Re: [PLUG] Ubuntu MATE LTS 3 years vs 5 for non-LTS
That switch was an epic shitshow. Mostly due to GPU driver limitations and a complete lack of official OEM installation tools. Things might be different now. At the time, a lot of users actually asked if they could stay on the older XFCE based desktop. Mint didn't add any significant value to the end-user. And I would know... I was part of the transition "team". -Ben --- Original Message --- On Friday, March 24th, 2023 at 1:38 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > I noticed that Free Geek switched to Mint for those PC's they sell a while > ago. > > Screenshots of mint mate seem to be a mix of win 10, win 11 and MacOS desktop > stirred together with a strong win10 motif > > But the $64k question can you still run older GTK2.0 apps on the desktop? > > Ted > > -Original Message- > From: PLUG plug-boun...@pdxlinux.org On Behalf Of W7DAL > > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 1:19 PM > To: plug@pdxlinux.org > Subject: Re: [PLUG] Ubuntu MATE LTS 3 years vs 5 for non-LTS > > TryLinux Mint Mate latest version. They have finally made Linux user friendly > to the point I'm comfortable recommending it to non-tekkie friends. I've been > following Linux from the earliest days. > > Good Luck! > > -Dave > > > On 3/24/2023 12:43 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote: > > > I tried transitioning from Scientific Linux to Redhat LTS (not "L" > > sadly). That went away. > > > > Then I tried using Ubuntu Mate 20.04 LTS (horrid startup behaviors, > > but 22.04 is worse). I get this email today: > > > > - > > As of 30 April 2023 Ubuntu MATE 20.04 LTS has reached EOL (End of > > Life) and is no longer supported. > > > > Being a long term release (LTS), official Ubuntu flavors are only > > supported for 3 years, as opposed to Ubuntu's 5 years. This means > > MATE components of your system will no longer receive updates after > > today, but foundational components will continue to receive security > > updates from Ubuntu. > > - > > > > Hrm. In Ubuntu-land, LTS long term support means less > > time supported. And today is April 30. > > > > So, sandwiched between way too many non-software engineering tasks, > > I'm transitioning to Debian Mate. > > So far, Debian is pain relief. > > > > No promise of LTS, but upgrades seem effortless and the dancing > > paperclips and snaps and gesture GUI are absent. > > Smaller RAM footprint, therefore I can keep using my "tall-screen" 3x4 > > laptops for their principal function, reading and writing A and A4 > > format documents. > > > > We'll see how this goes. I fear that gesture GUI (which requires > > steady hands, no tremor) will eventually take over the Linux desktop, > > so I may have less than a decade to complete > > important-to-the-world-IMHO keyboard-driven computing and writing > > tasks. > > > > Sigh. The world will not end with a bang, instead a "tweet". > > > > Keith L.
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
Air gapped backups are super important. One of my clients once was gunned by an attacker that erased the backups off their NAS. I had pushed for them to have air gapped backups and they did but they didn't really believe in them. That made them a believer! Ted -Original Message- From: PLUG On Behalf Of Michael Ewan Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 3:50 PM To: Portland Linux/Unix Group Subject: Re: [PLUG] External drive issue I generally keep at least three copies of important stuff, the original, the rsync backup, and another rsync on a different machine (that one also has cloud backup). For really important stuff I have an air gap off site disk with a copy of everything (the problem there is remembering to refresh it). On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:44 AM Rich Shepard wrote: > On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Michael Ewan wrote: > > > Note, mkfs.xfs is done on the raid1 disk set, not on the individual > drives. > > Michael, > > Got it. I'm seriouly considering formatting both with xfs, installing > dirvish on /dev/sde1 then using rsync to keep /dev/sdf1 as a mirror. > Not being combined into a logical volume I shouldn't again lose all > backups because the lv failed and wiped both disks. > > Thanks, > > Rich >
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
I generally keep at least three copies of important stuff, the original, the rsync backup, and another rsync on a different machine (that one also has cloud backup). For really important stuff I have an air gap off site disk with a copy of everything (the problem there is remembering to refresh it). On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:44 AM Rich Shepard wrote: > On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Michael Ewan wrote: > > > Note, mkfs.xfs is done on the raid1 disk set, not on the individual > drives. > > Michael, > > Got it. I'm seriouly considering formatting both with xfs, installing > dirvish on /dev/sde1 then using rsync to keep /dev/sdf1 as a mirror. Not > being combined into a logical volume I shouldn't again lose all backups > because the lv failed and wiped both disks. > > Thanks, > > Rich >
