Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-28 Thread Gary Petraccaro
That's a question you are best off answering for yourself by testing against 
the highest quality you can make to see where you can first hear a 
difference.  If you just want to know because of a theoretical interest, 
pick a lossless format and forget the question.


- Original Message - 
From: Joe n3...@hotmail.com

To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:59 PM
Subject: bit rate and sample rate


Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different 
bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know 
what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know 
you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about 
voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and 
sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech 
audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm 
talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. 
Thanks in advance. Joe.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-28 Thread Gary Wood
Gary, I also feel that this may be an arbitrary standard.  I may have been 
one of these who asked the question, based on comments I've heard.   Of 
course, many say that wav is the best, but when I listen to music, or even 
spoken recordings, the quality may vary from recording to recording, and 
maybe this is all subjective at best.  This is just only my opinion.  Just 
weighing in.
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Petraccaro garyp...@verizon.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


I tried a book I was reading for a bookclub on the Stream, and was able to 
go
all the way to 32-bit mono.  Now, I could hear a difference between that 
and

128 mono, but, to my aging ears, it was slight.  I figure that the
commercial spoken recordings issued as mp3s are at 128 and keep recordings 
I

want to keep at that standard, but it's strictly arbitrary.

- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Minor kmi...@windstream.net

To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:31 PM
Subject: RE: bit rate and sample rate



Hi.

Some out there will disagree with me, but that's all right.  I think that
for recording just speech, CD quality is overkill.  Personally I would 
use

64 KBPS with 44.1 Khz sampling, in mono.  I don't think you'd notice much
of
an improvement with higher bit rates, and in fact you might be able to go
even lower, to 32 kbps, but you might notice some artifacts creep into 
the

picture.

As I said, this is for just speech recording.  Music is a completely
different animal.  I personally use 128 kbps mp3 files at 44k sampling. 
I

know it's not CD quality, but I personally like my files at a constant
value, and this sounds good enough for me.

Have a good day, and don't work too hard.

Kevin Minor
kmi...@windstream.net


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-27 Thread Gary Wood

Should 44 khz be right for voice recordings?
- Original Message - 
From: david davidsaxb...@optusnet.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:41 AM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


your bit was should be 64kbps and your sampling rate really should be no 
lower than 44100KHZ its the best quality and I believe that quality over 
quantity
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Wood k8...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


I'm not sure if this is right, but for voice recordings, maybe it should 
be 22.5 for sample rate, and 64 KBPS for bit rate.
- Original Message - 
From: Joe n3...@hotmail.com

To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:59 PM
Subject: bit rate and sample rate


Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of 
different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still 
don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for 
speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm 
only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What 
combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me 
fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the 
sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better 
understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-27 Thread david

yes its the best to use for voice its a radio standard format
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Wood k8...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate



Should 44 khz be right for voice recordings?
- Original Message - 
From: david davidsaxb...@optusnet.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:41 AM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


your bit was should be 64kbps and your sampling rate really should be no 
lower than 44100KHZ its the best quality and I believe that quality over 
quantity
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Wood k8...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


I'm not sure if this is right, but for voice recordings, maybe it should 
be 22.5 for sample rate, and 64 KBPS for bit rate.
- Original Message - 
From: Joe n3...@hotmail.com

To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:59 PM
Subject: bit rate and sample rate


Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of 
different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still 
don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for 
speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm 
only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What 
combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give 
me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or 
the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better 
understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-26 Thread Gary Wood
I'm not sure if this is right, but for voice recordings, maybe it should be 
22.5 for sample rate, and 64 KBPS for bit rate.
- Original Message - 
From: Joe n3...@hotmail.com

To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:59 PM
Subject: bit rate and sample rate


Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different 
bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know 
what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know 
you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about 
voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and 
sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech 
audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm 
talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. 
Thanks in advance. Joe.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-26 Thread Gary Wood

I think that the gentleman wanted to know for voice recording.
- Original Message - 
From: Richard Claypool bellevue@gmail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate



Hi,

I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. 
that's the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps.  If you want 
lossless i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac.

