[OGD] Phal. lindenii

2006-08-31 Thread Robert Bedard

I  grow Phal. lindenii in pots two different ways, after twenty years of 
growing this species. In one, I use very coarse fir bark in plastic 
pots, in the other I use very loose New Zealand  Sphagnum  in terra 
cotta pots. I allow the moss to go nearly dry between  waterings, but 
not as dry as typical  Phals. I water the bark plants copiously, 
(almost daily.) Both of these techniques are based on the idea that 
lindenii likes cooler, moister conditions and lots of air to the roots. 
My greenhouse gets a bit on the warm and dry side for lindenii this time 
of year, so I  don't think they would like to be mounted in my 
conditions. Both of these techniques are designed to  mitigate the heat 
and dryness which seem to really stress the lindenii. I keep  them in a 
cool  spot in my warm/intermediate greenhouse,  they get about 58F night 
time lows most of the year. They get lots of air movement. They really 
do not like it when consecutive days go above about 85F, and start to 
look heat-stressed.

I put unhappy plants or recently-imported lindenii plants with a small 
ball of NZS around the roots into an over-size terra cotta pot and water 
almost every day. Root ball might be 2.5cm in an 8cm pot. Only the 
tips of the leaves stick  out above the pot. They do not rot because 
they get lots of air movement. The wet pot is like a tiny evaporative 
cooler,  and keeps the immediate vicinity of the lindenii plants cooler. 
They really seem to appreciate this. I also grow them fairly bright for 
Phalaenopsis.

My lindenii plants are strong enough to set capsules readily, and bear 
multiple spikes in consecutive years. Hope another perspective helps.

rob't
Robert Bedard
http://www.robert-bedard.com/orchids/



___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Virus

2006-08-31 Thread Robert Bedard

I  have been monitoring the thread on Virus but have not had time to 
contribute. In 1986, I bought the remains of the Shaffer Phalaenopsis 
stud bench. At that time people were becoming increasingly aware of 
virus in older collections.  I wanted to test all of the breeding stock 
so I would  not be vectoring virus when I was making  crosses.

At that time only anti-sera available were for CyMV and OSRV. Out of 
about 140 tests, I got a little over 50 positives for CyMV, and about 25 
for OSRV. I cannot speak to the issue of false positives, as I had no 
way to verify the results of the serological tests.

What I needed to do was figure out a way to use these plants for 
breeding, without further spreading the virus. Some people were 
advocating  yearly testing, but for a large number of plants, this was 
prohibitively expensive, and would not guarantee that you do not 
transmit virus.

The plan I came up with was essentially this:
- Assume all plants have virus,
- put pollen ONLY on backup copies of plants, (yes, I made LOTS of stem 
propagations),
- dry sow all seed unless cross is such low fertility that green-capping 
was the only way to get seed,
- control potential insect vectors,
- of course, use sterile tools when repotting or removing old flower 
spikes, etc.

This plan got me out from under continual testing. It ensured that I 
would not be transmitting any additional virus to my original stock plants.

Twenty years later, I am still using the same plan. I have a large 
number of heirloom Phalaenopsis in my collection, many of which were 
virused when I checked them twenty years ago.

I would like to comment on one thing about a  false sense of  security. 
There are a huge number of virii that could potentially infect orchids, 
most of which have no anti-sera available for testing. So, an anti-serum 
test showing no sign of CyMV or ORSV doesn't mean that your plants is 
not infected with BYMV or something  else. It is much  safer to assume 
that all plants are virused with something as yet unknown.  This is not 
to say that there is no benefit to testing, but that a plant  that tests 
clean for CyMV and ORSV may still be infected with something else.

Just my two cents based on my experience.

rob't
Robert  Bedard
http://www.robert-bedard.com/orchids/


___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Cymbidium canaliculatum green-cap time

2006-02-06 Thread Robert Bedard

A friend has asked me to sow some Cymbidium canaliculatum capsules for 
him, and I wonder if anybody could recommend a point in time to harvest 
them for green-capping?

Thanks so much,
rob't



___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] World Orchid Society

2006-01-22 Thread Robert Bedard

I have corresponded briefly with both Daryl, and with Tom Roberts, the 
Editor of their magazine. Like Kenneth, I did a whois on the domain to 
find Daryl, and then I wrote him.

Being moderately cynical when it comes to human institutions, I was 
curious about what might set the WOS apart from some of the other Orchid 
institutions, so I e-mailed back and asked why their vision did not 
address the failures of many of these organizations to TRULY further the 
best interests of their membership; for me, that was going to be a 
critical litmus-test for whether I could support a new society, because 
I was feeling frustrated with other Orchid Instituions right now, that I 
felt were not responsive to the needs of the membership ... at first, it 
didn't really seem that they got it ... and I figured it was just 
another group that wanted to run their own little universe ... but after 
a couple rounds of e-mails, I think they would like to see it be different.

I think the problems with these institutions are rooted in the human 
condition, I think these folks mean well, but I remain skeptical. I wish 
them the best of luck though. The virtual end of noblesse oblige in the 
US, and the aging of the me generation is wreaking havoc with social 
institutions in general. I am sure we all (in the US) have seen a 
decline in the quality of our local affiliate (orchid) societies in the 
last ten or twenty years; indeed, many are in danger of evaporation ... 
people seem unwilling to give back to the community, unless there is 
something, (usually a LOT) in it for them. So you often see people 
with financial or personal (ego) reasons, running local affiliates with 
their own agenda, regardless of declining membership ...

Anybody have a more optimistic view? I would actually like to be wrong here.

rob't



___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Fordyce, et. al.

2006-01-12 Thread Robert Bedard

For the record, the Fordyces are going through some changes, but I have 
talked with Sue recently, and she assured me that they are keeping their 
website up, and the last I heard, the plan was for Frank to maintain a 
small collection of his breeding stock, and  continue to make hybrids. 
The last time I spole with Frank, a couple months ago, he was making 
hybrids. Sue had sold some divisions and flasks on eBay, as part of the 
nursery liquidation, and was surprised  how successful that was. I think 
we have not seen the last of the Fordyces.

The Michels (Orchids Orinda) are really capitalizing on the real estate 
market which is probably at a peak. Although their nursery was a 
pleasure to visit, I know Helen is excited about being able to do other 
things, and I think Maynard is pleased that they have so much 
flexibility right now. It is a good time for US orchid nurseries to take 
the money and run. The major inputs of energy and labor are really 
expensive in the US, and the pot-plant market has changed forever.

Valorie Tonkin bless her heart, has been trying to keep Tonkin's going 
since Jack passed away, but in my opinion, this is probably a good thing 
for her too.

Change is usually uncomfortable, but is not always bad.

rob't


___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Paph. venustum / correct name for (green/white/yellow) form

2006-01-10 Thread Robert Bedard

Two questions:

1) I have a very nice Paph. venustum that came labeled venustum album. 
It is primarily green and white, but has intense yellow where pink or 
bronze would be on the regular form. Is this form with the yellow also 
correctly called venustum var. measuresianum?

2) Anybody know what the correct name to submit Paph. venustum var. 
measuresianum to the AOS for judging would be?

Thanks,
rob't



___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Iris' correction

2005-06-03 Thread Robert Bedard


Thanks Iris, you are right (although splitting hairs) over my incorrect 
use of the word clones when I clearly meant  plants. (That is what I 
get for typing too fast, while thinking about something else.)


If you don't believe that I understand Orchid Nomenclature, you are free 
to visit this page:

http://www.robert-bedard.com/orchids/name.html

;-)

rob't



___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Re: peloric phal that changes flower types (Charles Ufford)

2005-06-02 Thread Robert Bedard


Charles, et. al.:

I have several peloric Phals in my collection; they appear to be 
unstable, sometimes producing anther caps and pollinia, sometimes not. 
The degree of peloria also varies by clone and by flowering; some clones 
are more reliable than others. Not sure I can answer your question, but 
would like to share a couple observations.


I have a peloric mutation of Be Tris 'Ching Hua #3' that produces no 
anther cap, pollinia or stigma most of the time, it has three lips that 
are nearly identical. With the exception of the anther cap/pollinia, it 
flowers reliably peloric. On this plant, in the three years that I have 
owned it, it has never produced a non-peloric flower. The other clones 
of Be Tris 'Ching Hua #3' that I have, have never produced a peloric 
flower. This clone is a pretty stable peloric.


I have several plants of Little Mary 'Cherry Blossom', and this one is 
variable. Sometimes, one side of an infls. will produce non-peloric 
flowers, sometimes flowers will have a peloric side (when viewed from 
the front) and a non-peloric side. 'Cherry Blossom' has vestigal calli 
at the petal bases, but does not produce three lips. This clone is not 
very stable, and produces different types of peloric flowers.


I have seen straight normal equestris rosea and Kuntrarti Rarasahati 
'Copperstate' produce occasional peloric flowers with three lips. I do 
not remember if these had fully formed columns (with anther, pollinia 
and stigma) or not.


Peloria in Doritis is much more stable, and apparently more dominant. I 
have several clones of Doritis from Norman's strain of Doritis alba that 
includes buysonniana, pulcherrima and the Champornensis form. I also 
have several Purple Gems made with peloric Doritis and both peloric and 
on-peloric equestris. All of the peloric and on-peloric clones from 
these matings are very reliable, and flower the same every time, either 
peloric or non-peloric. Eric Christenson does not want to recognize the 
Champornensis form of Doritis (Phalaenopsis pulcherrima [Christenson]), 
but it appears stable, and the triat is apparently heritable, so it does 
have horticultural value.


Maybe peloria is not so odd, when you consider that Orchids 
theoretically evolved from an ancestor that had three sepals and three 
petals ...


rob't
Robert Bedard
http://www.robert-bedard.com/orchids/

Original message:
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:47:08 -0400
From: Charles Ufford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OGD] peloric phal that changes flower types
To: Orchids@orchidguide.com
Cc: phals list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Hello all,
 I was taking some pictures of a few of my flowering plants tonight, and I
realized that one of my peloric phal equestris' that normally has sort of
funky peloric flowers that do have a functioning stigma, pollen and column,
now has about 75% flowers with normal column/pollinia, and 25% flowers that
were completely peloric. These new flowers truly had three lips with
complete pink coloration on the lip, and the column was a sort of
three-sided deal with no pollen or stigmatic surface. Normally the flowers
have two extra 'lips' that have a sort of muddled lip surface (some faint
pink but with white lines crossing the petal structure) and very small
side-nodes to the lip that have faint yellow and brown colors/spotting, and
the new flowers have full color, shape and all of the standard lip. My other
peloric equestris has always had one lip with 2 halfhearted attempts at
others (with no color or shape break), and has the column/stigmatic surface
and pollen. Coloration is faint on the peloric lips but not 'indecisive' as
to which form or color to express like the first one.
 Has anyone else ever seen a peloric phal that changes it's peloric
expression? I've heard others mention that they have seen pelorism expressed
on all flowers, and had no true column or pollen, or that they all did have
a true column and pollen, but not a mix.

thoughts, ideas?
charles



___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Angcm. leonis

2005-05-12 Thread Robert Bedard
Rick:
Angcm. leonis is found on Madagascar and on Comoro. I have plants of 
both forms that I obtained from Fred Hillerman years ago. According to 
Fred, and to my own experience, A. leonis from Comoro needs considerably 
brighter light than A. leonis from Madagascar. Taxonomists say they are 
the same species, which they may be, but there are some dramatic 
differences.

The Comoro form of A. leonis makes larger plants, with narrower leaves; 
it has fewer, larger flowers, and often tends to bloom successively if 
inadequate moisture is provided during bud development. Even with 
appropriate moisture, it tends to drop the first flowers on an infls. 
before the last ones open. It requires higher light to thrive than the 
Madagascan form. My Comoro A. leonis generally flowers with four to five 
flowers per infls., that are about three inches across. My large plant 
produces only one or two infls. at a time.

The Madagascan form of A. leonis is a smaller plant, with shorter, 
wider, darker green leaves than the Comoro form. The Madagascan form has 
more flowers than the Comoro form, but they are smaller. My Madagascan 
A. leonis flowers with six to seven flowers per infls., and usually 
several infls. per plant. The flowers are generally all open before the 
oldest fade.

The Madagascan form takes less light to thrive than the Comoro form, and 
Fred suggested that it would be a good candidate for under lights culture.

I have seen numerous plants that appear to have resulted from mating the 
two forms. This is one instance where you tend to get the worst 
attributes of both parents: few small flowers on large plants.

So, your Angcm. leonis might do well with a similar amount of light to 
your Phal., if it is from Madagascar, (somewhat unlikely, because I just 
do not see plants of the Madagascan form often); or if from Comoro, 
(more likely) you should give your Angcm. leonis far more light than 
your Phal. I have grown them together, and the Madagascan form does not 
seem to suffer from being grown in higher light; it will probably just 
be more willing to flower under less than ideal conditions than the 
Comoro form.

I grow a lot of Phalaenopsis; the A. leonis is a good companion plant. I 
grow it in hanging baskets with New Zealand Spahgnum, in brighter areas 
of the greenhouse, where I also grow tropical Bulbophyllums. I keep A. 
leonis on the wet side for most of the year, allowing them to go 
slightly drier between waterings during the worst of winter. Winter 
minimum night temps are in the mid 60's up high where I grow them.

Hope this helps,
rob't
Robert Bedard
Robert Bedard Horticulture
http://www.robert-bedard.com/orchids/
___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Re: Computer/orchid problem (Bernard Gerrard)

2005-03-29 Thread Robert Bedard
Bernard:
If you would be so kind as to post the addresses of the old and new 
sites, I would be glad to take a look at the code, and make 
recommendations on how you can optimize your new site to do better in 
Search Engine results. (Uri Baruk was essentially correct, [if I 
interpret his brief remark correctly], that you want to raise the 
Searchability of your new site, to make it more attractive to Search 
Engines.)

There are two other approaches that you might try. You might be able to 
get the original owner of the site to get Geocities to shut it down; I 
do not expect this will be particularly effective, as free webhosts do 
not generally have lots of customer support people available to help 
with this sort of thing. You might also request to the good folks at 
Google to remove your old site from their database.

If you type phalaenopsis flasks or phalaenopsis seedlings into Google, 
you will see my website; in North America, it comes up in number one 
position. I am not the oldest, nor the bestest Phal site out there, but 
I have a good deal of experience doing SEO (Search Engine 
Optimnization). I can tell you how to increase the rank of your new site.

rob't
Robert Bedard
http://www.robert-bedard.com/orchids/

___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Angraecum sesquipedale

2005-02-25 Thread Robert Bedard
Since you asked for punishmnet, you might try repotting it; that may 
delay flowering the following season ... (of course, mind the roots, 
they do not respond well to being disturbed). You might also try to 
figure out why the flowers are only lasting you one month ... they 
should probably last longer. I had the same problem this year (short 
flower life) due to some heater gases getting back inside the greenhouse.

rob't
June wrote:
My one plant flowers every January.  It conspires to prevent me from taking 
it to the Association show table by coming into bloom the day after the 
January meeting, and fading out the day before the February meeting. This 
happens every year without fail.  Any suggestions for a suitable punishment?

June


___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Angcm. sesquipedale flowering season

2005-02-23 Thread Robert Bedard
I have usually had at least one plant of Angcm. sesquipedale in my 
collection for most of the twenty years that I have been growing 
orchids. I have grown plants that flowered both in late winter and 
around Easter, and eventually, they end up flowering together in my 
collection, sometime in late winter. I am located very near Santa Cruz, 
CA, roughly between Santa Barbara and San Francisco.

My first Angcm. sesquipedale was the clone 'Orchidglade II' FCC/AOS that 
was mericloned by Jones and Scully. This plant was awarded 5/11/72, near 
Easter. I bought that plant in the mid 1980's, and the first time it 
flowered for me, it flowered near Easter. After that, it tended to 
flower in late winter as most of them do for me.

I currently have several plants from the population of 'Mount Zion' 
FCC/AOS X 'Star of Malagasy' FCC/AOS. 'Mount Zion' was awarded an 
FCC/AOS on 2/9/85 (late winter), and 'Star of Malagasy' was awarded an 
FCC/AOS on 1/12/76, (also late winter). All of the seedlings came into 
flower together, and are just going out of bloom. (The best of these 
seedlings took two blue ribbons and three trophies in commercial class 
at our local show in early February, largely because the flower had 
exceptional conformation, and the plant was well-grown.)

In An Introduction to the Cultivated Angraecoid Orchids of Madagascar, 
Fred Hillerman says that:

In its natural habitat, it [Angcm. sesquipedale] flowers between June 
and November. [p. 92, note that this represents six months, roughly 
corresponding to December through May in the northern hemisphere.]

Angraecum sesquipedale flowers around Christmastime in the northern 
hemisphere, although there is another, later variety that comes into 
bloom around Easter. [p. 94]

While I have never grown hundreds of seedlings, in my experience, Angcm. 
sesquipedale always ends up flowering in late winter for me, regardless 
of whether that particluar cultivar flowers for others in winter or 
spring. I primarily grow Phalaenopsis, although I grow them cooler and 
brighter than most people do. I let the temp go down to 60 at night 
during most of the year, and my light levels are very high. I flower 
Vanilla at the warm and bright end of the greenhouse.

A quick count of awards to Angcm. sesquipedale (both flower quality and 
cultural) as appear in Wildcatt, shows:
2 in December
6 in January
2 in February
1 in March
3 in April
2 in May

There does not seem to be a correlation between geographical location 
and flowering time, these awards are all in the northern hemisphere, and 
are clustered in FL, CA and HI with a couple others in the US, (WI, IL, 
OK and NJ.)

It appears to me that Angcm. sesquipedale has a long (six month) window 
that it can flower within, and that while there might be varieties that 
seem to prefer to flower earlier or later in that window, individual 
plants can flower at any time during that period, and flowering time may 
end up being variable, and based on cultural factors.

rob't
Robert Bedard
Robert Bedard Horticulture
http://www.robert-bedard.com/orchids/

___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com