Re: [PLUG] Ubuntu MATE LTS 3 years vs 5 for non-LTS
The Mint guys made a concentrated effort to make it user friendly recently and have done a great job IMHO. Easy enough for Grandma to use, and almost easy enough for her to install if someone gives her an install DVD or USB stick. I'm very impressed with it and busy sending USB sticks to reluctant friends. This is finally ready for the 'mass market'. https://www.linuxmint.com/edition.php?id=303 Don't know about the GTK2 apps... -Dave On 3/24/2023 1:38 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: I noticed that Free Geek switched to Mint for those PC's they sell a while ago. Screenshots of mint mate seem to be a mix of win 10, win 11 and MacOS desktop stirred together with a strong win10 motif But the $64k question can you still run older GTK2.0 apps on the desktop? Ted -Original Message- From: PLUG On Behalf Of W7DAL Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 1:19 PM To: plug@pdxlinux.org Subject: Re: [PLUG] Ubuntu MATE LTS 3 years vs 5 for non-LTS Try*Linux Mint Mate* latest version. They have finally made Linux user friendly to the point I'm comfortable recommending it to non-tekkie friends. I've been following Linux from the earliest days. Good Luck! -Dave On 3/24/2023 12:43 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote: I tried transitioning from Scientific Linux to Redhat LTS (not "L" sadly). That went away. Then I tried using Ubuntu Mate 20.04 LTS (horrid startup behaviors, but 22.04 is worse). I get this email today: - As of 30 April 2023 Ubuntu MATE 20.04 LTS has reached EOL (End of Life) and is no longer supported. Being a long term release (LTS), official Ubuntu flavors are only supported for **3 years**, as opposed to Ubuntu's 5 years. This means MATE components of your system will no longer receive updates after today, but foundational components will continue to receive security updates from Ubuntu. - Hrm. In Ubuntu-land, LTS long term support means less time supported. And today is April 30. So, sandwiched between way too many non-software engineering tasks, I'm transitioning to Debian Mate. So far, Debian is pain relief. No promise of LTS, but upgrades seem effortless and the dancing paperclips and snaps and gesture GUI are absent. Smaller RAM footprint, therefore I can keep using my "tall-screen" 3x4 laptops for their principal function, reading and writing A and A4 format documents. We'll see how this goes. I fear that gesture GUI (which requires steady hands, no tremor) will eventually take over the Linux desktop, so I may have less than a decade to complete important-to-the-world-IMHO keyboard-driven computing and writing tasks. Sigh. The world will not end with a bang, instead a "tweet". Keith L.
Re: [PLUG] Ubuntu MATE LTS 3 years vs 5 for non-LTS
I noticed that Free Geek switched to Mint for those PC's they sell a while ago. Screenshots of mint mate seem to be a mix of win 10, win 11 and MacOS desktop stirred together with a strong win10 motif But the $64k question can you still run older GTK2.0 apps on the desktop? Ted -Original Message- From: PLUG On Behalf Of W7DAL Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 1:19 PM To: plug@pdxlinux.org Subject: Re: [PLUG] Ubuntu MATE LTS 3 years vs 5 for non-LTS Try*Linux Mint Mate* latest version. They have finally made Linux user friendly to the point I'm comfortable recommending it to non-tekkie friends. I've been following Linux from the earliest days. Good Luck! -Dave On 3/24/2023 12:43 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote: > I tried transitioning from Scientific Linux to Redhat LTS (not "L" > sadly). That went away. > > Then I tried using Ubuntu Mate 20.04 LTS (horrid startup behaviors, > but 22.04 is worse). I get this email today: > > - > As of 30 April 2023 Ubuntu MATE 20.04 LTS has reached EOL (End of > Life) and is no longer supported. > > Being a long term release (LTS), official Ubuntu flavors are only > supported for **3 years**, as opposed to Ubuntu's 5 years. This means > MATE components of your system will no longer receive updates after > today, but foundational components will continue to receive security > updates from Ubuntu. > - > > Hrm. In Ubuntu-land, LTS long term support means less > time supported. And today is April 30. > > So, sandwiched between way too many non-software engineering tasks, > I'm transitioning to Debian Mate. > So far, Debian is pain relief. > > No promise of LTS, but upgrades seem effortless and the dancing > paperclips and snaps and gesture GUI are absent. > Smaller RAM footprint, therefore I can keep using my "tall-screen" 3x4 > laptops for their principal function, reading and writing A and A4 > format documents. > > We'll see how this goes. I fear that gesture GUI (which requires > steady hands, no tremor) will eventually take over the Linux desktop, > so I may have less than a decade to complete > important-to-the-world-IMHO keyboard-driven computing and writing > tasks. > > Sigh. The world will not end with a bang, instead a "tweet". > > Keith L. >
Re: [PLUG] Ubuntu MATE LTS 3 years vs 5 for non-LTS
Try*Linux Mint Mate* latest version. They have finally made Linux user friendly to the point I'm comfortable recommending it to non-tekkie friends. I've been following Linux from the earliest days. Good Luck! -Dave On 3/24/2023 12:43 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote: I tried transitioning from Scientific Linux to Redhat LTS (not "L" sadly). That went away. Then I tried using Ubuntu Mate 20.04 LTS (horrid startup behaviors, but 22.04 is worse). I get this email today: - As of 30 April 2023 Ubuntu MATE 20.04 LTS has reached EOL (End of Life) and is no longer supported. Being a long term release (LTS), official Ubuntu flavors are only supported for **3 years**, as opposed to Ubuntu's 5 years. This means MATE components of your system will no longer receive updates after today, but foundational components will continue to receive security updates from Ubuntu. - Hrm. In Ubuntu-land, LTS long term support means less time supported. And today is April 30. So, sandwiched between way too many non-software engineering tasks, I'm transitioning to Debian Mate. So far, Debian is pain relief. No promise of LTS, but upgrades seem effortless and the dancing paperclips and snaps and gesture GUI are absent. Smaller RAM footprint, therefore I can keep using my "tall-screen" 3x4 laptops for their principal function, reading and writing A and A4 format documents. We'll see how this goes. I fear that gesture GUI (which requires steady hands, no tremor) will eventually take over the Linux desktop, so I may have less than a decade to complete important-to-the-world-IMHO keyboard-driven computing and writing tasks. Sigh. The world will not end with a bang, instead a "tweet". Keith L.
[PLUG] Ubuntu MATE LTS 3 years vs 5 for non-LTS
I tried transitioning from Scientific Linux to Redhat LTS (not "L" sadly). That went away. Then I tried using Ubuntu Mate 20.04 LTS (horrid startup behaviors, but 22.04 is worse). I get this email today: - As of 30 April 2023 Ubuntu MATE 20.04 LTS has reached EOL (End of Life) and is no longer supported. Being a long term release (LTS), official Ubuntu flavors are only supported for **3 years**, as opposed to Ubuntu's 5 years. This means MATE components of your system will no longer receive updates after today, but foundational components will continue to receive security updates from Ubuntu. - Hrm. In Ubuntu-land, LTS long term support means less time supported. And today is April 30. So, sandwiched between way too many non-software engineering tasks, I'm transitioning to Debian Mate. So far, Debian is pain relief. No promise of LTS, but upgrades seem effortless and the dancing paperclips and snaps and gesture GUI are absent. Smaller RAM footprint, therefore I can keep using my "tall-screen" 3x4 laptops for their principal function, reading and writing A and A4 format documents. We'll see how this goes. I fear that gesture GUI (which requires steady hands, no tremor) will eventually take over the Linux desktop, so I may have less than a decade to complete important-to-the-world-IMHO keyboard-driven computing and writing tasks. Sigh. The world will not end with a bang, instead a "tweet". Keith L. -- Keith Lofstrom kei...@keithl.com
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: I try to run my disks less than 70% full otherwise you get too much fragmentation, so if you are rsyncing you are essentially backing up empty disk, unless of course your disks are very full. I use external USB docks and bare drives I can plug in and do filesystem backups to those. Some of these setups I can fit 2 or 3 backups on the external disks depending on how modern the dock is and if is compatible with the USB chip in the server it's plugged into. Ted, Dirvish does incremental backups after the initial one. Until last year when I set up the LV I had always backed up the directories I wanted onto a single external drive. Never ran out of room. I don't recall how full the LV disks were, but there's plenty of room on a 2T drive for my backups. Thanks, Rich
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
I try to run my disks less than 70% full otherwise you get too much fragmentation, so if you are rsyncing you are essentially backing up empty disk, unless of course your disks are very full. I use external USB docks and bare drives I can plug in and do filesystem backups to those. Some of these setups I can fit 2 or 3 backups on the external disks depending on how modern the dock is and if is compatible with the USB chip in the server it's plugged into. Ted -Original Message- From: PLUG On Behalf Of Rich Shepard Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 11:41 AM To: Portland Linux/Unix Group Subject: Re: [PLUG] External drive issue On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > I never depend on RAID either RAID5 or mirroring for backup purposes. Ted, Since having 2 drives in a RAID1 array and mirrored in a logical volumne for backup, and both drives were somehow wiped, I'm thinking of using only one disk (with xfs installed) for /media/backup and using a cron job (running after the daily backup at 00:30) to rsync to the other disk. That way I have two mirrored backups independent of each other. I'll ponder this overnight. Having separate hard drives containing the same backups (one written by dirvish the other rsync'd) seems to me to be less likely to both fail at the same time. Regards, Rich
