Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml

2002-03-13 Thread derick

On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Marco Cucinato wrote:

 cucinato  Wed Mar 13 12:23:30 2002 EDT
 
   Modified files:  
 /phpdoc/en/functions  array.xml 
   Log:
   Typo fix

That's what you get when working in trains :)

Derick

   
   
 Index: phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml
 diff -u phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml:1.163 phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml:1.164
 --- phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml:1.163   Mon Mar 11 19:45:09 2002
 +++ phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml Wed Mar 13 12:23:30 2002
 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
  ?xml version=1.0 encoding=iso-8859-1?
 -!-- $Revision: 1.163 $ --
 +!-- $Revision: 1.164 $ --
   reference id=ref.array
titleArray Functions/title
titleabbrevArrays/titleabbrev
 @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
  para
   constantCASE_UPPER/constant and constantCASE_LOWER/constant are
   used with the functionarray_change_key_case/function function. They
 - respectively are used for chaning a string to upper case or lower case.
 + respectively are used for changing a string to upper case or lower case.
  /para
 /section
  
 
 

--
  PHP: Scripting the Web - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All your branches are belong to me!
SRM: Site Resource Manager - www.vl-srm.net
---




Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml crack.xml

2002-03-12 Thread Gabor Hojtsy

   Modified files:
 /phpdoc/en/functions array.xml crack.xml
   Log:

   'make test' didn't like these.

 +   section id=array.seealso
 +titleSee also/title
 +para
 + See also functionis_array/function,
functionexplode/function,
 + functionimplode/function, functionsplit/function,
 + and functionjoin/function.
 +/para
 +   /section

What? We do not have sections like this for see also lists
anywhere... We have note role=seealso but it is also not
used anywhere. We have see also lists written as
paraSee also: .../para.

Goba





Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml crack.xml

2002-03-12 Thread derick

On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:

Modified files:
  /phpdoc/en/functions array.xml crack.xml
Log:
 
'make test' didn't like these.
 
  +   section id=array.seealso
  +titleSee also/title
  +para
  + See also functionis_array/function,
 functionexplode/function,
  + functionimplode/function, functionsplit/function,
  + and functionjoin/function.
  +/para
  +   /section
 
 What? We do not have sections like this for see also lists
 anywhere... We have note role=seealso but it is also not
 used anywhere. We have see also lists written as
 paraSee also: .../para.

I added this to crosslink the array functions to functions from other 
sections.

Derick

--
  PHP: Scripting the Web - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All your branches are belong to me!
SRM: Site Resource Manager - www.vl-srm.net
---




Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml crack.xml

2002-03-12 Thread Lars Torben Wilson

On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 01:10, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
Modified files:
  /phpdoc/en/functions array.xml crack.xml
Log:
 
'make test' didn't like these.
 
  +   section id=array.seealso
  +titleSee also/title
  +para
  + See also functionis_array/function,
 functionexplode/function,
  + functionimplode/function, functionsplit/function,
  + and functionjoin/function.
  +/para
  +   /section
 
 What? We do not have sections like this for see also lists
 anywhere... We have note role=seealso but it is also not
 used anywhere. We have see also lists written as
 paraSee also: .../para.
 
 Goba

Yeah, I know. But it looked like Derick had something bigger in
mind and I wanted to meet two primary criteria: 1) not fuck with
what seemed to be the general idea, and 2) compile.  I figured we'd 
work out the details after that. Maybe this was something which was
discussed at the meeting? :)


-- 
 Torben Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.thebuttlesschaps.com
 http://www.hybrid17.com
 http://www.inflatableeye.com
 +1.604.709.0506




Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml crack.xml

2002-03-12 Thread Gabor Hojtsy

   +   section id=array.seealso
   +titleSee also/title
   +para
   + See also functionis_array/function,
  functionexplode/function,
   + functionimplode/function, functionsplit/function,
   + and functionjoin/function.
   +/para
   +   /section
 
  What? We do not have sections like this for see also lists
  anywhere... We have note role=seealso but it is also not
  used anywhere. We have see also lists written as
  paraSee also: .../para.

 I added this to crosslink the array functions to functions from other
 sections.

Ah, I ckecked array.xml. This see also part is for the partintro.
Well, it would be nice to come up with a good structure for
see alsos in function descriptions and partintros.

This would be a bit too cluttered (using the note we invented
before for see also blocks):

   section id=array.seealso
titleSee also/title
note role=seealso
 para
See also functionis_array/function,
functionexplode/function,
  functionimplode/function, functionsplit/function,
  and functionjoin/function.
 /para
/note
   /section

Better ideas, anyone?

