Hi Julien, We have the update ready to go.
Quoting from Tom's mail - > So I value the early intervention of the > Security Directorate to try and fix such > issues sooner, and so cheaper, rather than later. We were wondering if it would be worthwhile (and allowed by the process) to request for an early Sec-Dir review while the control is still with the WG? Regards, Dhruv > -----Original Message----- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric > Sent: 19 November 2015 14:56 > To: DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA > Cc: pce@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Pce] PCE WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pce-pceps-04 > > Hola Diego, > > The WG LC was started for a 2-week period: you can consider it finished. > > Finished or not, you are expected to resolve all the received comments and > publish an update accordingly, so as to have the I-D ready to be sent to the > IESG. Feel free to proceed as soon as you are able to. > > Cheers, > > Julien > > > Nov. 18, 2015 - diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com: > > > > And let me insist that I'd directly ask the UTA WG about this. My only > > question is about procedure: shall we wait till we finish the last > > call period? Shall we perform it as part of the last call process? > > What do our chairs think? > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
