[Pharo-users] ConfigurationOfSandstoneDb
Hi Mike, attached is an updated version: - Packages should have corrected dependencies in ConfigurationOfSandstoneDb - also when 1.0 is released the development is 2.0-baseline always as one version is released and you load on the next upcoming. As it is the baseline it will load all At least this is also how Versioner works with the config, open it in the Versioner tool in 3.0. I can not commit, maybe you add it/upload it to the repo. Also put it into MetaRepoForPharo30 so it appears in the config browser as Stef suggested. I did not create groups (usually we could/should have one for each possible combination usage of SandStoneDB, for instance one for Goods, one for Fuel, ...also tests separated from core etc). I think the packages are not yet correctly cutted (for instance SandstoneDbFileSystemStore includes the store AND the tests). Usually tests should be in an own package, so one can load them separately. This way you could have a Core group for loading the basics you need at runtime and a group Tests that allows you to load the packages including the Tests when developing. Bye T. ConfigurationOfSandstoneDb-TorstenBergmann.5.mcz Description: Binary data
Re: [Pharo-users] [Ann] Phratch 4.0
Thank you Hilaire. I just fixed that. I am rebuilding the one-click. You can try again in 1 hour. Cheers, Jannik 2014-10-21 12:36 GMT+02:00 Hilaire hila...@drgeo.eu: Le 21/10/2014 07:07, jannik laval a écrit : Could you try phratch and say me what do you expect. Then explain me what is not working. AS you indicated me, I create an Arduino sprite, then when I click on the Arduinio block category I have an out of bounds error. See changelog Hilaire -- Dr. Geo - http://drgeo.eu iStoa - http://istoa.drgeo.eu -- ~~Jannik Laval~~ École des Mines de Douai Enseignant-chercheur http://www.jannik-laval.eu http://www.phratch.com http://www.approchealpes.info http://car.mines-douai.fr/
Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Clickable class side example and initialize methods in Pharo 4.0
You are welcome. You should expect more in this direction. Doru On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:02 AM, kilon alios kilon.al...@gmail.com wrote: very good feature that I was completely unaware of. I have actually examples in my Ephestos project that are at class side but I use ex instead of example. This will come very handy for my users thanks :) On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Tudor Girba tu...@tudorgirba.com wrote: Hi Torsten, Thanks for this. This is indeed the way to go. Just to let you know, the example infrastructure is also being developed in the context of GT, so we have a healthy interest overlap which is great. Only in our case, the discovery of the example happens through an example pragma. Would it be possible to change your slice to use this pragma instead of the example* convention? Cheers, Doru On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de wrote: One addition I implemented for Nautilus is that one can run examples directly in the browser just by clicking on class side example methods icons. See https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13892/Example-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus for a picture. SO PLEASE: WHEN YOU PROVIDE EXAMPLES IN CLASSES PLEASE PUT THEM ON THE CLASS SIDE AND LET THE SELECTOR START WITH example. This way people will easily see that it is an example and can run them. Additionally it would help to put them into a category like examples. So be a good citized and provide not only class comments but also examples for others to study. Side note: == It is also possible to click on the icon of class side initialize methods so the class get reinitialized (after a confirmation to avoid false clicking). https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13894/Class-side-initialize-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus Both issues are already integrated. -- www.tudorgirba.com Every thing has its own flow -- www.tudorgirba.com Every thing has its own flow
Re: [Pharo-users] [Ann] Phratch 4.0
Great! One more point to consider, the left panel, containing all the bricks, looks to me too narrow: you have to use the horizontal slider to reveal all the brick views. Not sure it is easy to make it larger, or even better make it resize-able Thanks Hilaire Le 22/10/2014 11:06, jannik laval a écrit : Thank you Hilaire. I just fixed that. I am rebuilding the one-click. You can try again in 1 hour. -- Dr. Geo - http://drgeo.eu iStoa - http://istoa.drgeo.eu
[Pharo-users] Package Browser
Hallo fellows, i have just started with smalltalk programming Pharo. Could you help me in one question please ? Its simple : After already performed a own NEW CLASS in the class browser , it is very convenient to PRINT OUT the complete Class , together with protokoll and methods in a LIST FORM , in HARD COPY on a Printer. Just to have the class and see it on real paper. I couldnt find any advice in books or help. regards Hans
[Pharo-users] Package Browser 2
Thank you for the answer. I have chosen FILE OUT . Let me aks : Who is the file then. On what location ? I only have seen that Pharo has make a snapshot of the Package-Class-Protokoll-Methods. After this snapshot the printer is not started. Therfore i suppose that a File has been made in any Folder. Regards Hans Hallo fellows, i have just started with smalltalk programming Pharo. Could you help me in one question please ? Its simple : After already performed a own NEW CLASS in the class browser , it is very convenient to PRINT OUT the complete Class , together with protokoll and methods in a LIST FORM , in HARD COPY on a Printer. Just to have the class and see it on real paper. I couldnt find any advice in books or help. regards Hans
Re: [Pharo-users] Package Browser
Hans, Welcome to Pharo. The simplest way that I've found to do this is to File Out the class. Simply right-click on the class and select file-out This gives you a text file on the disk which you can open in a normal text editor and print. Look for a new file in the same directory as your image called classname.st. Craig -Original Message- From: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] On Behalf Of Hans Schueren Sent: 22 October 2014 11:49 AM To: pharo-users@lists.pharo.org Subject: [Pharo-users] Package Browser Hallo fellows, i have just started with smalltalk programming Pharo. Could you help me in one question please ? Its simple : After already performed a own NEW CLASS in the class browser , it is very convenient to PRINT OUT the complete Class , together with protokoll and methods in a LIST FORM , in HARD COPY on a Printer. Just to have the class and see it on real paper. I couldnt find any advice in books or help. regards Hans
Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Clickable class side example and initialize methods in Pharo 4.0
Hi Tudor, that should be easy now: look at CompiledMethod#isExampleMethod which can be adopted as needed. Checking for the example pragma could be done this way: self pragmas anySatisfy: [:pragma | pragma keyword = #example ] but we should think first if this is enough. I already proposed to not only annotate with a pragma example but additionally give a category. Like this: example: 'Graphics' example: 'Network' This way we can easily build an example browser for our users where people can go through their point of interest and browse the examples. Maybe we should also rethink pragmas (in Pharo 5.0?) in general to be more Smalltalk like: Example category: 'Graphics' where Example is a real class in the system (!). One can even make it more explicit then ExampleCategory graphics with ExampleCategory(class)graphics returning a translateable string. People can add own categories and one easily knows about already available ones. Now that classes can have properties in Pharo 4.0 already I would like to see a unification for methods and classes here (with the general concept of an Annotation in our metamodel). In my opinion a method pragma is just a special form of annotating a method. And annotating classes is usefull as well (for instance you want to annotate a class with the appropriate Table name in an ORM framework, ...) A comment (in a method or in a class) is also nothing more than a special annotation. A class/method category is also an annotation. If unified a method or a class could be in one or more categories. Even a break point for an expression is IMHO just an annotation. Bye T. Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2014 um 10:43 Uhr Von: Tudor Girba tu...@tudorgirba.com An: Pharo Development List pharo-...@lists.pharo.org Cc: Any question about pharo is welcome pharo-users@lists.pharo.org Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Clickable class side example and initialize methods in Pharo 4.0 Hi Torsten, Thanks for this. This is indeed the way to go. Just to let you know, the example infrastructure is also being developed in the context of GT, so we have a healthy interest overlap which is great. Only in our case, the discovery of the example happens through an example pragma. Would it be possible to change your slice to use this pragma instead of the example* convention? Cheers, Doru On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de wrote:One addition I implemented for Nautilus is that one can run examples directly in the browser just by clicking on class side example methods icons. See https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13892/Example-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13892/Example-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus] for a picture. SO PLEASE: WHEN YOU PROVIDE EXAMPLES IN CLASSES PLEASE PUT THEM ON THE CLASS SIDE AND LET THE SELECTOR START WITH example. This way people will easily see that it is an example and can run them. Additionally it would help to put them into a category like examples. So be a good citized and provide not only class comments but also examples for others to study. Side note: == It is also possible to click on the icon of class side initialize methods so the class get reinitialized (after a confirmation to avoid false clicking). https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13894/Class-side-initialize-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13894/Class-side-initialize-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus] Both issues are already integrated. -- www.tudorgirba.com[http://www.tudorgirba.com] Every thing has its own flow
Re: [Pharo-users] Package Browser 2
On 22 Oct 2014, at 12:19, Hans Schueren werb...@hans-schueren.de wrote: Thank you for the answer. I have chosen FILE OUT . Let me aks : Who is the file then. On what location ? I only have seen that Pharo has make a snapshot of the Package-Class-Protokoll-Methods. After this snapshot the printer is not started. Therfore i suppose that a File has been made in any Folder. Regards Hans The file out is written in the directory where your image is located. In Pharo 4, you get a notification of this. But again, although this works, and can be filed in again, it will not result in something that is very human readable or nicely printable. Printing source code is not done very often nowadays, in any environment/language. I know it is a typical request for those new to Pharo Smalltalk to be able to 'hold' your source code, but really, after a while you will no longer want this. There are other ways to 'package' your source code (Monticello and friends). Hallo fellows, i have just started with smalltalk programming Pharo. Could you help me in one question please ? Its simple : After already performed a own NEW CLASS in the class browser , it is very convenient to PRINT OUT the complete Class , together with protokoll and methods in a LIST FORM , in HARD COPY on a Printer. Just to have the class and see it on real paper. I couldnt find any advice in books or help. regards Hans
Re: [Pharo-users] ConfigurationOfSandstoneDb
I think I have no access to the MetaRepoForPharo30 repository. What should I do? -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/ConfigurationOfSandstoneDb-tp4785703p4785935.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Pharo-users] ConfigurationOfSandstoneDb
I guess you have to be part of team Pharo on StHub, what is your account id ? On 22 Oct 2014, at 12:52, mikefilonov mikefilo...@gmail.com wrote: I think I have no access to the MetaRepoForPharo30 repository. What should I do? -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/ConfigurationOfSandstoneDb-tp4785703p4785935.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Pharo-users] ConfigurationOfSandstoneDb
I added you to the Pharo team on StHub On 22 Oct 2014, at 13:28, mikefilonov mikefilo...@gmail.com wrote: My account is mikefilonov Thank you -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/ConfigurationOfSandstoneDb-tp4785703p4785945.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Pharo-users] Package Browser 3
On 22 Oct 2014, at 14:00, kilon alios kilon.al...@gmail.com wrote: nothing wrong in doing things the old / analogue way but pharo offers a variety of tools to help you visualise and understand code. One example is when you want to know how one class is a subclass from another. Browser has a separate view for this called Hierarchy view. Another is when methods are get overriden either in the class you currently viewing or in a subclass, browser has special icons to inform you of that. Clicking on those icons will send you to the overriding methods. If the method has a test you can use as an example there would be an icon for it too, clicking it will run the test for you. What if you see a method used and you want to look into its definition ? You can use the browser to do that or your printer paper but right clicking on the method and going directly to its definition is way faster also it will show you what other class defines such method. Then of course you have the finder tool that allows you to search using just a few letters methods, classes and source and even allows you to provide an end result and gives back which method can produce that end result etc The bottom line is that there are many pharo tools at your disposal and they are extremely powerful. There are also a lot of third party tools as well, for example if you want to create a diagram of the algorithm of an application / package you can do that using Roassal. So I would say for time being stick with Pharo learn the tools and if you are not happy then print code and use your pen to create diagrams of its logic. Good overview and advice, Kilon - just give it a try, Hans. And in any case, draw pictures and take notes on paper while your browsing and studying the code, that always helps. On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Hans Schueren werb...@hans-schueren.de wrote: Just one thing for description of the hardcopy : Yes ; a browser inside the system is much better. The only reason to make a hardcopy in the form of a list is to have a Analog view of the interdependencies of the whole package. You know that in the job as electrician. You can measure the power from a plug with a digital or with a analog meter. Or with a combination of that. I am only a beginner. But to have paper makes the opportunity to make lines and notes with interdependencies REAL in ONE view. Such like to make a flow diagram of the whole Software in Basic language. ( My languages are Smalltalk 80 and Liberty Basic. ) Regards Hans Thank you for the answer. I have chosen FILE OUT . Let me aks : Who is the file then. On what location ? I only have seen that Pharo has make a snapshot of the Package-Class-Protokoll-Methods. After this snapshot the printer is not started. Therfore i suppose that a File has been made in any Folder. Regards Hans Hallo fellows, i have just started with smalltalk programming Pharo. Could you help me in one question please ? Its simple : After already performed a own NEW CLASS in the class browser , it is very convenient to PRINT OUT the complete Class , together with protokoll and methods in a LIST FORM , in HARD COPY on a Printer. Just to have the class and see it on real paper. I couldnt find any advice in books or help. regards Hans
[Pharo-users] Package Browser 4
Hello again , i have searched for a new text file in the Pharo Image folder that contains the printed version of my class. There is no text file. I have chosen the file out option in Pharo version 3.0 and the book version PBE one click 1.1. At the moment i have only PBE in use for learning. There is my new class created. If you want i can make a screen video and sending with e-mail of the File out session , that you can see , that there is no new text file. regards hans Just one thing for description of the hardcopy : Yes ; a browser inside the system is much better. The only reason to make a hardcopy in the form of a list is to have a Analog view of the interdependencies of the whole package. You know that in the job as electrician. You can measure the power from a plug with a digital or with a analog meter. Or with a combination of that. I am only a beginner. But to have paper makes the opportunity to make lines and notes with interdependencies REAL in ONE view. Such like to make a flow diagram of the whole Software in Basic language. ( My languages are Smalltalk 80 and Liberty Basic. ) Regards Hans Thank you for the answer. I have chosen FILE OUT . Let me aks : Who is the file then. On what location ? I only have seen that Pharo has make a snapshot of the Package-Class-Protokoll-Methods. After this snapshot the printer is not started. Therfore i suppose that a File has been made in any Folder. Regards Hans Hallo fellows, i have just started with smalltalk programming Pharo. Could you help me in one question please ? Its simple : After already performed a own NEW CLASS in the class browser , it is very convenient to PRINT OUT the complete Class , together with protokoll and methods in a LIST FORM , in HARD COPY on a Printer. Just to have the class and see it on real paper. I couldnt find any advice in books or help. regards Hans
Re: [Pharo-users] [squeak-dev] Using libraries in FFI
Try to run pharo with strace. That way you will see all syscalls including libraries opens that pharo does attempt. That's what I do when trying to figure out such things. HTH Phil On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Annick Fron l...@afceurope.com wrote: Hi Eliot, My problem is not with the VM, my problem is with my own library that I connect to through FFI. I know where the libraries are ! I have tried to add them in /etc/ld.so.conf.d , that does not work. I have tried export LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but somehow it erases some libraries needed by pharo. I have done sudo ldconfig ... In fact I have one library that depends from another one. In FFI I call one method which calls another method in the other library. I have tried to create symbolics links in the directory … I have checked that nm gives the right symbol with the right type .. So I have no idea what to try now ! Annick Le 22 oct. 2014 à 12:46, Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi Annick, LD_LIBRARY_PATH should be set to point to the relevant directories, but this can be tricky as there is a lot if variation across Linux distros as to where libraries are kept. The squeak script that comes with the Cog VMs extends LD_LIBRARY_PATH, so if you know where your libraries are you can use the script to find the other libraries the VM needs (c library and plugins). Eliot (phone) On Oct 22, 2014, at 2:55 AM, Annick Fron l...@afceurope.com wrote: Hi, I am using a module in FFI which depends on a large library let’s say 10 dynamic .so files in a directory. How is it possible to use this library without making all symbolic links ? Annick
Re: [Pharo-users] Package Browser
On 22/10/14 11:48, Hans Schueren wrote: Hallo fellows, i have just started with smalltalk programming Pharo. Welcome. This is a great journey. Take some time and ask all the questions you have. Now be prepared to change your way of doing things and you will be really surprised :) Stef Could you help me in one question please ? Its simple : After already performed a own NEW CLASS in the class browser , It is no really effective (In the future we will have a full class view instead of only a category view). Now code printed is like dead corpse. Try to play with senders and implementors because these are powerful tools to navigate fast your code. it is very convenient to PRINT OUT the complete Class , together with protokoll and methods in a LIST FORM , in HARD COPY on a Printer. Just to have the class and see it on real paper. I couldnt find any advice in books or help. regards Hans
[Pharo-users] Package Browser 4
Thank you for the information : Yes , the File with the extension .st is in the Pharo directory. First i couldn't find it by supposing a .txt File. I have opened the file with a office tool JARTE. Now it is easy to print my new class out. Remember back when you are a beginner in programming. I realised that Pharo has a huge Tracking Tools for engineering concepts and code. Only step by step learning is possible. Thanks again , and have a nice week. See you next time , for other Pharo matters , in this Cinema. Hans Hello again , i have searched for a new text file in the Pharo Image folder that contains the printed version of my class. There is no text file. I have chosen the file out option in Pharo version 3.0 and the book version PBE one click 1.1. At the moment i have only PBE in use for learning. There is my new class created. If you want i can make a screen video and sending with e-mail of the File out session , that you can see , that there is no new text file. regards hans Just one thing for description of the hardcopy : Yes ; a browser inside the system is much better. The only reason to make a hardcopy in the form of a list is to have a Analog view of the interdependencies of the whole package. You know that in the job as electrician. You can measure the power from a plug with a digital or with a analog meter. Or with a combination of that. I am only a beginner. But to have paper makes the opportunity to make lines and notes with interdependencies REAL in ONE view. Such like to make a flow diagram of the whole Software in Basic language. ( My languages are Smalltalk 80 and Liberty Basic. ) Regards Hans Thank you for the answer. I have chosen FILE OUT . Let me aks : Who is the file then. On what location ? I only have seen that Pharo has make a snapshot of the Package-Class-Protokoll-Methods. After this snapshot the printer is not started. Therfore i suppose that a File has been made in any Folder. Regards Hans Hallo fellows, i have just started with smalltalk programming Pharo. Could you help me in one question please ? Its simple : After already performed a own NEW CLASS in the class browser , it is very convenient to PRINT OUT the complete Class , together with protokoll and methods in a LIST FORM , in HARD COPY on a Printer. Just to have the class and see it on real paper. I couldnt find any advice in books or help. regards Hans
Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo - OpenDBXDriver: Unsupported data type: UNKNOWN
I do not remember exactly, but I think that the type of the column you are trying to parse is not known by the DBXTalk driver. The type looks like a DateAndTime so you should check what’s the code it comes and maybe add the type in the conversion table. Sorry not been able to be more clear, but I’m talking by memory here :) Esteban On 21 Oct 2014, at 23:47, bsselfri...@gmail.com wrote: Whenever I try to select a table that has timestamp defined columns I'm getting the following error: OpenDBXDriverError: OpenDBXDriver: Unsupported data type: UNKNOWN, trying to parse 2011-03-31 17:38:35 I've traced this down into the NBOpenDBX_ApiHodbx_column_type:pos: method. I don't know if this is a DBXTalk problem or an OpenDBX problem, or simply that OpenDBX does not support timestamp column types for MySQL database. My system is: Pharo 3.0. MySql DBXTalk Thanks, B Selfridge -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-OpenDBXDriver-Unsupported-data-type-UNKNOWN-tp4785813.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Pharo-users] Citizen example for manipulating a bibtex file
Hi,
Thanks again. I have a small script, using Citezen which does the trick.
I can explore and modify the BibTeX File from the playground with this:
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| bibFile bibliography bibStream bibOutputer |
bibFile := ((FileLocator documents / 'U/Libertadores/Grafoscopio') children
detect: [:each | each basename endsWith: 'bib' ]).
bibliography := CZBibParser parse: bibFile contents.
bibStream := '' writeStream.
1 to: (bibliography size) do: [:index |
(((bibliography entries at: index) fields at: 2) key = 'shorttitle')
ifTrue: [
(bibliography entries at: index)
key: ((bibliography entries at: index) fields at: 2) value].
bibOutputer := CZBibtexOutputer new.
bibStream nextPutAll:
(bibOutputer entryToBibtexString:
(bibliography entries at: index)); cr.].
bibliography.
bibFile writeStreamDo: [:stream |
stream nextPutAll: bibStream contents withUnixLineEndings ].
bibStream contents.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
I will put some functionality inspired by this on my prototype this weekend.
Cheers,
Offray
On 10/21/2014 01:20 AM, stepharo wrote:
Check in the tools there is a bib writer.
Stef
On 21/10/14 03:33, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
Thanks Stef and Damien,
I have this small script as a proof of concept:
===
| bibFile bibliography |
bibFile := ((FileLocator documents / 'U/Libertadores/Grafoscopio')
children
detect: [:each | each basename endsWith: 'bib' ]) contents.
bibliography := CZBibParser parse: bibFile.
1 to: (bibliography size) do: [:index |
(((bibliography entries at: index) fields at: 2) key = 'shorttitle')
ifTrue: [
(bibliography entries at: index)
key: ((bibliography entries at: index) fields at: 2) value
]].
bibliography.
===
Now I want to write back the corrected file to the .bib ... just
having problems finding which message does the job. I'll keep searching.
Cheers,
Offray
On 10/16/2014 06:40 AM, Damien Cassou wrote:
from Damien Pollet:
You will need to load the .bib file from zotero (read the file however
you like, then pass the stream to the CZ parser). You'll get a
CZBibSet (I don't recall the name exactly) which represents the
contents of the file. A Set is composed of entries, each of which has
a key and a set of fields. Finally, fields accept a few different
kinds of values.
Your processing is just iterating a set then setting the key of each
entry (or possibly removing and re-adding the entry, I don't recall if
it's implemented like a dictionary or more like a list).
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
off...@riseup.net mailto:off...@riseup.net wrote:
Hi,
I'm using a Zotero collection for keeping track of several
references I have
found for my article about the experience of the
outline/tree-like metaphor
for writing inside Pharo (as soon as I have a presentable
working draft I
hope to share it with you).
Now I want to make a post-processing of the bibtex file exported
from
Zotero. The idea is to use shorttitle field instead to replace
the Zotero
auto-generated one and have custom keys. So for example instead of:
===
@misc{_holistic_,
title = {Holistic software assessment (Uni Zurich -
2011) on Vimeo},
shorttitle = {Girba-holistic-2011},
url = {http://vimeo.com/42073344?__from=outro-local
http://vimeo.com/42073344?from=outro-local},
urldate = {2014-08-19},
note = {0}
}
===
I would like to have:
===
@misc{Girba-holistic-2011,
title = {Holistic software assessment (Uni Zurich -
2011) on Vimeo},
shorttitle = {Girba-holistic-2011},
url = {http://vimeo.com/42073344?__from=outro-local
http://vimeo.com/42073344?from=outro-local},
urldate = {2014-08-19},
note = {0}
}
===
I have already installed Citizen and open it on the browser to
see the code,
but I can find any place to start with examples.
Any advice on how to solve this issue will be appreciated.
Cheers,
Offray
--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing
enthusiasm.
Winston Churchill
Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo - OpenDBXDriver: Unsupported data type: UNKNOWN
Thank you for responding so quickly. The column in the database is defined as a time stamp. It seems as though OpenDBX doesn't understand that type. I'll try setting up date, date time, time, and timestamp columns and see what happens. - Brad Selfridge -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-OpenDBXDriver-Unsupported-data-type-UNKNOWN-tp4785813p4786033.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Clickable class side example and initialize methods in Pharo 4.0
Hi! I have doubt that #example: will be enough in the case of Roassal. Having a code example browser is indeed important and having a descent way to search for the examples is also important. I am thinking to stick to #example and infer some categories from the source code (e.g., if the method contains a Zinc class, then it may be categorized in network). Cheers, Alexandre Le 22-10-2014 à 7:38, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de a écrit : Hi Tudor, that should be easy now: look at CompiledMethod#isExampleMethod which can be adopted as needed. Checking for the example pragma could be done this way: self pragmas anySatisfy: [:pragma | pragma keyword = #example ] but we should think first if this is enough. I already proposed to not only annotate with a pragma example but additionally give a category. Like this: example: 'Graphics' example: 'Network' This way we can easily build an example browser for our users where people can go through their point of interest and browse the examples. Maybe we should also rethink pragmas (in Pharo 5.0?) in general to be more Smalltalk like: Example category: 'Graphics' where Example is a real class in the system (!). One can even make it more explicit then ExampleCategory graphics with ExampleCategory(class)graphics returning a translateable string. People can add own categories and one easily knows about already available ones. Now that classes can have properties in Pharo 4.0 already I would like to see a unification for methods and classes here (with the general concept of an Annotation in our metamodel). In my opinion a method pragma is just a special form of annotating a method. And annotating classes is usefull as well (for instance you want to annotate a class with the appropriate Table name in an ORM framework, ...) A comment (in a method or in a class) is also nothing more than a special annotation. A class/method category is also an annotation. If unified a method or a class could be in one or more categories. Even a break point for an expression is IMHO just an annotation. Bye T. Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2014 um 10:43 Uhr Von: Tudor Girba tu...@tudorgirba.com An: Pharo Development List pharo-...@lists.pharo.org Cc: Any question about pharo is welcome pharo-users@lists.pharo.org Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Clickable class side example and initialize methods in Pharo 4.0 Hi Torsten, Thanks for this. This is indeed the way to go. Just to let you know, the example infrastructure is also being developed in the context of GT, so we have a healthy interest overlap which is great. Only in our case, the discovery of the example happens through an example pragma. Would it be possible to change your slice to use this pragma instead of the example* convention? Cheers, Doru On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de wrote:One addition I implemented for Nautilus is that one can run examples directly in the browser just by clicking on class side example methods icons. See https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13892/Example-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13892/Example-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus] for a picture. SO PLEASE: WHEN YOU PROVIDE EXAMPLES IN CLASSES PLEASE PUT THEM ON THE CLASS SIDE AND LET THE SELECTOR START WITH example. This way people will easily see that it is an example and can run them. Additionally it would help to put them into a category like examples. So be a good citized and provide not only class comments but also examples for others to study. Side note: == It is also possible to click on the icon of class side initialize methods so the class get reinitialized (after a confirmation to avoid false clicking). https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13894/Class-side-initialize-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13894/Class-side-initialize-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus] Both issues are already integrated. -- www.tudorgirba.com[http://www.tudorgirba.com] Every thing has its own flow
Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Clickable class side example and initialize methods in Pharo 4.0