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Michael Ewan wrote: Note, mkfs.xfs is done on the raid1 disk set, not on the individual drives. Michael, Got it. I'm seriouly considering formatting both with xfs, installing dirvish on /dev/sde1 then using rsync to keep /dev/sdf1 as a mirror. Not being combined into a logical volume I shouldn't again lose all backups because the lv failed and wiped both disks. Thanks, Rich
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: I never depend on RAID either RAID5 or mirroring for backup purposes. Ted, Since having 2 drives in a RAID1 array and mirrored in a logical volumne for backup, and both drives were somehow wiped, I'm thinking of using only one disk (with xfs installed) for /media/backup and using a cron job (running after the daily backup at 00:30) to rsync to the other disk. That way I have two mirrored backups independent of each other. I'll ponder this overnight. Having separate hard drives containing the same backups (one written by dirvish the other rsync'd) seems to me to be less likely to both fail at the same time. Regards, Rich
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
Note, mkfs.xfs is done on the raid1 disk set, not on the individual drives. On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:10 AM Rich Shepard wrote: > On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Michael Ewan wrote: > > > Do not use EXT4, it will cause you problems down the road. Use xfs > > instead, it has higher reliability and better performance. > > Michael, > > Okay. I can install xfs on those two drives. > > Thanks, > > Rich >
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Randy Bush wrote: sorry. was not meant as a suggestion for you. meant as a recco of lvm/md0 in general. i also use it as raid 1. on new kit, when i can get it, i have boot/root on m2/nvme pice using raid 1, and then an ssd array with another md raid 10. randy, I'll take Michael's reccomendation to use xfs on those two drives, rebuild the LV from scratch, then re-install divish for all 8 vaults. Thanks, Rich
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
I never depend on RAID either RAID5 or mirroring for backup purposes. RAID's usefulness is if in the middle of the day (or in the middle of a backup) a hard drive fails then the server does not unceremoniously shut down. Instead I can take a final backup of the server then do whatever to replace the disk With hardware RAID cards that may simply mean swapping the failed disk and the hardware card takes care of rebuilding the array by itself. With software that may mean the array is scotched. I have attempted in the past to replace disks on software arrays. Sometimes it works sometimes it does not. Sometimes in the process of rebuilding the primary disk craps out. With small "desktop" servers I use mirroring simply because disks nowadays are cheap, and I'll use whatever RAID is available. Often it's so-called "fakeraid" because that way the server will boot off the "raid" array. Since the disks in these are purchased at the same time, when 1 goes I usually just replace both if they are out of warranty (and they usually are) recreate the array and restore from backup. Often I'll regen the entire server. I have several servers with "fakeraid" chips in them and they are 1U with only 2 slots for disks, so they have mirrored disks in them, and the process to get the OS installed and working so that the system will boot off the "raid" array is so cumbersome that it isn't even possible to upgrade the OS. Ubuntu's developers in particular hate fakeraid with a passion and in every new version are constantly screwing with the drivers so you have to find new ways to set them up. Some fakeraid chips write metadata to the end of the disk and GPT tables will overwrite those so I have to setup the disks as MBR (and no larger than 2TB of course) It's usually a lot of fun to update to a new version on these. But, the 1U server form factor is pretty restrictive in terms of what disks you can use. For cost most of the time I use 3.5" SATA disks. I have not found SAS drives to be worth the money, I'll spec em for customers since they will lay out the cash for them but I use disks I can buy over the counter for my personal stuff. It is a constant battle with disk drive makers who seem to have forgotten that the I in raid means INEXPENSIVE drives, not "independent" drives. They have prices jacked up sky high for anything that they think isn't going to retail. Ted -Original Message- From: PLUG On Behalf Of Rich Shepard Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 9:37 AM To: Portland Linux/Unix Group Subject: Re: [PLUG] External drive issue On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Rich Shepard wrote: > Checking cfdisk for both /dev/sde and /dev/sdf shows both having free > space for the entire disk. A question for the professional sysadmins: having both disks in a mirrored RAID1 array as a logical volumn fail, does it make sense to rebuild the RAID, vgs and lv? Since a mirrored copy didn't save my backup history, perhaps I should use only one disk for backp and save the other as a spare. Your professional opinion? TIA, Rich