Goba





Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml crack.xml

2002-03-12 Thread Gabor Hojtsy

  What? We do not have sections like this for see also lists
  anywhere... We have note role=seealso but it is also not
  used anywhere. We have see also lists written as
  paraSee also: .../para.
  
  Goba
 
 Yeah, I know. But it looked like Derick had something bigger in
 mind and I wanted to meet two primary criteria: 1) not fuck with
 what seemed to be the general idea, and 2) compile.  I figured we'd 
 work out the details after that. Maybe this was something which was
 discussed at the meeting? :)

Well, we've not discussed the actual tags to use, but the
concept is what Derick introduced. It will become a de facto
standard this way. I really like the divisions, but we need
to have the see also lists standard in partintros and function
pages...

Goba





Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml crack.xml

2002-03-12 Thread Lars Torben Wilson

On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 01:53, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
   What? We do not have sections like this for see also lists
   anywhere... We have note role=seealso but it is also not
   used anywhere. We have see also lists written as
   paraSee also: .../para.
   
   Goba
  
  Yeah, I know. But it looked like Derick had something bigger in
  mind and I wanted to meet two primary criteria: 1) not fuck with
  what seemed to be the general idea, and 2) compile.  I figured we'd 
  work out the details after that. Maybe this was something which was
  discussed at the meeting? :)
 
 Well, we've not discussed the actual tags to use, but the
 concept is what Derick introduced. It will become a de facto
 standard this way. I really like the divisions, but we need
 to have the see also lists standard in partintros and function
 pages...
 
 Goba

I agree 100% with all of that. But section was the only valid element
at that point, and I neglected to remember the recently discussed 
standard. :/ I'll try to think of a better solution.
 

-- 
 Torben Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.thebuttlesschaps.com
 http://www.hybrid17.com
 http://www.inflatableeye.com
 +1.604.709.0506




Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml crack.xml

2002-03-12 Thread Lars Torben Wilson

On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 01:52, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
  I added this to crosslink the array functions to functions from other
  sections.
 
 Ah, I ckecked array.xml. This see also part is for the partintro.
 Well, it would be nice to come up with a good structure for
 see alsos in function descriptions and partintros.
 
 This would be a bit too cluttered (using the note we invented
 before for see also blocks):
 
section id=array.seealso
 titleSee also/title
 note role=seealso
  para
 See also functionis_array/function,
 functionexplode/function,
   functionimplode/function, functionsplit/function,
   and functionjoin/function.
  /para
 /note
/section
 
 Better ideas, anyone?
 
 Goba

What about section id=array.seealso role=seealso? Easy enough to 
process. But even the example you have above doesn't look bad to me, 
since the seealso has to be inside a section anyway at that point,
and it does make sense.


-- 
 Torben Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.thebuttlesschaps.com
 http://www.hybrid17.com
 http://www.inflatableeye.com
 +1.604.709.0506




Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml crack.xml

2002-03-12 Thread Gabor Hojtsy

 section id=array.seealso
  titleSee also/title
  note role=seealso
   para
  See also functionis_array/function,
  functionexplode/function,
functionimplode/function, functionsplit/function,
and functionjoin/function.
   /para
  /note
 /section
  
 
 What about section id=array.seealso role=seealso? Easy enough to 
 process. But even the example you have above doesn't look bad to me, 
 since the seealso has to be inside a section anyway at that point,
 and it does make sense.

Well, I don't like this above, because you have see also in
the section id, in the section title, in the note role and
in the para text. Huh. It would be nice to have a simple
container tag for this, but I guess this is impossible
with docbook...

Goba





Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml crack.xml

2002-03-12 Thread Lars Torben Wilson

On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 03:10, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
  section id=array.seealso
   titleSee also/title
   note role=seealso
para
   See also functionis_array/function,
   functionexplode/function,
 functionimplode/function, functionsplit/function,
 and functionjoin/function.
/para
   /note
  /section
   
  
  What about section id=array.seealso role=seealso? Easy enough to 
  process. But even the example you have above doesn't look bad to me, 
  since the seealso has to be inside a section anyway at that point,
  and it does make sense.
 
 Well, I don't like this above, because you have see also in
 the section id, in the section title, in the note role and
 in the para text. Huh. It would be nice to have a simple
 container tag for this, but I guess this is impossible
 with docbook...
 
 Goba

Well, yeah, but every one of those is optional--especially the para
text. I was speaking more to the fact that there was a note inside a
section, not the specifics of the example.

What I meant by my first sentence was:

section id=array.seeaslo role=seealso
 titleSee also/title
 simpara
 . . .functions. . .
 /simparay
/section

i.e. just make section play this role here. 