Hi all, by principle, I'd be against extending so much the pragmas... from a design point of view they look like #defines and macros, that is an additional language to learn, without a correct support of the tools (no debug on pragmas, non-obvious behavior triggers, search for pragma users difficult, not documented). Alexandre, your idea of infering properties from the source code looks a lot more interesting (and with a lot more potential). Thierry Le 22/10/2014 19:38, Alexandre Bergel a écrit : Hi! I have doubt that #example: will be enough in the case of Roassal. Having a code example browser is indeed important and having a descent way to search for the examples is also important. I am thinking to stick to #example and infer some categories from the source code (e.g., if the method contains a Zinc class, then it may be categorized in network). Cheers, Alexandre Le 22-10-2014 à 7:38, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de a écrit : Hi Tudor, that should be easy now: look at CompiledMethod#isExampleMethod which can be adopted as needed. Checking for the example pragma could be done this way: self pragmas anySatisfy: [:pragma | pragma keyword = #example ] but we should think first if this is enough. I already proposed to not only annotate with a pragma example but additionally give a category. Like this: example: 'Graphics' example: 'Network' This way we can easily build an example browser for our users where people can go through their point of interest and browse the examples. Maybe we should also rethink pragmas (in Pharo 5.0?) in general to be more Smalltalk like: Example category: 'Graphics' where Example is a real class in the system (!). One can even make it more explicit then ExampleCategory graphics with ExampleCategory(class)graphics returning a translateable string. People can add own categories and one easily knows about already available ones. Now that classes can have properties in Pharo 4.0 already I would like to see a unification for methods and classes here (with the general concept of an Annotation in our metamodel). In my opinion a method pragma is just a special form of annotating a method. And annotating classes is usefull as well (for instance you want to annotate a class with the appropriate Table name in an ORM framework, ...) A comment (in a method or in a class) is also nothing more than a special annotation. A class/method category is also an annotation. If unified a method or a class could be in one or more categories. Even a break point for an expression is IMHO just an annotation. Bye T. Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2014 um 10:43 Uhr Von: Tudor Girba tu...@tudorgirba.com An: Pharo Development List pharo-...@lists.pharo.org Cc: Any question about pharo is welcome pharo-users@lists.pharo.org Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Clickable class side example and initialize methods in Pharo 4.0 Hi Torsten, Thanks for this. This is indeed the way to go. Just to let you know, the example infrastructure is also being developed in the context of GT, so we have a healthy interest overlap which is great. Only in our case, the discovery of the example happens through an example pragma. Would it be possible to change your slice to use this pragma instead of the example* convention? Cheers, Doru On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de wrote:One addition I implemented for Nautilus is that one can run examples directly in the browser just by clicking on class side example methods icons. See https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13892/Example-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13892/Example-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus] for a picture. SO PLEASE: WHEN YOU PROVIDE EXAMPLES IN CLASSES PLEASE PUT THEM ON THE CLASS SIDE AND LET THE SELECTOR START WITH example. This way people will easily see that it is an example and can run them. Additionally it would help to put them into a category like examples. So be a good citized and provide not only class comments but also examples for others to study. Side note: == It is also possible to click on the icon of class side initialize methods so the class get reinitialized (after a confirmation to avoid false clicking). https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13894/Class-side-initialize-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13894/Class-side-initialize-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus] Both issues are already integrated. -- www.tudorgirba.com[http://www.tudorgirba.com] Every thing has its own flow
Re: [Pharo-users] Citizen example for manipulating a bibtex file
On 22 Oct 2014, at 18:42, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas off...@riseup.net
wrote:
Hi,
Thanks again. I have a small script, using Citezen which does the trick. I
can explore and modify the BibTeX File from the playground with this:
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| bibFile bibliography bibStream bibOutputer |
bibFile := ((FileLocator documents / 'U/Libertadores/Grafoscopio') children
detect: [:each | each basename endsWith: 'bib' ]).
bibliography := CZBibParser parse: bibFile contents.
bibStream := '' writeStream.
1 to: (bibliography size) do: [:index |
(((bibliography entries at: index) fields at: 2) key = 'shorttitle')
ifTrue: [
(bibliography entries at: index)
key: ((bibliography entries at: index) fields at: 2) value].
bibOutputer := CZBibtexOutputer new.
bibStream nextPutAll:
(bibOutputer entryToBibtexString:
(bibliography entries at: index)); cr.].
bibliography.
bibFile writeStreamDo: [:stream |
stream nextPutAll: bibStream contents withUnixLineEndings ].
bibStream contents.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Some constructive comments about your code (smaller is always better,
especially for interactive snippets):
- you can change the #detect: to [ :each | each extension = #bib ]
- you can iterate directly over the entries with #do: as in bibliography
entries do: [ :each | .. ] which saves you the #at: index
- there are handy unary shortcuts for accessing elements, like #first, #second
and so on (up to #ninth) which also save you parenthesis
- you can also construct strings using the idiom String streamContents: [
:bibStream | .. ]
Sorry, these jumped to me when I saw your code, I hope you don't mind ;-)
I will put some functionality inspired by this on my prototype this weekend.
Cheers,
Offray
On 10/21/2014 01:20 AM, stepharo wrote:
Check in the tools there is a bib writer.
Stef
On 21/10/14 03:33, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
Thanks Stef and Damien,
I have this small script as a proof of concept:
===
| bibFile bibliography |
bibFile := ((FileLocator documents / 'U/Libertadores/Grafoscopio')
children
detect: [:each | each basename endsWith: 'bib' ]) contents.
bibliography := CZBibParser parse: bibFile.
1 to: (bibliography size) do: [:index |
(((bibliography entries at: index) fields at: 2) key = 'shorttitle')
ifTrue: [
(bibliography entries at: index)
key: ((bibliography entries at: index) fields at: 2) value
]].
bibliography.
===
Now I want to write back the corrected file to the .bib ... just
having problems finding which message does the job. I'll keep searching.
Cheers,
Offray
On 10/16/2014 06:40 AM, Damien Cassou wrote:
from Damien Pollet:
You will need to load the .bib file from zotero (read the file however
you like, then pass the stream to the CZ parser). You'll get a
CZBibSet (I don't recall the name exactly) which represents the
contents of the file. A Set is composed of entries, each of which has
a key and a set of fields. Finally, fields accept a few different
kinds of values.
Your processing is just iterating a set then setting the key of each
entry (or possibly removing and re-adding the entry, I don't recall if
it's implemented like a dictionary or more like a list).
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
off...@riseup.net mailto:off...@riseup.net wrote:
Hi,
I'm using a Zotero collection for keeping track of several
references I have
found for my article about the experience of the
outline/tree-like metaphor
for writing inside Pharo (as soon as I have a presentable
working draft I
hope to share it with you).
Now I want to make a post-processing of the bibtex file exported
from
Zotero. The idea is to use shorttitle field instead to replace
the Zotero
auto-generated one and have custom keys. So for example instead of:
===
@misc{_holistic_,
title = {Holistic software assessment (Uni Zurich -
2011) on Vimeo},
shorttitle = {Girba-holistic-2011},
url = {http://vimeo.com/42073344?__from=outro-local
http://vimeo.com/42073344?from=outro-local},
urldate = {2014-08-19},
note = {0}
}
===
I would like to have:
===
@misc{Girba-holistic-2011,
title = {Holistic software assessment (Uni Zurich -
2011) on Vimeo},
shorttitle = {Girba-holistic-2011},
url = {http://vimeo.com/42073344?__from=outro-local
http://vimeo.com/42073344?from=outro-local},
urldate = {2014-08-19},
note = {0}
}
===
I have already installed Citizen and open it on the browser to
see the code,
but I can find any
Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Clickable class side example and initialize methods in Pharo 4.0
I am also not a big fan of using pragmas. To me, it looks like an ad hoc approach to have examples close to the class. In the same spirit: Why not having tests in the same class? Would it not be cool? Of course not. In Roassal we have a class for examples (similar to TestCase). Alexandre Le 22-10-2014 à 14:51, Thierry Goubier thierry.goub...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi all, by principle, I'd be against extending so much the pragmas... from a design point of view they look like #defines and macros, that is an additional language to learn, without a correct support of the tools (no debug on pragmas, non-obvious behavior triggers, search for pragma users difficult, not documented). Alexandre, your idea of infering properties from the source code looks a lot more interesting (and with a lot more potential). Thierry Le 22/10/2014 19:38, Alexandre Bergel a écrit : Hi! I have doubt that #example: will be enough in the case of Roassal. Having a code example browser is indeed important and having a descent way to search for the examples is also important. I am thinking to stick to #example and infer some categories from the source code (e.g., if the method contains a Zinc class, then it may be categorized in network). Cheers, Alexandre Le 22-10-2014 à 7:38, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de a écrit : Hi Tudor, that should be easy now: look at CompiledMethod#isExampleMethod which can be adopted as needed. Checking for the example pragma could be done this way: self pragmas anySatisfy: [:pragma | pragma keyword = #example ] but we should think first if this is enough. I already proposed to not only annotate with a pragma example but additionally give a category. Like this: example: 'Graphics' example: 'Network' This way we can easily build an example browser for our users where people can go through their point of interest and browse the examples. Maybe we should also rethink pragmas (in Pharo 5.0?) in general to be more Smalltalk like: Example category: 'Graphics' where Example is a real class in the system (!). One can even make it more explicit then ExampleCategory graphics with ExampleCategory(class)graphics returning a translateable string. People can add own categories and one easily knows about already available ones. Now that classes can have properties in Pharo 4.0 already I would like to see a unification for methods and classes here (with the general concept of an Annotation in our metamodel). In my opinion a method pragma is just a special form of annotating a method. And annotating classes is usefull as well (for instance you want to annotate a class with the appropriate Table name in an ORM framework, ...) A comment (in a method or in a class) is also nothing more than a special annotation. A class/method category is also an annotation. If unified a method or a class could be in one or more categories. Even a break point for an expression is IMHO just an annotation. Bye T. Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2014 um 10:43 Uhr Von: Tudor Girba tu...@tudorgirba.com An: Pharo Development List pharo-...@lists.pharo.org Cc: Any question about pharo is welcome pharo-users@lists.pharo.org Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Clickable class side example and initialize methods in Pharo 4.0 Hi Torsten, Thanks for this. This is indeed the way to go. Just to let you know, the example infrastructure is also being developed in the context of GT, so we have a healthy interest overlap which is great. Only in our case, the discovery of the example happens through an example pragma. Would it be possible to change your slice to use this pragma instead of the example* convention? Cheers, Doru On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de wrote:One addition I implemented for Nautilus is that one can run examples directly in the browser just by clicking on class side example methods icons. See https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13892/Example-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13892/Example-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus] for a picture. SO PLEASE: WHEN YOU PROVIDE EXAMPLES IN CLASSES PLEASE PUT THEM ON THE CLASS SIDE AND LET THE SELECTOR START WITH example. This way people will easily see that it is an example and can run them. Additionally it would help to put them into a category like examples. So be a good citized and provide not only class comments but also examples for others to study. Side note: == It is also possible to click on the icon of class side initialize methods so the class get reinitialized (after a confirmation to avoid false clicking).
Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Clickable class side example and initialize methods in Pharo 4.0
I agree with Thierry but I disagree with Alex :) What is cool is that when you browse a widget class that you get all the examples for this class. Stef I am also not a big fan of using pragmas. To me, it looks like an ad hoc approach to have examples close to the class. In the same spirit: Why not having tests in the same class? Would it not be cool? Of course not. In Roassal we have a class for examples (similar to TestCase). Alexandre Le 22-10-2014 à 14:51, Thierry Goubier thierry.goub...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi all, by principle, I'd be against extending so much the pragmas... from a design point of view they look like #defines and macros, that is an additional language to learn, without a correct support of the tools (no debug on pragmas, non-obvious behavior triggers, search for pragma users difficult, not documented). Alexandre, your idea of infering properties from the source code looks a lot more interesting (and with a lot more potential). Thierry Le 22/10/2014 19:38, Alexandre Bergel a écrit : Hi! I have doubt that #example: will be enough in the case of Roassal. Having a code example browser is indeed important and having a descent way to search for the examples is also important. I am thinking to stick to #example and infer some categories from the source code (e.g., if the method contains a Zinc class, then it may be categorized in network). Cheers, Alexandre Le 22-10-2014 à 7:38, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de a écrit : Hi Tudor, that should be easy now: look at CompiledMethod#isExampleMethod which can be adopted as needed. Checking for the example pragma could be done this way: self pragmas anySatisfy: [:pragma | pragma keyword = #example ] but we should think first if this is enough. I already proposed to not only annotate with a pragma example but additionally give a category. Like this: example: 'Graphics' example: 'Network' This way we can easily build an example browser for our users where people can go through their point of interest and browse the examples. Maybe we should also rethink pragmas (in Pharo 5.0?) in general to be more Smalltalk like: Example category: 'Graphics' where Example is a real class in the system (!). One can even make it more explicit then ExampleCategory graphics with ExampleCategory(class)graphics returning a translateable string. People can add own categories and one easily knows about already available ones. Now that classes can have properties in Pharo 4.0 already I would like to see a unification for methods and classes here (with the general concept of an Annotation in our metamodel). In my opinion a method pragma is just a special form of annotating a method. And annotating classes is usefull as well (for instance you want to annotate a class with the appropriate Table name in an ORM framework, ...) A comment (in a method or in a class) is also nothing more than a special annotation. A class/method category is also an annotation. If unified a method or a class could be in one or more categories. Even a break point for an expression is IMHO just an annotation. Bye T. Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2014 um 10:43 Uhr Von: Tudor Girba tu...@tudorgirba.com An: Pharo Development List pharo-...@lists.pharo.org Cc: Any question about pharo is welcome pharo-users@lists.pharo.org Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Clickable class side example and initialize methods in Pharo 4.0 Hi Torsten, Thanks for this. This is indeed the way to go. Just to let you know, the example infrastructure is also being developed in the context of GT, so we have a healthy interest overlap which is great. Only in our case, the discovery of the example happens through an example pragma. Would it be possible to change your slice to use this pragma instead of the example* convention? Cheers, Doru On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de wrote:One addition I implemented for Nautilus is that one can run examples directly in the browser just by clicking on class side example methods icons. See https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13892/Example-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13892/Example-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus] for a picture. SO PLEASE: WHEN YOU PROVIDE EXAMPLES IN CLASSES PLEASE PUT THEM ON THE CLASS SIDE AND LET THE SELECTOR START WITH example. This way people will easily see that it is an example and can run them. Additionally it would help to put them into a category like examples. So be a good citized and provide not only class comments but also examples for others to study. Side note: == It is also possible to click on the icon of class side initialize methods so the class get reinitialized (after a confirmation to avoid false clicking).
Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Clickable class side example and initialize methods in Pharo 4.0
Le 22/10/2014 21:14, stepharo a écrit : I agree with Thierry but I disagree with Alex :) What is cool is that when you browse a widget class that you get all the examples for this class. I use browse class refs for that. Works on average pretty well; if it doesn't I throw away the code and reuse something else ;) Thierry Stef I am also not a big fan of using pragmas. To me, it looks like an ad hoc approach to have examples close to the class. In the same spirit: Why not having tests in the same class? Would it not be cool? Of course not. In Roassal we have a class for examples (similar to TestCase). Alexandre Le 22-10-2014 à 14:51, Thierry Goubier thierry.goub...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi all, by principle, I'd be against extending so much the pragmas... from a design point of view they look like #defines and macros, that is an additional language to learn, without a correct support of the tools (no debug on pragmas, non-obvious behavior triggers, search for pragma users difficult, not documented). Alexandre, your idea of infering properties from the source code looks a lot more interesting (and with a lot more potential). Thierry Le 22/10/2014 19:38, Alexandre Bergel a écrit : Hi! I have doubt that #example: will be enough in the case of Roassal. Having a code example browser is indeed important and having a descent way to search for the examples is also important. I am thinking to stick to #example and infer some categories from the source code (e.g., if the method contains a Zinc class, then it may be categorized in network). Cheers, Alexandre Le 22-10-2014 à 7:38, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de a écrit : Hi Tudor, that should be easy now: look at CompiledMethod#isExampleMethod which can be adopted as needed. Checking for the example pragma could be done this way: self pragmas anySatisfy: [:pragma | pragma keyword = #example ] but we should think first if this is enough. I already proposed to not only annotate with a pragma example but additionally give a category. Like this: example: 'Graphics' example: 'Network' This way we can easily build an example browser for our users where people can go through their point of interest and browse the examples. Maybe we should also rethink pragmas (in Pharo 5.0?) in general to be more Smalltalk like: Example category: 'Graphics' where Example is a real class in the system (!). One can even make it more explicit then ExampleCategory graphics with ExampleCategory(class)graphics returning a translateable string. People can add own categories and one easily knows about already available ones. Now that classes can have properties in Pharo 4.0 already I would like to see a unification for methods and classes here (with the general concept of an Annotation in our metamodel). In my opinion a method pragma is just a special form of annotating a method. And annotating classes is usefull as well (for instance you want to annotate a class with the appropriate Table name in an ORM framework, ...) A comment (in a method or in a class) is also nothing more than a special annotation. A class/method category is also an annotation. If unified a method or a class could be in one or more categories. Even a break point for an expression is IMHO just an annotation. Bye T. Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2014 um 10:43 Uhr Von: Tudor Girba tu...@tudorgirba.com An: Pharo Development List pharo-...@lists.pharo.org Cc: Any question about pharo is welcome pharo-users@lists.pharo.org Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Clickable class side example and initialize methods in Pharo 4.0 Hi Torsten, Thanks for this. This is indeed the way to go. Just to let you know, the example infrastructure is also being developed in the context of GT, so we have a healthy interest overlap which is great. Only in our case, the discovery of the example happens through an example pragma. Would it be possible to change your slice to use this pragma instead of the example* convention? Cheers, Doru On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de wrote:One addition I implemented for Nautilus is that one can run examples directly in the browser just by clicking on class side example methods icons. See https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13892/Example-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus[https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13892/Example-methods-should-be-runnable-in-Nautilus] for a picture. SO PLEASE: WHEN YOU PROVIDE EXAMPLES IN CLASSES PLEASE PUT THEM ON THE CLASS SIDE AND LET THE SELECTOR START WITH example. This way people will easily see that it is an example and can run them. Additionally it would help to put them into a category like examples. So be a good citized and provide not only class comments but also examples for others to study. Side note: == It is also possible to click on the icon of class side initialize methods so the class get reinitialized (after a confirmation to avoid false clicking).
[Pharo-users] Issues tagged for starting sprints
Hi guys Some of you would like to organize sprints (or participate to pharo-dev) and this is always difficult to jump into a hard bug. So I started to add glitches/enh that I usually do not log as bug entries. I tagged them as sprint to help you getting started on sprinting. https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?pgx=LFixFilter=44 Let me know if this is interesting for you. Stef
Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Clickable class side example and initialize methods in Pharo 4.0
Hi, I also disagree with Alex. Examples will become tests (see the work of Markus Gaelli and Adrian Kuhn) and they should be casually connected with the class and intention they test or provide example for. The other thing is that examples should be composable via code. And of course, they should be browsable. They will be close to the class by default, but it does not mean that in the class will be the only way. For example, we can well imagine having helper classes for holding examples, but most classes would not need that I think. As for pragmas, they are a better mechanism for describing intent than a method naming convention is. If nothing else, it lets us freedom in naming the method. It's true that at this point, pragmas are hard to browse, but this will not remain like this for long :) Cheers, Doru On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:14 PM, stepharo steph...@free.fr wrote: I agree with Thierry but I disagree with Alex :) What is cool is that when you browse a widget class that you get all the examples for this class. Stef I am also not a big fan of using pragmas. To me, it looks like an ad hoc approach to have examples close to the class. In the same spirit: Why not having tests in the same class? Would it not be cool? Of course not. In Roassal we have a class for examples (similar to TestCase). Alexandre Le 22-10-2014 à 14:51, Thierry Goubier thierry.goub...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi all, by principle, I'd be against extending so much the pragmas... from a design point of view they look like #defines and macros, that is an additional language to learn, without a correct support of the tools (no debug on pragmas, non-obvious behavior triggers, search for pragma users difficult, not documented). Alexandre, your idea of infering properties from the source code looks a lot more interesting (and with a lot more potential). Thierry Le 22/10/2014 19:38, Alexandre Bergel a écrit : Hi! I have doubt that #example: will be enough in the case of Roassal. Having a code example browser is indeed important and having a descent way to search for the examples is also important. I am thinking to stick to #example and infer some categories from the source code (e.g., if the method contains a Zinc class, then it may be categorized in network). Cheers, Alexandre Le 22-10-2014 à 7:38, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de a écrit : Hi Tudor, that should be easy now: look at CompiledMethod#isExampleMethod which can be adopted as needed. Checking for the example pragma could be done this way: self pragmas anySatisfy: [:pragma | pragma keyword = #example ] but we should think first if this is enough. I already proposed to not only annotate with a pragma example but additionally give a category. Like this: example: 'Graphics' example: 'Network' This way we can easily build an example browser for our users where people can go through their point of interest and browse the examples. Maybe we should also rethink pragmas (in Pharo 5.0?) in general to be more Smalltalk like: Example category: 'Graphics' where Example is a real class in the system (!). One can even make it more explicit then ExampleCategory graphics with ExampleCategory(class)graphics returning a translateable string. People can add own categories and one easily knows about already available ones. Now that classes can have properties in Pharo 4.0 already I would like to see a unification for methods and classes here (with the general concept of an Annotation in our metamodel). In my opinion a method pragma is just a special form of annotating a method. And annotating classes is usefull as well (for instance you want to annotate a class with the appropriate Table name in an ORM framework, ...) A comment (in a method or in a class) is also nothing more than a special annotation. A class/method category is also an annotation. If unified a method or a class could be in one or more categories. Even a break point for an expression is IMHO just an annotation. Bye T. Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2014 um 10:43 Uhr Von: Tudor Girba tu...@tudorgirba.com An: Pharo Development List pharo-...@lists.pharo.org Cc: Any question about pharo is welcome pharo-users@lists.pharo.org Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Clickable class side example and initialize methods in Pharo 4.0 Hi Torsten, Thanks for this. This is indeed the way to go. Just to let you know, the example infrastructure is also being developed in the context of GT, so we have a healthy interest overlap which is great. Only in our case, the discovery of the example happens through an example pragma. Would it be possible to change your slice to use this pragma instead of the example* convention? Cheers, Doru On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de wrote:One addition I implemented for Nautilus is that one can run examples directly in the browser just by
Re: [Pharo-users] How to force FFI to load a library
2014-10-22 14:50 GMT+02:00 Annick Fron l...@afceurope.com: Hi, I have one library which depends from another one. How can I force pharo to load the dependent library ? Annick I don't think it is necessary to force pharo to load the libraries. AFAIR the VM on linux uses dlopen() to load a module and that should load the dependent libraries as well, *if* the library, you are using, is linked against the others. For example, you want to load library testlib which depends on helperlib you have to compile and link the testlib and helperlib as follows gcc -shared -o libhelperlib.so helperlib.c gcc -shared -o libtestlib.so testlib.c -L. -lhelperlib now you should be able to load testlib from pharo. you can test if your dependent libraries can be automatically found by dlopen with: ldd testlib nicolai
[Pharo-users] Athens do not work on Image 40316+
Hello On image 40315 everything working. On image 40316-40320 (latest) parts of Athens do not work, tried by running Athens Tutorial and Roassal 2, which are both based on Athens. Problem is on both Windows and Linux (unable to test on any Mac) Instead of describing the error, here is a link to download the image after downloading Athens-Tutorial and clicking on do it on Step 2 of tutorial: http://www.mediafire.com/download/va5wbm0qix3aqh2/PharoAthensBugWindows.zip Hope it helps Jan Blizničenko -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Athens-do-not-work-on-Image-40316-tp4786099.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Clickable class side example and initialize methods in Pharo 4.0
Hi Doru, Le 22/10/2014 23:03, Tudor Girba a écrit : Hi, As for pragmas, they are a better mechanism for describing intent than a method naming convention is. If nothing else, it lets us freedom in naming the method. And they add another programming language on top of another, and in most cases are redundant with the method name and protocol. i.e. exampleThis has pragma example testThat has pragma test Simply because for the method name to be suitable, it has to convey intent one way or another. I can understand if you come and tell me that the pragma is to annotate for stuff that the compiler can't deduce, such as the #openmp pragmas. But I can't say that bringing in that kind of stuff would mean progress ;) It's true that at this point, pragmas are hard to browse, but this will not remain like this for long :) Tools may help to overcome limitations of pragmas, yes ;) But this sounds like because pragmas may not be that good to start with :) Thierry
Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo - OpenDBXDriver: Unsupported data type: UNKNOWN
What is the exact type in the database? See: http://www.linuxnetworks.de/doc/index.php/OpenDBX/DBMS_Datatypes Is it a TIME STAMP? That page says: [1] Implementations use DATETIME instead of TIMESTAMP as defined by the SQL standard You may want to try using DATETIME instead? Cheers, On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:23 PM, bsselfri...@gmail.com bsselfri...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for responding so quickly. The column in the database is defined as a time stamp. It seems as though OpenDBX doesn't understand that type. I'll try setting up date, date time, time, and timestamp columns and see what happens. - Brad Selfridge -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-OpenDBXDriver-Unsupported-data-type-UNKNOWN-tp4785813p4786033.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo - OpenDBXDriver: Unsupported data type: UNKNOWN
Also, see this old thread: http://forum.world.st/SqueakDBX-Can-t-parse-date-td1307447.html On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck marianop...@gmail.com wrote: What is the exact type in the database? See: http://www.linuxnetworks.de/doc/index.php/OpenDBX/DBMS_Datatypes Is it a TIME STAMP? That page says: [1] Implementations use DATETIME instead of TIMESTAMP as defined by the SQL standard You may want to try using DATETIME instead? Cheers, On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:23 PM, bsselfri...@gmail.com bsselfri...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for responding so quickly. The column in the database is defined as a time stamp. It seems as though OpenDBX doesn't understand that type. I'll try setting up date, date time, time, and timestamp columns and see what happens. - Brad Selfridge -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-OpenDBXDriver-Unsupported-data-type-UNKNOWN-tp4785813p4786033.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo - OpenDBXDriver: Unsupported data type: UNKNOWN
Yes, the column type definition is: timestamp. I am trying to use Pharo to access some old legacy MySQL tables. These tables have timestamps defined everywhere and there is NO WAY I will be allowed to change them. So, I'm going to have to try to figure out how to get around this problem. Since I'm new to the Pharo camp, (old VASmalltalk'er using DB2 as database), do you think the OpenDBX people would be open to supporting timestamp in their library? Brad Selfridge - Brad Selfridge -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-OpenDBXDriver-Unsupported-data-type-UNKNOWN-tp4785813p4786116.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