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
>> fwiw, i use lvm/md0 raid10 under debian on nodes on our ganeti clusters. >> quite happy with it. i hate hardware raid. > > Since RAID 10 requires four disks to mirror two pairs of striped disks > and two of my external drives are otherwise occupied, I don't have the > capability of using it. > > Thanks for the suggestion, sorry. was not meant as a suggestion for you. meant as a recco of lvm/md0 in general. i also use it as raid 1. on new kit, when i can get it, i have boot/root on m2/nvme pice using raid 1, and then an ssd array with another md raid 10. randy
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Michael Ewan wrote: Do not use EXT4, it will cause you problems down the road. Use xfs instead, it has higher reliability and better performance. Michael, Okay. I can install xfs on those two drives. Thanks, Rich
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Randy Bush wrote: fwiw, i use lvm/md0 raid10 under debian on nodes on our ganeti clusters. quite happy with it. i hate hardware raid. randy, Since RAID 10 requires four disks to mirror two pairs of striped disks and two of my external drives are otherwise occupied, I don't have the capability of using it. Thanks for the suggestion, Rich
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Michael Ewan wrote: In my experience, using lvm2 to mirror your disks should work for you and be the easiest to recover since each disk has a copy of the vg description, then vgscan will find your configuration for you. Skip using md unless you need multipath access to a device. Michael, Theory says that the disks mirror each other, yet somehow I lost the contents of both disks. There are no vertual disks since /dev/sde and /dev/sdf both have no filesystem installed; cfdisk shows each having free space across the entire disk. Thanks, Rich
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
fwiw, i use lvm/md0 raid10 under debian on nodes on our ganeti clusters. quite happy with it. i hate hardware raid. randy
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
In my experience, using lvm2 to mirror your disks should work for you and be the easiest to recover since each disk has a copy of the vg description, then vgscan will find your configuration for you. Skip using md unless you need multipath access to a device. On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 9:36 AM Rich Shepard wrote: > On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Rich Shepard wrote: > > > Checking cfdisk for both /dev/sde and /dev/sdf shows both having free > space > > for the entire disk. > > A question for the professional sysadmins: having both disks in a mirrored > RAID1 array as a logical volumn fail, does it make sense to rebuild the > RAID, vgs and lv? > > Since a mirrored copy didn't save my backup history, perhaps I should use > only one disk for backp and save the other as a spare. > > Your professional opinion? > > TIA, > > Rich >
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
Do not use EXT4, it will cause you problems down the road. Use xfs instead, it has higher reliability and better performance. On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 9:24 AM Rich Shepard wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Rich Shepard wrote: > > > I turned off the desktop and removed the power cord to replace the video > > card. The MediaSonic Probox also powered down. When I plugged in the > desktop > > and turned it on, along with the Probox, the two single drives in the > Probox > > (/data2 and /data3) automatically mounted, but the 2-drive logical > volume, > > /dev/md0 did not mount. When I try to mount it manually I find that it > > /doesn't exist. > > Checking cfdisk for both /dev/sde and /dev/sdf shows both having free space > for the entire disk. I interpret this to mean that I need to re-format each > with ext4, re-build the raid1 array, then recreate virtual groups and the > logical partition (as /dev/md0) and mount it as /media/backup. Sigh. I've > no > idea how it became FUBAR'd. > > Rich >
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Rich Shepard wrote: Checking cfdisk for both /dev/sde and /dev/sdf shows both having free space for the entire disk. A question for the professional sysadmins: having both disks in a mirrored RAID1 array as a logical volumn fail, does it make sense to rebuild the RAID, vgs and lv? Since a mirrored copy didn't save my backup history, perhaps I should use only one disk for backp and save the other as a spare. Your professional opinion? TIA, Rich
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Rich Shepard wrote: I turned off the desktop and removed the power cord to replace the video card. The MediaSonic Probox also powered down. When I plugged in the desktop and turned it on, along with the Probox, the two single drives in the Probox (/data2 and /data3) automatically mounted, but the 2-drive logical volume, /dev/md0 did not mount. When I try to mount it manually I find that it /doesn't exist. Checking cfdisk for both /dev/sde and /dev/sdf shows both having free space for the entire disk. I interpret this to mean that I need to re-format each with ext4, re-build the raid1 array, then recreate virtual groups and the logical partition (as /dev/md0) and mount it as /media/backup. Sigh. I've no idea how it became FUBAR'd. Rich
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: Does Mdadm -Q /dev/data2 or mdadm -Q /dev/sdX (whatever th actual disk is) show the disk is part of an array? Ted, No. There are four WD RED 2T drives in there: /dev/sdc, /dev/sdd, /dev/sde, and /dev/sdf. The LV is the latter two. cat /proc/mdstat does that show the array is reassembling? # ls /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [multipath] unused devices: Take a look at the commands here: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-manage-raid-arrays-with-mdadm-on-ubuntu-22-04 mdadm does nothing because there is no /dev/md0 I've never used a probox but it appears to have no intelligence and merely acts as a USB drive enclosure for multiple disks, so I'm assuming your disks show up as individual USB disks That's true. It's not a NAS, but a four-bay external USB enclosure. Thanks, Rich
Re: [PLUG] Apache Cordova
I thought this killed it: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/appcenter/announcing-apache-cordova-retirement/ When the owner of github turns it's back on a tech it's probably a good idea to ask why You may only be interested in developing iphone apps but Google has Android 13 deploying now (I just bought a new Pixel 6a 3 days ago and rooted it, and it's updated to Android 13) and Google also recently released a statement that once a year they are going to be deprecating apps from the PlayStore that don't meet current API level. And they change API levels at least once a year it seems. Cordova is not at that API level yet. I think most mobile app developers who need cross-platform who are windows-centric devs are using Xamarin and Linux devs are using Flutter but that's just my impression. Personally when I built my last mobile apps I eschewed iphone support and built Android apps using Android Studio and the tutorials on Google's website to do it. While iphones are hugely popular in the United States they are a minority phone in the rest of the world (yeah I know I'm going to get a bunch of people screaming at me for that) Plus, in my humble opinion, the most interesting apps (to me) are lower level networking apps and you cannot build a packet-flooder that will run on an iphone (well, at least not on one that's not jailbroken) while you can for Android (provided it's rooted). I don't think a lot of people realize but once you root an Android phone you can compile C apps directly on Linux into binaries that will run on the phone, I've done it. I just have a "thing" about being able to turn off all the crapware that Apple and Google like to load on phones. It's MY phone, dammit, not their device they can use to track me. Apple acts completely insane about jailbroken phones and goes on a rampage anytime someone figures out how to do it and has been known to push OTA updates that brick jailbroken phone, while Android ecosystem is pretty supportive of rooted phones, as long as you are willing to buy them not get some carrier to give you a "free phone" So I don't have much use for the iphone and little interest in making one of my Android apps run on one. Ted -Original Message- From: PLUG On Behalf Of Jake Bottero Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 12:41 AM To: Portland Linux/Unix Group Subject: [PLUG] Apache Cordova Anyone use Apache Cordova to build phone apps? Opinions?
Re: [PLUG] External drive issue
Does Mdadm -Q /dev/data2 or mdadm -Q /dev/sdX (whatever th actual disk is) show the disk is part of an array? cat /proc/mdstat does that show the array is reassembling? Take a look at the commands here: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-manage-raid-arrays-with-mdadm-on-ubuntu-22-04 I've never used a probox but it appears to have no intelligence and merely acts as a USB drive enclosure for multiple disks, so I'm assuming your disks show up as individual USB disks Ted -Original Message- From: PLUG On Behalf Of Rich Shepard Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2023 2:12 PM To: plug@pdxlinux.org Subject: [PLUG] External drive issue I turned off the desktop and removed the power cord to replace the video card. The MediaSonic Probox also powered down. When I plugged in the desktop and turned it on, along with the Probox, the two single drives in the Probox (/data2 and /data3) automatically mounted, but the 2-drive logical volume, /dev/md0 did not mount. When I try to mount it manually I find that it /doesn't exist. I've gone through this video card swapping several times this week with the LV mounting, either automatically of when I do so manually. Where do I start looking for the reason it's not now seen? Rich
[PLUG] Apache Cordova
Anyone use Apache Cordova to build phone apps? Opinions?
