Re: bit rate and sample rate
Gary, I also feel that this may be an arbitrary standard. I may have been one of these who asked the question, based on comments I've heard. Of course, many say that wav is the best, but when I listen to music, or even spoken recordings, the quality may vary from recording to recording, and maybe this is all subjective at best. This is just only my opinion. Just weighing in. - Original Message - From: "Gary Petraccaro" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 10:26 AM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate I tried a book I was reading for a bookclub on the Stream, and was able to go all the way to 32-bit mono. Now, I could hear a difference between that and 128 mono, but, to my aging ears, it was slight. I figure that the commercial spoken recordings issued as mp3s are at 128 and keep recordings I want to keep at that standard, but it's strictly arbitrary. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Minor" To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:31 PM Subject: RE: bit rate and sample rate Hi. Some out there will disagree with me, but that's all right. I think that for recording just speech, CD quality is overkill. Personally I would use 64 KBPS with 44.1 Khz sampling, in mono. I don't think you'd notice much of an improvement with higher bit rates, and in fact you might be able to go even lower, to 32 kbps, but you might notice some artifacts creep into the picture. As I said, this is for just speech recording. Music is a completely different animal. I personally use 128 kbps mp3 files at 44k sampling. I know it's not CD quality, but I personally like my files at a constant value, and this sounds good enough for me. Have a good day, and don't work too hard. Kevin Minor kmi...@windstream.net To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
I tried a book I was reading for a bookclub on the Stream, and was able to go all the way to 32-bit mono. Now, I could hear a difference between that and 128 mono, but, to my aging ears, it was slight. I figure that the commercial spoken recordings issued as mp3s are at 128 and keep recordings I want to keep at that standard, but it's strictly arbitrary. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Minor" To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:31 PM Subject: RE: bit rate and sample rate Hi. Some out there will disagree with me, but that's all right. I think that for recording just speech, CD quality is overkill. Personally I would use 64 KBPS with 44.1 Khz sampling, in mono. I don't think you'd notice much of an improvement with higher bit rates, and in fact you might be able to go even lower, to 32 kbps, but you might notice some artifacts creep into the picture. As I said, this is for just speech recording. Music is a completely different animal. I personally use 128 kbps mp3 files at 44k sampling. I know it's not CD quality, but I personally like my files at a constant value, and this sounds good enough for me. Have a good day, and don't work too hard. Kevin Minor kmi...@windstream.net To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
That's a question you are best off answering for yourself by testing against the highest quality you can make to see where you can first hear a difference. If you just want to know because of a theoretical interest, pick a lossless format and forget the question. - Original Message - From: "Joe" To: Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:59 PM Subject: bit rate and sample rate Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
yes its the best to use for voice its a radio standard format - Original Message - From: "Gary Wood" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 5:18 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate Should 44 khz be right for voice recordings? - Original Message - From: "david" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:41 AM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate your bit was should be 64kbps and your sampling rate really should be no lower than 44100KHZ its the best quality and I believe that quality over quantity - Original Message - From: "Gary Wood" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:25 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate I'm not sure if this is right, but for voice recordings, maybe it should be 22.5 for sample rate, and 64 KBPS for bit rate. - Original Message - From: "Joe" To: Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:59 PM Subject: bit rate and sample rate Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
Should 44 khz be right for voice recordings? - Original Message - From: "david" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:41 AM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate your bit was should be 64kbps and your sampling rate really should be no lower than 44100KHZ its the best quality and I believe that quality over quantity - Original Message - From: "Gary Wood" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:25 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate I'm not sure if this is right, but for voice recordings, maybe it should be 22.5 for sample rate, and 64 KBPS for bit rate. - Original Message - From: "Joe" To: Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:59 PM Subject: bit rate and sample rate Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
Hi Robert, Maybe the answer is to get a portable media player that plays FLAC and other file types. The ones we sell do. Take a look at my signature below. Laz "Robert doc Wright" wrote: I hear a lot about flak but I'm pretty sure my zenstone will not play it and I no my nls player will not. It seems such a hastle to use one format on your computer and then be forced to convert any time you wish to listen somewhere other than home. -- Talking MP3 players! Accessible & affordable! Great features including: FM radio, voice recording, expandable memory, great book marking capabilities, very user configurable, and a lot more! Play MP3, WMA, OGG, AAC, FLAC, AIFF, WAV, and more! All our players are less than $100, plus free shipping & handling to anywhere in the US! Join our mailing list by sending a blank email to: rockboxedsansatalkingmp3players-subscr...@yahoogroups.com To hear what our talking MP3 players sound like, download the demo from here: http://www.talkingmp3players.com/demo.html Visit our home page: http://www.talkingmp3players.com/ Contact information: Email: accessibleelectron...@gmail.com Phone: 727 498-0121 Skype name: lazmesa To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
