Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-11.txt

[Dhruv Dhody]

Hi,

A small update in the IANA section for the registry URL as per the IANA
preference.

Thanks!
Dhruv

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:09 AM,  wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group
> of the IETF.
>
> Title   : Domain Subobjects for Path Computation Element
> (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP).
> Authors : Dhruv Dhody
>   Udayasree Palle
>   Ramon Casellas
> Filename: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-11.txt
> Pages   : 33
> Date: 2015-11-19
>
> Abstract:
>The ability to compute shortest constrained Traffic Engineering Label
>Switched Paths (TE LSPs) in Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and
>Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) networks across multiple domains has been
>identified as a key requirement.  In this context, a domain is a
>collection of network elements within a common sphere of address
>management or path computational responsibility such as an Interior
>Gateway Protocol (IGP) area or an Autonomous System (AS).  This
>document specifies a representation and encoding of a Domain-
>Sequence, which is defined as an ordered sequence of domains
>traversed to reach the destination domain to be used by Path
>Computation Elements (PCEs) to compute inter-domain constrained
>shortest paths across a predetermined sequence of domains . This
>document also defines new subobjects to be used to encode domain
>identifiers.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-11
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-11
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> ___
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-11.txt

[internet-drafts]

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the 
IETF.

Title   : Domain Subobjects for Path Computation Element (PCE) 
Communication Protocol (PCEP).
Authors : Dhruv Dhody
  Udayasree Palle
  Ramon Casellas
Filename: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-11.txt
Pages   : 33
Date: 2015-11-19

Abstract:
   The ability to compute shortest constrained Traffic Engineering Label
   Switched Paths (TE LSPs) in Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and
   Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) networks across multiple domains has been
   identified as a key requirement.  In this context, a domain is a
   collection of network elements within a common sphere of address
   management or path computational responsibility such as an Interior
   Gateway Protocol (IGP) area or an Autonomous System (AS).  This
   document specifies a representation and encoding of a Domain-
   Sequence, which is defined as an ordered sequence of domains
   traversed to reach the destination domain to be used by Path
   Computation Elements (PCEs) to compute inter-domain constrained
   shortest paths across a predetermined sequence of domains . This
   document also defines new subobjects to be used to encode domain
   identifiers.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-11

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-11


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pceps-06.txt

[DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA]

Hi,

This new version of draft-ietf-pce-pceps addresses the comments received during 
the WG Last Call, and corrects a few nits the authors have found while 
addressing those comments.

We believe the document is ready to be progressed.

Be goode,

Begin forwarded message:

From: mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pceps-06.txt
Date: 20 November 2015 at 24:35:30.000 GMT+1
To: mailto:i-d-annou...@ietf.org>>
Cc: mailto:pce@ietf.org>>


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the 
IETF.

   Title   : Secure Transport for PCEP
   Authors : Diego R. Lopez
 Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
 Qin Wu
 Dhruv Dhody
Filename: draft-ietf-pce-pceps-06.txt
Pages   : 20
Date: 2015-11-19

Abstract:
  The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) defines
  the mechanisms for the communication between a Path Computation
  Client (PCC) and a Path Computation Element (PCE), or among PCEs.
  This document describe the usage of Transport Layer Security (TLS) to
  enhance PCEP security, hence the PCEPS acronym proposed for it.  The
  additional security mechanisms are provided by the transport protocol
  supporting PCEP, and therefore they do not affect the flexibility and
  extensibility of PCEP.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pceps/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pceps-06

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pceps-06


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

--
"Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"

Dr Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D
http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/

e-mail: diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com
Tel:+34 913 129 041
Mobile: +34 682 051 091
--




Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede 
contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la 
persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda 
notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin 
autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha 
recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente 
por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. 
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not 
read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this 
communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode 
conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa 
ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica 
notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização 
pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem 
por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e 
proceda a sua destruição
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pceps-06.txt

[internet-drafts]

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the 
IETF.

Title   : Secure Transport for PCEP
Authors : Diego R. Lopez
  Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
  Qin Wu
  Dhruv Dhody
Filename: draft-ietf-pce-pceps-06.txt
Pages   : 20
Date: 2015-11-19

Abstract:
   The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) defines
   the mechanisms for the communication between a Path Computation
   Client (PCC) and a Path Computation Element (PCE), or among PCEs.
   This document describe the usage of Transport Layer Security (TLS) to
   enhance PCEP security, hence the PCEPS acronym proposed for it.  The
   additional security mechanisms are provided by the transport protocol
   supporting PCEP, and therefore they do not affect the flexibility and
   extensibility of PCEP.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pceps/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pceps-06

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pceps-06


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-10.txt

[Dhruv Dhody]

Hi WG, All,

This update takes care of the IANA, Gen-Art, Sec-Dir, and IESG reviews.
Please let me know if you have any concern.

