Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Hi! I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will say that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi track recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity does, two different pieces of software to do two completely different things. Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the Reaper web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a little. On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno wrote: > I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of songs, using > guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very > favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I would like to > hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to which is better and why, > considering accessibility, of course. > > -- > Rich De Steno > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
RE: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Personally, I could not get tracks to sync up together so that they sounded correctly like they would in sonar or reaper. If someone could tell me how to make tracks line up the way they are supposed to, I would give it a try again. For example, while recording vocals, my second harmony part would not stay with the first, and I did not know how to make it line up. That is my two cents worth. -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Rich De Steno Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 7:47 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of songs, using guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I would like to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to which is better and why, considering accessibility, of course. -- Rich De Steno To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
RE: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Hi Dane, are you using reaper on windows? Or on Mac. If Windows there is a plugin called ReaAccess though that has stopped development though I hope that plugin can be re-written, or that someone can write a similar plugin for it. -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:07 AM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording Hi! I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will say that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi track recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity does, two different pieces of software to do two completely different things. Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the Reaper web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a little. On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno wrote: > I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of songs, using guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I would like to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to which is better and why, considering accessibility, of course. > > -- > Rich De Steno > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
I use Reaper under Windows, I thought the whole development of that project was stopped as there was no longer any need for it. On 27 Nov 2013, at 3:59 am, Sky Mundell wrote: > Hi Dane, are you using reaper on windows? Or on Mac. If Windows there is a > plugin called ReaAccess though that has stopped development though I hope > that plugin can be re-written, or that someone can write a similar plugin > for it. > > -Original Message- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane > Trethowan > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:07 AM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording > > Hi! > > I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much with > Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will say that if > you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or anything like > Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of your mind, Reaper > looks entirely different and - for multi track recording and mastering - > offers far more than Audacity does, two different pieces of software to do > two completely different things. > > Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. > > There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the Reaper > web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a little. > > > On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno wrote: > >> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of songs, using > guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very > favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I would like > to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to which is better and > why, considering accessibility, of course. >> >> -- >> Rich De Steno >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > ** > > Dane Trethowan > Skype: grtdane12 > Phone US (213) 438-9741 > Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 > Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 > Mobile: +61400494862 > Fax +61397437954 > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Why should i pay for a program when i can get audacity for free. Reaper doesn't even support other platforms. /A 26 nov 2013 kl. 13:06 skrev Dane Trethowan : > Hi! > > I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much with > Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will say that if > you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or anything like Audacity > then it would be best if you put that out of your mind, Reaper looks entirely > different and - for multi track recording and mastering - offers far more > than Audacity does, two different pieces of software to do two completely > different things. > > Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. > > There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the Reaper > web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a little. > > > On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno wrote: > >> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of songs, using >> guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very >> favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I would like >> to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to which is better and >> why, considering accessibility, of course. >> >> -- >> Rich De Steno >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > ** > > Dane Trethowan > Skype: grtdane12 > Phone US (213) 438-9741 > Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 > Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 > Mobile: +61400494862 > Fax +61397437954 > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
RE: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Hello, The only reason I stick with the paid editors such as reaper is they support my control interface called project mix IO which audacity does not at this time. -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Anders Holmberg Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 12:31 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording Why should i pay for a program when i can get audacity for free. Reaper doesn't even support other platforms. /A 26 nov 2013 kl. 13:06 skrev Dane Trethowan : > Hi! > > I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will say that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi track recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity does, two different pieces of software to do two completely different things. > > Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. > > There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the Reaper web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a little. > > > On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno wrote: > >> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of songs, using guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I would like to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to which is better and why, considering accessibility, of course. >> >> -- >> Rich De Steno >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > ** > > Dane Trethowan > Skype: grtdane12 > Phone US (213) 438-9741 > Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 > Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 > Mobile: +61400494862 > Fax +61397437954 > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
RE: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Yes the project has stopped. Are u using reaper with ReaAccess with Window-Eyes? If so, when I use it on 64 bit we causes it to crash so I have to use NVDA. -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:15 AM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording I use Reaper under Windows, I thought the whole development of that project was stopped as there was no longer any need for it. On 27 Nov 2013, at 3:59 am, Sky Mundell wrote: > Hi Dane, are you using reaper on windows? Or on Mac. If Windows there > is a plugin called ReaAccess though that has stopped development > though I hope that plugin can be re-written, or that someone can write > a similar plugin for it. > > -Original Message- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of > Dane Trethowan > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:07 AM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording > > Hi! > > I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much > with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will say > that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or > anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of > your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi track > recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity does, two > different pieces of software to do two completely different things. > > Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. > > There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the > Reaper web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a little. > > > On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno wrote: > >> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of songs, >> using > guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very > favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I would > like to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to which is > better and why, considering accessibility, of course. >> >> -- >> Rich De Steno >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > ** > > Dane Trethowan > Skype: grtdane12 > Phone US (213) 438-9741 > Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 > Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 > Mobile: +61400494862 > Fax +61397437954 > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Is there any particular reason why you were using the 64-Bit version? There's no difference in features between 32 and 64 Bit, only difference is for the plug-ins you can add on. On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:45 am, Sky Mundell wrote: > Yes the project has stopped. Are u using reaper with ReaAccess with > Window-Eyes? If so, when I use it on 64 bit we causes it to crash so I have > to use NVDA. > > -Original Message- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane > Trethowan > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:15 AM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording > > I use Reaper under Windows, I thought the whole development of that project > was stopped as there was no longer any need for it. > > > On 27 Nov 2013, at 3:59 am, Sky Mundell wrote: > >> Hi Dane, are you using reaper on windows? Or on Mac. If Windows there >> is a plugin called ReaAccess though that has stopped development >> though I hope that plugin can be re-written, or that someone can write >> a similar plugin for it. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >> Dane Trethowan >> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:07 AM >> To: PC Audio Discussion List >> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >> >> Hi! >> >> I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much >> with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will say >> that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or >> anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of >> your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi track >> recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity does, two >> different pieces of software to do two completely different things. >> >> Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. >> >> There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the >> Reaper web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a little. >> >> >> On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno wrote: >> >>> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of songs, >>> using >> guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very >> favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I would >> like to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to which is >> better and why, considering accessibility, of course. >>> >>> -- >>> Rich De Steno >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> ** >> >> Dane Trethowan >> Skype: grtdane12 >> Phone US (213) 438-9741 >> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 >> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 >> Mobile: +61400494862 >> Fax +61397437954 >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > ** > > Dane Trethowan > Skype: grtdane12 > Phone US (213) 438-9741 > Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 > Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 > Mobile: +61400494862 > Fax +61397437954 > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Don't know where you got that from, Reaper supports all platforms and I'm using it here on Mac and under Windows. Why should you pay? Well you don't have to if you don't want the product and that's entirely up to you but comparing Audacity to Reaper is like comparing Apples to Oranges as they're totally different. Now for those who are considering the purchase of Reaper - when I purchased a licence - it was $50.00 and that licence covered multi platforms. On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:30 am, Anders Holmberg wrote: > Why should i pay for a program when i can get audacity for free. > Reaper doesn't even support other platforms. > /A > 26 nov 2013 kl. 13:06 skrev Dane Trethowan : > >> Hi! >> >> I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much with >> Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will say that if >> you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or anything like >> Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of your mind, Reaper >> looks entirely different and - for multi track recording and mastering - >> offers far more than Audacity does, two different pieces of software to do >> two completely different things. >> >> Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. >> >> There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the Reaper >> web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a little. >> >> >> On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno wrote: >> >>> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of songs, using >>> guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very >>> favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I would like >>> to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to which is better and >>> why, considering accessibility, of course. >>> >>> -- >>> Rich De Steno >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> ** >> >> Dane Trethowan >> Skype: grtdane12 >> Phone US (213) 438-9741 >> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 >> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 >> Mobile: +61400494862 >> Fax +61397437954 >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
RE: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Hi Dane, You keep writing that Reaper and Audacity are totally different programmes. Where are the differences? I've been using sound forge 7 for ages does that cover the features of the other two programmes? Thanks and take care Alexandra > -Original Message- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane > Trethowan > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 10:16 PM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording > > Don't know where you got that from, Reaper supports all platforms and I'm > using it here on Mac and under Windows. > > Why should you pay? Well you don't have to if you don't want the product > and that's entirely up to you but comparing Audacity to Reaper is like > comparing Apples to Oranges as they're totally different. > > Now for those who are considering the purchase of Reaper - when I > purchased a licence - it was $50.00 and that licence covered multi platforms. > > > On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:30 am, Anders Holmberg > wrote: > > > Why should i pay for a program when i can get audacity for free. > > Reaper doesn't even support other platforms. > > /A > > 26 nov 2013 kl. 13:06 skrev Dane Trethowan : > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much with > Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will say that if > you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or anything like > Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of your mind, Reaper > looks entirely different and - for multi track recording and mastering - offers > far more than Audacity does, two different pieces of software to do two > completely different things. > >> > >> Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. > >> > >> There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the Reaper > web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a little. > >> > >> > >> On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno > wrote: > >> > >>> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of songs, > using guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very > favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I would like > to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to which is better and > why, considering accessibility, of course. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Rich De Steno > >>> > >>> > >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > >> > >> > >> ** > >> > >> Dane Trethowan > >> Skype: grtdane12 > >> Phone US (213) 438-9741 > >> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 > >> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 > >> Mobile: +61400494862 > >> Fax +61397437954 > >> > >> > >> > >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > ** > > Dane Trethowan > Skype: grtdane12 > Phone US (213) 438-9741 > Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 > Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 > Mobile: +61400494862 > Fax +61397437954 > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Many differences, all I can say is have a look for yourself. On 27 Nov 2013, at 8:37 am, Alexandra Grünauer wrote: > Hi Dane, > > You keep writing that Reaper and Audacity are totally different programmes. > Where are the differences? I've been using sound forge 7 for ages does that > cover the features of the other two programmes? > > Thanks and take care > Alexandra > >> -Original Message- >> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane >> Trethowan >> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 10:16 PM >> To: PC Audio Discussion List >> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >> >> Don't know where you got that from, Reaper supports all platforms and I'm >> using it here on Mac and under Windows. >> >> Why should you pay? Well you don't have to if you don't want the product >> and that's entirely up to you but comparing Audacity to Reaper is like >> comparing Apples to Oranges as they're totally different. >> >> Now for those who are considering the purchase of Reaper - when I >> purchased a licence - it was $50.00 and that licence covered multi > platforms. >> >> >> On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:30 am, Anders Holmberg >> wrote: >> >>> Why should i pay for a program when i can get audacity for free. >>> Reaper doesn't even support other platforms. >>> /A >>> 26 nov 2013 kl. 13:06 skrev Dane Trethowan : >>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much with >> Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will say that if >> you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or anything like >> Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of your mind, Reaper >> looks entirely different and - for multi track recording and mastering - > offers >> far more than Audacity does, two different pieces of software to do two >> completely different things. >>>> >>>> Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. >>>> >>>> There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the > Reaper >> web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a little. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of songs, >> using guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very >> favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I would like >> to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to which is better and >> why, considering accessibility, of course. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Rich De Steno >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>>> >>>> >>>> ** >>>> >>>> Dane Trethowan >>>> Skype: grtdane12 >>>> Phone US (213) 438-9741 >>>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 >>>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 >>>> Mobile: +61400494862 >>>> Fax +61397437954 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> ** >> >> Dane Trethowan >> Skype: grtdane12 >> Phone US (213) 438-9741 >> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 >> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 >> Mobile: +61400494862 >> Fax +61397437954 >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 26, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote: > > Is there any particular reason why you were using the 64-Bit version? There's > no difference in features between 32 and 64 Bit, only difference is for the > plug-ins you can add on. > > >> On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:45 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >> >> Yes the project has stopped. Are u using reaper with ReaAccess with >> Window-Eyes? If so, when I use it on 64 bit we causes it to crash so I have >> to use NVDA. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane >> Trethowan >> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:15 AM >> To: PC Audio Discussion List >> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >> >> I use Reaper under Windows, I thought the whole development of that project >> was stopped as there was no longer any need for it. >> >> >>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 3:59 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>> >>> Hi Dane, are you using reaper on windows? Or on Mac. If Windows there >>> is a plugin called ReaAccess though that has stopped development >>> though I hope that plugin can be re-written, or that someone can write >>> a similar plugin for it. >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>> Dane Trethowan >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:07 AM >>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much >>> with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will say >>> that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or >>> anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of >>> your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi track >>> recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity does, two >>> different pieces of software to do two completely different things. >>> >>> Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. >>> >>> There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the >>> Reaper web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a little. >>> >>> >>>> On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno wrote: >>>> >>>> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of songs, >>>> using >>> guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very >>> favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I would >>> like to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to which is >>> better and why, considering accessibility, of course. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Rich De Steno >>>> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>> >>> >>> ** >>> >>> Dane Trethowan >>> Skype: grtdane12 >>> Phone US (213) 438-9741 >>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 >>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 >>> Mobile: +61400494862 >>> Fax +61397437954 >>> >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> ** >> >> Dane Trethowan >> Skype: grtdane12 >> Phone US (213) 438-9741 >> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 >> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 >> Mobile: +61400494862 >> Fax +61397437954 >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > ** > > Dane Trethowan > Skype: grtdane12 > Phone US (213) 438-9741 > Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 > Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 > Mobile: +61400494862 > Fax +61397437954 > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org because 64-bit is my computer, and also the > access only seems to work on the 64-bit version of Reaper To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
RE: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Hello Dane, I use a 64 bit computer, and when I tried ReaAccess with the 32 bit version it just told me that it could not install unless I have 64 bit. -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of sky mundell Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:34 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 26, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote: > > Is there any particular reason why you were using the 64-Bit version? There's no difference in features between 32 and 64 Bit, only difference is for the plug-ins you can add on. > > >> On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:45 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >> >> Yes the project has stopped. Are u using reaper with ReaAccess with >> Window-Eyes? If so, when I use it on 64 bit we causes it to crash so >> I have to use NVDA. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >> Dane Trethowan >> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:15 AM >> To: PC Audio Discussion List >> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >> >> I use Reaper under Windows, I thought the whole development of that >> project was stopped as there was no longer any need for it. >> >> >>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 3:59 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>> >>> Hi Dane, are you using reaper on windows? Or on Mac. If Windows >>> there is a plugin called ReaAccess though that has stopped >>> development though I hope that plugin can be re-written, or that >>> someone can write a similar plugin for it. >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>> Dane Trethowan >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:07 AM >>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much >>> with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will >>> say that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or >>> anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of >>> your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi track >>> recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity does, two >>> different pieces of software to do two completely different things. >>> >>> Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. >>> >>> There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the >>> Reaper web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a little. >>> >>> >>>> On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno wrote: >>>> >>>> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of >>>> songs, using >>> guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very >>> favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I >>> would like to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to >>> which is better and why, considering accessibility, of course. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Rich De Steno >>>> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>> >>> >>> ** >>> >>> Dane Trethowan >>> Skype: grtdane12 >>> Phone US (213) 438-9741 >>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 >>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 >>> Mobile: +61400494862 >>> Fax +61397437954 >>> >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> ** >> >> Dane Trethowan >> Skype: grtdane12 >> Phone US (213) 438-9741 >> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 >> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 >> Mobile: +61400494862 >> Fax +61397437954 >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > ** > > Dane Trethowan > Skype: grtdane12 > Phone US (213) 438-9741 > Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 > Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 > Mobile: +61400494862 > Fax +61397437954 > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org because 64-bit is my computer, and > also the access only seems to work on the 64-bit version of Reaper To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Hi there! Nice ad for the iPhone , seems the rest of your eMail is blank. On 27 Nov 2013, at 9:33 am, sky mundell wrote: > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Nov 26, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote: >> >> Is there any particular reason why you were using the 64-Bit version? >> There's no difference in features between 32 and 64 Bit, only difference is >> for the plug-ins you can add on. >> >> >>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:45 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>> >>> Yes the project has stopped. Are u using reaper with ReaAccess with >>> Window-Eyes? If so, when I use it on 64 bit we causes it to crash so I have >>> to use NVDA. >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane >>> Trethowan >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:15 AM >>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>> >>> I use Reaper under Windows, I thought the whole development of that project >>> was stopped as there was no longer any need for it. >>> >>> >>>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 3:59 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Dane, are you using reaper on windows? Or on Mac. If Windows there >>>> is a plugin called ReaAccess though that has stopped development >>>> though I hope that plugin can be re-written, or that someone can write >>>> a similar plugin for it. >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>>> Dane Trethowan >>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:07 AM >>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much >>>> with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will say >>>> that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or >>>> anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of >>>> your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi track >>>> recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity does, two >>>> different pieces of software to do two completely different things. >>>> >>>> Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. >>>> >>>> There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the >>>> Reaper web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a little. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of songs, >>>>> using >>>> guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very >>>> favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I would >>>> like to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to which is >>>> better and why, considering accessibility, of course. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Rich De Steno >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>>> >>>> >>>> ** >>>> >>>> Dane Trethowan >>>> Skype: grtdane12 >>>> Phone US (213) 438-9741 >>>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 >>>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 >>>> Mobile: +61400494862 >>>> Fax +61397437954 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>>> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>> >>> >>> ** >>> >>> Dane Trethowan >>> Skype: grtdane12 >>> Phone US (213) 438-9741 >>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 >>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 >>> Mobile: +61400494862 >>> Fax +61397437954 >>> >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> ** >> >> Dane Trethowan >> Skype: grtdane12 >> Phone US (213) 438-9741 >> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 >> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 >> Mobile: +61400494862 >> Fax +61397437954 >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org because 64-bit is my computer, and also >> the access only seems to work on the 64-bit version of Reaper > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
I can't help you then as I don't use that plug-in. On 27 Nov 2013, at 9:42 am, Sky Mundell wrote: > Hello Dane, I use a 64 bit computer, and when I tried ReaAccess with the 32 > bit version it just told me that it could not install unless I have 64 bit. > -Original Message- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of sky > mundell > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:34 PM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording > > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Nov 26, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Dane Trethowan > wrote: >> >> Is there any particular reason why you were using the 64-Bit version? > There's no difference in features between 32 and 64 Bit, only difference is > for the plug-ins you can add on. >> >> >>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:45 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>> >>> Yes the project has stopped. Are u using reaper with ReaAccess with >>> Window-Eyes? If so, when I use it on 64 bit we causes it to crash so >>> I have to use NVDA. >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>> Dane Trethowan >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:15 AM >>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>> >>> I use Reaper under Windows, I thought the whole development of that >>> project was stopped as there was no longer any need for it. >>> >>> >>>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 3:59 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Dane, are you using reaper on windows? Or on Mac. If Windows >>>> there is a plugin called ReaAccess though that has stopped >>>> development though I hope that plugin can be re-written, or that >>>> someone can write a similar plugin for it. >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>>> Dane Trethowan >>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:07 AM >>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much >>>> with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will >>>> say that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or >>>> anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of >>>> your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi track >>>> recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity does, two >>>> different pieces of software to do two completely different things. >>>> >>>> Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. >>>> >>>> There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the >>>> Reaper web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a > little. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of >>>>> songs, using >>>> guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very >>>> favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I >>>> would like to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to >>>> which is better and why, considering accessibility, of course. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Rich De Steno >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>>> >>>> >>>> ** >>>> >>>> Dane Trethowan >>>> Skype: grtdane12 >>>> Phone US (213) 438-9741 >>>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 >>>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 >>>> Mobile: +61400494862 >>>> Fax +61397437954 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>>> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>> >>> >>> ** >>> >>
RE: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Ok. What do you use on windows to make it accessible if u don't use ReaAccess? -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:44 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording I can't help you then as I don't use that plug-in. On 27 Nov 2013, at 9:42 am, Sky Mundell wrote: > Hello Dane, I use a 64 bit computer, and when I tried ReaAccess with > the 32 bit version it just told me that it could not install unless I have 64 bit. > -Original Message- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of sky > mundell > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:34 PM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording > > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Nov 26, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Dane Trethowan >> > wrote: >> >> Is there any particular reason why you were using the 64-Bit version? > There's no difference in features between 32 and 64 Bit, only > difference is for the plug-ins you can add on. >> >> >>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:45 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>> >>> Yes the project has stopped. Are u using reaper with ReaAccess with >>> Window-Eyes? If so, when I use it on 64 bit we causes it to crash so >>> I have to use NVDA. >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>> Dane Trethowan >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:15 AM >>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>> >>> I use Reaper under Windows, I thought the whole development of that >>> project was stopped as there was no longer any need for it. >>> >>> >>>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 3:59 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Dane, are you using reaper on windows? Or on Mac. If Windows >>>> there is a plugin called ReaAccess though that has stopped >>>> development though I hope that plugin can be re-written, or that >>>> someone can write a similar plugin for it. >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>>> Dane Trethowan >>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:07 AM >>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much >>>> with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will >>>> say that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or >>>> anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of >>>> your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi track >>>> recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity does, two >>>> different pieces of software to do two completely different things. >>>> >>>> Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. >>>> >>>> There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the >>>> Reaper web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a > little. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of >>>>> songs, using >>>> guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read >>>> very favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. >>>> I would like to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to >>>> which is better and why, considering accessibility, of course. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Rich De Steno >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>>> >>>> >>>> ** >>>> >>>> Dane Trethowan >>>> Skype: grtdane12 >>>> Phone US (213) 438-9741 >>>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 >>>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 >>>> Mobile: +61400494862 >>>> Fax +61397437954 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>
Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
I just use my Screen Reader and the mouse or We Cursor, I can get to all the tracks and menus from there though I do find it convenient to name tracks as soon as I put them down so I don't get confused. On 27 Nov 2013, at 9:45 am, Sky Mundell wrote: > Ok. What do you use on windows to make it accessible if u don't use > ReaAccess? > > -Original Message- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane > Trethowan > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:44 PM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording > > I can't help you then as I don't use that plug-in. > > > On 27 Nov 2013, at 9:42 am, Sky Mundell wrote: > >> Hello Dane, I use a 64 bit computer, and when I tried ReaAccess with >> the 32 bit version it just told me that it could not install unless I have > 64 bit. >> -Original Message- >> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of sky >> mundell >> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:34 PM >> To: PC Audio Discussion List >> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Nov 26, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Dane Trethowan >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> Is there any particular reason why you were using the 64-Bit version? >> There's no difference in features between 32 and 64 Bit, only >> difference is for the plug-ins you can add on. >>> >>> >>>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:45 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes the project has stopped. Are u using reaper with ReaAccess with >>>> Window-Eyes? If so, when I use it on 64 bit we causes it to crash so >>>> I have to use NVDA. >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>>> Dane Trethowan >>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:15 AM >>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>>> >>>> I use Reaper under Windows, I thought the whole development of that >>>> project was stopped as there was no longer any need for it. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 3:59 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Dane, are you using reaper on windows? Or on Mac. If Windows >>>>> there is a plugin called ReaAccess though that has stopped >>>>> development though I hope that plugin can be re-written, or that >>>>> someone can write a similar plugin for it. >>>>> >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>>>> Dane Trethowan >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:07 AM >>>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>>>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much >>>>> with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will >>>>> say that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or >>>>> anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of >>>>> your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi track >>>>> recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity does, two >>>>> different pieces of software to do two completely different things. >>>>> >>>>> Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. >>>>> >>>>> There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the >>>>> Reaper web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a >> little. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of >>>>>> songs, using >>>>> guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read >>>>> very favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. >>>>> I would like to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to >>>>> which is better and why, considering accessibility, of course. >>>>>>