-- 
 Torben Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.thebuttlesschaps.com
 http://www.hybrid17.com
 http://www.inflatableeye.com
 +1.604.709.0506




Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml

2002-01-06 Thread Zak Greant

On 2002-6-01 16:50, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
 Egon Schmid wrote:
  The rules in English are the following:
 
  See also func1 and func2.
  See also func1, func2, and func3.
  See also func1, func2, func3, and func4.

 that what the university of Chicago manual of style says,
 but otoh the university of Montana style guide says

 Omit the comma between the last two items in a series unless
 needed for clarity: John, Mona and Sharon came to my party

( http://www.umt.edu/urelations/style/apxa.htm )

 most native speakers i asked also prefered the second form ...

 does anyone have a *definitive* answer on this topic?

  Both forms are perfectly acceptable. I also prefer the second form
  but use of the first form is probably more sensible. Proper use of 
  the second form can require subtle understanding of English, while the
  first form is correct (if somewhat formal) in all cases.

-- 
Zak Greant

PHP Quality Assurance Team
http://qa.php.net/

We must be the change we wish to see. - M. K. Ghandi



Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml

2002-01-06 Thread Lars Torben Wilson

Zak Greant writes:
 On 2002-6-01 16:50, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
  Egon Schmid wrote:
   The rules in English are the following:
  
   See also func1 and func2.
   See also func1, func2, and func3.
   See also func1, func2, func3, and func4.
 
  that what the university of Chicago manual of style says,
  but otoh the university of Montana style guide says
 
  Omit the comma between the last two items in a series unless
  needed for clarity: John, Mona and Sharon came to my party
 
 ( http://www.umt.edu/urelations/style/apxa.htm )
 
  most native speakers i asked also prefered the second form ...
 
  does anyone have a *definitive* answer on this topic?
 
   Both forms are perfectly acceptable. I also prefer the second form
   but use of the first form is probably more sensible. Proper use of 
   the second form can require subtle understanding of English, while the
   first form is correct (if somewhat formal) in all cases.

+1

 -- 
 Zak Greant
 
 PHP Quality Assurance Team
 http://qa.php.net/
 
 We must be the change we wish to see. - M. K. Ghandi
 

-- 
 Torben Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.thebuttlesschaps.com
 http://www.hybrid17.com
 http://www.inflatableeye.com
 +1.604.709.0506




Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml

2002-01-04 Thread Egon Schmid

From: Gyozo Papp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 pgerzson Fri Jan  4 09:34:02 2002 EDT

   Modified files:
 /phpdoc/en/functions array.xml
   Log:
   correct See also cross references and exampe outputs for
several functions
   and array_unique note on preserving keys

Oh, I havenĀ“t understood what you said about the comma. The rules in
English are the following:

See also func1 and func2.
See also func1, func2, and func3.
See also func1, func2, func3, and func4.

I have looked at the diff and I have seen another minor
incorrectness. The space between and and function have
sometimes removed. The rendering would look like this (see the last
change line):

... andrsort().

-Egon




Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml

2002-01-04 Thread Papp Gyozo

From: Egon Schmid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml 


| From: Gyozo Papp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| 
|  pgerzson Fri Jan  4 09:34:02 2002 EDT
| 
|Modified files:
|  /phpdoc/en/functions array.xml
|Log:
|correct See also cross references and exampe outputs for
| several functions
|and array_unique note on preserving keys
| 
| Oh, I havent understood what you said about the comma. The rules in
| English are the following:

Did I say anything about commas? ;) You're right I removed several
commas without notice.

| 
| See also func1 and func2.
| See also func1, func2, and func3.
| See also func1, func2, func3, and func4.

Please forgive my ignorance, I haven't known this rule in English yet.
(about comma usage in enumaration). I have only one excuse that
in Hungarian there should not be used comma and any conjuction such as
'and' together.

| 
| I have looked at the diff and I have seen another minor
| incorrectness. The space between and and function have
| sometimes removed. The rendering would look like this (see the last
| change line):
| 
| ... andrsort().
| 

OK, I'll correct it and commit again.



Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml

2002-01-04 Thread Egon Schmid

From: Papp Gyozo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 From: Egon Schmid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml

 | From: Gyozo Papp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |
 |  pgerzson Fri Jan  4 09:34:02 2002 EDT
 | 
 |Modified files:
 |  /phpdoc/en/functions array.xml
 |Log:
 |correct See also cross references and exampe outputs for
 | several functions
 |and array_unique note on preserving keys
 |
 | Oh, I havent understood what you said about the comma. The
rules in
 | English are the following:

 Did I say anything about commas? ;) You're right I removed several
 commas without notice.

 | See also func1 and func2.
 | See also func1, func2, and func3.
 | See also func1, func2, func3, and func4.

 Please forgive my ignorance, I haven't known this rule in English
yet.
 (about comma usage in enumaration). I have only one excuse that
 in Hungarian there should not be used comma and any conjuction
such as
 'and' together.

Yes, Hungarian and German is different from English :)

-Egon




Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml

2001-11-20 Thread Gabor Hojtsy

 -  The name of this function is functionkey_exists/function
 -  in PHP version 4.0.6.
 +  This function was introduced in PHP 4.0.6.

Hrm. This clarification is not a clarification. The meaning of
the sentence is lost. There is no need to have this sentece
here, because the info is in the compatibility part generated
by Hartmut (and put automatically below function names). So
the information in that sentence was, that the function was
not names array_key_exists in 4.0.6... Not the same, you
comitted... I think a revert is needed here...

Goba




Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml

2001-11-20 Thread Derick Rethans

On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:

 comitted... I think a revert is needed here...

I already did that.

Derick




Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml

2001-11-20 Thread Gabor Hojtsy

  -  The name of this function is functionkey_exists/function
  -  in PHP version 4.0.6.
  +  This function was introduced in PHP 4.0.6.
 
 Hrm. This clarification is not a clarification. The meaning of
 the sentence is lost. There is no need to have this sentece
 here, because the info is in the compatibility part generated
 by Hartmut (and put automatically below function names). So
 the information in that sentence was, that the function was
 not names array_key_exists in 4.0.6... Not the same, you
 comitted... I think a revert is needed here...

Derick already reverted it, so no action is required on your part
Thomas.

Goba




Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml

2001-09-16 Thread Hojtsy Gabor

 eschmid Sat Sep 15 19:47:45 2001 EDT
 
   Modified files:  
 /phpdoc/en/functions array.xml 
   Log:
   Whitespace and some typos.

Can you repeat, what is advised about WS and
other fixes in the README?

Goba





Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml

2001-09-16 Thread Egon Schmid


- Original Message -
From: Hojtsy Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Egon Schmid [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PHP-Doc list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml


  eschmid Sat Sep 15 19:47:45 2001 EDT
 
Modified files:
  /phpdoc/en/functions array.xml
Log:
Whitespace and some typos.

 Can you repeat, what is advised about WS and
 other fixes in the README?

Please read the diff.

-Egon




Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml

2001-09-16 Thread Hojtsy Gabor

   eschmid Sat Sep 15 19:47:45 2001 EDT
  
 Modified files:
   /phpdoc/en/functions array.xml
 Log:
 Whitespace and some typos.
 
  Can you repeat, what is advised about WS and
  other fixes in the README?

 Please read the diff.

Some examples:

-refpurposeFilters elements of an array using a callback
function/refpurpose
+refpurpose
+ Filters elements of an array using a callback function
+/refpurpose

   example
title
-Implementation of functionarray_keys/function for PHP 3
-users
+ Implementation of functionarray_keys/function for PHP 3
+ users
/title

-refpurposeApplies the callback to the elements of the given
arrays/refpurpose
+refpurpose
+ Applies the callback to the elements of the given arrays
+/refpurpose

- functionarray_multisort/function, and functionuksort/function.
+ functionarray_multisort/function, and
+ functionuksort/function.

Well, there were many WS like fixes, where you eg. introduced PEAR
standards, I can see, but the above extrations (and there are
many more of them) were only TRUE ws only fixes. Please try to
follow this guideline, contained in the README in the future.

Many Thanks,
Goba




Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml

2001-07-02 Thread Daniel Beckham

Doh!  Sorry about that.  It was a quick change and I didn't even do a 'make
test'.  I already knew that.. just left my brain at home today.

Daniel

- Original Message -
From: Egon Schmid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 2:44 PM
Subject: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions array.xml


 eschmid Mon Jul  2 15:44:45 2001 EDT

   Modified files:
 /phpdoc/en/functions array.xml
   Log:
   Never use a  character in examples or ordinary text.


 Index: phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml
 diff -u phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml:1.73
phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml:1.74
 --- phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml:1.73 Mon Jul  2 12:52:10 2001
 +++ phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml Mon Jul  2 15:44:44 2001
 @@ -3062,7 +3062,7 @@
programlisting role=php
  function cmp ($a, $b) {
  if ($a == $b) return 0;
 -return ($a  $b) ? -1 : 1;
 +return ($a lt; $b) ? -1 : 1;
  }

  $a = array (3, 2, 5, 6, 1);