Re: [pinhole-discussion] authentic space

2002-10-28 Thread Colin Talcroft
Authentic space. Interesting idea, and I like the
sound of the words, but I am having trouble
undertstanding exactly what we are talking about.

Spaces true to their historical context? Perhaps that
just means spaces that have failed to keep up with the
times. There is a barber shop near where I live that
was built in the 1940s, I would guess. I've never been
in it, but from the street it looks like a movie
set--the old-fashioned leather chairs, enamel sinks,
the hand lettering on the window glass. Is this an
authentic space? I think you could argue either way
equally convincingly. Authentic because unchanged and
therefore, in a sense, true to its times, but at the
same time an anachronism and not authentic because its
times no longer exist, not authentic because it is
clearly out of synch with the only times we in fact
have, these times. 

Is it suited to pinhole because we tend to romanticize
the simple and elemental qualities of the process and
connect them with nostalgia for times past? The most
vulgar expression of this may be those sepia photos
you can get dressed up in old West clothes. 

I also remember once standing in front of an innocuous
government building in Tokyo built in the Victorian
style. I suddenly noticed a plaque noting that it had
been the Japanese Army's general headquarters during
the war. Suddenly I wanted the place to feel evil. No
matter how hard I tried, though, it was just an old
building. It was not responsible for the actions
planned in it. I decided then that places have no
memory. I've had the feeling looking at battlefield
sites that were empty fields.  

Makes me wonder if space can objectively be called
authentic or inauthentic at all. I doubt it, somehow.
It seems to me more a matter of whether the space
resonates at the same frequency we happen to be
vibrating at as we gaze at it or as we think about it.

Just some thoughts on the subject as I sit here
avoiding work I should be doing...

I, too, would be interested to hear what other people
think. Especially interested in why people think
authentic space, if there is such a thing, is a
pinhole kind of thing.

Colin  

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/



Re: [pinhole-discussion] Pinhole nude question

2002-10-28 Thread Catherine Just
Yes this is a great help too. I appreciate the
information!

Catherine
--- Howard Wells sandw...@earthlink.net wrote:
 Catherine,
 
 I've spent a good bit of time battling the lone
 exposure times of
 pinhole using a lot of pinholes in the f128 to f150
 range with fast film
 but I've also been able to get interesting effects
 with lenses without
 resorting to filters.
 
 One method to create pinhole type effects while
 reducing exposure times
 is to use a lens either focused past infinity (ie
 closer to the film
 plane than infinity) or to move a lens into the
 macro focus area. In
 35mm I use a focusing extension tube (by
 Zorkendorfer) with enlarging
 lenses for this. Stopping all the way down increases
 the detail and if
 the lens makes a circular aperture the effect can be
 quite pleasing.
 I've also shot landscapes with a 55mm macro lens
 focused at 9 inches and
 stopped all the way down. Lately I've been putting a
 Russian 28mm leica
 thread lens on my nikons. Actual point of focus is
 about 3 inches from
 the front of the lens. I've also shot portraits by
 holding a loupe or
 other simple lens in front of the camera. 
 
 Very easy with a 4x5 camera, or any camera with
 bellows, of course and
 you have more information to play with on the
 negative. Hope this helps
 a little. I'm a tireless experimenter.
 
 Howard Wells
 
 
 Catherine Just wrote:
  
  I was wondering about the lighting! Thanks for the
  info. I'm printing it out for a reference!
  
  Sounds like I'm better off doing a long exposure -
  inside - with controlled lighting - with a regular
  lens camera...
  
