Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Joe Clarke (jclarke)]

Thank you to all authors and named contributors.  We have received 
acknowledgement that there is no currently known IPR associated with these 
drafts.

As a reminder, IPR disclosure is not just a do-it-when-polled thing.  If you 
learn of IPR at any point in the process, you must disclose as part of the 
guidelines in BCP79 and the relevant RFCs below.

The WG LC on this work is still open until May 10.

Joe

From: OPSAWG  on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke) 

Date: Friday, April 19, 2024 at 10:33
To: opsawg@ietf.org 
Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work
We’re up to WG LC on these four drafts.  And while we did an IPR poll before, 
we want to be thorough since this work has evolved.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts”
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to these drafts"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules”
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.

Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.

As of this time, no IPR has been disclosed on any of the four drafts.

Joe
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Ivan Bykov]

Hi Joe,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts.


Ivan Bykov

On Apr 19, 2024, at 09:32, Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
 wrote:

CAUTION : This email originated outside the company. Do not click on any links 
or open attachments unless you are expecting them from the sender.
ATTENTION : Cet e-mail provient de l'extérieur de l'entreprise. Ne cliquez pas 
sur les liens ou n'ouvrez pas les pièces jointes à moins de connaitre 
l'expéditeur.


We’re up to WG LC on these four drafts.  And while we did an IPR poll before, 
we want to be thorough since this work has evolved.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts”
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to these drafts"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules”
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.

Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.

As of this time, no IPR has been disclosed on any of the four drafts.

Joe
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Disclaimer

This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of Ribbon 
Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or proprietary 
for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or 
distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Richard Roberts]

Hi all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts

Regards
Richard Roberts



Juniper Business Use Only
From: OPSAWG  On Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 4:32 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

CAUTION : This email originated outside the company. Do not click on any links 
or open attachments unless you are expecting them from the sender.
ATTENTION : Cet e-mail provient de l'extérieur de l'entreprise. Ne cliquez pas 
sur les liens ou n'ouvrez pas les pièces jointes à moins de connaitre 
l'expéditeur.

We're up to WG LC on these four drafts.  And while we did an IPR poll before, 
we want to be thorough since this work has evolved.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Fdatatracker.ietf.org*2Fdoc*2Fdraft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit*2F=05*7C02*7Cmohamed.boucadair*40orange.com*7C860718fec1dc45e9522708dc607d93ae*7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20*7C0*7C0*7C638491339679182650*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C0*7C*7C*7C=MKwGt0XpPWqzvbp788xmVE6NRXMTEFLcWKxPaVESxgE*3D=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GFard8SD0HGBLXarOEbDdxji2nydyqSqhqQx9xj9rQ0UckCIwtNc3Aj3Q9h-AXLwnLQYZyejgoTuEmmFu2DS8VJ73N4D$>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Fdatatracker.ietf.org*2Fdoc*2Fdraft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit*2F=05*7C02*7Cmohamed.boucadair*40orange.com*7C860718fec1dc45e9522708dc607d93ae*7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20*7C0*7C0*7C638491339679199415*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C0*7C*7C*7C=*2Bzl4yP66*2FCVm*2FvsVtTqzVB9Lxsruyzw0GWJ4acruGpU*3D=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GFard8SD0HGBLXarOEbDdxji2nydyqSqhqQx9xj9rQ0UckCIwtNc3Aj3Q9h-AXLwnLQYZyejgoTuEmmFu2DS8ZL9LC70$>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Fdatatracker.ietf.org*2Fdoc*2Fdraft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac*2F=05*7C02*7Cmohamed.boucadair*40orange.com*7C860718fec1dc45e9522708dc607d93ae*7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20*7C0*7C0*7C638491339679212062*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C0*7C*7C*7C=3tqZzV6HyywKjHuJ5VR7fTiSIE1kqerfNhD0oXum1IQ*3D=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GFard8SD0HGBLXarOEbDdxji2nydyqSqhqQx9xj9rQ0UckCIwtNc3Aj3Q9h-AXLwnLQYZyejgoTuEmmFu2DS8ShCu1ud$>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Fdatatracker.ietf.org*2Fdoc*2Fdraft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue*2F=05*7C02*7Cmohamed.boucadair*40orange.com*7C860718fec1dc45e9522708dc607d93ae*7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20*7C0*7C0*7C638491339679220958*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C0*7C*7C*7C=WaRbsbmpYZh3DRcV1e0l1i2lS6kWrQRp40thcmdCmYA*3D=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GFard8SD0HGBLXarOEbDdxji2nydyqSqhqQx9xj9rQ0UckCIwtNc3Aj3Q9h-AXLwnLQYZyejgoTuEmmFu2DS8eomx-Cf$>

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to these drafts"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.

Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.

As of this time, no IPR has been disclosed on any of the four drafts.

Joe
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Victor Lopez]

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts

Victor

From: OPSAWG  on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke) 

Date: Friday, 19 April 2024 at 16:33
To: opsawg@ietf.org 
Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work
We’re up to WG LC on these four drafts.  And while we did an IPR poll before, 
we want to be thorough since this work has evolved.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts”
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to these drafts"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules”
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.

Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.

As of this time, no IPR has been disclosed on any of the four drafts.

Joe
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Victor Lopez]

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts

Victor

From: OPSAWG  on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke) 

Date: Monday, 25 September 2023 at 17:29
To: opsawg@ietf.org , mohamed.boucadair 
, Richard Roberts , Oscar 
González de Dios , samir.barg...@gmail.com 
, Wubo (lana) , 
victor.lo...@nokia.com , ivan.by...@rbbn.com 
, Qin Wu , ke-oog...@kddi.com 
, luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com 

Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts:

  *   draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac
  *   draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit
  *   draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit
  *   draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue

Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to whether 
or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work.
Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed per 
IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).

Joe

___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Oscar González de Dios]

Dear Joe, all

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts.

Best Regards,

  Oscar

From: OPSAWG  On Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 4:32 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

AVISO/WARNING: Este correo electrónico se originó desde fuera de la 
organización. No haga clic en enlaces ni abra archivos adjuntos a menos que 
reconozca al remitente y sepa que el contenido es seguro / This email has been 
originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open 
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

We're up to WG LC on these four drafts.  And while we did an IPR poll before, 
we want to be thorough since this work has evolved.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to these drafts"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.

Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.

As of this time, no IPR has been disclosed on any of the four drafts.

Joe



Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede 
contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la 
persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda 
notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin 
autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha 
recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente 
por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is confidential and privileged 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. 
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not 
read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this 
communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode 
conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa 
ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica 
notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização 
pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem 
por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e 
proceda a sua destruição
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Wubo (lana)]

Hi Joe, all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts.

Thanks,
Bo

From: OPSAWG  On Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 10:32 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

We're up to WG LC on these four drafts.  And while we did an IPR poll before, 
we want to be thorough since this work has evolved.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to these drafts"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.

Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.

As of this time, no IPR has been disclosed on any of the four drafts.

Joe
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Ogaki, Kenichi]

Hi Joe and All,

No, I’m not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts.

All the best,
Kenichi

From: OPSAWG  On Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 11:32 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

We’re up to WG LC on these four drafts.  And while we did an IPR poll before, 
we want to be thorough since this work has evolved.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts”
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to these drafts"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules”
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.

Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.

As of this time, no IPR has been disclosed on any of the four drafts.

Joe
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Qin Wu]

Hi, Joe:
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts

-Qin
De: OPSAWG mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org>> En nombre 
de Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Enviado el: viernes, 19 de abril de 2024 16:32
Para: opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
Asunto: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work
We're up to WG LC on these four drafts.  And while we did an IPR poll before, 
we want to be thorough since this work has evolved.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to these drafts"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.

Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.

As of this time, no IPR has been disclosed on any of the four drafts.

Joe
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[LUIS ANGEL MUÑOZ , Vodafone]

Hi Joe and all

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts

Regards
Luis



C2 General
De: OPSAWG  En nombre de Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Enviado el: viernes, 19 de abril de 2024 16:32
Para: opsawg@ietf.org
Asunto: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

CAUTION : This email originated outside the company. Do not click on any links 
or open attachments unless you are expecting them from the sender.
ATTENTION : Cet e-mail provient de l'extérieur de l'entreprise. Ne cliquez pas 
sur les liens ou n'ouvrez pas les pièces jointes à moins de connaitre 
l'expéditeur.