RE: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
and for adjusting the amount of reverberation, you can just use your screen readers mouse keys as well-Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 3:01 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording I just use my Screen Reader and the mouse or We Cursor, I can get to all the tracks and menus from there though I do find it convenient to name tracks as soon as I put them down so I don't get confused. On 27 Nov 2013, at 9:45 am, Sky Mundell wrote: > Ok. What do you use on windows to make it accessible if u don't use > ReaAccess? > > -Original Message- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of > Dane Trethowan > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:44 PM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording > > I can't help you then as I don't use that plug-in. > > > On 27 Nov 2013, at 9:42 am, Sky Mundell wrote: > >> Hello Dane, I use a 64 bit computer, and when I tried ReaAccess with >> the 32 bit version it just told me that it could not install unless I >> have > 64 bit. >> -Original Message- >> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >> sky mundell >> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:34 PM >> To: PC Audio Discussion List >> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Nov 26, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Dane Trethowan >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> Is there any particular reason why you were using the 64-Bit version? >> There's no difference in features between 32 and 64 Bit, only >> difference is for the plug-ins you can add on. >>> >>> >>>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:45 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes the project has stopped. Are u using reaper with ReaAccess with >>>> Window-Eyes? If so, when I use it on 64 bit we causes it to crash >>>> so I have to use NVDA. >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>>> Dane Trethowan >>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:15 AM >>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>>> >>>> I use Reaper under Windows, I thought the whole development of that >>>> project was stopped as there was no longer any need for it. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 3:59 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Dane, are you using reaper on windows? Or on Mac. If Windows >>>>> there is a plugin called ReaAccess though that has stopped >>>>> development though I hope that plugin can be re-written, or that >>>>> someone can write a similar plugin for it. >>>>> >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>>>> Dane Trethowan >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:07 AM >>>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>>>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much >>>>> with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will >>>>> say that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or >>>>> anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out >>>>> of your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi >>>>> track recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity >>>>> does, two different pieces of software to do two completely different things. >>>>> >>>>> Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. >>>>> >>>>> There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on >>>>> the Reaper web site, some are free of charge whilst others will >>>>> cost a >> little. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of >>>>>> songs, u
Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Yep, on the slider. On 27 Nov 2013, at 10:59 am, Sky Mundell wrote: > and for adjusting the amount of reverberation, you can just use your screen > readers mouse keys as well-Original Message- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane > Trethowan > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 3:01 PM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording > > I just use my Screen Reader and the mouse or We Cursor, I can get to all the > tracks and menus from there though I do find it convenient to name tracks as > soon as I put them down so I don't get confused. > > > On 27 Nov 2013, at 9:45 am, Sky Mundell wrote: > >> Ok. What do you use on windows to make it accessible if u don't use >> ReaAccess? >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >> Dane Trethowan >> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:44 PM >> To: PC Audio Discussion List >> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >> >> I can't help you then as I don't use that plug-in. >> >> >> On 27 Nov 2013, at 9:42 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >> >>> Hello Dane, I use a 64 bit computer, and when I tried ReaAccess with >>> the 32 bit version it just told me that it could not install unless I >>> have >> 64 bit. >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>> sky mundell >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:34 PM >>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Nov 26, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Dane Trethowan >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Is there any particular reason why you were using the 64-Bit version? >>> There's no difference in features between 32 and 64 Bit, only >>> difference is for the plug-ins you can add on. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:45 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yes the project has stopped. Are u using reaper with ReaAccess with >>>>> Window-Eyes? If so, when I use it on 64 bit we causes it to crash >>>>> so I have to use NVDA. >>>>> >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>>>> Dane Trethowan >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:15 AM >>>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>>>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>>>> >>>>> I use Reaper under Windows, I thought the whole development of that >>>>> project was stopped as there was no longer any need for it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 3:59 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Dane, are you using reaper on windows? Or on Mac. If Windows >>>>>> there is a plugin called ReaAccess though that has stopped >>>>>> development though I hope that plugin can be re-written, or that >>>>>> someone can write a similar plugin for it. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Original Message- >>>>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>>>>> Dane Trethowan >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:07 AM >>>>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>>>>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi! >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much >>>>>> with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will >>>>>> say that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or >>>>>> anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out >>>>>> of your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi >>>>>> track recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity >>>>>> does, two different pieces of software to do two completely different > things. >>>>>> >>>>>> Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. >>>>>> >>
RE: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Where is the slider in reaper? Which area is it in and which part do I need to click? When I look for the slider their doesn't appear to be one. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Right-click on the effect you require. On 27 Nov 2013, at 11:52 am, Sky Mundell wrote: > Where is the slider in reaper? Which area is it in and which part do I need > to click? When I look for the slider their doesn't appear to be one. > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
RE: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