  Catherine
  --- Colin Talcroft ctalcr...@yahoo.com wrote:
   Hi Catherine,
  
   Thanks for saying you like my work, and I'm glad
 to
   hear that looking at it was of help. Thought you
 and
   anyone else interested might find it useful to
 know
   that those three nudes (including the one you
   mention
   specifically) were all done indoors usually with
 one
  
   500 Watt light. The film was T-Max 100.
 Exposures
   with
   a lens were usually 4 to 16 seconds at f=16 if I
   remember correctly. The pinhole exposures
 usually
   were
   about 20 minutes at the least, often more like
 30,
   and
   sometimes as long as 40 minutes. It's not a
   coincidence that the pinhole poses are mostly
   reclining. That's about the only way to stay
 still
   for
   that length of time. Often the model would fall
   asleep! I can remeber a session or two during
 which
   I
   set up the pinholes, let them go, spent 10 or
   fifteen
   minutes doing lens photos, and still had time to
 get
   out a sketchbook and do some drawings before
   finishing
   the pinhole exposures and setting up a new pose!
  
   Colin
  
  
 __
   Do you Yahoo!?
   Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web
 site
   http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
  
   ___
   Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
   Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
   Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
   unsubscribe or change your account at
   http://www.???/discussion/
  
  =
  Catherine Just Photography
  Weddings~Portraits~Fine Art
  http://www.catherinejust.com
  619.294.3195
  
  Don't just state your intent, Live it. ~Jerry
 Seiner Jr.
  
  __
  Do you Yahoo!?
  Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
  http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
  
  ___
  Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
  Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
  Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
  unsubscribe or change your account at
  http://www.???/discussion/
 
 ___
 Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML 
 Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
 Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
 unsubscribe or change your account at
 http://www.???/discussion/


=
Catherine Just Photography
Weddings~Portraits~Fine Art
http://www.catherinejust.com
619.294.3195


Don't just state your intent, Live it. ~Jerry Seiner Jr.

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/



[pinhole-discussion] Polaroid Reciprocity

2002-10-28 Thread Jason Russell
I was wondering if anyone could help me with Polaroid Reciprocity.  I just
recently started shooting with a Santa Barbara (2 inch Super Wide) with a
Polaroid back.  Right now I'm shooting with Polapan 400 BW (72).  I've done
most of my shooting outside and the exposures have all been less than six
seconds.  I wanted to try shooting inside under much lower light.  I'm just
not sure how much I need to compensate for reciprocity.  I checked out the
info on Polaroid's site, but I'm still a unclear.
Has anyone else shot with this film or a similar film that could give me an
idea of how much time to add.
The shot I want to shoot right now, by my calculations is about 2 and a half
minutes without compensating for reciprocity.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Jason Russell
WISH-TV
Indianapolis, IN

If you go any faster we're gonna travel back through time.




Re: [pinhole-discussion] zone plate

2002-10-28 Thread George L Smyth
If it's down, you can get to much of the information mirrored on my site at
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/hmpi/Pinhole/Articles/PinholeArticles.htm.

Cheers -

george



--- John Fisher photobu...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Would you check the URL? I have tried to open the site.But haven't had any 
 luck. thank you
 
 
 
 
 
 From: Paul Prober pro...@silcom.com
 Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
 To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
 Subject: [pinhole-discussion] zone plate
 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:34:34 -0700
 
 
 Hi,
 
   Chris Patton at Pinhole and beyond has a zone plate area. The site 
 address
 is
 www.standford.edu/~cpatton/zp.html  There is many zone plate lens, plus
 formulas for focusing the lens to subject.
 Paul Prober
 
 
 
 ___
 Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
 Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
 Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
 unsubscribe or change your account at
 http://www.???/discussion/
 
 
 _
 Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free!  Try MSN. 
 http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp
 
 
 ___
 Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML 
 Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
 Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
 unsubscribe or change your account at
 http://www.???/discussion/


=
Handmade Photographic Images - http://GLSmyth.com
DRiP Investing - http://DRiPInvesting.org

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/



Re: [pinhole-discussion] using filters

2002-10-28 Thread gregg b. mc neill
have you tried to put the filter inside the camera?  I did thid with my red 
25 when i shot IR


gbmcneill


I've been shooting B+W landscapes on a pinhole camera.  To bring out clouds
I've been using a yellow filter behind the pinhole - in front would mean
than every speck of dirt is in focus. My problem is that specks of dirt 
cast

a blur/shadow on the negs.  I've tried vigilant cleaning but can't seem to
eradicate them. Any suggestions on keeping contrast in the sky without a
filter? Or alternatively how to use a filter without rendering every speck
of dirt?

thanks, Jeremy.




_
Internet access plans that fit your lifestyle -- join MSN. 
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp





Re: [pinhole-discussion] Pinhole of partial eclipse

2002-10-28 Thread gregg b. mc neill





From: Richard Heather rheat...@slonet.org
Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Pinhole of partial eclipse
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:25:06 -0700

Do you have a web address for this search? I have partial eclipse leaf
pinhole shadow images.
Richard Heather



David Samulson email:  d...@compuserve.com

gb mcneill


_
Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free!  Try MSN. 
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp





Re: [pinhole-discussion] authentic space

2002-10-28 Thread I Zarkov
Actually Steve, I thought that 'authentic space' aptly describes what 
pinhole photography does best: the least-'mediated' form of optical 
representation possible, the least mechanically altered form of vision 
between the object and its representation.

Just my .02USD
-Z-

_
Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free!  Try MSN. 
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp





Re: [pinhole-discussion] authentic space

2002-10-28 Thread erickson
It seems to me that what you are describing is spaces with a history, and a
funky history at that. The remembrance of things past, to steal a phrase.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Bell veracity...@earthlink.net
To: Pinhole List pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:00 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] authentic space


 So far i've done a lot of shooting in diners and also in thrift stores. i
 look at thrift stores as a kind of attempt for some people to reclaim this
 idea of the past. friends of mine go to them looking for vintage type
 clothing. i go there to buy every old camera in sight (it's really
 ridiculous, even the broken ones, gotta have those instamatics). i've also
 done some industrial/urban landscapes. i think i've stopped defining
 authentic space by other people's standards, and started defining it by my
 own, which i'm happy about. that was this series of photos becomes
 documentary, but also very personal.

 the one thing i'm really struggling with is the process i'm using. you see
 i'm doing this all for my color photography class, but i think in the end
 it would be better if the prints were something like pt/pd or maybe even
 salt prints or something like that. something that is more on the
 alternative process tip, simply because i think the subject matter would
 lend itself well to such a look.

 whatever are everyone elses thoughts on authentic space?

 steve


  [Original Message]
  From: Gregg Kemp gregg@p at ???
  To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
   Date: 10/27/2002 7:26:02 PM
  Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] authentic space
 
 
  On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 06:43  PM, Steve Bell wrote:
 
   Hmm, well let's see.
  
   i originally began with the idea of places where people go to reclaim
   the
   past. for example, diners. i go to diners all the time, and a friend
of
   mine started talking to me about the idea of authentic space. like, in
   the
   50's diners were kind of this ideal for the future. all stream lined
   and
   chrome and neon. now diners are this ideal of the past. this space
   where
   people feel like they are part of something authentic. we also talked
   about
   how yuppie artist types get apartments in more urban areas, and
nouveau
   bourgoise people buy industrial type buildings and turn them into
   living
   spaces so they can feel more conntected to the working class that
   they've
   left behind. this is all architectural theory that she had been
   reading.
  
   it got me very interested. so i've been shooting authentic space. i
   started
   off just doing diners and thrift stores, but i've now started relying
   more
   on my instincts, shooting whatever feels like authentic space, rather
   than
   defining it by these specific criteria.
 
  I find this very interesting Steve - the idea of how the perspective of
  a place changes over time.  What places, or types of places have your
  instincts taken you to (if you don't mind my asking)?
 
  And thank you Rosanne, for asking about the meaning of authentic
  places.  I just assumed I had simply missed out on something else.
 
  - Gregg
 
 
  ___
  Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
  Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
  Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
  unsubscribe or change your account at
  http://www.???/discussion/


 --- Steve Bell
 --- veracity...@earthlink.net
 --- http://www.unbeknownst.org/~insurrective /
 http://www.angelfire.com/zine2/insurrection
 --- In fact, rock, rather than being an example of how freedom can be
 achieved within the capitalist structure, is
  an example of how capitalism can, almost without a conscious effort,
 deceive those whom it oppresses...So
  effective has the rock industry been in encouraging the spirit of
 optimistic youth take-over that rock's truly
  hard political edge, it's constant exploration of the varieties of
 youthful frustration, has been ignored
  and softened.  --Michael Lydon



 ___
 Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
 Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
 Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
 unsubscribe or change your account at
 http://www.???/discussion/







Re: [pinhole-discussion] authentic space

2002-10-28 Thread Steve Bell
So far i've done a lot of shooting in diners and also in thrift stores. i
look at thrift stores as a kind of attempt for some people to reclaim this
idea of the past. friends of mine go to them looking for vintage type
clothing. i go there to buy every old camera in sight (it's really
ridiculous, even the broken ones, gotta have those instamatics). i've also
done some industrial/urban landscapes. i think i've stopped defining
authentic space by other people's standards, and started defining it by my
own, which i'm happy about. that was this series of photos becomes
documentary, but also very personal.

the one thing i'm really struggling with is the process i'm using. you see
i'm doing this all for my color photography class, but i think in the end
it would be better if the prints were something like pt/pd or maybe even
salt prints or something like that. something that is more on the
alternative process tip, simply because i think the subject matter would
lend itself well to such a look.

whatever are everyone elses thoughts on authentic space?

steve


 [Original Message]
 From: Gregg Kemp gregg@p at ???
 To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
  Date: 10/27/2002 7:26:02 PM
 Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] authentic space

 
 On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 06:43  PM, Steve Bell wrote:
 
  Hmm, well let's see.
 
  i originally began with the idea of places where people go to reclaim 
  the
  past. for example, diners. i go to diners all the time, and a friend of
  mine started talking to me about the idea of authentic space. like, in 
  the
  50's diners were kind of this ideal for the future. all stream lined 
  and
  chrome and neon. now diners are this ideal of the past. this space 
  where
  people feel like they are part of something authentic. we also talked 
  about
  how yuppie artist types get apartments in more urban areas, and nouveau
  bourgoise people buy industrial type buildings and turn them into 
  living
  spaces so they can feel more conntected to the working class that 
  they've
  left behind. this is all architectural theory that she had been 
  reading.
 
  it got me very interested. so i've been shooting authentic space. i 
  started
  off just doing diners and thrift stores, but i've now started relying 
  more
  on my instincts, shooting whatever feels like authentic space, rather 
  than
  defining it by these specific criteria.
 
 I find this very interesting Steve - the idea of how the perspective of 
 a place changes over time.  What places, or types of places have your 
 instincts taken you to (if you don't mind my asking)?
 
 And thank you Rosanne, for asking about the meaning of authentic 
 places.  I just assumed I had simply missed out on something else.
 
 - Gregg
 
 
 ___
 Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML 
 Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
 Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
 unsubscribe or change your account at
 http://www.???/discussion/


--- Steve Bell
--- veracity...@earthlink.net
--- http://www.unbeknownst.org/~insurrective /
http://www.angelfire.com/zine2/insurrection
--- In fact, rock, rather than being an example of how freedom can be
achieved within the capitalist structure, is
 an example of how capitalism can, almost without a conscious effort,
deceive those whom it oppresses...So
 effective has the rock industry been in encouraging the spirit of
optimistic youth take-over that rock's truly
 hard political edge, it's constant exploration of the varieties of
youthful frustration, has been ignored
 and softened.  --Michael Lydon