Regards,
Dhruv


On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:05 PM,  wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group
> of the IETF.
>
> Title   : Domain Subobjects for Path Computation Element
> (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP).
> Authors : Dhruv Dhody
>   Udayasree Palle
>   Ramon Casellas
> Filename: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-10.txt
> Pages   : 33
> Date: 2015-11-19
>
> Abstract:
>The ability to compute shortest constrained Traffic Engineering Label
>Switched Paths (TE LSPs) in Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and
>Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) networks across multiple domains has been
>identified as a key requirement.  In this context, a domain is a
>collection of network elements within a common sphere of address
>management or path computational responsibility such as an Interior
>Gateway Protocol (IGP) area or an Autonomous System (AS).  This
>document specifies a representation and encoding of a Domain-
>Sequence, which is defined as an ordered sequence of domains
>traversed to reach the destination domain to be used by Path
>Computation Elements (PCEs) to compute inter-domain constrained
>shortest paths across a predetermined sequence of domains . This
>document also defines new subobjects to be used to encode domain
>identifiers.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-10
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-10
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> ___
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-10.txt

[internet-drafts]

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the 
IETF.

Title   : Domain Subobjects for Path Computation Element (PCE) 
Communication Protocol (PCEP).
Authors : Dhruv Dhody
  Udayasree Palle
  Ramon Casellas
Filename: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-10.txt
Pages   : 33
Date: 2015-11-19

Abstract:
   The ability to compute shortest constrained Traffic Engineering Label
   Switched Paths (TE LSPs) in Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and
   Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) networks across multiple domains has been
   identified as a key requirement.  In this context, a domain is a
   collection of network elements within a common sphere of address
   management or path computational responsibility such as an Interior
   Gateway Protocol (IGP) area or an Autonomous System (AS).  This
   document specifies a representation and encoding of a Domain-
   Sequence, which is defined as an ordered sequence of domains
   traversed to reach the destination domain to be used by Path
   Computation Elements (PCEs) to compute inter-domain constrained
   shortest paths across a predetermined sequence of domains . This
   document also defines new subobjects to be used to encode domain
   identifiers.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-10

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-10


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] PCE WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pce-pceps-04

[t . petch]

 Original Message -
From: "Julien Meuric" 
To: "Dhruv Dhody" ; "DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA"

Cc: 
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 10:19 AM
> Hi Dhruv,
>
> If you expect some updates after a review from the Security
Directorate,
> then the sooner the better. If you feel it useful, we will proceed
when
> your next revision is published.
>
> Thanks for being proactive here,

Two sorts of things that the Security Directorate might comment on

- the use of compression, where the I-D says
"
 *  Support for and negotiation of compression is OPTIONAL.
"
whereas on 26th April 2014 (not 2015) the TLS WG said
"   We have strong confirmation of consensus to remove compression
from TLS 1.3.   The Editor is requested to make the appropriate changes
to the draft on github.

Joe"

This came about because of loopholes that had been found with the use of
compression; my sense is that compression has gone the way of RC4 (but
that there is no I-D to say so).

- fingerprints, where the I-D says
"Implementations MUST support SHA-256 as the hash algorithm for  the
fingerprint."

which seems reasonable but there is an outstanding DISCUSS on another
I-D which says
"(3) Consider zmap. When this is deployed, what'll be the
effect of surveys that fingerprint all of the devices on the
visible Internet who implement this protocol? Did the WG
consider that?"

to which my response is I don't understand; but it is a DISCUSS so
someone will in due course.  Like PCEPS, the reference is to the
fingerprint of a certificate stored in a device for client/server
authentication with TLS.  Will this I-D get the same DISCUSS?  I don't
see why not (but then I don't understand the DISCUSS:-(

Tom Petch













>
> Julien
>
>
> Nov. 19, 2015 - dhruv.dh...@huawei.com:
> > Hi Julien,
> >
> > We have the update ready to go.
> >
> > Quoting from Tom's mail -
> >
> >> So I value the early intervention of the
> >> Security Directorate to try and fix such
> >> issues sooner, and so cheaper, rather than later.
> >
> > We were wondering if it would be worthwhile (and allowed by the
process) to request for an early Sec-Dir review while the control is
still with the WG?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dhruv
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
> >> Sent: 19 November 2015 14:56
> >>
> >> Hola Diego,
> >>
> >> The WG LC was started for a 2-week period: you can consider it
finished.
> >>
> >> Finished or not, you are expected to resolve all the received
comments and
> >> publish an update accordingly, so as to have the I-D ready to be
sent to the
> >> IESG. Feel free to proceed as soon as you are able to.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Julien
> >>
> >>
> >> Nov. 18, 2015 - diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com:
> >>>
> >>> And let me insist that I'd directly ask the UTA WG about this. My
only
> >>> question is about procedure: shall we wait till we finish the last
> >>> call period? Shall we perform it as part of the last call process?
> >>> What do our chairs think?
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Pce mailing list
> >> Pce@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
> ___
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] PCE WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pce-pceps-04

[Julien Meuric]

Hi Dhruv,

If you expect some updates after a review from the Security Directorate, 
then the sooner the better. If you feel it useful, we will proceed when 
your next revision is published.