So you would press f to go into the fx, add the fx, then press f, and then rout your mouse curser, and then what key do you use next? I'm just getting new to this. -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:55 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording Right-click on the effect you require. On 27 Nov 2013, at 11:52 am, Sky Mundell wrote: > Where is the slider in reaper? Which area is it in and which part do I > need to click? When I look for the slider their doesn't appear to be one. > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Hi, What you can't do is manage some of the plugin controls and much more. Take a look at the rea access list. Joe At 23:01 26/11/2013, you wrote: I just use my Screen Reader and the mouse or We Cursor, I can get to all the tracks and menus from there though I do find it convenient to name tracks as soon as I put them down so I don't get confused. On 27 Nov 2013, at 9:45 am, Sky Mundell wrote: > Ok. What do you use on windows to make it accessible if u don't use > ReaAccess? > > -Original Message- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane > Trethowan > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:44 PM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording > > I can't help you then as I don't use that plug-in. > > > On 27 Nov 2013, at 9:42 am, Sky Mundell wrote: > >> Hello Dane, I use a 64 bit computer, and when I tried ReaAccess with >> the 32 bit version it just told me that it could not install unless I have > 64 bit. >> -Original Message- >> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of sky >> mundell >> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:34 PM >> To: PC Audio Discussion List >> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Nov 26, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Dane Trethowan >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> Is there any particular reason why you were using the 64-Bit version? >> There's no difference in features between 32 and 64 Bit, only >> difference is for the plug-ins you can add on. >>> >>> >>>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:45 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes the project has stopped. Are u using reaper with ReaAccess with >>>> Window-Eyes? If so, when I use it on 64 bit we causes it to crash so >>>> I have to use NVDA. >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>>> Dane Trethowan >>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:15 AM >>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>>> >>>> I use Reaper under Windows, I thought the whole development of that >>>> project was stopped as there was no longer any need for it. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 3:59 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Dane, are you using reaper on windows? Or on Mac. If Windows >>>>> there is a plugin called ReaAccess though that has stopped >>>>> development though I hope that plugin can be re-written, or that >>>>> someone can write a similar plugin for it. >>>>> >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>>>> Dane Trethowan >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:07 AM >>>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>>>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much >>>>> with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will >>>>> say that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or >>>>> anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of >>>>> your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi track >>>>> recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity does, two >>>>> different pieces of software to do two completely different things. >>>>> >>>>> Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. >>>>> >>>>> There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the >>>>> Reaper web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a >> little. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of >>>>>> songs, using >>>>> guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read >>>>> very favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. >>>>> I would like to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, a
Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Hi! Well it was my thoughts that it was a windows only product. But if there are a mac version then i should give it ago. What do you get if you pay for it? Do you get any extra features? Skickat från min iPhone > 26 nov 2013 kl. 22:15 skrev Dane Trethowan : > > Don't know where you got that from, Reaper supports all platforms and I'm > using it here on Mac and under Windows. > > Why should you pay? Well you don't have to if you don't want the product and > that's entirely up to you but comparing Audacity to Reaper is like comparing > Apples to Oranges as they're totally different. > > Now for those who are considering the purchase of Reaper - when I purchased a > licence - it was $50.00 and that licence covered multi platforms. > > >> On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:30 am, Anders Holmberg wrote: >> >> Why should i pay for a program when i can get audacity for free. >> Reaper doesn't even support other platforms. >> /A >>> 26 nov 2013 kl. 13:06 skrev Dane Trethowan : >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much with >>> Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will say that if >>> you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or anything like >>> Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of your mind, Reaper >>> looks entirely different and - for multi track recording and mastering - >>> offers far more than Audacity does, two different pieces of software to do >>> two completely different things. >>> >>> Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. >>> >>> There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the Reaper >>> web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a little. >>> >>> On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno wrote: I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of songs, using guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I would like to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to which is better and why, considering accessibility, of course. -- Rich De Steno To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>> >>> >>> ** >>> >>> Dane Trethowan >>> Skype: grtdane12 >>> Phone US (213) 438-9741 >>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 >>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 >>> Mobile: +61400494862 >>> Fax +61397437954 >>> >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > ** > > Dane Trethowan > Skype: grtdane12 > Phone US (213) 438-9741 > Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 > Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 > Mobile: +61400494862 > Fax +61397437954 > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
hi I think you should be able to install a 32 bit program on a 64 bit windows but not the oposit. Skickat från min iPhone > 26 nov 2013 kl. 23:42 skrev "Sky Mundell" : > > Hello Dane, I use a 64 bit computer, and when I tried ReaAccess with the 32 > bit version it just told me that it could not install unless I have 64 bit. > -Original Message- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of sky > mundell > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:34 PM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording > > > > Sent from my iPhone > >>> On Nov 26, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Dane Trethowan >> wrote: >> >> Is there any particular reason why you were using the 64-Bit version? > There's no difference in features between 32 and 64 Bit, only difference is > for the plug-ins you can add on. >> >> >>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:45 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>> >>> Yes the project has stopped. Are u using reaper with ReaAccess with >>> Window-Eyes? If so, when I use it on 64 bit we causes it to crash so >>> I have to use NVDA. >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>> Dane Trethowan >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:15 AM >>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>> >>> I use Reaper under Windows, I thought the whole development of that >>> project was stopped as there was no longer any need for it. >>> >>> >>>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 3:59 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Dane, are you using reaper on windows? Or on Mac. If Windows >>>> there is a plugin called ReaAccess though that has stopped >>>> development though I hope that plugin can be re-written, or that >>>> someone can write a similar plugin for it. >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>>> Dane Trethowan >>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:07 AM >>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much >>>> with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will >>>> say that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or >>>> anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of >>>> your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi track >>>> recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity does, two >>>> different pieces of software to do two completely different things. >>>> >>>> Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. >>>> >>>> There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the >>>> Reaper web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a > little. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of >>>>> songs, using >>>> guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very >>>> favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I >>>> would like to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to >>>> which is better and why, considering accessibility, of course. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Rich De Steno >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>>> >>>> >>>> ** >>>> >>>> Dane Trethowan >>>> Skype: grtdane12 >>>> Phone US (213) 438-9741 >>>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 >>>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 >>>> Mobile: +61400494862 >>>> Fax +61397437954 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>>> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@
Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
No extra features, just a copy you can call your own and a lifetime supply of upgrades for both platforms, the licence key you get is interchangeable between both platforms. On 27 Nov 2013, at 9:39 pm, Anders Holmberg wrote: > Hi! > > Well it was my thoughts that it was a windows only product. > But if there are a mac version then i should give it ago. > What do you get if you pay for it? > Do you get any extra features? > > Skickat från min iPhone > >> 26 nov 2013 kl. 22:15 skrev Dane Trethowan : >> >> Don't know where you got that from, Reaper supports all platforms and I'm >> using it here on Mac and under Windows. >> >> Why should you pay? Well you don't have to if you don't want the product and >> that's entirely up to you but comparing Audacity to Reaper is like comparing >> Apples to Oranges as they're totally different. >> >> Now for those who are considering the purchase of Reaper - when I purchased >> a licence - it was $50.00 and that licence covered multi platforms. >> >> >>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:30 am, Anders Holmberg wrote: >>> >>> Why should i pay for a program when i can get audacity for free. >>> Reaper doesn't even support other platforms. >>> /A 26 nov 2013 kl. 13:06 skrev Dane Trethowan : Hi! I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will say that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi track recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity does, two different pieces of software to do two completely different things. Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the Reaper web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a little. > On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno wrote: > > I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of songs, > using guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read > very favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I > would like to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to which is > better and why, considering accessibility, of course. > > -- > Rich De Steno > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> ** >> >> Dane Trethowan >> Skype: grtdane12 >> Phone US (213) 438-9741 >> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 >> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 >> Mobile: +61400494862 >> Fax +61397437954 >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
In the case of Reaper its recommended you install the 32-Bit version on all machines unless you have specific requirements in your plug-in handling. On 27 Nov 2013, at 9:51 pm, Anders Holmberg wrote: > hi > I think you should be able to install a 32 bit program on a 64 bit windows > but not the oposit. > > Skickat från min iPhone > >> 26 nov 2013 kl. 23:42 skrev "Sky Mundell" : >> >> Hello Dane, I use a 64 bit computer, and when I tried ReaAccess with the 32 >> bit version it just told me that it could not install unless I have 64 bit. >> -Original Message- >> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of sky >> mundell >> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:34 PM >> To: PC Audio Discussion List >> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>>> On Nov 26, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Dane Trethowan >>> wrote: >>> >>> Is there any particular reason why you were using the 64-Bit version? >> There's no difference in features between 32 and 64 Bit, only difference is >> for the plug-ins you can add on. >>> >>> >>>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 7:45 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes the project has stopped. Are u using reaper with ReaAccess with >>>> Window-Eyes? If so, when I use it on 64 bit we causes it to crash so >>>> I have to use NVDA. >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>>> Dane Trethowan >>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:15 AM >>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>>> >>>> I use Reaper under Windows, I thought the whole development of that >>>> project was stopped as there was no longer any need for it. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 3:59 am, Sky Mundell wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Dane, are you using reaper on windows? Or on Mac. If Windows >>>>> there is a plugin called ReaAccess though that has stopped >>>>> development though I hope that plugin can be re-written, or that >>>>> someone can write a similar plugin for it. >>>>> >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>>>> Dane Trethowan >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:07 AM >>>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>>>> Subject: Re: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording >>>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> I'm a regular user of Reaper though I haven't played all that much >>>>> with Audacity so I'm not going to try and compare them but I will >>>>> say that if you're thinking of Reaper interms of a sound editor or >>>>> anything like Audacity then it would be best if you put that out of >>>>> your mind, Reaper looks entirely different and - for multi track >>>>> recording and mastering - offers far more than Audacity does, two >>>>> different pieces of software to do two completely different things. >>>>> >>>>> Try Reaper for yourself and see what you think. >>>>> >>>>> There are plenty of excellent guides and tutorials available on the >>>>> Reaper web site, some are free of charge whilst others will cost a >> little. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 26 Nov 2013, at 11:46 am, Rich De Steno >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I have successfully used Audacity for multitrack recording of >>>>>> songs, using >>>>> guitars, a keyboard, and a drum machine. I have heard and read very >>>>> favorable comments about another multitracker called Reaper. I >>>>> would like to hear opinions from anyone who has used both, as to >>>>> which is better and why, considering accessibility, of course. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Rich De Steno >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ** >>>>
RE: Audacity Versus Reaper for Multitrack Recording
Hi Ted, concerning the latency in Audacity. There is a setting for a latency correction in audacity. In the preferences dialog, in the recording category, there's a latency correction edit box. The default value of the correction is -130ms, and the more negative the value, the larger the correction. There are a couple of ways of adjusting this value so that tracks line up correctly. 1. The first is just to use trial and error. You don't need to get it more accurate than about 10ms. 2. The second is to use a method such as the one described in a guide to audacity for jaws users, which is available at: http://goo.gl/Qi2CeD In the recording section of this guide, there's a sub section on latency correction. In addition to these two methods, I'm aware that someone is working on a plug-in to partly automate the measurement of the latency, but I'm not sure when this will be available, David. original message: Personally, I could not get tracks to sync up together so that they sounded correctly like they would in sonar or reaper. If someone could tell me how to make tracks line up the way they are supposed to, I would give it a try again. For example, while recording vocals, my second harmony part would not stay with the first, and I did not know how to make it line up. That is my two cents worth.