Ave Rickamus
twitter
http://twitter.com/elheme
msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer

- Original Message - 
From: brandon armstrong stunners...@gmail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 
for cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per 
second should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second.

that's the quality of most cd recordings.
Brandon
On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote:

Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of 
different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still 
don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for 
speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm 
only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What 
combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give me 
fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the 
sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better 
understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 3832 (20090206) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com






__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 3832 (20090206) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-26 Thread david
your bit was should be 64kbps and your sampling rate really should be no 
lower than 44100KHZ its the best quality and I believe that quality over 
quantity
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Wood k8...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


I'm not sure if this is right, but for voice recordings, maybe it should 
be 22.5 for sample rate, and 64 KBPS for bit rate.
- Original Message - 
From: Joe n3...@hotmail.com

To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:59 PM
Subject: bit rate and sample rate


Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different 
bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know 
what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know 
you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about 
voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and 
sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech 
audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm 
talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. 
Thanks in advance. Joe.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-26 Thread Robert doc Wright

that is not so where spoken word is concerned. I use 11025 k at 64 bit mono

- Original Message - 
From: brandon armstrong stunners...@gmail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for 
cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second 
should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second.

that's the quality of most cd recordings.
Brandon
On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote:

Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different 
bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know 
what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know 
you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about 
voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and 
sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech 
audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm 
talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. 
Thanks in advance. Joe.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-26 Thread Robert doc Wright
I hear a lot about flak but I'm pretty sure my zenstone will not play it and 
I no my nls player will not. It seems such a hastle to use one format on 
your computer and then be forced to convert any time you wish to listen 
somewhere other than home.
- Original Message - 
From: Richard Claypool bellevue@gmail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


corective is subjective.  There are people who can hear the difference 
between 320k mp3 and flac.  I can not, but they can.


If you're ripping a cd, and want a perfect archive without the size of wav 
files, go flac.  If you don't care about quality loss, then pick which 
flavor of mp3 encoding sounds best to you, and use it.  If 128k is good 
enough for you, go for it.


We have newer and tighter methods of encoding, but mp3 is still bmoc.
Ave Rickamus
twitter
http://twitter.com/elheme
msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer

- Original Message - 
From: Judy W ju...@austin.rr.com

To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:24 PM
Subject: RE: bit rate and sample rate




Yes, and I have a degree in radio television film and 192 is the correct
rate for a cd.  If you want to save hard drive space, you can go lower, 
but

one can hear the difference.

Judy


-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]

On Behalf Of brandon armstrong
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:13 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate

for thoughs who are knowing, I took broadcasting in college, and 
graduated

with a degree in radio broadcasting.
Brandon
On Apr 25, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Richard Claypool wrote:


Hi,

I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps.

that's the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps.  If you want
lossless i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac.

Ave Rickamus
twitter
http://twitter.com/elheme
msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer

- Original Message - From: brandon armstrong
stunners...@gmail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate



if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1

for cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per
second should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second.

that's the quality of most cd recordings.
Brandon
On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote:


Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of
different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still 
don't
know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I 
know

you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about
voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and
sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech 
audio.
What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking 
about

MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in
advance. Joe.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 3832 (20090206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com





__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 3832 (20090206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 3832 (20090206) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com






__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 3832 (20090206) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-26 Thread Laz Mesa
The sampling rate doesn't make a difference in the size of the file,
so there shouldn't be any consideration to go below 44.  I've seen a
lot of files encoded at 22 because the person thought it would halve
the file size, but that's only an old wives tale.  Try it yourself and
see if it makes any difference in the size of the file.  Encode the
same thing at the same bit rate but at 22 and at 44 sampling rates and
take a look at the file sizes.

As for bit rate, whatever sounds good to your ears.  I myself prefer
at least 64 for mono recordings because once you start going below
that, the digital artifacts start to creep in.  This translates to at
least 128 for stereo recordings.

Some people are ok with the lower sampling rates and lower bit rates,
while others can't stand to even listen to MP3 files at all, no matter
what the bit rate or sampling rate.  It's a very personal thing, so
whatever sounds good to your ears is your answer.

Laz

Joe wrote:

 Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different
 bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know
 what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know
 you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about
 voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and
 sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech
 audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm
 talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this.
 Thanks in advance. Joe.

-- 
Talking MP3 players!  Accessible  affordable!  Great features
including:  FM radio, voice recording, expandable memory, great book
marking capabilities, very user configurable, and a lot more!  Play
MP3, WMA, OGG, AAC, FLAC, AIFF, WAV, and more!  All our players are
less than $100, plus free shipping  handling to anywhere in the US!

Join our mailing list by sending a blank email to:
rockboxedsansatalkingmp3players-subscr...@yahoogroups.com

To hear what our talking MP3 players sound like, download the demo from here:
http://www.talkingmp3players.com/demo.html

Visit our home page:
http://www.talkingmp3players.com/

Contact information:
Email:  accessibleelectron...@gmail.com  Phone:  727 498-0121  Skype
name:  lazmesa

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-26 Thread Laz Mesa
Hi Robert,

Maybe the answer is to get a portable media player that plays FLAC and
other file types.  The ones we sell do.  Take a look at my signature
below.

Laz

Robert doc Wright godfea...@wrighthere.net wrote:

I hear a lot about flak but I'm pretty sure my zenstone will not play it and
I no my nls player will not. It seems such a hastle to use one format on
your computer and then be forced to convert any time you wish to listen
somewhere other than home.


-- 
Talking MP3 players!  Accessible  affordable!  Great features
including:  FM radio, voice recording, expandable memory, great book
marking capabilities, very user configurable, and a lot more!  Play
MP3, WMA, OGG, AAC, FLAC, AIFF, WAV, and more!  All our players are
less than $100, plus free shipping  handling to anywhere in the US!

Join our mailing list by sending a blank email to:
rockboxedsansatalkingmp3players-subscr...@yahoogroups.com

To hear what our talking MP3 players sound like, download the demo from here:
http://www.talkingmp3players.com/demo.html

Visit our home page:
http://www.talkingmp3players.com/

Contact information:
Email:  accessibleelectron...@gmail.com  Phone:  727 498-0121  Skype
name:  lazmesa

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-26 Thread Joe
Hi. Thanks fore all the suggestions. I've experimented with a lot of 
combinations over the years, and you can hear the difference. I guess what I'm 
asking, is how low can you get away with and still have acceptable voice 
quality. I guess that's an impossible question to answer since not everyone's 
hearing is the same. A golden eared audio file will hear things someone else 
won't even notice. If you want to try an interesting experiment and you have 
goldwave and good headphones with a flat response from 20 to 20 kHz, try 
testing your hearing to see just how far up the spectrum you can hear a sine 
wave. select a kHz tone and turn the volume up just until you barely hear it. 
Never never go any louder than that as you increase frequency. if you don't 
hear a tone after lets say 16 kHz, it doesn't necessarily mean its not there, 
it just means your hearing probably rolls off at that frequency. Again. Don't 
turn up the volume since you don't want to damage your hearing. Keep it just at 
the point you can hear a 3 kHz sign wave. I pick that frequency because most 
peoples hearing is OK there, so what you perceive to be a low volume level at 
that frequency  is probably accurate. This test is far from precise but it 
gives a good idea of someone's hearing range. You may not hear as high as you 
think you can. Anyway, thanks for all the answers. I'll continue to experiment. 
The recordings I'm making are just voice recordings of tutorials on how to use 
an amateur radio from a blind perspective that I'm putting on line. I'm also 
voice tagging names of albums on my thumb drive for my NLS player to be put in 
audio+podcasts. Thanks again. Joe.
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-25 Thread Joe
Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit 
rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what 
combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need 
higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice 
recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate 
will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should be 
higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd 
like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe.
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-25 Thread brandon armstrong
if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for cd 
quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second should 
be at 128 kbps or killabites per second.
that's the quality of most cd recordings.
Brandon
On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote:

 Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different bit 
 rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what 
 combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need 
 higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice 
 recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample rate 
 will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What should 
 be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. 
 I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe.
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-25 Thread Richard Claypool

Hi,

I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps.  that's 
the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps.  If you want lossless 
i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac.

Ave Rickamus
twitter
http://twitter.com/elheme
msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer

- Original Message - 
From: brandon armstrong stunners...@gmail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for 
cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second 
should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second.

that's the quality of most cd recordings.
Brandon
On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote:

Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different 
bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know 
what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know 
you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about 
voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and 
sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech 
audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm 
talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. 
Thanks in advance. Joe.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 3832 (20090206) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com






__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 3832 (20090206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-25 Thread brandon armstrong
for thoughs who are knowing, I took broadcasting in college, and graduated with 
a degree in radio broadcasting.
Brandon
On Apr 25, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Richard Claypool wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps.  that's 
 the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps.  If you want lossless 
 i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac.
 Ave Rickamus
 twitter
 http://twitter.com/elheme
 msn
 bellevue@gmail.com
 skype
 lord_of_beer
 last fm
 http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer
 
 - Original Message - From: brandon armstrong stunners...@gmail.com
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM
 Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate
 
 
 if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for 
 cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second 
 should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second.
 that's the quality of most cd recordings.
 Brandon
 On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote:
 
 Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different 
 bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know what 
 combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know you need 
 higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about voice 
 recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and sample 
 rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio. What 
 should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 
 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in advance. 
 Joe.
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
 database 3832 (20090206) __
 
 The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
 
 http://www.eset.com
 
 
 
 
 __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
 database 3832 (20090206) __
 
 The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
 
 http://www.eset.com
 
 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-25 Thread Judy W

Yes, and I have a degree in radio television film and 192 is the correct
rate for a cd.  If you want to save hard drive space, you can go lower, but
one can hear the difference.

Judy
 

-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of brandon armstrong
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:13 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate

for thoughs who are knowing, I took broadcasting in college, and graduated
with a degree in radio broadcasting.
Brandon
On Apr 25, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Richard Claypool wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps.
that's the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps.  If you want
lossless i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac.
 Ave Rickamus
 twitter
 http://twitter.com/elheme
 msn
 bellevue@gmail.com
 skype
 lord_of_beer
 last fm
 http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer
 
 - Original Message - From: brandon armstrong 
 stunners...@gmail.com
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM
 Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate
 
 
 if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1
for cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per
second should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second.
 that's the quality of most cd recordings.
 Brandon
 On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote:
 
 Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of
different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't
know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know
you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about
voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and
sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech audio.
What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about
MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in
advance. Joe.
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
 signature database 3832 (20090206) __
 
 The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
 
 http://www.eset.com
 
 
 
 
 __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
 signature database 3832 (20090206) __
 
 The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
 
 http://www.eset.com
 
 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-25 Thread Judy W
Hi,

for speech I would suggest 44.1 and 64 kbps. If it is a performance, sound
seeing tour, or historical event I would consider either 96 or 128 for
speech only. This does not apply to the earlier posts on music and cd
quality.

Judy
 

-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Richard Claypool
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate

Hi,

I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps.  that's
the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps.  If you want lossless
i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac.
Ave Rickamus
twitter
http://twitter.com/elheme
msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer

- Original Message -
From: brandon armstrong stunners...@gmail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


 if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 for

 cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per second

 should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second.
 that's the quality of most cd recordings.
 Brandon
 On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote:

 Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of different

 bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know 
 what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know 
 you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about

 voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and 
 sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech 
 audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm 
 talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this.

 Thanks in advance. Joe.
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

 __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
 signature database 3832 (20090206) __

 The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

 http://www.eset.com


 


__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3832 (20090206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-25 Thread Kevin Minor
Hi.

Some out there will disagree with me, but that's all right.  I think that
for recording just speech, CD quality is overkill.  Personally I would use
64 KBPS with 44.1 Khz sampling, in mono.  I don't think you'd notice much of
an improvement with higher bit rates, and in fact you might be able to go
even lower, to 32 kbps, but you might notice some artifacts creep into the
picture.

As I said, this is for just speech recording.  Music is a completely
different animal.  I personally use 128 kbps mp3 files at 44k sampling.  I
know it's not CD quality, but I personally like my files at a constant
value, and this sounds good enough for me.

Have a good day, and don't work too hard.

Kevin Minor
kmi...@windstream.net


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-25 Thread Richard Claypool
That's nice, but it still does not change the fact that a 128k mp3 is not cd 
quality.  Now, for most people, 128k is perfectly fine granted, but that 
doesn't change the facts.

Ave Rickamus
twitter
http://twitter.com/elheme
msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer

- Original Message - 
From: brandon armstrong stunners...@gmail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


for thoughs who are knowing, I took broadcasting in college, and graduated 
with a degree in radio broadcasting.

Brandon
On Apr 25, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Richard Claypool wrote:


Hi,

I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. 
that's the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps.  If you want 
lossless i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac.

Ave Rickamus
twitter
http://twitter.com/elheme
msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer

- Original Message - From: brandon armstrong 
stunners...@gmail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 
for cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per 
second should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second.

that's the quality of most cd recordings.
Brandon
On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote:

Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of 
different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still 
don't know what combination of the two give good enough quality for 
speech. I know you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm 
only talking about voice recordings using a mic at this point. What 
combination of bit and sample rate will take the least space and give 
me fair quality speech audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or 
the sample rate. I'm talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better 
understanding of this. Thanks in advance. Joe.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 3832 (20090206) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com





__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 3832 (20090206) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 3832 (20090206) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com






__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 3832 (20090206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-25 Thread Richard Claypool
corective is subjective.  There are people who can hear the difference 
between 320k mp3 and flac.  I can not, but they can.


If you're ripping a cd, and want a perfect archive without the size of wav 
files, go flac.  If you don't care about quality loss, then pick which 
flavor of mp3 encoding sounds best to you, and use it.  If 128k is good 
enough for you, go for it.


We have newer and tighter methods of encoding, but mp3 is still bmoc.
Ave Rickamus
twitter
http://twitter.com/elheme
msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer

- Original Message - 
From: Judy W ju...@austin.rr.com

To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:24 PM
Subject: RE: bit rate and sample rate




Yes, and I have a degree in radio television film and 192 is the correct
rate for a cd.  If you want to save hard drive space, you can go lower, 
but

one can hear the difference.

Judy


-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of brandon armstrong
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:13 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate

for thoughs who are knowing, I took broadcasting in college, and graduated
with a degree in radio broadcasting.
Brandon
On Apr 25, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Richard Claypool wrote:


Hi,

I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps.

that's the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps.  If you want
lossless i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac.

Ave Rickamus
twitter
http://twitter.com/elheme
msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer

- Original Message - From: brandon armstrong
stunners...@gmail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate



if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1

for cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per
second should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second.

that's the quality of most cd recordings.
Brandon
On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote:


Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of
different bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still 
don't
know what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I 
know

you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking about
voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and
sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech 
audio.

What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm talking about
MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of this. Thanks in
advance. Joe.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 3832 (20090206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com





__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 3832 (20090206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 3832 (20090206) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com






__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 3832 (20090206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-25 Thread Richard Claypool
One thing I'll add to this.  if it's speach, go 64k mono, not stereo.  when 
you take a file, and make it stereo, you have to put twice as much data into 
the same size file, guess what gets crunched?  that's right, quality.  for a 
drastic sample of this effect, ri9p a file at 24k mono, and then at 24k 
stereo.


Pet pieve, people who rip books at 64k stereo.  Plus, not all encoders are 
equil.


Ave Rickamus
twitter
http://twitter.com/elheme
msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer

- Original Message - 
From: Judy W ju...@austin.rr.com

To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:28 PM
Subject: RE: bit rate and sample rate



Hi,

for speech I would suggest 44.1 and 64 kbps. If it is a performance, sound
seeing tour, or historical event I would consider either 96 or 128 for
speech only. This does not apply to the earlier posts on music and cd
quality.

Judy


-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Richard Claypool
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate

Hi,

I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. 
that's

the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps.  If you want lossless
i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac.
Ave Rickamus
twitter
http://twitter.com/elheme
msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer

- Original Message -
From: brandon armstrong stunners...@gmail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 
for


cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per 
second



should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second.
that's the quality of most cd recordings.
Brandon
On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote:

Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of 
different



bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know
what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know
you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking 
about



voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and
sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech
audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm
talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of 
this.



Thanks in advance. Joe.
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 3832 (20090206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com






__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature

database 3832 (20090206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 3832 (20090206) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com






__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 3832 (20090206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-25 Thread Kelly Pierce
For audio books on CD I obtain from the public library and rip to
listen on my MP3 player, I use a 44.100 sampling rate and 96k bitrate.
 I have found that I lose some of the emotion and distinctness of the
reader at 64k.  At that lower bitrate, the recording sounds flat.
Broadcast radio standards do call for 128k bit rates.  For personal
listening of voice recordings, 96k is a good compromise for me between
broadcast quality and the 64k used in many online archives.  I’m
especially keen to the trade offs as I am still using an original
Bookport with a 512 megabyte card.


Kelly




On 4/25/10, Richard Claypool bellevue@gmail.com wrote:
 One thing I'll add to this.  if it's speach, go 64k mono, not stereo.  when
 you take a file, and make it stereo, you have to put twice as much data into
 the same size file, guess what gets crunched?  that's right, quality.  for a
 drastic sample of this effect, ri9p a file at 24k mono, and then at 24k
 stereo.

 Pet pieve, people who rip books at 64k stereo.  Plus, not all encoders are
 equil.

 Ave Rickamus
 twitter
 http://twitter.com/elheme
 msn
 bellevue@gmail.com
 skype
 lord_of_beer
 last fm
 http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer

 - Original Message -
 From: Judy W ju...@austin.rr.com
 To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:28 PM
 Subject: RE: bit rate and sample rate


 Hi,

 for speech I would suggest 44.1 and 64 kbps. If it is a performance, sound
 seeing tour, or historical event I would consider either 96 or 128 for
 speech only. This does not apply to the earlier posts on music and cd
 quality.

 Judy


 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of Richard Claypool
 Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:12 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate

 Hi,

 I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps.
 that's
 the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps.  If you want lossless
 i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac.
 Ave Rickamus
 twitter
 http://twitter.com/elheme
 msn
 bellevue@gmail.com
 skype
 lord_of_beer
 last fm
 http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer

 - Original Message -
 From: brandon armstrong stunners...@gmail.com
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM
 Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


 if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1
 for

 cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per
 second

 should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second.
 that's the quality of most cd recordings.
 Brandon
 On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote:

 Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of
 different

 bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know
 what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know
 you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking
 about

 voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and
 sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech
 audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm
 talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of
 this.

 Thanks in advance. Joe.
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

 __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
 signature database 3832 (20090206) __

 The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

 http://www.eset.com





 __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
 signature
 database 3832 (20090206) __

 The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

 http://www.eset.com




 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

 __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
 signature database 3832 (20090206) __

 The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

 http://www.eset.com





 __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
 database 3832 (20090206) __

 The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

 http://www.eset.com




 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-25 Thread Rob Tabor

Hello.
I run my audio at 44.1 KHz, but what bit rate would you all advise to 
produce CD quality for a voice and music mix, such as a voiceover promo?

Rob Tabor
- Original Message - 
From: Judy W ju...@austin.rr.com

To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:28 PM
Subject: RE: bit rate and sample rate



Hi,

for speech I would suggest 44.1 and 64 kbps. If it is a performance, sound
seeing tour, or historical event I would consider either 96 or 128 for
speech only. This does not apply to the earlier posts on music and cd
quality.

Judy


-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Richard Claypool
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate

Hi,

I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. 
that's

the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps.  If you want lossless
i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac.
Ave Rickamus
twitter
http://twitter.com/elheme
msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer

- Original Message -
From: brandon armstrong stunners...@gmail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 
for


cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per 
second



should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second.
that's the quality of most cd recordings.
Brandon
On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote:

Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of 
different



bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know
what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know
you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking 
about



voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and
sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech
audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm
talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of 
this.



Thanks in advance. Joe.
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 3832 (20090206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com






__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature

database 3832 (20090206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: bit rate and sample rate

2010-04-25 Thread Rob Tabor

Good evening.
I use Lame MP3 encoder which seems to capture good fidelity. Is there an MP3 
codec that produces higher audio fidelity?

Rob Tabor
- Original Message - 
From: Richard Claypool bellevue@gmail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


One thing I'll add to this.  if it's speach, go 64k mono, not stereo. 
when you take a file, and make it stereo, you have to put twice as much 
data into the same size file, guess what gets crunched?  that's right, 
quality.  for a drastic sample of this effect, ri9p a file at 24k mono, 
and then at 24k stereo.


Pet pieve, people who rip books at 64k stereo.  Plus, not all encoders are 
equil.


Ave Rickamus
twitter
http://twitter.com/elheme
msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer

- Original Message - 
From: Judy W ju...@austin.rr.com

To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:28 PM
Subject: RE: bit rate and sample rate



Hi,

for speech I would suggest 44.1 and 64 kbps. If it is a performance, 
sound

seeing tour, or historical event I would consider either 96 or 128 for
speech only. This does not apply to the earlier posts on music and cd
quality.

Judy


-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]

On Behalf Of Richard Claypool
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate

Hi,

I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps. 
that's

the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps.  If you want lossless
i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac.
Ave Rickamus
twitter
http://twitter.com/elheme
msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer

- Original Message -
From: brandon armstrong stunners...@gmail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate


if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1 
for


cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per 
second



should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second.
that's the quality of most cd recordings.
Brandon
On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote:

Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of 
different



bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know
what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know
you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking 
about



voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and
sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech
audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm
talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of 
this.



Thanks in advance. Joe.
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 3832 (20090206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com






__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature

database 3832 (20090206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 3832 (20090206) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com






__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 3832 (20090206) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org