The sampling rate doesn't make a difference in the size of the file, so there shouldn't be any consideration to go below 44. I've seen a lot of files encoded at 22 because the person thought it would halve the file size, but that's only an old wives tale. Try it yourself and see if it makes any difference in the size of the file. Encode the same thing at the same bit rate but at 22 and at 44 sampling rates and take a look at the file sizes. As for bit rate, whatever sounds good to your ears. I myself prefer at least 64 for mono recordings because once you start going below that, the digital artifacts start to creep in. This translates to at least 128 for stereo recordings. Some people are ok with the lower sampling rates and lower bit rates, while others can't stand to even listen to MP3 files at all, no matter what the bit rate or sampling rate. It's a very personal thing, so whatever sounds good to your ears is your answer. Laz Joe wrote: >> Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different >> bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know >> what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know >> you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about >> voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and >> sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech >> audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm >> talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. >> Thanks in advance. Joe. -- Talking MP3 players! Accessible & affordable! Great features including: FM radio, voice recording, expandable memory, great book marking capabilities, very user configurable, and a lot more! Play MP3, WMA, OGG, AAC, FLAC, AIFF, WAV, and more! All our players are less than $100, plus free shipping & handling to anywhere in the US! Join our mailing list by sending a blank email to: rockboxedsansatalkingmp3players-subscr...@yahoogroups.com To hear what our talking MP3 players sound like, download the demo from here: http://www.talkingmp3players.com/demo.html Visit our home page: http://www.talkingmp3players.com/ Contact information: Email: accessibleelectron...@gmail.com Phone: 727 498-0121 Skype name: lazmesa To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
I hear a lot about flak but I'm pretty sure my zenstone will not play it and I no my nls player will not. It seems such a hastle to use one format on your computer and then be forced to convert any time you wish to listen somewhere other than home. - Original Message - From: "Richard Claypool" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:16 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate corective is subjective. There are people who can hear the difference between 320k mp3 and flac. I can not, but they can. If you're ripping a cd, and want a perfect archive without the size of wav files, go flac. If you don't care about quality loss, then pick which flavor of mp3 encoding sounds best to you, and use it. If 128k is good enough for you, go for it. We have newer and tighter methods of encoding, but mp3 is still bmoc. Ave Rickamus twitter http://twitter.com/elheme msn bellevue@gmail.com skype lord_of_beer last fm http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer - Original Message - From: "Judy W" To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:24 PM Subject: RE: bit rate and sample rate Yes, and I have a degree in radio television film and 192 is the correct rate for a cd. If you want to save hard drive space, you can go lower, but one can hear the difference. Judy -Original Message- From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of brandon armstrong Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:13 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate for thoughs who are knowing, I took broadcasting in college, and graduated with a degree in radio broadcasting. Brandon On Apr 25, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Richard Claypool wrote: Hi, I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. that's the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps. If you want lossless i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac. Ave Rickamus twitter http://twitter.com/elheme msn bellevue@gmail.com skype lord_of_beer last fm http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer - Original Message - From: "brandon armstrong" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second. that's the quality of most cd recordings. Brandon On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote: Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
that is not so where spoken word is concerned. I use 11025 k at 64 bit mono - Original Message - From: "brandon armstrong" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:01 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second. that's the quality of most cd recordings. Brandon On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote: Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
your bit was should be 64kbps and your sampling rate really should be no lower than 44100KHZ its the best quality and I believe that quality over quantity - Original Message - From: "Gary Wood" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:25 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate I'm not sure if this is right, but for voice recordings, maybe it should be 22.5 for sample rate, and 64 KBPS for bit rate. - Original Message - From: "Joe" To: Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:59 PM Subject: bit rate and sample rate Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
I think that the gentleman wanted to know for voice recording. - Original Message - From: "Richard Claypool" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:12 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate Hi, I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. that's the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps. If you want lossless i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac. Ave Rickamus twitter http://twitter.com/elheme msn bellevue@gmail.com skype lord_of_beer last fm http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer - Original Message - From: "brandon armstrong" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second. that's the quality of most cd recordings. Brandon On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote: Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
I'm not sure if this is right, but for voice recordings, maybe it should be 22.5 for sample rate, and 64 KBPS for bit rate. - Original Message - From: "Joe" To: Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:59 PM Subject: bit rate and sample rate Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
