Is there a Sisterhood?

[Jostein]

Since Aaron so generously called the 645 a ladies' camera, I was wondering how
many of us would qualify for a Sisterhood? :-)

Jostein





This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Peter Jordan]

To quote Irving Berlin,

"there were never such devoted sisters"

Count me in.

Peter

- Original Message - 
From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 1:24 PM
Subject: Is there a Sisterhood?




Since Aaron so generously called the 645 a ladies' camera, I was wondering 
how

many of us would qualify for a Sisterhood? :-)

Jostein





This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Aaron Reynolds]

I wouldn't think you'd want to admit to it.

-Brother Aaron

-Original Message-

From:  Jostein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj:  Is there a Sisterhood?
Date:  Thu Mar 2, 2006 8:24 am
Size:  270 bytes
To:  pentax-discuss@pdml.net


Since Aaron so generously called the 645 a ladies' camera, I was wondering how
many of us would qualify for a Sisterhood? :-)

Jostein





This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

RE: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Tim Øsleby]

Jostein. You owe me a new keyboard. I've got coffee all over it because of
your post. Well said Jostein. 

Count me out of both the Brotherhood and the Sisterhood. Most likely I will
never aspire as a member of any of those hoods. I'm a happy member of the
"Childhood" with my APS sized gear. On second thought: The Childhood must be
for the FF users. APS is more "Infanthood". Making P&S shooters Foetushoods.

Never the less, we are all members of the Lenshood.

Thanks for bringing the brotherhood into perspective ;-)


Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
 
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds 
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)

> -Original Message-
> From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 2. mars 2006 14:25
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Is there a Sisterhood?
> 
> 
> Since Aaron so generously called the 645 a ladies' camera, I was wondering
> how
> many of us would qualify for a Sisterhood? :-)
> 
> Jostein
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> 

RE: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Shel Belinkoff]

Good thing Marnie's on "vacation" or you'd be labeled a sexist pig ...
wouldn't that be a drag ;-))

Shel



> [Original Message]
> From: Jostein 

> Since Aaron so generously called the 645 a ladies' camera, I was 
> wondering how many of us would qualify for a Sisterhood? :-)

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[E.R.N. Reed]

Shel Belinkoff wrote:


Good thing Marnie's on "vacation" or you'd be labeled a sexist pig ...
wouldn't that be a drag ;-))

Shel



 


[Original Message]
From: Jostein 
   



 

Since Aaron so generously called the 645 a ladies' camera, I was 
wondering how many of us would qualify for a Sisterhood? :-)
   






 

I'm not Marnie, but I thought Jostein's remark was quite chivalrously 
phrased.
Aaron's reply would've been more likely (I suspect) to provoke a 
negative reaction!


Nice pun ...

ERNR
who at one time wouldn't have minded having a 645

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[William Robb]

- Original Message - 
From: "Tim Øsleby"

Subject: RE: Is there a Sisterhood?





Thanks for bringing the brotherhood into perspective ;-)


There's the Brotherhood, then there are a few people using girlyboy cameras 
who want to be recognized as the Sisterhood. None of us in the Brotherhood 
understand why they would want to admit to their girly cams.


William Robb

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[David Savage]

What about those who shoot large format?

If we follow this logic "anything" less than 8x10 falls into the
"Nancy boy" category.

What am I thinking? Logic on the PDML?

Dave

On 3/2/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> Wrom: TFJMVRESKPNKM
> Subject: RE: Is there a Sisterhood?
>
>
>
> >
> > Thanks for bringing the brotherhood into perspective ;-)
>
> There's the Brotherhood, then there are a few people using girlyboy cameras
> who want to be recognized as the Sisterhood. None of us in the Brotherhood
> understand why they would want to admit to their girly cams.
>
> William Robb
>
>
>

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Aaron Reynolds]

I had the Barbie Cam, but I think we all realized it was a gag.

-Brother Aaron

p.s. for the uninitiated, the Legendary Barbie Cam was a pink and silver 
digital camera with a large flower embossed around the lens. It was my first 
digital camera, circa 2000, and was my only digital camera until I got a 
teeny-tiny Leica/Panasonic in late 2004 in preparation for my son's birth.  The 
Barbie Cam moved to Japan with a friend of mine and recently ceased functioning.

-Original Message-

From:  "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj:  Re: Is there a Sisterhood?
Date:  Thu Mar 2, 2006 9:35 am
Size:  380 bytes
To:  


- Original Message - 
From: "Tim Øsleby"
Subject: RE: Is there a Sisterhood?



>
> Thanks for bringing the brotherhood into perspective ;-)

There's the Brotherhood, then there are a few people using girlyboy cameras 
who want to be recognized as the Sisterhood. None of us in the Brotherhood 
understand why they would want to admit to their girly cams.

William Robb

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[E.R.N. Reed]

David Savage wrote:


What about those who shoot large format?
 


There be Giants.


If we follow this logic "anything" less than 8x10 falls into the
"Nancy boy" category.

What am I thinking? Logic on the PDML?
 


Only if you don't know the L is for List.

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Aaron Reynolds]

Come on, who can hand-hold a 4x5?

Besides, Pentax don't make one.

-Aaron

-Original Message-

From:  "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj:  Re: Is there a Sisterhood?
Date:  Thu Mar 2, 2006 9:49 am
Size:  638 bytes
To:  pentax-discuss@pdml.net

What about those who shoot large format?

If we follow this logic "anything" less than 8x10 falls into the
"Nancy boy" category.

What am I thinking? Logic on the PDML?

Dave

On 3/2/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> Wrom: TFJMVRESKPNKM
> Subject: RE: Is there a Sisterhood?
>
>
>
> >
> > Thanks for bringing the brotherhood into perspective ;-)
>
> There's the Brotherhood, then there are a few people using girlyboy cameras
> who want to be recognized as the Sisterhood. None of us in the Brotherhood
> understand why they would want to admit to their girly cams.
>
> William Robb
>
>
>

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[David Savage]

This, I hope, was implied:

=><=

Dave

On 3/2/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about those who shoot large format?
>
> If we follow this logic "anything" less than 8x10 falls into the
> "Nancy boy" category.
>
> What am I thinking? Logic on the PDML?
>
> Dave
>
> On 3/2/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > Wrom: TFJMVRESKPNKM
> > Subject: RE: Is there a Sisterhood?
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks for bringing the brotherhood into perspective ;-)
> >
> > There's the Brotherhood, then there are a few people using girlyboy cameras
> > who want to be recognized as the Sisterhood. None of us in the Brotherhood
> > understand why they would want to admit to their girly cams.
> >
> > William Robb
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[David Savage]

Anyone who uses a Speedgraphic?

Dave (the smart arse) S. :-)

On 3/2/06, Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Come on, who can hand-hold a 4x5?
>
> Besides, Pentax don't make one.
>
> -Aaron
>
> -Original Message-
>
> Wrom: MNNSKVFVWRKJVZCMHVIBGDADRZFSQHYUCDDJ
> Subj:  Re: Is there a Sisterhood?
> Date:  Thu Mar 2, 2006 9:49 am
> Size:  638 bytes
> To:  pentax-discuss@pdml.net
>
> What about those who shoot large format?
>
> If we follow this logic "anything" less than 8x10 falls into the
> "Nancy boy" category.
>
> What am I thinking? Logic on the PDML?
>
> Dave
>
> On 3/2/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > Wrom: TFJMVRESKPNKM
> > Subject: RE: Is there a Sisterhood?
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks for bringing the brotherhood into perspective ;-)
> >
> > There's the Brotherhood, then there are a few people using girlyboy cameras
> > who want to be recognized as the Sisterhood. None of us in the Brotherhood
> > understand why they would want to admit to their girly cams.
> >
> > William Robb
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Shel Belinkoff]

http://www.bostick-sullivan.com/Hobo/welcome.htm

(Funny comment, though - LOL)

Shel



> [Original Message]
> From: Aaron Reynolds 

> Come on, who can hand-hold a 4x5?
>
> Besides, Pentax don't make one.

