RE: Studio lighting enablement

2013-07-04 Thread Gerrit Visser
That is an excellent deal.

Bruce is responsible for many things but I think I may have turned the
tables on him recently :-)

Gerrit



-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Walt
Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 11:56 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: OT: Studio lighting enablement

So, I went to the local camera shop today to look for a real softbox to use
for the family photo shoot I was set to do this evening. Before I knew it, I
was walking out with two fairly nice pneumatic-type light stands, two Studio
Systems SPS920 AC studio strobes
(http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/246869-REG/SP_Studio_Systems_SPS920_9
20_AC_Strobe_Series.html),
two umbrellas (white and black) and a 6' flash sync cable. I went in
expecting to spend about $50-$75 and ended up spending $200. I feel like I
got a pretty damned good deal, though.

It was a display setup, of which the carrying bag had faded on one side from
sitting in direct sun in the storefront window. I really couldn't afford it,
but I felt like I couldn't afford to let the opportunity pass. Everything
seems to be of reasonably good build quality, and the strobes/modeling
lights all checked out before I left the store with them.

Now, if I can just find some good studio space . . . and some extremely hot
models.

I blame Bruce for all of this, of course.

-- Walt

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Studio lighting enablement

2013-07-04 Thread Bruce Walker
I found my piggy bank quaking and hiding under a dresser this morning.


On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Gerrit Visser gerrit...@gmail.com wrote:
 That is an excellent deal.

 Bruce is responsible for many things but I think I may have turned the
 tables on him recently :-)

 Gerrit



 -Original Message-
 From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Walt
 Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 11:56 PM
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Subject: OT: Studio lighting enablement

 So, I went to the local camera shop today to look for a real softbox to use
 for the family photo shoot I was set to do this evening. Before I knew it, I
 was walking out with two fairly nice pneumatic-type light stands, two Studio
 Systems SPS920 AC studio strobes
 (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/246869-REG/SP_Studio_Systems_SPS920_9
 20_AC_Strobe_Series.html),
 two umbrellas (white and black) and a 6' flash sync cable. I went in
 expecting to spend about $50-$75 and ended up spending $200. I feel like I
 got a pretty damned good deal, though.

 It was a display setup, of which the carrying bag had faded on one side from
 sitting in direct sun in the storefront window. I really couldn't afford it,
 but I felt like I couldn't afford to let the opportunity pass. Everything
 seems to be of reasonably good build quality, and the strobes/modeling
 lights all checked out before I left the store with them.

 Now, if I can just find some good studio space . . . and some extremely hot
 models.

 I blame Bruce for all of this, of course.

 -- Walt

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.



-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Studio lighting enablement

2013-07-04 Thread Walt

Uh-oh! Sounds like a case of K-5 Fever.

The prognosis is grim. ;)

-- Walt

On 7/4/2013 8:13 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:

I found my piggy bank quaking and hiding under a dresser this morning.


On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Gerrit Visser gerrit...@gmail.com wrote:

That is an excellent deal.

Bruce is responsible for many things but I think I may have turned the
tables on him recently :-)

Gerrit



-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Walt
Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 11:56 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: OT: Studio lighting enablement

So, I went to the local camera shop today to look for a real softbox to use
for the family photo shoot I was set to do this evening. Before I knew it, I
was walking out with two fairly nice pneumatic-type light stands, two Studio
Systems SPS920 AC studio strobes
(http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/246869-REG/SP_Studio_Systems_SPS920_9
20_AC_Strobe_Series.html),
two umbrellas (white and black) and a 6' flash sync cable. I went in
expecting to spend about $50-$75 and ended up spending $200. I feel like I
got a pretty damned good deal, though.

It was a display setup, of which the carrying bag had faded on one side from
sitting in direct sun in the storefront window. I really couldn't afford it,
but I felt like I couldn't afford to let the opportunity pass. Everything
seems to be of reasonably good build quality, and the strobes/modeling
lights all checked out before I left the store with them.

Now, if I can just find some good studio space . . . and some extremely hot
models.

I blame Bruce for all of this, of course.

-- Walt

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.






--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-22 Thread David J Brooks
Ann.

Not familiar with that Verilux lamp.

Can you post a pic or link

Dave

On 4/20/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 ann sanfedele wrote:

 My studio is 3 pieces fo 8 foot high x 36  white foamcore , taped at
 the hoints to fold for easy storage,
 my window and a Verilux lamp -- I've inherited a second lamp but it
 hasn't gotten to me yet.
 
 The verilux floor lamps are cool daylight and two at right angles work
 nicely...
 

 ACk!  - I mean 45 degree angles - ugh I  was sleepy
 ann

 
 I have a piece of black cloth to drape over the light box and a few
 stray pieces of white board for reflectors.
 
 Except for the pics of Trina and Patti , the shots here were  taken with
 this set up
 
 http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2637896
 
 seamless is bulky and heavy and tears easily...
 
 I think my set up is pretty enviornmentally friendly, too
 
 ann
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Scott Loveless wrote:
 
 
 
 Howdy, gang!  The wife and I have been talking about doing a little
 studio portraiture and were wondering if we could solicit a few opinions
 
 
 from the sanitari..PDML.
 
 
 We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also need
 to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts
 were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the
 roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A single
 light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal with
 the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous
 lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a lot,
 guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm
 considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.
 
 As far as environment goes, we have 9 foot ceilings and enough space to
 move the camera up to about 20 feet from the sitter.  Our house is
 almost a shotgun style, so width of the backdrop is an issue.  Anything
 wider than 6' would be problematic unless I moved a lot of furniture
 around.  Windows face northeast and northwest
 
 Anyone care to offer an opinion about brands, continuous vs. strobe,
 watt seconds, etc?
 
 Thanks!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-22 Thread Scott Loveless
I'm not Ann, but I'll answer anyway.  The Verilux lamps are very high quality 
(priced accordingly) daylight balanced reading lamps.  I don't believe they've 
ever made a photo-specific light.

--
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com/


 -- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Ann.
 
 Not familiar with that Verilux lamp.
 
 Can you post a pic or link
 
 Dave
 
 On 4/20/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  ann sanfedele wrote:
 
  My studio is 3 pieces fo 8 foot high x 36  white foamcore , taped at
  the hoints to fold for easy storage,
  my window and a Verilux lamp -- I've inherited a second lamp but it
  hasn't gotten to me yet.
  
  The verilux floor lamps are cool daylight and two at right angles work
  nicely...
  
 
  ACk!  - I mean 45 degree angles - ugh I  was sleepy
  ann
 
  
  I have a piece of black cloth to drape over the light box and a few
  stray pieces of white board for reflectors.
  
  Except for the pics of Trina and Patti , the shots here were  taken with
  this set up
  
  http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2637896
  
  seamless is bulky and heavy and tears easily...
  
  I think my set up is pretty enviornmentally friendly, too
  
  ann
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Scott Loveless wrote:
  
  
  
  Howdy, gang!  The wife and I have been talking about doing a little
  studio portraiture and were wondering if we could solicit a few opinions
  
  
  from the sanitari..PDML.
  
  
  We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also need
  to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts
  were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the
  roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A single
  light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal with
  the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous
  lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a lot,
  guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm
  considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.
  
  As far as environment goes, we have 9 foot ceilings and enough space to
  move the camera up to about 20 feet from the sitter.  Our house is
  almost a shotgun style, so width of the backdrop is an issue.  Anything
  wider than 6' would be problematic unless I moved a lot of furniture
  around.  Windows face northeast and northwest
  
  Anyone care to offer an opinion about brands, continuous vs. strobe,
  watt seconds, etc?
  
  Thanks!
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 
 
 
 -- 
 Equine Photography
 www.caughtinmotion.com
 http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
 Ontario Canada
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-22 Thread David J Brooks
On 4/22/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm not Ann, but I'll answer anyway.

You had me fooled for a second there.:-)

Dave



The Verilux lamps are very high quality (priced accordingly) daylight
balanced reading lamps.  I don't believe they've ever made a
photo-specific light.

 --
 Scott Loveless
 www.twosixteen.com/


  -- Original message --
 From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Ann.
 
  Not familiar with that Verilux lamp.
 
  Can you post a pic or link
 
  Dave
 
  On 4/20/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   ann sanfedele wrote:
  
   My studio is 3 pieces fo 8 foot high x 36  white foamcore , taped at
   the hoints to fold for easy storage,
   my window and a Verilux lamp -- I've inherited a second lamp but it
   hasn't gotten to me yet.
   
   The verilux floor lamps are cool daylight and two at right angles work
   nicely...
   
  
   ACk!  - I mean 45 degree angles - ugh I  was sleepy
   ann
  
   
   I have a piece of black cloth to drape over the light box and a few
   stray pieces of white board for reflectors.
   
   Except for the pics of Trina and Patti , the shots here were  taken with
   this set up
   
   http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2637896
   
   seamless is bulky and heavy and tears easily...
   
   I think my set up is pretty enviornmentally friendly, too
   
   ann
   
   
   
   
   
   
   Scott Loveless wrote:
   
   
   
   Howdy, gang!  The wife and I have been talking about doing a little
   studio portraiture and were wondering if we could solicit a few opinions
   
   
   from the sanitari..PDML.
   
   
   We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also need
   to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts
   were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the
   roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A single
   light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal with
   the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous
   lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a lot,
   guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm
   considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.
   
   As far as environment goes, we have 9 foot ceilings and enough space to
   move the camera up to about 20 feet from the sitter.  Our house is
   almost a shotgun style, so width of the backdrop is an issue.  Anything
   wider than 6' would be problematic unless I moved a lot of furniture
   around.  Windows face northeast and northwest
   
   Anyone care to offer an opinion about brands, continuous vs. strobe,
   watt seconds, etc?
   
   Thanks!
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
  
   --
   PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
   PDML@pdml.net
   http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
  
 
 
  --
  Equine Photography
  www.caughtinmotion.com
  http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
  Ontario Canada
 
  --
  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-20 Thread Bob Shell
I put an article I wrote a while back up on my website for free  
download as a pdf.  It talks about some general theory of softbox use  
and has some one-light portraits as examples.

Just go to www.bobshell.com and scroll down to the link.

I hope it is useful to some of you.

Bob

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-20 Thread ann sanfedele
ann sanfedele wrote:

My studio is 3 pieces fo 8 foot high x 36  white foamcore , taped at 
the hoints to fold for easy storage,
my window and a Verilux lamp -- I've inherited a second lamp but it 
hasn't gotten to me yet.

The verilux floor lamps are cool daylight and two at right angles work 
nicely...


ACk!  - I mean 45 degree angles - ugh I  was sleepy
ann


I have a piece of black cloth to drape over the light box and a few 
stray pieces of white board for reflectors.

Except for the pics of Trina and Patti , the shots here were  taken with 
this set up

http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2637896

seamless is bulky and heavy and tears easily...  

I think my set up is pretty enviornmentally friendly, too

ann






Scott Loveless wrote:

  

Howdy, gang!  The wife and I have been talking about doing a little 
studio portraiture and were wondering if we could solicit a few opinions 


from the sanitari..PDML.
  

We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also need 
to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts 
were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the 
roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A single 
light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal with 
the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous 
lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a lot, 
guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm 
considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.

As far as environment goes, we have 9 foot ceilings and enough space to 
move the camera up to about 20 feet from the sitter.  Our house is 
almost a shotgun style, so width of the backdrop is an issue.  Anything 
wider than 6' would be problematic unless I moved a lot of furniture 
around.  Windows face northeast and northwest

Anyone care to offer an opinion about brands, continuous vs. strobe, 
watt seconds, etc?

Thanks!

 






  




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread Bruce Dayton
Hello Scott,

The room does seem a little challenging.  One big issue is the height
of the ceiling.  My umbrellas have a removable back that allows them
to either bounce or shoot through.  When the ceilings are high I can
use them for bouncing the light, but if the ceilings are lower, then
shooting through saves me several feet.  So that is one suggestion -
get shoot through umbrellas.  Basically you need to have the light
high enough for the shadows to fall behind your subject.

As to backdrop, Bill Robb has talked a few times about more of a
muslin like drop that you can make yourself - maybe he'll chime in.
In that size of width, some natural folds to the cloth might look less
antiseptic than seamless and might be easier to deal with.

For lights, I use the Alien Bees.  They are priced very competitively
and have features to match the high end systems.  My understanding is
that they are lighter duty, so wouldn't be a good choice for a studio
that is shooting day in and day out.  But for my usage, which is much
more hit and miss, they are excellent.  It is certainly worth checking
them out.

Anyway, some starting advice - hope it helps.

-- 
Bruce


Wednesday, April 18, 2007, 9:19:57 PM, you wrote:

SL Howdy, gang!  The wife and I have been talking about doing a little
SL studio portraiture and were wondering if we could solicit a few opinions
SL from the sanitari..PDML.

SL We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also need
SL to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts
SL were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the
SL roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A single
SL light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal with
SL the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous
SL lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a lot,
SL guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm
SL considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.

SL As far as environment goes, we have 9 foot ceilings and enough space to
SL move the camera up to about 20 feet from the sitter.  Our house is
SL almost a shotgun style, so width of the backdrop is an issue. Anything
SL wider than 6' would be problematic unless I moved a lot of furniture
SL around.  Windows face northeast and northwest

SL Anyone care to offer an opinion about brands, continuous vs. strobe,
SL watt seconds, etc?

SL Thanks!

SL -- 
SL Scott Loveless
SL www.twosixteen.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread pnstenquist
I have a Studio Pro Excalibur 3200 lighting kit that stores nicely in two 
canvas bags. It includes two 300 watt monolights, one 150 watt hair light and 
snorkel, two umbrellas, and three stands. I can light a group of a dozen or 
more people nicely. It's perfect for portraits. I also have a background stand 
from Superior Seamless. It will suspend a large muslim or a wide roll of 
seamless at heights up to about ten feet. It also fits in a canvas case for 
transport. I've set up many places, even outdoors with a generator for power. 
Paul
 -- Original message --
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Howdy, gang!  The wife and I have been talking about doing a little 
 studio portraiture and were wondering if we could solicit a few opinions 
 from the sanitari..PDML.
 
 We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also need 
 to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts 
 were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the 
 roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A single 
 light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal with 
 the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous 
 lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a lot, 
 guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm 
 considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.
 
 As far as environment goes, we have 9 foot ceilings and enough space to 
 move the camera up to about 20 feet from the sitter.  Our house is 
 almost a shotgun style, so width of the backdrop is an issue.  Anything 
 wider than 6' would be problematic unless I moved a lot of furniture 
 around.  Windows face northeast and northwest
 
 Anyone care to offer an opinion about brands, continuous vs. strobe, 
 watt seconds, etc?
 
 Thanks!
 
 -- 
 Scott Loveless
 www.twosixteen.com
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread Bob Shell
Scott,

Will you be shooting digital or film, or both?

What is your budget?

For digital some of the new continuous lights that use fluorescent  
tubes are great.  Good light quality like hot lights but almost no  
heat. And WYSIWYG, unlike studio flash.

If you want flash, you can't go wrong with AlienBees.  Made to very  
high standards.  Fan cooled.  Modeling lights and replacement flash  
tubes readily available if you ever need them.  Wide range of light  
modifiers available from them and other companies.

My studio was set up as a teaching studio and I have three shooting  
areas that are set up with lights all the time. I have three  
AlienBees in one set, and have been running them heavily since they  
first came on the market in 2003.  I've yet to need to replace a  
flash tube or modeling light.

I have Multiblitz monolights (3) on another set, and Visatek (from  
Broncolor) on the third set.  Both produce excellent light quality,  
but modeling lights are harder to get and more expensive, and light  
modifiers from the companies are expensive.  I also have a bunch of  
White Lightning units of various vintages that I use when I need more  
lights for a particular project, and some JTL equipment.

I've tested just about every brand of studio flash at one time or  
another for my magazine articles/books, and really do think that  
AlienBees is the best value per dollar currently available.

Bob

On Apr 19, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:

 Howdy, gang!  The wife and I have been talking about doing a little
 studio portraiture and were wondering if we could solicit a few  
 opinions
 from the sanitari..PDML.

 We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also  
 need
 to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts
 were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the
 roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A  
 single
 light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal  
 with
 the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous
 lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a  
 lot,
 guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm
 considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.

 As far as environment goes, we have 9 foot ceilings and enough  
 space to
 move the camera up to about 20 feet from the sitter.  Our house is
 almost a shotgun style, so width of the backdrop is an issue.   
 Anything
 wider than 6' would be problematic unless I moved a lot of furniture
 around.  Windows face northeast and northwest

 Anyone care to offer an opinion about brands, continuous vs. strobe,
 watt seconds, etc?

 Thanks!

 -- 
 Scott Loveless
 www.twosixteen.com


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread David J Brooks
Not to hi jack the thread, but does anyone remeber the site for flash
tutorials, strobo something or other. I had it bookmarked but its
gone.

Dave

On 4/19/07, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Scott,

 Will you be shooting digital or film, or both?

 What is your budget?

 For digital some of the new continuous lights that use fluorescent
 tubes are great.  Good light quality like hot lights but almost no
 heat. And WYSIWYG, unlike studio flash.

 If you want flash, you can't go wrong with AlienBees.  Made to very
 high standards.  Fan cooled.  Modeling lights and replacement flash
 tubes readily available if you ever need them.  Wide range of light
 modifiers available from them and other companies.

 My studio was set up as a teaching studio and I have three shooting
 areas that are set up with lights all the time. I have three
 AlienBees in one set, and have been running them heavily since they
 first came on the market in 2003.  I've yet to need to replace a
 flash tube or modeling light.

 I have Multiblitz monolights (3) on another set, and Visatek (from
 Broncolor) on the third set.  Both produce excellent light quality,
 but modeling lights are harder to get and more expensive, and light
 modifiers from the companies are expensive.  I also have a bunch of
 White Lightning units of various vintages that I use when I need more
 lights for a particular project, and some JTL equipment.

 I've tested just about every brand of studio flash at one time or
 another for my magazine articles/books, and really do think that
 AlienBees is the best value per dollar currently available.

 Bob

 On Apr 19, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:

  Howdy, gang!  The wife and I have been talking about doing a little
  studio portraiture and were wondering if we could solicit a few
  opinions
  from the sanitari..PDML.
 
  We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also
  need
  to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts
  were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the
  roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A
  single
  light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal
  with
  the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous
  lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a
  lot,
  guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm
  considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.
 
  As far as environment goes, we have 9 foot ceilings and enough
  space to
  move the camera up to about 20 feet from the sitter.  Our house is
  almost a shotgun style, so width of the backdrop is an issue.
  Anything
  wider than 6' would be problematic unless I moved a lot of furniture
  around.  Windows face northeast and northwest
 
  Anyone care to offer an opinion about brands, continuous vs. strobe,
  watt seconds, etc?
 
  Thanks!
 
  --
  Scott Loveless
  www.twosixteen.com
 
 
  --
  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread Bob Shell

On Apr 19, 2007, at 7:59 AM, David J Brooks wrote:

 Not to hi jack the thread, but does anyone remeber the site for flash
 tutorials, strobo something or other. I had it bookmarked but its
 gone.

There's some good stuff here, including one of my lessons:

http://www.photoflexlightingschool.com/

Bob

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread Scott Loveless
David Savage wrote:
 I cant add anything to help with your decision, but this question
 comes up quite frequently at the DPReview Lighting Technique Forum:

 http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1025

 Cheers,

 Dave


 On 4/19/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Howdy, gang!  The wife and I have been talking about doing a little
 studio portraiture and were wondering if we could solicit a few opinions
 from the sanitari..PDML.

 We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also need
 to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts
 were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the
 roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A single
 light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal with
 the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous
 lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a lot,
 guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm
 considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.

 As far as environment goes, we have 9 foot ceilings and enough space to
 move the camera up to about 20 feet from the sitter.  Our house is
 almost a shotgun style, so width of the backdrop is an issue.  Anything
 wider than 6' would be problematic unless I moved a lot of furniture
 around.  Windows face northeast and northwest

 Anyone care to offer an opinion about brands, continuous vs. strobe,
 watt seconds, etc?
 

   
Thanks, Dave.  I tend to avoid DPReview if at all possible, but I'll 
take a look.  Thanks for the tip.  Much appreciated.

-- 
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread Scott Loveless
Paul Sorenson wrote:
 I have three AlienBees and am pretty happy with them.  They're fairly 
 inexpensive, well made.  I use them w/umbrellas, sometimes shoot-through 
 and sometimes reflecting.  Here's their URL...

 http://www.alienbees.com/

 -P



 Scott Loveless wrote:
   
 Howdy, gang!  The wife and I have been talking about doing a little 
 studio portraiture and were wondering if we could solicit a few opinions 
 from the sanitari..PDML.

 We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also need 
 to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts 
 were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the 
 roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A single 
 light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal with 
 the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous 
 lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a lot, 
 guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm 
 considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.

 As far as environment goes, we have 9 foot ceilings and enough space to 
 move the camera up to about 20 feet from the sitter.  Our house is 
 almost a shotgun style, so width of the backdrop is an issue.  Anything 
 wider than 6' would be problematic unless I moved a lot of furniture 
 around.  Windows face northeast and northwest

 Anyone care to offer an opinion about brands, continuous vs. strobe, 
 watt seconds, etc?

 Thanks!

 


   
Thanks, Paul.  Alien Bees are on our short list.  If we decide to go 
with strobes instead of continuous lighting, we'll probably get their 
digibee package.

-- 
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread Scott Loveless
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have a Studio Pro Excalibur 3200 lighting kit that stores nicely in two 
 canvas bags. It includes two 300 watt monolights, one 150 watt hair light and 
 snorkel, two umbrellas, and three stands. I can light a group of a dozen or 
 more people nicely. It's perfect for portraits. I also have a background 
 stand from Superior Seamless. It will suspend a large muslim or a wide roll 
 of seamless at heights up to about ten feet. It also fits in a canvas case 
 for transport. I've set up many places, even outdoors with a generator for 
 power. 
 Paul
  -- Original message --
 From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also need 
 to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts 
 were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the 
 roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A single 
 light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal with 
 the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous 
 lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a lot, 
 guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm 
 considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.

 
   
Paul, do you think a couple 100 or 150 w/s strobes would be adequate for 
what I've described - one or two people at a time, or a very close 
grouping of perhaps four?  I could always add one of those optical 
slaves that screws into a standard light fixture if I needed a hair 
light.  Any thoughts?

-- 
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread Scott Loveless
Bruce Dayton wrote:
 Hello Scott,

 The room does seem a little challenging.  One big issue is the height
 of the ceiling.  My umbrellas have a removable back that allows them
 to either bounce or shoot through.  When the ceilings are high I can
 use them for bouncing the light, but if the ceilings are lower, then
 shooting through saves me several feet.  So that is one suggestion -
 get shoot through umbrellas.  Basically you need to have the light
 high enough for the shadows to fall behind your subject.

 As to backdrop, Bill Robb has talked a few times about more of a
 muslin like drop that you can make yourself - maybe he'll chime in.
 In that size of width, some natural folds to the cloth might look less
 antiseptic than seamless and might be easier to deal with.

 For lights, I use the Alien Bees.  They are priced very competitively
 and have features to match the high end systems.  My understanding is
 that they are lighter duty, so wouldn't be a good choice for a studio
 that is shooting day in and day out.  But for my usage, which is much
 more hit and miss, they are excellent.  It is certainly worth checking
 them out.

 Anyway, some starting advice - hope it helps.

   
Thanks, Bruce.  Quite a few of you have suggested the Alien Bees.  Based 
on the features they seem to be very competitive  Ceiling height is 
definitely an issue.  Bouncing off the ceiling is probably something we 
could do with a seated or prone subject.  I would imagine that they're a 
bit low for a standing adult.  Christie and I discussed Bill Robb's 
muslin ideas a while back and decided that our landlord probably 
wouldn't appreciate a couple gallons of paint splattered across the back 
yard.  g

-- 
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread Scott Loveless
Interspersed

Bob Shell wrote:
 Scott,

 Will you be shooting digital or film, or both?
   
Mostly digital.  All of the color work and probably a good deal of the 
black and white will be done with the K100 and K10.  Any film will be 
black and white.
 What is your budget?
   
That's funny!  g  Seriously, we don't want to spend too much on this.  
Neither of us has ever done anything quite like this, and I doubt we'll 
be selling the end product any time soon.  It's intended use is for 
personal photography and as a learning exercise.  A two light Alien Bees 
package is probably at the high end of what we'd like to spend.
 For digital some of the new continuous lights that use fluorescent  
 tubes are great.  Good light quality like hot lights but almost no  
 heat. And WYSIWYG, unlike studio flash.
   
Since we don't have any interest in shooting color film at this point, 
fluorescent lighting is looking attractive.  I am concerned about 
umbrellas, though.  Is there any way to use an umbrella with a 12 
parabolic reflector?  On the low end I'm seeing single bulb and triple 
bulb lights.  Any preference?
 I've tested just about every brand of studio flash at one time or  
 another for my magazine articles/books, and really do think that  
 AlienBees is the best value per dollar currently available.
   
Thanks, Bob.  Much appreciated.


-- 
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread Russell Kerstetter
If you haven't already been here...

www.strobist.com

It may not be exactly what you are looking for, but a lot of the
principles may apply, as well as some learing tools (if you are not
experienced with lighting already).

Russ

On 4/18/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Howdy, gang!  The wife and I have been talking about doing a little
 studio portraiture and were wondering if we could solicit a few opinions
 from the sanitari..PDML.

 We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also need
 to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts
 were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the
 roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A single
 light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal with
 the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous
 lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a lot,
 guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm
 considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.

 As far as environment goes, we have 9 foot ceilings and enough space to
 move the camera up to about 20 feet from the sitter.  Our house is
 almost a shotgun style, so width of the backdrop is an issue.  Anything
 wider than 6' would be problematic unless I moved a lot of furniture
 around.  Windows face northeast and northwest

 Anyone care to offer an opinion about brands, continuous vs. strobe,
 watt seconds, etc?

 Thanks!

 --
 Scott Loveless
 www.twosixteen.com


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
Legacy Air, Inc.
11900 Airport Way
Broomfield Colorado 80021
(303) 404-0277
fax (303) 404-0280
www.legacy-air.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread Scott Loveless
David J Brooks wrote:
 Not to hi jack the thread, but does anyone remeber the site for flash
 tutorials, strobo something or other. I had it bookmarked but its
 gone.

 Dave

   
strobist.blogspot.com

-- 
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread Scott Loveless
Bob Shell wrote:
 Scott,

 Will you be shooting digital or film, or both?

 What is your budget?

 For digital some of the new continuous lights that use fluorescent  
 tubes are great.  Good light quality like hot lights but almost no  
 heat. And WYSIWYG, unlike studio flash.

 If you want flash, you can't go wrong with AlienBees.  Made to very  
 high standards.  Fan cooled.  Modeling lights and replacement flash  
 tubes readily available if you ever need them.  Wide range of light  
 modifiers available from them and other companies.

   
One more question.  Are there any lights I should avoid?

-- 
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread David J Brooks
Thats the one.

Re booked marked now.

Thanks

Dave

On 4/19/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 David J Brooks wrote:
  Not to hi jack the thread, but does anyone remeber the site for flash
  tutorials, strobo something or other. I had it bookmarked but its
  gone.
 
  Dave
 
 
 strobist.blogspot.com

 --
 Scott Loveless
 www.twosixteen.com


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread Bob Shell

On Apr 19, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:

 Mostly digital.  All of the color work and probably a good deal of the
 black and white will be done with the K100 and K10.  Any film will be
 black and white.

You can go with continuous or flash.

 What is your budget?

 That's funny!  g  Seriously, we don't want to spend too much on  
 this.
 Neither of us has ever done anything quite like this, and I doubt  
 we'll
 be selling the end product any time soon.  It's intended use is for
 personal photography and as a learning exercise.  A two light Alien  
 Bees
 package is probably at the high end of what we'd like to spend.

You need three lights, minimum.

 For digital some of the new continuous lights that use fluorescent
 tubes are great.  Good light quality like hot lights but almost no
 heat. And WYSIWYG, unlike studio flash.

 Since we don't have any interest in shooting color film at this point,
 fluorescent lighting is looking attractive.  I am concerned about
 umbrellas, though.  Is there any way to use an umbrella with a 12
 parabolic reflector?  On the low end I'm seeing single bulb and triple
 bulb lights.  Any preference?

You can't really use umbrellas with the fluorescent stuff, so far as  
I know.  Too much light loss.  Softboxes are much better than  
umbrellas, anyway.

I can't help you on the low end stuff, since I haven't tried it.

Bob


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread Bob Shell
Yeah, avoid off-brand stuff from the far east.  When you need a new  
modeling light you may find it nearly impossible to find.  And if the  
stuff breaks, forget 'service'.  Stick with known brands.

Bob

On Apr 19, 2007, at 9:19 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:

 Bob Shell wrote:
 Scott,

 Will you be shooting digital or film, or both?

 What is your budget?

 For digital some of the new continuous lights that use fluorescent
 tubes are great.  Good light quality like hot lights but almost no
 heat. And WYSIWYG, unlike studio flash.

 If you want flash, you can't go wrong with AlienBees.  Made to very
 high standards.  Fan cooled.  Modeling lights and replacement flash
 tubes readily available if you ever need them.  Wide range of light
 modifiers available from them and other companies.


 One more question.  Are there any lights I should avoid?

 -- 
 Scott Loveless
 www.twosixteen.com


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread ann sanfedele
My studio is 3 pieces fo 8 foot high x 36  white foamcore , taped at 
the hoints to fold for easy storage,
my window and a Verilux lamp -- I've inherited a second lamp but it 
hasn't gotten to me yet.

The verilux floor lamps are cool daylight and two at right angles work 
nicely...

I have a piece of black cloth to drape over the light box and a few 
stray pieces of white board for reflectors.

Except for the pics of Trina and Patti , the shots here were  taken with 
this set up

http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2637896

seamless is bulky and heavy and tears easily...  

I think my set up is pretty enviornmentally friendly, too

ann






Scott Loveless wrote:

Howdy, gang!  The wife and I have been talking about doing a little 
studio portraiture and were wondering if we could solicit a few opinions 
from the sanitari..PDML.

We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also need 
to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts 
were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the 
roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A single 
light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal with 
the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous 
lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a lot, 
guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm 
considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.

As far as environment goes, we have 9 foot ceilings and enough space to 
move the camera up to about 20 feet from the sitter.  Our house is 
almost a shotgun style, so width of the backdrop is an issue.  Anything 
wider than 6' would be problematic unless I moved a lot of furniture 
around.  Windows face northeast and northwest

Anyone care to offer an opinion about brands, continuous vs. strobe, 
watt seconds, etc?

Thanks!

  




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread pnstenquist
You could probably get by with 150 watt strobes, but by the time you're done, 
you'll probably spend as much as the cost of a kit.
Paul
 -- Original message --
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I have a Studio Pro Excalibur 3200 lighting kit that stores nicely in two 
 canvas bags. It includes two 300 watt monolights, one 150 watt hair light and 
 snorkel, two umbrellas, and three stands. I can light a group of a dozen or 
 more 
 people nicely. It's perfect for portraits. I also have a background stand 
 from 
 Superior Seamless. It will suspend a large muslim or a wide roll of seamless 
 at 
 heights up to about ten feet. It also fits in a canvas case for transport. 
 I've 
 set up many places, even outdoors with a generator for power. 
  Paul
   -- Original message --
  From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also need 
  to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts 
  were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the 
  roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A single 
  light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal with 
  the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous 
  lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a lot, 
  guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm 
  considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.
 
  

 Paul, do you think a couple 100 or 150 w/s strobes would be adequate for 
 what I've described - one or two people at a time, or a very close 
 grouping of perhaps four?  I could always add one of those optical 
 slaves that screws into a standard light fixture if I needed a hair 
 light.  Any thoughts?
 
 -- 
 Scott Loveless
 www.twosixteen.com
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-19 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Studio lighting


 Howdy, gang!  The wife and I have been talking about doing a little
 studio portraiture and were wondering if we could solicit a few opinions
 from the sanitari..PDML.

 We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also need
 to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts
 were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the
 roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A single
 light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal with
 the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous
 lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a lot,
 guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm
 considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.

 As far as environment goes, we have 9 foot ceilings and enough space to
 move the camera up to about 20 feet from the sitter.  Our house is
 almost a shotgun style, so width of the backdrop is an issue.  Anything
 wider than 6' would be problematic unless I moved a lot of furniture
 around.  Windows face northeast and northwest

 Anyone care to offer an opinion about brands, continuous vs. strobe,
 watt seconds, etc?

I've been using a Photogenic 800ws box and cable set for 15 years or so.
Great quality product.
I went with this rather than monolights after seeing what happens when a 
monolight topples over.
I can keep my entire lighting kit in a large Samsonite suitcase and a couple 
of smaller cases.

William Robb 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-18 Thread David Savage
I cant add anything to help with your decision, but this question
comes up quite frequently at the DPReview Lighting Technique Forum:

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1025

Cheers,

Dave


On 4/19/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Howdy, gang!  The wife and I have been talking about doing a little
 studio portraiture and were wondering if we could solicit a few opinions
 from the sanitari..PDML.

 We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also need
 to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts
 were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the
 roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A single
 light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal with
 the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous
 lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a lot,
 guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm
 considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.

 As far as environment goes, we have 9 foot ceilings and enough space to
 move the camera up to about 20 feet from the sitter.  Our house is
 almost a shotgun style, so width of the backdrop is an issue.  Anything
 wider than 6' would be problematic unless I moved a lot of furniture
 around.  Windows face northeast and northwest

 Anyone care to offer an opinion about brands, continuous vs. strobe,
 watt seconds, etc?

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Studio lighting

2007-04-18 Thread Paul Sorenson
I have three AlienBees and am pretty happy with them.  They're fairly 
inexpensive, well made.  I use them w/umbrellas, sometimes shoot-through 
and sometimes reflecting.  Here's their URL...

http://www.alienbees.com/

-P



Scott Loveless wrote:
 Howdy, gang!  The wife and I have been talking about doing a little 
 studio portraiture and were wondering if we could solicit a few opinions 
 from the sanitari..PDML.
 
 We need to be able to set it up and take it down quickly.  We also need 
 to be able to store it as compactly as possible.  Our initial thoughts 
 were to start simple - a 53 roll of white seamless, stands for the 
 roll, and a couple lights with either umbrellas or soft boxes.  A single 
 light and a reflector may suit our needs, too.  I'd rather not deal with 
 the heat from tungsten lights, so it's either fluorescent continuous 
 lighting or monoblocks.  Current plans are to photograph the kids a lot, 
 guests when they'll allow it, and a few models for some projects I'm 
 considering.  One or two people in the frame should be typical.
 
 As far as environment goes, we have 9 foot ceilings and enough space to 
 move the camera up to about 20 feet from the sitter.  Our house is 
 almost a shotgun style, so width of the backdrop is an issue.  Anything 
 wider than 6' would be problematic unless I moved a lot of furniture 
 around.  Windows face northeast and northwest
 
 Anyone care to offer an opinion about brands, continuous vs. strobe, 
 watt seconds, etc?
 
 Thanks!
 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net