Thanks for being proactive here,

Julien


Nov. 19, 2015 - dhruv.dh...@huawei.com:

Hi Julien,

We have the update ready to go.

Quoting from Tom's mail -


So I value the early intervention of the
Security Directorate to try and fix such
issues sooner, and so cheaper, rather than later.


We were wondering if it would be worthwhile (and allowed by the process) to 
request for an early Sec-Dir review while the control is still with the WG?

Regards,
Dhruv



-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
Sent: 19 November 2015 14:56

Hola Diego,

The WG LC was started for a 2-week period: you can consider it finished.

Finished or not, you are expected to resolve all the received comments and
publish an update accordingly, so as to have the I-D ready to be sent to the
IESG. Feel free to proceed as soon as you are able to.

Cheers,

Julien


Nov. 18, 2015 - diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com:


And let me insist that I'd directly ask the UTA WG about this. My only
question is about procedure: shall we wait till we finish the last
call period? Shall we perform it as part of the last call process?
What do our chairs think?


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-09: (with COMMENT)

[Dhruv Dhody]

Hi Barry,

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Barry Leiba 
wrote:

> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-09: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence/
>
>
>
> --
> COMMENT:
> --
>
> In Section 5.1, to be consistent with how IANA prefers registry URLs to
> be specified, please remove the string "/pcep.xhtml" from the three IANA
> URLs.
>
> ​[Dhruv]: Ack, updated in the working copy. ​
>

​Thanks for your reviews.

Regards,
Dhruv​
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] PCE WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pce-pceps-04

[DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA]

Hi Julien,

I finished a version addressing the comments and correcting some nits the 
authors found while addressing the comments. We are making a final review and 
will upload it this evening (CET)

Be goode,

On 19 Nov 2015, at 10:25 , Julien Meuric 
mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com>> wrote:

Hola Diego,

The WG LC was started for a 2-week period: you can consider it finished.

Finished or not, you are expected to resolve all the received comments and 
publish an update accordingly, so as to have the I-D ready to be sent to the 
IESG. Feel free to proceed as soon as you are able to.

Cheers,

Julien


Nov. 18, 2015 - 
diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com:

And let me insist that I’d directly ask the UTA WG about this. My only question 
is about procedure: shall we wait till we finish the last call period? Shall we 
perform it as part of the last call process? What do our chairs think?


--
"Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"

Dr Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D
http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/

e-mail: diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com
Tel:+34 913 129 041
Mobile: +34 682 051 091
--




Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede 
contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la 
persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda 
notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin 
autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha 
recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente 
por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. 
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not 
read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this 
communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode 
conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa 
ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica 
notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização 
pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem 
por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e 
proceda a sua destruição
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] PCE WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pce-pceps-04

[Dhruv Dhody]

Hi Julien, 

We have the update ready to go. 

Quoting from Tom's mail - 

> So I value the early intervention of the 
> Security Directorate to try and fix such 
> issues sooner, and so cheaper, rather than later.

We were wondering if it would be worthwhile (and allowed by the process) to 
request for an early Sec-Dir review while the control is still with the WG? 

Regards,
Dhruv


> -Original Message-
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
> Sent: 19 November 2015 14:56
> To: DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
> Cc: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Pce] PCE WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pce-pceps-04
> 
> Hola Diego,
> 
> The WG LC was started for a 2-week period: you can consider it finished.
> 
> Finished or not, you are expected to resolve all the received comments and
> publish an update accordingly, so as to have the I-D ready to be sent to the
> IESG. Feel free to proceed as soon as you are able to.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Julien
> 
> 
> Nov. 18, 2015 - diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com:
> >
> > And let me insist that I'd directly ask the UTA WG about this. My only
> > question is about procedure: shall we wait till we finish the last
> > call period? Shall we perform it as part of the last call process?
> > What do our chairs think?
> 
> ___
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] PCE WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pce-pceps-04

[Julien Meuric]

Hola Diego,

The WG LC was started for a 2-week period: you can consider it finished.

Finished or not, you are expected to resolve all the received comments 
and publish an update accordingly, so as to have the I-D ready to be 
sent to the IESG. Feel free to proceed as soon as you are able to.


Cheers,

Julien


Nov. 18, 2015 - diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com:


And let me insist that I’d directly ask the UTA WG about this. My only 
question is about procedure: shall we wait till we finish the last 
call period? Shall we perform it as part of the last call process? 
What do our chairs think?


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-09: (with COMMENT)

[Kathleen Moriarty]

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence/



--
COMMENT:
--

Thank you for working out new text for the security considerations
section from the SecDir review.  The new text is significantly better.

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06179.html


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce