Re: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-08 Thread ernreed2
Mark said:
 Boyd's seems to be hangin' on. It's good place to get lens caps, filters,
 film, and occasionally, used gear. They had short-dated Fuji Super HQ 200
 film for $1.00 a roll when I went two weeks ago. Photo Express did an
 excellent job printing it. I think they survive cause Camera Exchange can't
 seem to hire someone who doesn't treat you like an idiot and is as retail as
 retail gets. I went with a coworker and they were charging her $8.00 a roll
 for NPH. Good grief!

Yeah, but the last few times I went to Boyd's, there was next to nothing in 
the place (in terms of inventory) and the only person out front is this guy 
who seems to have learnt customer service AT Camera Exchange. He indicated 
that they didn't have anything, and gave the impression that he didn't give a 
damn. This has been my experience on at least three trips in the past year 
(same guy there each time). 
As to charitably including Ritz/Wolf, well, they do have caps, filters, 
film ... and on at least one occasion I saw an Optio 550 on display at one of 
their stores! This was several months after I'd made the trip to Precision 
Camera in Austin to buy mine, but still it was nice to see that it was, 
finally, available in San Antonio. So I suppose these days, if Boyd's is a 
camera store, so is Ritz/Wolf. I stand corrected.

ERN



Re: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-07 Thread Peter J. Alling
True enough, but if they're bringing out a camera to compete with the 
Digital Rebel they will have
to compete in places like WalMart.  There's no way around it.

William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - 
From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: Re: Dpreview - New SLR

 

The product isn't the problem, it's getting distribution.  I stopped
into the local Wallmart today. they
had the Canon Digital Rebel in stock and on display.  There were no
Pentax cameras there at all.  If they
don't get exposure they won't sell any.
   

Don't use Wal-Mart as a guide in this case. They buy based on price, not
brand.
Canon is big enough to be able to volume discount more than Pentax is.
At this point, Pentax needs to develop its brand as a cachet brand rather
than mainstream, much like what Leica has survived on for the past 4
decades.
William Robb

 




Re: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-07 Thread Peter J. Alling
Based on the fact that they haven't introduced a new ltd. lens lately it 
may be a great finish.

William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - 
From: Dr. Shaun Canning 
Subject: Re: Dpreview - New SLR

 

Well they had better give us some products worthy of lusting after like
Leica have for eons...
   

Have you looked at the 31mm abd 77mm lenses? 
It's a great start.

William Robb
 




Re: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-07 Thread Jim Apilado
People come up and admire my Leica M4.  They believe I am a great
photographer because I have a Leica in my hands.  They don't react to me
when I hold my LX.  I can't see the name Pentax getting any special
recognition for its name.

Jim A.

 From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 23:29:57 -0600
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Dpreview - New SLR
 Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Resent-Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 01:33:53 -0400
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Peter J. Alling
 Subject: Re: Dpreview - New SLR
 
 
 The product isn't the problem, it's getting distribution.  I stopped
 into the local Wallmart today. they
 had the Canon Digital Rebel in stock and on display.  There were no
 Pentax cameras there at all.  If they
 don't get exposure they won't sell any.
 
 Don't use Wal-Mart as a guide in this case. They buy based on price, not
 brand.
 Canon is big enough to be able to volume discount more than Pentax is.
 
 At this point, Pentax needs to develop its brand as a cachet brand rather
 than mainstream, much like what Leica has survived on for the past 4
 decades.
 
 William Robb
 
 



Re: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-07 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: Re: Dpreview - New SLR


 Based on the fact that they haven't introduced a new ltd. lens
lately it
 may be a great finish.

True enough. I do think though, that they are going to have to turn
themselves into a brand with Leica style cachet appeal to survive.
OTOH, perhaps they can do quite well at present levels of sales,
though I suspect that those numbers will continue to erode. Canon is
just too much of a steamroller right now to not crush the smaller
players that get in the way.

William Robb




Re: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-07 Thread Tom C
I do typically try to avoid the staff.  They may have one of the best 
overall selections of photography gear in Seattle, but snobbishness turns me 
off.  It almost seems like it's their corporate culture.


Tom C.


From: alex wetmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dpreview - New SLR
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 10:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Tom C wrote:
 That's impressive that Glazers is carrying it.  When I went there to 
look at
 a PZ-1p years ago I was uniformly snubbed.

They still snub the Pentax, they just carry it.  I typically don't
shop there because I'm unimpressed with their staff.  I do tend to buy
paper there though because they have inkjet paper options that I've
seen nowhere else.
They weren't interested when I pointed out that the lens should really
be left in the A mode when they hand the camera to people for testing
purposes.  They also didn't seem very interested in selling me the
24-90/3.5-4.5.
alex



Re: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-07 Thread Dr. Shaun Canning
Pentax would be a prime candidate for acquisition right now. They are 
profitable to a point, but small enough to acquire and dismember. A 
juggernaught like Canon could easily do so. Nikon, however, are in 
trouble (well at least their parent company is in financial trouble - 
they lost 3 or 4 billion USD this last year).

Cheers
Shaun
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - 
From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: Re: Dpreview - New SLR


Based on the fact that they haven't introduced a new ltd. lens
lately it
may be a great finish.

True enough. I do think though, that they are going to have to turn
themselves into a brand with Leica style cachet appeal to survive.
OTOH, perhaps they can do quite well at present levels of sales,
though I suspect that those numbers will continue to erode. Canon is
just too much of a steamroller right now to not crush the smaller
players that get in the way.
William Robb

--

Dr. Shaun Canning
Archaeologist
Cultural Heritage Services
P.O. Box 21, Dampier,
6713.
0414-967644
Http://www.heritageservices.com.au



Re: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-07 Thread Gonz
Its a bit of a drive, but at least at one point Precision Camera in 
Austin had them.  I bought mine over the net however, the price 
discrepancy was too much to ignore.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
True enough, but if they're bringing out a camera to compete with the
Digital Rebel they will have
to compete in places like WalMart.  There's no way around it.

I hope they'll market their cameras at walmart cause none of the camera
shops in San Antonio are carrying much of Pentax SLR products. I've yet to
actually see the *istD in person.
Mark



Re: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-07 Thread graywolf
Except that the majority of its stock is closely held. There is no way outsiders 
can gain controlling interest from what I hear.

--
Dr. Shaun Canning wrote:
Pentax would be a prime candidate for acquisition right now. They are 
profitable to a point, but small enough to acquire and dismember. A 
juggernaught like Canon could easily do so. Nikon, however, are in 
trouble (well at least their parent company is in financial trouble - 
they lost 3 or 4 billion USD this last year).

--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html



Re: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-07 Thread Herb Chong
Leica isn't a great example anymore. they are in financial straits and
unless the new digital real Leicas ( i.e. M and R series) deliver all that
is expected, they are going to have to make significant cost cuts to stay in
business. Pentax has significant other, non-photographic, profitable
businesses to fall back on and could abandon consumer camera equipment and
still stay in business.you could even get some yourself some day soon.
Pentax is poised to become a world leader in artificial ceramic bones.

Herb
- Original Message - 
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 1:29 AM
Subject: Re: Dpreview - New SLR


 At this point, Pentax needs to develop its brand as a cachet brand rather
 than mainstream, much like what Leica has survived on for the past 4
 decades.




Re: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-07 Thread Peter J. Alling
While I believe Pentax is a publicly traded company, I think I read 
somewhere that a majority of their stock is closely held.  It's tough to 
buy and
dismember companies like that.  I used to work for one.  The CEO owned 
51% of the voting stock outright, made a corporate takeover impossible.

Dr. Shaun Canning wrote:
Pentax would be a prime candidate for acquisition right now. They are 
profitable to a point, but small enough to acquire and dismember. A 
juggernaught like Canon could easily do so. Nikon, however, are in 
trouble (well at least their parent company is in financial trouble - 
they lost 3 or 4 billion USD this last year).

Cheers
Shaun
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: Re: Dpreview - New SLR

Based on the fact that they haven't introduced a new ltd. lens

lately it
may be a great finish.

True enough. I do think though, that they are going to have to turn
themselves into a brand with Leica style cachet appeal to survive.
OTOH, perhaps they can do quite well at present levels of sales,
though I suspect that those numbers will continue to erode. Canon is
just too much of a steamroller right now to not crush the smaller
players that get in the way.
William Robb





Re: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-07 Thread Mark Dalal
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Its a bit of a drive, but at least at one point Precision Camera in
 Austin had them.  I bought mine over the net however, the price
 discrepancy was too much to ignore.

That is a drive. Not too bad but still a good 90 minutes. Definitely
important before dropping $1300 on a camera.

Mark



Re: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-07 Thread ernreed2
Mr Robb said, among other things:
 True enough. I do think though, that they are going to have to turn
 themselves into a brand with Leica style cachet appeal to survive.

Wouldn't their prices have to go up a Whole Lot to achieve that?

ERN



Re: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-07 Thread ernreed2
 From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  True enough, but if they're bringing out a camera to compete with the
  Digital Rebel they will have
  to compete in places like WalMart.  There's no way around it.
 
 I hope they'll market their cameras at walmart cause none of the camera
 shops in San Antonio are carrying much of Pentax SLR products. I've yet to
 actually see the *istD in person.
 
 Mark
 

Think you meant neither of the camera shops, Mark -- if Boyd's is still 
hanging on ...
(sigh)




Re: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-07 Thread Mark Dalal
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  I hope they'll market their cameras at walmart cause none of the camera
  shops in San Antonio are carrying much of Pentax SLR products. I've yet
to
  actually see the *istD in person.
 
  Mark
 

 Think you meant neither of the camera shops, Mark

Well, I was being gracious and counting Ritz/Wolf Camera g

 if Boyd's is still hanging on ...
 (sigh)

Boyd's seems to be hangin' on. It's good place to get lens caps, filters,
film, and occasionally, used gear. They had short-dated Fuji Super HQ 200
film for $1.00 a roll when I went two weeks ago. Photo Express did an
excellent job printing it. I think they survive cause Camera Exchange can't
seem to hire someone who doesn't treat you like an idiot and is as retail as
retail gets. I went with a coworker and they were charging her $8.00 a roll
for NPH. Good grief!

Mark



RE: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-06 Thread Jens Bladt
This is great news. Hopefully this new camera can make high qualitay
pictures - like the Nikon D70, which - in some respects  - beats more
expensive models?


Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Henri Toivonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. juni 2004 22:07
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Dpreview - New SLR


http://www.dpreview.com/news/0406/04060601pentax900dslr.asp

I don't know if this is already old news, haven't been following you
guys today,.

/Henri





Re: Dpreview - New SLR

2004-06-06 Thread David Nelson
*prays*
Please Pentax, don't let it be silver.
Silver cameras are just so uncool. Unless it looks like an old chrome 
pentax, of course, retro is definitely cool (-:

Seriously, I think that this camera could be good for pentax right now. 
When it gets more definite I'll do the rounds of the local camera stores 
and try and get them excited about it. I'm sick of discovering that a 
store does indeed stock the *ist D but has it tucked away in the corner 
somewhere.
David

Jens Bladt wrote:
This is great news. Hopefully this new camera can make high qualitay
pictures - like the Nikon D70, which - in some respects  - beats more
expensive models?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Henri Toivonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. juni 2004 22:07
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Dpreview - New SLR
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0406/04060601pentax900dslr.asp
I don't know if this is already old news, haven't been following you
guys today,.
/Henri