Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
Hi, Sorry, so you use K adaptall with new bodies without problems. I think about KA ones. Alek Użytkownik Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:38:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> So you use safely KA adaptall with new bodies? Is it this one for sure?What about >metering, like A lenses? > >I have the K Adaptall, not the KA. It works fine on my two newer >bodies. No jamming. Meters as if it were a K or an M lens (no >contacts on the mount). > >TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ >
Re: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:38:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So you use safely KA adaptall with new bodies? Is it this one for sure?What about >metering, like A lenses? I have the K Adaptall, not the KA. It works fine on my two newer bodies. No jamming. Meters as if it were a K or an M lens (no contacts on the mount). TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Re: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
So you use safely KA adaptall with new bodies? Is it this one for sure?What about metering, like A lenses? Alek Użytkownik Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 10:19:34 -0500, Jeff wrote: > >> Maybe other members can shed some light into the Adaptall compatibility with >> the AF Pentax models. > >My Adaptall II version of the Tamron SP 90/2.5 works fine on my ZX-5 >and MZ-S, both with and without the Pentax 1.7X AF teleconverter. > >TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ >
Re: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
Hi, On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:30:20 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So you use your without any problems on ZX5 and MZS but you > wrote that there can be jamming problems [...] I didn't write anything about jamming problems, since I haven't had any with the Adaptall lenses on K-1000, LX, ZX-5, and MZ-S bodies. > PS Do you know if only FA lenses allow to use P-TTL or not? > What if you use "A" ones or adaptall KA? Sorry, I don't know, since I don't have the AF-360FGZ flash. I'm still using an old AF-280T, and that not very often. TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Re: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
Hi, I just asked about K adaptall, I am going to buy KA one!! for my Tamron 90/2.8. So you use your without any problems on ZX5 and MZS but you wrote that there can be jamming problems (when you mentions Pz-1p). So I hope I can safely use it on my Pz-1 and maybe in future on MZS or ZX-L for instance. Please answer PS Do you know if only FA lenses allow to use P-TTL or not?What if you use "A" ones or adaptall KA? Re: Tamron adaptall KA > > >> On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 10:19:34 -0500, Jeff wrote: >> >> > Maybe other members can shed some light into the Adaptall compatibility >with >> > the AF Pentax models. >> >> My Adaptall II version of the Tamron SP 90/2.5 works fine on my ZX-5 >> and MZ-S, both with and without the Pentax 1.7X AF teleconverter. >> >> TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ >> >> >> >
Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 22:04:52 -0500, Jeff wrote: > Doug, is yours [Tamron SP 90/2.5] the K or KA version? It's the K version, now that you mention it. TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
Doug, is yours the K or KA version? Jeff. - Original Message - From: "Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 9:33 PM Subject: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA > On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 10:19:34 -0500, Jeff wrote: > > > Maybe other members can shed some light into the Adaptall compatibility with > > the AF Pentax models. > > My Adaptall II version of the Tamron SP 90/2.5 works fine on my ZX-5 > and MZ-S, both with and without the Pentax 1.7X AF teleconverter. > > TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ > > >
Re: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 10:30 AM Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA > > And you use KA adaptall with your manual bodies?I prefer tamron 2.8 since it gives 1:1.What about quality of the lens? > Alek > I am leaving and answer within a few days. > Thanks > I originally bought the K adaptor to use with the Ricoh XR-1S. Then I upgraded to a Ricoh XR-X (Program) so I bought the K-RI. And when I bought (stole) a Program Plus, I bought a K-A adaptor for it. Luckily my Vivitar Series I lenses have Program contacts for Pentax and Ricoh. Jeff.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
And you use KA adaptall with your manual bodies?I prefer tamron 2.8 since it gives 1:1.What about quality of the lens? Alek I am leaving and answer within a few days. Thanks Użytkownik Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >- Original Message - >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 10:12 AM >Subject: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA > > >> I also have some manual lesnes:105/2.8, K135/2.5-not Takumar, K28/3.5 etc >and I bought Tamron SP macro 90/2.8 also manual version and plan to buy >adaptall for my cameras and wonder if it fixes for newer ones.But if it is >good for PZ-1 it also should work with newer bodies I hope. >> Manual lenses are really great, that is why I bought manual macro one. >> Alek > >I own the original Tamron SP 90/2.5. It has been a great lens for the past >20 years. >My other Tamron lens is the SP 70-210/3.5-4. Not too shabby. >Both work well with my Super Program and Ricoh XR-X. > >Maybe other members can shed some light into the Adaptall compatibility with >the AF Pentax models. > >Jeff. >
Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 10:12 AM Subject: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA > I also have some manual lesnes:105/2.8, K135/2.5-not Takumar, K28/3.5 etc and I bought Tamron SP macro 90/2.8 also manual version and plan to buy adaptall for my cameras and wonder if it fixes for newer ones.But if it is good for PZ-1 it also should work with newer bodies I hope. > Manual lenses are really great, that is why I bought manual macro one. > Alek I own the original Tamron SP 90/2.5. It has been a great lens for the past 20 years. My other Tamron lens is the SP 70-210/3.5-4. Not too shabby. Both work well with my Super Program and Ricoh XR-X. Maybe other members can shed some light into the Adaptall compatibility with the AF Pentax models. Jeff.
Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
I also have some manual lesnes:105/2.8, K135/2.5-not Takumar, K28/3.5 etc and I bought Tamron SP macro 90/2.8 also manual version and plan to buy adaptall for my cameras and wonder if it fixes for newer ones.But if it is good for PZ-1 it also should work with newer bodies I hope. Manual lenses are really great, that is why I bought manual macro one. Alek Why did you sell Z1p?Bought MZS or changed system? >> Alek> > >The PZ-1 & Z-1p have the same mount. The Adaptall mounts were designed >before the AF cameras were available. I don't believe Tamron redesigned the >mounts for the new cameras, since they changed their lenses to AF with fixed >mounts. > >I sold my Z-1p just because I was getting better results with my manual >focus cameras/lenses. >Also, Im now embarked on an MF crusade. Love those 6x9 negs/trannies. > >Jeff. >
