SV: Performance
Add more memory to the vm :) Klaus -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: Sarathy Mattaparti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sendt: 9. oktober 2000 20:00 Til: Orion-Interest Emne: Performance Hi, Previously i used Pentium III 550 MHz and 64 MB RAM and i bought a new computer its Dual Pentium III 800 MHZ and 256 MB RAM. i havent seen the difference. I am using Windows 2000 Server as my OS. I just changed the configuration of access log.. Any suggestions to improve the performance ?? Thanks Sarathy _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.
RE: SV: Performance for static files
If we were serving up static pages, then we wouldn't need Orion... :) Frank Eggink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/07/00 03:43 PM Please respond to Orion-Interest To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: SV: Performance for static files Maybe a still too early notice: in the new 2.4 Linux kernel they will serve static http request direct from the kernel. This could give interesting results wrt performance :-) On Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:46 AM, Christof Baumgaertner [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > This benchmarks do not show the numbers for static files which are read directly from the file > system. I would like to see a comparison between a standard webserver (without any dynamic server > technology like ASP, JSP, Servlets) serving static files and Orion. Are there any realworld > numbers around? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Look at the benchmark page... > > > > Against Apache and IIS its got no problems at all beating them into the > > bushes. The url is enclosed, have fun... > > > > Klaus Myrseth > > > > -Opprinnelig melding- > > Fra: Christof Baumgaertner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sendt: 7. september 2000 08:40 > > Til: Orion-Interest > > Emne: Performance for static files > > > > We have a webbased client/server application which in addition to its > > dynamic elements has to serve a huge amount of small files (HTML, GIF, > > JS). I understand that Orionserver's performance for J2EE based > > applications is pretty good. How about serving static files from the > > file system? Can it compete with high performance servers like AOL > > Server, Stronghold Apache or others in this area? > > > > Thanks, > > Christof > > > > > > > > Benchmark.urlName: Benchmark.url > > Type: Internet Shortcut (application/x-unknown-content-type-InternetShortcut) > << File: christof.vcf >>
RE: SV: Performance for static files
Maybe a still too early notice: in the new 2.4 Linux kernel they will serve static http request direct from the kernel. This could give interesting results wrt performance :-) On Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:46 AM, Christof Baumgaertner [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > This benchmarks do not show the numbers for static files which are read directly >from the file > system. I would like to see a comparison between a standard webserver (without any >dynamic server > technology like ASP, JSP, Servlets) serving static files and Orion. Are there any >realworld > numbers around? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Look at the benchmark page... > > > > Against Apache and IIS its got no problems at all beating them into the > > bushes. The url is enclosed, have fun... > > > > Klaus Myrseth > > > > -Opprinnelig melding- > > Fra: Christof Baumgaertner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sendt: 7. september 2000 08:40 > > Til: Orion-Interest > > Emne: Performance for static files > > > > We have a webbased client/server application which in addition to its > > dynamic elements has to serve a huge amount of small files (HTML, GIF, > > JS). I understand that Orionserver's performance for J2EE based > > applications is pretty good. How about serving static files from the > > file system? Can it compete with high performance servers like AOL > > Server, Stronghold Apache or others in this area? > > > > Thanks, > > Christof > > > > > > > >Benchmark.urlName: Benchmark.url > > Type: Internet Shortcut >(application/x-unknown-content-type-InternetShortcut) > << File: christof.vcf >>
SV: SV: Performance for static files
Look at the bottom of the page, thee is a link called old benchmark :) It compares Apache, IIS and Orion... Klaus Myrseth -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: Christof Baumgaertner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sendt: 7. september 2000 11:46 Til: Orion-Interest Emne: Re: SV: Performance for static files This benchmarks do not show the numbers for static files which are read directly from the file system. I would like to see a comparison between a standard webserver (without any dynamic server technology like ASP, JSP, Servlets) serving static files and Orion. Are there any realworld numbers around? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Look at the benchmark page... > > Against Apache and IIS its got no problems at all beating them into the > bushes. The url is enclosed, have fun... > > Klaus Myrseth > > -Opprinnelig melding- > Fra: Christof Baumgaertner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sendt: 7. september 2000 08:40 > Til: Orion-Interest > Emne: Performance for static files > > We have a webbased client/server application which in addition to its > dynamic elements has to serve a huge amount of small files (HTML, GIF, > JS). I understand that Orionserver's performance for J2EE based > applications is pretty good. How about serving static files from the > file system? Can it compete with high performance servers like AOL > Server, Stronghold Apache or others in this area? > > Thanks, > Christof > > > >Benchmark.urlName: Benchmark.url > Type: Internet Shortcut (application/x-unknown-content-type-InternetShortcut)
Re: SV: Performance for static files
This benchmarks do not show the numbers for static files which are read directly from the file system. I would like to see a comparison between a standard webserver (without any dynamic server technology like ASP, JSP, Servlets) serving static files and Orion. Are there any realworld numbers around? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Look at the benchmark page... > > Against Apache and IIS its got no problems at all beating them into the > bushes. The url is enclosed, have fun... > > Klaus Myrseth > > -Opprinnelig melding- > Fra: Christof Baumgaertner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sendt: 7. september 2000 08:40 > Til: Orion-Interest > Emne: Performance for static files > > We have a webbased client/server application which in addition to its > dynamic elements has to serve a huge amount of small files (HTML, GIF, > JS). I understand that Orionserver's performance for J2EE based > applications is pretty good. How about serving static files from the > file system? Can it compete with high performance servers like AOL > Server, Stronghold Apache or others in this area? > > Thanks, > Christof > > > >Benchmark.urlName: Benchmark.url > Type: Internet Shortcut >(application/x-unknown-content-type-InternetShortcut) begin:vcard n:Baumgärtner;Christof tel;pager:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;cell:+49 171 8169911 tel;fax:+49 89 6797 tel;work:+49 89 6797 2220 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:www.websentric.com org:WebSentric AG adr:;;Raiffeisenallee 5;Oberhaching;;82041;Germany version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Vice President CTO x-mozilla-cpt:;-4208 fn:Christof Baumgärtner end:vcard
SV: Performance for static files
Look at the benchmark page... Against Apache and IIS its got no problems at all beating them into the bushes. The url is enclosed, have fun... Klaus Myrseth -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: Christof Baumgaertner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sendt: 7. september 2000 08:40 Til: Orion-Interest Emne: Performance for static files We have a webbased client/server application which in addition to its dynamic elements has to serve a huge amount of small files (HTML, GIF, JS). I understand that Orionserver's performance for J2EE based applications is pretty good. How about serving static files from the file system? Can it compete with high performance servers like AOL Server, Stronghold Apache or others in this area? Thanks, Christof Benchmark.url