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Aaron Reynolds]

On Mar 2, 2006, at 10:08 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:


http://www.bostick-sullivan.com/Hobo/welcome.htm


All right, all right, you got me there.  BUT the FPS on that thing is 
brutal and you're limited to a burst of two!  At least the P67 has a 
burst of 10 and shoots about 0.85 FPS.


-Aaron

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[mike wilson]

> 
> From: Jostein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/03/02 Thu PM 01:24:33 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Is there a Sisterhood?
> 
> 
> Since Aaron so generously called the 645 a ladies' camera, I was wondering how
> many of us would qualify for a Sisterhood? :-)
> 
> Jostein

You want to be Sister Jostein of the Flared Veil?

8-)


-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software 
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[graywolf]

And I still say real photographers use a Speed Graphic.

 Buncha chump wanna bees...



graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---


David Savage wrote:

What about those who shoot large format?

If we follow this logic "anything" less than 8x10 falls into the
"Nancy boy" category.

What am I thinking? Logic on the PDML?

Dave

On 3/2/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


- Original Message -
Wrom: TFJMVRESKPNKM
Subject: RE: Is there a Sisterhood?





Thanks for bringing the brotherhood into perspective ;-)


There's the Brotherhood, then there are a few people using girlyboy cameras
who want to be recognized as the Sisterhood. None of us in the Brotherhood
understand why they would want to admit to their girly cams.

William Robb

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Collin R Brendemuehl]

The there's always the 8x10 Hobo.

Collin

At 10:07 AM 3/2/2006, you wrote:

Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:00:00 -0500
From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Come on, who can hand-hold a 4x5?

Besides, Pentax don't make one.

-Aaron


"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Scott Loveless]

There are precisely two of us on the list who admit to shooting with
the lowly *ist (film body, for those of you who need clarification). 
Got any special names for us, Brother Bill?

:P

On 3/2/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tim Øsleby"
> Subject: RE: Is there a Sisterhood?
>
>
>
> >
> > Thanks for bringing the brotherhood into perspective ;-)
>
> There's the Brotherhood, then there are a few people using girlyboy cameras
> who want to be recognized as the Sisterhood. None of us in the Brotherhood
> understand why they would want to admit to their girly cams.
>
> William Robb
>
>
>


--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com

--
"You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Tom C]

Yeah, you're D-less.



Tom C.







From: "Scott Loveless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 11:42:16 -0500

There are precisely two of us on the list who admit to shooting with
the lowly *ist (film body, for those of you who need clarification).
Got any special names for us, Brother Bill?

:P

On 3/2/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tim Øsleby"
> Subject: RE: Is there a Sisterhood?
>
>
>
> >
> > Thanks for bringing the brotherhood into perspective ;-)
>
> There's the Brotherhood, then there are a few people using girlyboy 
cameras
> who want to be recognized as the Sisterhood. None of us in the 
Brotherhood

> understand why they would want to admit to their girly cams.
>
> William Robb
>
>
>


--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com

--
"You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Collin R Brendemuehl]

A lot of the serious b&w portraits I've seen in the past few years 
have been done with 11x14.

(These are of people who think that they're really important.)
There is a lot of money to be made in this arena.  Even with 8x10.
One won't shoot very many, but the money appears to be very good.

Collin

At 10:07 AM 3/2/2006, you wrote:

Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 22:49:04 +0800
From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

What about those who shoot large format?

If we follow this logic "anything" less than 8x10 falls into the
"Nancy boy" category.

What am I thinking? Logic on the PDML?

Dave


"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Jostein]

- Original Message - 
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


There's the Brotherhood, then there are a few people using girlyboy 
cameras who want to be recognized as the Sisterhood. None of us in 
the Brotherhood understand why they would want to admit to their 
girly cams.


Must be the sex factor.

Sister Jostein

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Jostein]

- Original Message - 
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Good thing Marnie's on "vacation" or you'd be labeled a sexist pig 
...

wouldn't that be a drag ;-))


LOL.

Before I know it, I'll have to buy a tripod with high heels for it...

Sister Jostein

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Cotty]

On 2/3/06, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed:

>
>Since Aaron so generously called the 645 a ladies' camera, I was
wondering how
>many of us would qualify for a Sisterhood? :-)

Well, I'm a lady, don't you know...






Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Scott Loveless]

That's a given.

On 3/2/06, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, I'm a lady, don't you know...
>


--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com

--
"You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Steve Sharpe]

At 2:24 PM +0100 3/2/06, Jostein wrote:

Since Aaron so generously called the 645 a ladies' camera, I was wondering how
many of us would qualify for a Sisterhood? :-)


I guess I would, then!
--

Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
•

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[William Robb]

- Original Message - 
From: "Aaron Reynolds"

Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?



Come on, who can hand-hold a 4x5?


I can. I've use a Crown handheld, and I suspect I could handhold my 
Tachihara if I really felt the need.




Besides, Pentax don't make one.


I really wish they had made large format lenses.

William Robb 

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[William Robb]

- Original Message - 
From: "Scott Loveless" 
Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?




There are precisely two of us on the list who admit to shooting with
the lowly *ist (film body, for those of you who need clarification). 
Got any special names for us, Brother Bill?


Depends. Are you coming to GFM this year?

Brother William

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Scott Loveless]

Registration #7, baby!

On 3/2/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott Loveless"
> Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?
>
>
> > There are precisely two of us on the list who admit to shooting with
> > the lowly *ist (film body, for those of you who need clarification).
> > Got any special names for us, Brother Bill?
>
> Depends. Are you coming to GFM this year?
>

Registration #7, baby.

Girly man Scott

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[William Robb]

- Original Message - 
From: "Scott Loveless" 
Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?




Registration #7, baby!


*ist users are the Finest Kind

William Robb

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Scott Loveless]

So I'm a bit slow on the uptake.  Anyone with just a slight grasp of
the obvious immediately recognized that I should have responded with
"no" and then held your answer over your head for the next few months.
 But thanks for the compliment!  

D-less.

On 3/2/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott Loveless"
> Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?
>
>
> > Registration #7, baby!
>
> *ist users are the Finest Kind
>
> William Robb
>
>

RE: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Antti-Pekka Virjonen]

> -Original Message-
> From: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 5:00 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?
> 
> Come on, who can hand-hold a 4x5?
> 
> Besides, Pentax don't make one.
> 
> -Aaron

The real men ;-).

Antti-Pekka


Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Computec Oy Turku

www.computec.fi

RE: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Paul Ewins]

I've got a few Speed Graphics and have just acquired an RB Auto Graphic
which is a huge old 4x5 SLR. My first test shots were hand-held at 1/60 and
looked sharp enough. I think that because it is made to be held at waist
level it is naturally more stable than something held up to eye-level.

I guess my Auto 110 must make me eligible for the Childhood!

Paul Ewins
Melbourne, Australia 

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 2:00 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

Come on, who can hand-hold a 4x5?

Besides, Pentax don't make one.

-Aaron

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[graywolf]

"Real Photographers*" come in both sexes. It is superior knowledge and 
ability that separates us from the masses, not gender stereotypes. Also 
we work in and record the flow of humanity rather than take pretty 
pictures. And, Aaron, Real Photographers always hand-hold their 4x5.



* Real Photographers use the term "Speed Graphic" generically for all 
sheet film press cameras. We are not brand chauvinists like those who 
use whimpy cameras (Whimp Photographers?).




graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---


Antti-Pekka Virjonen wrote:

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 5:00 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

Come on, who can hand-hold a 4x5?

Besides, Pentax don't make one.

-Aaron



The real men ;-).

Antti-Pekka


Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Computec Oy Turku

www.computec.fi

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Aaron Reynolds]

On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:39 AM, graywolf wrote:


And, Aaron, Real Photographers always hand-hold their 4x5.


I can only assume that your 4x5s are the wussy non-monorail kinds, 
then.  Which allows me to still dismiss you out-of-hand.


-Brother Aaron

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[graywolf]

The only thing better than a 4x5 Auto Graflex is a 5x7 Auto Graflex. Of 
course a 5x7 Speed is neat too.


graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---


Paul Ewins wrote:

I've got a few Speed Graphics and have just acquired an RB Auto Graphic
which is a huge old 4x5 SLR. My first test shots were hand-held at 1/60 and
looked sharp enough. I think that because it is made to be held at waist
level it is naturally more stable than something held up to eye-level.

I guess my Auto 110 must make me eligible for the Childhood!

Paul Ewins
Melbourne, Australia 


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 2:00 AM

To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

Come on, who can hand-hold a 4x5?

Besides, Pentax don't make one.

-Aaron

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Collin R Brendemuehl]

Super Graphic.
The only press camera (that I know of) with a 1/1000 shutter and a 
rotating back.


Collin

At 09:49 AM 3/3/2006, you wrote:

Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 09:43:57 -0500
From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The only thing better than a 4x5 Auto Graflex is a 5x7 Auto Graflex. Of
course a 5x7 Speed is neat too.

graywolf


"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Collin R Brendemuehl]

Yes, my 4x5 is a "mere" Nagaoka wood field.
My 8x10 is a monorail.  And with a home-made bellows at that!

http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/ebay/8x10_01.jpg
http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/ebay/8x10_02.jpg

What I really want is the "matching" 8x10 Nagaoka wood field.
Like this:
http://www.laatuaika.com/forsale.html

Collin



At 09:49 AM 3/3/2006, you wrote:

Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 09:44:38 -0500
From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:39 AM, graywolf wrote:

> And, Aaron, Real Photographers always hand-hold their 4x5.

I can only assume that your 4x5s are the wussy non-monorail kinds,
then.  Which allows me to still dismiss you out-of-hand.

-Brother Aaron


"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Jim Apilado]

I do.

Jim A.

> From: Steve Sharpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 19:07:36 -0500
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?
> Resent-From: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Resent-Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 19:20:38 -0500
> 
> At 2:24 PM +0100 3/2/06, Jostein wrote:
>> Since Aaron so generously called the 645 a ladies' camera, I was wondering
>> how
>> many of us would qualify for a Sisterhood? :-)
> 
> I guess I would, then!
> -- 
> 
> Steve
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> •
> 

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Derby Chang]

Aaron Reynolds wrote:

Come on, who can hand-hold a 4x5?

Besides, Pentax don't make one.

-Aaron

  


Peter Gowland could. And did.

http://www.petergowland.com/camera/

D

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Cesar]

Hmmm, I don't recall Aaron saying that.  Maybe because back then I only 
had the one 645 ;-P


But if this is to be the case, then I must stand in the Sisterhood crowd.

You have to love the larger negative,

César
Panama City, Florida

Jostein wrote:


Since Aaron so generously called the 645 a ladies' camera, I was wondering how
many of us would qualify for a Sisterhood? :-)

Jostein
 

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Cesar]

Jostein wrote:



- Original Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




Good thing Marnie's on "vacation" or you'd be labeled a sexist pig ...
wouldn't that be a drag ;-))



LOL.

Before I know it, I'll have to buy a tripod with high heels for it...

Sister Jostein


Would this replace the spikes?  :-)

I can just picture all the variations on GFMtn - good thing Frank would 
not be involved...


Maybe I can take the Brother/Sister pair out for a shoot tomorrow,

César
Panama City, Florida

Re: Is there a Sisterhood?

