: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-10-10-14.59.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D10-2D10-2D14.59.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=yWzMAmP8OvB3MaXD2MOc_D3OpnBZjLUpWCcwoQNcz0U=V8Pnk0OaPZLgw4YYc2YxZqwiaQH0xSveCVfzFsoqbW0=>


Time: Wednesday PT 8h00 UTC 16h00.

IRC: freenode 
https://freenode.net/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__freenode.net_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=yWzMAmP8OvB3MaXD2MOc_D3OpnBZjLUpWCcwoQNcz0U=J1CVUv3UTaXYghzs7ad4bZP9CXmlYN_yWf8J6xPSL70=>
 channel: #opnfv-vswitchperf; 
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-vswitchperf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__webchat.freenode.net_-3Fchannels-3Dopnfv-2Dvswitchperf=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=yWzMAmP8OvB3MaXD2MOc_D3OpnBZjLUpWCcwoQNcz0U=gmeE0wdrD6eBqM2GSH0TwIvndapl-TOIlCdy2YnXZEY=>
Audio: 
https://zoom.us/j/2362828999<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_j_2362828999=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=yWzMAmP8OvB3MaXD2MOc_D3OpnBZjLUpWCcwoQNcz0U=ruoIgszkhci_lpCvDyliIQN_hZTVrV0lT9-Mo5XYT9M=>
Or iPhone one-tap :
US: +16699006833,,2362828999# or +16465588656,,2362828999#
Or Telephone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 877 369 0926 (Toll Free) or +1 855 
880 1246 (Toll Free)
Meeting ID: 236 282 8999
International numbers available: 
https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=Xn-Kas4jq2GuyfbCCKYpwvi6FpHEYX8n<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_zoomconference-3Fm-3DXn-2DKas4jq2GuyfbCCKYpwvi6FpHEYX8n=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=yWzMAmP8OvB3MaXD2MOc_D3OpnBZjLUpWCcwoQNcz0U=V5q8NB05CC2BmLxF1qeOCvV2wiVKe7xEIlQDlEgz9QU=>

Cheers,
Sridhar


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#22478): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22478
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/28274067/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Reminder - Intel Pharos Lab Unavailable Weekend of 11/30

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Tim,

It looks like you'll be back on-line 12/3, right?
(just the weekend, not the whole month of December).

thanks for all you do for us!
Al


From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Timothy Gresham
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 11:42 AM
To: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' 
Cc: 'Trevor Bramwell' ; Deng, Yipan 

Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Reminder - Intel Pharos Lab Unavailable Weekend 
of 11/30


Intel will have a planned downtime from 11/30@12:00PM until approximately  
1/3@12:00PM  Pacific.

No OPNFV Lab services will be available during this time frame.

We will communicate via this list once services have been restored.


Tim Gresham
Open Source Technology Center - Cloud Engineer
Intel Corporation


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#22465): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22465
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/28372384/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] VSPERF Vloop VNF.

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Sridhar,

As we discussed separately, I accidentally ran some THPT tests with
your new Ubuntu-18 vloop VM on Thursday, Oct 4.

First run was with vfio-pci still enabled in 02_vswitch.conf
left-over from the SR-IOV tests I was running. Results attached in
2018-10-04_15-32-41overall_vfio.log

This test had results in the normal range of pvp throughputs I've measured 
recently,
a little on the low side...

I then remembered to change 02_vswitch.conf back to
# 'modules' : ['uio', 'vfio-pci'],
'modules' : ['uio', os.path.join(RTE_TARGET, 'kmod/igb_uio.ko')],

and the performance was much lower by about a third (one of three test logs):
2018-10-04_16-02-25overall.log

I'm hoping these results will trigger some additional thought and discussion.

regards,
Al

From: Rao, Sridhar [mailto:sridhar@spirent.com]
Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 10:14 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: Klozik Martin ; 'Cian Ferriter' 
; Govindharajan, Hariprasad 
; Finn, Emma ; 'Mars 
Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)' ; MORTON, ALFRED C 
(AL) ; Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com) 
; Bob Fubel ; Cooper, Trevor 
 (trevor.coo...@intel.com) 
Subject: VSPERF Vloop VNF.

Hello VSPERF-enthusiasts,

First let me explain the context:
We currently have ubuntu 14.04 based vloop VNF, whose performance in PVP/PVVP 
scenarios is 'not good'. I wanted to overcome this issue by creating a new 
vloop VNF. Thanks to inputs from Martin and some documentation in Jira by 
Maryam, Gene, et.al., from Intel, I created a VM based on ubuntu 18.04 
(https://artifacts.opnfv.org/vswitchperf/vnf/vloop-vnf-ubuntu-18.04_20180920.qcow2<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__artifacts.opnfv.org_vswitchperf_vnf_vloop-2Dvnf-2Dubuntu-2D18.04-5F20180920.qcow2=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=_6cen3Hn-e_hOm0BhY7aIpA58dd19Z9qGQsr8-6zYMI=LHFU45aymhIdaXIACd8wL50OprvSUwZ0-fw9nvl-gvY=tAk8_7_hm3X2D-5KdY2kJfwp0nOnyj0Z-Yvzl3ciRBw=>)
 . I have documented the steps I followed to create the image here: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/vsperf/VSPERF+VNFs<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_vsperf_VSPERF-2BVNFs=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=_6cen3Hn-e_hOm0BhY7aIpA58dd19Z9qGQsr8-6zYMI=LHFU45aymhIdaXIACd8wL50OprvSUwZ0-fw9nvl-gvY=CMloSN6BbqgO53Cm60qlay8rvaldgWQ-XF72xo5nHW8=>
 . Unfortunately, the performance went from 'not good' to 'really bad'. If you 
see in the above link, there is hardly anything done to the base image - 
minimal installation and configuration. Installation of dpdk, testpmd and 
forwarding configurations are done by VSPERF, which is same for any image.

Now, coming to the point:
I was wondering if we can put in one place what all 'Optimizations' we can do 
to improve the performance? I'm requesting, specifically Martin, the Intel-Team 
and the Redhat team - who have done this activity before and got better 
performance - to share some inputs. You can either respond over mail or Update 
the wiki page. I'll do the same and test it.
Any inputs/suggestions regarding what configurations we should do to address 
this issue would be extremely helpful.

Regards
Sridhar



2018-10-04_15-32-41overall_vfio.log
Description: 2018-10-04_15-32-41overall_vfio.log


2018-10-04_16-02-25overall.log
Description: 2018-10-04_16-02-25overall.log
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#22151): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22151
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/26845740/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] VSPERF weekly meeting - 03 OCT 2018 (ww80)

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Having trouble connecting today...

From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Sridhar K. N. Rao
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2018 12:52 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) ; 'Trevor Cooper' 
; 'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)' 
; 'Cian Ferriter' ; 
Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com) ; Bill 
Michalowski (bmich...@redhat.com) ; Alec Hothan (ahothan) 
; eddie.arr...@huawei.com; Jose Angel Lausuch 
; Julien Meunier ; 
thomas.fai...@6wind.com; martin.klo...@tieto.com; richard.el...@tieto.com; 
Finn, Emma ; Bob Fubel ; Akanksha 
Srivastava 
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] VSPERF weekly meeting - 03 OCT 2018 
(ww80)

Agenda:

  1.  Development
  2.  CI Build
  3.  Containerizing VSPERF.
  4.  VSPERF IEEE NFVSDN Demo.


Meeting minutes

  *   WW79: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-09-26-15.04.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D09-2D26-2D15.04.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=x_uPxRvUdnExEt2qKoTQ9tebx3M6sPJkTe8dW3nvVvs=BxV-l_zurEpZv_jfIp9JRMxlk0QU0v_sVcDCnMaDmSA=>
  *   WW78: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-09-19-15.02.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D09-2D19-2D15.02.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=x_uPxRvUdnExEt2qKoTQ9tebx3M6sPJkTe8dW3nvVvs=B_s15QPREnBwLnP_kH6OCurZp9RuVNWgG3K9NDMVR6A=>
  *   WW77: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-09-12-14.59.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D09-2D12-2D14.59.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=x_uPxRvUdnExEt2qKoTQ9tebx3M6sPJkTe8dW3nvVvs=lJrzDRXMe5fN1A2PIPacYUNTDU7jsn7t727uhlAa2GQ=>
  *   WW76: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-08-22-15.07.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D08-2D22-2D15.07.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=x_uPxRvUdnExEt2qKoTQ9tebx3M6sPJkTe8dW3nvVvs=NbtDB33eFmWUf5e17GUMnD9POTRFO6MbrANSBSR0Us8=>
  *   WW75: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-08-15-15.04.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D08-2D15-2D15.04.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=x_uPxRvUdnExEt2qKoTQ9tebx3M6sPJkTe8dW3nvVvs=n5CMSkMvb7F_4-RnUPDKsR6kUPtMzmpN-Z6ezkKg-cU=>


Time: Wednesday PDT 8h00 (GMT -7) UTC 15h00.

IRC: freenode 
https://freenode.net/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__freenode.net_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=x_uPxRvUdnExEt2qKoTQ9tebx3M6sPJkTe8dW3nvVvs=wiOdR_z3duC1BOT-KSqHEQkwe1Bjadd2-ZxHWmHjeIo=>
 channel: #opnfv-vswitchperf; 
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-vswitchperf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__webchat.freenode.net_-3Fchannels-3Dopnfv-2Dvswitchperf=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=x_uPxRvUdnExEt2qKoTQ9tebx3M6sPJkTe8dW3nvVvs=ko6d8hyD_Bv2MzrtHQJPLRTH5e1YVV3wzJMkhoJBWzk=>

Audio: 
https://zoom.us/j/2362828999<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_j_2362828999=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=x_uPxRvUdnExEt2qKoTQ9tebx3M6sPJkTe8dW3nvVvs=jKJKsZf_xK3Lwer_H3RbIol8SHHFVCA177K73OnBSBM=>
Or iPhone one-tap :
US: +16699006833,,2362828999# or +16465588656,,2362828999#
Or Telephone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 877 369 0926 (Toll Free) or +1 855 
880 1246 (Toll Free)
Meeting ID: 236 282 8999
International numbers available: 
https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=Xn-Kas4jq2GuyfbCCKYpwvi6FpHEYX8n<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_zoomconference-3Fm-3DXn-2DKas4jq2GuyfbCCKYpwvi6FpHEYX8n=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=x_uPxRvUdnExEt2qKoTQ9tebx3M6sPJkTe8dW3nvVvs=MpXVf3oBkOt-LAmSeOUexa7J9JWxec4b26kCHl6UiXo=>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#22118): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22118
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/26715344/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [cnwg] Recap of the kickoff meeting for the new Cloud Native Working Group [cnwg]

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Bin and Wenjing,

The proposal to schedule this important session
(especially for testing projects) lands on a
truly bad week for VSPERF folks – 4 of us are
unavailable on the 6th, including our PTL Sridhar.

Is it possible to record the session?
or reschedule to the following week?

Also we have selected an Intern for our project
which begins with containerization, and she is more
likely to be able to joins the week of Sept 10.

thanks for considering this request,
Al


From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of HU, BIN
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 4:18 PM
To: Wenjing Chu ; Wenjing Chu 
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [cnwg] Recap of the kickoff 
meeting for the new Cloud Native Working Group [cnwg]

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Wenjing,

Currently the agenda on 9/6 is open. I will put this discussion on the agenda.

Thanks
Bin

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> 
On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 1:03 PM
To: Wenjing Chu mailto:chu.wenj...@gmail.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [cnwg] Recap of the kickoff 
meeting for the new Cloud Native Working Group [cnwg]


Because the US Labor Day holiday conflict, and we probably don’t want to wait 
for another two weeks. I’d like to propose that we have the second meeting in 
the Tech-Discuss time slot on Sept 6, and then rejoin the Clover meeting time 
afterwards.

Bin,
Is the 9/6 tech-discuss meeting slot open? Thanks.

Eddie Arrage will do an overview and demos to illustrate how OPNFV projects, 
esp. testing projects, can adopt and support cloud native, and benefit from it, 
and what we can do in achieving the community goals, including adapting the 
current CI to be much more agile. It will be demo driven and hands on.

Regards
Wenjing


From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 6:54 AM
To: Wenjing Chu mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [cnwg] Recap of the kickoff 
meeting for the new Cloud Native Working Group [cnwg]

Two weeks from now is US Labor Day holiday... I spoke too soon before studying 
the calendar.

That raises a couple of questions:
- Do we want to change the pattern and switch to Aug 27? then going bi-weekly 
from there?
- Do people still want to stick with Mondays, which tend to have more holidays?

Wenjing



On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 6:24 AM, Wenjing Chu 
mailto:chu.wenj...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Sorry if you had difficulty in finding the CNWG meeting zoom.
The correct zoom meeting number is in the meeting invite. 
https://zoom.us/j/5014627785.
And the meeting IRC is #opnfv-meeting.
The wiki page had an old number and wrong IRC, both are now corrected.

Stephen, can you send out a new meeting invite to update everyone's calendar, 
but with CNWG caption?
Because few people were able to join this morning's call, we have cancelled the 
meeting. Please check your calendar invite for next meeting in 2 weeks.

Regards
Wenjing






On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:26 PM, Wenjing Chu 
mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>> wrote:
Thanks for a lot of people joining this morning’s call. I’m very encouraged 
with the interest level. Thank you.

I’ve created a wiki as a home to keep track of meeting agendas and minutes, and 
general logistics information. It’s here: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=26837622
(I need some help in making the URL fall under the working group menu and a 
more memorable URL…)

The WG scope and work items are also listed there, as approved by the TSC.

The participants in today’s call opted to reuse the existing Clover project 
call time slot on Monday morning 6AM for the WG calls. You can find the details 
in the above wiki link. @Stephen you may want to double check for me to make 
sure it is correct.

The calls will be bi-weekly for now… until we see a clearer need to change 
anything.

I’m thinking about roughly classifying the topics of the WG in 3 areas:

- 

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 15 Aug 2018 (ww75)

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Minutes from today's VSPERF session:
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-08-15-15.04.html

Al
(driving for the day, Happy Independence Day, India!)

From: Rao, Sridhar [mailto:sridhar@spirent.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 10:59 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) ; 'Trevor Cooper' 
; 'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)' 
; 'Cian Ferriter' ; 
Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com) ; Bill 
Michalowski (bmich...@redhat.com) ; Alec Hothan (ahothan) 
; eddie.arr...@huawei.com; Jose Angel Lausuch 
; Julien Meunier ; 
thomas.fai...@6wind.com; martin.klo...@tieto.com; richard.el...@tieto.com
Subject: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 15 Aug 2018 (ww75)

This week's meeting will be driven by Al Morton.
Thanks Al. I will share details with you over mail.

Agenda,

  1.  Development Updates
  2.  Continuous Release
  3.  VSPERF-Interns Update.
  4.  VSPERF Results.
  5.  ...


Meeting minutes

  *   WW74: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-08-08-15.02.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D08-2D08-2D15.02.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=t8F18LGm_Mh9_3gHZFKXYnYLoyzEOwqCG1EzqDPcjyQ=f5gCMns2SnzqK5PUcUbHf3bnw9g-R3kjFcklcdRyOck=>
  *   WW73: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-07-25-15.00.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D07-2D25-2D15.00.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=t8F18LGm_Mh9_3gHZFKXYnYLoyzEOwqCG1EzqDPcjyQ=RvVcZf5E4G8JWwj98vFCn-NnUnC4PhYtdTlfLGXzieY=>
  *   WW72: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-07-18-14.59.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D07-2D18-2D14.59.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=t8F18LGm_Mh9_3gHZFKXYnYLoyzEOwqCG1EzqDPcjyQ=6gHMfPaGsThPyzxR4mad8SoqC6nam_OAQTOE2SrhWAA=>



Time: Wednesday PDT 8h00 (GMT -7) UTC 15h00.

IRC: freenode 
https://freenode.net/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__freenode.net_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=t8F18LGm_Mh9_3gHZFKXYnYLoyzEOwqCG1EzqDPcjyQ=L-1Z2TTHn8ayISlEbPks8yNo___VDFcU-JJzrfjIPnI=>
 channel: #opnfv-vswitchperf; 
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-vswitchperf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__webchat.freenode.net_-3Fchannels-3Dopnfv-2Dvswitchperf=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=t8F18LGm_Mh9_3gHZFKXYnYLoyzEOwqCG1EzqDPcjyQ=1fwT24s1bZBIrY1aTHdpjW6TpvPKxKGwSGpWLRuAkrY=>

Audio: 
https://zoom.us/j/2362828999<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_j_2362828999=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=t8F18LGm_Mh9_3gHZFKXYnYLoyzEOwqCG1EzqDPcjyQ=384-5Z1DqaOPXPCmA52iDF_dSrLOkDnAt2eisuqGMrs=>
Or iPhone one-tap :
US: +16699006833,,2362828999# or +16465588656,,2362828999#
Or Telephone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 877 369 0926 (Toll Free) or +1 855 
880 1246 (Toll Free)
Meeting ID: 236 282 8999
International numbers available: 
https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=Xn-Kas4jq2GuyfbCCKYpwvi6FpHEYX8n<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_zoomconference-3Fm-3DXn-2DKas4jq2GuyfbCCKYpwvi6FpHEYX8n=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=t8F18LGm_Mh9_3gHZFKXYnYLoyzEOwqCG1EzqDPcjyQ=CvG9emMtwWHJo__ELD0EKSoOWkQErW5XVnSEVl2-yHs=>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#21770): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21770
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/24531106/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 25 Jul 2018 (ww73)

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Sorry, I'm participating in a workshop and
will miss the meeting today...

Al

From: Rao, Sridhar [mailto:sridhar@spirent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 2:37 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) ; 'Trevor Cooper' 
; 'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)' 
; 'Cian Ferriter' ; 
Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com) ; Bill 
Michalowski (bmich...@redhat.com) ; Alec Hothan (ahothan) 
; eddie.arr...@huawei.com; Jose Angel Lausuch 
; Julien Meunier ; 
thomas.fai...@6wind.com; martin.klo...@tieto.com; richard.el...@tieto.com
Subject: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 25 Jul 2018 (ww73)

Agenda,

  1.  Development Update
  2.  Testbed-Update
  3.  L3-Cache-Profiles of VSPERF Workloads - Result Sharing.
  4.  VSPERF-Container Networking Update
  5.  IEEE NFVSDN
  6.  VSPERF Results Publishing
  7.  VSPERF-Interns?


Meeting minutes

  *   WW72: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-07-18-14.59.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D07-2D18-2D14.59.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=OR96pBMENj0lHb5nYcg0gtEphdZY5pDHmYHMW54cf1E=Q3MOA352N4GNHhUCk14oMTb7xYoC5UL2LssqQ40-GNk=>
  *   WW71: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-07-11-15.00.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D07-2D11-2D15.00.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=OR96pBMENj0lHb5nYcg0gtEphdZY5pDHmYHMW54cf1E=bKPyb9dPIxH78Tr0-pRpuDfLueYyZOiLiWeSYgfzJ0E=>
  *   WW70: 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-06-27-15.02.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D06-2D27-2D15.02.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=OR96pBMENj0lHb5nYcg0gtEphdZY5pDHmYHMW54cf1E=yCsJ3aOEycoSpruCdX0mwjns8ZHGHA80gGwT8T9qnXI=>


Time: Wednesday PDT 8h00 (GMT -7) UTC 15h00.

IRC: freenode 
https://freenode.net/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__freenode.net_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=OR96pBMENj0lHb5nYcg0gtEphdZY5pDHmYHMW54cf1E=S2VYk9KVXiPj_1e_0QzdRaud3nYfx4HfftpyUrlPbZQ=>
 channel: #opnfv-vswitchperf; 
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-vswitchperf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__webchat.freenode.net_-3Fchannels-3Dopnfv-2Dvswitchperf=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=OR96pBMENj0lHb5nYcg0gtEphdZY5pDHmYHMW54cf1E=ycRdEqDkYHPEtk5J08cO2dZrnua8DXwjyyQSAw_zHE8=>

Audio: 
https://zoom.us/j/2362828999<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_j_2362828999=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=OR96pBMENj0lHb5nYcg0gtEphdZY5pDHmYHMW54cf1E=jcq-6LUDJXykcJ-X0TclBlInJ5T1jkDhgKGPTEOVoC8=>
Or iPhone one-tap :
US: +16699006833,,2362828999# or +16465588656,,2362828999#
Or Telephone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 877 369 0926 (Toll Free) or +1 855 
880 1246 (Toll Free)
Meeting ID: 236 282 8999
International numbers available: 
https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=Xn-Kas4jq2GuyfbCCKYpwvi6FpHEYX8n<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_zoomconference-3Fm-3DXn-2DKas4jq2GuyfbCCKYpwvi6FpHEYX8n=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=OR96pBMENj0lHb5nYcg0gtEphdZY5pDHmYHMW54cf1E=Gr83Z3cfKiR-IgYq_xxj9zodxq2J8w8-oiAh9AFGLyI=>




Spirent Communications e-mail confidentiality.

This e-mail contains confidential and / or privileged information belonging to 
Spirent Communications plc, its affiliates and / or subsidiaries. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution and / or the taking of any action based upon reliance on 
the contents of this transmission is strictly forbidden. If you have received 
this message in error please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete it 
from your system.

Spirent Communications plc
Northwood Park, Gatwick Road, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9XN, United Kingdom.
Tel No. +44 (0) 1293 767676
Fax No. +44 (0) 1293 767677

Registered in England Number 470893
Registered at Northwood Park, Gatwick Road, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9XN, 
United Kingdom.

Or if within the US,

Spirent Communications,
27349 Agoura Road, Calabasas, CA, 91301, USA.
Tel No. 1-818-676- 2300

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#21689): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/2168

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Review of proposed scope for OVP 2018.0x

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

+1 to consider moving v6 to mandatory.
Anyone in a crunch for addresses would agree...
Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Eddie Arrage
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 1:47 PM
To: Georg Kunz ; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Review of proposed scope for OVP 
2018.0x

Hi Georg,

Thanks for compiling all this information!

In additional to the incremental test cases between releases, another 
consideration should be moving some of the 'optional' test areas from the 
2018.01 release to 'mandatory' in this release. It makes a lot of sense to at 
least consider moving the IPv6 test cases from optional to mandatory. IPv6 
should be table stakes at this point - this is my opinion anyway.

All the best,
Eddie

From: opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Georg Kunz
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 8:25 AM
To: opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tsc] Review of proposed scope for OVP 2018.0x

Dear TSC,

I promised during today's TSC call to provide more detailed information on the 
proposed scope of the next OVP release (2018.0x):


  *   Slides showing a concise mapping of test suites to proposed categories 
and requirement levels (mandatory / optional)

https://wiki.opnfv.org/download/attachments/2925933/Dovetail-OVP%20-%20TSC%20scope%20review.pdf?version=1=1530025340369=v2



  *   List of all proposed new test cases to be included in addition to the 
existing scope (OVP 2018.01)

https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Proposed+Test+Scope+of+OVP+2018.0x



  *   State of the proposed test cases in our CI

https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Status+of+proposed+tests

Please note that some of the failing test cases do in fact pass in the normal 
daily CI runs of the installers. The dovetail test suite is executed after 
Functest and Yardstick and we do see an irregular (PASS/FAIL) behavior across 
all platforms. I attribute this to the fact that the deployments have already 
gone through quite some test load which causes instabilities. If a test passes 
regularly in the daily installer runs and shows unstable behavior in the 
Dovetail runs, we still consider it mature enough for inclusion.



  *   Bottlenecks ping stress test

There was a request for more information on the bottlenecks stress test we are 
proposing for inclusion. In a nutshell, the test spawns a configurable number 
of threads, each deploying a Heat stack consisting of two VMs through 
Yardstick. The two VMs attempt to verify connectivity by means of pings. The 
test passes if the number of successfully deployed stacks is greater than a 
configurable threshold.

In its current configuration, the test deploys 2x 20 stacks / threads and 
requires that all 20 stacks deploy successfully [1].



Unfortunately, we observe the testcase to fail regularly (observe the "result" 
and "success_rate" fields: [2]) given its current parameterization. We received 
the input on the call that Dovetail should not change the parameterization of 
test cases, but delegate this to the corresponding testing projects.



[1] 
https://github.com/opnfv/bottlenecks/blob/master/testsuites/posca/testcase_cfg/posca_factor_ping.yaml

[2] 

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer]

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Aaron and Barometer team,

Is anyone else having trouble accessing GTM?

I just saw a message from Emma…
Al


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [announce] moving on....

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Ray,

It’s always sad to see a valued member of our community move-on,
but your is a very special case.  You have contributed to every
project and major event in many ways, and through many leadership
changes you have been a constant, go-to-member of OPNFV.

I’ve especially enjoyed our travel adventures together,
and feel relatively certain about our paths converging again.

My very best regards, and warm wishes for your future success!
Al


From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2018 3:32 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss 
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [announce] moving on

All,

I shared this news with some of the community members over the past several 
days, and I wanted to notify the rest of the community.

I recently made a difficult decision to pursue a new opportunity outside of the 
LF.  Having been involved in OPNFV since the formation days, the thought of 
leaving the community isn't easy.  This is especially the case since I just 
spent the entire week with many community members at ETSI during the Plugfest.  
I was again reminded that I'm part of a wonderful & motivated community.

My last day at the Linux Foundation is on June 22nd, and I'm working with both 
Phil & Heather on transition plans so that things don't get dropped.

I sincerely hope that our paths will cross again.  I'm still going to be 
involved in open source software, so I'm definitely not going too far.  
Wherever and whenever our paths cross, I hope we can share a drink soon

Regards,

Ray
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Wiki on Multistream tests

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Christian,

Here's the Wiki page on Traffic Gen testing,
mostly created by Sridhar last year:

https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/vsperf/Traffic+Generator+Testing

It's worthwhile to look at the explanations as
well as the figures:

https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/vsperf/Traffic+Generator+Testing#TrafficGeneratorTesting-AnalysisofTestResults

because the different generators created the multiple streams
using different fields, and we believe that fact explains the
results.

*somewhere* I there is a Wiki/JIRA/Etherpad where we 
noted the current capabilities of each T-gen to produce
multistreams (IOW, what fields they could modify).

I couldn't find that page easily, but I'll let my sub-conscious 
search engine work on it and try again...

Al


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] [nfvbench] FD.io CSIT MDR (Multi drop rate) binary search

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Thanks Alec, I’ll take a look at this too.

I think it’s a great idea to use techniques that
reduce search time in the context of CSIT, which
involves much repetitive testing and a well-known
performance level is expected measurement result.

It is a somewhat different use case when the test
involves several un-tested/new factors or configurations.
This is more like the usual case of benchmarking,
where accuracy and repeatability can be more important
than time.

Something to consider.
Al

From: Rao, Sridhar [mailto:sridhar@spirent.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 12:37 AM
To: Alec Hothan (ahothan) <ahot...@cisco.com>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <a...@research.att.com>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] [nfvbench] FD.io CSIT MDR (Multi 
drop rate) binary search

Thanks a lot, Alec. Will look into this and update during Next week’s call.
Will see if we can integrate into VSPERF-Trex, quickly.

Regards,
Sridhar K. N. Rao (Ph. D)
Architect – SDN/NFV
+91-9900088064

From: Alec Hothan (ahothan) <ahot...@cisco.com<mailto:ahot...@cisco.com>>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 12:24 AM
To: Rao, Sridhar <sridhar@spirent.com<mailto:sridhar@spirent.com>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Cc: 'ALFRED C 'MORTON (AL)'' <acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] [nfvbench] FD.io CSIT MDR (Multi 
drop rate) binary search

FYI

FD.io CSIT has published a document describing a faster way to do the 
throughput binary search by combining multiple drop rates into the same binary 
search – see attached email.
This is a generalization of the double-rate binary search algorithm introduced 
in NFVbench -  augmented with additional time optimization.
They have a python implementation available (running on top of TRex) and the 
algorithm itself is not specific to TRex.
I’m looking at ways to make it more portable and available as a library so it 
can be reused by different tools. It would certainly be good to see if we could 
take the best of Al’s proposal and see if it makes sense to integrate them into 
MDR. This will be discussed at the plugfest.

If you have comments, it would be best to send them on the FD.io mailer: 
csit-...@lists.fd.io<mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io>


Thanks

  Alec






Spirent Communications e-mail confidentiality.

This e-mail contains confidential and / or privileged information belonging to 
Spirent Communications plc, its affiliates and / or subsidiaries. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution and / or the taking of any action based upon reliance on 
the contents of this transmission is strictly forbidden. If you have received 
this message in error please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete it 
from your system.

Spirent Communications plc
Northwood Park, Gatwick Road, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9XN, United Kingdom.
Tel No. +44 (0) 1293 767676
Fax No. +44 (0) 1293 767677

Registered in England Number 470893
Registered at Northwood Park, Gatwick Road, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9XN, 
United Kingdom.

Or if within the US,

Spirent Communications,
27349 Agoura Road, Calabasas, CA, 91301, USA.
Tel No. 1-818-676- 2300
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Agenda for weekly meeting - 2018-05-23

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Mark and Georg,
I would really like to discuss this topic,
but I can't make the meeting this week.

Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Georg Kunz
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 1:33 AM
To: Beierl, Mark 
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Agenda for weekly meeting - 
2018-05-23

Hi Mark,

I very much like the idea because this methodology allows us to evaluate a 
specific performance characteristic ("no performace interference between 
storage and network data") without having to report concrete performance 
numbers as part of OVP.

The next Dovetail call is tomorrow, and we can add this to the agenda. If you 
cannot make it on such short notice, we'll move it to next week. Feedback via 
email from the team and the performance benchmarking community is welcome any 
time.

Best regards
Georg

From: Beierl, Mark [mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 7:26 PM
To: Georg Kunz >
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Agenda for weekly meeting - 
2018-05-23

Had a brief conversation with Georg about setting a bar for entering into the 
performance phase of Dovetail:

The concept is to run a tenant network workload (Vsperf or NFVBench) and 
capture the baseline. Next run a storage network workload (StorPerf) and 
capture its baseline. Next run both together and if there is a significant drop 
in either (ie don't record the actual throughputs, just the delta) report that 
as non compliant because storage and tenant networks are colliding.

Perhaps we can discuss this concept in an upcoming meeting?
Regards,
Mark

Mark Beierl
SW System Sr Principal Engineer
Dell EMC | Cloud & Communication Service Provider Solution
mobile +1 613 314 8106
mark.bei...@dell.com

On May 22, 2018, at 17:52, Georg Kunz 
> wrote:
Hi Dovetailers,

This is the preliminary agenda for tomorrow's weekly Dovetail call:


  *   web portal update
  *   plugfest preparation
  *   CI status
  *   AOB

Best regards
Georg
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Request for Network Administration tools

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Parker,

OPNFV has a controller performance project, CPERF,
which doesn’t participate in releases but continues its work
on controller testing. The project is also a resource for collaboration
between ODL and OPNFV when issues come up.  This sounds like
yet another opportunity for collaboration.

I’ve CC’d our PTL, Sai, and Daniel, Luis, and Jamo who are
other Cperf regulars. Both Jamo and I attended the LaaS
presentation you did with Jack at ONS 2018 and asked several questions.

I’m taking some time off this week, but I’m sure a
Cperf’er can help. We also have a mini-meeting at
2:15pm ET Thursday for more interactive discussions.

regards,
Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Parker 
Berberian
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 12:41 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Request for Network Administration tools

Hi All,

If you don't know me, I am Parker Berberian. I am running the Lab as a Service 
at the UNH Interoperability Lab.

We are beginning development on supporting dynamic pod allocation. To do this, 
we need to be able to manipulate our underlay network in an automated fashion 
in order to create opnfv "pods" from any arbitrary machines we host.

Essentially, when a deployment happens, we need to be able to take any of our 
available machines and add them to the appropriate vlans and make sure they can 
all talk to each other. There may be as many as 4 switches between different 
machines, so all the necessary switches need to be configured to forward the 
given vlans.

We use Cisco 9300 switches 
(here)
 which support OpenFlow. So we originally considered used an SDN controller 
such as OpenDaylight.

Has anyone used a tool that might accomplish what we need? Any recommendations 
are welcome.

Thank you,
Parker Berberian.
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 09 May 2018 (ww64)

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Here is the TST009 specification versions of Binary Search
and Binary Search with Loss Verification that I mentioned
during our call today.

The rest of the TST009 spec is here:
https://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/Open/Drafts/TST009_NFVI_Benchmarks

regards,
Al

From: Rao, Sridhar [mailto:sridhar@spirent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 12:04 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <a...@research.att.com>; 'Trevor Cooper' 
<trevor.coo...@intel.com>; 'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)' 
<mars.toktonal...@nokia.com>; 'Cian Ferriter' <cian.ferri...@intel.com>; 
Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com) <ctrau...@redhat.com>; Bill 
Michalowski (bmich...@redhat.com) <bmich...@redhat.com>; Alec Hothan (ahothan) 
<ahot...@cisco.com>; eddie.arr...@huawei.com; Jose Angel Lausuch 
<jalaus...@suse.com>; Julien Meunier <julien.meun...@6wind.com>; 
thomas.fai...@6wind.com; martin.klo...@tieto.com; richard.el...@tieto.com
Subject: RE: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 09 May 2018 (ww64)

Meeting Minutes:
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-05-09-15.05.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D05-2D09-2D15.05.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=EF5QdfrAEUsUGiJ4k65kIpLpZEDFkM2Pqgw3sAXqwqE=XkWt-cqCgDMjrSR2fvtviQMQhpURd7FCEZK7qT42G6o=>

Thanks for attending!

Regards,
Sridhar

From: Rao, Sridhar
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2018 8:50 AM
To: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Cc: 'ALFRED C 'MORTON (AL)'' <acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>>; 
'Trevor Cooper' <trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>; 
'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)' 
<mars.toktonal...@nokia.com<mailto:mars.toktonal...@nokia.com>>; 'Cian 
Ferriter' <cian.ferri...@intel.com<mailto:cian.ferri...@intel.com>>; Christian 
Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>) 
<ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>>; Bill Michalowski 
(bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>) 
<bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>>; 'Alec Hothan (ahothan)' 
<ahot...@cisco.com<mailto:ahot...@cisco.com>>; 'eddie.arr...@huawei.com' 
<eddie.arr...@huawei.com<mailto:eddie.arr...@huawei.com>>; 'Jose Angel Lausuch' 
<jalaus...@suse.com<mailto:jalaus...@suse.com>>; 'Julien Meunier' 
<julien.meun...@6wind.com<mailto:julien.meun...@6wind.com>>; 
'thomas.fai...@6wind.com' 
<thomas.fai...@6wind.com<mailto:thomas.fai...@6wind.com>>; 
'martin.klo...@tieto.com' 
<martin.klo...@tieto.com<mailto:martin.klo...@tieto.com>>; 
'richard.el...@tieto.com' 
<richard.el...@tieto.com<mailto:richard.el...@tieto.com>>
Subject: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 09 May 2018 (ww64)

Agenda,


  1.  Gambia Participation
  2.  Development update
  3.  VSPERF Results Display  in TestAPI - Update.
  4.  Testing the patches as part of review process - A Proposal.
  5.  The two works for OPNFV Plugfest - Status and Plan.



Meeting minutes

  *   WW63: It was only knowledge sharing session by Martin Klozik - no minutes 
got recorded.
  *   WW62 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-04-18-15.06.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D04-2D18-2D15.06.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=EF5QdfrAEUsUGiJ4k65kIpLpZEDFkM2Pqgw3sAXqwqE=iCjtF2DKTz3WwKDZ-RSpFzdC324RwgCyUBASlPDkSDE=>
  *   WW61 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-04-11-15.00.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D04-2D11-2D15.00.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=EF5QdfrAEUsUGiJ4k65kIpLpZEDFkM2Pqgw3sAXqwqE=x6oi9nVIErIL1kZhr-snmXv0EAUu70V7PoEWM3XIA88=>
  *   WW60 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-04-04-15.00.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D04-2D04-2D15.00.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=EF5QdfrAEUsUGiJ4k65kIpLpZEDFkM2Pqgw3sAXqwqE=w0r1QLVcjNyD6fGP8OVQ-nI2jfimEWwUc2vhbd9w2Ns=>



Time: Wednesday PDT 8h00 (GMT -7) UTC 15h00.

IRC: freenode 
https://freenode.net/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer]

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Aaron,

We discussed the 3 possibilities for Gambia during the
weekly meeting. Emma raised several key areas to consider,
and I hope they are captured in the notes...

Thanks for your additional input w.r.t. Functest, Cedric.

I haven’t formed a strong opinion yet,
Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
ollivier.ced...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2018 12:30 PM
To: David McBride ; Aaron Smith 

Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer]

If you want to follow both tracks without duplicating your changes, you do skip 
Gambia.
Then your master will by synced to H after 6 months and then you will simply 
have to cherry-pick the bugfixes.

On sam., 2018-04-21 at 18:21 +0200, 
ollivier.ced...@gmail.com wrote:
Both? Technically very difficult and it duplicates branches and all patchsets 
if barometer follows both master and stable.
In case of Features integrated in Functest, it's even much more complex as it 
raises side effects on Functest, Snaps, requirement synchronization over the 
OPNFV projects, etc.

Again the topic is interesting but we may take all technical details into 
consideration (see threads about first tests again XCI).
From the time being, the model mostly fits a virtual installer and Apex.

From the time being, the full model is built from a falsy upward compatibility 
(already discussed during release meeting).
And all dependencies and needs regarding Functest are unmet.

I will open a full thread about the falsy upward compatibility.

Cédric

On ven., 2018-04-20 at 15:32 -0700, David McBride wrote:
Do both! :)

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Aaron Smith 
> wrote:

I am assuming participation in the Gambia release?

The question is whether to switch to XCI or continue with the traditional 
release.

 Feedback?

Aaron
--
Mobile

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss



--
David McBride
Release Manager, OPNFV
Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
Email/Google Talk: 
dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
Skype: davidjmcbride1
IRC: dmcbride

___

opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list

opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org

https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Guideline for participants //RE: Discussion about Fraser Plugfest/Plugtest from Testperf

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Also, The ETSI folks said that registration deadline is now
April 15th. (can’t remember if the new date was mentioned this morning)

Al

From: Cooper, Trevor [mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, April 9, 2018 4:59 PM
To: Yuyang (Gabriel) <gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>; pierre.lynch 
<pierre.ly...@keysight.com>
Cc: test-wg <test...@lists.opnfv.org>; Brattain, Ross B 
<ross.b.bratt...@intel.com>; MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <a...@research.att.com>; 
georg.kunz <georg.k...@ericsson.com>; tim.irnich <tim.irn...@ericsson.com>; 
ahothan <ahot...@cisco.com>; mark.beierl <mark.bei...@emc.com>; cedric.olivier 
<cedric.oliv...@orange.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: Guideline for participants //RE: Discussion about Fraser 
Plugfest/Plugtest from Testperf

Hi Gabriel …this is the registration link 
https://portal.etsi.org/webapp/plugtests/Register.asp?EventID=250<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__portal.etsi.org_webapp_plugtests_Register.asp-3FEventID-3D250=DwMFbw=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=SPQphEvkDLeWOH-K5ujsmylrBGASzZGW-rjw3NabYAc=2tmxXO3iAw8uziNmZdvXMfbQaKf4fI9BCtz8kA2W6mU=>

/Trevor



From: Yuyang (Gabriel) [mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2018 10:51 AM
To: pierre.lynch <pierre.ly...@keysight.com<mailto:pierre.ly...@keysight.com>>
Cc: test-wg <test...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>; 
Brattain, Ross B <ross.b.bratt...@intel.com<mailto:ross.b.bratt...@intel.com>>; 
Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>; 
acmorton <acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>>; georg.kunz 
<georg.k...@ericsson.com<mailto:georg.k...@ericsson.com>>; tim.irnich 
<tim.irn...@ericsson.com<mailto:tim.irn...@ericsson.com>>; ahothan 
<ahot...@cisco.com<mailto:ahot...@cisco.com>>; mark.beierl 
<mark.bei...@emc.com<mailto:mark.bei...@emc.com>>; cedric.olivier 
<cedric.oliv...@orange.com<mailto:cedric.oliv...@orange.com>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: Guideline for participants //RE: Discussion about Fraser 
Plugfest/Plugtest from Testperf

Hi Pierre,

Thanks a lot for all these information! I have subscribed your new email to the 
test-wg email list: 
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/test-wg<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.opnfv.org_mailman_listinfo_test-2Dwg=DwMFbw=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=SPQphEvkDLeWOH-K5ujsmylrBGASzZGW-rjw3NabYAc=j4eGEDue2VoVwmw95xDTxSQw7umzJNa1k-j_NO1PlFE=>.
 I will send you the password in another mail.

I echo that it is a great idea to involve dovetail in ETSI Plugtest and we 
should start our pre-testing now.
From what I know, the release set and optional set (draft) of test cases of 
Dovetail has already included some tests from Funtest, Yarstick and Bottlenecks.
As to other test cases from our testing projects, we should also need the 
feedbacks before the weekend.
We could dicuss it at tomorrow's Testperf meeting.

Moreover, I could not find the registration link for ETSI plugtest. It is said 
on the website that the registration ends at March 31st.
Could you also help with that? Thanks a lot!


Best,
Gabriel
发件人： pierre.lynch
收件人： Yuyang 
(Gabriel)<gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com<mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>
抄送： 
test-wg<test...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>;ross.b.brattain<ross.b.bratt...@intel.com<mailto:ross.b.bratt...@intel.com>>;trevor.cooper<trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>;acmorton<acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>>;georg.kunz<georg.k...@ericsson.com<mailto:georg.k...@ericsson.com>>;tim.irnich<tim.irn...@ericsson.com<mailto:tim.irn...@ericsson.com>>;ahothan<ahot...@cisco.com<mailto:ahot...@cisco.com>>;mark.beierl<mark.bei...@emc.com<mailto:mark.bei...@emc.com>>;cedric.olivier<cedric.oliv...@orange.com<mailto:cedric.oliv...@orange.com>>
主题： Re: Guideline for participants //RE: Discussion about Fraser 
Plugfest/Plugtest from Testperf
时间： 2018-04-04 22:38:48

Hello all,

First: looks like I am not subscribed to the test-wg list, so my last email 
bounced back to me. I didn’t find it on the OPNFV mailing lists site….can 
someone please subscribe me to that? New email: 
pierre.ly...@keysight.com<mailto:pierre.ly...@keysight.com>

I spoke with Silvia Almagia, the Plugtest organizer at ETSI.


  *   I told her about the plan to brainstorm in the community which scenarios 
(features) could be brought to the Plugtest. It will be like I described: each 
scenario would be listed as a separate platform for scheduling purposes.
  *   There is no formal process to insert test cases

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [testperf][yardstick][vsperf][nfvbench][TGaaS] Traffic generator as a service update

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Adding Sridhar...

From: Foley, Emma L [mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 4:44 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: Alec Hothan (ahothan) <ahot...@cisco.com>; MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
<acmor...@att.com>; Sinha, Abhijit <abhijit.si...@intel.com>; Limingjiang (Rex) 
<limingji...@huawei.com>; pierre.ly...@keysight.com
Subject: [testperf][yardstick][vsperf][nfvbench][TGaaS] Traffic generator as a 
service update

Hi folks,

A few of us met last week at ONS, and continued the discussion on creating a 
common traffic generator library in OPNFV.
The summary is below, and on the etherpad [1], please update if there have been 
any omissions.

We decided to start with looking at trex drivers.
There are at least 5 similar drivers at the moment: NFVBench, yardstick, 
vsperf, Red Hat and FD.io.
Comparisons have been done between some trex drivers, and revealed ~25% 
difference in performance.
This is likely dues to differences in running the tests as well as different SW 
versions, as well as search algorithms for the NDR/PDR.

We need to converge on a common driver so that performance figures are not 
dependent on the test tools that is used.
There are slight difference in topology and test setup; each test should 
describe the current set-up for comparison.
We will compare a common test between all projects to get a baseline comparison 
before we start making any changes.
Because performance can vary between nodes, we will test on the same HW.

The plan of action is as follows:

-Find a POD

-An L2 forwarding test will be run by each participating project (order 
and participants to be determined later)

o   Some methodology and topology might need to be adjusted.

-Focus on common driver development to optimize the performance figures

-Re-run comparsions

We will also need to work on vsperf config parser (for yaml to Python) [2] so 
we can have consistent config formats for all portions of testing.

The initial participants in this comparison are:

-Vsperf

-NFVBench

-Yardstick

We will update weekly at the testperf meeting.

Best regards,
Emma

[1] 
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/topics_for_TGAAS_discussion_at_plugfest<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__etherpad.opnfv.org_p_topics-5Ffor-5FTGAAS-5Fdiscussion-5Fat-5Fplugfest=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=sxhME6HMD81YVzlgh4hF5KnhKULdB3OtmEys5BsUirA=qsSPpo3RYe8F98kVsnc7gxNW_73ig1QiimWj0lZbd8o=>
[2] 
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/51757/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.opnfv.org_gerrit_-23_c_51757_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=sxhME6HMD81YVzlgh4hF5KnhKULdB3OtmEys5BsUirA=VzeAJa_evH0H6Gd3Q3_GelLPeVNd8qI9vNfIdDiMXZ0=>


--
Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] {VSPERF] Weekly meeting details

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Eastern Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN="MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)":MAILTO:acmor...@att.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=opnfv-tech
 -disc...@lists.opnfv.org:MAILTO:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
DESCRIPTION;LANGUAGE=en-US:IRC: freenode https://freenode.net/<https://urld
 efense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__freenode.net_=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_
 HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=aybYqRLzzMVjXILACUaApDcchZnbaTs-
 y1ah7DQgkLE=vFG6YXnewTJqWMls4vRwFbG0Y3N2N-9B0cHMAsbceaw=> channel: #op
 nfv-vswitchperf http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-vswitchperf\n\nAudio & Shared Desktop: https://z
 oom.us/j/2362828999<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__z
 oom.us_j_2362828999=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL7
 2cBw=aybYqRLzzMVjXILACUaApDcchZnbaTs-y1ah7DQgkLE=NE6qH_16Z8HcdbrF0vUyz
 DXUJkTYGk6Co-kWZTTnT2Y=>\nOr iPhone one-tap :\nUS: +16699006833\,\,23628
 28999# or +16465588656\,\,2362828999#\nOr Telephone:\nDial(for higher qual
 ity\, dial a number based on your current location):\nUS: +1 669 900 6833 
 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 877 369 0926 (Toll Free) or +1 855 880 1246 (Toll
  Free)\nMeeting ID: 236 282 8999\nInternational numbers available: https:/
 /zoom.us/zoomconference?m=Xn-Kas4jq2GuyfbCCKYpwvi6FpHEYX8n<https://urldefe
 nse.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_zoomconference-3Fm-3DXn-2DKa
 s4jq2GuyfbCCKYpwvi6FpHEYX8n=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIl
 tVyD1oL72cBw=aybYqRLzzMVjXILACUaApDcchZnbaTs-y1ah7DQgkLE=Hgu2EqV5wSFDZ
 dqxDfwQtfm5My8V2VDClGpOQ4D93sA=>\n\n\n\n
RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=WE;WKST=SU
SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=en-US:{VSPERF] Weekly meeting details
DTSTART;TZID=Eastern Standard Time:20180328T11
DTEND;TZID=Eastern Standard Time:20180328T12
UID:04008200E00074C5B7101A82E008C091380B1FC1D301000
 010003B26DC3CF2C7EC40B71BDAB410070475
CLASS:PUBLIC
PRIORITY:5
DTSTAMP:20180321T183010Z
TRANSP:OPAQUE
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SEQUENCE:0
LOCATION;LANGUAGE=en-US:https://zoom.us/j/2362828999
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-APPT-SEQUENCE:0
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-OWNERAPPTID:550844386
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:TENTATIVE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INTENDEDSTATUS:BUSY
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INSTTYPE:1
X-MICROSOFT-DISALLOW-COUNTER:FALSE
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:DISPLAY
DESCRIPTION:REMINDER
TRIGGER;RELATED=START:-PT15M
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Alec,
I’ll help with the breakout...
Al

From: Alec Hothan (ahothan) [mailto:ahot...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 11:40 AM
To: Bob Monkman <bob.monk...@arm.com>; pierre.ly...@keysight.com; 
rp...@linuxfoundation.org; Rao, Sridhar <sridhar@spirent.com>; MORTON, 
ALFRED C (AL) <acmor...@att.com>; eddie.arr...@huawei.com
Cc: richardx.el...@intel.com; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; 
trevor.coo...@intel.com; Tina Tsou <tina.t...@arm.com>; Honnappa Nagarahalli 
<honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>; Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA


Bob,

Thanks for your interest, I’d like to have input from Sridhar and Al to see if 
they want to help prepare/moderate a break out session on DP benchmarking.
I see the morning plenary session has a few that have implications on DP:
·   Long Duration Stability Test (Sridhar, Gabriel)
·   ETSI NFV & LFN collaboration – Testing (Pierre)
·   Few container based networking (not sure how much DP benchmarking are 
in those sessions)

I can certainly talk about NFVbench but would prefer to also have VSPERF in the 
discussion. Possible topics of discussion for the breakout:

  *   Update on the DP benchmarking state in OPNFV (including how NFVbench and 
VSPERF are complementary, how they compare and which to use in what condition)
  *   DP benchmarking insertion into OVP
  *   Full system and production-level DP benchmarking
  *   Latency measurement and how open source libraries can get us “out of the 
hole”
  *   TST009 status and what’s next (this is more for Al)

I’m not too clear about the format of these breakout session, if it is multiple 
round tables in a big room it’s not going to be super easy for discussions 
(noise) or even slide-presentation or whiteboarding… So that makes me concerned 
given that every one of the above topics is practically large enough to deserve 
a normal session.
Perhaps Ray can touch a word on the break-out session format.

Thanks

  Alec



From: Bob Monkman <bob.monk...@arm.com<mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com>>
Date: Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 9:49 PM
To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com<mailto:ahot...@cisco.com>>, 
"pierre.ly...@keysight.com<mailto:pierre.ly...@keysight.com>" 
<pierre.ly...@keysight.com<mailto:pierre.ly...@keysight.com>>, 
"rp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org>" 
<rp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org>>, "Rao, Sridhar" 
<sridhar@spirent.com<mailto:sridhar@spirent.com>>
Cc: "richardx.el...@intel.com<mailto:richardx.el...@intel.com>" 
<richardx.el...@intel.com<mailto:richardx.el...@intel.com>>, 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>" 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>,
 "trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>" 
<trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>, Tina Tsou 
<tina.t...@arm.com<mailto:tina.t...@arm.com>>, Honnappa Nagarahalli 
<honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com<mailto:honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>>, Brian 
Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com<mailto:brian.bro...@arm.com>>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

Alec,
  Adding Tina, Honnappa, and brian, who will be in attendance and 
one or more of them may be able to attend if you pull something together for 
Data Plane Benchmarking. We are certainly quite interested in that topic.

Regards,
bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Director, Networking Software Strategy & Ecosystem Programs
Arm
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490
Skype: robert.monkman

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Alec Hothan 
(ahothan)
Sent: Saturday, March 3, 2018 8:25 AM
To: pierre.ly...@keysight.com<mailto:pierre.ly...@keysight.com>; 
rp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org>; Rao, Sridhar 
<sridhar@spirent.com<mailto:sridhar@spirent.com>>
Cc: richardx.el...@intel.com<mailto:richardx.el...@intel.com>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

Ok thanks Ray.
Pierre: I have not exactly proposed any topic for discussion (yet) and I was 
just trying to see who would be interested to do some joint discussion around 
DP benchmarking – as I understand these will be several round table sessions in 
a larger room (not ideal for whiteboarding).
Is there any particular topic in DP benchmarking you’d be inter

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 28 Feb 2018 (ww57)

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Sridhar and all,

I have a conflict with our VSPERF meeting today,
presenting TST009 to the TST WG – many new sections
including those that address the VSPERF comments.

So, that’s my e-mail update. Sorry to miss you!
Al


From: Klozik, MartinX [mailto:martinx.klo...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 7:00 AM
To: Rao, Sridhar; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Cooper, Trevor; 'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - 
US/Irving)'; Ferriter, Cian; Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com); Bill 
Michalowski (bmich...@redhat.com); Elias, RichardX; Alec Hothan (ahothan); 
eddie.arr...@huawei.com
Subject: RE: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 28 Feb 2018 (ww57)

Hi Sridhar,

just a note about VSPERF CI. IXIA is still not working. I’ve also noticed, that 
Windows VM 10.10.120.6 (where IxNetwork should be running) is not available.

So currently we have two INFRA tickets, which have to be solved to bring our 
daily jobs up again:

INFRA-215<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.opnfv.org_browse_INFRA-2D215=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=8BCQpLYJCgWx73CqgjWU1fuY8WQ2Q5ChCqa6NJD1dKg=pIZe7TGGwdLmbP8kANHbI6Re1xe3ng2ee4pqOpZA3nE=>

Ixia: License Error - No perpetual framework license found on chassis 
10.10.50.6<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.opnfv.org_browse_INFRA-2D215=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=8BCQpLYJCgWx73CqgjWU1fuY8WQ2Q5ChCqa6NJD1dKg=pIZe7TGGwdLmbP8kANHbI6Re1xe3ng2ee4pqOpZA3nE=>



INFRA-220<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.opnfv.org_browse_INFRA-2D220=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=8BCQpLYJCgWx73CqgjWU1fuY8WQ2Q5ChCqa6NJD1dKg=ioqnRyhElzakuYv0Jlz1Uf-50UwLikmJ2iihXHdTz4I=>

Windows VM (10.10.120.6) dedicated to POD12 is not 
reachable<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.opnfv.org_browse_INFRA-2D220=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=8BCQpLYJCgWx73CqgjWU1fuY8WQ2Q5ChCqa6NJD1dKg=ioqnRyhElzakuYv0Jlz1Uf-50UwLikmJ2iihXHdTz4I=>


Best Regards,
Martin

From: Rao, Sridhar [mailto:sridhar@spirent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 5:00 AM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Cc: 'ALFRED C 'MORTON (AL)'' <acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>>; 
Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>; 'Mars 
Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)' 
<mars.toktonal...@nokia.com<mailto:mars.toktonal...@nokia.com>>; Ferriter, Cian 
<cian.ferri...@intel.com<mailto:cian.ferri...@intel.com>>; Klozik, MartinX 
<martinx.klo...@intel.com<mailto:martinx.klo...@intel.com>>; Christian Trautman 
(ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>) 
<ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>>; Bill Michalowski 
(bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>) 
<bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>>; Elias, RichardX 
<richardx.el...@intel.com<mailto:richardx.el...@intel.com>>; Alec Hothan 
(ahothan) <ahot...@cisco.com<mailto:ahot...@cisco.com>>; 
eddie.arr...@huawei.com<mailto:eddie.arr...@huawei.com>
Subject: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 28 Feb 2018 (ww57)

Agenda


  1.  Development Update.
  2.  Discussion: NFVi forwarding performance & compliance (verification) 
program. Performance Efficiency scoring.

Meeting minutes

  *   WW56 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-02-14-15.58.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D02-2D14-2D15.58.html=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=8BCQpLYJCgWx73CqgjWU1fuY8WQ2Q5ChCqa6NJD1dKg=Alm0c6Ah7L9S7BNNCUzHuDJoD42dKIsF_96kVt2ME9U=>
  *   WW55 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-02-07-15.59.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D02-2D07-2D15.59.html=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=8BCQpLYJCgWx73CqgjWU1fuY8WQ2Q5ChCqa6NJD1dKg=uw220YF4q-wRyh6bOgmvynai_eDKv7x6rr2UDB9vvbA=>
  *   WW54 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-01-31-16.02.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D01-2D31-2D16.02.html=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=8BCQpLYJCgWx73CqgjWU1fuY8WQ2Q5ChCqa6NJD1dKg=8aygaY30CUQ9fIeEeY1V5_16lWZsptGD4-hGXQnBjZU=>



Time: Wednesday UTC 16h00, Ireland (UTC) 16h00, PST 8h00 (UTC/GMT -8)

IRC: freenode 
https:/

[opnfv-tech-discuss] FW: [OPNFV status] Confirm your subscription

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Is this legit?

I didn’t Subscribe to anything, AFAIK.
Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
nore...@statuspage.io
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 1:14 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV status] Confirm your subscription

OPNFV

Notification Subscription Confirmation




Thanks for subscribing to OPNFV status updates. You're almost done - we just 
need to confirm your subscription.

In order to activate your subscription, please click the following link:
http://status.opnfv.org/confirm/jTc10pS2wpdo0nQc


View status 
page
 or 
unsubscribe
 from these emails.
Powered by 
Statuspage




___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.opnfv.org_mailman_listinfo_opnfv-2Dtech-2Ddiscuss=DwICAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=spW0Y14ttbyi4GsOsyT4cdS8rBvwjh0YD5hfNqpsAgo=bys2j65V4NEBbC1g2dxAVos-0bXJut5AxFVYjrc0icQ=
 
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 7 Feb 2018 (ww55)

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Thanks Sridhar, I uploaded the slides (save the PTL a step!)
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/vsperf/Vswitch+Readouts

After the Meeting, Pierre asked that I combine all the
input from VSPERF'ers into a single new contribution,
which will include the 4 Editor's Notes that Eddie and Alec
suggested today, plus any additional comments I receive
from everyone by Monday (Feb 12).

regards,
Al

From: Rao, Sridhar [mailto:sridhar@spirent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 12:07 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); 'Trevor Cooper'; 'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - 
US/Irving)'; 'Cian Ferriter'; Martin Klozik (martinx.klo...@intel.com); 
Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com); Bill Michalowski 
(bmich...@redhat.com); 'Elias, RichardX'; Alec Hothan (ahothan); 
eddie.arr...@huawei.com
Subject: RE: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 7 Feb 2018 (ww55)

Minutes can be found here:
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-02-07-15.59.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D02-2D07-2D15.59.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=YxI8sX22YrPWk_mKTRs1S_JTM1HKPPNLOVPsFBGVidM=jAm-yJF9W_umrZNzvTknDJzjynT7nHjjjYS2OUwflbY=>

Al, Thanks a lot for giving the overview of TST009 and walking us through the 
document. It was very helpful.

Can you kindly share the slides - I'll upload it in VSPERF readouts page?

Regards,
Sridhar K. N. Rao (Ph. D)
Architect
+91-9900088064

From: Rao, Sridhar
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 10:21 AM
To: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Cc: 'ALFRED C 'MORTON (AL)'' <acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>>; 
'Trevor Cooper' <trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>; 
'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)' 
<mars.toktonal...@nokia.com<mailto:mars.toktonal...@nokia.com>>; 'Cian 
Ferriter' <cian.ferri...@intel.com<mailto:cian.ferri...@intel.com>>; Martin 
Klozik (martinx.klo...@intel.com<mailto:martinx.klo...@intel.com>) 
<martinx.klo...@intel.com<mailto:martinx.klo...@intel.com>>; Christian Trautman 
(ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>) 
<ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>>; Bill Michalowski 
(bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>) 
<bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>>; 'Elias, RichardX' 
<richardx.el...@intel.com<mailto:richardx.el...@intel.com>>; 'Alec Hothan 
(ahothan)' <ahot...@cisco.com<mailto:ahot...@cisco.com>>; 
'eddie.arr...@huawei.com' 
<eddie.arr...@huawei.com<mailto:eddie.arr...@huawei.com>>
Subject: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 7 Feb 2018 (ww55)

Agenda:

  1.  Development Update if any.
  2.  Review of previous week's discussions.
  3.  Discussion on TST-009: Please go through this Jira created by Al, which 
also includes recent version 
https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/VSPERF-552<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.opnfv.org_browse_VSPERF-2D552=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=YxI8sX22YrPWk_mKTRs1S_JTM1HKPPNLOVPsFBGVidM=aQdzC7wj9gHeKCwyoRqWqhyZ77gRrNXhYrPWqlv6pO4=>

Meeting minutes

  *   WW54 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-01-31-16.02.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D01-2D31-2D16.02.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=YxI8sX22YrPWk_mKTRs1S_JTM1HKPPNLOVPsFBGVidM=dua31atejR2DdioP1qCu1rdXl_Up-z0_wVmAFSRSRWA=>
  *   WW53 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-01-24-16.00.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D01-2D24-2D16.00.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=YxI8sX22YrPWk_mKTRs1S_JTM1HKPPNLOVPsFBGVidM=2Ml_lZs_9tjl4R1qxXjGkevVt1T7C4HjSWNEQuSscKg=>
  *   WW52 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-01-17-16.02.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D01-2D17-2D16.02.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=YxI8sX22YrPWk_mKTRs1S_JTM1HKPPNLOVPsFBGVidM=FTzsQLlyEx95yToNtycGDTRgN2eiJx8Wf9lbuy2_dUY=>



Time: Wednesday UTC 16h00, Ireland (UTC) 16h00, PST 8h00 (UTC/GMT -8)

IRC: freenode 
https://freenode.net/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__freenode.net_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HU

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] committer promotion nomination

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

+1, important stuff!
Al

> -Original Message-
> From: Tahhan, Maryam [mailto:maryam.tah...@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2018 8:07 AM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Aaron Smith; Foley, Emma L; Gherghe, Calin
> Cc: Kelly, Gordon; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Power, Damien
> Subject: [barometer] committer promotion nomination
> 
> Hi barometer committers
> 
> I would like to nominate Gordon for promotion from contributor to
> committer role for barometer. He's made great contributions to the
> project today in terms of all the docker containers and has been
> supporting our installer efforts.
> 
> barometer committers, please vote +1/-1.
> 
> I will kick off the vote with a +1.
> 
> Thanks
> Maryam

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Updated invitation: [barometer] Weekly Call @ Weekly from 12pm to 1pm on Tuesday (EDT) (acmor...@att.com)

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

We are meeting today, right?
Al

From: aasm...@redhat.com [aasm...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 10:50 AM
Required: aasm...@redhat.com; bj@intel.com; tony.b.mcma...@intel.com; 
emma.l.fo...@intel.com; scott.mansfi...@ericsson.com; mario.rodrig...@arm.com; 
aput...@redhat.com; calin.gher...@intel.com; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L); 
romanx.korynkev...@intel.com; manish.ja...@cavium.com; 
pavan.gu...@calsoftinc.com; damien.po...@intel.com; kand...@us.ibm.com; 
wesley.campb...@intel.com; Javier Arauz; ning@intel.com; ab...@redhat.com; 
tarasx.chor...@intel.com; ola.liljed...@arm.com; raghuveer.re...@intel.com; 
yangya...@chinamobile.com; serkant.ulude...@argela.com.tr; 
krishna.j.mur...@intel.com; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; 
andrew.duig...@intel.com; Srinivas Chaganti; MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Subject: Updated invitation: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Weekly Call @ 
Weekly from 12pm to 1pm on Tuesday (EDT) (acmor...@att.com)
When: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 12:00 PM-1:00 PM.
Where: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/819733085

This event has been changed.
more details 
»<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.google.com_calendar_event-3Faction-3DVIEW-26eid-3DMzh0YnFkcjZqbDdlOGh1N2pwdmMxbm9hY2tfUjIwMTcxMDI0VDE2MDAwMCBhY21vcnRvbkBhdHQuY29t-26tok-3DMTgjYWFzbWl0aEByZWRoYXQuY29tMjVlY2U5ZGYyYjRjYTJjNjI3ZWMwZmYxNWM2N2EzZGQ2NGNhYzY2YQ-26ctz-3DAmerica_New-5FYork-26hl-3Den=DwMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=WHIQPwkJAr9O5Jmy9uB7zC993iRj2DHh2F_RhL_vu6w=eD6ql9xE1RNlf0cSaVZTS8yDeMZM1wnU3g0deNnTzxY=>

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Weekly Call
WhenChanged: Weekly from 12pm to 1pm on Tuesday Eastern Time
Where   
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/819733085<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__global.gotomeeting.com_join_819733085=DwQFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=WHIQPwkJAr9O5Jmy9uB7zC993iRj2DHh2F_RhL_vu6w=5CkuVFwOfczQd5S1p6q9tbx3mwOAA1OM8CBMmb7nlu4=>
 
(map<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.google.com_url-3Fq-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fglobal.gotomeeting.com-252Fjoin-252F819733085-26sa-3DD-26usd-3D2-26usg-3DAFQjCNFq8VvQ18laejgHKAIS8AztFJI-5Fug=DwMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=WHIQPwkJAr9O5Jmy9uB7zC993iRj2DHh2F_RhL_vu6w=gxxFDeu-gHSjc4a7FJkpv6LfgK1Hq8BBFt5abszvkgU=>)
Calendaracmor...@att.com
Who •   aasm...@redhat.com - organizer
•   bj@intel.com
•   tony.b.mcma...@intel.com
•   emma.l.fo...@intel.com
•   scott.mansfi...@ericsson.com
•   mario.rodrig...@arm.com
•   aput...@redhat.com
•   calin.gher...@intel.com
•   bs3...@att.com
•   romanx.korynkev...@intel.com
•   manish.ja...@cavium.com
•   pavan.gu...@calsoftinc.com
•   damien.po...@intel.com
•   kand...@us.ibm.com
•   wesley.campb...@intel.com
•   Javier Arauz
•   ning@intel.com
•   ab...@redhat.com
•   tarasx.chor...@intel.com
•   ola.liljed...@arm.com
•   raghuveer.re...@intel.com
•   yangya...@chinamobile.com
•   serkant.ulude...@argela.com.tr
•   krishna.j.mur...@intel.com
•   opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
•   andrew.duig...@intel.com
•   Srinivas Chaganti
•   acmor...@att.com

Changed: Barometer JIRA: 
https://jira.opnfv.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=57=BAROMETER<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.google.com_url-3Fq-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fjira.opnfv.org-252Fsecure-252FRapidBoard.jspa-253FrapidView-253D57-2526projectKey-253DBAROMETER-26sa-3DD-26usd-3D2-26usg-3DAFQjCNGWrGuhms9xXQYLIKuNv4TRqu9dMQ=DwMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=WHIQPwkJAr9O5Jmy9uB7zC993iRj2DHh2F_RhL_vu6w=Zx5UrzWg5eO64KadmdHuyqcIefsaTVRmsOjDqKFMY4Y=>

Fraser Release information: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Releases#Releases-OPNFVreleaseprojects<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.google.com_url-3Fq-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fwiki.opnfv.org-252Fdisplay-252FSWREL-252FReleases-2523Releases-2DOPNFVreleaseprojects-26sa-3DD-26usd-3D2-26usg-3DAFQjCNEEdv69KxbL6-2D5SA5OBsCBsRd6fkg=DwMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=WHIQPwkJAr9O5Jmy9uB7zC993iRj2DHh2F_RhL_vu6w=oaNjjdyLYJgmIBoHEY4iuNn_Q_gMQ_RgF_P1Z6uhJZ8=>

Going?   All events in this series:   
Yes<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.google.com_calendar_event-3Faction-3DRESPOND-26eid-3DMzh0YnFkcjZqbDdlOGh1N2pwdmMxbm9hY2tfUjIwMTcxMDI0VDE2MDAwMCBhY21vcnRvbkBhdHQuY29t-26rst-3D1-26tok-3DMTgjYWFzbWl0aEByZWRoYXQuY29tMjVlY2U5ZGYyYjRjYTJjNjI3ZWMwZmYxNWM2N2EzZGQ2NGNhYzY2YQ-26ctz-3DAmerica_New-5FYork-26hl-3Den=DwMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=WHIQPwkJAr9O5Jmy9uB7zC993iRj2DHh2F_RhL_vu6w=rioU95nQRm0hCpcuZJB3HQrqyGgZvwTEUhV9JBQBQlQ=>
 - 
Maybe<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.google.com_

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] DMA Project will be presenting in this week's (15-01-2018) meeting

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Thanks Aaron.

I have to give an e-mail update this week:
my usual schedule is over-ridden.
Sorry to miss the DMA talk.

We had a very productive meeting last week
where the folks present were mostly sympathetic
and in agreement that IFA027 (and a few other specs
should be edited/revised) as the simplest solution
to the requirements of TST008.  There are a few
more details to sort-out during another joint meeting
this week.

regards,
Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Smith
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 9:30 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] DMA Project will be presenting in 
this week's (15-01-2018) meeting

Hi all,
 The DMA project team will be presenting the Distributed Metrics and Analysis 
project in the meeting.

Looking forward to Bryan S. being available for a demo of his ONAP progress the 
following week.  :)

Aaron

--

AARON SMITH

SENIOR PRINCIPAL SOFTWARE ENGINEER, NFVPE

Red Hat



314 Littleton Rd, Westford, MA 01886

aasm...@redhat.comM: 
617.877.4814
[https://www.redhat.com/files/brand/email/sig-redhat.png]


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 10 Jan 2017 (ww51)

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Thanks Sridhar!

I've completed my action item (and you were CC'd).
We'll see where the e-mail exchange with Maciek goes...

regards,
Al

From: Rao, Sridhar [mailto:sridhar@spirent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 12:04 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); 'Trevor Cooper'; 'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - 
US/Irving)'; 'Cian Ferriter'; Martin Klozik (martinx.klo...@intel.com); 
Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com); Bill Michalowski 
(bmich...@redhat.com); 'Elias, RichardX'; Alec Hothan (ahothan)
Subject: RE: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 10 Jan 2017 (ww51)

Minutes can be found here:
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-01-10-16.00.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2018_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2018-2D01-2D10-2D16.00.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=Mmh0vlQi17ru7-iPVRfdSKFat6XZRSqSjUjN2YCHJ4o=SZ60-JKk6Wv6l_RS49Yz3lMURf4OwS7wvOnBOOxkh5A=>

Thanks for the inputs.!

Regards,
Sridhar K. N. Rao (Ph. D)
Architect
+91-9900088064

From: Rao, Sridhar
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 6:11 PM
To: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Cc: 'ALFRED C 'MORTON (AL)'' <acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>>; 
'Trevor Cooper' <trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>; 
'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)' 
<mars.toktonal...@nokia.com<mailto:mars.toktonal...@nokia.com>>; 'Cian 
Ferriter' <cian.ferri...@intel.com<mailto:cian.ferri...@intel.com>>; Martin 
Klozik (martinx.klo...@intel.com<mailto:martinx.klo...@intel.com>) 
<martinx.klo...@intel.com<mailto:martinx.klo...@intel.com>>; Christian Trautman 
(ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>) 
<ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>>; Bill Michalowski 
(bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>) 
<bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>>; 'Elias, RichardX' 
<richardx.el...@intel.com<mailto:richardx.el...@intel.com>>; 'Alec Hothan 
(ahothan)' <ahot...@cisco.com<mailto:ahot...@cisco.com>>
Subject: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 10 Jan 2017 (ww51)

Hi All,

The agenda for this week's meeting:


  1.  Development Update.
  2.  Progress Review.
  3.  TGAAS.
  4.  Consolidation of the Discussion Topics.

Meeting minutes

  *   WW50 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-12-20-16.01.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D12-2D20-2D16.01.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=Mmh0vlQi17ru7-iPVRfdSKFat6XZRSqSjUjN2YCHJ4o=iqJQsHXNLraInH7mfy-uR64ZmeXUSIGNB7vnPU38Cvg=>
  *   WW49 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-12-13-16.00.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D12-2D13-2D16.00.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=Mmh0vlQi17ru7-iPVRfdSKFat6XZRSqSjUjN2YCHJ4o=G-qVaJsekIfQnlHFWNSk3OkWye3jEeK5wSMJyODtWY0=>
  *   WW48  
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-11-29-16.14.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D11-2D29-2D16.14.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=Mmh0vlQi17ru7-iPVRfdSKFat6XZRSqSjUjN2YCHJ4o=fwDVVgjM7fP6Z_8Sbvp3fP7PpZkt1zNLkb4eAW7lHW8=>


Time: Wednesday UTC 16h00, Ireland (UTC) 16h00, PST 8h00 (UTC/GMT -8)

IRC: freenode 
https://freenode.net/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__freenode.net_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=Mmh0vlQi17ru7-iPVRfdSKFat6XZRSqSjUjN2YCHJ4o=4BBKxncZ6AspskMCZsxzxiLYvR1Hi9oQ3xVHTjSM-OI=>
 channel: #opnfv-vswitchperf 
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-vswitchperf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__webchat.freenode.net_-3Fchannels-3Dopnfv-2Dvswitchperf=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=Mmh0vlQi17ru7-iPVRfdSKFat6XZRSqSjUjN2YCHJ4o=V7aC3Qtd6YAfueZcswWqXGdCGhs5IL9e9J4389iQRWw=>

Audio: 
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/391235029<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__global.gotomeeting.com_join_391235029=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=Mmh0vlQi17ru7-iPVRfdSKFat6XZRSqSjUjN2YCHJ4o=w4jVNnwlDcTbQNmkTCFe8iPCu1m4uhqy9s8e7Q0Ce0s=>
You can also dial in using your phone.  United States: +1 (571) 317-3116  
Access Code: 391-2

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 13 Dec 2017 (ww49)

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Sridhar and all,

I may be a few minutes late to our meeting today,
it all depends on how long my doctor's appointment
runs-over, but I'll join you as soon as I can.

FYI - I had an action to create a JIRA ticket for
TST009 review:
https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/VSPERF-552

see you soon,
Al

From: Klozik, MartinX [mailto:martinx.klo...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 7:43 AM
To: Rao, Sridhar; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Cooper, Trevor; 'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - 
US/Irving)'; Ferriter, Cian; Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com); Bill 
Michalowski (bmich...@redhat.com); Elias, RichardX
Subject: RE: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 13 Dec 2017 (ww49)

Hi All,

I won't be able to join today. During last weeks I was trying to fix our CI 
jobs, which was a bit more challenging than expected. There are two separate 
issues:


1)  VERIFY & MERGE jobs - there are issues with execution of VPP testcases 
at ericcson-build3 machine. Thus some time ago I changed configuration of 
VERIFY & MERGE jobs to be executed at ericsson-build4 machine. For some time it 
worked, but then VPP has failed and it is not working there at all. In order to 
be able to pass gerrit verification of new patches, I had to disable VPP tests 
- it means that if vppctl is not able to connect to running VPP, then VPP tests 
are skipped to avoid verification failure. As I'm not able to connect to this 
server I can't find the root cause. The easiest "solution" is to reboot that 
server. I've asked responsible admins for help some time ago, but I've not 
heard from them for some time now.

So I tried another approach, it means to allow execution of VERIFY & MERGE jobs 
at our intel-pod12. I've changed priorities, so Jenkins would firstly check if 
pod12 is idle with fallback to ericsson-build4 machine. Patch is available at 
gerrit and waiting for review from releng team:

https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/47581/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.opnfv.org_gerrit_-23_c_47581_=DwQFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=dni7PJlv6kNbMGrbHV3yFYFdyrZkUJs1iHQjXOx3a_s=8-VSlOsazD_vfx59RhB6NyWCuhccW0gWwo5E4NF7RHg=>

2)  DAILY job execution always failed after POD12 was moved to the new 
location; The reason was crash and reboot of node2 during execution of Ovs 
Vanilla testcases. It took me a while to find a root cause, which is actually a 
kernel crash during removal of "openvswitch.ko" kernel module. Originally I 
though, that it is caused by some resources allocated by OVS, which were not 
cleared properly after OVS shutdown. However it happens also in case, that OVS 
is not started at all. I was able to reproduce it on node2 (CentOS7.3) just by 
calling insmod and rmmod on openvswitch kernel module several times. Sometimes 
machine crashes after a few attempts, other time it takes more than 10 
iterations of insmod/rmmod. I tried 2 different 3.10.0-xxx kernel versions and 
two different OVS versions with the same output. It seems, that it is specific 
to RHT's patched 3.10 kernel. In case that the same OVS version is used with 
4.x kernel, then system is stable (I was able to run several dozens of 
insmod/rmmod iterations without any issue). Thus I've installed kernel-lt from 
elrepo.org to node2, to be able to run our daily job successfully.

With 4.4 kernel, I was able to execute both vswitchperf-daily-master and 
vswitchperf-daily-euphrates several times. Unfortunately it has failed again 
recently, but this time during execution of VPP TCs. One time VPP was not able 
to acquire one NIC. Second time boot of VM was very slow and compilation of 
testpmd took over 30s (it normally takes about 8s). Let's see if these 
incidents will happen more often or not.

Also some performance figures are varying. For example pvp_tput executed 
manually at node2 measures over 11 mil. FPS, but during daily job execution, it 
often measures about 7 or 8. This needs some further investigation to find the 
root cause.


Best Regards,
Martin

From: Rao, Sridhar [mailto:sridhar@spirent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 6:22 AM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Cc: 'ALFRED C 'MORTON (AL)'' <acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>>; 
Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>; 'Mars 
Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)' 
<mars.toktonal...@nokia.com<mailto:mars.toktonal...@nokia.com>>; Ferriter, Cian 
<cian.ferri...@intel.com<mailto:cian.ferri...@intel.com>>; Klozik, MartinX 
<martinx.klo...@intel.com<mailto:martinx.klo...@intel.com>>; Christian Trautman 
(ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>) 
<ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>>; Bill Michalowski 
(bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>) 
<bmich...@redhat.com&

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Barometer] benchmarking the time for CPU measurements proposal

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Maryam,

Following discussion at the barometer meeting today,
I think we agreed to perform readings at 1 second intervals,
15 minute test duration will give us 900 samples (not overwhelming), 
and save the raw data for later plotting and analysis.

I have the following additional suggestions.
Please see below,
Al

> -Original Message-
> From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-
> discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Tahhan, Maryam
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 4:08 AM
> To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> Cc: Kelly, Gordon
> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Barometer] benchmarking the time for CPU
> measurements proposal
> 
> Hi Folks
> 
> Looking at the 2 collection plugins in collectd for Host and VM (from
> the hypervisor) CPU usage - I'm proposing the following.
> 
> We follow the methodology here:
> https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/white-papers/ia-32-ia-64-benchmark-code-execution-paper.pdf
>   
[ACM] 
I scanned the paper, and I'm glad we're at the second generation 
of methods that appear to reduce experimental error.

> to instrument the read function around the calls to measure the CPU usage
> (using CPUID, RDTSC and RDTSCP). We report out the value We collect as
> another metric. We will also calculate the measurement overhead of the
> measurement calls themselves and take that away from the cycle count
> values we are reporting.
> 
> - Run a 1 min, 5 min and 15 min test. Measure the cost every 10 seconds
> (or 1 second - but then reduce the test time based on the frequency of
> reading)?
[ACM] 
1 reading per second seemed to be typical usage, 
based on Plugfest feedback. That should also be enough
waiting time to avoid conflict with any RDTSCP measurement post-processing.

> - Based on the reported cycle count calculate the time it takes to
> complete a reading
[ACM] 
Need to disable any clock-varying modes of operation. 
We want constant freq. clk. for this test.

> - Run on an idle system
> - Run on a system under load
[ACM] 
Probably 70-80% Utilized as a max (unless readings
of 100% are unavoidable, as with some VMs, or someone
has a rationale for some specific level).

> - Run for 1 VM and 5 VMs...
> - Run on a platform that doesn't have hyper threading enabled.
[ACM] 
  - Run for Host as well as Guest (maybe not all combinations above)
(the processes are slightly different, Host readings may take longer
 according to Volodymyr's diagrams)

> 
> All feedback welcome.
[ACM] 
I'll send more if something clever occurs to me :-)
THANKS!

> 
> BR
> Maryam
> 
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__lists.opnfv.org_mailman_listinfo_opnfv-2Dtech-
> 2Ddiscuss=DwICAg=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=fN3o6XO66ACoBRu9ZlUSeCRVmoX
> ZXAcU0jchPbERK2A=UxA1sQwsAd08zXlls--5gRnuqgR3nGF3Ddv-uQa49tA=
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 29 Nov 2017 (ww48)

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Sridhar,
Let's add "VSPERF Long Duration Tests", if there is time!
We should have our project discussion before multi-project
discussion at plugfest, IMO, and this is our last chance.
Al

From: Rao, Sridhar [mailto:sridhar@spirent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 12:56 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Trevor Cooper; Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving); 
Cian Ferriter; Martin Klozik (martinx.klo...@intel.com); Christian Trautman 
(ctrau...@redhat.com); Ranganath, Sunku; Bill Michalowski 
(bmich...@redhat.com); Elias, RichardX
Subject: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 29 Nov 2017 (ww48)

Hi All,

Proposed agenda topics:

  1.  Previous weeks' action items review.
  2.  Development update.
  3.  Gauge and Trend in test-results - Update.
  4.  Plugfest Progress Update.



Meeting minutes

  *   WW47 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-11-22-16.02.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D11-2D22-2D16.02.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=fsjTFauV6NFJjZdd_f8YSIWA4cPxU_SQ1eNoOmnvCRU=yhCNiNe5O85kEVpcnkhlVte3hvuca0tDX7UT09wXTRk=>
  *   WW46 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-11-15-16.01.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D11-2D15-2D16.01.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=fsjTFauV6NFJjZdd_f8YSIWA4cPxU_SQ1eNoOmnvCRU=89mE69L2uLBvJu5QeKNY9CJ1JBQSYZ8QZWgUX-EntkM=>
  *   WW45 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-11-08-16.01.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D11-2D08-2D16.01.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=fsjTFauV6NFJjZdd_f8YSIWA4cPxU_SQ1eNoOmnvCRU=1NmOn8Pw7x0cpx6c8FWepzaTYxlL0ueMNoQGmzS0QOs=>


Time: Wednesday UTC 16h00, Ireland (UTC) 16h00, PST 8h00 (UTC/GMT -8)

IRC: freenode 
https://freenode.net/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__freenode.net_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=fsjTFauV6NFJjZdd_f8YSIWA4cPxU_SQ1eNoOmnvCRU=j7RkOt3G1oQrWx6jEiAQDZ8_1VbmaVERvGCrcBnWZkI=>
 channel: #opnfv-vswitchperf 
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-vswitchperf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__webchat.freenode.net_-3Fchannels-3Dopnfv-2Dvswitchperf=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=fsjTFauV6NFJjZdd_f8YSIWA4cPxU_SQ1eNoOmnvCRU=OU7gRucYvPfOmrZYdzxV-NmAyNjBdRiafs9Yn9V_cK8=>

Audio: 
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/391235029<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__global.gotomeeting.com_join_391235029=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=fsjTFauV6NFJjZdd_f8YSIWA4cPxU_SQ1eNoOmnvCRU=hVkENPu8gI41FrGqgI0TMw8bxkIPQ4-MBXB1tOhlQG8=>
You can also dial in using your phone.  United States: +1 (571) 317-3116  
Access Code: 391-235-029
Phone numbers from other countries are here ... 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_meetings=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=fsjTFauV6NFJjZdd_f8YSIWA4cPxU_SQ1eNoOmnvCRU=N68v2Wyi89MkdaSQerH1vAGlWJgFv2po5zKxvcaOFwM=>



Regards,
Sridhar K. N. Rao (Ph. D)
Architect
+91-9900088064




Spirent Communications e-mail confidentiality.

This e-mail contains confidential and / or privileged information belonging to 
Spirent Communications plc, its affiliates and / or subsidiaries. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution and / or the taking of any action based upon reliance on 
the contents of this transmission is strictly forbidden. If you have received 
this message in error please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete it 
from your system.

Spirent Communications plc
Northwood Park, Gatwick Road, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9XN, United Kingdom.
Tel No. +44 (0) 1293 767676
Fax No. +44 (0) 1293 767677

Registered in England Number 470893
Registered at Northwood Park, Gatwick Road, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9XN, 
United Kingdom.

Or if within the US,

Spirent Communications,
27349 Agoura Road, Calabasas, CA, 91301, USA.
Tel No. 1-818-676- 2300
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Regarding the Testperf meeting this week

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Gabriel,

I noticed your Long Duration testing update
slides in Fatih's meeting minutes:


5.   Brief update on long duration test

 *   Yu Yang (Gabriel) presented update regarding long duration test
 *   
https://wiki.opnfv.org/download/attachments/6819987/Brief%20Update%20on%20Long%20Duration%20Testing.pptx?version=1=1511774363565=v2
 *   The reason to start with OSA which is used by XCI is targeted for Long 
Duration Testing is due to resource shortage
 *   The mail has been sent to installers and they're asked if they support 
long duration testing
 *   A long term strategy is needed in order to run long duration testing 
against OPNFV installers
 *   Nokia POD has been assigned for long duration testing
 *   Support will be needed from Infra WG to ensure CI chain is setup, 
fulfilling the needs of OPNFV Test Community

I think there are opportunities to coordinate among
the testing projects here, and ask questions about
other project's plans. The scope of what you described
in the slides seems very broad.

I have missed all the Testperf meetings so far this month
due to travel, F2F meetings, and US Thanksgiving.
I don't know if the topic of Long Term Testing has
been thoroughly discussed recently, but I'd like to
propose it as a topic for the agenda, with discussion
based on you're the topics you covered in your slides.

regards,
Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Yuyang 
(Gabriel)
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 8:17 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Regarding the Testperf meeting this week

Hi,

Plugfest is in next week and we're all busy preparing for it.
According to the discussion/suggestions from last usual and APAC Testperf 
meeting, we'll decide if we should cancel it after sending out an email 
collecting topics.
If there is no specific topic we'd like to talk about, we'd better cancel the 
meeting.
So please feedback if you need something to be discussed.

Thanks,
Gabriel
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] OPNFV lab shutdown!

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Thanks Trevor! your efforts much appreciated!
Al

From: Cooper, Trevor [mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 2:29 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving); Ferriter, 
Cian; Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com); Ranganath, Sunku; Bill 
Michalowski (bmich...@redhat.com); Elias, RichardX; Rao, Sridhar; Klozik, 
MartinX
Subject: RE: [VSPERF] OPNFV lab shutdown!

POD12 is back ... everything seems to be running ... Nodes, Ixia chassis, 
license server VM, IxNetwork and I have kicked off CI jobs.

/Trevor

From: Cooper, Trevor
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 4:49 PM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Cc: ALFRED C 'MORTON (AL)' <acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>>; Mars 
Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving) 
<mars.toktonal...@nokia.com<mailto:mars.toktonal...@nokia.com>>; Ferriter, Cian 
<cian.ferri...@intel.com<mailto:cian.ferri...@intel.com>>; Christian Trautman 
(ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>) 
<ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>>; Ranganath, Sunku 
<sunku.rangan...@intel.com<mailto:sunku.rangan...@intel.com>>; Bill Michalowski 
(bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>) 
<bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>>; Elias, RichardX 
<richardx.el...@intel.com<mailto:richardx.el...@intel.com>>; Rao, Sridhar 
<sridhar@spirent.com<mailto:sridhar@spirent.com>>; Klozik, MartinX 
<martinx.klo...@intel.com<mailto:martinx.klo...@intel.com>>
Subject: [VSPERF] OPNFV lab shutdown!

Please note

The Intel OPNFV lab will be down for maintenance from Wednesday, November 22nd 
by noon (PST) until Monday, November 27th by noon (PST). Intel will be doing 
updates on the generators in the building which houses the Intel OPNFV lab. 
There will be no electricity in the building for that time period.

I will shut down POD 12 servers and the Ixia at noon tomorrow and bring them 
back up on Monday morning.

Happy Thanksgiving to all US based VSPERF's!

/Trevor



From: Klozik, MartinX
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 6:30 AM
To: Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>; 
Rao, Sridhar <sridhar@spirent.com<mailto:sridhar@spirent.com>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Cc: ALFRED C 'MORTON (AL)' <acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>>; Mars 
Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving) 
<mars.toktonal...@nokia.com<mailto:mars.toktonal...@nokia.com>>; Ferriter, Cian 
<cian.ferri...@intel.com<mailto:cian.ferri...@intel.com>>; Christian Trautman 
(ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>) 
<ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>>; Ranganath, Sunku 
<sunku.rangan...@intel.com<mailto:sunku.rangan...@intel.com>>; Bill Michalowski 
(bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>) 
<bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>>; Elias, RichardX 
<richardx.el...@intel.com<mailto:richardx.el...@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 15 Nov 2017 (ww46)

Hi Trevor,

you're right, second one was about node4.

Data for node1 follows:
pod12-node1 connections:
eno3 -> ixia port 1
eno4 -> ixia port 2

Installation and configuration of SANDBOX2 is ongoing.

Thank you,
Martin

From: Cooper, Trevor
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 1:34 AM
To: Klozik, MartinX 
<martinx.klo...@intel.com<mailto:martinx.klo...@intel.com>>; Rao, Sridhar 
<sridhar@spirent.com<mailto:sridhar@spirent.com>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Cc: ALFRED C 'MORTON (AL)' <acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>>; Mars 
Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving) 
<mars.toktonal...@nokia.com<mailto:mars.toktonal...@nokia.com>>; Ferriter, Cian 
<cian.ferri...@intel.com<mailto:cian.ferri...@intel.com>>; Christian Trautman 
(ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>) 
<ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>>; Ranganath, Sunku 
<sunku.rangan...@intel.com<mailto:sunku.rangan...@intel.com>>; Bill Michalowski 
(bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>) 
<bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>>; Elias, RichardX 
<richardx.el...@intel.com<mailto:richardx.el...@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 15 Nov 2017 (ww46)

Hi Martin ... thanks I have updated the diagram 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/pharos/Intel+POD12<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_pharos_Intel-2BPOD12=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=RsKhZAIOB6Oxyef

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 22 Nov 2017 (ww47)

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi all,

Sridhar just reminded me to share the
Etherpad link to discussion of Long Duration tests.
However, I found that the page I was thinking of
is actually about Stress tests:
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/DanubeStressTest

However, I note that our VSPERF LTD already describes
"Soak" tests, which would satisfy the need for Long Duration
testing, I think:
 Test ID: LTD.Throughput.RFC2889.MaxForwardingRateSoak
http://docs.opnfv.org/en/stable-danube/submodules/vswitchperf/docs/testing/developer/requirements/vswitchperf_ltd.html

Note the use of RFC2889 in these tests, the result of one of
Scott Bradner's comments when Maryam presented our
draft to the IETF BMWG.

I also saw that my action item from the meeting last week
was creation of a JIRA ticket for Back-to-back Frame Benchmark testing:
https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/VSPERF-549

See you tomorrow,
Al


From: Rao, Sridhar [mailto:sridhar@spirent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 11:42 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Trevor Cooper; Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving); 
Cian Ferriter; Martin Klozik (martinx.klo...@intel.com); Christian Trautman 
(ctrau...@redhat.com); Ranganath, Sunku; Bill Michalowski 
(bmich...@redhat.com); Elias, RichardX
Subject: RE: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 22 Nov 2017 (ww47)

Hi All,

Thanks for the attending the meeting.

The minutes can be found here:
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-11-22-16.02.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D11-2D22-2D16.02.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=dELIWPfbbPZ6fJIOY9BlEf1mu4FCA1sJFZd-XJG5jD0=OX4z19-gL6gbwO7ui_Zw7mv_TIS8YC1mc19nGdHT5f0=>

Regards,
Sridhar K. N. Rao (Ph. D)
Architect
+91-9900088064

From: Rao, Sridhar
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 11:25 AM
To: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Cc: 'ALFRED C 'MORTON (AL)'' <acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>>; 
'Trevor Cooper' <trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>; 
'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)' 
<mars.toktonal...@nokia.com<mailto:mars.toktonal...@nokia.com>>; 'Cian 
Ferriter' <cian.ferri...@intel.com<mailto:cian.ferri...@intel.com>>; Martin 
Klozik (martinx.klo...@intel.com<mailto:martinx.klo...@intel.com>) 
<martinx.klo...@intel.com<mailto:martinx.klo...@intel.com>>; Christian Trautman 
(ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>) 
<ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>>; 'Ranganath, Sunku' 
<sunku.rangan...@intel.com<mailto:sunku.rangan...@intel.com>>; Bill Michalowski 
(bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>) 
<bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>>; 'Elias, RichardX' 
<richardx.el...@intel.com<mailto:richardx.el...@intel.com>>
Subject: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 22 Nov 2017 (ww47)

Hi All,

Proposed agenda topics:

  1.  Last week action items review.
  2.  Development update.
  3.  Long-Duration Tests - Discussion with Testperf in Plugfest.
  4.  Demo of VSPERF - Intel RMD Integration.


Meeting minutes

  *   WW46 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-11-15-16.01.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D11-2D15-2D16.01.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=dELIWPfbbPZ6fJIOY9BlEf1mu4FCA1sJFZd-XJG5jD0=flB0gg-YmenjjPQzxigpTNMypuCpYnpkQQzOmOKsRTg=>
  *   WW45 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-11-08-16.01.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D11-2D08-2D16.01.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=dELIWPfbbPZ6fJIOY9BlEf1mu4FCA1sJFZd-XJG5jD0=sITEWhY6J3a2kO2XimErDSyo67MbvTTtRTmQqy-EOXA=>
  *   WW44 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-11-01-14.59.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D11-2D01-2D14.59.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=dELIWPfbbPZ6fJIOY9BlEf1mu4FCA1sJFZd-XJG5jD0=SDRLzcmvfP_nR2mFvRiLbECr43ZvnFvsghwRiKSDLNw=>




Time: Wednesday UTC 16h00, Ireland (UTC) 16h00, PST 8h00 (UTC/GMT -8)

IRC: freenode 
https://freenode.net/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__freenode.net_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIlt

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] weekly meeting

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Aaron, Bryan, and all,

I’d like to add a brief discussion to the agenda tomorrow,
related to the thread that many project members participated
in last week, the subject was:
“ves_app.py exception when collecting from multiple collectd clients”

In short, I’m interested in the steps that measured results
follow to arrive at any VIM, and what information accompanies
the results.

One of our barometer wiki pages gives the collectd 101,
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/fastpath/Collectd+101
gives the contents of a value list for collectd statistics.
The most important ones to this discussion are:
•  Values
•  Value length: the number of values in the data set.
•  Time: timestamp at which the value was collected.
•  Interval: interval at which to expect a new value.
•  Host: used to identify the host.

As I have mentioned before, TST008 requires that
measured values be accompanied by the time they are measured.
I now wonder if the collectd Time: when the value was “collected”
is close enough to the actual time when the hypervisor reads
the meter or gauge and passes the value to libvirtd API & virt plugin
to ignore the difference (time error). It could simplify
life on earth if the error is small.

Please give this a little thought before we meet, thanks!
Al


From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 10:15 AM
To: Aaron Smith; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] weekly meeting

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
FYI, I updated the VES tools to build a container for the VES Agent (ves_app.py 
in the Barometer repo). Using it now with the latest tests for the Models 
kubernetes 
stack.
Also built the VES Collector as a container. Using my personal docker hub 
account for now:
https://hub.docker.com/u/blsaws/

Scripts that build these containers are in the VES repo: 
https://github.com/opnfv/ves/tree/master/build

Still trying to figure out how I can do the same with collectd – having to 
build collectd and librdkafka at deploy time really extends the test cycle, so 
it’s a priority.

Pretty soon I will be using Cloudify-kubernetes blueprints to deploy the Agent, 
Collector, and other components (Prometheus, InfluxDB, Grafana) as services on 
the k8s master node (using labels to deploy them there).

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Smith
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 6:37 AM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] weekly meeting

11/21/17 --

  Small crowd :)
  Welcomed a new attendee from the ARMBAND project.
  Container discussion
  How are the Barometer containers going to be distributed?
  Docker hub
  Contact Fativ about access
   Need to be careful about the underlying OS and available and assuming what 
packages are available.  Install guide should be detailed and include 
installation of any required rpms, libraries, etc…  For example, Ubuntu / MOSS 
vs. Ubuntu ISO.  How to handle kernel versions?

Agenda for tomorrow:

More discussion on containers, VES, etc...

Aaron

--

AARON SMITH

SENIOR PRINCIPAL SOFTWARE ENGINEER, NFVPE

Red Hat



314 Littleton Rd, Westford, MA 01886

aasm...@redhat.comM: 
617.877.4814
[https://www.redhat.com/files/brand/email/sig-redhat.png]


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] TST008 missing info from collectd

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Thanks Maryam,  I uploaded a contribution
with your suggestions on Friday, and I don't
expect any resistance when TST WG meets
next week.

regards,
Al

From: Tahhan, Maryam [mailto:maryam.tah...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 1:05 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Cc: Aaron Smith; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Mcmahon, Tony B; Power, 
Damien
Subject: RE: [barometer] TST008 missing info from collectd

Hi Al
Thanks for going through this again.

More comments inline below preceded by [MT]


BR
Maryam
From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) [mailto:acmor...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 2:35 PM
To: Tahhan, Maryam <maryam.tah...@intel.com<mailto:maryam.tah...@intel.com>>
Cc: Aaron Smith <aasm...@redhat.com<mailto:aasm...@redhat.com>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Mcmahon, Tony B <tony.b.mcma...@intel.com<mailto:tony.b.mcma...@intel.com>>; 
Power, Damien <damien.po...@intel.com<mailto:damien.po...@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [barometer] TST008 missing info from collectd

Hi Maryam,
thanks for taking another look at TST008 and collectd support!
please see replies below,
Al

From: Tahhan, Maryam [mailto:maryam.tah...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 7:46 AM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Cc: Aaron Smith; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Tahhan, Maryam; Mcmahon, Tony B; Power, Damien
Subject: [barometer] TST008 missing info from collectd


Hi Al

I did an analysis based on your updates to TST008 to see what's still a gap in 
collectd in terms of alignment with TST 008. There's  a couple of open 
questions below.



CPU Plugin:

*Tick Interval* are missing from the CPU readings --> we can add this to 
metadata.

But an open question, as I dug into this a little more today:

"The tick interval is controlled by a system parameter, "HZ", whose default 
value shall be 100 for measurements complying with the present document."

Looking at: 
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/time.7.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__man7.org_linux_man-2Dpages_man7_time.7.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=ejI6nq05jteIfofHOKihPTKWloAr2MTpM7biphbcPN0=kBFsPemx3t34QrvRgTIXLvAFCAyaN__JKYLkVMYvqYY=>
"The value of HZ varies across kernel versions and hardware platforms.
On i386 the situation is as follows: on kernels up to and including
2.4.x, HZ was 100, giving a jiffy value of 0.01 seconds; starting
with 2.6.0, HZ was raised to 1000, giving a jiffy of 0.001 seconds.
Since kernel 2.6.13, the HZ value is a kernel configuration parameter
and can be 100, 250 (the default) or 1000, yielding a jiffies value
of, respectively, 0.01, 0.004, or 0.001 seconds.  Since kernel
2.6.20, a further frequency is available: 300, a number that divides
evenly for the common video frame rates (PAL, 25 HZ; NTSC, 30 HZ)".

Q. So does it make sense to report both jiffies and HZ? Or do we scale 
something back to the 100HZ value in the plugin?
[ACM]
Either the Tick Interval (same as Jiffy) or the configured value of HZ
would be enough (as they have a reciprocal relationship), but I think we
should include the Tick Interval for sure. The units of Hz are clear for HZ,
and that's an advantage when both are reported.

I don't think collectd should scale the measurements; it should simply
report what Jiffy, HZ was used.

I specified 100 Hz as it seemed a reasonable default, but if implementations
have moved on (to 250Hz or beyond), I'd be happy to update the Spec.
It will make deployment easier if the TST008 default is commonly used.
(we are still in maintenance mode, any change is possible!)

[MT] that would be great to update. And I can make sure then both are sent from 
collectd.


*The measurement interval*. Q.  the timestamp for a metric and the interval at 
which to expect a new value is also sent with the collectd metric is that 
enough or do we need to be more explicit?

[ACM]

Yes. Both the Timestamp and measurement interval are required, so

there is only a question about the timestamp format.

Is it both time and date?



[MT] yes it includes both date and time.



*Processor usage results shall be reported as time in seconds* --> at the 
moment this is in nanoseconds... but we can add an option to the cpu plugin.

[ACM]

If your experience tells you that usage is more commonly

reported in nanoseconds, I'd be happy to change TST008

to comply. I see that IFA027 uses Utilization in percent,

exclusively.



[MT] usage I've typically seen on most systems is in nano-seconds...  it would 
be great to update.



Interface/OVS/port plugins:

*Interface Speed* in bits per second (with the option of a prefix multiplier) 
--> can be added to metadata or sent as a metric in its own right

*Interface Status* --> can be added to metadata or sent as a metric in its own 
right

[ACM]

I think that the tr

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] TST008 missing info from collectd

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Maryam,
thanks for taking another look at TST008 and collectd support!
please see replies below,
Al

From: Tahhan, Maryam [mailto:maryam.tah...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 7:46 AM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Cc: Aaron Smith; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Tahhan, Maryam; Mcmahon, 
Tony B; Power, Damien
Subject: [barometer] TST008 missing info from collectd


Hi Al

I did an analysis based on your updates to TST008 to see what's still a gap in 
collectd in terms of alignment with TST 008. There's  a couple of open 
questions below.



CPU Plugin:

*Tick Interval* are missing from the CPU readings --> we can add this to 
metadata.

But an open question, as I dug into this a little more today:

"The tick interval is controlled by a system parameter, "HZ", whose default 
value shall be 100 for measurements complying with the present document."

Looking at: 
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/time.7.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__man7.org_linux_man-2Dpages_man7_time.7.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=ejI6nq05jteIfofHOKihPTKWloAr2MTpM7biphbcPN0=kBFsPemx3t34QrvRgTIXLvAFCAyaN__JKYLkVMYvqYY=>
"The value of HZ varies across kernel versions and hardware platforms.
On i386 the situation is as follows: on kernels up to and including
2.4.x, HZ was 100, giving a jiffy value of 0.01 seconds; starting
with 2.6.0, HZ was raised to 1000, giving a jiffy of 0.001 seconds.
Since kernel 2.6.13, the HZ value is a kernel configuration parameter
and can be 100, 250 (the default) or 1000, yielding a jiffies value
of, respectively, 0.01, 0.004, or 0.001 seconds.  Since kernel
2.6.20, a further frequency is available: 300, a number that divides
evenly for the common video frame rates (PAL, 25 HZ; NTSC, 30 HZ)".

Q. So does it make sense to report both jiffies and HZ? Or do we scale 
something back to the 100HZ value in the plugin?
[ACM]
Either the Tick Interval (same as Jiffy) or the configured value of HZ
would be enough (as they have a reciprocal relationship), but I think we
should include the Tick Interval for sure. The units of Hz are clear for HZ,
and that's an advantage when both are reported.

I don't think collectd should scale the measurements; it should simply
report what Jiffy, HZ was used.

I specified 100 Hz as it seemed a reasonable default, but if implementations
have moved on (to 250Hz or beyond), I'd be happy to update the Spec.
It will make deployment easier if the TST008 default is commonly used.
(we are still in maintenance mode, any change is possible!)


*The measurement interval*. Q.  the timestamp for a metric and the interval at 
which to expect a new value is also sent with the collectd metric is that 
enough or do we need to be more explicit?

[ACM]

Yes. Both the Timestamp and measurement interval are required, so

there is only a question about the timestamp format.

Is it both time and date?

*Processor usage results shall be reported as time in seconds* --> at the 
moment this is in nanoseconds... but we can add an option to the cpu plugin.

[ACM]

If your experience tells you that usage is more commonly

reported in nanoseconds, I'd be happy to change TST008

to comply. I see that IFA027 uses Utilization in percent,

exclusively.





Interface/OVS/port plugins:

*Interface Speed* in bits per second (with the option of a prefix multiplier) 
--> can be added to metadata or sent as a metric in its own right

*Interface Status* --> can be added to metadata or sent as a metric in its own 
right

[ACM]

I think that the trade-off is between

the clear association of metadata with a measured value,

and the fixed reporting format always found in metrics.

The parameters above are straightforward to report,

so I think Metadata will be fine.



Thanks Again! Let me know on HZ default and nanosec for usage.

Anyone on CC who read this far may chime-in, too.

Al



BR
Maryam
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Vote for new barometer PTL

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

+1, thanks for stepping-up, Aaron

Al

From: Foley, Emma L [mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 11:30 AM
To: Gherghe, Calin; Tahhan, Maryam; MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Aaron Smith
Cc: Verrall, Timothy; Power, Damien; Mcmahon, Tony B; 
opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Aaron Smith
Subject: RE: [barometer] Vote for new barometer PTL

+1

Sorry for duplicates, I'll keep this to one thread.


From: Gherghe, Calin
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 4:25 PM
To: Tahhan, Maryam <maryam.tah...@intel.com<mailto:maryam.tah...@intel.com>>; 
'MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)' <acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>>; Foley, 
Emma L <emma.l.fo...@intel.com<mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>; Aaron Smith 
<aasm...@redhat.com<mailto:aasm...@redhat.com>>
Cc: Verrall, Timothy 
<timothy.verr...@intel.com<mailto:timothy.verr...@intel.com>>; Power, Damien 
<damien.po...@intel.com<mailto:damien.po...@intel.com>>; Mcmahon, Tony B 
<tony.b.mcma...@intel.com<mailto:tony.b.mcma...@intel.com>>; 
opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Aaron Smith <aasm...@redhat.com<mailto:aasm...@redhat.com>>
Subject: RE: [barometer] Vote for new barometer PTL

+1

From: Tahhan, Maryam
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 8:21 AM
To: 'MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)' <acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>>; Foley, 
Emma L <emma.l.fo...@intel.com<mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>; Gherghe, Calin 
<calin.gher...@intel.com<mailto:calin.gher...@intel.com>>; Aaron Smith 
<aasm...@redhat.com<mailto:aasm...@redhat.com>>
Cc: Verrall, Timothy 
<timothy.verr...@intel.com<mailto:timothy.verr...@intel.com>>; Power, Damien 
<damien.po...@intel.com<mailto:damien.po...@intel.com>>; Mcmahon, Tony B 
<tony.b.mcma...@intel.com<mailto:tony.b.mcma...@intel.com>>; Tahhan, Maryam 
<maryam.tah...@intel.com<mailto:maryam.tah...@intel.com>>; 
opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Aaron Smith <aasm...@redhat.com<mailto:aasm...@redhat.com>>
Subject: [barometer] Vote for new barometer PTL

Barometer committers ...

There have been no further nominations for the Barometer PTL position ... 
therefore Aaron Smith is the sole candidate. To provide a record of this and 
acknowledgement from Barometer committers please respond here indicating your 
approval/disapproval (+1, -1) for Aaron to take over as PTL effective from the 
Euphrates release.

Thanks!

Maryam


From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Tahhan, Maryam
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 11:30 AM
To: opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Aaron Smith <aasm...@redhat.com<mailto:aasm...@redhat.com>>
Cc: Verrall, Timothy 
<timothy.verr...@intel.com<mailto:timothy.verr...@intel.com>>; Power, Damien 
<damien.po...@intel.com<mailto:damien.po...@intel.com>>; Mcmahon, Tony B 
<tony.b.mcma...@intel.com<mailto:tony.b.mcma...@intel.com>>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Stepping down as barometer PTL post E 
release.


Hi folks,



After much consideration, I have decided to step down as the PTL for barometer 
after the E release. I have really enjoyed my time as the PTL and the support 
of a great team. I and the team would like to remain involved/stay on as a 
project committers and contributors. But I think it's the right time to give 
someone else the chance to lead a great project. With that, I would like to 
nominate Aaron Smith as the next barometer PTL.



Thank you for the experience and great journey :)

Maryam
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 11 Oct 2017

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

I can chair the meeting today, Trevor.

Beyond the JIRA clean-up, Trevor notes a key action held
over for today: to review the FDIO CSIT tests:
  
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1707/report/vpp_performance_tests/index.html#<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.fd.io_csit_rls1707_report_vpp-5Fperformance-5Ftests_index.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=nN41oHPucCaoyeAAzVG4Y0JwBVg8IieMHxHHR2Qmxw8=-XeVMZ0RfFDq1KEYLMRWuCFxKzo_RAyE0HznCESQ-2U=>
and then we can make a comparison with our CI results
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/vsperf/VSPERF+CI+Results

Al

From: Cooper, Trevor [mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 7:54 PM
To: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org'
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); 'Sridhar Rao'; Klozik, MartinX; 'Bill Michalowski'; 
'Christian Trautman'; 'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)'
Subject: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 11 Oct 2017


I have a conflict tomorrow and will not be able to attend ... is there a 
volunteer to chair the meeting?



A few notes ...

-  I did notify the TSC of VSPERF's intent to participate in Fraser.

-  I haven't had a chance yet to work on the second sand-box in POD 12

-  Please check all Jira tickets assigned to you for Euphrates ... 
either close them or update fix version to future release



Some proposed agenda topics ...

-  Euphrates Release milestones (The updated release schedule is here 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Euphrates?preview=/8689511/12391892/OPNFV%20Release%20%2522Euphrates%2522%20r11.pdf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_SWREL_Euphrates-3Fpreview-3D_8689511_12391892_OPNFV-2520Release-2520-252522Euphrates-252522-2520r11.pdf=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=O7kMIPWbSxN54gSO3oU7aa0ywWPw-q_hhfBKtvrxYTw=PjDt33xcaEeTQhpNyzhBmlEqpBHOqZPtgmeupS1Tj0k=>)

o   MS10 (10/19) - JIRA issues closed or deferred

o   MS11 (10/20) - Release Euphrates 5.0

-  Status of 
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/44247/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.opnfv.org_gerrit_-23_c_44247_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=O7kMIPWbSxN54gSO3oU7aa0ywWPw-q_hhfBKtvrxYTw=AOTe083PODFYEhWCLB8YIvgclOmf-L-lR_6-gdWMCas=>
 Add multistream support to T-Rex

-  Status of tuning CI configuration (Martin)
-  Discuss VPP test cases and results in CSIT report ... try to 
calibrate against VVSPERF CI results 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1707/report/vpp_performance_tests/index.html#<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.fd.io_csit_rls1707_report_vpp-5Fperformance-5Ftests_index.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=O7kMIPWbSxN54gSO3oU7aa0ywWPw-q_hhfBKtvrxYTw=SdI79XWU0yf38RGgNH23PhdLEEe6VmtMBdnGMY4VLMA=>



Meeting minutes
-  Ww40 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-10-04-14.49.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D10-2D04-2D14.49.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=O7kMIPWbSxN54gSO3oU7aa0ywWPw-q_hhfBKtvrxYTw=mQJv2l-dGLG3KLNpAgNxvtV42BA57N959P7af65aDZs=>
-  ww39 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-09-27-15.01.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D09-2D27-2D15.01.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=O7kMIPWbSxN54gSO3oU7aa0ywWPw-q_hhfBKtvrxYTw=TJM-yPZiPbw4unoHnbsAO9ZhzAQLQHtpbbKvyloFSBs=>

-  ww38 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-09-20-15.05.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D09-2D20-2D15.05.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=O7kMIPWbSxN54gSO3oU7aa0ywWPw-q_hhfBKtvrxYTw=gXcjm_drIZ3yNE3538o4ao3mR3FPfze2RGHOT44xkkg=>

-  ww37 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-09-13-14.53.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D09-2D13-2D14.53.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=O7kMIPWbSxN54gSO3oU7aa0ywWPw-q_hhfBKtvrxYTw=fSRmCORSST3hNeCeZ-tH1syT7KPNuYihvbJ6eobbq0Q=>



Time: Wednesday UTC 15h00, Ireland (UTC/GMT +1) 16h00, PDT 8h00 (UTC/GMT -7) 
... Currently observing daylight saving

IRC: freenode 
https://freenode.net/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__freenode.net_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Vote for new VSPERF PTL

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

+1, thanks for stepping-up, Sridhar!
Al

From: Cooper, Trevor [mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 7:11 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Klozik, MartinX; 'Bill Michalowski'; 'Christian 
Trautman'; Rao, Sridhar; Tahhan, Maryam; Cooper, Trevor
Subject: [VSPERF] Vote for new VSPERF PTL
Importance: High

VSPERF committers ...

There have been no further nominations for the VSPERF PTL position ... 
therefore Sridhar Rao from Spirent is the sole candidate. To provide a record 
of this and acknowledgement from VSPERF committers please respond here 
indicating your approval/disapproval (+1, -1) for Sridhar to take over as PTL 
effective from the Euphrates release.

Thanks!

Trevor




From: Cooper, Trevor
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 8:59 PM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org>
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>>; Klozik, 
MartinX <martinx.klo...@intel.com<mailto:martinx.klo...@intel.com>>; 'Bill 
Michalowski' <bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>>; 'Christian 
Trautman' <ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>>; 'Mars Toktonaliev 
(Nokia - US/Irving)' 
<mars.toktonal...@nokia.com<mailto:mars.toktonal...@nokia.com>>; Raymond Paik 
<rp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>; 'Rao, 
Sridhar' <sridhar@spirent.com<mailto:sridhar@spirent.com>>
Subject: [VSPERF] New PTL for VSPERF after E release

I will be stepping down as PTL for VSPERF effective from the E release. Thank 
you VSPERF team ... I am very grateful for the opportunity to lead the project 
through Danube and Euphrates. I have learned a lot from all of you and have 
enjoyed your company immensely.

I would like to nominate Sridhar Rao (Spirent) as the next VSPERF PTL. If there 
are any further nominations please notify by 6th October.

/Trevor

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

+1 and thanks for the proposal, Alex!

Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Frank 
Brockners (fbrockne)
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 4:44 AM
To: Alec Hothan (ahothan); opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed

+1 – per what Alec mentioned below, the new tagging scheme is only a small 
change incremental change from the earlier plans, but offers a lot of 
flexibility moving forward.
Frank

From: Alec Hothan (ahothan)
Sent: Montag, 25. September 2017 21:34
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: David McBride 
>; Fatih 
Degirmenci 
>; Frank 
Brockners (fbrockne) >; Tallgren, 
Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo) 
>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed


I would like to get a quick vote from any person that works directly or 
indirectly with code in OPNFV

Please reply with -1, 0 +1

For using prefixed git tags for the Euphrates release: “opnfv-5.0.0”

This is a slight change to the plan on record (which was to use “5.0.0”). This 
does NOT impact euphrates deliverables for participating OPNFV projects (git 
tags on stable/euphrates are applied by releng).
The only externally visible effect is the naming of container tags for 
Euphrates official images in DockerHub will be named accordingly (e.g. 
“opnfv/functest:opnfv-5.0.0”).
Everything else remains the same.

If you’d like to know more, the rationale is described here: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/releng/OPNFV+projects+and+OPNFV+release+versioning
 (thanks for Fatih, David, Frank, Tapio for reviewing)
In a nutshell, this adjustment is needed to prepare the path for proper 
continuous delivery support by projects.
Any clarification/questions/discussion can be done over email or at the TSC or 
release meetings tomorrow.

Thank You.

  Alec


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Stepping down as barometer PTL post E release.

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

+1 Bryan, "Thank You" and "Well Done" doesn't say enough...

best wishes in *all* your endeavors, Maryam!

Thank you for your willingness to step-up, Aaron!

Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 9:25 AM
To: Tahhan, Maryam; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Aaron Smith
Cc: Verrall, Timothy; Power, Damien; Mcmahon, Tony B
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Stepping down as barometer PTL 
post E release.

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
And thanks to you, Maryam, for your excellent work as PTL. I'm sure over the 
last couple of releases the team picked up some great pointers from you on how 
to do this job right, so we should be in good hands.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Tahhan, Maryam
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 3:30 AM
To: opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; 
Aaron Smith >
Cc: Verrall, Timothy 
>; Power, Damien 
>; Mcmahon, Tony B 
>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Stepping down as barometer PTL post E 
release.


Hi folks,



After much consideration, I have decided to step down as the PTL for barometer 
after the E release. I have really enjoyed my time as the PTL and the support 
of a great team. I and the team would like to remain involved/stay on as a 
project committers and contributors. But I think it's the right time to give 
someone else the chance to lead a great project. With that, I would like to 
nominate Aaron Smith as the next barometer PTL.



Thank you for the experience and great journey :)

Maryam
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Canceled: [barometer] Weekly Call

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Maryam,
I still have the Invite, just got the reminder @15 minutes…
Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Tahhan, Maryam
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 11:41 AM
To: Aaron Smith; Juan Vidal ALLENDE
Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L); Foley, Emma L; serkant.ulude...@argela.com.tr; 
j.javier.ar...@gmail.com; Power, Damien; pavan.gu...@calsoftinc.com; Campbell, 
Wesley; daniel.par...@intel.com; Mcmahon, Tony B; Scott Mansfield; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; ola.liljed...@arm.com; 
schaga...@versa-networks.com; Gherghe, Calin; manish.ja...@cavium.com; Sun, 
Ning; yangya...@chinamobile.com; Duignan, Andrew; kand...@us.ibm.com; Murthy, 
Krishna J; Reddy, Raghuveer; Ray, Bj; mario.rodrig...@arm.com; Chornyi, TarasX
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Canceled: [barometer] Weekly Call

Hi Aaron
The barometer call is still scheduled for this evening with the Prometheus 
integration overview. I’m not sure what Juan was cancelling. Please let me know 
if you still have the invitation.

BR
Maryam

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Smith
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 3:27 PM
To: Juan Vidal ALLENDE 
>
Cc: Foley, Emma L >; 
serkant.ulude...@argela.com.tr; 
ola.liljed...@arm.com; Power, Damien 
>; 
pavan.gu...@calsoftinc.com; Campbell, Wesley 
>; 
daniel.par...@intel.com; Mcmahon, Tony B 
>; Scott Mansfield 
>; 
mario.rodrig...@arm.com; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; 
j.javier.ar...@gmail.com; 
schaga...@versa-networks.com; Gherghe, 
Calin >; 
manish.ja...@cavium.com; Sun, Ning 
>; 
yangya...@chinamobile.com; Duignan, Andrew 
>; 
kand...@us.ibm.com; Murthy, Krishna J 
>; Reddy, 
Raghuveer >; Ray, 
Bj >; 
bs3...@att.com; Chornyi, TarasX 
>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Canceled: [barometer] Weekly Call

Will the Prometheus discuss be rescheduled for the call next week?

Aaron

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:24 AM, Juan Vidal ALLENDE 
> wrote:
Updated the goto meeting


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss



--

AARON SMITH

SENIOR PRINCIPAL SOFTWARE ENGINEER, NFVPE

Red Hat



314 Littleton Rd, Westford, MA 01886

aasm...@redhat.comM: 
617.877.4814
[https://www.redhat.com/files/brand/email/sig-redhat.png]


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Bulk access to the long duration POD - Intel18

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Gabriel,

please add me under the VSPERF list:

Al: acmor...@att.com


From: test-wg-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:test-wg-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] 
On Behalf Of Yuyang (Gabriel)
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 11:55 PM
To: morgan.richo...@orange.com; Jose Lausuch; Brattain, Ross B; Cooper, Trevor; 
mark.bei...@emc.com
Cc: infra...@lists.opnfv.org; test...@lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-tech-discuss
Subject: [test-wg] Bulk access to the long duration POD - Intel18

Hi,

As we discussed in the Testperf meeting and the alignment with Infra group, we 
will need access to the Intel-18 POD for the long duration test.
To avoid duplicated requests, we decide to create a ticket to collect name list 
for bulk access subscription.
A action item has been assigned to me to collect the name list though email. 
Please provide your feedback below so that I could create the ticket.

Bottlenecks:
Gabriel Yu: gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com
Ace Lee: liyi...@huawei.com

VSPERF:
Trevor: trevor.coo...@intel.com

STORPERF:
Mark: mark.bei...@emc.com

Yardstick:
Ross: ross.b.bratt...@intel.com


Functest:
Morgan: morgan.richo...@orange.com
Jose Lausuch: jose.laus...@ericsson.com



Best,
Gabriel
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 30 Aug 2017

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Thanks, I can talk you through it, I think.

Will try to join from my iPad, too, but not for
any sort of real typing...

From: Christian Trautman [mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:18 AM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Cc: Trevor Cooper; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Sridhar Rao; MartinX 
Klozik; Bill Michalowski; Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)
Subject: Re: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 30 Aug 2017

I'll see if I can do take the meeting notes. Just need to find a quick how to 
before the meeting.

-Christian,


From: "ALFRED C MORTON (AL)" <acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>>
To: "Trevor Cooper" <trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>, 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Cc: "Sridhar Rao" <sridhar@spirent.com<mailto:sridhar@spirent.com>>, 
"MartinX Klozik" <martinx.klo...@intel.com<mailto:martinx.klo...@intel.com>>, 
"Bill Michalowski" <bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>>, 
"Christian Trautman" <ctrau...@redhat.com<mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>>, "Mars 
Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)" 
<mars.toktonal...@nokia.com<mailto:mars.toktonal...@nokia.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 8:31:08 AM
Subject: RE: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 30 Aug 2017

Thanks for letting us know, Trevor.

I will use the organizer credentials to start the
meeting at 1100 EDT.  I’m in the office today, and
despite filling an exception with IT, my IRC access
is blocked.

So, I could use some help with IRC minutes.

see others at the meeting,
Al


From: Cooper, Trevor [mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 9:39 PM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Sridhar Rao; Klozik, MartinX; Bill Michalowski; 
Christian Trautman; Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)
Subject: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 30 Aug 2017


I am unable to attend the vsperf weekly meeting tomorrow … some suggestions for 
agenda topics are …



-  TREX integration / testing 
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/34561/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.opnfv.org_gerrit_-23_c_34561_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=cR_CfBfU-JFZF8AVLSJRFjMQZmmAhOAqX_kWBlY7-7w=6zpnnPG5sdKcsoTcXmU8T9CTc5YxbOjmnrcBz3mX33w=>
 (Latency statistics are affecting Trex performance so they are disabled by 
default, Sridhar configuration files in Jira, …)

-  Test API patch … was merged 
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/40005/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.opnfv.org_gerrit_-23_c_40005_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=cR_CfBfU-JFZF8AVLSJRFjMQZmmAhOAqX_kWBlY7-7w=5E5NS08PJQev1hI9pYnX1R-CmwrmQVTujDicmtsY-rM=>
-  CI POD tuning (tests and documentation)





Previous Minutes

-  Ww34 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-23-14.59.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D08-2D23-2D14.59.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=cR_CfBfU-JFZF8AVLSJRFjMQZmmAhOAqX_kWBlY7-7w=M65QMzM_BZo4XsvPOTF369h9tyeOXxIqAeEZPzXPYGw=>

-  ww33 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-16-14.57.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D08-2D16-2D14.57.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=cR_CfBfU-JFZF8AVLSJRFjMQZmmAhOAqX_kWBlY7-7w=SDZP8rDW8KYj0T37dkwTuyx116vuXCuoIr-R4MFWrOw=>

-  ww32 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-09-14.45.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D08-2D09-2D14.45.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=cR_CfBfU-JFZF8AVLSJRFjMQZmmAhOAqX_kWBlY7-7w=rVEmG3kyau7kXdMhZx2H959OlW0GbQ9HHpCxGtAMn6A=>

-  ww31 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-02-14.55.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D08-2D02-2D14.55.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=cR_CfBfU-JFZF8AVLSJRFjMQZmmAhOAqX_kWBlY7-7w=-H8frXbFg0xvC5KkRWTOimPyH6TEGAKCXFq3mR5k8To=>

-  ww30 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-07-26-15

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 30 Aug 2017

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Thanks for letting us know, Trevor.

I will use the organizer credentials to start the
meeting at 1100 EDT.  I'm in the office today, and
despite filling an exception with IT, my IRC access
is blocked.

So, I could use some help with IRC minutes.

see others at the meeting,
Al

From: Cooper, Trevor [mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 9:39 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Sridhar Rao; Klozik, MartinX; Bill Michalowski; 
Christian Trautman; Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)
Subject: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 30 Aug 2017


I am unable to attend the vsperf weekly meeting tomorrow ... some suggestions 
for agenda topics are ...



-  TREX integration / testing 
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/34561/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.opnfv.org_gerrit_-23_c_34561_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=cR_CfBfU-JFZF8AVLSJRFjMQZmmAhOAqX_kWBlY7-7w=6zpnnPG5sdKcsoTcXmU8T9CTc5YxbOjmnrcBz3mX33w=>
 (Latency statistics are affecting Trex performance so they are disabled by 
default, Sridhar configuration files in Jira, ...)

-  Test API patch ... was merged 
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/40005/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.opnfv.org_gerrit_-23_c_40005_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=cR_CfBfU-JFZF8AVLSJRFjMQZmmAhOAqX_kWBlY7-7w=5E5NS08PJQev1hI9pYnX1R-CmwrmQVTujDicmtsY-rM=>
-  CI POD tuning (tests and documentation)





Previous Minutes

-  Ww34 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-23-14.59.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D08-2D23-2D14.59.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=cR_CfBfU-JFZF8AVLSJRFjMQZmmAhOAqX_kWBlY7-7w=M65QMzM_BZo4XsvPOTF369h9tyeOXxIqAeEZPzXPYGw=>

-  ww33 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-16-14.57.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D08-2D16-2D14.57.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=cR_CfBfU-JFZF8AVLSJRFjMQZmmAhOAqX_kWBlY7-7w=SDZP8rDW8KYj0T37dkwTuyx116vuXCuoIr-R4MFWrOw=>

-  ww32 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-09-14.45.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D08-2D09-2D14.45.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=cR_CfBfU-JFZF8AVLSJRFjMQZmmAhOAqX_kWBlY7-7w=rVEmG3kyau7kXdMhZx2H959OlW0GbQ9HHpCxGtAMn6A=>

-  ww31 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-02-14.55.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D08-2D02-2D14.55.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=cR_CfBfU-JFZF8AVLSJRFjMQZmmAhOAqX_kWBlY7-7w=-H8frXbFg0xvC5KkRWTOimPyH6TEGAKCXFq3mR5k8To=>

-  ww30 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-07-26-15.03.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf_2017_opnfv-2Dvswitchperf.2017-2D07-2D26-2D15.03.html=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=cR_CfBfU-JFZF8AVLSJRFjMQZmmAhOAqX_kWBlY7-7w=YbyBh9ArtjWzwGbgPkzENx8sKbNsCcxYmI79PkDdQ8I=>


Time: Wednesday UTC 15h00, Ireland (UTC/GMT +1) 16h00, PDT 8h00 (UTC/GMT -7) 
... Currently observing daylight saving

IRC: freenode 
https://freenode.net/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__freenode.net_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=cR_CfBfU-JFZF8AVLSJRFjMQZmmAhOAqX_kWBlY7-7w=n2eSirmB2gtJypq5oIFALyE5P75DaskvQffdvxtGpP8=>
 channel: #opnfv-vswitchperf 
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-vswitchperf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__webchat.freenode.net_-3Fchannels-3Dopnfv-2Dvswitchperf=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=cR_CfBfU-JFZF8AVLSJRFjMQZmmAhOAqX_kWBlY7-7w=D9oUXA0l4LE2oew_xbtdEbbPveOhbjTgWG73jwu0L6k=>

Audio: 
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/391235029<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__global.gotomeeting.com_join_391235029=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=cR_CfBfU-JFZF8AVLSJRFjMQZmmAhOAqX_kWBlY7-7w=7Z57D6x2e4-QRJwVWfZlc7xlCqupY22HbNnOVdsx2ac=>
You can also dial in using your phone.  United States: +1 (571) 317-3116  
Access Code: 391-235-029
Phone numbers from other countries are here ... 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings<https://urldefense.proofpoin

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Proposed Agenda Items for Aug 23 meeting

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi VSPERF'ers

Dev updates come first, but I think it would help
to collect insights on what we see here.

- CI Results Discussion 

Martin's plotting wiki page:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/vsperf/VSPERF+CI+Results
presents an excellent basis for discussion.
Back2Back on all scenarios and the SR-IOV
results make for some interesting comparisons.


- Multi-Stream N-tuple field access affects results

Sridhar's Summaries in Appendix E:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/vsperf/Traffic+Generator+Testing#TrafficGeneratorTesting-AppendixE:HardwareandBaremetalTrafficGenerators-Summarized

appear to show that varying different fields in the
N-tuple (because different generators have different
abilities to select and vary the field values) has an 
effect on throughput. What exact fields were varied to
create 4K flows in each of the T-gens? And what 
method was used to vary the values (linear, random)?

thanks and regards,
Al

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Latency Histogram

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Sridhar, Thanks for taking this on.

The difficulty with histograms on not-yet-measured results
is that you have to guess what the distribution will look
like in order to specify the bins.  Instead of guessing,
we usually run some short pilot tests with many bins,
and try to get a feel for the range and the key features of
distribution.

In any case, I think it would be useful to specify the
actual values for each bin, rather than the bin widths,
something like:

# List of BIN BOUNDARIES
HISTO_LATENCY_BIN_BOUNDARIESS = 'histo_latency_bin_boundaries'

So, if I want bins to begin at
0ns, 10ns, 20ns, 40ns, 80ns, 120ns,
then I specify the actual values in the list.
The list makes the

# Number of Bins
HISTO_LATENCY_BINS = 'histo_latency_bins'

redundant, but I suppose we could allow *either* the
list of widths or an explicit list of bin boundaries.
We might use the widths at first, and then customize
the exact boundaries after we've seen some data.

Al


From: Rao, Sridhar [mailto:sridhar@spirent.com]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 11:59 AM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Cc: Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>> 
(trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>); Martin Klozik 
(martinx.klo...@intel.com<mailto:martinx.klo...@intel.com>); MORTON, ALFRED C 
(AL)
Subject: [VSPERF] Latency Histogram

Hello VSPERF Members,

I hereby propose the following to include Latency Histogram support while 
reporting results in VSPERF.

The histogram output from a traffic-generator output can be visualized as below:
'histogram': {'bin_unit': '  ',
'values': { bin1: freq1,
   bin2: freq2,
   .
binN: freqN},
  },
}
}
Where,
#bin_unit: one of ns|us|ms
#bin1: > 0 and < bin1
#bin2: >= bin1 and < bin2
#binN: >= binN-1
#freq: No/Of Values (Packet-count) whose latency value fall within the 
corresponding bin-range.

Considering this, I propose to add the following to ResultsConstants class.

HISTO_LATENCY_UNIT = 'histo_latency_unit'
# Number of Bins
HISTO_LATENCY_BINS = 'histo_latency_bins'
# List of BIN WIDTHS
HISTO_LATENCY_BIN_WIDTHS = 'histo_latency_bin_widths'
# List of bin-counts for each bin-width
HISTO_LATENNCY_BIN_COUNTS = 'histo_latency_bin_counts'

Please feel free to share your thoughts.

Regards
Sridhar



Spirent Communications e-mail confidentiality.

This e-mail contains confidential and / or privileged information belonging to 
Spirent Communications plc, its affiliates and / or subsidiaries. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution and / or the taking of any action based upon reliance on 
the contents of this transmission is strictly forbidden. If you have received 
this message in error please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete it 
from your system.

Spirent Communications plc
Northwood Park, Gatwick Road, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9XN, United Kingdom.
Tel No. +44 (0) 1293 767676
Fax No. +44 (0) 1293 767677

Registered in England Number 470893
Registered at Northwood Park, Gatwick Road, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9XN, 
United Kingdom.

Or if within the US,

Spirent Communications,
27349 Agoura Road, Calabasas, CA, 91301, USA.
Tel No. 1-818-676- 2300
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] TST008 analysis

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Maryam,

My e-mail update for this week (sorry, I'll miss the meeting
today) is that I completed most of the edits in TST 008 spec,
and I hope to discuss it with the TST working group tomorrow.

Some of the details on Memory metrics are still open, need further
discussion, but this is a start (for example, physical total RAM
seems to be synonymous with Total Memory as we took it in TST008,
but other's view of "total memory" seems to exclude kernel memory
and other reserved memory space.

regards,
Al


From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 6:37 PM
To: 'Tahhan, Maryam'
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Power, Damien; Mcmahon, Tony B
Subject: RE: [barometer] TST008 analysis

Hi Maryam,

Thanks a million for your review! There are fairly
clear actions for TST008 (which was approved, and has
entered the maintenance mode with the rest of the
Release 2 specifications, so we can propose changes).

Following our discussion and agreements in the barometer
meeting today, I'll respond to your questions below
(from memory - I was in motion, so feel free to edit...).

I've started to edit TST008,
Al

From: Tahhan, Maryam [mailto:maryam.tah...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:05 AM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Power, Damien; Mcmahon, Tony B
Subject: [barometer] TST008 analysis


Hi Al
I've gone through TST 008 and have a few questions:



Q. Parameters to metrics, are these intended to be sent as part of the metric 
being reported, or can they be sent as information themselves, link status 
being the example I would pick on :)

[ACM]

The Parameters should be reported when collection begins,

or when their values change. Both TST008 and our metrics

requirements wiki page list the metric Name, Scope, and

Units of measurement as required aspects to communicate

(because they give the full context to the measurements).

Scope came-up on the call briefly, and this is probably

more critical for the Processor and Memory metrics.



Q. Do we need to report both usage and utilization for CPU? Or is one enough? 
"On the completion of a measurement interval, the measured times shall be 
summed and the usage and utilization shall be reported. "

[ACM]

In this last sentence of section 6.7, "and" becomes "and/or" .



Q. "Interface Speed: the nominal frequency of the physical interface bit clock 
in Hz, which governs the rate that the interface operates. Virtual interfaces 
may not have a meaningful value for this parameter. " in Hz? Or in Mb/s?

[ACM]

Let's simplify this one.

We'll use bits per second, and allow an appropriate

prefix multiplier (M for Mega, etc.), in section 7.3.



I can't find a way of retrieving the interface speed in HZ, should it be HZ or 
Mb/s

sudo ethtool enp134s0 | grep Speed

Speed: 1000Mb/s



cat /sys/class/net/enp134s0/speed

1000



Q. "Interface: the name of a single interface where communication metrics are 
monitored " --> what about uuid or id - some interfaces aren't identified by 
name

[ACM]

Good catch, this can be clarified as "name (or other identifier)".

I added: "...and shall be unique within the Scope of measurement"



Q. "Interface Status: the operational state of the interface indicating 
readiness for use, usually expressed as "up"or "down" " --> is the parameter to 
be sent with the metric? Interface status would be interesting of its own right?

[ACM]

Since this is a Parameter, it represents the desired admin state

which has been configured up or down, and should be

reported/communicated like other parameters (at the start or after change).



Q. " here are four fundamental metrics of memory utilization:

1) Memory buffered

2) Memory Cached

3) Memory free

4) Memory Slab

These four metrics comprise the total of used 
memory. Therefore, the sum of these metrics can be subtracted from the Total 
Memory to obtain the current value of free memory"



Memory free - is a typo I think with the sentence that follows.

[ACM]

It turns out that this confusing info was supposed to represent this:

mem_used = mem_total - (mem_free + mem_buffered + mem_cached + mem_slab_total);

from https://github.com/collectd/collectd/blob/master/src/memory.c#L325



So, These four metrics comprise the total of used memory

is the sentence in error (free is not used),

and should say,

These four metrics comprise memory unoccupied by *user processes*?

(not sure about *user processes*, maybe another term would be better)

The second sentence should describe the calculation of *used memory*.





Q.   "The following parameters shall be supported for these four 
me

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF]

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Thanks to Trevor, I have what I need...

From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 3:30 PM
To: 'Goldammer, MartinX'; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF]

Hi VSPERF,

One of my Action Requests from today's meeting is:
*  ACTION: Al to review latency output (histogram table) from TREX provided by 
Martin Godalmer and provide feedback 
(trevor_intel<http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-07-12-14.56.log.html#l-8>,
 15:14:27)

I searched the recent e-mail and minutes,
but haven't found a link to the TREX histogram.

Could someone please share the location or histogram file with me?

thanks,
Al

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Goldammer, 
MartinX
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 4:29 AM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] I would like to contribute to the project

Hi,
I'd like to contribute to the VSPERF project - please add me as a Contributor
Thank you very much
Martin Goldammer

--
Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole 
use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is 
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 
sender and delete all copies.
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF]

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi VSPERF,

One of my Action Requests from today's meeting is:
*  ACTION: Al to review latency output (histogram table) from TREX provided by 
Martin Godalmer and provide feedback 
(trevor_intel,
 15:14:27)

I searched the recent e-mail and minutes,
but haven't found a link to the TREX histogram.

Could someone please share the location or histogram file with me?

thanks,
Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Goldammer, 
MartinX
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 4:29 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] I would like to contribute to the project

Hi,
I'd like to contribute to the VSPERF project - please add me as a Contributor
Thank you very much
Martin Goldammer

--
Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole 
use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is 
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 
sender and delete all copies.
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] TST008 analysis

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Maryam,

Thanks a million for your review! There are fairly
clear actions for TST008 (which was approved, and has
entered the maintenance mode with the rest of the
Release 2 specifications, so we can propose changes).

Following our discussion and agreements in the barometer
meeting today, I'll respond to your questions below
(from memory - I was in motion, so feel free to edit...).

I've started to edit TST008,
Al

From: Tahhan, Maryam [mailto:maryam.tah...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:05 AM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Power, Damien; Mcmahon, Tony B
Subject: [barometer] TST008 analysis


Hi Al
I've gone through TST 008 and have a few questions:



Q. Parameters to metrics, are these intended to be sent as part of the metric 
being reported, or can they be sent as information themselves, link status 
being the example I would pick on :)

[ACM]

The Parameters should be reported when collection begins,

or when their values change. Both TST008 and our metrics

requirements wiki page list the metric Name, Scope, and

Units of measurement as required aspects to communicate

(because they give the full context to the measurements).

Scope came-up on the call briefly, and this is probably

more critical for the Processor and Memory metrics.



Q. Do we need to report both usage and utilization for CPU? Or is one enough? 
"On the completion of a measurement interval, the measured times shall be 
summed and the usage and utilization shall be reported. "

[ACM]

In this last sentence of section 6.7, "and" becomes "and/or" .



Q. "Interface Speed: the nominal frequency of the physical interface bit clock 
in Hz, which governs the rate that the interface operates. Virtual interfaces 
may not have a meaningful value for this parameter. " in Hz? Or in Mb/s?

[ACM]

Let's simplify this one.

We'll use bits per second, and allow an appropriate

prefix multiplier (M for Mega, etc.), in section 7.3.



I can't find a way of retrieving the interface speed in HZ, should it be HZ or 
Mb/s

sudo ethtool enp134s0 | grep Speed

Speed: 1000Mb/s



cat /sys/class/net/enp134s0/speed

1000



Q. "Interface: the name of a single interface where communication metrics are 
monitored " --> what about uuid or id - some interfaces aren't identified by 
name

[ACM]

Good catch, this can be clarified as "name (or other identifier)".

I added: "...and shall be unique within the Scope of measurement"



Q. "Interface Status: the operational state of the interface indicating 
readiness for use, usually expressed as "up"or "down" " --> is the parameter to 
be sent with the metric? Interface status would be interesting of its own right?

[ACM]

Since this is a Parameter, it represents the desired admin state

which has been configured up or down, and should be

reported/communicated like other parameters (at the start or after change).



Q. " here are four fundamental metrics of memory utilization:

1) Memory buffered

2) Memory Cached

3) Memory free

4) Memory Slab

These four metrics comprise the total of used 
memory. Therefore, the sum of these metrics can be subtracted from the Total 
Memory to obtain the current value of free memory"



Memory free - is a typo I think with the sentence that follows.

[ACM]

It turns out that this confusing info was supposed to represent this:

mem_used = mem_total - (mem_free + mem_buffered + mem_cached + mem_slab_total);

from https://github.com/collectd/collectd/blob/master/src/memory.c#L325



So, These four metrics comprise the total of used memory

is the sentence in error (free is not used),

and should say,

These four metrics comprise memory unoccupied by *user processes*?

(not sure about *user processes*, maybe another term would be better)

The second sentence should describe the calculation of *used memory*.





Q.   "The following parameters shall be supported for these four 
metrics:

* Measurement time: the point in time when the values were read 
(time and date).

* Total Memory: the Random Access Memory, RAM, available to the 
compute node measured

* Swap space: the configured memory available for processes to 
share through swapping "



Would total memory not be a stat on its own?

[ACM]

I took the position that Total was configured and not measured.

but

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guide/s2-proc-meminfo.html

seems to indicate that MemTotal is measured,

and gives the definition as total RAM excluding

 a number of reserved bits and the kernel binary code.



But these definitions need to work for both physical and 

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Next meeting and Action Items

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi VEPERF,

Our next meeting is scheduled for July 5th,
and it is anticipated that many US participants
will be taking some time off.

If anyone has a pressing issue to meet next week, 
please communicate it in a reply to this group.
Otherwise, we can do e-mail updates and meet 
in 2 weeks.

The IRC minutes from this weeks's meeting are here:
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-06-28-15.05.html

In particular, see the 5 action items, some assigned
to folks who were not present.

regards,
Al
(acting organizer for today)

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Survey of VSPERF Users and Contributors

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Trevor,
one more reply (glad to see so many),
Al

1.   How do you use VSPERF or plan to use VSPERF?
I've used VSPERF test capabilities to examine detailed questions
about NFVI dataplane benchmarking. The question of RFC2544
Back to Back Frame test stability has been looming for some time.
We have some good results, and still some work to do.
2.   Why do you think VSPERF is an important project in OPNFV, what are the 
main benefits of the project that you foresee?
VSPERF provides a platform where the entire Industry can learn more
about NFVI dataplane benchmarking, and try-out new techniques
together. The project has already contributed to IETF Benchmarking
Methodology Working Group on the topics of test configuration for
improving repeatability and recommended NFVI test setups (Deployment
Scenarios). The value of good specifications in the Open Source
community is clear.
3.   What are major gaps or features that you would like to see in VSPERF 
that are not there today?
VSPERF could become an implementation of new NFVI benchmarking specifications
as they emerge, and help to drive the specification development (as the
recent work http://nfvprivatewiki.etsi.org/index.php?title=NFVI_Benchmarking
has already done: There are some trade-offs to make when using "free"
test traffic generators, especially if results integrity and ability
to compare with others are critical aspects of the test campaign).

4.   Anything else?
This project provides a useful OS tool that is unique in many aspects.
It's very worthwhile to continue the work, IMO.


From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Cooper, Trevor
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 12:22 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Survey of VSPERF Users and Contributors

I am collecting feedback about VSPERF from users and contributors ... the main 
purpose is to help me motivate for our ongoing investment in the project. I 
already approached a few people ... even if you have already given feedback 
feel free to add anything else.


1.   How do you use VSPERF or plan to use VSPERF?



2.   Why do you think VSPERF is an important project in OPNFV, what are the 
main benefits of the project that you foresee?



3.   What are major gaps or features that you would like to see in VSPERF 
that are not there today?



4.   Anything else?


Thanks

/Trevor

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] GTM Collision - please stop

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Mark,

According to the meetings I've tentatively accepted,
SNAPS-OO  Steven Pisarski 
s.pisar...@cablelabs.com
and
SFC   Brady

are also meeting in this time slot...

I CC'd the PTLs,
Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Beierl, Mark
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 10:16 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] GTM Collision - please stop
Importance: High

Hello,

According to the calendar: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings,
 right now is the time slot for StorPerf.  Nothing else is scheduled for right 
now, so whoever keeps ending my meeting, please stop and update the calendar 
accordingly.

Regards,
Mark

Mark Beierl
SW System Sr Principal Engineer
Dell EMC | Office of the CTO
mobile +1 613 314 8106
mark.bei...@dell.com

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Summit CFP - VSPERF submission

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Trevor,

I'm interested to join either the vsperf or plugfest
submissions.  It occurred to me that vsperf might have
some role at the upcoming plugfest, if that makes sense
and is logistically possible (I'm guessing we would be
limited to SW traffic gens for practical purposes).
I think that we would want to focus on performance
and stress testing, to distinguish this talk from other
Plugfest summary proposals.

thanks for getting this started!
Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Cooper, Trevor
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 10:49 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Summit CFP - VSPERF submission

Submission deadline is Monday, April 10


The Design Summit takes place June 12-13 and is where the OPNFV technical 
community will convene to continue working on the E-Release and have plenary 
sessions and project breakouts. It is very focused on the OPNFV platform. The 
Summit Conference takes place Jun 14-15 and is for the wider NFV ecosystem, 
featuring keynotes, breakout sessions, a technology showcase, networking 
opportunities, etc. This is where the breakouts will be structured into the six 
tracks. Panels consist of 4 or more speakers in a single session. When in 
doubt, we recommend you submit for the Summit conference as a breakout session. 
From there, our track chairs will be able to make further recommendations as 
needed.

---

Let's submit at least one VSPERF submission ... give your suggestions to 
edit/update this proposal ... and/or make a new proposal ... the more the 
better ... once reviewed the organizers can recommend to combine proposals if 
there is overlap.

Title: ???
Speakers: Trevor, ... who else is interested?
Abstract

VSPERF is an automated test-framework for measuring NFVI data-plane performance 
using industry standard benchmark specifications and is used by open source 
development teams as well as commercial vendors. The VSPERF team's experience 
includes publishing an IETF internet draft and deploying a CI test environment 
with multiple traffic generators and DUT configurations. This session will go 
deep into how VSPERF can be used to optimize and improve data-plane performance 
of NFVI as well as provide data driven comparisons between hardware and 
software traffic generators and capabilities.


-

We decided to submit some proposals from the test working group ...  
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/TestCommunitySummit.
 Proposals from individuals and test projects are still encouraged!



Title: OPNFV Plugfest Unplugged

Speakers: Trevor and ?

The OPNFV Testing Working Group aims to unify testing strategies and methods 
across projects and test infrastructure. Plugfests (held after each release)  
have greatly assisted with this effort and helped shape the evolution of our 
testing community. This session provides an insider's view into OPNFV Plugfests 
explaining participation options, benefits and learnings from three successful 
events to-date. We will also discuss how Plugfest results have impacted 
evolution of test strategies for various types of testing including VNF and 
Stress testing.





Title: Conversations with the testing community

Panel discussion: Jose, Yujun, Kubi, Trevor, Gabriel, Mark

Moderator: Morgan

Abstract:

After a brief introduction of the activities of each project, some questions 
will help the audience to understand the work of the testing groups.

How can we contribute to a test project?

Can I create my test project or shall I join an existing one?

How do you work concretely? How do you interact with infra group, feature 
projects?

What are the collaborative work across the projects?

Is there a strategy for the test coverage, for the stress tests?

How are defined the test categories?

What are the main challenges for the future?





Title: test community what's next?

speakers: Kubi or Jack/Gabriel/Morgan

Abstract

The testing community defined priorities for Danube.

We worked on a landing page (in progress) and test case catalogue (hopefully 
available for Danube)

The test projects already consume test database API and created internal API.

Storperf API is used by Yardstick. Dovetail calls Functest and Yardstick. 
Bottleneck uses yardstick API.

Each test project may expose and consume APIs from other test projects and 
could also be used by other projects.

The goal of this session is to remind the first collaborative achievements and 
see how the testing community could adopt a micro services approach in order to 
harmonize the way to expose and consume API to others





Title: Big Data for Testing

Speakers: Donald Hunter (donaldh) 

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Trying PROX

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Yes, I left PROX working, and tried-out some of the
command combinations suggested on the etherpad.

Thanks for documenting the question/answer exchange
on latency accuracy detection and measurement discard
on etherpad as well.

Al

From: Cooper, Trevor [mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2017 2:10 AM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Pervaze Akhtar
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Trying PROX

I just tried it and works … we can discuss in the meeting tomorrow

/Trevor



From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of MORTON, 
ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 2:51 PM
To: Pervaze Akhtar 
<pervaze.akh...@netronome.com<mailto:pervaze.akh...@netronome.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Trying PROX

Thanks for your suggestion Pervaze!
I tried a command from history that seemed to do the trick.

I encountered some additional errors, but dug some more
and found the missing setup steps.

I documented our little adventure on the etherpad:
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/vsperfpdv<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__etherpad.opnfv.org_p_vsperfpdv=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=NdNxraGQycohQLDcw2FEAVRGYlFmhhPY3XVnAeFPviY=RP5jPsRJA5rgC8FPYTAN6HQIw3ZvSoUKb7u17dVEf2I=>

Al

From: Pervaze Akhtar [mailto:pervaze.akh...@netronome.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 3:58 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Trying PROX

> but no mounted hugetlbfs found for that size

The command to mount the hugepagesfs is roughly:
mount -t hugetlbfs none /mnt/hugetlbfs
The error looks like you (or the app) is using DPDK and the run time env. is 
trying to allocate hugepages, but either the they are not mounted, or the grub 
or other settings are not allocating the expected number of hugepages (looks 
like 1G pages in this case).

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:45 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
<acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

As the plugfest is coming soon, I made a few minutes
to try-out PROX, which we discussed earlier this year.

Although prox seems to run fine on Pod 12 Node-5,
the Node-4 version is currently throwing this error:

EAL: 59 hugepages of size 1073741824 reserved, but no mounted hugetlbfs found 
for that size
PANIC in rte_eal_init():
Cannot get hugepage information

helpful clues appreciated,
Al

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.opnfv.org_mailman_listinfo_opnfv-2Dtech-2Ddiscuss=DwMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=_6QN-2pbjyCiuFPqGlgOUZ7OG_akdhMk26narfH-Np0=YgdzPNnHEsXvGjBVo5k5MPj7mq3C6WvlaZpZY5rIkro=>

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Trying PROX

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Thanks for your suggestion Pervaze!
I tried a command from history that seemed to do the trick.

I encountered some additional errors, but dug some more
and found the missing setup steps.

I documented our little adventure on the etherpad:
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/vsperfpdv

Al

From: Pervaze Akhtar [mailto:pervaze.akh...@netronome.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 3:58 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Trying PROX

> but no mounted hugetlbfs found for that size

The command to mount the hugepagesfs is roughly:
mount -t hugetlbfs none /mnt/hugetlbfs
The error looks like you (or the app) is using DPDK and the run time env. is 
trying to allocate hugepages, but either the they are not mounted, or the grub 
or other settings are not allocating the expected number of hugepages (looks 
like 1G pages in this case).

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:45 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
<acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

As the plugfest is coming soon, I made a few minutes
to try-out PROX, which we discussed earlier this year.

Although prox seems to run fine on Pod 12 Node-5,
the Node-4 version is currently throwing this error:

EAL: 59 hugepages of size 1073741824 reserved, but no mounted hugetlbfs found 
for that size
PANIC in rte_eal_init():
Cannot get hugepage information

helpful clues appreciated,
Al

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.opnfv.org_mailman_listinfo_opnfv-2Dtech-2Ddiscuss=DwMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=_6QN-2pbjyCiuFPqGlgOUZ7OG_akdhMk26narfH-Np0=YgdzPNnHEsXvGjBVo5k5MPj7mq3C6WvlaZpZY5rIkro=>

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Trying PROX

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi all,

As the plugfest is coming soon, I made a few minutes
to try-out PROX, which we discussed earlier this year.

Although prox seems to run fine on Pod 12 Node-5,
the Node-4 version is currently throwing this error:

EAL: 59 hugepages of size 1073741824 reserved, but no mounted hugetlbfs found 
for that size
PANIC in rte_eal_init():
Cannot get hugepage information

helpful clues appreciated,
Al

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Update

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Maryam,
thanks for your notes for the week, apologies for
delay replying to a couple of items below:

* ETSI document: whether we can make the same measurements on virtual CPUs as 
we do physical CPUs.
   

Maryam's research into libvirt's vcpu measures was very helpful
(see her message of 2/15), and we built a convincing example
(in an Informative Annex) showing how the *Scope* metric
parameter can be used to specify either physical Processor or
Virtual Processor measurements. The libvirt domain is the equivalent
of a Virtual Machine Instance ID, and that's what some want to
measure.  ETSI has moved re-named some of their directories,
and the latest draft (0.0.5) of TST008 (the doc we're talking about)
is available here:  
https://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/Open/Drafts/TST008_NFVI_Metrics_Spec

So, now that we've got fairly solid (ETSI TST WG-approved) definitions for
key metrics, one question came up pertaining to the supporting
information for the metrics - can we collect the Parameters (input
factors) and the Scope along with the measured results at the VIM?

For example, for Processor Utilization, the parameters are:
- Tick Interval (period of interrupts to read Execution context)
- Set of Execution Contexts (likely to be included with the results)
- Start time for the measurement interval
- Measurement Interval Duration
and the Scope should also be clear in the reported results
(but this needs checking).
It seems as though all Parameters should be available (or derivable)
from most forms of measurement collection. Extracting the Tick Interval
might be a current Gap, but since the Tick is static, it should be
surmountable.

There's some synergy with looking at the measurements Maryam reported:
* [TODO] run some tests on the host and the guest side to determine accuracy of 
CPU metrics - In progress 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/fastpath/CPU+Utilisation+Case+Study
 I would appreciate any input/feedback as I'm finding some unusual anomalies. :)
so I plan to have a look at the Wiki next,
Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 12:03 PM
To: Tahhan, Maryam; 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org'; Mcmahon, Tony B; 
Power, Damien
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Update 

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
FYI, I submitted a patch to move the ves_plugin to the v3 of the VES API.
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/29959/

We have rebased the VES code for Danube on the latest AT release on github 
and integrated the current version of the ves_plugin. But we need the plugin to 
use the "v3" API endpoint instead of "v1".

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Tahhan, Maryam
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 8:56 AM
To: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' 
>;
 Mcmahon, Tony B >; 
Power, Damien >
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Update 

Hi folks

No call today due to cancellations...

[barometer] Update 

[ACTION]: Maryam to add collectd usecase diagrams to wiki. --> done 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/fastpath/Collectd+Abstraction+Layer+usecases
 there are some more diagrams to be added in based on the agent discussion
[ACTION]: Maryam to follow up on kafka bus support--> see below
[ACTION]: All - to review and update documentation
Node up/down status work --> [ACTION] Maryam to send out more info on this 
separately --> done, please see the email on host health

* Dev update: 

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Ray and Plugtesters,

Apologies for missing Monday’s meeting
(Jury Duty is a Civic responsibility,
but makes attending some meetings impossible).

Regarding test cases, I wonder if the Scope of
testing has been decided, and whether a
*performance-oriented* test case might be entertained
this time?  This topic has been out of scope in the
previous Plugfests and ETSI CTI’s Plugtest™, AFAIK.

It may still be too soon, but it’s worth asking now.

regards,
Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 1:21 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call

All,

A few things after our call on Monday

First, I realized that I had sent out a recurring weekly meeting for Plugfest 
planning when this is supposed to be a bi-weekly meeting.  I will go ahead and 
cancel the current series and start a new one that starts on March 13th.  (so 
the upcoming meetings are March 13/27 plus April 10th).  Apologies for the 
thrash, but you can also find the upcoming meeting info. at 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Plugfest+-+Danube+Release#Plugfest-DanubeRelease-PlugfestPlanningMeetings

Second, I started a test cases page at 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Danube+Plugfest+Test+Cases.
  I followed the template from the last Plugfest, but as you can see it's just 
a skeleton.  I encourage everyone (esp. those who were on the call yesterday) 
to contribute ideas/suggestions for what we should focus on for the upcoming 
Plugfest.

Finally, a reminder that the Plugfest is open to both members & non-members of 
OPNFV.  You can register at 
https://www.regonline.com/OPNFVPlugfestApril2017

Thanks,

Ray
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] VOTE on generating VSPERF Stable branch for Danube

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

+1, nice work folks!

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Bill 
Michalowski
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 3:46 PM
To: Trevor Cooper
Cc: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org'
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] VOTE on generating VSPERF Stable 
branch for Danube

+1
- Original Message -
From: Trevor Cooper >
To: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' 
>
Sent: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 16:30:51 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] VOTE on generating VSPERF Stable branch 
for Danube
VSPERF committers and contributors …

The deadline for creating the stable branch of VSPERF for Danube is 10th March

There are currently are no outstanding patches waiting for review or commit

PLEASE RESPOND WITH +1, 0, -1 to indicated your agreement/disagreement with 
generating the stable branch. We will check on the consensus at our weekly 
meeting this week (Wednesday) before the final decision
to proceed.

Thanks

Trevor (VSPERF PTL)
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] VSPERF Dashboard for Danube

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Nicely done, Martin!

Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Cooper, Trevor
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 11:50 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] VSPERF Dashboard for Danube

Martin has created a dashboard for Danube ... please check it out and feel free 
to suggest improvements. Thanks Martin!

There is a list of all D-rel related tickets (filter checks both affected and 
fix version fields, just for case, that it is wrongly set). Second list shows 
D-rel tickets which are not assigned to anybody - needs our attention. A pie 
graph shows distribution of tickets among team members - it is also usable to 
get the list of D-rel tickets for particular team member - click on the pie 
slice and select "view in issue navigator" link

https://jira.opnfv.org/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=11003#
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Weekly Call Minutes

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Sorry for the delay on this,
the public link to the ESTI NFV Stable Draft:

"Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV); Testing;
NFVI Compute and Network Metrics Specification"

we have discussed several times is
available here:

https://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/Open/Drafts/TST008

and any comments are welcome (ideally before/on Jan 17),
Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Tahhan, Maryam
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 8:00 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Weekly Call Minutes 


Minutes from the barometer weekly call:

* Release MS5 update
  * MS5 moved to January 27
  * MS6 moved to February 17
  * MS7 stays where it is

* Dev update: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/fastpath/Barometer+Danube+Development+Updates

* Testing update:
  * In Draft Status:
* Functests for 6 plugins implemented.
* Internal review to be kicked off.
* D release has some Fuel bugs (blocking on the baremetal installation) 
that need to be resolved (but working with the latest functest). This is a 
testing challenge. Workaround has been identified and will be trying to test on 
the latest Fuel with the workaround.

* VES update:
  * Newest version of JSON spec released to github.
  * Agent and collector code available.
  * Working on adding the Code to OPNFV.
  * Looking at Snap.
  * Looking at updating the VES Demo with the latest version of the spec, and 
collector code.
  * Q what control frameworks should be leveraged as part of the collaboration 
between the projects (in-band/out-of-band) E release conversation.

* ETSI NFV update
  * Specification being developed in ETSI - under Testing, looking at the 
typical metrics that will be collected. A definition set is required for the 
measurements to serve as a reference point for monitoring frameworks...
 * CPU, network interface and Memory metrics have been tackled/started.
 * Concern around the memory stats and the kernel. If the kernel is not 
keeping up with the memory stats there's a possibility a system will come to a 
halt.
 * Stable draft stage has been reached.

* Metrics and Events List wiki under reconstruction 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/fastpath/Metrics+and+Events+Requirements+High+Level+List

BR
Maryam

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Starting to clean-up meetings page on the wiki

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Yujun Zhang
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2016 8:10 AM
To: Beierl, Mark; Kunzmann, Gerald
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Starting to clean-up meetings page on the wiki

The demo page looks good.

Would it be acceptable to split meetings by working group instead of projects? 
test-wg, mano-wg, infra-wg and etc.

[ACM]
I don’t see how that would work, since the meetings are
scheduled for specific projects. I could appreciate
separate calendars for the different work areas
(Requirements, Integration and Testing, Collaborative Development)
as on the Approved projects page [2]
But if the purpose of the master calendar is to help
(new) projects to avoid all other meetings, then we need
all meetings in the one place.

Al
[2] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Approved+Projects

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:52 AM Beierl, Mark 
> wrote:
Hello, Gerald.

Unfortunately, there is not an easy way to filter out events from a calendar, 
but what can be done is to include the Promise calendar into the Team Meetings 
calendar.  As long as you use the same type for your event (i.e. OPNFV 
GoToMeeting) and colour, it will show up.

I am not sure if that is the right approach, however, as that means each 
project would have its own calendar for meetings, instead of having a single 
calendar.

Advantages:

  *   Users can subscribe to a project's calendar and see only those events 
instead of everything.
  *   Might get rid of the annoying "Some events were not shown in the 
calendars below..." banner
  *   Teams have cleaner view
Disadvantages:

  *   "Legend" for team calendars will be huge as it must show every project 
title.
  *   Each team calendar must have same event types and colours.

I have put a "Test" calendar into the Demonstration Space [1] that shows what 
it looks like to display multiple calendars in a single view.  Note the legend 
on the left where it shows "TestPerf", "StorPerf", OPNFV Team Meetings.

What do others think of the choices?

[1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/ds/calendars

Regards,
Mark

Mark Beierl
Advisory Solutions Architect
Dell EMC | Office of the CTO
mobile +1 613 314 8106
mark.bei...@dell.com

On Dec 16, 2016, at 05:27, Kunzmann, Gerald 
> wrote:

Hi Yujun, Mark, all,

Thanks for the pointer to the list view.

Does anyone know if I could include the “OPNFV Team Meetings” calendar in my 
project and *filter for Promise meetings*. That way, I could avoid maintaining 
a Promise calendar and the “OPNFV Team Meetings” calendar.

Best regards,
Gerald

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Yujun Zhang
Sent: Freitag, 16. Dezember 2016 10:41
To: Raymond Paik >; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Starting to clean-up meetings page on the wiki

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:36 AM Raymond Paik 
> wrote:
All,

Next step is to see if there's a way to streamline the meetings calendar on the 
upper right corner.  If anyone has good ideas/suggestions, please let me know.

We use the list view in TestPerf meeting calendar[1]. Not sure if this works 
for massive meetings.

[1]: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TestPerf

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Canceled: [VSPERF] Weekly Call

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

I'll miss the meeting today, sorry, my end of year pseudo PTO has begun
long ago, but I'm really taking some time off today...
Regards,
Al
___
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] on behalf of Christo Kleu 
[christo.k...@netronome.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 7:18 AM
To: Cooper, Trevor
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Canceled: [VSPERF] Weekly Call

Good day Trevor,

Do we have a call tonight? (last week was the plugfest)

Regards,
ckleu

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Cooper, Trevor 
> wrote:
Canceling VSPERF weekly this meeting due to plugfest/hackfest

/Trevor


VSPERF Weekly Meeting - Wednesday UTC 16h00, Ireland 16h00, Pacific 8h00


  *   IRC:

  *   freenode https://freenode.net/
  *   IRC channel: #opnfv-vswitchperf 
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-vswitchperf

  *   MeetBot: http://meetbot.opnfv.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2015/

Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/915183117

You can also dial in using your phone.
United States +1 (571) 317-3129

Access Code: 915-183-117

More phone numbers
Australia +61 2 8355 1040
Austria +43 7 2088 0034
Belgium +32 (0) 28 93 7018
Canada +1 (647) 497-9350
Denmark +45 69 91 88 64
Finland +358 (0) 923 17 0568
France +33 (0) 170 950 592
Germany +49 (0) 692 5736 7210
Ireland +353 (0) 15 360 728
Italy +39 0 247 92 13 01
Netherlands +31 (0) 208 080 219
New Zealand +64 9 909 7888
Norway +47 75 80 32 07
Spain +34 955 32 0845
Sweden +46 (0) 853 527 836
Switzerland +41 (0) 435 0167 13
United Kingdom +44 (0) 330 221 0086



___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Test case left behind

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

I take it back, Match Action is included in the LTD now,
there's nothing left behind. But there is a need to 
update the Summary of tests at the end of the LTD...

Al

> -Original Message-
> From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-
> discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 1:05 PM
> To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Test case left behind
> 
> *** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***.
> Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more
> information.
> 
> Hi VSPERF,
> 
> 
> 
> From what I can tell, the Match Action test case
> https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/vSwitchTestsDrafts
> 
> doesn't appear in our current LTD spec:
> http://artifacts.opnfv.org/vswitchperf/docs/requirements/index.html#docu
> ment-vswitchperf_ltd
> 
> However, I have the vague memory of completing this
> test case integration into the LTD, and that there was
> a JIRA ticket mix-up because I couldn't access JIRA
> when I submitted the patch...
> 
> more checking to do, to be sure we don't leave this
> work behind.
> 
> Al
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Test case left behind

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi VSPERF,



>From what I can tell, the Match Action test case
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/vSwitchTestsDrafts

doesn't appear in our current LTD spec:
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/vswitchperf/docs/requirements/index.html#document-vswitchperf_ltd

However, I have the vague memory of completing this
test case integration into the LTD, and that there was 
a JIRA ticket mix-up because I couldn't access JIRA
when I submitted the patch...

more checking to do, to be sure we don't leave this
work behind.

Al
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Barometer] request to join

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Maryam,
I'd like to Join the Barometer Project as 
a Contributor.

thanks,
Al

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Interpretation of yardstick test results

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Morgan,

you wrote:
We got an update on grafana last week but it was more on the capabilities of 
the tools than on the interpretation of the results.
I think we should clearly have a discussion on this topic.
It is probably complex to define thresholds = f(pod, hardware, network 
config,..) but it would be helpful.
Is there any activity on standardization side on this area?

I think there is agreement (in some stds bodies) that the benchmarking results
we collect for NFVI and VNFs should support operator engineering and capacity 
planning
in a better way than we have done in the past (for physical NF).
In other words, truly fundamental metrics should lead to additive system models,
and VNF workload expressed in the same units could be matched with system 
capabilities.
I think Trevor's list below is kind-of a pre-requisite for this...
It's different from (more useful than?) setting thresholds for specific tests
that can be mapped to different platforms, and a related process in my mind.
If you can perform comparative tests (A vs B), then the relative test results
should be useful without thresholds.

One side topic that has come up recently: I don't know if there are
"standard" definitions for processor utilization and interface metrics
(packet and byte counts) that can be expressed at various levels of physical
and virtualization, but it would certainly help the have these (std) metrics
available to support operations (and avoid calculation differences per system).

Al


From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Cooper, Trevor
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 10:57 AM
To: morgan.richo...@orange.com; Frank Brockners (fbrockne); Juraj Linkes -X 
(jlinkes - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco); Gaoliang (kubi); limingjiang
Cc: Andrej Vanko -X (avanko - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco); 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Interpretation of yardstick test results

I don't think Yardstick tests are being interpreted much today, at least not as 
performance metrics. To reach a level of maturity that would make 
interpretation easy/useful and help the industry, IMO we need

Analysis of test coverage -> catalog with views per metric / project / 
scenarios ... and ultimately also workload/VNF
Tools / traffic generators -> features, suitability and limitations
Test cases -> accurate description of what is being tested, details of metrics 
measured, relevant specifications / references (what part of spec is actually 
implemented)
Any requirements from CVP ... cannot have separate set of tests/tools (who 
would work on that?)

Agree with Morgan we should discuss as a test community and have a strategy for 
Danube.

/Trevor


From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
morgan.richo...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 9:10 AM
To: Frank Brockners (fbrockne) >; 
Juraj Linkes -X (jlinkes - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) 
>; Gaoliang (kubi) 
>; limingjiang 
>
Cc: Andrej Vanko -X (avanko - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) 
>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Interpretation of yardstick test results

Hi,

I think the question was already asked in Brahmaputra :)

We got an update on grafana last week but it was more on the capabilities of 
the tools than on the interpretation of the results.
I think we should clearly have a discussion on this topic.
It is probably complex to define thresholds = f(pod, hardware, network 
config,..) but it would be helpful.
Is there any activity on standardization side on this area?

I put several possible future discussions on the Testing community page 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TestPerf
Please note that I postponed all the today agenda to next week as the quoraum 
was not reached.
I put the catalog mentioned by Myriam last week, but also the question of test 
coverage (discussions initiated months ago but could be interesting to 
reinitiate for Danube)  and performance/stress tests.
I was recently asked about the stress tests done in OPNFV and as far as I know 
we do not really try to stress the system (except vsperf and storperf).
We have the tools and the framework (Yardstick, Rally,..and some proprietary 
loaders)  to do it but not a real strategy on performance/stress tests
Danube is maybe a good time to try to elaborate something
I think we need also to organize a sync with CVS group to avoid any 
misunderstanding

/Morgan



Le 06/10/2016 à 09:59, Frank Brockners (fbrockne) a écrit 

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV on Github

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

> -Original Message-
> From: Aric Gardner [mailto:agard...@linuxfoundation.org]
... 
> The mirroring to github is done with a Gerrit plugin and updates live.
> 
> Regards,
> Aric
[ACM] 
Thanks Aric, seems more than adequate to me!
Al


> 
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:06 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> <acmor...@att.com> wrote:
> > Sounds good to me, +1.
> > Additional question:
> >
> > How often will we execute the mirroring operation to GitHub?
> > Nightly (UTC)?
> > Al
> >

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Voting for the OPNFV Committer Board Election

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Ray,

For an election with one Candidate, I expect to
vote for the Candidate or abstain. In other orgs,
this would have been selection by acclamation,
without the ballot.

The ranking of “Yes” and “No” choices is visible to me, but
choices of “Chris Price” and “Abstain” would have been more clear.
The meaning of Yes/No wasn’t clear me, despite the instructions
“give each of the following choices a rank…”

Anyway, I think the equivalent of Acclamation is
a likely outcome, and I appreciate that this must have been
a corner case for you to handle with Condorcet, so if others get it,
great. ☺

thanks,
Al

From: Raymond Paik [mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2016 2:59 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Voting for the OPNFV Committer Board Election

Al,

Do you not see two options ("Yes" or "No")?  I actually see that a few people 
voted already, so I'm not sure if others are also having the same problem

Thanks,

Ray

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:50 AM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
<acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>> wrote:
Since there’s only one choice, the ballot page is
a little confusing. It appears all you can do is
click Submit, as there is no ranking to do.

Al

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>]
 On Behalf Of Raymond Paik
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2016 2:46 PM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Voting for the OPNFV Committer Board Election

All:

For committers that are eligible to vote 
(https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/2016+Committer+Board+Election+-+Committers+List)
 in the Committer Board election, you will be receiving an email from "Ray Paik 
(CIVS poll supervisor)" to cast your vote.  Please note that the email will not 
be coming from my Linux Foundation email address and if you can't find the 
email (incl. in your spam folder) in the next several hours, please let me know.

As I noted in my earlier email, although we only have one nominee we still need 
to have an election so I encourage everyone to cast their vote.  You can find 
the nomination statement at 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Nomination+for+the+2016+Committer+Board+Election.
  The poll will close at 5pm Pacific Time on September 30th. (Friday).

Thanks and let me know if you have any questions.

Ray

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Voting for the OPNFV Committer Board Election

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Since there’s only one choice, the ballot page is
a little confusing. It appears all you can do is
click Submit, as there is no ranking to do.

Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2016 2:46 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Voting for the OPNFV Committer Board Election

All:

For committers that are eligible to vote 
(https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/2016+Committer+Board+Election+-+Committers+List)
 in the Committer Board election, you will be receiving an email from "Ray Paik 
(CIVS poll supervisor)" to cast your vote.  Please note that the email will not 
be coming from my Linux Foundation email address and if you can't find the 
email (incl. in your spam folder) in the next several hours, please let me know.

As I noted in my earlier email, although we only have one nominee we still need 
to have an election so I encourage everyone to cast their vote.  You can find 
the nomination statement at 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Nomination+for+the+2016+Committer+Board+Election.
  The poll will close at 5pm Pacific Time on September 30th. (Friday).

Thanks and let me know if you have any questions.

Ray
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] FW: [cperf] Intel Labs Outage

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

cperf,
this is the outage I mentioned yesterday,
and the schedule...
Al


-Original Message-
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Jack Morgan
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 1:09 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Intel Labs Outage

Reminder: I will begin powering down systems in an hour. thanks


On 08/29/2016 12:14 PM, Jack Morgan wrote:
> OPNFV,
>
> The campus which holds the Intel Lab is going to be doing maintenance
> work on its electrical and mechanical equipment. Unfortunately, this
> means that the lab will be unavailable from noon Friday, September 2nd
> to 7:00 am Tuesday, September 6th. I will be shutting down systems a
> little before noon (PST) on Friday and powering them back up from 7:00
> am the following Tuesday.
>
>
> Regards,
>

-- 
Jack Morgan
OPNFV Pharos Intel Lab

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] multiple compute nodes with Tacker

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Sending this appeal again - Just received another notice of
a filtered message because of the goo gl URL...

> -Original Message-
> From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 10:18 AM
> To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] multiple compute nodes with
> Tacker
> 
> This subject thread has a URL (goo gl) that triggers a
> proofpoint filter at AT, and we don't see the
> message. I've been following this interesting thread
> in the archive. The message was sent back on Aug 16.
> 
> If the next sender would please delete the offending
> URL in the next message on the thread, then I won't
> have to keep chasing the thread down in the archive :-)
> 
> thanks much!
> Al
> 
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] opnfv.org is not resolving

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

I saw it for a while about an hour ago,
but it's ok now...

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 1:46 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] opnfv.org is not resolving

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Anyone else seeing this issue? Just started happening. Opnfv.org and all 
subdomains.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] multiple compute nodes with Tacker

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

This subject thread has a URL (goo gl) that triggers a
proofpoint filter at AT, and we don't see the 
message. I've been following this interesting thread
in the archive. The message was sent back on Aug 16.

If the next sender would please delete the offending
URL in the next message on the thread, then I won't 
have to keep chasing the thread down in the archive :-)

thanks much!
Al
 
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Sept 2016 Sprint

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Works now, thanks a bunch!
Al

> -Original Message-
> From: Tahhan, Maryam [mailto:maryam.tah...@intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 9:13 AM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> Subject: RE: [VSPERF] Sept 2016 Sprint
> 
> Hi Al
> I've added all the committers and any active contributors to the
> developers list now. You should be able to pull in issues.
> If you have any issues please let me know
> 
> BR
> Maryam
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) [mailto:acmor...@att.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 2:03 PM
> To: Tahhan, Maryam <maryam.tah...@intel.com>; opnfv-tech-
> disc...@lists.opnfv.org
> Subject: RE: [VSPERF] Sept 2016 Sprint
> 
> Hi Maryam and all Committers,
> 
> Can anyone (besides Maryam) drag and drop a JIRA ticket from Backlog to
> the September Sprint list?
> 
> I can't, JIRA says I don't have schedule permission.
> 
> Maryam - I think we've been here before (for real, not déjà vu), and
> Aric was unable to resolve it...
> 
> regards,
> Al
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-
> > discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Tahhan, Maryam
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 8:49 AM
> > To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> > Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Sept 2016 Sprint
> >
> > Hi folks
> > I am a bit late to this so for that I apologise. To continue with the
> > monthly sprint trend, I've ended the current sprint and started a new
> > sprint backlog for sept
> > (https://jira.opnfv.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=43
> > =V
> > SPERF=planning.nodetail=VSPERF-332 )
> >
> > [ACTION] VSPERF community: can you please log into Jira and
> > create/pull any issues that you plan on working on in Sept into the
> > backlog before COB Fri 2nd of Sept 2016
> >
> > If you have any issues, please give me a shout.
> >
> > BR
> > Maryam
> > ___
> > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Sept 2016 Sprint

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Maryam and all Committers,

Can anyone (besides Maryam) drag and drop a JIRA ticket
from Backlog to the September Sprint list?

I can't, JIRA says I don't have schedule permission.

Maryam - I think we've been here before (for real, not déjà vu),
and Aric was unable to resolve it... 

regards,
Al

> -Original Message-
> From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-
> discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Tahhan, Maryam
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 8:49 AM
> To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Sept 2016 Sprint
> 
> Hi folks
> I am a bit late to this so for that I apologise. To continue with the
> monthly sprint trend, I've ended the current sprint and started a new
> sprint backlog for sept
> (https://jira.opnfv.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=43=V
> SPERF=planning.nodetail=VSPERF-332 )
> 
> [ACTION] VSPERF community: can you please log into Jira and create/pull
> any issues that you plan on working on in Sept into the backlog before
> COB Fri 2nd of Sept 2016
> 
> If you have any issues, please give me a shout.
> 
> BR
> Maryam
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] How to enable latency test?

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Hi Binghan,

Please see section 6 of [0] for HW requirements and
limitations of latency measurement in MoonGen (typically
only a sub-set of packets can be measured for latency).
IMO, this is a small compromise when considering an
opensource solution for the test device.

regards,
Al

[0] 
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266913386_MoonGen_A_Scriptable_High-Speed_Packet_Generator


From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Bill 
Michalowski
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 8:34 AM
To: Christian Trautman
Cc: Binghan; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] How to enable latency test?

Thanks Christian!  I just assigned this to myself and will integrate the 
feature into VSPERF in the near future.
- Bill
- Original Message -
From: Christian Trautman >
To: Binghan >
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Sent: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:19:49 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] How to enable latency test?
Hi Binghan,
Moongen does support collection of latency stats so it just needs to be added 
to VSPerf. We will add this as a JIRA ticket and advise you when its available.
Thanks.
-Christian,

From: "Christian Trautman" >
To: "Binghan" >
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 9:14:40 PM
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] How to enable latency test?
Hi Binghan,
Moongen in VSPerf does not currently collect latency stats. I will inquire with 
the developers if this is planned in the near future and get back to you.
-Christian,

From: "Binghan" >
To: "MartinX Klozik" >
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 11:04:15 AM
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] How to enable latency test?
Hi Martin,
I am using Moongen, I cannot find latency result from Moongen log, I consider 
that VSperf parse Moongen log to get the test result.
And about the configuration, I did not use the custom.conf, everything is by 
default. Sure, traffic generator part has been reconfigured, but nothing else.
I attached pvp test log file and test report.
Thanks a lot.

BRs,
Binghan

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Klozik, MartinX 
> wrote:
Hi Binghan,

Could you please sent us following info?
* what traffic generator you use
* your vsperf configuration
* full test output

In general these values are reported by traffic generator and the level of 
implementation might be different among supported traffic
generators. It would be good to check if these latencies are visible in traffic 
generator itself.

Thank you,
Martin

From:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org]
On Behalf Of Binghan
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 3:02 PM
To:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] How to enable latency test?

Hi VSPERF experts,

I am trying to use VSPERF to benchmark OVS performance.

I use default configuration, but no matter I run PVP test or P2P test, the 
latency result is always 0. Do I need to configure anything special to enable 
latency test?

BRs,
Binghan

[INFO ]  2016-08-26 22:00:15,727 : (root) -  Key: throughput_rx_fps, 
Value: 19123026.00
[INFO ]  2016-08-26 22:00:15,727 : (root) -  Key: throughput_rx_mbps, 
Value: 9950.989
[INFO ]  2016-08-26 22:00:15,727 : (root) -  Key: 
throughput_rx_percent, Value: 64.253
[INFO ]  2016-08-26 22:00:15,727 : (root) -  Key: tx_rate_fps, Value: 
19123026.00
[INFO ]  2016-08-26 22:00:15,727 : (root) -  Key: tx_rate_mbps, Value: 
12850.673
[INFO ]  2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) -  Key: tx_rate_percent, 
Value: 64.253
[INFO ]  2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) -  Key: min_latency_ns, 
Value: 0.000
[INFO ]  2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) -  Key: max_latency_ns, 
Value: 0.000
[INFO ]  2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) -  Key: avg_latency_ns, 
Value: 0.000
[INFO ]  2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) -  Key: type, Value: rfc2544
[INFO ]  2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) -  Key: packet_size, Value: 64

--

Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited

Registered in Ireland

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Meeting Cancelled 8/18

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Thanks for letting us know, Daniel,
enjoy your time in the backcountry, un-plugged!


Nikos:  Are you on holiday this week?
If you are available, I would like to use the time
to discuss some measurements with Latte 
(now working for me as of Tuesday this week, with some tweaks).

Al

> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Farrell [mailto:dfarr...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 3:41 AM
> To: 'integration-...@lists.opendaylight.org' (integration-
> d...@lists.opendaylight.org) (integration-...@lists.opendaylight.org);
> TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV
> Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Luis Gomez; Nikos Anastopoulos; Jamo Luhrsen;
> Marcus Williams
> Subject: [cperf] Meeting Cancelled 8/18
> 
> Hello CPerf,
> 
> I'll be in the backcountry with no networking Wed-Friday.
> 
> You all are welcome to meet without me, but I'm going to assume
> we'll cancel for now. We can cover relevant work in the Integration
> and S3P calls, or via email/IRC.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Daniel Farrell
> Software Engineer, Red Hat SDN Team
> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/user:dfarrell07

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Opening nominations for the Committers-at-Large TSC elections

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

+1, and to complete my #action from the testperf meeting this morning:

Statement: Mark is recognized as strong contributor to the test community,
and since our community is a key part of OPNFV, it was agreed (today)
that we should make at least two nominations from among the testers
for the available seats. Mark is one of our nominees, along with Morgan.

regards,
Al


From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Ulrich Kleber
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 9:58 AM
To: Carlos Goncalves; Raymond Paik; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Opening nominations for the 
Committers-at-Large TSC elections

Hi,

I would like to nominate Mark Beierl.

Nominee: Mark Beierl
Employer: EMC
Statement: Beside his work on Storperf, Mark was the main worker during the 
wiki migration. Here he showed his integrating
and collaboration abilities and his broad understanding through the different 
areas of OPNFV.
I believe it would be a great help to have him on the TSC.

Cheers,
Uli



From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik
Sent: 08 August 2016 08:21
To: opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Opening nominations for the Committers-at-Large 
TSC elections

OPNFV Community:

Based on feedback last week, the list of committers have been updated and you 
can find the committers list at 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/OPNFV+Committers+List.

Now, I'd like to open the nomination period for the Committers-at-Large TSC 
elections.  As noted in the elections wiki page 
(https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Community+Election+Procedure#CommunityElectionProcedure-CommunityTSCmemberelection(proposalpendingapproval),
 nominations can be either self-nominations or anyone can nominate other 
committers. If a committer is nominated by others, the nominee must accept the 
nomination for it to be valid.

For self-nominations, I created a wiki page with a suggested template at 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/2016+Commiters-at-Large+TSC+Election+Self-Nominations.
  If you are interested in nominating yourself, please add your nomination 
statements directly on the wiki page.

If you'd like to nominate others, please send your nominations to opnfv-tsc & 
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing lists so that your nominations can be accepted (or 
declined) by the nominees on the mailing lists.

I will close the nominations at 5pm Pacific Time on August 12th (Friday).  
Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Ray

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [testperf] poll for APAC friendly time slot for weekly meeting

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Unless someone from Europe accepts a time,
this appears to be an APAC-only meeting
(it’s doubtful anyone from North America will
join at the proposed times: something to discuss
if this wasn’t the intention).

Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Yujun Zhang
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 10:48 PM
To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [testperf] poll for APAC friendly time slot 
for weekly meeting

So far, four participants have taken the poll.

See http://doodle.com/poll/fa4nspdf4ta2u7pb

I would suggest we close the vote before this weekend.
--
Yujun


On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 10:25 PM Yujun Zhang 
> wrote:
Dear testers,

As an action of last weekly meeting, I have created a poll to select an APAC 
friendly time slot.

http://doodle.com/poll/fa4nspdf4ta2u7pb

Please follow the link and vote for your opinion.

If agreed, we shall shift one meeting per month to the new hour.

--
Yujun
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss