If we were serving up static pages, then we wouldn't need Orion... :)
| Frank Eggink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/07/00 03:43 PM
|
To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: SV: Performance for static files |
Maybe a still too early notice: in the new 2.4 Linux kernel they will serve static http request direct
from the kernel. This could give interesting results wrt performance :-)
On Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:46 AM, Christof Baumgaertner [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> This benchmarks do not show the numbers for static files which are read directly from the file
> system. I would like to see a comparison between a standard webserver (without any dynamic server
> technology like ASP, JSP, Servlets) serving static files and Orion. Are there any realworld
> numbers around?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Look at the benchmark page...
> >
> > Against Apache and IIS its got no problems at all beating them into the
> > bushes. The url is enclosed, have fun...
> >
> > Klaus Myrseth
> >
> > -----Opprinnelig melding-----
> > Fra: Christof Baumgaertner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sendt: 7. september 2000 08:40
> > Til: Orion-Interest
> > Emne: Performance for static files
> >
> > We have a webbased client/server application which in addition to its
> > dynamic elements has to serve a huge amount of small files (HTML, GIF,
> > JS). I understand that Orionserver's performance for J2EE based
> > applications is pretty good. How about serving static files from the
> > file system? Can it compete with high performance servers like AOL
> > Server, Stronghold Apache or others in this area?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Christof
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Benchmark.urlName: Benchmark.url
> > Type: Internet Shortcut (application/x-unknown-content-type-InternetShortcut)
> << File: christof.vcf >>