[Jostein]

- Original Message - 
From: "Tim Øsleby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 3:05 PM
Subject: RE: Is there a Sisterhood?


Jostein. You owe me a new keyboard. I've got coffee all over it 
because of

your post. Well said Jostein.


Pleasure...:-)

Btw, I noticed this post turned up in the archive soon after it was 
sent, but only turned up in my inbox just now.


Jostein

Handheld 4x5 ( was Re: Is there a Sisterhood?)

[Collin R Brendemuehl]

Anyone who has ever used a Graphic, Horseman, or LInhof knows how.
Just add a flash for indoor use.  And look at the Hindenberg fire pics.
Lots of both 135 and 4x5.  Use a 120mm to 135mm lens, TMax or TriiX 400 film,
and shoot 1/400 @ f16 on sunny days or 1/250 @ f8 on dimmer days.
It's not that hard.  Quality lens choices are easy.  120 Angulon, 125 Fujinon,
127 Ektar, 135 Fujinon, 135 Rodenstock Ysarex.  Or use the 127 or 135
Wollensak if you must.

Collin
KC8TKA

ps  A pro journalist photog in our neighborhood has the license plate 
"F8 NB THR"



At 10:07 AM 3/2/2006, you wrote:

Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:00:00 -0500
From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Come on, who can hand-hold a 4x5?

Besides, Pentax don't make one.

-Aaron


"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott

Re: Handheld 4x5 ( was Re: Is there a Sisterhood?)

[Pancho Hasselbach]

Ooops, I went wrong, it's only 6x7, but it can shift.

Sorry.

Pancho Hasselbach schrieb:


So nobody seems to know the wica?
Look at this, great stuff form Leicatown:
http://www.wica-wetzlar.de/index.html

Pancho

Collin R Brendemuehl schrieb:


Anyone who has ever used a Graphic, Horseman, or LInhof knows how.
Just add a flash for indoor use.  And look at the Hindenberg fire pics.
Lots of both 135 and 4x5.  Use a 120mm to 135mm lens, TMax or TriiX 
400 film,

and shoot 1/400 @ f16 on sunny days or 1/250 @ f8 on dimmer days.
It's not that hard.  Quality lens choices are easy.  120 Angulon, 125 
Fujinon,

127 Ektar, 135 Fujinon, 135 Rodenstock Ysarex.  Or use the 127 or 135
Wollensak if you must.

Collin
KC8TKA

ps  A pro journalist photog in our neighborhood has the license plate 
"F8 NB THR"



At 10:07 AM 3/2/2006, you wrote:


Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:00:00 -0500
From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Come on, who can hand-hold a 4x5?

Besides, Pentax don't make one.

-Aaron




"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott

Re: Handheld 4x5 ( was Re: Is there a Sisterhood?)

[Pancho Hasselbach]

So nobody seems to know the wica?
Look at this, great stuff form Leicatown:
http://www.wica-wetzlar.de/index.html

Pancho

Collin R Brendemuehl schrieb:


Anyone who has ever used a Graphic, Horseman, or LInhof knows how.
Just add a flash for indoor use.  And look at the Hindenberg fire pics.
Lots of both 135 and 4x5.  Use a 120mm to 135mm lens, TMax or TriiX 400 
film,

and shoot 1/400 @ f16 on sunny days or 1/250 @ f8 on dimmer days.
It's not that hard.  Quality lens choices are easy.  120 Angulon, 125 
Fujinon,

127 Ektar, 135 Fujinon, 135 Rodenstock Ysarex.  Or use the 127 or 135
Wollensak if you must.

Collin
KC8TKA

ps  A pro journalist photog in our neighborhood has the license plate 
"F8 NB THR"



At 10:07 AM 3/2/2006, you wrote:


Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:00:00 -0500
From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Come on, who can hand-hold a 4x5?

Besides, Pentax don't make one.

-Aaron



"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott