Re: Too Much PAW
Hmm.. that adds up to 100.1%. That doesn't leave much room for the rest of us. LOL! rg graywolf wrote: 99 and 44/100ths talk. The other 0.66% are scared. And the rest of us are too old. (grin) Tanya Mayer Photography wrote: OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and that bloody photography list. I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot is safe! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and meeting with a bunch of internet stalkers, lol, his words, not mine! You are very naughty boys, now go to the back of the classroom and behave yourselves... ...And no fondling ass you walk there, ok?!? vbg tan. -Original Message- From: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 7:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Too Much PAW From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER disgorged: hehe, the challenge is on! tan. (who fondles AS she photographs) ps no wise arse comments about fondling, ok Cotty? hehe. I'll let someone else have a go :-) Cue Lasse... Yes, yes, Cotty... You want me to have a go at fondling, yes? I haven't been following the thread in detail, but I recall something about tans bottom and now she says she fondles AS she photographs. Am I to step in here? Sure, I'll do the fondling if it helps. Just send me an airline ticket, one tuna sandwich and a note to the captain where to take me and I'd be most happy to oblige. Lasse (who fondless ass she photographss)
RE: Too Much PAW
On 25/2/04, FRANK disgorged: Tanya, Call hubby over to the computer right now. Show him this: http://www.nrg666.com/pdml/portraits/pages/FrankTheriault.htm Oh no! - too late. Well, it was nice while she lasted... Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=| http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps _ Free UK Mac Ads http://www.macads.co.uk
RE: Too Much PAW
On 25/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: Just remember, at least five of us WIMMEN are planning to be there! I'm bringing my own bodyguard, though ... ERN Don't forget, one of my specialties is picturing people who don't want to be pictured... No worries, you'll never even know it's happened ;-) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=| http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps _ Free UK Mac Ads http://www.macads.co.uk
RE: Too Much PAW
On 25/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: Yeah, somehow, judging by the looks of Frank's bunny ears, I think I'll be pretty safe. Unless that is, Cotty squashes me in the back of tv's car on the drive to GFM! hehe... tan. Stone the crows. I thought she was riding on the roof with a supply of Wichity Grubs. Mind if we call you Sheila to avoid confusion? Are you seriously staying at tv's? What's you flight arrival day and time? If it's near enough mine, I'll share the cost of a cab with you to Falls Church Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=| http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps _ Free UK Mac Ads http://www.macads.co.uk
RE: Too Much PAW
Cotty, I am yet to book flights but there is plenty of availability around the dates that I want. I am looking at flying in around the 27th May - tv has some work around the 30th that I was going to tag along for and generally just check things out for the week before GFM. Was hoping to squeeze a trip to NY in too. I will be flying out on the Monday immediately following GFM (7th June), and have to fly to LA first to get a connection to Australia, so times will depend on that. Love to share a cab on the way BACK to the Airport if that works out though... Of course, this all depends on $$$ and if I manage to get there or not, just got a HUGE phone bill (au$2k - no kidding! this includes my web hosting etc, but it is still very scary to see it on paper like that!), so unless I win the lotto in the next few weeks or can convince someone (ie a magazine or publication etc) to sponsor me things aren't looking to great tan. -Original Message- From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 8:55 PM To: pentax list Subject: RE: Too Much PAW On 25/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: Yeah, somehow, judging by the looks of Frank's bunny ears, I think I'll be pretty safe. Unless that is, Cotty squashes me in the back of tv's car on the drive to GFM! hehe... tan. Stone the crows. I thought she was riding on the roof with a supply of Wichity Grubs. Mind if we call you Sheila to avoid confusion? Are you seriously staying at tv's? What's you flight arrival day and time? If it's near enough mine, I'll share the cost of a cab with you to Falls Church Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=| http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps _ Free UK Mac Ads http://www.macads.co.uk
Re: Too Much PAW
New math! And yes, I did it deliberately. After all who admits to being too old? Robert Gonzalez wrote: Hmm.. that adds up to 100.1%. That doesn't leave much room for the rest of us. LOL! rg graywolf wrote: 99 and 44/100ths talk. The other 0.66% are scared. And the rest of us are too old. (grin) Tanya Mayer Photography wrote: OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and that bloody photography list. I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot is safe! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and meeting with a bunch of internet stalkers, lol, his words, not mine! You are very naughty boys, now go to the back of the classroom and behave yourselves... ...And no fondling ass you walk there, ok?!? vbg tan. -Original Message- From: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 7:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Too Much PAW From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER disgorged: hehe, the challenge is on! tan. (who fondles AS she photographs) ps no wise arse comments about fondling, ok Cotty? hehe. I'll let someone else have a go :-) Cue Lasse... Yes, yes, Cotty... You want me to have a go at fondling, yes? I haven't been following the thread in detail, but I recall something about tans bottom and now she says she fondles AS she photographs. Am I to step in here? Sure, I'll do the fondling if it helps. Just send me an airline ticket, one tuna sandwich and a note to the captain where to take me and I'd be most happy to oblige. Lasse (who fondless ass she photographss) -- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com You might as well accept people as they are, you are not going to be able to change them anyway.
