Re: Benchmarks

2000-09-18 Thread Christof Baumgaertner

I know that there a completely different technologies evaluated as well. I was
referring to the different performance numbers between Resin and Orionserver.

Lawrence Fry wrote:

 Christof,

 I read this article, and the comparison in this benchmark is between php,
 perl and java. The benchmark is not intended to compared j2ee application
 servers, and as noted in the article, only includes "toy" applications like
 hello world. The conclusion of the article is that java is as good or better
 than php and perl.

 However, lets make some comparisons. Orion is about 2% faster than Resin,
 which in my book is nearly the same. However, Resin is not a j2ee server,
 and uses non-j2ee ejb protocols. Most of us use Orion for the ejb support.

 Regards,

 Lawrence

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christof
 Baumgärtner
 Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2000 10:18 AM
 To: Orion-Interest
 Subject: Benchmarks

 Orionserver claims to be the fastest one out there. What is the official
 comment to the numbers presented at
 http://www.caucho.com/articles/benchmark.xtp ?


begin:vcard 
n:Baumgärtner;Christof
tel;cell:+49 171 8169911
tel;fax:+49 89 6797 
tel;work:+49 89 6797 2220
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.websentric.com
org:WebSentric AG
adr:;;Raiffeisenallee 5;Oberhaching;;82041;Germany
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
note:Vice President CTO
fn:Christof Baumgärtner
end:vcard



Re: Performance for static files

2000-09-08 Thread Christof Baumgaertner

Looks to me like if Orionserver tries to do HTTP/1.1 Keep-Alive without setting
the Content-length accordingly. Can anybody confirm?

Dale Bronk wrote:

 Right now until I am proved otherwise, I disagree.  I posted a message a day
 or so ago and have no reply yet.  Now I do believe that it is probably some
 setting I have (although I am using the default settings from Orion), but my
 web pages are not served very fast at all.  I am on a PIII 256M using
 Windows Server 2000 and tested the same static pages with Apache and IIS and
 they really popup quickly.  With Orion, the pages seem to completely display
 but the browser keeps going for up to 10-15 seconds before it stops.

 I am not saying I disagree with the benchmarks, what I am saying is I agree
 with them with the correct set of configurations as I have used the same
 static pages on the same machine with Apache, IIS, and Orion.  I did not use
 any benchmarking tools other than my eye but it was very obvious (clearing
 browser cache between each request) that as soon as the pages "appeared" to
 be fully display (very small graphics, if any) using Apache and IIS, the
 browser (both IE and NS) stopped.  With Orion, the browsers just kept going
 (not sure doing what) for another 10-15 seconds.

 Like I said, I am sure it is some configuration but I wish someone would
 tell me what the setting is.  I also tried browsing from several different
 machines to make sure that it was not simply my browser.

 Dale

 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 3:51 AM
 Subject: SV: Performance for static files

  Look at the benchmark page...
 
  Against Apache and IIS its got no problems at all beating them into the
  bushes. The url is enclosed, have fun...
 
  Klaus Myrseth
 
  -Opprinnelig melding-----
  Fra: Christof Baumgaertner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sendt: 7. september 2000 08:40
  Til: Orion-Interest
  Emne: Performance for static files
 
 
  We have a webbased client/server application which in addition to its
  dynamic elements has to serve a huge amount of small files (HTML, GIF,
  JS). I understand that Orionserver's performance for J2EE based
  applications is pretty good. How about serving static files from the
  file system? Can it compete with high performance servers like AOL
  Server, Stronghold Apache or others in this area?
 
  Thanks,
  Christof
 
 
 


begin:vcard 
n:Baumgärtner;Christof
tel;pager:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;cell:+49 171 8169911
tel;fax:+49 89 6797 
tel;work:+49 89 6797 2220
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.websentric.com
org:WebSentric AG
adr:;;Raiffeisenallee 5;Oberhaching;;82041;Germany
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Vice President CTO
x-mozilla-cpt:;-4208
fn:Christof Baumgärtner
end:vcard



Performance for static files

2000-09-07 Thread Christof Baumgaertner

We have a webbased client/server application which in addition to its
dynamic elements has to serve a huge amount of small files (HTML, GIF,
JS). I understand that Orionserver's performance for J2EE based
applications is pretty good. How about serving static files from the
file system? Can it compete with high performance servers like AOL
Server, Stronghold Apache or others in this area?

Thanks,
Christof





Re: SV: Performance for static files

2000-09-07 Thread Christof Baumgaertner

This benchmarks do not show the numbers for static files which are read directly from 
the file
system. I would like to see a comparison between a standard webserver (without any 
dynamic server
technology like ASP, JSP, Servlets) serving static files and Orion. Are there any 
realworld
numbers around?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Look at the benchmark page...

 Against Apache and IIS its got no problems at all beating them into the
 bushes. The url is enclosed, have fun...

 Klaus Myrseth

 -Opprinnelig melding-
 Fra: Christof Baumgaertner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sendt: 7. september 2000 08:40
 Til: Orion-Interest
 Emne: Performance for static files

 We have a webbased client/server application which in addition to its
 dynamic elements has to serve a huge amount of small files (HTML, GIF,
 JS). I understand that Orionserver's performance for J2EE based
 applications is pretty good. How about serving static files from the
 file system? Can it compete with high performance servers like AOL
 Server, Stronghold Apache or others in this area?

 Thanks,
 Christof

   

Benchmark.urlName: Benchmark.url
 Type: Internet Shortcut 
(application/x-unknown-content-type-InternetShortcut)


begin:vcard 
n:Baumgärtner;Christof
tel;pager:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;cell:+49 171 8169911
tel;fax:+49 89 6797 
tel;work:+49 89 6797 2220
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.websentric.com
org:WebSentric AG
adr:;;Raiffeisenallee 5;Oberhaching;;82041;Germany
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Vice President CTO
x-mozilla-cpt:;-4208
fn:Christof Baumgärtner
end:vcard