Re: housekeeping

2007-06-06 Thread Doug Brewer
cbwaters wrote:
> Who has a good deal on SD cards? I need another 2G for next week's trip to 
> Michigan.

http://www.newegg.com has the 150X 2G for a little over $20 each.

> 
> Somebody was telling me at GFM that photoshop temporary files can fill-up 
> your drive.  Does that apply to Elements as well?  Any tips on where to find 
> the bloat?

Mark was talking about that, I think. Look in the temp directory in your 
Adobe folder.

> 
> Probably the same somebody was telling me that DNG files were much bigger, 
> or something like that.  A full conversation is difficult on GFM, what with 
> so much distraction.  Should I be making DNGs or PEFs?

I'm shooting DNG. And, naturally, you want to do what I do.

> 
> I came home with a few extra of those Pentax CD holders.  If anybody wants 
> one, send me some postage (paypal works) and it's yours.
> 
> I think that's it for now.
> 
> Thanks,
> CW
> 
>  
> 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-06 Thread Doug Brewer
Doug Brewer wrote:

http://www.newegg.com has the 150X 2G for a little over $20 each.

whoops, I mean the 150X Transcend 2G...

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-06 Thread Paul Sorenson
If your more concerned about capacity than speed, Office Depot has 1 gig 
SanDisk SD cards on sale this week for $9.99.

-p

cbwaters wrote:
> Who has a good deal on SD cards? I need another 2G for next week's trip to 
> Michigan.
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-06 Thread Doug Franklin
Paul Sorenson wrote:
> If your more concerned about capacity than speed, Office Depot has 1 gig 
> SanDisk SD cards on sale this week for $9.99.
> 
> -p
> 
> cbwaters wrote:
>> Who has a good deal on SD cards? I need another 2G for next week's trip to 
>> Michigan.

Cory, since you're in Atlanta, if you can get by Fry's they usually have
something on special that's not total crap.  I recently got 2GB 150X PQI
cards for about $22 each, and I've gotten 4GB 150X cards for around $45
there.  You might do better on the Internet, but you have to wait for
them. :-)

-- 
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-06 Thread P. J. Alling
If you're willing to pay a bit more for immediate gratification, Staples 
has 2.0 Gig Ultra II's on sale for about 30.00, (that may be over by now 
however).

Paul Sorenson wrote:
> If your more concerned about capacity than speed, Office Depot has 1 gig 
> SanDisk SD cards on sale this week for $9.99.
>
> -p
>
> cbwaters wrote:
>   
>> Who has a good deal on SD cards? I need another 2G for next week's trip to 
>> Michigan.
>>
>> 
>
>
>   


-- 
All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-06 Thread Kenneth Waller
I bought 2 Sandisk Extreme III 2.0gb cards @ Circuit City yesterday for 
$34.95.

Kenneth Waller

- Original Message - 
From: "cbwaters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Subject: housekeeping


> Who has a good deal on SD cards? I need another 2G for next week's trip to
> Michigan.
>
> Somebody was telling me at GFM that photoshop temporary files can fill-up
> your drive.  Does that apply to Elements as well?  Any tips on where to 
> find
> the bloat?
>
> Probably the same somebody was telling me that DNG files were much bigger,
> or something like that.  A full conversation is difficult on GFM, what 
> with
> so much distraction.  Should I be making DNGs or PEFs?
>
> I came home with a few extra of those Pentax CD holders.  If anybody wants
> one, send me some postage (paypal works) and it's yours.
>
> I think that's it for now.
>
> Thanks,
> CW


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-06 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
I'm using Transcend 150x 2G cards most of the time. They work great,  
$21 each from NewEgg.com.

I've never had any problems with Photoshop temp files on Mac OS X.  
Must be a Windows thing.

DNG files created in the K10D are larger than PEF files (average 16M  
vs average 11M) due to the fact that Pentax applies lossless  
compression to the PEF files but not to the DNGs. I keep the K10D set  
on RAW/PEF to save space on the card, then auto-convert them to DNG  
on import to Lightroom. Lightroom's DNG conversion produces the same  
file size as the PEFs on average (so does DNG Converter if you leave  
the lossless compression option turned on).

Godfrey


On Jun 6, 2007, at 5:08 AM, cbwaters wrote:

> Who has a good deal on SD cards? I need another 2G for next week's  
> trip to
> Michigan.
>
> Somebody was telling me at GFM that photoshop temporary files can  
> fill-up
> your drive.  Does that apply to Elements as well?  Any tips on  
> where to find
> the bloat?
>
> Probably the same somebody was telling me that DNG files were much  
> bigger,
> or something like that.  A full conversation is difficult on GFM,  
> what with
> so much distraction.  Should I be making DNGs or PEFs?


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-06 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 07/06/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using Transcend 150x 2G cards most of the time. They work great,
> $21 each from NewEgg.com.
>
> I've never had any problems with Photoshop temp files on Mac OS X.
> Must be a Windows thing.

Not a Windows thing, must be a user thing.

-- 
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-06 Thread Mark Roberts
Digital Image Studio wrote:

>On 07/06/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm using Transcend 150x 2G cards most of the time. They work great,
>> $21 each from NewEgg.com.
>>
>> I've never had any problems with Photoshop temp files on Mac OS X.
>> Must be a Windows thing.
>
>Not a Windows thing, must be a user thing.

Right. It's not "temp" files, it's cache files created by Camera Raw 
and Bridge. They don't really cause problems, just take up space.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-06 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 07/06/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> BTW, I do seem to recall reference to Photoshop temp files not being
> deleted and accumulating on Windows systems, I think it was on
> Photo.net.

PS CS creates a temp file per session (on the nominated drive, I'm not
sure what happens if multiple drives are nominated) which is always
automatically deleted if the application is closed normally. If it
crashes it can leave debris but on a well set-up system that type of
occurrence would be rare.

-- 
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-06 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi

On Jun 6, 2007, at 5:19 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:

> Digital Image Studio wrote:
>
>> On 07/06/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'm using Transcend 150x 2G cards most of the time. They work great,
>>> $21 each from NewEgg.com.
>>>
>>> I've never had any problems with Photoshop temp files on Mac OS X.
>>> Must be a Windows thing.
>>
>> Not a Windows thing, must be a user thing.
>
> Right. It's not "temp" files, it's cache files created by Camera Raw
> and Bridge. They don't really cause problems, just take up space.

I have both Bridge and Camera Raw set to create distributed cache  
files. They are created in each directory that Bridge processes. In a  
directory with 105 PSD image files, one is about 16M and the other is  
about 44K.

Yes, they take up some space, but I don't consider that to be  
excessive. That directory contains about 3.1Gbytes worth of data  
files and four more subdirectories. 16M worth of cache information  
seems trivial when you consider how much time it takes for Bridge/ 
Camera Raw to reprocess that much data and cache the thumbnails, etc.  
This is not a problem...

BTW, I do seem to recall reference to Photoshop temp files not being  
deleted and accumulating on Windows systems, I think it was on  
Photo.net.

Godfrey



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-07 Thread Mark Roberts
Digital Image Studio wrote:

>On 07/06/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> BTW, I do seem to recall reference to Photoshop temp files not being
>> deleted and accumulating on Windows systems, I think it was on
>> Photo.net.
>
>PS CS creates a temp file per session (on the nominated drive, I'm not
>sure what happens if multiple drives are nominated) which is always
>automatically deleted if the application is closed normally. If it
>crashes it can leave debris but on a well set-up system that type of
>occurrence would be rare.

I just checked my system: It's Camera Raw that creates "cache" (not 
"temp") files of about 4.3 meg each On my system they're in 
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application 
Data\Adobe\CameraRaw\Cache and I haven't found any way to change the 
location yet.

Not a big deal except that I have my computer set up to use the C drive 
for the operating system *only*. These cache files just increase the 
size of my system back-up and, of course, the time required to make the 
back-up. 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-07 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 07/06/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I just checked my system: It's Camera Raw that creates "cache" (not
> "temp") files of about 4.3 meg each On my system they're in
> C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application
> Data\Adobe\CameraRaw\Cache and I haven't found any way to change the
> location yet.

Interesting, I'm still running ACR2.4 and all I can see there is the
conversion "Database" file.

> Not a big deal except that I have my computer set up to use the C drive
> for the operating system *only*. These cache files just increase the
> size of my system back-up and, of course, the time required to make the
> back-up.

I have a similar problem though it's Picasa and Google Earth that
pollute my system drive with huge cache/database files. The Google sub
alone in my user profile is 1.65GB so incremental back-ups are
impractical and there is no way to redirect the files. :-(

-- 
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-07 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: housekeeping



> I just checked my system: It's Camera Raw that creates "cache" (not
> "temp") files of about 4.3 meg each On my system they're in
> C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application
> Data\Adobe\CameraRaw\Cache and I haven't found any way to change the
> location yet.
>
>

Open Bridge: Edit/Camera RAW Preferences. You will find a control there to 
let you limit the size of the cache (It appears to be 1gb by default), and 
you can also select the location of the cache there.

William Robb 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-07 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi

On Jun 7, 2007, at 6:54 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:

>> Not a big deal except that I have my computer set up to use the C  
>> drive
>> for the operating system *only*. These cache files just increase the
>> size of my system back-up and, of course, the time required to  
>> make the
>> back-up.
>
> I have a similar problem though it's Picasa and Google Earth that
> pollute my system drive with huge cache/database files. The Google sub
> alone in my user profile is 1.65GB so incremental back-ups are
> impractical and there is no way to redirect the files. :-(

I tell the Apple Backup application to exclude the subdirectories  
that cache and temp files are stored in. There should be a way to do  
that with any useful backup utility.

Godfrey

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-07 Thread Mark Roberts
William Robb wrote:

>From: "Mark Roberts"
>
>> I just checked my system: It's Camera Raw that creates "cache" (not
>> "temp") files of about 4.3 meg each On my system they're in
>> C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application
>> Data\Adobe\CameraRaw\Cache and I haven't found any way to change the
>> location yet.
>
>Open Bridge: Edit/Camera RAW Preferences. You will find a control there 
to 
>let you limit the size of the cache (It appears to be 1gb by default), 
and 
>you can also select the location of the cache there.

Thanks Bill!
(I hadn't thought of checking in *Bridge* for that.)


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-07 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: housekeeping


> 
> Thanks Bill!
> (I hadn't thought of checking in *Bridge* for that.)
> 

Glad I can still be of some use from time to time

William Robb

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-07 Thread Tom C
A related question.  How can one regenerate the thumbnails displayed in 
Bridge?  I'm on CS2.

It seems (not sure) that several times when I've opened Bridge and looked at 
a folder that was still being copied to, from the camera CF, that it loses 
it's mind and does not generate all the thumbnails.

I've looked in the menus and Help but have not come across an answer.

Tom C.


>From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List 
>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" 
>Subject: Re: housekeeping
>Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 12:07:41 -0600
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Mark Roberts"
>Subject: Re: housekeeping
>
>
> >
> > Thanks Bill!
> > (I hadn't thought of checking in *Bridge* for that.)
> >
>
>Glad I can still be of some use from time to time
>
>William Robb
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>PDML@pdml.net
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-07 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Set Bridge to use a distributed cache.

Quit Bridge, go to the directory you want to have it reprocess,  
delete the two files it makes ...
Adobe Bridge Cache.bc
Adobe Bridge Cache.bct
... then restart Bridge. It will reprocess the folder in its entirety.

Otherwise, when you have the Folders panel frontmost in the sidebar,  
there is a menu at the top with a Refresh command. This sometimes  
works. ;-)

G


On Jun 7, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Tom C wrote:

> A related question.  How can one regenerate the thumbnails  
> displayed in
> Bridge?  I'm on CS2.
>
> It seems (not sure) that several times when I've opened Bridge and  
> looked at
> a folder that was still being copied to, from the camera CF, that  
> it loses
> it's mind and does not generate all the thumbnails.
>
> I've looked in the menus and Help but have not come across an answer.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-07 Thread Tom C
Thanks.  I couldn't get the Refresh command to do anything at all.

I selected the Purge Central Cache command, and it decided it needed to 
automatically regenerate the thumbnails.


Tom C.


>From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List 
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List 
>Subject: Re: housekeeping
>Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 12:46:02 -0700
>
>Set Bridge to use a distributed cache.
>
>Quit Bridge, go to the directory you want to have it reprocess,
>delete the two files it makes ...
>Adobe Bridge Cache.bc
>Adobe Bridge Cache.bct
>... then restart Bridge. It will reprocess the folder in its entirety.
>
>Otherwise, when you have the Folders panel frontmost in the sidebar,
>there is a menu at the top with a Refresh command. This sometimes
>works. ;-)
>
>G
>
>
>On Jun 7, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Tom C wrote:
>
> > A related question.  How can one regenerate the thumbnails
> > displayed in
> > Bridge?  I'm on CS2.
> >
> > It seems (not sure) that several times when I've opened Bridge and
> > looked at
> > a folder that was still being copied to, from the camera CF, that
> > it loses
> > it's mind and does not generate all the thumbnails.
> >
> > I've looked in the menus and Help but have not come across an answer.
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>PDML@pdml.net
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-07 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 08/06/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2007, at 6:54 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
>
> >> Not a big deal except that I have my computer set up to use the C
> >> drive
> >> for the operating system *only*. These cache files just increase the
> >> size of my system back-up and, of course, the time required to
> >> make the
> >> back-up.
> >
> > I have a similar problem though it's Picasa and Google Earth that
> > pollute my system drive with huge cache/database files. The Google sub
> > alone in my user profile is 1.65GB so incremental back-ups are
> > impractical and there is no way to redirect the files. :-(
>
> I tell the Apple Backup application to exclude the subdirectories
> that cache and temp files are stored in. There should be a way to do
> that with any useful backup utility.

Of course I could do that but then my data wouldn't be backed up. My
problem is that incremental back-ups are impractical (but preferable
on a system drive as they allow regressive restoration) as they add to
the previous back-up. Hence I have to execute a full back-up each
time. If I could redirect them I could place them on secure drives and
they wouldn't fragment my system drive and would save me a little
time.

-- 
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-07 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Jun 7, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:

>> I tell the Apple Backup application to exclude the subdirectories
>> that cache and temp files are stored in. There should be a way to do
>> that with any useful backup utility.
>
> Of course I could do that but then my data wouldn't be backed up. My
> problem is that incremental back-ups are impractical (but preferable
> on a system drive as they allow regressive restoration) as they add to
> the previous back-up. Hence I have to execute a full back-up each
> time. If I could redirect them I could place them on secure drives and
> they wouldn't fragment my system drive and would save me a little
> time.

Backing up temp and cache files is ridiculous. They're not your data,  
they're the applications and OS transient data stores and are  
recreated automatically, dynamically, as the system and applications  
run. Backing them up is simply a waste of space in the archive.

I use the incremental Backup application to do all my regular account  
things and exclude all transient temp files and caches, as well as  
the photographic files.

Photo files are large and I don't want to use incremental backups on  
them ... that would waste a tremendous amount of space as well. I  
only want the latest versions replicated in the backup stores. I use  
a file synchronizer to back them to the archives specifically rather  
than an incremental backup utility.

It proves to be an efficient system. The photo backups run every  
evening automated, or when I say "do it now", the main system backup  
runs every week. Backup storage capacity is consumed at an economical  
rate this way.

Godfrey

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-07 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Jun 7, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Tom C wrote:

> Thanks.  I couldn't get the Refresh command to do anything at all.

Yeah, I'm not entirely sure what it's supposed to be refreshing.

> I selected the Purge Central Cache command, and it decided it  
> needed to
> automatically regenerate the thumbnails.

Good ... I have never used those commands, forgot they were even  
there. :-)

Godfrey

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Housekeeping

2007-06-08 Thread Igor Roshchin


Thu Jun 7 20:37:55 EDT 2007
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:

> On Jun 7, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Tom C wrote:
> > Thanks.  I couldn't get the Refresh command to do anything at all.
> 
> Yeah, I'm not entirely sure what it's supposed to be refreshing.

Based on my observation, it makes the Bridge to find and process the 
new files in the current directory (folder).


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-09 Thread Mark Cassino
cbwaters wrote:

> Somebody was telling me at GFM that photoshop temporary files can fill-up 
> your drive.  Does that apply to Elements as well?  Any tips on where to find 
> the bloat?

Not sure about Elements, but in PS look in preferences and then plug-ins 
and scratch disks. That's where the PS temp files go - they are 
something like Photoshop Temp### where the ## are numbers.

Last winter a friend called and asked me to look at her computer because 
she was out of disk space and didn't know why. She must of had 50 gigs 
of old PS temp files on it! In my experience if you properly shutdown PS 
it removes the temp file, but if the system crashes or the program is 
terminated abnormally, then the temp file is left behind...

> Probably the same somebody was telling me that DNG files were much bigger, 
> or something like that.  A full conversation is difficult on GFM, what with 
> so much distraction.  Should I be making DNGs or PEFs?

I made the switch to PEF's for GFM. Yesterday I got 180 PEF's on a 2 gig 
card, which would have held something like 135 DNG files. It's worth it.

- MCC


-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, Michigan
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: housekeeping

2007-06-27 Thread David Savage
I just came across this message:

In CS2 Bridge under Edit>Camera Raw Preferences...>Camera Raw Cache>Select 
Location... you can change it.

Cheers,

Dave



On 07/06/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > I just checked my system: It's Camera Raw that creates "cache" (not
> > "temp") files of about 4.3 meg each On my system they're in
> > C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application
> > Data\Adobe\CameraRaw\Cache and I haven't found any way to change the
> > location yet.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net