RE: Too Much PAW
On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER disgorged: hehe, the challenge is on! tan. (who fondles AS she photographs) ps no wise arse comments about fondling, ok Cotty? hehe. I'll let someone else have a go :-) Cue Lasse... Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=| http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps _ Free UK Mac Ads http://www.macads.co.uk
Re: Too Much PAW
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER disgorged: hehe, the challenge is on! tan. (who fondles AS she photographs) ps no wise arse comments about fondling, ok Cotty? hehe. I'll let someone else have a go :-) Cue Lasse... Yes, yes, Cotty... You want me to have a go at fondling, yes? I haven't been following the thread in detail, but I recall something about tans bottom and now she says she fondles AS she photographs. Am I to step in here? Sure, I'll do the fondling if it helps. Just send me an airline ticket, one tuna sandwich and a note to the captain where to take me and I'd be most happy to oblige. Lasse (who fondless ass she photographss)
RE: Too Much PAW
OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and that bloody photography list. I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot is safe! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and meeting with a bunch of internet stalkers, lol, his words, not mine! You are very naughty boys, now go to the back of the classroom and behave yourselves... ...And no fondling ass you walk there, ok?!? vbg tan. -Original Message- From: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 7:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Too Much PAW From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER disgorged: hehe, the challenge is on! tan. (who fondles AS she photographs) ps no wise arse comments about fondling, ok Cotty? hehe. I'll let someone else have a go :-) Cue Lasse... Yes, yes, Cotty... You want me to have a go at fondling, yes? I haven't been following the thread in detail, but I recall something about tans bottom and now she says she fondles AS she photographs. Am I to step in here? Sure, I'll do the fondling if it helps. Just send me an airline ticket, one tuna sandwich and a note to the captain where to take me and I'd be most happy to oblige. Lasse (who fondless ass she photographss)
Re: Too Much PAW
On 25/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER disgorged: hehe, the challenge is on! tan. (who fondles AS she photographs) ps no wise arse comments about fondling, ok Cotty? hehe. I'll let someone else have a go :-) Cue Lasse... Yes, yes, Cotty... You want me to have a go at fondling, yes? I haven't been following the thread in detail, but I recall something about tans bottom and now she says she fondles AS she photographs. Am I to step in here? Sure, I'll do the fondling if it helps. Just send me an airline ticket, one tuna sandwich and a note to the captain where to take me and I'd be most happy to oblige. Lasse (who fondless ass she photographss) Oh Lord. Scandinavians. It's all bottoms isn't it. Well, she asked for it. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=| http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps _ Free UK Mac Ads http://www.macads.co.uk
RE: Too Much PAW
On 25/2/04, TANJA THE SWEET disgorged: OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and that bloody photography list. I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot is safe! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and meeting with a bunch of internet stalkers, lol, his words, not mine! LOL. You should listen to him more. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=| http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps _ Free UK Mac Ads http://www.macads.co.uk
RE: Too Much PAW
Tanya, Call hubby over to the computer right now. Show him this: http://www.nrg666.com/pdml/portraits/pages/FrankTheriault.htm It will calm any concerns he might have about the quality of people you'll meet at GFM. cheers, frank PS: I couldn't help thinking, when I read your husband's comment about internet stalkers, Yeah, we've all been on this list for years and years, quietly planning and waiting, being patient, waiting for the moment to strike, viper-like, at our prey... vbg The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] snip He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and meeting with a bunch of internet stalkers, lol, his words, not mine! _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/featurespgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
RE: Too Much PAW
Yeah, somehow, judging by the looks of Frank's bunny ears, I think I'll be pretty safe. Unless that is, Cotty squashes me in the back of tv's car on the drive to GFM! hehe... tan. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 12:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Too Much PAW Tanja said: OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and that bloody photography list. I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot is safe! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and meeting with a bunch of internet stalkers, lol, his words, not mine! Just remember, at least five of us WIMMEN are planning to be there! I'm bringing my own bodyguard, though ... ERN
Re: Too Much PAW
And a shotgun? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tanja said: OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and that bloody photography list. I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot is safe! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and meeting with a bunch of internet stalkers, lol, his words, not mine! Just remember, at least five of us WIMMEN are planning to be there! I'm bringing my own bodyguard, though ... ERN
Re: Too Much PAW
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 23:02:54 +0200, Lasse Karlsson wrote: Lasse (who fondless ass she photographss) You're a _bad_, _bad, boy Lasse. But it's the comment I would have made, had I been so bold, so I guess that makes me one, too. :-) TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Re: Too Much PAW
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tanja said: OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and that bloody photography list. I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot is safe! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and meeting with a bunch of internet stalkers, lol, his words, not mine! I said: Just remember, at least five of us WIMMEN are planning to be there! I'm bringing my own bodyguard, though ... so then Peter J. Alling inquired: And a shotgun? The bodyguard says to tell you his new SUV doesn't have a gun rack yet. ERN
RE: Too Much PAW
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 9:45 PM Tanja said: OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and that bloody photography list. I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot is safe! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and meeting with a bunch of internet stalkers, lol, his words, not mine! Just remember, at least five of us WIMMEN are planning to be there! I'm bringing my own bodyguard, though ... ERN Eleanor, You did not have to bring your own. You just know that I would have been the first in line to do the job. Just ask the other WIMMEN PDMLers that have met me :-) How far away is GFMtn? Cesar Panama City, Florida
Re: Too Much PAW
On 23/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: Too Much PAW!?!?!?!?! Wow, this list is nuttier than I thought. There are threads on whisky, sports cars and, in the past, an incredible number of goofy off-topics. Now people are threatening to unsubscribe because there are too many threads about PICTURES!?!?!?!?!? See you later, gs http://www.georgesphotos.net ROTFL. George, you are absolutely right. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _ Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
RE: Too Much PAW
hehe, the challenge is on! tan. (who fondles AS she photographs) ps no wise arse comments about fondling, ok Cotty? hehe.
Re: Too Much PAW
- Original Message - From: Shel Belinkoff Subject: PAW: Too Much PAW Rob Studdert commented that the PAW postings are becoming too much, and suggested that we only post PAW pics on Friday. Phtooey! I say. Phooey agreed. At least the PAW is on topic. William Robb
RE: Too Much PAW
OMG, I SO did NOT need to know that!! lol... Cotty... HELP!! vbg Paul, you aren't going to be at GFM are you?!? *eek*! tan. -Original Message- From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2004 11:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Too Much PAW I sometimes fondle as I photograph. That does make it a lot more fun g. Paul (I'm not Cotty:-) On Feb 23, 2004, at 9:36 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote: hehe, the challenge is on! tan. (who fondles AS she photographs) ps no wise arse comments about fondling, ok Cotty? hehe.
Re: Too Much PAW
Now Tanya, don't be judgmental. You were the first one who admitted to fonldling while you photographed g Seriously, I'm thinking about GFM. It's usually hard for me to get away. Paul On Feb 24, 2004, at 9:31 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote: OMG, I SO did NOT need to know that!! lol... Cotty... HELP!! vbg Paul, you aren't going to be at GFM are you?!? *eek*! tan. -Original Message- From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2004 11:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Too Much PAW I sometimes fondle as I photograph. That does make it a lot more fun g. Paul (I'm not Cotty:-) On Feb 23, 2004, at 9:36 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote: hehe, the challenge is on! tan. (who fondles AS she photographs) ps no wise arse comments about fondling, ok Cotty? hehe.
Re: Too Much PAW
Shel, I think we're finding the answer to the question you posed when you started this... Are you photographers or equipment fondlers? Let's find out ;-)) Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PAW: Too Much PAW Rob Studdert commented that the PAW postings are becoming too much, and suggested that we only post PAW pics on Friday. Phtooey! I say. The pics should come as the mood strikes you, when you have a good one you want to share, or when you have one you're looking for comments about. And why just one a week? This is a photography list, pictures, images, photographs ... call 'em what you will, we communicate through our photos. I've noticed that people who rarely post messages have presented us with some photos. Perhaps some of those people find it hard to express themselves for one reason or another ... this list can be intimidating some times, the discussions technical in nature and hard to follow, so the posting of pictures is a great way for some people to communicate and share their thoughts and feelings with the list. I've also noticed that some of the more tech oriented people haven't participated in the PAW yet ... after all their talk about how valuable the technical and high tech side of gear and peripherals is to making a good photo, I haven't seen any of those good, high-tech produced pics. C'mon guys, join the party, show us your stuff. Again, I'm not the moderator of the PAW, but my opinion is to let the photos flow LOL. If they are going to be restricted to being posted only on a specific day of the week, then I suggest that discussions about digital gear and technical discussions, and discussions about flash, or film, and even OT discussions, be limited to but one designated day per week. Anyway, Rob's comment was in response to Raimo's comment that the list traffic was a bit heavy and that he was going to unsubscribe for a while. I don't believe Raimo said anything specific about the PAW being the reason for his decision ... don't have the message handy so I'm not sure. But, regardless, this has always been a heavy traffic list, and over the years many people have dropped off because of the message count. That's just the way it is. So, let's not pick on the PAW, especially since it's in its infancy. It'll develop its own place on the list in time ... and I bet it will still be overshadowed by tech talk. Just my dos centavos ... shel
RE: Too Much PAW
Well, personally, I'd be disappointed if I logged on each morning and had like two PDML emails I love the high volume, it is like a big party going 24-7. It is quite simple really, just delete those messages that are irrelevant to you. And I totally agree with Shel on this one, lets all just chill out dudes, and let the photos floowww, man...! and like, uh, peace out, ok... I mean like, art is art, and no-one can force it to be on like, on just a Friday, ya know? man? hehehe, from fairygirl who is feeling a trifle hippyesque today (well, I WAS born in the 70s!)... vbg tan. -Original Message- From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2004 11:59 AM To: PDML Subject: PAW: Too Much PAW Rob Studdert commented that the PAW postings are becoming too much, and suggested that we only post PAW pics on Friday. Phtooey! I say. The pics should come as the mood strikes you, when you have a good one you want to share, or when you have one you're looking for comments about. And why just one a week? This is a photography list, pictures, images, photographs ... call 'em what you will, we communicate through our photos. I've noticed that people who rarely post messages have presented us with some photos. Perhaps some of those people find it hard to express themselves for one reason or another ... this list can be intimidating some times, the discussions technical in nature and hard to follow, so the posting of pictures is a great way for some people to communicate and share their thoughts and feelings with the list. I've also noticed that some of the more tech oriented people haven't participated in the PAW yet ... after all their talk about how valuable the technical and high tech side of gear and peripherals is to making a good photo, I haven't seen any of those good, high-tech produced pics. C'mon guys, join the party, show us your stuff. Again, I'm not the moderator of the PAW, but my opinion is to let the photos flow LOL. If they are going to be restricted to being posted only on a specific day of the week, then I suggest that discussions about digital gear and technical discussions, and discussions about flash, or film, and even OT discussions, be limited to but one designated day per week. Anyway, Rob's comment was in response to Raimo's comment that the list traffic was a bit heavy and that he was going to unsubscribe for a while. I don't believe Raimo said anything specific about the PAW being the reason for his decision ... don't have the message handy so I'm not sure. But, regardless, this has always been a heavy traffic list, and over the years many people have dropped off because of the message count. That's just the way it is. So, let's not pick on the PAW, especially since it's in its infancy. It'll develop its own place on the list in time ... and I bet it will still be overshadowed by tech talk. Just my dos centavos ... shel
Re: Too Much PAW
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote: hehehe, from fairygirl who is feeling a trifle hippyesque today (well, I WAS born in the 70s!)... That means you should be a hard-bitten, cynical member of Generation-X, surely? ;-) S