We're up to WG LC on these four drafts.  And while we did an IPR poll before, 
we want to be thorough since this work has evolved.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to these drafts"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.

Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.

As of this time, no IPR has been disclosed on any of the four drafts.

Joe
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[mohamed . boucadair]

Hi Joe, all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts.

Cheers,
Med

De : OPSAWG  De la part de Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Envoyé : vendredi 19 avril 2024 16:32
À : opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

We're up to WG LC on these four drafts.  And while we did an IPR poll before, 
we want to be thorough since this work has evolved.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to these drafts"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.

Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.

As of this time, no IPR has been disclosed on any of the four drafts.

Joe

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

[OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Joe Clarke (jclarke)]

We’re up to WG LC on these four drafts.  And while we did an IPR poll before, 
we want to be thorough since this work has evolved.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts”
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to these drafts"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules”
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.

Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.

As of this time, no IPR has been disclosed on any of the four drafts.

Joe
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Victor Lopez (Nokia)]

Hi

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these four drafts

Regards,

Victor


From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
Date: Monday, 25 September 2023 at 17:29
To: opsawg@ietf.org , mohamed.boucadair 
, Richard Roberts , Oscar 
González de Dios , samir.barg...@gmail.com 
, Wubo (lana) , Victor Lopez 
(Nokia) , ivan.by...@rbbn.com , 
Qin Wu , ke-oog...@kddi.com , 
luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com 
Subject: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links 
or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information.



This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts:

  *   draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac
  *   draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit
  *   draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit
  *   draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue

Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to whether 
or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work.
Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed per 
IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).

Joe

___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Richard Roberts]

In all thoroughness, yes 




Juniper Business Use Only


From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 2:41 PM
To: Richard Roberts ; opsawg@ietf.org ; 
mohamed.boucadair ; Oscar González de Dios 
; samir.barg...@gmail.com 
; Wubo (lana) ; 
victor.lo...@nokia.com ; ivan.by...@rbbn.com 
; Qin Wu ; ke-oog...@kddi.com 
; luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com 

Subject: Re: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work


[External Email. Be cautious of content]


Thanks, Richard.  To be thorough, I assume you mean all four drafts?



Joe




Juniper Business Use Only

From: Richard Roberts 
Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 05:17
To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) , opsawg@ietf.org 
, mohamed.boucadair , Oscar 
González de Dios , samir.barg...@gmail.com 
, Wubo (lana) , 
victor.lo...@nokia.com , ivan.by...@rbbn.com 
, Qin Wu , ke-oog...@kddi.com 
, luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com 

Subject: Re: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work



Hi Joe,



No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft





Juniper Business Use Only



From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2023 5:28 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org ; mohamed.boucadair 
; Richard Roberts ; Oscar 
González de Dios ; samir.barg...@gmail.com 
; Wubo (lana) ; 
victor.lo...@nokia.com ; ivan.by...@rbbn.com 
; Qin Wu ; ke-oog...@kddi.com 
; luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com 

Subject: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work



[External Email. Be cautious of content]



This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts:

· draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac

· draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit

· draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit

· draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue



Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to whether 
or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work.

Please state either:



"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"

or

"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"



If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed per 
IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).



Joe


___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Joe Clarke (jclarke)]

Thanks, Richard.  To be thorough, I assume you mean all four drafts?

Joe

From: Richard Roberts 
Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 05:17
To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) , opsawg@ietf.org 
, mohamed.boucadair , Oscar 
González de Dios , samir.barg...@gmail.com 
, Wubo (lana) , 
victor.lo...@nokia.com , ivan.by...@rbbn.com 
, Qin Wu , ke-oog...@kddi.com 
, luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com 

Subject: Re: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

Hi Joe,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft



Juniper Business Use Only


From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2023 5:28 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org ; mohamed.boucadair 
; Richard Roberts ; Oscar 
González de Dios ; samir.barg...@gmail.com 
; Wubo (lana) ; 
victor.lo...@nokia.com ; ivan.by...@rbbn.com 
; Qin Wu ; ke-oog...@kddi.com 
; luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com 

Subject: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[External Email. Be cautious of content]


This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts:
· draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac
· draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit
· draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit
· draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue



Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to whether 
or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work.