Good evening. I use Lame MP3 encoder which seems to capture good fidelity. Is there an MP3 codec that produces higher audio fidelity? Rob Tabor - Original Message - From: "Richard Claypool" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:18 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate One thing I'll add to this. if it's speach, go 64k mono, not stereo. when you take a file, and make it stereo, you have to put twice as much data into the same size file, guess what gets crunched? that's right, quality. for a drastic sample of this effect, ri9p a file at 24k mono, and then at 24k stereo. Pet pieve, people who rip books at 64k stereo. Plus, not all encoders are equil. Ave Rickamus twitter http://twitter.com/elheme msn bellevue@gmail.com skype lord_of_beer last fm http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer - Original Message - From: "Judy W" To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:28 PM Subject: RE: bit rate and sample rate Hi, for speech I would suggest 44.1 and 64 kbps. If it is a performance, sound seeing tour, or historical event I would consider either 96 or 128 for speech only. This does not apply to the earlier posts on music and cd quality. Judy -Original Message- From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Richard Claypool Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:12 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate Hi, I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. that's the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps. If you want lossless i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac. Ave Rickamus twitter http://twitter.com/elheme msn bellevue@gmail.com skype lord_of_beer last fm http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer - Original Message - From: "brandon armstrong" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second. that's the quality of most cd recordings. Brandon On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote: Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
Hello. I run my audio at 44.1 KHz, but what bit rate would you all advise to produce CD quality for a voice and music mix, such as a voiceover promo? Rob Tabor - Original Message - From: "Judy W" To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:28 PM Subject: RE: bit rate and sample rate Hi, for speech I would suggest 44.1 and 64 kbps. If it is a performance, sound seeing tour, or historical event I would consider either 96 or 128 for speech only. This does not apply to the earlier posts on music and cd quality. Judy -Original Message- From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Richard Claypool Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:12 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate Hi, I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. that's the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps. If you want lossless i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac. Ave Rickamus twitter http://twitter.com/elheme msn bellevue@gmail.com skype lord_of_beer last fm http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer - Original Message - From: "brandon armstrong" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second. that's the quality of most cd recordings. Brandon On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote: Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
For audio books on CD I obtain from the public library and rip to listen on my MP3 player, I use a 44.100 sampling rate and 96k bitrate. I have found that I lose some of the emotion and distinctness of the reader at 64k. At that lower bitrate, the recording sounds flat. Broadcast radio standards do call for 128k bit rates. For personal listening of voice recordings, 96k is a good compromise for me between broadcast quality and the 64k used in many online archives. I’m especially keen to the trade offs as I am still using an original Bookport with a 512 megabyte card. Kelly On 4/25/10, Richard Claypool wrote: > One thing I'll add to this. if it's speach, go 64k mono, not stereo. when > you take a file, and make it stereo, you have to put twice as much data into > the same size file, guess what gets crunched? that's right, quality. for a > drastic sample of this effect, ri9p a file at 24k mono, and then at 24k > stereo. > > Pet pieve, people who rip books at 64k stereo. Plus, not all encoders are > equil. > > Ave Rickamus > twitter > http://twitter.com/elheme > msn > bellevue@gmail.com > skype > lord_of_beer > last fm > http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer > > - Original Message - > From: "Judy W" > To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" > Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:28 PM > Subject: RE: bit rate and sample rate > > >> Hi, >> >> for speech I would suggest 44.1 and 64 kbps. If it is a performance, sound >> seeing tour, or historical event I would consider either 96 or 128 for >> speech only. This does not apply to the earlier posts on music and cd >> quality. >> >> Judy >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] >> On Behalf Of Richard Claypool >> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:12 PM >> To: PC Audio Discussion List >> Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate >> >> Hi, >> >> I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. >> that's >> the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps. If you want lossless >> i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac. >> Ave Rickamus >> twitter >> http://twitter.com/elheme >> msn >> bellevue@gmail.com >> skype >> lord_of_beer >> last fm >> http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "brandon armstrong" >> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" >> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM >> Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate >> >> >>> if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 >>> for >> >>> cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per >>> second >> >>> should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second. >>> that's the quality of most cd recordings. >>> Brandon >>> On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote: >>> >>>> Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of >>>> different >> >>>> bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know >>>> what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know >>>> you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking >>>> about >> >>>> voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and >>>> sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech >>>> audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm >>>> talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of >>>> this. >> >>>> Thanks in advance. Joe. >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>> >>> __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus >>> signature database 3832 (20090206) __ >>> >>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. >>> >>> http://www.eset.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus >> signature >> database 3832 (20090206) __ >> >> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus >> signature database 3832 (20090206) __ >> >> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> >> > > > __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature > database 3832 (20090206) __ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
One thing I'll add to this. if it's speach, go 64k mono, not stereo. when you take a file, and make it stereo, you have to put twice as much data into the same size file, guess what gets crunched? that's right, quality. for a drastic sample of this effect, ri9p a file at 24k mono, and then at 24k stereo. Pet pieve, people who rip books at 64k stereo. Plus, not all encoders are equil. Ave Rickamus twitter http://twitter.com/elheme msn bellevue@gmail.com skype lord_of_beer last fm http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer - Original Message - From: "Judy W" To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:28 PM Subject: RE: bit rate and sample rate Hi, for speech I would suggest 44.1 and 64 kbps. If it is a performance, sound seeing tour, or historical event I would consider either 96 or 128 for speech only. This does not apply to the earlier posts on music and cd quality. Judy -Original Message- From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Richard Claypool Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:12 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate Hi, I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. that's the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps. If you want lossless i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac. Ave Rickamus twitter http://twitter.com/elheme msn bellevue@gmail.com skype lord_of_beer last fm http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer - Original Message - From: "brandon armstrong" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second. that's the quality of most cd recordings. Brandon On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote: Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
corective is subjective. There are people who can hear the difference between 320k mp3 and flac. I can not, but they can. If you're ripping a cd, and want a perfect archive without the size of wav files, go flac. If you don't care about quality loss, then pick which flavor of mp3 encoding sounds best to you, and use it. If 128k is good enough for you, go for it. We have newer and tighter methods of encoding, but mp3 is still bmoc. Ave Rickamus twitter http://twitter.com/elheme msn bellevue@gmail.com skype lord_of_beer last fm http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer - Original Message - From: "Judy W" To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:24 PM Subject: RE: bit rate and sample rate Yes, and I have a degree in radio television film and 192 is the correct rate for a cd. If you want to save hard drive space, you can go lower, but one can hear the difference. Judy -Original Message- From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of brandon armstrong Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:13 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate for thoughs who are knowing, I took broadcasting in college, and graduated with a degree in radio broadcasting. Brandon On Apr 25, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Richard Claypool wrote: Hi, I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. that's the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps. If you want lossless i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac. Ave Rickamus twitter http://twitter.com/elheme msn bellevue@gmail.com skype lord_of_beer last fm http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer - Original Message - From: "brandon armstrong" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second. that's the quality of most cd recordings. Brandon On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote: Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
That's nice, but it still does not change the fact that a 128k mp3 is not cd quality. Now, for most people, 128k is perfectly fine granted, but that doesn't change the facts. Ave Rickamus twitter http://twitter.com/elheme msn bellevue@gmail.com skype lord_of_beer last fm http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer - Original Message - From: "brandon armstrong" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:12 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate for thoughs who are knowing, I took broadcasting in college, and graduated with a degree in radio broadcasting. Brandon On Apr 25, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Richard Claypool wrote: Hi, I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. that's the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps. If you want lossless i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac. Ave Rickamus twitter http://twitter.com/elheme msn bellevue@gmail.com skype lord_of_beer last fm http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer - Original Message - From: "brandon armstrong" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second. that's the quality of most cd recordings. Brandon On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote: Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
RE: bit rate and sample rate
Hi. Some out there will disagree with me, but that's all right. I think that for recording just speech, CD quality is overkill. Personally I would use 64 KBPS with 44.1 Khz sampling, in mono. I don't think you'd notice much of an improvement with higher bit rates, and in fact you might be able to go even lower, to 32 kbps, but you might notice some artifacts creep into the picture. As I said, this is for just speech recording. Music is a completely different animal. I personally use 128 kbps mp3 files at 44k sampling. I know it's not CD quality, but I personally like my files at a constant value, and this sounds good enough for me. Have a good day, and don't work too hard. Kevin Minor kmi...@windstream.net To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
RE: bit rate and sample rate
Hi, for speech I would suggest 44.1 and 64 kbps. If it is a performance, sound seeing tour, or historical event I would consider either 96 or 128 for speech only. This does not apply to the earlier posts on music and cd quality. Judy -Original Message- From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Richard Claypool Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:12 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate Hi, I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. that's the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps. If you want lossless i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac. Ave Rickamus twitter http://twitter.com/elheme msn bellevue@gmail.com skype lord_of_beer last fm http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer - Original Message - From: "brandon armstrong" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate > if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for > cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second > should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second. > that's the quality of most cd recordings. > Brandon > On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote: > >> Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different >> bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know >> what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know >> you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about >> voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and >> sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech >> audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm >> talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. >> Thanks in advance. Joe. >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus > signature database 3832 (20090206) __ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
RE: bit rate and sample rate
Yes, and I have a degree in radio television film and 192 is the correct rate for a cd. If you want to save hard drive space, you can go lower, but one can hear the difference. Judy -Original Message- From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of brandon armstrong Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:13 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate for thoughs who are knowing, I took broadcasting in college, and graduated with a degree in radio broadcasting. Brandon On Apr 25, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Richard Claypool wrote: > Hi, > > I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. that's the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps. If you want lossless i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac. > Ave Rickamus > twitter > http://twitter.com/elheme > msn > bellevue@gmail.com > skype > lord_of_beer > last fm > http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer > > - Original Message - From: "brandon armstrong" > > To: "PC Audio Discussion List" > Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM > Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate > > >> if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second. >> that's the quality of most cd recordings. >> Brandon >> On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote: >> >>> Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe. >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus >> signature database 3832 (20090206) __ >> >> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> > > > __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus > signature database 3832 (20090206) __ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
for thoughs who are knowing, I took broadcasting in college, and graduated with a degree in radio broadcasting. Brandon On Apr 25, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Richard Claypool wrote: > Hi, > > I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. that's > the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps. If you want lossless > i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac. > Ave Rickamus > twitter > http://twitter.com/elheme > msn > bellevue@gmail.com > skype > lord_of_beer > last fm > http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer > > - Original Message - From: "brandon armstrong" > To: "PC Audio Discussion List" > Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM > Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate > > >> if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for >> cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second >> should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second. >> that's the quality of most cd recordings. >> Brandon >> On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote: >> >>> Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different >>> bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what >>> combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need >>> higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice >>> recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample >>> rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What >>> should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 >>> files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. >>> Joe. >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature >> database 3832 (20090206) __ >> >> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> > > > __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature > database 3832 (20090206) __ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
Hi, I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. that's the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps. If you want lossless i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac. Ave Rickamus twitter http://twitter.com/elheme msn bellevue@gmail.com skype lord_of_beer last fm http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer - Original Message - From: "brandon armstrong" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second. that's the quality of most cd recordings. Brandon On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote: Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3832 (20090206) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: bit rate and sample rate
if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second. that's the quality of most cd recordings. Brandon On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote: > Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit > rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what > combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need > higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice > recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate > will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should > be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. > I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe. > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org