Please state either:



"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"

or

"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"



If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed per 
IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).



Joe


___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Richard Roberts]

Hi Joe,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft



Juniper Business Use Only


From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2023 5:28 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org ; mohamed.boucadair 
; Richard Roberts ; Oscar 
González de Dios ; samir.barg...@gmail.com 
; Wubo (lana) ; 
victor.lo...@nokia.com ; ivan.by...@rbbn.com 
; Qin Wu ; ke-oog...@kddi.com 
; luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com 

Subject: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[External Email. Be cautious of content]


This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts:

  *   draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac
  *   draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit
  *   draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit
  *   draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue



Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to whether 
or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work.

Please state either:



"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"

or

"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"



If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed per 
IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).



Joe


___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[LUIS ANGEL MUÑOZ , Vodafone]

Hello all

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these four drafts

Best regards
Luis


C2 General
De: Oscar González de Dios 
Enviado el: lunes, 25 de septiembre de 2023 20:24
Para: samier Barguil ; Joe Clarke (jclarke) 

CC: opsawg@ietf.org; mohamed.boucadair ; Richard 
Roberts ; Wubo (lana) ; 
victor.lo...@nokia.com; ivan.by...@rbbn.com; Qin Wu ; 
ke-oog...@kddi.com; LUIS ANGEL MUÑOZ, Vodafone 
Asunto: RE: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

This is an external email. Do you know who has sent it? Can you be sure that 
any links and attachments contained within it are safe? If in any doubt, use 
the Report Message button in your Outlook client to report this mail.
Hi Joe, OPSAWG,

  No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to the four drafts.

  Best Regards,

Oscar

De: samier Barguil mailto:samir.barg...@gmail.com>>
Enviado el: lunes, 25 de septiembre de 2023 18:13
Para: Joe Clarke (jclarke) mailto:jcla...@cisco.com>>
CC: opsawg@ietf.org; mohamed.boucadair 
mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>>; Richard 
Roberts mailto:rrobe...@juniper.net>>; Oscar González de 
Dios 
mailto:oscar.gonzalezded...@telefonica.com>>;
 Wubo (lana) mailto:lana.w...@huawei.com>>; 
victor.lo...@nokia.com; 
ivan.by...@rbbn.com; Qin Wu 
mailto:bill...@huawei.com>>; 
ke-oog...@kddi.com; MUÑOZ, LUIS ANGEL, Vodafone 
Spain mailto:luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com>>
Asunto: Re: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

You're right Joe.

I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these four drafts

Regards,

Samier

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 6:11 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
mailto:jcla...@cisco.com>> wrote:
I should have adjusted my boilerplate to say “these drafts”.  I assume your 
“this draft” is applicable to all four?

Joe

From: samier Barguil mailto:samir.barg...@gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, September 25, 2023 at 11:54
To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) mailto:jcla...@cisco.com>>
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org 
mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>>, mohamed.boucadair 
mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>>, Richard 
Roberts mailto:rrobe...@juniper.net>>, Oscar González de 
Dios 
mailto:oscar.gonzalezded...@telefonica.com>>,
 Wubo (lana) mailto:lana.w...@huawei.com>>, 
victor.lo...@nokia.com 
mailto:victor.lo...@nokia.com>>, 
ivan.by...@rbbn.com 
mailto:ivan.by...@rbbn.com>>, Qin Wu 
mailto:bill...@huawei.com>>, 
ke-oog...@kddi.com 
mailto:ke-oog...@kddi.com>>, 
luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com 
mailto:luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com>>
Subject: Re: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work
Hello all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

Regards,

Samier

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:28 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
mailto:jcla...@cisco.com>> wrote:

This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts:
• draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac
• draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit
• draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit
• draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue

Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to whether 
or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work.
Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed per 
IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).

Joe




Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede 
contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la 
persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda 
notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin 
autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha 
recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente 
por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is confidential and privileged 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. 
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not 
read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this 
communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode 
conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa 
ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica 
notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização 
pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação 

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[mohamed . boucadair]

Hi Joe, all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts.

Cheers,
Med

De : Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
Envoyé : lundi 25 septembre 2023 17:29
À : opsawg@ietf.org; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET 
; Richard Roberts ; Oscar 
González de Dios ; 
samir.barg...@gmail.com; Wubo (lana) ; 
victor.lo...@nokia.com; ivan.by...@rbbn.com; Qin Wu ; 
ke-oog...@kddi.com; luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com
Objet : IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work


This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts:

  *   draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac
  *   draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit
  *   draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit
  *   draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue

Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to whether 
or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work.
Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed per 
IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).

Joe


Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Wubo (lana)]

Hi Joe, all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these four drafts.

Thanks,
Bo Wu
From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2023 11:29 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org; mohamed.boucadair ; Richard 
Roberts ; Oscar González de Dios 
; samir.barg...@gmail.com; Wubo (lana) 
; victor.lo...@nokia.com; ivan.by...@rbbn.com; Qin Wu 
; ke-oog...@kddi.com; luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com
Subject: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work


This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts:
· draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac
· draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit
· draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit
· draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue

Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to whether 
or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work.
Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed per 
IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).

Joe

___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Qin Wu]

Hi,
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to any of these drafts.

-Qin
发件人: Joe Clarke (jclarke) [mailto:jcla...@cisco.com]
发送时间: 2023年9月25日 23:29
收件人: opsawg@ietf.org; mohamed.boucadair ; Richard 
Roberts ; Oscar González de Dios 
; samir.barg...@gmail.com; Wubo (lana) 
; victor.lo...@nokia.com; ivan.by...@rbbn.com; Qin Wu 
; ke-oog...@kddi.com; luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com
主题: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work


This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts:
・ draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac
・ draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit
・ draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit
・ draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue

Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to whether 
or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work.
Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed per 
IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).

Joe

___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Ogaki, Kenichi]

Hi All,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these four drafts.

Thanks,
Kenichi

--
Kenichi Ogaki
KDDI Corp. | NW Dev. Div.

-Original Message-
From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)  
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 12:29 AM
To: opsawg@ietf.org; mohamed.boucadair ; Richard 
Roberts ; Oscar González de Dios 
; samir.barg...@gmail.com; Wubo (lana) 
; victor.lo...@nokia.com; ivan.by...@rbbn.com; Qin Wu 
; 大垣 健一 ; luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com
Subject: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts:

*   draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac
*   draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit
*   draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit
*   draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue

 

Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to whether 
or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work.

Please state either:

 

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"

or

"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

 

If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed per 
IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).

 

Joe

 

___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Oscar González de Dios]

Hi Joe, OPSAWG,

  No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to the four drafts.

  Best Regards,

Oscar

De: samier Barguil 
Enviado el: lunes, 25 de septiembre de 2023 18:13
Para: Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
CC: opsawg@ietf.org; mohamed.boucadair ; Richard 
Roberts ; Oscar González de Dios 
; Wubo (lana) ; 
victor.lo...@nokia.com; ivan.by...@rbbn.com; Qin Wu ; 
ke-oog...@kddi.com; MUÑOZ, LUIS ANGEL, Vodafone Spain 

Asunto: Re: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

You're right Joe.

I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these four drafts

Regards,

Samier

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 6:11 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
mailto:jcla...@cisco.com>> wrote:
I should have adjusted my boilerplate to say “these drafts”.  I assume your 
“this draft” is applicable to all four?

Joe

From: samier Barguil mailto:samir.barg...@gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, September 25, 2023 at 11:54
To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) mailto:jcla...@cisco.com>>
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org 
mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>>, mohamed.boucadair 
mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>>, Richard 
Roberts mailto:rrobe...@juniper.net>>, Oscar González de 
Dios 
mailto:oscar.gonzalezded...@telefonica.com>>,
 Wubo (lana) mailto:lana.w...@huawei.com>>, 
victor.lo...@nokia.com 
mailto:victor.lo...@nokia.com>>, 
ivan.by...@rbbn.com 
mailto:ivan.by...@rbbn.com>>, Qin Wu 
mailto:bill...@huawei.com>>, 
ke-oog...@kddi.com 
mailto:ke-oog...@kddi.com>>, 
luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com 
mailto:luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com>>
Subject: Re: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work
Hello all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

Regards,

Samier

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:28 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
mailto:jcla...@cisco.com>> wrote:

This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts:
• draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac
• draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit
• draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit
• draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue

Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to whether 
or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work.
Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed per 
IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).

Joe




Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede 
contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la 
persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda 
notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin 
autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha 
recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente 
por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is confidential and privileged 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. 
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not 
read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this 
communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode 
conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa 
ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica 
notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização 
pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem 
por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e 
proceda a sua destruição


Le informamos de que el responsable del tratamiento de sus datos es la entidad 
del Grupo Telefónica vinculada al remitente, con la finalidad de mantener el 
contacto profesional y gestionar la relación establecida con el destinatario o 
con la entidad a la que está vinculado. Puede contactar con el responsable del 
tratamiento y ejercitar sus derechos escribiendo a 
privacidad@telefonica.com. Puede 
consultar información adicional sobre el tratamiento de sus datos en nuestra 
Política de 
Privacidad.

We inform you that the data controller is the Telefónica Group entity linked to 
the sender, for the purpose of maintaining professional contact and managing 
the relationship established with the recipient or with the entity to which it 
is linked. You may 

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[samier Barguil]

You're right Joe.

I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these four drafts

Regards,

Samier

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 6:11 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
wrote:

> I should have adjusted my boilerplate to say “these drafts”.  I assume
> your “this draft” is applicable to all four?
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> *From: *samier Barguil 
> *Date: *Monday, September 25, 2023 at 11:54
> *To: *Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
> *Cc: *opsawg@ietf.org , mohamed.boucadair <
> mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>, Richard Roberts ,
> Oscar González de Dios , Wubo (lana)
> , victor.lo...@nokia.com ,
> ivan.by...@rbbn.com , Qin Wu ,
> ke-oog...@kddi.com , luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com <
> luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com>
> *Subject: *Re: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Samier
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:28 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
> wrote:
>
> This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts:
>
> · draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac
>
> · draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit
>
> · draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit
>
> · draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue
>
>
>
> Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to
> whether or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work.
>
> Please state either:
>
>
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> or
>
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
>
>
> If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed
> per IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
>
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Joe Clarke (jclarke)]

I should have adjusted my boilerplate to say “these drafts”.  I assume your 
“this draft” is applicable to all four?

Joe

From: samier Barguil 
Date: Monday, September 25, 2023 at 11:54
To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org , mohamed.boucadair 
, Richard Roberts , Oscar 
González de Dios , Wubo (lana) 
, victor.lo...@nokia.com , 
ivan.by...@rbbn.com , Qin Wu , 
ke-oog...@kddi.com , luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com 

Subject: Re: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work
Hello all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

Regards,

Samier

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:28 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
mailto:jcla...@cisco.com>> wrote:

This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts:
· draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac
· draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit
· draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit
· draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue

Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to whether 
or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work.
Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed per 
IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).

Joe

___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[samier Barguil]

Hello all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

Regards,

Samier

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:28 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
wrote:

> This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts:
>
>- draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac
>- draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit
>- draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit
>- draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue
>
>
>
> Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to
> whether or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work.
>
> Please state either:
>
>
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> or
>
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
>
>
> If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed
> per IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

[OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

[Joe Clarke (jclarke)]

This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts:

  *   draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac
  *   draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit
  *   draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit
  *   draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue

Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to whether 
or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work.
Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed per 
IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).

Joe

___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg